HomeMy Public PortalAbout2005-2007 - FY CAMPO Transportation Improvement ProgramCAf[JAL AREA METROPOL[JAN
PLANNHNC6i ORCffANHlA THON
R NSPORT !RON
I PROV ENT R06R
y 2005-2007
JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI METROPOL[TAN RE6ION
Draft
September 2004
The preparation of this report was f i nanced i n part by the U.S. Department of T ransportation,
Federal Highway Administration, and Federa l Transit Administration in cooper ation with the
Missouri Department o f Transportation. Th e opini ons, find i ngs, and conclusions expressed in this
report a r e n ot necessari l y those of the Federal H ighway Administration, Federal T ransit
Administration, or the Mi sso u r i H ighway and Transportation Department.
Admi ni strator /For Information Contact City of Jefferson, Missouri
Department of Co mm unity Development/Pl a n ning Division -Room 120
John G . Ch risty Municipal Bui ld i ng -320 East McCarty Jefferson City, Missouri
Te l ephone 573 -634 -6410
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Transportation Planning Process Certification Statement ..................................................................... 5
Certification Of Restrictions On Lobbying ........................................................................................... 6
The Purpose of the Transportation Improvement Program ................................................................... 8
The TIP Structure for Projects .......................................................................................................... 8
Planning Factors ............................................................................................................................ 9
Documents Used in Identifying TIP Projects ..................................................................... 0000 .............. 9
Geographic Boundaries of the TIP .......... 00 ...................................................................................... 10
Changes in priorities from previou s TIPs ........................................................................................ 11
Major Projects From the Previous TIP That Were Implemented .......................................................... 11
Significant Delays In The Planned Implementation of Major Projects ................................................... 12
The TIP Annual Development Proce ss ........................................................................... 00 ................ 12
Projects for 2005-2007 Listed by Agency ........................................................................................ 13
Missouri Department of Transportation .................................................................................. 13
Callaway County ................................................................................................................. 14
Co l e County ........................................................................................................................ 14
City of Jefferson, Missouri .................................................................................................... 15
Street and Intersection Improvem ents ..................................................................... 00 ..... 15
Parks and Recreation Commission .................................................................................. 15
Memorial Airport .......................................................................................................... 16
Transit ........................................................................................................................ 17
Illustrative Project Parks and Rec reation ......................................................................... 20
Parks and Recreation Com miss ion .................................................................................. 20
Financial Capability ...................................................................................................................... 21
The TIP Project and Program Summary ........................................................................................... 23
Appendix 1 -FHWA/FTA TIP Requirements ...................................................................................... 26
Appendix 2 -Transportation Projects and Recommended Selection Criteria ......................................... 27
Bridge Projects ................................................................................................................... 27
Proj ects for Major Highways ................................................................................................. 27
Artertial Roadways Projects .................................................................................................. 27
Collector Roads Projects ....................................................................................................... 28
I
Transit Service Projects ....................................................................................................... 28
Transportation Enhancement Projects .................................................................................... 28
Facilities For Pedestrians and Bicycles for Transportation Purposes ..................................... 28
Acquisition of Scenic Easements and Scenic or Historic Si t es .............................................. 29
Scenic or Historic Highway Programs ....................................... 00 ..................................... 29
Landscaping and Other Scenic Beautification .................................................................... 30 I
Historic Preservation ..................................................................................................... 30
Rehabilitation and Operation of Historic Tran sportation Buildings, Structures or Facilities ...... 31
Preservation of Abandoned Railway Corridors ................................................................... 31
Control and Removal of Outdoor Advertisi ng .................................................................... 31
Archaeological Planni ng and Re search ............................................................................. 32
Mitigation Of Water Pollution Due To Highway Runoff Or Reduce Wildlife Mortality ................ 32
Establishment of Transportation Museums ....................................................................... 32
Appendix 3 Eligible Project Types by Funding Program ...................................................................... 34
Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality.(CMAQ) .............................................................................. 34
3
I
Interstate Maintenance. (1M) ................................................................................................. 34
National Highway System (NHS) ........................................................................................... 34
Highway Bridge Repla ce ment/Rehabilitation (HBRR ) ................................................................ 35
Surface Transportation Program (STP) ................................................................................... 35
Section 5307 FTA-Formula Funding to Transit Operators ........................................................ 36
Section 5309 -FTA Discretionary Funds ................................................................................ 36
Section 5310 FTA-Capital Assistance to Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities ................ 36
Section 5311 -FTA general t ra nsit assistance to rural and small urban areas ............................. 36
4
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
I n acco rd ance with 23 CFR 450.334, the Capital Area Me tropolitan Planning Organizati on, as the
metropolitan planning organization f or the Jefferson, Missou ri Urbanized Area and the Mi ssouri
Department of Transportation hereby certifies that the Cap ita l Area Metropolitan Pl anning
Organization is carrying out a cont i nuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation planning
process for the region in accordance with the applicable requirements of:
I. 49 U.S. C. Section 5323(k), 23 U.S.C. 135, and 23 CFR part 450.220;
II. Ti tle VI of the Civi l Rights Act o f 1964 and the Title VI Assuran ce executed by each State
under 23 U.S .C. 324 a nd 29 U.S.C. 794;
III. Section 1101 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (Pub. L. 105 -178)
regarding the involvement of disadvantaged bus in ess enterprises in the FHWA and the FTA
funded project (Sec. 105 (f), Pub . L. 97-424, 96 Stat. 2100, 49 CFR part 23);
IV. Th e provision of the Ame ri cans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336, 104 Stat.
327, as amended) and the U.S . DOT impl eme nting regulation;
V. The provi sio n of 49 CFR part 20 regarding restrictions on infl uencing certa in act ivities
S ignature Signature
Kenneth Ferguson, Cha i rman Roger Sc hwartz, P.E., Distr ict Engi neer
Capital Area Metropol itan Planning Organization Mi ssou ri Departm ent of Transportation
Date: Date: __________________________ _
5
CERTIFICATION OF RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING
I, Ken Ferguson, MPO Chairman, hereby certify on behalf of the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) No Federal approp riated fund s have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing o r attempting to influence an officer or employee
of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of
any Federal grant, the making of any Federal l oan, the entering into of any coope ra tive
agreement, and the extension, continuation , renewal, amendment, or modifi cation of any
Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall comp lete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions .
(3) The undersigned shall requ i re that the language of this certificati on be included in the award
documents for all sub awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub grants, and contracts
under grants, loan s, an d cooperative agreements) and that all sub re cipients shall certify and
disclose accordingly .
Th e certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when th is
t ran saction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1 352, titl e 31, U.S. Code.
Executed this Twenty-fifth day of August, 2004.
Kenneth Ferguson, Chairman
Capital Area Metropolitan Pl anning Organization (CAMPO)
6
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO )
B oard of D i rectors
City of Jefferson
Councilmember Ken Ferguson, Chairman
Counci lmember Mi ke Harvey
Councilmember Brian Crane
Councilmember Edith Vogel
Pa t Sullivan, P.E., Director of Community Development
Jani ce McMillan, AICP, Deputy Direct or fo r Planning and Transportation
Cole County
Bob Jones, Presidi n g Co mmission er, Vice-Ch a irman
Chris Yarnell, P.E., Director of Publi c Works
Callaway County
Rodney Garnett, Associate Commissioner
Small Citi es
Paul Wal z, Mayor, City of Holts Summit
Missouri D epartm ent of Transportati o n
Roger Schwartze, P.E., Distri ct 5 Engi neer
Multi-Modal Representative
Steven B ill ings, Missouri Dept. of Transportation
State Agen cy Represe ntative
Randall G . Allen, AlA, Director, Missouri Division of D esig n and Construction
Technical Committee
City of Jefferson
Ja ni ce Mc Millan, AICP, Deputy Direct or,
Plannin g and Transportation , Technical
Committee Cha irman
Pat Sulli van P.E., Director, Department of
Community Development
Matt Morasch P.E., Depu t y D irector Pu b lic
Works
Ron Craft Director, Airport Division
Ric h a rd Turner Directo r , Transit Divi sion
Alan Morrison AICP, Planner III,
T r ansportation
Bill Lockwood Director, Pa rks, Forestry, &
Recreation
Engineeri ng (Vacant)
Ca llaway County
Paul Winkelmann, County Highway
Administrator, Tech nica l Co mmittee
Vice -Chairman
Cole County
Chris Yarnell, P.E ., Director of Pu bli c Works
Larry Benz, P.E., County Engineer
MPO Staff
Missouri De partment of Transportation
Jay Bes tgen P.E ., Tra n sportation Planning
Eng ineer
Alan Tram pe P.E . Area Engineer
Mark Anderson, Transportation Planner,
Multimodal Operations
Ex-Officio Members:
Federal Highway Administration: Missouri Div.
Jim Radmacher, P.E . Transportation
Planning Eng ineer
Federa l Transit Adm in ist ration : Reg io n VII
Joni Roese ler, Planning & Program
Development T eam Leader
John We iss
Misso u ri De partment of Transportation:
La r ry Ko pfer, P.E. Urban Planning Engineer
Private Transportation Interest:
Jim Kistler, Executive Vice Presiden t
Missouri Transportation & Deve lopment
Co unc il
Alan Morrison, AI CP -Long Range Transportation Plann e r, Plann er III
Anne Str atman -Administrative Assistant
7
T h e Purpose of t he Transpo rtation Improvemen t Program
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is one of several transportation planning
documents used by Metropolitan Planning Organizations for programming transportati on and
transportat ion related projects in metropolitan areas. The MPO, in an effort to provide a
comprehensive, coordinated and continuing transportation planning process, develops the TIP
through coopera tion of city, county and other local jurisdictions and agencies, and with
participation by State and Federa l transportation agen cy representatives.
The TIP is a program or schedule of transportation improvements and activities coveri ng a
three to five-year time period, and intended to be implemented using a combination of State,
Federal and local funding , and includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the TIP can be
implemented . Th e TIP is therefore fis ca lly constrained.
Al so included in the TIP are projects that, a l though they may not have Federal funding, are
of regional significance, and are therefore included in the TIP. I ll ustrative projects that do not
have specific Federal funding identified may also be included in the TIP, for the purpose of
illustrating a project that wou ld or could be done, except that no funding ha s been attributed to
the project.
The MPO i s charged with provid i ng a process that provides citi zens, affected publ ic
agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, and other affected employee
representatives, private providers of transportation, and other interested parties with a reasonable
opportunity t o comment on the proposed program. This process is identified in the MPO Public
Involvement Program adopted by the MPO in 2003 .
The TIP i s required to be approved by the MPO and the Governor, and updated at least once
every two years. Fo ll owing approval and adoption of the TIP, it is incorporated into the State
Transportation Improvement Program, without modifi ca tion .
Under regu lations governing u r ban transportation planning, the Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization (CAMPO), as the designated MPO for the Jefferson City urbanized area, is
charged with devel oping the TIP.
The TIP Str ucture for Projects
This TIP contains projects proposed by the participating jurisdictions within the MPO Planning Area,
and is divided into categories or type of improve ment, and by the jurisdiction that takes the lead
for or sponsors the p r oject, such as a city, county, or State agency.
Th e projects descri be specific improvements and provide the follow i ng information :
• The name, location , description, and Project No. (if available) of the proposed improvement,
and
• A schedule of expenditures in current dol l ars by fiscal year, including the funding sources, and
the project's sponsor o r th e jurisdiction r esponsible for the project.
An additional table includes the TIP projects in a summary format, emphasizing expenditures
over the three years covered by the TIP .
8
TEA -21 Planning Factors
Under TEA -21, seven planning factors are to be consi d ered during the development of any MPO
plan .
• Supporting the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by ena bli ng global
competiti veness, productivity, and efficiency .
• Incr easing the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-
motorized users.
• Increasing the accessi bility and mobility options available to people and for freight.
• Prot ecti ng and enhancing the environment , promotin g energy conservation, and improving
th e quality of life.
• Enhan cing the integration and co nnectivity of the transportation system, across and between
modes, f or peo p le and freight.
• Promot ing efficient system management and operation.
• Emphas izing th e prese r va tion of the ex isting transpo rtation system.
Documents That May Be Used In Identifying TIP Projects
Projects and programs in the TIP m ay be selected by agencies and governmental entities based on
several methods. These m ethods ar e themselves generally b ased on iden tified needs, and may
originate from reports, studies or unexpected eve nts such as unantici pated development,
emergen ci es, or social and eco nomi c c hanges. Th e membershi p of the Technical Co mmittee and
the Board of Directo r s of the MPO review th e propose d projects and programs to be in cl uded in th e
TIP, and as the metropolitan coo rdinating entity for tran sportation planning, updates the TIP.
T he studi es and sou r ce documen ts th at m ay be used f or ide ntifying items to be i nclu ded in t he TIP
may i nclu de, but are not li mited to fo l lowing documents:
• For th e City of Jefferson , an d th e co un ties of Cole and Callaway: the Tran sportation and Major
Street Plans, Transit Deve lopm en t Program Pl ans, si dewal k plans, ADA p l ans, greenways and
bicycle/pedestrian master plans, co rridor studies, and the County-wide T ransportati on St udy
for Co l e County and Jefferson City.
• For Cole County: The Co unty-wide Transportation Study for Cole County and Jefferson City.
• Capital Improvement Pr ogra m s and Annual Bud gets for th e citi es of Jefferson , St. Martins,
Ho lts Summit, and the Town of La ke Mykee, Callaway County, and Cole County.
• Th e Right-of-Way and Construction Pr og r am of the Mi sso u r i Department of Transportation
• For the State of Missouri, the ci ty of Jeffers on, and Co l e County, The Missouri State
Penitentiary Redevelopment Plan , th e East Side Redeve lopment Plan cu r rently in process, the
Wh it t on Expressway Study and the Airport Layout Plan Update scheduled for 2005 are al l
doc u ment s that may be u sed for project identification.
9
Geographic Boundaries of the TIP
The TIP covers the Urbanized Areas defined by the 2000 Census, the FHWA Adjusted Urbanized
Area boundary, and the Planning Boundary for CAMPO . These areas include the southern portion
of Callaway County, the northern portion of Cole County, the Cities of Jefferso n, St. Martin s, Holts
Summit, and the town of Lake Mykee.
-==-c:~~---====---•Miles
0 1.25 2.5 5 7 .5 10
Capital Area MPO Planning Area
--Cole County Roads
--Call away County Roads
Missouri Riv er
Jefferson City Limits
-Munic ipal Cor porate Limits
c=J MPO Planning Boundary
c=J Callaway County
c=J Cole County
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Changes in Priorities from Previous TIPS .
Aviation/Airports:
Jefferson City Memorial Airport has modified the projects listed in the 2004 TIP to reflect a
r ecombination of activities to be included in the 2004 TIP, resulting in a reduction from
eight separate projects to two. The perimeter road r e l oca ti o n and airport perimeter
fencing projects remain in the 2004 TIP.
Th e first project, the land purchase project has been cance lled , and the grading project, the
secon d project listed, is being done by the FAA.
The reseeding project has been removed, and will not be required.
The fourth project, the Airport Layou t Update will be moved to the 2 005 TIP.
The remaining projects will be co mbined with other projects and moved from the 2004 TIP to
the 2005 TIP.
Major Projects from the Previous TIP That Were Implemented .1
Roads, streets and Intersection projects:
MODOT-US 54 Northbo und Missouri River Bridge expansion joints (project Sp0819) -
completed
MODOT-Rt. 179 -Mi ssouri Blvd. to Rt . C complete, Rt. C to Rt. B -under construction
City of Jefferson -South Country Club Drive -under construction
City of Jefferson -Sunset Lake -Advertised for bid
City of Jefferson -East High -Vette rs to McCarty completed, Ash to Locust under
constru ction
City of Jefferson -East McCarty -under construction
Traffic and signalization projects
City of Jefferson -Di x & Industrial signal upgrade completed
City of Jefferson -Bolivar McCarty si gnalizati o n -under contract, awaiting construction
start after Di x & Industrial
City of Jefferson -McCarty Street Traffi c Signals -in design, expect t o bid in August of
2004
Sidewalk projects
City of Jefferson -Belai r Sidewalks completed
City of Jefferson -Myrtl e Street Sidewalks-expect to bid in winter 2004/05
Airport projects
City of Jefferson -Airport Fen ce-expect to bid in August of 2004
Greenways, bicycle and pedestrian projects
Studies/plans
City of Jefferson -MSP Redevelopment Plan: Neighborhood Plan -co mpleted
Cole County -Rex Whitton Expressway Feasi b il ity Study -in prog ress
Transit
City of Jefferson: Jefftran pu rchased 5 fixed route buses, (2 are DNR shuttle busses)
1 As of July 1, 2004.
11
Significant Delays in the Planned Implementation of Major Projects.
The Lay o ut Pl an for t h e Jefferso n City Me m o r ial Ai r port will be prepared in 2005 instead of
2004.
Month
Ma y-Jun e
Jul y-
August
Au gust-
September
October-
De cem be r
The Tip Annual Development Process
Activity
-Notification to submit TIP proj ects are se nt to participa t in g j urisdi ction s
-A Notice to the Publi c i s published, post ed and d istributed with i nform ation
on how to s u bmit projects for inclusion i nto the TIP and deadli nes f or
submitting projects
-Dates for proposed Technical Committee meetings are sent out
-Participating jurisdictions r eturn TIP project l ists; and a draft TIP is prepared
-Th e Techni ca l Committee meets to rev i e w the draft TIP
-T he Te chnica l Committee r eceives a nd re v iews TIP projects
-Notice to t h e Publi c announcing the availabi lity of th e TIP for review and
comment
-Disc uss projects and prioritize as necessary, and
-Formulate recommendations to the Board of D i r ectors
-Technical Com mittee draft TIP is publi she d and distributed to t he Bo a rd of
Directors, Mo DOT, FHWA , FTA and participatin g ju risdictions
-A Seco nd Notice t o th e Public is published announcing the ava ilability of the
TIP for review a nd co mme nt and date of Board of Directors meeting when
the TIP wi ll be consid ered
-T he Board of D irectors meets, holds a public f orum on the adopti on of TIP,
receives public co mments, and recommendations, considers
recommendati o n s of the Technical Com mit t ee and discuss changes t o the
TIP
-Board of Directors adopts the TIP: as approved by th e Board, or with
c hanges.
-Ad opted TIP p u b lish ed and distributed to MoDOT for approval by Governor
and incorporation into the State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP)
-MoDOT forwards Fin al TIP to FHWA and FTA
12
Projects for 2005 -2007 listed by agency
Missouri Department of Transportation
Project description:
Lead agency: MODOT geometric improvements I congestion
Leng t h: 1.4
mi.
Project No.: Sp0819
comments:
Project locatio n: US 50 /Rt . 179 interchang e
Phase: prel im.
Engin ./design
Funding
Local
State
Fed eral
Total
Sources
MODOT
FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
$75,000 $15,000
$75 000 $15 000
Lead agen cy: MODOT
Project No .: 5u0441
Project description : Rt. 179 exte nsion
Project location : Rt . 179 , US 50 to Rt. B
Length: 4.8 mi.
Phase: construction
Comments: payme nt to the Transportation Corporation
Funding Sources FY 2005 FY 2006
Lo cal
State MODOT $3,075,000 $3,167,000
Federal
Total $3 075 000 $3 167 000
Lead agency: MODOT
Project No.: 5P0844
Project descri ption: US50 I City View Dr. Inter cha nge
Project location : US50 @ City V iew Dr.
Com m ents: prelim. engineering to sco pe & check design
Funding
Local
State
Federa l
Total
So urces
MODOT
FY 2005 FY 2006
$20,000 $10,000
$20 000 $10 000
Lead agency: MODOT
Project No.: 5P0872
Pr oj ect description: US 50 I 63 Median Ba r rier
Pr oj ect location: Mo nroe St. to East of Clark Ave.
Comments:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Total
Safety Project : insta ll barrier i n median
Sources
MODOT (safety)
STP (safety)
FY 2005
$186,800
$747 200
$934 000
FY 2006
FY 2007
$3,262,000
$3 262 000
Length: .2 mi.
Phase: design
FY 2007
Length:
Ph ase: design
FY 2007
Lead agency: MODOT Project description: Bridge Rehabilitation Length:
Project location : Lafayette St. /and Vetter St. -
Project No.: 5P0873* Monroe St. to East of Clark Ave. Phase: design
Comments: * Part of Project 5P0872
Funding Sources FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Local
State MODOT (safety) $628,000
Federal
T otal $628 000
13
Lead agency: MODOT Project descri ption : Upgrade Active Warning Devices
Project No.: 5T0013
Comments:
Funding
Loca l
State
Fede r a l
Total
Project location: Union Pacific RR line at Rt . 179
Sou r ces
Railroad
MODOT
STP/Highway Rail Safety
FY 2005
$400
$400
$7 200
$8 000
Lead agency: MODOT Project description: Upgrade Active Warning Devices
Project No.: ST0014
Comments:
Funding
Loca l
State
Federal
Total
Callaway County
Project location : Un ion Pacific RR li n e at El ston on Rt. T
Sources
Railroad
MODOT
STP/Hig hway Ra il Safety
FY 2005
$400
$400
$7 200
$8 000
Length : .1
mi
Phase: Const.
FY 2006 FY 2007
Le ngth: .1
mi
Phase : Con st.
FY 2006 FY 200 7
Lead agency: Le ng th : 1200
Callaway Cou nty Project description: bridge replacement ft .
Project No .: Project l ocation : County Road (CR) 397 @ Cedar Creek Phase: design
Co mments : bridge no. 20100131
Funding Sources FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Loca l Ca llaway Co. $66,000 $44,000
State
Federal BRO $264 000 $176 000
Tota l $330 000 $220 000
Cole County
Lea d agency:
Cole Co unty Project d escription: Congestion study Length :
Project No.: 5P0820 Project location : Re x Whitton Expressway/USSO Phase: co n tract
Co mments : Stu dy by MODOT, funded by Co le County, carried over f ro m 2004
Funding Sources FY 2005 FY 2006
$19,205
FY 2007
Local Co l e co. $250,000
State
Fe deral
Total $250 000 $19 205
14
I
I
City of Jefferson Missouri Street and Intersection Improvements
Lead agency: City of Jefferson
Project No .:
Project desc ription: Christy Lane extension
Project location : Christy Dr. To Rt . 179
Comments:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Comm ents:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Comments:
Funding
Lo ca l
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No .:
Comments:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Sources
Local sales tax
FY 2005
$400,000
$400 000
Project description : intersection improvements
Project lo cation: Lafayette and Stadium Dr.
Sources
Local sa le s tax
FY 2005
$206,000
$206 000
Project description: intersection improvements
Project location: Tanner Bridge Rd. /Elli s Blvd .
Sources
Local sa les ta x
FY 2005
$277,000
$277 000
Project description: intersection improvements
Project location : Southwest Blvd ./Stadium Dr.
Sources FY 2005
Local sa l es ta x
Length:
Pha se : construction
FY 2006 FY 2007
Length :
Pha se: co nstruction
FY 2006 FY 2007
Length :
Pha se: construction
FY 2006 FY 2007
Length:
Phase : construction
FY 2006
$610,846
FY 2007
Total $610 846
City of Jefferson, Missouri Parks and Recreation Commission
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Pr oject description : Wicker Lane to Southwest Blvd .
Greenway trail exte nsion
Project No .: Project location :, 10 ft concrete trail extension along
Stp-3111 ( 507) the frog hollow branch of Wear's creek
Comme nts: ca rryover from 2004
Funding Sources
Local Loca l sa les tax
State
Federal
Total
FY 2005
$68,526
$274 104
$342 630
Length:.27
m i.
Phase : prelim.
design/ROW
FY 2006 FY 2007
15
Ci ty of Jeffe rson Me mori al Airport
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson Pr oj ect description: airport layout plan u pdate
Project location: Jefferso n Ci ty Memori al Ai r port
Length:
Project No.: Phase: contract
Comments:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Total
carry over from 2004 entitlement grant
Source
Local sa les tax
FAA -AlP entitlement
FY 2005
$1,750
$33 250
$35 000
Lead agency : Project description : Runway 12-30, r unway
FY 2006
City of Jefferson maintenance Length:
FY 2007
Project No .: Project location : Jefferso n City Memorial Ai r port Phase: plann i ng
Comme nts : carryover from FY 2004 = $112,100
Funding Sources FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Local Local s ales tax $9,250
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency :
City of Jefferson
Project No .:
Comments:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Tota l
Lead agency :
FAA -AlP e nt it lement 2004/5 $175750
$1 85 000
Project description: new air traffic control tower
Project location : Jefferso n City Me m orial Airport
So u rces
Local sa les tax
MODOT aviation trust fund
FAA -AlP entit l ement
FY 2005
$50,000
$50,000
$150 000
$250 000
FY 2006
$50,000
$50,000
$150 000
$250 000
City o f Jefferson
Project No.:
Project desc ription : taxiway expansion, and improvements
Project l ocation: Jefferson City Memorial Ai rport
Comment s: move r u nway, improve li g hti ng, extend taxiway
Funding Sources FY 2005 FY 2006
Loca l Local sa les tax
State MODOT Aviation Tr ust Fund
Federal
Total
Length:
Phase :
FY 2007
$50,000
$50,000
$150 000
$250 000
Length :
Phase :
FY 2007
$150,000
$1,350,000
$1 500 000
16
City of Jefferson Misso uri Transit
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Project description : purchase of eight (8) 35' low floor
buses, (5 i n 2005, 3 in 2006).
Project location: JEFFTRAN
Comments: fixed route replacements
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Total
Sources
Local sales tax
FTA 5309
FY 2005
$283,545
$1134 180
$1417725
FY 2006
$177,000
$708 000
$885 000
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Project description : purchase two (2) van/minibuses for
2005, four ( 4) van minibuses for 2006
Project location: JEFFTRAN
Comments: replacement paratransit vehicles
Funding Sources
Local Local sales tax
State
Federal FTA 5309
Total
Lead agency:
FY 2005
$22,000
$88 000
$110 000
City of Jefferson
Project No .:
Project description: one (1) low floor minivan
Project location : JEFFTRAN
Comments: replacement for transit service vehicle
Fundi ng Sources
Local Local sales tax
State
Federal FTA 5309
Total
Lead agency:
FY 2005
$6,000
$24 000
$ 30 000
City of Jefferson Project description: cap ital equipment purchase
Project No .: Project location: JEFFTRAN
Comments: 2 uhf mobil e radios (2005), phone upgrade (2006)
FY 2006
$44,000
$176 000
$220 000
FY 2006
Length:
Phase:
FY 2007
Length:
Phase:
FY 2007
Length:
Phase:
FY 2007
Length:
Phase:
Funding Sources FY 2005
$240
FY 2006 FY 2007
Local Loca l sa les tax
State
Federal FTA 5309 $960
Total $12 000
Lead agency: Proj ect description: passenger t ransfer faci lity
City of Jefferson
Proj ect No.: Project location: old bus station-W. McCarty St.
co mments: renovation for transfer station
Funding So urces FY 2005
Lo ca l Local sales tax
State
Federal FTA 5309
Total
$4,000
$16 000
$20 000
FY 2006
$14,000
$56 000
$70 000
Length:
Phase:
FY 2007
17
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
com m ents:
Fund ing
Loca l
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency:
Project d escri ption: Intel lig ent Transportation Systems (ITS)
Automati c Vehicle Lo cation System (AVL)
Project location: JEFFTRAN
Sources
Local sa les tax
FTA 5309
FY 2005 FY 2006
City of Jefferson Project descripti on: computing equipment and softwar e
Project No.: Project location : JEFFTRA N
Comments: 3 computers@ $3500 e a .
Funding
Local
State
Fede r al
T ota l
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Co mments:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency :
City of Jefferson
Sources
Local sa les tax
FTA 5309
FY 2005
$2,100
$8 400
$10 500
Proj ect desc riptio n : four ( 4) bus sh e lters
Project location: various locations in Jefferson City
So urces
Local -Pri vat e Organ .
FTA 5309
FY 2005
$5 ,000
$2 0 000
$25 000
Project description : transit fa c ility improvements
FY 2006
FY 2006
Length:
Pha se:
FY 2007
$15,000
$60 000
$75 000
Le ngth :
Phase:
FY 2007
$400
$1 600
$2 000
Le ngth :
Pha se:
FY 2007
Length:
Project No .: Proj ect location: bus barn, veh icle wash, mainte nance shop Phase:
Comments: re nova t io n : roofing, weatherproofing, pain t a nd door r epai r s. Office fl oori ng.
Fund ing Sources FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Local Local sa l es t ax $22,321
State
Federal FTA 5309 $89 284
Total $11 1 605
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson Project descri ption: cap ital eq uip m ent purcha se
Project No.: Project location: JE FFTRA N
Comments: tire service equip. (20 05 )
Funding So urces FY 2005
Local
State
Federal
Total
Local sa l es tax
FTA 5309
$700
$2 800
$3 500
FY 2006 FY 2007
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson Proj ect description: capital eq uipment purchase
Project location: Central Maintenance 820 E. Miller
exhaust system upgrade (2005). Vehicle wash system (2006)
Project No.:
Comments:
Sou r ces FY 2005
Local sales tax $2,000
FY 2006
$28,000
Funding
Loca l
State
Federal FTA 5309 $8 000 $112 000
Total $10 000 $140 000
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson Project description: capita l equipment purchase
Project location: Central Maintenance 820 E. Miller
fuel syst em: tank, monitor, dispensers, and automated fuel attendant
Project No.:
Comments:
Funding
Local
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Co mments :
Funding
Local
State
Fe dera l
Total
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Sources FY 2005 FY 2006
Local sa les tax $6,000
FTA 5309 $24 000
$30 000
Project description: Intelligent Transportation System
(ITS) Automated Route Information Cente r
Project location:
Central Maintenance 820 E. Miller
Sources FY 2005 FY 2006
Local sales tax
FTA 53 09
Proj ect description :
t ransit fa cil ity improvements
Project location: JEFFTRAN 820 E. Miller
Comments: power entrance gate and card reader
Funding Sou r ces
Local Local sales tax
State
Federal
Total
Lead agency :
Th e Special Learning Center
Project No.:
Com m ents:
Fundin g
Local
State
Federa l
Total
FTA 5309
Project description:
FTA Section 5310 Paratransit vehicle
Project location : 1115 Fairgrounds Rd
Sources
Local Private Non -Profit
FTA 5310
FY 2005
FY 2005
$7,080
$28,312
$35 390
FY 2006
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2007
FY 2007
$6,000
$24 000
$30 000
FY 2007
$6,000
$24,000
$30 000
FY 2007
19
Illustrative projects -projects that would be done, if adequate funding was identified.
City of Jefferson, Missouri Parks and Recreation Commission
Lead agency: Project description :
City of Jefferson Dunklin St. Trailhead to Missouri River bridg e
Project No.: Project location: along Dunklin, Bol iva r and W. Main St.
Co mments : extend 10' co ncrete bike/pedestrian trail
Length: .79
mi .
Phase:
prelim.
Planning
Funding Sources FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No .:
$397 000
Project description : Ellis Porter Riverside Park Greenway
Trai l extension
Project location : extend greenway trail through Riverside
Park
Length: .64
mi.
Phase :
prelim.
Planning
Comments: 10' concrete bike/pedestrian trail
Fundinq Sources FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total _i_99 765 $88 265
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project No.:
Project description : handicap accessible pedestrian paths
and landscaping
Project location: capital grounds @ Capital Ave. and
Jefferson St.
Comments: Lewi s & Clark bicentennial monument park
Fundi no
Length :
Phase :
prel im .
Pl anning
FY 2007
Total $525 000 $466 585
Lead agency:
City of Jefferson
Project description : South Country Club Dr. Greenway
ex ten sion
Project No.: Project location : Fairgrounds Rd. To Scruggs Station Rd.
Comments: 10 ft. Concrete bike/pedestrian trail
Fundinq Sources FY 2005 FY 2006
Total $350 000
Lead agency: Project description : Missouri River bridge bike/pedestrian
Length: 1.1
mi.
Pha se:
prelim .
Planning
FY 2007
City of Jefferson path Length: .86 mi.
Project No .: Phase : prelim.
illustrative Project location: W. Main St. To Cedar City Dr. Plann ing/canst.
Comments: addition-6ft. wide attachment to the so uthbound bridge, al so N. And S. Approaches .
Fundino Sources FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Total $5 to $5.5 mill ion est. project cost $3 300 000 $2 200 000
20
I
I
I
I
I
Financial Capability
For the FY 2005-FY 2007 CAMPO TIP, the TIP is fi scall y con strained for each ye ar. The
projects within the TIP are finan c ially feas ib le, and the federally funded projects identified in the TIP
ca n be implemented us in g current and proposed Federal and State revenue sources, and locall y
dedicated tran sportation revenues.
F d-S un mg ou rces f 2005 o r
Local : Cole County $250,000
Highways and Interchanges State : MODOT $3,356,800
Federal: Highway Safety $747,200
Total $4 354 000
Loca l : Railroad $800
Rai l road Safety State: MODOT Safety $800
Federal : Highway Rail Safety $14,400
Total $16 000
Local: Ca llaway County Road & Bridge $66,000
Bridge Repair and Rep lacement State: MODOT Safety $628,000
Federal: BRO $264,000
Total $958 000
Street and i nter section Local : City of Jefferson Sales Ta x $883,000
Improvements Total $883 000
Local: City of Jefferson Sales Ta x $61,000
Aviatio n and airports State: MODOT -Aviation T rust Fund $50,000
Federal: FAA -AlP Entitlem e n t $359,000
Total $470 000
Greenways, Bi cycle and Ped es trian Local: City of Jefferso n Sa les Tax $68,526
Routes, Trai ls, and improvements Feder al: STP $274,104
Total $342 630
Local: City of Jefferson $360,043
Transit Local : Special Learning Center $7,080
State : $0
Federal: FTA 5309 $1,399,624
Federa l : FTA 5307 $506,844
Federa l : FTA 5310 $28,312
Total $2 301 903
Total $9,325,533
F d" S un mg ources f 2006 or
Lo cal: Cole County $19,205
Highways and Interchanges State : MODOT Safety $3 ,192,000
Federal : $0
Tota l $3 211 205
Local: Callaway County Road & Bridge $44,000
Bridge Repair and Repla cement State : $0
Federa l: BRO $176,000
Total $220 000
Local : City of Jefferson Sa l es Tax $610,846
Street and i ntersection State : $0
Improvements Federal: $0
Total $610 846
Local : City of Jefferson Sale s Ta x $50,000
Aviation and airports State: MODOT Aviation Trust Fund $50,000
Fe deral : FAA -AlP Entitlement $150,000
Total _i_250 000
Local : City of Jefferson $277,542
Transit Federa l : FTA 5307 $1 ,595,118
Total $1 872 660
21
I Total
F d ' S un lnQ f 2007 ources or
Lo cal: $0
Highways and Interchanges State: MODOT Safety $3,262,000
Federal : $0
Total $3 262 000
Local: City of Jefferson Sa les Tax $200,000
Aviatio n and airports State: MODOT Aviation Trust Fund $1,400,000
Federal : FAA -AlP Entitlement $150,000
Total $1 750 000
Local : City of Jefferson $21,000
Intelligent Transportation Systems Federa l : FTA 5309 $84 ,000
Total $105 000
Local: City of Jeffer so n $17,364
T ra nsit Fed era l: FTA 5309 $25,600
Federal : FTA 5307 $548,203
Total $591 167
Total $5,708,167
Note : FTA 5307 est1mated fundmg IS based on FY-2004 amount, with a 4% adjustment for each year
of FY 2005, FY 2006, and FY 2007.
22
I
TIP Project and Program Summary
~roject location
Lead
Project descri ption : aoencv Proiect No . Local State Federal Local State Federal Local State Federa l
2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2 00 7
Highways and lnterchanoes
US50/Rex Whitton MOD OT/
Whitton Expressway Congestion Study Expressway COLE $25 0,000 $19,205
COUNTY 5P0820
Geometric improvements I congestion US50 /Rt. 179 MODOT $75 ,000 $15 ,000 interchange 5P0819
Rt. 179 extens ion Rt. 179 , US50 toRt. B MODOT 5U0441 $3,075,000 $3,167,000 $3 ,262 ,000
USS O I 63 Median Barrier Monroe E. of Clark Ave . MODOT JSP0872 $186,800 $747,200
US 50 I City View Dr. Interchange US 50 @City View Dr. MODOT 5P0844 $20 ,000 $10 ,000
Proiect Catecorv Fundinc Total $250,000 $3,356,800 $747,200 $19,205 $3 ,192.000 $3 ,262.000
Railroads I Safetv
Warning Device Upg rade Rt. 179 at Jefferson Citv MODOT 5T0013 $400 $400 $7 ,200
Wamin!l Device Uo!lrade Rt. T at Elston MODOT 5T0014 $400 $400 $7 ,200
Project Catecorv Fundi no Total $800 $800 $14.400
Bridge repair/replacement
Bridge Rehab Lafayette St. and Vetter St. US50/63-Monroe St. to MODOT $628 ,000 East of Clark Ave . JSP0873
Bridge replace ment County Road (CR) 397 Callaway $66 ,000 $264,000 $44 ,000 $1 76,000 @ Cedar Creek county
Project Catecorv Fundlno Total $66,000 $628 ,000 $264 ,000 $44,000 $176 ,000
Street and Intersection imProvements
Christy Lane . Extension Christy Dr. ToRt. 179 City of $400 ,000 Jefferson
Intersection improvements Lafayette and Stadium City of $206,000 Dr. Jefferson
Intersection improvements Tanner Bridge Rd . /Ellis City of $2 77,000 Blvd . Jefferson
Intersection improvements Southwest Blvd./Stadium City of $610 ,846 Dr. Jefferson
Project Catecorv Fundlno Total $883 ,000 $610 ,846
-
23
Lead
Project description: ProJect location aaency Project No. Local State Federal Local State Federal Local State Federal
2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007
Aviation/Airport Improvements
Airport layout plan update Memorial Airport City of $1,750 $33,250 Jefferson
City of $9 ,250 $175 ,750 Runway 12-30 runway maintenance Memorial Airport Jefferson
City of $50 ,000 $50,000 $150,000 $50,000 $50,000 $150,000 $50,000 $50,000 $150,000 New air traffic control tower Memorial A irpo rt Jefferson
City of $150,000 $1 ,350,000, Taxiway expansion , and imp rovements Memorial Airport Jefferson
Project Cateaorv Fundina Total $61 ,000 $50,000 $359,000 $50,000 $50,000 $150,000 $200,000 $50,000 $1 ,500 ,000
Greenwavs BicYcle/Pedestrian Routes And Trails
10ft concrete trail extension along the Frog Wicker Lane to City of Southwest Blvd . $68 ,526 $274 ,104 Hollow branch of Wear's Creek Greenway trail extension Jefferson STP-
3111(507)
ProJect Cateaorv Fundina Total $68,526 $274 ,104
lntelliaent Transportation Systems JEFFTRAN Cltv of Jefferson Transit
ITS : Automated Ve hicle Location system $15,000 $60 ,000 (AVL) JEFFTRAN
ITS : automated route informa tion center $6,000 $24 ,000
JEFFTRAN
Prolect Category Funding Total $21 ,000 $84 ,000
Transit Improvements
Purchase of eight (8) 35' low floor buses. (5 JEFFTRAN City of $283,545 $1 ,134 ,180 $1 77,000 $708,000 in 2005 3 in 2006) Jefferson
Purchase two (2) van /minibuses for 2005. JEFFTRAN City of $22,000 $88 ,000 $44,000 $176 ,000 four (4) va n minibuses for 2006 Jefferson
Purchase one (1) low floor minivan JEFFTRAN City of $6,000 $24 ,000 Jefferson
Pa sse nger transfer facility renova tion old bus station -West City of $14,000 $56,000 McCarty St. Jefferson
24
c::l
Lead
ProJect description: Proiect location aaencv Proiect No. Local State Federal Local State Federal Local State Federal
2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007
Capital equipment purchase tire service JEFFTRAN City of $700 $2 ,800 equip . (2005) Jefferson
Capital equipment purchase exhaust City of system upgrades (2005 ). Vehicle wash JEFFTRAN Jefferson $2,000 $8 ,000 $28,000 $112 ,000
system (2006)
Capital Equipment Purchase Radios JEFFTRAN City of $240 $960 $4 ,000 $16 .000 Upgrade phone system Jefferson
Capital equipment purchase fuel system : City of ta nk, monitor, dispensers, automated JEFFTRAN $6 ,000 $24 ,000
attendant_L2005l Jefferson
Computing equ ipment and software JEFFTRAN City of $2 ,100 $8 ,400 $400 $1 ,600 Jefferson
Transit facility improvements items 6& 7 on JEFFTRAN City of $22 ,321 $89 ,284 transit CIP , bldg . repair Jefferson
Transit fa cility improvements power JEFFTRAN City of $6 ,000 $24,000 entrance gate and card reader Jefferson
Operating Expenses JEFFTRAN C ity of $10 ,137 $506,844 $10 ,542 $527,118 $10,964 $548,203 Jefferson
Section 5310 Paratransit Vehicle $7,080 $28,312
Four (4 ) bus shelters various locations in the City of $5,000 $20,000 ci ty of Jefferson Jefferson
Proiect Cateaorv Fundina Total $367,123 $1,934,780 $277,542 $1,595,118 $17,364 $573,803
Note : FTA 5307 Expenditures are based on full expenditure of estimated FY 2005 -2007 available Operating Assistance funding.
TIP Programmed Expenditures
Loc Federal ~ Local State Federal State Federal
Year 2005 2005 ~ 2005 ~ 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007
1.696.449 I $4.035,600 II $3,593,484 I $1,001,593 I 3.242.000 $1.921.118 $3.312.000 2.157.803
25
A p p e n dix 1 TIP REQUIREMENTS
The Federal Highway Administration (FH WA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have
requ irements for producing a Tra n sportation I mprovement Program by the MPO for a
metropolitan area. They are found in 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613, as publ is hed in
the Federal Register dated October 28, 1993. The following is a l ist of the areas the TIP
must cover, including requiremen ts for a federally acceptable planning product:
The TI P must cover the metropol itan area.
The TIP must be updated and approved at least every 2 years by the MPO and the
Governor.
Copies of the T I P must be sent to FH WA and FTA.
Reasonable opportunity for public comment prior to approval must be given .
The TIP shall cover at least 3 years and shall include a pri ority l ist of projects or at least
be grouped by year.
The TIP shall be financially constrained and shall include a financial plan.
The seven (7) factors described in TEA-21 shall be explicitly reflected in the TIP,
outlined in CFR 450.316.
Simpl ified procedures for the TIP shall be submitted for approval by FHWA and FTA.
The TIP shall include:
All transportation proj ects proposed for funding under T itle 23 and the Federal
Transit Act.
Only projects co nsistent with the long range transportation plan.
All projects which require FHWA and FTA approval
All projects proposed to b e fu n ded w ith federal f u nds.
All regionally significant projects with non-federa l funds.
Sufficient descr iptive mat erial for each project (wo r k type, termini , length, etc.).
Estimated cost per project.
Amount of federal funds to be obligated each program year.
Proposed source of funding.
I dentification of the rec ipient and agency respons ib l e for carrying out the project.
Projects may be grouped, if not considered of appropriate scale, by function , geographic
area and work type.
Fede r al funds allocated to th e area pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 133(d) (3) (E) shall be
identified.
For monitoring progress i n implementing the transportation plan, the TIP shall:
I dent if y the criteria and proce ss for prioritizing impl ementation of transpo rtati on plan
elements.
Identify any changes in priorities from previous TIPS.
List major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented.
Identify any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects.
The TIP may be modified at any time but must follow all procedures. (Small grouped
projects need not go through the public comment process).
After approval by the MPO and Governor, the TIP shall be included i n the Statewide TIP
(STIP). Projects not included in the federally approved STIP w i ll not be eligible for
funding with Title 23 or FTA funds .
26
Appendix 2 Transportation improvement projects and recommended criteria for the
proposal of a project. 2
This section identifies reasons and general guidelines for local jurisdictions to propose a
project for inclusion into the TIP . For information on how MODOT prioritizes projects refer to
Missouri 's Planning Framework for Transportation Decision-Making, Final Draft February,
2004 .
Bridge Projects
For Bridges, there are two recommended criteria. A structural criteria 3 and a safety criteria.
For the structural criteria, one of the foll owi ng conditions should apply:
Th e bridge shou l d be structurally deficient, or
Be functionally obsolete, or
Have a low AASHTO bridge rating.
For the safety criteria the following should apply
A history of accidents over the previous 5 years
A recognized nonstructural condition that creates a hazard
Major Highways projects
For Major highways, there is a structural, safety, and congestion criteria, in that order of
importance.
For the structural criteria, one of the fol lowing conditions should apply:
The roadway should be deficient as defined through a pavement rating
standard, or, other accepted roadway evaluation standard, or
Functionally obsolete, by design standards
For the safety criteria the following should apply
A history of accidents over the previous 5 years
A recognized nonstructural condition that creates hazard
For the congestion c riteria the foll owing should apply
A high volume to capacity ratio (V/C)
A higher than acceptable delay at intersections
Poor network connectivity
Arte~al RoadwaysPr~ects
For arterial roadways, there is a structural criteria, a safety criteria and a congestion criteria.
For the structural criteria , one of the following conditions should apply:
The roadway should be deficient as defined through a pavement rating
standard, or,
Fun ctionally obsolete, by des ign standards
For the safety criteria the following should apply
A history of accidents over 5 years
A recognized nonstructural co nd ition cr eating a hazard
For the congestion criteria the following should apply
A high volume to capacity ratio (V/C)
A higher than acceptable delay at intersections
Poo r roadway network co nnectivity
2 Modified from source documents produ ced by the Atlanta Regional Commission .
3 MODOT identifies three bridge co ndition ratings : one for the deck, another for the substructure, and a third for the
superstructure. Source: Missouri's Pla nning Framework for Transportation Decision-Making .
27
Collector Roads Projects
For collector roadways, there is a structural, safety, congestion, and multi -modal criteria.
For the structural criteria, one of the following cond iti ons should ap p ly:
The roadway should be deficient as defined through a pavement rating
standard, or,
Functionally obsolete, by design standards
For the safety criteria the following should apply
A history of accidents over the previous 5 years
A recognized nonstructural condition that creates a hazard
For the congestion criteria the following should apply
A high volume to capacity ratio (V/C)
A higher than acceptable delay at intersections
Poor roadway network co nnectivity
For the multi-modal criteria the following should apply
A lack of sidewa lks and pedestrian cr osswalks, t r affic separation , bicycle lanes
or paths, or signalization .
A lack of transit service, shelters, benches, and lighting.
Poor ADA accessibility
Transit Services
For the transit services category the following criteria should be considered:
New Service-
New service should b e construed as meaning a compl etely new route, the
ext ensi on of an existing route, or the provisi on of services not previou sly
offered. New service includ es capital investments such as the purchase of
rolling stock, fare co llection hardware and software, or development of new
fixed guide ways.
Repla cement -the capital investments necessary for replacing old , dilapidated,
and/or technologically obsolete items.
Rehabilitation and/or preventive maintenance capital investments necessary for the
rehabilitation of the transit system projects such as r ehabilitating rol l ing
stock, fare co llection hardware and software, transit safety infrastructure etc.
Expansion -the capital investments necessary for th e reduction of headways or
transit travel time on existing routes.
Non-operational improvements and/or enhancements -capital i n vestments
necessary to improve the quality of the transit experience, such as the
provision of bus shelters, benches, trash cans, signage , and landscaping , etc.
Operational and/or functional infrastructure -capital investments that are necessary
to improve the operation and functionality of the t r ansit system, such as
deployment of ITS i nfrastructure in accordance with the reg iona l architecture,
and the development of park and ride lots, as examples .
Transportation Enhancements:
Facilities for Pedestrians and Bicycles for Transportation Purposes Including the Provision
of Safety and Educational Activities for Bicyclists and Pedestrians
This category includes new facilities or improving faci l ities fo r b icycl e riders and
pedestrians. Facil ities for pedestrians and bicyclists should be i mplemented during the
design, development and co nstruction of all fede ral -aid transportation projects, and, if on
a NHS route, must be cons istent with the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AAS HTO ) standards, which are recommended for all pedestrian
I
28
and bicycle projects r egardl ess of location.
Possible el igi ble projects may in cl u de, but are n ot limited to:
T he acquisition, development and construction of separat e bicycle and
pedestrian faciliti es on or off highway righ t -of -ways or in relation to tran sit
f aciliti es,
Constructing new si dewalks to ADA stan d ards in areas where sidewa l ks
currently do n ot exist,
Th e r eplace m ent of deteriorated sidewalks in extreme cases,
Wid en ing c urb l an es or re -striping to create wider curb lanes and/or bicycle
lan es,
Paving shou lders for bicycle and pedestrian use,
Providing access to publ ic transit,
Parking facilities for project use, and
Insta lling b icycle locke r s at ra i l stations, bus depots, airports and oth er
faci liti es.
Activi ti es not eligible:
T he repair of old sidewalks with new and required cu rb ramps,
Th e use of fund i ng to co mply with ADA st andards on existi n g sidewa lks and
pathways, and
Recreational loops around ball fields, parks, lakes or other public areas .
Generally, p r ojects that are so l ely recreational ar e also not eligible for funding.
Acquisition of Scenic Easements and Scenic or Historic Sites
Projects in this ca tegory include the use of funds for purchase, donation, transfer or trade of
land that possesses s ignifican t aesth et ic, natural, visual or open space values, including
acquisition of lands and any property listed in or eligibl e for li stin g i n the National Registe r of
Histori c Pla ces.
Fu nds may be u sed for planning and transaction costs including:
Appraisa l s, surveys, legal costs or purchase costs.
Po ssib l e projects co uld in clud e :
A cqu i sition of a scen i c easement, scenic site or hi st or ic site that e nh ances the
t r ansportation experience as part of the transportation system including
the acqu isiti on of a historic bridge, depot or other transportation terminal
or la nd ar ound a historic site adjacent to a scenic highway.
Scen i c or Historic Highway Programs Including the Provision of Tourist and Welcome
Center Facilities
This category includes funding for t h e protection and enhancement of state or federally
designated scenic or histori ca l h i ghways.
Funds may be used only:
For projects th at will protect and enhance the scenic, histori ca l , cu l tura l ,
natural and archeological integrity and
Vi sitor appreciation of an exi sting highway an d ad jacent area or
For the p lann ing, design and development of new stat e sce n ic byway
programs.
29
Examples of project s in cl ude:
I nterpretive plaques, restoration of histor ic l i ghting standards,
Historic aesthetic treatment on retain i ng wa ll s and guardrails,
Aesthetically pleasi ng bridge rai l s for use on scenic highways or in areas of
high visual sensitivity.
Projects that are not eligible include:
Constru ct ion of safety rest areas, additional la nes, new scenic or histor ic
highways or
Lighting that does n ot h ave historic im pact.
Landscap i ng and Other Sceni c Beautificati on
This category includes landscape planning, design and construction projects that enhance the
aesthetic or ecological resources alon g highways, other transportation corridors, points of
access and la n ds in proximity to oth er t r ansportation en h a n cement projects.
Projects that enhance the at tractiveness of a transportation f aci lity include:
Planning, desig n an d construction of scenic vistas and overlooks,
Restoration of histo ric la ndsca p es, and
Construction of l andscapes that are compati b le with their surroundings
Projects t hat enhance the ecological ba lance alon g a transportation corridor include:
Planning, testing and planting for rest o r ation or reintroduction of native plant
communities a nd appr opr ia t e adaptive sp ecies
Activities associated with interpreting sites and providing information about
the programs th rough which resources a re preserved is also eligib le
Examples of projects incl ude but are not limited to:
Moving trees outside of clear zones and into more att ractive and/or safer
locations,
Retrofitting existing n o ise barriers with l andscapi ng,
Replacement of a utili ta ri an bridge with a nother of appropriate arch itectural
qua lities i n a setti ng that ca ll s for more than a utilitarian desi gn,
Roadside ecologica l v i ewi ng areas,
Development of aesth eti cal ly p leasing bridge ra i ls,
Entran ce/exit pla ntings to communiti es a nd under grounding overhead
utilities.
Funds shou ld n ot be used for routine, incide ntal or maintenance activities such as
grass cutting, tree pruning a n d removal, soil stabil izati on, the construction of noise
barr iers, drainage improvement s o r post-construction finish work -such as
replanting and reseeding. Seed i ng and planting vegetation for erosion contr ol wil l
not constitute an eligible landscaping enhancement project.
Histori c Preservat i o n
Projects w i thin this category shou l d e n hance the transportati on system by improving the
ability of the pub lic to appreciate t h e historic significance of the project itself or the area to
be served by the project. Projects must relate t o the i nter modal transportation system by
function, proximity or impact to be e l igible for funding .
Work under this category incl u des:
Identification, eval u ation , d ocu mentation, acquisition, protection,
30
managem e nt, rehabilitation, Interpretation, restoration, stabilization and
maintenance of any historic district, site, structure, object or landscape.
(Such projects can include any combination of these activities or can be combined
with oth er program area activities.)
The restoration of a caboose is not an e ligible activity.
To be e ligibl e f or funding, the property or stru cture in question must be included in or .
eligi ble for inclusi on in the National Register of Historic Pla ces .
Rehabilitation and Operation of Historic Transportation Buildings, Structures or Facilities
Including Historic Railroad Facilities and Canals
Hi stori c transportation bui l dings are buildings or related structures associated with the
operation, use, constru ction or maintenance of any mode of transportation.
Structures and facilities include:
Tunnels, bridges, trestles, e mbankments, rails or other guide way, non-
operatio na l v ehicles, cana l viaducts, tow paths and locks, and
Stations and other m a nmade transportati on features related to the operation,
use, co nstruction or maintenance of any mode of t ranspo rtation .
To be eligible for funding, the property or structur e in question must be included in or
eligible for inclu sio n in the National Register of Historic Places.
"Re habilitation " m ea n s the process of returning the p rope rty to a condition that
makes possible a contemporary u se while preserving the significant historic features
of that property.
"Operation means" the provision of access and service in a manner related to both
the continuation of a contemporary transportation or non-transportation use
consistent with the historic character of the property and open to the general public
on a not-for -profit basis.
Preservation of Abandoned Railway Corridors Including Conversion and Use Thereof for
Pedestrian and Bicycle Trails
Rail corridors are t ra nsportati on corridors of varying width i n which rail tracks exist or have
existed in the past. Abandoned ra i lway corridors are rail corridors that h ave been authorized
for abandonment by the Surface T ransportation Board, rail corridors for which abandonment
proceedings are pe nding before the STB or rail corridors that have been set aside for future
transportation use under any applicable federal or state authority.
The preservation of abandoned railway corridors includes:
Th e planning , acquisition, rehabilitation and development of co rridors for public
uses including bicycle and pedestrian use .
It permits the development and r e habilitation of privately owned rail corridors open
to the general public on a not-for-profit basis .
Control and Removal of Outdoor Advertising
Expenditures made to remove existing signs, displays and devices shall be made according
to a legal process that bases payment on an equitable appraisal. Priority should be given to
the removal of outdoor advertising signs, displays and devices on designated scenic roads or
31
in a r eas where local or state laws or ordinances ban n ew bi llboards and /or in conjunction
with other t ra nsportation en h ance ment projects.
I n usi ng funds under this category, additional resources may be used to ensure that
new outdoor advertising signs, dis pl ays, and devi ces are permitted only i n areas
actua l ly used for commercial and industrial pu r poses, including compilation of an
accu r ate inventory of existing conforming signs.
Arc haeolog i cal Pl a nni ng and Research
Th is category includes, b ut is not limited to:
Research on sites el i gib le for transportat ion enhancement funds,
Experimental projects in archaeological site preservation and interpretati on,
Plan n ing to improve identificati on, evaluation and treatment of ar chaeo log ica l
sites,
Problem-oriented sy nthesis using data derived from though not limited to:
T ransportati on-r elated archaeologica l pr ojects,
Develop m ent of national and regiona l research designs to guide future
surveys,
Data recove r y a nd synthetic research and projects having simi lar
pu r poses carried out in Partners h i p wi t h other federal, state, local
and tribal government agencies and non-governmental
orga n iza ti o ns.
Expenditures should be used f or research or inter pretati on of sites associated with
tran sportation faci liti es and for excavations.
Mi t igati on of Water Pollution Due To Highway Runoff or Red uce Veh i cle -Caused Wildlife
Mortality Whil e Mainta i ning Habitat Connectivit y
This category is limited to facili ties and prog r ams mi n imizing pollution from transportation
facil it ies producing storm water run off that are in add ition to cu r rent requiremen t s an d
procedures for such mitigation.
Any mitigation efforts funded with enhancement moneys must be above and beyond the
federal mandates. Projects th at de m onstrate aesthetic and ecologica l methods for mitigation
and that en hance r echarge are el igibl e.
The efforts some states have m ade to r educe vehicle-ca used wildlife mortality are also
recognized in this category of el i gible enhancement activities.
Enhancement funds may be used to constru ct animal "u nder cross ings " to g u ide
anima ls to safe roadway crossing areas to reduce the animal death rate.
I neligible projects:
"Riprapping" as an i ndependent project is not an el igi b l e activity.
An y project that is part of mitigation requirements mandated by the Department
of Natural Resources or the Federal Highway Administration
Establishme nt of T r an s portation Museums
This category al lows transportation enhancement f unds to be used to construct and/or
establish transportation museums for use of the general publ ic.
These museums may include, but are not l i mited to those highlighting waterway
facil ities including:
32
Historic ships and vessels,
Railroad depots,
Locomotives,
Air travel and
Other r ela ted transportation fa ci l ities .
33
Appendi x 3 Eligible Proj ect Types by Funding Program 1
Note: A ppl icants are not expected to identify potential fund ing sources for projects. Th is
information is included only to i ll ustrate the various types of projects that are e ligibl e for
specific federal funding programs. This information is appl icable to TEA-21 legislation as of
July, 2 0 04.
Congestion Mit i gati o n/Air Quality (CMAQ)
CMAQ projects can generally be classified in one of the following categories:
Transit improvements;
Outreach Activities;
Sh a r ed-ride services;
T raffi c f low improveme nts;
Demand management strategies;
Pedestrian and bi cycle programs;
I nspection and maintenance p r ograms.
Interstate Ma i ntenance (IM)
The following types of projects on the existing interstate syst em are eligible:
Reconstruction of existing t h rough-lanes on interstate highways;
Acce l eration/deceleration la nes on interstate highways;
Interstate interchange reconstruction or reconfig ura ti o n ;
Bus/HOV lanes or rail rap id trans it as a substitute f or gener a l purpose h i ghway la n es;
Studies as appropriate to pla n and i mplement the above; a nd
Pe r ipheral Pa r k-and-Ride lots.
Nati onal H i ghway System (NHS)
The fo ll o w ing types of projects a r e e lig ible if t h ey occu r o n th e National Highw ay Syst e m :
Road construction, reco n structio n , r esurfacing, restor ation and r ehabi litation ;
Operational improvements;
Highway safety improvements;
Su rface transportation p l a n ning;
H ig h way r esearch and pla nni ng;
T raffi c management and co n tro l start-up cos t s;
Fringe and corridor parking faci lities;
Carpool and vanpool project s;
Bicycle and pedestrian transportati on facilities;
Management system projects;
Wetl and miti gation associ ated with NH S project constru ct ion ;
HOV lanes or rail rapid tra n sit as a substitute for n ew general purpose lanes on
freeway and major reg i o n a l arterial roadways;
Studies as appropriate to p lan and implement the above; and
Construction of, and operationa l improvements for , a Federal Aid highway not on the
National Highway Syst em, and constru cti on of a tra nsit project el i gible f or
assistance under the Federa l T ransit Act, if such h ighway or transit project is in
the same corridor as, and in proximity to, a f ull y access controlled h ighway
designated on the Na t ional Highway System; if t he construction or improvement
will improve the l evel of service on the fully access controlled h i ghway and
improve regiona l t r avel; and if t he co nst ructi o n or improvement i s more cost-
effective than an im p rove m ent to the fully access controlled highway t h a t h as
ben efits comparable to the benefits which wi ll be ach ieved by the construction of
or improvements to, t h e highway on the NHS.
1Source: AMPO (Association Of Metropolitan Planning Organizations)
34
H ig h way Bridge Replacem e nt/Re habi litation (HBRR)
The following types of projects are eligible for HBRR funds:
Reco n struction; rep lacement, rehabilitation, repair and restoration of deficient
highway bridges located on any public road;
Wi den i ng of bridges or viaducts to relieve congestion on a public bridge;
Construction of HOV lane structures on a public bridge; and
Culverts of minimum size on a public bridge.
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
Types of facilities for which STP funds can be used:
Funds can be used on all faci l ities except r oads f u nctionally classified as local or rural
Minor Collectors, unless:
T h e r oads were on a Federal -Aid highway system on January 1, 1991; or
An exemption has been made as approved by the Secretary of USDOT; or
T h e fun d i n g is for the fo ll owi ng types of projects
Alternative m ode projects (see list below)
Safety proj ects (see l ist below)
Projects eligible for STP funding:
Highway (including I n terstate highways) and bridge projects (including bridges on
publ ic roads of all functional class ifications):
Construction , reco n struction/rehabilitation, resurfaci ng, restoration and operational
improvemen ts of the ex i sting highway and transit systems;
Highway an d t r ansit safety imp r ovements and programs;
Highway and transit research and development programs;
Capital a nd operating costs for traffic mon itori n g, management and control facil i ties,
and programs;
Surface t r ansportation p lan n ing;
Technology transfer programs;
T ra nsportati on e nh an ce m en t activities;
Development and establishment of t h e six managem en t systems identified i n TEA -
21: Pavement, Bridge, Highway Safety, Traffic Congestion, Public
Transportation, and Intermodal Fa cilities ;
Capital costs for t r an sit p r ojects;
Construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate other transportation
modes;
Modification of publ ic sidewa l ks to co mply with the Am ericans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et. Seq.);
Seismic retrofit and painting of and application of ca l cium magnesium acetate,
sodium acetate/formate, or other environmentally acceptable, minimally
corrosive anti-icing and de-icing compositions on bridges and approaches
thereto and other elevated structu res;
Mitigation of damage to wi ldlife, habitat, and ecosystems ca used by a transportation
project funded under Ti tle 23;
Vehicles a nd facilities, whether publicly or privately owned, that are used to provide
intercity passenger service by bus;
Alternative mode projects:
Car poo l projects;
Fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs;
Bicycle and pedestri an transportati on faci l iti es;
Modification of public sidewalks to co mply with Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990;
Safety Projects:
Hazard eliminations;
Projects to mitigate hazards caused by wildlife;
Railway -hig h way grade cross i ngs;
Transportation Control measures
Natural habitat and wetlands mitigati on efforts (related to STP-funded projects):
35
Parti cip atio n in natu ra l habitat and wetland s mitigati on b a n ks;
Con tributions to statewide and regional efforts t o conserve, restore, enhance and
create wetlands;
Deve lopment of stat ewide and r egional wetlands conservation and mitigation p lans,
including banks, effo rts, and plans;
Infrastructure-based intelligent transportation systems cap ital impr ovements; and
En v iron mental restoration and poll ution abatement projects.
STP funding is allocated into f our areas: Urban, Small Urban, Rura l, and Flex
STP-Urban dollars can be use d t o fund the transportation project types mentioned
above w ithin th e des ign ated Urban ized Area. The Urban ized Area is an area with
50,000 or more persons l iving withi n a ce ntral city or cities and the surrounding
densely settled area .
STP -Sma ll Urban dollars can be used to fund the p roject types mentioned above
within a densely settled area with more than 5,000 but less than 50,000 persons.
STP-Rural dollars can fund the project types mentio n ed above i n areas outsi de th e
defined Ur ba nized Area (see definition above).
STP-F iex dollars can be use d to fu nd the project types mentioned above in any area-
urban, small urban, or rura l.
Section 5307 (Federa l Transit Administration Formu l a Funding to Transit Operators)
The f o llowing types of projects are elig ibl e for these fund s :
Mass transit operation (up t o FTA approv ed limits w ith required 50 percent local
match)
Reg ular mass transit cap ita l im p r ovement projects;
T ransit vehicle maintena n ce and operations; and
Stu dies as n ecessary to p l an and implement th e a bove.
Section 5309 (Federal Transit Administration Discretionary Funds)
T h e following types of projects are el ig ibl e for these funds:
Sp ecial mass transit capital projects;
Reg iona l rapid transit syste m constru ction ;
Incre m enta l costs of al te rn ative fu e l ve h icles over and above the cost of di ese l
veh icles;
Studies as n ecessary to plan and impl ement th e above.
Section 5310 (Federal Transit Administration Capital Assistance to Elderly Persons and
Persons with Disabilities
The following t ypes of projects are elig ible for these funds:
Capital assistance pr ojects, not t o exceed 80 percent of cost, to provide service for
el derl y pe r so ns and persons w it h d isabilities.
Se ction 5311 (for general transit assistance to rural and small u rban areas only)
The fo ll ow ing types of p r ojects are e l igible for these f unds:
Both operating and cap ital assistance is available up t o 80 percent of the total cost
for rural and small urban area projects.
36