HomeMy Public PortalAbout7A1 CCM 2011-02-15AGENDA
ITEM 7.A-1.
CITY COUNCIL
TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 15, 2011
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Vizcarra called the City Council Regular Meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. in
the Council Chambers located at 5938 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City.
2. ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
ALSO PRESENT:
Councilmember-Blum, Sternquist, Yu, Chavez, Vizcarra
Councilmember-None
Acting City Manager/Parks & Recreation Director Burroughs,
City Attorney Vail, City Clerk Flandrick, Community
Development Manager Lambert, Community Development
Director Masura, Financial Services Manager Molina, Public
Safety Officer Ariizumi
3. INVOCATION
Rabbi Alan Lachtman, Temple Beth David, provided the Invocation.
4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Sergeant Stacy Morgan, Temple Station, led those present in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
5, CEREMONIAL MATTERS — PRESENTATIONS
A. INTRODUCTION OF CAMELLIA FESTIVAL ROYAL COURT
Mary Sneed, General Chairman of the Camellia Festival, introduced the
Festival Committee and the Royal Court:
Banner Carrier Whitney Melton; Banner Carrier Dylan Mrakich; Banner
Carrier Breanna Jimenez; Banner Carrier Jacob Garcia; Prince Ethan
Cooper-Gaskill; Prince Danny Gitchel; Princess Lillie Bemiller; Princess
Juliana Morales; Queen Abigail Alfonso; and King Hector Gomez Jr.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Susan Schlaeter, Library Manager, provided a schedule of upcoming Library
programs.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 2
Starene Cruse, Temple City resident, questioned why the January 27th
community redevelopment meeting video was not yet available on the website;
requested that Code Enforcement put a notice on the website that destruction of
signs for City Council candidates is illegal; and asked if there was a "blackout"
period during the election where Council cannot bring up or promote Council
candidates.
Teresa Olguin, Liaison with the San Gabriel Valley Humane Society, provided the
Society's newsletter to the Council and stated the Society was in dire need of
financial help. She relayed information of a "cave-in" at their headquarters over
the holidays and indicated that not one member of the Council came to help.
She was saddened that the little monies the City contributes only covers three
days when an animal is caught by the City, and then is cared for by the Humane
Society. She felt it behooved everyone to take responsibility and asked Council
to find it in their hearts to open the City's pocketbooks as very minimal has been
done by Temple City.
Councilmember Sternquist responded that she recently adopted a dog from the
San Gabriel Valley Humane Society, and although the Council may not have
done as much as a group, these are City funds and monies we expend to anyone
are public funds. individually Council does support the Humane Society and also
through fundraisers in the park.
Public Safety Officer Ariizumi stated the City does belong to the San Gabriel
Valley Joint Powers Authority (JPA) along with four other cities. The JPA has an
Executive Director that oversees the contract with the Humane Society. Michael
Burns, Executive Director, requested that the JPA be allowed to respond to these
issues as they were not advised of the Humane Society's appearance tonight.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
City Attorney Vail stated, subsequent to the posting of the agenda, Legal
Counsel from the County and the Flood Control District requested action by the
City on a case that has been ongoing for some time. A lawsuit was initiated
several years ago against the County and District regarding stormwater
discharges into the L.A. Basin. As a result, a claim was filed by the County
against a number of cities. Since the lawsuit itself is determinative as to when
the County will seek indemnification, it was decided to toll their statute of
limitations until the U.S. District Court made a decision. The judge did rule in
favor of the County, but an appeal has been filed and the case is still pending in
the 9th Circuit Court. The original agreement expires March 15t, so there is a
need to extend it until a final decision has been made. It is recommended that
Council make the finding that there is a need to take immediate action and to add
this item to the agenda as a subsequent need item.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 3
Mayor Pro Tem Chavez moved to:
1) Make a finding that there is a need to take immediate action and that the
need for action came to the attention of the City Council after the agenda
for February 15, 2011 meeting was posted; and
2) Add this item to the agenda as a subsequent need item as Item No. 7L.
Consent Calendar — Extension of Tolling Agreement by and between the
County of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and
the City of Temple City;
seconded by Councilmember Blum and unanimously carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmember-Blum, Sternquist, Yu, Chavez, Vizcarra
NOES: Councilmember-None
ABSENT: Councilmember-None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember-None
Councilmember Yu moved to approve the Consent Calendar, seconded by
Councilmember Blum and unanimously carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmember-Blum, Sternquist, Yu, Chavez, Vizcarra
NOES: Councilmember-None
ABSENT: Councilmember-None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember-None
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 2011, as
presented.
B. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS — MEETING OF JANUARY 25,
2011
Received and filed the Planning Commission actions of their meeting of
January 25, 2011.
C. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION ACTIONS — MEETING OF JANUARY
20, 2011
Received and filed the Public Safety Commission actions of their meeting
of January 20, 2011.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 4
D. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR PLACEMENT AND REMOVAL
OF A STREET BANNER BY TEMPLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT
Approved the request by the Temple City Unified School District for City
staff to place and remove a street banner advertising their kindergarten
enrollment period, subject to submission of proper insurance
documentation.
E. APPROVAL OF PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. 6 TO HIRSCH &
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR WORK PERFORMED ON THE LIVE OAK
PARK CIRCULAR PLANTER RENOVATION PROJECT
Approved progress payment No. 6, in the amount of $360.00, to Hirsch &
Associates, Inc. for professional architectural services performed for the
Live Oak Park Circular Planter Renovation Project (P10-03).
SECOND QUARTER TREASURER'S REPORT, REVENUE AND
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORTS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FINANCIAL REPORT
Received and filed the Second Quarter City Treasurer's Report, Revenue
and Expenditure Summary Reports and the Capital Improvement
Financial Report.
G. SECOND QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENTS
Approved the second quarter budget amendments and amended the
adopted budget accordingly.
H. VISA CARD REPORT
Received and filed the Visa Card Report with the current charges.
I. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR COMPREHENSIVE DOWNTOWN
PARKING STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN
1) Approved the Request for Proposals and associated scope of
services for a Comprehensive Downtown Parking Study and
Strategic Plan; and
2) Authorized staff to solicit proposals for a Comprehensive Downtown
Parking Study and Strategic Plan in accordance with the City's
procurement policies.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 5
J. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CITYWIDE TRAFFIC CALMING
STUDY AND MASTER PLAN
1) Approved the Request for Proposals and associated scope of
services for a Citywide Traffic Calming Study and Master Plan; and
2) Authorized staff to solicit proposals for a Citywide Traffic Calming
Study and Master Plan in accordance with the City's procurement
policies.
K. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 11-4723 —APPROVAL OF PAYMENT
OF BILLS
Adopted Resolution No. 11-4723, a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ALLOWING CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $274,414.53 DEMAND NOS. 31195
THROUGH 31291.
L. SUBSEQUENT NEED ITEM — EXTENSION OF TOLLING AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF
TEMPLE CITY
Approved extension of the Tolling Agreement by and between the County
of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and the
City of Temple City, and authorized the City Manager or his designee to
sign the Agreement.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 11-940 ESTABLISHING STAGGERED
TERMS OF OFFICE FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS
City Attorney Vail corrected the title of this item to be the adoption of
Ordinance No. 11-940 establishing staggered terms of office for City
Commissioners.
Acting City Manager/Parks and Recreation Director Burroughs stated this
ordinance, introduced for first reading on February 1, will add a new
section to the Municipal Code relating to terms of office for all
Commissioners. The past practice of staggering terms for Commissioners
will now be codified through adoption of Ordinance No. 11-940.
At the request of Council, City Clerk Flandrick read the title of Ordinance
No. 11-940.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 6
Mayor Pro Tem Chavez moved to waive further reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 11-940, an ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW SECTION
2690 TO THE TEMPLE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
COMMISSIONER TERMS OF OFFICE, seconded by Councilmember Yu
and unanimously carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmember-Blum, Sternquist, Yu, Chavez, Vizcarra
Councilmember-None
Councilmember-None
Councilmember-None
B. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 11-941 -
CHANGES TO THE ZONING CODE RELATING TO EXISTING LEGAL
NONCONFORMING OUTDOOR ADVERTISING STRUCTURES
Community Development Manager Lambert summarized his staff report,
stating on January 11, 2011, the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution recommending that the City Council adopt this ordinance
relating to the modernizing and upgrading of existing legal nonconforming
outdoor advertising structures. On February 1, 2011, the City Council
conducted a public hearing and introduced the draft ordinance for first
reading. Ordinance No. 11-941 is now presented for second reading and
adoption.
At the request of Council, City Clerk Flandrick read the title of Ordinance
No. 11-941.
Councilmember Blum moved to waive further reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 11-941, an ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS
9328 AND 9329 OF THE TEMPLE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO EXISTING LEGAL NONCONFORMING OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
STRUCTURES, seconded by Councilmember Yu and unanimously
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
9. NEW BUSINESS
Councilmember-Blum, Sternquist, Yu, Chavez, Vizcarra
Councilmember-None
Councilmember-None
Councilmember-None
A. APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING ZONE
VARIANCE 10-1770 — A REQUEST FOR MULTIPLE ZONE VARIANCES
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 7
TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND STORY ADDITION AND A NEW 2 -CAR
GARAGE AT 6231 MUSCATEL AVENUE
Community Development Manager Lambert reviewed his staff report,
stating, on November 9, 2010, the Planning Commission conducted their
first public hearing regarding this issue, and after discussion, moved to
deny the zone variances, resulting in a 2-2 tie vote. The item was
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 12, 2010
where the Commission voted to deny the zone variances by a 3-2 vote,
and directed staff to present a resolution of denial at the next Planning
Commission meeting. On January 11, 2011 the Planning Commission
adopted Resolution No. 11-2317 denying Zone Variance 11-2317.
The subject site is currently improved with a one-story, single-family
dwelling that was constructed in 1955. The existing dwelling is 976
square feet and consists of 2 bedrooms and 1 bathroom and is zoned
Single -Family Residential (R-1) and is surrounded by properties that are
zoned R-1.
The following three zone variances are being requested: 1) to have a
combined second floor side yard setback of 10 feet, instead of the
required 15 feet; 2) not providing at least 50 percent or more of the
second story front elevation setback further than 10 feet of the first story's
front elevation; and 3) to have a house width of 9 feet 8 inches, instead of
the required 25 feet. The applicant is proposing to construct a 736 square
foot addition on the second floor and to construct a new 400 square foot 2 -
car garage. The applicant is also requesting to voluntarily demolish more
than 50 percent of the existing dwelling, and would therefore be
considered a "new dwelling" per the City's Zoning Code, and subject to
current development standards. The end result would be a ground floor
consisting of an attached 2 -car garage, living room, kitchen, dining room,
laundry area and bathroom, with the second floor consisting of 3
bedrooms and 2 bathrooms.
The property is an interior lot consisting of 40 feet of street frontage and
190 feet of lot depth. The current Zoning Code requires at least 60 feet of
street frontage and the narrowness of this lot does limit the development
potential of the subject site. The proposed second story addition will result
in a contemporary architectural design and would feature a portion of the
second floor at a similar plane to the first floor along the front elevation,
appearing to go straight up from the first floor to the second floor.
Initially staff recommended approval due to the uniqueness of the lot and
the ability to mitigate some factors of the variance, allowing the applicant
to achieve a second story of the desired size while using identifiable
design guidelines. Ultimately, the Planning Commission could not justify
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 8
the findings to approve the zone variance, as it is possible to construct an
addition or a new residence without approval of a zone variance. The
Commission also mentioned the proposed contemporary design did not
justify approval of a zone variance and the overall building did not have a
cohesive design. In adopting the resolution denying the variance request,
the Planning Commission found that there is nothing exceptional or
extraordinary about the subject lot and that the property owner is not being
denied any rights possessed by other property owners in the vicinity.
Community Development Manager Lambert provided a power point
presentation of the property and the proposed addition.
Mayor Vizcarra opened the public hearing.
Kelly Timmons, neighbor of the property owner, stated she would be in
favor of approving this as the property has not been updated in years and
even the most simple facade would benefit surrounding homes and the
neighborhood. The City, by allowing the previous owner of the property to
the north to take away 10 feet, left this property with 40 feet, and in doing
so, punished every subsequent owner of the property. The proposed style
is very becoming and in tune with the neighborhood and she asked
Council to consider and approve this request.
Elaine Tan, Appellant, stated, after seeing the presentation, hoped that the
Council understood the difficulty working with an unusually narrow lot.
After consulting with numerous contractors and design firms, she felt they
have a very sound plan and modest house for a family of four. In planning
this addition, they felt severely restrained because of the narrow lot in
meeting certain requirements. She submitted a list of surrounding
neighbors who believe this project is an improvement to the neighborhood
and asked the Council to consider this request.
George Chen, designer of the project, stated he has been diligently
working with City staff since June 2010 on numerous options and felt that
this current proposal best fits in addressing zoning constraints. He
encouraged Council to look at the design of the project as a whole and,
with the use of a power point presentation, provided a simulation of the
proposed project. The front yard setback has 5 feet more than required;
the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is approximately 35% lower than the zoning
requirements and a significant amount of area is devoted to open space.
While maintaining a significant setback, the proposed living area is
significantly smaller than allowed at a modest 1,700 square feet. The
zoning requirements do not really apply to a 40 foot lot and impact the
livability of the house.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 9
Hearing no further requests to speak, either for or against this item, the
public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Yu stated Council must make certain findings to approve
a variance. Regarding the exceptional and extraordinary circumstances or
conditions, he felt the 40 foot wide lot is very unusual. The second finding
that the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
property right possessed by other properties in proximity, by not allowing a
garage where everyone on the street has one, denies that right. To find
that the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to neighboring properties, the neighbors state that having such
a small house out of scale and with no garage in a nice neighborhood is
not helping property values and approval of this request would add to the
public welfare and help the neighborhood as a whole. The architect
mentioned mitigating factors that were below City requirements. He and
Councilmember Blum were on the Planning Commission when the design
guidelines were adopted and they were not meant for a 40 foot lot. He
could make all of the findings and approve the variance.
Councilmember Sternquist stated her lot also is 40 feet wide and her
similar request to build a new home on her lot was approved by the
Planning Commission 20 years ago. Every neighbor on her street was
thrilled that her house was built. This situation is unique and there is no
reason why this house should not be built. She was in support of
approving this variance.
Mayor Pro Tem Chavez agreed, noting that Government Code section
65906 states that a zone variance is a defined means used to solve a
unique problem for a property owner and this is a unique problem.
Councilmember Yu stated certain criteria to be met and he agreed with all
of it. This property needs to be fixed up and would be an improvement to
the neighborhood, and he felt the architectural style would add to the
neighborhood ambiance. This is a relatively small house in comparison to
others in the neighborhood and he thought it refreshing to see someone
work with staff to arrive at a solution. He felt the criteria had been met and
he could approve the variance.
Councilmember Blum stated the property does need to be fixed up. There
is a house on the street that sticks out, that has a square front that goes
straight up and that is why the guidelines were set. There are also large
houses on the street that have been built under the new criteria. He did
agree with everything but would like to see a setback on the second story
and would ask the designer to take that into consideration. The lot is fairly
deep and there is room to shift it in the back. The garage is desirable and
he had no problem with that. He would just like to see that the front
feature is not so stark.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 10
Mayor Vizcarra stated common sense dictates that this variance needs to
be granted so the structure can be built.
Councilmember Sternquist moved to reverse the decision of the Planning
Commission and approve Zone Variance 10-1770, seconded by
Councilmember Blum and unanimously carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Councilmember-Blum, Sternquist, Yu, Chavez, Vizcarra
NOES: Councilmember-None
ABSENT: Councilmember-None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember-None
City Attorney Vail stated a Resolution of approval would be prepared for
the next meeting's agenda.
RECESS/RECONVENE
The City Council meeting was recessed at 8:48 p.m. and reconvened at 9:01
p.m. with all Councilmembers present.
10. COMMUNICATIONS — None
11. RECESS TO COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
At 9:01 p.m., the City Council recessed to the Community Redevelopment
Agency Meeting. Minutes of the Agency Meeting are set forth in full in the
Agency's records.
RECESS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTHORITY
MEETING
At 9:02 p.m., the City Council recessed to the Community Development &
Housing Authority Meeting. Minutes of the Authority Meeting are set forth in full
in the Authority's records.
RECONVENE AS CITY COUNCIL
The City Council Meeting was reconvened at 9:20 p.m. with all Councilmembers
present.
12. ACTION ON REQUEST BY CRA — None
13. UPDATE FROM CITY MANAGER — None
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 11
14. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS — None
15. COUNCIL REPORTS REGARDING AD HOC OR COMMISSION MEETINGS
Councilmember Blum reported that the Rosemead Boulevard Improvement
Project Ad Hoc Committee continues to meet weekly. The Communications Ad
Hoc Committee met prior to this meeting to address how to proceed with this
project and effectively communicate its progress. The Public Art Advisory Group
meets for the third time tomorrow.
Councilmember Yu added that the Rosemead Boulevard Improvement Project
Ad Hoc Committee discussed a community meeting for information on this
project. The final venue and time have not yet been set, but it will be scheduled
at the end of March.
Councilmember Yu reported that the Council Chambers Renovation Ad Hoc
Committee met and directed staff to obtain prices and samples. The scope of
work will include refurbishing wall panels, carpeting and possibly looking at
upholstering of chairs and redoing the sound system.
Mayor Pro Tem Chavez stated, about 30 days ago, the Council asked
Councilmember Sternquist and himself to consider replacement for the vacancy
on the Parks and Recreation Commission. They reviewed prior applications of
those still interested in the position and interviewed one new applicant. After
consideration, this Ad Hoc Committee reached a recommendation for that
vacancy and will ask that a resolution be placed on the next agenda for
discussion and approval of Pam Vigil to fill that seat.
Councilmember Sternquist reported on attending the Mosquito & Vector Control
District meeting on Friday. Twenty representatives from different cities met, with
a decision made to repair the roofing at their site in West Covina for a cost of
approximately $25,000 instead of replacement of a new roof at a cost of
$125,000.
16. COUNCIL ITEMS SEPARATE FROM THE CITY MANAGER'S REGULAR
AGENDA
A. COUNCILMEMBER BLUM
Councilmember Blum stated, in 2006, the State passed Proposition 84,
one category of which deals with funding for state parks and recreation
facilities. The final round of applications for funding requests is July 1st
this year and he requested that the Parks and Recreation Commission to
compile a parks and open space master plan of the City's priorities as far
as recreation is concerned. Then a strategic plan can be put together to
go with the funding request by the July 1st deadline.
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 12
B. COUNCILMEMBER STERNQUIST
Councilmember Sternquist reported on the Senior Meal Program, the first
of which was held on February 14th and was very well attended. Most of
the City Council was in attendance to greet the more than 80 seniors who
came and received a nutritious lunch. The volunteers were phenomenal
and it was a wonderful event. Reservations are to be made 24 hours in
advance and a two dollar donation is recommended.
C. COUNCILMEMBER YU — None
D. MAYOR PRO TEM CHAVEZ
Mayor Pro Tem Chavez reported on providing ethics training to the
Temple City Unified School District Board. The training went very well and
he thanked City Attorney Vail for his assistance and information. He also
thanked Parks & Recreation Commissioner Nan Fish and Camellia
Festival Chairman Mary Sneed and staff for their work on the Camellia
Festival. He agreed that the Senior Lunch Program had a great turnout
with an ethnically diverse crowd.
E. MAYOR VIZCARRA
In response to Mayor Vizcarra, Parks and Recreation Director Burroughs
responded that the rubber tire grant application process usually starts
around the first of the year and staff will keep it in mind for next year.
Councilmember Yu thanked Councilmember Sternquist and the Mayor for
attending the Lunar Chinese New Year as he did again this year. It was a
well attended event.
Parks and Recreation Director Burroughs announced that input is being
solicited from the community to develop a Citywide Bicycle Master Plan.
Everyone is asked to participate in a survey which is on the City's website.
The survey is part of the City's effort to develop its first citywide bikeways
master plan, which could include a 20 -mile network of designated
bikeways to connect cyclists to key destinations. The proposed Bicycle
Master Plan will be presented for public input and review on March 9 at a
joint meeting of the City's Planning and Public Safety Commissions.
17. REIMBURSEMENTS OF EXPENSES PAID TO OFFICIALS FOR CONDUCT
OF CITY BUSINESS — None
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 13
18. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE
AGENDA
Mary Burke, Temple City resident, suggested, as was brought up at a past
Council meeting, that medicine and vitamins be collected at City Hall for disposal.
Public Safety Officer Ariizumi responded that the Temple Sheriff's Station has 3
mailboxes in their parking lot for collection of these types of items.
Ms. Burke continued, thanking the Council for following up on the suggestion for
a remodel of the acoustics and audio-visual equipment in the Council Chambers.
She relayed concerns in her neighborhood dealing a water project which has the
streets torn up. Repairs in front of four homes were done very well, but there are
a couple of others that have sloppy work.
Public Safety Officer Ariizumi reported that the City has been working very
closely with the County on this project which is nearing completion and within
the timeline submitted for the project.
Mary Kokayko, Temple City resident, referring to the Council Chambers
Renovation, suggested that the first row of seats be removed for safety reasons.
Also, she has informed some residents regarding tree removal that sometimes
the City does have to remove good trees because of roots interfering with
sewers, etc.
Jerry Jambazian, Temple City businessman, reminded everyone of the
Candidates' Forum tomorrow at 7:30 p.m. at the Historical Society, conducted by
the League of Women Voters. Everyone is invited. He commended the JSA and
The Voice for doing an excellent job in conducting their Candidate Forum last
Sunday, which was very well attended.
19. CLOSED SESSION — None
20. ADJOURNMENT
The City Council Regular Meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m.
Mayor
City Council Minutes
February 15, 2011
Page 14
ATTEST:
City Clerk