Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2011-12-13CITY OF MOAB ember 13, 201f PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP 6:30 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS (217 East Center Street) City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Main Number (435) 259-5121 Fax Number (435) 259-4135 www.moabcity.org City of Moab - Regular Council Meeting City Council Chambers: 217 East Center Street Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. 4111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 6:30 p.m. PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SECTION 1: APPROVAL OF MINUTES None SECTION 2: CITIZENS TO BE HEARD SECTION 3: DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES 3-1 Community Development Department 3-2 Engineering Department 3-3 Planning Department 3-4 Police Department 3-5 Public Works Department SECTION 4: PRESENTATIONS 4-1 Presentation Regarding the Trails Master Plan by Sandy Freethey, Trail Mix Committee Chair 4-2 Presentation of the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for December 2011 for Helen M. Knight School SECTION 5: PUBLIC HEARING (Approximately 7:30 PM) 5-1 Proposed Full -Service Restaurant Liquor License for Michelle and Karl Kelley, d.b.a. Desert Bistro Located at 36 South 100 West. The Proposed License Location is within a 600 foot Proximity of the Public Pathway 5-2 Proposed Ordinance #2012-01— An Ordinance of the City of Moab Amending the Official City of Moab Zoning Map for the Purposes of Approving an Application to Rezone Portions of the Red Rock Partners Property Located at 61 North 100 West from C-2 and R-4 to C-3 5-3 Solicitation of Potential Projects for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Small Cities Program for Program Year 2012 SECTION 6: CONSENT AGENDA 6-1 Council Appointment of the Mayor Pro -Tenn 6-2 Council Designation of a Councilmember Responsible for Approving Bills 6-3 Confirmation of a Mayoral Appointment to the Grand County Solid Waste District Board for a Term Ending December 31, 2013 6-4 Confirmation of a Mayoral Appointment to the Moab City Planning Commission for a Term Ending December 31, 2016 6-5 Approval of 2012 Moab Golf Club Rates 6-6 Approval of the 2012 Regular City Council Meeting Schedule 6-7 Approval of the 2012 Moab City Holiday Schedule SECTION 7: NEW BUSINESS 7-1 Approval of a Moved -on Structure Permit for Mark Zink to Conduct a Product Display Located at 311 South Main Street on April 3, 2012 7-2 Approval of the Second Amendment to the Mulberry Grove Subdivision Improvements Agreement 7-3 Request to Send Proposed Resolution #01-2012 — A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Annual Budget to Public Hearing 7-4 Approval of a Plat Amendment for West Center Street Properties 7-5 Approval Proposed Resolution #23-2011— A Resolution Adopting the Water Conservation Plan Update 2011 for the City of Moab 7-6 Approval of Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity Maintenance Policies and Procedures 7-7 Approval of an Extension Agreement by and between Moab City, Grand County Water Conservancy District and the Grand County Cemetery District for Use of the Cemetery Well 7-8 Approval of Proposed Resolution #24-2011— A Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Grand County Non -Motorized Trails Master Plan (GCNTMP) as an Amendment to the Moab City General Plan 7-9 Approval of Proposed Resolution #25-2011— A Resolution of the Governing Body of the City of Moab Authorizing Delinquent Terminated Utility Accounts to be Written off of the Accounting System SECTION 8: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE SECTION 9: ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS SECTION 10: REPORT ON CITY/COUNTY COOPERATION SECTION 11: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS SECTION 12: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB SECTION 13: ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org CITY OF MOAB ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE December 9, 2011 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Rebecca W. Andrus, City Engineer Subject: US 191 Bicycle Pathway Surfacing Considerations — Asphalt vs. Concrete As we have progressed through the construction of the US 191 project, several key changes have occurred that offer a new opportunity. The bicycle path from 500 West to the Transit Hub was originally designed to be asphalt primarily because of installation cost. When UDOT bid the project, it was nearly $200,000 above the budget cost. Since then, we have eliminated the boardwalk and replaced it with a standard trail section. The rail fence was also taken out of the project to be done separately as a City/County joint project since the contractor cost after months of negotiation only got down to $113.50 per foot. The cost for the fencing is anticipated to fall within the match that the City and County have already obligated to the project. With these changes, there is currently a surplus in the project of approximately $126,000 that would be returned to UDOT if unused. Change orders and various Value Engineering cost proposals may alter this number somewhat. Earlier in the project, the City asked UDOT to get a price from the contractor for switching the path from asphalt to concrete. The pricing came in at over $116,000 more than asphalt; see the cost proposal from WW Clyde. It did not make sense to change surfacing materials at that time because the additional cost would have been entirely borne by the City. However, with the surplus in the project that UDOT will match 80%/20%, the City cost for switching from asphalt to concrete could be as low as $24,000 if the entire project remains within budget. I have attached several pictures that were provided to me by Trail Mix showing some of the issues that they are having with asphalt paths. The County has determined that the anticipated regular maintenance cost of an asphalt path is $3,000 per mile per year (County email attached). I have also included pictures of the Mill Creek Parkway, which was put in using concrete over 15 years ago. It remains in great condition with no regular maintenance. Using a conservative number for the useful life of a concrete path at 25 years, this would put the maintenance savings at $75,000 per mile. The 500 W to Transit Hub pathway section that will be put in with the UDOT project is approximately one mile. Therefore, if the additional cost for concrete is $24,000, there will be a net savings of over $50,000 for the life of the project. It is anticipated that concrete will last longer than this, which would increase the benefits of switching. Additionally, asphalt would require full depth reclamation within that time period, which could cost $80,000 in today's dollars. It would be prudent to budget for the possibility of utilizing concrete instead of asphalt for the path. I propose using the storm drainage fund to pay for some of the over $100,000 in drainage infrastructure that will be put in as part of this project and setting aside $30,000 for use in changing to a concrete path. The additional money is to be used only if the project exceeds the budgeted amount when the change order is applied. These budgetary changes would be included in the mid -year budget opening that will be up for approval in January. Sincerely, Rebecca W. Andrus, PE Moab City Engineer 3-2 W.W. Clyde & Co. P.O. Sox 350 Springville, Utah 84663 (801) 802-6803 / fax (801) 802-6830 Equal Opportunity Employer 11114-044 October 31, 2011 Russell Tangren Resident Engineer Utah department of Transportation P.O. Box 1138 Moab, Utah 84532 Re: F-0191(86)126 US 191; MP 126 to MP 129.8 Concrete Trail Option Pricing Dear Russ: In response to your request for changing the Trail S surfacing from asphalt to concrete we offer the following proposal: 527 CY of UTBC @ $33.001 CY = $17,391,00 527 CY of Concrete @ $355,00/ CY = $187,085.00 Total = $204,476.00 Additionally the duration of this activity would change from five working days to twenty two working days. Sincere J4--------- Steve Swis er Project Manager MIN American Road 3 Transportation 9ui]dprS AsSOciation Pictures of one -year -old asphalt pavement that is already showing signs of significant cracking. Trail Mix has had to apply Crack Seal to try to mitigate the damage before it becomes more severe. The glove and coin in the picture on the left show the thickness of the cracks. These pictures depict asphalt that has been in place for three years. Beyond the cracking, weed growth within the asphalt can be a significant issue that leads to further decay of the asphalt. This asphalt is 6-7 years old and is showing signs of failure. Immediate patching is necessary at this point, but its effects are limited and full reconstruction is not far in the future. Without regular maintenance, asphalt deteriorates rapidly. Concrete pavement utilized onthe Mill Creek Parkway isover 1S-yean-o|dand isstill ingreat shape. Regular maintenance has not been required. Rebecca Andrus From: Freethey <sngmoab@preciscom.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 8:27 PM To: rebecca@moabcity.org; Olsen, David Subject: Fwd: paved pathway / asphalt maintenance Attachments: Asphalt Maintenance.xls Rebecca and David Here are messages and attachment about a pavement maintenance worksheet schedule that Geoff Freethey and Krissie Killoy have created. The message mentions $3,000 per mile, per year as an average which is a number provided by Bill Jackson with the County Road Dept. Sandy Original Message Subject:paved pathway / asphalt maintenance Date:Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:54:49 -0600 From:kkilloy <kkilloy@,grand.utah.gov> To:<gfreeth@preciscom.net>, "'David Olsen"' <david@moabcity.org>, "'Freethey"' <sngmoab@preciscom.net>, "Chris Baird" <cbaird@grand.utah.gov>, "'Kim Schappert"' <kschappe@mac.com> Thanks Geoff for creating a budget worksheet. I added a tab (see attached) to get a rough idea for asphalt maintenance costs. A couple of notes: • From the information I gathered, the 4 year alternating maintenance plan seems to be an "average".. I have heard a range of suggestions from two years to seven years depending on conditions and the treatment(s) proposed. • I am not sure how accurate the per square yard estimate is for fog seal. I have two calls out to double check this. • For ease of administration and reducing mobilization costs we will want to group trail segments into a two to three year rotating schedule • When it comes time to complete seal coating we may want to discuss quantities applied (rather than square feet or yards) with the contractor It appears that allocating $3,000 per square mile of paved path is adequate based on current costs. This gives us a starting point for budgeting purposes. The next step is to draft a RFP for the previously identified 2012 projects (Goose Island, Gemini, and front of Arches segments). I will start a draft and send it out to the group for review. It would be great if once budgets are complete we could solicit bids (i.e. get crack sealing done before April). Charlie Skews is in town tomorrow so I will run these numbers by him as well. Thanks, Krissie 1 3-2 CITY OF MOAB PROPOSED FULL -SERVICE RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE PROXIMITY PUBLIC HEARING The City of Moab will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at approximately 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moab City Offices at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. The purpose of this hearing is to solicit public input on a proposed Full -Service Restaurant Liquor License for Michelle and Karl Kelley, d.b.a. Desert Bistro Located at 36 South 100 West. The proposed license location is within a 600 foot proximity of the Public Pathway. The City Council will solicit public input regarding granting a variance to the proximity distance restrictions for a Full - Service Restaurant Liquor License. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. /s/ Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Published in the Times Independent, December 1 and 8, 2012. R:\Notices\2011\proximity ph.docx 5-1 "FULL -SERVICE RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE" LOCAL CONSENT Date: Attn: DABC Licensing & Compliance Section , [ ] City [ ] Town [ ] County hereby grants its consent to the issuance of a full -service restaurant liquor license to: Business Name: Applicant / Business Owner: KtCL-{v_7., ! [GAL V-e-U.-L( Location Address: -3& SOvM (Do Pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code 32A-4, Part 1, this license allows for the storage, sale and consumption of liquor on the premises. (>4 Check if applicable LOCAL CONSENT FOR PROXIMITY VARIANCE In accordance with Utah Code 32A-4-101(4), the local authority also grants consent to a variance regarding the proximity of this establishment relative to a public or private school, church, public library, public playground, or park. fubt,1e_ 1-16nor.,3 & .E(24 , feu t Authorized Signature Print Name / Title This is a suggested form. A city, town, or county's own form is acceptable. Local consent may be faxed to the DABC at 801-977-6889 or mailed to: Department of Alcoholic beverage Control PO Box 30408 Salt Lake City, UT 84130-0408 Effective May 12, 2009 (v.8.16.10) page 7 of 44 UDABC P. O. BOX 30408 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103-0408 RE: Liquor License for Desert Bistro 36 South 100 West Moab, Utah 84532 To Whom It May Concern: We are opposed to the granting of a liquor license to Desert Bistro at the above address. The property abuts our own property on their West property line, and we have found that the liquor license and the serving of liquor causes a huge amount of rowdyness and noise. The rowdyness and noise disturb the peace of all of the residents who live in the same neighborhood. We have had to put up with all of that for years from the RIO, which is next door to the Desert Bistro. The adding of one more liquor license on 100 West will double the noise and disturb the peace of the neighbors even more. We also feel that the serving of liquor that close to the Moab Park System, will cause a problem for people wanting to use the Parkway Path because of the rowdyness and noise. We ask that you deny the variance and deny the liquor license. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 7 e . �- ande)-edit— oyoak 175 West Center Street Moab, UT 84532 cc: Moab City Planning Commission Moab City Council editor@moabtimes.com Classified -Legal Notice Please publish the public hearing notice below in the legal notices section of as soon as possible. Send billing and proof of publication to the attention of Charlotte Evans Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control P.O. Box 30408 Salt Lake City, UT 84130-0408. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me or Charlotte at 977-6800. Thank you very much. S incerely, Keith Zuspan Licensing and Compliance Division Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Legal Notice Pursuant to sections 32B-1-202 Utah code annotated, a public hearing will be held on Friday, November 18, 2011, at 4:30 p.m., at the Desert Bistro, 36 South 100 West, Moab, Utah to gather information regarding whether a variance should be granted to the Desert Bistro to receive a liquor license located at 36 South 100 West. The proposed Desert Bistro restaurant is located within the 600 foot proximity restriction of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act with regard to the Friends of the Parkway pathway (Moab Park System) located on 100 South. Public input is welcome. Written comments/input may be sent to: UDABC, PO Box 30408, Salt Lake City, UT 84103-0408 Dated this 2nd day of November 2011 Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Michael Navarre, Chief of Police MOAB CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 217 East Center Street, Suite #130 Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-8938 FAX (435) 259-8915 Date: 11/10/2011 MCPD-MEMO-11-11-01 To: Moab City Counci From: Navarre l/,r Re: Desert Bistro (alcohol license) The D.A.B.0 has determined that this establishment is within the 600' proximity restriction with regards to the Mil!creek Parkway, located on 100 W 100 So. Therefore a public hearing will be held by the State. We concur with the D.A.B.C. on the proximity issue. The establishment is within the 600' proximity restriction of the Parkway. This license should be forwarded to Moab City public hearing. Measurements are attached. Thanks em Desert Bistro Liquor License 0 20 40 N 80 120 160 Feet 1 inch = 60 feet CITY OF MOAB PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2o12-oi The City of Moab will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at approximately 7:3o p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moab City Offices at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. The purpose of this hearing is to solicit public input on Proposed Ordinance #2012-01 - An Ordinance of the City of Moab Amending the Official City of Moab Zoning Map for the Purposes of Approving an Application to Rezone Portions of the Red Rock Partners Property Located at 61 North too West from C-2 and R-4 to C-3. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. /s/ Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Published in the Times Independent, December 1 and 8, 2011. R:\Notices\2011\ph ord 2012-01.docx 5-2 ORDINANCE #2012-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOAB AMENDING THE OFFICIAL CITY OF MOAB ZONING MAP FOR THE PURPOSES OF APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO REZONE PORTIONS OF THE RED ROCK PARTNERS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 61 NORTH 100 WEST FROM C-2 AND R-4 TO C-3 WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the City of Moab and the Moab City Planning Commission desire to make zone amendments to promote the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity, and general welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the City; WHEREAS, Michael H. Bynum, Manager, Red Rock Partners, LLC, 755 North Main Street, Moab, Utah, owner of record of an approximate 5.64-acre tract of land located at approximately 61 North 100 West, Moab, Utah, has applied to change the zoning from C- 2 and R-4 to C-3; and, WHEREAS, The Planning Commission ("Commission") of the City of Moab held a public hearing on March 10, 2011, concerning the amendment of the City of Moab Official Zone Map to reflect a zoning change for said property located at the above described location; and, WHEREAS, the Commission in a split 3-2 vote favorably recommended the zoning change to the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDINAINED by the City of Moab that effective upon the signing of this Ordinance, the City of Moab Official Zoning Map with its amended boundary lines and zoning districts is declared to be an official record of the City and shall be included as part of Title 17 of the Moab Municipal Zoning Ordinances and shall reflect a zone change from C-2 and R-4 to C-3 for the above described property. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this -th day of , 2012. City of Moab Mayor David L. Sakrison Attest: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Ordinance #2012-01 Page 1 of 1 5-2 City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Correspondence October 20, 2011 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: City Staff Subject: Adoption of Ordinance 2011-10, an Ordinance Amending the Official Zoning Map for the Purpose of Approving an Application to Rezone Portions of Property Owned by Red Rock Partners and Located at 61 North 100 West Background The City has received a request from Michael H. Bynum, Manager for Red Rock Partners, LLC to review the application for the rezoning of 61 North 100 West. The property is split zoned with C-3, R-4 and C-2. The applicant is asking for a C-3 Zone to extend to all parts of the property. The attached letter is asking Council to place the application on the agenda for December 13, 2011. This application was first reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of February 24, 2011 but was tabled for further review. Subsequently, the Commission held a vote on March 10, 2011, and in a 4-0 vote, favorably recommended the zone change to Council. On March 22, Council reviewed the application and elected to not hold a public hearing and voted 1-4 to not approve the request to rezone the property. On April 26, 2011, Councilmember Bailey moved to reconsider the proposal to rezone the property and in a 4-1 vote, the action carried. Immediately, the item was tabled in a 5-0 vote with no set date to bring the application from the table for further review and discussion. Process Based on the request from Mr. Bynum, the Mayor will have to entertain a motion and vote to take the application from the table and then establish December 13, 2011 as the date of the public hearing. The attached background information was submitted to the Planning Commission as well as Council for review prior to the meetings listed above. p:\planning department \2011\correspondence \pI-II-233 cc red rock rezoning.docx 5-2 RED ROCK PARTNERS, LLC 40 N. 100 West Moab, UT 84532 (435) 260-1388 October 12, 2011 Hand — Delivered Ms. Donna Metzler City Manager 217 E Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 RE: Red Rock Partners Zone Application Dear Ms. Metzler: As Manager of Red Rock Partners, I am writing to request that our application for re- zone be placed on the December 13, 2011 Council Agenda for a public hearing. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Kind R� •�..� / Michael H. Bynum Manager, Red Rock Partners, LLC 5-2 44 UtahStateUniversity MOAB EDUCATION CENTER December 6, 2011 City Council Members City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 Dear Members of the Moab City Council, I would like to voice my support for the proposal to rezone the property at 61 North and 100 West to C-3 to support the future development of a hotel and conference center. A conference center in Moab would be consistent with efforts at USU Moab to increase capacity within the community to host educational conferences and events that would substantially enrich our community. The central location of the property is ideal for this use and would provide numerous collateral benefits: move some traffic and events off of Main Street; accommodate the many groups that wish to hold training and educational events in the Moab area; expand the visitor season; and create economic activity that would benefit many local businesses throughout the year. Thank you for giving full consideration to this proposal. Sincerely, Steven R. Hawks, EdD, MBA Associate Dean and Executive Director Utah State University Moab 125 W 200 S Moab, UT 84532 steve.hawks@usu.edu 435-259-7432 City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Inter -office Correspondence 14 it 043 March 15, 2011 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Moab Council From: City Staff Subject: Review and Approval of an Application to Rezone Portions of the Red Rocks Partners Property Located at 61 North 100 West From C- 2 and R-4 to C-3 and Approval of Ordinance #2011-10 Amending the Official City of Moab Zoning map Background The Planning Commission held a public hearing to review this application on February 24, 2011. The Commission voted in a split vote to favorably recommend the rezone to Council. If approved, the rezoning will create consistent zoning across the entire parcel. The property is currently zoned predominantly R-4 with a small amount as C-2. The portion of the property that fronts on 1st West Street is currently C-3. The application has been submitted in an effort to change the C-2 and R-4 portions to C-3. Please refer to the attached PC memos PL-11-037, PL-11-041, and particularly, memo PL-11- 032, dated February 19, 2011, for background information regarding the application. Discussion The Planning Commission requested additional information for their meeting on March 10 and were provided with: o History of the zoning for the area, A discussion about the advantages of redevelopment, and o A survey of the existing development of 1s` West and Williams Way. Also, a comparison was provided as to the types of uses allowed in the three zones in Planning memo, PL-11-037, and a visual survey of the types of uses on First West as well as adjacent properties on nearby Williams Way was presented by staff. Page 50 of 92 G Page 2 of 3 The zoning history was first classified as C-2 in 1954. The entire west side of the city was zoned commercially at the time and labeled "Central Commercial Zone". Today, the Central Commercial Zone is given a "C-3" designation. Between 1954 and 1974 there is little evidence as to what occurred in the area but the surviving zoning map indicates that during the twenty year span many of the zones we now have were created and applied to various parcels. During this time, the original C-2 was divided into R-4 and R-3 with large portions of the property as C-3. This historic map also follows zone change updates until 1982. Maps from 1992,1993, and 1998 show no changes in the zoning in the immediate area. Then in 2009, Council approved the zone change of the Bazil-Todd property from C-3 to C-2 so they could construct an office/home and provide their dwelling on the ground floor. The referenced zoning maps will be available for Council review. Aspects of rezoning and redevelopment include those listed below. It should be considered that this action goes beyond development of just this property and that approval of the ordinance can be considered as a Downtown redevelopment that will provide depth off of Main Street and strengthen our commercial core. ➢ Redevelopment is one of the most effective ways to reverse deterioration and breathe new life into distressed areas, breaking down barriers and drawing new investments by private enterprises. ➢ Redevelopment is meant to attract and create jobs, revitalize the business climate, rehabilitate the housing stock and initiate active participation by citizens in the area. ➢ Incompatible or undesirable conditions are considered blight, and renovating these areas is the major focus of redevelopment; Blight directly contributes to disproportionately high crime rates, and dangerous or illegal activities. ➢ New police stations, renovated library branches and street paving are some of the notable results of these types of improvements; ➢ Redevelopment attracts new services and businesses to the area, increasing the economic health of the City as well as providing local residents with new and viable job opportunities; ➢ Redevelopment offers existing business owners opportunities to upgrade their store through fagade improvements, enhancing their chances to attract and maintain customers and therefore succeed in their business efforts, ➢ Redevelopment enhances the existing streetscape and landscaping of public throughways in these areas; ➢ Redevelopment monitors vacant properties and maintains strict Code Enforcement efforts, including graffiti removal; • Redevelopment is an investment in neighborhoods that helps in resident retention by developing open space areas, parks and community resource facilities that unite many diverse neighborhoods and accentuates positive aspects to be shared in all cultures. Process The process for a Zoning Map amendment is similar to a text amendment of the development code in that it is Council's discretion to hold or not hold a public hearing. The Code allows Page 51 of 92 Page 3 of 3 Council to adopt text amendments as well as Zoning Map amendments in Chapter 17.04.100, Action by City Council. Paragraph "A", without a public hearing; "A. The city council may authorize any zoning map amendment or text amendment by ordinance adopted at a public meeting, which shall be held following receipt of the planning commission recommendation." The code goes on to state, "In its discretion, the council may elect to receive testimony or evidence from the applicant, city staff, and the public prior to taking final action on the ordinance." If a public hearing is conducted, then the necessary notices and advertising must be completed. Alternatives 1) Council can decide to hold a public hearing and establish a date; 2) Council can decide to not hold a public hearing and approve Ordinance #2011-02 as recommended by the Planning Commission; 3) Council can approve Ordinance #2011-02 with any changes necessary to address concerns; 4) Council can vote to not approve the ordinance and state the reasons for denial; 5) Council can table the ordinance in order to satisfy needs for additional information. pAplanning department VOINcorrespondence \p1-II-041 red rock memo.docz Page 52 of 92 5-2 ORDINANCE #2011-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOAB AMENDING THE OFFICIAL CITY OF MOAB ZONING MAP FOR THE PURPOSES OF APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO REZONE PORTIONS OF THE RED ROCK PARTNERS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 61 NORTH 100 WEST FROM C-2 AND R-4 TO C-3 WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the City of Moab and the Moab City Planning Commission desire to make zone amendments to promote the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity, and general welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the City; WHEREAS, Randy Day, of Red Rock Partners, LLC, 755 North Main Street, Moab, Utah, representing the owner of record of an approximate 5.64-acre tract of land located at approximately 61 North 100 West, Moab, Utah, has applied to change the zoning from C-2 and R-4 to C-3; and, WHEREAS, The Planning Commission ("Commission") of the City of Moab held a public hearing on March 10, 2011, concerning the amendment of the City of Moab Official Zone Map to reflect a zoning change for said property located at the above described location; and, WHEREAS, the Commission in a split 3-2 vote favorably recommended the zoning change to the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDINAINED by the City of Moab that effective upon the signing of this Ordinance, the City of Moab Official Zoning Map with its amended boundary lines and zoning districts is declared to be an official record of the City and shall be included as part of Title 17 of the Moab Municipal Zoning Ordinances and shall reflect a zone change from C-2 and R-4 to C-3 for the above described property. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this _`h day of , 2011. City of Moab Mayor David L. Sakrison Attest: Rachel Ellison City Recorder Ordinance #2011-10 Page 1 of 1 Page 53 of 92 5-2 STY 04, MOAB Memo To: From: Subject: Background City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Inter -office Correspondence February 19, 2011 Members of the Moab Planning Commission City Staff Public Hearing to Approve an Application to Rezone Property as Submitted by Tom Stevens Representing Red Rock Partners Pl 11037 Tom Stevens, acting on behalf of Red Rock Partners, has applied for a rezone of property located at 61 North 100 West (northwest corner of the intersection of Williams Way and 100 West). The property is currently zoned predominantly R-4 with a small amount as C-2. The portion of the property that fronts on 1st West Street is currently C-3. The application has been submitted in an effort to change the C-2 and R-4 portions to C-3 for a resort development. The affected property is approximately 5.13 acres in size. The residents of the existing mobile home park were given the required nine month notification, possibly in 2007-08, to vacate the property. Discussion This application will erase a split of one of the properties by the zoning boundary between R-4 and C-2 and C-3. This is similar to a recently approved rezoning of property and will remove the confusion created by this situation. Contemporary zoning generally follows property lines and centerlines of street rights -of -way and the applicant has provided a plat showing this concept. As provided in a previous memo to the Planning Commission, the objectives and characteristics of the zones should be evaluated in reaching a decision. The objectives for the C-3 zone are contained in Chapter 17.24.010 of the code. It states, "The C-3 central commercial zone has been established as a district in which the primary use of the land is for business purposes. The area covered by this zone is now and it is intended that it shall continue to be the dominant shopping and financial center of the city and surrounding territory. For this reason the zone has been located in the central part of the city where the street pattern makes the business buildings readily accessible to all parts of the city and surrounding region and where business and Page 54 of 92 Page 2 of 6 shopping activities can be carried on with maximum convenience. The C-3 zone is characterized by wide, clean, well -lighted streets, ample pedestrian ways and vehicular parking lots for the convenience and safety of the public. Attractive, inviting and well - maintained shops, stores, offices and other buildings are also characteristic of this zone. Representative of the uses in this zone are banks, hotels, office buildings, theaters, and a wide variety of retail outlets. In order to accomplish the objectives and purposes of this title and to promote the characteristics of this zone, the regulations set out in this chapter shall apply in the C-3 zone." Proposed residential uses cannot be located on the ground floor. A conceptual plan has not been received at this time but the code requires that residential uses in the C-3 not occupy possible ground floor commercial spaces. The exception is if the housing units are intended for affordable housing. The objectives of the current zoning are also interesting. In Chapter 17.51.010, the R-4 zone is described as providing, "the most appropriate locations for mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions along with conventional dwellings. The zone is characterized by open fields interspersed by well -maintained mobile home parks, mobile home subdivisions, and other types of dwellings." The R-4 zoning in this area does not mirror the images conjured up by the description in the code but it does allude to "...other types of dwellings" that may be an appropriate match to the surrounding commercial development. Chapter 17.21.010 describes the C-2, commercial -residential, zone as an area that would "facilitate the development of attractive areas within the city that allow the mixing of compatible commercial and residential uses; facilitate the orderly expansion of commercial uses out from the central commercial district; and, be characterized by attractive and well -maintained commercial and residential buildings set back from public streets and surrounded by landscaped yards." It is logical that this area would become an extension of the central commercial district (C-3 Zone). The proximity of the property within one block of Main Street is a natural expansion and approval would be in conformance with the provisions of the General Plan to expand this commercial area. It will attract visitors and provide lodging within walking distance of the night life and other activities on Main Street. Rezoning of older properties for redevelopment can enhance the neighborhood and provide an increase in utilization of underdeveloped spaces, buildings and utilities. These underused areas are a significant asset that the City can offer for redevelopment projects. The potential for additional residential development, improved neighborhood environments, and providing additional jobs are all economic benefits. Page 55 of 92 Page 3 of 6 Code Chapter 17.04.040, Zoning Map Amendments, contains criteria for the Planning Commission and Council to apply to requests to rezone: Review of Criteria Chapter 17.04.050 states, "For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the City of Moab, zoning map amendments are to be discouraged. Zoning map amendments shall only be approved if the applicant establishes that one or more of the following standards apply to the subject real property: 1. The land to be zoned was zoned in error and, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the City's General Plan. It can be argued that this area was zoned in error and was merely applied because of the type of development that was in existence at the time of adoption of these sections of the code. It is necessary for central commercial areas to have surrounding transition or "supporr zones that provide complimentary and accessory types of businesses and services for various retail establishments. This type of arrangement provides proximity shopping on a pedestrian scale . and creates a compact walk able design in compliance with Smart Growth. Rezoning of this property is also in keeping with the policies and goals of the General Plan. Rezoning will• • "...provide for adequate amounts of appropriate commercial land in the future and to ensure the attractiveness, natural beauty, existing character and environmental stability of these areas; • Encourage the development and vitality of a central commercial district compatible with small-town living; • Will fulfill the implementation of the "in -filling and redevelopment policy of the plan"; • Encourage clustering of commercial enterprises; • Satisfy the Plan by permitting expansion of commercial uses into or within residential areas... if such development maintains the residential desirability of the affected neighborhoods and the "character" of the structure and signs and `fits in" with other existing structures; • Encourage variety in new commercial developments and businesses; • Allows the central commercial zone to expand when additional commercial capacity is needed and when such development is compatible with historical structures and character of the community; • Encourage upgrade in the appearance of commercial areas and ensure that building design enhances existing town.scale and character. 2. The area for which a map amendment is requested has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a redevelopment of the area. Page 56 of 92 Page 4 of 6 The area has become a busy economic area with commercial development in the guise of a subdivision of `twin homes" on Williams Way, additional residential development and the proposal for a new hospital a short distance from this property. 3. The proposed map amendment is necessary in order to provide land for a use which was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City's General Plan, and that such change will be consistent with the policies and goals of the Plan. Special consideration shall be given to existing conditions on and around the area in question, including the changing nature of the area, land uses, densities, and the height and scale of both existing and proposed structures. Certainly, a destination resort was not anticipated just one block off of Main Street in 2002, but the economic value of property has risen greatly in the past hand full of years. As noted above granting the rezone will be in keeping with the goals, objectives, and policies for implementation of the General Plan. Map Amendment Approval Criteria. According to Chapter 17.04.060, the Planning Commission and City Council shall consider the following criteria in reviewing a proposed map amendment: 1. Was the existing zone for the property adopted in error? See #1 above. 2. Has there been a change of character in the area including, but not limited to: the installation of public facilities or new utilities; other approved zone changes; new growth trends; deterioration of existing development; or the need for development transitions? Please see above for a portion of the answer for this criteria. Existing structures are deteriorating. Many of the commercial buildings saw their banner years a long time ago and are in need of repair and constant maintenance. New growth trends have been shaped by the recreation and housing needs of a second home industry because of the opportunities in the Spanish Valley and surrounding areas and National Parks. Zone changes to commercial districts have been granted by Council in recent history and this action has caused a `peninsula" of R-4 zone between commercial zones to be created. 3. Is there a need for the proposed zoning within the area or community? This proposed rezoning will satisfy the General Plan through expansion of the central commercial district and provide redevelopment of these older properties. 4. Is the proposed zoning classification compatible with the surrounding area or uses; will there be adverse impacts; and/or can any adverse impacts be mitigated? Page 57 of 92 Page S of 6 The zoning is compatible with the surrounding zones and is adjacent with the C-3 Zone. Surrounding uses include a single-family home that will probably see some impact and the other prominent use is a commercial mobile home park. 5. Will benefits be derived by the community or area by granting the proposed zoning? From the standpoint of economic development, the community should greatly benefit from the rezoning and the proposed development for the property. The neighborhood will be improved through redevelopment and it should act as encouragement for other surrounding property owners to review their properties for improvement. 6. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope of development suggested by the proposed zoning classification? If utilities are not available, can they be reasonably extended? Adequate facilities exist but some upgrade of services may be required at the developer's expense. 7. Does the application conform with the provisions of the Moab General Plan, the Land Use Code, and applicable agreements with affected governmental entities? The application meets all applicable standards. Decision to rezone must be based on the General Plan as well as the Land Use Code. The Plan states, "All ordinance changes, rezoning, or improvement programs should be in conformance with the expressed policies and maps of the General Plan." It also goes on to say "...that all new zone changes [must] conform with the General Plan" and that they be done in a manner "necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community and work to preserve the natural environment and character of a small-town community." A rezone makes sense when viewed in the light of the types of uses on the surrounding properties. It also makes sense as a logical extension of the C-3 Zone and agrees with the goals of the General Plan. It may be in the best interests of the City of Moab for the Planning Commission to consider adjacent properties in this annexation The rezoning is logical for the area because: • A single tract would no longer be split by two zones • It is a natural extension of the C-3 zone • It meets the criteria of the General Plan The development of the property will fall under additional scrutiny because of the possible impacts to traffic and parking that may be associated with this type of development. These issues will be addressed through review of a commercial site plan application that will be the next step for the applicant if successful in the rezoning of the property. Page 58 of 92 Page 6 of 6 Alternatives 1) The Commission can approve the application to rezone as submitted; 2) The Commission can vote to not approve the proposed rezoning and state their reasons; 3) The Commission may table the application for additional comment and review. pAplanning department \2011\correspondence \pI-II-032 red reck rezone.docx Page 59 of 92 City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Inter -office Correspondence March 7, 2011 Memo To: Members of the Moab Planning Commission From: City Staff Subject: Additional Information to Approve an Application to Rezone Property as Submitted by Red Rock Partners Discussion This application will erase a split of a tract approximately 5 acres in size that is divided between R-4 and C-2 and C-3 Zones. Contemporary zoning practices generally follow property lines and centerlines of street rights -of -way. The Zoning Declaration in Code Chapter 17.04.050 should be kept in mind while evaluating this application: 1. The land to be zoned was zoned in error and, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the City's General Plan. 2. The area for which a map amendment is requested has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a redevelopment of the area. 3. The proposed map amendment is necessary in order to provide land for a use which was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City's General Plan, and that such change will be consistent with the policies and goals of the Plan. Special consideration shall be given to existing conditions on and around the area in question, including the changing nature of the area, land uses, densities, and the height and scale of both existing and proposed structures. In addition, the Map Amendment Approval Criteria are found in Chapter 17.04.060, and the Planning Commission and City Council must consider the following in reviewing a proposed map amendment: 1. Was the existing zone for the property adopted in error? 2. Has there been a change of character in the area including, but not limited to: the installation of public facilities or new utilities; other approved zone changes; new growth trends; deterioration of existing development; or the need for development transitions? 3. Is there a need for the proposed zoning within the area or community? 4. Is the proposed zoning classification compatible with the surrounding area or uses; will there be adverse impacts; and/or can any adverse impacts be mitigated? Page 60 of 92 r Page 2 of B 5. Will benefits be derived by the community or area by granting the proposed zoning? 6. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope of development suggested by the proposed zoning classification? If utilities are not available, can they be reasonably extended? 7. Does the application conform with the provisions of the Moab General Plan, the Land Use Code, and applicable agreements with affected governmental entities? A decision to rezone must be based on the General Plan as well as the Land Use Code. The Plan states, "All ordinance changes, rezoning, or improvement programs should be in conformance with the expressed policies and maps of the General Plan." It also goes on to say "...that all new zone changes [must] conform with the General Plan" and that they be done in a manner "necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community and work to preserve the natural environment and character of a small-town community." , A rezone is a logical expansion of the C-3 when reviewing the types of uses on the surrounding properties and agrees with the goals of the General Plan. The Vision for Moab (pp 5-6) has several goals to follow when planning for the future: 1. Promote the presence of a vital downtown as the center of commercial activities and employment. 2. Utilize compact development patterns that make the most efficient use of public facilities and services, protect open space and minimize urban sprawl. 3. Maintain a rural/small town character that saves and complements its historic structures and neighborhoods. 4. Create walk -able neighborhoods, free of high-speed traffic hazard. 5. Locate schools, parks, trails and other public facilities within walking/biking distance of homes. 6. Reduce the effects of summer heat by providing or requiring shade in parking lots, shopping areas, parks and other public areas and neighborhoods; discourage removal of historic trees; and reduce coverage requirements for asphalt. 7. Separate and buffer conflicting land uses, especially where commercial abuts residential. 8. Encourage a diverse mix of year-round jobs that offer competitive salaries and meaningful work to keep Moab families employed in Moab. 9. Preserve Moab's surrounding landscapes and other natural resources to enhance the quality of life for community residents and in order to continue to attract people to the area who contribute to economic stability. 10. Develop a community and resort destination that is designed for people where walking and biking are the comerstone of the transportation system. 11. Protect the stillness and visual integrity of Moab's enveloping desert landscape. 12. Protect and preserve open space, agricultural lands, riparian areas, ridgelines, mesas and wetlands. 13. Improve quality of living through support for affordable housing. The rezoning is logical for the area because: • A single tract would no longer be split by two zones • It is a natural extension of the C-3 zone • It meets the goal of the General Plan Future development of the property will fall under additional scrutiny because of the possible impacts to traffic and parking that may be associated with this type of development. These issues will be addressed through review of a commercial site plan ). Page 61 of 92 C 5-2 Pane 3 of i3 application that will be the next step for the applicant if successful in the rezoning of the property. This application will erase a split of one of the properties by the zoning boundary between R-4 and C-2 and C-3. If approved, the rezoning of the property will remove the administrative confusion created by this situation. Contemporary zoning generally follows property lines and centerlines of street rights -of -way and the applicant proposal has provided a plat showing this concept. An evaluation of the objectives and characteristics of the zones may be helpful in reaching a decision. The objectives for the C-3 zone are contained in Chapter 17.24.010 of the code and states, `The C-3 central commercial zone has been established as a district in which the primary use of the land is for business purposes. The area covered by this zone is now and it is intended that it shall continue to be the dominant shopping and financial center of the city and surrounding territory. For this reason the zone has been located in the central part of the city where the street pattern makes the business buildings readily accessible to all parts of the city and surrounding region and where business and shopping activities can be carried on with maximum convenience. The C-3 zone is characterized by wide, clean, well -lighted streets, ample pedestrian ways and vehicular parking lots for the convenience and safety of the public. Attractive, inviting and well - maintained shops, stores, offices and other buildings are also characteristic of this zone. Representative of the uses in this zone are banks, hotels, office buildings, theaters, and a wide variety of retail outlets. in order to accomplish the objectives and purposes of this title and to promote the characteristics of this zone, the regulations set out in this chapter shall apply in the C-3 zone." Generally, proposed residential uses cannot be located on the ground floor in the C-3. A conceptual plan has not been received at this time but the code requires that residential uses in the C-3 not occupy possible ground floor commercial spaces. The lone exception is if the housing units are intended for affordable housing stock. The objectives of the current zoning are also interesting. In Chapter 17.51.010, the R-4 zone is described as providing, "the most appropriate locations for mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions along with conventional dwellings. The zone is characterized by open fields interspersed by well -maintained mobile home parks, mobile home subdivisions, and other types of dwellings." The R-4 zoning in this area does not mirror the images conjured up by the description in the code but it does allude to "...other types of dwellings", that may be a match to the surrounding commercial development. Chapter 17.21.010 describes the C-2, commercial -residential, zone as an area that would "facilitate the development of attractive areas within the city that allow the mixing of compatible commercial and residential uses; facilitate the orderly expansion of commercial uses out from the central commercial district; and, be characterized by attractive and well -maintained commercial and residential buildings set back from public streets and surrounded by landscaped yards." Page 62 of 92 L Pooe 4 of B A comparison of the uses in each zone follows. R-4 C-2 C-3 A. One -family dwellings and accessory buildings B. Planned unit developments subject to the requirements and conditions set forth in Chapter 17.66 of this title 1. Retail, convenience and wholesale establishments less than three thousand square feet (wholesale establishments with stock on premises but excluding establishment whose principal activity is that of a storage warehouse 2.Office buildings, clinics and utility buildings excluding service yards and drive through services 1. Retail establishments and service enterprises 2.Office buildings, clinics, utility buildings C. Fences, walls, and hedges which do not exceed seven feet in height provided that no fence, wall or hedge shall exceed four feet in height within the required front or side yard that fronts on a street 3. Assembly of appliances from previously prepared parts (contained within a building) 3. Assembly of appliances from previously prepared parts D. Customary household pets, including but not limited to cats, dogs, and canaries; but not including the breeding of dogs and cats for sale 4. Eating establishments less than two thousand square feet excluding drive-ins or drive through services 4. Auto body and fender shops, auto painting E. Public schools, public libraries, public parks, playgrounds, recreation buildings and churches but not temporary revival tents or buildings 5. Service enterprises 5. Beer parlors and alcohol dispensing establishments F. Agriculture 6.One-family and two-family dwellings, apartment houses and court apartments 6. Electrical appliance shops (wholesale) G. Temporary buildings and yards for the storage of materials and equipment incidental to the construction of dwellings and other permitted uses; provided, however, that a permit for such temporary building shall not be effective for more than one year 7. Fraternity organization Lodges 7. Engraving and printing establishments H. Home occupations 8. Funeral le ablisbtnents, 8. Fraternity buildings, clubs, Pane 5 of 8 mortuaries and churches lodges I. Two-family dwellings 9. Gymnasium or physiculture establishments 9. Funeral establishments, mortuaries, wedding chapels J. Child day care centers and foster family care homes 10. Home occupations 10. Garages and used car lots L. Court apartments 11. Lodging establishments (under ten units) 11. Gymnasium or physiculture establishments M. Boarding and rooming houses 12. Parking lots (commercial) 12. Home occupations N. Clubs and lodges (nonprofit) 13. Schools, hospitals, public buildings and public parks 13. Hospitals O. Mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions 14. Signs 14. Pawnshops P. Publicly owned athletic fields and schools 15. Rest homes and day care centers 15. Motels, cafes, food drive - ins, offices Q. Boys' schools and correctional institutions 16. Green houses and nurseries 16. Parking lots (commercial) R. Pasturing of animals 17. Pet shops, veterinary clinics, art and craft shops, taxidermy shops, electrical appliance shops (wholesales), plumbing shops, carpentry shops, hardware stores, electrical retail stores, river running companies, bakeries, stone and monument sales establishments, engraving and printing establishments and secondhand stores. 17. Revival tents (temporary) S. Plant nurseries 18. Service stations T. Radio and television towers 19. Schools and other public buildings 20. Secondhand stores 21. Accessory signs and Billboards 22. Utility buildings and public buildings Page 64 of 92 t Page S of 8, 23. Stone and monument sales establishments _ 24. Taxidermy shops _ 25. Tire recapping (all activities inside of a building) 26. Wholesale establishments with stock on premises but excluding establishments whose principal activity is that of a storage warehouse 27. Trucking companies subject to city council approval 28. Dwellings and apartment houses are not permitted, except that dwellings above the ground floor shall be permitted; 30. Ground floor dwellings only when the owner of the property is a legally constituted housing authority as recognized by the State of Utah, Grand County, or the City of Moab, or alternatively, the owner of the property is a legally recognized nonprofit land trust operating under a signed property management contract with a legally constituted housing authority as recognized by the State of Utah, Grand County, or Moab City Page 65 of 92 Pane 7 of B It is logical that this area would become an extension of the central commercial district (C-3 Zone) because a portion is already designated as such. The proximity of the property within one block of Main Street is a natural expansion and approval would be in conformance with the provisions of the General Plan to expand the commercial area. It will attract visitors and provide lodging within walking distance of the night life and other activities on Main Street and provide an anchor for the development of 100 West as well as for Main Street businesses. Rezoning of older properties for redevelopment can enhance neighborhoods and provide an increase in utilization of underdeveloped spaces, buildings and utilities. These underused areas are a significant asset that the City can offer for redevelopment projects. The potential for additional residential development, improved neighborhood environments, and providing additional jobs are additional benefits. Possible general benefits of redevelopment on underutilized properties include: • redevelopment of areas that currently attract anti -social behavior • provision of new units to respond to local housing needs • improved housing mixes • Improved mix use for a more walk able community • provision of key worker accommodation • increased demand and support for local services • provide surveillance of currently unsupervised areas • generate funds for wider physical improvements through unit sales • More efficient use of existing utilities In the broad picture, • All proposals should consider potential long term impacts — for example, would development have a detrimental impact on vehicular access to potential future development on an adjacent area? OR would there be great benefit to the community derived from the redevelopment? • Need to review the areas immediately around a site — adjacent areas may detract from new development and become future "problem" areas. Redevelopment can in many situations help foster redevelopment of adjacent properties. • The viability of a proposed use of property needs to be considered when it is replacing older development that is limited in the number of units provided and that is part of the existing built fabric that is nearing the end of its useful life. • Proposals should be evaluated with an assessment of the condition of surrounding development including housing stock and other structures so that they can be incorporated into comprehensive redevelopment projects in the longer term if possible. Past changes in zoning from R-4 to C-2 on nearby and adjacent properties have allowed for development that would not have occurred if R-4 designation was left in place. This trend and the ensuing development of townhomes and the construction of the hospital, medical office building, and extended care facility are major changes in the area that will have great impacts in the future. While commercial expansion to the east has been thwarted by a handful of residents in the area, the area along First West has already been rezoned to create an environment for Page 66 of 92 Paae 8 of B, commercial expansion. A survey of First West clearly shows the preponderance of commercial development. It is expected that p:\planning department VOIRcorrespondence\pI-II-037 redevelopment of red rock part information.docz Page 67 of 92 ciSY OF a� MO.AB City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Inter -office Correspondence March 7, 2011 Memo To: Members of the Moab Planning Commission From: City Staff Subject: Approval of Resolution #06-2011 Recommending Approval of an Application to Rezone Portions of the Red Rocks Partners Property Located at 61 North 100 West From C-2 and R-4 to C-3 Background The Planning Commission held a public hearing to review this application on February 24, 2011. If approved, the rezoning will create consistent zoning across the entire parcel. The property is currently zoned predominantly R-4 with a small amount as C-2. The portion of the property that fronts on 1s1 West Street is currently C-3. The application has been submitted in an effort to change the C-2 and R-4 portions to C-3. The affected property is approximately 5.13 acres in size. Discussion The attached Planning Resolution is drafted in the affirmative and the motion should reflect this approach. The vote then will be to uphold the motion to recommend that Council approve the change or it can be voted down indicating an unfavorable recommendation to Council. Alternatives 1) The Commission can approve Resolution #06-2011 as written; 2) The Commission can vote to not approve Resolution 06-2011 and state their reasons; 3) The Commission may table the application for additional comment and review. p'.[perm ng department \2011\correspondence \pi•II-041 red rock memo docx Page 68 of 92 CITY OF MOAB PLANNING RESOLUTION 406-2011 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE IN ZONING OF A PORTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY RED ROCK PARTNERS FROM C-2 AND R-4 TO C-3 AND AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WHEREAS, Tom Stevens, (Applicant) of the Stevens Group, Inc., with offices at 0155 Maroon Mesa Road, Carbondale, Colorado 81623, acting on behalf of the owner of record (Owner) Red Rock Partners, 755 North main Street, Moab, Utah 84532, has applied for a rezone of property located at 61 North 100 West and consisting of 5.13 acres, more or less; and WHEREAS, said property is currently zoned predominantly R-4 with a minor amount as C-2 and a portion of the same parcel adjacent to First West Street is zoned C-3; and WHEREAS, the application has been submitted by the Applicant in an effort to change the C-2 and R-4 portions to C-3 to provide consistent zoning across the parcel; and WHEREAS, Applicant has submitted to the Planning Commission ("the Commission") said application for a zone change to make the parcel of land all one zone rather than create a split multiple zoning on said property; and WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed the application in duly advertised public hearing held on February 24, 2011, to review said application regarding the proposed zone change; and WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed the character and objectives of the three zones and the contiguity of the R-3 Zone to the subject property to determine the appropriateness of the application; and WHEREAS, the Commission also reviewed the Use Regulations for the C-2, R-4, and C-3 zones to determine the impacts that may affect adjacent properties through approval of the request; and WHEREAS, having evaluated the concems of the public, the Commission concluded that the concerns were valid but pertained to the further development of surrounding properties rather than the rezoning and development of the specific property; and WHEREAS, the Applicant or future property Owner(s) will be required to provide the City with a development plan that will address issues that may be identified to provide a safe environment for residents of the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-2011, on March 10, 2011 citing the change in the character of nearby properties and development on those properties with the decrease of residential uses and an increase in commercial uses; and WHEREAS, having considered public comment, Staff recommendations, and discussion of the pertinent aspects of the proposed development, the Moab Planning Commission by the adoption of Resolution #06-2011, does hereby find that: 1) The property was not zoned in error but was zoned using inaccurate methods to distinguish the extent of various commercial areas in the city; 2) The rezoning is a logical expansion of the C-3 Zone and is in compliance with the 2002 City of Moab General Plan; Page 69 of 92 CITY OF MOAB Planning Resolution #06-2011 2 3) There have been changes of character in the area including, but not limited to: the installation of public facilities or new utilities; other approved zone changes; new growth trends; deterioration of existing development; and a need for development transitions; 4) The proposed zoning classification is compatible with the surrounding area and uses; 5) Adverse impacts can be mitigated; 6) Benefits will be derived by the community or area by granting the proposed zoning. Additional commercial development will be generated on other properties along First West Street; 7) Adequate facilities are available to the property or can be reasonably extended for the future development; WHEREAS, the Moab Planning Commission, has determined that the rezoning of this property is in the best interests of the City, and that the applicable provisions of the Moab Municipal Code and the intent of the Moab General Plan can be met NOW, THEREFORE, THE MOAB PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOAB, UTAH favorably recommends the application to rezone a portion of the Red Rock Partners property from R-4 a d to C-3 to Moab City Council ornto r p:\planning department \2011\pe resolutions46.2011 red rk rezone.doex Page 70 of 92 C tu!peus Iwo Aq 6upoz 6unspce pue !awed 's6u!pfinq 6u9s!xa mous dew ebueqo euoz pesodoid to Bait( Buyvtows den - v pcflyx3 izi5Oh TS= 461° igt13 ,010 ErAV owe V02;. VW. =VP 6u!qojeq qwn papuep lueo!iddy Aq peupp Avec ad eipu3 'pa! u! peumno Do PI .1,-)d peuozeH eq pasodom Ban/ G 1 North, 100 West Application for Rezoning Owner/Applicant: Red Rock Partners do Randy Day 755 North Main Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-7488 randydayAcitlink.net Submitted By: The Stevens Group, Inc. Tom Stevens 0155 Maroon Mesa Road Carbondale, Colorado 81623 (970) 963-3307 office (970) 3 19-0699 cell tstevens Astevensgroupinc. com www.stevensgroupinc.com Page 72 of 92 I I. INTRODUCTION Red Rock Partners, LLC. (Owners) are the current owners of the 7.22 acre parcel of land bordered by 100 West, Williams Way and Walnut Lane. This parcel is currently zoned R 4, C-2 and C-3. The Owners seek to rezone those portions of the subject property currently zoned R 4 and C-2 to C-3 zoning consistent with the C-3 zoning of the front (east) portion of the site, to allow the future development of a hoteVresort with associated commercial uses. I7.24.0/0 Olvectives and characteristics. The C-3 central commecmal zone has been established as a distnct in which the primary use of the land is for business purposes. The area covered by this zone is now and it is intended that it shall continue to be the dominant shopping and financial center of the city and surrounding territory. For this reason the zone has been located in the central part of the city where the street pattern makes the business buildings readily accessible to all parts of the city and surrounding region and where busmess and shopping activities can be corned on with maximum convenience. The C-3 zone is characterized by wide, dean, well -lighted streets, ample pedestnan ways and vehicular parking lots for the convemence and safety of the public. Attractive, inviting and well -maintained shops, stores, offices and other buildings are also characteristic of this zone. Representative of the uses in this zone are banks, hotels, office buildings, theaters, and a wide variety of retail outlets. In order to accomplish the objectives and purposes of this title and to promote the charactenstics of this zone, the regulations set out m this chapter shall apply in the C-3 zone. The proposal of a hoteVresort/spa with associated commercial space precisely fits the purpose and the intent of the C-3 zone district. This parcel of land, located just one block off Main Street and in the central part of the city lends itself well to this type of development by keeping hotel and commercial uses in the central core and within easy, convenient distance from existing commercial core activities. Page 73 of 92 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject parcel has been assigned an address of 61 North, 100 West, Moab, Utah 84532. The 7.22 +/- acre parcel of land is currently zoned R 4 for the west two thirds of the property, C-3 for the east one third of the property with a small area of C-2 at the southern portion of the site. The site is surrounded by C-3 to the east, as well as to the north and south of the eastern most third of the parcel, C-2 to the south and west and R 4 to the north. Its current use within the R 4 zoned area is a trader court with 45 traders. The parcel is within City limits- and is serviced by City utilities, roads and support services such as police, fire etc. Access is provided to the site by 100 West, Williams Way and Walnut Lane. The attached site survey shows an area to the southern portion that was the product of a quit claim from Shields to the City of Moab for a 100 foot wide strip of land in 1 96 1 . In 1988, the city quited back to Shields certain portions of that 196 I conveyance. The area not conveyed back is represented on the site survey. There are structures along the east property line, along 100 West The parcel is essentially flat, falling from east to west from 4015 feet at its highest point to 4002 at its lowest. Although the site has approximately 13 feet of fall, spread over the length of the site gives the perception of being nearly flat. All existing structures, paved roads, fences, improvements and easements including a 20 foot wide irrigation easement which runs along the southern boundary, turning north through the site have been represented on the site survey. Traders and utilities to those traders have not been included in the site survey. Notice has already been given to residents of the trailer court pursuant to State mandated requirements, that the court will be closed and residents will be required to find alternative housing. Closure of the court has not been scheduled, and It 15 the intent of the Owner to allow residents to stay in the court as long as possible. It should be noted, closure of the court is not dependent on approval of this rezoning application. However, the Owner understands that alternative, replacement housing is important to the redevelopment of this parcel and plans to offer alternative, replacement housing which will be addressed within this application. This trailer court has provided Page 74 of 92 Moab with valuable affordable housing inventory. However, the conditions of trailers within this trailer court are poor. Few, if any, trailers would pass simple life safety inspections. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Owners propose to redevelop the existing property into a luxury hoteVresort/spa with associated commercial uses. This development program 15 not intended to compete with existing lodging accommodations within Moab but instead offer a type of lodging new to Moab. All development will be in accordance with the C-3 zone district and its dimensional requirements for setback, height, lot coverage, parking etc. All roads and utilities necessary to redevelop the property exist to the property boundary meaning no extension of any city infrastructure will be required. An integral component of the redevelopment of this parcel is the closing of the existing trailer court located on site, the removal of the trailers and the development of replacement housing for the existing trader court residents. The Applicant also owns land at Mill Creek and Highway 19 I . This property is currently under city review for annexation and subsequent development into affordable housing, market rate housing and commercial space. The 2009 Grand County and City of Moab HOU5/NG STUDY and AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN identified a strong need for low income to mid professional housing options. The existing trader court has provided a low income housing option for several years. However, this housing option is no longer viable due to the condition of the trailer court. Redevelopment is clearly needed. A community must be able to take a step back, take an objective look at the affordable housing being provided and answer one simple question, are we proud of this? Much work will need to be done to offer replacement housing. While the Owner intends to offer new, highly efficient, well designed replacement housing at the alternate site, it is not expected that all current residents will take advantage of this option. What is important is that the option is available. Also this option must be designed so it is financially accessible to the current trader court residents. Two components weigh strongly in financial accessibility, initial purchase or rental rate, and monthly cost of operation. It is the Applicants goal to affect the development of new units that are both affordable in initial acquisition as well as energy efficient units that minimize the cost of monthly operation. Page 75 of 92 IV. REPLACEMENT HOUSING As previously stated, the site contains 45 trailer homes. These trailers will be removed from the site and alternative housing will be offered as replacement housing. At this time the Owner is processing the 22 acre Mill Creek Drive/Highway 19 I property that is in its ownership through the City for annexation and development review. The development program for this parcel calls for the development of deed restricted affordable housing in compliance with the goals of the 2009 Grand County and City of Moab HOUSING STUDYand AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN. 45 of these units will be reserved as replacement housing for the trailer court residents. These two parcels are unrelated and the development review of each parcel 15 unrelated, and as such each parcel will be reviewed as a stand-alone land use application. The reality though is that both parcels are inter -related. While the Owners have the legal ability to remove all trailers from the court at this time, and pursue re -development of that parcel, it is not their desire to leave the existing residents with no housing option. That is the tie for these two parcels. Re -development of the 100 WestNValnut Lane parcel must address replacement housing for the existing residents, not from a legal standpoint, but from a community standpoint. For that reason, the Owners are developing both parcels in conjunction. It cannot be clear at this time how many of the trailer court residents will take advantage of replacement housing. What Is clear is that each family living in the trailer court can significantly increase their quality of life by leaving their existing trailer and relocating to a newly constructed, energy efficient, well designed, safe unit. The units proposed at Mill Creek/Highway 19 I range from studio to three bedroom units. There will be units to rent and units offered for purchase. Units will run the range of pricing beginning with low income up to the mid professional category. The residents of the trailer court will be given first choice of units, allowing them to pick a unit that best suits their size and economic needs. Timing is obviously a sensitive 155ue when developing two independent parcels under such a scenario. It will take a concerted effort by the Owner, as well as cooperation from the City to result in a seamless transition from approvals, development and occupancy of these units without having a gap in time leaving existing residents without housing while waiting for the completion of the new replacement housing. The Owner will make every effort to do their part to not close the trailer court and remove trailers until the replacement units have been constructed. Page 76 of 92 V. COMPLIANCE WITH 2O02 GENERAL PLAN The General Plan is a very comprehensive document that guides the growth of all aspects of Moab. There are, however, certain components of the Plan that directly guide the subject parcel and this application for rezoning. A few of these key components have been addressed below. The General Plan states "The implementation stage of the City of Moab General Plan w4l1 come as rezoning, development and annexation requests are made..." This application seeks rezoning of the subject parcel which means the City now has the opportunity to implement the plan relative to this parcel. Within the General Plan, several sections exist that relate directly to this parcel of land and the development plans associated with the rezoning request. SECTION I , ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The goal of the economic development language is "to encourage development .that increases the City tax base, reduces unemployment , creates higher wages and/or improves the standard of hving and quality of life withm the City's capability to prowde services and the stated policies related to growth." The existing residential use on the majority of the subject parcel generates no tax revenue for the City. Also it is arguably one of the City's larger consumers of City resources, specifically police. By replacing this existing use with lodging and commercial, the City will expand its tax base considerably while potentially reducing the consumption of City resources. The existing parcel, in its residential use, generates no employment while upon redevelopment into lodging and commercial, jobs will be created ranging from service to upper management. This creation of jobs, especially the higher wage jobs has a clear benefit to the City. Currently, the majority of lodging and commercial uses are confined to Main Street/Highway 19 I . In the particular vicinity of the subject parcel, businesses have attempted to locate on 100 West with little success. There has been no commercial draw to get people away from Main Street. With the addition of an upper end hoteVresort/spa and commercial uses on the subject parcel, surrounding commercial parcels will have the economic "anchor" they have needed to survive, thus improving the economic climate well beyond to the specific parcel boundaries of the subject property. The General Plan goes on to state that the City should "consider carefully adjusting zoning rules as they relate to economic development." It further states that the City should "encourage existing businesses and industries to expand." The requested rezone of the subject parcel will expand the lodging industry and has the potential to become a significant economic development for Moab. The lodging industry currently operates at near capacity during "on season" with rooms often times being completely Page 77 of 92 gr,05. 5-2 booked. Additional capacity allows additional visitors and additional economic impact on all supporting businesses. Rather than compete with the existing lodging industry however, the plan for the subject parcel is to develop a higher level of guest experience with an upper end hoteVspa and commercial. This allows for the contemplated development plans of the subject parcel to expand the lodging industry and thus the economic development of the community without directly competing with the existing lodging industry. One of the policies of the General Plan, Section I, Economic Development, is to "encourage, initiate and support City beautification and cleanup efforts." The existing trailer court, and the subject parcel as a whole, represent some of the least visually appealing areas within Moab. The redevelopment of this parcel will have a positive impact on the overall beautification of Moab. Additionally the General Plan calls for the City to "develop streetscape plans for Center Street from /00 West to 300 East." The subject parcel serves as a terminus to Center Street and can bring the streetscape onto 100 West. SECTION 2, GROWTH AND URBANIZATION The goal specified within this section is "to encourage the orderly growth and development of Moab within the Oty's ability to provide services. Emphasis should be on balancing land use: Guiding growth to locations that are .safe and sensible for the City to service, while maintaining the character of the town and the beauty of its surrounding landscapes." Within the original planning for the City of Moab, this parcel was seen as appropriate for commercial development and as such was zoned commercial. However, only that portion of the parcel along 100 West was zoned to commercial as the balance of the parcel was an existing trailer court and had to be zoned accordingly. Without the trailer court, it is likely that the parcel would have been zoned commercial from the beginning. Having commercial and lodging one block off Main Street just makes good planning sense. Unless it has been determined that the commercial core shall be confined to Main Street only, those parcels off Main Street, but still within walking distance to Main Street, would certainly be considered part of the commercial core. The subject parcel represents an opportunity for the City to expand viable commercial uses along Center Street, 100 North and 100 South and along 100 West with the rezoning of this parcel. Services already exist to the subject parcel meaning no extension of service is required, again marking this parcel a prime location for development. The development review process will require impact assessment reports which will identify any and all fiscal, environmental, public facilities and services that will be impacted and require that the developer pay for these impacts. This includes fees for such services as water and sewer, and could in the future include fees for storm drains, roads, street lighting, parks and recreation according to the General Plan. Page 78 of 92 4-41 5-2 The General Plan goes on to state that the City should "encourage vanety on new commercial development and businesses" and "allow the central business zone to expand when additional commercial capacity is needed and when such development is compatible loth historic structures and character of the community." SECTION 5, HOUSING Section 5 of the General Plan addresses housing. The goal of this section states "to follow a housing strategy that meets the needs of the current residents, anticipates growth on housing needs, promotes a cohesive, small town environment, supports a high quality of hfe, and addresses the problems of affordable housing." In 2009 the City of Moab, in conjunction with Grand County, produced the Grand County and City of Moab Housing Study and Affordable Housing Plan. This plan looked at current housing inventory and compared that to current housing demand and projected housing demand into the future. The demand projected for the year 2012 was 224 units of rental and 388 units of sale housing. Given this need for housing it would be irresponsible to submit development plans to the City that resulted in a decrease in existing affordable housing inventory. Clearly one of the most pivotal issues with the subject parcel is the existing trailer court. While this court has provided much needed affordable housing for Moab in past years it has outlived its design life. Not only are the trailers inefficient from an energy consumption standpoint due to when they were built and their condition but few, if any, units would pass a simple code safety inspection. An eye sore, a disproportionate consumer of City resources (police) and poor living conditions are all elements that are precisely contrary to the goals of the General Plan. Red Rock Partners seeks to provide affordable housing not just as replacement for the existing trailer court but additional homes for the community at large within the proposed development located at Mill Creek Drive and Highway 19 I . While this is being processed under a completely different land use application, it should be considered a viable source of replacement housing for the trader court. It is very important that the City be aware that Red Rock Partners has completed the State required step of notification to close the trader court. At this point, a simple thirty day notification is all that is required to force closure of the court. Obvnously Red Rock Partners has not given this notification to any of the trailer court residents and has no plans to do so until replacement housing is available. This is why the Mill Creek Drive property is going through the development review process. It is currently in the annexation process and will be followed by the development review process as outlined in the City of Moab Municipal Code. Page 79 of 92 410 The net result of these two separate applications being reviewed is that, if approved, the residents of the trailer court will be provided new, energy efficient, quality, affordable housing, and the existing trader court will be redeveloped into a unique property that not only provides significant tax revenue to the City but acts as a major source of economic fuel for the Moab community, providing jobs from service to high paying management, all while providing guests to the Moab area a unique lodging experience. VI. REVIEW CRITERIA I. The name, address, and telephone number of the applicant; Red Rock Partners, LLC. Randy Day 755 North Main Street Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-7488 (office) (435) 260- 1388 (cell) 2. A description of the requested change or amendment and a description of the property to be affected by such request by a metes and bounds legal description; The Applicant requests a rezone of the subject property from its current underlying zone districts of R-4, C-2 and C-3 to entirely C-3. A legal description of the property has been provided herein on the Site Survey attached herein. 3. A title certificate or report from a licensed title company or attorney listing the name of the property owner(s) and all liens, easements, judgments, and encumbrances of record that affect the title to the subject property; A Title Certificate has been provided herein (Exhibit C). 4. A statement from the county treasurer showing payment in full of all real property taxes due on such parcel; Statement from the county treasurer showing taxes have been paid in full has been included herein (Exhibit A). Page 80 of 92 S. A boundary survey of the land area to be rezoned, which shall include a depiction of existing zoning district boundaries, real property boundaries, existing structures, and public roads existing within three hundred feet in all directions of the subject property boundary; An Improvement Survey dated 5-23-2008 prepared by Keogh Land Surveying has been included herein (Exhibit D) depicting property boundaries, existing structures, roads and the zone district boundaries. 6. A list of surrounding property owners and their legal mailing addresses for all properties within three hundred feet of the exterior boundary of the parcel proposed for a zoning map amendment; A list of surrounding property owners has been included herein (Exhibit 5). 7. A statement by the applicant explaining the rationale for the zoning request relative to the standards imposed by this chapter; Zoning for the subject parcel contemplated commercial, C-3 zoning on the front portion of the site while R 4 had to be assigned to the rear portion of the site due to the existing trailer court. This trailer court will be removed which represents a substantial change in conditions from when the property was zoned initially. Due to its adjacent proximity to commercially zoned property, the existence of a portion of the subject parcel zoned C-3 and the need within the community for commercial space and lodging, this site lends itself ideally to commercial use. 8. A filing fee in accordance with the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the city council; and This will be paid at the time of submission of this application. 9. A narrative or concept plan describing why this property is suited for the intended purposes and stating what development and/or construction is planned See Section III Proposed Development above. Page 81 of 92 ,Z-Av, 1 17.04.060 Map amendment approval criteria. The planning commission and city council shall consider the following criteria in reviewing a proposed map amendment: A. Was the existing zone for the property adopted in error? The existing zoning was not adopted in error. However the existing zoning was adopted to accommodate a use that is changing. The site zoning is split between C-3 and R 4. The C- 3 portion of the site was clearly intended to bring commercial use to the site. The R 4 zone was required to accommodate the existing use of the trader court. The trailer court is be closed allowing this use to convert to C-3, consistent with the front portion of the site. B. Has there been a change of character in the area including, but not limited to: the installation of public facilities or new utilities; other approved zone changes; new growth trends; deterioration of existing development; or the need for development transitions? As previously stated, the deteriorated trailer court will be shut down upon completion of replacement housing allowing for the entire site to become C-3 rather than just the portion of the site that was not utilized for trailer court C. Is there a need for the proposed zoning within the area or community? The community is clearly in need of additional, quality retail space as well as a full service hotel spa. This currently does not exist in Moab. Although during "on season" all lodging 15 full within the Moab downtown and surrounding area, it is not the intent of the Applicant to compete with the existing lodging inventory. Instead the development plan calls for a full service hoteVspa with associated retail commercial space. D. Is the proposed zoning classification compatible with the surrounding area or uses; will there be adverse impacts; and/or can any adverse impacts be mitigated? Page 82 of 92 At this time this property was zoned, the City felt it was an appropriate location for commercial and as such they zoned the property not being used for a trailer court as C-3. The result is that the front one third of the property 15 currently zoned C-3 while the rear two thirds of the property was zoned R-4 to cover the existing trailer court. The site meets the cntena for C-3 zoning in that it is part of the existing commercial core, the streets are wide, clean and well lit. There are ample pedestnan ways and vehicular parking. There should be no negative impacts to the community since the roads, utilities, pedestrian ways etc. are currently in place E. ill benefits be derived by the community or area by granting the proposed zoning? There are two significant benefits to the community to this rezone plan. First is the closure of the trailer court and development of replacement housing. This court is in very poor condition, is not safe for residents in that few, if any, of the trailers would pass simple code safety inspections. Additionally this court requires a severely disproportionate amount of City police resources. This site is in desperate need of redevelopment. The second benefit to the community will be the additional lodging and commercial space. Not only does this add a new dimension to Moab by developing a type of lodging and commeroal shop that does not exist but will also be a significant source of tax revenue for the City. F. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope of development suggested by the proposed zoning classification? If utilities are not available, can they be reasonably extended? All required facilities are to the property line. No extensions will be required. G. Does the application conform with the provisions of the Moab general plan. the Land Use Code, and applicable agreements with affected governmental entities? The Applicant does believe this proposal conforms to the applicable provisions. Page 83 of 92 17.04.070 Text amendment approval criteria. It is the burden of the applicant to provide "good cause" to support a proposed text amendment For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the city of Moab, amendments to the Land Use Code are committed to the sound discretion of the city council based upon the following nonexclusive list of criteria: A. Is the proposed use substantially similar to other authorized uses permitted within the subject zoning district? Yes. A5 previously stated in this application, the City deemed this site appropriate for commercial C-3 zoning and executed that zoning on the front portion of the site. This application seeks to now rezone the rear portion of the site previously used as a trailer court to C-3, consistent with the existing zoning on the front portion of the site and a large portion of the surrounding area. Additionally, the C-2 zone district surrounds the site to the south and west with the C-3 zone district sounding the eastern most third of the site on the north,. east and south sides. B. Is the proposed use a relatively new use type or development concept that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the city's general plan? Yes and no. The lodging and commercial aspect of the redevelopment of this site is not a new use or development concept. The type of commercial and the type of lodging are new, at least to Moab and may not have been contemplated at the time of adoption of the General Plan. The proposed use however, does fit precisely within the C-3 zone district allowed uses, making it consistent with the views of the general plan and the drafting of the C-3 zone district. C. /s the amendment consistent with the policies and goals of the general plan? See Section V., Compliance with 2002 General Plan above. D. Will the amendment create significant adverse impacts upon neighboring properties within or adjacent to the zoning districts which would be affected by the change? The site is bordered by commercial zoning completely on three sides and a portion of the forth with residential zoning across Walnut Lane to the north. As such, this does not represent the introduction of zoning inconsistent with surrounding uses. The redevelopment of Page 84 of 92 this parcel will not require the extension of city utilities or road system. Based on this the Applicant does not believe that this proposal represents any adverse impact to the community. E. Is it in the public interest to approve the proposed amendment? It is clearly in the public interest to approve this request for zoning text amendment. The proposed redevelopment of the subject parcel pursuant to the text amendment will close and remove the trader court once replacement housing has been completed. This, in and of itself, should be adequate benefit to the community to support this application. The redevelopment of the site into a hoteVresort/spa with associated commercial will significantly benefit the community by adding jobs, adding tax revenue, while adding an element to Moab lodging currently missing. F. Is the amendment likely to lead to a positive redevelopment of a specific area or zone? As previously stated this amendment will lead to the positive redevelopment of the subject site, 7 plus acres, within the downtown core. G. Will the amendment provide a variety of options for residents in terns of economic development, affordable housing, or other benefits? The redevelopment of this subject parcel pursuant to the text amendment will provide significant economic stimulus to the community. The construction of a hoteVresort/spa with associated commercial space will require several years of planning, design and construction infusing tens of millions of dollars onto the community. Once complete this development will employee a sizable staff. The operation of this facility will provide significant tax revenue for the City, on a site that currently provides no economic benefit to the city or the community at large. The affordable housing benefit to this proposal has been discussed in Section IV above. H. Is the amendment appropriate considering the existing conditions in the zoning district, the established relationships between zoning districts, existing land uses and densities, and the scale of both existing and proposed development? Although the hoteVresort/spa and associated commercial space has not been designed at this time, it is the intent of the applicant to comply with the dimensional requirements of the C-3 zone district. Since this zone district surrounds the subject parcel on one site completely and two sides partially, with the C-2 commercial zone surrounding the parcel on the south and west sides, this proposed text amendment does not introduce a use inconsistent with surrounding uses. For this reason the relationship between the redevelopment of this subject parcel and surrounding parcels will be positive and consistent with the town vision when ongmally zoned. Page 85 of 92 From a land use standpoint, the governing rationale is to keep commercial and lodging activity confined to the central core. This proposal conforms with that rationale. The boundary definition of the commercial core could be questioned but that too has been defined by current zoning. This subject parcel is surrounded by C-3 and C-2 commercial zoning. It appears that the only reason a portion of this subject parcel was ongmally zoned R-4 was to accommodate the existing trader court. This trader court will be closed. From a building scale perspective, the surrounding buildings are two storey, pitched roof construction but have the ability under current zoning to increase to the zoning limits, the same zoning limits that govern this parcel tf zoned completely to C-3. Timing then becomes a consideration. Since the adjacent surrounding parcels as well as the front third of this subject parcel can be redeveloped at any time to the commercial zoning Wilts, the argument simply does not exist that this parcel will be out of scale with the surrounding property and uses. Page 86 of 92 ReR ��yvy�� ep7, P rn,AS [ vJ'���\ c�iriA1FG `U{ �;• P',,11, 00 la *,;ems, etal ; - �. f�mtwirTsormi Vt�:'f err 1 ' 0,1zT41.0,1igir1.511j5fiNit''' 1Y 5 %j. rt ti�► ":11 �fSda97 4f��°ri,w .%f.l% sip„ .. �t--,iC,n.,,,z �l�l rAVA'P �rali., ;aia, ;r1.'•T,',� ,, 72 [�r-j , Y, G'CIlti�q re e:3:::4 7 . y: 1 I 1 1 J A J J „u ryrr/rirrrrrrrrrfrrrirrrr�� It I 'rx -- c sit i t I1 Vt b %IN tk:S Ail A �t, .�_,a � _-___ _ 1 z e Page 87 of 92 i v if x 4 3 q V 0 • aZ� gok. <�g w A mx 6 1r.g1 'i it ¢.1 did g. a ,F��A' `11 a ggR 1 it ril!i b fix 54. h aapril3 lig 1.fa ill r IX C t� Q l �3XJS J,S3A1 001 r �g CITY OF MOAB COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING Moab City will hold a public hearing to consider potential projects for which funding may be applied under the CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) Small Cities Program for Program Year 2012. Suggestions for potential projects will be solicited both verbally and in writing, from all interested parties. The expected amount of CDBG funds for this Program Year will be discussed along with the range of projects eligible under this program and a review of previously funded projects. The hearing will begin at 7:3o P.M. on December i3, zoil and will be held at Moab City Hall, 217 East Center Street. Further information can be obtained by contacting David Olsen at 259-5129. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations (including auxiliary communicative aides and services) during the hearing should notify the City Recorder at least 3 days prior to the hearing to be attended. /s/ Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Published in the Times Independent, December i and 8, zoii. 5-3 Memo To: Moab Governing Body B Public from: David Olsen Dote: December 7. 2011 Re: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Nearing Information explaining Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) eligible applicants, the three national objectives of the CDBG program and federal compliance requirements is attached. CDBG projects the City has administered include providing infrastructure for the Cinema Court Project, reroofing and replacing HVAC units at the Virginian Apartments, replacing the the existing 10" diameter water transmission line connecting city wells on golf course property to city spring by Pack Creek, Center Street Ballpark Bleachers, Fencing and Lighting Projects, installing the East Center Street Median and sidewalks, the Moonstone Gallery mini park, improving the Virginian Apartments, tuck pointing mortar and landscaping Star Hall, building Sun Court, developing the Mill Creek Flood Control and Parkway Project, buying property for the Seekhaven Family Crisis Shelter, providing financial assistance for the Grand County Housing Authority Affordable Housing Project, installing Rotary Park playground equipment and paths, installing the 400 East tree medians and paying for surveying and City digital mapping. The Southeastern Utah Association of Governments (SUAOG) approves projects on a competitive basis. Grand, San Juan, Emery and Carbon Counties compete for funds. There is no cap on this year's requests, so the community with the highest priority project could possibly take all the funds. High priority projects include low to moderate income housing, food banks, water projects and sewer projects. No activity will displace low to moderate income individuals. Possible Projects to Confide:: At this time, no written request has been submitted. co FCCBH FOUR CORNERS COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL H EALTH 9 December 11 Moab City Attn: Dave Olsen, Project Manager 217 E. Center Street Moab, UT 84532 RE: CDBG funding Dear City Council Members, As per the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) guide, Four Corners Community Behavioral Health, Inc. (FCCBH) is asking the City of Moab to apply for funding on behalf of our non-profit agency. FCCBH intends to build 12 housing units on the current Willows property located at 48 N Shields Lane. The Willows Expansion Project meets the CDBG guidelines for the 12% District Allocation set aside for housing specific projects. The monies will be used to fund architect design, site fees, and construction costs. The outcome will be 6 permanent and 6 transitional housing units for very low income disabled persons. We have been advised by the City Planning office that the property has 6,000 square feet available for additional housing. This plan would utilize about 3,000 square feet. We would be able to add more units in the future, if needed, to maximize the space. Four Corners LC built the Ridgeview Apartments, a 6 apartment complex that opened October 1, 1994. There are 4 one bedroom and 2 two bedroom units. Interact has managed these apartments for the last 10 years. During that time there have been virtually no vacancies and usually a lengthy waiting list. The proposed apartments will serve individuals with very low income (below the 50% level) who are disabled by severe and persistent mental illness. Some also have dual diagnoses including chronic substance abuse or chronic physical illness. These disabilities can lead to long-term or episodic homelessness as those affected cycle repeatedly through the streets, shelters, housing, jails or hospitals. The apartments will be targeted for adults who have no other housing options. Four Corners will provide intensive case management services, outreach, independent living skills, health related services, and encourage a substance -free home environment to ensure a more stable and productive life. In addition, Four Corners will be seeking rent subsidy through the Housing Authority in the form of Project Based vouchers. Tenants will be responsible for 30% of their income and the voucher would cover the remaining balance up to the fair market rent. Administration Plaza P.O. Box 867; 105 W 100 N Price, UT 84501 Telephone (435) 637-7200 FAX l4.151 617_7177 Moab Office 198 East Center St. Moab, UT 84532 Telephone (435) 259-6131 FAX 14.15\ 750_51AQ Castle Dale Office P.O. Box 387; 45 E 100 S Castle Dale, UT 84513 Telephone (435) 381-2432 FAX ld151 1 R 1 _7 5d7 Price Office P.O. Box 867; 575 E 1 ^" Price, UT 84501 Telephone (435) 637-: FAX MAS\ A17_0141 A large majority of our chronically homeless population, unable to work consistently, receives Disability and/or Supplemental Security Income. Those not receiving disability typically live on General Assistance, less than half of disability income. All these individuals fall into the extremely low-income category, below 50 percent of median income. Persons with mental illness are often eliminated from consideration for subsidized housing due to poor credit, poor rental history, and/or a criminal history related to their mental illnesses. This is a significant gap in housing services. Our Local Homeless Coordinating Committee, now the Moab Area Housing Coalition, lends its support to this project. Thank you for taking the time to review this project. Affordable housing is a scarce commodity in our community. Currently, there is no Transtional Housing and 1 bedroom apartments are difficult to find. Twelve units help bridge the gap for this very needy population. Please contact me if additional information is needed. Sincerely, Sharon Relph RN, MSN Director, Interact FCCBH, Inc. 435-259-7340 5-3 CHAPTER III. NATIONAL OBJECTIVES, ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES AND INDIVIDUAL FEDERAL COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS A. ELIGIBLE GRANT APPLICANTS Consistent with federal law, eligible applicants for the State CDBG program are: ♦ Incorporated cities and towns with populations of less than 50,000 excluding those in Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties; ♦ All of Utah's counties except Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties; and, unique to Utah, are the: ♦ Units of local governments recognized by the Secretary of HUD that include six of the seven associations of government, excluding the Wasatch Front Regional Council. By federal law the state may only fund the applicants listed above. For convenience and mutual benefit, combinations of the above may enter into a subcontractor's agreement where one applicant is regarded as a primary beneficiary acting as the grantee entity for both applicants. Other users of CDBG funds such as non-profit and for -profit corporations, councils of government, housing authorities, and special service districts must apply through and enter into subcontractor agreements with an eligible applicant who also derives a primary benefit. These entities must be incorporated in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The state encourages units of general local government to cooperate with each other as well as other entities to engage in eligible activities. 1. Sponsorship of a Non -eligible Recipient — Eligible grantees who agree to sponsor a non -eligible sub -recipient must realize that such an agreement carries serious legal implications and responsibilities. Careful consideration and a full understanding of the sponsored must be considered before entered into an agreement. The sponsoring entity and the state will sign the prepared contract, and as such is legally bound to comply with all pertinent laws and regulations, as is their sub -recipient. The responsibility for "who does what" in such an arrangement will depend on each entity, the project or activity, and the degree of comfort that the sponsor has with the sub - recipient. However, the OMB circular appropriate for the type of organization ultimately using the funds determines compliance with fiscal requirements. The state is only responsible to ensure compliance by the sponsoring entity, which means that the sponsoring entity should either make sure they are comfortable with the accounting procedures used by the sub -recipient or should do a periodic review of the budget and 1 expenditures of that entity while the CDBG grant is in process. The state maintains contact with sub -recipients during the course of the project through phone, written and in - person site visits. These technical assistance efforts are the state's way of assisting the sponsoring entity with some of its oversight needs. However, sponsors should realize that final compliance by the sub -recipient ultimately lies with them. Sponsorship responsibilities include holding the public hearings, the signing of the application and contracts, compliance with all civil rights requirements including compliance with handicap accessibility laws, and a certain amount of environmental oversight. Compliance with any labor related laws is usually reviewed at the sub - recipient level, but the sponsor may request involvement to ensure that any local or jurisdictional requirements related to procurement and construction activity are understood and will be followed by the sub -recipient. If the sponsor has retained any administrative costs for a CDBG contract the sponsor's financial records will also be reviewed. Sponsorship also requires assistance with the completion of the final monitoring and the close out packet at the end of the project. The sponsor will be monitored at the end of the 'project in addition to the sub -recipient to ensure this compliance. 2. Public Service — Public service providers, traditionally non-profit organizations, are allowed to apply for CDBG funds for capital improvements and maior equipment purchases. Examples are delivery trucks, furnishings, fixtures, computer equipment, construction, and remodeling and facility expansion. State policy prohibits the use of CDBG funds for operating and maintenance expenses. This includes paying administrative costs, salaries, etc. State CDBG funds may not be used in entitlement areas (See Chapter 1, page 2). No more than 15 percent of the state's. yearly allocation of funds may be expended for public service activities. B. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS Each applicant must identify and meet only ONE of the three national objectives listed below even though the project might be able to qualify under other national objectives. 1. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE #1- LOW AND MODERATE INCOME BENEFIT "The projected use of funds has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low/moderate income (LMI) families..." LMI. (Low/Moderate Income) families are defined as those families whose income does not exceed 80 percent of the county median income for 2009 or 80 percent of the median income of the entire non -metropolitan area of the state of Utah, whichever is higher. See Appendix C for delineation of 80 percent of county median income by family size. In order to meet this national objective the applicant must demonstrate a benefit to low and moderate income in one of the following ways: 2 a. Economic Development: The activity must: (1) Be carried out in a neighborhood where a substantial number (51 percent) of LMI persons reside; or (2) Employ persons, a majority of whom are LMI; or (3) Make training available to LMI persons to help them qualify for higher skilled employment; or (4) Engage in advertising and recruitment efforts targeted to LMI persons. Documentation necessary to meet LMI benefit: Determine which of the four E.D. activities the project will address. The grantee must determine the best method by which to substantiate this determination and provide appropriate documentation. Possible methods include: ♦ Identification of the specific neighborhood and an income survey of the project's intended beneficiaries; ♦ Income certifications obtained from individuals hired; ♦ Documentation of the type of training to be provided; ♦ Documentation of recruitment efforts of LMI persons. b. Site Specific activities: At least 51 percent of the direct beneficiaries of the proposed project must consist of families whose TOTAL FAMILY INCOME does not exceed 80 percent of the county median income for the current program year as demonstrated by the income figures provided in Appendix C, or at least 51 percent of the beneficiaries of the proposed project consist of families whose TOTAL FAMILY INCOME does not exceed 80 percent of the median income for the entire non -metropolitan area of the State of Utah. Please contact state staff for statewide median income figure. When either of the methods below is used the "project area" must first be specifically determined and identified before the survey is performed. ♦ If a site specific project. will provide direct benefit to the entire community the applicant may use the 2000 census data shown as Appendix D rather than preparing an original survey. The applicant will be required to demonstrate how the project benefits the entire community. All relevant census data to verify this information must be included in the application. ♦ If the site -specific project will directly benefit only a portion of the community an original survey of the defined project area must be done to determine LMI population in that specific area. If a survey is to be 3 performed, the survey must be conducted following the state approved methodology found in Appendix E. This method must be used if the survey is to be accepted. The burden of proof is on the applicant to carry out the survey in an acceptable manner. This survey will be accepted for the current year's application and for two (2) consecutive application cycles, if the subsequent applications are for a project whose boundaries and/or beneficiaries are identical to those in the original survey. If the survey shows that 60 percent or more of the beneficiaries are LMI then the survey may be good for five (5) consecutive years if the beneficiaries remain the same. c. City or countywide activities: At least 51 percent of the direct beneficiaries of the proposed project must consist of families whose TOTAL FAMILY INCOME does not exceed 80 percent of the county median income for the current program year as demonstrated by the income figures provided in Appendix C. ♦ If an applicant's jurisdiction has been identified in Appendix D, (pre - approved LMI community — 2000 Census) a copy must be attached and included with the application. ♦ Applicants may perform a new community survey to determine if their community is 51 % LMI by following the instructions in Appendix E. d. Limited Clientele activities: This activity is defined as one that provides benefits to a specific group of persons rather than everyone in an area. At least 51 % of the persons served must be LMI. To qualify under this category, a Limited Clientele activity must meet one of the following tests. ♦ Benefit is specifically limited to a group generally presumed to be 51 percent or more LMI, unless there is evidence to the contrary. Examples of such controversial indicators may be the lifestyle of the community or the known income figures in the area in which the group resides, the construction of a facility that would not ordinarily be utilized by LMI or whose use may be cost prohibitive for LMI, etc. The state is responsible for ensuring that adequate documentation is obtained where there is the possibility of such evidence to the contrary. (See list of groups below) ♦ Abused Children ♦ Battered Spouses ♦ Migrant Farm Workers ♦ Elderly Persons (Defined by HUD as age 62 or over) ♦ Illiterate Adults ♦ Homeless Persons f& Persons living with AIDS f& Severely Disabled Adults  use wheelchair or special aid for at least 6 months, unable to perform functional activities including seeing, hearing, or walking, are"prevented from working or have autism, cerebral palsy, alzheimer's, senility, dementia or mental retardation. OR V' Information must be provided on family size and income and must show that at least 51 percent of the clientele served are persons whose family income does not exceed the low and moderate - income limit (e.g., programs being operated where LMI income certification is routinely requested to allow participation in the program); OR V' The activity serves to remove architectural barriers to the mobility of elderly and disabled. Sidewalk curb cuts (ADA ramps) do not qualify under this category. e. Targeted activities  100% of the beneficiaries served by this type of activity must be LMI. Housing activities must be targeted to 100% LMI. Lateral utility connections for those who are certified as LMI are considered eligible as housing rehabilitation. In no case, may CDBG funds be used to pay for sewer laterals for non-LMI individuals. (Note: In order to pay connection fees for LMI individuals under this activity, the following must be clarified: HUD views the payment of assessed connection fees as part of the overall project. Whether or not CDBG monies are used for the construction, HUD rules and regulations apply to the construction of the improvements even though connection fees will be paid only for low/moderate income (LMI) persons in the community. If grantees wish to construct the facility and pay connection fees, the entire project must first be shown to meet a National Objective and to have met and addressed all other CDBG requirements. If grantees wish to pay only connection fees for a utility that is being constructed with other funds, the same requirements apply. If grantees wish to pay connection fees for a utility that has already been constructed they may do so only if they can show that the installation of the utility was originally carried out in compliance with requirements applicable to CDBG activities including citizen participation, compliance with environmental and labor requirements and that it meets a national objective.) 2. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE #2 - AIDING IN THE PREVENTION OR ELIMINATION OF SLUMS OR BLIGHT The state staff must determine compliance with this objective prior to rating and ranking by the RRC. Perform Activities on a Spot basis: Acquisition, clearance, relocation, historic preservation and building rehabilitation activities which eliminate specific conditions of blight or physical decay on a spot basis will meet this objective. Under this criterion, rehabilitation is limited to the extent necessary to eliminate specific conditions detrimental to public health and safety. To be considered to be detrimental to public health and safety, a condition must pose a threat to the public in general. Documentation required to meet "SPOT" Slum/Blight: (1) The scope of work detailed in the application must provide a description of the specific condition of blight or physical decay treated; and (2) Under this standard, any rehabilitation performed to non-LMI households is limited to that necessary to eliminate specific conditions detrimental to public health and safety and must be acknowledged in the scope of work as detailed in the application. 3. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE #3 - URGENT, HEALTH, WELFARE NEEDS To comply with the national objective of meeting community development needs having a particular urgency, an activity must be designed to alleviate existing conditions which the local government certifies and state determines: ♦ Pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, ♦ Are of recent origin or recently became urgent, ♦ The state grant recipient is unable to finance the activity on its own, and ♦ Other sources of funding are not available to carry out. The determination of a jurisdiction's ability to meet these criteria will be based on the submission, at time of the application, of documentation from the appropriate federal or state agency certifying an immediate threat to health and welfare. Resources from other federal, local or state programs may be used to match or participate in order to relieve the threat. CDBG funds may only be used to complete the funding needed for projects that have maximized all other available funding sources (GAP funding). 6 Documentation Required to meet Urgent Health and Welfare Needs: A proposed project will ONLY be considered under this national objective if ALL FOUR of the following requirements are met at the time of application submission to the RRC: a. A description of the nature and degree of seriousness of the conditions . requiring assistance. The determination of "immediate threat" has been made in consultation with an appropriate state or federal agency. The documentation from such agency must be included with the application and must demonstrate that there is an immediate threat to health and r welfare. 11/ b. Evidence confirming that other financial resources to alleviate the need were not available. The documentation must include refusals or i, maximization of assistance from other agencies, not just an indication that P they have been contacted. P c. Information on the timing of the development of the serious condition. A condition will generally be considered to be of recent origin if it is 0developed or became critical within 18 months preceding the state grant 0 ` recipient's certification. Documentation certifying this fact must be A' included with the application. 0 d. Evidence that the state grant recipient certified that the CDBG activity was idesigned to address the urgent need. 0 0 C. CONSISTENCY WITH THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN Every applicant is required to document that the project for which they are applying is consistent with that community's and the region's current version of the CONSOLIDATED PLAN. Applicants must describe how that consistency is accomplished. Compliance with the requirement will be determined regionally, PRIOR TO RATING AND RANKING. The regional determination will be subject to validation by the state. The applicant must include evidence that the community was and continues to be a willing partner in the development of the regional consolidated planning process. The project or project type must be a high priority in the investment component of the plan and must help fulfill the long term or strategic goals of both the regional and local plans. The allocation of resources must be projected at least 5 years into the future and applications should be consistent with the long-term direction of the plan. Each Association of Government staff is required to review the regional consolidated plan submitted by their office on behalf of their communities to ensure that each plan 1 ■ includes a brief narrative identifying the process used to determine the priorities contained in the plan, in addition to any capital improvement lists submitted. D. INCLUSIVE FEDERAL COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. 70 PERCENT LOW/MODERATE INCOME. COMPLIANCE: Assurance must be made to HUD that over each two year grant period at least 70 percent of the entire state CDBG allocation will support activities that benefit low and moderate income persons. To do this, the State must receive adequate information regarding the LMI population proposed to be assisted by each grantee regardless of the National Objective selected (see application form). This requirement does not affect the activities selected by applicants. The State will continue to fund any one of the three National Objectives (low to moderate income benefit, slum and blight elimination, or urgent need). 2. OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS: Applicants must be in compliance with all applicable federal and state regulations and overlay statutes. The federal statutes that apply to the program include: Davis -Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act; Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968; Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; Age Discrimination Act of 1975; Architectural Barriers Act of 1968; Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; Executive Orders 11063, 11246, 12892, 12898, 13166; The Hatch Act (5 USC 1501 et seq.); The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969; Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Title IV of the Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act; HUD Reform Act; Office of Management and Budget Circulars: A-87--Cost Principles for State and Local Governments and 24 CFR Part 85, Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments A-128--Single Audit Act; Section 104(d) of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1974.. Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 and Final Rule, September 1999. 8 5-3 PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL FEDERAL OVERLAY STATUTES AND REGULATIONS MAY APPLY TO THE STATE PROGRAM IF DIRECTED BY HUD AND CONGRESS E. ELIGIBLE At.TIVITIES Each applicant must select an ELIGIBLE activity from the following Matrix Codes. Please choose the code that best describes the activity to be accomplished by your project. It is recommended that you consult with the AOG and/or state staff to help in the matrix code selection process. For details of each activity, please see the statute at 42 U.S.C. Chapter 69, Sec. 5305 (Section 105) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended. (http:// www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/communitvdevelopment/rulesandregs/laws/sec5305.cfm) The eligible activity selected must be identified in the application. (See application form in WebGrants). Eligible CDBG Activities Matrix Code Description 01 Acquisition of Real Property 02 _ Disposition (of Property) 03 Construction - Public Facilities and Improvements 03A Construction - Senior Centers 03B Construction - Handicapped Centers 03C Construction - Homeless Facilities 03D Construction - Youth Centers 03E Construction - Neighborhood Facilities 03F Construction - Parks, Recreational Facilities 03G Construction - Parking Facilities 03H Construction - Solid Waste Disposal Improvements 03I Construction - Flood Drain Improvements 03J Construction - Water/Sewer Improvements 03K Construction - Street Improvements 03L Construction - Sidewalks 03M Construction - Child Care Centers 03N Construction - Tree Planting 030 Construction - Fire Stations/Equipment 03P Construction - Health Facilities 03Q Abused/Neglected Children Facilities 03R Asbestos Removal 03S Construction - Facilities for AIDS Patients 04 Clearance and Demolition 05 Public Service — General 9 i 05A Public Service — Seniors Services 05B Public Service — Handicapped Services 05C Public Service — Legal Services 05D Public Service — Youth Services 05E Public Service — Transportation Services — 05G Public Service — Battered and Abused Spouses 05H Public Service — Employment Training 05J Public Service — Fair Housing Activities (Subject to 15 % Cap) 05M Public Service — Health Services 05P Public Service — Screening for Lead Based Paint Poisoning 05Q Public Service — Subsistence Payments (Prevent Homelessness) 12 Construction of Housing 13 Direct Homeownership Assistance 14A Rehab — Single Family . 14B Rehab — Multi -Family 14C Public Housing Modernization 14D Rehab- Other Publicly Owned Residential Buildings 14E Rehab — Public/Privately Owned Commercial or Industrial Bldgs 14F Energy Efficiency Improvements 14G Acquisition for the purpose of Rehab 14H Rehab - Administration 14I Lead -Based Paint Hazard Testing and Abatement 16A Historic Preservation- Residential 16B Historic Preservation- Non -Residential 17A Commercial/Industrial — Land Acquisition/Disposition 17B Commercial/Industrial — Infrastructure Development 17C Commercial/Industrial — Building Acquisition, Construction, Rehab 17D Commercial/Industrial — Other Improvements 18A ED — Direct Financial Assistance to For -Profits 18B ED — Technical Assistance 18C ED — Micro -Enterprise Assistance 19C CDBG — Non -Profit Organization Capacity Building 19D CDBG Assistance to Institutes of Higher Education 19E CDBG Operation & Repair of Foreclosed Property 19H State CDBG Technical Assistance to Grantees • 20 _ Planning 21A Administration 21D Fair Housing Activities (Subject to 20% Admin Cap) 10 F. INELIGIBLE GRANT ACTIVITIES The general rule is that any activity not authorized under the CDBG regulations is ineligible to beassisted with CDBG funds. The following activities may not be assisted with CDBG funds (refer to 24 CFR Part 500 for additional specifics): 1. Buildings or portions thereof, used for the general conduct of government. This does not include, however, the removal of architectural barriers involving any such building. 2. General government expenses (expenses required to carry out the regular responsibilities of the unit of general local government). 3. Political Activities. CDBG funds shall not be used to fmance the use of facilities or equipment for political purposes or to engage in other partisan political activities. Special Provisions: 1. Purchase of equipment. a. The purchase of construction equipment is not permitted. However, compensation for the use of such equipment through leasing, depreciation, or use allowances pursuant to specific OMB Circulars as applicable for an otherwise eligible activity is an eligible use of CDBG funds. b. The purchase of fire protection equipment is eligible as it is considered to be an integral part of a public facility. c. The purchase of equipment, fixtures, personal property is generally ineligible unless it's an integral structural fixture or part of an administration or public service activity. 1. Operating and Maintenance expenses are ineligible — the general rule is that any expense associated with repairing, operating or maintaining public facilities, improvements and services is ineligible. Specific exceptions to this general rule are operating and maintenance expenses associated with office space for program staff carrying out the CDBG program. Examples of ineligible expenses are: a. Maintenance and repair of publicly owned streets, parks, playgrounds, water and sewer facilities, neighborhood facilities, senior centers, centers for persons with disabilities, parking and other public facilities and improvements. b. Payment of salaries for staff, utility costs and similar expenses necessary for the operation of public works and facilities. 2. New housing construction is not allowed except 11 a. as provided under last resort housing provisions; b. housing constructed under Section 17 of the United States Housing Act of 1937; c. when carried out by a community based development organization (CBDO) pursuant to a neighborhood revitalization project, an economic development project, or energy conservation project. 3. Income payments, meaning a series of subsistence type grant payments made to an individual or family for items such as food, clothing, housing (*rent or mortgage), or utilities are not permitted, this excludes emergency grant payments made over a period of up to three consecutive months. 5. Per the faith -based initiative, religious organizations are eligible to apply for CDBG funds on the same basis as other eligible organizations, such as non -profits and require sponsorship from an eligible jurisdiction. Organizations may not use CDBG funding for inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction or proselytizing. Funds may not be used on a structure used inherently for religious activities or for organizations that discriminate based on religion. 12 Moab City Board Appointments Date of Appointment (Council Meeting) 12/13/2011 Board Name Term Length Term Expiration Name Address Telephone # Notes Replaces Previous Board Member Mayor's Signature Grand County Solid Waste District Fill-in term 12/31/2013 Board Member Person/ Info Sarah Bauman 275 East 300 South 260-9440 Dan Stenta Please Return to Moab City Recorder's Office 12/7/2011 6-3 Moab City Board Appointments Date of Appointment (Council Meeting) 12/13/2011 Board Name Term Length Term Expiration Name Address Telephone # Notes Replaces Previous Board Member Mayor's Signature Planning Commission 5 Year Term 12/31/2016 Board Member Person/ Info Wayne Hoskisson 457 Walker St. 259-0328 Wayne Hoskisson Please Return to Moab City Recorder's Office 12/9/2011 2012 Proposed Golf Rates Golf Pass 2011 rates $400, $1 daily use fee $390 $590, no daily use fee $590 Green Fee 18 holes $30 $29 9 holes $18 $18 Cart Fee 18 holes $14 $13 9 holes $7 $6 Local Card $30 $26.50 Green Fee 18 holes $20 $20 9 holes $10 $10 Cart Fee 18 holes $10 $10 9 holes $5 $5 6-5 City of Moab Regular Council Meeting Schedule 2012 The City of Moab will hold Regular City Council Meetings at 7:00 PM with workshops beginning at 6:30 PM on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month. All Regular City Council Meetings will be held in the Moab City Council Chambers at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. Meeting dates will be as follows: January 10 January 24 February 14 February 28 March 13 March 27 April 10 April 24 May 8 May 22 June 12 June 26 July 10 July 31 August 14 August 28 September 11 September 25 October 9 October 23 November 13 November 27 December 11 /s/ Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Published in the Times -Independent, December 22 and 29, 2011. 6-6 City of Moab Holiday Schedule 2012 All City Offices will be closed on the following holidays during 2012: Monday, January 2 Monday, January 16 Monday, February 20 Monday, May 28 Wednesday, July 4 Tuesday, July 24 Monday, September 3 Monday, November 12 Thursday, November 22 Friday, November 23 Tuesday, December 25 New Year's Day (observed) Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day Presidents' Day Memorial Day Independence Day Pioneer Day Labor Day Veterans' Day (observed) Thanksgiving Day Day After Thanksgiving Christmas Day Published in the Times -Independent, December 22 and 29, 2011. 6-7 MOAB CITY MOVED -ON STRUCTURE PERMIT BUSINESS PHONE: 043s) 246 - gins OWNER'S NAME VI I ARK Zrnz►C MAILING ADDRESS: 31Di SFAAWS14 OAL ► Itt (� � �>{ VidA$ %4 53Z. PROPOSED USE OF STRUCTURE: TYPE OF STRUCTURE: Grit; IITTA,cg n ea/ AI'Ac 1W ADDRESS OF PROPOSED STRUCTURE 'S LOCATION 3 it s(5,A„.1 Y"l A Gm sr NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (PRINT): alARK ZWit, I (THE PROPERTY OWNER) AGREE TO ALLOW THE MOVED -ON STRUCTURE ON MY PROPERTY FOR THE TERM OF THIS PERMIT. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE: LOCATION OF RESTROOM FACILITIES: :IGNATURE OF OWNEAPPROVIN USE OF RESTROOM , �CILITIES: COMPLIES WITH MOVED -ON STRUCTURE ORDINANCE: OYES ❑ NO ZONE: C1a Zoning Administrator's Signature: , A, BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED: ❑ YES [BrNO i BUILDING INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE: DATE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL MOVED -ON STRUCTURE TERM: FROM 2 tuk Required inspections on back. 4131.i4la $75.00 .75 $75.75 PYMT REVD CITY OF MOAB SIGNATURE OF CITY RECORDER CITY OF MOAB MOVED -ON STRUCTURE INSPECTIONS 217 EAST CENTER STREET MQAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 BUSINESS NAME: P20148 60111 84k0/4511 �« ADDRESS OF MOVED -ON STRUCTURE: 311 5MCD-1 ritir4Qt) sr THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONDUCTING BUSINESS. OBTAIN THE REQUIRED SIGNATURES THEN RETURN YOUR PERMIT TO THE CITY RECORDER'S OFFICE FOR FINAL APPROVAL. BUILDING INSPECTOR (435) 259-1344/1345 125 EAST CENTER BUILDING PERMIT # (iF REQUIRED) INSPECTION RECRED: ❑ YES L7 NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION APPROVEDIrDISAPPROVED ❑ REASON: FIRE INSPECTOR (435) 259-5557 45 SOUTH 100 EAST INSPECTION REQUIRED: ❑ YES ❑ NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REASON: SIGNATURE HEALTH INSPECTOR (435)259-5602 575 KANE CREEK BLVD INSPECTION REQUIRED: ❑ YES ❑ NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REASON: SIGNATURE 03/05/04 7-1 Moved On Structure Permit Business Name: Moab City Carwash goo, Date Time: April 3, 24}11, 2pm to 4pm Proposed Use of Structure: Open sided EZ-UP tent will provide shelter for product display and prospective clients. None of the products are for sale at the function but are used to help answer product questions. No utilities are required for this structure. No food will be available, though soda pop and bottle water will be provided free of charge. Type of Structure: 10'X20' Open -sided EZ-UP Tent From:THE MAIL ROOM 970 385 4350 11/18/2009 11:34 #778 P.008/013 20 4 i re i� l� DRAINAGE VIA COVERED FLUME INTO CURB & GUTTER ly l I i l GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 ( IN FEET ) i inch = 20 ft. Aisr 50' i I I _:( . I, I� 411\ ,) 80 DRAINAGE VI FLUME 7-1 Memo To: From: item: Background City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department interoffice Correspondence December 8, 2011 Honorable Mayor and Members of Council Planning Staff Approval of the Second Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Improvements Agreement for Mulberry Grove, PUD PI-II.251 The Mulberry Grove Improvements Agreement was approved by Council on January 9, 2008. Subsequently, a requested extension of an additional two (2) years for completion of the improvements was also granted in November 2009. The time for completion of the improvements runs out on January 9, 2012. As the project has proceeded towards completion in recent months, meetings held with the developers have revealed that there is confusion about what is considered to be a "required improvement'. That discussion has focused on the carports as the required approved parking for the plan. Discussion The developer has felt that the carports were not a part of the improvements because there is not a specific line item in the improvements cost worksheet (Exhibit A) for "Carports". However, there is a cost estimate of grade preparation for the foundation (under "Earthwork"). Carports 1, 3 and 4 were completed months ago but number three was destroyed by fire. The 2009 Improvements Agreement is attached for your review. As a result of the several meetings staff has held with the developers a solution has been reached. The draft Second Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Improvements Agreement for Mulberry Grove, PUD clarifies what improvements are required, when they will need to be constructed, and when additional building permits and Certificates of Occupancy can be issued. The specific language is found on page 3 of 9, sections 2 and 4. Carport 8 has been determined to be required for screening and buffering of the Mulberry Grove development from the Hecla Subdivision and is under construction. There are finished homes in the east portion of the development that will use carport 8 and the structure will sense as a portion of the required buffering for the adjacent residents in Hecla Subdivision. The remaining carports-2, 5, 6, and 7- are not complete, but will be built as lots are sold. p:\planning department \2009\correspondence \p1-09-148 mulberry groce cc extension.docx 7-2 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT For Mulberry Grove PUD The CITY OF MOAB, a Utah municipality (hereinafter "CITY"), and MULBERRY LANE COMMUNITY, LLC (hereinafter "OWNER") mutually referred to as the "Parties", do hereby enter into the following Agreement, pursuant to Moab Municipal Code (hereinafter: "City Code") Section 17.66, to cover the installation of PUD improvements required by City Code (hereinafter: the "Required Improvements") and to provide for the maintenance of installed improvements and facilities within the PUD. I. RECITALS. A. OWNER has submitted to the CITY for approval a proposed residential Planned Unit Development PUD designated Mulberry Grove (hereinafter: the "PUD" or the "Plat"). B. The City Planning Commission has fully considered said Plat and has heard and considered public comment regarding said Plat pursuant to city and state code. C. The City Planning Commission conditionally approved a Final Plat for the PUD at its regular meeting held November 8, 2007. D. One of the conditions of the approval referenced in paragraph C above, is the execution of a PUD Improvements Agreement between the Parties. E. OWNER has submitted to CITY for its review construction plans and specifications entitled Mulberry Grove, PUD Improvements, having been prepared by OWNER and bearing the stamp of a licensed Professional Engineer (hereinafter: the "Construction Plans"). Said plans show in sufficient detail the Required Improvements for the PUD. F. The Construction Plans have been reviewed and approved subject to such modifications as may have been specified by each of the following entities: (i) The City Public Works Director with respect to culinary water improvements as provided by the City, storm water drainage improvements, parking improvements, and access improvements. (ii) The Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency (GWSSA) with respect to sewer improvements. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 1 of 9 on Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp II. AGREEMENT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE PREMISES, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. Covered Property. The real property subject to this Agreement (hereinafter; the "Property") is described as follows: LANDS LOCATED WITHIN SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SALT LAKE MERIDIAN, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TRACT A MULBERRY LANE PUD AMENDED. Together with: A PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE NW1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLBM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS S. 3°00' E. 93.0 FEET FROM THE NW CORNER OF THE NE1/4 NW1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLBM, AND PROCEEDING THENCE S. 75° 14' E. 396.5 FEET (RECORD=S. 75°26' E. APPROXIMATELY 390 FEET) TO THE NW CORNER OF THE GOUGH PROPERTY, THENCE WITH THE WEST LINE OF GOUGH S. 24°19' E. (RECORD=S. 24°30'E.) 453.5 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE N. 65°4L'E. (RECORD=N. 65°30'E.) 5.0 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE S. 12°19'E. (RECORD= S. 12°30'E.) 110.0 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE S. 51 °11' W. (RECORD=S. 51 °00' W.) 43.0 FEET, THENCE S.0°1 L'W. (RECORD=SOUTH) 191.0 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE S. 81 °43' W. 577.1 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EL/2 NW 1/4 SECTION 7, THENCE WITH SAID LINE N. 0°07' E. 741.6 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE N. 1°44' E. 179.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Less the following: A PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE NW1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLBM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NW CORNER OF LOT 13 OF HECLA SUBDIVISION, SAID CORNER BEARS S 72° 07' E 1986.8 FT. FROM THE NW CORNER OF SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, AND PROCEEDING THECE WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13 S 12° 19' E (RECORD = S 12° 30' E) 110.0 FT. TO THE SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, THENCE WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 12 OF HECLA PUD S 51 ° 11' W (RECORD = S 51 ° 00' W) 43.0 FT. TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID LOT 12, THENCE N 0° 09' E 125.6 FT. TO AN ANGLE POST IN A CHAIN LINK FENCE, THENCE N 37° 29' E 8.5 FT. TO A NAIL IN CONCRETE, THENCE N 65° 41' E (RECORD = N 65° 30' E) 5.0 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 2 of 9 7-2 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp 2. Required Improvements. OWNER will make all improvements to the property shown on the Construction Plans. Required Improvements shall include but not be limited to the following: (a) Site clearing and removal of obstructions (b) General site grading (c) Site utilities including but not limited to culinary water and sanitary sewer (d) Streets, curb & gutter, and sidewalks (e) Street striping and signage (f) Parking areas (excepting carports 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 as delineated on Exhibit B) i. Carports 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 as delineated on Exhibit B may be constructed as lots are sold. A carport space must be provided for individual Lots 2-14 and Lots 18- 36 prior to the selling of these lots. Lots 30-36 that are required to have a carport space must have a carport space available in carports 7 or 8. Lots 1-27 that are required to have a carport space must have a carport space available in carports 1-6). (g) Storm water drainage facilities (h) Non -motorized pathways (i) All landscaping, fencing, or other visual screening required as a condition of approval. 3. Construction Standards. Improvements shall be completed in conformance with the approved Construction Plans. All changes to the Construction Plans must be authorized in writing by the City Public Works Director and/or GWSSA's Manager as appropriate. In addition, all improvements shall be completed in conformance with the City of Moab Public Improvement Specifications, GWSSA's construction standards, and all state and federal regulations where applicable. Where discrepancies occur between the Construction Plans and the listed reference standards, the Construction Plans shall prevail. 4. Timeline for Completion. Construction of all Required Improvements for the Property shall be completed by January 9, 2012.A reasonable extension of time for the completion of improvements may be granted, at the discretion of the City Council, upon a showing by the OWNER that there is good cause for an extension and that the work has been diligently prosecuted from the date of this Agreement. (a) Building Permits — No building permits will be issued for any lot until the required city water improvements and GWSSA sewer improvements have been completed, and all other requirements for the issuance of a building permit have been satisfied. No building permits will be issued for any lot, from the date of this agreement, until substantial progress (at least 50% completion) has been achieved for Carport 8 as shown on Exhibit B). (b) Certificates of Occupancy — No Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for any structure on any lot until all required improvements have been completed. 5. Acceptance of Improvements, Warranty. All work shall be subject to quality assurance testing and inspection as specified in the Construction Plans and/or applicable reference standards. OWNER or OWNER'S authorized representative shall provide 48 hours minimum notification to CITY or GWSSA as applicable when inspection by either entity is required. The costs associated with such testing and inspection shall be the responsibility of OWNER. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 3 of 9 7-2 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp (a) Upon satisfactory completion of improvements as evidenced by inspection & testing as applicable, all sewer mains shall be dedicated to GWSSA. (b) OWNER warrants that all public improvements dedicated to CITY shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and that all such improvements shall be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance by CITY. (i) OWNER shall promptly repair or replace any defective work following receipt of written notice under this warranty from the CITY. (ii) OWNER additionally warrants that all public improvements shall be delivered free and clear of any lien or encumbrance. 6. Performance Guaranty. Pursuant to City Code 17.66.180 C, OWNER has elected to post a performance guaranty with CITY in lieu of completing all Required Improvements prior to recordation of the Plat. The performance guaranty shall be in the form of collateral pledge of real property. Contemporaneous with the execution of this agreement, OWNER shall execute a Deed of Trust naming the City as beneficiary in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the Required Improvements as determined by the PUD Improvements Cost Worksheet attached hereto as Exhibit A. The fair market value of the real property pledged as collateral shall be of an amount not less than one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated cost of all Required Improvements as determined by the PUD Improvements Cost Worksheet attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Deed of Trust shall be a first position lien against the subject property, and Owner shall pay all costs of providing a satisfactory lender's title insurance policy in favor of the City in the amount of the Deed of Trust and assuring same. The Deed of Trust is attached as Exhibit B hereto and shall be executed prior to recordation of the PUD Final Plat. 7. Partial Releases of Performance Guaranty. No partial releases of the performance guaranty shall be permitted for partial completion of the work. 8. Final Release of Performance Guaranty. Upon completion of all Required Improvements in accordance with the approved Construction Plans, OWNER may request that the performance guaranty be released. (a) In order for OWNER to receive final release, the following shall be presented to CITY: (i) A completed Final Release Form supplied by CITY and signed by OWNER. Said form shall include OWNER'S certification of warranty for the completed improvements. (ii) Copies lien waivers/releases from all contractors who performed work on the project and all suppliers who supplied materials that were incorporated into the work. (iii) Written certification by OWNER that all outstanding charges for the Improvements have been paid and that there are no liens, encumbrances, or other restrictions on the Improvements. (iv) Letter from GWSSA certifying their acceptance of the sewer improvements. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 4 of 9 rri Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp (b) Upon acceptance of a complete request for final release, the City Public Works Director shall verify that all Required Improvements are complete and in accordance with the approved Construction Plans and Final Plat. (c) Upon written certification from the City Manager that OWNER has completed all of the required public and other PUD improvements in accordance with this Agreement, and that there are not liens, encumbrances or other restrictions on the Improvements, and that such Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Public Works Director and the City Engineer, the City Council shall execute a resolution verifying the acceptance of the Improvements and authorizing the release to the OWNER of the Deed of Trust on the Pledged Property. 9. CITY's Use of Performance Guaranty upon Default. Upon written certification by the City Manager that the OWNER has failed to perform its obligations under this Agreement, within the time period set forth in this Agreement, and if CITY intends to proceed with the task of installing any or all of the Required Improvements covered by this Agreement, the City may elect to declare and record a Notice of Default pursuant to the Deed of Trust, and as authorized by U.C.A. 57-1-24. The property subject to the Deed of Trust shall then be sold at a public sale in the manner provided by law. The amount of indebtedness subject to satisfaction under the Deed of Trust shall be the balance, at the time of sale, of all costs of construction/completion of all Improvements required under this Agreement, together with sums owing under this Agreement and the terms of the Deed of Trust, up to the indebtedness limit specified in the Deed of Trust. Nothing herein shall be construed to abrogate any right on the part of the City to pursue a deficiency judgment, as provided by law. 10. Default, Remedies, Lapse of Plat. All provisions of this Agreement are material and any violation is grounds for declaration of Default. Prior to invoking any remedies for Default under this Agreement CITY shall deliver written notice to the OWNER describing the act, event, or omission constituting same, and allowing OWNER a period of not less than thirty (30) days in which to cure or abate the violation. Cure within that period reinstates this Agreement. (a) Upon declaration of Default, CITY may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation, foreclosing upon the Deed of Trust; withholding building permits or certificates of occupancy/zoning compliance; an action to enjoin or abate zoning violations; recording of a lapse of plat, in whole or in part; and any other remedies available at law or equity, including specific performance or injunctive relief. (b) The recording of a lapse of plat by CITY shall result in the reversion of the approval of the PUD. A lapse of plat shall terminate all previous approvals and result in the elimination of platted lots for the affected property. 11. CITY's Option to Maintain Improvements in the Event of OWNER's Failure or Neglect. OWNER has set in place mechanisms, including covenants and restrictions, providing for the maintenance of water and sewer facilities, common areas, roads, trails, landscaping and other required improvements. Pursuant to City Code Section 17.66.100 (C), in the event of failure or neglect on the parts of the OWNER, successors or assigns, to maintain such required improvements in good condition, the City may perform the necessary work and may enter upon Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 5 of 9 7-2 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp the land and do the work and charge the cost thereof, including reasonable attorneys' fees, to the OWNER, or successors or assigns. The OWNER, successors or assigns will reimburse the CITY for all costs which the CITY incurs in performing the necessary work. 12. General Provisions. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of OWNER in the ownership or development of all or any portion of the Property. Prior to assigning any or all of his rights and duties under this Agreement OWNER shall obtain from any transferee a written assumption acknowledging and agreeing to be bound by this Agreement. (a) This Agreement is the product of mutual bargaining. All terms shall be construed in accordance with their plain meaning, regardless of the extent to which either party participated in the drafting. (b) Failure of a party to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right, nor shall any course of dealing or previous action or inaction be deemed a waiver of any rights or claims arising with respect to later or subsequent breaches, acts or omissions. (c) The term "Agreement" includes this Improvements Agreement, all exhibits hereto, the Final Plat/Plan for the PUD, and all related design drawings, which documents shall constitute the sole and complete Agreement between the parties. The Agreement shall supercede all prior Agreements or representations, however evidenced. No modifications to any of the terms of this Agreement shall be binding, unless reduced to writing and lawfully executed by both parties. (d) The place of performance of this Agreement is Grand County, Utah. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this Agreement, the parties stipulate to venue in the Seventh Judicial District Court, Grand County, Utah. In any such proceeding the parties waive trial to a jury on all claims and agree that the action shall be tried to the court. (e) In any legal proceeding concerning the terms of this Agreement the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs in addition to any other relief authorized herein. (0 This Agreement shall be governed by Utah law. (g) This Agreement does not create any third party beneficiary rights. It is specifically understood by the parties that; (i) the Project is a private development; (ii) CITY has no interest in, responsibilities for, or duty to third parties concerning any improvements to the Property, unless CITY accepts the improvements pursuant to this Agreement; (iii) and except as otherwise provided herein, OWNER shall have full power and exclusive control of the Property. (h) The provisions of this Agreement are severable, and if any portion should be held to be void or unenforceable, then the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed to be in Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 6 of 9 ;a Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp full force without reference to the invalid provision. (i) In the event of any legal dispute concerning this Agreement neither party shall be liable to the other for consequential damages, lost profits, or delay related damages of any kind. (j) All notices under this Agreement shall be given in writing by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, and delivered to the following addresses: To the CITY: City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Attn: City Manager To OWNER: Mulberry Lane Community, LLC c/o Michelle L. Wiley 472 Tusher Street Moab, Utah 85432 (k) Notice may be delivered to such other parties or addresses as the parties may designate in writing from time to time. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the City of Moab, acting by and through the Moab City Council, which has duly authorized execution, and by OWNER as of the date(s) specified below. CITY: Mayor David L. Sakrison Date ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 7 of 8 Date Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp OWNER: Mulberry Lane Community, LLC By: Douglas K. Jones, Member, Mulberry Lane Community, LLC By: Michelle Wiley, Member, Mulberry Lane Community LLC STATE OF UTAH ) COUNTY OF GRAND ) Date § Date The foregoing agreement was executed before me by Douglas K. Jones and Anne L. Wilson this day of , 20. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public, State of Utah Address: Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 8 of 8 Eft EXHIBIT A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS COST WORKSHEET PROJECT NAME: Mulberry Grove Subdivision PHASE #: Single phase protect DEVELOPER/OWNER: Mulberry Lane Community LLC REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS Category Sub -category Line item description Unit Unit Price Plan Quantity Item Cost SITEWORK CLEARING & GRUBBING i Tree & Stump Removal for access & utility corridors (material chipped & stockpiled on site for future use) LS $ 8,000.00 1 $ 8,000 EARTHWORK General Excavation .(material stockpiled on site) CY $ 6.00 1,800 $ 10,800 Subgrade Preparation under Surface Improvements - roads, parking areas, carport structures, & pathways SY $ 0.90 10,180 - - $ 9,162 UTILITIES WATER (City of Moab) ✓ Install 8" dia. Water Main-C900 CL 200 (complete) LF $ 21.00 3,245 $ 68,145 $ 7,800 Install 8" dia.Line Valves - cast iron (complete) EA $ 975.00 8 Install Fire Hydrant (complete) EA $ 3,400.00 5 $ 17,000 Install 3/4" dia. Res. Service Connection (complete) LS $ 850.00 44 $ 37,400 SEWER (GWSSA) ✓ Install 8" dia. Sewer Main - PVC SDR35 - (complete) LF $ 25.00 2,290 $ 57,250 $ 37,050 Install 48" dia. Sewer Manhole (complete) EA $ 2,850.00 13 Install 4" dia. Res. Sewer Service Line (complete) LS $ 400.00 42 $ 16,800 $ 45,600 POWER (Rocky Mt. Power) ✓ Install Conduit for Underground Primary & Secondary LF $ 12.00 3,800 Subdivision Backbone by Rocky Mountain Power LS $ 44,000.00 1 $ 44,000 $ 129,195 ROADS, PARKING, FIRE ACCESS, & PATHWAYS if t it ENTRANCE ROADS & PARKING AREAS Install 6" thick Concrete Pavement w/color SF $ 5.50 23,490 Install 4" thick Concrete Sidewalk w/color SF $ 3.75 1,350 $ 5,063 Install 6" Concrete Curb Wall LF $ 12.00 420 $ 5,040 Install 3/4" dia. clean rock as base course 8" thick TON $ 14.00 1,030 $ 14,420 $ 1,000� $ 19,980 Install Detectable Waming Mats EA $ 200.00 5 CONTRUCTION/ FIRE ACCESS ROUTES Install 1" UBC base course under 20' access corridor TON $ 13.50 1,480 Install 3" Soil Pavement Surface Course SF $ 1.75 19,400 $ 33,950 Install Concrete Grid Pavers filled with sand & seeded (Hastings Checker Block or equal) SF $ 2.25 21,300 $ 47,925 SIGNAGE Traffic signs (installed) EA $ 250.00 8 $ 2,000 LIGHTING Install Low Bollard Type Area Light Fixture EA $ 950.00 36 $- 34,200 $ 25,650 STORM DRAINAGE STORM DRAINS 2?j Install 18" dia. Storm Drain Pipe (complete) LF $ 45.00 570 Install Concrete Area Drain/Drop Inlet EA $ 2,100.00 7 $ 14,700 Install Storm Drell Outfall Structure EA $ 1,500.00 2 $ 3,000 OTHER REQUIRED Install 5' high Screening Fence - Trex LF $ 16.00 260 $ 4,160 $ 40,000 LANDSCAPING & Install Parking Area Landscaping per plan LS $ 40,000.00 1 SCREENING Install Landscaping Irrigation System ' LS $ 12,000.00 1 $ 12,000 MISC. Dust Control LS $ 6,000.00 1 $ 6,000 if Surveying - Construction Staking & Lot Comers LS $ 18,000.00 1 $ 18,000 if Quality Assurance Testing LS $ 12,000.00 1 $ 12,000 CITY APPROVAL: By: Public Works Director Total Estimated Construction Cost Plus Required 25% contingency Total Amount of Financial Guaranty f 7-07 Date $ 787,300 196,800 $984,100 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0309avised 12/7/20c FUTURE CARPORT (NOT A PART) (TYPICAL) CONSTRUCT FRONT FOUNDATION PIERS (SEE SHEET A1.0) (TYPICAL) p #2 �— -- �. t El .J WINDING WAY 16 15 SOUTH SPUR 23 21 19 I I FEMA 500 YR FLOODPLAIN 0 0 c) (?) 00 00 (Th000 0 1°000 0 0000 0 "0 0 0 , 0 00 < T O o o -- } I i �i 14s,\Q� I 13 Q I /00 0 0 '(: PATH CONVECTOR _ EAST i EX POND EX ORCHARD 29 EXHIBIT B- Carport Numbering System EDGE OF RIVER 10 p .83 OT"It4 J��S QP1H 33 WINDING WAY 35 V` -V- —V--_yam -V_ —6`_ _y.._.—V_ .V-- TRACT B V .r, g 0 O g �0 00 iz SP d'� C a of .5 1 W) C _ ,„ „, R C 6UiF.0^ E i v pia.. algiAaw W5 O oC 4 O F Cgy W • rg mW J t ga r N ▪ K r E ck rt,#. ` 1 wOwwines below. thallanbaloreyoudIg. i= nws a WWI vfo..w ea..te►I OW u1l CALL BLUE STAKES OF UTAH TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 1400.662.4111 UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF UTAH PLAN SCALE: 1" = a0' (ilx17) SCALE: 1" = 40' (24z38) 80' 40' 20' 0 4" CONCRETE BIKE TRAIL (NO VEHICLE ASPHALT STAMPED CONCRETE GRAVEL SUBBASE ONLY CONCRETE THICKENED EDGE PARKING AREA — EAST 1 40 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp SECONDFIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT For Mulberry Grove PUD The CITY OF MOAB, a Utah municipality (hereinafter "CITY"), and MULBERRY LANE COMMUNITY, LLC (hereinafter "OWNER") mutually referred to as the "Parties", do hereby enter into the following Agreement, pursuant to Moab Municipal Code (hereinafter: "City Code") Section 17.66, to cover the installation of PUD improvements required by City Code (hereinafter: the "Required Improvements") and to provide for the maintenance of installed improvements and facilities within the PUD. I. RECITALS. A. OWNER has submitted to the CITY for approval a proposed residential Planned Unit Development PUD designated Mulberry Grove (hereinafter: the "PUD" or the "Plat"). B. The City Planning Commission has fully considered said Plat and has heard and considered public comment regarding said Plat pursuant to city and state code. C. The City Planning Commission conditionally approved a Final Plat for the PUD at its regular meeting held November 8, 2007. D. One of the conditions of the approval referenced in paragraph C above, is the execution of a PUD Improvements Agreement between the Parties. E. OWNER has submitted to CITY for its review construction plans and specifications entitled Mulberry Grove, PUD Improvements, having been prepared by OWNER and bearing the stamp of a licensed Professional Engineer (hereinafter: the "Construction Plans"). Said plans show in sufficient detail the Required Improvements for the PUD. F. The Construction Plans have been reviewed and approved subject to such modifications as may have been specified by each of the following entities: (i) The City Public Works Director with respect to culinary water improvements -as provided by the City, storm water drainage improvements, parking improvements, and access improvements. (ii) The Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency (GWSSA) with respect to sewer improvements. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 1 of 9 S p,icc :ilx�r,; r�.crccd for RC, tiCr . aump II. AGREEMENT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE PREMISES, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Covered Property. The real property subject to this Agreement (hereinafter; the "Property") is described as follows: LANDS LOCATED WITHIN SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SALT LAKE MERIDIAN, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TRACT A MULBERRY LANE PUD AMENDED. Together with: A PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE NW1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLBM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS S. 3°00' E. 93.0 FEET FROM THE NW CORNER OF THE NE1/4 NW1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLBM, AND PROCEEDING THENCE S. 75° 14' E. 396.5 FEET (RECORD=S. 75°26' E. APPROXIMATELY 390 FEET) TO THE NW CORNER OF THE GOUGH PROPERTY, THENCE WITH THE WEST LINE OF GOUGH S. 24°19' E. (RECORD=S. 24°30'E.) 453.5 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE N. 65°4L'E. (RECORD=N. 65°30'E.) 5.0 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE S. 12°19'E. (RECORD= S. 12°30'E.) 110.0 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE S. 51°11' W. (RECORD=S. 51°00' W.) 43.0 FEET, THENCE S.0°1L'W. (RECORD=SOUTH) 191.0 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE S. 81°43' W. 577.1 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EL/2 NW 1/4 SECTION 7, THENCE WITH SAID LINE N. 0°07' E. 741.6 FEET TO A CORNER, THENCE N. 1°44' E. 179.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Less the following: A PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE NW1/4 SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLBM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NW CORNER OF LOT 13 OF HECLA SUBDIVISION, SAID CORNER BEARS S 72° 07' E 1986.8 FT. FROM THE NW CORNER OF SECTION 7, T 26 S, R 22 E, SLM, AND PROCEEDING THECE WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13 S 12° 19' E (RECORD = S 12° 30' E) 110.0 FT. TO THE SW CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, THENCE WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 12 OF HECLA PUD S 51° 11' W (RECORD = S 51° 00' W) 43.0 FT. TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID LOT 12, THENCE N 0° 09' E 125.6 FT. TO AN ANGLE POST IN A CHAIN LINK FENCE, THENCE N 37° 29' E 8.5 FT. TO A NAIL IN CONCRETE, THENCE N 65° 41' E (RECORD = N 65° 30' E) 5.0 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 2 of 9 7-2 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp 2. Required Improvements. OWNER will make all improvements to the property shown on the Construction Plans. Required Improvements shall include but not be limited to the following: (a) Site clearing and removal of obstructions (b) General site grading (c) Site utilities including but not limited to culinary water and sanitary sewer (d) Streets, curb & gutter, and sidewalks (e) Street striping and signage (f) Parking areas (excepting carports 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 as delineated on Exhibit B) i. Carports 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 as delineated on Exhibit B may be constructed as lots* are sold. A carport space must be provided for individual Lots 2-14 and Lots 18- 36 prior to the selling of these lots. Lots 30-36 that are required to have a carport space must have a carport space available in carports 7 or 8. Lots 1-27 that are required to have a carport space must have a carport space available in carports 1-6). (g) Storm water drainage facilities (h) Non -motorized pathways (i) All landscaping, fencing, or other visual screening required as a condition of approval. 3. Construction Standards. Improvements shall be completed in conformance with the approved Construction Plans. All changes to the Construction Plans must be authorized in writing by the City Public Works Director and/or GWSSA's Manager as appropriate. In addition, all improvements shall be completed in conformance with the City of Moab Public Improvement Specifications, GWSSA's construction standards, and all state and federal regulations where applicable. Where discrepancies occur between the Construction Plans and the listed reference standards, the Construction Plans shall prevail. * 4. Timeline for Completion. Construction of all Required Improvements for the Property shall be completed by January 9, 2012. within two years from the date of this agreement. A reasonable extension of time for the completion of improvements may be granted, at the discretion of the City Council, upon a showing by the OWNER that there is good cause for an extension and that the work has been diligently prosecuted from the date of this Agreement. (a) Building Permits — No building permits will be issued for any lot until the required city water improvements and GWSSA sewer improvements have been completed, and all other requirements for the issuance of a building permit have been satisfied. No building permits will be issued for any lot, from the date of this agreement, until substantial progress (at least 50% completion) has been achieved for Carport 8 as shown on Exhibit B). (b) Certificates of Occupancy — No Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for any structure on any lot until all required improvements have been completed. 5. Acceptance of Improvements, Warranty. All work shall be subject to quality assurance testing and inspection as specified in the Construction Plans and/or applicable reference standards. OWNER or OWNER'S authorized representative shall provide 48 hours minimum notification to CITY or GWSSA as applicable when inspection by either entity is required. The costs associated Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 3 of 9 Formatted: List Paragraph, Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: i, ii, iii, ...+ Start at: 1 + Alignment: Right + Aligned at: 1.25" + Indent at: 1.5" ( Formatted: Tab stops: 2.16", Left 7-2 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp with such testing and inspection shall be the responsibility of OWNER. (a) Upon satisfactory completion of improvements as evidenced by inspection & testing as applicable, all sewer mains shall be dedicated to GWSSA. (b) OWNER warrants that all public improvements dedicated to CITY shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and that all such improvements shall be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance by CITY. (0 OWNER shall promptly repair or replace any defective work following receipt of written notice under this warranty from the CITY. (ii) OWNER additionally warrants that all public improvements shall be delivered free and clear of any lien or encumbrance. 6. Performance Guaranty. Pursuant to City Code 17.66.180 C, OWNER has elected to post a performance guaranty with CITY in lieu of completing all Required Improvements prior to recordation of the Plat. The performance guaranty shall be in the form of collateral pledge of real property. Contemporaneous with the execution of this agreement, OWNER shall execute a Deed of Trust naming the City as beneficiary in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the Required Improvements as determined by the PUD Improvements Cost Worksheet attached hereto as Exhibit A. The fair market value of the real property pledged as collateral shall be of an amount not less than one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated cost of all Required Improvements as determined by the PUD Improvements Cost Worksheet attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Deed of Trust shall be a first position lien against the subject property, and Owner shall pay all costs of providing a satisfactory lender's title insurance policy in favor of the City in the amount of the Deed of Trust and assuring same. The Deed of Trust is attached as Exhibit B hereto and shall be executed prior to recordation of the PUD Final Plat. 7. Partial Releases of Performance Guaranty. No partial releases of the performance guaranty shall be permitted for partial completion of the work. 8. Final Release of Performance Guaranty. Upon completion of all Required Improvements in accordance with the approved Construction Plans, OWNER may request that the performance guaranty be released. (a) In order for OWNER to receive final release, the following shall be presented to CITY: (0 A completed Final Release Form supplied by CITY and signed by OWNER. Said form shall include OWNER's certification of warranty for the completed improvements. (ii) Copies lien waivers/releases from all contractors who performed work on the project and all suppliers who supplied materials that were incorporated into the work. (iii) Written certification by OWNER that all outstanding charges for the Improvements have been paid and that there are no liens, encumbrances, or other restrictions on the Improvements. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 4 of 9 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp (iv) Letter from GWSSA certifying their acceptance of the sewer improvements. (b) Upon acceptance of a complete request for final release, the City Public Works Director shall verify that all Required Improvements are complete and in accordance with the approved Construction Plans and Final Plat. (c) Upon written certification from the City Manager that OWNER has completed all of the required public and other PUD improvements in accordance with this Agreement, and that there are not liens, encumbrances or other restrictions on the Improvements, and that such Improvements have been inspected and approved by the City Public Works Director and the City Engineer, the City Council shall execute a resolution verifying the acceptance of the Improvements and authorizing the release to the OWNER of the Deed of Trust on the Pledged Property. 9. CITY's Use of Performance Guaranty upon Default. Upon written certification by the City Manager that the OWNER has failed to perform its obligations under this Agreement, within the time period set forth in this Agreement, and if CITY intends to proceed with the task of installing any or all of the Required Improvements covered by this Agreement, the City may elect to declare and record a Notice of Default pursuant to the Deed of Trust, and as authorized by U.C.A. 57-1-24. The property subject to the Deed of Trust shall then be sold at a public sale in the manner provided by law. The amount of indebtedness subject to satisfaction under the Deed of Trust shall be the balance, at the time of sale, of all costs of construction/completion of all Improvements required under this Agreement, together with sums owing under this Agreement and the terms of the Deed of Trust, up to the indebtedness limit specified in the Deed of Trust. Nothing herein shall be construed to abrogate any right on the part of the City to pursue a deficiency judgment, as provided by law. 10. Default, Remedies, Lapse of Plat. All provisions of this Agreement are material and any violation is grounds for declaration of Default. Prior to invoking any remedies for Default under this Agreement CITY shall deliver written notice to the OWNER describing the act, event, or omission constituting same, and allowing OWNER a period of not less than thirty (30) days in which to cure or abate the violation. Cure within that period reinstates this Agreement. (a) Upon declaration of Default, CITY may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation, foreclosing upon the Deed of Trust; withholding building permits or certificates of occupancy/zoning compliance; an action to enjoin or abate zoning violations; recording of a lapse of plat, in whole or in part; and any other remedies available at law or equity, including specific performance or injunctive relief. (b) The recording of a lapse of plat by CITY shall result in the reversion of the approval of the PUD. A lapse of plat shall terminate all previous approvals and result in the elimination of platted lots for the affected property. 11. CITY's Option to Maintain Improvements in the Event of OWNER's Failure or Neglect. OWNER has set in place mechanisms, including covenants and restrictions, providing for the maintenance of water and sewer facilities, common areas, roads, trails, landscaping and other required improvements. Pursuant to City Code Section 17.66.100 (C), in the event of failure or Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 5 of 9 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp neglect on the parts of the OWNER, successors or assigns, to maintain such required improvements in good condition, the City may perform the necessary work and may enter upon the land and do the work and charge the cost thereof, including reasonable attomeys' fees, to the OWNER, or successors or assigns. The OWNER, successors or assigns will reimburse the CITY for all costs which the CITY incurs in performing the necessary work. 12. General Provisions. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of OWNER in the ownership or development of all or any portion of the Property. Prior to assigning any or all of his rights and duties under this Agreement OWNER shall obtain from any transferee a written assumption acknowledging and agreeing to be bound by this Agreement. (a) This Agreement is the product of mutual bargaining. All terms shall be construed in accordance with their plain meaning, regardless of the extent to which either party participated in the drafting. (b) Failure of a party to exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right, nor shall any course of dealing or previous action or inaction be deemed a waiver of any rights or claims arising with respect to later or subsequent breaches, acts or omissions. (c) The term "Agreement" includes this Improvements Agreement, all exhibits hereto, the Final Plat/Plan for the PUD, and all related design drawings, which documents shall constitute the sole and complete Agreement between the parties. The Agreement shall supercede all prior Agreements or representations, however evidenced. No modifications to any of the terms of this Agreement shall be binding, unless reduced to writing and lawfully executed by both parties. (d) The place of performance of this Agreement is Grand County, Utah. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this Agreement, the parties stipulate to venue in the Seventh Judicial District Court, Grand County, Utah. In any such proceeding the parties waive trial to a jury on all claims and agree that the action shall be tried to the court. (e) (0 (g) In any legal proceeding concerning the terms of this Agreement the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs in addition to any other relief authorized herein. This Agreement shall be governed by Utah law. This Agreement does not create any third party beneficiary rights. It is specifically understood by the parties that; (i) the Project is a private development; (ii) CITY has no interest in, responsibilities for, or duty to third parties concerning any improvements to the Property, unless CITY accepts the improvements pursuant to this Agreement; (iii) and except as otherwise provided herein, OWNER shall have full power and exclusive control of the Property. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 6 of 9 03-fq Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT For Mulberry Grove PUD The CITY OF MOAB, a Utah municipality (hereinafter "CITY"), and MULBERRY LANE COMMUNITY, LLC (hereinafter "OWNER") mutually referred to as the "Parties", do hereby enter into the fallowing Agreement, pursuant to Moab Municipal Code (hereinafter: "City Code") Section 1.7.66, to cover the installation of PUD improvements required by City Code (hereinafter: the "Required Improvements")and to provide for the maintenance of installed improvements and facilities within the PUD. I. RECITALS. A. OWNER has submitted to the CITY for approval a proposed residential Planned Unit Development PUD designated Mulberry Grove (hereinafter: the "PUD" or the "Plat"). B. The City Planning Commission has fully considered said Plat and has heard and considered public comment regarding said Plat pursuant to city and state code. C. The City Planning Commission conditionally approved a Final Plat for the PUD at its regular meeting held November 8, 2007. D. One of the conditions of the approval referenced in paragraph C above, is the execution of a PUD Improvements Agreement between the Parties. E. OWNER has submitted to CITY for its review construction plans and specifications entitled Mulberry Grove. PUD Improvements, having been prepared by OWNER and bearing the stamp of a licensed Professional Engineer (hereinafter: the "Construction Plans"). Said plans show in sufficient detail the Required Improvements for the PUD. F. The Construction Plans have been reviewed and approved subject to such modifications as May have been specified by each of the following entities: (i) The City Public Works Director with respect to culinary water improvements if provided by the City, storm water drainage improvements, parking improvements, and access improvements. (ii) The Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency (GWSSA) with respect to sewer improvements and culinary water improvements. Ent 484581 Bk 720 Pg 292 -- 3 / Date: 06-FEB-2008 11:25AM Fee: None Filed By: MMD MERLENE MOSHER DALTON Recorder GRAND COUNTY CORPORATION For: MOAB CITY Mulberry Cirove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page I of 8 7-2 Space above reserved 'for Recorder's stamp (a) Site clearing and removal of obstructions (b) General site grading (c) Site utilities including but not limited to culinary water and sanitary sewer (d) Streets, curb & gutter, and sidewalks (e) Street striping and signage (f) Parking areas (g) Storm water drainage facilities (h) Non -motorized pathways (i) All landscaping, fencing, or other visual screening required as a condition of approval. 3. Construction Standards. Improvements shall be completed in conformance with the approved Construction Plans. All changes to the Construction Plans must be authorized in writing by the City Public Works Director and/or GWSSA's Manager as appropriate. In addition, all improvements shall be completed in conformance with the City of Moab Public Improvement Specifications, GWSSA's construction standards, and all state and federal regulations where applicable. Where discrepancies occur between the Construction Plans and the listed reference standards, the Construction Plans shall prevail. 4. Timeline for Completion. Construction of all Required Improvements for the Property shall be completed within two years from the date of this agreement. A reasonable extension of time for the completion of improvements may be granted, at the discretion of the City Council, upon a showing by the OWNER that there is good cause for an extension and that the work has been diligently prosecuted from the date of this Agreement. (a) Building Permits — No building permits will be issued for any lot until required water and sewer improvements to be performed by GWSSA have been completed, and all other requirements for the issuance of a building permit have been satisfied. (b) Certificates of Occupancy —No Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for any structure on any lot until all required improvements have been completed. 5. Acceptance of Improvements, Warranty. All work shall be subject to quality assurance testing and inspection as specified in the Construction Plans and/or applicable reference standards. OWNER or OWNER's authorized representative shall provide 48 hours minimum notification to CITY or GWSSA as applicable when inspection by either entity is required. The costs associated with such testing and inspection shall be the responsibility of OWNER. (a) Upon satisfactory completion of improvements as evidenced by inspection & testing as applicable, all water and sewer mains shall be dedicated to GWSSA. (b) OWNER warrants that all public improvements dedicated to CITY shall be constructed in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and that all such improvements shall be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance by CITY. (i) OWNER shall promptly repair or replace any defective work following receipt of written notice under this warranty from the CITY. Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 3 of 8 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0294 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp City Engineer, the City Council shall execute a resolution verifying the acceptance of the Improvements and authorizing the release to the OWNER of the Deed of Trust on the Pledged Property. 9. CITY's Use of Performance Guaranty upon Default. Upon written certification by the City Manager that the OWNER has failed to perform its obligations under this Agreement, within the time period set forth in this Agreement, and if CITY intends to proceed with the task of installing any or all of the Required Improvements covered by this Agreement, the City may elect to declare and record allotice of Default pursuant to the Deed of Trust, and as authorized by U.C.A. 57-1-24. The property subject to the Deed of Trust shall then be sold at a public sale in the manner provided by law. The amount of indebtedness subject to satisfaction under the Deed of Trust shall be the balance, at the time of sale, of all costs of construction/completion of all Improvements required under this Agreement, together with SUMS owing under this Agreement and the terms of the Deed of Trust, up to the indebtedness limit specified in the Deed of Trust. Nothing herein shall be construed to abrogate any right on the part of the City to pursue a deficiency judgment, as provided by law. 10. Default, Remedies, Lapse of Plat. All provisions of this Agreement are material and any violation is grounds for declaration of Default. Prior to invoking any remedies for Default under this Agreement CITY shall deliver written notice to the OWNER describing the act, event, or omission constituting same, and allowing OWNER a period of not less than thirty (30) days in which to cure or abate the violation. Cure within that period reinstates this Agreement. (a) Upon declaration of Default, CITY may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation, foreclosing upon the Deed of Trust; withholding building permits or certificates of occupancy/zoning compliance; an action to enjoin or abate zoning violations; recording of a lapse of plat, in whole or in part; and any other remedies available at law or equity, including specific performance or injunctive relief. (b) The recording of a lapse of plat by CITY shall result in the reversion of the approval of the PUD. A lapse of plat shall terminate all previous approvals and result in the elimination of platted lots for the affected property. 11. CITY's Option to Maintain Improvements in the Event of OWNER's Failure or Neglect. OWNER has set in place mechanisms, including covenants and restrictions, providing for the maintenance of water and sewer facilities, common areas, roads, trails, landscaping and other required improvements. Pursuant to City Code Section 17.66.100 (C), in the event of failure or neglect on the parts of the OWNER, successors or assigns, to maintain such required improvements in good condition, the City may perform the necessary work and may enter upon the land and do the work and charge the cost thereof, including reasonable attomeys' fees, to the OWNER, or successors or assigns. The OWNER, successors or assigns will reimburse the CITY for all costs which the CITY incurs in performing the necessary work. 12. General Provisions. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of OWNER in the ownership or development of all or any portion of the Property. Prior to assigning any or all of his rights and duties under this Agreement OWNER shall obtain from any transferee a written assumption acknowledging and agreeing to be bound by this Agreement. (a) This Agreement is the product of mutual bargaining. All terms shall be construed in Mulberry Grove PUD PUD Improvements Agreement Page 5 of 8 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg O296 Y 1" Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp To the CITY: City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Attn: City Manager To OWNER: Mulberry Lane Community, LLC c/o Michelle L. Stenta 472 Tusher Street Moab, Utah 85432 (k) Notice may be delivered to such other parties or addresses as the parties may designate in writing from time to time. Mulberry Grove PUD PIJD Improvements Agreement Page 7 of 8 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0298 EXHIBIT A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS COST WORKSHEET PROJECT NAME: Mulberry Grove Subdivision PHASE #: Single phase protect DEVELOPER/OWNER: Mulberry Lane Community LLC REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS Category Sub -category Line item description Unit Unit Price Plan Quantity Item Cost SITEWORK CLEARING & GRUBBING i Tree & Stump Removal for access & utility corridors (material chipped & stockpiled on site for future use) LS $ 8,000.00 1 $ 8,000 EARTHWORK General Excavation .(material stockpiled on site) CY $ 6.00 1,800 $ 10,800 Subgrade Preparation under Surface Improvements - roads, parking areas, carport structures, & pathways SY $ 0.90 10,180 - - $ 9,162 UTILITIES WATER (City of Moab) ✓ Install 8" dia. Water Main-C900 CL 200 (complete) LF $ 21.00 3,245 $ 68,145 $ 7,800 Install 8" dia.Line Valves - cast iron (complete) EA $ 975.00 8 Install Fire Hydrant (complete) EA $ 3,400.00 5 $ 17,000 Install 3/4" dia. Res. Service Connection (complete) LS $ 850.00 44 $ 37,400 SEWER (GWSSA) ✓ Install 8" dia. Sewer Main - PVC SDR35 - (complete) LF $ 25.00 2,290 $ 57,250 $ 37,050 Install 48" dia. Sewer Manhole (complete) EA $ 2,850.00 13 Install 4" dia. Res. Sewer Service Line (complete) LS $ 400.00 42 $ 16,800 $ 45,600 POWER (Rocky Mt. Power) ✓ Install Conduit for Underground Primary & Secondary LF $ 12.00 3,800 Subdivision Backbone by Rocky Mountain Power LS $ 44,000.00 1 $ 44,000 $ 129,195 ROADS, PARKING, FIRE ACCESS, & PATHWAYS if t it ENTRANCE ROADS & PARKING AREAS Install 6" thick Concrete Pavement w/color SF $ 5.50 23,490 Install 4" thick Concrete Sidewalk w/color SF $ 3.75 1,350 $ 5,063 Install 6" Concrete Curb Wall LF $ 12.00 420 $ 5,040 Install 3/4" dia. clean rock as base course 8" thick TON $ 14.00 1,030 $ 14,420 $ 1,000� $ 19,980 Install Detectable Waming Mats EA $ 200.00 5 CONTRUCTION/ FIRE ACCESS ROUTES Install 1" UBC base course under 20' access corridor TON $ 13.50 1,480 Install 3" Soil Pavement Surface Course SF $ 1.75 19,400 $ 33,950 Install Concrete Grid Pavers filled with sand & seeded (Hastings Checker Block or equal) SF $ 2.25 21,300 $ 47,925 SIGNAGE Traffic signs (installed) EA $ 250.00 8 $ 2,000 LIGHTING Install Low Bollard Type Area Light Fixture EA $ 950.00 36 $- 34,200 $ 25,650 STORM DRAINAGE STORM DRAINS 2?j Install 18" dia. Storm Drain Pipe (complete) LF $ 45.00 570 Install Concrete Area Drain/Drop Inlet EA $ 2,100.00 7 $ 14,700 Install Storm Drell Outfall Structure EA $ 1,500.00 2 $ 3,000 OTHER REQUIRED Install 5' high Screening Fence - Trex LF $ 16.00 260 $ 4,160 $ 40,000 LANDSCAPING & Install Parking Area Landscaping per plan LS $ 40,000.00 1 SCREENING Install Landscaping Irrigation System ' LS $ 12,000.00 1 $ 12,000 MISC. Dust Control LS $ 6,000.00 1 $ 6,000 if Surveying - Construction Staking & Lot Comers LS $ 18,000.00 1 $ 18,000 if Quality Assurance Testing LS $ 12,000.00 1 $ 12,000 CITY APPROVAL: By: Public Works Director Total Estimated Construction Cost Plus Required 25% contingency Total Amount of Financial Guaranty f 7-07 Date $ 787,300 196,800 $984,100 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0309avised 12/7/2007 Space above resen>ed. for Recorder's stamp agreement of Trustor in this document; 3) the payment of such additional loans or advances as hereafter may be made to Trustor as provided in the Improvements Agreement; and 4) the payment of all sums expended or advanced by Beneficiary under or pursuant to the terms of this document, together with interest as provided. TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF THIS TRUST DEED, TRUSTOR AGREES: 1. To keep said property in good condition and repair; to not remove or demolish any building on the property; to complete or restore promptly and in good and workmanlike manner any building which may be constructed, damaged or destroyed; to comply with all laws, land use regulations, covenants and restrictions affecting said property; to not commit or permit waste of the property; to not commit or allow any act upon said property in violation of law; and to do all other acts which from the character or use of said property may be reasonably necessary. 2. To provide and maintain property and casualty insurance covering the property in an amount not less than the total purchase price of $984,100 and covering all improvements now existing or later erected or placed on the property. The property insurance policy shall name the Beneficiary as an additional insured. In the event of a loss or casualty to the property, Trustor shall give immediate notice to Beneficiary, who may make proof of loss, and each insurance company concerned is hereby authorized and directed to make payment for such loss directly to Beneficiary instead of to Trustor and Beneficiary jointly, and the insurance proceeds, or any part thereof, may be applied by Beneficiary, at its option, to reduction of the indebtedness secured by this document, or to the restoration or repair of the property. 3. To maintain with until the indebtedness secured hereby is paid in full, evidence of unencumbered and marketable title in the property. 2 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0302 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp under this Trust Deed or the Improvements Agreement, with interest from date of expenditure at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum until paid, all of which sums shall be secured by this Trust Deed. 8. Should said property or any part thereof be taken or damaged by reason of any public improvement or eminent domain proceeding, fire, flood, seismic event, or as a result of any other casualty or government taking, Beneficiary shall be entitled to all compensation, awards and other payments or relief therefor, and shall be entitled at its option to commence, appear in and prosecute in its own name, any action or proceedings, or to make any compromise or settlement in connection with such taking or damage. All such compensation, awards, damages, rights of action and proceeds, including the proceeds of any policies of real property and other insurance affecting said property, are hereby assigned to Beneficiary, who may, after deducting therefrom all its expenses, including attorney's fees, apply the same toward satisfaction of any indebtedness secured by this document. Trustor agrees to execute such further assignments of any compensation, award, damages, and rights of action and proceeds as Beneficiary or Trustee may require. 9. At any time and from time to time upon written request of Beneficiary, payment of its fees and presentation of this Trust Deed and the Improvements Agreement for endorsement (in case of full reconveyance for cancellation and retention), without affecting the liability of any person for the payment of the indebtedness secured hereby, Trustee may: a) consent to the making of any map or plat of said property; b) join in granting any easement or creating any restriction thereon; c) join in any subordination or other agreement affecting this Trust Deed or the lien or charge thereof; or d) reconvey, without warranty, all or any part of said property. 4 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0304 7-2 9 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp and collection, including reasonable attorney's fees, toward satisfaction of any indebtedness secured by this Trust Deed. 12. The collection by Beneficiary rents or profits, or the proceeds of fire and other insurance policies, or compensation or awards for any taking or damage of said property, shall not constitute a cure or waiver by Beneficiary of any default under this Trust Deed. 13. The failure on the part of Beneficiary to promptly enforce any right arising under this Trust Deed shall not operate as a waiver of such right, and the failure by Beneficiary to declare default following any act or omission constituting default shall not constitute a waiver of Beneficiary's rights as to any other or subsequent default. No modification of the terms of this Trust Deed shall be valid or binding unless reduced to writing and executed by both Beneficiary and Trustor. 14. Time is of the essence with respect to all obligations in this Trust Deed. Upon default by Trustor in the payment of any sums owing under this Trust Deed or in the performance of any agreement or obligation in this Trust Deed or the Improvements Agreement, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of Beneficiary. In the event of such default, Beneficiary may execute or cause Trustee to execute a written notice of default and of election to cause said property to be sold to satisfy the obligations hereof, and Trustee shall file such notice for record in each county wherein said property or some part or parcel thereof is situated. Beneficiary may also deposit with Trustee the Improvements Agreement and all documents evidencing sums advanced and secured by the Trust Deed. Prior to recording notice of default the Trustee shall deliver written notice of same to the Trustor, who 6 Ent 484561 Bk 0720 Pg 0306 7-2 Space above reserved for Recorder's stamp a) Trustee, upon presentation to it of an affidavit signed by Beneficiary, setting forth facts showing a default by Trustor, is authorized to accept as true and conclusive all facts and statements therein, and to act in conformity with this Trust Deed. 16. Alternately, upon the occurrence of any default Beneficiary shall have the option to declare acceleration and all sums owing shall be immediately due and payable and Trustee shall proceed with foreclose of this Trust Deed in the manner provided by law for the foreclosure of mortgages on real property. 17. Beneficiary may appoint a successor trustee at any time by recording in the Grand County land records a notice of substitution of trustee. From the time the substitution is filed for record, the new trustee shall succeed to all the powers, duties, authority and title of the trustee named herein or of any successor trustee. Notice shall be given to the Trustor in the manner provided by law. 18. This Trust Deed shall apply to, inure to the benefit of, and bind all parties, their heirs, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. All obligations of Trustor hereunder are joint and several. The term "Beneficiary" shall mean the owner and holder, including any assignee of the Improvements Agreement and Trust Deed. 19. Trustee accepts this Trust when this Trust Deed, duly executed and acknowledged, is made a public record as provided by law. Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of a pending sale under any other Trust Deed or of any action or proceeding in which Trustor, Beneficiary, or Trustee shall be a party, unless brought by Trustee. 20. This Trust Deed or any rights, title, or interest in the property conveyed in trust 8 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0308 �% reasonable notice for the purpose of verifying Trustor's compliance with the terms of this Trust Deed. 26. The Trustor requests that a copy of any notice of default and all other notices under this Trust Deed or as required by law be mailed to the following address: Mulberry Lane Community LLC, c/o Michelle Stenta, Moab, Utah 84532. 10 Ent 484581 Bk 0720 Pg 0310 Budget Amendment Documents will be available at Tuesday's meeting. City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Inter -office Correspondence PL-II-250 December 8, 2011 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Subject: Review of an Amended Plat for Specific Properties Located on West Center Street as Submitted to Council by Tim Keogh Background The City has received an application for a multi -property plat amendment for lots on West Center Street. The properties involved are owned by Tim Keogh, Alan Fogg, Colleen Taylor, Keith Holyoak, Alvie Holyoak, Barbara Hicks, and John Hartley. The intent of this amendment is to correct a host of errors such as over -lapping legal descriptions, errors in legal descriptions, and misalignment of fences. In a sense it serves as a corrective action because the area for a long time has been a jumble of discrepancies. If approved, the boundary line adjustments will benefit the current and future property owners by redefining and clarifying property lines. In many cases the new property lines will match existing historic fence lines reducing confusion in the area. Discussion This application is being reviewed under MMC Section 16.08.050, and a public hearing is not required for approval. The adjustments to the lot lines meet all of the requirements of the code: • Approval does not increase the number of lots; • The lots conform to the dimensional requirements of the C-3 and C-2 zones for lot width and area • All owners have signed the application State Code Chapter 10-9a-608(2) allows a subdivision to occur on property without a public hearing before the Land Use Authority if: • • (a) the petition seeks to: (i) join two or more of the petitioner fee owner's contiguous lots; (ii) subdivide one or more of the petitioning fee owner's lots, if the subdivision 7-4 MoOab City Council PL-11-250 West Center Street Amendment December 8, 2011 Page 2 of 2 will not result in a violation of a land use ordinance or a development condition; (iii) adjust the lot lines of adjoining lots or parcels if the fee owners of each of the adjoining lots or parcels join in the petition, regardless of whether the lots or parcels are located in the same subdivision; (iv) on a lot owned by the petitioning fee owner, adjust an internal lot restriction imposed by the local political subdivision; or (v) alter the plat in a manner that does not change existing boundaries or other attributes of lots within the subdivision that are not: (A) owned by the petitioner; or (B) designated as a common area; and (b) notice has been given to adjacent property owners in accordance with any applicable local ordinance. (3) Each request to vacate or amend a plat that contains a request to vacate or amend a public street, right-of-way, or easement is also subject to Section 10-9a-609.5. (4) Each petition to vacate or amend an entire plat or a portion of a plat shall include: (a) the name and address of each owner of record of the land contained in the entire plat or on that portion of the plat described in the petition; and (b) the signature of each owner described in Subsection (4)(a) who consents to the petition. pAplanning department\2011\correspondence \pI-II-250 cc w center st amend.docz 7-4 NARRATIVE FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT The several properties involved in this boundary adjustment have physical (fenced) boundaries on the ground that do not coincide with boundaries of record. Al I parties are in agreement with the fenced lines of occupation with the end result being ownership to those fences. ree - 1)iuu.uu plus z1.23.uu pc amended lot or unit. Receipt No. PETITION TO VACATE, ALTER OR AMEND A SUBDIVISION PLAT Utah State Code 10-9a-608(2)(a) This section of the Utah Code allows for the vacation, alteration or amendment to a subdivision plat without a public hearing if the petition seeks to: i. Join two or more of the petitioner fee owner's contiguous lots; ii. Subdivide one or more of the petitioning fee owner's lots, if the subdivision will not result in a violation of a land use ordinance or a development condition; iii. Adjust the lot lines of adjoining lots or parcels if the fee owners of each of the adjoining lots or parcels joins in the petition, regardless of whether the lots or parcels are located in the same subdivision; iv. On a lot owned by the petitioning fee owner, adjust an internal lot restriction imposed by the local political subdivision; or v. Alter the plat in a manner that does not change existing boundaries or other attributes of lots within that subdivision that are not: (A) Owned by the petitioner; or (B) Designated as a common area; and vi. The vacation, alteration or amendment is approved by the Moab City Council; and, vii. An amended plat showing the vacation, alteration, or amendment is submitted, signed by the City Council and recorded in the office of the county recorder in which the land is located; and viii. The document having satisfied all of the above conditions is to be recorded at the Grand County Recorders Office, 125 East Center, Moab, Utah, within thirty (30) days of approval by the Moab City Council. DATE OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: MAYOR Dave Sakrison Date ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Rachel Ellison Date OWNERS: (kn C j 0-- o / I W/Vie /4/4°i(le»9/U Date State of 0-ksCI .-V1 ) County of ra-r\ ) Date On the \ I-4 day of nr__A-t 2_0 1 1 , personally appeared before me v( who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary public My Commission Expires: R-1-15 Residing in Gra-AnoN C.0 v1 OWNERS: Date Date Cynthia Lynn MacDonald Hotel Commissionk� oI shah My August 1, 2015Expires on: Comm. Number. 612095 State of ) County of ) On the day of , personally appeared before me , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. My Commission Expires: Notary Public Residing in OWNERS: Oct // 20// Date Date State of� ) County of Giret.,^,A ) On the 1 `--1 day of OC..," 20 i , personally appeared before me o-ION,5 M. (r' who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. My Commission Expires: $-(-jS 72a/a6- t� State of ) County of rft.,r‘c:\ ) Notard Public Residing in Croxvi COu.t+) , vT.kn Cynthia Lynn MaciDonal Notary Publk State of Utah My Commission Expires on: August 1, 2015 Comm. Number:612095 Date Date On the ,A day of C.)& 1 a0 , personally appeared before me ;yrAaS , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public My Commission Expires: Residing in Gv-ux-va Coo l l3t03n Cynthia Lynn MacDonald Notary Public State of Utah My Commission Expires on: August 1, 2015 Comm. Number: 612095 7-4 OWNERS: Date State of L-)isn ) County of-t'a-v\ti ) On the oC I day of fliftr c90 personally appeared before me e+P.�kkec • _ lcor who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Cynthia_Lynn MacDonald Notary PuWk Stoll of Utah My Commission Wino ons- August 1, 2015 • :. 612095 OWNERS: NotaPublic Residing in Gr:l....e..4 (.:_Aw13) 0Iro.I}1 Date State of 3'\--Es-in ) County of G-n7---2‘• ) On the ca_. day of ID-5)--C-- , personally appeared before me , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Cynthia Lynn MacDonald Notary Pubik Stott of UMph My Commission Expires ons August 1, 2015 :rl_ sti 612095 oti5 NotaPublic Residing in G e„,A V1—. OWNERS: gotailu— Date Date State of LAbir1 County of Gro-vul On the day of NUJ ► 2.o i 1 , personally appeared before me Wr1/44:15.Yi7. N1 • \AkCVS , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. My Commission Expires: 7RS: 1((a&e‹ 2z15 Nota Public Residing in I e104,6, crr State of \ST041 ) County of gra,YNA § On the \? day of 1\6 12©t 36\1\-n ]�-a�r•���c My Commission Expires: P. v31 `2,06 IE�I J �� 1 Date Date , personally appeared before me Cynthia Lynn MacDonald Notary Public State of Utah My Commission Expires on: August 1, 2015 Comm. Numbers 612095 , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Residin in lic nuts b, Cynthia Lynn MacDonald Notary Pudic state of Utah My Commission Expires on: - August 1, 2015 Comm. Number: 612095 7-4 r OWNERS:�„� 2—// 6. Date Date State of O'IsEtir\ ) County of On the cZ - day of e 2o \ t , personally appeared before me �vM o'-'2) . "ec2 Cynthia Lynn MacDonald Notary Public State of Utah IM� issio , zoExpiresis on: D �f. Comm. Number: 612095 OWNERS: , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. V� Notary Pu • c , ��� �- Residing in Date Date State of ) County of ) On the day of , personally appeared before me , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. My Commission Expires: Notary Public Residing in CENTERUNE LICNUMENT AELL/FRN AT THE INTERSECTION OF I00 NORTH 2 I00 WEST StroATS GRAPHIC SCALE b q ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch - BO 1. EAST EAST 79.8' _ 45.3' _. 8.05' N66'70'W oE PARCEL A 2 d (KEOON) is x 3 01-001-010 w c _ NEWER T-POST MRE FENCE �1L WEST 63.3' ` - EAST 60.7' OLD FENCE a te.5' EAST PARCEL B (FOGG RESIDENCE) 01-0O1-0141 KEST CENTER STREET 0 v A EAST 70.3' NORTH 1.0' �73`30 =fiL9' W\ DASHED LINES AIN UNES OF RECORD (TYPICAL) PARCEL C (THE RID) 01-001-OW NISWOOW 64.7' 1 i} CHAIN UNK FENCE I SZ I EAST ee.0' Ne9'45'W FENCE N59'00' 79.3' G N89'00'W 128.8' D 15.4 lY D n e` R�: NEST 5 0' WEST 4.95' PARCEL D g (HOLYOAK ET AL) 01-001-0119 SB9126'461'W 280.16' 6/ 4- PARCEL A DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE Nw( OF SECTION I. T 26 S, R 21 E. SLM. MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A PONT W6CH BEARS N 75103'30'W 261.9 FT. FROM THE CENTERUNE MONUMENT NELL/PIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF 100 VEST AND CENTER STREETS, SAID PONT ALSO BEARS N 43Z1'w 7080 FT. MON THE VALLEY CONTROL POSITION TO THE CENTER 1 CORNER OF SECTION 1, T 26 S. R 21 E. SU& AND PROCEEDING THENCE ALONG THE VEST ECGE OF A CARPCRT S 0010'W 36.5 FT., THENCE MOH A FENCE S 01'22T 721 FT., THOICE MITI A T-POST 8 CURE FENCE WEST 63.3 FT. THENCE MTH A BOARD Q CHAINUNK FENCE N 01'04'W 95.6 FT., THENCE N ee'S0'w 16.05 FT, THENCE NORTH 14.63 FT., THENCE EAST 79.8 FT. TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING AND CONTMNRNG 7,2X SO. FT. ACRE OR LESS. PARCEL B DESCRIPTION CF A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NW OF SECTOR 1, T 26 S. R 21 E, SIM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, \ UTAH, MORE PARTICULARLY OESCRIBEO AS FOLLOWS \ BEGINNING AT A PONT WNICH BEARS N 75103'30'w 2131.9 FT. FROM THE CENTERLINE MONUMENT BELL/PIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF 100 WEST AND CENTER STREETS, SAID POINT ALSO BEARS N 43121'W 708.0 FT. FROM THE VALLEY CONTROL POSMON TO THE CENTER } CORNER OF SECTION 1, T 26 S, R CENTERLINE MONUMENT BELL/PIN AT • THE INTERSECTION OF CENTER k 100 WEST STREETS 12,190 SO. FT. MORE OR LESS PARCEL C DESCRIPTION OF A PARCEL OF LARD IN THE NW} OF SECTION 1, T 26 S. R 21 E. AM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT' 1111101 BEARS N 41176'W 76.5 FT. FROM THE CENTERUNE MONUMENT WELL/PIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF 100 WEST AND CENTER STREETS, SAID PONT ALSO BEARS N 27'51'W 565.3 FT. FROM THE VALLEY CONTROL POSITION TO THE CENTER } CORNER OF SECTION 1, T 26 S, R 21 E, SW. AND PROCEEDING THENCE SOUTH 103.7 FT, THENCE MTH A FENCE N 69145'YI 79.0 FT., THENCE WTH A FENCE S 03.14.E 77.0 FT, THENCE WTI A FENCE N 69'0019 79.5 FT., THENCE MTH A FENCE N 01'20'W 177.9 FT., THENCE EAST 70.3 FT., THENCE NORTH 1.0 FT THENCE EAST e6A FT TO THE PONT OF BEOWNING AND CONTAINING 22.132 SO. FE. MORE OR LESS. PARCEL D DESCRIPTION CF A PARCEL CF LAND IN THE Nw} OF SECTION 1, T 26 S. R 21 E, SW, MOAB OTT, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH, MORE PARTIOJLARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS S 48'35'W 1E6.3 FT. FROM THE CENTERLINE MONUMENT WELL/PIN AT THE NTERSECTON OF 100 WEST AND COTTER STREETS. SAID PONT ALSO BEARS N 4755'w 4771 FT. FROM THE VALLEY CONTROL POSITION TO DHE CENTER } CORNER OF SECTION I, T 26 5, R 21 E. SUM, AND PROCEEDING DEFACE SOUTH 35.2 FT.,'MENGE WEST 5.0 FT., THENCE SOUTH 22.71 FT., THENCE WEST 4.95 FT., THENCE S 00TYW 248.58 FT., THENCE S 89'26'46`W 2e0.16 FT., THENCE NORTH 393.87 FT., THENCE M7N A FENCE EAST 160.7 FT., THENCE MD/ A FENCE S 01122.E 622 FT., THENCE S 89.00.E 128.8 FT. TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING ANO CONTAINING 1C0,790 SO. FT, MORE CR LESS. SGUT1 TXIS PLAT ITC/N/77 JVAP SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I, TIMOTHY M. KEOGH, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 AM A REGISTERED UTAH LANO SURF --CUR, HOLDING CERTINCATE N0. 171004 AS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH, AND 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE OWNER 1 HAW PREPARED THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON AND SAME ARE TRUE w(6 RdlITECT. AND 40. DATE 7WOTIHY M. N! CH 3Ll 017IOD4 �� W TIMOTHY M. M KEOGH eti �Ab44s fN p o VrP KEOGH LAND SURVEY/NC 45 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH, 84532 A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF .KEOCH, FOGG, HICKS &' HOLYOAK LANDS ON KEST CENTER ST. WITHIN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 SECTION 1, T 26 S, R 21 E, SLM, MOAB CITY, GRAND COUNTY, UTAH PREPARED FOR KEOGH, FOCC, HICKS & HOLYOAK DATE: 11-04-11 DRAWN BY: TEAK CHECKED BY: TMK SCALE: 1'=60' F.B # 143 swinkwcenterDWG 7-4 e*. 1. Loeffler OLreel. Boundary Line Adjustment • ••• KA I .111.1iTN NI I 1. �IIt!.1.1.11.\1.: 4:1 1111 11 & \ 111[111:L1 1 inch = 60 feet 30 60 LAMM-RS(1)N \ \ 11 1 1 11!.1 120 VIVA \ 1.1i7,111 LAN1BFRSON WWI. LIAM T j• it tnt).\t: At vitt. LI) Pit t. 180 FRANCES STRUSI1:11 RI-1D D 16111 D I I li \A 240 300 .1( f \ ( I I \ I I I R t( It! \ DS . 1; • A, IIUR.Y(IAK Kfill II 111.fil,N11 • Feet 360 N10113 Cl FY 111NL.1.1 t R A NC11.1.1 S I RUSFER1 HI( is \ R \RISARAM& 1-tARTIF KNOBN LLC Ii 1AH DI R I I \ \ 1•Simi- \ ESSii \I(.\ L _ . _ I \ /11;11111m..... tsz) 4.) \ ,.\.••.1),,,\..ttit 111..kt. AI I. 1 \ 'er-e - • S I OY1E FRED!. RICK M AS I RID It STOYIE WILLIAM RI'FA K I It 7 BYRD 011ROTIIY 7-4 Resolution # 23-2011 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN UPDATE 2011 FOR THE CITY OF MOAB WHEREAS, Utah water providers are required to update their water conservation plans every five years; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab's last update was adopted in 2006; and WHEREAS, the Water Conservation Plan Update 2011 for the City of Moab is attached to this resolution; and NOW THEREFORE, we, the Governing Body of the City of Moab do hereby resolve to adopt the Water Conservation Plan Update 2011 for the City of Moab in substantially the form attached to this resolution and to direct the appropriate parties to submit said plan to the State of Utah. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this 13`h day of December, 2011 SIGNED: David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder Resolution #23-2011 Page 1 of 1 7-5 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN UPDATE 2011 City of Moab Grand County, Utah Prepared by: Donna Metzler City Manager 7-5 Water Conservation Plan Update 2011 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE CITY OF MOAB AND ITS WATER SYSTEM 1 2 History, Government and Population 2 Moab Area Geology and Origination of Water Sources 3 Moab Water Rights/Water Source Capacity 3 Current City of Moab Water Distribution System Configuration 5 Water Use Trends, Current Water Use, per Capita Consumption and Number of Water Connections 7 Demand Projections to 2050 9 System Deficiencies 11 Future Supply Sources 11 Intersystem Agreements 12 Water Quality 12 Distribution System 13 Treatment System 13 Reuse Potential 13 Institutional and Political Factors 13 Environmental Concerns 14 Fiscal Structure and Financial Resources 14 CURRENT WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES 14 Current Water Conservation Challenges 14 PAST WATER CONSERVATION EFFORTS 16 Emergency Action Plan 16 Public Education on Wise Water Use 17 Study and Adoption of Incremental Water Rates Keyed to Excessive, Wasteful Use 17 Expansion of the Secondary Water System to Replace Culinary Water with Irrigation -grade Water 18 WATER CONSERVATION GOALS 18 Considerations in the Development of Appropriate and Realistic Goals Numerical Goals for Water Conservation RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ADDITIONAL WATER CONSERVATIONS MEASURES 18 19 19 Public Education on Wise Water Use 19 Adoption of Water Conservation Rate Structure that Encourages Conservation of Water for Outdoor Purposes 20 Implementation of Measures to Reduce City and other Governmental Users' Use of Water on Lawn Areas 20 APPENDICES 21 APPENDIX 1: RESOLUTION #23-2011 Adopting the Water Conservation Plan Update 2011 for the City of Moab 21 7-5 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN UPDATE 2011 City of Moab Grand County, Utah INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Because of unprecedented growth in many Utah communities, along with the relative scarcity of adequate water supplies in the west, the State of Utah mandates that each Utah community adopt and then update every five years a Water Conservation Plan. The Water Conservation Plan is meant to address how a given community will meet its future water demand needs through water conservation programs and practices. The City of Moab, motivated by severe water shortages during the uranium boom of the early 1950s, acquired rights to underground water that exceed culinary demand at the City's build -out. Water rights have also been purchased subsequent to the boom, further augmenting supplies beyond anticipated demand. The City's build -out is based on the City's full growth potential, which is based on existing zoning. The City of Moab can also meet additional culinary water demand created by limited annexations and/or higher density rezoning that might occur in the future. Despite adequate water supply to meet build -out projections, it is important that the City anticipate drought conditions and development patterns that are different from those contemplated in the build -out analysis, as well as other unknown factors that may affect water supply and distribution. The City of Moab first completed a Water Conservation Plan in 1996. Because billing categories and population estimate methodology have changed since the 1996-2000 reporting period, data from that timeframe is not included in the current analysis. Moreover, data from the 2000-2006 timeframe was re -analyzed due to discrepancies in population estimates used to calculate the per capita residential water usage rates. Because of these discrepancies, the Per Capita Average for residential water use for 2001-2005 was inaccurately calculated at 162 gallons per day (gpd), while more up-to-date population estimates reveal that the Per Capita Average for 2001-2005 was actually 190 gpd. The 2011 Water Conservation Plan Update reveals a considerable conservation trend from the 1996-2000 timeframe to the 2001-2005 timeframe, given the total gallons per day (gpd) delivered in that period. The current plan specifically deals with an analysis of the period of 2006-2010. Average per capita consumption for 2010 was 169 gallons per person per day. Overall, from 2006-2010 the total water delivered by the City of Moab culinary system has decreased by 17.2% relative to the average for 2001-2005. The Per Capita Average comparing the same period shows a 7.8% decrease. Because previous water conservation plans have indicated relatively low per capita water usage rates for 2000-2006, the City of Moab has not been aggressive in pursuing water conservation measures. With a current per capita consumption of 169 gallons per person per day, the City of Moab is well below the state City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 1 7-5 average of 182 gallons per person per day for residential use, but above the American Water Works Association's culinary use conservation target of 150 gallons per day per capita. It is recommended that the City progressively implement the water conservation measures outlined in this plan, concentrating on reduction in outdoor water use. This plan recommends that the City aim toward a 5% reduction in per capita water consumption over the next five years, and that the City reduce outdoor usage of culinary water by 10% in the same time period. Recommended water conservation measures include public education, adoption of a water conservation rate structure that focuses on reducing outdoor water use and other efforts. Water conservation measures are addressed in pages 18-20 of this plan. THE CITY OF MOAB AND ITS WATER SYSTEM History, Government and Population The City of Moab was incorporated in 1902. The 2010 Census showed the City's population at 5,046. The City of Moab has a Council -Manager form of government, with five elected Council members serving at large and a separately elected Mayor. The City's population has grown slowly over the past 10 years, with an average growth rate of 0.56% over the past 10 years. The chart on the following page shows the City of Moab's slow and steady population growth trend. City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 2 7-5 Figure 1. Moab Population 5,100 5,050 5,000 4,950 0 4,900 g 4,850 a a° 4,800 4,750 4,700 4,650 4,600 Moab Population 2000-2010 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year J Moab Area Geology and Origin of Water Sources The City of Moab is located at the north end of Spanish Valley to the south of the Colorado River. Spanish Valley is a salt collapse graben, formed when a dome of Paradox Formation slats bulged up, fracturing the overlying sedimentary formations. The fractured formations and part of the salt dome eroded away, largely from runoff from the La Sal Mountains through the Pack Creek drainage. The La Sal Mountains compose a small mountain range southeast of Moab that rises approximately 12,000 feet above sea level. The Glen Canyon Group (Navajo, Kayenta and Wingate) of sandstones conducts water downward from the mountains, which then surfaces in springs at various points along the Eastern Moab Fault complex on the edge of Spanish Valley. The City's water source, consisting of wells and springs, is a large aquifer contained in the highly porous Wingate sandstone to the east of the city. This aquifer is fed by the snowmelt from the La Sal Mountains This water is classified as Pristine Ground Water by the Utah DEQ Division of Drinking Water. Moab Water Rights/Water Source Capacity Through its history, the City of Moab has acquired enough water rights and water source capacity to meet build -out projections. City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 3 VI Shortly after its incorporation in 1902, the City of Moab acquired an approximate half -interest in Skakel Spring, located behind the Grand Old Ranch House about a mile south of the Colorado River. The amount of the acquisition was 0.625 cfs. Skakel Spring was used as the culinary source for the City's drinking water system installed in the original platted town blocks to the south. Outlying farmhouses utilized wells for water. Contemporary with formation of the City, the Moab Irrigation Company built a diversion dam on Mill Creek where the creek enters the east side of Spanish Valley, and currently provides irrigation water throughout the City and to unincorporated areas north and west of Moab City. Many residential lots in the original Moab City town blocks still have irrigation shares with which outside watering is done, with the water being delivered down the gutters of the town streets to inlets into yards. When the uranium boom occurred in Southeast Utah after World War II, Moab's population suddenly jumped from about 1,500 to 8,000, resulting in a severe shortage of culinary water. In 1955, the City purchased the 1,600-acre Lloyd Sommerville Ranch, which contained Sommerville #1, #2, #3, McKonkie, and Birch springs. The City sold most of the ranch lying west of the spring area to George White, and located the Moab City Cemetery, Old City Park (which contains McConkie and Birch springs) and the Moab Golf Course (which contains the Sommerville #2 and #3 springs) on part of the remainder. The City drilled six wells adjacent to the Sommerville #2 and #3 springs; from 1998 through 2005 only wells #6 and #10 have been pumped into the culinary system. The springs (including Skakel) and the wells are the City of Moab water supply source today. Water from the Sommerville Ranch springs can fill the City water storage tanks (three, having 3,500,000 gallons total capacity) by gravity flow. In 1999 the City acquired the remaining interest of 0.626 cfs in Skakel Spring, and afterward rebuilt the Skakel Spring diversion structure to secure it from accidental or deliberate contamination. Full rights to Skakel were acquired by the City in order to supply future demand anticipated from annexation of commercial properties in the north US 191 corridor. With the loss of cultivated farmland to residential development, 308.79 of the 1,086.897 shares of the Moab Irrigation Company stock were acquired in 1979 by the Grand County Water Conservancy District, which diverts Mill Creek upstream into Ken's Lake for irrigation delivery above Moab in Spanish Valley. Since then, 66.5 shares of Moab Irrigation Company stock have been leased or purchased and transferred by private owners upstream to the Mill Creek Diversion for Ken's Lake. Seventeen years ago the Moab Irrigation Company put in pressurized irrigation pipelines to replace their original open ditch system within Moab. The City of Moab's total water rights (not including any Moab Irrigation Company water) total 14.137 cfs, which is 6,345.11 gallons per minute or 9,137,009 gallons per day. The following provides a summary of Moab's acquired water rights, for both springs and wells: City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 4 7-5 Figure 2. Municipal Springs Municipal Springs (water rights perfected) cfs Name of Spring Water Right # Priority Date 2.252 Skakel Spring 05-2105 1880 0.21 McConkie Spring 05-2007 1903 0.2 Sommerville Spring #1 05-2008 6-12-1951 0.207 Sommerville Springs #2, 3 05-2511 10-20-1958 Springs subtotal: 2.869 cfs = 1,287.69 gallons per minute Figure 3. Municipal Wells Municipal Wells (perfected and proving) cfs Name of Well Water Right # Priority Date 3.0 Wells 4a, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 05-169 9-15-1955 1.63 Same 05-206 10-07-1964 2.256 Same 05-716 10-24-1968 1.0 Same 05-101 1-27-1954 1.114 Same 05-183 2-21-1956 1.0 Same 05-336 4-14-1961 1.0 Well #10 05-429 7-23-1962 0.150 West Park Well 05-1540 10-12-1978 0.118 West Park Well 05-1744 04-24-1980 Wells subtotal: 11.268 cfs = 5,057.90 gallons per minute Current City of Moab Water Distribution System Configuration The City of Moab supplies drinking water to almost all of the residents and businesses within the City. Not all of the above named water rights currently provide water into the Moab water distribution system. Moab's primary water rights are surface rights to three springs producing approximately 2,260 acre feet per year that flow out of the aquifer. These rights are fully utilized City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 5 co in the summer, but not in the winter. As indicated above, Moab also holds groundwater rights to six major wells that penetrate the aquifer. Only two of these wells are currently on line, and are only utilized during peak irrigation season. Water sources in the distribution system for the City of Moab vary seasonally. Moab obtains water from three wells and three springs during the summer months. From the north end of town, water from Skakel Spring is pumped through a chlorination station and into a one -million -gallon tank, which then feeds the Northwest Low pressure zone of the city. Moab City Springs One, Two and Three plus Moab City Wells Six and Ten south of Moab are channeled into pipes and flow into two gas chlorination stations. From each of these chlorination stations, water flows downhill to the city grid. Two one -million - gallon storage tanks are not in line with the main transmission lines, but branch off at the south end of the system. The City of Moab contracted with the University of Utah Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in 2010 to produce a report entitled Moab Culinary Water Distribution System Model Description and Analysis: Recommendations for Current and Future Improvements (herein after "The 2010 Moab Water Distribution System Report"). Among other things, this report looked at the utilization of water sources in the Moab water distribution system. According to the report, Moab currently uses less than half of the water sources that have been allotted and developed for the City. The following table, taken from this report, shows the water production of each of the in-service water sources for the City: Figure 4. 2010 Annual Water Production and Utilization by Source 2010 Annual Water Production and Utilization by Source (in millions of gallons) Source Unused Water Volume Potential Immediately Used Production Utilization Available Springs 1 and 2 244 244 100% 0 Spring 3 220 220 100% 0 Skakel Spring 114 232 44% 148 Well 97 788 12% 691 Well10 94 367 26% 273 TOTAL 769 1851 40% 1112 Drought conditions beginning in 1998 with a shift in the Northern Pacific Decadal Oscillation system in ocean currents caused a shift from water production from gravity sources to pumped sources. While the amount of water pumped as a percentage of total water diverted changed dramatically in 2000, the percentage of water pumped has remained fairly steady since that time. Note that diminished pressure due to reduced infiltration due to drought conditions takes two years to reach the point of discharge. Spring flow has remained fairly constant over the past five City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 6 ca years. The chart on the following page shows the City's total water production over time, along with the percentage breakdown of pumped versus gravity sources and a comparison to pre - drought conditions: Figure 5. Total Water Production from Gravity and Pumped Sources Total Water Production from Gravity and Pumped Sources, 1998-2010 in millions of gallons Year Total Gravity % of 1998 flow Total Pumped Total Diversion % Pumped % of 1998 1998 517.90 - 96.21 614.11 16 - 1999 504.20 97.4 93.97 598.17 16 97.4 2000 510.80 98.6 280.62 791.42 35 128.9 2001 463.51 89.5 342.49 806.00 42 131.2 2002 425.87 82.2 239.50 665.37 36 108.3 2003 398.75 77.0 280.72 679.47 41 110.6 2004 421.21 81.3 275.66 696.87 40 113.5 2005 422.01 81.5 282.15 704.16 40 114.7 2006 451.62 87.2 354.16 805.78 44 131.2 2007 448.62 86.6 285.98 734.60 39 119.6 2008 494.76 95.5 345.64 840.40 41 136.9 2009 464.12 89.6 304.61 768.73 40 125.2 2010 467.41 90.3 293.49 760.90 39 123.9 Water Use Trends, Current Water Use, per Capita Consumption and Number of Water Connections Current water use reflects an ongoing trend of reduced water consumption for both residential and commercial water consumers. In addition, previous Water Conservation Plans indicate that delivery of water through residential meters has decreased from a 1996-2000 average of 1,353,960 gallons per day to a 2006-2010 average of 876,616 gallons per day, a 35% decrease over a 15 year period. Overall, for 2006-2010 the total water delivered by the City of Moab culinary system has decreased by 17.2% relative to the average for 2001-2005. The per capita City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 7 7-5 average comparing the same period shows a 7.8% decrease. Of note, Commercial usage has decreased 18.2% from the 2001-2005 period, while the total amount delivered has decreased 17.2%. There is evidence of achievement of water conservation over the last 15 years, as well as during the term of the 2006 City of Moab Water Conservation Plan. Figure 6. Average Water Consumption Residential versus Commercial 2006-2010 Average Water Consumption Residential versus Commercial 2006-2010 Year POpu- lation Per Capita Avg Average gpd Dwellings Average gpd Commercial and Other Total gpd Delivered 2006 4943 171 847,049 848,659 1,695,709 2007 4971 178 885,789 714,010 1,599,799 2008 4999 173 868,410 698,772 1,567,182 2009 5027 184 926,682 706,887 1,633,568 2010 5046 169 855,150 596,666 1,451,816 Figure 7. Water Consumption Trends 2001-2010 Water Consumption Trends 2001-2010 Avg Years Per Capita Avg Average gpd Dwellings Average gpd Commercial Average Total gpd Delivered 2001-2005 190 926,962 998,357 1,925,320 2006-2010 175 876,616 816,388 1,593,714 Change -15 -50,346 -181,969 -331,606 % Change -7.8% -5.4% -18.2% -17.2% The number of water connections in the City of Moab system as of July 2010 is 1,910. It appears as though this is an approximate 4.3% increase from 2006. For 2010, there were 1446 Residential connections and 464 Commercial connections. Since the method for categorizing what constitutes a residential connection versus a commercial connection has changed with City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 8 changes in accounting systems, it is difficult to provide an "apple -to -apple" comparison for changes in residential and commercial connections since the last report. It is safe to say that the total number of connections has increased at a higher rate than population growth, which would lead one to believe that growth in the number of second homes and commercial establishments have been the main contributors to the increase in number of connections. Population growth since 2006 has been approximately 0.42% per year. Demand Projections to 2050 It is important that a water conservation plan not only consider the five-year time frame called for by the plan, but a longer time horizon. This plan looks to 2050 and beyond. The 1996 Public Facilities Analysis, Grand County/City of Moab addressed the water demand from development of land already within the City of Moab, or contained in "islands" of unincorporated county within City boundaries, to the density limit of current zoning. Existing city residential zoning permits 4,298 additional units to be added to the 2,051 currently existing. Annexation of unincorporated "islands" would add 288 additional ERUs to the 32 existing in these islands in 1995. At build -out, total residential units equal 6,669, housing a projected population of 18,473. Using the 2010 population figures, along with the total amount of water delivered in 2010, we can derive a total per capita average water consumption of 278 gpd per resident. This 278 gpd number considers total water consumption and not just residential water consumption. The 1996 build -out analysis did not project a particular population growth rate. However, at a rate of 1% per year (higher than the current rate of approximately 0.56% annually for the last ten years), the City would meet build -out in approximately 130 years. Water demand would be 5,135,494 gallons per day at the build -out population potential of 18,473. With a source capacity of 9,136,958 gallons per day in hand, the City has 44% more in water rights and source capacity over what it needs at build -out. At 1 % growth per year, about twice the current rate, the City's population would reach approximately 7,438, by 2050. This is only 40% of the City's build -out potential. A population of 7,438 would put water demand at 2,067,764 gallons per day in 2050. Given that the City has water rights of 9,157,009 gallons per day, the City will not need to acquire more water rights any time before build -out potential is reached. City commercial zoning would allow an expansion from approximately 1,521,000 square feet (2005 estimate) to 4,489,066 square feet, an increase of three times, if current lot coverage rates continue in new construction. Industrial zoning permits an increase from the 2005 estimate 97,400 square feet to 281,289 square feet, a 65% increase. However, the Public Facilities Analysis did not assume any annexation of lands outside the current City of Moab perimeter boundary. This is a sound assumption for Grand County City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 9 7-5 residential -zoned lands to the south of Moab on the floor of Spanish Valley. These rural residential areas are uphill from the Moab water system, already served by Spanish Valley Water and Sewer Improvement District (now part of the Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency), and typically consist of half acre or acre minimum lot sizes (larger minimums in most subdivisions by covenant) with farm animals and horses allowed on lots one acre or greater in size. The vast majority of these county property owners are as resistant to annexation into Moab as the City is rationally resistant to acquiring areas already receiving utility services which would bring no new tax revenues with them if annexed. Commercial areas are a different matter. The City of Moab recently annexed a new commercial area along Hwy 191 to the Colorado River Bridge. Many of these properties are already serviced by the city water system. Acquisition of the other half interest in Skakel Spring, which is located in the center of the north US 191 unincorporated commercial corridor, permits the City to anticipate providing culinary water to additional commercial properties without reducing its surplus source capacity from the golf course area springs and wells. Costs for extending services would be recovered from property owners as extraordinary costs upon annexation or development of the properties. Another city expansion involves lands currently owned by the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) on the "sand flats" benchlands between the Slickrock Bike Trail and eastern Moab City limits, north of Sand Flats Road. This property has recently been annexed into the City. A development group proposes to site a 460-unit residential planned unit development on these lands, entitled the Lionsback development. The City of Moab will be providing both water and sewer services to this new development, which is expected to be phased in over a 15-year timeframe. Moab City might modestly expand its municipal border southwards on US 191 in the Highway Commercial zoning district. However, annexation of this area will not impact city water supplies, as water and sewer services to these areas will be provided by the Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency and not the City. Grand County has anticipated commercial and other growth in these areas as part of the county's Public Facilities Analysis, and the Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency has incorporated these lands into their build -out analysis for the provision of water and sewer services. The Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency will need to pursue additional water sources to fully provide for the build -out potential of lands within Agency boundaries. The 2010 Moab Water Distribution System Report reviewed future development scenarios and provided recommendations regarding the City system's ability to accommodate the anticipated developments. Regarding the Lionsback development, the report recommends that the city allow development itself but recommends against utilizing the water storage tank contemplated for the project for city storage. The report also examined potential commercial and residential development as described above, and indicated that water sources are more than adequate to meet the demands of the planned developments. The 2010 Moab Water Distribution System Report maintains that the "data indicate that the City of Moab can double its current population City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 10 7-5 before new sources need to be developed or administrative constraints need to be placed on water use" and that "currently the greatest motivation for water conservation is energy conservation". Further the report maintains that "total water availability, however, is not a limiting factor for growth in the foreseeable future." In summary, the City of Moab has sufficient pristine groundwater source and distribution capacity at projected levels of per capita or ERU use to meet reasonable future demands from growth within current city limits, recently annexed areas, from future annexation of commercial properties outside the city limits, and from limited rezoning of city parcels to higher density/granting density bonuses. Given the growth potential through 2050, the City would not have to seek additional water sources or institute administrative control measures until well after the 2050 time horizon. System Deficiencies The 2010 Water Distribution System Report identifies deficiencies in the existing City of Moab water system. Contrary to the 1996 Public Facilities Analysis, the 2010 report does not recommend construction of new water storage facilities. It does recommend improvements to the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system, replacement of fire hydrants, and the upgrade of several water mains. It does not recommend that the City secure any additional water rights or water sources at this time. Future Supply Sources As discussed above, the 1996 Public Facilities Plan, the 2010 Water Distribution System Report and reasonable estimates of city population and commercial growth indicate that the City will probably have sufficient water for at least the next 100 years. Although this is the case, it is important for the City to anticipate future drought conditions and to acknowledge uncertainty inherent in fully understanding the viability of the City's water sources by contemplating the acquisition or use of additional or alternative water sources. One possibility in this regard is to acquire from the Moab Irrigation Company water shares that could be used for outdoor watering. Most of the remaining Moab Irrigation Company water shares that are delivered in Moab, north and west of Moab, and on Wilson and South Mesas above Mill Creek to the east of Spanish Valley could be bought and transferred to the Ken's Lake diversion on Mill Creek. Inside the City limits and in the north US 191 corridor, a number of orchards, hay fields, pastures and gardens are currently irrigated with these shares. Recharge from this irrigation may be largely responsible for inflow to the Matheson Wetlands Preserve operated by the Nature Conservancy at the north end of Spanish Valley. When some of these parcels have been converted to residential or commercial development in recent years, the predominant pattern has been to cluster buildings, leaving landscaped open areas. The City needs to explore and define ways in which parcels developed with large open spaces can obtain and/or City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 11 iz retain Moab Irrigation Company irrigation water shares for outside landscaping irrigation. Acquisition of water shares by the Nature Conservancy to maintain recharge of the Matheson Preserve should be considered in this planning. Although studies have indicated that the City of Moab has adequate water rights and production capacity to meet build -out demand for culinary water without having to install a secondary irrigation system, it might be to the City's benefit to implement such a secondary system and enjoy this pristine groundwater demand savings if: (1) growth patterns depart from plan assumptions so that the total culinary demand on the City's water system is greater than anticipated in the current plans, or (2) the City finds it profitable to "swap" conserved pristine groundwater for irrigation water from the Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency because the Agency is unable to divert enough pristine groundwater out of the same aquifer the city is using to meet growth demands in the Agency's service area. In 2005, it appeared that 180,641,000 gallons of pristine groundwater were consumed by 31 city customers for irrigation; another 185,075,000 gallons were apparently used by 2,121 residential customers for outdoor watering. This provides an idea of the total amount of pristine groundwater that could be conserved by the city if it was replaced by water from a secondary irrigation water system. Options for a secondary water system constitute the greatest potential for future water sources. Intersystem Agreements There are currently no significant intersystem agreements for culinary water. The Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency, which serves Spanish Valley and is uphill and to the south of the City, does not have sufficient water sources in hand to meet its service area's build -out demand. The Agency undertook a $4.7 million project in 2000 to improve storage and distribution to resolve system deficiencies, and collects impact fees for the purpose of expanding the system to meet growth demands in the future per its Capital Infrastructure Plan. Geography and gravity allow the Agency to supply the City with culinary water, but the Agency doesn't have culinary water to spare and the City doesn't need it. The Grand Water Service Agency and City of Moab collaborate on matters affecting both entitites such as source protection plans, financing of expansion of the sewage treatment plant, and regional drinking water facility planning They may choose to collaborate on development of a valley -wide secondary irrigation water system for the reasons discussed above, although these options do not need to be immediately pursued. Water Quality Water quality in the Moab water system is excellent. All drinking water supply for the City of Moab is Pristine Ground Water from wells and springs discharging from a sandstone aquifer. This aquifer enjoys the protections of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designation as a Sole Source Aquifer. [Sole Source Aquifer Determination for Glen Canyon Aquifer System, Moab, Utah, published in the January 7, 2002 Federal Register, volume 67 #4, pp. 736-738.] City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 12 ca Distribution System The City of Moab water distribution system is in good condition and is sized to meet current and projected demand, with the exception of new service lines needed for new development. In addition, the 2010 Water Distribution System Report outlines water line improvements that should be made in order to provide for the efficient distribution of water throughout the City. Treatment System Treatment for the City of Moab water system consists of minimal chlorination. USGS water sampling in 1997 found the drinking water of the City of Moab, before treatment, equals or exceeds the quality of 80 percent of brands of bottled drinking water from springs sold in stores (comparison data is from the published Natural Resources Defense Council study of bottled water quality). Reuse Potential Reuse potential for the Moab water system is not feasible for a city -only secondary water system because the City of Moab Wastewater Treatment Plant is located next to the Colorado River on the edge of the Matheson Wetlands Preserve at the far, low, north end of Spanish Valley and discharges directly into the Colorado River, and the City does not have the water right to use this discharge for a secondary irrigation system. The Grand County Water Conservancy District has filed on and holds irrigation water rights to the discharge from the City Wastewater Treatment Plant, but the point of diversion for this water right is the Colorado River. Institutional and Political Factors There are several institutional and political factors relevant to the City of Moab Water Conservation Plan. It will be important to monitor water rights applications submitted by adjacent water agencies such as the Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency and other water providers to ensure that applications that involve such things as a change in points of diversion do not negatively affect the quantity or quality of Moab's water sources. In addition, the ability of the City to work with the Moab Irrigation Company and its shareholders to keep surface - diverted irrigation water flowing to areas within the City, rather than being moved away from these lands for application elsewhere is key. A large part of the Moab Irrigation Company's water shares are currently used by homeowners for yard irrigation, so it functions as a de facto secondary irrigation water system for residences in older portions of town. City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 13 co Environmental Concerns Environmental concerns for the culinary system are minimal, since the City of Moab will not develop new water supply sources or water rights, does not have a water treatment facility and will presumably never have one, and will not expand the existing production, storage and distribution system except for that needed to service new development. The City will need to continue to monitor water quality to ensure the long term sustainability of Moab's abundant water sources. Fiscal Structure and Financial Resources Since the City will not need to aggressively pursue the acquisition of additional water rights, financial resources will only be needed to make modest system improvements. The 1993 transmission line bond will be paid off in 2013. The $1.3 million Main Street water main upgrade 2005-2006 was paid for in cash that the City had saved from revenues. Connection and user fees fully support the costs of operating the system and retiring the modest bonded debt, although the city should provide for inflationary increases in its rate structure. The City's current water rate structure reflects the City's intent to keep water rates low for its residents. The following is the City's current water rate structure: Figure 8. Current Water Rate Structure for the City of Moab (per month) RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL Within the City Outside the City $5.81 $11.63 .46 .92 .63 1.26 Within the City Outside the City $9.92 $19.84 2.20 4.41 .56 1.13 .65 1.30 .77 1.55 • minimum charge (includes the first 2,000 gallons) • per thousand for 3,000 to 10,000 gallons • per thousand for 11,000 or more gallons • minimum charge (includes the first 2,000 gallons) • per thousand for 3,000 to 5,000 gallons • per thousand for 6,000 to 10,000 gallons • per thousand for 11,000 to 50,000 gallons • per thousand for 51,000 or more gallons CURRENT WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES Current Water Conservation Challenges The City of Moab has a number of challenges with respect to water conservation. Past water conservation efforts, a relatively dry climate, public perception, a high percentage of outdoor City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 14 7-5 water usage, impacts on the City Waste Water Treatment Plant, and uncertainty with respect to the long term availability of current water sources are just a few of the challenges to be addressed. Many of these challenges are inter -related. One issue currently facing the City of Moab with respect to water conservation is that previous water conservation plans have overestimated the level of water conservation that has occurred over the last 15 years. While the current report does show a reduction in per capita water consumption from the previous period, there have been minimal deliberate water conservation efforts over the past five years that would have led to this result. There are a few reasons why this situation presents a unique challenge. The idea of water conservation has not been thoroughly institutionalized and culturally accepted within the community People are under the impression that water is a readily available resource with no need for conservation efforts, and adjusting this perception will be difficult. Implementing new conservation measures at this point in time will present new challenges. A second issue, related to the above, is the public perception about the need for water conservation in general. Studies looking at growth potential both within city limits and due to annexation indicate that the city has sufficient water sources to provide for growth at build -out, a scenario that may not occur for another 130 years. It is difficult to provide a convincing case to the public for the urgency of implementing water conservation measures. Because of this, it will be important to emphasis the uncertainty of future conditions and the availability of water, as well as the cost -saving and energy saving aspects of water conservation. Another challenge, faced by communities throughout the west, is that Moab is a relatively arid community. Average rainfall is less than nine inches per year, while the national average for 2010 was about 33 inches. The amount of rainfall is directly related to the percentage of culinary water used for irrigation as compared to indoor uses. Previous water conservation plans indicate that from November through April water consumption per capita by residents is typically below 150 gallons per day. In the hottest month, water use per day per resident is 5.4 times the lowest, coldest month. Commercial water use is 6.5 times higher per day in the hottest than the coldest month annually. Most of this difference is due to outdoor water use from April through October, peaking in July or August. The 2005 Water Conservation Plan showed that approximately 60% of the water that is delivered to customers from city sources is used for outdoor irrigation. This means that the major conservation efforts need to be aimed toward outdoor use. Water conservation measures such as water conservation rate structures are difficult when trying to address outdoor use only. Yet another challenge that the City of Moab water system faces with respect to water conservation is the impact that a reduction in water flow through the sewer system has on the Wastewater Treatment Plant. According to the City Moab Wastewater Facilities Master Plan, a reduction in per capita water use has caused an increase in BOD and TSS concentrations of the influent coming into the Wastewater Treatment Plant, leading to difficulties in efficient treatment and the resulting costly upgrades needed to maintain effluent at acceptable levels. The reduction in water usage over the past 10 years has led to increases in the strength of the wastewater. This City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 15 al is a dilemma that must be balanced when looking at both upgrades to the treatment plant and implementation of water conservation efforts. This dilemma makes it all the more important that any water conservation measures deal with outdoor use rather than indoor use as the focus, so that we can reduce water usage but not negatively impact the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Another challenge related to implementation of water conservation measures is that the City of Moab has a very small Water Department staff. The City does not have a Water Conservation Coordinator and we do not see in the foreseeable future that we will have one. This will make it important that the measures implemented are cost effective and not staff intensive, and that the effectiveness of water conservation efforts be simple to measure. A final challenge to be considered is the long-term viability of the Moab Irrigation Company. It has been mentioned several times that the ability of city residents to use Moab Irrigation water is important for preservation of culinary water for indoor use. It is important to maintain a positive relationship with Moab Irrigation to ensure continued operation of the irrigation system within city limits. It is also important to recognize that the Moab Irrigation Company system, while recently upgraded to a pressurized system, is an old system with constant maintenance challenges. PAST WATER CONSERVATION EFFORTS Although the City of Moab has not engaged in aggressive water conservation efforts in the last five years, previous plans have identified, and the City has implemented to some degree, water conservation efforts. The following provides a summary of identified water conservation measures, along with the implementation status of the measures. Emergency Action Plan The City's emergency plan can be considered a water conservation plan for circumstances in which pumped culinary water from city wells is not available. In event of emergency, such as the main well pump failure that occured in 1998 at the Moab Golf Course, citizens are asked through the media to discontinue all outside watering until adequate water flow is restored. City Public Works staff go in the field to identify customers who haven't gotten the message. If citizens refuse to stop outside watering when asked, their water meter is turned off and locked. Gravity flow from the Sommerville springs to the City storage tanks is sufficient to keep the storage tanks full while meeting inside culinary water needs; during the winter months, spring flow normally exceeds water usage in the system and the well pumps are not operated. Under emergency conditions, the City's concern is to maintain the storage tanks full so that water is available for firefighting City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 16 RI Public Education on Wise Water Use In response to the 1996 Water Conservation Plan, the City of Moab implemented educational programs to encourage outdoor water conservation. These programs included pamphlets, newspaper articles, and reminders on the City utility bill. The 2006 plan called for continuation of these efforts, specifically, the following: (1) Renewal of City public education through the media and bill enclosures, reminding people to not water in the heat of the day; to water for a long period of time at intervals to get deep penetration of water and encourage deep rooting of landscaping, rather than for brief periods often; and to encourage low -water -demand plant selection for landscaping (xeriscaping). (2) Sponsoring of public workshops on water -efficient irrigation and landscaping as a public service. (3) Revision of landscaping standards in residential and commercial site development zoning regulations to require water -efficient landscaping cultivar selection and irrigation systems. (4) Development and placement of attractive placards in guest facility bathrooms reminding visitors that they are visiting a beautiful desert in which water is limited, and spelling out ways they can conserve water during their stay. Some of these efforts were implemented. The public workshops and placard placement were not. Given the level of conservation that the 2006 plan purported to have been achieved in the previous period, these more intensive efforts were not deemed urgent or warranted. The City has not monitored or determined to what extent any of these efforts contributed to water conservation, especially since most of the efforts were not implemented in a systematic fashion, and the City was not aiming for specific numerical conservation goals. Study and Adoption of Incremental Water Rates Keyed to Excessive, Wasteful Use The 2006 plan called for the development of a water conservation rate structure. The City has completed an analysis of options with respect to developing a water conservation rate structure. The proposed structure would entail a graduated billing system that charges progressively more per gallon for water as usage increases. The new structure has not been adopted for several reasons. The first reason is that the proposed structure does not deal with commercial water conservation, and this is a complex issue that needs to be addressed. The second reason is that the proposed structure does not differentiate between indoor and outdoor use. The differentiation is important, given the challenges outlined in this Plan. The last reason is that the City has not been aggressive in dealing with water conservation measures, given the assumption that previous and current water conservation had produced desired results. City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 17 ca Expansion of the Secondary Water System to Replace Culinary Water with Irrigation -grade Water This item has not been pursued, since overall demand on the City's culinary water system has declined slightly during the term of this plan, and because of the complexity of the endeavor. See the above section for a discussion of the possibility of linking a City of Moab and Spanish Valley secondary water system that would substitute surface -diverted for pristine culinary water for irrigation throughout Spanish Valley, conserving pristine groundwater from the sandstone aquifer for culinary use. If the systems were so combined, it is logical that the point of diversion for those of the 711,609 Moab Irrigation Company water shares representing South Fork of Mill Creek flow would be moved upstream to the Sheley Diversion on Mill Creek which feeds the Ken's Lake irrigation reservoir, from which water would then gravity -feed the pressurized secondary water system throughout the valley. The effects of this arrangement on the recharge of the Matheson Wetlands Preserve requires study so that appropriate mitigation measures can be taken. WATER CONSERVATION GOALS Considerations in the Development of Appropriate and Realistic Goals The City of Moab's Conservation Goals for the next five years need to take into account past conservation outcomes, challenges and constraints, and long-term prognosis for the viability of water resources. The City of Moab has seen a fairly steady decline in total water consumption and per capita water consumption over the past 15 years. Delivery of water through residential meters has decreased from a 1996-2000 average of 1,353,960 gallons per day to a 2006-2010 average of 876,616 gallons per day, a 35% decrease over a 15 year period. Per capita water consumption has decreased 7.9% from the 2001-2005 time period to the 2006-2010 time period. This decline was seen despite only moderate conservation efforts. While it appears that there is room for further conservation, especially with respect to outdoor usage, it may not be reasonable to expect continued large reductions in water consumption. Goals must be realistic in this respect. It is also important to address the challenges and constraints in the development of short and long term water conservation goals. The fact that the City of Moab has not implemented intensive conservation efforts in the past, the overall public perception about the availability of water, the fact that Moab's outdoor water use is relatively high, the need to maintain water flow into the wastewater treatment plant to ensure its efficient operation, and the issues related to preserving and promoting the secondary water system all must be taken into consideration. Lastly, it is important to recognize that there is uncertainty associated with understanding the City's water sources. While it appears in looking at spring flows and water rights that the City City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 18 co has plenty of water for the foreseeable future, there are issues such as water quality, drought conditions and unknown factors that may affect our water sources. These issues point to the need for conservatism. Numerical Goals for Water Conservation The average per capita residential water consumption for 2006-2010 was 175 gallons per day per capita. This is a 7.9% reduction from the previous five year period. The average total water delivered for the 2006-2010 was 1,593,714, a 17.2% reduction from the previous five year period. These numbers constitute the benchmarks by which future conservation should be measured. Given the challenges and constraints addressed above, the City can reasonably aim toward reducing residential per capita water consumption by an average of 5% over the next five years. This means that the City would aim toward an average for the period of 2011-2016 of 166 gallons per day per capita. Given the need to address the consumption of culinary water for outdoor uses, the City should aim to reduce its consumption of residential water during the months of May -September by 10%. The City will need to establish a 2011 benchmark in order to measure this usage. This benchmark should be established by February, 2012. Given the City's use of culinary water for use on city park areas, the City should aim to reduce its per acre use of culinary water for park use by 10% over the next five years. The City will need to establish a 2011 benchmark in order to measure this usage. This benchmark should be established by February, 2012. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ADDITIONAL WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES The following measures should be implemented in an attempt to meet the City's Numerical Goals for Water Conservation: Public Education on Wise Water Use The city has not engaged in public education on the wise use of water for several years. It is recommended that these efforts be reinvigorated, with an emphasis on the need for water conservation in the use of culinary water for outdoor usage. The following measures should be implemented: City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 19 iz (1) Publishing of news releases about the City's water sources, the city's water conservation plan, and the emphasis on the reduction in the use of culinary water for outdoor purposes. (2) Renewal of City public education through the media and bill enclosures, reminding people to not water in the heat of the day; to water for a long period of time at intervals to get deep penetration of water and encourage deep rooting of landscaping, rather than for brief periods often; and to encourage low -water -demand plant selection for landscaping (xeriscaping). (3) Sponsoring of public workshops on water -efficient irrigation and landscaping. (4) Publishing of information on water use audits for residential uses. Adoption of a Water Conservation Rate Structure that Encourages Conservation of Water for Outdoor Purposes Pursuant to the 2006 plan, the city studied and developed a water conservation rate structure keyed at reducing wasteful use. Unfortunately, the proposed structure, which was never implemented, did not adequately provide for commercial use, and did not differentiate between indoor and outdoor use. As discussed in this plan, the issue of the conservation of water used outdoors is extremely important for the Moab water system. The City should re-examine this study and move toward implementing a water conservation rate structure that specifically addresses outdoor use for both residential and commercial use. This rate structure should be implemented in 2012. Implementation of Measures to Reduce City and other Governmental Users' Use of Water on Lawn Areas The City should work with other governmental users in taking measures to reduce application of culinary water to large lawn and other planted areas. The City should conduct water usage audits of city and other facilities to determine more efficient water application and lawn maintenance practices. These efforts should begin in 2012. In addition, the City should continue to consider alternatives to grass and other high water plants when developing new parks and park areas. Addition of Water Conservation Efforts to the City's Sustainability Plan Although the City will not be able to hire a Water Conservation Coordinator, it is recommended that the City incorporate water conservation into the City's Sustainability Plan. This plan outlines yearly action steps for obtaining specific sustainability goals. City of Moab Water Conservation Plan 2011 Update, Page 20 CI APPENDIX 1 Resolution # 23-2011 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN UPDATE 2011 FOR THE CITY OF MOAB WHEREAS, Utah water providers are required to update their water conservation plans every five years; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab's last update was adopted in 2006; and WHEREAS, the Water Conservation Plan Update 2011 for the City of Moab is attached to this resolution; and NOW THEREFORE, we, the Governing Body of the City of Moab do hereby resolve to adopt the Water Conservation Plan Update 2011 for the City of Moab in substantially the form attached to this resolution and to direct the appropriate parties to submit said plan to the State of Utah. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this t'' 13day of December, 2011 SIGNED: David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder Resolution #23-2011 7-5 CITY OF MOAB 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532-2534 MAIN NUMBER (435) 259-51 21 FAx NUMBER (435) 259-4135 MAYOR: DAVID L. SAKRISON COUNCIL: KYLE BAILEY JEFFREY A. DAVIS SARAH BAUMAN KIRSTIN PETERSON GREGG W. STUCK! To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Jeff Foster, Public Works Director Date: December 7, 2011 Subject: Request for City Council Adoption of Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity Maintenance Policy and Procedures The Federal Government according to USC Sec. 109(d), 23 CFR 655.603 states that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (here and after referred to as "The MUTCD" is the approved national standard for designing traffic control devices. This applies to any street, highway, or bicycle trail open to public travel. Over the past few years, the City has been putting considerable effort towards identifying and upgrading signs that are old and/or are not up to retroreflectivity standards. We have recently been working towards integrating the signage into the City's GIS database and mapping. The MUTCD has set a deadline of January 2012 for requiring adoption of City Council sanctioned policy that will bring all roadway signage within compliance prior to future dates that these signage requirements must be in place. This policy must address how the City will test the roadway signs for retroreflectivity, a strategy for replacing signs that do not comply, and then how the city will address complying with the requirements into the future. The next deadline of January 2015 requires that all regulatory, warning and ground mounted signs meet the retroreflectivity requirements. The deadline after that requires that all street name signs will meet minimum letter heights by January 2018. The draft policy presented identifies each of the requirements necessary to meet the MUTCD requirements by the deadline date. The policy also sets into motion the process the Public Works Department will follow in order to comply with each of the upcoming deadline dates indicated above. The Council's adoption of this policy will also show compliance with the MUTCD requirements, to have the "Applicable Local Government Entity" adopt a plan prior to the deadline date. 7-6 CITY OF MOAB TRAFFIC SIGN RETROREFLECTIVITY MAINTENANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT POLICY — December 7, 2011 THIS POLICY MUST BE ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ORDER TO MEET FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS PURPOSE AND INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity Maintenance Policies and Procedures is to establish the process by which required levels of retroreflectivity will be maintained on roadway signage under Moab City jurisdiction. The maintenance of roadway signage is essential for routine travel and the safety of the traveling public. The City Streets Department will provide such services, either with its own personnel or by contract, in a safe and cost effective manner. Due to variables in weather, traffic issues, personnel, budget limitations, environmental concerns and other factors, this policy and the associated procedures must remain flexible. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 1. Sign Inventory Moab City is currently developing a field sign inventory database. Once all data is updated and the system is in place, the city will utilize the management method of expected sign life to stay in compliance with federal retroreflectivity standards. High Intensity Prismatic (H.I.P.) sheeting shall be utilized on signs. The expected sign life for the H.I.P. sheeting being used shall be twelve (12) years. This is based upon information contained in Utah's Best Practices for Traffic Sign Maintenance/Management Handbook published in October, 2010. Signs will be replaced within six months from the date that signs included under the retroreflectivity requirements have been in place for twelve (12) years, they will be replaced. Although not required, random visual nighttime inspections may be performed to verify the twelve (12) year life of the sheeting and to identify signs degraded by vandalism or other reasons. Signs included under the retroreflectivity requirements, which typically are only in use two to three months per year (traffic control, weight restriction, etc.), shall be replaced on a twenty (20) year schedule. 2. Inspection Method Prior to completion of the updated database, the city will utilize the reflectometer and or visual nighttime assessment method by means of a calibration signs procedure. If the city utilizes the visual nighttime assessment method, calibration signs with known retroreflectivity levels at or above the specified minimums will be erected at the city maintenance shop. The nighttime inspector(s) will use the visual appearance of the calibration signs to establish the evaluation threshold for the night's inspection activities. The night of the inspection, staff will view each sign type (regulatory black/white, stop sign, warning sign and guidance sign) mounted at the standard height from a standard pick-up truck with low beams, from a distance between 100 and 600 feet in advance of the signs, to mimic field conditions as much as practical. When not in use, the calibration signs shall be stored inside so the retroreflectivity does not deteriorate over time. 3. Documentation Documentation of the location, sign type, size and reason for sign replacement will be recorded for each sign that is not in an acceptable condition and needs replacement. Sign replacement will occur as soon as practical. 7-6 CITY OF MOAB ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE December 7, 2011 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Rebecca W. Andrus, City Engineer Subject: Approval of the Extension Agreement for the Cemetery Well On July 3, 1986 the City of Moab, Grand County Water Conservancy District (Water District), and the Grand County Cemetery District (Cemetery District) entered into an agreement for the use of the Lance Well, also referred to as the Cemetery Well (Well). Since the City had determined that the water from the Well was not suitable for culinary use in the City's municipal system, this agreement allowed the Water District and the Cemetery District to use the water. The original agreement expired on July 3, 2011. The circumstances have not changed over the past twenty-five years, and the use of the Well as specified under the Original Agreement is a beneficial use of the water resources of the area and continues to constitute a work in the public interest and for the public good. In light of these facts, I have prepared an extension to the original agreement for a term of five years that will automatically renew after that as long as the parties all agree that it is still the most beneficial use of the water. The extension and original agreement are included in the packet. The Water District approved the extension agreement during their meeting on November 17, 2011. I recommend that the Council approve the extension as written. Sincerely, Rd-cc-040AD . A4,, Rebecca W. Andrus, PE Moab City Engineer is EXTENSI ON AGREEMENT This Extension Agreement (the Agreement) is made and effective this day of 2011, BETWEEN: CITY OF MOAB (hereinafter "Moab City"), a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah. AND: AND: GRAND COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT (hereinafter the "Water District"), a body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah. GRAND COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT (hereinafter the "Cemetery District"), a body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah. WHEREAS the parties entered into the Original Agreement on July 3, 1986, which was recorded in the County Recorder's office as Entry No. 410141, Book 385, Page 435-437; and WHEREAS the Original Agreement expired on July 3, 2011; and WHEREAS the parties recognize that use of the Well as specified under the Original Agreement is a beneficial use of the water resources of the area and continues to constitute a work in the public interest and for the public good; NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: It is provided that said Agreement shall be extended for an additional term of five (5) years, commencing upon the expiration of the Original Agreement. This extension shall be on the same terms and conditions as contained in the original Agreement and as if set forth herein excepting that: al The initial term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years, commencing upon the date of expiration of the Original Agreement. This Agreement shall automatically be renewed for each successive renewal term unless one of the parties shall notify the others in writing of intention not to renew the Agreement at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of the original or any renewal term. 7-7 SIGNED AND SEALED the day and year first written above. ATTEST: CITY OF MOAB, UTAH Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder By: David L. Sakrison, Mayor GRAND COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT By: Clerk Chairman GRAND COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT By: Secretary/Treasurer Chairman AGREEMENT Entry No. .�� Recorded F"'/3 -E‘ /a319/1/ Sk,�c4rPg 51 ;ReeNotu t illy Mae Nooriander Recorder of Greed County THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this 3rd day of July , 1986, by and between the City of Moab, a municipal corporation organized and existing tinder the laws of the State of Utah (hereinafter "Moab City"); and the Grand County Water Conservancy District, a body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah (hereinafter the "Water District"); and the Grand County Cemetery District, a body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah (hereinafter the "Cemetery District"); WITNESSET H: WHEREAS, the parties recognize. that joint and cooperative action is necessary to ensure that the water resources of Spanish Valley and Moab Valley be put to their most beneficial use and that the management of the water resources of the area constitutes a work in the public interest and for the public good; and, WHEREAS, Moab City owns a certain water well and appurtenances thereto, commonly referred to as the Lance Well (hereinafter the "Well"), located at a point North 1238.6' and West 1363.6' from the East 1/4 corner of Section 7, T26S, R22E, SLB&M; and, WHEREAS, Moab City has determined that water from the Well is not suitable for culinary use by Moab City in its municipal water system; and, WHEREAS, Moab City has, therefore, previously entered into an agreement by and between the Cemetery District and Moab City whereby the Cemetery District was authorized to use the well as a source of irrigation water for the municipal cemetery; and, 435 7-7 WHEREAS, to facilitate this Agreement, the Cemetery District has entered into an agreement with Moab City whereby the Cemetery Distract will use culinary water from Moab City's municipal water system as the principal source of water supply for irrigation of the cemetery; and, WHEREAS, use of municipal water by the Cemetery District makes possible the diversion and use of water from the Well by the Water District for delivery to Moab Irrigation Company for distribution through its ditches pursuant to the requirements of an agreement between the Water District and Moab Irrigation Company; and, WHEREAS, use of water from the Well to satisfy the Water District's obligations to Moab Irrigation Company will increase the quantity of water available for delivery to the Water District's customers upstream in Spanish Valley out of Mill Creek through Ren's Reservoir; and WHEREAS, the parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the foregoing arrangement, consistent with the terms and provisions of this Agreement, provides for the most beneficial use of the Well as a source of water supply for the community; NOW, THEREFORE, in Consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Moab City hereby grants to the Water District and Cemetery District the right to use the Well in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement for a period of .25's years from the date of execution hereof. Moab City shall not participate in or otherwise have any obligation with respect to the use of the Well or be obligated to pay any cost incurred in the operation, -2-- 436 7-7 maintenance or refitting of the equipment related to the Well. The Well shall at all times be and remain the sole and separate property of Moab City, and upon the termination hereof, any and all appurtenances added to, replaced or upgraded during the term of this Agreement shall become the property of Moab City. 2. The Water District, at its sole expense, will file an appropriate change application with the State Engineer of the State of Utah to effectuate a transfer of certain water rights of the Water District to the Well to provide for the diversion of water therefrom for use by the District. Title to the water right transferred to the Well by the Distract shall be and remain the sole and separate property of the Water District. 3. The Cemetery District will•use water from Moab City's municipal water distribution system as the primary source of water for irrigation of the cemetery; however, the Cemetery District shall hereby have the right to pump water from the Well for its use on the cemetery at a discharge rate of 3/8 of the Well's total flow, twenty-four (24) hours per day, measured at the Well, but only during such times as Moab City imposes water rationing which impairs the Cemetery District's ability to obtain delivery of a sufficient quantity of water from Moab City's municipal system for irrigation of the cemetery. During such periods of joint use of the Well by the Water District and the Cemetery District, the amount of time water is diverted from the Well for use by the Cemetery District will be recorded by both Districts for billing purposes. For such times, power costs will be paid by both Districts on a pro-rata basis determined according to the amount of -3- 43 7 7-7 time the Well is pumped by each District. All pumps, motors, and appurtenances connected with the operation of the Well itself shall be maintained by the Water District at its expense, except as hereinafter provided. At the end of each calendar year, the costs incurred by the Water District for maintenance and/or repairs shall be calculated so that during joint periods of use of the Well as hereinabove described, said costs can be divided between the Water District and the Cemetery District on a pro--rata basis. The proportionate share of each District will be calculated based upon the same relative percentages used to determine each party's share of the power costs throughout the year as described above. 4. Any dispute between the Water District and Cemetery District over the use of the Well and/or the amount to be paid by each for its joint use, will be arbitrated by the City Council of Moab City, as a neutral party, and as owner of the Well. The decision of the City Council shall be final and will be adhered to by both Districts. 5. The Water District will furnish and install at its expense, all necessary valves, meters, pipes and other appurtenances necessary to enable water from the Well to be diverted from the Well into the Moab Irrigation Company ditch at a point negotiated by the Water District and Moab Irrigation Company. The existing water line extending from the Well to the point of delivery established by the Water District at the Moab Irrigation Company ditch, and any replacements or additions thereto, will be maintained by the Water Distract at its expense. The portion of the line extending from said point of delivery to the Cemetery will be maintained by the Cemetery District at its expense. -4- 438 7-7 b. This agreement shall supersede and replace the terms and provisions of any and all existing agreements, oral or written, between Moab City and any other party hereto pertaining to the use of the Well which in any way conflicts with the provisions of this Agreement. �F SIGNED AND SEALED the day and year first written alcove. • 0 ATTEST y,f • S �i' A ,n , 4- 9P� City �Rgco r de r 0i , R- "4. ,+ w �- •ti 2 Secretary/Treasurer CITY OF MOAB B Mayor GRAND COUNTY CEMETERY DISTRICT By: Chairman GRAND COU (/ Y WATER C, DISTRICT �L` r /. Chairman -5_ 439 7-7 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 24-2011 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED GRAND COUNTY NON - MOTORIZED TRAILS MASTER PLAN (GCNTMP) AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF MOAB GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (Council) adopted the General Plan (Plan) as amended, by resolution on January 8, 2002 to provide an official statement of goals and policies for the future development of Moab City; and WHEREAS, the Plan, through numerous references, provides for recreational opportunities and specifically, trails and offers City support for their location, acquisition, and construction especially in newly proposed developments; and WHEREAS, the partners of Trail Mix, developed the Grand County Non -motorized Trails Master Plan (GCNTMP) (Trail Plan) as amended in order to develop a fully integrated network of environmentally sustainable trails for non -motorized use that will link the Moab Valley to other areas of Grand County so residents and visitors alike, can travel safely through the county on foot, bicycle, or horseback while they commute to work or school and enjoy the many outdoor recreational opportunities the area has to offer; and WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (Council) adopted the Amended Trail Plan by resolution (#16- 2008) on May 22, 2008, in support of the future development of additional trails in Grand County; and WHEREAS, the Trail Plan is intended to preserve individual trails that are a portion of the non - motorized, integrated trail network providing safe, convenient, enjoyable recreation and alternate transportation experiences for all trail users through Grand County; and WHEREAS, the Moab City Planning Commission (Commission), on November 17, 2011, in a duly advertised public hearing, reviewed the Trail Plan for inclusion into the Moab General Plan, and through adoption of Planning Resolution # 2011-16, on the date of said meeting, determined that the Trail Plan formalizes a vital alternative transportation characteristic of the Moab area and is necessary in an effort to provide alternate transportation opportunities that will reduce the environmental impacts in developed as well as undeveloped areas of Grand County; and WHEREAS, the Moab Council reviewed the Trail Plan during a regularly scheduled meeting held on December 13, 2011, to decide the appropriateness of the amendment of the General Plan through the addition of the Trail Plan to the General Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOAB, UTAH, THAT the proposed Grand County Non -Motorized Trails Master Plan (GCNTMP) is hereby adopted in its entirety as an essential element of the City of Moab General Plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED by action of the Moab City Council in open session this 13th day of December, 2011. ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta Moab City Recorder Resolution #24-2011 Page 1 of 1 Dave Sakrison Mayor 7-8 City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Correspondence PL-II-223 September 22, 2011 Memo To: Members of the Moab Planning Commission From: Planning Staff Subject: Adoption of Resolution # 24-2011, Approving the Adoption of the Grand County Non -motorized Trails Master Plan (GCNTMP) as an Addendum to the City of Moab General Plan Background On January 24, 2008, the Moab Planning Commission originally reviewed the Grand County Non - motorized Trails Master Plan (Plan) for inclusion into the Moab General Plan. After several delays, Resolution #03-2008 was approved by a vote of 5-1 on May 22, 2008. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council only approve portions of the plan that were in the City Limits. Council reviewed the Plan for inclusion in the General Plan on May 27, 2008 and subsequently approved Resolution #16-2008 amending the General Plan with the complete Trails Plan. Adoption of the Plan provides for recreational opportunities and offers City support for their location, acquisition, and construction of trails especially in newly proposed developments. Trail Mix is the group of dedicated hikers and bikers who developed the Plan and now an amendment is due. The Plan continues to enhance a fully integrated network of environmentally sustainable trails for non -motorized use that will link the Moab Valley to other areas of Grand County. The Plan was generated to preserve and develop individual trails that form the non -motorized, integrated trail network to provide safe, convenient, enjoyable recreation and alternate transportation experiences for all trail users throughout Grand County. With adoption of Planning Resolution # 2008-03, the Planning Commission determined that the GCNTMP addressed the sustainability of a vital transportation characteristic of the Moab area that is necessary in the effort to provide alternate transportation opportunities, reducing the environmental impacts in developed and undeveloped areas of the county. All of the goals above still hold true and Trail Mix is continuing to work to provide fresh ideas for trail locations and construction. The amendment being considered updates the original plan by indicating new construction and proposed sites for trail extensions and connections. The Planning Commission must review the plan and make a recommendation to Council who will then adopt the Plan as an amendment to the General Plan. The County Council reviewed the Plan amendment and adopted the update on August 11, 2011. Attached is the County Council Resolution 2595-2011 for your review. p:\planning department \2011\correspondence \pI-II-223 pg gcnmtp update.docx 7-8 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION #16-2011 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED GRAND COUNTY NON - MOTORIZED TRAILS MASTER PLAN (GCNTMP) AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF MOAB GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Moab City Council (Council) adopted the General Plan (Plan) as amended, by resolution on January 8, 2002 to provide an official statement of goals and policies for the future development of Moab City; and , WHEREAS, on May 27, 2008, Council approved Resolution #16-2008 that adopted the Grand County Non -motorized Trails Master Plan (GCNTMP) in order to develop a fully integrated network of environmentally sustainable trails for non -motorized use that will link the Moab Valley to other areas of grand County so residents and visitors alike, can travel safely through the county on foot, bicycle, or horseback while they commute to work or school and enjoy the many outdoor recreational opportunities the area has to offer; and, WHEREAS, the Plan, provides for recreational opportunities and specifically, trails and offers City support for their location, acquisition, and construction especially in newly proposed developments; and, WHEREAS, the GCNTMP is intended to preserve and enhance individual trails that are developing into non -motorized, integrated trail network providing safe, convenient, enjoyable recreation and alternate transportation experiences for all trail users throughout Grand County; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission (Commission), on October 13, 2011, reviewed the GCNTMP as an amendment to the Moab General Plan and held a public hearing on November 17, 2011 to accept input on the GCNTMP; and, WHEREAS, the Commission, by the adoption of Planning Resolution # 16-2011, on the date of said meeting, determined that the GCNTMP addresses the sustainability of a vital transportation characteristic of the Moab area and is necessary in an effort to provide alternate transportation opportunities that will reduce the environmental impacts in developed as well as undeveloped areas of the county. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MOAB PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOAB, UTAH, THAT the Commission favorably recommends that the Moab City Council consider the proposed Trail Plan as an essential element of the General Plan and that it is in conformance with the stated goals and objectives of the General Plan. PASSED AND ADOPTED by action of the Moab Planning Commission in open session this day of , 2011. Kelly Thornton, Chair pAplanning department\2011\pc resolutions\I6-2011 gcntmp amendmentdocx GRAND COUNTY NON•MOTORIZED TRAILS MASTER PLAN 201 1 PREVIOUS VERSIONS ADOPTED IN 2005 & 2008 i 7-8 Table of Contents Non -motorized Trails Master Plan Partners iv Introduction 1 Background 1 Vision 2 Mission 2 Guiding Principles 2 Purpose and Scope 3 The Trails 3 Definitions 3 Standards 3 Users 4 Development Process 5 Grand County, Moab City, Private Land 5 Bureau of Land Management 5 U.S. Forest Service 5 School Institutional Trust Lands Administration 5 Plan Update 6 Goals and Recommendations 6 ii 7-8 Table of Contents continued Table - TRAILS MATRIX Explanation of Trails Matrix 7 1. Matrix of approved, unsigned, and pending trails 8-14 Figures - MAPS and TRAIL LISTS 1. Grand County Regional Overview Map Index and status of land 15 Summary of Regional Maps 16 Explanation of Trails Depicted on Regional Maps 17 2. Trails and land status in the Book Cliffs region 18-19 3. Trails and land status in the Monitor & Merrimac region 20-21 4. Trails and land status in the Klondike -Sovereign region 22-23 5. Trails in the Arches National Park region 24-25 6. Trails and land status in the Yellow Cat region 26-27 7. Trails and land status in the Castle Valley region 28-29 8. Trails and land status in the Cisco-Westwater region 30-31 9. Trails and land status in the Gemini & Canyonlands region 32-33 10. Trails and land status in the Behind The Rocks region 34-35 11. Trails and land status in the Slickrock-Mill Creek region 36-37 12. Trails in the North Moab Recreation Area 38-39 13. Trails and land status in the La Sal Mountains region 40-41 14. Location of detailed inset maps in the Moab -Spanish Valley region 42-43 15. Trails in the Moab City 1 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region 44-45 16. Trails in the Moab City 2 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region 46-47 17. Trails in the Spanish Valley 1 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region 48-49 18. Trails in the Spanish Valley 2 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region 50-51 19. Trails in the Spanish Valley 3 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region 52-53 20. Trails in the Spanish Valley 4 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region 54-55 21. Trails in the Spanish Valley 5 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region 56-57 22. Map showing the BLM Recreation Focus Areas 58 iii 7-8 GRAND COUNTY NON -MOTORIZED TRAILS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS Government Agencies Bureau of Land Management Canyonlands Natural History Association Grand County Grand County Recreation Special Service District Grand County Transportation Special Service District Grand County Travel Council Moab City National Park Service San Juan County School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) Sovereign Lands U.S. Forest Service Utah Department of Transportation Utah State Parks Private Partners Bikes Belong Colorado Plateau Mountain Biking Association (COPMOBA) International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) Lower Utah Nordic Alliance Moab Friends For Wheelin' Moab Trails Alliance (MTA) Red Rock Four Wheelers Ride With Respect Southeastern Utah Backcountry Horsemen iv 7-8 Grand County Non -Motorized Trails Master Plan Introduction An integrated and environmentally sound network of trails for non -motorized use is beneficial to the future well being of Grand County and its communities. Trails help to tie a community together in both a physical and a cultural sense while offering outdoor opportunities for residents and the many visitors upon which much of today's economy is based. Recognizing the value of non -motorized trails, Grand County established the Grand County Trail Mix Committee (Trail Mix) in 2000 to serve as an advisory committee to the Grand County Council on non -motorized trail issues. The Trail Mix Committee created the Grand County Non -motorized Trails Master Plan, and has the responsibility for continuing its development. A trails inventory is included along with future trail development possibilities. Trail Mix is primarily funded by Grand County and holds monthly meetings which are open to the public. Trail Mix is comprised of volunteer trail advocates, a paid trail coordinator and paid trail specialists, and representatives from local government and land agencies. During the meetings non -motorized trail issues are discussed, trails are proposed, priorities are set, and trail work is scheduled. Hikers, bikers, equestrians and skiers represent the non - motorized users, along with our Moab Trails Alliance (MTA) partner, a 501(c) 3 non-profit. MTA, funded by local businesses and private donors, has written numerous grant proposals on behalf of Trail Mix and Grand County and has raised money used to match grants for trail development. Background Grand County is in southeastern Utah and encompasses an area of about 3,694 square miles with a population of approximately 9,700 residents. It is the heart of canyon country with its spectacular rock formations, miles of canyons, the Colorado River, and many mesas. Moab is the county seat with approximately 5,200 residents followed by Castle Valley with approximately 400 and Thompson with approximately 40. (Source: Utah Demographic and Economic Analysis). Since it's settling in the late 1880's, Moab grew into a booming mining town peaking in the 1950's when the uranium market opened up. This remote desert region was explored by any means possible from foot to seismic truck and much of the trail network today is the result of those labors. Since the late 1980's, Grand County's economy has come to rely in part, on the recreation industry, in which non -motorized trails play a vital role. Non - motorized trails also help make Grand County an enjoyable place to live and visit. These trails connect neighborhoods, schools, businesses and recreation areas and provide access to the county's abundant public lands. i Vision To develop a fully integrated network of environmentally sustainable trails for non -motorized use that will link the Moab Valley to other areas in Grand County. Such a trail system offers residents and visitors alternatives for travel throughout the county on foot, bicycle, or horseback while they commute to work or school or as they enjoy the many outdoor recreational opportunities the county has to offer. Mission To preserve and develop the individual trails that are growing into a non -motorized, integrated trail network providing convenient, enjoyable recreation and transportation experiences for all trail users throughout Grand County. Guiding Principles Trails are important to the economy and play an important role in the responsible use of natural resources ■ Non -motorized trails are a key component of the local economy. ■ Education of trail users is an essential element in resource protection. ■ A planned trail system minimizes damage to the environment. Trails are important to livable neighborhoods and a vibrant business community ■ Trails provide an altemative to motorized roadways. ■ Trails connect businesses, parks and create access to public lands. ■ Trails connect neighborhoods to schools. The Trail Mix Committee supports the Safe Routes to School Program. ■ Trails promote health, recreation and increase the quality of life. Trails are viewed as part of a total, integrated transportation system ■ Trails and pathways link the community through the use of commuter trails and is a Trail Mix priority. ■ The transportation system includes connectivity of recreational trails to each other, and to the community. ■ Private and public sectors must work together to minimize trespassing and promote respect for public and private property. Trails are properly designed to achieve a successful trail system ■ Trail design must consider multiple user groups such as cyclists, hikers and equestrians, and minimize conflicts between different trail users. ■ Proper design includes consideration of grades, widths, sight distances, vertical clearance, safety and sustainability. ■ Proper design minimizes the effects on wildlife, the environment, and cultural resources. ■ Well -planned and signed trails along with access points to public lands are essential to an effective trail system. The entire trail system must be properly maintained to keep it viable ■ Maintenance must involve the users to promote ownership of the trail system. ■ Maintenance includes improving drainage, minimizing erosion, rerouting when necessary, and keeping trails free of inappropriate debris. ■ A well maintained trail system emphasizes safety and pride in our community. 2 7-8 Purpose and Scope The Grand County Non -motorized Trail Master Plan (The Trails Master Plan) provides a blueprint for an integrated trail system by cataloging the county's existing trails and by identifying strategic locations for future trail development. An integrated trail network promotes safety, reduces conflicts, better connects schools, neighborhoods and businesses, and encourages outdoor activities. The plan strives to make trails an integral part of the community by preserving access to public lands and accommodating a variety of users. The Trails Master Plan proposes an easily navigable, logically connected network of trails that spread trail use throughout Grand County. This includes shared access where appropriate. Trail Mix strives to promote non -motorized trails without taking away motorized trail opportunities. The Trails Master Plan includes both a "Trails Matrix" and "Trail Maps". The Trails Matrix serves as an alphabetical list or index of all trails included in the plan, and also categorizes each trail as; "Approved", "Unsigned" or "Pending". Trail maps divide Grand County into 13 regions for ease of use. Because of proximity, certain trails that extend into adjacent areas of San Juan County are included in the Trails Master Plan. Trails Definitions Roads - The Grand County Transportation Inventory shows both paved and unpaved roads within the county. For the non -motorized user groups, the following categories are used in The Trails Master Plan: • Shared Routes - All designated roads, except the Interstate Highways are legal for non motorized use. Some of these roads may have signage alerting drivers that non motorized users may be present. • Bike Lanes Bike lanes are painted and signed routes on paved roads adjacent to vehicle lanes. Pathways - Pathways (paths) are typically non -motorized routes in high -traffic areas. Paths are created wide enough (48-120 inches) for users to pass each other with ease and open to all non -motorized traffic unless otherwise posted. (Those with disabilities are allowed on pathways with motorized vehicles.) • Paved — Pathways (paths) are typically surfaced with asphalt or concrete and separated from roadways. • Natural Surface — Primitive dirt trails or paths surfaced with materials such as wood chips, gravel, or road base (anything other than asphalt or concrete) and separated from roadways. Singletrack - A singletrack trail requires users to travel in single file. The trail is typically a natural surface and 12 to 36 inches wide. There are three types of single-track: • Motorcycle - Some singletrack trails are open and legal for motorcycle use and are also used by non - motorized users. An example is the Sovereign Trail System. • Non -Motorized - Singletrack open to non -motorized users: bicycle, horse, and foot traffic. • Hiking and Equestrian - Singletrack trails are generally open to both horse and foot traffic. Standards Government agencies have adopted trail standards that apply to trail development within their jurisdiction. Standards developed by the International Mountain Biking Association and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (ASSHTO) may be used as a resource for future trail development 3 Users Shared use: While the non -motorized users of the trails in Grand County are diverse, they can be grouped into the categories of hikers, pedestrians, cyclists, equestrians, and cross country skiers. Each group has its own view of what constitutes a quality trail experience. In some cases this creates conflicts, some of which can be resolved by designating certain trails for a specific user group, or building new trails for a specific user group. Taking multi -use trails and limiting their use to one group is not a preferred approach. Where limited resources must be shared, cooperation and tolerance among groups is promoted. Economic benefits from non -motorized users: Hiking and sightseeing in the National and State Parks brings tourists by the thousands to enjoy our beautiful scenery. Cyclists are drawn to the mountain bike trails and slickrock and road cyclists enjoy miles of challenging rides. Cyclists have created many special events that draw tourists to Grand County. Runners and equestrians also have created special events that draw thousands of tourists to the area. Hikers Grand County offers not only some of the most unique vistas in the world but also affords the visitor and resident the opportunity to get "up close and personal" with the environment. The difficulty of hiking trails ranges from easy to extremely challenging. The hiking environment ranges from desert, to canyon, to mountaintop. A hiker's trail experience typically includes time to enjoy the environment and scenery away from an urban setting, as well as a chance for exercise, and perhaps a challenge. While hikers are not legally restricted to staying on trails, cross-country travel adds extra environmental impact. Pedestrians A pedestrian's experience typically includes a desire for exercise or to get from one place to another without dealing with traffic. Pedestrians require a network of in -city and county trails that offer access to businesses, schools, and public lands. Cyclists Grand County has some of the most diverse cycling opportunities in the nation. Both mountain bikers and road cyclists have trails and pathways available, ranging from easy to difficult. The availability of a variety of trails offers both residents and visitors many opportunities for fitness, sightseeing and enjoying some of nature's greatest wonders. A mountain biker's trail experience typically includes the desire for routes not shared with motorized users. Many mountain bikers prefer singletrack trails. A road cyclist desires well maintained roads, paths, and respectful vehicles, along with safe routes while covering a significant number of miles at a fair pace. Equestrians While equestrians may ride legally on most of our public lands without restrictions, many riders prefer established trails that are signed. Favorite trail rides that begin near Ken's Lake are; the Red Rock Trail and the Johnson's Up - On -Top area. Elsewhere, the Onion Creek Bench area is also popular, as are the La Sal Mountains in the summer. Some equestrian's prefer longer trails to test the endurance of horse and rider. An endurance ride event is scheduled each October. Cross -Country Skiers The Lower Utah Nordic Alliance (LUNA) was established in December 2006. Volunteers in partnership with the Forest Service, help to set and groom the X-Country ski trails in the La Sal Mountains throughout the winter. Both locals and tourists enjoy the winter activities. 4 7-8 Development Process Trail Mix developed the Trails Master Plan over a multi -year period by meeting with the public, numerous agencies and organizations, and Grand County officials. The Trails Master Plan is based on an evaluation of existing trails and an estimation of future trail needs. When prioritizing trail development, the Trail Mix Committee strives to: (1) include a variety of trails to satisfy all skill levels of trail users, and (2) establish connectivity within the City, Spanish Valley and the backcountry. Trails proposed in the Trails Master Plan are voted on by members of the Trail Mix Committee. The Trail Mix Committee votes on trails during the Trails Master Plan process and again when the Committee identifies trails for prioritization and development. Grand County, Moab Citv and Private Land: The Trail Mix Committee emphasizes the need to respect the rights of private property owners while taking into account the legitimate public need for safe trail routes throughout the community and access to public lands. When a proposed trail crosses Grand County or Moab City owned land, or when a public trail is proposed across private property, then the Committee will follow County or City procedures to obtain approval for the proposed trail. Easements for trails across private property are preferred, but other agreements can be acceptable. The Committee will work with the land manager or developer to select a trail alignment that will meet the needs of all parties. Bureau of Land Management: The Trail Mix Committee works within framework of the 2008 Bureau of Land Management's Resource Management Plan (RMP). Hiking, Biking, and Equestrian "Focus Areas" were created for specific trail users. In addition to the Focus Areas, the RMP stipulates that 50 miles of new hiking trails may be developed, and that 150 miles of new biking trails may be built. After approval, trails may be added within BLM managed Focus Areas or other BLM lands. All trails proposed on BLM managed lands must meet the requirements set forth by the BLM, including environmental and cultural reviews, and public notice. All trail additions and changes will be documented by the Trail Mix Committee, and added as amendments when the Trails Master Plan is updated during the periodic amendment process. US Forest Service: The Trails Master Plan includes many trails suggested for inclusion in the Forest Service Non -motorized Travel Plan that is currently under development and review. After public hearings and environmental reviews the trails selected will be built starting in 2012. Adding new trails after the Non -motorized Travel Plan is implemented will be reviewed in special circumstances. SITLA (State Institutional Trust Lands Administration): Trails often cross a combination of federal, state, and private lands. Trail Easements or Right of Entry agreements are required when crossing SITLA property. A trail easement is typically held by the City of Moab, Grand County, or a Federal agency. When a trail requires an easement, the Trail Mix Committee will follow the procedures set by the agency who will acquire the easement. For example; at a Grand County Council meeting the Trail Mix Committee requests that the County accept a trail easement. If the Council agrees to assume the responsibility for the easement, then the Trail Mix Committee applies to SITLA to grant the trail easement. Easement trades for trails may occur between agencies. For example; the BLM, when trading easements with SITLA, will typically acquire and hold the easement for the trail requested. 5 7-8 Plan Update An effort has been made to assemble an inventory of designated and approved trails, and those that may be proposed for future development. However, the Trails Master Plan is a "living document' where changes and additions will continue as the plan evolves to meet current and future needs. Trail Mix strives to update the Trails Master Plan every five years. Goals and Recommendations • Involve and Coordinate Partners: As beneficiaries of a trails master plan and the vision of an integrated trail system, local govemment, federal agencies and private citizens will be part of the long term coordination effort. All our partners will be part of the planning, development, implementation, and maintenance of the trails master plan. We continue to foster and maintain an interactive dialog with our established partnerships, while working with other organizations and individuals that have an interest in non -motorized trails. • Create a Method and Means for Maintenance: Establish a viable organizational structure for the maintenance of the paved path network. Consideration should be given to incorporating trails maintenance, or a trail coordinator position into the County Community Development area, or perhaps ultimately create a County Recreation Department that would deal with pathways and tails, as well as with other county recreational activities. In the mean time, consider an "Adopt -a -Mile" program of volunteers for minimal maintenance to the pathways, and contract for work to be done on the more technical maintenance projects. • Acquire easements and Protect Access: The City and County encourage the development of trails and pathways within subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), including the Moab Area Partnership for Seniors (MAPS). Where easements are needed, support from private property owners, the city, county, federal and state land managers is requested when necessary, to implement this plan, especially to retain access to public lands. • Prioritize Connectivity and Create Commuter Paths: Create connectivity for an easily navigated regional trail system. Connectivity includes a priority to gain additional commuter paths, connections between neighborhoods, and access to public lands. "Complete Streets" should be encouraged for all new and improved road projects. Commuter Paths are a priority for safety when traveling to work or school. Desirable connectivity also includes the connection of the dirt trails throughout the County to each other, and back to Moab. Educate citizens of the value of connectivity. • Protect Environmental and Cultural Resources: Continue to clearly sign trails to keep users on the trail, and therefore disturbing the natural setting as little as possible. • Minimize Shared -user Conflicts: As visitation increases, shared use trails have created conflicts between various user groups. We will strive to create separate use trails when appropriate, and educate users that compatible shared -use needs to occur on many of our trails. • Address Overcrowding: Popularity of certain trails such as the National Park hiking trails has created a variety of challenges with seasonal overcrowding. Development of additional designated hiking trails outside of the Parks will help to spread out the hikers. Parking is a problem at Arches National Park and potential shuttle systems are being reviewed The problems of limited parking and the potential damage to the environment due to seasonal overuse is well known at Mill Creek — Power Dam, and solutions are always being considered with no one good solution available at this time. • Create a Variety of Trails: Develop trails for all the non -motorized users. Include trails for all skill levels and with a variety of lengths. Consider constructing additional ADA accessible pathways. • Create More Singletrack Trails: We will continue to develop singletrack trails for all biking skill levels. • Create More Equestrian Trails: Connect the Spanish Trail Arena to public lands. Develop additional marked equestrian trails. • Plan for Adequate Trailhead Requirements: Create trailhead sites to include adequate parking, shuttle van drop off areas, and restroom facilities as needed. 6 Explanation of Trails Matrix • TRAIL NAMES: Listed alphabetically in two categories; 1st section "Approved and Unsigned"; 2nd section "Pending" • PRIMARY NON -MOTORIZED USER: The predominant non -motorized trail user is identified. • MAPS: MAP REGION within the County where the trail is located. • LENGTH: The mileage refers to distances drawn on the map, not the round trip distance for users. • NON -MOTORIZED AND MOTORIZED USERS: These columns identify typical non - motorized users of the trail, including Bike, Hike/Pedestrian, Equestrian, and Skier. The Motorized columns identify the type of motorized user that might be encountered on the trail, such as motorcycles, ATVs or 4x4 vehicles. • BLM — RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOCUS AREAS: Recreation specific Focus Areas were created by the BLM's RMP in 2008. Trails located in Focus Areas are shown in this column. • LAND OWNER OR MANAGER: Private owners or government agencies are listed where each trail is located. • STATUS: The Matrix provides the status (Approved, Pending, and Unsigned) of each trail. ➢ A = "Approved" Indicates that the trail or route designation has been approved by the land owner/manager. ➢ P = "Pending action" Indicates that a trail has been included in the non -motorized trails master plan, and may be in the process of working towards approval. Pending actions might include: Awaiting an appropriate time to submit a proposal to the land owner/manager Proposal of trail plan to land owner/manager Negotiations and route placement with land owner/manager ➢ U = "Unsigned" This term indicates a trail is used by hikers or equestrians, but the trail is not signed. In most cases neither hikers nor equestrians are restricted on public lands. Official trail "approval and designation" may not be appropriate in some cases. When overuse and trail braiding occur, then a trail will be signed and regulated. • COMMENTS: Trail information may be noted in this column. • COLORS: The colors in the Matrix represent the Land Owners and Land Managers. n = BLM n= National Parks n= National Forests n= State n= Moab City / Private n= County / Private 7 7-8 Table 1. Matrix of Approved, Unsigned, and Pending Non -Motorized Trails. Nallaai Park National Forest Bureau of LandManagement iMoab C?y/FMate 181ab _ Count yl/Private Primary Non -Motorized User user group that most frequently uses the trail; Length, refers to distance as drawn, not round trip for a used I 1 I _ 1 1 _ Status, changes from pending to approved as trail are reviewed a approved by controlling owner. Unsi ned bails are hiking and equestrian only routes in use, but not marked. Map Regions fkomororkoi Use umnr than Land Owner/Manager Status Trail Name (alphabetical al habetical order/ P ` Primary Non' Motorized user: Home, sld Home, ld e 'E �s 3 E ,e Y ii, m o m: c I i ug� y Q o r Q> t 3,1 _ 'J 3 a• a C i ao. i s i ,a c a€ t� U � a: i c r a3 V Q rc i 1 Y d a z A. = a i i , 3 t E m e 9 � b • ,I Q m z '5 o _ r ig u� ra I� i ii l k � i yi# F d S i � LL i° 4 6 t ; M ,/ •• ! r` ; is 1z -g O ' o� a j s!� d ci L` +"�3 7 I L gggg i_ B 6 a. Comments Approved or Unsigned 100 North Bike • 0.2 A Bike lane on paved street 100 North to 300 South Bike • 1.1 A Bike lane on paved street 100 West to 200 South Bike • 0.1 A Bike lane on paved street 200 North-200 East Bike • 0.3 A Bike lane on paved street 400 East bike lane Bike • 0.7 A 400 East to 191 Bike • 0.3 • A Bike lane on paved street 500 W-400 N-100 W Bike • 1.5 A Bike lane on paved street 600 West bike Zang Bike • 0.7 A Add bike lane when repaved Aka/a Soo Troll - Hike 5.8 A Canyonlands NP Allan Troll Bike • _ 0.8 • • • • A Amass Bock Bike• 4.9 • • A All on 4x4 road Anonymous Park Connectors Hike • 0.1 • • A Anonymous Park Trail Bike • 0.8 • • A : Ott of 500 West Arch TIRO Anh's Caner Bike 0.7 •• A MolorcydeSingletrack Bike 1.5 • • A Ariic thrlio Td Hike• 0.8 _ A Canyonlands NP Baby.Sisl e. Bike _ 2.1 A Technical trails off the Loop Bea Sipe �� Bike 10.8 • A Pan of route shared with motors Bachelor Bask: Hike• 2.7 • • • .1 A Used by motorized vehicles Badlands Bike 0.2 A Motorized singletrack Bar-B Bike 2.2 • • y A Bat-M PHI Bike 0.4 A Singletrack near cliff edge Bap Cutoffs Bike 0.3 A Shortened loop Bar-M Loop Bike 8.0 • • • • • A Bar-M Mt Bike Focus Area, 4x4 road Bartlett Wash Slinkroek Bike 2.6 • •• A Beginners Loop Ski• 0.3 A Winter only Big pNef Bike 4.2 A Boron Mesa Troll Bike i• 1.0 A ; Mantl La Sal BrokenArrh.720 Hike 1• 1.3 • A Arches NP Branco 1 Horse 1.2 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Bronco 2 Horse 1.6 • • • • • A Needs signs Endurance Riders trail Bronco Horse 3.0 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Bronco Horse 2.3 •J • • • • A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Bronco-Deadmen Pt Horse 3.5 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Branco -Spring Cyn Horse 4.7 A ; Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Buckskin 1 Hose 0.4 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders bail Buckskin 2 Horse 1.5 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Buckskin 3 Horse 2.0 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Buckskin 4 Horse 0.8 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders bail Buckskin 5 Horse 0.4 A Needs signs-Enduronce Riders bail Buckskin 8 Horse 8.5 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders bail Buckskin 7 Horse 2.0 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Buckskin 8 Horse 1.5 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders bail Buckskin -Bronco Horse 1.0 •A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Bull Run Bike 5.1 : A M Burro PI Trail Bike 4.2 • • •l A Monti La Sol Camp Leg.1 Horse 1.1 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Carnp Log 2 Horse 1.0 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Camp Trier ile Horse 1.1 A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Cs/Center Basin Trail Bike• 3.7 • • A May be shared with motors w/ FS trail plan Castleton to Adobe Hike 5.0 A Caslleton Tower v Hike 1.6 U Climber's approach trail arclo-O Bike 2.9 • A Lark Lake Troll Bike• 2.2 • • A Mang La Sal Colo R Bike Bridge/Lions Park Bike 0.1 • • A Under construction Cob R Hwy Bridge Underpass(N) Bike 0.3 • • A Paved in 2010 Cob Rr Bridge Underpass(S) Bike 0.3 • • A Payed in 2010 Capper Rec. Dino Track Hike 0.2 A Corona Arch Troll Hike• 1.2 A BLM hiking tail CoudnwM hWash Cow Freckle Cow Trail saws Negro Bill CralerVieW Trail Hike 5.2 A Un-marked route in canyon Bike 2.0 A Motorized &notebook Hike 3.0 • • • U In use. Unmarked route. Hike 0.7 A Canyonlands NP Gown Fool Hike• 0.4 • • A Crystal Geyser Bike 4.0 • A Motorcycle Singletrack Culvert r Cany Hike• 3A U Propose for approval and signing CW-1 Bike 0.6 A Motorcycle Singletrack CW-2 Bike 6.0 A Motorcycle Singletrack CW-3 Blke 6.6 A Motorcycle Singletrack a 7-8 Table 1. Matrix of Approved, Unsigned, and Pending Non -Motorized Trails. National Park !National Forest (Bureau of Land Management (Moab Cky/Private [Slate Count !Private Primary Non -Motorized User. user group that most frequently uses the trail; Length, refers to distance as drawn, not round trip for a user, I I I I I II Status, changes from pending to approved as trails are reviewed 8 approved by controlling owner. Unsigned balls are hiking and equestrian only routes in use, but not marked. Trail Name (alphabetical order) ICW.4 CW-5 CW-e CW-7 CW 8 -Dark Angel . Day Canyon Trail Dead Haw Hiker Deadmen's Ridge Doe Flat Troll Deep Creek Trail Delicate Arch Trill Delicate Arch Ykdw. 4[v6s Garddn TrOr Doe Cenyan Trill DoObl►'lkhat Troll DPW& ONO Drive -In Hill pry Fork -Beaver Basin Troll Duma Mine Cutoff EKG Endure Loop Eaueslrlan So. MITI Ck EgrrWrianMAE Fells Loop Trail [Kens Lake] F' Furnhw Fisher Mew-BLM Fisher Mew-USFS Fisher Towers Trail Flat Pass Funnel Arph Gemini Bridges Gemini Bellow Below Gemini Bridges -East Gemini BrldgeFWest Geyser Pass Lapp Geyser Pass Rood Gild Bar Carryon Gild Bar Singletrack Gild Basin Trail Cory'. Trill Hazzard County Hell Canyon Trill Hey Joe Hidden Advanced Hidden Valley Trail Kph School -Pack Ck Hlghdred to MITI Crook Hospital Trail Hunter Rim to Pritchett Arch Hunters Canyon Rim Trail Hunters Canyon Trail IMy 128 Bike Path -Phase 1 Hey 128 Bike Pelh-Phase 2 14ro 128 Biko PeUI-Phase 3 Hwy 128 Underpass -Lions Pk Hwy 313 bike lane• Ida Gulch Erpmsldan _Inlrapld .- Jackson. Ladder Jackson. Trail _ Jodi Slicluock Jewel Tibbetts Arch Trail Johnsonn Up On Top MIII Cyr Johnsons-Up-On-Top Trails Juniper Camp Trail Juniper Trall Killer B. lOo dlko Bluffs (SIPS) Klondike Bluffs Trail K :II T�I Primary Non - Motorized User: Bike, Hike, Horse, Ski yyO 3 4 LY U e Y elap Raab,. a V 2� Y v =nr.carrm, rsrr ,A71.ffi:mT t�irar-�ax;�tio- Q a 4 =LIM Bike 6.5 Nan-Melerkad Uaer w 8 5 S W in 4161•1111.1 Wes 5� i J Lard Owns/Manager crn=1= s ECM- r. 9 e u° 2> a Status Bike Blke Bike Bike Hike Hike Hike Bike 10.9 0.4 0.2 1.8 OA 4.6 6.7 3.1 x k 2 Comments A Molcroyde Singletrack A Motorcycle Singletrack A A A Motwcyc a Sirgletrack MacroyKa SlrepeUack Motorcycle Singletrack A Arches NP U Unmarked. On old cattle ball A A i Bike Hike Hike 1 0.3 3.6 1.6 A A A Motorized Singletrack Manti La Sal Arches NP Hike 0.3 A Arches NP Hike 5.1 A Arches NP Horse Hike Hike Horse Hike Bike Bike Bike Horse Horse Hike Hike Bike Bike Hike Bike Hike Hike Hike Bike Bike Ski Ski Hike Bike Sld Bike Bike Bike Hike 2.0 0.3 100tt 0.3 2.5 0.6 3.8 9.0 4.4 3A 1.5 0.9 9.6 1.9 3.9 9A 0.3 0.3 0.7 7.5 5.8 A A A U A A A A A U A A A A A A U A U A A Manti La Sal Arches NP Arches NP In use. Seek owner approval Manti La Sal Motorized Singletrack Motorized Singletrack Approved except Ihru private land Contact owner and utility company Arches NP BLM trail All on designated 4x4 roads From mad to bridges -hiking only On closed road in canyon All on designated 4x4 roads All on designated 4x4 roads 1.8 3.2 1.6 1.0 1.8 A A U A A Winter only Winter only Now separate trail from Culvert Winter oNy Horse Hike Bike Hike Hike Hike Bike Hike Bike Bike Bike Bike Bike Horse 7.6 1.2 1.9 3.4 4.5 2.3 01 0.4 0.3 1.5 1.6 1.6 0.9 0.7 1.4 0.1 23.1 10.1 A A A U A A A A A U A U A A A A A A Motorized Singletrack Loop -some on road Needs Sons -Endurance riders trail Connects to Moab Rim 4x4 road Hlah school access Connects to 4x4 road to Pritchett A. Canyon hike w/ water Partial funding Construct 2011-12 Striped and signed as a bike lane 1 Bike Hike Bike Bike Hike Hike Horse Hike Bike Bike Hike Bike Blke 0.8 0.2 2.0 1.1 1.6 0.7 10.0 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.4 6.9 171.1 • A A A A A U U U A A Connect to Amasa Back Connect to Amass Back Free -riding area approved with RMP New BLM trail In use. Work w/developer for provd. Sand Flats Rec Area Motorized Skkyeback A Mostly on deeionated roads 9 National Park Table 1. Matrix of Approved, Unsigned, and Pending Non -Motorized Trails. !National Forest rureau of Land Management !Moab CkyPrivete �81010 County/PrNI to 1 Ll Status, changes from pending to approved as hails are reviewed 8 approved by controlling Mina. Unsigned trails are hiking and equestrian only routes in Use, but not marked. Primary Non -Motorized User, user group that most frequently uses the trail' Length, refers to distance as drawn, not round trip for a user, 1 1 1 Primary Non - Motorized Trail Name Ufef1 Bike, Hike, (alphabetical order ; Hone, ski a :Is `o a. 2 5 Y Map Repbne i 5 w a Ne-Malaind Urar man E9lLd:G!!711V1 M M 3 Lake Loop {Kens Lake] Lathrop Troll . Lary. BZ Lazy Men Little Canyon Singlelrack LIW° Sally Long Branch. Lrngbow Trull Lower M 8 M LPS LPS4vcleh LPSSand'Flat #4rys Trail Mel Made Trail Matheson Preserve nMeGlll-MMda Mega BhePe Mee Loop Mere Arch Tried Mill Crook Canyon Mill Crook Cyn - No. Fork Mill Crook Drive Mill Crook Horse Access MITI Creek Parkway Mill Creek Rim Trail Mill Creek Wm•Powardam Trail Miliaria Trail Miners Basin Hike Hike Hike Bike _ Bike Bike _ Bike Bike Hike Bike Bike Bike Bike Bike Hike Hike Bike Bike Bike Hike Hike Hike Bike Horse Hike Hike Hike Bike Hike Hike Bike Bike Bike Bike Bike Hike Horse Horse Horse Horse Bike Hike Hike Hike Hike Hike Bike Horse Hike Hike Horse Hike Hike Bike Hike Bike Bike Bike Hike Hike Bike Horse Bike Bike Bike Bike Bike Hike Bike Bike Hike Moab Canyon Trull Moab Rlm Moab Rim Spur Molitor MMTIM8C ..._ AgonHpFk. Meadows Trail MM View Ikwtwrg 1 Mustang 2 Malang 3 Muslnna 4 N. Hwy 191 Bike Lard Nsveio Arch Nolo Ridge North Nay* Rldse Sle9s4A111 Canyon NeckSprhy Tral I Nalg_roBillCanyon Trail North 40 Onion Creek Benches Troll Olho Access/Spring Cyn Olho Arch Trail Pack Creek Park Avwte Parried Mesa Petrified Forest Pine Trott Arch Pinnacle Trail Ppe Drosm-BLM Plea DreamSI71.A PK Lane to Rim Pocket Bridge Trail ',Prison Spider Pole Carryon Troll Porcupine Rim Trail Porcupine to Mel Marlin Portal Trail Pothole Arch Tull Powerilne Road Pritchett Arch Trull Pritchett Canyon ,PDtramid Trail RattinnekQ Trdl 6 1.7 0.2 5.2 i 2 O W e i i g 1 Land Owner/Manager LL 3 O 9 �Il U u 0 S Status 2.8 0.3 2.2 1.7 1.0 0.7 4.9 1.8 0.5 0.2 3.8 5.0 0.8 0.6 3.2 26.6 0.4 4.6 0.4 0.6 0.1 1.2 2.1 0.7 1.5 4.1 4.3 8.7 4.2 0.8 7.8 1.5 0.5 0.3 4.4 5.8 0.4 1.8 0.3 0.2 0.3 5.6 2.2 4.0 1.4 0.9 0.5 4.7 0.9 4,0 0.3 0.2 0.4 6.0 1.6 0.2 1.3 9.0 3.0 13.9 3.8 2.2 1.1 1.1 0.5 19.0 3.1 24.3 I L Eel 'RSR Comments A A Arches NP A , CarlyoNands NP A A LPS retum rode on road A A A U A A A A Entry to LPS from Sand flats A Motorized Singietrack U A Pedestrians only - No pelq no bikes A Bike lane on paved street A A Motorcycle SIngletrack A Canyonlands NP U U Continues on Rill to Mill A Bike lanes each side A A A A A Managed by DOE A Mantl La Sal U Ends at Amasabedc 4x4 road A A All on designated 4x4 roads A All on designated 4x4 roads A All on designated 4x4 roads A Manti La Sal A Mantl La Sal A Needs signs -Endurance riders troll A Needs signs -Endurance riders trail A Needs signs -Endurance riders trail A Needs elgns-Endurance riders trail A Bike Lane bridge to 500W-West side of 191 A Arches NP A A�.-�....-, A Cayonlzds NP A No horses A Easement A U From Wag Canyon jMill CI¢ U Spur off Rill to Mill A A Arches NP U A Motorized Singlehack A Arches NP A Motorized Sirgietrack A A County easement U U A NI an designated 4x4 roads A Mang La Sal A 3.18 mi Single track A On road A A U Utility company easement A Hiking from Pritchett 4x4 road A NI on designated 4x4 roads A A 10 7-8 Table 1. Matrix of Approved, Unsigned, and Pending Non -Motorized Trails. National Pork iNetio rgrst 'oroalF 'Bureau of LandManagement 'Moab Clry/Pr:vate IStale 7N11111MINNE.. 'Coun /Private Primary Non -Motorized User user group that most frequently uses the trail; Length, refers to distance as drawn, not round trip for a user, I I I I I 1 I _ Status, changes from pending to approved as trails are reviewed 8 approved by contro ling owner. Unsi ned bails are hiking and equestrian only routes In use, but not marked. rev w ten. .1 non-Nswtei use ww..w„ . Land Owner/Manag_er Status Trail Name Primary Non- Motorized Usar: Bike, Hike, E $ E !e O 8 o e S z m eo o ;' 3 >• 0 'e e g . w b 6 . o r.+e. � V 6ey - a Y 8 5 a i > y w E c c _ $4 13.1 4 s� w N i� 1 i gg g I: 2 m ee a o •�• S' Z m; .2 •' 2 ao a g i= O d rse D"' gill 3. a. = = S g 11 .f ` Comments (alphabetical order) Horse, Ski I s P 4> li rue u l5 2 m i.3 3 li m 3 Rod Butte.-.__ • Bike • 1.4 A Motorized Sirgleback Mad POE Horse Troll Horse • 1.4 A Part of Red Cliffs Ranch Rod Rack Homo Trail Horse • 1.1 • • • • A Needs slim. Some portions on road. Rod Rocks Bike • 1.3 A Motorized Sirgletrack Rod Blot Bike • 0.3 A _ Motorized Sirglelrack Renegade 1 Horse • 4.8 • • • • • • A Needs agns._ durance riders trail Renegade Horse • 3.9 • • • • • • A Needs sirs -Endurance riders trail Rear ds 3 Horse • 1.3 • • • • • • A Needs sirs Endurance riders trail Renegade 4 Horse • 4.8 • • A Needs alerts -Endurance riders trail Renseado 5 Horse • ' 0.8 • A Needs shins -Endurance riders trail Renegade Cutoff i Horse • 1.4 • • • • • • A Needs ggrs-Endurance riders trait Renegade -Mustang Horse • 6.7 • • • • • • A Needs sn}wEndurance riders trail Richardson Amphitheater Loop Hike • 2.9• A Richardson Anvil -North Loop Hike • 2.9 • • • A MI to MITI (Traded Hike •6.1 • U Mickley Trail{Kens LORI Hike 0.5• A Rocki)•A Bike • 1.5 A Rx7ulecker Bike •1.6 • A Rotary Pork Hike 0.1 • A Connect to Parkway Rudy Spur Bike • 1.6 A San Miguel to Mill Crook Dr Bike 0.3 A Blkeyath thruprvate Sand Drag Arch Trail Hike • 0.5 A Arches NP Sege Panel Hike • 250 ft A Seven Mlle -Lower Hike • 1.5 U Sevenmile Canyon -North Fork Hike •2.3 • U Sevonmlle Canyon -South Fork Hike •3.9 U Trail on 4x4 road south of 313 Shuman Gulch Trail Bike •1.6 • A Monti La Sal SiciAtto Arch Trait Hike • 0.4 A. Arches NP S9ckrock Acton Bike •. 1.5 • • • • A __ On designated 4x4 road SllckrockTrail Bike • 9.8 1 A Seidl tirade Bike • 0.4 • A Motorized Skge0/eta South Johnson Ly_On Top: Horse • 2.2 • • • • • • • U In use. Development mg limit. South Mountain Trail Hike •9.7 • A Mend La Sal Sovereign Sinddracks Bike • 18.3 • A Built primariry for motorcycles Spring Canyon- Mill Creek Hike •O.g A Ucense sgdement with owner Slate Forest/li & Track Bike • 12.7 • A Primarily for motorcycles Sled Bender Bike •5.9 A All on designated 4x4 roads Sleeleender Accou Hike • 2.6 U Steve MITI Creek Hike 0.1 • A Syndfno Loop Trail Hike • 7.6 A Cany01 ands NP The Other Geyser Bike • 0.2 A Motorcycle Sirglstrack The Thumb Bike • 0.7 A Motorcycle Slrgletreck Thomson Singlotrack None • 33.3 • A Motorcycle Singletrack Tombstone Trail Hike • 1.1 • • • A Tower Arch trail Hike • 1.3 A Arches NP Trens•La Sal Trail Bike • 16.8 • • • A Monti La Sal Tukuniklvlsta Arch Hike • 1.4 U Tunnel Aroh Hike • 0.1 • A Arches NP UFO Bike • 1.5 A Upheaval Cahyrs: Trail Hike • 3.6 A Canyonlands NP UPS Bike • 1 A A Mad La Sal Wall Troll Hike 2.0 U Route shortened fort) 2008 MP West 400 N Bike • 0.5 A Bike Zane on paved street WeslwatesUOT(hike) Hike • 0.6 U Whale Rock Trail Hike • 0.5 A Arches NP White Rim Bike • 68.5 • A On road in Canyonlands NP Wild Horse 1 Horse • 9.9 • • • •- A Needs signs -Endurance Riders trail Wild Horse 2 Horse • 3.2 • • • • • • A Needs signs-Endurarxe Riders bail Wilhite Trail Hike • 5.5 A Canyonlands NP Windows Loop Hike • 1.0 A Arches NP Pending 200 South Spur Bike • 0.1 P Negotiate w/properly owner 48 horns of Mario Bike • 11.0 • P . A-1 Connect Bike 0.5 P Contact properly owner Above the G Bike 0.7• P Adobe Mesa Hike • 1.8 P New hiking trail proposed to Forest Adobe-Fishor Rim Bike • 31.1 • • P Manti La Sal /uteri Connector Bike • 0.6 • • • • P Needs striping -San Juan County Adri rTrecteay Hike • 0.5 P New trill to dine tracks Antiquity Lane J Bike _ 0.1 • • • • P Contact property owners 11 7-8 Table 1. Matrix of Approved, Unsigned, and Pending Non -Motorized Trails. Nallonal Park !National Forest l9uimau of. Land Manapeminl 'Moab Cky/Pmete !State _ County/Private _ Primary Non -Motorized User, user group that most frequently uses the trail. Length refers to distance as drawn, not round trip for a user, I I 1 L I1II Status, changes from pending to approved as trails are reviewed 8 approved by controlling owner. Unsigned bails are hiking and equestrian only routes in use, but not marked. Trail Name (alphabetical order) Primary Non - Motorized User: Bike, Hike, Horse, Skl 0 m c a i Y 2 0 II, Resigns ^-mr.=rnrE K E9=!E IIIPi Arbor Connect Bike UMr Nal-Wrier Usr 2 m 0.3 • • 3 lark. User, f t S F 1t i_LU Lend Owner/Ma r :Rtrm��r�m S s 6 Status P Contact owners Comments Arches Dr Connect Aron North Connect Around Boron _ Bachelor to Horse_ Bakf•Hazzerd Loop Bartlett Spur Beaver to Manna Bike Horse _ Bike Hike Bike Bike Hike 0.3 0.4 3.2 0.7 2.1 0.05 1.4 P Contact home owners Contact land owners Manti La Sal Manti La Sal Manti La Sal Contact property owners Beeman Lane Blg Bald Horse Big Mesa Sr/Akita Bg M"s Toe Bingo Bike Bike Bike Bike Bible Lana Boren Masa Hiko Bike Hike Boulder Connect Bike 0.7 5.5 3.2 3.2 4.2 OA 1.2 0.2 P P P P P Contact prapattovners Manti La Sal On 4x4 road to Wlpg Out Hill Contact awnwers Mani' La Sal Contact owners Bowing Alley Brinks Spring Trail Bnankrd Arch Brumley Climb Bnmley Ridge Budweiser to Shumway Bull•7 Loop MelMendal_Pli t}, Burrs To Moms Bike Bike Hike Hike Hike Bike Bike Bike Hike 1 0.1 0.6 0.2 2.7 7.1 0.9 2.0 2.1 1.0 P P P P P P P P P Canted owners Manti La Sal Manti La Sal Manti La SN Contact pmparbr owners Mani' La Sal Monti La Sal Charlie' Trail Bike 0.2 P Charlottes Edge Hike 2.6 P Chile to Sbstm Chile Trail Conservancy Connector 1 Bike Bike Bike 0.5 1.1 0.1 P P P Propose to owners CsnnrW a Orrick mu9raeese b arms Conservancy Connector 2 Coppsr SINtafrsdC Dava's Trail Dorn Duchesne Easement Trail Bike Bike Hike Hike , Bike Bike 0.3 1.9 0.5 5.5 0.1 0.3 P P P P P P Old Senior Center Trail -contact owner Manti La Sal On City aasement77 East Bench Rd Horse 1.2 P Elk Mtn Mission Trail Equostrton Highway 191 Flsher-Adobe Singletrack Fisher Mesa•USFS Fogg Trail Geyser Rd Geyser Rd-2 Gold Basin Trail Gold Knob Golf Spur Goose Island Overlook Great EicaW Grubstake Heather Lana Heather to Fogg Hecle-Holyoak Connector Hidden Canyon Rim Hideout Highland Trail Holynek Hoodoo Trail Horse Croak 1� 191 Bike Lane If I'd Known It Was Them (IIKIWT) Irdriplda(Mori Homo Addition}, Bike Horse Bike • Bike Horse Blke Bike Hike Hike Bike Hike Bike Bike Horse Horse Bike Bike Bike Horse Bike Hike Bike Bike Bike Bike 0.5 2.0 31.1 1.1 0.4 4.4 10.5 2.1 0.5 0.2 1.2 2.9 4.6 1.9 2.5 0.4 2.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 2.9 1.5 8.2 0.9 6.9 Jackpol Bike 1.6 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Contact home owners i County Contact UDOT Negotiate with property owner Manti La Sal Manti La Sal Manti La Sal Propose to City Negotiate with land goner Contact property owners Contact land owners Wildlife 8 Archaeo Issues -Approval unlikely Contact property owners COmact PrOPerty owner, Rich-Amph Hiking Focus area Manti La Sal Need grant money Contact land owner Park personnel proposing addition Juniper Mesa Trail Hike Jopltors Run Kane Crk Blvd Bike Lane Kane Crk Rd-Crorscreek Kane Crk Rd -Lions Park Path Kayenta Heights Keen Kens Lake Access Bike Bike Bike Hike Horse Bike Horse 1.3 3.8 2.5 0.3 2.7 1A 8.3 0.9 P P P P P P P Would replace Blue Dot Rim Propose to City/County Pending owner approval TNC approval needed Manti La Sal 12 7-8 Table 1. Matrix of Approved, Unsigned, and Pending Non -Motorized Trails. 'National Park-... INslaonatEo-r al 'Bureau of Lard Managamonl "Moab CltyiPrivate ISlela • Countv}/Private Primary Non -Motorized User, user group that most frequently uses the trail. Length, refers to distance as drawn, not round trip for a user, I Status, changes from pending to approved as trails are reviewed 6 approved by controlling owner. Unsi ned bails are h king and equestdan only routes in use, but not marked. Map Repents Nan-awt•ied use e.w. w. Land Owner/Mararr Status Trail Name (alphabetical order) Primary Non- motorized User: Bike, Hike, Horse, Ski yE 'E rt O ..6 o e;: a° z° a o. _ v g IZ iY �' 3• �g > t3 S a5°.yY+ t3 • ,s 3 e � g 5 3 ro r rE # 8 P° u. 'a Zd T. 3* r > ,� - E � � y c 3 w � •� i 4 e w ; tr .72 Iet i l yr 3 7 l m P LL 0. o_ II cR z m z -• . is ig c a• ¢ 3= ; o r O~ 1 y, L, O u f E Lg _ I ,. Y B I I .7` comments I„Kirby Lane Horse l• 0. • • P Aropcve to Cour* and owners _ icenw Bike J 11.2 P Consult RxR for integrating with Sovereign La Sal Bike • 0.1 • • • • • • P Bike lame on paved street La Sal Creek Bike • 1.3 P Mang La Sal Laurol To Horse Bike • 1.8 P Mang La Sal Lens Park -Moab Bike • 1.8 • • P Construct wl new car bridge project Lens Tail Trail Hike 1.6 • P Extension off of NorthShore Lone Mew Bike 9.9 • P Lower Brum* Hike • 1.2 P ManG La Sal MdM Crossover Singlelrack Bike • 2.0 • • we P Meador Drive Bike • 0.3 • • • • • P Propose to developer Meadow View Trail Bike • 0.8 • • • P Medic/no Lake -IHike • 2.2 • • • P Manti La Sal Maas Tracks Hike • 3.6 • P Mew Paint Bike • 1.4 P Mi Vida Bike 2.1 • • • • P Sirgletrack connecting roads Mi Vida Hike Hike • 1.1 P Mill Creek Parkway Extension-E Hike • 1.0 P Contact pram* owner MITI Creak Parkway Extension•W Hike • 0.3 P Contact propertY owner 61oab Rlm Hike Hike • 2,3 P Moonlight to Barrio Bike • 1.3 P Seasonal dosure possible Mud' CoCoivnenien Bike • • 5.7 • • • • • • P Connects Forest trails with BLM focus area Muar rl a 4StimvSL Bike • 18.5 • • P So. Spanish Valley Mtn Bike Focus Area Munsey to Tank Rd Bike • 0.6 P Canted propedy owner Murphy 8 E. Bench Bike Lanes Bike • 3A • • • • P Need easements IL funding(commuter) Murphy Ln Horse Trail Horse • 1,0 . . . P Contact property owners N. Fork Severna* Rim Bike • 2.3 P Navajo Heights Conned Bike 0.7 • • • • • P Contact pmearty owners Nevski Rod* 4 Bike • 12.5 • • P NnrElaWomer -31 Ski • 4.9 P Winter *he North Shore Hike 1.5 • • • P Old City Park bike lane Bike • 0.8 • • • • • • • P Contact City and private owners Old City Park Road Horse • 0.5 • • • owners Onlon Crook Additions Horse • 11.3 • • P Mostly on dosed Rasa Oowah to Loop Road Bike • 2.3 P Manti La Sal Pack Creek Trail Bike • 7.8 • • • P Commuter -contact land owners Park Dr Bike • 135R • • P Goofed Property owners Pipe Dream -Private Bike • 0.7 • • P When development occurs Plateau Circle Bike • 0.6 • • • • • P Contact County and properly owners Plateau Circle Equestrian Horse • 1.0 • • • • P Contact County and property owners Potash Conned Oct Hot 1911 Bike • 0.3 P Propose to BUM 8 UDOT Powerhouse Lane Bike • 0.2 • • P Negotiate with owners 6 City Powodlne Conned* Bike • 4.5 • • • P Propose to County 8 owners Pro -Laurel Hike • 4.2 • P Monti La Sel Radio -Sand Flats Bike • 0.3 • • P RodreckiConnecter Bike • 1.3 • • P Propose to Stale and land ovaws Resource Drive Bike • 0.5 • • • • • P Proposed cross connector Resource Equestrian Horse • 0.6 P Contact land owns* Film Climb Hike • 1.3 P Rim to 191 Bike • 3.0 P NI on 4x4 road Rim Village Bike • 0.3 • • • • • P Propose to developer Roberts-Rimrock Bike • 1.4 • • P Contact County and ProPertY owns* Rocky Road Bike 0.5 • • • P Contact property owners Rolling Stones Loops Bike • 4.2 P Round Monitor Bike • 1.8 P Round The Valley Bike • 15A • P Conned Pipe Dram, Mud Spam, Mill Rim Sege Bike • 0.2 • • • • • • P Bike lane on pored street San Jose Bike • 0.3 • • • • • P Propose to County San Juan Bike • 0.2 • • • P Bike lane an Awed drive Send Flats Slnyelrede Bike • 10.5 • • • P Scenic Snake Single Track Bike • 1.3 • • P Withdrawn -development could charge need Sevon Mile Rim Bike • 5.2 • • • • • P All on 4x4 road Up Bike • 6.3 P 5.1 milu road -1.2 miles singletrack "Seven Seven Up to Switchbacks Bike • 4.3 P 3.4 miles on designated road Sheepherders Bike • 0.7 • • P Monti La Sal a State Forest Shumway Lane Horse • 0.5 • • • • P Contact property rimers Skagway Bike • 2.2 P Slaughter Bike • 5.3 P Monti La Sal Slickrock Access N. Bike • O. P Conte* developer Slickrodt Access S. Bike • 0.5 • • • • • P Contact developer Sllckrock Extension Bike • 2.4 P Propose to BLM 13 7-8 Table 1. Matrix of Approved, Unsigned, and Pending Non -Motorized Trails. Natlond !National Forist IBurwu of.Lannd Maiiapdineril )'Moab Cei /Private keila !Coumy+P to Primary Non -Motorized User, user group that most frequently uses the trail; Length, refers to distance as drawn, not round trip for a user I I i Status, changes from pending to approved as trails are reviewed lk approved by contra ling earner. Unsigned trails are hiking and equestrian only routes In use, but not marked. Map Region* Non -Ablated Um mamma Land Owner/Manager Status Name ` (alphabetical order/ Primary Non- MOLori- User: BIM, HIM, Bike, Ski i E M Ys`� o n I 1 O i GA s d o.z _�• o.i-e'=x$ a 'J > c3 C ,� ?. r u a o o: s T t m rE ; 8 K fi T. T.I ea i 3 f. e > Le i s E 4 _ �_ 3 fi 1 a± C s< r wff ie � Ili gg g i � � C, Q e 6 �$; m a -• t! 6 IeLaTrail i� g�g� �ii 9 �.a. A 8 2 k = E q f •7s Comments Stlalsock to Fins _ _ _ _ _ Bike •0.3 • • • • P Propose to BLM as shared w/motoroye Soyrgn-Norlh Ed- Bike • 2.4 P Primaryy for motorcycled Spanish Trail BIM 2.4 • • • P Propose to County -commuter connect Spanish Trail Rd Horse • 1.0 • • • • ••P Contacl�toperty owners Spanish Valley Dr Horse • 0.9 • • • • P Contactpnpelty owners Spanish Valley Dr. Bike Path Bike 6.5 • • • P Pioposed oammuler 6. 1 Bike • 6.9 • • • • • P Parity on Prison Spider 4x4 road Wave Bypass Bike • 3.6 P Mardi La Sal Squaw Exit Bike •5.1' • P Man& La Sri Starbuck Horse • 0.3 P Contact property demon Steen Trail BIM 3.6 • • P Stocks Dr Connect Bike 1.2 • • • P Propose to County Substation to Bench Trail Bike 0.6 P Contaclkcrpery owners Sun -Power Connect Bike • 02 • • • • • P Propose to owners Super Fun•D Trdl Bike •6.0 P Senklo Plln Terraces Trail Bike 1.2 P Bike •O.B • P Propos, to Foreat Service Thampeor Loops Bike • 13.6 • • • • P -1.6 mi an 4x4 rd•borders with motorcyc le IT Tap Shelf BIM • 1.7 P Manti La Sri Tower Tio Hike •1.3• P Connect Rich-Amphi to Fisher Towers Tuk Tray Hike •2.2 • P Monti La Sal Tusher Carryon East BIM • 2.7• P Tusher Csnyan West Bike • 2,q• P Larder BnsnleY Hike • 2.6 P Monti La Sal Utility Commuter Bike 4.4 P Propose commuter route on gas line Utility Connect Bike 0.4 P Propose to ownera Weyner Bike 0.3 • • • • • P Bike lane on paved street Wasatch Bike 0.1 • P Water Tank Hill Bike 0.2 • • P Propose to City Wi7ar Te*Troll Horse • 0.7 P Propose to developer Wpl 91de Commuter Bike • 4.2 • • P Propose to utility 8 land owners West Spanish Valley Equestrian Horse • 0.9 P W ilbun Way Bike •1.9 • P Williams Way Bike 0.7 • • • • • P Propose to City W,nerap to Conservancy Hike 0.6 • • P Propose to Nature Conservancy Wooklee Wry i Bike • _ _ 2.6 _ _ P . 14 7-8 ODELORME XMap® 5.2 GIS Edito N'\S \ � 5rATE !\ N. \� ���. . r 9 ] C 9 12 IS ..ma 2ow^E3 Data use subject to license. ti DeLorme. XMap1ID 5.2 GIS Editor. www delorme com 15 7-8 Summary of Regional Maps • Book Cliffs The Sego Canyon Trail and the Rattlesnake Canyon trails are located in this region. • Monitor and Merrimac The region includes the BLM designated, Mill Canyon/Upper Courthouse Biking Focus Area (Merrimac and Monitor), the Tusher Slickrock Mountain Bike Focus Area, the Bartlett Slickrock Free Ride Area, the Spring Canyon Hiking Focus Area, and the Labyrinth Canyon Canoeing Focus Area which emphasizes hiking. • Klondike -Sovereign The region includes the BLM designated, the Bar M Mountain Bike Focus Area, two separate Klondike Bluffs Mountain Bike Focus Areas, and numerous popular mountain bike trails and the paved path in Moab Canyon. Also in this region is the Sovereign Trail System which is a shared with motorized users. • Arches National Park The region includes designated non mechanized trails within Arches National Park. Additional trails located on this Regional map are located just north of the Colorado River, across from the Pedestrian/Bike Bridge. • Yellow Cat The Kokopelli Trail crosses the southeast corner of this region • Castle Valley The region includes the BLM designated Richardson Amphitheater/Castle Rock Hiking and Climbing Focus Area. This region is also popular with equestrian users, especially in the Onion Creek Bench area. • Cisco-Westwater The region includes the BLM designated Westwater Canyon River Use and Hiking Focus Area. • Gemini and Canyonlands The region includes Dead Horse Point State Park and Canyonlands Island in the Sky, the BLM designated Gold Bar/Corona Arch Hiking Focus Area, and the Seven Mile Canyons Equestrian Focus Area. • Behind the Rocks The region includes the BLM designated 24 Hours of Moab Special Venue Area, the Tombstone Competitive BASE jumping area, and the Behind the Rocks Hiking Focus Area. • Slickrock-Mill Creek This region is located between Spanish Valley and Castle Valley. This region includes the BLM designated Mill Creek Canyon Hiking Focus Area and the Negro Bill Hiking Area. • North Moab Recreation Area This map details the paved trail infrastructure that links the City of Moab with all public lands north of the City. It includes the Lions Park area, the Transit Hub, the Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge across the Colorado River and the non -motorized pathways along SR 128, the paved path in Moab Canyon and the Millsite Trail. • La Sal Mountains This region includes the U.S. Forest Service, SITLA, BLM and private parcels of forest land in the La Sal Mountain area. Included in this region are many of the mountain trails that are located in San Juan County, such as the Trans La Sal Trail. • Moab -Spanish Valley This region is centered on US191 as it runs southeast from Moab, and continues into Spanish Valley. Trails and pathways located in Moab City or Spanish Valley include a variety of access points to public lands. The BLM designated Upper Spanish Valley Mountain Bike Focus Area is within this region, located in San Juan County. Moab City Enlargement Maps 1 and 2, Spanish Valley Enlargement Maps 1-5 16 7-8 Explanation of Trails Depicted on Regional Maps The principle non -motorized user of a trail is represented with the following colors: Hiking trail lines = Green Biking trail lines = Red Equestrian trail lines = Purple Nordic trails = Blue "Approved Trails" = solid lines in all colors "Unsigned" hiking and equestrian trails = solid lines in green and purple "Pending Trails" = depicted with a dashed line on top of a colored line (Pending trail lines represent a "suggested" route.) The trails on these maps are intended as a regional and valley -wide system. A portion of the trails listed are located in San Juan County. Examples include; trails in Island in the Sky -Canyonlands National Park, Dead Horse Point State Park trails, and the BLM management area including the Upper Spanish Valley Bicycle Focus Area in Spanish Valley, and various trails in the La Sal Mountains. 17 ReII 6ugp pasodoid ileR 6uilt4 pau6lsun w pawiddy --� SeX10 MOO venal6uls aJpgroiow pewAdy Apadoid alenud uopeniasaJ uelpul PueI aleiS spuel pa6euetu yy�g NOI LVNV 1dX3 -uo!Bei eil10 moos ayn u! sme;s puei pue siieal .z aanbtd Jomp3 sio is sera woo•auuolap MPAM '.1041P3 SID t5 ede{Nx 'auuoiap 'asuaall of pafgns asn alga 3w21o13a CO Book Cliffs Approved Rattlesnake Trail Sego Panel Thomson Singletrack Pending Thompson Loops 18 7-8 woo•auuolap AWN. 'M31)3 Sip Z'5 edeWX 'atwole0 •asuao!l of loafgns asn Elea saylq col spews verialeu5 paZuoyoW ttoZ en 6unll4 BWPued Iteft WWI Bulpued pea uaunanba panaddy pelt 6umr14 pauetsun m panadche left 13uNq panouddy k adwd aaenlld tie1glW poet ele3S spuel pa6euew Wle ease snool uopaana4 pazpopuruou Wie NO! LYNYHX3 pue Joliuoyl ayn ui smels pue! pue spell .£ aan oi!PS SID Z'S titclpWX 3WHOl3Q Monitor & Merrimac Approved Approved Motorized Pendin: Singletrack Bartlett Wash Slickrock Arch Trail Airport Trackway Bronco 1 thru 4 Badlands Big Mesa ST Bronco-Deadman Pt Cow Freckle Big Mesa Toe Bronco -Spring Cyn Crystal Geyser Bingo Buckskin 1 thru 8 Dee Flat Trail Brinks Sprg Trl Buckskin -Bronco Duma Mine Cutoff Hidden Canyon Rim Camp Leg 1 Enduro Loop Jackpot Camp Leg 2 Guy's Trail Lone Mesa Camp Triangle Juniper Trail M&M Crossover ST Hey Joe Mary's Trail Meadow View Trl Hidden Advanced Petrified Forest Mesa Point Jedi Slickrock Pinnacle Trail Navajo Rocks Jewel Tibbetts Arch Trail Red Butte N. Fork Sevenmile Rim Lower M & M Red Rocks Rim to 191 N. Fork Seven Mile Red Slot Round Monitor Monitor & Merrimac South Duma Seven -Mile Rim Mustang 1 thru 4 The Other Geyser Tusher Canyon East Renegade 1 thru 5 The Thumb Tusher Canyon West Renegade Cutoff S. Wipeout Hill Wookiee Way Renegade -Mustang Wild Horse 1 & 2 21 7-8 9 na JolIP3 SID VS fiCdeMIX 9 Ol wool ele0 £ l L 0 I I woxawiolaprhvms •Jo193 SIO l'S faideWX •01W0-380 -asuaolI laafgns asn Elea ll0Z diva pale-ea6 snap) Uogeanal pan. wow-u0N Apadoxl wwwd pue alelS spa, Pam WlB Hell bun n Pasodwd Pangs aq w haallafbu s aKlglwow Pasodaud emu. peu 6ugq Pasadoid saP/Ogq Own pweus xaeuskuls aseuwow PaswddY pee bwlryy paupsun m panomdy - lleA 6uMg panwddy uogeueldx3 anon-911 ui snle}s pue! pue sum]. amelA Klondike -Sovereign Approved Motorized Routes Pending used by bikers Baby Steps Approved Grubstake Baby Steps Loop Sovereign Singletracks Klonso Bar-B Mega Tracks Bar-M Cliff Pending Rolling Stones Loops Bar-M Cutoffs Sovereign -North Ext. Skagway Bar-M Loop Circle-0 Copper Ridge Dino Track Deadman's Ridge EKG Killer Bee Klondike Bluffs Trail Lazy EZ Little Salty Long Branch Mega Steps Moab Cyn Trail North 40 Rockin-A Rusty Spur Seven Mile -Lower UFO zs 7-8 DzLORME XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor Figure 5. Trails in the Arches Natonal Park region. Explanation 2011 National Park hiking trail Proposed hikmgtiking trail not in Arches NP 1 2 3 Dela Zoom 10 9 Data use subject to license. DeLorme. XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor. www.delorme.com m, 24 7-8 Arches National Park Approved or Unofficial Pending Broken Arch Trail Lions Tail Trail Courthouse Wash North Shore Dark Angel Delicate Arch Trail Delicate Arch View Devils Garden Trail Double Arch Trail Double O Arch Fiery Furnace Klondike Bluffs (NPS) Landscape Arch Navajo Arch Park Avenue Pine Tree Arch Sand Dune Arch Trail Skyline Arch Trail Tower Arch trail Tunnel Arch Windows Loop 25 7-8 ao wo*•auuolap AAMM 1� •JOVP3 SIO Z'S OdeINX IMO:flea .a. *wimp of pafgns asn elea OUl wooz gleU E Z � Gen sum panoiddd — kUadad wend Peel ijejS Peel PaBeuew 1V18 'w� u011eueicbg m N uo!bei leo molleA eq4 ui snlels pue! pue snail •g aanb!A JOIM3 Sle Z'S IdeNIX Mi12 013Q Yellow Cat Approved Kokopelli Trail 27 7-8 UDE I eA ueulsanba pasodeod - IIBA 6u!N!q Pxodeid ueA 6unpq pasodojd usa uemsanba pau6!sun Jo pan eddy -- Ilea 6uMs Pau6lsun Jo penoiddd - I!eA Bunn paeoiddv - RUadoid alenud pm ems pus' pabeuew png ease snx) ualleaxlai pazuolow-uou yy lg uogeueithe ti of wool elea Its Join SID Z'9 WIeWX WOO awuoiap MAMA 011P3 SIJ rg ciDdeWX 'simple° •asuaaq 03 soa(gns asn a;ell -uoibaa Aellen ape° eqi ui snle}s pue! pue sped -L a.Inbid 3W2101gC1 CO N Castle Valley Approved Pending Castleton to Adobe Fisher -Adobe ST Castleton Towers Fisher Mesa-USFS Fisher Mesa-BLM Hoodoo Trail Fisher Mesa-USFS Onion Creek Additions Fisher Towers Trail Tower Tie Ida Gulch Equestrian Kokopelli Trail Mat Martin Trail Onion Creek Benches Trail Parriot Mesa Red Cliffs Horse Trail Richardson Amphitheater Loop Richardson Amph-North Loop 29 7-8 XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor Figure 8. Trails and land status in the Cisco-Westwater region Explanation BLM non -motorized recreation locus area BLM managed land State land Private property Approved biking trail Approved motorbike singletrack stared with mountain tskers 2 3 a Dmo Zoom 9 7 Data use subject to license. DeLorme. XMapm 5.2 GIS Editor. www delorme com 30 7-8 Cisco-Westwater Approved CW-1 CW-2 CW-3 CW-4 CW-5 CW-6 CW-7 CW-8 Kokopelli Trail Mel's Loop 31 7-8 woo•auuolap AVAM ',011:13 Sip Z*5OdeWX •auuola0 •asuaog o; pafgns asn a;ep t-ot urooz elea 7 £ t Raz pun BuPI14 Bufpuad II@�l BuWlq au!Pued e ow) ueAsanbe pemuddy Heil BLINK Pea!sun JO panwddy pa-0 Bumq panoiddy ...,-- Awdoid erenNd Ned levoAuN Pua! ROM � cpuci pa6uuew roe �1 eeJe spoor uonsaiow pezpowuruou yne ;- -•• NOLLVN1H1dX3 ` W 4aed leuor;eN spueluoiCue0 ease spueluoAueo-i wee aye ui sniels pue! pue sues_ '6 am6ad iollpa sip vs Onyx CO Weir nits 3wNo-3a Gemini -Canyonlands Approved or Unsigned Pending Alcove Spg Trail Bu117 Loop Arth's Corner Charlottes Edge Aztec Butte Trl Copper Ridge Singletrack Big Chief Intrepid Addition Bull Run Jupiters Run Corona Arch Trail Navajo Rocks Crater View Trl Potash Connect Culvert Cyn Seven Up Day Canyon Trail Seven Up to Switchbacks Dead Horse Hikes Spidey Gemini Bridges Super Fun-D Trail Gemini Bridges Below Wilburs Way Gemini Bridges -East Gemini Bridges -West Gold Bar Cyn Gold Bar Singletrack Hwy 313 bike lane Intrepid Lathrop Trail Little Canyon Singletrack Longbow Trail Mesa Arch Trail Moab Canyon Neck Spg Trail Poison Spider Portal Trail Pyramid Sevenmile Canyon -North Fork Sevenmile Canyon -South Fork Super Fun-D Syncline Loop Trail Upheaval Cyn Trail Whale Rock Trail White Rim Wilhite Trail 33 7-8 wo:•auuo!ap mmm 0493 SI`J Z 5 eWX'auuolap •esua311 of loafgns asn elep to: woo- KM t toz pen &my pasodoi pen 6uiM1Q pasodom peA 6wntiu pauNsun m panaiddy pen 6wHiq pa+addy - Aµ ckud alemitd purl ams puel pe6euetu Ars Bale soup ..aleanm pazuolouruou prig uopeueadx3 Jol!p3 SID Z'S OdeWX 31.4N013a k...„ Behind The Rocks Approved or Unsigned Pendin: Amasa Back 48 hours -Moab Funnel Arch Moab Rim Hike Hidden Valley Trail Rim Climb Hunter Rim to Pritchett Arch Hunter Canyon Rim Trail Hunters Canyon Trail Jacksons Ladder Jacksons Trail Minesweeper Moab Rim Moab Rim Spur Pothole Arch Trail Pritchett Arch Trail Pritchett Canyon Rockstacker Tombstone Trail Tukunikivista Arch 35 ODELORME SAND FLATS RECREATI.QN-ARI=A Explanation BLM non -motorized recreation focus area BLM managed land State land Private property Approved biking trail Approved or unsigned hiking trail --- Approved or unsigned equestrian trail ® Proposed biking trail Proposed hiking trail - Motorized singletrack trail 1 2 Data Zoom 10.7 Data use subject to license. (� DeLorme. XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor. www.delorme.com mi 3 2011 XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor . Trails and land status in the Slickrock-Mill Creek region. 38 7-8 Slickrock-Mill Creek Approved or Unsigned Pendin: Cow Trail across Negro Bill Goose Island Overlook Equestrian So. Mill Ck Hideout Flat Pass Juniper Mesa trail Highland to Mill Creek Mi Vida Hwy 128-Phase 1 Sand Flats Singletrack Hwy 128-Phase 2 Slickrock Access N. Hwy 128-Phase 3 Slickrock Access S. Johnsons Up On Top Mill Cyn Slickrock Extension Juniper Camp Trail Slickrock to Fins Kokopelli Trail Lazy Man LPS LPS-Notch LPS-SandFlat Mill Creek Canyon Mill Crk Cyn - No. Fork Mill Creek Horse Access Navajo Ridge Steps -Mill Cyn Negro Bill Canyon Trail Otho Access/Spring Cyn Otho Arch Trail Pocket Bridge Trail Porcupine Rim Trail Porc to Mat Martin Rill to Mill Slickrock Access Slickrock Trail Spring Canyon - Mill Creek Steel Bender SteelBender Access Steep Mill Creek 37 Bay snood 6u!>I!H uoAu_p yoAlno-ue8 Wop. woo•awiolep mmm �olIP3 S19 Z'9 adeVVX 'auto'aa .8su9011 of loa(gns asn Elea ssedrapun pasodad ssediap,n punoAdwe3 pea4pesl QaH usueil pasodad 8WZ PO - drib Vile ease spool uo4eana1 pozumow-uoN I!�l 6umi aasodad Ilea 6upl!q pasodold I!ai 6uP84 Pau&sun.so panaddy - BA 6ungq Panaddy Agmpeoa Aunoo NOLINNV1dX3 •aopuaoo eaay aoneenezigeon upoN ay} aeau pue ui sempe} pue eneu. ambu Jo31P3 SIJ Z'S @dEWX • •t North Moab Recreation Area Approved Pendin: Colo R Bike Bridge/Lions Park Lions Tail Trail Colo Rr Bridge Underpass(N) North Shore Colo Rr Bridge Underpass(S) Hwy 128 Bike Path -Phase 1 Hwy 128 Bike Path -Phase 2 Hwy 128 Bike Path -Phase 3 Hwy 128 Underpass-Lion's Pk Mil[site Moab Canyon Trail 39 7-8 ��" DELORME XMap� 5.2 GIS Editor Figure 13. Trails and land status in the La Sal Mountains region. �%1 `.1 r7=fvc1 OfrtI rc GRAND CO $AN JUAN:Ca-, /!C Data use subject to license. DeLorme. XMap� 5.2 GIS Editor. www.delorme.com 40 Explanation mt, National Forest BLM managed land State land Private property Approved motorbike singletrack Approved biking trail Approved or unsigned hiking trall Approved or unsigned horse trail Proposed biking trail Proposed hiking tratl Existing 3 proposed Nordic trails 7-8 La Sal Mountains Approved Pending Wish List Bachelor Basin Beaver to Manns Adobe Mesa Beginners Loop Brumley Arch Adobe -Fisher Rim Boren Mesa Trail Bur!friends (PBR) Around Boren Burro Pass Trail BurroTo Manns Bachelor to Horse Carpenter Basin Trail Gold Basin Hiking Bald -Hazzard Loop Clark Lake Trail Gold Knob Big Bald Crows Foot Medicine Lake Boren M Hike Deep Creek Trail Nordic Warner Brumley Climb Doe Canyon Trail PreLaurel Brumley Ridge Dry Fork -Beaver Basin Trail Sheepherders Dorry Fisher Mesa Trail Squaw Exit Fisher -Adobe ST Geyser Pass Loop Terraces Trail Geyser Rd Geyser Pass Road Tuk Geyser Rd-2 Gold Basin Ski Trail Upper Brumley Horse Creek Hazzard County Keen Hell Canyon Trail La Sal Creek Kokopelli Trail Laurel To Horse Miners Basin Lower Brumley Moonlight Meadows Trail Moonlight to Burro MtnView Mud Connection Pack Ck Horse Oowah to Loop Rd Pole Canyon Trail Slaughter Shuman Gulch Trail Squaw Bypass South Mountain Trail Top Shelf State Forest Single Track Trans-LaSal Trail UPS 41 5 1SMICH 1VNO:IVN 1VS YI-I1NVIN Woo at.wojapiovia 1011P3 SID Z*5 OdeWX '8=0190 •� •asueon of loatons asn e;ep W S•ol ui002 nee Lwz Ampunop ucaaN-ms Apadoid amid Puel aims Puel paBeuew W18 Male S11301 uo9ealaa7 nib uoneuepdx3 0 0 O O �� � ` 'kN. of R. 1 T i C`� r \ ray . Z# ite11eA Nsiueds L# Ae#eA %muede at/ Ally 4eOW ...... Y# KIp_4, on •uo!bei Aellen gsiuedg-geon 041 N21Vd 1VNOIIVN S3H02:IV sdew lesui penelep to uopocri am6!A Jompa sip n ocipWX Moab -Spanish Valley Approved or Unsigned Pending 100 North 200 South Spur Munsey to Tank Rd 100 North to 300 South A-1 Connect Murphy & E. Bench Bike Lanes 100 West to 200 South Above the G Murphy Ln Horse Trail 200 North-200 East Airport Connector Navajo Heights Connect 400 East bike lane Allen Trail Old City Park bike lane 400 East to 191 Antiquity Ln Old City Park Rd 500 W-400 N-100 W Arbor Connect Pack Creek Trail 500 West bike lane Arches Dr Connect Park Dr Anonymous Park Connectors Arena North Connect Pipe Dream -Private Anonymous Park Trail Bartlett Spur Plateau Cir Bike Colo R Bike Bridge/Lions Park Beeman Ln Plateau Cir Equestrian Colo R Hwy Bridge Underpass(N) Bittle Ln Powerhouse Lane Colo Rr Bridge Underpass(S) Boulder Connect Powerline Connector Drive -In Hill Bowling Alley Radio-SandFlats Equestrian Utility Budweiser to Shumway Redrock Connector Falls Loop Trail (Kens Lake) Charlies Trail Resource Drive Hidden Valley Trail Chile to Sbsttn Resource Equestrian High School -Pack Ck Chile Trail Rim Village Highland to Mill Creek Conservancy Connector 1 Roberts-Rimrock Hospital Trail Conservancy Connector 2 Rocky Road Hwy 128 Underpass-Lion's Pk Dave's Trail Round The Valley Johnsons Up On Top Mill Cyn Duchesne Sage . Johnsons-Up-On-Top Trails Easement Trail San Jose Kokopelli Trail East Bench Rd San Juan Kens Lake Access Elk Mtn Mission Trl Scenic Snake Single Track Lake Loop Equestrian Highway 191 Shumway Lane Matheson Preserve Fogg Tr Spanish Trail McGill-MiVida Golf Spur Spanish Trail Rd Mill Creek Drive Goose Isld Overlook Spanish Valley Dr Mill Creek Horse Access Heather Lane Spanish Valley Dr. Bike Path Mill Creek Parkway Heather to Fogg Starbuck Mill Creek Rim Trail Hecla-Holyoak Connector Steen Trail Mill Creek Rim-Powerdam Trail Highland Trail Stocks Dr Connect Millsite Trail Holyoak Substation to Bench Trail N. Hwy 191 Bike Lane Hwy 191 Bike Lane Sun -Power Connect Navajo Ridge North If I'd Known It Was There (IIKIWT) Navajo Ridge Steps -Mill Canyon Kane Crk Blvd Bike Lane Tank to Rim Pipe Dream-BLM Kane Crk Rd-Crosscreek Utility Commuter Pipe Dream-SITLA Kane Crk Rd -Lions Park Path Utility Connect PK Lane to Rim Kayenta Heights Wagner Powerline Rd Kirby Lane Wasatch Red Rock Horse Trail La Sal Water Tank Hill Rock Loop Trail (Kens Lake) Lions Park -Moab Water Tank Trail Rotary Park Meador Drive West Side Commuter San Miguel to Mill Creek Dr Mi Vida West Spanish Valley Equestrian South Johnsons Up On Top Mi Vida Hiking Williams Way Steep Mill Creek Mill Creek Parkway Extension-E Winesap to Conservancy Wall Trail Mill Creek Parkway Extension-W Westwater-UOT(hike) Mud Connection West 400 N Mud Springs Prelim 43 7-8 Q'ELORME EXPLANATION O Lana managed ay a Federal agency O State land O Pnveat property " City O Pone* raapany . County Approval trolls Mostly bileng tat Wog oleo HAIN 13;k40 a N�%up equally Proposal treat Biking Wking 2011 ft 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 Data use subject to license. DeLorme. XMapiTh 5.2 GIS Editor. www delorme.com XMap� 5.2 GIS Editor ab City 1 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region, 44 7-8 Moab City #1 Approved Pendin: 500 W-400 N-100 W Above The G Anonymous Park Connectors Bartlett Spur Anonymous Park Trail Charlies Trl Colo R Bike Bridge/Lions Park Conservancy Connector 1 Colo R Hwy Bridge Underpass(N) Conservancy Connector 2 Colo Rr Bridge Underpass(S) Easement Trail Hospital Trl Elk Mtn Mission Trl Hwy 128 Underpass-Lion's Pk Goose Isld Overlook Matheson Preserve Kane Crk Blvd Bike Lane McGill-MiVida Kane Crk Rd -Lions Park Path Millsite Lions Pk -Moab N. Hwy 191 Bike Lane Mi Vida West 400 N Mi Vida Hiking Mill Creek Parkway Extension-W Park Dr Steen Trl Winesap to Conservancy 45 7-8 .DELORME XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor Figure 16. Trails in the Moab City 2 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region. EXPLANATION O mM managed land O &V A land O Pnvata Cdy O Pnvolo • County Approved Innis MaStly Nun but Ming alSo Mostly biking elkmp and bong 0,4,44 Proposed trolls - BLrtp - Hk op Data use subject to license. DeLorme. XMape 5.2 GIS Editor. www delorme.com 46 7-8 Moab City #2 Approved or Unsigned Pending 100 North 200 South Spur 100 North to 300 South A-1 Connect 100 West to 200 South Antiquity Ln 200 North-200 East Arbor Connect 400 East bike lane Arches Dr Connect 400 East to 191 Bittle Ln 500 West bike lane Boulder Connect Allen Trail Bowling Alley Drive -In Hill Chile to Sbsttn Equestrian Utility Chile Trail High School -Pack Ck Dave's Trail Kokopelli Trail Duchesne Mill Creek Drive Hecla-Holyoak Connector Mill Creek Parkway Holyoak Mill Creek Rim-Powerdam Trail If I'd Known It Was There (IIKIWT) Pipe Dream-BLM Kane Crk Rd-Crosscreek Pipe Dream-SITLA La Sal Rotary Park Mill Creek Parkway Extension-E San Miguel to Mill Ck Dr Mi Vida Wall Trail Munsey to Tank Rd Williams Way Pipe Dream -Private Powerhouse Ln Powerline Connector Sage . San Juan Scenic Snake Substa. to Bench Sun Power Connect Tank to Rim Wagner Wasatch Water Tank Hill 47 7-8 ��_DEfORM[ X hap� 5.2 GIS Edit� Figure 17. Trails in the Spanish Valley 1 inset of the Moab -Spanish valley region. Baking Equestrian Proposed trolls Brkrne FINN Equestrian Data use subject to license. L7 DeLorme XMap� 5.2 GIS Editor www delorme.com as 7-8 Spanish Valley #1 Approved or Unsigned Pending Hidden Valley Trail Arena North Connect Pack Creek Trail Highland to Mill Creek Budweiser to Shumway Plateau Cir Horse Mill Creek Horse Access East Bench Rd Plateau Cir Bike Navajo Ridge North Equestrian Highway 191 Resource Equestrian Navajo Ridge Steps -Mill Canyon Golf Spur Resource Drive PK to Rim Highland Trail Roberts-Rimrock Powerline Rd Hwy 191 Bike Lane Rocky Road Steep Mill Ck Kayenta Heights San Jose Westwater-UOT (hike) Mill Creek Rim Trail Shumway Lane Murphy & E. Bench Bike Lanes Spanish Trail Murphy Ln Horse Tr Spanish Trail Rd Navajo Heghts Connect Spanish Valley Dr. Bike Path Old City Park Bike Lane Starbuck Old City Park Rd Utility Commuter Utility Connect 49 7-8 :DEL OtE XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor Figure 18. Trails in the Spanish Valley 2 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region. O• EXPLANATION alit manopod bnd Q SW* land O Pdvato land Approved trails - Diking - MAIN - Equalo on Proposod trans _.91.0I- Biking - Hiking ® Equo/tnan Data use subject to license. Delorme XMap<u 5.2 GIS Editor www delorme com GRAND CO l SAN JUAN CO ft 0 000 1200 180D 2400 3000 3000 I Data Zoom 13 0 50 7-8 Spanish Valley #2 Unsigned Pending Johnsons Up On Top Mill Cyn Beeman Ln Johnsons Up On Top Trls Fogg Tr S. Johnsons UOT Heather Lane Westwater-UOT (hike) Heather to Fogg Kirby Lane Meador Drive Redrock Connector Rim Village Spanish Valley Dr Stocks Dr Connect Water Tank Trail West Side Commuter West Spanish Valley Equestrian 51 7-8 1DELQgly.IE XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor F gure 19. Trails in the Spanish Valley 3 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley region. EXPLANATION OBLM managed land ✓ State land O Pnvalo land Approved gads - &sine HAN ^r- EaselsIan Proposed trolls a0atp Hiking - E Inman Data use subject to license. u • DeLorme. XMapm 5.2 GIS Editor. www delorme com 0 000 1200 MOO 2400 3000 031a 200m 13-0 52 7-8 Spanish Valley #3 Approved or Unsigned Pending Falls Loop Trail (Kens Lake) Airport Connector Lake Loop (Kens Lake) Kens Lake Access Red Rock Horse Trail Round The Valley Rock Loop Trail (Kens Lake) South Johnsons Up On Top 53 7-8 ODELORME XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor i ure 20. Trails in the Spanish Valley 4 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley eg EXPLANATION O KM managed and O State and O Poste land Approved Palls Bede King Equestrian Proposed tells Biking Kling Equestrian f Data use subject to license. L7 DeLonna XMape 5.2 GIS Editor. www deiorme.com 2g11 SOUTH SPANISH VALLEY BIKING FOCUS AREA B00 1200 1800 2400 3000 3800 Data Zoom 13.0 54 7-8 Spanish Valley #4 Pending Mud Connect Mud Springs Prelim Round The Valley 55 7-8 bdo04 �a XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor e 21. Trails in the Spanish Valley 5 inset of the Moab -Spanish Valley regio Soup Spanna Valley 00Ing rotas Ares J_!l� rff EXPLANATION Q MN mooed land O Mate land o Precede land Proposed biking trail 2011 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 3600 Date Zoom 13.0 a Data use subject to license. • DeLorme. XMape 5.2 GIS Editor. www delorme com 56 7-8 Spanish Valley #5 Pendin: Mud Connect Mud Springs Prelim 57 7-8 fiDELORM[ XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor Figure 22. MaaIshowin• th- BLM Recreation Focus Areas. Spring Canyon • 4 EXplANATION Non•moehanizod Bilking) Mechantzed,(Blking) 0ElartlottiTushor rQck dfik 041.8•yrinth Canyon Conyodand.Meow Pan. Richardson Amphithoator B eonmlls: C anyone F).x Sfa mil.. 8 9 12 15 Data Zoom a•! Data use subject to license. DeLorme. XMap® 5.2 GIS Editor. www delorme com Gold Bar Coy • a .eh - —^(iBehind the Ro Ca Sfi HS.6rrr F 24.Nours Hatch Wash Woatwaier Canyon 58 7-8 RESOLUTION #25-2011 A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB AUTHORIZING DELINQUENT TERMINATED UTILITY ACCOUNTS TO BE WRITTEN OFF OF THE ACCOUNTING SYSTEM WHEREAS, it is important to write off delinquent terminated utility accounts from the Moab City accounting system to maintain integrity of this system; and WHEREAS, Resolution #10-2003 provided conditions for writing off delinquent terminated utility accounts; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution #10-2003, the City Council is authorized to write off accounts over $50.00; NOW THEREFORE WE THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB DO HEREBY WRITE OFF THE FOLLOWING DELINQUENT TERMINATED UTILITY ACCOUNTS: DELINQUENT TERMINATED UTILITY ACCOUNTS TO BE WRITTEN OFF THE ACCOUNTING SYSTEM WITH CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT DATE TERMINATED 501903 $208.27 05/23/11 502502 189.88 03/18/11 705600 199.81 09/23/11 905601 519.72 03/23/11 1003703 131.93 08/23/11 1101802 216.77 07/28/11 1205105 86.75 05/23/11 1301409 89.38 06/04/10 1603305 54.63 09/20/10 1604100 81.32 06/10/11 1605000 201.00 11 /23/10 1803304 120.00 01 /25/11 2101205 95.31 07/23/11 2408603 61.16 04/15/11 2409445 76.14 08/23/11 TOTAL $2,332.07 RESOLUTION PASSED AND ADOPTED in open meeting of the City Council of Moab City, Utah, this 13TH day of December, 2011. Mayor David L. Sakrison ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder Resolution #25-2011 December 13, 2011 7-9 DELINQUENT TERMINATED UTILITY ACCOUNTS TO BE WRITTEN OFF THE ACCOUNTING SYSTEM WITH CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT DATE TERMINATED 501903 $208.27 05/23/11 502502 189.88 03/18/11 705600 199.81 09/23/11 905601 519.72 03/23/11 1003703 131.93 08/23/11 1101802 216.77 07/28/11 1205105 86.75 05/23/11 1301409 89.38 06/04/10 1603305 54.63 09/20/10 1604100 81.32 06/10/11 1605000 201.00 11/23/10 1803304 120.00 01 /25/11 2101205 95.31 07/23/11 2408603 61.16 04/15/11 2409445 76.14 08/23/11 TOTAL $2,332.07 Customers have been sent monthly billings since accounts were terminated. Letters were sent notifying customers they had 15 days to pay balance of account or make payment arrangements, otherwise, their account would be sent to our collection agency.