Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
PKT-CC-2012-06-12
CITY OF MOAB June 12, 2012 PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP 6:30 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS (217 East Center Street) City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Main Number (435) 259-5121 Fax Number (435) 259-4135 www.moabcity.org City of Moab - Regular Council Meeting City Council Chambers: 217 East Center Street Tuesday, June 12, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. 4111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 6:30 p.m. PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SECTION 1: APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 April 5, 2012 May 1, 2012 May 8, 2012 May 29, 2012 SECTION 2: CITIZENS TO BE HEARD SECTION 3: DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES 3-1 Community Development Department 3-2 Engineering Department 3-3 Planning Department 3-4 Police Department 3-5 Public Works Department SECTION 4: PUBLIC HEARING (Approximately 7:15 PM) 4-1 Public Input on Proposed Ordinance #2012-10 — An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Classified Hourly Pay Rate Schedule and Exempt and Elected Officials Salary SECTION 5: CONSENT AGENDA 5-1 Request to Send Proposed Resolution #10-2012 — A Resolution Amending the 2011-2012 Fiscal Year Budget to Public Hearing 5-2 Approval of the Certification of Utah Retirement System Contribution Rates for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 5-3 Approval of a Special Business Event License for Raft for the Cure 2012 to Conduct a Fund Raising Event on June 29 and 30, 2012 5-4 Approval of a Request for Special Use of Swanny City Park by Jason Taylor and Brian Merrill on June 29 and 30, 2012 5-5 Award of the General Plan Update Proposal 5-6 Approval of the General Plan Update Professional Services Agreement By and Between the City of Moab and SE Group SECTION 6: NEW BUSINESS 6-1 Approval of Proposed Resolution #08-2012 — A Resolution Adopting the 2012-2013 Fiscal Year Budget 6-2 Approval of a Moved -on Structure Permit for Big Bear of Utah Incorporated/Phantom Fireworks to Conduct a Retail Fireworks Business Located at 260 South Main Street from June 23 to July 4, 2012 and July 20 to July 24, 2012 6-3 Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2012-07 — An Ordinance to Amend Title 17.80.050 of the Moab Land Use Code, by Amending a Portion of the Supplementary Regulations for Large Scale Retail Developments Over Thirty Thousand Square Feet, For Parking and Landscaping 6-4 Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2012-09 — An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code, Section 17.09.530, By Amending the Number and Types of Conditional Uses in the C-5 Zone and Amending 17.30, Use Regulations, By Allowing Child Care Centers as an Allowed Use in the C-5 Zone 6-5 Approval of Proposed Resolution #11-2012 — A Resolution Establishing Water Usage Rates For the City of Moab SECTION 7: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE SECTION 8: ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS SECTION 9: REPORT ON CITY/COUNTY COOPERATION SECTION 10: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS SECTION 11: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB SECTION 12: EXECUTIVE SESSION 12-1 An Executive Session to Discuss the Character, Professional Competence or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual SECTION 13: ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org MOAB CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING April 5, 2012 The Moab City Council held a Special Meeting on the above date at the Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor David L. Sakrison called the Special Meeting to order at 7:00 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Kyle Bailey, Doug McElhaney, Kirstin Peterson, Jeffrey Davis and Gregg Stucki. Also in attendance were City Manager Donna Metzler, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel Stenta, Recreation Coordinator John Geiger, MARC Director Laurie Collins, and Community Development Director David Olsen. City Manager Metzler made a presentation regarding the Amended Fiscal Year 2011-2012 budget. Discussion followed. Councilmember Davis moved to adjourn. Councilmember Stucki seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye. Mayor Sakrison adjourned the Special Meeting at 8:40 PM. APPROVED: ATTEST: David L. Sakrison Mayor Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Asst. City Mgr. SPECIAL MEETING & ATTENDANCE BUDGET DISCUSSION AND PRESENTATION MOTION TO ADJOURN, APPROVED ADJOURNMENT April 5, 2012 Page 1 of 1 1-1 MOAB CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING May 1, 2012 The Moab City Council held a Special Meeting on the above date at the Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor David L. Sakrison called the Special Meeting to order at 6:00 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Doug McElhaney, Kyle Bailey, Jeffrey Davis and Gregg Stucki. Also in attendance were City Manager Donna Metzler, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel Stenta, City Engineer Rebecca Andrus, Public Works Director Jeff Foster, Police Chief Mike Navarre and Animal Control Officer Randy Zimmerman. Councilmember Davis moved to approve a request by Geoff Thomas for an Amplified Music Event at Old City Park on May 6 and 27, 2012. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. City Manager Metzler made a presentation regarding the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 proposed budget. Discussion followed. City Manager Metzler made a presentation regarding the Amended Fiscal Year 2011-2012 budget. Discussion followed. Councilmember Bailey moved to adjourn. Councilmember Davis seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. SPECIAL MEETING & ATTENDANCE AMPLIFIED MUSIC EVENT AT OLD CITY PARK, APPROVED BUDGET DISCUSSIONS AND PRESENTATIONS MOTION TO ADJOURN, APPROVED Mayor Sakrison adjourned the Special Meeting at 8:09 PM. ADJOURNMENT APPROVED: ATTEST: David L. Sakrison Mayor Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Asst. City Mgr. May 1, 2012 Page 1 of 1 1-2 MOAB CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING May 8, 2012 The Moab City Council held its Regular Meeting on the above date in the Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor David L. Sakrison called the Pre -Council Workshop to order at 6:30 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Kyle Bailey, Kirstin Peterson, Doug McElhaney and Gregg Stucki; City Treasurer Jennie Ross, Community Development Director David Olsen, City Engineer Rebecca Andrus, City Planner Jeff Reinhart, Public Works Director Jeff Foster, City Manager Donna Metzler and City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel Stenta. Mayor Sakrison called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 PM and led in the Pledge of Allegiance. Five (5) members of the audience and media were present. Councilmember Peterson moved to Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 24, 2012. Under Citizens to Be Heard, Karen Robinson distributed a flyer regarding are corporations people. A Community Development Department Update was not given. Under Engineering Department Update, City Engineer Andrus stated that she had been working on an emergency action plan for dams and had attended a hearing for the Special Service District change order. City Engineer Andrus then stated that she had been working with Grand County on the Marriott project and on a grant for the Lions Park Project signage. City Engineer Andrus then gave an update on the highway 191 project. Under Planning Department Update, Planning Director Reinhart stated that the General Plan Selection Committee was underway and that the Marriott project would be on the next Grand County Planning Commission agenda. Under Police Department Update, Police Chief Navarre read a letter of recognition for Officer Tom Nixon. Under Public Works Department Update, Public Works Director Foster state that he had received comments regarding slack lining activities and that staff was working with slack lining groups to accommodate their requests. REGULAR MEETING & ATTENDANCE CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES CITIZENS TO BE HEARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UPDATE ENGINEERING UPDATE PLANNING UPDATE POLICE UPDATE PUBLIC WORKS UPDATE Under Presentations, Rory Tyler made a presentation regarding PRESENTATION Millcreek Canyon. Councilmember Bailey moved to approve Proposed Resolution #07-2012 —A Resolution by the Moab City Council to Adopt the City of Moab Tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 and Setting a Public Hearing for Review of the Final Budget on May 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM. Councilmember Stucki seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. Councilmember Peterson moved to approve an Application for the PROPOSED RESOLUTION #07- 2012, APPROVED SPECIAL USE OF SWANNY CITY May 8, 2012 Page 1 of 3 Special Use of Swanny City Park by Theresa King, d.b.a. Moab Arts Festival on May 25 to 27, 2012 with conditions. Councilmember McElhaney seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. Councilmember Stucki moved to approve a Special Business Event License for Moab Arts Festival to Conduct an Arts Festival on May 26 and 27, 2012. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. Councilmember McElhaney moved to approve a Special Event License for Relay for Life/Ducky Derby to Conduct Fund Raising Events on May 19, 2012 and August 10 to 11, 2012. Councilmember Peterson seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. Councilmember Stucki moved to approve a Moved -on Structure Permit for Moab First Assembly to Conduct a Fireworks Stand Located at 446 South Main Street from July 1 to 4, 2012. Councilmember McElhaney seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-1 aye with Councilmember Peterson voting nay. Councilmember Peterson moved approve a Performance Permit for Sand Sheff, Sunnie Sheff, Jeff Cohen and Kaitlin Harris to Conduct Performances Located at 56 West and 100 South. Councilmember Stucki seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. Councilmember McElhaney moved to approve a Local Vendor License for Sunnie and Sand Sheff, d.b.a. Moab's Dog and Pony Show to Conduct Entertainment and Retail Sales Located at 56 West 100 South. Councilmember Peterson seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. Councilmember Peterson moved to Accept the City Health Insurance Renewal Proposal as outlined in the May 4, 2012 proposal from the Recorder's Office. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. There was no Correspondence to be Read. Under Administrative Report, City Manager Metzler stated that the staff had been busy with the budget and that the panels were being replaced at the Aquatic Center under warranty. City Manager Metzler then stated that Millcreek Village should be presented at the next Council meeting for approval and that she had served on the School District Superintendent selection committee. A Report on City/County Cooperation was not given. Under Mayor and Council Reports, Mayor Sakrison stated that he would not be at the next meeting and that he needed to appoint someone to the Grand County Solid Waste District Board. Councilmember Peterson stated that she had attended the Utah Bike Summit in Ogden and that Moab had been used as a good example of trail development. PARK, APPROVED SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR MOAB ARTS FESTIVAL, APPROVED SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR RELAY FOR LIFE/DUCKY DERBY, APPROVED MOVED -ON STRUCTURE PERMIT, APPROVED PERFORMANCE PERMIT, APPROVED LOCAL VENDOR LICENSE, APPROVED CITY HEALTH INSURANCE RENEWAL PROPOSAL ACCEPTED READING OF CORRESPONDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT REPORT ON CITY/COUNTY COOPERATION MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS May 8, 2012 Page 2 of 3 1-3 Councilmember McElhaney moved to pay the bills against the City of Moab in the amount of $278,499.44. Councilmember Bailey seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye by a roll -call -vote. Mayor Sakrison adjourned the Regular Council Meeting at 7:47 PM. APPROVED: ATTEST: David L. Sakrison Rachel E. Stenta Mayor City Recorder APPROVAL OF BILLS ADJOURNMENT May 8, 2012 Page 3 of 3 1-3 MOAB CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING May 29, 2012 The Moab City Council held a Special Meeting on the above date at the Council Chambers of Moab City Offices, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. Mayor David L. Sakrison called the Special Meeting to order at 6:00 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Kyle Bailey, Kirstin Peterson, Jeffrey Davis and Gregg Stucki. Also in attendance were City Manager Donna Metzler, City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Rachel Stenta, City Engineer Rebecca Andrus, Public Works Director Jeff Foster, Police Chief Mike Navarre and Animal Control Officer Randy Zimmerman. Councilmember Bailey moved to approve a request for special use of Swanny City Park by Mark Griffith to Conduct a Bicycle Safety Event on June 6, 2012. Councilmember Peterson seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. City Manager Metzler made a presentation regarding the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 proposed budget. Discussion followed. City Manager Metzler made a presentation regarding the Amended Fiscal Year 2011-2012 budget. Discussion followed. Councilmember Bailey moved to adjourn. Councilmember Davis seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0 aye. SPECIAL MEETING & ATTENDANCE REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE OF SWANNY CITY PARK, APPROVED BUDGET DISCUSSIONS AND PRESENTATIONS MOTION TO ADJOURN, APPROVED Mayor Sakrison adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:45 PM. ADJOURNMENT APPROVED: ATTEST: David L. Sakrison Mayor Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Asst. City Mgr. May 29, 2012 Page 1 of 1 1-4 CITY OF MOAB PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2012-10 The City of Moab will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 12, 2012 at approximately 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moab City Offices at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. The purpose of this hearing is to solicit public input on Proposed Ordinance #2012-10 — An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Classified Hourly Pay Rate Schedule and Exempt and Elected Officials Salary. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. /s/ Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Published in the Times Independent, May 31 and June 6, 2012. R:\Notices\2012\ph ord 2012-10.docx 4-1 ORDINANCE NO.2012-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB CLASSIFIED HOURLY PAY RATE SCHEDULE AND EXEMPT AND ELECTED OFFICIALS SALARY WHEREAS, the Moab City Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual allows that pay ranges may be adjusted periodically to accommodate increases in the cost of living; and WHEREAS, the Moab City Personnel, Policies and Procedures Manual calls for using standard state and national measures to determine cost of living adjustments; and WHEREAS, the Utah Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that the Cost of Living Increase for the State of Utah from 2010-2011 was greater than 3%; and WHEREAS, the 2012/2013 Fiscal Year Budget Shows a 3% Cost of Living Increase for all employees covered by the Pay Rate Schedule; and WHEREAS, the proposed "City of Moab Classified Hourly Pay Rate Schedule" is attached to this resolution as Attachment A, respectively; and WHEREAS, Moab Municipal Code Section 2.44.010 states that all salaries of the elective and appointive officers of the City and the other employees of the City shall be fixed by motion or resolution of the City Council as in accordance with existing law. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB RESOLVE TO ADOPT The City of Moab Classified Hourly Pay Rate Schedule (Attachment A) and Exempt and Elected Official Salaries (Attachment B) as referred herein effective July 1, 2012. DATED this 26th day of June 2012. SIGNED: David L. Sakrison Mayor ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Ordinance #2012-10 June 26, 2012 4-1 CITY OF MOAB CLASSIFIED HOURLY PAY RATES 2012/2013 PROPOSED Pay Grade i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ET E2 E3 E4 E5 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 MIN STEPS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L M N O P O R S T 10.00 10.30 10.61 10.94 11.26 11.61 11.95 12.31 12.67 13.06 13.44 13.85 14.26 14.69 15.13 15.57 16.06 16.54 17.04 17.54 18.07 10.51 10.82 11.13 11.46 11.80 12.16 12.54 12.92 13.29 13.69 14.09 14.53 14.96 15.41 15.87 16.36 16.84 17.36 17.87 18.40 18.95 10.98 1 1.3 0 11.65 12.00 12.35 12.72 13.11 13.49 13.91 14.32 14.74 15.18 15.65 16.12 16.60 17.11 17.61 18.14 18.68 19.25 19.83 11.52 11.85 12.22 12.58 12.97 13.34 13.74 14.16 14.58 15.03 15.47 15.93 16.43 16.91 17.42 17.95 18.49 19.03 19.60 20.20 20.81 12.05 12.42 12.78 13.17 13.57 13.98 14.40 14.82 15.26 15.73 16.20 16.69 17.19 17.70 18.24 18.79 19.35 19.93 20.52 21.15 21.78 12.62 13.00 13.39 13.80 14.20 14.64 15.08 15.52 16.00 16.49 16.97 17.49 18.01 18.56 19.10 19.68 20.27 20.88 21.50 22.15 22.81 1325 13.65 14.05 14.47 14.91 15.37 15.82 16.29 16.80 17.30 17.83 18.34 18.89 19.47 20.05 20.65 21.27 21.90 22.55 23.23 23.93 13.87 14.28 14.71 15.15 15.60 16.09 16.57 17.06 17.57 18.10 18.64 19.21 19.79 20.36 20.98 21.62 22.26 22.92 23.62 24.32 25.05 14.53 14.97 15.41 15.87 16.37 16.85 17.36 17.88 18.41 18.96 19.53 20.12 20.72 21.34 21.49 22.64 23.31 24.01 24.73 25.47 26.23 15.20 15.66 16.14 16.62 17.13 17.63 18.16 18.72 19.27 19.85 20.45 21.04 21.69 22.34 23.00 23.70 24.40 25.13 25.88 26.67 27.47 15.94 16.44 16.92 17.43 17.96 18.49 19.04 19.61 20.21 20.82 21.43 22.07 22.74 23.42 24.13 24.85 25.56 26.36 27.16 27.97 28.82 16.70 17.20 17.71 18.25 18.80 19.37 19.94 20.53 21.16 21.78 22.43 23.11 23.80 24.51 25.26 26.02 26.80 27.61 28.44 29.28 30.16 17.51 18.04 18.58 19.13 19.71 20.29 20.91 21.54 22.18 22.85 23.53 24.24 24.96 25.71 26.48 27.27 28.10 28.95 29.81 30.69 31.61 18.33 18.88 19.45 20.03 20.63 21.25 21.85 22.53 23.22 23.91 24.63 25.36 26.12 26.91 27.74 28.56 29.42 30.28 31.20 32.14 33.10 19.21 19.78 20.36 20.97 21.60 22.26 22.92 23.61 24.32 25.05 25.79 26.56 27.38 28.19 29.05 29.91 30.80 31.73 32.68 33.65 34.66 20.10 20.70 21.36 22.00 22.67 23.34 24.02 24.76 25.49 26.28 27.07 27.87 28.71 29.57 30.47 31.37 32.31 33.29 34.28 35.32 36.38 21.08 21.72 22.38 23.05 23.74 24.45 25.19 25.94 26.72 27.54 28.36 29.21 30.08 30.97 31.92 32.88 33.87 34.88 35.93 36.99 38.10 22.09 22.76 23.44 24.15 24.86 25.62 26.38 27.18 28.00 28.83 29.69 40.88 31.50 32.45 33.42 34.42 35.45 36.51 37.62 38.76 39.92 23.15 23.84 24.57 25.30 26.06 26.85 27.66 28.50 29.33 30.21 31.13 32.05 33.02 34.01 35.02 35.05 37.17 38.30 39.44 40.62 41.84 24.26 24.98 25.74 26.51 27.31 28.13 28.98 29.84 30.74 31.65 32.61 33.58 34.59 35.62 36.70 37.80 38.93 40.11 41.30 42.54 43.82 25.41 26.18 26.98 27.79 28.62 29.47 30.37 31.26 32.21 33.17 34.17 35.18 36.25 37.34 38.46 39.62 40.81 42.02 43.28 44.59 45.93 26.63 27.43 28.26 29.11 29.98 30.88 31.81 32.74 33.72 34.75 35.78 36.85 37.97 39.12 40.29 41.49 42.72 44.01 45.33 46.69 48.09 27.91 28.75 29.61 30.50 31.43 32.35 33.33 34.32 35.35 36.41 37.51 38.64 39.79 40.99 42.22 43.48 44.77 46.12 47.50 48.95 50.42 29.23 30.11 30.99 31.94 32.90 33.88 34.90 35.95 37.01 38.14 39.27 40.45 41.66 42.92 44.20 45.53 46.90 48.30 49.75 51.25 52.79 30.62 31.54 32.51 32.49 34.47 35.50 36.57 37.69 38.81 39.96 41.17 42.39 43.67 44.98 46.32 47.71 49.16 49.16 52.15 53.71 55.33 7.76 7.98 8.23 8.47 8.73 8.99 9.25 9.54 9.82 10.12 10.41 10.72 11.05 11.37 11.72 12.07 12.44 12.80 13.19 13.60 14.01 7.87 8.12 8.35 8.57 8.87 9.13 9.39 9.68 9.97 10.28 10.58 10.90 11.23 11.57 11.91 12.27 12.64 13.02 13.40 13.81 14.22 14.00 14.42 14.85 15.30 15.76 16.22 16.72 17.22 17.73 18.26 18.81 19.37 19.96 20.55 21.17 21.81 22.46 23.13 23.83 24.54 25.28 14.21 14.65 15.09 15.53 16.01 16.49 16.97 17.49 18.01 18.56 19.11 19.68 20.27 20.88 21.51 22.16 22.81 23.50 24.21 24.94 25.69 2528 26.03 26.81 27.62 28.45 29.30 30.18 31.10 32.02 32.98 33.98 34.99 36.04 37.12 38.23 39.39 40.56 41.79 43.03 44.33 45.66 25.68 26.45 27.23 28.06 28.89 29.77 30.65 31.57 32.53 33.50 34.51 35.54 36.61 37.71 38.84 39.99 41.20 42.44 43.71 45.02 46.37 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% ATTACHMENT B Exempt and Elected Official Salaries Section 1. Yearly salary range for the following exempt positions only: City Manager — Grade E5 $63,935 — $115,529 Police Chief— Grade E3 $58,276 — $105,277 Public Works Dir. — Grade 18 $46,124 — $83,353 Recorder — Grade 17 $44,015 — $79,553 Treasurer — Grade 14 $38,273 — $69,113 Section 2. Yearly salary rates for the following elected official positions: Mayor $12,000 Councilmembers $ 6,000 In addition to yearly salaries, elected officials also receive the following yearly compensation in health and dental care coverage: Coverage type Medical Premium Dental Premium Health Savings Account Contribution/Match Family $13,207 $1,332 $2,000/$1,500 Two-party Spouse $9,407 $644 $2,000/$1,500 Two-party Child $8,744 $975 $2,000/$1,500 Single $4,450 $322 $1,000/$750 Information about all Moab City financial transactions can be found at: http://www.utah.gov/transparency Ordinance #2012-10 — Attachment B 4-1 CITY OF MOAB PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED RESOLUTION #10-2012 — A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 The City of Moab will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 26, 2012 at approximately 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moab City Offices at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. The purpose of this hearing is to solicit public input on Proposed Resolution #10- 2012 — A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Budget. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder's Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259-5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. /s/ Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder/Assistant City Manager Published in the Times Independent, June 14 and 21, 2012. R:\Notices\2012\BUDGET FY 2011-2012year endopening.docx 5-1 RESOLUTION # 10-2012 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 BUDGET WHEREAS, the City of Moab has proposed to amend the 2011/2012 fiscal year budget for the various funds; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE 2011/2012 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET SHALL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: Amended Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Budget 1. General Fund 2. Recreation Fund 3. Capital Projects Fund 4. Enterprise Fund - Water 5. Enterprise Fund - Sewer Amended Amended Revenue Expenditures $ 7,376,440 $ 7,376,440 $ 470,419 $ 470,419 $ 1,133,000 $ 1,113,000 $ 1,091,919 $ 869,429 $ 761,810 $ 654,500 2011/2012 Fiscal Year Budget Amendments FUNDS REVENUES EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND $78,807 $78,807 EXPENSES Executive — Benefits 10-413-13 $2,203 Administrative — Benefits 10-414-13 $3, 588 Recorder — Benefits 10-415-13 $1,293 Planning — Benefits 10-418-13 $921 Engineering — Benefits 10-419-13 $1, 590 Police — Benefits 10-421-13 $13, 688 Animal Control — Benefits 10-426-13 $2, 024 Animal Shelter — Benefits 10-427-13 $800 Film Commission— Benefits 10-428-13 $618 Streets — Benefits 10-440-13 $16, 533 Parks — Benefits 10-451-13 $7, 653 MRAC — Benefits 10-452-13 $2, 896 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Affordable Housing $25, 000 REVENUES Employee Medical Cafe Residual 10-36-420 $53, 055 Resolution #10-2012 Page 1 of 2 5-1 Energy Taxes Beginning Fund Balance INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSFERS RECREATION FUND EXPENSES Recreation — Benefits MARC — Benefits 10-31-800 $752 10-39-940 $25, 000 $3,930 $3,930 REVENUES MARC—Rental Fees 23-66-271 $1,451 Recreation — Adult Soccer 23-34-539 $2, 479 $2, 479 $1,451 CAPITAL PROJECT FUND $26,000 $26,000 EXPENSES Aquatic Center Project 41-470-70 $26,000 REVENUES Claim Settlement Proceeds $26,000 ENTERPRISE FUND $8,029 $8,029 EXPENSES Water — Benefits $5,219 Sewer — Benefits $2, 810 REVENUES Water — Sundry Revenue 51-36-900 $5,219 Sewer — Sundry Revenue 51-56-900 $2, 810 PASSED AND ADOPTED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of the City of Moab this 26th day of June, A.D., 2012. David L. Sakrison Mayor ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Resolution #10-2012 Page 2 of 2 5-1 UTAH RETIREMENT SYSTEMS P.O. Box 1590 Salt Lake City, UT 84110-1590 ROBERT V. NEWMAN--EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (800) 753-7318 (toll -free phone) (801) 366-7318 (phone) (801) 366-7759 (fax) May 25, 2012 DANIELLE GUERRERO, DEPUTY RECORDER MOAB CITY 217 E CENTER ST MOAB, UT 84532-2439 Please return your completed/signed form to URS no later than June 22, 2012. This mailing includes your annual participating employer Certification Of Retirement Contribution Rates, instructions for its completion and a return URS envelope. Prior year rates are shown on the form for your reference. Rate tables are also available under the Spotlight tab on the URS for Employers web site. The new retirement rates are effective July 1, 2012 and should be used to calculate your first file transmission with a period ending date in July. These rates apply to all employee earnings reported for a period ending date of July 1 or after. For employers creating files on our web site, the retirement rates will automatically update with the first file creation showing a period ending date in July. Automated web updates do not include any employee deferral changes to URS savings plans or variable employer deposits to savings plans as authorized on your Certification of Retirement Contribution Rates. Employers using in-house or third -party payroll vendors should share this information with those vendors to have programs upgraded with the newly approved rates, fund numbers for Tier 2, defined benefit (retirement) and employer -paid URS savings plans. ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION RATES INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Complete the form and return to us in the enclosed envelope by June 22, 2012. 2. Enter a zero or n/a for line items that do not apply. 3. Do not change mandatory percentages already pre -listed. 4. Percentages entered as 'Employee contributions withheld from employees and 'Employee contributions paid by employer' are required to equal the pre -listed 'Total employee contributions' percentage on the form AND match information provided to URS on your IRS Pick-up Election form (MEMS-50). 5. Notify the retirement office of any inactive funds by lining through the rate information and providing the last date money was remitted for employees using that fund number. 6. Sign and date the form before mailing it back to URS. Please call Information Services Employer Support Staff at 801-366-7318 or call toll -free at 800-753-7318 if you have questions or need assistance completing the certification or updating our software program. 5-2 UTAH RETIREMENT SYSTEMS P.O. Box 1590 Salt Lake City, UT 84110-1590 (801)366-7700 (800)365-8772 FAX (801) 366-7759 May 25,2012 MOAB CITY ATTN: DANIELLE GUERRERO 217 E CENTER ST MOAB UT 84532-2439 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION RATES (INSTRUCTIONS ENCLOSED) 15 TIER 1 NONCONTRIBUTORY LOCAL GOVERNMENT Current Rate Effective Rate 07/01/2012 Employer paid retirement contributions 13.77 % 16.04 % 401(k) employer -paid contributions 0.00 % 457 employer -paid contributions 0.00 % Explain policy regarding 401(k)/457 employer contributions 43 TIER 1 PUBLIC SAFETY NONCONTRIBUTORY Current Rate Effective Rate 07/01/2012 Employer paid retirement contributions 27.07 % 30.45 % 401(k) employer -paid contributions 0.00 % 457 employer -paid contributions 0.00 % Explain policy regarding 401(k)/457 employer contributions 111 TIER 2 DB HYBRID LOCAL GOVERNMENT Employee contributions withheld from employees Total employee contributions Employer retirement contributions 401(k) employer -paid contributions 457 employer -paid contributions Explain policy regarding 401(k)/457 employer contributions Current Rate Effective Rate 07/01/2012 0.00 % 0.00 % 11.92 % 12.74 % 2.41 % 1.59 % 0.00 % 122 TIER 2 DB HYBRID PUBLIC SAFETY Employee contributions withheld from employees Total employee contributions Employer retirement contributions 401(k) employer -paid contributions 457 employer -paid contributions Explain policy regarding 401(k)/457 employer contributions Current Rate Effective Rate 07/01/2012 0.00 % 0.00 % 18.79 % 19.25 % 1.55 % 1.09 % 0.00 % 5-2 211 TIER 2 DC ONLY LOCAL GOVERNMENT Employee contributions withheld from employees Total employee contributions Employer retirement contributions 401(k) employer -paid contributions 457 employer -paid contributions Explain policy regarding 401(k)/457 employer contributions Current Rate Effective Rate 07/01/2012 0.00 % 0.00 % 4.33 % 4.33 % 10.00 % 10.00 % 0.00 % $ 222 TIER 2 DC ONLY PUBLIC SAFETY Employee contributions withheld from employees Total employee contributions Employer retirement contributions 401(k) employer -paid contributions 457 employer -paid contributions Explain policy regarding 401(k)/457 employer contributions Current Rate Effective Rate 07/01/2012 0.00 % $ 0.00 % 8.34 % 8.34 % 12.00 % 12.00 % 0.00 % $ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I certify that the above information and rates are correct and that all persons involved in submitting reports have been notified. Signature Date Title Phone * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * XURCERT 999-50-0415 5-2 DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: (� RECEIPT NO.: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE: $80.00 PLUS (CHECK ONE): ❑ TRANSIENT ($80): OR ❑ CURRENT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: y,-J� .a0 [ _l LICENSE #: ZONE: R 2 NAME OF EVENT: eaFF 4/2_ Cure._ 2r) -a_ DESCRIPTIONOF EVENT: 12, 1 L VIA{ t 'I6) bead- ,560,1 G 1\b1A.12.4" LOCATION OF EVENT: f571,4t.3(,1A141 Ct Part. PREMISES TO BE USED: �i„, . K 11l11! �Dtlytd041-0 w TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IF ANY): -�G7 2O o(�'� evviS r 34e. DATE(S) AND TIMEA S) OF EVENT: t, Uvue , J20 1v ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: 7.-00 NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: Z TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: q::J06/ EXPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): 0O �OI e- • -nTY ATID uitttht adtidsS� rot�4-�-rt�,o�vtd at V EVENT SPONSORS NAME: 111,A0040 pt'YAVe V, U ire- Ca "-Al �Y� � (,��Q✓o � � �rPfH'ONE: e- s Ft /:77 / SPONSOR'SADDRESS: 2j75 &�J✓I 01 144.04 r CITY: MAPS STATE: V r ZIP: Ow32- SPONSORS DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER He STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: SPONSORS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: TYPE OF ORGANIZATION:O PROPRIETORSHIP O PARTNERSHIP EVENT SPONSORS SALES TAX ID #: DATE OF BIRTH: KOORPORATION OOTHER (SPECIFY): �1 �R ��1��I�,��Q NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: VieSCf� � iee of fe r evi THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. J PLEASE PR INT�NAME(S) BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. I/WE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION AND APPLICANT (SPONSOR). INVE AGREE TO FILE THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. /Z‘) /ZvI-Z. Signature of Sponsor Uate State of Utah ) ) SS County of Grand ) SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this � day of I/WE NOTARY PUBLIC HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIRE 5-3 SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LIST OF VENDORS (MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF MOAB PRIOR TO THE EVENT) 5.09.030 Sales Tax Collection. A. Unless exempted by state law, each special business event licensee shall be responsible for obtaining a state sales tax license and shall require that all vendors either: 1. Provide proof of a sales tax license and agree to be responsible for direct remittance of all sales tax proceeds to the state; or 2. Execute a sales tax remittance agreement whereby the vendor delivers sales tax proceeds to the licensee for remittance to the state under the licensee's sales tax license. NAME OF EVENT: F1,' Tv( 4.e, OWL. DATE(S) OF EVENT: l4,/ 2.-417 tCD k..0I 7-- BUSINESS NAME OWNER'S NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE # ITEMS TO BE SOLD TEMPORARY SALES TAX LICENSE NO./SALES TAX ID iti i= MveAv e ,Atr Zz s S - Oita( C/N SAS, V �632 c435--z-S-9 770(9 06008/03 cn W Aik i CITY OF MOAB C YO 4 MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE COMPLIANCE FORM 217 E CENTER STREET MOAB, UT 84532 PHONE: (435) 259-5121 FAx: (435) 259-4135 FOR ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY PARKING: MOAB CITY CODE: SIGN PERMIT: MOVED -ON NECESSARY: ❑YES L7 NO AV "1/4 REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL ❑ YES a -NO REVIEWED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: 244;hae J SIGNATURE DATE: 6- Zi`'2.0 NAME OF APPLICANT: PHONE: `"l 3S-- Vigo -I iii 7 APPLICANTS MAILING ADDRESS: 7- vJ 5-• MI ( h CITY: it WM STATE: UT- ZIP: BUSINESS NAME: ?AFT- r v ILL -Pit- �1(1� kis 151.0 ver%.1-wrzc. I. BUSINESS LOCATION: vi� au- � 1, ZONE: i2.2„. c 1/50%- k C-, 1<c)VVI-a-4," 2(44.^r_Y ciwiG DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: ' evew4. aeei tfrt pick& fv}- p,e.e,pc., ( 6,„„LtLloused 4 - - -1` k Yt p. - ✓e fru v� C0� e�v-k- �A �-4-eY r�Ja4)-(- -VY k p . 06/1 f 225 S. MAIN STREET I 1-888-622-4097 1435-259-7019 j MOAB, UTAH 1 84532 i ONLINE: MoabAdventureCenter.com )) I RAFTING TRIPS HUMMER SAFARIS , HORSEBACK RIDING SCENIC FLIGHTSRaft for the Cure Event 2012 GUIDED HIKES MOUNTAIN BIKING NATIONAL PARK TOURS , OUTDOOR GEAR For the past several years the Moab Adventure Center/Western River Expeditions has teamed up with local outfitters to provide the Raft for the Cure event. This event is to raise money for the Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Last year we used Swanny City Park for loading and unloading of our buses for the 1 river and then in the evening provided live entertainment for those that participated in our Raft trip. Again we would like to be able to use the park for this venue as it was a great central location for us to put on this wonderful event. Below is a detailed description of how we plan to use the park. Friday June 29, 2012 — • Evening set up of the stage and getting lifejackets ready for the next morning. Set would begin around 6:00 pm and should go no later than 8:00 pm that evening. We would provide our own security to watch our lifejackets and stage that night. Saturday June 30,2012 • 7:00 — 8:15 People will start meeting for the Raft trip, from this point they will check in, get fitted with a lifejacket and then depart for their day long river trip. • 8:30 - 3:30 No activities planned • 3:30 — 6:00 set up of activities in the park. We will have a sound check and start getting ready for the activities. • 6:00 — 9:45 we will have live music and burgers and hotdogs for the participants during the concert that evening. • 9:45 —10:00 Take down of event If you have any questions please feel free to contact Jason Taylor at 435-260-1487 RITI EILTO] RIM . D THEN SOS Moan City of Moab APPLICATION FOR THE SPECIAL USE OF CITY PARKS Swanny Park, located, between 100 and 200 West from 30 to 400 North, is a non -reservation park that is meant to be open to the public on a first -come, first served basis. Special Use of Swanny Park and other non -reservation parks within the City is subject to approval by the Moab City Council. The City Council may approve use applications for events that provide clear benefits to the community. Requests for usage by private businesses that serve a limited clientele will not be approved. This application must be submitted, along with any special events license application, to the City Recorder's office at least six weeks prior to the scheduled event. Upon approval of the application by the City Council, a Special Park Use Permit will be issued upon payment of the appropriate fee, provided for in the Schedule of Fees. PLEASE PRINT OR FILL ELECTRONICALLY Applicant Information Name of Person Responsible for Use of Park:J,q$D» '7;9 /0213ri44-, Name of Organization and Event if applicable: p•te-i (err - Cvre_ foa-� .1-v%✓crtiivez Address: Z2s— S. a'� neLop�, uT &YS3 `t. Day Phone: 435--2-420-1'{fr7 EmaiF jaSon02) wesit''v^rlve-r•C Proposed Park Usage Information Which park to you intend to use? Swanny Park. _X._ Other (please indicate name of park - Please indicate the proposed dates and times of use: Proposed Start Date: UoZq`Z�I Z Start Time: 10`0v am/ r�i End Time- 8� am Proposed End Date: 3°/28f7- Start Time: tv-oo pm End Time t"p am Please specify what areas of the park are proposed for use. Areei Oar- emete l 6autsikelg For Swanny Park, please show in detail on the attached diagrams, which areas of the park are proposed to be used. Show locations of all structures and facilities. Number of participants you expect: 2 n0 Number of spectators that you expect: .SO Please describe structures, tents, canopies, portable restrooms, etc. that you propose to set up at the park: . 14.11 20 K2-o e�(3) ! ox to +enk5i Will amplification be required for your event? Yes No Please specify any electrical needs for your event: Rio Please describe the parking and traffic plan for your event. Location of parking, signage, traffic control devices, use of volunteers, etc. should be described. If you anticipate any street closures for your event, please describe below, and show on the accompanying diagram. /Va PLEASE COMPLETE OTHER SIDE 5-4 Signature of Contact Person: Do you intend for the park to be open to the public during your event? Yes 74. No For non-Swanny Park events: Do you plan to charge for admission to the park? Yes No Please describe any security or crowd control measures you plan for use of the park: se For groups over 100 people, please describe your refuse control and recycling plan: kite /y ewe- OWN rekSe. Oi.n Please describe your clean-up plan during and after the event: Clex4-1 vp foe tT' G•- e ✓eeff ‘eve nej e f J rivu- Please describe your restroom facility plan: n eg s-/i "-to.517vd4y7S14hse,-s C4-1-r be `'rvts,l71 / n / f "lee 8,507, 6ftiaiike Other Information Please describe how your organization, your event, and/or your use of the park will provide broad -based benefits to the community: ! 1� L /' 1 rS ev f afri 41 40141/7d�.te� 6� Az...Az...Moot" _4(4v/ re C.. A1-4/kg:5"k`ti Q Vi-Pve,171 Avn Dvz el lou/IP7_ 110-7 (-vrll 41j(`-'5 to? Lre6 / 5/0eTia Please specify and describe other community or city facilities that you plan to use: Have you applied for a Special Event Permit for this use? Yes X No Will you be able to provide proof of insurance, showing the City as an additional insured? Yes )4' No I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct. I agree to abide by the City of Moab Parks Policies and any conditions attached to this permit. c Date. 5/2-S l Office Ube Only Public Works Review-. Police Department Review: Park Use Fee. Administrative Review. Date Fee Paid- Date of City Council Approval. Insurance Received• Final Set up Diagram Received• Special Conditions or Requirements: Other Required Permits and Approvals 5-4 Swanny Park 400North Street Aquatic Center Outdoor Swim'rig overedi $andshgil Playground 6 Covered Picnic Tables ParkDilve 3 Picnic Tables 100 50 ,Nj SCALE 0 100 1" = 100' 200 FEET To Main St. One Block /00 West Street a/i411°1__ -- :... . !F sue• �..; cY- :, - r.:S: ) ..., r.^.%ti iv:L9:a::S!.•?:�rPi r'-W -S:�}!MZK '' :%,,,:2(*:5}:4..•%:Y� .r.' is %^' ............. .. . . PRODUCER COBB STRECKER DUNPHY & ZIMMERMANN, INC. 5 Triad Center, Suite 340 Salt Lake City, Utah 84180 INSURED Canyon Country River Adventures dba Moab Adventure Center 7258 Racquet Club Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121 I 'cur c':4ccccc:•} ,:.}:4e i}.. �y aR:'a 'titi�\' {iC r: <F?tc;<R !SCR:; Q - �t. �r�...:.n nil: }: .fin. .:..:.r..:-�:.::4::::.. n.....:v'.: S: S::;^...4:.r.{; .ti.}.}:'�:::t::t?ti}}. .. n.rcl.-n,- .e .\:.:..r\...:,..:.. v.vm .a:..v.._,...,:,. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO 7HE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN 1S SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. :`, • ,.. • DATE [Eainmirn THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE CO. COMPANY B COMPANY COMPANY D CO LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCY NUMBER POUCY EFFECTIVE DATE (MMMD/YY 1 POUCY EXPIRATION DATE (MM/DD/YY) UMITS A GENERAL UABIUTY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABIUTY CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT BI/PD DED:$250 X X NPP8049239 06/30/12 07/01/12 GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $2,000,000 sIncluded PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $1,000,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Arty one Tire) $100, 000 MED EXP (Any one person) $5, 000 AU OMOBILE LIABIUTY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT a BODILY INJURY (Per person) s BODILY INJURY (Per accident) 8 PROPERTY DAMAGE s GARAGE LIABIUTY ANY AUTO AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT a OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT S AGGREGATE s EXCESS LIABIUTY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM EACH OCCURRENCE a AGGREGATE 9 b WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY THE PROPRIETOR/ PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE: I i INCL EXCL STATUTORY LIMITS EACH ACCIDENT 9 DISEASE - POUCY OMIT a DISEASE- EACH EMPLOYEE 4 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS Charitable event for breast cancer awareness. ADDITIONAL INSURED ONLY IF REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT WITH RESPECT TO GENERAL LIABILITY: CITY OF MOAB. . y.tt...r: ��r:rr:rr.............::::r:r.:':':rv:::•v:::-Ni::r:.:': r: r':::: N::�:r ::: rr::: -::: . `rig �+ 4ii\ tia ' ':\ 2i: �iSsEk,: t .... ' ?ort�•_...i- ............. zrr:- - -.: r,..._.:: .fib,♦. _.hlA' `•-" �d22 Lev `"vt^•�.h-"fiv � �aCA-T� �\X, i \\r Vic\ @tf:I \ •[. jlt •"•���..�.t'\iSti!�_i:-}_4 :t4itt.' 4..aw.%.try'�T:cvS.:.�.tt..3<ecfc�:cF4cycm i[*c—fh'.`�`'�`+-')-�'=�--- ---•--'-•--- --r. �ts�\'rxv.?�::%+.•..�4�}.,..:`J�\:�fi.�?�'N�i6.....h..:�kte�3t:--t<}:�ati>':}:ir. City of Moab 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POUCIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBUGATION OR UABIUTY OF ANY K'tND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRE'SENTATIVES- AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,f HS'-Y' • +,4, �S '"' 'J •Y.;�'S :Jf� �ilS:J.':"S ' S'n':4:L: x �_ �iyy���S'..��'.'.f}}'')[}: ;r";: `%:u y:i i';:o ;-..`,i:'i.+`,criYfi)rtti i>Y-,� ;p `� :j'iif:�'f.�J;� SaW �<��.C�T.L:;Lvk'�`�)b ?(:>i: l:} ):(�C•�r:?:L• Tit•:.....ci'i:4::2•:•3:::t'F.:e.0 ..•`:G:tv', n5tv:9.4 •� ir<•.::r2P,>:4i` .:.:,.:.;-:....;.......tv:,::v.,•x 5-4 Memo To: From: Subject: Discussion City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Correspondence June 6, 2012 Honorable Mayor and Members of Council Jeff Reinhart, City Planner 92._ Approval of the General Plan Update Proposal and Approval of the General Plan Update Professional Services Agreement by and Between Moab City and SE Group The deadline for submitting proposals to the RFP for the General Plan Update was April 13, 2012. A total of eight firms/teams submitted their proposals with the following results. Alphabetical listing of General Plan Respondents Firm Name Team Bid Amount 1 AECOM Souder, Miller and Associates $60,000.00 2 Civil Solutions $37,250.00 3 Design Workshop $50,000.00 4 Four Corners Planning Sites Southwest $49,940.00 5 Landmark Fehr and Peers, Zions Bank, Mckay Edwards $49,840.00 6 Land Planning and Design Reed or Reed, Pinnacle Design, Mentor Consulting $123,900.00 7 RPI Russell Planning and Engineering $53,280.00 8 SE Group Russell Planning and Engineering $49,902.00 An eight -person review committee made up of members of city staff, county staff, and the city planning commission met on three occasions to discuss the qualifications and references of each of the submitting firms. The list was narrowed to three: SE Group, AECOM, and Landmark Design, Inc. After presentations by the three groups, SE Group emerged as the review committee's choice to recommend to Council. This decision is based on the references, quality of their presentation, and several other factors. I agree with the selection team and recommend that we accept SE Group's proposal for the preparation of the General Plan Update and execute the associated Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $49,902.00. p:\planning department\2012\correspondence \p1-12-80 cc general plan .docx 5-5 City of Moab General Plan Update SE Group Scope of Services May 22, 2012 SCOPE OF WORK Phase 1: Planning Foundation The first phase of work establishes the "planning foundation" for the General Plan Update. This foundation identifies the existing policy framework in which this update will take place. It will also identify the background issues and factors that are presently influencing growth and quality of life in Moab. Public involvement will be an important part of this phase, as the initial public outreach will establish the enthusiasm from the community for this plan update. Task A: Project Start -Up and Data Gathering To begin the planning process, SE Group and Russell Planning and Engineering (RPE) will collect data and existing planning documents from the City and region. Any recent surveys that speak to the community's goals for future growth and development in Moab will be evaluated, as well as a close examination of the current General Plan. Our team will speak in-depth with the City Planning Department and Planning Commission about how the current plan is working, which policies have been beneficial, and what big -picture goals that they have going into this process. More specifically, the sub -tasks associated with Project Start -Up will include: 1. Review and finalize the project scope of work with the City Planning Department, Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Coordination with City Planning Department to secure access to all relevant planning studies, surveys, documents, maps, atlases and plans which relate to the General Plan Update Process. Electronic copies (including GIS and/or CAD data) of such information is preferred. 3. Initial coordination to define communications protocols with the City, delegate principal point -of -contact as well as alternative contacts. 4. Establishment of the official project schedule, including meeting dates for public engagement, Focus Group and Advisory Committees. 5. Establish meeting protocols (formats for audio conferencing and/or video conferencing). 6. Work with the City to identify key stakeholders who the City will request to participate most actively in the update process. 7. SE Group will arrange meetings with the City and meet with the City Council to review the scope of work. 8. Resource and inventory analysis update including sewer and water capacities by meeting with and reviewing background data with the City Public Works and Engineering Staff. 9. Summarize the above efforts in memorandum format and distribute to the City. Deliverables: Project Start -Up Protocols and Existing Data Summary Meetings: Planning Team Kick -Off Meeting (remotely) Task B: Public Involvement Plan As a plan update, public engagement will be critical to identifying the policies and objectives that should be carried forward, and those that need to be reconsidered or added. To achieve this, we have identified a public involvement approach that is creative, multi -faceted and community -driven. The tools that are included in this approach ensure that the plan update is a true reflection of Moab resident's goals for the future. Furthermore, in order to maximize the efficiency of the budget and reach the greatest number of citizens throughout the process, the approach will include a series of tools that can be led by SE Group, City staff, and residents themselves. Advisory Committee To bolster the public involvement process, an Advisory Committee will be instrumental. The Advisory Committee should include representatives from the Planning Commission, City Council, Grand County, the National Park Service, Utah Trust Lands (SITLA), citizen's groups and key land owners. An ideal size for an Advisory Committee is about 15-18 people. Throughout the process, this group will meet monthly, or at key project milestones, to carry the momentum of the update forward and ensure continual community input. City staff will be a component of the Advisory Committee in terms of scheduling, facilitating and recording the meetings, and providing materials for those meetings. The Consulting Team will provide interim materials for meetings with the assistance of City staff to ensure that every meeting has a clear charge and that the momentum for the process continues throughout. On an ongoing basis, tools such as the City of Moab's website will be used to advertise meeting announcements and draft planning products. The Moab Times -Independent will also be looked to for ongoing coverage of public events. Public Engagement Visits At this time, SE Group will conduct the first of 3 Public Engagement Visits. The goal of these visits will be to focus our outreach efforts, meeting with as many individuals and stakeholders as possible over a two or three-day period, specific to each of the Project Phases. The Public Engagement Visits will be bolstered by additional meetings in-between those that are led by the City and Advisory Committee, which SE Group will provide materials and content for. Public Engagement Visit #1 will consist of meetings with City and Advisory Committee, Stakeholder Interviews, a Kick -Off Event, and a Public Open House and over a three-day period. This visit will be primarily aimed at establishing a dialogue between the community and planning team about their goals for the General Plan Update, as well as beginning to understand their overall vision for future land use. Community Kick -Off Event To kick-off the General Plan Update, we would like to consider hosting a booth or table at a local event, such as the Moab Arts Festival, Farmers Market, or even the Rodeo. The main intent of this is two -fold: one, for the planning team to become familiar with the community, and vice -versa, so that a trust and enthusiasm for the project is established early on. In Moab, this will also be a way to hear from visitors their perspective, who may also be considered to be key stakeholders. Stakeholder Interviews and "Meet the Planners" Stakeholder interviews are the most effective way to hear directly from community members what their goals for the Comprehensive Plan Update are. We recommend between 15-20 interviews and will look to the Town to identify who those key individuals are. It is ideal to talk to a broad range of stakeholders, including business owners, property owners, developers, conservationists, local school board members, transportation officials, planning officials from the region or neighboring communities, and Moab's own Planning Commissioners. Stakeholder interviews are tremendously useful in learning a great deal about the community very early in the process, and are a powerful way to open up a constructive dialogue between individuals and the planning team. The community needs to know that their ideas will be reflected in this Plan Update and stakeholder interviews are a good way to build that trust. Related to stakeholder interviews, we also propose to have an informal listening session ("Meet the Planners" at a local establishment to simply invite people to drop in and share their ideas with the planning team. This would be less structured than the interviews and usually leads to very interesting discussions. Listening sessions are effective in getting people involved in the process that otherwise wouldn't be likely to engage in a formal session due to time or unfamiliarity with planning. Depending on the schedule of the Public Engagement Visit, "Meet the Planners" could be over coffee in the morning, in the afternoon, or even in the evening. Citizen -Led Focus Groups Keeping with our approach as facilitators of Update, we propose the formation of Citizen -Led Focus Groups to help carry the Plan forward throughout the process. We have recently used this approach with great success in Ridgway, Colorado, and found them to be valuable for several reasons. First, Focus Groups lead to a far more engaging planning process. They allow the community to play a significant role in crafting solutions and policies for the future in a way that traditional participation techniques don't. Citizens with specific expertise, such as in land use, sustainability, or transportation, can work directly with the planning team to evaluate future land use scenarios and write policies. Secondly, Focus Groups leverage the funds that Moab has available for this Update. They allow some of the heavy -lifting to be conducted by dedicated members of the community and City Staff. As the consultants, we are here to ask the right questions, guide their discussions, and provide technical expertise on key issues. Lastly, Focus Groups lead to a high degree of community buy -in to the plan itself and set the stage for community members being able to set it into motion for implementation. At this time, we would suggest the following Focus Groups: o Land Use and Housing. This group will focus on the allocation of land for various uses (including housing), General Plan and Zoning alignment and density patterns. • Business and Economic Development. This group will focus on development of specific goals for the defined business districts, review parking availability and need, engage the Moab Area Chamber of Commerce and business owners, and explore branding and alignment of business interests with community sentiment. ✓ Parks, Open Space and Connectivity. This group will focus on exploring the role that parks and open spaces play within the community fabric, identify specific recreational opportunities for the City, evaluate the alignment of the Streets General Plan, Sheridan Avenue Streetscape and 2002 Parks and Pathways Plan with the General Plan. • Public Utilities, Services and Infrastructure. This last Focus Group will be tasked with discussing renewable energy integration issues within the City Fabric, recycling and greening policies, capacities of existing infrastructure systems and confirm inventories of existing facilities and utilities, as well as the airport Focus Groups will be led by members of the Advisory Committee to delve further planning topics such as those listed above. The Focus Groups will be engaged in providing input for several milestones throughout the project timeline, and will be encouraged to meet casually on their own time, either as a group or individually, to discuss topics and make recommendations to the Consulting Team. During the initial phase, we would encourage the Focus Groups to meet at least twice. Hard -to -Reach Community Members The SE Group Team understands how important it is to reach all segments of the Moab population, and we have a variety of tools to ensure that hard -to -reach groups have the opportunity to engage. To reach the non-English speaking population, we can reach out to specific people or send materials to local churches or community organizations to post. To reach the younger population, we should consider the use of Facebook or Twitter, or speak with Moab High School about having students volunteer to serve on a Focus Group. To reach people with difficult work schedules, we have created "to -go meetings" in which people can recreate meeting exercises on their own time and return the results to the City. In developing the public involvement plan, SE Group will discuss these various approaches and tools to decide which would be the most beneficial to this process. Deliverables: Public Involvement Plan, Stakeholder Interview Summary, Public Meeting Materials and Summary Meetings: Public Engagement Visit # 1 (on -site, 2-3 days), including initial Advisory Committee and Focus Group Meetings, Community Kickoff Event, Stakeholder Interviews and `?Meet the Planners" Task C: Public Visioning Open House In our experience, we have found that a public open house is a drain on resources unless specific questions are asked of the community. In order to make the most use of the City's budget, we propose to focus the first public meeting on reaffirming the vision set forth in the 2002 General Plan. There will be some presentation of existing conditions within the community, but it will be far more engaging for the community to begin discussing their vision for the future. In doing so, they will realize the importance of the General Plan and a future land use map in achieving their goals for economic development, a sustainable environment, housing, and other planning topics. Ideally, the Open House would occur at the end of Public Engagement Visit #1, once the planning team has had the chance to meeting with the Advisory Committee and conduct many of the stakeholder interviews. Deliverables: See Task B Meetings: See Task B Task D: Planning Foundation and Vision Report This task will be to digest the information received during Phase 1 to develop a list of specific questions or drivers that align with the community vision and the elements of the General Plan Update. For example, "open space" has been stated as an element of the community vision for Moab. How does "open space" manifest itself throughout the General Plan? What role does open space play for the residents of Moab? What about the tourist visitor? The planning foundation will also update the demographic, growth and employment statistics since 2002 to help provide a comparison of anticipated verses actual results. The planning foundation establishes, based on our independent perspective, what moves the community forward. Based on our review of background information and discussions with the Advisory Committee and Focus Groups, we will prepare a written summary of our observations. This document will also include an assessment of how current issues and considerations might impact the existing General Plan. While we do not propose to create a stand-alone vision document, the Community's Vision will be an important component of this report. This statement will be designed to be broadly distributed and used as a basis for public engagement, and to remind the community of their shared values moving forward in this update. Deliverables: Community Vision Statement Meetings: Planning Team, Advisory Committee and Focus Group Meetings as needed (SEG remote) 5-5 Phase 2: Opportunities The second phase of work will be to explore the opportunities for achieving the community vision. Based on the presentation and feedback received to date, the Consulting Team will correlate the identified key issues against the specific planning resources areas. During this phase the Consulting Team members will work closely with the Focus Groups and the City Planning Staff to clearly outline areas of specific study or additional information that can help address issues. We will also conduct a third public workshop and charrette during this phase to explore how these opportunities might manifest themselves within specific areas (wards) of the City as well as overall city-wide strategies. Task A: Analysis Given the budgetary constraints to this update, our analysis process relies mostly on review of available information and data collection from known sources. Our planning and engineering experts will review this resource information and evaluate areas where "gaps" exist relative to issues raised. As required, they will work with the appropriate Focus Group chairs and the Planning Department to fill these gaps. The analysis process will consider many questions. These issues will be discussed with either the Advisory Committee or the Focus Groups as part of our analysis. Land Use and Housing: • What is the overall pattern of growth and how does that coincide with the County objectives? Do the plans support one another's objectives? • How will the South Moab annexation effect employment and housing in Moab? • What are the appropriate growth boundaries to consider? • What has been the form and pattern of new residential subdivision? Has it followed guidelines for growth? Has it been well received? Have these new areas had low turnover? • Is the boundary between urban and rural growth still appropriate? • What is the demand for redevelopment, density, and walkable neighborhoods in Moab? • How do the current Zoning Classes meet the community's future land use vision? • What other code changes occurred as a result of the 2002 General Plan? Have these code changes been effective? What unintended consequences have resulted from these changes? • How can the General Plan better align with the Affordable Housing Plan for Moab in the future? Business and Economic Development: a Has the goal for balanced commercial development been reached? What are the good examples of this balance? What are the bad examples? ® Has the underlying zoning been supportive of downtown development? • Has parking requirements and objectives been met? If not, why? • Has transitional zoning been implemented? Has it worked? What has not worked with it? O Has the City and Chamber of Commerce worked closely together? Has this relationship been beneficial? What are good examples of this collaboration? • What events and programs does the City employ to support economic development? Are these focused on certain areas of the City? Do specific wards or areas of the City have unique or special needs for economic development programming or assistance? Parks, Open Space and Connectivity: • What has been the change in use patterns for parks and recreational venues in Moab? • Do these facilities have clear deficiencies that the General Plan Update should consider? If so, what? • Have the organizational plan changes to Moab been effective in identifying park needs? What could be done better? • What is the mix of funding for parks and recreation? Are user fees too high or too low? • How have tourists been accommodated by the parks and recreational facilities in Moab? What opportunities have not been explored? • How have changes in demographics altered park usage? • Has the connectivity to the river corridor or creeks been well received? What has worked? What more can be done? • Have alleys and street goals been updated to reflect current traffic patterns, service needs, usage patterns? • Does the pedestrian system support multi -modal objectives? If so, how? • Does the Non -motorized Trails Master Plan reflect and correspond to the evolving land use pattern? Where does it depart? • How does the streetscape design downtown dovetail with broader policies and goals for the circulation and connectivity? Public Utilities, Services and Infrastructure: • How has growth impacted public utilities? Have projections been accurate? ■ What are the projections for the future? What is the capacity of the system? e How has distributed generation (home -based solar and wind) influenced energy infrastructure? Have policies been crafted to support such systems? Are they net - metered? o Have rural and agricultural needs changed related to raw water goals? e Are capacities sufficient for the short-term, mid-term or long-term? a How effective has the undergrounding policy for electrical and communication infrastructure been? a Has the City considered energy efficiency measures or policies? Does the state have policies that need to be reflected in this update? Deliverables: Issues dam' Opportunities Memo Meetings: Planning Team, Advisory Committee and Focus Group Meetings as needed (SEG remote) Task B: Opportunities Public Workshop and Charrette Following the review of these issues with the City and Focus Groups, SE Group will lead a public workshop and charrette to explore how existing and perhaps new policies might be reflected in the community. We will provide a summary of key issues, key opportunities and goals. The workshop will include graphic maps and board showing existing boundaries along with comments/issues identified during prior tasks. Participants will be asked to provide written feedback (on comment cards), post sticky notes on maps, or engage one of the Consulting Team or Focus Group members in a conversation. Ideas about fixture land use, boundaries and spatial dimensions will be discussed and input sought. Small working groups (by neighborhood, issue, and objective) may be organized during the meeting to explore specific areas of interest. Our experience has taught us that formulating the right approach to public engagement sometimes requires flexibility — give people a chance to participate in multiple ways. We will adapt our final agenda and plan according to this mantra. The overall objective of the meeting is to gauge community sentiment on the strategies for updating the General Plan and work to vet ideas for goals, policies and objectives. Deliverables: Public Meeting Materials and Meeting Summary Meetings: Public Engagement Visit #2 (on -site, 2-3 days) Task C: Draft Goals, Policies and Objectives The public and Focus Group feedback on the issues, opportunities and goals for the General Plan Update will be worked into a series of draft goals, policies and objectives. The form of the work will begin to outline the final General Plan Update document. Draft figures reflecting future land use, boundaries and infrastructure will be prepared. The draft document will be submitted to the Advisory Committee for its review, comment and suggestion. During this review, our team will be available by teleconference call (or video conferencing) to discuss any aspect of the draft, clarify thoughts or ideas, and evaluate or consider alternatives). The objective for this task will be to have a final, agreed upon set of goals, policies and objectives that can then be formalized into a General Plan Update. Future Land Use Map A future land use (FLU) map provides the cohesive vision and guide for growth and development and acts as a framework on which to base zoning and development code revisions. In reviewing the current General Plan, and speaking with the City, this is one new element of the plan that we would recommend adding with the update. A FLU map can be highly illustrative or very detailed, depending on the level of predictability and flexibility that the City and community would like to achieve. The SE Group Team will work hard to identify where that balance is, and also to identify the appropriate range of land use classes, densities, and symbology for commercial hubs, connections, redevelopment areas, and opportunities that makes sense for Moab. The FLU map is a great way for the community to see how their vision could materialize into development, and usually is a focal point of discussion. Because of this, we would anticipate several rounds of revisions, working closely with the City, Advisory Committee and Focus Groups to get it exactly right. Deliverables: Draft Goals, Policies and Objectives (3 iterations), and Draft FLU Map (3 iterations) Meetings: Planning Team, Advisory Committee and Focus Group Meetings as needed (SEG remote) Phase 3: Plan Development The last phase of work is where things come together. We believe in creating plans that are meant to be used by the community: land owners, developers, citizen organizations, and decision -makers. SE Group will deliver a plan that is highly graphic, illustrative, and easily interpretable to achieve this goal. Task A: Draft General Plan Update Building upon all the work to date and with an agreed upon list of goals, policies and objectives, the Consulting Team will formulate more detailed policy statements, refine goals and objectives, identify investment and/or regulatory strategies associated with specific goals and polices and incorporate background considerations for all elements. We would also suggest adding a new element in the plan for each goal; public input. For each policy, a brief discussion of public input on the issue could be provided. This helps to assure that in consideration of this policy, public concerns and ideas were fully considered. This, in turn, helps improve the connection between the General Plan and community engagement process The draft document will be provided first to the Advisory Committee and the City Council. Deliverables: Draft General Plan Update Meetings: Planning Team and Advisory Committee as needed (SEG remote) Task B: Draft Plan Public Workshop To help assure that the General Plan Update hit the right mark, the Consulting Team will conduct a presentation of the work at a public meeting (City Council Meeting). Prior to the public meeting, we will meet with representatives from the Advisory Committee, Focus Group, City Council and other key stakeholders to get their specific input. The goal for all of this engagement is to assure that the draft reflects all considerations and that it is well understood. We assume that the Advisory Committee will take the lead in consolidating City responses to the draft plan. The Consulting Team will coordinate with the Advisory Committee to review the draft comments. Deliverables: Public Meeting Materials and Summary Meetings: Public Engagement Visit #3 (on -site, 2 days) Task C: Final General Plan Update and Adoption The final step in the process involves adjusting the draft to reflect public comments and those received from the Advisory Committee. The Consulting Team will work to address all outstanding issues and prepare a final draft General Plan Update. This document will be provided to the Advisory Committee for a final review. The document will also be posted for public comment. It is our understanding that the review process might include additional local meetings (Planning, Zoning, and Adjustment) and City Council. Our Consulting Team will be available to attend these meetings by teleconference or video call as necessary. Based on any final changes, we will make final edits to all plan elements, maps and documents and delivery a record print and electronic set for adoption by the City Council in accordance with Utah State code 10-9a-403. SE Group will assist the City in all materials required for the adoption meeting, and will assist in the presentation of the Final Plan, should that be desired at that time. Deliverables: Final General Plan Update and Data, Adoption Presentation. Meetings: Plan adoption assistance to be determined. FEE SE GROUP RUSSL' L L Principal Associate $80.00 513.5.00 Staf $12.5,00 S65•00 Project Engineer $112,00 Design Engineer 390.00 [ASKS I1OURS labor Expenses Iota] PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS / PLANNING FOUNDATION Task A: Project Initiation and Data Gathering 4 12 12 2 4 $2,978 $2,978 Task B: Public Involvement Plan 8 24 8 6 $4,270 $200 $4,470 Task C: Visioning Open House 8 8 16 $2,760 $300 $3,060 Task D: Planning Foundation and Vision 4 24 16 4 $4,000 $4,000 Total Phase 1 24 68 52 12 $13,560 $500 $14,508 ASE 2.: OPPORTUNITIES Task A: Analysis 4 16 40 20 6 24 $9,752 $9,752 Task B: PublicWorkshop/Charrette 8 16 32 6 $5,190 $500 $5,690 Task C: Draft Goals, Policies and Objectives and Future Land Use Map 8 24 32 2 1 $5,510 $5,510 Total Phase 2 20 56 104 28 26 $20,452 $500 $20,952 PHASE 3: PLAN DEVELOPMENT Task A: Draft Plan 6 16 32 6 8 $5,640 $5,640 Task B: Publie Workshop 8 12 32 6 $4,870 $500 $5,370 Task C: Final Plan and Adoption 4 16 24 4 $3,880 $3,880 Total Phase 3 18 44 88 16 8 $14,390 $500 $14,890 TOTAL 62 168 . .yV' 56 34 S48,402` S1,500 S49,902 na SCHEDULE "l'AsKS ( l -NE _1 UI..Y AUG SGPT 0C;1' NoV DEC PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS / PLANNING FOUNDATION Task A: Project Initiation and Data Gath. Task B: Public Involvement Plan �1 Task C: Visioning Open House Task D: Planning Foundation and Vision ;'� PHASE 2: OPPORTUNITIES Task A: Analysis Task B: Public Workshop/Charrette Task C: Draft Goals, Policies and Objectives and Future Land Use Map PHASE 3: PLAN DEVELOPMENT Task A: Draft Plan Task B: Public Workshop Task C: Final Plan and Adoption 111 Advisory Committee Meetings and/or City Councv: k) Focus Group Meeting's QPublic Meetings (Open House, CharretteProruhop, or Presentation) 5-5 ilanning t,ngineeringussell Proposal Submittal for the S E GROUP 323 West Main Street, Suite 2 Frisco, CO 80443 970-668-33' Primary conta Mark Kane, mkane@segroup.ce m S I_ GROUP Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder April 11, 2012 City of Moab Dear Rachel, Moab, Utah is undoubtedly a special place. It is world-renowned for its scenery and recreation, access to National Parks, and diverse array of nearly year-round events. Locally and regionally, it is valued for its history, culture, climate and quality of life. Moab's economy and way of life are dependent upon balancing these characteristics, and the General Plan Update is an important tool in achieving the balance and vision that the community desires. SE Group has teamed with Russell Planning and Engineering to provide you the most sound and effective General Plan Update possible. Our firm, based in Frisco, Colorado, specializes in planning small recreation -based communities, and deeply understands the intricate balancing act that places like Moab face. We are multi -disciplinary and leaders in our field, but are extremely client -oriented, dedicated to our niche, and thus, selective in the projects that we pursue. The Moab General Plan Update is an ideal mix of our expertise and passion for community planning of this kind. The SE Group Team will be led by Mark Kane, Director of Community Planning, who has played instrumental roles in various land use planning efforts where small town character and the natural environment are paramount. Mark is a consummate strategist —as the Principal overseeing all aspects of the company's land planning and design projects, he always has an eye on the bigger picture issues. Mark's strategic planning skills will be a great asset to producing a plan update that adds predictability to future growth in Moab. Melissa Sherburne will serve as the team's Project Manager and has managed several comprehensive plans in the region, including those in Fruita, Gypsum, Mountain Village, and Ridgway, Colorado. As Project Manager, Melissa will oversee the daily needs of the City, public involvement, and meeting preparation, as well as serve as the primary planner for the update. Melissa is also a LEED Accredited Professional, giving her the knowledge to put the principles of sustainability, into practice. Russell Planning and Engineering is a great asset to our team, with a strong knowledge of current conditions and potential opportunities in Moab. Based in Durango, Jeff Pillus has worked, and.is currently working, extensively in the area and essentially functions as a local partner. Jeff's first-hand knowledge of infrastructure, transportation and connectivity, and land use and development carries us far early on in learning what the real issues and needs are for the update process. We envision a grassroots effort for this process, in which SE Group serves primarily as the facilitator and advisors of the update, overseeing an Advisory Committee and Citizen -led Focus Groups. We have recently conducted a similar approach for the Town of Ridgway, with overwhelming success. In communities such as Moab, residents and key stakeholders truly know what is best for the future, and the SE Group team will provide expertise to evaluate and decipher that vision into effective policies and strategies. Thank you for your consideration of the SE Group Team. We look forward to the chance to speak with you in greater depth about our community -based approach to this project. Mark Kane Melissa Sherburne Principal Project Manager PO BOX 2729 323 WEST MAIN STREET SUITE 201 FRISCO COLORADO 80443 TEL 970 668 3398 FAX 970.668.5798 WWW.SEGRouR_C Om Table of Contents *40 firm descriptions SE Group ., I: G i. (1) i i P For over 50 years, SE Group has been providing planning and design services to clients throughout the world. More specifically, we are a multi -disciplinary design and planning firm, specializing in mountain and recreation -based communities, including a number of National Park gateways (Red Lodge, MT, Jackson, WY, Estes Park, CO, Yosemite, CA, Government Camp, OR, Crater Lake, OR, and others). Based in Frisco, CO, Burlington, VT, Salt Lake City, UT, and Ketchum, ID, we understand recreation -based communities, both as places to work and a places to call home. Our planning work ascribes to three Core Values: Effective Public Engagement: Creative and effective public involvement is key to SE Group's planning approach. Especially in small mountain, rural, and desert communities, the General Plan must truly reflect the fabric and vision of its diverse residents and visitors. To do so requires not simply a series of public meetings, but a true partnership between the consultant and the community. We use modern tools (web, surveys), as well as time honored techniques (charrettes, one-on-one stakeholder interviews) to enable our team to clearly understand and plan for the vision of the community. We work with our clients to establish issue -based focus groups that can act independently to explore issues and solutions and can bring that insight back into the process. This "ground -up" approach not only leads to a more engaging process, but ultimately a plan that is embraced and implemented by citizens and decision - makers. Effective Policy Documents: SE Group specializes in creating innovative, yet actionable plans. They are dynamic guidebooks for growth and development, instead of wordy policy documents. Clients attest that the resulting plans do not "sit on the shelf," but instead are relied upon by developers, decision -makers, and members of the public. The key to creating successful documents is achieving a balance between predictability and flexibility, graphics and guidelines, and vision and actions. The SE Group team will work with the City of Moab to structure a planning document that achieves this balance, while also meeting the specific regulatory and administrative needs of the City. Sustainability at All-Levelsr Sustainability means something different to rural and mountain communities. The challenges are greater, being more remote, weather -dependent, and having destination - based economies. Opportunities for transit, local food production, housing, and jobs are far more limited. At the same time, SE Group believes that through effective land use and community planning efforts, opportunities that can be found for achieving new levels of sustainability. The guiding principle of our work is that environmental, economic, and social benefits can all be optimized with the aid of specific community design and land development policies. City of ,Moab General Plan Urjdate City of Moab General Plan Update Principals Ted Beeler President Ted has over three decades of experience leading and managing projects of varying size and scope, involving multi -discipline planning and analytical assignments for both public and private sector clients. Ted has broad expertise in the areas of research, analysis, program formulation, planning and leading the preparation of resource and development -oriented studies. In addition to leading the growth and development of SE Group, Ted remains significantly involved by providing strategic oversight on a variety of projects, ranging from visioning to market and financial feasibility studies, due diligence analysis and strategic planning. Ted brings his passion for the mountains coupled with his travel experiences to other worldwide resorts, in helping clients to discover and implement new ideas. Kent Sharp Principal, Vice President Kent's experience combines 14 years of professional experience gained as a Principal with SE Group, eight years as the Winter Sports Administrator for the U.S. Forest Service in Summit County, Colorado, and several years in mountain resort operations. Kent applies his skills to a wide range of project assignments which include Master Planning, regulatory compliance and market and financial analyses. As a Principal in the firm, Kent oversees teams of SE Group managers and staff, providing critical project direction and insight into land planning and analysis. Kent is also a highly skilled public engagement specialist, facilitator and planning strategist. Mark Kane Principal, Director of Community Planning Mark brings over 18 years of experience in environmental and land use planning and analysis to the SE Group team. Mark is a consummate strategist: as the principal overseeing all aspects of the company's land planning and design projects, he always has an eye on the bigger picture issues. Having worked throughout New England and the West, Mark is skilled at developing plans that uphold the aesthetic and character of community, through clear and actionable policies. Current Active Projects SE Group 1111 Red Lodge Transportation Feasibility Feasibility Study Red Lodge, Montana SE Group is working in partnership with Sanderson -Stewart of Bozeman on assessing transportation options to link various recreational (alpine, nordic) and tourism venues with the City of Red Lodge to support economic development. ' Hunter -Smuggler Cooperative Plan USFS-Local Cooperative Plan Aspen, CO SE Group is the prime contractor for a cooperative planning process that addresses land use and recreational access within a portion of the National Forest lands associated with the Hunter and Smuggler Mountains in Aspen, CO. Project focus groups and draft plan has been completed with adoption pending and identification of first implementation projects beginning. Waterbury Feasibility Study Waterbury, VT SE Group has worked as a subcontractor with Goody Clancy and Freeman French Freeman to evaluate land use and site development options for renovation and/or redevelopment of state lands in Waterbury, VT. Working with the State of VT and local stakeholder groups, the feasibility study addressed all relevant issues for the long- range plan including infrastructure, market -economics, environmental constraints and site design. The results of the analysis were shared with the VT Legislature to determine the acceptable course of action. FAHC ACF Regional Health Care Planning Burlington, V I, SE Group is assisting White 8c Burke on identification of land options for a new ambulatory care facility for the largest regional hospital in Vermont. Using GIS tools and environmental constraints mapping, the anlysis is spanning the entire county and will lead to specific feasibility studies. Eaglecrest Recreational Master Plan Juneau, AK Working with the City of Juneau and the Eaglecrest Ski Area team, SE Group has led the analysis and study for long-range land/recreational uses at one of the city s most valued recreational venues. Mt. Agassiz Park Management Plan Manitoba, Canada Working for Parks Canada, SE Group is leading the analysis of regional demographic and economic factors along with physical site and land use constraints at the Mt. Agassiz area within Riding Mountain National Park. The work is being completed to support a management plan amendment process for the Park that addresses local issues and concerns and identifies future land uses that align with these foundational elements. SE Group has supported the process of engaging stakeholders and worked closely with Park staff to prepare materials for local outreach efforts. St. Albans Streetscape Urban streetscape Design St. Albans, VT SE Group has led the planning and design phase for a new streetscape along Main Street in St. Albans, Vermont. As the largest city in Franklin County, St. Albans has seen growth and a renewed interest promoting greater economic development by improving pedestrian access within the city limits and reconnecting businesses with the streetscape. SE Group has led numerous public meetings to explore options for altering road geometries and specific design elements that promote these objectives. We have worked with City officials to identify grant opportunities and are now poised to prepare formal construction documents for the first phase of a multi -phased project. Note: In addition to the above community planning projects, SE Group is actively engaged in numerous environmental planning (NEPA), landscape architecture and design projects in each of our three main offices. City of Moab General Plan Update Russell Planning & Engineering Russell Planning and Engineering, Inc. (RPE) is a locally owned small business incorporated in 2001. Through customer service, communication, and innovation RPE has grown to a total of 18 employees, including 11 licensed professional engineers and one AICP certified professional planner. Our experience includes a mix of urban, rural, resort and recreational projects in the southwestern US. Working in this environment has taught us to be flexible and ready to handle competing interests between cultures, property owners, and public entities. RPE was founded on the principles of teamwork and open communication ensuring that all team members are aware of project goals and progress, thereby resulting in timely and error free projects. We maintain a personal approach to our projects and clients, offering responsiveness and availability to the City that cannot be duplicated by other firms. Princip )1Russell Plrmni ,,`. f_ngiricoririf: Michael K. Russell, P.E. Michael K. Russell, sole Principal of Russell Planning & Engineering, founded the company in 2001 and has over 28 years experience in civil engineering and project management. Spending roughly half of his career in the public sector, he understands public processes and the tools for successful projects. He served as County Engineer for La Plata County, Colorado where he was in charge of all land development engineering reviews and assisted in the creation of future land use plans, the County Trails Plan, and the County Transportation Plan. As a private consultant, he has planned, designed, and reviewed construction on a multitude of regional projects including conceptual land use plans, feasibility studies, economic enhancement project, and infrastructure plans. Current Active Projects Master Plan Durango, CO Russell Planning and Engineering is the lead consultant responsible for the completion of the plan. Durango Multi -modal Master Plan Feasibility Study for Mixed -use Development of State Land Board Property Feasibility Study LaPlata County, CO Utility planning, capacity analysis, cost estimating. Mercury Village Planning Durango, CO RPE is the lead consultant responsible for all planning and engineering for the project. 4 SE Group 11 4 . A +vject experience The projects that are provided in this section demonstrate the core values of the SE Group Team, as well as the key components of our planning approach. Each one of them included significant public outreach, innovative planning solutions, and the highest level of client satisfaction. Furthermore, they all took place (or are in progress) in small, recreation and tourism -based communities. We are very proud to be specialists in planning for such communities and our project portfolio demonstrates that. Aspen, Colorado City of Moab General Plan Update City of Moab General Plan Update Town of Ridgway Land Use Plan Update Location: Ridgway, CO Client: Town of Ridgway Date of Project Involvement: 2011-2012 Cost: $10,000 SE c I: 0 ll Description: SE Group recently completed the Land Use Plan Update for the Town of Ridgway, Colorado. Ridgway is located in southwestern Colorado, and is situated at the base of the spectacular San Juan mountain range. This is an important year-round tourism destination, with Telluride, Mountain Village, and Ouray in close proximity; but it also has a rich Western heritage that is rooted in agriculture and mining. The land use issues that Ridgway faces are reflective of those roles, as residents want a vibrant economy that reinforces its small town 1:z`F*44&'_' 'Town of Iticig-woy character, quality of life, and the natural environment. The Land Use Plan Update involved a creative and engaging public process that was facilitated by SE Group, but driven by the community. Stakeholder interviews, three public workshops (including one charrette), and a Citizen Task Force carried the plan forward continuously within a compact timeline, and ensured that the plan is a true reflection of the community's vision for the future. The resulting plan is a guidebook -style land use document, with illustrative concepts and forward -thinking policies. One important overarching goal of the community's is to focus growth inward to preserve surrounding agricultural lands and to strengthen quality of life, environmental sustainability, and character of the town. In order to achieve this, the plan includes incentive -based density bonuses, new land use classes to encourage compact development and mixed uses, and policies to support high quality development projects. The Ridgway Land Use Plan Update was adopted in February 2012. Services Performed: Land Use Planning, Existing Policy Review, Urban Design, Public Engagement and Facilitation, Visioning, GIS Mapping and Document Preparation and Graphics. LAND USE PLAN ! ,mot 2011 [7pdatc 6 Hunter Creek -Smuggler Mountain Cooperative Plan Location: Aspen, CO Client: For -the -Forest and USFS Date of Project Involvement: 2011-current Cost: $120,000 (Planning Processes), $240,000 (Total) Description: SE Group is privileged to be leading the Hunter Creek -Smuggler Mountain Cooperative Plan (Hunter - Smuggler Plan), under the direction of the U.S. Forest Service. This exciting project is a new way of planning Forest Service lands that have high recreational use, wildlife and ecosystem values, and are adjacent to mountain and resort communities. The community -based plan involves participation from a wide range of stakeholders from local recreation conservation and environmental groups as well as agencies and jurisdictions, Git.0) 71'.spci, and covers 4,680 acres on the White River ;i::;k+.;� ;;; •4r.'��3"'��' National Forest outside of Aspen, Colorado. A planning team was created, with close interaction of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County planning staff The Hunter -Smuggler Plan included an extensive visioning process, which resulted in the completion of a Vision Document. The Vision Document represents common values shared amongst most stakeholders, and provides a foundation for identifying opportunities, or actions, to meet that vision within the planning area. The Draft Hunter -Smuggler Cooperative Plan was recently released and includes recommendations for forest health, wildlife habitat, recreation, and education projects within the planning area. Following the approval of that document, the projects will be evaluated through a public National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. The Cooperative Plan, as well as background materials and the Vision Document, are available on the project website: www.hunter- smugglerplan. cam. Services Performed: Inter -Agency Cooperative Planning (United States Forest Service, City of Aspen, Pitkin County), Land Use and Recreation Planning, Resource Management, Visioning, Public Engagement and Facilitation, Geospatial Analysis and Mapping, Document Preparation and Graphics. SE Group Sr o,;,, . X nlar Crtek-Emu/gter You ut ■i• CO•petattrf Pteu a ',plead ^. Suggested t.pp (approx.. mMq n.. rwthrrm«arar. (j IlnWdrwi,d.r Planning Pm W Public Open Ppm m white Ip..r Pale.lfn.n 7 City of Moab General Plan Update Telluride Valley Floor Land Use Evaluation Location: Telluride, CO Client: Town of Telluride, CO Date of Project Involvement: 2001-2006 Cost: $200,000 Description: Working closely with the Town of Telluride and Chase & Company, SE Group was asked to provide comprehensive land use and real estate planning and analysis services in support of a determination of "Highest and Best Use" on the area known as the Telluride Valley Floor. Recognized as one of the nation's most endangered historic places by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Telluride Valley Floor saw intense development pressures. Being on unincorporated lands, the parcel was the subject of considerable interest from the Town as well as from neighboring communities and the county. Within this context, SE Group prepared detailed analyses of existing land use regulations and site development restrictions to assess the buildout potential of the 880-acre parcel. A wide range of possible options were explored, quantified and analyzed in context with both the regulatory environment as well as the local and regional economic and market conditions. The results of this study was ultimately forwarded to Chase & Company and used as a basis for the detailed valuation of the property. The project ultimately culminated in a condemnation process through which the Town of Telluride ultimately took control of the land and has proceeded to develop and is implementing a conservation and open space management plan. Services Performed: Land Use Planning, Geospatial Analysis and Mapping (GIS), Public Engagement and Facilitation, Review and Expert Testimony, and Document Preparation. 8 Girdwood Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Area Master Plan Location: Girdwood, AK Clients: Municipality of Anchorage, AK and Alyeska Resorts Date of Project Involvement: 2005-2007 (Land Use Planning), Area Master Plan (2007-2009) Cost: $85,000 (Land Use Planning), Area Master Plan ($200,000) SE Group Description: Girdwood Alaska, an unincorporated S community within the Municipality of Anchorage, has long sought to solidify its position as a four -season destination in the State of Alaska. As the home to the • Alyeska Ski Resort and situated half way between the busy cruise ship port of Seward and Anchorage, the locale i has the right combination of beautiful setting, cultural attractions and a vibrant demographic and recreational tourism market. SE Group was retained to work with the National Development Council (NDC), to prepare an assessment • • 6 �o L. L on the suitability of suitability of the region for winter recreational activities. The NDC, the nation's oldest non- profit community development organization, had helped establish a strong public -private partnership in support of the long-term comprehensive planning for the area. SE Group provided detailed assessment of recreational opportunities (including gold, alpine and nordic skiing), facilitated public engagement to a diverse stakeholder community, and assisted with the incorporation of our findings into the Municipality's Area Master Plan process. Following completion of this assignment, SE Group was retained by Alyeska Resort to prepare a detailed Area Master Plan for recreational and residential development. This planning process built upon the Girdwood Comprehensive Plan process and has continued to this date with specific design and implementation projects. Services Performed: Land Use and Site Planning, GIS Mapping, 3D Visualization, Public Engagement and Facilitation, Streetscape Design, Permitting and Document Preparation. City of Moab General Plan Update Moran Center at Waterfront Park Master Plan Location: Burlington, VT Client: City of Burlington, VT Date of Project Involvement: 2008—current Cost: $110,000 Description: The City of Burlington is in the process of revitalizing the long vacant Moran Power Generating facility into a vibrant, mixed -use activity center. Given its premier location, the project is subject to a wide variety of passionate interest groups and extensive environmental review. SE Group has been involved since the earliest visioning sessions, generating concept sketches for public forum presentations. This process proved critical to achieving public consensus and moving the vision forward to reality. The Moran Center at Waterfront Park will host a wide variety of uses including a Children's Museum, rooftop restaurant, Lake Champlain Sailing Center, and a towering indoor ice -climbing wall. In consideration of the project's environmentally sensitive waterfront location and past industrial usage, extra care is being given to integrate environmental remediation and innovative storm water treatment techniques seamlessly into the design of the outdoor program elements. Services Performed: Land Use and Site Planning, GIS, 3D Visualization, Public Engagement, Streetscape Design, Urban Design, and Document Preparation. ck u 10 Durango Multi -modal Master Plan Location: Durango, CO Client: City of Durango, CO Date of Project Involvement: 2011 to present Cost: $28,000 Description: The purpose of the Plan is to establish a connected functional network of transit routes, bicycle routes, and pedestrian facilities throughout the city. On and off street trail and transit connections will be identified, construction cost estimates prepared, and a new set of user-friendly maps will be developed. The final product will be an implementable list of projects by zone, recommendations for transit system enhancements, pedestrian facilities, bike lanes, bike parking, and suggested locations for potential "park and rides." The project is approximately 70% complete. Services Performed: Russell Planning and Engineering is the lead consultant responsible for the completion of the plan. SE Group Russell Planning & [ngineering Feasibility Study for Mixed -use Development of State Land Board Property Location: La Plata County, CO Client: La Plata County Planning Department, as a subconsultant to Design Workshop Date of Project Involvement: 2010 to present Cost: $31,000 Project Description: La Plata County in cooperation with the State Land Board, hired the design team to prepare a Feasibility Study for the development of a large 600-acre parcel in the County. The parcel was owned by the State Land Board and development of the parcel for high -density industrial, commercial, retail, and residential use was analyzed. RPE, attended public workshops and analyzed the available utility sources. Conceptual plans were developed involving connection to the City of Durango water system and the South Durango Sanitation District for water and sewer service. Analysis included feasibility, capacity, conceptual design, and development cost estimates. This project is 70% complete. Services Performed: Utility Planning, Capacity Analysis, Cost Estimating. 11 Ciiy of Moab General Plan update City of Durango Multi -modal Transit Center Location: Durango, CO Client: City of Durango, as a subconsultant to Brooke Architecture Date of Project Involvement: 2007-2009 Cost: $33,400 Description: The City of Durango recently opened their new Multimodal Transit Center in downtown Durango. This facility serves as the regional transit facility for Durango and all of southwest Colorado. The design included traffic circulation analysis for busses and passenger vehicles, parking lot design, grading and drainage engineering, site engineering and bicycle and ADA- compliant pedestrian access, stormwater routing and treatment design, utility engineering including new infrastructure and improvements and relocations of existing utilities. Services Performed: The design included traffic circulation analysis for busses and passenger vehicles, parking lot design, grading and drainage engineering, site engineering and bicycle and ADA-compliant pedestrian access, stormwater routing and treatment design, utility engineering including new infrastructure and improvements and relocations of existing utilities. Russell Phnning & 1_1)12,4Ice ing Three Springs Neighborhood Location: Durango, CO Client: Southern Ute Indian Tribe / GF Development Group, LLC Date of Project Involvement: 2007 to present Cost: $472,000 Description: Three Springs is a 681-acre Traditional Neighborhood Development committed to sustainable design principles. Design services are provided on a continuing basis for the multiple phases of the project. The development is currently being constructed in phases as a mixed use community including the Merry Regional Medical Center, restaurants, retail, commercial, and residential neighborhood. Services Performed: Design services are provided on a continuing basis for the multiple phases of the project. Completed designs include road and utility infrastructure design, site design for drainage improvements, site design for a new City Police Substation, and various County Road designs in the vicinity of the project. 12 Durango Mountain Resort - Purgatory Village Conceptual Plan Location: La Plata County, CO Client: Purgatory Village Land, LLC Date of Project Involvement: 2004-2006 Cost: $2.28 million 0 Description: RPE prepared a Conceptual Master Plan including 111 subdivision, road, parking, sewer, water, and transit component design for major expansion of Durango Mountain (Purgatory) Ski i Resort. On -going work involves close coordination with the owner regarding overall site planning and lot layout, including refinements to the infrastructure master plans, preparation of construction cost estimates, and meeting with the affected agencies and county planning staff. Completed work included coordination with environmental consultants to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Project consists of 600 residential units and 170,000 square feet of commercial, integrating with many existing privately owned adjacent properties. The Conceptual Plan was approved by the County and the individual r area plans are currently being developed. a Services Performed: RPE prepared a Conceptual Master Plan including subdivision, road, parking, sewer, water, and transit. Component design work involves close coordination with the owner regarding overall site planning and lot layout, including refinements to the infrastructure master plans, preparation of construction cost estimates, and meeting with the affected agencies and county planning staff. SE Group Russell Planning } Lngineer ing " . r ; L . " " " 1 ' r , : team composition SE Gro a We have assembled a team of consultants for this project that reflect the range of talents and expertise that the Moab General Plan Update will likely demand. The following chart illustrates a potential organizational structure that will allow us to engage the right agencies, advisors and organizations, team -members, and citizens at the right times in the planning process. On the pages to follow, we've included bio's of our key personnel, as well as additional team members who would be working on this project. L } CITY OF MOAB ' PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CITY STAFF ADVISORY COMMITTEE Project Management Mark Kane, Principal Melissa Sherburne, Project Manager 1 Economic Development Key Team Ted Beeler (SEG) Members: Kent Sharp (SEG) CITIZEN -LED FOCUS GROUPS Environment Sustainability Travis Beck (SEG) Kelly Owens (SEG) Land Use Urban Design Nancy Lauro (RPE) Mark Hamelin (SEG) Andrew Pollack -Bruce (SEG) Infrastructure Connectivity Jeff Pillus (RPE) Adam Portz (SEG) City of Moab General Plan Update 15 City of Moab General Plan Update Key Team Members SE Group Mark Kane Principal, Director of Community Planning Mark is a Principal and Director of Community Planning for SE Group. With over 14 years of experience in community planning throughout the country, Mark is particularly skilled at translating a community's vision for the future into meaningful land use policies and actions. Mark also offers a wealth of knowledge in planning strategy and tools for a client to consider, such as form -based code, incentived zoning, transfer of development rights programs, river setbacks, and alternative energy siting and permitting. Mark will oversee all aspects of the Moab General Plan Update. Melissa Sherburne, LEED AP Project Manager, Planner Melissa is an experienced land use and environmental planner. Melissa joined SE Group in 2011, and managed comprehensive plans for the City of Fruita, the Town of Gypsum, the Town of Mountain Village, and most recently, the Town of Ridgway, Colorado. As Project Manager on those plans, Melissa oversaw the public involvement, day-to-day client needs and budget, and was the primary planner, writer and graphics specialist. Melissa's passion for community planning in rural and small recreation -based communities is what brought her to SE Group. Melissa will serve as Project Manager and lead planner for the Moab General Plan Update. Travis Beck Senior Planner Travis is a skilled public involvement specialist and environmental planner and has organized and facilitated public meetings for complex and controversial projects throughout the West. Travis' led the development of an online portal for the public to engage in planning processes, which allows the public to both review and comment online though a customized commenting system. Travis will lead the public involvement and facilitation portion of the Moab General Plan Update, as well as oversee the environmental aspects of the plan update. Ted Beeler President As described in the Principal Bio's in Section 1, Ted is a highly experienced planning professional, having worked in tourism and recreation -based communities throughout the world. More than anyone else in the firm, Ted has worked on various planning and feasibility studies in National Park gateway communities, so will oversee the economic and market analysis portion of the Moab General Plan Update. Ted will also play an important role in key stakeholder outreach, participating in interviews with developers, land owners, and public agencies. Kent Sharp Vice President, Principal As described in the Principal Bio's in Section 1, Kent is a skilled facilitator and land planning strategist. Kent also has a true understanding of the dynamics that make resort communities viable and vibrant, having spent a great deal of time in places such as Moab. Kent will play a role in both the public involvement and economic and market analysis portions of the Moab General Plan Update Note: Resumes for team members listed on this page are included in the addendum. 16 SE Group Mark Hamelin Senior Design Director Mark serves as lead designer on many of the firms nationally and internationally recognized projects and provides design direction to project managers throughout the firm. Deriving inspiration from the physical and contextual nature of the site, Mark has the ability to quickly grasp the projects vision to create simple, yet elegant solutions to highly complex land planning problems. His ability to communicate and collaborate with a wide variety of professional consultants and stake holders allows the design process to be interactive, unique and exciting. Adam Portz Associate Landscape Architect Working as a Registered Landscape Architect and having a passion for outdoor adventures makes Adam a valuable member of the SE Group team. With over twelve years of professional experience, Adam is well -versed; balancing a creative approach to master planning and site design with a solid technical foundation. Adam will support the urban design component of the Moab General Plan Update. Kelly Owens Associate Environmental Planner With six years of natural resource planning experience and a Masters degree in biology, Kelly brings a well-rounded perspective to land use planning projects. Her involvement from the assessment phase, to the strategizing, through field investigation and preparation of actionable policies make her an important member of the planning team. Additionally, Kelly has technical expertise in soil science and wetland delineation, and thorough understanding of federal and state regulatory processes. Kelly will support the environmental analysis, mapping and public involvement components of the Moab General Plan Update. Michael Repyak Associate Land Planner Mike has been a planner with SE Group since 1999, in both the mountain planning and land planning disciplines. Mike often focuses on base lands planning, where the recreational amenities and trails meet the community. Mike is also routinely involved in creating and overseeing the overall graphics of planning document. Mike will oversee the graphics and plan document for the Moab General Plan Update, as well as provide support for evaluating specific planning opportunities such as transportation linkages and redevelopment. Andrew Pollak -Bruce Staff Land Planner A graduate of University of Colorado at Boulder, with a Master of Regional Planning from Cornell University, Andrew has a valuable technical knowledge of land use and policy planning. His comprehensive planning work has focused on the sustainability of tourism -based communities, and the unique challenges that they face in balancing environmental, social, and economic sustainability. Andrew will assist in day-to-day project duties, such as research, writing, meeting preparation, and mapping. Mitch Lefevre Staff Landscape Architect Mitch is a skilled graphics and 3D specialist, lending his skills to a variety of planning and design projects. Mitch will have a very focused role on the Moab General Plan Update, primarily to assist in graphics, 3D visualization and build -out diagrams, and mapping. 17 City of Moab General Plan Update Russell Planning and Engineering Jeff Pillus, P.E. Project Manager As Project Manager, Jeff specializes in guiding infrastructure planning and assisting clients in planning for growth. As a homeowner in Moab, he is familiar with the challenges faced by the City with respect to downtown retail, UDOT, truck traffic, parking, and drainage. He has 15 years of experience in site planning, project permitting and civil engineering. The majority of projects that he manages are in the Moab area including commercial, retail, and residential development. He has worked closely with City staff and developers on ideas for improvements to the downtown area including providing a Complete Streets educational presentation to the Planning Commission in 2010. Nancy D. Lauro, AICP Senior Planner Nancy joined Russell Planning & Engineering, Inc. (RPE) in 2007 and has 24 years of experience in land use planning and entitlement. Prior to her employment with RPE, she served as Manager of Current Planning and Community Development Director for La Plata County, Colorado. With RPE, she has worked as a project manager for entitlement on several large mixed -use projects including Mercury Village in Durango and Reservoir River Ranch, in Pagosa Springs, CO. Her work experience includes comprehensive planning, development agreements, annexations, and all facets of the entitlement process. She specializes in finding common ground and getting projects to approval. Note: Resumes for team members listed on this page are included in the addendum. — 18 --- "SE Group harnessed the energy, creativity and independent spirit of our community to develop a Land Use Plan that suits the individuals who live and work here. The SE Group Team was able to identify and highlight our community gems and values while presenting and exploring innovative land use concepts for the community to consider. I'm .confident we now have an updated Land Use Plan that will serve the Ridgway community well into the future." Jen Coates, Town Manager, Ridgway, Colorado " a r e n n c e s S E G r o u p P r o j e c t _ _ C o n t a c t I n f o r m a t i o n , J e n C o a t e s , T o w n M a n a g e r - T o w n o f R i d g w a y j c o a t e s @ t o w n . r i d g w a y . c o . u s 9 7 0 - 6 2 6 - 5 3 0 8 x 1 2 T o w n o f R i d g w a y L a n d U s e P l a n U p d a t e H u n t e r - S m u g g l e r C o o p e r a t i v e P l a n S c o t t F i t z w i l l i a m s , F o r e s t S u p e r v i s o r - W h i t e R i v e r N a t i o n a l F o r e s t s f i t z w i l l i a m s @ f s l e d . u s 9 7 0 - 9 4 5 - 3 2 0 0 T e l l u r i d e V a l l e y F l o o r L a n d U s e E v a l u a t i o n M r . L a n c e M c D o n a l d , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r - T o w n o f T e l l u r i d e l m c d o n a l d @ t e l l u r i d e - c o . g o v 9 7 0 - 7 2 8 - 2 1 6 7 G i r d w o o d C o m p r e h e n s i v e L a n d U s e P l a n a n d A r e a P l a n M r . C h a r l e s D e p e w , D i r e c t o r - N a t i o n a l D e v e l o p m e n t C o u n c i l c d e p e w @ n d c - o n l i n e . o r g 2 0 6 - 4 4 1 - 5 3 6 8 M r . R a n d a l l C a l l , C o u n s e l - A l y e s k a R e s o r t j r c @ c i r q u e p r o p e r t y . c o m ( 8 0 1 ) 3 0 4 - 9 3 0 0 M o r a n C e n t e r K i r s t e n - M e r r i m a n S h a p i r o , S p e c i a l P r o j e c t s M a n a g e r - B u r l i n g t o n C o m m u n i t y a n d E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t O f f i c e k m e r r i m a n @ c i . b u r l i n g t o n . v t . u s ( 8 0 2 ) 8 6 5 - 7 2 8 4 C i t y o f D u r a n g o M u l t i - m o d a l M a s t e r P l a n M s . A m b e r B l a k e , M u l t i - M o d a l C o o r d i n a t o r - C i t y o f D u r a n g o 9 7 0 - 3 7 5 - 4 9 4 9 C i t y o f D u r a n g o M u l t i - m o d a l T r a n s i t C e n t e r R o y P e t e r s e n , G e n e r a l S e r v i c e s D i r e c t o r - C i t y o f D u r a n g o 9 7 0 - 3 7 5 - 4 9 9 9 L a P l a t a C o u n t y F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y f o r M i x e d - u s e D e v e l o p m e n t o f S t a t e L a n d B o a r d P r o p e r t y M r . E l i o t H o y t , P r i n c i p a l - D e s i g n W o r k s h o p 3 0 3 - 6 2 3 - 5 1 8 6 C i t y o f M o a b G e n e r a l P l a n U p d a t e 2 1 0 Itement of philosophy & ject understanding SE Group In our research, visit to Moab, and conversations with the City, there are a number of considerations that our team observed as we developed our proposal. First, the City's fabric and economy are inextricably tied to the tourism of Arches and Canyonlands National Parks. It is a quintessential gateway community, which presents great opportunities for the economy, but also challenges for maintaining a balanced quality of life. As future land use scenarios arise during the planning process, their compatibility with tourism and quality of life must be strongly considered. Our work in communities within the region, and of similar issues and scale, will allow us to elevate this relationship from the very beginning of the process. The second driver that we observed is the need for a cohesive vision for future land use in Moab. The current General Plan includes vision statements; however, they are not clearly translated into physical form. Part of our process will include reaffirming or refining those vision statements and illustrating how those could develop in the future. Furthermore, a common vision will allow the future land use map to set the stage for zoning and code update. Next, we recognized the need for the Moab General Plan Update to align with other local , county, and regional plans. The General Plan should work cohesively with these documents to promote the goals that residents share for growth and development. For example, growth patterns to focus density inward and protect rural lands surrounding the city may be a concept that is promoted in the General Plan as well as the recently updated Grand County Master Plan; or, community -wide connectivity and pedestrian improvements throughout Moab that are included in various City plans, should be carried through this update. Having alignment of policies and actions throughout all documents adds clarity for prioritization and implementation of projects. Our planning philosophy is grounded in a creative and engaging public process. All of the drivers and opportunities must be thoroughly vetted through the community, and our grassroots approach is an effective way to do so. We believe that consultants should be there to provide technical support and ask the right questions, but the vision and solutions must truly come from the community. Lastly, the SE Group Team realizes and is committed to the personal attention that a project like this demands. We are very selective in the projects that we pursue and the Moab General Plan Update would be an ideal blend of our expertise, skills, and passion for community planning of this kind. City of Moab General Plan Update 23 schedule SE Group TASKS PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS / PLANNING JUNE JULY AUG SI?1'L.14,0 T NOV FOUNDATION I)I'.C, Task A: Project Initiation and Data Gath. Task B: Public Involvement Plan - Task C: Visioning Open House [ Task D: Planning Foundation and Vision PHASE 2: OPPORTUNITIES Task A: Analysis Task B: Public Workshop/Charrette ' . - i Task C: Draft Goals, Policies and Objectives and Future Land Use Map PHASE 3: PLAIN DEVELOPMENT Task A: Draft Plan Task B: Public Workshop , it Task C: Final Plan and Adoption Y Advisory Committee Meetings and/or City Council Focus Group Meetings Public Meetings (Open House, Charrette/Workshop, or Presentation) City of Moab General Plan Update 35 budget SE GROUP RUSSELL PM / Principal Associate Staff $65.00 $135.00 $80.00 Project Design PM Engineer Engineer $125.00 $112.00 $90.00 SE Group 'TASKS ---_ - Y 14 11OUIiS Labor Expenses Total PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS / PLA.NNING FOUNDAl'ION Task A: Project Initiation and Data Gathering 4 12 12 2 4 $2,978 $2,971 Task B: Public Involvement Plan 8 24 8 6 $4,270 $200 $4,47( Task C: Visioning Open House 8 8 16 $2,760 $300 $3,061 Task D: Planning Foundation and Vision 4 24 16 4 $4,000 $4,001 Total Phase 1 24 68 52 12 $13,560 $500 $14,50 PHASE 2: OPPORTUNITIES Task A: Analysis 4 16 40 20 6 24 $9,752 $9,75; Task B: Public Workshop./Charrette 8 16 32 6 $5,190 $500 $5,69( Task C: Draft Goals, Policies and Objectives and Future Land Use Map 8 24 32 2 2 $5,510 $5,51( Total Phase 2 20. 56 104 28 26 $20,452 $500 $20,95 PHASE 3: PLAN DEVELOPMENT Task A: Draft Plan 6 16 32 6 8 $5,640 $5,64( Task B: Public Workshop 8 12 32 6 $4,870 $500 $5,37( Task C: Final Plan and Adoption 4 16 24 4 $3,880 $3,88( Total Phase 3 18 44 88 16 8 $14,390 $500 $14,89 , .1,0 Yio 'it �' $48,402 $1,500 $49,9( City of Moab General Plan Update City of Moab General Plan Update Mark D. Kane Principal, Director of Community Planning Mark brings over 18 years of experience in environmental and land use planning and analysis to the SE Group team. Mark is a consummate strategist: as the principal overseeing all aspects of the company's land planning and design projects, he always has an eye on the bigger picture issues. Having worked throughout New England and the West, Mark is skilled at developing plans that uphold the aesthetic and character of community, through clear and actionable policies. Representative Projects • Town of Ridgway Land Use Plan Update, Ridgway, CO. Principal -in -Charge. Land Use Plan Update for the picturesque western town; includes incentivized density and other policies to uphold environmental sustainability and quality growth. Creative public engagement process include citizen -led Focus Groups, a charette, and stakeholder interviews. • Hunter Creek -Smuggler Mountain Cooperative Plan, Aspen, CO. Principal. Multi -agency cooperative plan for over four -thousand valuable recreation and. ecological lands adjacent to Aspen. • Quechee Lakes Long -Range Community Plan, Vermont. Principal -in -Charge. Long-range community plan for the roughly 1,300 residential owners of Quechee Lakes, which required an intensive public engagement process including surveys, newsletters and meetings. Mark acted as principal facilitator of this public process, integrating it into the preparation of a comprehensive planning document that is driving both continued planning efforts and long-range capital investment. • Town of Telluride Conceptual Land Development Study, Colorado. Project Manager. Mark was project manager for SE Group on the conceptual land use plan, environmental and market analysis in formulating the `highest and best use' of a 716-acre site on the Telluride Valley Floor. This plan was instrumental in guiding the future of this site, which was it ultimately being purchased and placed into conservation easement. Education Bachelor of Science, Environmental Studies, University o£Vermane, 1091 .Attlflatic err, Graham Envl ton Mental SUtainabiliry Institute — External Advisory Board American Planning Annotation/Vermont Planners Aaaoelation Urban Land Institute American Society of I.andscape Architects • Milton Town Core Master Plan, Milton, Vermont. Project Manager. Working with Development plan for town core of Milton, Vermont. Through an extensive public process including a community survey and creation of an interactive web site, a series of design studies and land use concepts were presented. Based upon input from the community, marketing information and planning efforts, a final master plan was created indicating areas for new growth and creating an implementation framework. • Open Space Analysis: Northwest Regional Planning Study, Vermont. Principal -in -Charge. Detailed visual assessment involving 44 scenic vistas and field collection of digital photographs using an analysis method developed exclusively for the project. Several public meetings were held with various town and regional planning commissions, select boards, and conservation committees. Mt Crested Butte Town Center, Colorado. Principal -in -Charge. Site design, landscape design, and land use permitting support for the development of the Mt. Crested Butte Town Center. A preliminary design plan that includes residential, skier service, recreation, and limited commercial development within an integrated pedestrian environment was developed. A hallmark of the project has been the design of a sophisticated parking and transportation management system that works seamlessly with the local transit system. These design elements will allow visitors and guests easy access to new development and ski area services and amenities. Melissa Sherburne, LEED AP Project Manager, Planner Melissa is an experienced land use and and policy planner, especially in recreation -based communities. She has served as project manager on a number of award -winning and innovative projects in places such as Fruita, Gypsum, Steamboat Springs, and Mountain Village, Colorado. Melissa's technical expertise, coupled with her unique understanding of the challenges that mountain and resort communities face, allow her to develop plans that balance the complex goals and needs of these unique places. SE Group 1.1 Is Cl I Representative Projects SE Group; Frisco, CO • Town of Ridgway Land Use Plan Update, Ridgway, CO. Project Manager. Land Use Plan Update for the picturesque western town; includes incentivized density and other policies to uphold environmental sustainability and quality growth. Creative public engagement process include citizen -led Focus Groups, a charette, and stakeholder interviews. • Hunter Creek -Smuggler Mountain Cooperative Plan, Aspen, CO. Planner. Multi -agency cooperative plan for over four -thousand valuable recreation and ecological lands adjacent to Aspen. • Elkhorn Feasibility Study, Estes Park, Colorado. Planner. Conceptual planning, site design, and feasibility analysis for the redevelopment of one of Colorado's oldest guest lodges. The concept includes additional recreational amenities, cultural facilities, and connections to downtown Estes Park. AECOM, Fort Collins, CO, Project Manager (2006-2011) • Fruita Community Plan Update, Fruita, CO. Project Manager. Comprehensive plan update that will serve as the guide for future development of the city and enable citizens to direct an orderly growth and development process. The public process also involved a review of annexation, subdivision and zoning ordinances, and other pertinent documents that relate to implementation of the comprehensive plan. it, Master of Environmental Management, Duke University, 2005 Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2001 Affiliations CO APA BrLawr Committee Board Member Awards Merit Award for Planning, ASLA Colorado, Gypsum/ Eagle RiverArea Plan, 2010 Merit Award for Planning and Urban Design, ARA Qolorado, Fruita 2008 Comprehensive Plan, 2008 • Eagle River Area Plan, Gypsum, CO. Project Manager. The Eagle River Area Plan is a land use plan aimed at preserving the Eagle River corridor's picturesque setting and outstanding natural resources, while also strengthening Gypsum's long-term economic and social sustainability. • Mountain Village Comprehensive Plan, Mountain Village, CO. Project Manager.The first comprehensive plan for Mountain Village, which is the resort community adjacent to Telluride. The innovative plan is a partnership between residents, second -homeowners, the Town, and the ski company, and is focused on balancing economic, social, and environmental sustainability. • Fruita Parks, Open Space and Trails Master Plan, Fruita, CO. Planner. Fruita is the gateway community to the Colorado National Monument, which is renowned for its mountain biking, among other natural resources. This master plan identified key trail connections between the city and public lands, as well as how locations for future parks and open space preservation. • Steamboat Springs Open Space and Trails Master Plan, Steamboat Springs, CO. Project Manager. The Steamboat Springs Open Space and Trails Master Plan ensures the protection of city's natural and scenic resources. The plan includes open space preservation strategies, the creation of an off-street trails system, and recommendations for becoming a bicycle -friendly community. • Estes Valley Habitat Assessment, Estes Park, CO. Planner. The study identified the most important habitats, species, ecological linkages, and processes that need to be conserved and enhanced to maintain a healthy ecosystem. City of Moab General Pion Update Travis Beck Senior Planner 111111.111111111 Travis is a skilled public involvement specialist, project manager, and environmental planner. Travis has organized and facilitated public meetings for complex and controversial projects throughout Colorado, and in particular, mountain communities. Travis' led the development of an online portal for the public to engage in planning processes, which allows the public to both review and comment online though a customized commenting system. Additionally, Travis' background in environmental science and policy provides a technical foundation to work through complex environmental and regulatory issues facing land management and planning projects. Travis has worked on a variety of environmental and land use planning projects throughout Colorado and the West. Representative Projects • Town of Ridgway Land Use Plan Update, Ridgway, CO. Senior Planner. Land Use Plan Update for the picturesque western town; includes incentivized density and other policies to uphold environmental sustainability and quality growth. Creative public engagement process include citizen -led Focus Groups, a charette, and stakeholder interviews. Travis facilitated the public design charette, as well as provide oversight on environmental policy and public lands. • Hunter Creek -Smuggler Mountain Cooperative Plan, Aspen, CO. Project Manager. Multi -agency cooperative plan for over four -thousand valuable recreation and ecological lands adjacent to Aspen. Travis led the extensive public involvement process, which included facilitation and stakeholder engagement. The process is online at www.hunter-smugglerplan.com. • Breckenridge Ski Resort Breckenridge, Colorado. Senior Project Manager. Travis served as the Senior Project Manager for the Peak 6 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) NEPA process as the Prime Contractor for the U,S. Forest Service. The Draft EIS objectively analyzes scientifically complex issues such as Canada lynx, stream health, and the mountain pine beetle epidemic. Travis managed the internal SE Group team and 11 different sub -consultant resource specialists, while guiding a Forest Service Interdisciplinary Team comprised of approximately 20 individuals. Public involvement was critical in this EIS project, and Travis facilitated public outreach and public meetings throughout the process. Travis directed staff through the receipt of approximately 900 comment letters on the Draft EIS. In addition, SE Group developed an innovative project -specific website to present the NEPA process to the public (www.breckenridgepeak6.com). Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies, Biniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 2001 Affiliations Society of Wetland Scientists National Association of Environmental Professionals Summit County, Colorado Planning Commissioner - Board of Adjustment • Summit County Recreation Path, Summit County, Colorado. Project Manager. Travis served as the Project Manager for the Summit County Open Space and Trails proposal for a paved recreation path on National Forest System lands administered by the Forest Service. Travis' team at SE Group prepared an Environmental Assessment for the Forest Service, which was approved and will be constructed in 2012. The EA considered a range of environmental resources including stream health, wildlife and wetlands. • Eclipse Snow Park, Alice, Colorado. Project Manager. Wetland delineation and site survey of potential ski area located a short distance from Denver. Planning services included overall environmental evaluation, as well as close involvement with Clear Creek County Planning Department and County Commissioners. • Monarch Mountain Master Development Plan, Monarch, Colorado. Project Manager. Environmental and overall planning for resort improvements. Effective public engagement was instrumental to the acceptance of the Master Plan by the U.S. Forest Service. SE Group Ted Beeler E c. President, Owner Ted has over three decades of experience leading and managing projects of varying size and scope, involving multi -discipline planning and analytical assignments for both public and private sector clients. Ted has broad expertise in the areas of research, analysis, program formulation, planning and leading the preparation of resource and development -oriented studies. In addition to leading the growth and development of SE Group, Ted remains significantly involved by providing strategic oversight on a variety of projects, ranging from visioning to market and financial feasibility studies, due diligence analysis and strategic planning. Ted brings his passion for the mountains coupled with his travel experiences to other worldwide resorts, in helping clients to discover and implement new ideas. Ted's areas of expertise include: Market and Financial Feasibility Studies • Project visioning Due Diligence related to resort acquisitions Strategic planning and regulatory approvals Comprehensive land use planning Representative Projects Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area, Bloomington, Minnesota. Conducted a Strategic Business Plan for the upgrading and expansion of a successful urban ski area into a four -season recreation area. The study focused on the physical, market and financial elements of a $22M capital improvement plan for the Three Rivers Park District. Mt Agassiz Feasibility Study, Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba. Prepared a comprehensive feasibility study evaluating the potential reintroduction of a defunct ski area in the National Park. The study program included public outreach, physical and market assessments and preparing financial pro-forma's of three operating scenarios. • Dyer Mountain, Lassen County, California. Developed project vision and led consultant team in formulating the planning, design and development strategies of a new four -season resort in Northern California. Assisted Dyer Mountain Associates in land acquisition contracts, regulatory approvals, voter initiative, environmental planning and creation of ski and real estate resort development concepts. Prii !cation Master of Urban Planning, University of Michigan, 1977 Bachelor of Science, University of Utah, 1974 Appointments National Ski Areas Association Board of Directors — 2000-2006 National Ski Areas Association Environmental Committee Member— 1998 to present Professional Affiliations Member of Vistage International, 1999.2010 Urban Land Institute National Association of Environmental Professionals Girdwood, Alaska. Presentation on four season recreation and resort trends to group of regulators, politicians, resort developers and community leaders in Girdwood, AK for the Glacier Summit. Facilitated discussion about process of developing a new resort including the preparation of a community vision, concept plans and regulatory environment, leading to the creation of a Memorandum of Understanding among landowners, proponents, stakeholders, agencies of jurisdiction and politicians. • Oquirrh Mountain Resort Preliminary Feasibility Study, Salt Lake City, Utah. Prepared the market and financial feasibility analysis for the development of a major destination resort proposed by the Kennecott Land Company. City of Moab General Plan Update Kent Sharp Principal Kent's industry knowledge combines 15 years of professional experience gained as a Principal with SE Group, eight years as the Winter Sports Administrator for the U.S. Forest Service in Colorado, and several winters spent in mountain resort operations. Specializing in a variety of Federal, State and local entitlement processes, Kent is adept in managing complex public involvement processes with a multitude of stakeholders, often within contentious environments. As a Principal in the firm, Kent oversees teams of SE Group managers and staff, providing critical project direction and insight into a wide variety of planning and analysis assignments. Through his involvement and oversight, SE Group is able to anticipate issues early in the planning process and bring tested solutions to address the complexities of planning, entitlement and development. 17, F G o , 1. Representative Projects • Elkhorn Project, Estes Park, CO. Prepared a comprehensive development plan for a community oriented recreation facility, hotel, and performing arts center. This process centered on development of the concept plans, capital investment requirements, financial performance estimates, and working with Town officials to secure support for the development phase including a proposal to utilize tax increment financing. • Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area, Bloomington, Minnesota. Conducted a Strategic Business Plan for the upgrading and expansion of a successful urban ski area into a four -season recreation area. The study focused on the physical, market and financial elements of a $22M capital improvement plan for the Three Rivers Park District. • Mt. Agassiz Feasibility Study, Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba. Prepared a comprehensive feasibility study evaluating the potential reintroduction of a defunct ski area in the National Park. The study program included public outreach, physical and market assessments and preparing financial pro-forma's of three operating scenarios. • Arizona Snowbowl, Flagstaff, Arizona. 2002 Facilities Improvements Plan, Environmental Impact Statement, and 2005 Master Development Plan. ,:I t� Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Economics, Business Adminisrratioh and Einance, University of Colorado,1987 Professional Affiliations Team Breckenridge Sports @lob — Board of Directors/Vice President, Breckenridge Ski Resort's elite Ski Racing and Training Program. Summit fiats Association —Advisory Board Member, @om inanity Association Managing and Operating four ski -to destination backcountry huts in Summit County, eolorado. • Breckenridge Ski Resort, Breckenridge, Colorado. Master Development Plan, Environmental Impact Statement, and Peak 9 Lifts and Facilities Improvements Environmental Assessment. • Durango Mountain Resort, Durango, Colorado. Master Development Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. • Erzurum, Turkey. Mountain Resort Master Plan for a new, four -season resort in Erzurum, Turkey which will host the Alpine and Nordic events for the 2011 Universiade Winter Games as well as World Cup Alpine skiing events. • Jackson Hole Mountain Resort Jackson, Wyoming. Guided Backcountry Skiing Environmental Assessment and Planning and approval for the 2007/2008 replacement of the Mountain Tram. Oquirrh Mountain Resort Preliminary Feasibility Study, Salt Lake City, Utah. Prepared the market and demographics assessment and projection, financial feasibility analysis, and pro forma for the development of a major destination resort proposed by the Kennecott Land Company. 5-5 Jeff Pillus, P.E. Project Manager As Project Manager, Jeff specializes in guiding infrastructure planning and assisting clients in planning for growth. He has 15 years of experience in site planning, project permitting and civil engineering. His work experience includes managing a wide variety of public, commercial, institutional, and private developments. Representative Projects Rivers Gate, Pagosa Springs, CO (2007—Present) Client Liaison As a 500-unit commercial, mixed -use, and residential development project, Rivers Gate will serve as the eastern gateway to the town. The project involves site planning, infrastructure planning, highway access permitting and civil engineering design for the expansion of downtown Pagosa Springs, CO. The project presents challenges in balancing public access with private interests along the San Juan River corridor in an urban setting. Tuba City Main Street Revitalization, Tuba City, AZ (2010 2011) Project Manager RPE was selected to assist the Bik' eh Hozho Community Development Corporation in development of an Arts and Retail District in the historic town core. The project included streetscape design, pedestrian plazas, retail space development, and the renovation of several historic structures. Community involvement was the key to the success of the project. A comprehensive public outreach program was implemented to gather information from residents, community leaders, and stakeholders to guide the designers in developing planning options. SE Grou Russell PI•.innin�; r fir ginreeritr�; Eclueatdan Bachelor of Science — Environmental Engineering, 1996 — Pennsylvania State University L-rc;ensure Professional Engineer Utah & Colorado 3fillatrons American Society of Landscape Architects American Water Works Association • Mill Creek Village, Moab, UT (2011—Present) Project Manager Mill Creek Village is a residential development in the City of Moab that has required special consideration of traffic and speed control. As Project Manager, Jeff has helped negotiate traffic calming designs acceptable to the City, Owner, and Chief Brewer of the Moab Fire Department. • Glacier Club, Durango, CO (2002—Present) Client Liaison The Glacier Club is a 700 acre, 880 unit, master planned golf resort community. Jeff managed site planning and engineering design for multiple phases of residential and resort development. Designs included multi and single family residential, clubhouse facilities, steepterrain management, highway design, traffic planning, and permitting. The project presents challenges due to steep and rocky terrain. • Edgemont Ranch, Durango, CO (2003—Present) Project Engineer The project is a multi -phased residential development project on 830 acres northeast of Durango, CO.. The original project, constructed in the 1980's was expanded in 2003 from 240 to 700 units. All infrastructure was re -designed to accommodate the expansion including a booster pump water system with two storage tanks and telemetry, sewer design and County highway widening and auxiliary lane construction. • Chaco Trails Master Planned Community, Crown Point, NM (2004 2006) Project Engineer The project is a 2500 unit master planned community for the Navajo Housing Authority on a 4 sq mi site. Conceptual design included feasibility studies for roads, water 8c sewage systems, drainage, and utilities, as well as planning, aerial survey and agency coordination. C of Moab General Plan Update Nancy D. Lauro, AICP i Senior Planner nning USSG'�� Nancy joined Russell Planning & Engineering, Inc. (RPE) in 2007 and has 24 years of experience in land use planning and entitlement. Prior to her employment with RPE, she served as Manager of Current Planning and Community Development Director for La Plata County, Colorado. With RPE, she has worked as a project manager for entitlement on several large mixed -use projects including Mercury Village in Durango and Reservoir River Ranch, in Pagosa Springs, CO. Her work experience includes comprehensive planning, development agreements, annexations, and all facets of the entitlement process. specializes in finding common ground and getting projects to approval. Experience RUSSELL PLANNING ac ENGINEERING, INC., DURANGO, CO • Responsible for project management, design, and review • Responsible for managing project entitlement work and ensuring code compliance for various residential, commercial and mixed use projects in Durango, CO, La Plata County, CO, Pagosa Springs, CO, Moab, UT and Archuleta County, CO. • Responsible for collecting data, writing reports, and preparing proposals for projects • Responsible for presenting projects before the Planning Commissions, Town Boards and/or City Councils • Planning Institute of Colorado — A subsidiary of the Colorado Chapter of the American Planning Association (2007- present) She Eciuc .=,w/.. B.S, Environmental Studies 1981— University of Vermont M.R.P., Regional Planning 1985 — Washington State University Licensure American Institute of Certified Planners since 1991 • Co- author: "Permission To Build" Chosen by peers to co-author an on-line course LEED Green Associate designed to educate Colorado Real Estate Professionals on basic planning and 2011. development review processes. Course has been on-line since January 2010. Affiliations LA PLATA COUNTY, DURANGO, CO, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR/MANAGER American Planning Association OF CURRENT PLANNING (1996-2007) • Responsible for supervision of current planning, long range planning and oil & gas divisions for rapidly growing County. • Responsible for all aspects, code revisions, comprehensive planning, public involvement and education of public and appointed/elected officials. Administered 1.5M budget. • Responsible for supervision of 17 staff members including professional planners, engineers, surveyors, oil & gas planners and administrative staff. • Responsible for review of projects and authoring regulations. • Provided presentations to Planning Commission, Board of County Commissioners, and various citizens groups. SUMMIT COUNTY, BRECKENRIDGE, CO, MANAGER OF CURRENT PLANNING (1986-1996) • Responsible for managing current planning division and supervising four professional planners. • Responsible for reviewing projects, writing regulations, developing plans, and preparing budgets. • Provided presentations to Planning Commission, Board of County Commissioners, and various citizens groups. IP. City of Moab General Plan Update Milton Town Core Master Plan - Milton, Vermont SE Group provided design guidance, planning and support services for the planning phase of the Town Core Master Plan. Issues of circulation, land use, setback and massing were explored during an intensive public process that included two public visioning workshops, two public presentations, a community survey and on-line web pages devoted to the project. SE Group prepared a final Town Core Master Plan report outlining potential land use directives and ordinances, design considerations as well as appropriate implementation approaches. The Town has recently adopted new zoning regulations, implementing many of the recommendations from the study. Mt. Crested Butte Town Center Master Plan — Crested Butte, Colorado SE Group provided site design, landscape design, and land use planning support for the development of the Mt. Crested Butte Town Center. The design plan included residential, skier service, recreation, and limited commercial development within an integrated pedestrian environment was developed. A hallmark of the project is the design of a sophisticated parking and transportation management system that works seamlessly with the local transit system. These design elements will allow visitors and guests easy access to new development and sid area services and amenities. Quechee Lakes Long -Range Community Plan - Queechee Lakes, Vermont Quechee Lakes is a uniquely special place. Its slow evolution in the nearly 40 years of its existence has allowed it to remain true to its mission: to provide the members with a quality four -season community sensitive to the natural beauty of the valley. The demographics of the Quechee Lakes homeowners, however, are very different today than they were in the 1970s, and the recreation and membership facilities have aged through general wear and tear. Recognizing the need to comprehensively address the challenges arising from the changing needs of its membership and the aging facilities, the SPC resolved to develop a long-range plan that would provide direction for future decision making. Under the guidance of SE Group, the process to create the plan sought broad input and encouraged diverse thinking from the membership, yet was grounded in a sense of pragmatic realism. Goals, alternatives and strategies for addressing the range of amenities, facilities and community fabric issues were presented in the plan, in addition to recommendations to guide implementation of the proposed alternatives and strategies. ■ i i ■ ■ SE Group ■ The following projects were managed by Melissa Sherburne, prior to joining SE Group, while at EDAW/AECOM Fort iCollins. Given their proximity and relevence to Moab, it is important to point out this experience. As Project Manager ✓ Melissa oversaw the public involvement, day-to-day client needs and budget, and was the primary writer and graphics specialist for the plan documents. Fruita Community Plan 2008 Update, Colorado Fruita, Colorado is one of the state's tourism gems with strong cultural roots. World-renowned for its mountain biking trails, Fruitas tradition is founded in the Grand Valley's agricultural way of life. The city has maintained its charming character and small size, but the secret of its fantastic access to recreation, ideal climate, and friendly community has gotten out. The community was at an important juncture where they needed to weigh their values to balance the preservation of their distinctive qualities with reasonable, strategic growth. The Fruita Community Plan Update involved a public involvement plan that engaged the community in all levels of policy -making process. Through public workshops, stakeholder interviews, presentations to community groups, involvement in community events, and newsletters, we ensured that each resident had the chance to contribute what they value most about Fruita and the direction in which they would like to see it go in the future. Fruita exemplifies growth issues seen throughout the West. Strong community involvement and forward -thinking planning resulted in a plan that allowed the community to benefit from smart growth, while keeping the city's ideal traits intact. Recipient of Colorado Chapter of the ASLA's Merit Award for Planning, 2008. Mountain Village Comprehensive Pk n, Co 0 The Mountain Village Comprehensive Plan was a highly unique planning project, given the complex challenges that the town and community face as a remote resort destination. Being the town's first comprehensive plan, it will be instrumental in guiding future land use and redevelopment activities that support the community's vision for year-round economic sustainability, character preservation, and social fabric. Also, as the sister community to the historic Town of Telluride, the plan will address regional issues such as affordable housing, recreation, and the environment. A highly detailed level of design, including visual modeling and volumetrics analysis, creative and extensive public outreach, and detailed implementation strategies, are important project elements. Eagle River Area Plan, Gypsum, Colorado The Town of Gypsum is a gateway to Eagle County for travelers flying into Eagle County airport or driving east along I-70. Its picturesque setting within the Eagle River Valley lends itself to recreation and tourism, although much of the D town has not yet made the most of this asset. The Eagle River Area Plan is the update to the comprehensive plan and is focused on the five -mile stretch along the Eagle River between Highway 6 and I-70 and the east and west town limits, and resulted in a land use concept plan that best meets the community's goals for the future. a The study area is home to gravel mining operations, agriculture, and some conservation lands owned and managed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. While a large portion of the area is constrained by the floodplain of the Eagle River and other important natural resources, the plan identifies land uses in the remaining parts of the study area that will complement these resources and promote the economic and social sustainability for Gypsum. These uses include additional parks and trails, tourist or river -based retail, multi -modal transportation connections, and new residential areas. Recipient of Colorado Chapter of the ASLA's Merit Award for Planning, 2010. Li. 5-5 PLANNING SERVICES AGREEMENT City of Moab General Plan Update THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on this date of Client Name: City of Moab ("Client") Address: 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Phone: 435-259-5129 Fax: 435-259-0600 collectively referred to as the 'Parties". Client and Consultant agree as follows: , 2012, by and between: Consultant Name: SE Group ("Consultant ") Address: 323 West Main Street Frisco, CO 804430 Phone: 970-668-3398 Fax: 970-668-5798 The Client wishes to be provided with the Services (defined below) by the Consultant and the Consultant agrees to provide the Services to the Client on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 1. Key Terms 1.1 Services The Consultant shall provide the following services ("Services") to the Client in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement: Professional services for the update of the 2002 City of Moab General Plan by identifying changed conditions, goals, and objectives that warrant amendments. Said services will incorporate recent efforts, feasibility studies, and other documents that support the implementation of the General Plan and identify any new conditions warranting additions of new goals and/or objectives. Services shall be provided according to the Scope of Work shown as Attachment A, hereto. 1.2 Delivery of Services a. Effective Date: The Consultant shall commence the provision of the Services on July 1, 2012 ("Effective date"). b. Completion Date: The Consultant shall complete the Services by December 31, 2012 ("Completion Date"). 1.3 Site. 5-6 The Consultant shall provide the Services at the following site(s): City of Moab, Utah 1.4 Price. a. As consideration for the provision of the Services by the Consultant, the price ('Price") for the provision of the Services is not to exceed $49,902.00 (Attachment B). b. The Client shall pay for Consultant's out-of-pocket expenses comprising: i. [insert examples here, if agreed] ii. c. The Client shall not pay for Consultant's out-of-pocket expenses comprising: i. [insert examples here, if agreed] ii. 1.5 Payment. a. The Client agrees to pay the Price to the Consultant upon completion of the project: OR price paid in one payment, in installments or upon completion of specific milestones? Need to determine details. b. The Consultant shall invoice the Client for the Services that it has provided to the Client weekly/monthly/after the Completion Date] (delete as appropriate). c. The Client shall pay such invoices within 21 days of their receipt from the Consultant. d. The method of payment of the Price by the Client to the Consultant shall be by: i. check sent to the following address: SE Group 323 West Main Street Suite 201 Frisco, CO 80443 e. Any charges payable under this Agreement are exclusive of any applicable taxes, tariff surcharges or other like amounts assessed by any governmental entity arising as a result of the provision of the Services by the Consultant to the Client under this Agreement and such shall be payable by the Client to the Consultant in addition to all other charges payable hereunder. 2. Engagement. Client hereby engages Consultant (Consultant) in an independent contractor relationship, effective on July 1, 2012 ("Effective date") pursuant to the terms of this agreement to provide the herein described services for the project as more 5-6 described in these provisions. Client and Consultant agree to cooperate with each other in order to fulfill their responsibilities and obligations under this Agreement. Both Client and Consultant shall endeavor to maintain good working relationships among members of the Project Team. The Client and Consultant shall each identify a project representative authorized to act on behalf of their respective entities. 3. Scope of Services. Consultant agrees to perform certain work in connection with the project as more particularly described in Attachment A. 3.1 Materials, maps and information. The Client shall provide the Consultant with accurate maps, surveys, and other pertinent information to complete the project. 3.2 Schedule. Consultant shall perform services according to the Schedule provided in Attachment C. Significant deviations from the Schedule shown in Attachment B shall be agreed upon in writing by both parties. 4. General terms 2.1 Intellectual Property Rights The Consultant agrees to grant to the Client a non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty free license to use, copy and modify any elements of the Material not specifically created for the Client as part of the Services. In respect of the Material specifically created for the Client as part of the Services, the Consultant assigns the full title guarantee to the Client and any/all of the copyright, other intellectual property rights and any other data or material used or subsisting in the Material whether finished or unfinished. If any third party intellectual property rights are used in the Material the Consultant shall ensure that it has secured all necessary consents and approvals to use such third party intellectual property rights for the Consultant and the Client. For the purposes of this Clause 2.1, "Material" shall mean the materials, in whatever form, used by the Consultant to provide the Services and the products, systems, programs or processes, in whatever form, produced by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. 2.2 Warranty a. The Consultant represents and warrants that: i. it will perform the Services with reasonable care and skill; and ii. the Services and the Materials provided by the Consultant to the Client under this Agreement will not infringe or violate any intellectual property rights or other right of any third party. 2.3 Limitation of liability a. Subject to the Client's obligation to pay the Price to the Consultant, either party's liability in contract, tort or otherwise (including negligence) arising directly out of or in connection with this Agreement or the performance or observance of its obligations under this Agreement and every applicable part of it shall be limited in aggregate to the Price. b. To the extent it is lawful to exclude the following heads of loss and subject to the Client's obligation to pay the Price, in no event shall either party be liable for any loss of profits, goodwill, loss of business, loss of data or any other indirect or consequential loss or damage whatsoever. c. Nothing in this Clause 2.3 will serve to limit or exclude either Party's liability for death or personal injury arising from its own negligence. 2.4 Term and Termination a. This Agreement shall be effective on the date hereof and shall continue, unless terminated sooner in accordance with Clause 2.4(b), until the Completion Date. b. Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon notice in writing if: i. the other is in breach of any material obligation contained in this Agreement, which is not remedied (if the same is capable of being remedied) within 30 days of written notice from the other Party so to do; or ii. a voluntary arrangement is approved, a bankruptcy or an administration order is made or a receiver or administrative receiver is appointed over any of the other Party's assets or an undertaking or a resolution or petition to wind up the other Party is passed or presented (other than for the purposes of amalgamation or reconstruction) or any analogous procedure in the country of incorporation of either party or if any circumstances arise which entitle the Court or a creditor to appoint a receiver, administrative receiver or administrator or to present a winding -up petition or make a winding -up order in respect of the other Party. c. Any termination of this Agreement (howsoever occasioned) shall not affect any accrued rights or liabilities of either Party nor shall it affect the coming into force or the continuance in force of any provision hereof which is expressly or by implication intended to come into or continue in force on or after such termination. 2.5 Relationship of the Parties The Parties acknowledge and agree that Services performed by the Consultant, its employees, agents or sub -contractors shall be as an independent contractor and that nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a partnership, joint venture, agency relationship or otherwise between the parties. 2.6 Notices Any notice which may be given by a Party under this Agreement shall be deemed to have been duly delivered if delivered by hand, first class post, facsimile transmission or electronic mail to the address of the other Party as specified in this Agreement or any other address notified in writing to the other Party. Subject to any applicable local law 5-6 provisions to the contrary, any such communication shall be deemed to have been made to the other Party if delivered by: i. first class post, 2 days from the date of posting; ii. hand or by facsimile transmission, on the date of such delivery or transmission; and electronic mail, when the Party sending such communication receives confirmation of such delivery by electronic mail. 2.7 Miscellaneous a. The failure of either party to enforce its rights under this Agreement at any time for any period shall not be construed as a waiver of such rights. b. If any part, term or provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable, neither the validity nor enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement shall be affected. c. Neither Party shall assign or transfer all or any part of its rights under this Agreement without the consent of the other Party. d. This Agreement may not be amended for any other reason without the prior written agreement of both Parties. e. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof unless any representation or warranty made about this Agreement was made fraudulently and, save as may be expressly referred to or referenced herein, supersedes all prior representations, writings, negotiations or understandings with respect hereto. f. Neither Party shall be liable for failure to perform or delay in performing any obligation under this Agreement if the failure or delay is caused by any circumstances beyond its reasonable control, including but not limited to acts of god, war, civil commotion or industrial dispute. If such delay or failure continues for at least 7 days, the Party not affected by such delay or failure shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement by notice in writing to the other. g. This Clause 2.8(g) and Clauses 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8 of this Agreement shall survive any termination or expiration. h. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the Client is located (or if the Client is based in more than one country, the country in which its headquarters are located) (the "Territory") and the parties agree to submit disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement to the non- exclusive of the courts in the Territory. AS WITNESS the hands of the Parties hereto or their duly authorized representatives the day and year first above written. The City of Moab has caused this Contract to be subscribed by its Mayor and attested by its City Recorder on its behalf; and the Contractor has signed this Contract as set forth below. City of Moab, Utah Date: By: Mayor David Sakrison A'1"1'hST: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder (Seal) CONSULTANT: Date:_ By: Title State of ) § County of ) On the day of , personally appeared before me who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public My Commission Expires: Residing in: Grand County (Seal) 5-6 ATTACHMENT A Scope of Work The selected consultant will assist the Planning Commission, City Council, City staff, the public and other stakeholders in updating the City's current General Plan. The selected consultant is not expected to develop an entirely new General Plan. Following is a list of expected tasks of the consultant to be detailed in the final contract with the selected consultant: 1. Conduct an initial meeting with City staff to review the project schedule, schedule meetings and determine a strategy for reviewing the 2002 Plan. 2. Obtain existing plans, maps and other documents relevant to the project. City staff will provide all available documentation to the consultant. 3. Conduct meetings with elected officials and citizens. These meetings should include the Mayor, City Council, Planning Commission, citizens, landowners and other stakeholders. The purpose of these meetings will be to review the current plan and gain input on changes in conditions warranting changes in the plan. 4. Conduct weekly review meetings and/or telephone conferences with City staff to discuss project status and drafts for review. 5. Plan a public participation process for the purpose of reviewing and updating the current General Plan. The public participation process should reach out to all segments of the community and provide for multiple modes and opportunities for input into the revision process. 6. Conduct public meetings and topic -specific focus groups as necessary. 7. Review and revise goals, objectives and implementations strategies based on public input and community desires. 8. Analyze the consistency of current City ordinances and policies in relationship to the goals and objectives in the Plan and create an implementation program. 9. Complete and submit draft revisions to the City for review, comment, and approval individually based upon a schedule developed at the beginning of the planning process. 10. Make periodic reports to the City Council and Planning Commission on the progress of the Project. 11. Prepare a "Public Draft" document and present a draft to the City Council , Planning Commission and the public. 12. Prepare a "Final Draft" document of the amended sections and make a final presentation at a public hearing and all associated meetings to secure adoption of the Update General Plan. 5-6 RESOLUTION # 08-2012 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 BUDGET WHEREAS, The City of Moab adopts the 2012/2013 Fiscal Year Budget presented to the Mayor and City Council as follows: FUNDS REVENUES EXPENDITURES 1. GENERAL FUND $ 7,701,025 $ 7,701,025 2. CLASS "C" ROAD FUND $ 235,000 $ 235,000 3. RECREATION FUND $ 532,351 $ 532,351 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $ 823,375 $ 823,375 5. MILLCREEK PROJECT FUND $ 51,500 $ 51,500 8. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUND $ 0 $ 0 9. CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 956,900 $ 956,900 10. SANITATION CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 0 $ 0 11. ENTERPRISE FUND (WATER) $ 1,065,620 $ 882,470 12. ENTERPRISE FUND (SEWER) $ 1,117,100 $ 672,750 13. ENTERPRISE CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 986,500 14. STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $ 385,000 $ 85,000 15. STORM WATER UTILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS $ $ 300,000 16. YOUTH CITY COUNCIL FUND $ 0 $ 0 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the minutes of the meeting held June 12, 2012 are ordered to show the adoption of the proposed Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Budget Funds, as presented to the Mayor and City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of the City of Moab this 12th day of June, A.D., 2012. David L. Sakrison Mayor ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta City of Moab Page 1 of 33 Resolution #08-2012 June 12, 2012 6-1 MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Revenue: Taxes 31300 SALES & USE TAXES 31400 FRANCHISE TAXES 31500 HIGHWAY TAXES 31600 TRANSIENT ROOM TAXES 31700 RESORT COMMUNITY TAXES 31800 ENERGY TAXES 38722 ANIMAL SHELTER SALES TAX Total Taxes Licenses and permits 32110 BEER LICENSES 32160 FLAT BUSINESS LICENSES 32209 SIGN PERMITS 32210 BUILDING PERMITS - CITY 32211 BUILDING PERMITS -COMMERCIAL 32212 1% BLDG PERMIT CHARGE 32213 PLAN CHECK FEES 32290 OTHER LICENSES & PERMITS Total Licenses and permits Intergovernmental revenue 33580 STATE LIQUOR FUND ALLOTMENT 36972 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 36973 MISC STATE GRANTS 36974 SAN JUAN CO. CONTRIBUTION 37100 GRAND COUNTY CONTRIBUTION 37110 GCRSSD RECREATION CTR CONTRIBUTION Total Intergovernmental revenue Charges for services 34001 SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY DEPTS 34020 RESTITUTION PAID 34200 GARBAGE BILLING / COLLECTION 34430 REFUSE COLLECTION CHARGES 34510 FILM COMM - SPECIAL EVENT FEES 34716 MRAC - AQUATIC SPORTS 34717 MRAC - MISC 34718 MRAC - CASH OVER/SHORT 34719 MRAC - EMPLOYEE WELLNESS DISCOUNT 34720 MRAC - ADMISSIONS/AQUATIC 34721 MRAC - ADMISSIONS/AQUAT & FITNESS 34722 MRAC - RETAIL 34723 MRAC - PROGRAM FEES/ AQUATIC 34724 MRAC - PROGRAM FEES/FITNESS 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ 1,450,000.00 $ 1,450,000.00 $ 184,000.00 $ 184,000.00 $ 510,000.00 $ 510,000.00 $ 675,000.00 $ 675,000.00 $ 2,655,000.00 $ 2,655,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 5,624,000.00 $ 5,624,000.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 109,300.00 $ 109,300.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ - $ $ $ 15,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 67,000.00 $ 82,000.00 $ 69,000.00 $ 69,000.00 $ - $ - $ 40,500.00 $ 40,500.00 $ 810,000.00 $ 810,000.00 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 $ - $ $ 7,500.00 $ $ - $ 7,500.00 $ - $ $ 90,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 1ExieV0l 33 $ 6,200.00 $ 6,200.00 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 34725 MRAC - CHILD CARE FEES 34726 MRAC - MEMBERSHIPS/AQUATIC 34727 MRAC - MEMBERSHIPS/AQUAT & FITNESS 34728 MRAC - RENTAL FEES 34729 MRAC - SPECIAL EVENT FEES 34730 ANIMAL SHELTER FEES 34740 ANIMAL SHELTER INTERLOCAL Total Charges for services Fines and forfeitures 35010 FINES, FORFEITURES & PENALTIES 35050 A/R 30-DAY PENALTIES 37200 FORFEITURES Total Fines and forfeitures Interest 36110 INTEREST INCOME Total Interest Miscellaneous revenue 36160 PROCEEDS FROM LT DEBT 36200 RENTS & CONCESSIONS 36220 FILM COMM - SPONSOR/DONATION 36226 FILM COM. - EQUIP RENTAL FEES 36400 SALE OF REAL/PERS. PROPERTY 36401 INSURANCE REBATE 36420 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL CAFE RESIDUAL 36450 SIDEWALK PERMITS 36500 SALE OF MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 36900 OTHER 36901 DONATIONS 36940 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER ASSESSMNT 36950 Unrealized gain/loss on bonds 36970 INSURANCE INCOME 38260 ANIMAL DEPOSITS NON -OPERATING 38721 ANIMAL SHELTER - SUNDRY RESALE Total Miscellaneous revenue Contributions and transfers 39920 OVERHEAD PAID FROM SWD ENT FND 39930 OVERHEAD PAID FROM ENT. FUND 39940 GENERAL FUND BEG. BALANCE 39950 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS Total Contributions and transfers Total Revenue: 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ 2,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 118,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 1,252,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 118,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 1,252,000.00 40,000.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 40,000.00 3,400.00 3,000.00 46,400.00 $ 46,400.00 37,000.00 $ 37,000.00 37,000.00 $ 37,000.00 8,500.00 $ - $ 8,500.00 500.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ - $ 500.00 15,000.00 11,000.00 40,000.00 - $ 500.00 $ - $ 500.00 1,500.00 $ - $ 1,500.00 77,000.00 $ 77,000.00 45,000.00 $ 365,000.00 $ 63,325.00 $ 45,000.00 365,000.00 63,325.00 473,325.00 $ 473,325.00 Page 3 of 33 7,686,025.00 , 01,025.00 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Expenditures: General government Executive and Central Staff 41310 Exec SALARIES & WAGES 41313 Exec EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41321 Exec SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 41323 Exec TRAVEL 41324 Exec OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 41325 Exec EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 41328 Exec TELEPHONE 41331 Exec PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE 41333 Exec EDUCATION 41335 Exec OTHER 41346 Exec SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES Total Executive and Central Staff Recorder 41510 Recorder SALARIES & WAGES 41513 Recorder EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41515 Recorder OVERTIME 41521 Recorder SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 41522 Recorder PUBLIC NOTICES 41523 Recorder TRAVEL 41524 Recorder OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 41525 Recorder EQUIP./SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 41528 Recorder TELEPHONE 41531 Recorder PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 41533 Recorder EDUCATION 41535 Recorder OTHER 41546 Recorder SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 41550 Recorder COPIER SUPPLIES 41574 Recorder MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 415810 LEASE PRINCIPAL 415820 LEASE INTEREST Total Recorder Administrative 41410 Admin SALARIES & WAGES 41413 Admin EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41415 Admin OVERTIME 41421 Admin SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 41422 Admin PUBLIC NOTICES 41423 Admin TRAVEL 41424 Admin OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 41425 Admin EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (42,000.00) $ (42,000.00) $ (103,000.00) $ (103,000.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (4,600.00) $ (4,600.00) $ (4,100.00) $ (4,100.00) $ (100.00) $ (100.00) $ (2,800.00) $ (2,800.00) $ (100.00) $ (100.00) $ (1,600.00) $ (1,600.00) $ (400.00) $ (400.00) $ (200.00) $ (200.00) $ (162,500.00) $ (162,500.00) $ (170,000.00) $ (170,000.00) $ (106,000.00) $ (106,000.00) $ (1,600.00) $ (1,600.00) $ (4,500.00) $ (4,500.00) $ (5,000.00) $ (5,000.00) $ (4,100.00) $ (4,100.00) $ (6,700.00) $ (6,700.00) $ - $ $ (7,300.00) $ (7,300.00) $ (29,000.00) $ (29,000.00) $ (6,000.00) $ (6,000.00) $ (900.00) $ (900.00) $ (2,200.00) $ (2,200.00) $ (5,700.00) $ (5,700.00) $ (2,200.00) $ (2,200.00) $ - $ (351,200.00) $ (351,200.00) $ (194,000.00) $ (194,000.00) $ (111,000.00) $ (111,000.00) $ (100.00) $ (100.00) $ (900.00) $ (900.00) $ - $ $ (1,200.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (3,900.00) $ (Ra150101) $ (100.00) $ (100.00) 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 41428 Admin TELEPHONE 41430 Admin MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 41431 Admin PROFESSIONAL/TECH. SERVICE 41433 Admin EDUCATION 41435 Admin OTHER 41446 Admin SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 41474 Admin MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 41475 Admin GRANT EXPENSES Total Administrative General 41610 General SALARIES & WAGES 41613 General EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41621 General SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 41622 General PUBLIC NOTICES 41623 General TRAVEL 41624 General OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 41625 General EQUIP./SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 41626 General BLDG/GRDS- SUPPL & MAINTENANCE 41627 General UTILITIES 41629 General RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT 41630 General MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 41635 General OTHER 41646 General SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 41651 General INSURANCE 41674 General MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total General Elections 41722 Election 41723 Election 41729 Election 41731 Election 41732 Election 41733 Election 41734 Election 41735 Election 41736 Election 41737 Election 41746 Election 41747 Election 41774 Election Total Elections PUBLIC NOTICES TRAVEL RENTAL - VOTING POLLS/PAGER PROFESSIONAL/TECH - PRIMARY PROFESSIONAL/TECH - GENERAL EDUCATION - INITIATIVE EDUCATION - PRIMARY/GENERAL CARR PRINTING EXPENSES ELECTION DINNERS - PRIMARY ELECTION DINNERS - GENERAL SPECIAL DEPT'L - PRIMARY SPECIAL DEPT'L - GENERAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Planning 41810 Planning SALARIES & WAGES 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ $ (5,200.00) $ - $ (5,200.00) (17,000.00) $ (500.00) $ (200.00) $ (50.00) $ - $ (17,000.00) (500.00) (200.00) (50.00) $ $ - $ (15,000.00) (334,150.00) $ (349,150.00) $ $ $ $ $ (200.00) $ - $ (200.00) $ - $ $ $ $ (200.00) $ (200.00) (3,000.00) $ (3,000.00) - $ - (38,000.00) $ (1,700.00) $ (1,600.00) $ (5,000.00) $ (200.00) $ (177,000.00) $ - $ (38,000.00) (1,700.00) (1,600.00) (5,000.00) (200.00) (177,000.00) $ (226,900.00) $ (226,900.00) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Page 5 of 33 $ (217,000.00) $ (217,000.00) 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 41813 Planning EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41815 Planning OVERTIME 41821 Planning SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 41822 Planning PUBLIC NOTICES 41823 Planning TRAVEL 41824 Planning OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 41825 Planning EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 41828 Planning TELEPHONE 41830 Planning MONTHLY FUEL- GASCARD 41831 Planning PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 41833 Planning EDUCATION 41835 Planning OTHER 41846 Planning SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 41874 Planning MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total Planning Engineering 41910 Engineer SALARIES & WAGES 41913 Engineer BENEFITS 41915 Engineer OVERTIME 41921 Engineer SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 41922 Engineer PUBLIC NOTICES 41923 Engineer TRAVEL 41924 Engineer OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 41925 Engineer EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 41928 Engineer TELEPHONE 41930 Engineer MONTHLY FUEL- GASCARD 41931 Engineer PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 41933 Engineer EDUCATION 41935 Engineer OTHER 41946 Engineer SPECIAL DEPTARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 41974 Engineer MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total Engineering Treasurer 42010 Treasurer SALARIES & WAGES 42013 Treasurer EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42015 Treasurer OVERTIME 42021 Treasurer SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 42023 Treasurer TRAVEL 42024 Treasurer OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 42025 Treasurer EQUIPMENT SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 42028 Treasurer TELEPHONE 42031 Treasurer PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 42033 Treasurer EDUCATION 42035 Treasurer OTHER 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes (118,000.00) (6,000.00) (2,600.00) (1,200.00) (2,500.00) (4,400.00) (1,000.00) (5,300.00) (800.00) (60,000.00) (3,650.00) (300.00) (800.00) (1,100.00) (424,650.00) $ (118,000.00) $ (6,000.00) $ (2,600.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (2,500.00) $ (4,400.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (5,300.00) $ (800.00) $ (60,000.00) $ (3,650.00) $ (300.00) $ (800.00) $ (1,100.00) $ (424,650.00) (131,000.00) $ (131,000.00) (67,000.00) $ (67,000.00) (400.00) $ (400.00) (5,800.00) $ (5,800.00) - $ - (800.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (500.00) $ (3,800.00) $ - $ (800.00) (1,500.00) (500.00) (3,800.00) (8,000.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (200.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (8,000.00) (1,200.00) (200.00) (1,000.00) $ (221,200.00) $ (221,200.00) (91,000.00) $ (61,000.00) $ (250.00) $ (425.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (11,000.00) $ (200.00) $ (3,500.00) $ (5,900.00) $ (750.00) $ (100.00) $ (91,000.00) (61,000.00) (250.00) (425.00) (1,000.00) (11,000.00) (200.00) (3,500.00) (5,900.00) P33 (100.00) 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes 42036 Treasurer BANK HANDLING CHARGES $ (19,000.00) $ (19,000.00) 42046 Treasurer SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $ (3,200.00) $ (3,200.00) 42051 Treasurer INSURANCE $ (1,800.00) $ (1,800.00) 42063 Treasurer CASH OVER & SHORT $ - $ 42074 Treasurer MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $ (2,000.00) $ (2,000.00) Total Treasurer $ (201,125.00) $ (201,125.00) Total General government Public safety Police 42110 Police SALARIES & WAGES 42113 Police EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42114 Police OTHER BENEFITS- U/ALLOWANCES 42115 Police OVERTIME 42121 Police SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 42123 Police TRAVEL 42124 Police OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 42125 Police EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 42126 Police BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 42128 Police TELEPHONE 42129 Police RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT 42130 Police MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 42131 Police PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 42133 Police EDUCATION 42135 Police OTHER 42146 Police SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 42169 Police Lease payments 42172 Police SPECIAL EVENTS 42173 Police D.A.R.E. - EQUIP. & SUPPLIES 42174 Police MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 421810 LEASE PRINCIPAL 421820 LEASE INTEREST Total Police Attorney 42231 Attorney PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES Total Attorney Narcotics Task Force 42310 Narcotics SALARIES & WAGES 42313 Narcotics EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42314 Narcotics OTHER BENEFITS- U/ALLOWANCES 42315 Narcotics OVERTIME 42323 Narcotics TRAVEL 42324 Narcotics OFFICE SUPPLIES $ (836,000.00) $ (816,000.00) $ (646,094.00) $ (646,094.00) $ (14,760.00) $ (14,760.00) $ (36,000.00) $ (36,000.00) $ (2,100.00) $ (2,100.00) $ (11,700.00) $ (11,700.00) $ (5,300.00) $ (5,300.00) $ (31,700.00) $ (31,700.00) $ - $ - $ (26,880.00) $ (26,880.00) $ (3,200.00) $ (3,200.00) $ (38,000.00) $ (38,000.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (5,200.00) $ (5,200.00) $ (75,000.00) $ (75,000.00) $ (27,520.00) $ (25,520.00) $ - $ - $ $ (1,500.00) $ (1,500.00) $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ (1,764,954.00) $ (1,742,954.00) (79,000.00) $ (79,000.00) (79,000.00) $ (79,000.00) $ (63,100.00) $ (63,100.00) $ (48,600.00) $ (48,600.00) $ (960.00) $ (960.00) $ (5,500.00) $ (5,500.00) $ (3,350.00) $ (gM070033 $ (300.00) $ (300.00) 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 42325 Narcotics EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 42328 Narcotics TELEPHONE 42330 Narcotics MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 42331 Narcotics PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE 42333 Narcotics EDUCATION 42335 Narcotics OTHER 42346 Narcotics SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 42369 Narcotics LEASE PAYMENT 42370 Narcotics FORFEITURES 42374 Narcotics MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total Narcotics Task Force Inspections 42431 Inspection PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 42475 Inspection SPECIAL PROJECTS Total Inspections Beer Tax Funds Eligible Expenses 42510 Beer Tax SALARIES & WAGES 42546 Beer Tax SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES Animal control 42610 Animal Ctl SALARIES & WAGES 42613 Animal Ctl EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42614 Animal Ctl OTHER BENEFIT- U/ALLOWANCES 42615 Animal Ctl OVERTIME 42621 Animal Ctl SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 42623 Animal Ctl TRAVEL 42624 Animal Ctl OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 42625 Animal Ctl EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 42628 Animal Ctl TELEPHONE 42630 Animal Ctl MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 42631 Animal Ctl PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 42633 Animal Ctl EDUCATION 42635 Animal Ctl OTHER 42646 Animal Ctl SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 42669 Animal Ctl Lease payments 42674 Animal Ctl MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total Animal control Animal Shelter 42710 Animal Shltr SALARIES & WAGES 42713 Animal Shltr EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 42714 Animal Shltr OTHER BENEFITS- U/ALLOWANCES 42715 Animal Shltr OVERTIME 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes (2,000.00) $ (2,000.00) (1,800.00) $ (1,800.00) (4,500.00) $ (250.00) $ (1,750.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (2,500.00) $ - $ (4,500.00) (250.00) (1,750.00) (4,000.00) (2,500.00) (4,000.00) $ (6,870.00) $ (149,480.00) $ (4,000.00) (6,870.00) (149,480.00) (91,000.00) $ (91,000.00) (91,000.00) $ (91,000.00) $ (20,000.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (22,000.00) (86,000.00) $ (86,000.00) (44,000.00) $ (44,000.00) (1,920.00) $ (1,920.00) (5,500.00) $ (5,500.00) (200.00) $ (200.00) (800.00) $ (800.00) (200.00) $ (200.00) (3,500.00) $ (3,500.00) (1,200.00) $ (1,200.00) (6,400.00) $ (6,400.00) (1,000.00) $ (1,000.00) (600.00) $ (600.00) (300.00) $ (300.00) (1,500.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (153,120.00) $ (153,120.00) (39,800.00) $ (18,100.00) $ (960.00) $ (750.00) $ (39,800.00) (18,100.00) P33 (750.00) 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 42722 Animal Shltr PUBLIC NOTICES 42724 Animal Shltr OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 42725 Animal Shltr EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 42726 Animal Shltr BLDG/GRDS-SUPPLIES & MAINT. 42727 Animal Shltr UTILITIES 42728 Animal Shltr TELEPHONE 42730 Animal Shltr MONTHLY FUEL- GASCARD 42731 Animal Shltr PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE 42733 Animal Shltr EDUCATION 42735 Animal Shltr OTHER 42746 Animal Shltr SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 42769 Animal Shltr Lease payments 42774 Animal Shltr MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total Animal Shelter Total Public safety Highways and public improvements Highways 44010 Highways SALARIES & WAGES 44013 Highways EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 44015 Highways OVERTIME 44021 Highways SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 44023 Highways TRAVEL 44024 Highways OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 44025 Highways EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 44026 Highways BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 44027 Highways UTILITIES 44028 Highways TELEPHONE 44029 Highways RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT 44030 Highways MONTHLY FUEL- GASCARD 44031 Highways PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 44033 Highways EDUCATION 44035 Highways OTHER 44042 Highways STREET LIGHTS 44046 Highways SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 44069 Highways Lease payments 44074 Highways MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 44077 SPECIAL PROJECTS 440810 LEASE PRINCIPAL 440820 LEASE INTEREST Total Highways Storm Drainage 42531 PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 42546 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (1,200.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (100.00) $ (100.00) $ (800.00) $ (800.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (9,800.00) $ (9,800.00) $ (900.00) $ (900.00) $ (300.00) $ (300.00) $ (400.00) $ (400.00) $ (400.00) $ (400.00) $ (100.00) $ (100.00) $ (2,800.00) $ (2,800.00) $ - $ (80,010.00) $ (80,010.00) $ (524,000.00) $ (524,000.00) $ (332,900.00) $ (332,900.00) $ (6,200.00) $ (6,200.00) $ (800.00) $ (800.00) $ (2,900.00) $ (2,900.00) $ (3,800.00) $ (3,800.00) $ (21,000.00) $ (21,000.00) $ (37,100.00) $ (37,100.00) $ (15,000.00) $ (15,000.00) $ (3,200.00) $ (3,200.00) $ (2,600.00) $ (2,600.00) $ (34,000.00) $ (34,000.00) $ (11,000.00) $ (11,000.00) $ (1,900.00) $ (1,900.00) $ (8,000.00) $ (8,000.00) $ (93,060.00) $ (93,060.00) $ (14,000.00) $ (14,000.00) $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ (1,111,460.00) $ (1,111,460.00) Page 9 of 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder' MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Total Storm Drainage Sanitation 44231 Sanitation PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES Total Sanitation Safety 44121 Safety SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 44123 Safety TRAVEL 44125 Safety EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 44128 Safety TELEPHONE 44131 Safety PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 44133 Safety EDUCATION 44135 Safety OTHER 44146 Safety SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 44174 Safety MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 44175 Safety SAFETY EQUIPMENT Total Safety Total Highways and public improvements Parks, recreation, and public property Parks 45110 Parks SALARIES & WAGES 45113 Parks EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 45115 Parks OVERTIME 45121 Parks SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 45123 Parks TRAVEL 45124 Parks OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 45125 Parks EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 45126 Parks BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 45127 Parks UTILITIES 45128 Parks TELEPHONE 45129 Parks RENTALS 45130 Parks MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 45131 Parks PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 45133 Parks EDUCATION 45135 Parks OTHER 45146 Parks SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 45169 Parks Lease payments 45173 Parks PARK IMPROVEMENTS 45174 Parks MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total Parks Swimming Pool 45210 MRAC SALARIES & WAGES 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ - $ $ (810,000.00) $ (810,000.00) $ (810,000.00) $ (810,000.00) $ (1,220.00) $ (1,220.00) $ (900.00) $ (900.00) $ (1,400.00) $ (1,400.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (25,000.00) $ (25,000.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (34,720.00) $ (34,720.00) $ (192,000.00) $ (192,000.00) $ (172,000.00) $ (172,000.00) $ (200.00) $ (200.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (800.00) $ (800.00) $ - $ $ (9,600.00) $ (9,600.00) $ (12,200.00) $ (12,200.00) $ (46,000.00) $ (46,000.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (17,000.00) $ (17,000.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (600.00) $ (600.00) $ (12,000.00) $ (12,000.00) $ $ (466,400.00) $ (466,400.00) Page 10 of 33 $ (320,000.00) $ (320,000.00) 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 45213 MRAC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 45215 MRAC OVERTIME 45221 MRAC SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 45222 MRAC LEGAL NOTICES/ADVERTISING 45223 MRAC TRAVEL 45224 MRAC OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 45225 MRAC EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 45226 MRAC BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 45227 MRAC UTILITIES 45228 MRAC TELEPHONE 45229 MRAC RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT 45231 MRAC PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 45233 MRAC EDUCATION 45234 MRAC INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/SUPP. 45235 MRAC OTHER 45246 MRAC SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 45261 MRAC SUNDRY EXPENSES -MISCELLANEOUS 45273 MRAC SWIM PROGRAMS Total Swimming Pool Total Parks, recreation, and public property Community and economic development Film Commission 42810 Film 42813 Film 42815 Film 42821 Film 42822 Film 42823 Film 42824 Film 42825 Film 42828 Film 42830 Film 42831 Film 42833 Film 42835 Film 42846 Film 42874 Film 42875 Film 42876 Film Comm SALARIES & WAGES Comm EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Comm OVERTIME Comm SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS Comm PUBLIC NOTICES Comm TRAVEL Comm OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES Comm EQUIP./SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE Comm TELEPHONE Comm MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD Comm PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES Comm EDUCATION Comm OTHER Comm SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES Comm MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Comm SPECIAL PROJECTS Comm GRANT EXPENSES Total Film Commission Community Development 46024 Econ Dev RECYCLING SERVICES 46026 Econ Dev ARTS PROMOTION 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes (77,000.00) (400.00) (300.00) (7,500.00) (1,000.00) (3,600.00) (3,500.00) (17,500.00) (95,000.00) (3,700.00) (500.00) (7,500.00) (500.00) (500.00) (2,000.00) (25,000.00) (7,500.00) (1,000.00) (574,000.00) $ (77,000.00) $ (400.00) $ (300.00) $ (7,500.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (3,500.00) $ (17,500.00) $ (95,000.00) $ (3,700.00) $ (500.00) $ (7,500.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (25,000.00) $ (7,500.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (574,000.00) (44,709.00) $ (44,709.00) (31,225.00) $ (31,225.00) (200.00) $ (200.00) (1,600.00) $ (1,600.00) (1,600.00) $ (1,600.00) (6,500.00) $ (6,500.00) (2,100.00) $ (2,100.00) (500.00) $ (500.00) (1,200.00) $ (1,200.00) (400.00) $ (400.00) (400.00) $ (400.00) (725.00) $ (725.00) (150.00) $ (150.00) (400.00) $ (400.00) - $ - (2,400.00) $ (13,225.00) $ (107,334.00) $ (2,400.00) (13,225.00) (107,334.00) - $ Page 11 of 33 (7,000.00) $ (7,000.00) 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 46075 Econ Dev SHELTER SERVICES 46076 MOAB INFORMATION CENTER 46082 Econ Dev SOUTHEASTERN ASSO. OF GOV. 46084 Econ Dev GRAND COUNTY/4TH JULY FIREWORK Total Community Development Total Community and economic development Debt service 47111 CAPITAL LEASE PRINCIPAL 47112 CAPITAL LEASE INTEREST 47121 CAPITAL LEASE OFFSET CHARGES TO DEPTS Total Debt service Transfers and contributions out 48061 TRANS. TO CAPITAL PROJ. FUND 48071 TRANSFER TO MILLCREEK FUND 48086 CONTRIBUTION - RECREATION FUND 48090 TRANSFER TO STORM WATER UTIL 48097 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECTS 48098 CONTRIBUTION TO COMM DEV FUND Total Transfers and contributions out Total Expenditures: Total Change In Net Position 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (5,000.00) $ (5,000.00) $ - $ $ (2,500.00) $ (2,500.00) $ (5,000.00) $ (5,000.00) $ (19,500.00) $ (19,500.00) $ (138,113.00) $ (138,113.00) $ (11,736.00) $ (11,736.00) $ (149,849.00) $ (149,849.00) $ $ (7,000.00) $ (7,000.00) $ (125,473.00) $ (125,473.00) $ $ $ (41,000.00) $ (41,000.00) $ (173,473.00) $ (173,473.00) $ (7,686,025.00) $ (7,701,025.00) $ - $ Page 12 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 2012-2013 CLASS C Change In Net Position Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue 33560 Class C CLASS C ROAD FUND Total Intergovernmental revenue Interest 36100 Class C INTEREST INCOME 36160 PROCEEDS FROM LT DEBT Total Interest Public Hearing Council Changes $ 178,000.00 $ 178,000.00 $ 178,000.00 $ 178,000.00 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Miscellaneous revenue $ $ 36200 PROPERTY OWNER CONTRIBUTIONS $ - $ Total Miscellaneous revenue Contributions and transfers 3650 Proceeds on sale or trade of fixed assets 39561 Class C TRANS. FROM EQUITY-B.O.Y. RESV Total Contributions and transfers Total Revenue: Expenditures: Highways and public improvements Highways 40041 Class C SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 40058 Class C ROADBASE - PATCHING 40070 Class C COLD MIX 40071 Class C CHIP SEAL 40072 Class C CRACK SEALING 40073 Class C SPECIAL PROJECTS 40074 Class C MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 400810 LEASE PRINCIPAL 400820 LEASE INTEREST 40169.1 Class C Equipment capital lease 40169.2 Class C Capital lease interest Total Highways Total Highways and public improvements Total Expenditures: Total Change In Net Position 54,500.00 $ 54,500.00 54,500.00 $ 54,500.00 35,000.00 235,000.00 $ (20,000.00) $ (20,000.00) $ (9,000.00) $ (9,000.00) $ (16,000.00) $ (16,000.00) $ (140,000.00) $ (140,000.00) $ (25,000.00) $ (25,000.00) $ (25,000.00) $ (25,000.00) $ (235,000.00) $ (235,000.00) (235,000.00) $ (235,000.00) Page 13 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes RECREATION Change In Net Position Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue 33561 GRAND COUNTY - RSSD $ 56,665.00 $ 56,665.00 33563 SCHOOL DISTRICT $ 20,238.00 $ 20,238.00 Total Intergovernmental revenue $ 76,903.00 $ 76,903.00 Charges for services 34537 TOURNAMENT SOFTBALL - MEN'S 34538 TOURNAMENT SOFTBALL - YOUTH 34539 ADULT SOCCER 34540 VOLLEYBALL - ADULT COED 34545 VOLLEYBALL- WOMEN'S 34546 VOLLEYBALL - YOUTH SPRING 34563 ADULT COED SOFTBALL 34564 MENS SOFTBALL 34566 YOUTH/BASEBALL/SOFTBALL 34567 SKI PROGRAM 34568 YOUTH FOOTBALL 34569 SPRING YOUTH SOCCER 34570 FALL YOUTH SOCCER 34571 SOCCER CAMPS 34572 TURKEY TROT 34573 SMART START 34574INDOOR SOCCER -YOUTH 34576JRJAZZ BASKETBALL 34577 FLAG FOOTBALL 34578 MIDDLE SCHOOL FOOTBALL 34579 FLAG FOOTBALL - ADULT 34580 YOUTH VOLLEYBALL 34581 MIDDLE SCHOOL VOLLEYBALL 34583 YOUTH SPONSOR/BASEBALL 34599 MIDDLE SCHOOL TRVL BASEBALL 34600 ULTIMATE FRISBEE Total Charges for services Moab arts & recreation 66150 MEMBERSHIP FEES 66160 PROGRAM FEES 66180 MATERIALS - TAXABLE 66210 GRANTS AND DONATIONS 66250 WORKSHOP FEES 66271 RENTAL FEES 66372 SPECIAL EVENTS FEES Total Moab arts & recreation $ 3,400.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,220.00 $ 2,220.00 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 $ 720.00 $ 720.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ $ - $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ - $ $ 4,210.00 $ 4,210.00 $ 12,420.00 $ 12,420.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 3,100.00 $ - $ $ 1,900.00 $ $ - $ 1,900.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 480.00 $ 480.00 $ 1,920.00 $ 1,920.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 9,350.00 $ 9,350.00 69,770.00 $ 69,770.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 9,112.00 $ 9,112.00 $ $ $ 34,500.00 $ 34,500.00 $ 27,100.00 $ MIE06101 $ 76,712.00 $ 76,712.00 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Interest 36100 INTEREST INCOME Total Interest Miscellaneous revenue 36210 TEEN CENTER DONATIONS/GRANTS 36220 TEEN CENTER PROGRAM FEES 36230 TEEN CENTER WORKSHOP FEES 36560 OTHER INCOME 36570 GRANTS AND DONATIONS 36571 CTC GRANT 36757 SAFE PASSAGE GRANT Total Miscellaneous revenue 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes 300.00 $ 300.00 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 16,450.00 $ 16,450.00 $ - $ $ - $ $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 10,470.00 $ 10,470.00 $ 30,587.00 $ 30,587.00 $ 59,507.00 $ 59,507.00 Contributions and transfers 33562 CITY OF MOAB $ 125,473.00 $ 125,473.00 36231 PREP PROGRAM GRANT $ 62,160.00 $ 101,264.00 39535 RECREATION FUND BEG. BALANCE $ 24,788.00 $ 22,422.00 39537 LOAN FROM GENERAL FUND 39540 TRANSFER FROM AFTER SCHOOL Total Contributions and transfers $ 212,421.00 $ 249,159.00 Total Revenue: Expenditures: Parks, recreation, and public property Recreation 64010 Recreation SALARIES - DIRECTOR/ASST. 64013 Recreation EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 64015 Recreation OVERTIME 64021 Recreation SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 64022 Recreation ADVERTISING 64024 Recreation OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 64025 Recreation - EQUIP SUPPLIES & MAINT 64028 Recreation TELEPHONE 64030 Recreation MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 64031 Recreation PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL 64033 Recreation EDUCATION 64035 Recreation OTHER 64036 Recreation DIRECTOR - TRAVEL 64037 Recreation DIRECTOR/EDUCATION 64046 Recreation SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 64065 Recreation FINGER -PRINTING 64092 Recreation TURKEY TROT/EASTER EGG HUNT Total Recreation $ (83,400.00) $ (83,400.00) $ (63,900.00) $ (63,900.00) $ (200.00) $ (200.00) $ (445.00) $ (445.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (2,200.00) $ (2,200.00) $ (250.00) $ (250.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (140.00) $ (140.00) $ (350.00) $ (350.00) $ (1,100.00) $ (1,100.00) $ (550.00) $ (550.00) $ (350.00) $ (350.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (350.00) $ (350.00) $ (700.00) $ (700.00) $ (1,700.00) $ iflOrcO $ (163,735.00) $ (163,735.00) 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Ski Program 64102 SMART START Total Ski Program Soccer 64201 Soccer YOUTH SOCCER 64202 Soccer FALL SOCCER 64205 Soccer ADULT 64209 Soccer INDOOR - YOUTH 64210 Soccer WAGES 64213 Soccer SOCCER REFEREE - WAGES 64215 Soccer INDOOR - YOUTH DIRECTOR Total Soccer Adult Softball 64427 COED SOFTBALL 64435 MEN'S SOFTBALL 64436 MEN'S SOFTBALL TOURN/DI RECTOR 64437 MEN'S SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT 64438 MEN'S SOFTBALL TOURN.-UMPIRES Total Adult Softball Adult Volleyball 64601 CO-ED VOLLEYBALL 64602 VOLLEYBALL 64613 CO-ED VOLLEYBALL- DIRECTOR 64614 WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL- DIRECTOR Total Adult Volleyball Basketball 64804 JR JAZZ BASKETBALL 64805 JR. JAll REFEREE SERVICES 64807 MS BASKETBALL REFEREES 64813 Basketball EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Total Basketball Youth Volleyball 64901 YOUTH VOLLEYBALL 64902 MIDDLE SCHOOL VOLLEYBALL 64903 MIDDLE SCHOOL VOLLEYBALL 64904 YOUTH SPRING VOLLEYBALL - WAGES 64905 YOUTH SPRING VOLLEYBALL Total Youth Volleyball Youth Baseball/Softball 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (6,300.00) $ (6,300.00) $ (1,780.00) $ (1,780.00) $ (750.00) $ (750.00) $ (490.00) $ (490.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (3,600.00) $ (12,920.00) $ (12,920.00) $ (830.00) $ (830.00) $ (120.00) $ (120.00) $ (200.00) $ (200.00) $ (1,530.00) $ (1,530.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (4,680.00) $ (4,680.00) $ (350.00) $ (350.00) $ (350.00) $ (350.00) $ (700.00) $ (700.00) $ (2,980.00) $ (2,980.00) $ (1,750.00) $ (1,750.00) $ - $ $ (150.00) $ (150.00) $ (4,880.00) $ (4,880.00) $ (1,625.00) $ (1,625.00) $ (1,630.00) $ (1,630.00) $ $ $ $ (3,255.00) $ (3,255.00) Page 16 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 65111 Youth BB/SB WAGES- MAINTENANCE WORKERS 65112 Youth BB/SB WAGES- UMPIRES & SCOREKEEPERS 65113 Youth BB/SB EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 65123 Youth BB/SB BASEBALL STATE TOURN. EXPENSES 65125 Youth BB/SB EQUIPMENT -SUPPLIES & MAINT. 65126 Youth BB/SB BASEBALL FIELD MAINTENANCE 65158 MIDDLE SCHOOL TRVL BASEBALL 65173 FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 65174 YOUTH BASEBALL/SOFTBALL 65177 UTAH GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOC 65178 UTAH BOYS BASEBALL ASSOCIATION Total Youth Baseball/Softball Youth Football 65213 Youth Football BENEFITS 65275 YOUTH FOOTBALL 65280 FLAG FOOTBALL 65281 FLAG FOOTBALL - ADULT 65285 MIDDLE SCHOOL FOOTBALL 65286 YOUTH FOOTBALL REFEREES 65295 MS FOOTBALL REFEREES Total Youth Football BMX 65410 BMX WAGES 65424 BMX MATERIALS & SUPPLIES Total BMX Special Projects 66046 SPECIAL PROJECTS Total Special Projects Teen Center 70010 Teen Center SALARIES & WAGES 70013 Teen Center EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 70021 Teen Center SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 70022 Teen Center PUBLIC NOTICES 70023 Teen Center TRAVEL 70024 Teen Center OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 70025 Teen Center EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 70028 Teen Center TELEPHONE 70031 Teen Center PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE 70033 Teen Center EDUCATION 70035 Teen Center OTHER 70046 Teen Center SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 70078 Teen Center SPECIAL PROJECTS 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (4,000.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (5,760.00) $ (5,760.00) $ (900.00) $ (900.00) $ (1,875.00) $ (1,875.00) $ (150.00) $ (150.00) $ (700.00) $ (700.00) $ - $ $ - $ $ (16,400.00) $ (16,400.00) $ (315.00) $ (315.00) $ (270.00) $ (270.00) $ (30,370.00) $ (30,370.00) $ (350.00) $ (350.00) $ (3,350.00) $ (3,350.00) $ (980.00) $ (980.00) $ (75.00) $ (75.00) $ (1,150.00) $ (1,150.00) $ (720.00) $ (720.00) $ - (6,625.00) $ (6,625.00) $ (150.00) $ (150.00) $ (75.00) $ (75.00) $ (225.00) $ (225.00) (2,500.00) $ (2,500.00) (2,500.00) $ (2,500.00) $ (33,536.00) $ (33,536.00) $ (2,649.00) $ (2,649.00) $ - $ $ - $ $ (250.00) $ (250.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (1,200.00) $ (3,060.00) $ (3,060.00) $ (200.00) $ (200.00) $ (250.00) $ (250.00) $ (450.00) $ (450.00) $ (4,898.00) $ Ft4aS33$7011f) $ 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's )ffice1 MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 70079 Teen Center PROGRAMS Total Teen Center Moab Arts & Recreation Center 80010 MARC SALARIES & WAGES 80013 MARC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 80014 MARC SALARIES & WAGES - INSTRUCTORS 80015 MARC SALARIES & WAGES OT 80021 MARC SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 80022 MARC PUBLIC NOTICES 80023 MARC TRAVEL 80024 MARC OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 80025 MARC EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 80027 MARC UTILITIES 80028 MARC TELEPHONE 80031 MARC PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE 80033 MARC EDUCATION 80035 MARC OTHER 80046 MARC SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 80077 MARC SPECIAL EVENTS 80078 MARC SPECIAL PROJECTS Total Moab Arts & Recreation Center Communities That Care (CTC) 75010 SALARIES & WAGES 75013 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 75023 TRAVEL 75025 EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE 75031 PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL SERVICES 75033 EDUCATION 75035 OTHER 75046 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 75078 SPECIAL PROJECTS Total Communities That Care (CTC) Prep 90010 PREP - SALARIES & WAGES 90013 PREP - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 90022 PREP - PUBLIC NOTICES 90023 PREP - TRAVEL 90024 PREP - OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 90031 PREP - PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE 90033 PREP - EDUCATION 90046 PREP - SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES Total Prep 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes (46,493.00) $ (46,493.00) $ (56,800.00) $ (56,800.00) $ (24,900.00) $ (24,900.00) $ (3,200.00) $ (3,200.00) $ (900.00) $ (900.00) $ (400.00) $ (400.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (1,600.00) $ (1,600.00) $ (4,200.00) $ (4,200.00) $ (5,900.00) $ (5,900.00) $ (2,700.00) $ (2,700.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (400.00) $ (400.00) $ (1,700.00) $ (1,700.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (31,100.00) $ (29,297.00) $ (6,500.00) $ (7,350.00) $ (145,300.00) $ (144,347.00) $ (3,215.00) $ (3,215.00) $ (255.00) $ (255.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (2,887.00) $ (800.00) $ (800.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (1,500.00) $ - $ - (200.00) $ (200.00) (11,470.00) $ (10,357.00) $ (42,200.00) $ (52,314.00) $ (3,340.00) $ (4,133.00) $ (325.00) $ (325.00) $ (5,800.00) $ (14,803.00) $ (2,725.00) $ (2,725.00) $ (600.00) $ (10,990.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (2,640.00) $ (5,470.00) $ (13,334.00) $ (62,460.00) $ (1ME64aX1f) 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Total Parks, recreation, and public property Total Expenditures: Total Change In Net Position 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (495,613.00) $ (532,351.00) $ $ Page 19 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revenue: Contributions and transfers 39209 COMMUNITY DEV. FUND/BEG. BAL. 39210 CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND 39223 GRANTS 39224 CDGB'05 MOONSTONE GALLERY 39226 UTAH POWER GRANT 39250 CDBG WILLOWS 39351 CDBG CINEMA COURT PROJECT 39352 CDBG 05-06 BALLPARK FENCE 39353 CDBG 06-07 BALLPARK LIGHTS 39354 CDBG 07 BALLPARK BLEACHERS 39355 CDBG 08 WATER LINE 39356 CDBG 09 VIRGINIAN APARTMENTS 39357 LIONS PARK TE GRANT 39358 NORTH CORRIDOR PATH TE GRANT 39359 NPS RTCA GRANT LIONS PARK 39360 LIONS PARK NPS CTTP INTERP GRANT Total Contributions and transfers Total Revenue: Expenditures: Transfers and contributions out 40090 INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE Total Transfers and contributions out Community Development Community development 40002 TEA-21 UDOT N. CORRIDOR PATHS 40003 CDBG 09 VIRGINIAN APARTMENTS 40004 ROTARY PARK 40005 LIONS PARK TE 2011 40006 NORTH CORRIDOR PATH 40007 LIONS PARK DESIGN 40008 LIONS PARK LAND & WATER CONSERV FUND GRANT 40009 LIONS PARK SCENIC BYWAYS GRANT 40018 CDBG WILLOWS 40019 CDBG 11 CINEMA COURT PROJECT 40020 CDBG 07 BALLPARK BLEACHERS 40021 CDBG 08 WATER LINE 40022 PUBLIC ART 40023 SIGNAGE 40049 CORNER PARK 300 S 400 E 40076 PAYMENT-IN-LIEU/100 W.-P. LOT 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ 526,875.00 $ 542,375.00 41,000.00 $ 41,000.00 $ 240,000.00 $ 240,000.00 99,000.00 $ 906,875.00 $ 823,375.00 $ 906,875.00 823,375.00 $ (200,875.00) $ (200,875.00) $ (125,000.00) $ (125,000.00) $ (15,500.00) $ (100,000.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (241,000.00) $ (241,000.00) $ (240,000.00) $ (240,000.00) $ - $ Page 20 of 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 40078 SKATE PARK 40084 CDBG'05 MOONSTONE GALLERY 40086 CDBG 02 SUN COURT BBALL 40089 E. CENTER MEDIAN & PARKING 40095 Recreation Center/Playground Equipment 40096 CDBG 05-06 BALLPARK FENCE 40097 CDBG 06-07 BALLPARK LIGHTS 40098 BALLPARK LIGHTING & IMPRVMNTS 40099 200 EAST STREET IMPROVEMENT Total Community development Total Community Development Total Expenditures: Total Change In Net Position 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (906,875.00) $ (823,375.00) Page 21 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED MILLCREEK Change In Net Position Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue 33579 FUTURE GRANTS 33581 UTAH TRAILS/MILCREEK DR PATH - STATE FUNDS 33582 UTAH TRAILS/MILLCREEK DR PATH - LOCAL FUNDS 33583 UTAH TRAILS 500 W. UNDERPASS 33584 UTAH TRAILS PIPE DREAM TRAIL 33585 FIRE/FUEL/REDUCT/REVEG Total Intergovernmental revenue 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 Contributions and transfers 33210 CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 39210 MILLCREEK PROD. FUND/BEG. BAL. $ 21,500.00 $ 21,500.00 Total Contributions and transfers $ 28,500.00 $ 28,500.00 Total Revenue: Expenditures: Transfers and contributions out 40090 INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE $ Total Transfers and contributions out $ $ Millcreek Projects Millcreek 40002 FIRE/FUEL/REDUCTION/REVEG 40003 MILLCREEK/MAIN STREET - WEIR 40004 UTAH TRAILS 500 W. UNDERPASS 40005 UTAH TRAILS PIPE DREAM 40010 SALARIES 40013 BENEFITS 40031 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 40035 OTHER 40041 ACQUISITIONS 40048 BMX TRACK 40050 BROWNING ROTARY MUSICAL PLAYGROUND GRANT 40051 BROWNING TRAILS GRANT 40074 SPECIAL PROJ.-FENCING & IMPROV 40076 TREE EDUCATION/ADVERTISING 40086 TREES/IRRIGATION 40088 UTAH TRAILS MILLCREEK DR PATH Total Millcreek $ (25,000.00) $ (25,000.00) $ - $ $ - $ $ (14,000.00) $ (14,000.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (2,000.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (5,000.00) $ (5,000.00) (5,000.00) $ (5,000.00) (51,500.00) $ (51,500.00) Total Millcreek Projects Page 22 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Total Expenditures: Total Change In Net Position 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (51,500.00) $ (51,500.00) $ $ Page 23 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes CAPITAL PROJECTS Change In Net Position Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue 36124 GRANTS AND DONATIONS $ 36125 DOG PARK DONATIONS $ Total Intergovernmental revenue $ - $ Interest 36100 INTEREST INCOME Total Interest Miscellaneous revenue 36160 CIB LOAN 36165 PROCEEDS FROM LONG TERM DEBT 36200 ANIMAL SHELTER DONATIONS 36201 TRANS ENHANCE GRANT 36210 CIB GRANT 36220 LEASE REVENUE CITY CENTER 36225 MORTGAGE PRNCPAL OLD CITY HALL 36226 MORTGAGE INTEREST OLD CITY HL 36227 UTAH STATE ENERGY PROGRAM GRANT 36228 UTAH POWER GRANT 36229 FEDERAL HIGHWAY GRANT 36230 LIBRARY CITY CENTER CONTR 36235 CIB LOAN AQUATIC CENTER 36236 CONTRIBUTION FROM REC DISTRICT 36237 DEVELOPER FEES Total Miscellaneous revenue Contributions and transfers 39222 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 39561 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BEG. BAL 39562 TRANSFER FROM MUNCIPAL BLDG BOND SETASIDE Total Contributions and transfers Total Revenue: Expenditures: Public safety Animal Shelter 79140 ANIMAL SHELTER PROJECT 79141 ANIMAL SHELTER EQUIPMENT 79142 ANIMAL SHELTER FF&E Total Animal Shelter $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ 53,000.00 $ 53,000.00 $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ 43,000.00 $ 43,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 101,000.00 $ - $ $ - $ $ 191,000.00 $ 191,000.00 $ 407,000.00 $ 388,000.00 $ $ $ 492,900.00 $ 59,000.00 $ 551,900.00 $ 492,900.00 59,000.00 551,900.00 $ 975,900.00 jik 956,900.00 $ (43,000.00) $ (43,000.00) $ (43,000.00) $ (1'3XCEP101):33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Police 79150 POLICE EQUIPMENT Total Police Total Public safety Highways and public improvements Highways 44072 STREETS/SPECIAL PROJ./CONCRETE 44073 NORTH CORRIDOR FRONTAGE ROAD 44074 POWERHOUSE LANE 44075 SEALCOAT 44076 MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS 44077 500 WEST/KANE CREEK IMPROVE 44078 TFER TO ROAD IMPROVE SETASIDE 44079 100 NORTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 44080 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 44081 100 WEST DESIGN 44082 WILLIAMS WAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 44083 EQUIPMENT 44084 BARTLETT STREET IMPROVEMENTS 44085 100 NO FROM MAIN TO 100 W IMPROVE Total Highways 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (124,400.00) $ (124,400.00) $ (124,400.00) $ (124,400.00) $ (50,000.00) $ (50,000.00) $ $ (105,000.00) $ (105,000.00) $ (35,000.00) $ (35,000.00) $ - $ $ (120,000.00) $ (101,000.00) $ - $ $ $ (35,000.00) $ (35,000.00) $ - $ $ (36,500.00) $ (36,500.00) $ - $ $ (381,500.00) $ (362,500.00) Storm Drainage 42577 STRMWTR DETENTION BASIN PROJ Total Storm Drainage $ $ Total Highways and public improvements Parks, recreation, and public property Parks 78043 SWANNY PARK RESTROOMS 78045 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT/IMPROVEMENTS Total Parks $ (80,000.00) $ (80,000.00) $ (80,000.00) $ (80,000.00) Recreation 45070 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $ Total Recreation $ $ Swimming Pool 47070 AQUATIC CENTER PROJECT 47071 AQUATIC CENTER SET ASIDE 47098 CONTRIBUTION TO CIB ESCROW Total Swimming Pool $ (15,000.00) $ (15,000.00) $ $ $ (15,000.00) $ (e9M0E531)33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes Special Projects 79044 PERFORMANCE GURANTEE DEFAULT IMPROVEMENTS $ $ Total Special Projects $ $ Moab Arts & Recreation Center 46070 ROOF PROJECT 46071 SOLAR PROJECT 46072 MARC BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Total Moab Arts & Recreation Center Total Parks, recreation, and public property Community and economic development Community Development 79045 USU SETASIDE Total Community Development Senior Assisted Living 79042 MAPS - ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT 79043 IMPACT FEE OFFSET Total Senior Assisted Living Total Community and economic development Transfers and contributions out 40090 INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE 81001 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND Total Transfers and contributions out Municipal Building Authority Municipal Building 77031 MUNI BLDG PROJECT 77042 PUBLIC BLDG BOND RESERVE 77045 MUNICIPAL BLDG FF&E 77046.1 MUNICIPAL BLDG BOND PMT 77046.2 MUNI BLDG BOND INTEREST 77047.1 2009 AQUATIC BOND PMT 77050 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS 77051 CENTER STREET GYM IMPROVEMENTS 77055 CITY HALL SOLAR PHOTO VOLTAIC 77056 DOG PARK Total Municipal Building Total Municipal Building Authority Total Expenditures: $ - $ $ (10,000.00) $ (10,000.00) $ (71,000.00) $ (71,000.00) $ (41,000.00) $ (41,000.00) $ (191,000.00) $ (191,000.00) $ - $ - (19,000.00) $ (19,000.00) $ (332,000.00) $ (332,000.00) Page 26 of 33 (975,900.00) $ (9-»00.00) 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED Total Change In Net Position 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes Page 27 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED ENTERPRISE FUND Income or Expense Income From Operations: Water Operating Income 36300 WATER PENALTIES 36500 SALE OF MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 36900 Water SUNDRY REVENUES 37100 WATER SALES 37120 TAX ON SHOP WATER SALES 37325 Water SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY DEPARTMENTS 37260 WATER CONNECTION 38600 ALLOWANCE ON DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS Total Water Operating Income Sewer Operating Income 56900 Sewer SUNDRY REVENUE 57300 SEWER SERVICES CHARGES 57325 Sewer SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY DEPTS 57350 Sewer SPANISH VALLEY SEWER 57440 SEWER CONNECTION Total Sewer Operating Income Water Operating expense 50009 Water GENERAL FUND 0/H 50010 Water SALARIES & WAGES 50013 Water EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 50015 Water OVERTIME 50021 Water SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 50023 Water TRAVEL 50024 Water OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 50025 Water EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 50026 Water BUILDING SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 50027 Water UTILITIES 50028 Water TELEPHONE 50029.1 Water RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 50029.2 Water capital lease expense 50030 Water MONTHLY FUEL- GASCARD 50031 Water PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 50033 Water WATER/EDUCATION 50035 Water OTHER 50046 Water SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 50051 Water INSURANCE 50069 Water DEPRECIATION Total Water Operating expense Sewer Operating expense 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ 3,000.00 $ $ - $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 530,000.00 $ 530,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 541,000.00 $ 541,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 520,000.00 $ 520,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 153,000.00 $ 153,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 730,500.00 $ 730,500.00 $ (175,000.00) $ (175,000.00) $ (200,160.00) $ (200,160.00) $ (146,000.00) $ (146,000.00) $ (6,500.00) $ (6,500.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (4,000.00) $ (4,000.00) $ - $ $ (12,500.00) $ (12,500.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (34,000.00) $ (34,000.00) $ (2,500.00) $ (2,500.00) $ (4,600.00) $ (4,600.00) $ - $ $ (16,000.00) $ (16,000.00) $ (25,500.00) $ (25,500.00) $ (2,800.00) $ (2,800.00) $ (1,250.00) $ (1,250.00) $ (56,100.00) $ (56,100.00) $ (1,560.00) $ (1,560.00) $ (187,000.00) $ (187,000.00) $ (882,470.00) $ (882,470.00) Page 28 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 60009 Sewer GENERAL FUND O/H 60010 Sewer SALARIES & WAGES 60013 Sewer EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 60015 Sewer OVERTIME 60021 Sewer SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 60023 Sewer TRAVEL 60024 Sewer OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES 60025 Sewer EQUIPMENT SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 60026 Sewer BUILDING SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 60027 Sewer UTILITIES 60028 Sewer TELEPHONE 60029 Sewer RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 60030 Sewer MONTHLY FUEL - GAS CARD 60031 Sewer PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 60033 Sewer EDUCATION 60035 Sewer OTHER 60046 Sewer SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 60069 Sewer DEPRECIATION Total Sewer Operating expense Total Income From Operations: Non -Operating Items: Water Non -operating income 36100 INTEREST INCOME 36110 WATER IMPACT FEE INTEREST INCOME 36111 WATER IMPACT FEES 36112 WATER IMPACT FEE BEG F.B. 39535 W/S - BEG. FUND BALANCE 5630 Gain (loss) on asset retirement 5651 Water CONTRIBUTIONS OF ASSETS Total Water Non -operating income Sewer Non -operating income 56100 Sewer INTEREST INCOME 56110 SEWER IMPACT FEE INTEREST 56111 SEWER IMPACT FEES 56112 SEWER IMPACT FEE BEG F.B. 56113 SEWER IMPACT FEE FINANCE INTEREST 56860 Sewer Contribution from capital projects Total Sewer Non -operating income Water Non -operating expense 50082 Water INTEREST ON BONDS/DEBT SERVICE 50084 Water TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FACILITIES Total Water Non -operating expense 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ (190,000.00) $ (190,000.00) $ (89,400.00) $ (89,400.00) $ (60,100.00) $ (60,100.00) $ (1,800.00) $ (1,800.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (750.00) $ (750.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (1,000.00) $ (31,000.00) $ (31,000.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (45,000.00) $ (45,000.00) $ (2,200.00) $ (2,200.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (1,500.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (3,000.00) $ (38,500.00) $ (38,500.00) $ (500.00) $ (500.00) $ (2,500.00) $ (2,500.00) $ (29,500.00) $ (29,500.00) $ (172,000.00) $ (172,000.00) $ (672,750.00) $ (672,750.00) $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 86,000.00 $ 101,000.00 $ 356,120.00 $ 406,120.00 $ 459,620.00 $ 524,620.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 330,000.00 $ 345,000.00 $ 12,600.00 $ 12,600.00 $ 371,600.00 $ 386,600.00 Page 29 of 3 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes Sewer Non -operating expense 60082 Sewer INTEREST ON SEWER BONDS $ $ 60085 CONTRIBUTION TO EXTENDED CARE FACIL $ Total Sewer Non -operating expense $ $ Total Non -Operating Items: Total Income or Expense Page 30 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Capital Budget 51- 51 Water & Sewer Fund as of 01/31/2012 2013 Description Dept. Request Recommended Council Approved Projects: $ 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 365,000.00 Impact Expenditures - Sewer Impact Expenditures - Water $ 92,000.00 $ 92,000.00 $ 107,000.00 Total Projects: $ 442,000.00 $ 442,000.00 $ 472,000.00 Direct Purchase: 1611- Land 1615 - Water shares 1631- Water wells 1641- Water tanks $ 14,000.00 $ - $ - 1642 - Water lines $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 30,000.00 1643 - Meters $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 1651- Sewage treatment facilities 1652 - Sewer lines $ 220,000.00 $ 245,000.00 1661.1 - Equipment - general $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 1661.2 - Equipment - water $ 69,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 1661.3 - Equipment - sewer $ 30,000.00 $ - $ - 1665 - Office furniture and equipment 1671- Autos and trucks $ 95,000.00 $ 95,000.00 Total Direct Purchase: $ 158,500.00 $ 464,500.00 $ 514,500.00 $ 600,500.00 $ 906,500.00 $ 986,500.00 Total Capital Requirement: Long Term Debt Repayment: 1993A BWR Water Revenue Total Long Term Debt Repayment: $ - $ - $ - $ 600,500.00 $ 906,500.00 $ 986,500.00 Total Capital and Long Term Debt Requirement: Resources to be Provided: $ 105,880.39 $ 547,500.00 $ 627,500.00 Net Income Add Depreciation $ 359,000.00 $ 359,000.00 $ 359,000.00 Provided/Required from Operation: $ 464,880.39 $ 906,500.00 $ 986,500.00 Project Borrowing $ 464,880.39 $ 906,500.00 $ 986,500.00 Total Resources to be Provided: Resource Remaining or to be Provided: Beginning Capital Asset Reserve: Ending Capital Asset Reserve: Pane :11 of 3'i 6/8/2012 J:\2012\Budget 2012-2013\Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.x1Nloab City Recorder's Office MOAB CITY CORPORATION Budget Worksheet Detail As of January 31, 2012 58.33% OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS EXPIRED STORM WATER DRAINAGE FUND Income From Operations: Water Operating Income 36450 STORM WATER DRAINAGE FEE Total Water Operating Income Water Operating expense 40009 Storm wtr GENERAL FUND O/H 40010 Storm wtr SALARIES & WAGES 40013 Storm wtr EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 40031 Storm wtr PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 40046 Storm wtr SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 40069 Storm wtr DEPRECIATION 40075 Storm wtr SPECIAL PROJECTS Total Water Operating expense Total Income From Operations: Non -Operating Items: Water Non -operating income 36110 INTEREST INCOME 36112 TFER FROM BEG F.B. 36210 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND Total Water Non -operating income Water Non -operating expense 40090 Storm wtr TRANSFER TO SURPLUS FUND BAL. Total Water Non -operating expense Total Non -Operating Items: Total Income or Expense 2012-2013 Public Hearing Council Changes $ 142,000.00 $ 142,000.00 $ 142,000.00 $ 142,000.00 (45,000.00) $ (45,000.00) (40,000.00) $ (40,000.00) (85,000.00) $ (85,000.00) 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 239,000.00 $ 239,000.00 $ 243,000.00 $ 243,000.00 Page 32 of 33 6/8/2012 Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.xlsx Moab City Recorder's Office Capital Budget 53 - 53 Storm Water Utility fund as of 01/31/2012 2013 Description Dept. Request Recommended Council Approved Projects: $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 STEWART CANYON DESIGN Total Projects: $ - $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Direct Purchase: $ - $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Total Direct Purchase: $ - $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Total Capital Requirement: Long Term Debt Repayment: $ - $ - $ - Total Long Term Debt Repayment: $ - $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Total Capital and Long Term Debt Requirement: $ 300,000.00 Resources to be Provided: $ 300,000.00 Net Income Add Depreciation Provided/Required from Operation: $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Project Borrowing $ - $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Total Resources to be Provided: $ - $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Resource Remaining or to be Provided: Beginning Capital Asset Reserve: Ending Capital Asset Reserve: Page 33 of 33 6/8/2012 J:\2012\Budget 2012-2013\Copy of Budget Worksheet Detail final 2012.AMbab City Recorder's a m w PHANTOM FIREWORKS UT 8014064021 cd m obi:m/2012 atISBuessNAME: $iA��� ��.�. �-�L TN- IA ISM. - B�s�r�ss F�;� u llama ia4 1AJ . iiu din.. e_ 5 i C U 7- 8 Y it s PROP© USE OF STRUCTURE 5 S O ,� T G ` 'PPE OF STRICTURE Sf o Z"-- ADDRESS OF PROPOSED STRUCTURE 'SLOCATION cacao Se , rA.a.,; a.. <S 4, ,NOE - OF PROPERTY OWE ( Ci at k. r Cleat, ES7HEFRC3AEtii♦Yf7�tr14ER)AGRiETOA1.lAYPiHE&10VED-Qlf�ifl[�CII$�ONNIY / iAti �`q}FRO PERTYFORINE1ERFAOFVISPERM O PR�iYOMER'SSISE9I�F: { / � f - tourieffoFRama otAFAa rrfs U.) a_ I K...,- D ro ESE OF REST ROPARFACILDIFIC .� ye5 ,/'���s `vt1WANR$lti OilihFiAmGCoMFLJ C--_ONS��]RE OR : IYES 0 No - I Rdv stnutro�i: - - $375.00 Zoning Administrator's Signature 1,: ]' � 4L 1 1 1%STATE TAX 3.75 1 , :a'c BUILDINOPFRarREQ]9RED; ❑YES w,wr BEAMS itlaPECEDRI SIStaiWIE: ; CITY OF MOM DANAFPRo EDGY CRY COUNCH. ZTOZ/L0/90 TZ0179817108 in SAdOMMIId WOlNVHd 80/60 3Jdd Cm OF MOAB MOVED -ON STRUCTURE ENSPECTIONS 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259.4135 BUSINESS NAME: &1.5 Ba4r o� LCt���1nc Pit.got -om,-Rrci...torICs ADDRESS OF MOVED -ON STRUCTURE: W0.11(.- DrL a40 S /Y14:0‘. St THE FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONDUCTING BUSINESS. OBTAIN THE REQUIRED SIGNATURES THEN RETURN YOUR PERMIT TO THE CITY RECORDERS OFFICE FOR FINAL APPROVAL. BUILDING INSPECTOR (435) 259-1344/1345 125 EAST CENTER BUILDING PERMIT # OF REQUIRED) INSPECTION REQUIRED: ❑ YES Cl NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REASON: SIGNATURE IC FIRE INSPECTOR (435) 259-5557 45 SOUTH 100 EAST INSPECTION REQUIRED: ❑ YES ® NO (SIC 4ATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REASON: SIGNATURE HEALTH INSPECTOR (435)259-5602 471 SOUTH MAIN INSPECTION REQUIRED: ❑ YES ❑ NO (SIGNATURE REQUIRED) IF YES, DATE OF INSPECTION APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED ❑ REASON: SIGNATURE 03/05/04 6-2 All banners should be hung up accordingly. Banners need to be taken down on July 5th. Table tops and Phantom side skirts should be removed and thrown away. When closed at night Put up walls to cover Open & small BOGO signs to protect the tent from weather and/or vandalism. NO SMOKING Within 50 Feet Signs should be on all sides of the tent A minimum of 3 sides of the tent must be open with no walls during operation. Visibility inside the tent is vital Beck Closed Side View NwFIRE Tent Banner Placement n+i seierted items Long Open Side View Walls Off Front Open )1 i "20x40" Side View with 5x8ft Banner ENTER/0— 1: ; on selecteci it:,psis nOZa0/90 ZZ01798b108 in SAdOMalId WOlNVHd 460 li-nagery Date 12!3112005 1993 6-2 c;I co Big Bear of Utah,, Inc. dba Phantom Fireworks Distributors of Phantom and Wolf Pack Brand Fireworks 124 W. Burton Ave, S.L.C., UT 84115 Off'ice:801-486-1516 Fax:801-486-4021 FIREWORKS TEMPORARY SALES LICENSE & LEASE AGREEMENT This agreement is made between: gxe— ; v2 Address: _ (hereinafter referred to as the "Landlord"), and Big Bear Fireworks, inc. dba Phantom Fireworks (hereinafter referred to as "Phantom") of the address specified above, for the purpose of granting an Operating Group designated by Phantom, the exclusive right to operate a temporary state legal consumer fireworks sales facility on the following described premises: Location Narne Walker's Dmq - Moab Addreea City, State zip 260 S Main St Moab, UT Aureasara Parcel Number inS 33 The parking lot or common area listed above is owned and/or controlled by the Landlord, and the Landlord warrants and certifies full • right and authority to do so, grants to phantom, and the Operating Group selected by Phantom, the exclusive right to operate a consumer fireworks sales stand or tent on the premises for the specified period from: Date Year Date Year Rental Fee Initial June 20th 2012 t0 July 30th 2012 'The stand or tent may be set up and taken down 5-10 days before and after the selling period as permitted by law. Phantom and the Landlord agree to the following terms and conditions: 1_ Phantom will provide liability insurance coverage in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000.00, will name Landlord as an 'Additional Insured," and will, prior to occupancy, deliver a certificate to Landlord evidencing such insurance covering the erection, maintenance and operation of the fireworks sales venue; additionally, Phantom will hold the Landlord harmless from any liability in connection with 2. Phantom shall pay all costs involved in erection, maintenance and operation of the stand dr tent, and, on departure, Phantom shall return the premises to its original condition. 3. Phantom shall obtain and pay for all necessary permits and licenses required by law; shall post any debris and performance bonds required by locai authority; and shall adhere to all laws and regulations. 4_ if the safe of consumer fireworks shall be prohibited by public authority, the prepaid lease rent will be refunded, and this lease agreement shall automatically become null and void. If the.public authority having jurisdiction over the leased premises limits or restricts the sale of fireworks in any way, then this lease agreement is subject t0 revision. 5_ If Phantom is unable to secure a group to operate on the property and the property is not utilized, the prepaid rent will be refunded, and this lease agreement shall automatically became null and vold for that year. in the event the property is not utilized in a given year, Phantom shall have the option to use the property for the following year under the same terms and conditions by giving notice by March 1, of the next year. If the property is sold or otherwise inaooessible due to construction or the like, then this lease is subject to revision. If thls lease should become null and void under this provision or paragraph 4 of this agreement, then prepaid rents shall be refunded to Phantom within ten (ten) business days of written cancellation. (Landlord's initials). 6_ Landlord agrees that if a refund of prepaid rent is due and owing to Phantom under the. provisions of this agreement, that Phantom's acceptance of less than the full amount of any prepayment shall not be deemedean accord and satisfaction or compromise of such payment unless Phantom specifically consents in writing to payment of such lesser fund, regardless of Landlord's characterization as "full payment," "accord and satisfaction." or other similar characterization on the payment instrument. 7. In any action or proceeding to enforce, interpret or declare rights under this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees, costs sesociated with suit and litigation expenses. $_ Rent shalt be payable by June 1st of each lease year. • 9. This agreement commences as of the date indicated on the signature below. 10. Phantom is hereby given an option to renew this Lease for five (5) one (1) year periods beginning in the year 2018 under the same terms and conditions as stated above, Phantom must notify Landlord of Its intent to exercise option by September 1 of the last lease year reflected in this Lease. 11. Each individual signing this Lease Agreement expressly represents and warrants that they are authorized by the entity for which they sign, to legally bind and commit that entity to the terms set forth herein_ All notices required or allowed under this Agreement shall be given in writing to the addresses listed herein or such other addresses as the parties may designate. 12. Phantom agrees not to Secure tent with stakes_ Phantom will instruct tent company to use water barrels to secure tent_ , Date P tom - Authorize3. 'egnature I ate Title! Regional Manager Phone: `/3_,r 5-5 6' Email:, (f/lJc��'roc- 1 .' 9D11 9-c64-2. Email: Jwitter@firewarks.com r-, 6-2 City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Correspondence Pld2-79 June 6, 2012 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Subject: Approval of Draft Ordinance #2012-07 Amending Portions of the Supplementary Regulations for Large Scale Retail Developments over Thirty Thousand Square Feet, as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission Background Council first reviewed this proposed code amendment at the regular meeting held on April 3, 2012. It was decided at the time that the ordinance should be tabled. The reasons were not completely clear to staff although some concerns were voiced that the ordinance went too far in regulating large scale retail developments. Prior to the meeting, Planning Staff asked two designer/developers to review the ordinance and comment on it. They stated that it was about time the problem was approached in this way and that the menu of items from which the developer could choose from allowed a great deal of imagination and creativity and ample options to pursue to have the parking aligned as needed or desired. Staff has also learned from SITLA representatives that the drafts given to a particular developer who has shown interest in Moab for development appreciates the approach. The memo from the meeting agenda packet for April 3, 2012, is included as additional background information. Discussion Again, please note that not all of the changes indicated in the draft as highlighted/strikeout are language changes. Complete subsections were relocated in an effort to organize like elements to make the document easier to read and locate specific information under major headings The American Planning Association large scale retail model upon which our current Large Scale Retail regulations are largely based, is a rigid uncompromising document with little room for negotiating how a site will appear. Last minute removal of the sole negotiating provision from the ordinance that would give the city options for approval, has acted as a barrier to development and focuses on the parking requirements. Ordinance #2012-07 allows for additional front parking if other design elements and landscaping are applied to the parking areas and the structures. 6-3 PL-12-79 Moab City Council Ordinance #2012-07 Large Scale Retail- Parking and Landscaping June 6, 20I2 Page 2 of 2 The screening of roof top units was included at the request of SITLA and USU because their development will be higher in elevation and will look down on the tops of the commercial structures. A green roof as written into this ordinance, could be an acceptable option to this requirement when used in the building design. Additional landscaping will serve to buffer the buildings and visually and physically break up the large expanses of asphalt. Containment of generated storm water through bio-retention areas and landscaping is necessary to avoid impacts on new adjacent development as well as on existing development of surrounding properties. Also, the retention will "pre -filter" the water prior to re- introduction in to the ground. Screening of parking areas from roadways allows flexibility in building placement and landscaping options as long as line of site issues can be avoided. In addition, there are studies that have been out for awhile that show that landscaped development has a greater success rate and that particularly trees have a positive impact on how long shoppers remain in an area and that they spend more money during their stay. Process The process for text amendments is found in Chapter 17.04, Zoning Map Amendments and Text Amendments. In Chapter 17.04.080 paragraph A., the Code requires that a public hearing be held by the Planning Commission. Paragraph B requires that a decision to, "either recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the application", must be reached within thirty (30) days of the public hearing and that the decision is to be conveyed to Council within ten (10) days. According to Chapter 17.04.100 (A), Council may approve the amendment at the next public meeting without a public hearing but, can also, "In its discretion... elect to receive testimony or evidence from the applicant, city staff, and the public prior to taking final action on the ordinance." (17.04.100 C) The Planning Commission considered this amendment for many months and the proposed changes are reflected in this ordinance. Alternatives Council can vote to: 1) Approve the ordinance as written; 2) Approve the ordinance with changes; 3) Establish a time and date for a public hearing; 3) Table the ordinance for additional information. p:\planning department \2012\correspondence \p1-12-79 cc Isr parking.docx 6-3 Memo To: From: Subject: City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Correspondence PL-12.56 April 19, 2012 Honorable Mayor and Members of Council Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Approval of Draft Ordinance #2012-07 Amending Portions of the Supplementary Regulations for Large Scale Retail Developments over Thirty Thousand Square Feet, as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission Background Code Sections 17.80.050 through 17.80.080 contain the required site design requirements for Retail development that consist of structures exceeding 30,000 square feet in size. Council adopted this code section on February 26, 2008. The ordinance had gone through numerous revisions and one of the deleted items was a provision that allowed the Planning Commission to have the flexibility for some limited options in approving the landscaping and the parking during review of the site plan. However, there were no standards for the Planning Commission to follow. Ordinance #2012-07 does several things in addition to establishing measurable criteria that the Commission can use in evaluating these site plans. 1. It allows for more front parking if landscaping and screening of parking areas is provided. Screening also specifically includes building on "out lots" around the perimeter of the parking area; 2. Provides options for developers to apply that also increase front parking in the guise of bio- retention areas and green roofing designs to help contain and pre -treat storm water runoff; 3. Requires a greater level of landscaping; 4. Requires a convenient location for parking of bikes; 5. Requires a higher level of pedestrian safety; 6. Provides for the screening of roof top HVAC units from adjacent properties; 7. Allows the development to be more flexible, sustainable, and negotiable. Process The process for text amendments is found in Chapter 17.04, Zoning Map Amendments and Text Amendments. In Chapter 17.04.080 paragraph A., the Code requires that a public hearing be held by the Planning Commission. Paragraph B requires that a decision to, "either recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the application", must be reached within thirty (30) days of the public hearing and that the decision is to be conveyed to Council within ten (10) days. 6-3 PL-12-56 Moab City Council Ordinance #2012-07 Large Scale Retail- Parking and landscaping April 19, 2012 Page 2 of 2 According to Chapter 17.04.100 (A), Council may approve the amendment at the next public meeting without a public hearing but, can also, "In its discretion... elect to receive testimony or evidence from the applicant, city staff, and the public prior to taking final action on the ordinance." (17.04.100 C) Discussion It is worthy to note that not all of the changes noted in the draft that has the highlight/strikeout function are actually language changes. There are entire subsections that were relocated to be more in line with specific topics and show as changes in their new locations. The Planning Commission has considered this amendment for many months and the proposed changes are reflected in this draft. Alternatives Council can vote to: 1) Approve the ordinance as written; 2) Approve the ordinance with changes; 3) Establish a time and date for a public hearing; 3) Table the ordinance for additional information. p:\planning department\2012\correspondence\p1-12-54 cc side yard carports.docx 6-3 ORDINANCE #2012-07 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 17.80.050 OF THE MOAB LAND USE CODE, BY AMENDING A PORTION OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS FOR LARGE SCALE RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS OVER THIRTY THOUSAND SQUARE FEET, FOR PARKING AND LANDSCAPING WHEREAS, the City of Moab ("City")adopted Chapter 17, Zoning, of the Moab Municipal Code ("Code") in an effort to promote the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity, and general welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the city by guiding development within the City of Moab in accordance with the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab ("City') adopted Chapter 17.80, Supplementary Regulations for Large Scale Retail Developments Over Thirty Thousand Square Feet, to guide the construction of large scale retail development within the City of Moab; and WHEREAS, it was identified by City Staff (Staff) and the Planning Commission ("Commission") that the existing parking and landscaping regulations were insufficient to generate the appropriate aesthetics for large areas of hard surfaced parking areas; and WHEREAS, the Moab City Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on April 12, 2012, to hear and decide the merits of said amendment; and, WHEREAS, the Commission, after reviewing the public testimony and the recommendation of Staff favorably recommends to Council that the suggested amendment be adopted; and, WHEREAS, Council held duly advertised public meetings to review the recommendations from Staff and the Planning Commission and decide the merits of said amendment on April 24, 2012 and June 12, 2012; and, NOW, THEREFORE, Council hereby declares and ordains that the following changes shall be made to Chapter 17.80.050, et al as amended below: 17.80.050 Site design. Large scale retail developments as defined by this Chapter 17.09. In addition, the following provisions shall apply: A. Building Size. New retail establishments shall not exceed two hundred thousand gross square feet as a single tenant or combination of tenants in a single structure. Remodels and/or expansions of existing building shall not result in retail establishments exceeding two hundred thousand square feet as a single tenant or combination of tenants in a single structure. B. Building Height. New retail establishments and remodels and/or expansions of existing buildings in excess of thirty thousand gross square feet shall not exceed forty feet in height. C. Parking. These regulations are intended to: i. Reduce the "heat island effect" of the parking surface ii. Encourage natural on -site processing of stormwater through landscape features designed to slow and filter polluted runoff iii. Encourage groundwater recharge and/or reuse 6-3 iv. Reduce the overall scale of paved surfaces v. Minimize the utilitarian visual impact vi. Enhance Pedestrian safety 1. Lot Orientation. Parking areas shall provide safe, convenient, and efficient access for all types of vehicles, public transit, all alternative forms of travel, and pedestrians. They should be distributed around larger buildings in order to shorten distances to other buildings and public sidewalks and to reduce the overall scale of the paved surface, and provide shared parking between businesses. Bike racks shall be located in well -lighted areas and placed in locations that are visible from store entrances and parking areas. 2. Parking areas shall be planned as an accessory to the buildings they serve to achieve a high quality design and appearance. The parking area's utilitarian appearance should be minimized [reduced] by utilizing effective landscaping, street furniture and other public amenities. 3. Parking lots should be designed to avoid causing erosion damage to grading and surrounding landscaping. Whenever possible, permeable paving systems shall be evaluated and utilized especially for overflow and employee parking areas. To reduce impervious surfaces, one-way drive aisles shall be incorporated into the design to the greatest extent possible. 4. Parking lots shall incorporate methods for stormwater management utilizing low impact development (LID) techniques including, but not limited to: a. End -of -island bioretention cell(s) with underdrain(s) and landscaping; b. Bioretention cells or biofiltration swales located around the parking perimeter; c. Breached Curb drainage inlets (or curb cuts) in the end -of -island bioretention cells and bioretention strips to collect runoff. d. Bioretention cells can be installed between lines of parking stalls to increase the total treatment surface area of these systems. 5. Parking and vehicular circulation. Parking facilities shall be recognized as transitional spaces where users change modes of travel, from car, bus, or bicycle to pedestrian. The design of those spaces shall therefore safely and attractively serve all modes, and provide safe walkways for pedestrian. 6. Surface parking. No single parking area shall exceed 150 feet unless divided into two or more sub -areas by a building, internal landscaped street, or landscaped pedestrian way. 7. Parking lots shall be configured and designed to reduce the overall mass of paved surfaces. No more than seventy percent (70%) of the required or proposed off-street parking area for the entire property shall be located between the front (street adjacent) facade within the front yard of the principal building(s) and the primary abutting street unless the principal building(s) and/or parking lots are screened from view by secondary development (such as restaurants), additional tree plantings, other landscaping, berms or screening. The planning commission shall approve all proposed screening and increases in parking according to the requirements listed herein. 8. No overnight camping shall be permitted in parking facilities authorized pursuant to Moab Municipal Code Chapters 8.20 and 10.04.230. The applicant shall post and enforce policies to ensure compliance with this provision. D. Paving and circulation requirements. 1. All parking stalls and maneuvering areas shall be paved and permanently maintained with asphalt, concrete, or pavers surfacing except in employee and overflow 6-3 parking areas where the use of gravel or other pervious surface material may be approved by the Planning Commission. The utilization of pavers or other approved pervious materials to provide for additional parking during times of high volume traffic is encouraged. 2. All areas within the parking area not used for parking stalls or maneuvering areas shall be landscaped. 3. Parking areas shall be designed to enable a car entering the parking area to move from one location to any other location within the parking area or premises without entering a street. F Parking Sub -areas. Unbroken rows of parking spaces shall not exceed 16 SPACES unless divided into two or more sub -areas by a building, internal landscaped street, significant planted dividers or islands or a landscaped pedestrian way. All islands shall be landscaped. G. Number of Parking Spaces. The number of parking spaces provided shall be one space for every two hundred (200) square feet of retail space. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to grant bonuses to the required number of parking spaces, provided that any additional bonuses may be granted by the Planning Commission upon approval of the landscape plan or if alternative energy is incorporated into the lighting and/or shading of the parking lot. Parking bonuses may be approved by the Planning Commission as allowed in Subsection H. H. Parking bonuses. The Commission shall use the following standards when evaluating the landscape design and granting parking bonuses. 1. Additional shade coverage exceeding the 50% requirement by 15% may allow up to 10% parking area increases. 2. The use of solar energy panels for lighting and/or shade structures shall allow additional parking bonuses of 10% based on a 15% solar panel coverage of the parking area. 3. Other valid options for bonuses as proposed by the contractor and approved by the Planning Commission may be used in lieu of the increases in shade or solar panels if the intent of the regulations are met or exceeded. Such options shall include solar panels located on the roofs of structures and green roofs used to absorb water runoff from principal uses. I. Storm Water Systems. Storm water system design shall emphasize water quality treatment and ground water recharge. The site storm water system shall capture all site runoff, provide water quality treatment through the use of appropriate structural BMPs, and discharge the RIBBON CURB STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER storm water to the public storm water system at a rate that does not exceed the pre - developed rate for the project site for the ten-year and one hundred -year storm events. In the event that the property cannot drain to the public storm water system, storm water may be discharged onto or across adjacent properties provided that easements permitting such use are executed with the respective landowners. Required additional storm water conveyance systems shall be subject to approval by the city and shall be constructed at the applicant's cost. J. Rear and Side Facades. Side and rear facades shall adhere to the requirements outlined in subsection 17.80.040(A) of this chapter. Architectural and landscaping features should mitigate to the maximum extent practicable the impacts of blank walls, loading areas, storage areas, HVAC units, garbage receptacles and other accessory features. 1. The minimum setback for any building facade shall be twenty-five feet. Where the facade faces adjacent residential zones an earthen berm shall be installed, no less than six feet in height, containing at a minimum, a double row of evergreen or deciduous trees planted at intervals of twenty feet trunk to trunk. Additional landscaping may be required by the planning commission to effectively buffer adjacent land use as deemed appropriate. All additional landscape requirements of the Landscape Ordinance shall apply. K. Outdoor Storage, Trash Collection, and Loading Areas. Loading areas and outdoor storage areas exert visual and noise impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. These areas, when visible from adjoining properties and/or public streets, shall be screened from view of adjacent public or private rights -of - way or neighboring properties. Appropriate locations for loading and outdoor storage areas include areas between buildings, where more than one building is located on a site and such buildings are not more than forty feet apart, or on those sides of buildings that do not have customer entrances. 1. Areas for outdoor storage, truck parking, trash collection or compaction, utility meters, HVAC equipment or other such equipment, similar uses, and similar service functions shall be screened from view from adjacent public or private rights -of -way or neighboring properties. Materials, colors, and designs of screening walls, fences and covers shall conform to those used as predominant materials, colors and designs of the building. Areas for outdoor storage, trash collection or compaction, loading, or other such uses shall not be located within thirty feet of any public street, public sidewalk, or internal pedestrian way. 2. Delivery and loading operations shall conform to Chapter 17.74, Noise. 3. Delivery and loading areas shall be substantially set back from a residential use or residentially zoned property that is adjacent to the site. A landscape buffer, or other approved buffering, of at least thirty feet in width shall be provided adjacent to the delivery and loading area where it adjoins residential uses or zones. The landscape buffer shall include 6-3 WAL.KW4Y si aRKiWGq bl°� -14-1-144) evergreen shrubs and/or trees plus deciduous canopy trees at regular intervals to provide noise, light, and visual screening. 4. If the delivery and loading spaces are located within an enclosed building or underground, no such set back and buffer area shall be required. 5. Outdoor storage of chemicals, fertilizers and other materials that pose a potential source of groundwater pollution shall be stored in a contained area that prevents leakage into the storm water system or into the groundwater. Environmental Protection Agency regulations or other regulations shall be followed. L. Pedestrian/Bicycle Accessibility. This section sets forth standards for public sidewalks and internal pedestrian circulation systems that can provide user- friendly pedestrian access as well as pedestrian safety, shelter, and convenience within the center grounds. 1. Sidewalks at least six feet in width shall be provided along all sides of the project site that abut a public or private right-of-way. The planning commission may waive this requirement as part of the development plan if a suitable alternative is proposed. 2. Continuous internal pedestrian walkways, no less than five feet in width, shall be provided from the public sidewalk or right-of-way to the principal customer entrances of all principal buildings on the site. At a minimum, walkways shall connect focal points of activity such as, but not limited to, parking areas, street crossings, building and store entry points, and shall feature landscaping as per requirements outlined in this chapter. 3. Walkways shall be provided through parking lots. A paved walkway or sidewalk must be provided for safe walking areas through parking lots greater than one 15li11-121,44 hundred fifty feet in length (measured either parallel or perpendicular to the street front). Walkways shall be provided every third parking aisle, or at a distance of not less than one hundred fifty feet? between paths (which -ever is the least restrictive.) Such access routes through parking areas shall be separated from vehicular parking and travel lanes by use of contrasting paving materials which may be raised above the vehicular pavement. Speed tables shall not be used to satisfy this requirement. 4. Sidewalks, no less than five feet in width, shall be provided along the full length of the building along any facade featuring a customer entrance, and along any t;, facade abutting public parking areas. Such sidewalks shall be located at least six feet from the facade of the building to provide planting beds for foundation landscaping. 5. All internal pedestrian walkways shall be distinguished from driving surfaces through the use of durable, low maintenance surface materials such as pavers, bricks, or scored and tinted concrete to Bike racks shall be located in well -lighted areas and placed in locations that are visible from store entrances and/or parking areas 17.80.060 Signage. enhance pedestrian safety and comfort, as well as the attractiveness of the walkways. 6. Public bicycle and pedestrian paths, trails, and lanes a minimum of ten feet in width shall be provided across the site as necessary to implement the Grand County Non -motorized Master Trails Plan as approved by the city council and in effect at the time of application. All such easement widths shall be contingent upon the type of trail proposed and may vary. Such trails shall provide connections to existing and/or future trails. 7. Bicycle lanes or paths shall be provided from an adjacent street to bicycle parking areas near a primary entrance of structures. 8. The applicant shall provide street stub outs, trails, and sidewalks as necessary to promote efficient circulation and connectivity with adjacent developed parcels or undeveloped parcels that are likely to develop. Large scale retail developments as defined by this chapter shall be required to follow the provisions of Chapter 15.44 (Sign Code). In addition, the following provisions shall apply: A. Sign Color. Sign colors shall be low reflectance, subtle, neutral, or earth tone colors. Use of high -contrast colors in all wall and monument signs is prohibited. B. Sign Types. Corporate or retail signage shall be limited to internally illuminated and channeled wall signs and monument signs. Maximum sign square footage, height and all other requirements shall be governed by Chapter 15.44 of this code. C. All free standing signs shall be monument style: i.e. mounted on a base (above grade) of wood, brick or stone, which is detached from any building and built with continuous background surface from the ground up. (Ord. 08-10 (part), 2008) 17.80.070 Landscaping. A. All planter beds and tree planters shall be bordered by a concrete curb not less than six inches in height adjacent to the parking surface except where areas of landscape are used for storm water detention. If used in this manner, all asphalt abutting landscaping shall terminate with a concrete ribbon curb 1.5 feet in width and 10 inches in thickness. 6-3 B. All plants and irrigation systems shall be installed according to the landscape installation guidelines shown on the approved landscape plan. The owner shall guarantee the quality of work, health and condition of plants and installation of materials including, but not limited to; plant types, size, spacing, and irrigation systems. Prior to final acceptance of the project and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the city shall inspect and certify that the installation is in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. All corrections, adjustments, and/or replacement of landscape elements and execution of a Landscape Maintenance Agreement shall be done prior to final approval by the city. In the event corrections cannot be made or installation cannot be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the city shall require a cash deposit equal in value to the amount of one and one-half the cost of the landscaping project. A cash deposit is returned only when the city gives final approval of the project. C. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. Failure to maintain shall constitute a misdemeanor and punishable as established in Code Sections 17.75, 17.78, and 12.24.160. D. Any changes to an approved landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the alteration taking place. Changes made without appropriate review and approval shall constitute a misdemeanor and punishable as established in MMC Sections 12.24.160, 17.75 and 17.78. E. Landscaping Materials and Spaces. Required landscaping shall be limited to the following materials and spaces: 1. Living ground cover; 2. Permeable, continuous non -living ground cover; 3. Living plant life other than ground cover; 4. Retained native vegetation; 5. Natural or manufactured features, including but not limited to boulders and planters; 6. Pedestrian ways; and 7. Public spaces. F. Landscaping Materials and Design Mix. Separate sections of landscaping shall be composed of the required materials in any combination as follows: 1. Living plant life other than ground cover or natural vegetation shall have a minimum coverage of five percent; 2. Living ground cover shall have a maximum coverage of eighty percent; 3. Permeable non -living ground cover shall have a maximum coverage of twenty percent; 4. Natural or manufactured features shall have a maximum coverage of fifteen percent; 5. Pedestrian ways or public spaces shall have a maximum coverage of fifty percent; G. Plant Materials and Landscape Design Standards. 1. Plants selected for landscape areas shall consist of plants that are well suited to the micro -climate and soil conditions at the project site. Plants with similar water needs shall be grouped together as much as possible. 2. Turf areas shall be limited to areas with shade for at least one-half of the mid- summer day and shall not be allowed in spaces narrower than ten feet wide. Turf shall not be used in more than ten percent of total landscape area, and should be located in places where people will use it. 3. For projects located at the interface between urban areas and natural open space (nonirrigated), highly drought tolerant plants shall be selected that will blend with the native vegetation and are fire resistant or retardant. Plants with low level fuel volume or high moisture content shall be emphasized. Plants that tend to accumulate excessive amount of dead wood or debris shall be avoided. 4. Areas with a slope greater than thirty-three percent shall be landscaped with deep rooting, water conserving plants for erosion control and soil stabilization. 5. Parking strips and other landscaped areas less than eight feet wide shall be landscaped with water conserving plants. H. Irrigation Systems. 1. A detailed irrigation plan shall be drawn to the same scale as the planting plan and shall contain the following information: a. Layout of irrigation system and summary legend outlining the type and size of all components of the system, including manufacture name and model number with approved equals; b. Static water pressure in pounds per square inch at the point of connection to the public water supply; c. Flow rate in gallons per minute and design operating pressure in pounds per square inch for each valve and precipitation rate in inches per hour for each valve with sprinklers; and d. Installation details for irrigation components. 2. A monthly irrigation schedule shall be prepared that covers the initial one hundred twenty -day plant establishment period and the typical long term uses period. The schedule shall consist of a table with the following information for each valve: a. Plant type (e.g., turf, trees, low water plants); b. Irrigation type (e.g., drip, bubblers, sprinklers); c. Flow rate in gallons per minute; d. Run time in minutes; e. Frequency of run (number of days per week); and f. Cycle time to avoid runoff. I. Building Foundation Landscaping. A minimum of fifty percent of a fag;ade length containing a primary customer entrance shall have a foundation landscaped area extending at least six feet out from the building. All other fag;ades that can be viewed from existing public rights of way shall have foundation landscaping extending a minimum of eighty percent of the fag;ade length. J. Parking Lot Landscaping. 1. Large parking areas should be enhanced with additional landscaping. Creative site design, to include preservation of existing stands of trees and clustered landscaped areas, is encouraged over symmetrical rows of small landscaped islands. 2. To the greatest extent possible, landscape islands shall be designed so that plant material is not located on the first one (1) foot of the edge of the island, where it is most likely to be trampled by individuals exiting and entering parked vehicles. Such edge shall be mulched or paved with porous paving materials such as pavers. a. Landscaping. Parking lot landscaping is an important element in reducing reflective heating, controlling water runoff and improving the aesthetics of a site. Increasing the landscape requirements may also help in the adaptive reuse of large scale retail buildings. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained as established elsewhere in this section. b. Parking lot dividers, islands, planters and planting areas shall be a minimum of six (6) feet wide at the widest point, and six (6) feet long except that all new or retrofitted tree planters shall be a minimum of nine feet by seven feet, measured to the outside perimeter of the planter, and shall have no less than forty-eight square feet of permeable soil planting area. c. Landscaping shall be used to define parking areas, primary vehicular drives and pedestrian areas in an aesthetically and environmentally pleasing manner. d. Landscaped areas shall be distributed throughout the entire parking area as evenly as is appropriate in the design of the park -facility. 3. Where trees already exist, the parking lot shall be designed to make the best use of this existing growth and shade wherever it is reasonably possible. 6-3 4. Landscaping shall include shrubs, trees, vines, ground covers, hedges, flowers, bark, chips, decorating cinders, gravel, and similar material which will improve the appearance of parking areas. a. Tree Requirements. Off-street open parking areas shall provide fifty percent (50%) or more of shade coverage at the time of maturity of the trees. To achieve this coverage the applicant shall: 1. Design, where possible, north/south oriented parking areas to provide maximum shade, 3. Plant at least one medium or large-scale tree for every three parking stalls, 4. Utilize a diversity of tree species that have the ability to survive the climate zone. b. The minimum size tree planted shall be no less than a 1.5 inch tree measured at four (4) feet from the base of the tree and sized to specifications according to the American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1) and Arizona Nursery Association Grower's standards. Low water use and "native" plant materials shall be used to the greatest extent possible. Problematic trees having shallow or invasive roots or having brittle or weak branching structure are prohibited. All trees shall be planted and maintained according to the landscaping plan detail sheet and in such a manner to maximize the growth, health and longevity of the plantings. Parking lot trees adaptable to the Spanish Valley environment shall be selected and planted according to the appropriate tree species sized for planters with various dimensions and approved by the Urban Forester. c. Trees shall be maintained in accordance with the Moab Municipal Code, Chapter 12.24, Tree Stewardship. Violations shall be punishable as established in Section 12.24.150 and 12.24.160. d.The interior of all vehicular use areas shall be landscaped so as to define parking isles and limit unbroken rows of parking and provide for pedestrian accessibility and safety. Ends of parking rows and corner areas shall be curbed and landscaped. K. Internal Pedestrian Walkway Landscaping. All internal pedestrian walkways, as required by this chapter, shall feature adjoining landscaped areas that include trees, shrubs, benches, flower beds, ground covers, or other such materials for no less than fifty percent of their length. L. Parking Lot Trees Required. All proposed parking areas shall have shade trees planted at spacing no greater than forty feet trunk to trunk around the entire perimeter, with exception of those areas where the placement of trees would constitute a clear visual safety hazard. All landscaped islands in the interior of parking lots shall have, at a minimum, one large shade tree every forty feet. Each separate landscaped island or area shall contain a minimum of one hundred sixty-five square feet, shall have a minimum dimension of eight feet in any direction and shall include at least one tree. Trees shall be required within the interior planting islands of any vehicular use area exceeding four thousand five hundred square feet. M. Adjacent Buffer Required. A landscaped buffer of at least fifteen (15) feet in 6-3 width shall be required along the entire edge of any parking lot or the edge of a building fagade without a primary or pedestrian oriented entrance when adjacent to a public right-of-way. The landscaped buffer shall incorporate canopy shade trees planted at a minimum of thirty feet on - center for the buffer area. N. Screening. 1. Seventy-five percent of the lot frontage adjacent to any arterial street, exclusive of vehicular and pedestrian entrances, shall provide screening of parking areas by means of on -site buildings, landscaping, decorative walls and retaining walls, or other approved methods which may include primary structures. Additional screening of on -site parking shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 2. Fifty percent of the lot frontage adjacent to all other streets and adjacent properties shall provide screening of on -site parking by means of on -site buildings, decorative walls, decorative retaining walls, landscaping, or other buildings and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 3. Lot frontage adjacent to residential uses or residential zoning districts shall provide screening of on -site parking by means of walls, landscaping, or buildings. O. Minimum Vegetation Size. No required canopy and shade tree planting shall be less than one and one-half inch caliper, measured at breast -height, at the time of planting. Evergreen trees shall be a minimum of seven feet in height at the time of planting. P. Installation and Maintenance. All landscape materials required by this section shall be installed in accordance with standard practices of horticultural professionals and in good and workmanlike manner and shall be maintained by the property owner in good condition. 1. All applicants for landscape plan approval shall file a maintenance schedule and a scope of maintenance work with the zoning administrator. At minimum the maintenance schedule shall include the following: a. Any damaged or dead trees, shrubs or ground cover shall be replaced promptly for the life of the building. b. Maintenance of landscaped areas shall include: i. Continuous operations of removal of weeds; ii. Mowing; trimming; edging; cultivation; iii. Reseeding; iv. Plant replacement; v. Appropriate fertilization; spraying; vi. Control of pests, insects and rodents by nontoxic methods whenever possible; 6-3 vii. Watering with an automatic irrigation system is required; and viii. Other operations necessary to assure normal plant growth. 2. Irrigation systems shall be maintained in good operating condition to promote the conservation of water. 3. The obligation for continuous maintenance shall be binding on the applicant for landscape plan approval, to any subsequent owners of the property, or other parties having a controlling interest in the property. (Ord. 08-10 (part), 2008) 17.80.080 Submittal requirements. A. Submittal Documents. The applicant shall submit an application form signed by the owner of the project site along with the application fee established by the city. In addition to the standard submittal requirements as outlined in this code, additional supplementary submittal requirements shall be required for developments subject to this subchapter. A site plan checklist will be provided by city planning staff. B. Engineering Plans and Studies. All drawings and reports listed in this section shall be stamped by a professional engineer holding a current license in the state of Utah. Applicant shall submit the following without exception: 1. Traffic Impact Study. A report that presents pre- and post -development traffic estimates and level of service values for all streets and intersections that will be impacted by the proposed development. 2. Water System Study. A report that presents the proposed development's fire flow and peak use requirements, and analyzes existing system capacity. 3. Storm Drainage Study. A report that presents pre- and post -development runoff flow estimates for the site, detention volume requirements, proposed BMPs, and all other information necessary to allow for review of the proposed drainage plan. 4. Exterior Lighting Plan. A detailed plan showing the location, height, and light output of all proposed lighting and the results of a computer lighting model showing the estimated luminance levels at grid points on the site and over an area extending one hundred fifty feet beyond the perimeter of the site shall be submitted. The plan shall include manufacturers' cut sheets detailing the fixtures to be used. 5. Construction Drawings and Specifications. A package that at a minimum shall show site utilities, site grading, surface improvements, internal traffic circulation, easements, and required traffic signage. 6. Title Report. The applicant shall submit an ownership and encumbrance report, abstract of title, or similar submittal disclosing all existing easements, rights -of - way, and interests affecting the project site. 7. Affected Entities. A listing by name, address, and telephone number of all 6-3 persons who may be affected entities, as defined in this chapter, with respect to the project site. C. Architectural Plans and Presentations. All drawings and reports listed in this section shall be prepared by an architect or landscape architect as appropriate, holding a current license in the state of Utah. The requirements for a site plan as listed in Code Section 17.09.660 shall be followed when preparing an application for review. Applicant shall also submit the following: 1. Conceptual Drawings. The package shall, at a minimum, include the following: a. Site plan views showing building locations, parking areas with space totals, pedestrian and vehicular circulation routes, public trails and pathways, landscaped areas, and screening; b. Elevation views of all proposed buildings showing scaled architectural details, massing, height, screening of roof top units from all adjacent properties especially those lands with higher elevations, and other design features; and c. Illustrative drawings, examples, or mock-ups showing the materials, colors and typical views from adjacent public streets of all proposed buildings. d. Outdoor Lighting. 1. Lighting shall meet the requirements of Chapter 17.09.660 G and be full cut-off downward directed fixtures and no light shall be emitted beyond the project site. The applicant must provide an exterior lighting plan that quantifies light coverage upon the project site and provides information on how outdoor lighting will be accomplished to minimize impacts on adjacent properties or roadways. 2. To minimize any indirect overflow of light on adjacent properties, the height of any proposed parking lot light standard shall not be taller than light standards in surrounding neighborhood residential zones and should stair step down to a lower height when close to neighboring residential uses or residentially zoned areas. In no case shall the height of the light standards exceed twenty-five feet. Spotlights of any kind that are mounted on building walls are not permitted. 2. Signage Plan. A plan showing the location, size, height, materials, lighting methods, colors and incorporated logos of all proposed corporate and retail signage within the development. A sign permit is required under a separate application as set forth in MMC 15.44 and 17.09.470. 3. Landscape Plan. A detailed plan showing all proposed landscape treatments including planting locations and species for all planted areas; surfacing for hardscaped areas; fences, wall and/or other screening devices; and proposed 6-3 irrigation systems. D. Adoptive Reuse and Renewal Plan. Applicant shall submit the following: 1. A building design plan that allows for and facilitates reuse of the building in the event the building is abandoned or vacated. 2. A building renewal plan that provides for maximum opportunity for rehabilitation or redevelopment of the structure in the event of abandonment, vacating of property, or relocation by the original occupants. The plan shall include a maintenance plan for normal repairs and upkeep of the main building, accessory buildings, "pad" buildings, parking lots and hard surfaces, landscaping, and signage, including the elimination of "ghost" signage. In effect on the day of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on the day of , 2012. SIGNED: David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta, Recorder 6-3 Ls, Downtown Idea Exchange Essential Information For Downtown Revitalization Vol. 46, No. 13 July 1, 1995 Case Study... Downtown Master Plan Stands The Test Of Time Sometimes what a downtown needs is not a new vision, but closer attention to the vision articulated by its existing master plan. Planners from downtown Islip, NY (pop. 18,924), for example, have been careful not to stray far from the concepts set forth in a master plan developed for the central business dis- trict more than 20 years ago. Although the plan was conceived in the late 1970s, the foresight shown by those responsible has helped the central business district reinvent itself over the past two decades. When the master plan was first developed, Islip's central business dis- trict was economically distressed, had lost ground to the shopping malls, and had a vacancy rate of nearly 20%. However, with the changes that have taken place in downtown, that figure has since dropped to about 3%, notes Gene Murphy, deputy commissioner of Islip's Department of Planning and Development. Downtown Follows Through On Its Vision While it was the development of the master plan — with its clear vision for the, future of downtown — that brought the area back from the brink, it is the persistence of the Planning Department to follow through on the ideas proposed by the original plan that is helping the central business dis- trict continue to thrive. "The main objective behind the . comprehensive plan was to give down- town a community identity," remarks (� Islip Planning Commissioner Tom (Continued on page 3) Believe It Or Not, Trees Will Affect Consumer Spending Patterns In Downtown Can greenery help downtowns improve their bottom line? Most defi- nitely, according to the results of a recent survey conducted by the University of Washington's Center for Urban Horticulture. In her report on the study's findings, Kathy Wolf, the Center's pro- ject director, notes that "healthy and well -maintained trees send positive messages about the appeal of a district, the quality of products there and the quality of costumer service." As the study shows, trees not only enhance the visual quality of downtowns, but can actually influence how consumers spend their money in downtown stores. For example, in their evaluation of three central business districts, par- ticipants gave a higher rating to areas with tree -lined streets. Overall, partici- pants viewed these has having more amenities and a higher level of comfort (Amenity and Comfort ratings were about 80% higher for a tree -lined side- walk compared to a non -shaded street). Even Quality of Product ratings were 30% higher in districts having trees vs. those with barren sidewalks, and customers felt that customer service was better on streets with trees. If that doesn't convince you to add more trees to your downtown, here's something else noted in the study. Customers behave differently on streets with trees. Respondents were asked to give opinions of their behavior within the three shopping districts, including travel time, travel distance, duration of visits, frequency of visits and willingness -to -pay for parking. Again, trees made a difference. . As the study showed, considering all behaviors, higher marks were reported in the districts having trees. For instance, respondents claimed that they would be willing to pay more for parking in a well -landscaped business district. This suggests that greater revenues can be realized by downtowns having an ample supply of shaded parking spaces. With regard to the suggestion that shoppers may be willing to pay more for goods in tree -lined downtowns, survey respondents were asked to specify a price for each of 15 items in a "basket of goods" in the three business districts. The survey participants consistently priced goods sig- nificantly higher in landscaped areas compared to the "no -tree" district. Furthermore, it did not matter what type of product was being sold, as More ideas inside... Consider This When Planting Trees 2 Cleaning Up Traditional Commercial Buildings 4 Economic Incentive Ideas That Work 5 The ABCs Of Developing A Good Downtown Work Plan 5 Keys To Creating A Retail -Friendly Environment 6 "Intelligent" Traffic Safety Technology 8 © 1999 Alexander Communications Group, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-3 this trend seemed to apply to low -price, impulse -buy convenience goods, as well as to bigger ticketed, com- parison-shopped items. Consumers weren't the only ones to show a prefer- ence for downtown greenery. Merchants showed the same general preference for trees, although their overall ratings in the various areas were consistently lower. This suggests that they feel greenery might not have as great an impact on consumer buying decisions. Planning And Design Tips For • "Greening" The Urban Landscape Considering their economic impact, the planting, growth and maintenance of trees should become important elements of a downtown revitalization plan. However, tree planting and maintenance programs should neither be carried out haphazardly, nor without public support. Downtowns should develop a comprehensive plan that will enable city agencies to understand the impor- tance of urban forests so that professional standards for handling greenery can be developed. Generally, the plan should include the growth and maintenance of trees on public — as well as on private — land, be guided by scientific understanding and professional arboricultural practices, and keep up with advances in technical knowledge. As noted in the study, "An orderly and well main- tained planting scheme, of both trees and accessory vegetation, produces highest visual quality ratings." To get the most benefit out of your downtown tree plan- ting program, the following measures should be taken: • Diversify curbside and park tree plantings. A diverse tree population may slow or prevent the spread of insects and diseases, or at least lessen their impact. • Improve growing conditions for downtown trees. Urban trees face a higher mortality rate than their countryside counterparts. However, their life expectancy can be improved through investment in better growing conditions. Priority should be given to improving rooting volume and soil quality. Consider this: Studies have found that large, mature trees with extensive leaf canopies provide far greater benefits than small- er, younger trees. So, why plant more new trees without protecting those you already have? • Emphasize an open canopy. Careful pruning should be used to thin and open up tree canopies. This would permit more visibility of signs and storefronts, while providing the forest amenities that appeal to consumers. Consider This When Planting Trees In Your Downtown Central business districts should set a goal of having tree coverage over approximately 15 per- cent of the area, according to American Forests, a national tree non-profit organization. However, according to Wolf, most retail environments in the United States have five percent or less. But once they decide to add more trees, downtowns must be careful about where to place them. "You can't choose a tree simply because of its appearance, plant it anywhere in downtown and expect it to thrive," explains Paul Rief, executive director of the Pacific Northwest Chapter of the International Society of Arboriculture. He advises downtowns to pick their sites before selecting their trees. However, there are several factors down- towns should consider when choosing their sites. These are: • Whether the location will be detrimental to the tree - For example, since dogwood trees do best in locations that are fairly sheltered from the sun, "you wouldn't want to plant one in an area where there would be no shade, or near a brick building which would absorb the sunlight and give off heat," Rief explains. • The amount of space available at a specific location - When planting trees, downtowns must consider whether there will be enough room for the tree once it reaches maturity. • The amount of litter the tree would create - Certain trees — like the crab apple tree — often shed their blossoms, which can make streets slippery, creating a hazard for pedestrians. Contact: International Society of Arboriculture, (503) 585-4285. • Be careful when choosing landscapers. When hiring private contractors to work on public trees, use only those companies that have arborists cer- tified by professional organizations, such as the International Society of Arboriculture or state arborist associations. • Compile a comprehensive database of all trees and planting spaces. A computerized inventory will allow planting opportunities and greenery troublespots to be identified more easily. Contact: Kathy Wolf, Center For Urban Horticulture, (206) 616-5758. O 2 Downtown Idea Exchange July 1, 1999 6-3 City of Moab Planning and Zoning Department Correspondence June 6, 2012 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Jeff Reinhart, City Planner � 2 Subject: Approval of Ordinance #2012-09 to Amend Chapter 17.09.530, Conditional Use Permits, and Chapter 17.30, Use Regulations, to allow Child Care Centers in the C-5 as an Allowed Use, as Submitted by Dave Bierschied and Referred to Council by P&Z Background Mr. Dave Bierschied has applied for a code text amendment in accordance with Code Chapter 17.14, Zoning Map Amendments and Text Amendments. As the Council recalls. Mr. Bierschied appeared before Council on April 10, 2012 and discussed this issue. This application was reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 24, 2012 and in a unanimous 4-0 vote the Commission referred the ordinance to Council with a favorable recommendation to approve. Two persons were in attendance to comment on the ordinance and both spoke in favor of the amendment. The most important point made during the discussion was the great need in the community for more child care centers, especially for younger children. A recent research project was cited as indicating that all but one of the existing licensed centers are full months in advance and have waiting lists. It was also noted that there are many unlicensed day cares in existence as well. The Planning Commission discussed possible future amendments to allow this use as a use by right and without the limiting number in other commercial zones. As is in this case, all regulations in force under state law will govern the establishment of future centers if more zones are amended to allow the use. Site plans will still be required for these developments. Process The process for text amendments is found in Chapter 17.04, Zoning Map Amendments and Text Amendments. In Chapter 17.04.080 paragraph A., the Code requires that a public hearing be held by the Planning Commission. Paragraph B requires that a decision to, "either recommend approval, approval 6-4 Moab Planning Commission PL-12-78 June f2012 Ordinance# 2012-09 Page 2 of 4 with modifications, or disapproval of the application", must be reached within thirty (30) days of the public hearing and that the decision is to be conveyed to Council within ten (10) days. According to Chapter 17.04.100 (A), Council may approve the amendment at the next public meeting without a public hearing but, can also, "In its discretion... may elect to receive testimony or evidence from the applicant, city staff, and the public prior to taking final action on the ordinance." (17.04.100 C) Discussion Specifically, Code Section 17.04.070, Text amendment approval criteria, contains the following criterion that is to be used in assessing a code amendment. It is the burden of the applicant to provide "good cause" to support a proposed text amendment. For the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the city of Moab, amendments to the Land Use Code are committed to the sound discretion of the city council based upon the following nonexclusive list of criteria: A. Is the proposed use substantially similar to other authorized uses permitted within the subject zoning district? B. Is the proposed use a relatively new use type or development concept that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the city's general plan? C. Is the amendment consistent with the policies and goals of the general plan? D. Will the amendment create significant adverse impacts upon neighboring properties within or adjacent to the zoning districts which would be affected by the change? E. Is it in the public interest to approve the proposed amendment? F. Is the amendment likely to lead to a positive redevelopment of a specific area or zone? G. Will the amendment provide a variety of options for residents in terms of economic development, affordable housing, or other benefits? H. Is the amendment appropriate considering the existing conditions in the zoning district, the established relationships between zoning districts, existing land uses and densities, and the scale of both existing and proposed development? Recent inquiries about child care centers and the restrictions that govern their use, especially in residential areas, have led to Mr. Bierschied's application for a code amendment. The application was received by the city in March and as noted above, Mr. Bierschied presented "the interest of the community" in seeing this amendment approved to the Council in April. Currently, newly adopted code amendments define Child Care Centers as, "A child care facility licensed by the State of Utah and in compliance with state rules and regulations as established by state law." As the Council may remember, this definition was recently added to the code through the review of the definitions in 6-4 Moab Planning Commission PL-12-78 June 6, 2OI2 Ordinance# 2012-09 Page 3 of 3 Titles 16 and 17. The wording of the definition was drafted to reference state law and minimize oversight of this use by City Staff. The table below is illustrative of where the use is currently allowed and under specific conditions. Zone Limits/conditions C-1 Allowed use and limited to 16 C-2 Allowed use and limited to 16 C-3 CU and limited to 16 C-5 CU R-2 CU and limited to 16 R-3 CU and limited to 16 R-4 CU and limited to 16 RA-1 CU and limited to 16 A-2 CU and limited to 16 The still current definition, "Nursery, day care", means a home or building in which children are tended or kept for compensation; does not include overnight accommodations for such children as does a foster home or an orphanage". This wording will continue to define the use type as a conditional use in other zones until the appropriate code sections have been amended. Summary The ordinance will provide for a zone, the C-5, that allows child care centers as an allowed use and be governed by state law as to the numbers and types of children based on age, square footage, and the number and training of staff members. This amendment will not change the uses in other zones but will add "Child Care Centers" to the use regulations of the C-5 and the newer definition, as described above, will be applied. Alternatives In its action, Council can: 1) Approve the proposed amendment as written; 2) Approve the proposed amendment with changes: 3) Table the application for additional review; 4) Set a date and time for a public hearing; 5) Vote to not approve the amendment to the code and state their reasons. p:\planning department \2012\correspondence\p1-12-78 ord 09 c-5 child care.docx 6-4 ORDINANCE #2012-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 17.09.530, BY AMENDING THE NUMBER AND TYPES OF CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-5 AND AMENDING 17.30, USE REGULATIONS, BY ALLOWING CHILD CARE CENTERS AS AN ALLOWED USE IN THE C-5 ZONE WHEREAS, the City Council ("Council') adopted the Moab Municipal Code ("Code") and especially Chapter 17.00.00, also known as "The Zoning Ordinance of Moab City, Utah" in an effort to encourage and facilitate orderly growth and development in the City of Moab ("City") as well as to promote a more attractive and wholesome environment; and WHEREAS, Council adopted Ordinance #2010-13 on September 14, 2010, that amended Code Chapters 17.09 and 17.70, by placing all of the conditional uses into one area of the code and establishing standards and conditions for approval of specific conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a code change that will affect the above mentioned Code Chapter 17.09, and specifically the table of listed conditional uses, section 17.09.530(B), and Chapter 17.30.020, Use requirements, for the C-5 Zone; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab Planning Commission ("Commission') held a duly advertised public hearing on May 24, 2012, to hear testimony and determine the merits of the changes to the Code; and WHEREAS, the Commission found that the proposed changes would benefit the community by providing greater options for daily child care in a variety of center settings; and WHEREAS the Commission unanimously voted to recommend to Council that adoption of the new language was in the best interests of the citizens of Moab; and, WHEREAS, Council reviewed Ordinance #2012-XX in a regularly scheduled public meeting held on June 12, 2012, to hear and decide the merits of the proposed changes to the table in Chapter 17.09.530, Conditional use permits, paragraph (B) and Chapter 17.30, Use requirements, of the Moab Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, Council found that the amendments to the code are in the best interests of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby adopts Ordinance #2012-XX and repeals the Conditional Use of Large commercial and home -based day-care centers for the C-5 Zone as indicated by the portion of the amended table shown below: 17.09.530 (B) CONDITIONAL USES R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 RA- 1 A- 2 C- 1 C- 2 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5 SAR MH/RV FC- 1 RC I Large commercial and home -based day-care centers(21) CCCC C C C AND, FURTHERMORE, Chapter 17.30.020, Use requirements, use G, Day care center, is repealed and amended to read "G. Child care center. 6-4 PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on , 2012. SIGNED: David L. Sakrison, Mayor ATTEST: Rachel Stenta, Recorder p:\planning department \2012\ordinances\ord 2012-coc child care in c-5.docx 6-4 ao1 a 09 CITY OF MOAB DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT APPLICATION 2 PAGES - FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN INK DATE STAMP TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT PROJECT NAME (if any): FOR CITY USE ONLY PROJECT STREET ADDRESS OR ACCESS STREET: RECEIVED FOR CITY USE ONLY APPLICATION NUMBER: la ' 0I 13 MARMAR3 ^ 2012 DATE RECEIVED: 0 CITY I I A CITY OF MOAB APPLICATION FEE: TEXT AMENDMENT-$350.00 ZONE CHANGE - SMALL RESIDENTIAL (<I/2 ACRE) - $350.00 LARGE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL - $500.00 T TREASURER'S RECEIPT NUMBER: All applications are subject to review by city staff for completeness. Staff will notify the applicant of deficiencies or completeness within fifteen days. A pre -application conference with city planning staff is encouraged prior to application submittal. I. APPLICANT Name: ---N) ccu4 Mailing Address: s ty\ ,PDz=.�� Phone #: 75417 Fax #: Z i .Z 9 y E-mail a rn , �� Iltv�.�JSy�-Cc i �,r`e.J T'• UwT� EV•� II. TYPE OF APPLICATION wText Amendment ❑ Zone Change III. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT C - S z®kf DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 217 EAST CENTER STREET • MOAB, UTAH • 84532 Phone: (435) 259-5129 • Fax: (435) 259-4135 • E-mail: info@moabcity.org Website: www.moabcity.org 6-4 1. The Land Development Code Section to be amended a. Chapter 17.30 Neighborhood Commercial Zone b. The only zones that allow Commercial Daycare Facilities are C-1 and C-2. There is little property zoned C-1 or C-2 (mostly along HWY 191) which is not conducive to school setting. There is a real need for these types of facilities in the downtown area near where most parents are working. The central location would save gas and travel time for parents using these services. c. The Neighbor Commercial Zones C-1 and C-2 already allow for this use. By definition neighborhood commercial would imply services in and around populated areas. (Neighborhoods). This text amendment would allow Commercial Daycare Facilities to centrally locate near work and the majority of housing. d. The proposed use allows for utilization of commercial properties near client base without taking away Moab City's ability to collect revenue from retail sales, such as in the C-3 and C-4 zones. e. Use -by -right fits neighborhood uses by definition.. f. Neighborhood Commercial implies uses near and around residential areas, providing services used by surrounding neighbors, without causing undo change in character of neighborhood. Kids and neighborhoods go together. g. Add "Commercial Daycare/Preschool Facilities as a use in C-5 zone. 17.30.10 Objectives and Characteristics The C-5 neighborhood commercial zone has been established for the primary purpose of providing a location where commercial establishments can be located where people who live in the surrounding neighborhood can obtain daily household goods and services conveniently. This zone is characterized by stores, shops and establishments situated in landscaped surroundings that are maintained in harmony with amenities of adjacent residential development. In order to accomplish the objectives and purposes of this title and to promote the characteristics of this zone, the following regulations shall apply in the C-5 neighborhood commercial zone. (Ord. 92-15 (part), 1992: Ord. 88-05 (part), 1988; prior code § 27-11-1) 17.30.020 - Use requirements. The following buildings, structures and uses of land shall be permitted in the C-5 zone upon compliance with the requirements set forth in this title: A. Convenience establishments as defined in this title; L. Single family dwellings; B. Parking lots; C. Pet shops; D. Signs; E. Rest homes; F. Schools and other public buildings; G. Day care center; H. Cafes; I. Gymnasiums; J. Apartments; K. Two-family dwellings; M. Fraternal organization lodges; N. Medical clinics; O. Professional offices; P. Grocery stores less than three thousand square feet; Q. Veterinary clinics with no outside kennel or livestock pen; and R. Planned unit developments subject to the requirements and conditions set forth in Chapter 17.66 (Planned Unit Developments) of this title relating to large-scale developments. S. Commercial Daycare/Preschool Facilities (added) 6-4 Moab Planning Commission PL-12-78 June 6, 2012 Ordinance# 2012-09 p:\planning department \2012\correspondence\p1-12-78 ord 09 c-5 child care.docz Page 4 of 4 6-4 ...Your Local Professionals 550 North Main, Suite C Moab, Utah 84532 435-259-6050 1-800-897-REAL (7325) FAX 435-259-5933 www.moabrealty.com Moab City 217 E Center Moab, UT 84532 RE: Waiver of Application Fee To Whom It May Concern, I am requesting a text amendment to the C-5 Zone. I understand that there is a $350.00 fee associated with the text amendment request. I am a Real Estate Broker and have a client that has been trying to find property in the downtown area to expand their home -based daycare/preschool into a Commercial Daycare/Preschool facility. Currently no residential zones and only C-1 and C-2 commercial allow for these facilities. We don't have a specific location for their expansion but there are several C-5 parcels that would fit this type of business model I believe that there is a great need for this type business in the downtown area and this text amendment would benefit the community as a whole. So I am requesting a waiver of the $350.00 application fee. Dave Bierschied, Broker Moab Realty 300 S Main Moab, UT 84532 435.260-1968 Resolution # 11-2012 ESTABLISHING WATER USAGE RATES FOR THE CITY OF MOAB Whereas, water usage charges are the primary source of revenue for the City of Moab Water Enterprise Fund; and Whereas, revenues from water usage charges are currently not sufficient in amount to cover the Water Enterprise Fund's regular operational costs; and Whereas, the Moab Governing Body deems it necessary to increase water usage charges in an amount to cover the regular operational costs of the Water Fund; and Whereas, the Moab Governing Body should establish sewer rates by resolution; NOW THEREFORE, WE, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB DO HEREBY RESOLVE TO ADOPT THE CITY OF MOAB RATE SCHEDULES AS FOLLOWS: Water Rate Schedule A. Rate Number 1 Minimum charge Commercial within the City: - $10.12 for 2,000 gallons or less per month Next 3,000 gallons - Next 5,000 gallons - Next 40,000 gallons - Over 50,000 gallons $2.24 per thousand gallons per month $.57 per thousand gallons per month $.66 per thousand gallons per month - $.79 per thousand gallons per month The rates set out in this subsection shall apply to all commercial users within the City including multiple dwellings, duplex dwellings, and apartment houses, but not including single family dwellings. B. Rate Number 2 Residential within the City: Minimum charge - $5.93 for 2,000 gallons or less per month Next 8,000 gallons - $.47 per thousand gallons per month Over 10,000 gallons - $.64 per thousand gallons per month The rates set out in this subsection shall apply to all single-family residential users within the City. Where more than one single-family dwelling is served through a single meter, the minimum charge shall be made for each dwelling served. C. Rate Number 3 Commercial outside the City: Minimum charge - $20.24 for 2,000 gallons or less per month Next 3,000 gallons - $4.50 per thousand gallons per month Next 5,000 gallons - $1.15 per thousand gallons per month Next 40,000 gallons- $1.33 per thousand gallons per month Over 50,000 gallons- $1.58 per thousand gallons per month Resolution # June 2012 Page 1 of 3 6-5 D. Rate Number 4 Residential outside the City: Minimum charge - $11.86 for 2,000 gallons or less per month Next 8,000 gallons - $.94 per thousand gallons per month Over 10,000 gallons - $1.29 per thousand gallons per month The rates set out in subsections C and D shall apply to all uses outside the City within a radius of two miles of the intersection of Center and Main Street within the City. Water usage outside the specified radius shall be charged at a rate determined by the City Council. E. Rate Number 5 Fire line rate Flat rate of $5.62 per thousand gallons per month F. Rate Number 6 Bed and breakfasts within the City: All bed and breakfasts are required to pay the City's prevailing commercial water rate on the portion of the dwelling that is used as a bed and breakfast, and the City's prevailing residential rate on the portion of the dwelling that is used as a residence. The portion of the dwelling that is used as a bed and breakfast shall be calculated according to the following formula: 1. Square footage of the number of allowed bedroom rentals as specified in the Conditional Use permit; plus 2. One-third the square footage of the kitchen area where bed and breakfast meals are prepared; plus 3. Sum of the bed and kitchen square footage calculated in Section 17.70.060 (D) (H2) divided by the total square footage of the bed and breakfast establishment as recorded in the Conditional Use permit. G. Rate Number 7 Firefighter rate within the City: Minimum charge - Free for 2,000 gallons or less per month Next 8,000 gallons - $.47 per thousand gallons per month Over 10,000 gallons - $.64 per thousand gallons per month H. Rate Number 8 City Parks and Cemeteries: $.27 per thousand gallons per month I. Rate Number 9 Moab Golf Course Well # 7 rate: $.11 per thousand gallons per month J. Rate Number 10 Public Works Yard Water Hauler rate: $2.24 per thousand gallons K. Rate Number 11 Fire Hydrant Construction Water rate: $2.24 per thousand gallons Resolution # June 2012 Page 2 of 3 6-5 All rates are subject to an annual adjustment for inflation, as determined by the City Council. This resolution shall take effect July 1, 2012. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing body of Moab City in open session this 12th day of June, 2012. CITY OF MOAB By: David L. Sakrison Mayor Attest: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Resolution # June 2012 Page 3 of 3 6-5