Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout02.18.2015 Park Commission PacketMEDINA► AGENDA MEDINA PARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2015 7:00 P.M. Medina City Council Chambers City Hall, 2052 County Road 24 1) Call to Order 2) Additions to Agenda 3) Approval of the Minutes from: • January 21, 2015 Meeting 4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda) 5) City Council Update 6) Eagle Scout Project - Hamel Legion Park a) Discuss Site Visits to Hamel Legion Park 7) Three Rivers Park District Presentation on Regional Trail Master Plan 8) Property Resources Development Corporation - PUD Concept Plan for a Conservation Design subdivision of 42 lots on 170 gross acres located east of Homestead Trail and west of Deerhill Road - Park Dedication Discussion 9) 2015 Goals Review 10) Staff Report a) General Items 11) Adjourn Posted2/11/2015 Pa•e 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Park Commission FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant to City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: February 11, 2015 DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2015 SUBJECT: Park Commission Meeting Report 2. Additions to Agenda If any Park Commissioner wishes to add an item to the agenda after the agenda has already been posted, the agenda item must be proposed at this point in the meeting. The Park Commission must agree to add the item by motion. 5. City Council Update This is a reoccurring agenda item to have the City Council Liaison to the Park Commission, Lorie Cousineau, give an update at each meeting on what is happening at the Council level. 6. Eagle Scout Project — Hamel Legion Park Griffin Schneider will be at the meeting to present his updated plan to the Park Commission on a request to complete an Eagle Scout Project at Hamel Legion Park. Please visit Hamel Legion Park as our first site visit prior to Wednesday's meeting to look specifically at the location of these bleachers, the flag pole, monument, etc. See attached presentation. Recommended Action: Make recommendation on possible Eagle Scout Project. 7. Three Rivers Park District Presentation on Proposal Regional Trail Master Plan Three Rivers Park District's Planner Ann Rexine will be at the meeting to present their updated regional trail master plan. Please take the time to read through this plan and be prepared to ask any questions of Ann Rexine since she is taking the time to come to our meeting. This new plan shows a proposed regional trail to connect from Baker Park Reserve to Carver Park Reserve (a distance of 17 miles). The portion of the regional trail in the City of Medina is fully contained within Baker Park Reserve, connecting west to the City of Maple Plain. If the Park Commission is in support of the proposed trail, Three Rivers Park District has asked us to submit a resolution of support to be incorporated into their master plan submittal to the Metropolitan Council. See attached plan. Recommended Action: Make recommendation on a resolution of support. 1 8. Property Resources Development Corporation — PUD Concept Plan for a Conservation Design subdivision of 42 lots on 170 gross acres located east of Homestead Trail and west of Deerhill Road — Park Dedication Discussion Planning Consultant Nate Sparks' report outlines the applicant's request to subdivide 170 gross acres into a 42 lot conservation design subdivision. The plan proposes approximately 33% of the buildable land area (-40 acres) to be placed in conservation and proposes trails generally in locations shown in Master Plan. The Park Commission should review the trails and other park and trail considerations and provide comments to the applicant. See attached report. Recommended Action: Provide comments to applicant on park, trail, and open space components of the Concept Plan and on possible recommendation for park dedication. 9. 2015 Goal Setting Session Attached is the updated list of 2015 goals per the Park Commission's discussion at the January meeting. Chair Steve Lee would like each member to adopt or lead a team on one of the goals for 2015. This would include setting timeframes for reports and discussions. Also, each member should pick one park to spearhead the discussion on that park. See attached list of goals. Recommended Action: Pick goals and parks to lead; schedule spring park tour. 10. Staff Report a. General Items. This agenda item is to give a verbal update on any other general park items. Staff representation at the February 18th Park Commission meeting will be Assistant to City Administrator Jodi Gallup and Public Works Director Steve Scherer. 2 Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT January 21, 2015 Medina City Hall Page 1 of 4 The Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on January 21, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at Medina City Hall. Park Commission Vice Chair Madeleine Linck presided. 1) Call to Order Commissioners Present: Madeleine Linck, Steve Lee, Lori Meehan, Nate Pearson, Dino DesLauriers, Robin Reid, and John Jacob Commissioners Absent: None Also Present: City Council member Lorie Cousineau, Public Works Director Steve Scherer and Assistant to City Administrator Jodi Gallup 2) Introduction of New Park Commissioners The two new Park Commissioners, Robin Reid and John Jacob, introduced themselves to the Park Commission. Then the other Park Commissioners introduced themselves to Robin Reid and John Jacob. 3) Appointment of Officers: Chair, Vice Chair & Secretary A motion was made by Linck and seconded by Meehan to nominate and appoint Steve Lee as Chair. Motion passed unanimously. A motion was made by Meehan and seconded by Lee to nominate and appoint Madeleine Linck as Vice Chair. Motion passed unanimously. A motion was made by DesLauriers and seconded by Meehan to nominate and appoint Nate Pearson as Secretary. Motion passed unanimously. 4) Additions to the Agenda: None. 5) Approval of Minutes: • December 17, 2014 Meeting A motion was made by Linck and seconded by Pearson to approve the minutes from December 17, 2014 as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 6) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda): None. 7) City Council Update Lorie Cousineau introduced herself to the Park Commission as their new City Council liaison and gave them an update on City Council actions since the last time the Park Commission met. 8) Eagle Scout Project — Hamel Legion Park Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT January 21, 2015 Medina City Hall Page 2 of 4 Griffin Schneider briefly reviewed the original scope of his Eagle Scout Project to include concrete slabs for the bleachers, moving the monument and flag pole, painting dugouts, creating dugout maintenance signs and conducting annual field maintenance. He stated that the revised scope of the project includes less concrete for the bleacher slabs, not painting the dugouts, moving the monument, leaving the flag pole in its existing location, but possibly replacing it, creating the dugout maintenance signs and conducting the annual field maintenance. Schneider reviewed the funding for the project. He stated that Bill DesLauriers has offered to donate his time in supervising the finishing of the equipment. He stated that the concrete will cost approximately $1,000, mesh will cost $167.05 and the preparation will cost between $300 - $500 in materials, equipment and labor. Schneider stated that he received two quotes on the maintenance signs and the low quote was with Fast Signs costing $37.86 per sign for a Dibond 13x20 sign. Schneider stated that the current flag pole is rusting and he would like to ask the Hamel Lion's for a donation to replace it. He is proposing to replace the flag pole with a galvanized steel pole which will help keep it from rusting in the future. Schneider also noted that he has already received a new flag donated by the American Legion. Discussion took place on the need to light the flag pole. It was noted that the flag would be removed after each game so a light would not be necessary. Schneider stated that the last item would be to move the monument. He stated that his crew would coordinate and provide the labor to move the monument to wherever the city wanted it to be placed. Schneider noted that his next steps would be to meet with Bill DesLauriers, Ted Fust and Steve Scherer to finalize the details on the concrete and to meet with the Hamel Athletic Club to finalize the wording and design of the maintenance signs. Schneider asked to revisit the updated concrete proposal by the city and stated that he would like to provide a counter proposal to connect the concrete slabs and bring the concrete up to the field so there would be no grass between the field and bleachers. Scherer stated that there does not need to be grass in-between the concrete slabs and the fields. He suggested filling that area with ag lime because the grass would be difficult to grow in that location and it would always be muddy. Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT January 21, 2015 Medina City Hall Page 3 of 4 DesLauriers stated that he had met on site with Pearson and Scherer and they felt it would be too much concrete if it was all connected and wrapped around to the dugouts. He stated that the city has its own projects to do up there, including cleaning up where the building is located before too much new concrete is put down. Lee stated that he liked where this project was heading, but felt the Park Commission still needed more information before recommendations could be made. He suggested that Pearson, DesLauriers, Jacob, and Scherer meet on site again with the Hamel Hawks to further discuss the concrete. He noted that a bigger slab of concrete would need more reinforcement and solid pricing needs to be figured out. 9) Resolution of Support for Three Rivers Park District Proposed Regional Trail Master Plan Gallup stated that Three Rivers Park District has updated their regional trail master plan and has asked for the City of Medina's support before they submit it to the Metropolitan Council. It was noted that the plan shows a proposed regional trail connection from Baker Park Reserve to Carver Park Reserve, which is a 17 mile connection. The portion of the regional trail in Medina is fully contained within Baker Park Reserve, connecting west to the City of Maple Plain. The Park Commission discussed the regional trail connection and was generally in support of the concept, but they did not feel like they had enough information to formally support the trail connection. There was some concern with not knowing where the specific trails were being proposed along the route. Gallup suggested inviting Three Rivers Park District to a future meeting to present the plan to the Park Commission for further consideration. 10) 2015 Goal Setting Session The Park Commission created the following goals for 2015: • Plan the spring park tour in March. • Discuss possible participation in Clean-up Day in March. • Discuss holding a bird watch/nature walk in April. • Review the Capital Improvement Plan in June after the spring park tour. • Discuss participation in Medina Celebration Day in August. • Discuss grant opportunities as they arise. Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT January 21, 2015 Medina City Hall Page 4 of 4 • Update the Friends of the Park Program. Meehan and Linck have volunteered to spearhead this task. • Review the Park & Trail Master Plan and make any updates prior to August before the Comprehensive Plan Committee starts looking at it. • Propose new signage for Lakeshore Park. Lee and Gallup will take a lead on this task. • Complete the Park and Fields of Medina. DesLauriers and Pearson will continue to serve on this committee. • Conduct site visits for one park before each Park Commission meeting to discuss that park in detail and any planned park improvements. The Park Commission will visit Hamel Legion Park to look at the proposed concrete location prior to the February meeting and Holy Name Park prior to the March meeting. • Add a plaque recognizing Terry Tomann at Tomann Preserve. Gallup will bring back an updated goals document for further review by the Park Commission next month. It was noted that the Park Commissioners should continue to bring this document with them to future meetings to reference the planned park improvements as each park is discussed in detail. A brief discussion took place on the need for soccer nets in the city and if residents had been surveyed or if people have shown an interest in soccer. It was noted that soccer nets were added to the plan because the city had existing baseball fields in many of the parks, but no soccer nets. It was determined that the soccer nets would be added for casual recreational use and would not be used for formal league play. 11) Staff Report • Scherer stated that the City has just hired an additional full-time Public Works employee, which he hopes will be able to help with some of the City's park needs. He noted that the city is not in a place to hire a full-time Park Department staff at this time. • Gallup reminded everyone to review the 2015 roster for Park Commission representation at City Council meetings. 12) Adjourn A motion was made by DesLauriers, seconded by Reid and passed unanimously, to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:16 p.m. Minutes prepared by Jodi Gallup. Hamel Legion Field Griffin Schneider Eagle Scout Project February 18, 2015 Project Overview 1 Concrete pad for bleachers Participants r Site Prep — City of Medina Funding Sources City of Medina Framing & Finishing — Hamel Hawks Bill Deslauriers and Boy Scouts Concrete — City of Medina City of Medina Relocate Boys Scouts, Hamel Hawks No cost monument New flagpole Boy Scouts, Hamel Hawks Dugout Field Boy Scouts, Hamel Hawks Maintenance Signs Spread infield aglime City of Medina, Boy Scouts and Hamel Hawks Hamel Lions & Legion Pine Tar Academy Material provided by City of Medina Cost * N/A $3,500 - $4,500 * $0 Donated Donated * * To be provided by City of Medina Proposed Concrete Configuration — ..... \ .. I /. 2 \ ..,... \ „... .., \ \ "AN \ 'N. - \ \ , 'Y. \ - --' .••• r_ / ...1,, . P / dc. 41 3 .11., II. L, I d be. 0.0,-,r, 4.-....— 0.0 13.kits.,3 4%,,,t....? "' E 12' x 18' • Of3 -F '12 x 33' 12' x 18' Total 828 square feet 3 Agreed Upon Concrete Configuration 15' x 18' 13' b x 16' h `17x33' 13'b x 16'h Approx. 1341 square feet or 15 yards of concrete 15' x 18' Layout Proposed Monument Site Proposed Areas for Concrete Current Monument & Flag Pole Appendix Additional details about proposed field improvements and maintenance Concrete Pad • Site Prep — City of Medina would prep and grade the site in connection with other grading done at the field • Forms, finishing equipment will be donated by Bill Deslauriers, who will also supervise finishing • Scouts will provide labor for construction of forms, rebar and finishing Dugout Signs • 2 Quotes — Fast Signs (Minnetonka) - Dibond (aluminum with plastic core) 13"x20" $37.86 per sign +mounting supplies — Go2 (Hamel) $400 +mounting supplies • Donation from Pine Tar Academy (list website at bottom of sign) • Scouts would provide labor to mount the signs in dugouts according to specifications Flagpole • Hamel Lions donated $500 for new pole • 27' continuous pole • Ted Fust will coordinate removal and installation • Delivery and any other extras would be covered by Hamel Legion (about $100) Monument • We will move to location desired by the city • Ted Fust will coordinate relocation and equipment and scouts will provide labor Infield Ag Lime • City to provide 2 truck loads • Hamel Hawks will provide supervision and scouts will provide labor THANK YOU! Hamel Memorial Park BASEBALL FIELD MAINTENANCE AFTER EVERY PRACTICE & GAME THE FOLLOWING FIELD MAINTENANCE ITEMS MUST BE COMPLETED! 1. Rake home plate area. 2. Rake Mound, includes packing in extra clay, if necessary. 3. Rake 1st and 3rd baselines lengthwise from home plate, around the bases and bullpens. Never rake across baselines. 4. Remove bases and replace with plugs. 5. Pick up dirt from around the infield. This mainly occurs between the pitchers mound and home plate. 6. Broom off all grass/infield edges. 7. Tarp home plate and mound area. 8. Brush out dugouts, both home and away. 9. Pick up trash in both dugouts. 10. Lock storage shed. Other Reminders! 1. Drag is not to be used on the mound or baselines to home plate & the home plate area. Raking only. 2. When raking the field ensure not to push dirt towards the grass line, as doing so will create "lips". 3. Do not drag the tarp across the grass or walk on top of the tarps. 4. Do not play catch or pepper in front of dugouts. 5. No heavy equipment should be driven over the mound. www.pinetaracademy.com , t� .(. • 7 33• e is . I) v (r Qv T the mission of Three Rivers Park District is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and education in a natural resources -based park system. Three Rivers Park District was established in 1957 after legislation was enacted in 1955 allowing for the activation of park districts whose primary duties are 'acquisition, development and maintenance of large parks, wildlife sanctuaries, forest and other reservations, and means for public access to historic sites and to lakes, rivers and streams and to other natural phenomena" (Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 398.07). There are more than 10 million annual visits to more than 26,500 acres of park reserves, regional parks and special -use areas in Hennepin and five adjoining counties and 120 miles of regional trails. Current outdoor - recreation activities in regional parks and trails include camping, hiking, cross-country and downhill skiing, tubing, bicycling, in -line skating, horseback riding, nature interpretation, golfing, fishing and swimming. Three Rivers Park District also operates a natural resources management program, which administers the restoration and perpetuation of both native wildlife and plants in order to provide park and trail visitors opportunities for high -quality recreational experiences. Board of Commissioners Penny Steele, District 1 Term Expires 12/31/16 ❑ Corcoran, Greenfield, Hanover, Independence, Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Medina, Minnetrista, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, New Hope, Orono (precincts I, 3 & 4), Plymouth, Rockford, Rogers, Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, Wayzata Jennifer DeJournett, District 2 Term Expires 12/31/14 ❑ Brooklyn Park (all precincts except WI-0 & WI-R), Champlin, Dayton, Maple Grove, Osseo Daniel Freeman, Vice Chair, District 3 Term Expires 12/31/16 ❑ Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park (only precincts WI-0 & Wl-R), Crystal, Golden Valley, Hopkins (precinct 2), Robbinsdale, St. Anthony, St. Louis Park John Gunyou, Chair, District 4 Term Expires 12/31/14 ❑ Deephaven, Edina, Excelsior, Greenwood, Hopkins (all precincts except 2), Minnetonka, Orono (precinct 2), Richfield (all precincts except 6 & 9), Shorewood, Tonka Bay, Woodland John Gibbs, District 5 Term Expires 12/31/16 ❑ Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Fort Snelling, Richfield (precincts 6 & 9) Larry Blackstad, Hennepin County Appointee Term Expires 12/31/14 ❑ Serves at large Steven Antolak, Hennepin County Appointee Term Expires 12/31/16 ❑ Serves at large Three Rivers Park District Acknowledgements Three Rivers Park District (Park District) gratefully acknowledges the staff, community members and other participants who contributed to the Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan. The Park District extends a special thank you to the individuals listed below who provided guidance, time, questions, and critical insight throughout the process. City Representatives City of Minnetrista David Abel, Community Development Director City of Independence Toni Hirsch, City Administrator City of Maple Plain Tessia Melvin, City Administrator (present) Jason Ziemer, City Administrator (former) Park District Project Staff Ann Rexine, Planner Eric Nelson, Senior Manager of Engineering Heather Kuikka, Planning Administrative Specialist Kelly Grissman, Director of Planning Stephen Shurson, Landscape Architect Agency Representatives MN Department of Natural Resources Laura Preus, Natural Resources Program Manager Hennepin County Department of Transportation Bob Byers, P.E. Park District Leadership Staff Boe R. Carlson, Superintendent and Secretary to the Board Thomas K. McDowell, Associate Superintendent Division of Recreation, Education & Natural Resources Jonathan Vlaming, Associate Superintendent Division of Planning, Design & Technology Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 iii This page left intentionally blank iv Three Rivers Park District Executive Summary The Baker/Carver Regional Trail will fill a gap in the regional park and trail system with a safe, accessible and enjoyable recreation and alternative transportation option. Currently, southwestern suburban Hennepin County residents do not have access to a convenient and attractive off -road regional trail that supports a north/south connection. The Baker/Carver Regional Trail will expand recreational access to park and trail facilities, residential neighborhoods, commercial nodes and downtown Maple Plain - which in turn supports bicycle and pedestrian mobility and economic development. When completed, the trail will measure approximately seventeen miles from the Lake Independence Regional Trail in Baker Park Reserve to the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail in Carver Park Reserve. The regional trail will connect the Hennepin County communities of Medina, Maple Plain, Independence and Minnetrista and the Carver County communities of Laketown Township and Victoria. Users will have the ability to effectively traverse the entire north/south length of western Hennepin County. The proposed regional trail will directly connect recreational destinations such as Baker and Carver Park Reserves, Gale Woods Farm, and Kingswood Park in addition to Lake Minnetonka LRT, Dakota Rail and Lake Independence Regional Trails - and the Luce Line State Trail, and will indirectly connect to Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. Some segments of the proposed trail already exist, or are planned for construction funding in the future. Originally a city of Minnetrista initiative, Three Rivers Park District assumed responsibility of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail planning in 2012. The proposed regional trail search corridor was expanded beyond the initial Minnetrista planning to include connection to Baker Park Reserve through the communities of Independence, Maple Plain and Medina. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Alignment Source: Three Rivers Park District Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 v The Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan is intended to reflect and expand upon the work done by Minnetrista and further incorporate the larger regional context and destinations. Active use of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is expected to provide walking/hiking, bicycling, running/ jogging, in -line skating, and dog walking opportunities during the non -winter months. The Park District's seasonal -use data of existing regional trails indicates that significant use of the trail will occur in the spring, summer and fall seasons. Winter use of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is dependent on weather conditions and independent winter use agreements with local communities to maintain and operate the trail during the winter season (defined as November 15 to March 31). When fully constructed, the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail is projected to generate 183,000 annual visits. In summary, the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is estimated to require at minimum; 1) acquisition costs: $435,700, 2) construction costs: $10,300,000, 3) one-time costs (maintenance equipment or similar): $100,000 and 4) annual costs: $5,000 for natural resource management and $60,000 for maintenance. Minnetrista Whale Tail take Maple Plain Independence Kingsw8od Park Mound Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Carver Park Reserve Victoria Laketown 0 Township Orono Baker Park Reserve Lake Minnetonka Sources' Evi, HERE, OeLorme, Tom, ntermac, in t P Corp., GEBCO, USGS. FAO„NPS NRCAN. GeoBase. IGN. Kadaster NL, eldnance Surveye Esn Japan, MEN. Esri China (Hong Kong),_. swiastopo. Mao/mind., ® OpenIs -, Map contributors, and the GIS User Community Baker/Carver Regional Trail Segmentation Source: Three Rivers Park District Segment A I Downtown Maple Plain Lake Independence Regional Trail (Baker Park Reserve)to Luce Line State Trail Medina, Maple Plain and Independence Future Construction 2.25 miles Segment B i Luce Line State Trail Luce Line State Trail Independence Constructed (unpaved) 2.16 miles Segment C I Kingswood Luce Line State Trail to CR 15 (through Kingswood Park) Independence and Minnetrista Future Construction 3.26 miles Segment D 1 Gale Woods Farm CR 15 to Dakota Rail Regional Trail (through Gale Woods Farm) Minnetrista Future Construction 0.9 miles Segment E 1 Dakota Rail Regional Trail Dakota Rail Regional Trail Minnetrista Constructed 1.28 miles Segment F I Six Mile Marsh Dakota Rail Regional Trail to Kings Point Road Minnetrista Future Construction 1.53 miles Segment G I Woodland Cove Kings Point Road to TH 7 (through Woodland Cove) Minnetrista Anticipated Construction 2014-2019 1.70 miles Segment H 1 Carver Park Reserve I TH 7 to Lowry Nature Center (through Carver Park Reserve) Laketown Township Anticipated Construction 2019 1.71 miles Segment I I Carver Park Reserve II Lowry Nature Center (through Carver Park Reserve) to Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Laketown Township and Victoria Constructed 2.25 miles Total: 17.04 miles vi Three Rivers Park District Table of Contents Page Section I Planning Framework 1-3 Overview 1 Metropolitan Regional Parks System 2-3 Three Rivers Park District 3 Regional Trail Planning Guidelines 3 Section II Planning & Public Process 5-9 Background 5-7 Dissemination of Information 7-8 Feedback Received 8-9 Future Public Engagement 9 Related Projects & Plans 9 Section III Demand Forecast 11-15 Overview 11 Recreation UseTrends 11-13 Existing Three Rivers Park District User Data 13 Demographics 13-14 Projected Trail Use 14 Section IV Trail Route Description & Development Concept 17-30 Overview 17 Trail Segmentation 18-30 Section V Design Guidance 31-37 Overview 31 Permitted Regional Trail Use 32 Access to All 32 Design Guidelines 33-34 Additional Trail Elements 34-37 Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 vii Section VI Operations & Maintenance Plan 39-43 Public Safety 39-40 Natural & Cultural Resources 40 Maintenance 40-42 General Operations & Considerations 42-43 Section VII Implementation, Estimated Costs, & Funding 45-47 Acquisition Plan and Costs 45-46 Development Plan and Costs 46 Acquisition and Development Funding 46 Potential Funding Sources 46-47 Appendix A Resolution of Support 49 Appendix B Visitation Estimate Methodology 55 Appendix C Regional Trail Segmentation Maps 59 Appendix D Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) Map 71 Appendix E Property Acquisition Map 75 Appendix F Cost Estimate 79 vin Three Rivers Park District Planning Framework The Baker/Carver Regional Trail will fill a gap in the regional park and trail system with a safe, accessible and enjoyable recreation and alternative transportation option. Currently, southwestern suburban Hennepin County residents do not have access to a convenient and attractive off -road regional trail that supports a north/south connection. The Baker/Carver Regional Trail will expand recreational access to park and trail facilities, residential neighborhoods, commercial nodes and downtown Maple Plain - which in turn supports bicycle and pedestrian mobility and economic development. When completed, the trail will measure approximately seventeen miles from the Lake Independence Regional Trail in Baker Park Reserve (City of Medina) to the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail in Carver Park Reserve, through the cities of Maple Plain, Independence, and Minnetrista in Hennepin County and Laketown Township and the City of Victoria in Carver County. As the regional trail connects to the existing Lake Independence Regional Trail, users can continue on the Lake Independence Regional Trail to reach Crow - Hassan Park Reserve, another ten miles - effectively traversing the entire north/south length of western Hennepin County and creating a desirable recreation opportunity which also serves as an alternative transportation option (Figure 1). Figure 1 Baker/Carver Regional Trail 1 County Context Source: Three Rivers Park District Crow River Regional Trail Lake Independence hp Regional Trail r"'' Medicine take Regional Trail Sarah Creek Regional Trail Luce Line State Trail Luce Line Regional Trail Dakota Rail ua= Regional Trail Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Proposed Regional Trail Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail Rush Creek Regional Trail Crystal Lake Shingle Creek Regional Trail \ Regional Trail North Cedar Lake Regional Trail Mississippi River Trail TWill Lakes Regional Trail Regional Trail ` , Bassett Creek Regional Trail Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail —1! Intercity Regional Trail Three Rivers Park District i Regional Trail System Open Alternative Route Under Construction "\_., Future Planning •-•\._.. Current Planning Lakes NORTH Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 1 Specifically, the proposed regional trail will directly connect recreational destinations such as Carver and Baker Park Reserves, Gale Woods Farm, and Kingswood Park in addition to Lake Minnetonka LRT, Dakota Rail and Lake Independence Regional Trails - and the Luce Line State Trail, and will indirectly connect to Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. Some segments of the proposed trail already exist, or are planned for construction funding in the near future (explained further in Section VII). These portions include sections through Carver Park Reserve, the crossing of Highway 7 and the two shared segments along the Dakota Rail Regional Trail and Luce Line State Trail (Figure 2). Metropolitan Regional Parks System The Twin Cities' nationally renowned Metropolitan Regional Parks System significantly contributes to the area's high quality of life. Establishing green space for recreation and resource protection enhances the region's livability and economic strength. The Metropolitan Regional Parks System includes 51 regional parks and park reserves, 38 regional trails with 231 miles open to the public, seven special recreation features and is still growing (Figure 3). Currently, there are 54,633 acres of protected land open for public use, with planned acquisition of an additional 15,000 acres over the next 20 years. The Metropolitan Regional Parks System is made up of 10 park implementing agencies consisting of six county park departments, three city park departments, and the Park District. The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning agency that oversees and provides partial funding of the acquisition, development, and operation of the regional parks and trail system. The Metropolitan Council and implementing agencies also develop regional park policies to protect the region's water quality; promote best management practices; and help integrate the parks system with housing, transportation, and other regional priorities. The Metropolitan Council provides guidance in the development of regional park and trail master plans. The Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan reflects that guidance. Each regional park or trail must have a master plan approved by the Trail Status PS/ Proposed e T. atoMePeele •,, Proposed RegionatT ICurrentPOeainn .1/4, Three Rivers Park o,=,re, Regional Trans Open to. Public .N., wee lane State Toll raJr,�rn Jrnrr Plain r- Independence Minnetrista _ Kmgsw:ood Park Gale Woods Farm Lake M,nnetonka Regional Park Carver Park Reserve Baker Park Reserve ="2. 6E sei- nsne}}'iona aPtdt. Figure 2 Baker/Carver Regional Trail Alignment & Status Source: Three Rivers Park District Figure CARVER 3 �T-1El THREE RIVERS _1 so: SCOTT oovie-Ken Leder Lr Farm merinrimairr R✓aMSEY Battle I Creek . DAKOTA Metropolitan Regional Parks System Update Baker/Carver Regional Trail is identified by the black circle. Source: Metropolitan Council - 2030 Regional Policy Plan 2 Three Rivers Park District Metropolitan Council prior to receiving Metropolitan Council funding. The master plan must address boundaries and acquisition, demand, development concept, implementation schedule, development and operational costs, and natural resources. Public input is encouraged throughout the master planning process. The Metropolitan Council's planning requirements help ensure consistency between the implementing agencies' and their own regional plans. Three Rivers Park District The Park District is an independent, special park district charged with the responsibilities of acquisition, development, and maintenance of regional park reserves, parks, special recreation features, and trails for the benefit and use of the citizens of suburban Hennepin County, the seven - county Twin Cities metropolitan area, and the State of Minnesota. The Park District works cooperatively with local communities, counties, public agencies, the Metropolitan Council, and the State Legislature. The Park District's mission is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and education in a natural resources -based park system. The Park District was established in 1957 by the Minnesota State Legislature when prominent members of the community promoted the benefits of parks in the outlying areas of Hennepin County. Since its inception, the Park District has grown to serve more than 10 million annual visitors through access to 26,500 acres of park reserves, regional parks, special recreation features, and 120 miles of regional trails. Regional Trail Planning Guidelines The Park District manages its lands under four categories of regional open space: regional park reserves, regional parks, regional special recreation features, and regional trail corridors. Regional trail corridors, such as the Baker/Carver Regional Trail, are intended to provide recreational travel along linear pathways that transcend multiple jurisdictions and may or may not also serve a transportation component. In addition, regional trails follow criteria established by the Metropolitan Council and Park District: ❑ Regional trail corridors are carefully selected to follow natural or cultural linear features with scenic appeal and/or historical, architectural and developmental interest, connect people with places, help create a sense of place amongst the greater community, intersect with local trail, sidewalk, and bicycle networks, provide access to mass transit, and link components of the regional park system together. ❑ Regional trails may function as a destination or linking regional trail or both: ❑ Destination regional trails are developed as greenways or linear parks, and are distinct in that the trail itself is a destination. This type of regional trail typically is an independent facility and includes a wide corridor providing opportunities for improving wildlife habitat, protecting natural/cultural resources, and providing recreational opportunities. ❑ Linking regional trails serve a greater transportation function and act as the backbone to the regional trail system by connecting the regional park system to itself and the people it serves in a logical and efficient manner. ❑ For either regional trail type, adjacent land with significant natural or cultural resources may be acquired as part of the trail corridor. Baker/Carver Regional Trail will serve as both a destination and linking function; however, its primary function is that of a destination trail as the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is routed and intended to be developed in a manner to integrate natural resources, expansive viewsheds, and open space within the trail corridor. In the future, a formal trail name will be considered for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail that portrays its unique destination qualities and provides contextual relationship for visitors. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 3 This page left intentionally blank 4 Three Rivers Park District Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative. Minnetrista city staff began discussions with the Park District on the possibility of a north/south regional trail connection between Carver Park Reserve, Lake Minnetonka Regional Park, Dakota Rail Regional Trail, Gale Woods Farm and the Luce Line State Trail. When the Park District assumed planning responsibilities for the regional trail in 2012, further connections were extended to include Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail, Kingswood Park, Baker Park Reserve, and the Lake Independence Regional Trail. The Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan is intended to reflect and expound upon the work done by Minnetrista and further incorporate the larger aforementioned regional context and destinations. Background Initial discussions regarding the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began with the Woodland Cove residential development, a 500-acre subdivision located on the southern shore of Halsted Bay (Lake Minnetonka) and adjacent to the western boundary of Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. The Woodland Cove development is expected to generate over 1,000 new housing units and double Minnetrista's population base. It was realized that a significant portion of a regional trail alignment could be achieved through collaboration among the developer, Minnetrista and the Park District, as the trail and natural open space are also desirable amenities to residential development (Figure 4). Preservation of the regional trail corridor also provides an opportunity for the developer to achieve park dedication requirements. During the Woodland Cove discussions, the regional trail concept was not yet part of the Metropolitan Council's Figure 4 Woodland Cove Development - conceptual 2010 trail route Source: City of Minnetrista & Carlson Real Estate Co. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 5 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan and was not identified on Park District long-range regional trail planning maps. As such, Minnetrista led the initial planning with the agreement that the Park District would assume the planning initiative after the City identified a preferred trail route from Carver Park Reserve to the Luce Line State Trail. Minnetrista's planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail eventually spanned two years, as the City secured the resources of a consultant to manage the regional trail route planning and conducted an extensive public process including community meetings, individual resident meetings, and focused stakeholder engagement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Park District. Several trail alignments through Minnetrista were considered, analyzed and evaluated - with a decisive route selected south of the Dakota Rail Regional Trail and a generalized route selected north of the Dakota Rail Regional Trail to the Luce Line State Trail. The tangible result of the city's planning was a series of presentation boards entitled Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan (Figure 5). NORTH REGION PLANNING FRAMEWORK LOH MINNELEISIA REGIONAL TRAIL NON IH RLGIu.N'— W�IIH RANKS .AND TEAKS MAY B.ACAGNDL•NLI IIf NONNI RECION — PREFERRED SOUTH FRAIL ALIGNMENT E[]N MINNEINK3A REGIONAL TRAIL Paf MILK Waco. Tau AucNNai Nry :I ^Na .n ev�i nl .'�"E.:�•.s,una.1r,5�e.w.�1. M. r nu! tiff Rai. so s stir maim erilmi 'Lew ir,ithis or sau nsfrurscs. ve, ial.�wo Ai Mir 1144�N.y luaF��ue Rla,w_Znn eu. v.NM1NME 7774y Coort Rom.. Nov Loom Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan Excerpts (2012) Source: City of Minnetrista (Schoenbauer Consulting, LLC) Beginning 2009/10 Baker/Carver Regional Trail conceived via Woodland Cove residential development in Minnetrista. Park District included as stakeholder throughout Minnetrista's planning. Aug. & Nov. 2011 Jan. - Mar. 2012 Minnetrista hosts community meetings to gain input from residents. Minnetrista receives Parks Commission and City Council direction regarding preferred trail route at public meetings. Jan. - April 2012 Jan. - Mar. 2012 Minnetrista meets with individual residents regarding concerns. Minnetrista City Council approves preferred trail route through their jurisdiction and transfers further planning efforts to the Park District. N 0 N n July 19, 2013 Park District requests an amendment to Met Council 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan to include Baker/ Carver Regional Trail search corridor. Joint Independence and Maple Plain meeting with mayors, Park District and city staff and Park District Board of Commissioners district representative to discuss general support and proposed route alternatives. August 12, 2013 Park District staff present proposed regional trail to Maple Plain and Independence City Councils at separate meetings. August 15, 2013 Park District staff attend Maple Plain Days with display booth depicting proposed trail information and opportunity for the public to provide written comments. September 14, 2013 Park District staff attend Independence Heritage Fest with display booth depicting proposed trail information and opportunity for the public to provide written comments. Figure 6 Baker/Carver Regional Trail Planning Timeline: 2009 - 2014 Source: Three Rivers Park District 6 Three Rivers Park District Upon assumption of the regional trail planning effort in 2012, the Park District requested, and was granted, an amendment to the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan to include the new regional trail search corridor as part of the regional parks and trail system plan. During this time, Park District planning staff also explored the extension of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail search corridor to include regional connections to the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail, Kingswood Park, and Baker and Crow -Hassan Park Reserves. This action further expands the regional importance of the north/south connection in western Hennepin County. As such, the Cities of Independence and Maple Plain were included in subsequent trail alignment discussions and efforts to engage the public. The Park District subsequently requested that the Metropolitan Council include the northerly extension from the Luce Line Regional Trail to Baker Park Reserve/Lake Independence Regional Trail as part of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Regional Parks Policy's System Plan. A detailed planning timeline provides an overview of actions required to take the Baker/Carver Regional Trail from inception through public and municipal input, Metropolitan Council review and finally Park District adoption (Figure 6). The Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan is intended to reflect and expound upon the work done by Minnetrista and further incorporate the larger regional context and recreational destinations, support alternative transportation options and provide an ancillary resource for economic development to neighboring jurisdictions. As part of the planning process, the Park District built upon the success of many existing planning efforts, collaborated closely with stakeholders, and utilized a variety of public outreach and engagement techniques. Dissemination of Information A concerted effort was made to ensure that information regarding the proposed regional trail planning was broadcast in multiple formats. The Park District started a project website where the general public could receive background information, maps, notices of public meetings and links to submit electronic and written comments (Figure 7). October 29, 2013 1"1 Open house held to solicit public feedback about proposed routes regarding the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail through Independence and Maple Plain. 1 Joint Independence and Maple Plain meeting with mayors, Park District and city staff and Park District Board of Commissioners representative to discuss public comments received and direction for next steps. March 2014 Planning Timeline Independence and Maple Plain City Council meetings to consider preferred trail route. A joint resolution of support is provided. .a N `w E u N G Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan submitted to Park District Board of Commissioners for review and release for public comment. N N Park District Board of Commissioners adopts the Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan. Formal public comments taken via comment card distributed at open house and electronically through Park District website. LI 0 N ut m 2 a d LL Joint City of Independence and Maple Plain workshop to discuss preferred regional trail route from Luce Line State Trail to Baker Park Reserve - including members of both City Councils, Planning Commissioners and Park District Board of Commissioners. Park District requests Baker/Carver Metropolitan Council 2040 a Regional Trail .y Regional Parks Policy n Master Plan Plan's System Plan include submitted to the northerly extension Metropolitan from Luce Line State Trail Council for review to Baker Park Reserve/ p and approval. Lake Independence Regional Trail. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 r ThreeRivers Padre ft Trails Planning. Design a. Technology overview 11110mNION-avall censtrucoon Projects Eveate Napa. Pe��anaPrra�M st" P n appriodmatey riles from &R,e,Par,Pervemhn, Lo:nyThcaefi9 °n,wrconpetoUemeornweBl Data endLab mn� of mInnetrIste cantluded Indavvendentztutlysr re9bnelhn rn„idn,b,a,9AMe, mmnnlyNA„/201, seva.ainput Pass �,_N� ,,.°..°nR.°.laL,°Lek°.decendenaMalin.-n pRernative P°e. VIewN°Open 1-nuaeBeards IgPDF Over.e,.ICone .<rignment,(Pege,,lArgnraelnslva,a) lv,rt.pvte .vovav City rneellos presentolvons end roaster .v draft comment pen. that wIll be remosonlets including the P °a.rm m vernmentverdn°:cec.°r.Percere Atimnstreeve Center Reposed Reglonarrrea - Carver to Bvker Pork Reserves 3011130,vnlum Lime 10,541.1 Hale avrOnePlatanren,elva.e,evr.wck,..na Figure 7 Baker/Carver Regional Trail Project Website A planning website was maintained to disseminate information to the public, available 24/7. Source: Three Rivers Park District Th FeeRiver Preliminary co Figure 8 Public Comment Summary & Preliminary Cost Estimate Document Excerpts Separate document Source: Three Rivers Park District The October 29, 2013 open house was advertised through a number of avenues. Letters to adjacent trail route properties in Independence and Maple Plain were mailed by the Park District, inviting property owners to the open house and to share their thoughts. Outdoor signage advertising the open house was placed at key locations: at Independence and Maple Plain City Halls and the Baker Park Reserve trailhead parking lot, and along the Lake Independence Regional Trail. A press release was issued by the Park District providing key details to open house prospective attendees. Local newspapers also published the planning process in both print and on their own websites. The Laker & Pioneer newspaper ran an article entitled, 'Park district proposing new regional trail" in August 2013 and the Lakeshore Weekly News ran an article entitled, 'Public is invited to comment on future trail" in December 2013. Maple Plain further advertised the Baker/Carver Regional Trail in its newsletter, the Maple Plain Insider in December 2013 - inviting the public to learn more about the regional trail initiative and submit written pubic comments. Feedback Received Public comments received during the planning process were generally supportive - with Minnetrista's comments documented as an open- ended supportive/non-supportive solicitation (referenced and included in the Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan). Public comments received by the Park District after its assumption of the master planning process included residents from Independence, Maple Plain and the greater region (separate document). Participants were asked if they were supportive of the regional trail, which alternative route they preferred from the Luce Line State Trail to Baker Park Reserve (the segment not included in Minnetrista's planning), and finally if they had any concerns or special considerations. Overall, 84 percent (45 respondents reporting) were supportive of the regional trail; however, a clear, preferred public choice regional trail route was not apparent from the polling. To gather consensus between jurisdictions, the Park District provided 8 Three Rivers Park District the public comments, cost estimates and a pros/ cons matrix to the Independence and Maple Plain elected officials to collectively discuss a preferred regional trail route (Figure 8). The result of this discussion was a mutually agreed upon preferred trail route that included a direct connection to downtown Maple Plain. In 2012, a Minnetrista City Council resolution included the Baker/Carver Regional Trail in its Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan and a joint resolution of support was provided to the Park District by Maple Plain and Independence City Councils in 2014 (Appendix A). Future Public Engagement The Park District will continue to engage the public through the design and construction phases of Baker/Carver Regional Trail. While the public engagement process for these phases has not yet been defined, the intent is to engage the public early and often and to balance engagement efforts between those most affected by the trail with the greater community and trail users. Related Projects & Plans The following plans and concurrent efforts were referenced during the planning process to ensure consistency and minimize duplication. Within each of the projects and plans listed below, the intent of the regional trail is apparent; however, the identified route may be slightly different than what is designated as part of this master plan in response to the detailed analysis and public engagement effort. Minnetrista ❑ Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan (2005) and subsequent amendment (2011) to include planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail ❑ 2030 Comprehensive Plan (2009) ❑ Woodland Cove development (2010 - present) Independence ❑ Comprehensive Park, Trail and Open Space Plan (1992) ❑ Comprehensive Park, Trail and Open Space Plan Update (2001-2006, draft) ❑ 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update (2010) Maple Plain ❑ City of Maple Plain Walking and Biking Plan (2012) ❑ 2030 Comprehensive Plan (2008) ❑ Redevelopment Implementation Plan (2009) Hennepin County ❑ Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan (1997 and 2014 draft update) Three Rivers Park District ❑ Kingswood Special Recreation Feature Acquisition Master Plan (2013) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ❑ Six Mile Creek Diagnostic Study (2013) nr,Rivers Trail Open House Independence City Hall R.19 53opm-]:30pm Along the Lake Independence Regional Trail near Baker Park Reserve trailhead parking lot. Along Highway 12, adjacent to Maple Plain City Hall. PARK DISTRICT Trail Open House Independence City Hall Oct. 29 5:30pm-7:30pm Outdoor signage advertising the open house was placed at key locations. Source: Three Rivers Park District Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 9 This page left intentionally blank 10 Three Rivers Park District Demand Forecast Baker/Carver Regional Trail is anticipated to become a significant regional trail destination due to its connectivity with recreational amenities including existing and proposed regional trails, regional parks and park reserves, in addition to downtown Maple Plain's retail and commercial nodes. The proposed regional trail will help fill a significant north -south gap in the regional trail system - adding 17 miles, and providing trail users a recreation -based multi -modal, alternative transportation option across the entire stretch of western Hennepin County. Recreational Use Trends National, state, regional, and Park District recreational use trend studies support continued expansion, improvement, and implementation of trails. Recreational studies also indicate that of the wide varieties of recreation activities, trails appear to be the common thread across most demographics groups. National Trends National recreation trends compiled within the Outdoor Recreation Participation Report: Topline 2013 by the Outdoor Foundation indicate a clear increase in participation since 2006 in several regional trail activities for persons over 6 years old: biking (road/paved surface) 2 percent increase; day hiking 16 percent increase; running/jogging 35 percent increase; and trail running 32 percent increase. This same study found that running, jogging, and trail running is the second most popular adult activity with 14.9 percent of adults participating (30.8 million participants); bicycling is the third most popular adult activity with 12 percent of adults participating (24.8 million participants); and hiking is the fourth most popular adult activity with 11.7 percent adults participating (24.2 million participants). The Outdoor Foundation found that accessibility is a key factor to getting Americans outside. Not surprisingly, their study found that people with walking (56 percent participation) and biking (58 percent participation) routes close to their home get outside at significantly higher rates than those without (47 percent participation for walking and biking). Statewide Trends The 2008-2012 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP), published by Minnesota DNR, denotes that of Minnesota adults, 54 percent participate in walking and 29 percent in biking as recreation activities (Figure 9). Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 11 Activity Walking Boating of all types Swimming or wading all places Driving for pleasure on scenic roads Picnicking Fishing of all types Biking outdoors of all types Visiting outdoor zoos Camping of all types Visiting nature center Outdoor Recreation Activities of Minnesota Adults (population 20 years and older, participating annually) Percent of population 54 43% 41 37 36 i 30 29 27 26 i 25 Top io outdoor recreation activities Some of Minnesota's popular activities, like walking, are within a 3o-minute drive of many participants' homes. Others, like driving and camping, are popular tourist activities. Minnesota has more boating and fishing participation than any other state. Figure 9 How Minnesota Adults Recreate Outdoors Source: MnDNR 2008-2012 SCORP The SCORP identified the following key trends and issues that are also relevant to regional recreational activities and facilities such as the Baker/Carver Regional Trail area: ❑ Two-thirds of all recreation use occurs within a half-hour drive from home; creating the need for outdoor recreation lands near areas of higher population density and growth. ❑ Sustaining existing outdoor recreation facilities for future generations remains a key issue. ❑ Obesity rates rose 132 percent in Minnesotans between 1990 and 2006; creating the need to improve opportunities for a healthier lifestyle through outdoor recreation. ❑ The Last Child in the Woods phenomenon extends to adults; access to "nearby" nature and frequent unstructured play and exploration is vital. ❑ The population is aging, more culturally and ethnically diverse, and more concentrated in urban and urbanizing areas; changes in who participates, what activities they participate in, where they participate, why they participate, and when they participate are all changing. The primary goal of the SCORP is to increase participation in outdoor recreation by all Minnesotans and visitors. By increasing recreation facilities and increasing them in or near populated areas and populated areas with increasing diverse populations, the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail will help meet this goal and start to respond to some of the trends and issues identified in the SCORP. Regional Trends The Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan notes that, according to the SCORP, trail recreation is becoming increasingly important as the interest and demand for more trails is being felt at all levels of government. This increased interest in trail recreation reflects the fact that it is a healthful form of exercise for people of all age groups; is suitable for all levels of physical conditioning; can be carried out by families, groups, or individuals; and is often available close to home. Park District Trends Visitation to the Park District's regional trails has increased 400 percent from 1999-2009 and is now estimated at approximately 4.1 million visits per year (2013). About half of this phenomenal growth in visitation is explained by the growth of the trail network itself, with the number of miles approximately doubling from 56 miles to 120 miles. Use patterns within the Park District's system of parks and trails have also changed in the last 12 years. The Baby Boomers who used to bring their children to Park District parks are now empty -nesters, and they have flocked to the regional trails to get exercise and to get outdoors. Biking, as an alternative form of transportation, has gained traction over the past five years throughout the metro region and more users are now bike commuting. The Park District's work with local communities and Hennepin County has resulted in a regional trail network that is better connected to the local 12 Three Rivers Park District "feeder" trail, sidewalk, and bike lane networks, making the system more accessible to a larger portion of the population. In 2011, the Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail surpassed 500,000 visits (followed closely by the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail at 496,000 annual visits) - marking the first time in the Park District's history that a regional trail received a half million visits and making visitation comparable to French Regional Park. Of the 14 Park District regional trails open in 2013, six received 300,000 or more visits. For comparison purposes, seven of the 20 parks and reserves received 300,000 or more visits. As of 2014, regional trail visits accounted for over 40 percent of all visits to the Park District's facilities. Trail visitation is expected to continue to increase at a rate greater than the expected increase in population, and to increase at a rate faster than expected visitation increases to the Park District's park units. Demographic Trends Aging Baby Boomer Generation. The Baby Boomer generation is one of the Park District's primary user groups. The U.S. Census Bureau considers a Baby Boomer to be someone born during the demographic birth boom between 1946 and 1964 following World War II. The recreational preferences and habits for this group are well established and demand for their preferred activities will continue to be strong. However, as this group ages, physical limitations will require some park and trail visitors to change their recreational activities from higher intensity activities such as running, in -line skating, and biking to lower -impact recreational activities such as walking, nature observation, and educational opportunities. Many of these activities are accommodated by the regional trail system. As this generation ages, trail use over time may initially decrease and then increase when the housing stock turns over to younger families with children. Immigrant Groups. Metropolitan Council demographers have identified that about half of the total increase in population for the region from 1990 to 2000 was due to immigration of first -generation U.S. citizens and the births of their children. This trend was expected to continue through 2010, if not longer. Within the region, there are several prevalent immigrant groups: Hmong/Southeast Asian, Hispanic/ Latino, Somali, and West Africans. To date, this influx of new immigrant groups are generally not participating in regional trail use at the same rates as non-immigrant populations. The Park District is committed to better understanding this phenomenon and will continue to study this further with the ultimate goal of attracting regional trail users which mirror the demographics of the region. Park District Regional Trail User Data Regional trails are most heavily visited during the spring, summer, and fall seasons with summer receiving 40 percent of annual visits, spring and fall each receiving 25 percent of annual visits, and winter receiving 10 percent of annual visits. Winter has seen more seasonal growth, in part due to warmer winters, the increased use of trails for commuting, and the use of trails for year-round exercise regimens. The trend continues to indicate that biking is, and will remain, the predominant regional trail activity at 76 percent, followed by walking (15 percent), and running (six percent). In -line skating, mobility - device users and other miscellaneous uses make up the balance of trail users. The vast majority of regional trail visitors use trails for recreation and exercise. However, 12 percent of all regional trail visits are now for commuting purposes, up from about 1 percent in 1998. Regional trails that are paved, with few stop conditions, limited interactions with vehicles, and with seamless connections to employment, retail, and commercial centers have a greater percentage of regional trail visits attributed to commuting (19- 28 percent) than regional trails without these three attributes. While these certainly are not the only Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 13 factors in determining the desirability of a regional trail corridor for commuting purposes, they appear to play an important role. The 2009 regional trail survey data indicates that regional trail users are predominantly white (96 percent), male (60 percent), highly educated (76 percent have a bachelor's degree or higher), married/partnered (77 percent), middle-aged (41 percent are in the 45-59 age group), and upper - middle class (43 percent have household incomes over $100,000). With the exception of premier "destination" trails such as the Dakota Rail Regional Trail, the majority of use comes from people living within three miles of the trail corridor. Consequently, the American Community Survey (2008-2012) demographics analyzed for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail are reflective of Park District trail user demographics as aforementioned. Several regional trails within the more diverse first - tier communities (Richfield, Bloomington, Edina, New Hope, Crystal, Robbinsdale, Brooklyn Center) are planned for development in the next three years, and the overall trail visitor profile is expected to diversify once those trails are open for use. Trail Visitor Preferences Bicycle and pedestrian studies from across the country, and over the last twenty-five years, have come to the same general conclusions regarding user preferences - regardless of user type. Trails with these characteristics will attract visitors from greater distances, will have greater annual use, and will produce more enjoyable experiences for trail users: ❑ Natural settings (scenic, leafy vegetation, limited evidence of the built environment, etc. ❑ A diversity of natural settings (woodlands, wetlands, prairies, etc.) ❑ Visual and physical separation from vehicles ❑ A continuous and contiguous route with limited stop conditions ❑ A smooth surface (either paved or aggregate) ❑ Connectivity with destinations and other bicycle/pedestrian facilities ❑ Opportunities for loops ❑ Trail amenities - drinking water, mileage markers, restrooms, and wayfinding Some bicycle and pedestrian studies also indicate that participants are willing to spend more money and travel longer distances to utilize facilities that incorporate these preferences. In recognition of user preferences, the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail route was selected to provide linkages to regional recreation destinations; balance recreation and natural resources; minimize stop conditions, provide a safe, off -road, multi -modal transportation option, and ultimately, increase the desirability of the regional trail. As such, it is reasonable to expect that a regional trail, such as Baker/Carver Regional Trail, that incorporates these preferences, will be used more and provide a more enjoyable experience than a regional trail that does not. Projected Trail Use & Visitation The percentage breakdown by activity of Baker/ Carver Regional Trail will generally mirror Park District regional trail activity trends (Table 1). Bicycling will be the primary regional trail use, with ancillary uses such as walking, running and in - line skating capturing a smaller percentage of the total use. These expected uses remain consistent throughout the trail corridor with the exception of where the regional trail passes through the Maple Plain downtown commercial area. In this location, it is anticipated that the regional trail will receive an increased percentage of pedestrian activity associated with the sidewalk network. Seasonal use percentages for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail are expected to be consistent with regional trail seasonal use with 90 percent of visitation occurring in the spring, summer, and fall seasons (Table 2). Winter use of the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail is dependent on weather conditions, available budget, and the assistance of local communities to maintain the trail. At the time this master plan was written, it is anticipated that the local communities will maintain the regional trail during the winter months as resources allow and demand warrants it. 14 Three Rivers Park District When fully constructed, the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is projected to generate 183,000 annual visits. This visitation estimate is calculated based on the following cumulative methodology: 1) connectivity to existing regional recreational amenities, 2) destination aesthetic qualities along the trail corridor and, 3) connection to Maple Plain's downtown (Appendix B). Metropolitan Council studies indicate that 50 percent of regional trail users live within 0.75 miles from the trail (core service area) and 75 percent of users live within 3 miles of the trail (primary service area). The core service area includes the communities of Medina, Independence, Maple Plain, Minnetrista, Laketown Township, and Victoria (via Carver Park Reserve). The primary service area includes the core service area and extends further into Medina, Orono, Mound, Shorewood, and St. Bonifacius (Figure 10). In addition, due to the regional trail's destination qualities, it can be expected that the regional trail will draw users from a larger Twin Cities service area. This is reemphasized by the regional trail's proximity to Lake Minnetonka and looping opportunities to adjacent trail networks. Table 1 Regional Trail Use by Activity Trail Activity Percent of Expected Use Bicycling 76% Walking/Hiking 15% Running/Jogging 6% In -line Skating 2% Other 1% Source: Three Rivers Park District Table 2 Regional Trail Use by Season Percent of annual visitation Projected annual visitation Spring Summer Fall Winter 25% 45,750 40% 73,200 25% 45,750 10% 18,300 Source: Three Rivers Park District Figure 10 Regional Trail Service Area Two service area categories exemplify core service area (0.75-mile radius indicated in blue) and primary service area (3-mile radius indicated in black). Source: Metropolitan Council & Three Rivers Park District Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 15 This page left intentionally blank 16 Three Rivers Park District Trail Route Description & Development Concept The 17-mile Baker/Carver Regional Trail is planned through the Cities of Medina, Independence, Maple Plain and Minnetrista in Hennepin County and Laketown Township and City of Victoria in Carver County. The regional trail will fill a critical north -south gap in the regional trail system while providing a highly desirable recreation amenity to adjacent communities as well as the greater region. The regional trail will also incorporate safe crossings of significant pedestrian and bicycle barriers including Highways 7 and 12. The regional trail is planned as a destination regional trail spanning some of the most scenic landscapes within the western Twin Cities metropolitan area. The incorporation and routing of the regional trail through Baker Park Reserve, Kingswood Park, Gale Woods Farm and Carver Park Reserve will preserve the opportunity for regional trail users to enjoy and experience some of the region's most scenic landscapes and areas of high quality natural resources in perpetuity. The primary intended use of the regional trail is recreation. However, the regional trail also will serve a commuting or transportation function to those users using the trail corridor to access one or more of the places of interest along the regional trail corridor including several existing regional and state recreational amenities: Lake Independence Regional Trail, Baker Park Reserve, Luce Line State Trail, Kingswood Park, Gale Woods Farm, Dakota Rail Regional Trail, Lake Minnetonka Regional Park (indirect connection), Carver Park Reserve and Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail. The Baker/Carver Regional Trail will traverse some of the most scenic landscapes within western Hennepin County. Top: Carver Park Reserve, Bottom: Gale Woods Farm Source: Three Rivers Park District Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 17 Luce Line Minnetrista Whale Tail Lake "Maple; Plain Independence Orono Kingswaod Park as 9 net Trott Mound Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Carver Park Reserve Victoria Laketown 0 Township' Baker Park Reserve endence ...eev Lake Minnetonka Sources. Esri, HERE. DeLorme. TomTo term.. in ment PCorp.. GEBCO, USGS. PAO, NPS. NRCAN. GeoBase. IGN, Katlaster NL mNnance SurveyE. Japan. MET!, E. China (Hong Korig),- Gusstopo, Mapmylndia. rP OpenStr-=,Map contrOutbrs, and the GIS User Community Figure 11 Baker/Carver Regional Trail Segmentation Source: Three Rivers Park District Segment A 1 Downtown Maple Plain Lake Independence Regional Trail (Baker Park Reserve) to Luce Line State Trail Medina, Maple Plain and Independence Future Construction 2.25 miles Segment B I Luce Line State Trail Luce Line State Trail Independence Constructed (unpaved) 2.16 miles Segment C I Kingswood Luce Line State Trail to CR 15 (through Kingswood Park) Independence and Minnetrista Future Construction 3.26 miles Segment D 1 Gale Woods Farm CR 15 to Dakota Rail Regional Trail (through Gale Woods Farm) Minnetrista Future Construction 0.9 miles Segment E I Dakota Rail Regional Trail Dakota Rail Regional Trail Minnetrista Constructed 1.28 miles Segment F I Six Mile Marsh Dakota Rail Regional Trail to Kings Point Road Minnetrista Future Construction 53 miles Segment G 1 Woodland Cove Kings Point Road to TH 7 (through Woodland Cove) Minnetrista Anticipated Construction 2014-2019 1.70 miles Segment H I Carver Park Reserve I TH 7 to Lowry Nature Center (through Carver Park Reserve) Laketown Township Anticipated Construction 2019 1.71 miles Segment I 1 Carver Park Reserve II Lowry Nature Center (through Carver Park Reserve) to Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Laketown Township and Victoria Constructed 2.25 miles Total Miles 17.04 Trail Segmentation For purposes of further describing the regional trail corridor and associated land acquisition and development plans, the regional trail is divided into nine segments (Figure 11). Each trail segment documents its particular location and status, context and destinations, natural resources, Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS), species of special concern, acquisition needs and design and construction assessment. Larger regional trail segment, MLCCS and acquisition maps can be found in Appendices C, D & E.F Upon adoption of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, communities with jurisdictional control of their street network are encouraged to coordinate with the Park District to realize the regional trail through road reconstruction and ancillary construction projects. In addition, the Park District will continue to coordinate with Hennepin County transportation projects to ensure construction of the regional trail when road reconstruction is slated along the selected route. 18 Three Rivers Park District Segment A I Downtown Maple Plain Norlhside Park •...Downtown Maple' Plain\ Main Street/OR 19 Existing HRWN Signal Future Railroad Grassi, Independence Segment A Map Medina Location and Status Segment A begins in Baker Park Reserve - linking to the Lake Independence Regional Trail - and traverses through Maple Plain downtown and surrounding residential ares of both Maple Plain and Independence before connecting to the Luce Line State Trail. This trail segment is 2.25 miles in length and is not yet constructed. Context and Destinations Extensive evaluation and community input was collected to select the trail alignment for Segment A (see Section II and Appendix A). Collective guidance was received from the Maple Plain and Independence public and decision -makers to route the trail. The recommended route alignment from the Baker Park Reserve trailhead parking lot follows the north side of Main Street, across Highway 12 at the existing High -Intensity Activated crossWalk (HAWK) signal, along the east side of CR 19 and then along the north side of CR 6 and west side of CR 110 to the Luce Line State Trail. The Baker/Carver Regional Trail provides access to Baker Park Reserve and the Lake Independence Regional Trail via the trailhead parking lot on the southwestern edge of the park reserve adjacent to CR 19. Baker Park Reserve offers 2,700 acres of natural landscape and offers a range of recreational activities including camping, water -based recreation, picnicking, play areas, golfing, horseback riding trails, and cross-country skiing, sledding, snowmobiling, snowshoeing and skijoring and dog sledding during the winter months. Baker Park Reserve is also home to Baker Near -Wilderness Settlement, an environmental learning center offering guests the opportunity to connect with nature and explore the outdoors overnight. Home to nearly 2,000 residents, Maple Plain offers trail users and adjacent residents direct and indirect access to restaurants and businesses, a Hennepin County Library branch, city hall, churches, post office, and the Orono Discover Center. With effective dissemination of informational material, it is surmised that Maple Plain could see an uptick in visitors using the trail from the Baker Park Reserve - especially overnight campground users. Depending on their needs, park users and campers may visit Maple Plain seeking camping supplies/groceries/sundries, local restaurants, coffee, WiFi and other associated necessities. Natural Resources The natural resources assessment of Segment A is best described by the following; 1) adjacency to Baker Park Reserve, 2) rural/urban environment of Maple Plain, and 3) adjacency to rural county roads leading to the Luce Line State Trail. Baker Park Reserve offers access to a diverse glacial landscape of gently undulating landscape dotted with wetlands and moderately -sized forest patches (Big Woods and tamarack bogs). As the trail traverses through Maple Plain and Independence, the landscape becomes a matrix of tree lined residential streets, road crossings Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 19 and county road right-of-way with vast vistas of adjacent large -lot residential lawns dotted with forested patches. The trail crosses Painters Creek along CR 6 (the creek has been culverted under the roadway). MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System defines the area immediately adjacent to Segment A as mostly artificial surfaces and planted and cultivated vegetation. There are also pockets of herbaceous plant communities with a noteworthy wetland complex on the southern leg of Segment A. There are also a small handful of small forest pockets near the trail corridor, but not immediately adjacent to it. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Heritage Inventory System includes the following species of special concern/plant communities within one - mile of Segment A. American Ginseng Panex quinquefolius Species of Special Concern Sugar Maple Forest (Big Woods) --- Not Classified Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator Threatened Acquisition Needs Segment A is intended to be realized within available road right-of-way. Select easement areas adjacent to the road right-of-way may exist along portions of Main Street in Maple Plain and CR 6 and 110 in Independence. Further details regarding necessary easements will be defined in future design development phases. Design and Construction Assessment A detailed planning level design and construction assessment was conducted as part of the route selection process. Segment A requires the typical base trail construction with additional considerations for embankment work, curb and gutter conversion/reconstruction along rural roads, retaining walls, wetland impact mitigation, power pole relocations, major tree impacts and a railroad crossing. Wayfinding signage is proposed at the Baker Park Reserve trailhead and at three county road intersection locations along Segment A. Two rest stops are also proposed as right-of- way allows. Segment B I Luce Line State Trail i Independence Segment B Map Location and Status Segment B utilizes the existing Luce Line State Trail from Highway 110 to Game Farm Road through Independence, a distance of 2.16 miles. Owned and operated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Luce Line State Trail stretches 63 miles from Plymouth to the small town of Cosmos in west -central Minnesota. The Park District operates and maintains the Luce Line Regional Trail from the state trail's terminus in Plymouth - connecting eastward 8.8 miles to the Minneapolis park and trail system at Theodore Wirth Regional Park. A noteworthy recommendation for future consideration eliminates the Luce Line State Trail alignment in favor of continuing north/south along Highway 110 and then east/west along Highway 26 to Game Farm Road. At the time of the master plan, this alignment's additional cost to maintain a continuous bituminous trail (without the limestone interruption of the Luce Line State Trail) did not outweigh the benefits. This alternative alignment could be reviewed again in the future should circumstances or user preference change. Context and Destinations This portion of the Luce Line State Trail is limestone, and will continue to be limestone under MnDNR guidance. This portion of the state trail allows biking, hiking, running, jogging, walking, dog walking, snowmobiling, and cross-country skiing. Additionally, an adjacent horse trail also parallels this portion of the Luce Line State Trail. The Park District respects the existing uses and 20 Three Rivers Park District does not propose any changes in existing uses or pavement conditions. Natural Resources The Luce Line State Trail is an abandoned rail corridor. As with similar converted rail corridors, a linear forested vegetative pattern has developed adjacent to the trail, offering glimpses to the rural landscape of large -lot residential properties and farm fields. MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System defines the area immediately adjacent to Segment B as predominately planted or cultivated vegetation with a large herbaceaous wetland node centrally located along the southern boundary of the corridor. Small patches of forests, woodlots, shrublands, and artificial surfaces and associated areas are also scattered along Segment B. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Heritage Inventory System includes the following species of special concern/plant communities within one - mile of Segment B. Sugar Maple forest (Big Woods) Not Classified Acquisition Needs As this segment of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is proposed to utilize the existing Luce Line State Trail, no land is required by the Park District for Segment B. Design and Construction Assessment As aforementioned, if the MnDNR determines that trail user demand warrants consideration to pave portions of the Luce Line State Trail, the Park District respects the underlying property owner's decision -making authority. At this time, the Park District does not propose any pavement changes to Segment B. Wayfinding signage is proposed at the start and terminus of the shared route with a rest stop, to be coordinated in conjunction with the MnDNR. Segment C I Kingswood Independence Mlnnetrista Q,s Segment C Map Location and Status Measuring 3.26 miles, Segment C begins at the junction of the Luce Line State Trail and Game Farm Road. Here it traverses in a north/south orientation through Kingswood Park, eventually connecting to Gale Woods Farm by way of property owned and operated by the Boys and Girls Club. Part of Minnetrista's early planning that identified this area as a trail search corridor (Section II), this regional trail route segment was solidified with the acquisition of Kingswood Park by the Park District in 2013. Segment C is currently unconstructed. Context and Destinations Kingswood Park, consisting of 106 acres on Little Long Lake, includes 70 percent of the lake's shoreline as well as a tamarack bog and unique glacial landscape. Little Long Lake and the surrounding uplands are considered some of the most pristine, high -quality natural resources in Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 21 the area. Until fully operational, the park will be open on a limited/interim basis - offering passive recreational hiking trails to experience the park. The Boys and Girls Club operates Voyager Environmental Center at the southern terminus of Segment C. The environmental center operates as a residential camp in the summer and on weekends during the school year. During the school year, the environmental center offers environmental education and recreational camp activities to schools. Safe trail access between the environmental center, Kingswood Park and Gale Woods Farm to the south may provide additional opportunities to coordinate programming between the organizations. Natural Resources The natural resources adjacent to Game Farm Road exist as a dotted forest patch edge condition with sporadic open areas of fenced pasture. As previously mentioned, Kingswood Park offers trail users a unique opportunity to visit a glacial landscape with an array of natural resources. The relatively undeveloped shoreline of Little Long Lake, maple -basswood forest covering a glacial esker along the western shore, oak woodland along the eastern shore and a 25-acre managed prairies and tamarack bog are symbolic of landscape and plant communities found throughout the region prior to European settlement. Eighty six percent (86%) of Kingswood Park resides under conservation easement, providing further environmental protection of the park's significant natural resource inventory. MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System defines the area immediately adjacent to Segment C as a diversity of land covers with a larger presence of planted or cultivated vegetation concentrated along the western boundary of the northern half of Segment C complemented with patches of artificial surfaces and herbaceous plant communities. The eastern boundary of the northern half of Segment C is a diverse complex with generally equal parts artificial surfaces, herbaceous cover, forests, woodlands, shrublands, and planted and cultivated vegetation. The southern half of Segment C is more ecologically significant and includes larger woodland areas through Kingswood Park with areas of herbaceous cover, shrubland, and artificial surfaces in near proximity to the trail corridor. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Heritage Inventory System includes the following species of special concern/plant communities within one - mile of Segment C. Sugar Maple Forest (Big Woods) --- Not Classified Humped Bladderwort Utricularia gibba Non -Threatened Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator Threatened Least Darter Etheostoma microperca Species of Special Concern Acquisition Needs The preliminary planning assessment indicates that the regional trail can generally be accommodated within the road right-of-way adjacent to Game Farm Road and CR 15 with minimal easement requirements. An easement for the Boys and Girls Club will be required from the southern end of Kingswood Park to CR 15. It is anticipated that this easement may be obtained through a larger land exchange in conjunction with the acquisition needs of Segment D. Design and Construction Assessment Trail design and construction assumes significant embankment work to address erosion along the glacial esker ridgeline within Kingswood Park and conversion of a rural road to curb and gutter section in addition to base trail construction. Wayfinding signage is proposed along Game Farm Road, at the Kingswood parking lot, at the south end of Kingswood, and at the CR 15 road crossing. Four rest stops are proposed approximately every mile, where reasonably feasible. 22 Three Rivers Park District Segment Di Gale Woods Farm immediately west of the privately held properties. Pasture Gale Woods Farm Active Farm Area Location and Status Segment D Map Segment D, measuring approximately 0.9 miles, is located entirely within Gale Woods Farm with the exception of a small segment located on the northern end along CR 15 and through private property owned by the Boys and Girls Club. Segment D is not yet constructed. Gale Woods Farm is a living, working farm with farm and folk educational programing, reservation pavilion, hiking and cross country running trails, fishing, and picnic areas. Context and Destinations At the northern terminus, Segment D is proposed over two privately -held parcels along the south side of CR 15. These parcels are fragments of larger parcels located on the north side of CR 15 and remain undeveloped. The regional trail is proposed to cross CR 15 at the existing Gale Woods Farm service access road located Several potential regional trail alignments were evaluated through Gale Woods Farm. A route through the eastern portion of the property was selected as it utilizes an existing utility easement through a wooded area and skirts around the western edge of an existing hay field - minimizing potential negative impacts to the farming operations and associated programming components by introducing a new, semi -conflicting use. Although direct access to the Gale Woods Farm core activity center from Segment D is not planned as it would create a conflict between regional trail users, program participants, and the operations of a working farm, direct access to the core activity center of the farm is provided along Segment E through a local trail connection. Natural Resources The Minnesota Land Trust holds a conservation easement over the entire Gale Woods Farm property. The conservation easement's purpose is to, 'preserve and protect the conservation values of the protected land' - the working farm, general park activities, and future regional trail corridor are consistent with this intent. MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System classifies the area immediately adjacent to Segment D as planted or cultivated vegetation, forest, woodland, and herbaceous plant communities. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Inventory System includes the following species of special concern/plant communities within 1-mile of Segment D. Zai'li, Prairie Rich Fen Class --- Not Classified Native Plant Community - Undetermined Class --- Not Classified Acquisition Needs Almost the entire Segment D is located within Gale Woods Farm; however, a short 100 foot segment is planned either within CR 15 right-of-way or - more preferably as it provides for more feasible Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 23 construction and safer alignment - through a small portion of two parcels that are each tied to a larger parcel primarily located on the opposite (north) side of the road and owned by the Boys and Girls Club. During preliminary discussions between the Park District and Boys and Girls Club, the Boys and Girls Club expressed an interest in a larger land exchange arrangement. As currently proposed the Park District will convey the property it owns north of CR 15 to the Boys and Girls Club and the Boys and Girls Club will convey the property it owns south of CR 15 to the Park District. In addition, the Boys and Girls Club will convey the required regional trail easement (Segment C) between CR 15 and Kingswood Park. The details of this arrangement are not yet finalized and may include a financial transaction if the land values associated with the proposed transaction do not balance. Design and Construction Assessment New base trail construction is required for Segment D with one rest stop at an undetermined location. Segment E 1 Dakota Rail Regional Trail MInnestrista E Location and Status Segment E Map Segment E utilizes the existing Dakota Rail Regional Trail for 1.28 miles from Gale Woods Farm to Westonka Recreational Park. Context and Destinations This existing segment, which is shared with the Dakota Rail Regional Trail, is located on an abandoned railroad corridor currently owned by the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA) and leased to the Park District for regional trail purposes. The corridor width is approximately 100' allowing for the establishment of narrow vegetative buffers along portions of Segment E. Within Gale Woods Farm, there is a paved trail connecting Segment E with an existing trailhead complete with parking, signage, benches, waste receptacle, and bathrooms at the main farm education building. Westonka Recreational Park, which offers 5 baseball fields, a playground, swings, and picnic areas, is located immediately adjacent to the south side of Segment E. A private mini golf course that incorporates art and natural elements into each hole is also located on the south side of the regional trail. Trail users can also access via the Dakota Rail Regional Trail downtown St. Bonifacius, located approximately 2 miles west, or downtown Mound, located approximately 1.5 miles east. St. Bonifacius offers access to local parks, churches, restaurants, bank, and gas station/ convenience store. Mound offers access to restaurants, churches, medical clinics, seasonal farmers market, transit, hardware store, library, pharmacy, bank, grocery store, post office, and other retail. Natural Resources The area adjacent to the regional trail is rural in nature offering scenic views over open grassy land, patches of woodlots and forest, and adjacent parks. There are no significant natural resources within the trail corridor itself; however, trail users can still observe many wildlife species that thrive in edge conditions as well as large open spaces. Common songs birds and waterfowl, whitetail deer, turkey, and osprey can be observed from Segment E. MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System classifies the area immediately adjacent to Segment E as a generally equally balanced mix of artificial surfaces, planted or cultivated vegetation, forests, woodland, and herbaceous 24 Three Rivers Park District cover. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Inventory System does not include any species of special concern/plant communities within one mile of Segment E. Acquisition Needs No additional acquisition needs are foreseen for this segment in the immediate future as the Park District has a permit from HCRRA for regional trail purposes along Segment E. Design and Construction Assessment At this time, no significant upgrades or reconstruction to the existing shared Dakota Rail Regional Trail segment are proposed. Trail parking, bathrooms and drinking water are accessible via Gale Woods Farm facilities. An upgrade is proposed to the existing wayfinding signage and two additional directional signs are proposed at the start and terminus of the shared trail segment. One rest stop is proposed along Segment E. Segment F 1 Six Mile Marsh Location and Status Segment F Map Segment F is located southeast of the Dakota Rail Regional Trail and connects to the Woodland Cove residential development portion of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail - through the Six Mile Marsh. Segment F measures approximately 1.53 miles and is unconstructed. Segment F's general route is the result of significant planning and public input conducted by Minnetrista (see Section II). Previously referred to in Minnetrista planning documents as the Tarmhill Route,' this trail alignment was the preferred crossing of Six Mile Marsh. As stated in the Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan, area residents have a high concern for potential impacts to the natural environment, especially along Six Mile Marsh. Several options were considered and ultimately rejected due to the potential for impacts to wetlands. The alignment depicted crosses the marsh at the narrowest point in an effort to avoid these wetland impacts. Context and Destinations Segment F serves as a critical link between the Dakota Rail Regional Trail and crossing the Six Mile Marsh and associated creek. As the trail leaves the Dakota Rail Regional Trail, the route provides vistas across farmland, small hobby farms and wetlands. As the trail route passes along Farmhill Road, the landscape becomes large lot single family homes. The Baker/Carver Regional Trail crosses Six Mile Creek, which outlets into Halsted Bay, one of Lake Minnetonka's many inlets. Natural Resources The Six Mile Marsh wetland and creek complex drains a large area south and west of Halsted Bay. It runs through agriculture and residential development and has a very low gradient which often results in stagnant backwater conditions. According to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (Watershed District), Halsted Bay water quality is among the worst in the Watershed District due in part to excessive nutrients. The watershed district continues to actively pursue opportunities to improve water quality in this vicinity. MLCCS Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 25 The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System defines the area immediately adjacent to Segment F as generally equal parts artificial surfaces, herbaceous cover, and planted or cultivated vegetation with a pocket or two of woodland and forest plant communities. The plant communities along Segment F are not anticipated to change in the near future as the human impacted plant communities (artificial surfaces and planted and cultivated vegetation) are not planned for restoration and the herbaceous areas are associated with the Six Mile Marsh complex which are protected by existing wetland and water body laws and regulations. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Inventory System does not include any species of special concern/plant communities within one mile of Segment F. Acquisition Needs The proposed trail route requires significant acquisition/easement coordination to achieve a contiguous trail segment. Several Segment F properties require negotiations, of which the Park District is committed to a willing seller approach, again as defined by the Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan. An easement across one private property is required to achieve connection from the Dakota Rail Regional Trail to Farmhill Drive. Road right- of-way is proposed for the remaining length of Farmhill Drive, with acknowledgement that in select areas, easements may be required to achieve the typical trail section. Crossing Six Mile Marsh is proposed at the Farmhill Drive cul-de-sac. Minnetrista owns a small property at the Farmhill Drive cul-de-sac for purposes of routing a trail. The property is narrow, located directly on the wetland edge and does not extend all the way to Six Mile Creek. Additional property rights likely in the form of an easement or fee title are required in this location. Due to the shape, configuration and similar ownership of the affected and adjacent parcels, it is possible that a creative approach to land acquisition will be needed in this location. Preliminary conversations with the current affected property owner indicate that multiple parcels may require acquisition to secure the regional trail corridor as several of the parcels are landlocked and have little to no value without the association of the buildable parcel(s) located off of Farmhill Drive. In this situation, the Park District would likely resell the surplus property with a regional trail easement over it. The south side of Six Mile Creek will also require additional property rights acquisition. Several easements will be needed from three to five private property owners depending on the final trail design and success of land acquisition negotiation. Several of the easements are anticipated to be relatively minor, one to two located right at Six Mile Creek and away from the private residences and possibly one to two along Kings Point Road. There is one significant easement need that essentially spans the distance from Six Mile Creek to Kings Point Road. In this instance, the Park District is exploring the complete acquisition of the property with the intent to place a regional trail easement on the property and then resell the property. This approach is being explored as the current property owner has indicated a willingness to sell the entire property, but not sell an easement. Design and Construction Assessment Trail construction for Segment F will include typical base trail construction for the northern portion and more specialized construction as the trail crosses Six Mile Marsh including a series of boardwalks and a pedestrian bridge to cross Six Mile Creek. While cursory review by the Watershed District has been conducted, design details will need to consider the Watershed District's rules and requirements associated with crossing the marsh. Wayfinding signage is proposed near the crossing of Six Mile Creek with two rest stops proposed along the route. 26 Three Rivers Park District Segment G I Woodland Cove I 1 1 I I r Segment G Map Park District OP Property / Carver Park Reserve 1 Halsted Ball Future Boardwalk Ilsil rFuture Boardwalk iSpr.,,,, Future Boardwalk I 6- Future Boardwalk Woodland Cove Development Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Connection (2019-2020) Location and Status Segment G is located between Kings Point Road and the existing grade -separated crossing of TH 7. There are currently two alternatives for this segment: Alternative Route G1 which is located through the heart of the new Woodland Cove residential development and a 40-acre parcel owned by the Park District and Alternative Route G2 which is located adjacent to Kings Point Road. At the time the master plan was written, there was local support to move forward with Alternative Route G1, and as such, the master plan is written to reflect that this route is the most likely to be implemented. An alternative route (G2) is still identified in the event an agreement cannot be reached to utilize the planned local trail system through Woodland Cove as part of the greater regional trail corridor. In the event Alternative Route G2 is implemented, local connections would provide access from Woodland Cove residents to the regional trail. Context and Destinations Most of Alternative Route G1 will be located within a new local open space network through the Woodland Cove development and a 40 acre wooded lot owned by the Park District. The open space network, which will ultimately be owned by Minnetrista, is a composition of a series of outlots with a minimum width of approximately 160'. The adjacent open space network will be a mix of 11 housing types catering to a variety of price points and ranging from custom homes to row townhouse to multi -family homes. The open space network is planned to be restored to a more natural aesthetic with wetlands, prairies, and some wooded areas. A major destination within this segment is a direct connection to Lake Minnetonka Regional Park offering hiking, biking, swimming, boating, fishing, geocaching, picnicking, and a creative play area. There will also be a combination of private (homeowners association owned/operated) and public parks within Woodland Cove which will be accessible via the connecting local trails. Natural Resources The existing natural resources along Alternative Route G1 are limited to the portion of the trail which will traverse the 40 acre parcel owned by the Park District. The Park District's property is a high -quality maple -basswood forest protected by a conservation easement. The remainder of Alternative Route G1 is heavily impacted by the development of Woodland Cove. The long- term plans of the open space network within the Woodland Cove development calls for the recreation of wetlands, prairies, and some wooded areas that will provide for an aesthetically pleasing - but not necessarily a natural resource significant corridor - given the corridor width and surrounding residential development. MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System classifies the area immediately adjacent to Alternative Route G1 as forested and planted or cultivated. A significant portion of this route Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 27 will be heavily impacted by the Woodland Cove development; however, the development plans call for the reestablishment of a more natural landscape such as prairies and wetlands. As such, in the long term some of this corridor may be redesignated to a more natural classification such as herbaceous, shrubland, or woodlands. Since the 40-acre parcel owned by the Park District is classified as forest and since this is within a conservation easement it is intended to remain this way well in perpetuity. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Inventory System does not include any species of special concern/plant communities within one mile of Segment G. Acquisition Needs A 20' wide regional trail corridor through the Woodland Cove open space network is required from the City of Minnetrista. The City and Park District are seeking creative ways to transfer the property rights to the Park District. The ultimate solution will account for the City's use of park dedication authority to secure the land and may account for potential future Park District parkland impacts due to proposed City improvements. Design and Construction Assessment Alternative Route G1 is planned for construction to the local standard of 8' wide. The Park District will upgrade to typical regional trail standards at which time adjacent trail segments are complete and after the pavement's useful life. Four road crossings and several boardwalks are anticipated and require additional design considerations. Wayfinding signage is proposed at the Kings Point Road crossing into the Woodland Cove development and one rest stop is proposed as space availability allows. Segment H I Carver Park Reserve I xisting Underpass Grimm Farm. a' eaareary Carver Park Reserve Segment H Map Location and Status Segment H is located between the existing grade separated crossing of TH 7 and the Lowry Nature Center, completely within Carver Park Reserve. This segment is not yet built but is anticipated to be constructed approximately in 2019. Context and Destinations Segment H passes through a more open area of Carver Park Reserve with vistas over open fields, prairies, and other managed open areas to the surrounding forests, woodlots, and wetlands. The topography of Segment H is similar to Segment I - gently rolling. Segment H trail users have access to a wide variety of recreation opportunities such as picnicking, archery, the Grimm Farm Historic Site, geocaching, cross country skiing, birding and other wildlife viewing, hiking, and the Lowry Nature Center complex (the first public environmental education center of its kind in the state) via the existing interior trail network. Many of these recreational offerings are on the west side of CR 11 (the opposite side of the road as the regional trail). The next Carver Park Reserve Master Plan update is expected to review and evaluate a grade- 28 Three Rivers Park District separated crossing of CR 11 in the northern half of the park reserve to complement the existing grade -separated crossing in the southern half of the park reserve. Such a crossing would offer improved safety and ease of crossing CR 11 and connectivity of the park as well as connectivity of the park with the regional trail. Trail users can also access other recreation opportunities such as fishing, camping, swimming, and a dog -off leash area; however, these areas are best accessed via Segment I. Natural Resources Carver Park Reserve is a system of interconnected lakes, marshes, and sloughs. Many of the wetlands are rich in biological diversity and classified as sanctuaries — the highest level of protection within the Park District's internal land use guidance. On upland sites, the dominant plant community is oak forest, but there are good stands of maple - basswood as well. Similar to natural areas across the region, state, and nation, there is an ongoing battle to minimize the establishment and spreading of many invasive species including a few noteworthy examples of buckthorn, Eurasian water milfoil, poison ivy, wild parsnip, and leafy spurge. The wildlife in Carver Park Reserve may be more diverse than any other Park District park reserve. There are open field species like bobolinks and meadowlarks, species that require large open areas or wooded areas near water bodies such as ospreys and barred owls, and wide variety of other wildlife species like Trumpeter Swans, mink, white-tailed deer, otters, as well as common and more rare waterfowl and songbirds. Natural resource management of the adjacent land will occur as part of the natural resources management of Carver Park Reserve and not the Baker/Carver Regional Trail. MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System classifies the area immediately adjacent to Segment H as planted or cultivated vegetation and forests with a scattering of woodlands, shrublands, and herbaceous plant communities. Especially noteworthy along the east side of the northern half of Segment H is the '7-11 Woods' which is a forest comprised of lowland hardwood forests, maple -basswood forest, and oak forest. The quality and integrity of this forest is exceptional and is designated as a sanctuary within the Park District's internal land use guidance classification system. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Inventory System includes the following species of special concern/plant communities within one mile of Segment H. Common Name Bald Eagle Scientific Name Haliaeetus leucocephalus Species of Special Concern Cerulean Warbler Setophaga cerulea Species of Special Concern Tamarack Swamp Not Classified Halberd -leaved Tearthumb Polygonum arifolium Non -threatened Trumpeter Swan Cygnus buccinator Threatened Acquisition Needs No additional land is required for Segment H. Design and Construction Assessment The proposed design and construction for Segment H include typical base trail assumptions through Carver Park Reserve. Wayfinding signage is proposed on the south side of Highway 7 and within the park reserve. Two additional rest stops are proposed at locations to be determined. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 29 Segment I I Carver Park Reserve II a Carver Park Reserve e 3 Segment I Map Location and Status Segment I is located between the Lowry Nature Center and Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail, completely within Carver Park Reserve. This segment is already constructed and open for public use. Context and Destinations Segment I passes through a complex of woods, wetlands, and open prairie and a landscape best described as ground moraine comprised of gently rolling relief within the southeast quadrant of Carver Park Reserve. There are vistas to Steiger Lake and the southern lobe of Lake Zumbra and existing resting nodes to take in the landscape and more personally connect with nature. Segment I trail users have access to a wide variety of recreation opportunities such as fishing, camping, swimming, a dog -off leash area, geocaching, birding and other wildlife viewing, hiking, and the Lowry Nature Center complex (the first public environmental education center of its kind in the state) via the existing interior trail network. Trail users can also access other recreation opportunities such as picnicking, archery, cross-country skiing, and the Grimm Farm Historic Site within Carver Park Reserve; however, these areas are best accessed via Segment H. Downtown Victoria, located within .8 miles of the southern terminus of Segment I via the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail, offers trail users access to a community center, grocery store, post office, churches, restaurants, and other commercial and retail destinations. Natural Resources Please see Segment H narrative for more information regarding natural resources associated with Carver Park Reserve. Since both segments are completely within Carver Park Reserve, the general natural resource assessment and description are the same. MLCCS The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System classifies the area immediately adjacent to Segment I as primarily woodland, shrubland, and herbaceous plant communities with a scattering of planted or cultivated vegetation and forests. Species of Special Concern The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Inventory System includes the following species of special concern/plant communities within one mile of Segment I. Maple Basswood Forest --- Not classified Least Darter Etheostoma microperca Species of Special Concern Acquisition Needs No additional land is required for Segment I. Design and Construction Assessment This segment of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail exists and is in use. No redesign or reconstruction is anticipated. Wayfinding signage is anticipated near the parking lot on Park Drive, near the Lowry Nature Center, with an additional directional sign placed at the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail terminus. Future improvements to parking may be considered if demand warrants. 30 Three Rivers Park District Design Guidance The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to safely accommodate 183,000 annual visits, an array of non -motorized uses, a variety of skill levels, and persons with special needs. In addition, the regional trail is intended to support both recreation and commuting uses and incorporate trail amenities that enhance trail users' experiences. Similar to many regional trail corridors, the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail corridor includes several challenges associated with constructing a regional trail where trail right-of-way doesn't exist, providing access to and across natural resources areas, and balancing safety, public expectations, natural resource protection, and potential private property impacts. One of the key elements to constructing the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail is to design and construct it in a manner that meets users expectations and needs, meets industry standards and best management practices, and is financially responsible. As such, the Park District utilizes a series of District -wide regional trail practices and guidelines in respect to trail design and support amenities. These practices and guidelines are summarized in this chapter and will serve as the basis for design and construction of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail. Various images along the Baker/Carver Regional Trail route exemplify rural characteristics and adjacent landscape imagery. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 31 Permitted Regional Trail Uses The regional trail will be open to the general public. Its intended uses include walking, jogging, in -line skating, bicycling, and other uses mandated by state law including, but not limited to, non -motorized electric personal assisted devices. Motorized vehicle and equestrian uses will be prohibited, except for motorized vehicles used by the Park District and partner cities for maintenance or law enforcement activities or otherwise permitted for ADA access. Equestrian uses are allowed on the Luce Line State Trail Segment B per MnDNR rules. Access to All The Park District is committed to providing access and recreational opportunities to all people, including persons with disabilities, minorities, and other special -population groups. The Park District meets this commitment through appropriate facility design, programming considerations, and by actively addressing potential barriers to participation. All regional trail facilities, including associated trailheads and trail amenities, will be designed to accommodate individuals with disabilities and developed in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and guidelines. Specific design guidelines are discussed on the following pages of this section. The Park District pursues promotional outreach activities and works with special -interest organizations such as the Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute and Wilderness Inquiry to further encourage participation in activities and use of park facilities by persons with special needs. If arrangements are made in advance, interpreters and alternative forms of printed material are available at programmed events. In addition to accommodating individuals with disabilities, the trail corridor passes through rural underdeveloped areas to small towns, providing access to people with different social and cultural backgrounds and connecting those persons with important local community destinations such as parks, commercial areas, community facilities, cultural destinations, and transit facilities. On a broader scale, communities adjacent to the trail will not only have access to the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail, but also gain direct access to several existing park reserves, regional parks, and regional and state trails. To improve local access, neighborhood trail connections are anticipated at regular intervals. The Park District does not charge entrance fees for its regional trails; therefore, the regional trail is available for all users to enjoy regardless of financial status. Design Guidelines In accordance with its regional designation and associated anticipated use, the Baker/Carver Regional Trail will be designed as an off -road 10-foot- wide, non -motorized paved multi -use trail (Figure 11), with the exception of Segment B owned and operated by the MnDNR and maintained as aggregate in this vicinity. A bituminous trail surface is preferred because it is cost-effective, less prone to erosion than aggregate surfaces, provides a desirable trail user experience, and is more appropriate given the anticipated visitation and connections to other paved facilities. In consideration of the wetlands associated with this regional trail, boardwalks and bridges are anticipated in a few isolated locations along the regional trail corridor. Curb ramps will be used at all roadway crossings. The preferred maximum trail grade is 5 percent with a 2 percent cross slope for drainage. Much of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is anticipated to be an independent trail corridor separate from roadways. However, in areas where the trail will be located adjacent to a roadway, the following design considerations apply. Where right-of-way allows, final trail design will attempt to maximize the boulevard width to account for sign placement, snow storage, and possibly trees or other complementary enhancements. In circumstances with limited right- of-way, the trail is still planned to be located off - road, but with less boulevard between the trail edge and back of the curb. In these locations, the trail will be separated from the road by a minimum paved two -foot -wide clear zone. This paved clear 32 Three Rivers Park District zone between the back of the curb and the trail edge provides a buffer between the trail users and motorists and will be striped to delineate the edge of the trail. In the event there are instances where the trail will not initially meet the preferred design, trail designers will evaluate a wide variety of design tools to determine the best fit for the unique situation. Unless the alternative trail design is an acceptable long range solution, it is anticipated that noncompliant trail segments would be improved as funding, right-of-way, or other opportunities present themselves. A number of factors will be considered during the design phase, such as: Maertain 9{f'WrYtiral Clear Zone Above Trail. —nrn-ree Branches Accordingly. See Place For Seeding ar Restoration Nees. 6' Topsail, Tip. — Figure 11 Regional Trail Typical Section Source: Three Rivers Park District ❑ Right-of-way width/acquisition needs ❑ Topography and drainage impacts ❑ Existing vegetation ❑ Driveway/road crossings ❑ Overhead and subsurface utilities ❑ Proximity to adjacent buildings, homes, businesses, and industrial facilities ❑ Wetlands/floodplain locations, potential impacts, and rules ❑ Wildlife (species, nesting/breeding areas and times, concentrations) ❑ Existing infrastructure ❑ Connectivity with other trail/sidewalk/bicycle facilities ❑ Safety ❑ Cost ❑ Obstructions ❑ Trail user preferences/desired trail user experience ❑ Opportunities to coordinate with other projects/agencies In addition to the discussed design considerations, regional trail segments will be designed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and NOTES: 2. WIDTH AT MAX. 2% SLOPE ON SHOULDER. 0 2:1 MP.XIMJS_OPE I+V'I OUTSIDE OF 2' SHOULDER. 0 PREFERRED 3' CLEP.RANCE [7 MIN.; FROM TREES OR OTHER OBSTRJCTIGN. 0 SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR TRAIL STRIPING. 0 BOULEVARD VARIES IN 'WIDTH, BUT SHALL BE A MIN. OF 2i. siaN INSTALLATION NOT APPLICABLE IN AL AREAS. 0 MAX.. CROSS.. SLOPE 2%. SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR SLOPE DIRECTION. 0 MIN. 2' BETWEEN EDGE OF TRAIL AND EDGE OF SIGN. Roadwa 1 D' local codes. More specifically, the following sources will be referred and adhered to when preparing the design and construction plans as appropriate: ❑ Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, prepared by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1999. ❑ Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles, Federal Highway Administration, January 1994. ❑ MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), March 2007. ❑ State Aid Rule 8820.9995 Minimum Bicycle Path Standards, State Aid for Local Transportation. ❑ Trail Planning, Design, and Development Guidelines, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR). ❑ Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), MnDOT, May 2005. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 33 Q' Public Right-of-way Access Guidelines (PROWAG). Q' Best Practices for Traffic Control at Regional Trail Crossings, A collaborative effort of Twin Cities road and trail managing agencies, July 2011. Q' Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding, Metropolitan Council, October 2011. Q' Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part I and II: Best Practices Design Guide (FHWA); ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas (United States Access Board); and ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (U.S. Access Board). Q' Guidance for Three Rivers Park District Trail Crossings, Determining Effective Trail Crossing Practices in TRPD Parks and Public Rights -of - Way, SRF Consulting Group, Inc., December 2013. Throughout the design process of Baker/Carver Regional Trail, the Park District will work closely with the local community to design the trail in a manner that has the greatest public benefit and least amount of private property impacts. Additional Trail Elements Trail identity, crossings, wayfinding, traffic signage and devices, rest stops, drainage, and trailheads are important elements of regional trails. Their proper design and placement add both aesthetic and functional value to the trail. Unifying, Desirable Corridor As a destination regional trail, a primary design goal is to create a sense of place along the regional trail and an enjoyable trail user experience. Designing the trail with unifying elements and incorporating local parks and adjacent natural resources will help achieve this goal. Unifying elements may include distinctive trail design, wayfinding signage, rest stops, and trail crossings. Where it is not possible to utilize parkland or acquire a wider corridor width, it is desirable to incorporate other enhancements that help evoke a sense of place such as wide tree - lined boulevards and buffers from adjacent land uses. Trail/Road Crossings There are several locations where the regional trail crosses roadways and in which careful attention to detail is required to provide a safe and user friendly crossing. The types of trail crossing treatments will be designed in accordance with industry best standards to ensure conflicts between trail users and roadway traffic are minimal. In all cases, existing roadway configuration, infrastructure elements, vegetation, and other potential visual obstructions will be evaluated so sight lines can be maintained. Special provisions, such as mirrors, may be added to improve trail visibility from driveways if deemed appropriate. As vehicular traffic fluctuates, there may be a need for additional traffic signals or modifications to existing signalized intersections. These type of design considerations and trail enhancements will be addressed during the trail design phase. Wetland and Floodplain Crossing There are portions of the regional trail that will traverse wetlands and floodplains. In these instances, the regional trail design may incorporate bridges, boardwalks, and other creative solutions to minimize potential natural resources impacts while maintaining a contiguous and continuous trail corridor. Design and implementation of bridges and boardwalks will be coordinated with the appropriate regulatory agencies to ensure all requirements are met and any potential impacts are minimized. Wayfinding Regional trail wayfinding signage provides trail users with orientation and location information for amenities and services. Wayfinding signage typically provides: Q' An overview map of the Park District's regional trail system and the specific regional trail. Q' Directions and distances to major destinations and points of interest along the regional trail. 34 Three Rivers Park District Q' Directions for long-term detours or interim routes when there are gaps within the regional trail. Q' Location information for nearby amenities such as local parks and local trails. Q' Location information for nearby services, such as drinking water, public restrooms, and public parking. Q' Visual identification of the regional trail network through physical kiosk/signage structures. The Park District employs three types of wayfinding signage structures: system kiosks, regional trail kiosks, and directional signage. System Kiosks. A free-standing, roofed structure that provides trail users with a map of Three Rivers' Regional Park and Trail System, the regional trail rules, and general information about the Park District. Regional Trail Kiosks. A free-standing, roofed structure that provides trail users with an aerial map, a description of trail highlights, and a map of the entire regional trail that depicts local Table 3 Wayfnding Signage Configurations (2014 dollars) trails, amenities, and services near the regional trail. Directional Sign. A post structure with description blades attached, depicting the direction, the name, and the distance to major destinations and points of interest on the trail. Each post structure has the capability of holding up to 12 description blades. Placement of wayfinding signage structures along regional trails typically follows one of three configurations listed as Level A, B or C (Table 3). The Park District wayfinding is intended to complement and work in collaboration with local and regional wayfinding efforts as well as adjacent land uses and development initiatives. There may be conditions along the regional trail corridor where the wayfinding signage is altered or otherwise enhanced to better serve the trail user and appropriately fit the surrounding environment. One example of where flexibility may be appropriate is at the Luce Line State Trail, as this segment of the regional trail is owned/operated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and a modification to the Location Components Estimated Cost Beginning/end of regional trail and at halfway point if regional trail is greater than 10 miles.* Q'System kiosk Q'Regional trail kiosk Q' Directional signage $45,000 Includes all signage and concrete pad, Level B ll�� Location Components Estimated Cost Approximately every two miles along regional trail. For new Level B locations, consider establishing on trail's north side.* Q' Regional trail kiosk Q'Directional signage $28,500 Includes all signage and concrete pad. Level C Location Components Estimated Cost Approximately every mile along regional trail. For new Level C locations, consider establishing at intersections with other regional trails or comprehensive trail systems (not trail spurs).* Q'Directional signage $9,000 *Exact location and content determined in conjunction with local community input. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 35 kiosk recognizing both agencies' interests may be appropriate. The wayfinding plan for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail includes signage at strategic delineated points (Figure 12). The exact location and content of wayfinding signage will be determined in conjunction with local community input and is often dictated by available public right-of-way. Traffic Signage & Devices In addition to wayfinding signage, the regional trail will incorporate traffic control signs and devices, such as trail stop signs and center line pavement markings. These signs and devices will reflect the physical characteristics and usability of individual trail segments and the system as a whole. The cost to add traffic control signs and devices, including striping, to a regional trail is approximately $1 per linear foot (2014 dollars). Rest Stops Rest stops are generally located every mile and provide places for trail users to stop and rest along the trail and an area for amenities such as trash receptacles, benches, and bicycle racks. These simple but important amenities can serve to reinforce the identity of the regional trail route and better support trail users with mobility challenges. General locations for rest stops are listed in Section IV, Trail Route Description and Development Concept and will be further evaluated during the design phase. The rest stop design may be modified to best meet the available right-of-way, adjacent land use, and complimentary facilities such as a bus stop. The cost per rest stop is approximately $5,600 each (2014 dollars). Drainage In locations where the regional trail is adjacent to a roadway, the drainage of the regional trail is similar to that of a typical sidewalk. Stormwater sheet flows over the trail pavement and onto adjacent urban roadways, where it is collected and conveyed by the roadway stormwater drainage system. In areas where the regional trail is on an independent route, such as through parks or other green spaces, or adjacent to rural road segments, alternative stormwater best management practices, such as rain gardens and infiltration swales, may be explored during the design phase of the regional trail. Stormwater must shed rapidly from the surface of the trail and not pool on the trail surface to prevent hazardous situations for the users. Design of stormwater management practices will be coordinated with regulatory and other affected parties to ensure all requirements are met and any potential impacts are minimized. Trailheads Large regional and community parks, as well as public facilities along the regional trail corridor that are easy to locate, will function as de facto trailheads simply by the nature of their existence and their offerings (i.e. water, parking, restrooms, benches, rest facilities, and picnic areas). While no specific improvements are planned to any of the possible Baker/Carver Regional Trail trailhead locations as a part of the Master Plan, this will be furthered evaluated as a part of the design phase as there may be scenarios where additional trailhead improvements are necessary to adequately support the regional trail while not negatively affecting the existing function of facilities. This will be further evaluated if warranted by demand. The Park District will collaborate with local communities where trailhead improvements are necessary. It is anticipated that the following existing public facilities will serve as key trailheads to the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail: ❑ City of Victoria and Laketown Township: Carver Park Reserve ❑ City of Minnetrista: Gale Woods Farm and Kingswood Park ❑ City of Independence: Luce Line State Trail at CR 110 (currently only parking) ❑ City of Maple Plain: Currently no designated facilities ❑ City of Medina: Baker Park Reserve 36 Three Rivers Park District Wayfinding and Rest Stop Facilities 0 Level A ® Level B Level C • Trail Segment Breaks Luce Line State Trail Minnetrista Whale Tail Lake Independence Kingswood Park Gale Woods Farm Carver Park Reserve Laketown Township Figure 12 Wayfinding Locations Source: Three Rivers Park District Lake Minnetonka Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Victoria Sources. Esri, HERE, DeLorme omTom, Intermap, increment P Corp.. GEBCO. USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Geo Base, IGN, Kadgrster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, 06penStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 37 This page left intentionally blank 38 Three Rivers Park District Operations & Maintenance Plan Three Rivers Park District will operate the Baker/Carver Regional Trail using a wide variety of professional staff and in accordance with Park District policies, guidelines, and ordinances. The ordinances define the rules and regulations to provide for the safe and peaceful use of the parks and corresponding facilities; for the educational and recreational benefits and enjoyment of the public; for the protection and preservation of the property, facilities and natural resources; and for the safety and general welfare of the public. The current Park District ordinances define regional trail hours as 5 AM to 10 PM. The Park District's present policy provides for the operation and maintenance of regional trails from April 1 to November 14. As such, the Park District is not anticipating plowing or otherwise maintaining the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail during the winter season. Local communities may elect to operate and maintain the regional trail segment during winter months with a winter use permit. The Park District may revise this policy at a future date and elect to operate and maintain the trail year-round. Regional trail staffing levels fluctuate to account for seasonal use patterns, maintenance requirements, and available funding. Public Safety Three Rivers Park District Public Safety Department is the law enforcement agency responsible for providing a safe environment for regional trail users. Public Safety officers strive to provide an excellent experience for our visitors by protecting the facilities, trails, and natural resources of the Park District. The main goal of Public Safety is to educate park guests on the use of the parks and the Three Rivers Park District Ordinances and state statutes. The Public Safety Department is a full -service POST -recognized law enforcement agency comprised of command staff, administrative staff, Park Police Officers, and campground and large event security. The Public Safety Section is further supported by a volunteer Trail Patrol program and the statewide mutual aid program which facilitates the sharing of public safety resources in times of emergency or other unusual conditions. This program serves to facilitate assistance from surrounding police agencies. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 39 Patrol Plan Public Safety Officers and volunteers will patrol the Baker/Carver Regional Trail utilizing a variety of specialized patrol methods. Patrol frequencies will be adjusted as necessary to account for trail use, incident level, other concerns which may arise, and available funding. In addition to routine patrol, Park District Public Safety Officers may be dispatched through the Hennepin County Dispatch System to respond to incidences as they occur. Public Safety Staffing Due to the creative deployment of existing Park Police Officers, utilization of seasonal staff, statewide mutual aid program, and a successful Trail Patrol volunteer program, no additional full- time Public Safety positions are anticipated to serve the Baker/Carver Regional Trail. As such, no additional operational funds are needed to provide public safety services along the Regional Trail. Natural & Cultural Resources The Natural Resource Department is responsible for restoring and protecting natural resources such as native plant communities, wildlife diversity and water quality on Park District property. The Natural Resources Department is comprised of Forestry Management, Wildlife Management and Water Resources Management. The Cultural Resource Section is responsible for identification, evaluation, protection, restoration, and interpretation of cultural resources on Park District property. Resource Protection Plan Baker/Carver Regional Trail is routed in a manner to maximize the access and enjoyment of remaining natural resources corridors and areas of cultural significance through western Hennepin County. The Park District will operate and maintain the regional trail corridor to highlight and not negatively affect the adjacent natural and cultural resources. In recognition of the natural and culturally interesting areas that the regional trail passes through or adjacent to, the Park District will utilize best management practices to minimize any potential impacts on those resources, work with adjacent property owners on how to best protect and manage significant resources, and incorporate opportunities to enjoy and interpret the resources. In the event the Park District acquires additional property along the regional trail which encompasses significant natural or cultural resources, the Park District will develop a stewardship plan specific to that resource and in accordance with other Park District natural and cultural resource management plans. Potential natural or cultural resource impacts as a result of trail design and construction are addressed in Section IV, Trail Route Description and Development Concept and Section V, Design Guidance. Resource Staffing Approximately a third of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is routed through existing parkland that is currently already receiving natural and cultural resource management. The width of the remaining trail corridor will vary from as little as 16 feet wide to possibly several hundred feet wide; however, it is anticipated that the majority of the trail corridor will be narrower with limited natural and cultural resources. Areas of significant width will be more of the exception than the rule and directly relate to the resource value, direct and indirect costs, recreation benefit, willingness of the property owner, and support of the local municipality. To account for minimal resource management along the trail corridor, additional seasonal or contract staffing such as Conservation Corps Minnesota is anticipated at an annual expense of $5,000 (2014 dollars). Maintenance The Park District Maintenance Department is responsible to maintain parks and trails in a safe, clean, and usable manner. The Maintenance Department provides both typical, routine maintenance such as mowing, sweeping, and trash clean-up as well as specialized maintenance such as small building construction, non -paved trail repair, and grooming. 40 Three Rivers Park District The Maintenance Department is comprised of a wide variety of highly skilled and trained maintenance professionals including carpenters, mechanics, park workers, and electricians complemented by seasonal staff. Maintenance Plan Maintenance operations will include seasonal condition assessments and periodic inspections, followed by necessary maintenance actions. Inspections will address possible safety issues, vandalism and non -routine maintenance concerns. The Park District will also respond to maintenance issues identified by the public on a timely basis as funding permits. Extraordinary maintenance occurs in response to storm damage, vandalism or other unplanned circumstances. Routine maintenance is outlined below. April and May: Sign inventory and replacement, spring cleanup, minor bridge and underpass repair, as needed. June, July, August and September: Erosion repair, fence repair, sign and post replacement, trash pickup, bridge and boardwalk repair (as needed). October and November: Bituminous patching and striping replacement, as needed. Throughout the season and/or in response to storm -related damage: Mowing, periodic trail sweeping, trash pick-up, general clean-up, and similar tasks. Maintenance of regional trail segments with limited property rights or segments that do not meet standard regional trail characteristics may require atypical maintenance. The majority of the equipment necessary to provide routine maintenance of the Baker/ Carver Regional Trail will be shared with the Baker and Carver Work Clusters. Some tools and equipment specific to this regional trail may be needed to adequately and efficiently maintain the regional trail. A onetime expense of $100,000 (2014 dollars) is anticipated to cover the cost of additional maintenance equipment which may include an additional vehicle, mower, trailer, electric utility cart, tool cat and implements, and miscellaneous hand and power tools. Specialized maintenance is outlined below. Preventative Surface Treatment: Baker/ Carver Regional Trail will receive scheduled striping, seal coating and redevelopment under the Park District's pavement management program and in accordance with Park District standards and as funding permits. Pavement management is a systematic method for tracking and addressing pavement conditions at a District -wide level. The Park District will also seek opportunities to work with Hennepin County and local cities in conjunction with road projects to improve trail design and surfacing. Trail/Bridge Inspection and Maintenance: Trails are inspected annually in the spring as part of the pre -season maintenance program and are then inspected periodically by Park District maintenance staff as part of ongoing operations. Minor trail repair is handled on a timely basis, and probable major repair needs are evaluated and recommended to Park District management for planning or engineering review. Major trail rehabilitation projects are submitted to the Park District Board of Commissioners for funding as part of the annual operating budget, preservation and rehabilitation program, or capital improvement program. The ownership and maintenance responsibilities associated with new pedestrian bridges constructed as part of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail will be determined when the bridges move into the design development phase. Bridges owned by MnDOT are the responsibility of MnDOT. The Park District only maintains the trail use of said bridges and underpasses. Maintenance includes sweeping, cleaning and painting as necessary. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 41 Noxious Weed Management: The Park District mechanically or chemically removes noxious weeds within the defined trail corridor at the request of cities. Edge/Trail Shoulder Vegetation Management: The Park District will maintain vegetative clearances so as not to negatively affect trail use on any sections where trail shoulder vegetation exists. Regional Trail Maintenance Staffing The Baker/Carver Regional Trail will be primarily maintained by the Baker and Carver Work Clusters which provide maintenance services to four park reserves, two regional parks (one undeveloped), three special recreation facilities (one undeveloped), three regional trails, and the Lake Minnetonka Islands. The inclusion of the regional trail will add an additional 11.35 miles (5.69 miles already existing/maintained) of regional trail maintenance responsibilities. These Work Clusters will be further impacted by the future development of Lake Sarah Regional Park and Kingswood Special Recreation Feature. In consideration of the future increased responsibilities within these Work Clusters, an additional 0.5 FTE maintenance position is needed to provide regional trail maintenance in accordance with current Park District regional trail maintenance practices and procedures. At the time the Baker/Carver Regional Trail is complete, routine maintenance operation costs including additional staffing are estimated to increase by $26,500/year in 2014 dollars. Additional costs for trail surface preservation and rehabilitation (trail surface repairs, striping requirements, and pavement requirements) are anticipated to increase by $33,000/year assuming a 30-year pavement life. The combined annual maintenance operation estimated cost for both route and trail surface preventative maintenance is $59,500/year. This equates to an estimated $0.37/trail visit. These costs will be included in the Park District's annual Asset Management Program. In the event, the development of rain gardens, best management practices, or other mitigation requirements require ongoing maintenance, additional seasonal staffing may be required to complete the work. If necessary, seasonal staffing budgets will be developed and evaluated during the design development phase. General Operation Considerations Sustainability The Park District's 2012 Sustainability Plan guides the Park District's efforts toward achieving established sustainability goals and targets by outlining broad strategies for organizational implementation. The following goals provide broad guidance and intent to Park District sustainability efforts: ❑ Manage and operate District parklands and facilities in a manner that ensures ecologic, financial and social integrity of the park system in perpetuity. ❑ Reduce dependence on fossil fuels to minimize green house gas (GHG) emissions and reduce public expenditures. ❑ Reduce the amount of waste sent to the incinerator and landfill to minimize costs and GHG emissions. ❑ Preserve groundwater supplies in the Twin Cities metropolitan area to ensure that current and future water needs can be met. ❑ Reduce Park District environmental impacts to demonstrate (or model) organizational commitment to environmental stewardship. ❑ Provide opportunities for public education and involvement in Park District sustainability initiatives. ❑ Design parks and trails that maximize the ability of the public to use non -motorized transportation. To move towards sustainability targets for GHG emissions, waste, and groundwater consumption reduction for the years 2015, 2025, and 2050, the Park District will focus on the following areas of implementation: facility systems, vehicles/ equipment and fuel use, waste management, groundwater conservation, sustainable work 42 Three Rivers Park District practices, public education and advocacy and system planning and development. The Park District strives to utilize appropriate sustainable best management practices and guidelines such as the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (B3 Project) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Development (LEED) Rating System on construction projects. Public Awareness The Park District's Marketing Communications Department manages a centralized marketing communications function that oversees public relations, marketing, media relations, the website, brand management, event planning and promotion. A number of effective marketing and outreach tools are used to promote the Park District, including but not limited to an annual distribution of District - wide map, the website, direct mail, press releases, centralized reservation system, feedback phone line, brochures, ads and on -site promotion. The Park District collaborates with a wide array of community, business and government organizations to promote its facilities, programs and services, and to educate the public about its resources. The Park District also works with the Metropolitan Council Regional Parks System and the State Office of Tourism to leverage shared opportunities for creating awareness and visibility and works with the county agencies to provide information about scholarship programs available to individuals receiving economic assistance. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 43 This page left intentionally blank 44 Three Rivers Park District Implementation, Estimated Costs, & Funding Construction of a new 17-mile regional trail spanning six communities will occur as opportunities present themselves and as resources allow. The timing of implementation is also dependent on the acquisition of the corridor which, under a willing seller approach, may take decades to realize. Implementation will be phased as available land and financial resources prohibit the entire corridor from being constructed as one project in the near future. A phased approach allows for trail segments to be constructed in a logical manner and respond to the demand and support from the local community, collaboration with other projects, and maximizing internal and external funding opportunities. In addition, implementation will occur at the discretion of the Park District Board of Commissioners and only when the Park District is financially prepared to assume the operation and maintenance responsibilities and costs of the regional trail. Acquisition Plan and Costs Property rights are already in place for over 9.5 miles of the 17-mile corridor and held by the Park District, Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (Dakota Rail Regional Trail corridor), and/or Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Luce Line State Trail). The acquisition requirements to create a continuous and contiguous corridor include the acquisition of an additional 7.5 miles. At minimum, there are 4.82 miles in which an additional one to ten feet of regional trail right-of-way are needed along existing road corridors (assuming for planning and cost estimating purposes only, an average acquisition width of 5 feet, this equates to 2.92 acres) and 2.1 miles in which an additional 20 feet of regional trail right-of-way are needed to create an independent trail corridor (5.1 acres). There may be additional acquisition opportunities to acquire a wider trail corridor and ultimately create a more desirable trail corridor by buffering the trail from surrounding development and by incorporating areas of natural or cultural resource significance directly into the corridor. As such, the acquisition needs presented in the master plan are the minimal acquisition requirements to achieve a continuous and contiguous corridor. The acquisition of the required land will follow a willing seller approach. As such, acquisition will occur when land -owners are ready and interested in selling their property or are considering development of their property - providing an opportunity to negotiate the designation of the regional trail corridor as part of development. The Park District will work with property owners and Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 45 the local municipality to explore creative acquisition strategies such as easements, lot splits, resale of surplus property, transfer of development rights, and similar to best meet the needs and expectations of all involved parties. Due to the willing seller approach, the acquisition phase may take decades to fully realize. The minimum estimated property rights acquisition cost is $435,700 (2014 dollars) for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail. Development Plan and Costs Approximately 5.7 miles of the Baker/Carver Regional Trail are already constructed and open to the public. The development costs for the remaining 11.3 miles include all foreseeable costs to construct the trail to regional trail standards including site preparation, reconfiguration and upgrade of rural to urban roadways (addition of curb and gutter), modification of drainage patterns, storm water treatment, bridges and boardwalks, wetland mitigation, utility relocation, and installation of signage, striping, kiosks, rest stops, landscaping, and similar support elements (Appendix F). Table 5 Implementation & Funding Plan (2014 dollars) Anticipated Implementation Potential Funding Sources Segment A 10+ yrs. - Following completion of acquisition. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Downtown Maple Plain Desirable to coordinate with future road work. ❑ Met Council CIP Grant ❑ Hennepin County Bikeway Grant ❑ Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant ❑ Federal Transportation Grant Segment B Trail construction complete. Luce Line State Trail Wayfinding/rest stops: TBD - When significant continuous/ contiguous segment is established. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Segment C 15+ yrs. - Following completion of acquisition. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Kingswood Desirable to coordinate with future road work for road based segments and/or future development ❑ Met Council CIP Grant of Kingswood Park. ❑ Hennepin County Bikeway Grant ❑ Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant Segment D 15+ yrs. - simultaneously or following completion of connection to Kingswood Park. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Gale Woods Farm ❑ Met Council CIP Grant ❑ Hennepin County Bikeway Grant ❑ Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant Segment E Trail construction complete. Dakota Rail Regional Trail Wayfinding/rest stops: TBD - When significant continuous/ contiguous segment is established. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Segment F 10+ yrs. - Following completion of acquisition. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Six Mile Marsh ❑ Met Council CIP Grant Desirable to coordinate with future road work for road -based segments. ❑ Hennepin County Bikeway Grant ❑ Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant Segment G Reconstruction at end of local trail's useful life and/or completion of adjacent trail segments. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Woodland Cove Segment H 2O19/2020 - Following construction of Woodland ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Cove Development and increased demand as a Carver Park Reserve I result of —1,100 new residential units. ❑ Met Council CIP Grant ❑ Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant Segment I Trail construction complete. Carver Park Reserve II 2019 or later for wayfinding signage- when significant continuous/ contiguous segment is established. ❑ Future Park District GO Bonds Source: Three Rivers Park District 46 Three Rivers Park District In recognition of the anticipated acquisition phase duration and amount of resources and coordination necessary to construct the remaining 11.3 miles of regional trail, it is anticipated that this trail will not be fully constructed and opened for public use for another 20 to 30 years. Regional trail development will be phased and significantly tied to opportunities that take advantage of external funding sources, road reconstruction projects, development initiatives, and local and regional political will. A very preliminary implementation and funding plan is summarized in Table 5. The estimated master planning level construction cost estimate for the unbuilt trail sections is $10.3 million (2014 dollars). Acquisition and Development Funding Acquisition and development funding will likely come from a variety of sources. A summary of potential funding sources follows: ❑ Federal Transportation Grants (Map 21) ❑ Metropolitan Council/State of Minnesota: Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program, Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Acquisition Account, Parks and Trails Legacy Fund Acquisition Account ❑ Federal Recreation Trail Grant Program ❑ Hennepin County Bikeway Grant Program ❑ Park District General Obligation Bonds ❑ Local Municipality, Watershed District, and other Agency Contributions ❑ Fundraising/Donations Operations & Maintenance Cost Summary The Operations and Maintenance Plan is included in Section VI, Operations and Maintenance. A summary of staffing needs and one-time and annual expenses necessary to operate and maintain the regional trail to current Park District standards and practices as well as potential funding sources is provided (Table 6). Table 6 Operations & Maintenance Cost Summary (2014 dollars) One-time Expense (equipment or similar) Staffing Annual Operation & Maintenance Costs Public Safety N/A No new FTE Expansion of Volunteer Patrol N/A Natural & Cultural Resources N/A No new FTE Seasonal/Contract Staffing Varies $5,000 Maintenance $100,000 0.5 FTE Seasonal/Contract Staffing Varies $60,000 ($26,500 for routine maintenance - Operation Budget and $33,000 for pavement management program - Asset Management Program) Summary/Total $100,000 0.5 FTE Seasonal/Contract Staffing Various Depending on Need Expansion of Volunteer Patrol $65,000 Potential Funding Sources Operation costs for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail will be primarily funded through the Park District Operating Budget. The Operating Budget's primary source of funds is local property taxes with some revenue from the State of Minnesota as part of the Operations and Maintenance Fund allocations from the Metropolitan Council. Additional costs associated with pavement maintenance will be funded from the Park District's Asset Management Program, which includes revenue allocated to the Park District from the State of Minnesota as well as the Park District general obligation bonds. All operation and maintenance costs are subject to the annual operating budget preparation process approved by the Park District Board of Commissioners. Source: Three Rivers Park District Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 47 This page left intentionally blank 48 Three Rivers Park District Resolutions of Support Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 49 This page left intentionally blank 50 Three Rivers Park District CITY OF INDEPENDENCE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 14-0325-01 A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN FOR A REGIONAL TRAIL BETWEEN CARVER AND BAKER PARK RESERVES WHEREAS, The City of Independence and the City of Maple Plain ("Cities") recognizes a Regional Trail between Carver and Baker Park Reserves is an important component of the regional parks system that serves residents of the Cities and the region; and WHEREAS, The Cities recognizes that Three Rivers Park District has gathered _significant_..public .._input ....in .._the_._de_v_elopment of the master plan _.for_. a Regional .Trail _ between Carver and Baker Park Reserves and is supportive of the trail going through the Maple Plain downtown area; and WHEREAS, The Cities recognizes that Three Rivers Park District has drafted the Proposed Master Plan for a Regional Trail between Carver and Baker Park Reserves; and WHEREAS, The Cities supports the management and development of the Regional Trail between Carver and Baker Park Reserves pursuant to the Three Rivers Park District Master Plan, and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Independence and the City of Maple Plain supports the Regional Trail Master and hereby recommends that Three Rivers Park District manage and develop the Regional Trail within the conditions and guidelines delineated by the District's Board of Commissioners in the Master Plan. This resolution was introduced by L��n�.la .Members voting in favor: �� � � Members voting against: n . Members absent: . The resolution was passed by the Independence City Council this the 25th day of March and by the Maple Plain City Council the 10th day of March, 2014. Mayor, Marvin D. Johnson L./ ATTEST: Toni Hirsch City Administrator, City of Independence May f Ac \vt ' fair e fYl V o-o n-) ATTEST: Tessia Melvin City Administrator, City of Maple Plain Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 51 RESOLUTION NO. 5q % 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED PARKS, TRAILS, AND OPEN SPACE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE MINNETRISTA REGIONAL TRAIL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Minnetrista is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, it has become necessary for the City to amend its Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan to include more detail regarding the alignment and design of a regional trail (Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan); WHEREAS, the City has conducted a public engagement process regarding the evaluation criteria and proposed alignment of the future regional trail; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Minnetrista hereby approves a Plan Amendment to the Parks, Trails, and Open Space plan to incorporate the Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan, with the following condition: 1) The city of Minnetrista has not in the past, nor will it in the future, use eminent domain to acquire land for trails. The City will use a "willing seller approach" to land acquisition for trails. A "willing seller approach" means that the city will acquire land for trails only from property owners who are willing to convey their land after fair and arms -length negotiations. The city will not use eminent domain (the power of condemnation) to acquire land for trails. This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Minnetrista on this 7th day of May, 2012 by a vote of Ayes and L Nays. atrianko) ATTEST: Te Haaretad. City C Te ri Haarstad, City Cler (SEAL) Mayor Che ,I Fischer 52 Three Rivers Park District STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The undersigned, duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Minnetrista, hereby certifies that the attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original: Res. No. 59-12 Approving an Amendment to the Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan to Incorporate the Minnetrista Regional Trail Master Plan on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Minnetrista. 97‘aerr-lo.-e Tern Haarstad City Clerk Dated this 18th day of June 2012. (City Seal) Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 53 This page left intentionally blank 54 Three Rivers Park District Visitation Estimate Methodology Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 55 This page left intentionally blank 56 Three Rivers Park District 1� 1'hreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Research & Evaluation Section Visitation Estimate Methodology September 11, 2014 Projected Visits to the Baker/Carver Regional Trail = 183,000 According to the Met Council, Lake Independence Regional Trail attracted 57,400 visits during 2013. The proposed regional trail should generate at least this many visits due to the following similarities: ❑ Both trails connect to the Luce Line State Trail. ❑ Both trails connect to Baker Park Reserve, which contains a 200 site campground and many miles of paved multi -use trails. ❑ Both trails travel through rural areas of western Hennepin County. The proposed regional trail should attract an additional 40,000 visits at minimum due to the following unique features: ❑ Proposed regional trail will provide connection to a wide variety or recreation opportunities by offering direct access to Carver Park Reserve, Lake Minnetonka Regional Park, Gale Woods Farm, and Camp Kingswood. ❑ Portions of proposed regional trail will not be immediately adjacent to roadways and be within a larger green corridor making it more aesthetically pleasing than the Lake Independence Regional Trail. ❑ Proposed regional trail will pass through the city of Maple Plain, which has a population 1,800 people. An additional 85,909 visits are projected for the proposed regional trail due to its connection with the Dakota Rail Regional Trail and Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail: ❑ The Dakota Rail Regional Trail attracted 464,800 visits during 2013 and based on a 2009 visitor study conducted by Three Rivers Park District, 62 percent of Dakota Rail Regional Trail visits passed through the area where the proposed regional trail intersects the Dakota Rail Regional Trail. This calculates to 288,176 visits (0.62 x 464,800). If the proposed regional trail is accessed by a conservative estimate of 20 percent of these visits, 57,635 visits will be added. ❑ The Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail attracted 415,800 visits during 2013 and based on a 2009 visitor study conducted by Three Rivers Park District, 34 percent of Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail visits passed through the area where the proposed regional trail intersects the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail. This calculates to 141,372 visits (0.34 x 415,800). If the proposed regional trail is again accessed by a conservative estimate of 20 percent of these visits, 28,274 visits will be added. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 57 This page left intentionally blank 58 Three Rivers Park District Regional Trail Segmentation Maps Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 59 This page left intentionally blank 60 Three Rivers Park District Maple Plain Downtown Maple Plain Future Railroad Crossing Independence CR 6 Northside Park Main Street/CR 19 Existing HAWK Signal Medina Orono Sources, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmy India, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Proposed Regional Trail 1 Segment A Status: Tentative Construction 10+ Years Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning Department - HK August 12, 2014 This GIS Data is provide,as is. without warranty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, or completeness limitations of the Plal ndvding the fact accepts Data imic and is Plata, constant stare or maintenance, correction, and update. 1� - ThreeRivers NORTH PARK DISTRICT 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles I I I Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 61 Rd 31, I wncr fig Vial e•trvrn rig i Independence r` Annsts on u',e'1 fi 1 l urns.( Rd 4<a�� s'9 Jee V Fort. Rid Minnetrista — ❑rake Dr /H�9hw pY'12 � 1- -Nia111 SI Sr' Henry Rs TITve Maple Plain Timber T w l (,lhs .,tl �I116 N Sources'. Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS. NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community - Proposed Regional Trail 1 Segment B Status: Constructed (Aggregate)/Open to the Public Map prepared by Three Rivers PaM District Planning Department - HKAugust 12, 2014 of y eData provideduianrataccracy,t completeness 1lof the oat acknowledges ggthe fact accepts Data Isdynamicand is in a constant slate of maintenance, mrrechon, and update. l - ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT NORTH 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Miles 1 I 1 I 62 Three Rivers Park District E V 11d.1i e N Derr ueel, Nd 307 m Independence Minnetrista 1 <:h11ny 31P m Kingswood Park 5 Sources'. Esri, HERE, DeLorme TomTorn In a p. increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase. IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Suivey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributond the GIS User Community Proposed Regional Trail I Segment C Status: Tentative Construction 15+ Years Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning Department - PK August 12, 2014 Th. GIS Data is provided 'las is. without warranty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the Data acknowledges ggthe fact accepts Data Is dynamic and Is In a constant state of maintenance, correction, and update. l - ThreeRivers NORTH PARK DISTRICT 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Miles I I t I Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 63 Gale Woods Farm Active Farm Area Boys & Girls Club Pasture Sources. Esn, HERE, De Lorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NROAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), sstopo, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Proposed Regional Trail I Segment D Status: Tentative Construction 15+ Years Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning Department • RK on August 8, SOU TIM GIS Gates is provided "as is" without warranty completenessclang of The as owl dge a a, timeliness, ccepts the limitations of the Data, including the fact that the Data is dynamic and is in a constant mate or maintenance, correction, and update. lam. ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT NORTH 0 0.035 0.07 0.14 Miles I I I 64 Three Rivers Park District I sallW b 0 .LDRLLSIQ NNW sian.iva.��,L �f 1 1 1 Z0 L0 0 ,epan pee eousaLe, .aoueuaLLseLu aLeLs LueLsuoe a ui si pue suueuAp s eae4 am ievn�w avifisu�pni�n e,ea avuna u,�i au, eepe,ueeaa iLue,o Rlee,leM)nep)IM,,l se„SIO syi ,N1a mea:+a ..a ae,vi ea pe,eae,a aew , oiIgnd ay} o} uadoma}onu}suoo :sn}e}g 3 luatubas 1 Heil pasodom iasN s10 aye pue'voinquwoo devoaa4suad0 Op 'e!purAwdeW'odoles!Ms'(6uoy 6uo1.1) eu!y0 us3'1131,1'uedep 5anins aoueupo IN JalsepeN'N01'asegoa0'Neo N'sdN'OVd'sesl'00g30`dho0d 1uawanui'wolwol'awuoia0'3?J3H'Psg:saanos e}su}sauuiw I le�l Joloauu00 LW e� spooM ape u!IV a5lel Ilelele4M eisulauwW Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 Minnetrista Six Mile Marsh Area Gtee� \sl`�e 6\1' West Tonka Recreation Area Halsted Bay Future Boardwalk/Bridge �y Sources'. Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, SGS, FAO, NPS. NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri hina (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmy India, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Com nity Proposed Regional Trail I Segment F Status: Tentative Construction 10+ Years Map prepared by Three Rivers Pa. District Planning Department - HK Augus111, 2014 This GIS Data provided "as is" without warranty of any representattonotaccuracy, timeliness, or the llmilz4o softhe Data acknowledges ggthe fact accepts Data is dynamic and is in a constant stale of maintenance, correction, and update. l ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT NORTH 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles II I I I 66 Three Rivers Park District Halsted Bay Kings Point Road Park District Property 1 112:5-.1.1"11.Carver Park Reserve iFuture Boardwalk litisi iFuture Boardwalk il: Future Boardwalk m 1 6-Future Boardwalk Woodland Cove Development Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Connection (2019-2020) Sources'. Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Proposed Regional Trail I Segment G Status: Tenative Reconstruction of Alternate Route G1 20+ years -or- Tentative Construction of Alternate Route G2 10 + years Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning Department - HK August 11. 2014 This GIS Data is provided "as is. without warranty f y representation of accepts the limitations of the Data, uin lutlry completeness, Irmekness, or g tact that the Data Isdyn mic and Is in a constant angt state of maintenance, correction, and update. - ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT NORTH 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles i 1 i 1 1 I Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 67 Park District Property Existing Underpass Grimm Farm, 4- picnic areas, and archery Carver Park Reserve ,4vo Lake Minnetonka Regional Park LOTUS DR I'I N C.4R\'FR———'---- Lowry Nature Center a Laketown Township Victoria Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Proposed Regional Trail I Segment H Status: Tentative Construction 2019/2020 Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District Planning DeparMent • HKAugust 27, 2014 This GIS Data is provided 'as is. vnthout warranty of any representation or accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. The a acknowledges and accepts th!ns of the Gala, including the Fad that he NORTH l ThreeRwers PARK DISTRICT 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 Miles I 68 Three Rivers Park District 17TOZ aaquaanoN 'ue/d aalseti/ //eal /euo/6ad aanaeD/aaNeg • Maintenance Facility MEM Lowry Nature Center Laketown Township Carver Park Reserve Victoria ®EI Sources: Esri. HERE. DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, U, S, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisslopo, Mapmylndia, © Open StreelMa"ntributors, and the'GIS User Community Proposed Regional Trail 1 Segment I Status: Constructed/Open to the Public Map prepared by Three Rivers Park District This GIS Data Is provided "as is" without warranty of any representation of accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. The user acknowledges and accepts the limitations of the Data, including the fact that the Data is dynamic and is in a constant state of maintenance, correction. and update. ® Play Area Eg Boat Launch p. Campground ® Dog Off -leash Area El Fishing Pier © Lowry Nature Center ® Swimming Area ® Group Camp NORTH 0 0.1 0.2 I I III I f� ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT 0.4 Miles 1 I This page left intentionally blank 70 Three Rivers Park District Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) Map Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 71 This page left intentionally blank 72 Three Rivers Park District Pioneer Ir,� Creek Golf 1 aAr Course Wlndsong Farm Goa Club ar. ti+Ai IaAr Minnetrissta �I Laketown Twnshp Island View Goa Club ,urger Rd . Independence'. o.•"' 11-7 'alto f A .r s a. ahb Lake Golt Club N Arm Dr Lakeview Golf Course Mound Mound �1^^ I aAr e\ P. r rlr,dl5 Hay % t., Arne Spring Park Mae& b Lake Enchanted Island Medina 1 aA, Orono 6s, Orono \ sp,„g Lark Ray Lake Minnetonka Shorewood 322 m sr., rod/ na!r Novionbetg Memorial Gardens ryefn/ ` ltr v Latayette Club s t Lit/Ovid/ u 4a Ray Lakr Lake M'mnawaslYs �liaa rnva.h la Regional Park Old \ nu, ud ot, P sm,tnronn as L. Minnetonka Country Club Chanhassen m l+rJ Sources' Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TorriTD'm'; 1(itermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Geo Bese, IGN, Kadaster NL,'IOP nance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Nlapjnyrlr�ja, O ©penStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Baker/Carver Regional Trail Minnesota Land Cover Classification System I I Artificial Surfaces - Woodland Nonvascular Vegetation Planted or Cultivated Vegetation III Shrubland Sparse Vegetation - Forests Herbaceous I Water a D.5 i 2 Miles I ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT NORTH TnreGISData ,=provtd. 'as is. without warranty ofany representation accuracy, timeliness, orcompleteness The user acknowledges a the !Imitations ofthe Data includ therarthat reDa. , r mcandisinaconstant of nremtenance, correction, a. update. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 73 This page left intentionally blank 74 Three Rivers Park District Property Acquisition Map Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 75 This page left intentionally blank 76 Three Rivers Park District Minnetrista Whale Tart Lake La ketow n Twnshp Independence i I t 1 I I I lI 7 Kingswood Park • • • 1 ` s. Gale Woods Farm J Ep) Maple - Plain 1 I 1 1 a Rail Regional Trail Baker Park Reserve e Sid Orono Mound Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Carver Park Reserve Victoria Lake Minnecol Medina Qo9yonal Trail Shorewood Chanhassen Source : Esri. HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS. FAO. NPS. 1,•iNRR.CAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmy India,'© OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Baker/Carver Regional Trail General Acquisition Plan — No Acquisition Needs — — 0-10 Feet • • • • Minimum 20 Feet Map prepared by Three Rivers Park Dlsbbt Planning Department - KG Sept. 3, 2014 This GIS Data is provided "az is" without warranty orany MP..takn of...ma, 0.5 2 Miles l ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT NORTH ess or completeness. The user acknowledges and accepts the limitations of the Data, including the fact that the Dam is dynamic and is in a constant state of maintenance, correction, and update. Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 77 This page left intentionally blank 78 Three Rivers Park District Cost Estimate Baker/Carver Regional Trail Master Plan, November 2014 79 This page left intentionally blank 80 Three Rivers Park District Acquisition and Construction Cost Estimate Qty Unit Unit Pric otential Funding Sources m c IF) d i c m c a c y E a F. m wx a y m U c Q c � w m £ c v y c c v)CC Lake Independence Regional Trail to Luce Line State Trail 11,880 FT 2.25 Miles Acquisition Assumes an average acquisition of 5' for portions of Segment A located outside of Baker Park Reserve 57,500 SQ FT $3 $143,750 Base Trail Construction 11,880 LN FT $100 $1,188, 000 Specialized Construction Considerations Embankment work, convert/reconstruct rural road to curb and gutter section, retaining walls, wetland impacts, power pole relocation, major tree impacts, and railroad crossing 1 Lump Sum $750,000 $750,000 Boardwalk 0 LN FT $800 $0 Pedestrian Bridge 0 Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding Near existing trailhead off of CR 19 (Baker) 1 Each $45,000 $45,000 Level B Wayfinding 0 Each $28,500 $0 Level C Wayfinding At intersections of CR 6/CR 83, CR 6/CR 19, and CR 19/Budd Avenue. 3 Each Rest Stops 2 Each $9,000 $5,600 $27,000 $11,200 10+ yrs. - Following completion of acquisition. Desirable to coordinate with future road work. Future Park District GO Bonds Met Council CIP Grant (Not Secured) Hennepin County Bikeway Grant (Not Secured) Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant (Not Secured) Federal Transportation Grant (Not Secured) Subtotal $2,164,950 CR 110 to Game Farm Road 11,405 FT 2.16 Miles Acquisition MnDNR (landowner) owns property and will continue to own/operate. No additional acquisition needs are foreseen. 0 SQ FT $1 $0 Base Trail Construction Existing Aggregate Trail - May consider paving at a later date if demand warrants and DNR (landowner) supports 0 LN FT $100 $0 Specialized Construction Considerations 0 Lump Sum $0 $0 Boardwalk 0 LN FT $800 $0 Pedestrian Bridge 0 Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding 0 Each $45,000 $0 Level B Wayfinding At start/terminus of shared route with Luce Line State Trail 2 Each $28,500 $57,000 Level C Wayfinding At mid point along shared route with Luce Line State Trail 1 Each $9,000 $9,000 Rest Stops 2 Each $5,600 $11,200 TBD - When significant continuous/ contiguous segment is established. Future Park District GO Bonds Subtotal $77,200 iv c C a cu c m Ci v m c c o c a) m c o, c c in 1 f Luce Line State Trail to CR 15 17,210 FT 3.26 Miles Acquisition Assumes an average acquisition of 5' for road based portions and 20' for independent corridor portions of Segment C. 79,275 SQ FT $1 $79,275 15+ yrs. Following completion of acquisition. Desirable to coordinate with future road work for road based segments and/or future development of Kingswood SRF. Future Park District GO Bonds Met Council CIP Grant (Not Secured) Hennepin County Bikeway Grant (Not Secured) Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant (Not Secured) Base Trail Construction 17,210 LN FT $100 $1,721,000 Specialized Construction Considerations Embankment work and convert rural road to curb and gutter section and significant slope stabilization in Kingswood Park. 1 Lump Sum $1,830,000 $1,830,000 Boardwalk 0 LN FT $800 $0 Pedestrian Bridge 0 Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding 0 Each $45,000 $p Level B Wayfinding Near planned parking lot (Kingswood) 1 Each $28,500 $28,500 Level C Wayfinding At Crossing of CR 15, south end of Kingswood, and midpoint between Kingswood and Luce Line State Trail along Game Farm Road 3 Each $9,000 $27,000 Rest Stops -1/mile 4 Each $5,600 $22,400 Subtotal $3,708,175 „ o .E y 3 a) o, d c ii fa X 0 f CR15to Dakota Rail Regional Trail 4,750 FT 0.90 Miles Acquisition Almost completely within Gale Woods Farm. Approximately 260' of easement required from Boys and Girls Club. This may be resolved through a greater land swap. 5,200 SQ FT $1 $5,200 15+ yrs. simultaneously or following completion of connection to Kingswood SRF. Future Park District GO Bonds Met Council CIP Grant (Not Secured) Hennepin County Bikeway Grant (Not Secured) Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant (Not Secured) Base Trail Construction New Trail Construction - Park Setting 4,750 LN FT $100 $475,000 Specialized Construction Considerations 0 Lump Sum $0 $0 Boardwalk 0 LN FT $800 $0 Pedestrian Bridge 0 Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding 0 Each $45,000 $0 Level B Wayfinding 0 Each $28,500 $0 Level C Wayfinding 0 Each $9,000 $0 Rest Stops -1/mile 1 Each $5,600 $5,600 Subtotal $485,800 u II il it -,^-. - ^ Potential Funding Sources L H To ° Cri aw re 73, iii 73 m ++ cc t d r c E Y c v C f Gale Woods Farm to -700' West of West Tonka Recreation Area 6,755 FT 1.28 Miles Acquisition Permit from HCRRA (landowner) already in place. No additional acquisition needs are foreseen. 0 SQ FT $1 $0 TBD When significantBonds continuous/ contiguous segment is established. Future Park District GO Base Trail Construction Existing Trail - No Improvements Required 0 LN FT $100 $0 Specialized Construction Considerations 0 Lump Sum $0 $0 Boardwalk 0 LN FT $800 $0 Pedestrian Bridge 0 Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding Upgrade Existing Level B to Level A 1 Each $16,500 $16,500 Level B Wayfinding Each $28,500 $0 Level C Wayfinding At start/terminus of shared route with Dakota Rail Regional Trail 2 Each $9,000 $18,000 Rest Stops ,v1/mile 1 Each $5,600 $5,600 Subtotal $40,100 t L fa Y. f6 m +, i •L y 01 c o1 i c v co in S Dakota Rail Regional Trail to Kings Point Road 8,080 FT 1.53 Miles Acquisition Assumes an average acquisition of 5' for road based portions and 20' for independent corridor portions of Segment F. 57,475 SQ FT $1 $57,475 10+ yrFollowing complettion of acquisition. Desirable to coordinate with future road work for road based segments. Future Park District GO Bonds Met Council CIP Grant (Not Secured) Hennepin County Bikeway Grant (Not Secured) Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant (Not Secured) Base Trail Construction 7,140 LN FT $100 $714,000 Specialized Construction Considerations 0 Lump Sum $0 $0 Boardwalk 940 LN FT $800 $752,000 Pedestrian Bridge 1 Each $300,000 $300,000 Level A Wayfinding findin Y � g 0 Each $45,000 $0 Level B Wayfinding Six Mile Marsh Area 1 Each $28,500 $28,500 Level C Wayfinding 0 Each $9,000 $0 Rest Stops -1/mile 2 Each $5,600 $11,200 Subtotal $1,863,175 c .. - v N c c E, c o d to 3 2 Kings Point Road to TH 7 8,980 FT 1.70 Miles Acquisition 20' corridor through Woodland Cove Development. 150,000 SQ FT $1 $150,000 Reconstruction at end of local trail's useful life and/or completion of adjacent traiP segments Future Park District GO Bonds Base Trail Construction Costs are for upgrading a planned local trail to regional trail standards 8,600 LN FT $100 $860,000 Specialized Construction Considerations Lump Sum $0 $0 Boardwalk 380 LN FT $800 $304,000 Pedestrian Bridge Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding Each $45,000 $0 Level B Wayfinding Each $28,500 $0 Level C Wayfinding At road crossing within Woodland Cove 1 Each $9,000 $9,000 Rest Stops -1/mile 1 Each $5,600 $5,600 Subtotal $1,328,600 y a i m 01 d 3 cc o Y i- a E3- v E CU v J tll1.71 TH 7 to Nature Center Area 9,015 FT Miles Acquisition Completely within Carver Park Reserve. No additional acquisition needs are foreseen. 0 SQ FT $1 $0 2019/2020 - Following construction of Woodland Cove Development and increased demand as a result of -1,100 new residential units. Future Park District GO Bonds Met Council CIP Grant (Not Secured) Federal Recreation Trail Program Grant (Not Secured) Base Trail Construction New Trail Construction - Park Setting 9,015 LN FT $100 $901,500 Specialized Construction Considerations 0 Lump Sum $0 $0 Boardwalk 0 LN FT $800 $0 Pedestrian Bridge 0 Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding 0 Each $45,000 $0 Level B Wayfinding Southside of TH 7 (Carver) 1 Each $28,500 $28,500 Level C Wayfinding Location TBD (Carver) 1 Each $9,000 $9,000 Rest Stops ,-1/mile 2 Each $5,600 $11,200 Subtotal $950,200 ,-,.2. vi N 1...significant c L 3 m o a' Y Y m i .7 ca £ d -. 0 , u jj u Nature Center Area to Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail 11,855 FT 2.25 Miles Acquisition Completely within Carver Park Reserve. No additional acquisition needs are foreseen. 0 SQ FT $1 $0 2019 or Later - When continuous/ contiguous segment is established. Future Park District GO Bonds Base Trail Construction Existing Trail - No Improvements Required 0 LN FT $100 $0 Specialized Construction Considerations 0 Lump Sum $0 $0 Boardwalk 0 LN FT $800 $0 Pedestrian Bridge 0 Each $300,000 $0 Level A Wayfinding Near existing parking lot on Park Drive (Carver) 1 Each $45,000 $45,000 Level B Wayfinding Near Lowry Nature Center area (Carver) 1 Each $28,500 $28,500 Level C Wayfinding Location TBD (Carver) 1 Each $9,000 $9,000 Rest Stops -1/mile 3 Each $5,600 $16,800 g A H Subtotal $99,300 Lake Independence Regional Trail (Baker) to Lake Minnetonka Regional Trail (Carver) 89,930 FT 17.04 Miles Acquisition Minimum acquisition needs. Additional land may be acquired to increase desirability of trail corridor and/or incorporate areas of natural/cultural resource significance. 349,450 SQ FT $1-3 $435,700 Base Trail Construction 58,595 LN FT $100 $5,859,500 Specialized Construction Considerations 2 Sump Varies $2,580,000 Boardwalk 1,320 LN FT $800 $1,056,000 Pedestrian Bridge 1 Each $300,000 $300,000 Level A Wayfinding 3 Each $15,000- $40,000 $106,500 Level B Wayfinding 6 Each $25,000 $171,000 Level C Wayfinding 12 Each $9,000 $108,000 Rest Stops 18 Each $5,600 $100,800 Total Total Construction Total Land Acquisition $10,717,500 $10,281,800 $435,700 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4500 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com PARKS REPORT To: Medina Parks Commission From: Nate Sparks, Consulting Planner Date: February 11, 2015 Meeting Date: February 18, 2015 Re: PRDC Conservation Design Planned Unit Development - Concept Plan Park Dedication Review Application Date: January 13, 2015 BACKGROUND / GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Resources Development Corporation, Inc. (PRDC) has made an application for a Conservation Design Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD) Concept Plan review. The applicant is proposing a 421ot CD-PUD on approximately 170 acres on a property located east of Homestead Trail and west of Deer Hill Road and Morningside Road. A CD-PUD is a type of PUD permitted by the City where an alternative development plan (including increased density) to traditional zoning is employed in order to preserve ecological resources, wildlife corridors, scenic views, and rural character. SUBJECT SITE The property is identified as four parcels in the Hennepin County property tax records. The total area of the properties is approximately 170 acres. The property lies to the west of the western terminus of both Deer Hill and Morningside Roads and east of Homestead Trail. There are several wetlands on the site including a large wetland area on the northern edge of the property that is greater than 30 acres in size. There are also areas of steep slopes on the property. The upland areas on the site are predominantly tilled farmland. The surrounding properties are residential in nature. The urban Medina Morningside and Keller Estates developments are to the southeast of the site. Otherwise, the site is surrounded by rural residential property. To the west of Homestead Trail is the Baker Park Reserve. To the south is the City of Orono. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN / ZONING The property is zoned RR, Rural Residential. The surrounding properties are primarily zoned RR, as well. To the southeast there are properties zoned UR, Urban Residential and SR, Suburban Residential. In the Comprehensive Plan, this property is guided for a Rural Residential Land Use. For development within this designation, the City must maintain a maximum density of one unit per ten acres. The City generally utilizes the five acre contiguous suitable soils requirement in order to pursue this objective. In the Comprehensive Plan and through the CD-PUD Ordinance, allowances are granted for allowing open space development and maintaining rural character and simultaneously preserve significant natural resources. This result may take the form of innovative developments that clusters smaller lots on portions of a site in order to provide permanently conserved open space. Such innovative arrangements can help preserve the City's natural resources, open space and rural character, while still maintaining an average overall density of ten acres for each unit. A CD-PUD is an option that a property owner is encouraged to consider as an alternative to conventional development. The City will give heightened consideration to such requests where the opportunities to achieve conservation objectives are significantly higher than that available through conventional development. The Open Space Plan identifies this property as being a high quality natural resource area. The northern portion of the site is identified as primarily a tamarack swamp. Homestead Trail along the western edge of the site is identified in the plan as a scenic road. Objectives of CD-PUD District The purpose of the CD-PUD District is to preserve the City's ecological resources, wildlife corridors, scenic views, and rural character while allowing residential development consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Open Space Report as updated from time to time. The specific conservation objectives of this district are to: 1 Protect the ecological function of native hardwood forests, lakes, streams, and wetlands. 2. Protect moderate to high quality ecologically significant natural areas. 3. Protect opportunities to make ecological connections between parks and other protected lands and ecologically significant natural areas. 4. Protect important viewsheds including scenic road segments. 5. Create public and private trails for citizens to access and enjoy Open Space resources. 6. Create public and private Open Space for citizens to access and enjoy Open Space resources. Conservation Areas The minimum required conservation area within a CD-PUD development is required to be at least 30% of the total buildable land area in the Rural Residential District or higher depending on the land and opportunities to achieve the City's conservation objectives. The total buildable land area is defined as the total area less the amount of land that includes: slopes greater than 18%, wetlands, required wetland buffers, lakes, and land contained within the 100 year floodplain. The applicant has provided a table depicted the method by which they are calculating the percentage of conservation area, stating that the conservation area is about 33% of the total buildable area. The general plan of development and preliminary plat will be able to illustrate and confirm this data. In the ordinance, it is stated that conservation areas are intended to be interconnected wherever possible to provide a continuous network of open space within the development and throughout the City. It should coordinate and maximize boundaries with conservation areas and/or open space on adjacent properties. The boundaries of designated conservation areas shall be clearly delineated and labeled on CD-PUD plans. These areas shall be delineated in the field with signage or other measures approved by the city. The conservation area shall incorporate public and private trails with connections to existing or planned regional trails as identified in the most recent Park, Trail and Open Space Plan. Designated public access trails shall be protected by an access easement owned by the City. The ordinance states that views of new dwellings from exterior roads and abutting properties should be minimized by the use of existing topography, existing vegetation, or additional landscaping. Ridge and hilltops should be contained within designated conservation areas wherever possible. Trees should not be removed from ridges and hilltops. 2 In the CD-PUD Ordinance, conservation areas are required to be platted into separate outlots. The areas must be restricted from further development by a permanent conservation easement (in accordance with Minnesota Statute Chapter 84C.01-05). The easement must be submitted with the General Plan of Development and approved by the City Attorney. The permanent easement may be held by any combination of the entities defined by Minnesota Statute Chapter 84C, but in no case may the holder of the easement be the same as the owner of the underlying fee. The permanent conservation easement shall be recorded with Hennepin County and must specify the entity that will maintain the designated conservation area. Land Stewardship Plan As stated in the ordinance, where a CD-PUD has designated conservation areas, a plan for the development, long-term use, maintenance, and insurance of all conservation areas, may be required. This land stewardship plan needs to define ownership and methods of land protection and establish necessary regular and periodic operation and maintenance responsibilities. The plan also needs to estimate staffing needs, insurance requirements, and other associated costs associated with plan implementation and define the means for funding the same on an on -going basis. This shall include land management fees necessary to fund monitoring and maintenance. PARK PLAN REVIEW Active Park Land The subject site is generally within the 1/2 mile and 1 mile radius of Medina Morningside Park. There is no proposed direct connection between this development and the park within the subdivision design. Trails The trail plan identifies three planned corridors on the site: • 28. West Deerhill Trails Description — These trails consist of two trails. Trail A is a straight line that would run along Deerhill Road from Willow Drive approximately 1 mile west to Baker Park Reserve. Trail B would run northwest from Deerhill Road along the open space corridor to a connection with a series of trails coming from the north and west. Need — This would be a connection from Wolsfeld Woods SNA to Baker Park Reserve, plus providing access to an open space corridor. Type and Surface Recommendations — The off -road section of the trails would be gravel or turf. Where trail would go along Deerhill Road, it should be off -road if possible, gravel or turf, as on Trail A. Turf on Trail B. Opportunities & Contingencies — These trails could be constructed with development in the area or the opportunity arises. • 29. Homestead Willow Trail - A Description — The Homestead Willow trail will eventually make a loop connection between Homestead Trail and Willow Drive. Trail A would connect from Homestead to West Deerhill Trail B. Trail B that would continue east to Willow Drive. Need — To have an off -road trail along an open space corridor with high quality natural areas. A connection from Baker Park Reserve to Wolsfeld Woods SNA. 3 Type and Surface Recommendations — Unpaved. Opportunities & Contingencies — As opportunity arises or development occurs. • 30. Homestead Willow Trail - B Description — This trail finishes the loop connection with Homestead Trail and Willow Drive. Trail B that would go from Deerhill West Trail B north around a high quality natural area of wetland and woodlands back to Willow Drive. Need — To have an off -road trail along an open space corridor with high quality natural areas. A connection from Baker Park Reserve to Wolsfeld Woods SNA. Type and Surface Recommendations — Unpaved. Opportunities & Contingencies — As opportunity arises or development occurs. The applicant is proposing a roadside trail within the right-of-way along the new street that connects with existing Deer Hill Road. The trail is proposed to exit the property in two locations on the west. One spur is proposed to exit the right-of-way in the northwest portion of the site and travel along the western edge of the property (west of Lot 1) . The other spur is located north of Lot 28, which would adjoin the western property line in a location which would lie on a straight line extended between existing Deerhill Road and Homestead Trail. Park Dedication The City may wish to acquire land for park and trails, cash -in -lieu of parkland dedication or a combination of the two. The total area of the subject site is 170.4 acres and deducting wetlands the net area is 132.21 acres. The subdivision ordinance states that up to 10% of this land area (13.22 acres) may be required for dedication for park purposes. The cash -in -lieu amount is based on 8% of the value of the land with the minimum cash contribution being $3,500 per dwelling unit and the maximum at $8,000 per dwelling unit. Staff estimates that the land value in this case will max out the Park Fee at $8,000 per unit ($336,000). If City requires a combination of land and cash, it would deduct the area of any trail easements (only necessary if outside of the right-of-way) in a proportional manner from the total park fee. The City's practice is for pedestrians ways that are connected within the right-of-way in connection with a street (as an alternative to required sidewalks) are not part of required park dedication. PARK COMMISSION REVIEW The purpose of the concept plan review for a CD-PUD is for the applicant to explain the general intent of the plan, for the Planning Commission, Park Commission, and City Council to provide advisory comments to the applicant, and for the public to give input. The Park Commission should provide general comments on the plan related to the anticipated park dedication requirements. ATTACHMENTS A — Aerial Photo B — Applicant Narrative C — Applicant Concept Plan D — Future Facilities Map from Master Plan 4 �% application onservation design Planned Unit Development (CD -MD) oncept Plan submitted to ity of Medina, Minnesota applicant roperty Resources Development Corporation, Inc. (PRDC) owner tonegate Farm, Inc. date January 13, 2015 Table of Contents Narrative 3 - 11 Table 1: Site Tabulation 8 Table 2: Lot Count & Size 8 Figures Zoning within 1,000 Ft. of Property Wetlands & Soils 2-Foot Contours & Slope Analysis Vegetation & Vistas Site Design Process Concept Plan Adjacent Properties & Utilities/Easements Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 NV1c1 IscliDNOD Cincl-CD 2 General Information (a)(1) & (2) Applicant: Owner: Property Resources Development Corporation, Inc. (PRDC) 6851 Flying Cloud Drive Suite A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Stonegate Farm, Inc. 6851 Flying Cloud Drive Suite A Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (a) (3) Attorney: Civil Engineer & Surveyor: Site Design: Monroe Moxness Berg 7760 France Avenue S., Ste. 700 Edina, MN 55435 Sathre-Bergquist 150 Broadway Ave. S Wayzata, MN 55391 J Scalzo Design, LLC 940 Ridge Point Blaine, MN 55434 Planner: Septic Engineer: Septic Design: SHC, LLC 246 S. Albert St., Suite 2A Saint Paul, MN 55105 Halling Engineering, Inc. 3727 E 255th St. Webster, MN 55088-9514 Miller's Sewage Treatment Solutions 9075 155th Street Kimball, MN 55353 (a)(4) Evidence of Sufficient Control See pages 2 and 3 of the Application signed by the Applicant and Owner and the Contingent Settlement Agreement dated and executed December 18, 2014 Present Status (b) (1) Location: PIDs: Acres: Legal: NE of the CR-6 and Homestead Trl. Intersection 21 118 23 31 0001 21 118 23 34 0002 21 118 23 34 0003 28 118 23 24 0001 170.49 (Approx.) Attached NV1c1 IscliDNOD Cincl-CD 3 (b)(2) Existing Zoning: The Subject property is zoned Rural Residential. Figure 1 shows all properties within 1,000-feet of the proposed project with existing zoning classifications as obtained from the City's website on 1/10/2015. Adjacent zoning districts include Rural Residential to the north and northeast, Suburban Residential along the southeast, Public/Semi-Public (park) to the west and RR-1B (2-acre) to the south in Orono. (b)(3) Existing Figures 1 and 7 depicts existing development of the Subject property and properties Development within 1,000 feet of the proposed project (c) Proposed Market & Market Demand PRDC believes that the unique characteristics and conservation approach to this project will make it appealing to a variety of potential buyers. The site plan is laid out in a way to appeal to a variety of demographics, allowing for custom houses to be tailored to the individual needs of the buyer. Initial market study from our team indicates that this type of subdivision does not currently exist in the marketplace, at least not with this variety of lot sizes and extensive protected open space, and therefore should perform well in the market. PRDC intends to engage a market research professional over the next several weeks to research the potential demand, and consequently absorption rates, of this type of product to ensure phasing is consistent with the market needs (see Section (g) for further discussion). Additionally, we understand that the City is interested in maintaining housing diversity throughout the community to ensure there are options available to current and future home owners ranging from affordable to the high -end of the market. Recent developments considered in the City have included an affordable rental housing project and entry-level and mid -level single family residential developments. The proposed development will likely cater to the higher end of the buyer spectrum rounding out the options available to those wishing to either move into the area, or offer move -up opportunities to those who currently reside in the City. Further, the southwestern portion of the community is populated with conventional subdivisions such as the Morningside and Keller Estates neighborhoods, or very large -lot rural residential development and lacks the innovative developments that can be seen in other areas of the community. As such, we believe that this project will bring a new vitality to the area while blending in seamlessly with the surroundings and offering amenities not only to the development itself, but to the City as well. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan & Adjacent Uses of Neighboring Property The City's Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") has guided the Subject property as Rural Residential which is defined as, "areas for low -intensity uses, such as rural residential, rural commercial, farming, hobby farms, horticulture, conservation of ecologically significant natural resources and passive recreation..." The Subject property is also identified on Figure 7-2 of the Plan as a "Moderate to High quality Natural Area" on the Open Space Plan Priority Areas. NV1c1 IscliDNOD ClrUCID 4 As depicted on the Concept Plan shown on Figure 6, our Team has carefully designed and planned for the seamless integration of the project into the surrounding area, and the adopted Comprehensive Plan, through the following site design characteristics: • Greenways are thoughtfully designed to maximize contiguous areas and align with the goals and objectives as laid out in several of the City's and cooperating agencies' policy documents. Homesites internal to the development are placed in strategic clusters allowing for the protection of more than 30% of buildable upland areas, and more than 50% of the gross site. • Conservation areas are aligned with the most significant wetland areas that are intended to be restored in some capacity, improving the function and quality of surface water on the site. • While lot sizes will vary throughout the development, individual lots will feel as expansive as many of the adjacent larger -lot rural residential areas due to the integration of conservation areas and additional protective covenants ensuring viewsheds and vegetative quality are protected. • Roadways are designed as rural section and to minimize the impervious surfaces throughout the development to the greatest extent possible. (d) Site Conditions The site is approximately 170 acres and is generally located east of Homestead Trail, and north of County Road 6. Deer Hill Road is stubbed into the eastern edge of the site with approximately 80 acres lying north and 90 acres lying south of the road. The City of Medina jurisdictional boundary runs along the southern property line, and there is an additional 23 acres associated with Stonegate Farm located in the City of Orono. The site is slightly irregular in shape along the western boundary and provides approximately 720- feet of frontage on Homestead Trail, with the property tucked behind some existing rural residential lots to the west. The southeastern property line is bordered by the Momingside and Keller Estates neighborhoods as well as several rural residential properties of varying lot sizes. The northern 40 acres of PID 28 118 23 24 0001 is relatively flat with some minor topographic changes, and generally slopes south to north. The southern 50 acres of PID 28 118 23 24 0001 has some more significant topographic changes, and generally slopes north to south with the steepest slopes along the southern perimeter of the site. The northern 80 acres of the site (PIDs 21 118 23 31 0001, 21 118 23 31 0002, 21 118 23 31 0003) generally slopes from south to north, and includes a large wetland area comprising nearly 31 acres of the northernmost parcel (known as the Tamarack). There are intermittent wetlands located throughout the site, and some tree stands located mostly near the perimeter of the site, as the majority of the site has been agricultural production. Additionally, along the western and eastern edge of the site, there are several rows of trees that were planted by the Owner, and are currently managed as a nursery. NV1c1 IscliDNOD ClrUCID 5 (e) and 827.73 Concept Plan Design Process & Schematic Drawings The PRDC Team developed the Concept Plan, Figure 5, utilizing the City's Site Design Process as identified in Section 827.73 in the Conservation Design Ordinance, and incorporating information collected during due diligence and review of the existing site conditions of the Subject property. (See Figures 2 through 5 which demonstrate the site design process). One of the key components in the conservation design process is to create a Yield Plan to establish the base density (number of lots permitted with existing zoning) under consideration for the development. Sathre-Bergquist has prepared an analysis based on Figure 2 which demonstrates a base density of 8-lots on the north 80-acres consistent with the Tamarack Ridge preliminary plat from 2012; and a base density of 14-lots on the south 90-acres utilizing the Hennepin County Soil Survey (HCSS). In late 2013 the City of Medina also assessed the Owner for 141ots on the south 90-acres of the property as part of the Willow Road improvements. Utilizing this information, Sathre-Bergquist has created a yield plan which shows 22-lots on the Subject property supporting both the City's Assessment and HCSS. In addition to the Site Design Process and establishing the Yield Plan for the project, PRDC understands the importance of respecting the relationship between the Subject site and adjacent properties. Therefore, some of the key considerations used to develop the Concept Plan were: • Adjacent, existing neighborhoods to the east of the property are guided Low Density and Medium Density Residential. The lot sizes in the these land use designations range from 15,000 square feet to(Th approximately an acre. It was important to our Team to ensure the proposed Concept Plan is consistent with adjacent neighborhood patterns and, while there are no lot size standards in the CD-PUD, we did j not introduce lots sizes that were incompatible with the surrounding area. • Respecting existing rural residential properties was also an important consideration, and strategic buffering through vegetation, wetlands and topographic changes will protect existing lower density properties. • As demonstrated in the Site Design Process, topography of the site played a significant role in the design of the Project and guided road alignment, home placement, and amenity locations. 0 • The south and southwestern edges provide exceptional views across Baker Park, and it is PRDC's objective to ensure that as many home owners as possible are able to enjoy and experience those views from their properties. Additionally, since this area of the site borders existing rural residential homes, we have setback homes from the `edge' and introduced an open space area to ensure that not only are rn views protected from the site, but looking onto the site as well. • Integration of the wetlands, including consolidation and restorations, will provide a natural "corridor" of open spaces that future and existing residents in the area can enjoy. These spaces will enhance the neighborhood and ultimately improve water and environmental quality. r- • Establishing key partnerships with organizations and agencies interested in the maintenance and management of the conservation areas will ensure their long-term improvement and ultimate restoration 6 potential. Our team is working diligently to establish these partnerships and make sure they exist into perpetuity. • Creation of covenants and a detailed homeowner's association document will ensure the protection of the conservation areas through well documented roles and responsibilities of all parties with an interest in the protection of the open spaces on the site. • Designing each home site to accommodate a primary septic and individual well will ensure the long- term viability and success of the individual homes, and ultimately the homeowner's association. (f) Site Tabulation and Characteristics Based upon the above stated considerations our Team designed the Concept Plan. The attached Concept Plan includes lot sizes ranging from approximately 1.0 acre to 2.0 acres. As demonstrated on the Concept Plan, a "corridor" of conservation open space along the eastern edge of the site will provide restoration and protection opportunities to existing wetland areas as well as some of the big woods remnants which can be found along the perimeter in this area. Additionally, this conservation area will connect into the wetland complex found in the middle of the site and will offer additional opportunities for restoration and connectivity into the corridor. There are several acres of conservation area that are integrated throughout the site offering opportunities to the future residents of the development, as well as the greater neighborhood, to enjoy the conservation and open space amenities. Trail development and connections were carefully integrated to allow pedestrians, cross-country skiers and horse riders access to some of the most ecologically interesting areas of the site, including the Tamarack and the `island' on the north side of the project site. Thoughtful integration of the conservation areas with the homesites will ensure the long-term viability and success of these amenities for not only the neighborhood but the City as well. Minimizing the roadways will help ensure the protection of the conservation areas and improve the site's water quality. As such, the proposed lots within the development will be served by a road network that includes a main curvilinear roadway connecting Homestead Trail with Deer Hill Road, and two secondary private cul-de-sacs which will access the main road. At our initial kick-off meeting city staff indicated a desire to minimize the amount of roadway within the development and encourage - where possible - the use of the primary access from Homestead Trail. We believe our Concept Plan and proposed road network responds to those recommendations in the following ways: The road "spine" is primarily oriented north -south from Homestead all the way into the northern 80-acres of the project site thus resulting in direct visual access to the primary entrance for approximately 70% of the lots. Generally, people travel in the pattern that is the most obvious, and visual access is a key contributor to a driver's decision making. • One curvilinear road is proposed as opposed to a grid. This will help reduce the potential of cut -through traffic, and the curvilinear design will help reduce speeds for those travelling in the neighborhood. • The "spine" provides primary access to the majority of the proposed lots and only two private cul- NV1c1 IscliDNOD ClrUCID 7 de -sacs are necessary. In addition to the alignment, the cul-de-sacs were designed to reduce as much impervious coverage as possible. The road network was designed to be efficient while still complying with the City's ordinances and standards for roadway and access design. The main access at Homestead is located in the City of Orono, but traverses land that is owned by Stonegate Farm (Owner). We have spoken with city staff from the City of Orono and anticipate that this access will be acceptable to them and Hennepin County. We will make the appropriate applications at Orono, and Hennepin County if applicable, concurrently to our applications for a General Plan of Development at Medina to ensure the viability of this access location. The design of the main roadway on the Concept Plan includes a 60-foot right-of-way ("ROW") and 24-feet of paved roadway. Our preference would be to construct the road to 22-feet of pavement with 50-feet of ROW to reduce the quantity of impervious surface associated with the roadway and to better integrate the new portion of roadway into the current and future plans of Deer Hill Road. However, we will continue to show the roadway with 24-feet of pavement and 60-feet of ROW unless otherwise directed by the City. The proposed Concept Plan integrates trails throughout the development consistent with the goals and objectives stated within the City's Trail Plan adopted in March 2014. The trails will be developed in ROW where available and applicable, and will be extended into open spaces and conservation areas as necessary. The following table breaks out the approximate site breakdowns as shown in the Concept Plan. Table 1: Use Tabulation (see Figure 5 and 6 for location) Use Ownership Acres % of Site Gross % of Site Net Rural Residential Home Sites Private 75.39 44.2% 62.3% Open Space (Upland Buildable) Private/ Easement 40.7 23.9% 33.6% Open Space - Unbuildable (Wetlands, wetland buffer, steep slopes> 18%) Private Easement 49.33 29.0% --- Subtotal wetlands ---- 38.20 --- --- Subtotal wetland buffer ---- 9.25 --- --- Subtotal steep slopes>I8% ---- 1.88 --- Street Paved Surface (Cul-de-sacs) TBD 1.02 0.6% 0.8% Street Paved Surface (Main Rd.) Public 3.97 2.3% 3.3% Subtotal Developed Area --- 80.38 47.2% --- Subtotal Open Space --- 90.03 52.8% --- Net BUILDABLE TOTAL 121.08 --- 100% Gross TOTAL 170.41 100% --- *Significant wetlands are located within open spaces and acreages denoted on the table above. This is an estimate only and will be further refined through development of the Land Stewardship Plan. **ROW Cul-de-sacs calculated at 1.9 Acres, and Main Road at 8.5 Acres. 8 NV1c1 IscliDNOD ClrUCID The following table represents further break down of the number of units, and average lot sizes as proposed on the Concept Plan. Table 2: Lot Count 8c Size Zoning Number of Units Lot Size Acres CD-PUD (North 80) 15 1.24 - 2.15 Acres CD-PUD (South 90 Ac) 27 1.3 -2 .67 Acres Subtotal Lots 42 --- Total Lot Area 75.39 Acres Average Lot Size 1.8 Acres (g) Phasing PRDC anticipates the project to be completed in a minimum of three Phases, beginning with Phase I in the southwestern corner of the site at the primary entrance. It is anticipated that the main road will be constructed up -front and all in one construction season, and therefore phasing could be fairly fluid to meet the demands of the market. As previously indicated, we intend to conduct a market study to understand absorption rates and buyer preferences of the anticipated product type. Once we have a firmer handle on the market, we will structure our phasing plan to respond to anticipated demands. Within each Phase there will likely be various `Additions" depending on the builders selected. We anticipate that the open space areas, landscaping, etc., will be completed as each Phase and/or Addition is brought on-line. Since each home/lot will be constructed with it's own well and primary septic site, no initial infrastructure will be necessary with the exception of the roadways and soft utilities. As the addition/phase approaches the private cul-de-sac, these roadways will be constructed and installed to ensure adequate supply to the market. There are several factors which could affect the timing of the project, and we would like to work with the City to establish and determine the appropriate timing once the detailed CD-PUD plan is approved and the Development Agreement drafted and executed. (h) Open Space Provisions We understand that the City's ordinance requires a minimum of 30% of the buildable land to be placed within conservation easements to be held by an qualifying party. PRDC is currently working to identify a partner to hold the conservation easements, and will work with that entity to establish a restoration and planting plan that will include an agreement for it's implementation and long term maintenance. The agreement will be memorialized as part of the Land Stewardship Plan which will be finalized as part of each phase and Final Plat. Any and all maintenance and management will likely become the responsibility of the HOA if not performed by the conservation easement holder. However, at this time the specifics of the relationship are not known but will be more fully developed as this process progresses. PRDC is working with a potential conservation easement holder on a partnership agreement, which will hopefully be established by the time this Concept Plan is heard at the Planning Commission. If so, PRDC will provide NV1c1 IscliDNOD ClrUCID 9 a verbal update of the status of that relationship and the process identified for moving forward with that entity and any other information that may be helpful to this review process. (i) Maintenance Plan & Covenants PRDC will establish a Homeowner's Association ("HOA") for the proposed development, which will include responsibility for management of the maintenance plan and covenants associated with the development. The majority of the Open Space will be contained within Conservation Easements that will be held by a third party. At this time, we have not solidified our relationship with an entity to hold the conservation easements and therefore it is unknown what level of responsibility, if any, the HOA will have for maintenance and management of the conservation easement areas. If necessary, the appropriate responsibilities to be assumed by the HOA will be defined during through the development of the Land Stewardship Plan. All other common areas including, but not limited to, the monument sign will be the responsibility of the HOA and will be detailed within the HOA documents. Additionally, as the landscape plan is developed in greater detail the specific roles and responsibilities of the HOA will be programmed and documents drafted. PRDC anticipates that the main road and trails will be located within the publicly dedicated right-of-way and will thus be the responsibility of the City. All private roads will also be the responsibility of the HOA which will be detailed in the Maintenance Plan. PRDC will also develop covenants to address home and landscape architecture, building envelope, and other use standards that will ensure the character of the neighborhood is protected. PRDC understands that these covenants must be as restrictive as the City's ordinances. It is anticipated that the covenants are likely to more restrictive than the City's ordinances and therefore will be subject to the enforcement of the HOA. We also anticipate the development of the HOA document to occur concurrently with the CD-PUD planning and development process to ensure the vision and character of the development in maintained and established from the beginning. (j) Schematic Utility Plans PRDC's goal is to design the project to accommodate individual septic systems and individual wells on each lot. The following summary of the septic design and individual wells is provided for your review and consideration: Individual Alternative Wastewater Treatment Systems Our Team is proposing to utilize alternative wastewater treatment methods to accommodate, at a minimum, a primary septic system on each lot. At this time we believe it will be possible to provide individual wastewater treatment to each lot and avoid the use of community wastewater treatment. The following summary of the initial design is provided: • Each lot/home will be designed to include an area suitable for the purposes of installing an alternative wastewater treatment system and associated primary drainfield/mound. NV1c1 IscliDNOD ClrUCID 10 " The current design utilizes a product called Multi-flo which essentially operates as it's own mini package plant, that will be individually managed and maintained by the home owner. (A pamphlet describing the Multi-flo is attached for your background and consideration). " The system is designed so that it will be highly unlikely that any secondary site will ever be needed, as the effluent leaving the Multi-flo is extremely clean, and thus more environmentally friendly than a traditional system. " In compliance with state rules and the City's CD Ordinance, a secondary drainfield/mound site will be located on every lot, where available, or within proximity to the lot within the conservation areas. " Although preliminary site work indicates that it is feasible to accommodate a primary septic site on each lot, we are not able to confirm until perc tests can be performed in the spring. If any lot(s) are determined not to meet the requirements of an on site individual system we intend to design a small community system to serve the lot(s). Water - Individual Wells PRDC discussed various options with several consultants to determine the best and safest approach to providing water to the individual lots. At this time, we believe the most efficient, and cost effective solution is to locate an individual private well on each lot. The following summary of initial design and reasoning is provided: " Once the septic system and drainfield/mound are located for each site the available area for a well can be identified and located outside of all necessary setbacks. " A pressurization review will be conducted on each lot to ensure compliance of all necessary setbacks for pressurized lines. " All appropriate permits will be obtained as part of the lot development process. " Individual wells will help minimize risk associated with contamination and safety which may be present with a community system. " Individual wells will also reduce the scope of the HOA and limit its management and maintenance responsibilities which will already be significant due to the scope of the conservation design. NV1c1 IscliDNOD ClrUCID 11 1/13/2015 Metes and Bounds " Hennepin County TSD Metes and Bounds The following is the County Auditor's description of this tax parcel. It may not be the legal description on the most recent conveyance document recording ownership. Please refer to the legal description of this property on the public record when preparing legal documents for recording PID : 21-118-23-31-0001 Municipality: MEDINA Addition Name: UNPLATTED 21 118 23 Lot: Block: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23. Print this window l Close this window http://www 16.co.hennepi n.m n.us/pi ns/pidresult.jsp?pid=2111823310001 1/1 1/13/2015 Metes and Bounds " Hennepin County TSD Metes and Bounds The following is the County Auditor's description of this tax parcel. It may not be the legal description on the most recent conveyance document recording ownership. Please refer to the legal description of this property on the public record when preparing legal documents for recording PID:21-118-23-34-0002 Municipality: MEDINA Addition Name: UNPLATTED 21 118 23 Lot: Block: THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23; SUBJECT TO ROAD. Print this window I I Close this window, http://www 16.co.hennepi n.m n.us/pi ns/pidresult.jsp?pid=2111823340002 1/1 1/13/2015 Metes and Bounds " Hennepin County TSD Metes and Bounds The following is the County Auditor's description of this tax parcel. It may not be the legal description on the most recent conveyance document recording ownership. Please refer to the legal description of this property on the public record when preparing legal documents for recording PID:21-118-23-34-0003 Municipality: MEDINA Addition Name: UNPLATTED 21 118 23 Lot: Block: THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23; SUBJECT TO ROAD. Print this window I I Close this window, http://www 16.co.hennepi n.m n.us/pi ns/pidresult.jsp?pid=2111823340003 1/1 1/13/2015 Metes and Bounds " Hennepin County TSD Metes and Bounds The following is the County Auditor's description of this tax parcel. It may not be the legal description on the most recent conveyance document recording ownership. Please refer to the legal description of this property on the public record when preparing legal documents for recording PID: 28-118-23-24-0001 Municipality: MEDINA Addition Name: UNPLATTED 21 118 23 Lot: Block: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23, SUBJECT TO ROAD; ALSO THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF WHICH LIES WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF SOUTH 0 DEGREES, 07 MINUTES, 42 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 925.33 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES, 52 MINUTES, 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 115.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES, 56 MINUTES, 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 53.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, DISTANT 1140.18 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND SAID LINE THERE ENDING; ALSO THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 668.33; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 548.47 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF DILLMAN ROAD; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY DEFLECTING TO THE RIGHT 41 DEGREES, 13 MINUTES, 16 SECONDS ALONG EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 60.15 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 239.14 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD BEING A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 254.35 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 249.7 FEET ALONG EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD, BEING TANGENT TO LAST DESCRIBED CURVE; THENCE NORTHERLY 166.62 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; SAID 166.62 FEET BEING ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO TH IPrint this window I Close this window I http://www 16.co.hennepi n.m n.us/pi ns/pidresult.jsp?pid=2811823240001 1/1 TREATMENT SYSTEMS Proud Manufacturers Of: el-lAgto • al90` -800-503-0163 • www.consolidatedtreatment.co Environmental Solutions PERFECT FOR THE MOST CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE SITES Consolidated Treatment Systems, Inc. is proud to present the Multi -Flo® wastewater treatment system. With over 35 years of proven performance, the Multi -Flo® is the Installer's choice for environmentally sensitive applications, Designed specifically for installers, the Multi -Flo® is lightweight, compact, easy to transport and even easier to install. The system's flat bottom makes it easy to bed and level and its submersible aerator makes electric a breeze. The compact design and performance is perfect for your most challenging environmentally sensitive sites and the fiberglass construction eliminates time on site waiting for expensive cranes or boom trucks to set the unit. The system's design is a blend of mechanical filtration coupled with aerobic digestion which is commonly found in large scale municipal systems. The Multi -Flo® has been certified under ANSI/NSF Standard 40 protocol as a class 1 system and removes more than 95% of wastewater contaminants. Every system comes complete with tank, audible 1 visual alarm, submersible aerator and hardware. Units also include a two year manufacturer's warranty. For more information please visit us on the web at www.consolidatedtreatment.com or call toll free 1-500-503-0163. 111111111-1.F1 fir WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PATENT PENDING EASILY ACCEPTS 1 2" FIBERGLASS RISER SECTIONS DURABLE FIBERGLASS CONSTRUCTION (3/16" NOMINAL) HOLDS UP TO THE TOUGHEST SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDES 3 LIFTING EYES WHICH ALSO PROVIDE ANCHOR POINTS FOR UPLIFT RESTRAINTS FLAT BOTTOM MAKES SYSTEM EASY TO BED AND LEVEL NOTE: 3 DISCHARGE OPTIONS SIMPLIFIES DRAIN FIELD CONNECTION ENGINEERED FLANGE SEALS WATERTIGHT TO PREVENT INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION NO EXTERNAL COMPRESSOR TO LOCATE OR WIRE * LIGHTWEIGHT, CAN 13E SET WITH MINI EXCAVATOR. 111 4- (S) N H Z f1! 2 Q 111 0 DL Q -1 W 11.. Q I' W -I I- D Q PRESENTED BY: CONSOLIDATED TREATMENT SYSTEMS, INC. TREATMENT SYSTEMS MODEL SPECIFICATIONS 1501 Commerce Center Drive Franklin, Ohio 45005 937-746-2727 Fax: 937-746-1446 www.consotidatedtreatment.com email: info@consolidatedtreatment.com Item FTB 0.5 Treatment (gal/day) 500 FTB 0.6 600 FTB 0.75 750 FTB 1.0 1000 FTB 1.5 1500 Volume (gal) 500 600 750 1000 1500 CBOD (lb/day) 1.5 1.5 1.5 3.0 4.5 Diameter 63" 71" 71" 78" 135"x63" Total Height 86" 86" 90 3/" 93°' 86" Excavation Depth 74'° 74 '/z" 81 " 81 " 76" No. of Aerators 1 1 1 2 3 No. of Filters 30 30 30 30 60 Shipping Weight (lb) 380 420 450 580 920 Inlet Invert 58" 58" 64'/z" 66" 57 1/2" Outlet Invert 54 3/4" 54 1/2" 59" 64 '/a" 54 %" System Components and Materials Wastewater Tank Dome and Cover: • Fiberglass -Reinforced Resin Aerator: • Cast Iron, Stainless Steel, 1/6 HP 1550 RPM Motor With Thermal Overload Protection 120 Volt AC 60 HZ, 1.9 amps Alarm System: • Low voltage (12 volt DC) sensors signal to the control box. The flashing light (audible indicator) alerts the owner to loss of air supply or high water level in the tank. PATENT PENDING Certified to ANSI/NSF Standard 401 Class 1 Environmental Solutions O Consolidated Treatment Systems, Inc. 2010 All Rights Reserved PRDC I Adjacent Zoning Zoning with 1,000 Feet of Project Site RR RR-1 B (Orono 2 Ac.) UR PS 0 287.5 575 1,150 1,725 Feet 2,300 SR m Ott 6 4aa� 0£6 OZ9 01.£ 591. 0 PV 08 1111oN) Tuid kaguItuIPad a2pt21 Pu uz-gZ asrnb2Jag-ar pES 29 SSDH luau panpap X0AJT1S HOS /ampunog purpa/A XananS I T OZ — (Xuadcud Jo ow uNlren) Sealy plrepjA je.z3113D - spuo149M '8 SI1OS I DMIci PRDC Base Density Calculation NV/I r General Wetland Areas (within 300' of property) 2011 Survey Located Wetland Boundary Soil. Survey derived from. HCSS & Sathre-Bergquist Tamarack Ridge Preliminary Plat (North $0 Ac.) Contiguous Suitable Soils per Medina Ordinance Stonegate Gross Acres: 171 (Approx.) Contiguous Suitable Soils: per Sathre- Bergquist and Hennepin County Soil Survey: 112 Ac.* 112 Ac. / 5 Ac. = 22.4 22 Lots Base Density* * Rounded to nearest whole number Fee AI N 0 155 310 620 930 1,240 ObZ` 6 u TOed 0£6 OZ9 06£ 996 0 32Eu uJci 2upsixg unozuoD lood-Z CM N L (o/og T .rano pareurpsg) sadojS dams Xxepunog purpam paleaol XanznS T I OZ a6auiba4 sisAiauy adois'sanowoD Dmici PRDC I Vegetation & Vistas ram 111_,J11,4nreardiElo � ss pMaple -Basswood Forest Tamarack ,[_:, Non-native & Planted Trees 0 Viewsheds & Vistas 0 155 310 620 930 F� 1,24( sir a mitialod speoierlualod airs asnoij alt;urrxoiddy alquppg Xl[Enualod suary uoprAJasuoD (umdpooi3 `%gi< sadojs gajjng purpayA ‘spurpayA) amppngun .e iiiM1111111111111111111iiimmomm••••••••••••••...= ssaDoad u6isa4 axis :EL'LZ8 DCIld PRDC I Concept PInn -- N m p N co z 'off N n 0 m z N D A 2 3 m 0 1 / 1.91 ac ; Lot 28 1.55 ac Lot 1.30 c 'Lot 2� 1.50 a Lot 33 % / -- 1.58 ac / Lot 34 / 1.33 ac Lot 35 1.54 ac PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN STONEGATE FARM MEDINA, MN PROPERTY RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Lot 42 1.74 ac HERS 2 W m N cti FR h �? PAP URA �O 73 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 1 sNo SIn3?1 co xx/xx/xx 133d NI 31VOS 001, 00Z OM 0 00L 00Z I I I I I I J I I I I I I I -ur vc --- VIOS3NNIIN `b'N1a3W XXX 30Vd/XXX X009 A1Nf100 NId3NN3H XX-039- XX.30N- XX.dM1 �v. vsd1 d 0009-U17(M) 1,6£9S'NW'V1VZAVM AVMOVON8 H1f10S OSL m �NI `isinoJ2138-3HHivs o aynS I is., I r I) I MEDINk m _,'_-i_ I- — —oAy ] No II MORNIN¢SIDE —\\ I I I - n I L___IT J L - DRIVE 1 MAPLEW000 _ — TD — ` — —1 / o� — I SECOND - N o u I I ADD TION I I z 1 _ A T F- z _ rP 1 >\ / / m //�\ / M / / J 1 --I . / r—� / r--f----� r/ 1 --7 / I -- --_ .3S0 31VW1103111 WONA 0NI110S3N S3S801 NO S3OtlWVO NOd 3191SNOdS3N A11V031 A1NVd NO a3Sf1 31'1111103111 ANV 010H 011HOIN 3H1S3/Aa3S3N 'ONI'1SIf100a38-3aH1Vs 7.111191SNOdS3N 11V d0 .0N1 '1SIf1OON39-3NH1VS RAIN W3ONI A93N3H111VHS ONV 3Sf1 31VWI1103111 NV 5310111SN00 NOIIVZINOHlfIV OIVS 1f10HlIM 3Sf1 1N011VZINOH1f1V N3llINM SS3NdX3 s.'0NI'1SIf100N38-3NH1VS 1f10HlIM 031181HONd AIlOIN1S SI 10f100ad SIH1 d0 (NOIIVWNOdNI d0 30NVA3AN00 NO/ONtl'N011f191a1510'ON IAd00 ONIOMONl) 3Sf1 31V0 xxx AS 03NO3H0 xxx A9 NMVN❑ SNOISIA3a 31V0 A9 'ON xxx M3N0 01311 Lb'C£9Z =°' „-tDot o00S DON L e n-i 6 u " 0 -9- DENOTE 5 /RON MONUMENT FouND DENOTES JUO/C/AL 4ANOM4RK FOUND Po wER POLE ��1 {�� / 6' - ---- s0�/6'07 W 2429./8 ----- V lam. J - - - - - N 0 �09'24 'E" 2637 4/ DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 739391 That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, lying north of the center line of County Road No. 6 as monumented and platted in the plat of Hennepin County State Aid Highway Number 6, Plat 5, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the Government Survey thereof. The north, east and west boundary lines of said tract have been marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Cases Nos. 17158 and 18135. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO.739390 The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 118, Range 23, according to the Government Survey thereof. The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, according to the Government Survey thereof. All of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23 described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence south along the east line of said southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 668.33 feet; thence west parallel with the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 548.47 feet to the easterly line of Hillman Road; thence northwesterly deflecting to the right 41 degrees 13 minutes 16 seconds along easterly line of said Road a distance of 60.15 feet; thence northerly 239.14 feet along the easterly line of said Road being a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 254.35 feet; thence northerly 249.7 feet along easterly line of said Road being tangent to last described curve; thence northerly 166.62 feet along the easterly line of said Road to the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; said 166.62 feet being along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 650.97 feet; thence east along north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 655.43 feet to the point of beginning, according the Government Survey thereof. The boundary lines of the land herein described are marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 17158. ALSO INCLUDING: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West along the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 1140.18 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence South 49 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 57.15 feet; thence South 29 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 13.85 feet to the northeasterly right of way line of Hennepin County Highway No. 201, Plat 53; thence southeasterly along said right of way line to the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds East along said east line to the point of beginning. Cenfep/ine of Fie/d ,pcod ��A sr.' 1V V 1 / EXCEPTION: 0 Ir D: w o S!�� Co,e. SEC. 2 // TwP. // 8, Rag% 23 (Co3f Iran Adoe- R PR / K6.5--11 et , I ct.W ��k0 iq �� Wp a It4 ��c 0 ,�� o I III ki �� IN O ��' 01 v�� ON l k) '4 v ��t i �\ o 0Z O0 �� �� ��o W 4 kl y�%. I ---- SQ�30104"w 66 66 ��J 1 /338.07 ---- c�� L7 2' J ( ` LIJ L�� LJ C.3 - - - S 0�28'22 "IA/ ��i Ln" /339.84 ---- --- n90 465 I I ---- N 0�07'24"E That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 118, Range 23, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 925.33 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence South 45 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East, a distance of 115.25 feet; thence South 11 degrees 56 minutes 18 seconds East, a distance of 53.92 feet; thence South 49 degrees 03 minutes 42 seconds West, a distance of 124.91 feet to a point in the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, distant 1140.18 feet southerly of the northwest comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds East along said west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 214.85 feet to the point of beginning. To Michael Seeland and Susan Seeland and Chicago Title Insurance Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made (i) in accordance with "Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveyors," jointly established and adopted by ALTA and ACSM in 1992, and includes Items 1, 2 , 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12 of Table A thereof, and (ii) pursuant to the Accuracy Standards (as adopted by ALTA and ACSM and in effect on the date of this certification) of a Surburban Survey. Date: November 26, 1993 Thomas S.:ergquist Registered Land Surve o Minnesota Lic. No. 7725 AREA* 194.28 Acres Recertified date: December 8, 1994 :a /336.42 - --- N h `0 C) {L, ��.-- y' 0�07142 " W 668.33 I ' 50007'42-�%v -r `) r" A I�� , , (�� v1 //40 i /8�� ��- !`14\,. I 3 T oh d" z h <�� IN ON R/sar-or- way ��s" i r)��j MOA A.4 ENTED ��_ ��% 0 W o -z \�� , t` �� 38 ti k ��1 G I ��% . EnrTED " o��;\ BARN Oot --1 ��. a0 �� ��h .�� y ,, .�� 6 tkh a9 , o \ , a 1 - 256.99 - " IN/�4756"E No�39'0/" 1E 41 297. 34- ki;h04;767  t%ti-.. \ N/�/44/1A", - /73.62- 7F- - - 1 h n h 1 o - , k1. 'J 9? o5 $'H��s 4 _003��*)0 _n03.49 .4 NO o " ,I  �� i 5 1 /6642 I -- - 7-- V�� fit- Zg c=a5 Av 4 . -4 / �25'0 6"w C-B. - N 'e=166./7 R=60.51 N5D54'.?/"E i,\ -- 249.63 I 4o 34 W 1- A rj J - 4- o a ,a % 4 ,����C. ��:, ���� O�� 1 / . , \4 W h w 1 / d3c 0 02 R e�� v 4 h W 20 W�� Wt o ,�� 0 Xvi a. h h` R��o I 2 Lk 0 I.2ci ��oot s�� Q 41 04 OBI 14/ h N ��2 ��WK N In ��2 h - 0�28'22 "W 784.65 zi it Q X_ N to O Z \ ; \ �� _ o: 'Li I r  Ni .�� it " r ���� " 00 tO H 4 N w .43 Na ��' m ; In IAI '/Ii 74_5. /6 ozi I A, ob ,3k" k' 031 ITom,+ p 3k3ti1�� a/s.+r-of-ways -���� 0. � MOn/uM - 074? E C: 1 r- ��- 1 ��- L- 835- 48 --- NO �4,9'34 "E J nr��v��TilJ��v h� w I�v - o N^ �� vq " gyp k vo -J 11 V REVISIONS BY EsMrv�, ADJ. PA�r., 5,2 s" + Dilr.4". /cE..s aoa // -30- 9, A,ay , .s//4.LMAN 6)26 /:4 - ltd. JIM to Nweor. c'han9ed SAO ?P.M. SRO 2-44 ADDED Elmn`f. ooc.wo. /9s6o94 626 3 zs- A , - - Te9L ,+reu sa4 // !�� MADE CoOgGtT/urs To 8R6 s aRa 9-2/- 9 ALTA SURVEY MICHAEL & SUSAN SEELAND Biker Regionai Trail Search Area MEDINA Future Facility Planning Map Legend Residential Density 1 Dot = 1 Potential Unit Distance From Park 1/2 Mile 1 Mile Parks Existing Park Proposed Park Trail Surface Type Paved Shoulder Turf Sidewalk Solid lines denote existing trail segments Dashed lines denote proposed trail segments Map Date: May 14, 2013 Scale: 1:30,000 2015 Park Commission Goals 1. List of annual items i) January — Annual Goal Setting Session ii) March/April/May — Annual Park Tour (set date in March) iii) April — Participate in Annual City Clean-up Day (discuss in March) iv) April/May/June — Annual Bird Watch/Nature Walk Event (discuss in April) v) June/July — Capital Improvement Plan Review (review in June) vi) September — Participate in Annual Celebration Day (discuss in August) vii) Grants to Review Annually (review as they become available) (1) Hennepin County Youth Sports Facility Grant • Application Deadline: Approximately November 1, 2015 (2) Parks & Trails Legacy Grant Program (DNR) • Application Deadline: September 2015 (regional trail connection) (3) Other Grants? 2. Friends of the Park Program — At the end of last year, the Park Commission determined that the Friends of the Park program was too strict and full of rules that would not entice residents to participate in the program. It is a goal of the Park Commission to update this program to make it more inviting to participate. 3. Park & Trail Master Plan — This plan was approved back in March 2014, but should be reviewed annually for changes. Please continue to bring this plan with to all future meetings to reference. Any updates to this plan should be made prior to August before the Comprehensive Plan Committee starts looking at it. 4. Signage at Lakeshore Park — Lakeshore Park has many signs to include: park rules, high water levels, Aquatic Invasive Species, parking, etc. A Park Commission subcommittee should visit the site and determine if we could combine some signs and where they should be placed. 5. The Park at Fields of Medina — The final plan has been approved, sidewalks and the parking lot have been installed and the playground equipment and shelter have been ordered and delivered and are waiting for installation. The City needs to go out for bids for concrete work this spring and we would like the park complete by mid -summer The Park Commission will be able to help with smaller park features, finalizing the design of the sport court, and helping to organize a grand opening of the park. 6. Planned Park Improvements — Review in detail one city park at each meeting this year. The Park Commission should take site visits to the park that will be discussed prior to the meeting to come prepared to discuss any issues or improvements needed in each park. 7. Sign at Holy Name Park — Look into replacing the restoration sign at Holy Name Park or just getting rid of the sign. It has a lot of water damage. 8. Medina Road Trail — Look into if trail users can go both directions on one side of the road or if the other side of Medina Road needs to be paved. 9. Baseball Maintenance Plan — A subcommittee should be established to create a maintenance plan that will work for all the baseball organizations to abide by. This subcommittee will also help with some of the conflict/resolution issues the city experiences amongst the various baseball organizations. Planned Park Improvements These items were removed from the Park & Trail Master Plan to stay more current. This document will be reviewed and updated annually at the Park Commission's Goal Setting Session. Hamel Legion Park 2015 • Solar trail lights • Snow machine • Soccer nets • Hawks Field/Parking Lot Clean-up Hamel Legion Park Ball Field Improvements • Dugouts at little league field • Dugout covers on all fields • Bull pens • Larger bleachers at lighted field • Larger bleachers at quad fields • Scoreboards Annual Improvements/Maintenance • Landscaping per plan • Annual infield maintenance • Open play field maintenance • Address drainage issues Holy Name Park 2015 • Picnic shelter Hunter Lions Park 2015 • Enhance back nature area with mowed loop, signage, benches, and bird houses • Stripe parking lot • Add playground mats and wood chips • Ball field enhancement (move out infield, grass infield, enclose with fencing) • Larger bleachers " Scoreboard " Dugouts/coverings 2016 " Bathroom facility & lighting " Water Fountain " Update building Lakeshore Park 2015 " Add playground features " Add picnic tables and concrete pads Annual Maintenance " Lakeshore Maintenance & Landscape Management Maple Park 2015 " Enhance ball field area " Benches and picnic tables at top of hill " Soccer nets 2016 " Pavillion Medina Lake Preserve 2015 " Obtain access to land through easement " Clean up the trail Medina Morningside Park 2015 " Re -seed old ball field to create more open play area " Landscape east border " Soccer nets 2016 " Bury Power Lines Rainwater Nature Area 2015 " New Bridge over creek 2016 " Interpretive signs Tomann Preserve 2015 • Obtain northeast corner of property • Install plaque/sign recognizing Terry Tomann Future Years • Establish a parking turnout for public access • Over -seeding of native mesic prairie grasses and forbs in areas 1, 4, and 6 • Add interpretive signage • Restoration of the Maple basswood forest ecosystem for areas 1 and 6 • Restore wetland located in area 2 with an appropriate control structure Walnut Park • Re -seeding and adding native plants