Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2/04/1997 public hearingCity of Greencastle • City ball Four East Walnut Street Greencastle, Indiana 46135 GREENCASTLE COMMON COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1997 7:00 P.M. TZOUANAKIS INTERMEDIATE The Greencastle Common Council met in Special Session for a Public Hearing Tuesday, February 4, 1997, 7:00 p.m. at Tzouanakis Intermediate School Media Center. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order. On the Roll Call, the following were found to be present: Councilor Roach, Councilor Hammer. Councilor Green, Councilor Baynard and Councilor Masten. Also present was City Attorney Zeiner. Ordinance 1996 -20, An Ordinance Pursuant to I.C. 8- 1.5 -3 -9.1 Removing The City's Water Utility From The Jurisdiction of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission For the Approval of Rates and Charges and The Issuance of Stocks, Bonds, Notes, Or Other Evidence of Indebtedness, second reading. Mayor Michael stated that there is no intent to raise water rates • at this time. Regulation are good, but can sometimes become a burden to local government. For the purpose of this hearing the Water utility is the only utility effected. Attorney Zeiner stated that from a legal standpoint the State Legislature made it possible for municipalities to opt out of the IURC. To go through the IURC for a rate increase costs approximately $40,000.00 to 550,000.00 and therefore the increase to consumers is higher due to the additional costs. Many communities have already opted out. Attorney Zeiner explained that in order for the City to raise water rates the Board of Works would have to make a recommendation, the Common Council would have to approve the recommendation and a Public Hearing would have to be held. Wholesale water users can still request that a rate increase be reviewed by the IURC if desired. There are also on going costs in that an annual report has to be prepared for the IURC. City Engineer Barnes stated that his experience dealing with the IURC has been limited to the new water plant. It took 120 days for the IURC to review with 6 replies and responses - the questions asked were valid, but Engineer Bames feels that the questions should have been asked prior to the bidding process. Councilor Roach stated that this is not a new issue. The previous Council looked at opting out of the IURC, but with building a new water plant, they felt the timing was not right. This is a matter of local control, the timing is good and the reasons are valid, Councilor Roach continued. Mayor Michael opened the floor to the public for public discussion. Francis Ellis, Shadowlawn, stated that she is a widow and has very little to live on and if control is given to local government she will wager that within 5 years there will be another water rate increase. Utilities • are more than I make now, Mrs. Ellis continued, I do odd jobs in order to buy my insulin and needles. Utility bills were estimated this month and they estimated my bill at $3400 and my " utility bill is never over $20.00. Councilor Roach responded that opting out of IURC has nothing to do will the billing or the estimating of bills - there was no choice in the last rate increase. Sometimes people have to make choices and sometimes the choices are not popular. By all estimates we hope that rates will not have to be increased in the next 5 years, but no one can predict the future and by opting out of the IURC smaller increases are possible. Bernice Strader stated that she doesn't believe there will not be an increase once this action is taken - isn't trash on the same bill? Attorney Zeiner stated that the only utility under the jurisdiction of IURC is the Water Department and we're talking about removing the regulations of IURC from that department only, trash and sewage will not be effected by this action. Mayor Michael explained that any rate increases would have to be done through an Ordinance with a Public Hearing. Councilor Roach explained that the new water plant is being built now and there shouldn't be any rate increase at this time. Councilor Hammer explained that the Sewage Department is not under the regulation of IURC and the last sewage increase was due to a plant expansion. The Sewage Department does not have to go through the IURC for rate increases and therefore there is not the additional cost. Any additional cost incurred by going through the MC for increases in water rates are built into the increase and the consumers end up paying those additional costs. Louise Reinke asked if you get out of the IURC can you get back in and can the IURC reform itself so that you want to stay in instead of opting out? Will this effect the quality of our water? " Engineer Barnes stated that this has nothing to do with water quality. The regulations for water quality will still be there, this issue only has to do with rates. Attorney Zeiner stated that you can petition to get back into the IURC once you have opted out, but the regulatory process for small communities is a burden to the IURC. In smaller communities you have access to your elected officials and they have to look you in the face everyday and therefore they are not going raise rates just to raise rates. Councilor Masten stated that the bureaucratic mind does not reform itself. Because of what the City has been put through in the process - delays, expenses, etc. - local decision making makes more sense. Lower incremental -increases are better than large increases. Councilor Baynard addressed Attorney Zeiner regarding the statement that 60% of small towns have opted out of IURC including Cloverdale. Does anyone want to get back in? Attorney Zeiner replied that Cloverdale had a moderate increase after opting out, but most agreed it was a necessary increase and no they do not want back in the IURC. Councilor Baynard then stated that the whole idea is not to hurt, but to help everyone - we pay utilities also and want to do what is best for all concerned. Tom Bemis asked if there was anything good about the IURC. Engineer Barnes stated that there is value in what they do, Indiana Gas and Public Service are under the jurisdiction of MC, some questions asked are valid and we should be able to answer them, but some ask questions just to justify their jobs. Sally Bartlett asked who would regulate rates. Mayor Michael responded that the Council, voters and Board of Works. If any changes are to be made, they would have to be done by Ordinance with two readings and a Public Hearing, Councilor Masten added that opting out of ® IURC doesn't completely eliminate us from regulation, we still have standards that have to be met. Jim Proctor from the Reelsville Water Corporation asked how much of the $40,000.00 - $50,000.00 was paid to the IURC. Attorney Zeiner stated that approximately $3,000.00 - $4,000.00 was paid to IURC - most of the money went to consultants, etc. to make sure we had the right information to give to the IURC. Mr. Proctor asked if in the future the City would hire specialists to establish rates. Attorney Zeiner stated that it makes sense, but the Council would make the ultimate decision. Councilor Masten stated that the cost of the rate studv is not that expensive -it's the numerous trips to Indianapolis that makes the cost jump. Councilor Masten stated that the Council is being open and honest - everyone is here and in agreement. This is a local issue and it makes sense to have local control. Councilor Roach stated that he concurs. Jim Proctor stated that he feels this is a good idea and is supportive. Don Flint asked if there was any chance of a rate reduction? Councilor Roach stated they can't say that there will be a rate reduction - but anything is possible. Councilor Roach also stated that the City of Greencastle supplies water to 67% of the County. Engineer Barnes stated that the more water used the less the cost is. Councilor Green stated that one of the questions the IURC asked was about the size of Greencastle - we have a plant with a capacity for pumping 4.3 million gallons of water - is that what you asked for? Does the IURC try to control how fast a community can grow? Engineer Barnes responded that the design was approved as submitted, but lots of time, energy and money was spent. Councilor Hammer stated that the City has the • expertise within our employees or we know where to go to get the information to get the job done for less money. Councilor Masten stated that we are all rate payers - we don't want to put a noose around our necks. This is a local issue and it just makes sense to have local control. Councilor Baynard made the motion to accept Ordinance 1997 -20 by title only, seconded by Councilor Roach. Vote was unanimous. Motion to adjourn made by Councilor Masten, seconded by Councilor Hammer. Vote was unanimous. / Q G c Nancy A. Ivli hael, Mayor ATTEST:: L Pamela S. Jones, Cl rk- asurer 0