Loading...
Exhibit RC 101 - Letter from Kevin Morris regarding Non-metered ChargesExhibit RC 101 July 21, 2019 The citizens of Saint Louis City address you through this communication to publicize the social inequality that affects all property owners located in the city of Saint Louis. Most of the buildings mentioned do not have water meters, therefore the collection of services such as: drinking water and wastewater treatment (MSD), is done by estimation, through a concept and cost table. The problem is that this form of estimating the collection of public services previously indicated is disproportionate, unfair, and far from reality. For you to understand, we have made a comparison between a house without a water meter and another house with a water meter. (Both cases, verifiable and with billing invoices updated to date). GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSES CHARACTERISTICS PROPERTY UNMETERED PROPERTY METERED Location Saint Louis City Chesterfield Area Sq. Ft. 2880 Sq. Ft. 5716 Sq. Ft. Number of rooms 12 11 Number of bathrooms 4 4.5 Number of toilets 4 5 Number of tubs 4 3 Number of showers 0 1 Number of Jaccuzys 0 1 Number of pools 0 1 Irrigation system NO YES Monthly payment MSD $126.27 $ 59.03 For the illustration, we have taken the public service of wastewater treatment (MSD) for being the provider of public service of greater cost and inequity. Now we are going to make a comparison of two properties within a case in which both lacked water meters, and are billed under the table of concepts and costs. FOR THIS EXAMPLE, WE USE CONCEPT COST TABLE FOR INVOICE OF UNMETERED AND METERED PROPERTY DETAIL OF CURRENT CHARGES PROPERTY IN ST .LOUIS PROPERTY IN CHESTERFIELD CONCEPT UNIT VALUE NUMBER SUBTOTAL NUMBER SUBTOTAL Base charge $23.83 1 $23.83 1 23.83 Baths $8.08 4 $32.32 3 24.24 Rooms $2.61 12 $31.32 11 28.71 Showers $8.08 0 $0 1 8.08 Water closets $9.7 4 $38.8 5 • 48.5 Jacuzzi $8.08 0 $0 1 8.08 Swimming pool ? 0 $0 1 ? Irrigation system ? 0 $0 I ? TOTAL $126.27 $141.44 REAL PAYMENT $126.27 $59.03 As can be seen, the property located in Saint Louis City pays 209% in comparison with the property that has a water meter. In other words, properties that do not have water meters are paying more than double than those with water meters.This situation happens if we compare it with cities like Frontenac, Clayton, Ladue, Chesterfield, Florissant, or any other city. Even a studio apartment located in Saint Louis city that does not have a water meter pays more than any other property that does have a water meter, although the latter has a pool. But the problem does not end there. It turns out that owners of multifamily properties always have to pay 100% of the estimated monthly value, regardless of whether or not there is water consumption. For example: A multi -family property composed of two apartments, in the case that only one is inhabited and the other empty, the owner of the property must pay 100% of the estimated value as if the two apartments were having water consumption ( From contacting customer service both companies (water and MSD), the answer is that since there is NO water meter, the customer will always have to pay the value that has been estimated in its entirety, even if the consumption is only 50%. If there is no consumption, the total has to be paid, because for properties that do not have a meter, there are only 2 options, always pay 100% of the estimate regardless of the consumption conditions or suspend the water service in its entirety.) Why is it that most inhabitants of Saint Louis City are paying in many cases rates up to 3 times more than the rest of the inhabitants, but also have to pay for unused water consumption? We have some documented cases that we will show at another time, since mentioning them now would make this writing much longer than it already is. But the situation is much more dramatic than what is reflected in this communication. It is evident at first sight, the serious and unjust economic situation to which we have been condemned by the fact that our homes do not have water meters. In conclusion and invoking the constitutional right to equality and prohibition of discrimination contained in the Fourteenth Amendments of The United States Constitution, we respectfullyrequest the accompaniment of the governmental entities to whom we have directed this communication to ensure the taking of the corresponding corrective measures that rebendicate the economic equality rights of the population of Saint Louis City. Respectfully Attached signatures image (signatures) KEVIN MORRIS 9208 Shadydale Dr. Jennings MO 63136 Phone: (314) 566-3178 424-n,v'tfi 1 11 i2 14 19 tk r �j .- dyjI, C xJ 0; 1' 61:7- E4MAIL ADDRESS DEL NUMBER 9.,E 546-3 pzo,Liev C3 ilo _ 5 /r r 1 :5 ;5 3 , Alp 2, 16 17 1S 19 1 fell/140A c.rr i ''S4s iVeiive a_ /4 0/ bp e . I I f y/(1,s-clf-4ii ot, r _ ) ?c) 7 ill l memo' _ _ _ 701. 5 ` Lt,'ita 7?-biiiA 1 if I ipy38,0,33y 41- c 1(h_i_ 4(7st ._ete„7, 1144...,,, 63 20 ygi 9gifff Lizct 11id(� 1 .AA i 53 Pi_ ovgr (Q) ti? A6C ikfi 4-- '0.1 .- 0'1 SIGN • delt._ails%. 31V) 01-.?J.2_9 '7r t_, 3 57tcto I ft4.-)1.1.U"` T\ (i -D -ate ROPIRTY AWN No. NAME A�1DLJ TNAME ,., -,, • E-MAII.ADDRESS -I N t IlCEL,NUMEg- ir) i AP, L), L, LH ,P0 , bil tr r-t)cir5---ctqc( T 111PAPIIRM r' r .J . 4 o. IlMig-4711WIMINTRAIIIMZION/VINFAIFAI zi e.,eyp cc 6 4424 .ea s r. ,,,, ii,cc;, b 1 io 11 12 14 15 1s 17 tel 1g 20