Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout12957ORDINANCE NO. 12957 AN ORDINANCE, repealing Ordinance No. 12507 as adopted September 12, 2007, and enacting a new ordinance in lieu thereof, establishing a Conflict of Interest Policy for District trustees, officers and employees. WHEREAS, Section 12.030 of the District's Plan prohibits trustees, officers and employees of the District from having any interest in District contracts as more fully described in said Section; and WHEREAS, in 1978 the General Assembly of the State of Missouri adopted a comprehensive statutory provision regulating conflicts of interest by public officials and employees, including trustees, officers and employees of the District (Section 105.450 et seq. RSMO, as may be amended, hereinafter the "Missouri Conflict of Interest Act"); and WHEREAS, the Missouri Ethics Commission has ordered that each political subdivision must readopt an ordinance (biannually) at an open meeting by September 15, 2009 which establishes and makes public the method of disdaining potential conflicts of interest, and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2007, the Board of Trustees of the District adopted Ordinance No. 12507 which provided that the District trustees, officers and employees, in the conduct of their official actions and their relations, would be governed by Section 12.030 of the District’s Plan and the applicable provisions of the State Conflict of Interest Law, as amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the District is desirous of establishing a clear policy regulating conflicts of interest of trustees, officers and employees of the District and to comply with the order of the Missouri Ethics Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT: Section One. Ordinance No. 12507, as adopted September 12, 2007, is hereby repealed. Section Two. The Conflict of Interest Policy, as marked "Exhibit A" and attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted and enacted for all trustees, officers and employees of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Section Three. The provisions contained in this ordinance shall take the place of and supersede the provisions of any District Regulations and any prior ordinances or resolutions relating to the same subject matter which are herewith inconsistent and such prior regulations, ordinances and resolutions are hereby repealed. The foregoing Ordinance was adopted September 10, 2009. NUMBER: H-2 PAGE 1 of 6 ISSUED: 9/13/07 GENERAL MANAGEMENT POLICY/PROCEDURE APPROVED BY _________________________ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TOPIC: Conflict of Interest Policy SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS ISSUE DATED September 9, 2005 PURPOSE This Policy is meant to promote an ethical business environment at The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, and to ensure compliance with all state ethics requirements. This Policy supersedes and replaces any prior policies, rules, practices, standards or guidelines to the contrary, whether written or oral. Other District policies, procedures and guidelines shall continue to apply to the extent not inconsistent with this Policy. POLICY To promote an ethical environment of unquestionable integrity and to comply with state requirements, the District requires all employees, as well as Trustees, to refrain from conflicts of interest involving any and all business transactions involving the District. Furthermore, the District expects that all employees and Trustees will use their best judgment in all business dealings with customers, suppliers, contractors, governmental and regulatory agencies, the media and vendors, that they will refrain from unethical actions, and that they will disclose all relevant outside employment and business transactions. This Policy details all such requirements. A “conflict of interest” occurs when your private interest interferes or appears to interfere in any way with the interests of the District. You are expected to avoid all situations that might lead to a real or apparent material conflict between your self-interest and your duties and responsibilities as an employee, officer or Trustee of the District. Any position or interest, financial or otherwise, which could materially conflict with your performance as an employee, officer or Trustee of the District, or which affects or could reasonably be expected to affect your independence or judgment concerning transactions between the District, its customers or suppliers or otherwise reflects negatively on the District would be considered a conflict of interest and should be avoided. A conflict of interest should be properly disclosed by the affected Trustee or District employee at the earliest opportunity. PROCEDURE 1. Conflict of Interest (a) Members of the Board of Trustees and all District employees must avoid all conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety when representing the District in business dealings or making any recommendations which could affect the District. In addition, each employee must disclose any actual or apparent conflict of interest to his or her supervisor and/or the Director of his or her department. Members of the Board of Trustees must disclose any actual or apparent conflict of interest to the full Board of Trustees. (b) It is not practical or possible to specify all activities which may create a conflict of interest; however, situations that are related to the procurement process that should be avoided by Trustees and District employees include: (1) Owning any interest (other than nominal amounts of stock in publicly traded companies) in any supplier, service provider, consultant, or lessor; (2) Consulting with or being an employee of any customer, lessor, contractor, service provider, consultant, or supplier (without prior written approval of his/her departmental director); (3) Purchasing goods and services from, or selling them to, the District or having a business associate or close relative do the same (unless done through an established program of disposal of surplus District property offered to the general public); (4) Participation in outside activities which are so substantial that they interfere with an employee’s ability to devote appropriate time and attention to his or her job responsibilities with the District; (5) Serving on the Board of Directors of any customer, lessor, contractor, service provider, consultant, supplier or other entity doing or seeking to business with the District. However, if avoidance is impractical, full disclosure must be made and the individual must abstain from participating in any votes concerning the entity in question; and (c) In addition to all other requirements of this section, and in accordance with state statutes, Trustees and District employees may not: (1) Have any contracts or arrangements with the District to perform any services outside of the scope of their regular employment; (2) Sell, rent, or lease any property to the District; and (3) Work for any person or entity in relation to any case, proceeding, application or matter that they worked on during their employment with the District except to the extent expressly allowed by law. (d) For each of the individuals named in (c) above, written disclosure must be made of any outside employment, other than with the District. (e) If a Trustee has a significant business relationship as an individual or through his or her employer with a vendor doing or being considered to do business with the District, the Trustee must inform the full Board of the business relationship and recluse himself or herself from voting on said matter. If the existence of a conflict of interest is undetermined, the subsequent inquiry may include disclosure of the nature of the business relationship, the amount of annual charges resulting from the relationship, and whether any of the charges relate, directly or indirectly to the business of the District. Intentionally providing materially false or misleading information, or omitting material information, shall constitute malfeasance in office for any Trustee, subjecting the Trustee to removal as provided in the Charter of the District. Furthermore, by definition, actions taken by a Trustee on behalf of the District based solely on the existence of a personal relationship between the Trustee and a vendor constitutes a conflict of interest. (f) If an employee has a significant business relationship as an individual or through an employer other than the District with a vendor doing or being considered to do business with the District the employee must inform his or her supervisor and/or the Director of his or her department of the business relationship. If the existence of a conflict of interest is undetermined, the subsequent inquiry may include disclosure of the nature of the business relationship, the amount of annual charges resulting from the relationship, and whether any of the charges relate directly or indirectly to the business of the District. Intentionally providing materially false or misleading information, or omitting material information, shall be cause for termination of employment with the District. Furthermore, by definition, actions taken by an employee on behalf of the District based solely on the existence of a personal relationship between the employee and a vendor constitutes a conflict of interest. (g) Additionally, the following acts are expressly prohibited for all Trustees and employees of the District: (1) Acting or refusing to act in any capacity in which he or she is empowered to act by reason of payment, offer to pay, or promise to pay, or receipt of gifts or anything of value. (2) Using or disclosing confidential information gained in the course of employment or term as a Trustee with the intent to obtain financial gain for him or herself, his or her spouse or children, or any business with which he or she is associated, or for the purpose of extorting anything of value from another. (3) Acting in any matter which specifically gives special monetary benefit to himself or herself, his or her spouse or children, any close family members or any business associate. 2. Interpretation and Administration This Policy shall be administered and interpreted as follows: (a) In the case of employees who are not managers, by the human resources department in consultation with the General Counsel. (b) In the case of employees who are managers, by the Executive Director in consultation with the General Counsel. (c) In the case of Trustees, by the disinterested Trustees in consultation with the General Counsel. 3. Business Relationships (a) The District considers its reputation for fairness and integrity one of its most valuable assets. Employees are expected to use good judgment in all dealings with individuals, service providers, consultants, suppliers, or firms which seek to become a supplier of goods or services to the District and all customers of our services. To that end, Trustees or District employees must conduct their business affairs so that the District’s integrity is unquestionable if the full details of those dealings were to become public. (b) To illustrate the high ethical standards expected of every Trustee and every employee of the District, the following conduct is expressly prohibited: (1) Receiving or soliciting money, loans or other favors which may influence business decisions or compromise independent judgment; (2) Receiving or soliciting gifts of money in any amount or any other gifts of more than a nominal value; a gift of nominal value is one that a company or individual routinely provides as part of their customary and normal business practices (all gifts must be reported in accordance with state ethics laws, if applicable); (3) Receiving or soliciting any trip without the employee’s supervisor’s prior written approval; (4) Receiving or soliciting kickbacks for obtaining business from the District; (5) Degrading the District’s reputation through any other activities which are of questionable integrity. (c) These guidelines are not intended to prevent the District from taking normal prompt payment discounts. They also do not prohibit receiving inexpensive gifts or services which are unsolicited and acceptable under normal and customary social circumstances, so long as the gratuity is not offered with a corrupt intent and does not influence or compromise the conduct of the recipient. In addition, the guidelines do not prohibit normal business entertainment expenses that are neither lavish nor solicited. (d) If any Trustee or employee of the District is requested to make or accept a gift or payment that is prohibited or may even appear to be prohibited under this Policy, the request and all surrounding circumstances should immediately be disclosed to the District’s General Counsel who will advise the appropriate course of action. 4. Disciplinary Action Violations of this Policy involving employees will be handled on a case-by-case basis and disciplinary action could cover the full range of actions permitted under the District’s Civil Service Rules. Violations of the Policy involving Trustees will be reviewed and handled by disinterested Trustees in consultation with the General Counsel. 5. Compliance with Laws, Rules and Regulations This Policy is based on the District’s policy that all employees, officers and Trustees comply with the law. While the law prescribes a minimum standard of conduct, this Policy requires conduct that often exceeds the legal standard. All employees, officers and Trustees are required to respond honestly and candidly when dealing with the District’s independent and internal auditors, regulators and attorneys. 6. Reporting of Illegal and Unethical Behavior Fraud is an element of business that can significantly affect the reputation and success of the District. The District requires its employees, officers and Trustees to talk to supervisors, managers or other appropriate personnel to report and discuss any known or suspected criminal activity involving the District or its employees. If, during the course of your affiliation with the District, you become aware of any suspicious activity or behavior including concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters, you must report violations of laws, rules, regulations or this Policy to your supervisor, the Director of Human Resources or the General Counsel. Reporting the activity will not subject you to discipline absent a knowingly false report. 7. Misappropriation Anyone who embezzles, steals or willfully misappropriates any monies, funds or anything of value from the District may be subject to fine, imprisonment, restitution payment and other such actions conferred by law or District policy, in addition to disciplinary action. 8. Investigation You must cooperate fully with any investigation, internal audit, external audit or regulatory examination. If an employee becomes aware that he or she is or has been the subject to any external investigation, the employee must immediately inform his or her supervisor and/or Director of the department, unless otherwise prohibited by law, regulation or the investigating authority. Trustees shall inform the disinterested Trustees and the General Counsel. 9. Financial Disclosure Statement In accordance with Missouri State Statutes, the following positions are required to submit annually, a Financial Disclosure Statement to the State: a. Members of the Board of Trustees b. Executive Director c. General Counsel d. All Director-level positions e. Purchasing Manager f. Other personnel as identified by the Board of Trustees Such Financial Disclosure Statements shall be filed within 30 days of appointment for new appointees, and no later than May 1 of each calendar year for all others. 10. Employees and Immediate Family Members, Selling to the District. (a) Employees and Immediate Family Members of the District: Employees of the District, and members of their immediate family, will not be permitted to sell goods and/or services to the District. VENDOR’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Name the individual or company requesting to do business with The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD): ___________________________________________________________________ 2. In the past two (2) years, has the individual or company named in 1. above (or any principal of such company, i.e. partner, officer, director, etc.) contributed cash or gifts in excess of $200.00 in value in the aggregate in any calendar year to any of the individuals or organizations listed on Attachment A hereto? Yes ____ No _____ If yes, describe in detail (date/amount/description). _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 3. In the past two (2) years, has the individual or company named in 1. above done business with any person listed in Attachment A and/or their respective companies. Yes _____ No _____ If yes, describe in detail (date/amount/description). __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 4. The undersigned certifies that the above information is true and correct to the best of his or her knowledge and belief. Dated this ____ day of __________________, 20__. Printed Name:_________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ Company: ____________________________________ Signature: ____________________________________ GENERAL MANAGEMENT POLICY/PROCEDURE Conflict of Interest ATTACHMENT A Updated July 31, 2009 NOTE: Attachment "A" contains a list of the MSD Trustees and their respective employer, MSD officers and Directors, and the organizations which each are individually associated with, as applicable. MSD BOARD OF TRUSTEES Trustee/Director Name of Firm, Organization or Company Affiliation Robert T. Berry American Public Works Association Member American Society of Civil Engineers Member American Water Works Association Member Circle Club of St. Louis Member Engineer’s Club of St. Louis Member Engineers Without Borders Member Masonic Lodge of Missouri Member Missouri Athletic Club Member Missouri Botanical Garden Member Missouri Society of Professional Engineers Member Missouri University of Science & Technology Adjunct Professor Missouri University of Science & Technology Academy of Civil Engineers Member Missouri University of Science & Technology Alumni Association Member, Executive Committee Mystic Order of the Shrine Member National Society of Professional Engineers Member Reserve Officers Association Member Scottish Rite Bodies Member Society of American Military Engineers Member U.S. Army Reserves, Retired Retired Officer Water Environment Federation Member James H. Buford African American Jewish Task Force Member ARCHS Board Member Chancellors Council University Missouri-St. Louis Board Member Commission on Human Rights Member Confluence Academy Board Member Fair St. Louis Board Member Father Support Center Board Member Fontbonne Council of Regents Member Grand Center Arts District Past Chair & Member Greater St. Louis Area Council, Boy Scouts of America Member Heat Up/Cool Down St. Louis Vice Chair Jobs for America’s Graduates (JAG) Board Member Junior League of St. Louis Board Member Missouri State University Foundation Board Member St. Louis Black Leadership Roundtable Board Member St. Louis Black Repertory Theatre Board Member GENERAL MANAGEMENT POLICY/PROCEDURE Conflict of Interest MSD BOARD OF TRUSTEES Trustee/Director Name of Firm, Organization or Company Affiliation James H. Buford St. Louis ConnectCare Chairman St. Louis Regional Health Committee Board Member St. Louis Science Center Board of Trustees Trustee The MUNY Board Member The National Conference for Community & Justice Regional Advisory Board Member US Bank Board Member Webster University College of Arts & Science Advisory Board Member Workforce Investment Board of St. Louis County Board Member Gerald Feldhaus Building & Construction Trades Council Executive Secretary- Treasurer Missouri State Building & Const. Trades Vice-President PRIDE of St. Louis, Inc. Co-Chair St. Louis Port Council Executive Board Member St. Peters Economic Development Board Member John H. Goffstein None Eddie Ross, Jr. (new member) David Visintainer (new member) Randy Hayman Association of Corporate Counsel Director Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis Member Crime Stoppers Director FOCUS St. Louis Member Friends of the Sheldon Board Member Herbert Hoover Boys & Girls Club Director Trailnet Director Brian Hoelscher American Public Works Association Member American Society of Civil Engineers Member Engineers Club of St. Louis Member Missouri Water Environment Association Member Water Environment Federation Member Barbara Mohn None GENERAL MANAGEMENT POLICY/PROCEDURE Conflict of Interest MSD BOARD OF TRUSTEES Trustee/Director Name of Firm, Organization or Company Affiliation Gene Rhodes None Jonathon Sprague Engineers Club of St. Louis Member Missouri Water Environment Member Water Environment Federation Member Vicki Taylor-Edwards AAIM Management Association Member Certified Employee Benefits Association Member Compensation Benefits Network Member Human Resources Management Association Member International Public Management Association Member St. Louis University School of Professional Studies Board Member Jeff Theerman Missouri Water Environment Association Member National Association of Clean Water Agencies Board of Directors St. Louis University Cook School of Business Management Advisory Board Water Environment Federation Member Karl Tyminski Central Methodist University Adjunct Faculty East Missouri Optimist Committee Chair Henry Woods Subdivision President Optimist Club of St. Louis Past President Jan Zimmerman American Water Works Association Member Barkley House Director Government Finance Officers Assoc Member