Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutAgreement_1960-05-25 to 71960-05-25_Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors - Affidavit of Completion for City incorporation_Affidavit of Completion for the incorporation of the City_or THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. 501 HALL OF RECORDS LOS. ANGELES 12, CALIFORNIA • GORDON T.- NEBVIQ CLERK OF Mr BOARD May 25, 1960 Honorable City Council City of Temple City' Gentlemen MEMBERS OF THE BOARD FRANK G, DONELLI CHAIRMAN KENNETH HAHN ERNEST E. DEES BURTON W. CHACE WARREN M. DORN T. RECEIVED QFF I.E CAL1F c�rr d 1965 APR Enclosed: please find an Affidavit of Completion for the incorporation of the City of Temple City which was filed with the Los Angeles County Recorder at 2:40 p.m., Wednesday, May 25, , 1960. The .instrument number for this filing is 4303. You will notice that we are enclosing three identical sets of documents; one to be retained in your files and two for your use in complying with the instructions 8 e forth under Section 54900 et seq. of the Government Corte. The Board order declaring the results of the election for the incorporation of your city was filed with the Secretary of State at 2:00 p.m., May 25,, 1960. On behalf of the l3oard of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, I would like to extend to you the Board's best wishes' on the incorporation, of the sixty-ninth city of the County of Los Angeles. GTN•hk cc: Mr. Arthur G. Will County -City Coordinator 'V'er;°trubr ours r • GORDON T. NESVIG THE. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 501 HALL OF RECORDS LOS ANGELES 12, CALIFORNIA GORDON T. NEEVIO CLERK of THE ROAM) MEMBERS OF THE BOARD FRANK G. BONELLI CHAIRMAN KENNETH HAHN ERNEST E. DEBS BURTON W. CHACE WARREN M. DORN STATE OF CALIFORNIA )} SS Omni CF LOS MUMS The territory. set forth in the certified. copy of boundary description attached hereto, and delineated on the map aloe attached hereto, was incorporated as a general law city under the name and style of CITY OP TEMPLE CITY pursuant'to an elec- tion held on April 26, 1960, and an order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles adopted on May 10, 2960, declaring paid territory incorporated. Proceedings therefor have been completed, and all requirements of law per- taining to the Said proceedings have been complied with. I certify under true and correet. of perjury that the f0o OIL' x. Clerk of the Board of County of Los Angelep, S s of the e of California May 25 , 290 e dad,&xiu+.;%.> ryry�{Jn�`Wbw 10 4b+ ar THE COUNTY OF Los ANGELES BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 501 HALL OF RECORDS LOS ANGELES 12, CALIFORNIA GORDON T. NERVIG CLERK OF THE BOARD The Chat Clerks 0 * 27AND 23 INN Jestt 19�:1T;-c?T4?"1€ IAT((I�ON VAZ $ or 4.IX 61T�'v P e' t 1X 1V,41414 'IQ 1 obwlLiw;°" tr rk of the cnt MvS election held. on t i"co flether enrtain a ntn.,2 a) r C S1t< rn .a I°,cry:; `1 1e of "4It' le. it JO un Eakin, u eleotion miser veto, Number o votes stet for the 4400xpo ration bop or v 1te-a as tlen toeo bar of for ore es ent of CJty To PcRALP ant GRANT aaan /A pi`0CC f l,. VAR3 a, .�! ai y, `yy `!:yp. Jo {p gg Wo 4X,N t w tD MEMBERS or THE BOARD PRANK G. BONELLI CHAIRMAN KENNETH HAHN ERNEST E. DEBB BURTON W. CHACE WARREN M. DORN Irmsg e Cods of tha Std Safi' ?%".A Sa thx q r,uaUri c nr�Ina, and T= , prin it ctax x taon or g? a5 tt ?. by th rteln d S:t.r mina th i tai It sx d r the G', as t; or Lod 11,:wt ed p�^pp tttY�q„6 3.f�1 n or 25,0 Sep{�s. d;+�yppAy4�'yai!�nRiy t±♦y`e�:(ge ii/tp�.y+iy`)dCr.i�kyk E4�d.+i .fir tr4 c'iclrk' to ` ec X PQ'f to th IMa td or k sps qm""I tryuMpAn,Y'e {` dqn the. pnd day et .34 .�sl'wa r W W1r i�".At Q'#A`ri'/ 4.r4ib.$a. pl'h?i` it4.0 Ioiant hoar- a 55�pp 5,, on �Irtrt t;d,ai d. VPit{ t { n.r +at.,"S'ta to q th„ j bound, ?i� rd {i oa ] f1 i g 41.isn 51 Nv h land. within. n. a 1 4c Snoarpor.7 tS.e,, an td"ip i>o-" roganzto for 'totied VOUTO reflelo w: < 9th t ay ' f February, y, end thereafter? aw hea le ti : t « the bu m : • SUperitacera , ! DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (Alternate Description) That parcel of land in the County of Los Angeles, State of California included within the following described boundary: Beginning at the most northerly corner of that portion of Rosemead Boulevard described in quitclaim deed to the State of California recorded in book 15638 page 322 of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence southerly along the westerly line of said Rosemead Boulevard to the southerly line of the land shown as Parcel 72 on map filed in book 12 page 21 of Re- cord of Surveys in said County Recorder's office; thence southerly at right angles to said southerly line to the northerly boundary of the City of Rosemead as the same existed on August 12, 1959; thence easterly along said northerly boundary to the most northerly corner of Lot 2 of Tract No. 14535 as shown on map recorded in book 298 pages 6 and 7 of Maps in said County Recorder's office thence east- erly along the northerly line of said Lot 2 to the boundary of the City of El Monte as the same existed on August 12, 1959; thence north erly along said last mentioned boundary and following the same in all its various courses to the southeasterly corner of Annexation No. 182 to the City of El Monte as described in Ordinance No 879 of said City of El Monte, a copy of which was filed on July 8, 1959 in said County Recorder's office° thence easterly parallel with the center line of Lower Azusa Road, shown as Lower Azusa County Road on map of Gidley-Peirso* Tract recorded. in book 21 page 64 of said Maps, to the northwesterly corner of Lot 4 of said last mentioned tract, being an angle point in said boundary of the City of El Monte° thence - 4 - PROPOSED INCORPORAT/ON OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) easterly along said last mentioned boundary to the northerly prolonga- tion of a line parallel with and distant westerly 40 feet, measured at right angles, from the easterly line of Lot 11 of said last men- tioned tract; thence easterly along the southerly line of said Lower Azusa Road and along the easterly prolongation of said last mention- ed southerly line to the westerly line of the land described in deed to. Frances K. Clayton recorded in book 30618 page 189 of said Offi- cial Records, being in said boundary of the City of El Monte; thence easterly along said last mentioned boundary and following the same in all its various courses to a line parallel with and distant westerly 40 feet, measured at right angles, from the westerly line of Tract No. 15360 as shown on map recorded in book 333 pages 11 and 12 of said Maps; thence easterly parallel with the center line of Lower Azusa Road, as shown on said last mentioned map, to said boundary of the City of El Monte; thence northerly along said last mentioned boundary and following the same in all its various courses to the northwesterly corner of Tract No. 17213 as shown on map re- corded in book 410 pages 7 and 8 of said Maps; thence easterly in a direct line to the northwesterly corner of the land described in deed recorded in book 23281 page 329 of said Official Records, being an angle point in said boundary of the City of El Monte° thence easterly along said last mentioned boundary -and following the same in all its various courses to the westerly line of Double Drive as described in deed recorded in book 11787 page 56 of said Official Records; thence easterly along the easterly prolongation of the southerly line of Grand Avenue as shown on map of Tract No. 13363 -5- PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) recorded in book 267 page 25 of said Maps to the center line of Double Drive as said last mentioned center line is shown on said map of Tract No. 13363; thence northerly along said last mentioned center line to and along that line shown as "center line of Double Drive as per 11-41-3" on map of Tract No. 10898 recorded in book 189 pages 42 and 43 of said Maps to the easterly prolongation of the course in the northerly line of Lot 7 in Block A of said Tract No. 10898 shown on said last mentioned map as having a bearing of N. 80° 02► E. thence westerly along said last mentioned easterly prolonga- tion and along the southerly line of Live Oak Avenue as shown on said last mentioned map to the northwesterly corner of said Lot 7; thence southerly along the westerly line of said Lot 7 to the south- westerly corner of said Lot 7; thence westerly along the northerly lines of Lots 8 and 31 in Block A of said Tract No. 10898 and along the westerly prolongation of the northerly line of said Lot 31 to the westerly line of said Tract No. 10898, being in the center line of Welland Avenue, 60 feet wide; thence northerly along said last men- tioned westerly line to the easterly prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 4 of Tract No. 10260 as shown on map recorded in book 219 page 20 of said Maps; thence westerly along said last mentioned easterly prolongation and northerly line to the southwesterly corner of Lot 1 of said Tract Noe 10260; thence northerly along the westerly line of said last mentioned Lot 1 to the northeasterly corner of Lot 5 of Tract No. 12049 as shown on map recorded in book 224 page 21 of said Pitapat thence westerly along the northerly line of said Lot 5 and along the westerly prolongation of said last mentioned northerly -3-- -6- d PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) line to the westerly line of McCulloch Avenue as shown on said last mentioned map; thence northerly along said last mentioned westerly line to the southerly line of Live Oak Avenue as shown on said last mentioned map; thence westerly along said southerly line of Live Oak Avenue to the northeasterly corner of Lot 9 of Tract No. 13935 as shown on map recorded in book 2$5 pages 13 and 14 of said Maps; thence southerly along the easterly line of said Tract No, 13935 to the northeasterly corner of Lot 2$ of said last mentioned tract; thence westerly along the northerly lines of Lots 2$, 19, and 10 of said Tract No. 13935 and along prolongations of said last mentioned northerly lines to the center line of El Monte Avenue as said last mentioned center line is shown on said last mentioned map; thence southerly along said last mentioned center line to a point distant southerly 330 feet measured along said last mentioned center line from the easterly prolongation of the southerly line of Live Oak Avenue as shown on map of Tract No. 12619 recorded in book 259 page 42 of said Maps; thence westerly 230 feet parallel with said last mentioned southerly line; thence northerly parallel with said last mentioned center line to the southerly boundary of the City of Arcadia as the same existed on August 12, 1959; thence westerly along said boundary of the City of Arcadia and following the same in all its various courses to the southeasterly corner of Lot 7 in block G of the Santa Anita Land Company's Tract as shown on map recorded in book 6 page 137 of said Maps; thence westerly parallel with the center line of Lemon Avenue as shown on said last mentioned map to the south- westerly corner of Lot 7 in block F of said last mentioned tract; -7- PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) thence northerly parallel with the center line of Temple City Boule- vard (shown as Sunset Blvd. on said last mentioned map) to the south- westerly corner of Lot 7 in block B of said last mentioned tract: thence westerly parallel with the center line of Camino Real as shown on said last mentioned map to the southwesterly corner of Lot 7 in block C of said last mentioned tract: thence westerly along the west- erly prolongation of the southerly line of said Lot 7 in block C to the westerly line of Lot 1 in block D of said last mentioned tract; thence southerly along said last mentioned westerly line to the most northerly corner of Lot 62 of Sunny Slope Vineyard Subdivision No 2 as shown on map recorded in book 10 page 181 of said Maps; thence westerly along the northerly lines of Lots 62, 61 and 60 of said Sunny Slope Vineyard Subdivision No, 2 to the southerly prolongation of that course in the westerly line of Rosemead Boulevard described as having a bearing of S. 7° 40' 00" W. and a length of 76.45 feet in deed to the State of California recorded in book 34401 page 340 of said Official Records: thence southerly in a direct line to an angle point in the easterly line of Tract No 15813 asshown on map recorded in book 413 pages 3 and 4 of said Maps, said angle point being shown on said last mentioned map as being distant N. 7° 10' 05" E. 96.94 feet from the easterly prolongation of the southerly line of Lot 8 of said last mentioned tract: thence' southerly along the west- erly line of Rosemead Boulevard as shorn on said last mentioned map to the southerly end of that course in said last mentioned westerly line described as having a bearing of SE 7° 40' 00" W. and a length of 114.51 feet in deed to the State of California recorded in book -8- ft PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) 32604 page 312 of said Official Records; thence southerly in a direct line to the northerly end of that course in the westerly line of Rosemead Boulevard, 100 feet wide, described as having a bearing of N. 70 401 00" E. in deed to the State of California recorded in book 33259 page 276 of said Official Records; thence southerly along the westerly line of Rosemead Boulevard, 100 feet wide, to the north- westerly corner of the land described as Parcel No. 1 in deed to the State of California recorded in book 29691 page 310 of said Official Records; thence southerly along the westerly line of said Parcel No. 1 to the southwesterly corner of said Parcel No. 1; thence southerly along the southerly continuation of a curve in the westerly line of said Parcel No. 1, concave easterly and having a radius of 4050 feet, to the northwesterly corner of the land described in deed to the State of California recorded in book 18752 page 370 of said Official Records; thence southerly along the westerly line of said last men- tioned land and along the westerly line of Rosemead Boulevard as described in deed to the State of California recorded in book 18962 page 85 of said Official Records and in deed to the State of Calif- ornia recorded in book 15486 page 2 of said Official Records to the southwesterly corner of the land described in said last mentioned deed; thence southerly in a direct line to the southwesterly corner of the easterly 20 feet of Lot 74 of Tract No. 5904, Sheet No. 1, as shown on map recorded in book 69 page 29 of said Maps; thence west- erly along the southerly lines of Lots 74 and 73 of said last men- tioned tract and along the westerly prolongation of the southerly line of said Lot 73 to the southeasterly corner of Lot 45 of said -4- -9- PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) Tract No. 5904; thence southerly along the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 45, and along the westerly line of Reno Avenue as shown on said last mentioned map to the southeasterly corner of Lot 132 of said last mentioned tract. thence southerly in a direct line to the northwesterly corner of the most northerly strip of land described in deed to said County recorded in book 6182 page 25 of said Official Records; thence southerly along the westerly line of said strip of land and along the southerly prolongation of said last mentioned westerly line, to the southerly line of that portion of Las Tunas Drive shown as Parcel 83 on Sheet 1 of Clerk's Filed Map No. 1660 recorded in said County Recorder's office, and as des- cribed in Final Judgment rendered in Case No. 269,622 of the Superior Court of said State of California, in and for said County of Los Angeles /copy of said Final Judgment being recorded in book 12289 page 277 of said Official Records; thence westerly along the south- erly lines of Parcels 83, 82, 81, 808, 80 and 8OA as shown on said last mentioned map, to the westerly line of Eaton Wash as described in deed to Los Angeles County Flood Control District recorded in book 7230 page 110 of Deeds in said County Recorder's office; thence southerly along said last mentioned westerly line to the northerly line of Broadway as shown on map of Tract No. 3623 recorded in book 40 page 52 of said Maps; thence southerly in a direct line to the northwesterly corner of the land described in deed to Los Angeles County Flood Control District recorded in book 11200 page 4 of said Official -Records; thence southerly and easterly along the boundary of said last mentioned land to the most westerly corner of the land I PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) described as Parcel 2 in deed to Los Angeles County Flood Control District recorded in book 7229 page 328 of said Official Records; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said last men- tioned land to the westerly line of the land described in deed to Los Angeles County Flood Control District recorded in book 10853 page 166 of said Official Records; thence southerly and easterly along the boundary of said last mentioned land to the most easterly corner of the land described as Parcel 1 in said deed to Los Angeles County Flood Control District recorded in book 7229 page 328 of said Official Records; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said last mentioned land to a westerly line of the land described in said deed to Los Angeles County Flood Control District recorded in book 10853 page 166 of said Official Records; thence southerly and easter- ly along the boundary of said last mentioned land to the southwest- erly line of the land described in deed to Los Angeles County Flood Control District recorded in book 16031 page 364 of said Official Records; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said last mentioned land to the easterly line of the land shown as Parcel 45 on said map filed in book 12 page 21 of Record of Surveys; thence southerly in a direct line to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the boundary of the City of El Monte as it existed on August 12, 1959, said boundary also being the west- erly line of Block F of Tract No. 4902 as per map recorded in book 96 page 13 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said • i PROPOSED INCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) County with the easterly prolongation of the southerly line of Lot 30 of Tract No. 19189, as per map recorded in book 493 pages 23 and 24 of Maps in the office of the said Recorder, said southerly line having a bearing of N. 60° 03► 05" E. and a distance of 19.18 feet a: shown on the map of said Tract No, 19189, thence westerly along said easterly prolongation and the southerly line of said Lot 30 to the easterly line of Fairhall Street as shown on the map of said Tract No. 19189; thence southerly, southwesterly and westerly along the easterly, southeasterly and southerly lines of said Fairhall Street to the northeasterly corner of Lot 10 of said Tract No. 19189; thence southerly in a direct line to the southeasterly corner of Lot 9 of said Tract No. 19189; thence southerly along the southerly prolonga- tion of the easterly line of said Lot 9 to the southerly line of Lower Azusa Road, 60 feet wide as shown on the map of said Tract No. 19189, said southerly line of Lower Azusa Road being also the exist- ing boundary of the City of El Monte; thence easterly and northerly along the said boundary of the City of El Monte to the point of beginning, and ALSO EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point in the boundary of the City of El Monte as it existed on August 12, 1959, said point being the intersection of said boundary of the City of El Monte with the southerly prolonga- tion of the westerly line of Lot 43 of Tract No. 13645 recorded in book 277 pages 46 and 47 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence northerly along said southerly prolongation -9- -12- r PROPOSED /NCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY (CONT.) and said westerly line of Lot 43 to the northwesterly corner of said Lot 43; thence easterly in a direct line to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 43; thence southerly along the easterly line of said Lot 43 to the southerly termination of the easterly line of said Lot 43, said easterly line as shown on map of said Tract No. 13645 has a bearing of N, 9° 45' 10" W and a distance of 54.39 feet; thence continuing southerly along the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said Lot 43 to the said boundary of the City of El Monte; thence westerly along said boundary of the City of El Monte to the point of beginning. DESCRIPTION APPROVED SEP 1 1959 JOHN A. LAMBIE 0 COUNTY ENGINEER BY•XLaaa .✓.n...cansar DEPUTY -13- WIT HHAS. in pur /election wenae duly a ltd dito and the returns of the vat : aporvisera duly declared to g upon cold. declaresons at Ea d e1cction !tu'G' f ea' the deo th or € blirrrai, duly incoap 'p "City ©t Temple V115=14, it also d, Fittj hn. Jock no i a�sis W, Merritt, rec4ivc4 czd t scar' pus bca37q or the IS CnDE Iro t Merri. i. cry Q T 1) q y ditolar0 the s` ar r rl n, Uouer4 lit, F ckcwon . s rl City Council car alt, lUTITOR ORDER= that xc+t i to file the proper e P ifortain end the C. I4=DON Tn. 03 Anr?lc$, 'Stet full, true and carrot Su erviesc,re or ooid Co said Board, IN WITNESS WHIM the Uoard of 8upervi