HomeMy Public PortalAboutOfficial Statement Series 2019B&C $328.4 MMNEW ISSUE Ratings
Book-Entry Only S&P: AAA
Fitch: AA+
See “RATINGS” herein
In the opinion of Gilmore & Bell, P.C. and White Coleman & Associates, LLC, Co-Bond Counsel to the District (as defined herein),
under existing law and assuming continued compliance with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”), the interest on the Series 2019B Bonds (as defined herein) (1) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax
purposes, and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax, and (2) is exempt from income
taxation by the State of Missouri. The Series 2019B Bonds have not been designated as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” within the
meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. The interest on the Series 2019C Bonds (as defined herein) is included in gross income
for federal income tax purposes and is not exempt from State of Missouri income taxation. See the section herein captioned “TAX
MATTERS” and the forms of opinion of Co-Bond Counsel attached hereto as Appendix E.
$52,130,000
The MeTropoliTan ST. louiS
SEWER DISTRIcT
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds
Series 2019B
$276,260,000
The MeTropoliTan ST. louiS
SEWER DISTRIcT
Taxable Wastewater System Refunding
Revenue Bonds
Series 2019c
Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover pages
The Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B (the “Series 2019B Bonds”) will be issued by The Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District (the “District”) to provide funds to (a) pay a portion of the costs of the Series 2019B Project (as defined herein), and (b) pay
the Costs of Issuance (as defined herein) of the Series 2019B Bonds. The Taxable Wastewater System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series
2019C (the “Series 2019c Bonds”, together with the Series 2019B Bonds, collectively, the “Series 2019B&c Bonds”) will be issued by
the District to provide funds to (a) refund the Refunded Bonds (as defined herein), and (b) pay the Costs of Issuance of the Series 2019C
Bonds. The Series 2019B&C Bonds will be secured by a pledge of certain revenues of the District as further described herein under the
section captioned “SEcURITY AND SOURcES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2019B&c BONDS.”
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are issuable only as fully-registered bonds and when issued will be registered in the name of Cede & Co.,
as registered owner and nominee for The Depository Trust Company (“DTc”), New York, NY. See the section herein captioned “THE
SERIES 2019B&c BONDS – Book-Entry Only System.” Principal of the Series 2019B&C Bonds is payable to the registered owners
of the Series 2019B&C Bonds as set forth on the inside cover pages of this Official Statement. Interest on the Series 2019B&C Bonds is
payable semiannually on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on May 1, 2020. UMB Bank, N.A. is serving as Bond Registrar and
Paying Agent (each as defined herein).
The Series 2019B&c Bonds and the interest thereon are limited obligations of the District payable solely from the
pledged revenues, as defined herein, on a parity with the District’s outstanding prior Senior Bonds (as defined herein).
The Series 2019B&c Bonds and the interest thereon shall not constitute a general or moral obligation of the District nor a
debt, indebtedness or obligation of, or a pledge of the faith and credit of, the District or the State of Missouri (the “State”
or “Missouri”) or any political subdivision thereof, within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter provision
whatsoever. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the District, the State or any political subdivision thereof
is pledged to the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Series 2019B&c Bonds or other costs
incident thereto. The District has no authority to levy any taxes to pay the Series 2019B&c Bonds. Neither the members of
the Board of Trustees of the District nor any person executing the Series 2019B&c Bonds shall be personally liable on the
Series 2019B&c Bonds by reason of the issuance thereof.
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are subject to optional and mandatory redemption as described herein. See the section herein captioned
“THE SERIES 2019B&c BONDS – Redemption Provisions.”
Maturities, Principal Amounts, Interest Rates, Yields, Prices and cUSIP Numbers are shown on the inside cover pages
This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only and is not a summary of the issue. Investors
must read this entire official Statement, including the appendices hereto, to obtain information essential to the making of
an informed investment decision. See “riSK FaCTorS” herein for a discussion of certain risks and other considerations
associated with an investment in the Series 2019B&c Bonds.
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the District and accepted by the group of Underwriters shown
below, subject to prior placement, withdrawal or modification of the offer without notice and subject to the approval of their validity
by Gilmore & Bell, P.C., St. Louis, Missouri, and White Coleman & Associates, LLC, St. Louis, Missouri, Co-Bond Counsel, and subject
to certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the District by its General Counsel and by its Disclosure
Counsel, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, Missouri. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by their co-counsel,
Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, Missouri, and Richard G. Hughes & Associates, LLC, St. Louis, Missouri. It is expected that the Series
2019B&C Bonds will be available for delivery through the facilities of DTC in New York, NY on or about December 4, 2019.
citigroup Barclays
Fidelity capital Markets Loop capital Markets
Morgan Stanley Raymond James
Stern Brothers
The date of this Official Statement is November 19, 2019.
$52,130,000
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds
Series 2019B
MATURITY SCHEDULE
Series 2019B Serial Bonds
Maturity
(May 1)
Principal
Amount
Interest
Rate
Yield
Price
CUSIP1
2021 $ 835,000 5.000% 1.130% 105.390% 592481 KH7
2022 880,000 5.000 1.150 109.117 592481 KJ3
2023 920,000 5.000 1.180 112.723 592481 KK0
2024 970,000 5.000 1.240 116.080 592481 KL8
2025 1,015,000 5.000 1.280 119.377 592481 KM6
2026 1,070,000 5.000 1.370 122.196 592481 KN4
2027 1,120,000 5.000 1.450 124.849 592481 KP9
2028 1,175,000 5.000 1.540 127.188 592481 KQ7
2029 1,235,000 5.000 1.660 128.980 592481 KR5
2030 1,300,000 5.000 1.750c 128.078 592481 KS3
2031 1,365,000 5.000 1.830c 127.282 592481 KT1
2032 1,430,000 5.000 1.880c 126.787 592481 KU8
2033 1,500,000 5.000 1.930c 126.295 592481 KV6
2034 1,575,000 5.000 1.970c 125.903 592481 KW4
2035 1,655,000 5.000 2.010c 125.512 592481 KX2
2036 1,740,000 5.000 2.050c 125.123 592481 KY0
2037 1,825,000 5.000 2.090c 124.735 592481 KZ7
2038 1,915,000 5.000 2.120c 124.445 592481 LA1
2039 2,015,000 5.000 2.150c 124.156 592481 LB9
Series 2019B Term Bonds
$11,680,000 Term Bond due May 1, 2044; Interest Rate: 5.000%; Yield: 2.250%c; Price: 123.198%; CUSIP No. 592481 LC71
$14,910,000 Term Bond due May 1, 2049; Interest Rate: 5.000%; Yield: 2.310%c; Price: 122.628%; CUSIP No. 592481 LD51
_______________________________
c Yield to the first optional par call date of May 1, 2029.
1CUSIP is a registered trademark of The American Bankers Association. CUSIP data is provided by CUSIP Global Services, managed by S&P
Global Market Intelligence on behalf of the American Bankers Association, and are included solely for the convenience of the registered owners.
Neither the District nor the Underwriters nor the Co-Municipal Advisors shall be responsible for the selection of CUSIP numbers nor do the
District nor the Underwriters nor the Co-Municipal Advisors make any representation as to the correctness of such numbers on the Series
2019B&C Bonds or as indicated herein.
$276,260,000
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Taxable Wastewater System Refunding Revenue Bonds
Series 2019C
MATURITY SCHEDULE
Series 2019C Serial Bonds
Maturity
(May 1)
Principal
Amount
Interest
Rate
Yield
Price
CUSIP1
2021 $ 1,515,000 1.824% 1.824% 100.000% 592481 LE3
2022 1,545,000 1.917 1.917 100.000 592481 LF0
2023 1,570,000 2.000 2.000 100.000 592481 LG8
2024 1,605,000 2.050 2.050 100.000 592481 LH6
2025 1,635,000 2.191 2.191 100.000 592481 LJ2
2026 1,675,000 2.291 2.291 100.000 592481 LK9
2027 1,710,000 2.414 2.414 100.000 592481 LL7
2028 12,185,000 2.514 2.514 100.000 592481 LM5
2029 12,485,000 2.564 2.564 100.000 592481 LN3
2030 12,810,000 2.614 2.614 100.000 592481 LP8
2031 17,610,000 2.714 2.714 100.000 592481 LQ6
2032 19,055,000 2.814 2.814 100.000 592481 LR4
2033 13,630,000 2.864 2.864 100.000 592481 LS2
2034 14,020,000 2.914 2.914 100.000 592481 LT0
Series 2019C Term Bonds
$20,355,000 Term Bond due May 1, 2038; Interest Rate: 3.159%; Yield: 3.159%; Price: 100.000%; CUSIP No. 592481 LU71
$142,855,000 Term Bond due May 1, 2045; Interest Rate: 3.259%; Yield: 3.259%; Price: 100.000%; CUSIP No. 592481 LV51
_______________________________
1CUSIP is a registered trademark of The American Bankers Association. CUSIP data is provided by CUSIP Global Services, managed by S&P
Global Market Intelligence on behalf of the American Bankers Association, and are included solely for the convenience of the registered owners.
Neither the District nor the Underwriters nor the Co-Municipal Advisors shall be responsible for the selection of CUSIP numbers nor do the
District nor the Underwriters nor the Co-Municipal Advisors make any representation as to the correctness of such numbers on the Series
2019B&C Bonds or as indicated herein.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Michael Yates, Chair
Annette Mandel, Vice Chair
James Faul, Member
James I. Singer, Member
Freddie Dunlap, Member
Amy Fehr, Member
ADMINISTRATION
Brian L. Hoelscher, P.E., Executive Director
Tim R. Snoke, Secretary-Treasurer
John Strahlman, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Susan M. Myers, General Counsel
Marion M. Gee, Director of Finance
Richard Unverferth, P.E., Director of Engineering
Tracey Coleman, Director of Human Resources
Bret A. Berthold, P.E., Director of Operations
Jonathon C. Sprague, P.E., Director of Information Systems
ADVISORS AND CONSULTANTS
Co-Bond Counsel
Gilmore & Bell, P.C. White Coleman & Associates, LLC
St. Louis, Missouri St. Louis, Missouri
Co-Municipal Advisors
PFM Financial Advisors LLC Independent Public Advisors, LLC
Cleveland, Ohio Kansas City, Missouri
Disclosure Counsel
Armstrong Teasdale LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
Co-Underwriters’ Counsel
Thompson Coburn LLP Richard G. Hughes & Associates, LLC
St. Louis, Missouri St. Louis, Missouri
Financial Feasibility Consultant
Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.
Kansas City, Missouri
____________________________
REGARDING USE OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
____________________________
THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS HAVE NEITHER BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933, AS AMENDED, NOR HAS ANY DOCUMENT BEEN QUALIFIED UNDER THE TRUST
INDENTURE ACT OF 1939, AS AMENDED, IN RELIANCE UPON EXEMPTIONS CONTAINED IN
SUCH ACTS. IN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION, INVESTORS MUST RELY ON THEIR
OWN EXAMINATIONS OF THE DISTRICT AND THE TERMS OF THE OFFERING. THE SERIES
2019B&C BONDS HAVE NOT BEEN RECOMMENDED BY ANY FEDERAL OR STATE
SECURITIES COMMISSION OR REGULATORY AUTHORITY. FURTHERMORE, THE
FOREGOING AUTHORITIES HAVE NOT CONFIRMED THE ACCURACY OR DETERMINED
THE ADEQUACY OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE
CONTRARY MAY BE A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING OF THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS, THE
UNDERWRITERS MAY OVER ALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE OR
MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS AT A LEVEL ABOVE
THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF
COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME.
The Underwriters have provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement:
The Underwriters have reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with and as part
of their respective responsibilities to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and
circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriters do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of
such information.
No dealer, broker, salesman or other person has been authorized by the District, the Underwriters
or the Co-Municipal Advisors to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the
Series 2019B&C Bonds other than those contained in this Official Statement, and, if given or made, such
other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by any of the
foregoing. This Official Statement neither constitutes an offer to sell nor the solicitation of an offer to buy
nor shall there be any sale of the Series 2019B&C Bonds by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is
unlawful for such person to make such offer, solicitation or sale. The information set forth herein has
been furnished by the District and other sources which are believed to be reliable, but such information is
not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness and is not to be construed as a representation by the Co-
Municipal Advisors or the Underwriters. Statements contained in this Official Statement which involve
estimates, forecasts or matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so described herein, are intended
solely as such and are not to be construed as a representation of fact. The information and expressions of
opinion herein are subject to change without notice and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor
any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that the information
herein is correct as of any time subsequent to its date.
References to website addresses presented herein are for informational purposes only and may be
in the form of a hyperlink solely for the reader’s convenience. Unless specified otherwise, such websites
and the information or links contained therein are not incorporated into, and are not part of, this Official
Statement.
____________________________
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
____________________________
Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Official Statement constitute
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Such statements are generally
identifiable by the terminology used such as “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,”
“budget” or other similar words.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, certain statements under the section in
this Official Statement captioned “RISK FACTORS” and certain statements contained in the Report on
the Financial Feasibility of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Revenue
Bonds, Series 2019B in Appendix D hereto.
THE ACHIEVEMENT OF CERTAIN RESULTS OR OTHER EXPECTATIONS CONTAINED
IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS,
UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS,
PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS DESCRIBED TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM
ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY
SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. NEITHER THE DISTRICT NOR ANY OTHER
PARTY PLANS TO ISSUE ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO THOSE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN THEIR EXPECTATIONS, OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR
CIRCUMSTANCES UPON WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR EXCEPT AS
DESCRIBED IN THE SECTION HEREIN CAPTIONED “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE.”
____________________________
INFORMATION CONCERNING OFFERING RESTRICTIONS IN CERTAIN
JURISDICTIONS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
____________________________
THE INFORMATION UNDER THIS CAPTION HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY THE
UNDERWRITERS, AND THE DISTRICT (REFERRED TO IN THESE LEGENDS AS THE
“ISSUER”) MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE
INFORMATION UNDER THIS CAPTION. REFERENCES UNDER THIS CAPTION TO “BONDS”
OR “SECURITIES” MEAN THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS OFFERED HEREBY, AND
REFERENCES TO THE “UNDERWRITERS” MEAN THE UNDERWRITERS AND THE INITIAL
PURCHASERS.
NOTICE TO INVESTORS IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA (“EEA”)
THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF
EUROPEAN COMMISSION REGULATION 809/2004 OR EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTIVE
2003/71/EC (AS AMENDED, INCLUDING BY EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTIVE
2010/73/EU, AS APPLICABLE) (THE “PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE”). IT HAS BEEN PREPARED
ON THE BASIS THAT ALL OFFERS OF THE BONDS WILL BE MADE PURSUANT TO AN
EXEMPTION UNDER ARTICLE 3 OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE, AS IMPLEMENTED IN
MEMBER STATES OF THE EEA, FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO PRODUCE A PROSPECTUS
FOR SUCH OFFERS. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS ONLY ADDRESSED TO AND DIRECTED
AT PERSONS IN MEMBER STATES OF THE EEA WHO ARE “QUALIFIED INVESTORS”
WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2(1)(E) OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE AND ANY
RELEVANT IMPLEMENTING MEASURE IN EACH MEMBER STATE OF THE EEA
(“QUALIFIED INVESTORS”). THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT MUST NOT BE ACTED ON OR
RELIED ON IN ANY SUCH MEMBER STATE OF THE EEA BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT
QUALIFIED INVESTORS. ANY INVESTMENT OR INVESTMENT ACTIVITY TO WHICH THIS
OFFICIAL STATEMENT RELATES IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO QUALIFIED INVESTORS IN ANY
MEMBER STATE OF THE EEA AND WILL NOT BE ENGAGED IN WITH ANY OTHER
PERSONS.
NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSES OF
SECTION 21 OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (“FSMA”) AND DOES
NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO THE PUBLIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 85 OF THE FSMA. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS FOR DISTRIBUTION ONLY TO,
AND IS DIRECTED SOLELY AT, PERSONS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM THAT ARE QUALIFIED
INVESTORS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 2(1)(E) OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE
WHO ARE ALSO (I) INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS, AS SUCH TERM IS DEFINED IN
ARTICLE 19(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (FINANCIAL
PROMOTION) ORDER 2005, AS AMENDED (THE “FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER”) OR (II)
HIGH NET WORTH ENTITIES, AND OTHER PERSONS TO WHOM IT MAY LAWFULLY BE
COMMUNICATED, FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 49(2)(A) TO (D) OF THE FINANCIAL
PROMOTION ORDER (ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER BEING REFERRED TO AS
“RELEVANT PERSONS”). THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT IS DIRECTED ONLY AT RELEVANT
PERSONS AND MUST NOT BE ACTED ON OR RELIED ON BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT
RELEVANT PERSONS, INCLUDING IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH SECTION 21(1) OF THE
FSMA APPLIES TO THE ISSUER. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND ITS CONTENTS ARE
CONFIDENTIAL AND SHOULD NOT BE DISTRIBUTED, PUBLISHED OR REPRODUCED (IN
WHOLE OR IN PART) OR DISCLOSED BY RECIPIENTS TO ANY OTHER PERSONS IN THE
UNITED KINGDOM. IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, ANY INVESTMENT OR INVESTMENT
ACTIVITY TO WHICH THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT RELATES IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO
RELEVANT PERSONS AND WILL BE ENGAGED IN ONLY WITH RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY
PERSON WHO IS NOT A RELEVANT PERSON SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON THIS
OFFICIAL STATEMENT OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS.
NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS IN HONG KONG
THE BONDS (EXCEPT FOR BONDS WHICH ARE A “STRUCTURED PRODUCT” AS
DEFINED IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF
HONG KONG) (“SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE”)) MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR
SOLD IN HONG KONG BY MEANS OF ANY DOCUMENT OTHER THAN (I) IN
CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE
MEANING OF THE COMPANIES (WINDING UP AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS)
ORDINANCE (CAP. 32 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) (“COMPANIES (WINDING UP AND
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE”) OR (II) TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS” AS
DEFINED IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE AND ANY RULES MADE
THEREUNDER, OR (III) IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH DO NOT RESULT IN THE
DOCUMENT BEING A “PROSPECTUS” AS DEFINED IN THE COMPANIES (WINDING UP AND
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE, AND NO ADVERTISEMENT, INVITATION OR
DOCUMENT RELATING TO THE BONDS MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY BE IN THE POSSESSION
OF ANY PERSON FOR THE PURPOSE OF ISSUE (IN EACH CASE WHETHER IN HONG KONG
OR ELSEWHERE), WHICH IS DIRECTED AT, OR THE CONTENTS OF WHICH ARE LIKELY TO
BE ACCESSED OR READ BY, THE PUBLIC OF HONG KONG (EXCEPT IF PERMITTED TO DO
SO UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF HONG KONG) OTHER THAN WITH RESPECT TO
BONDS WHICH ARE OR ARE INTENDED TO BE DISPOSED OF ONLY TO PERSONS OUTSIDE
HONG KONG OR ONLY TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN THE SECURITIES
AND FUTURES ORDINANCE AND ANY RULES MADE THEREUNDER.
NOTICE TO INVESTORS IN SWITZERLAND
THE BONDS MAY NOT BE PUBLICLY OFFERED IN SWITZERLAND AND WILL NOT
BE LISTED ON THE SIX SWISS EXCHANGE (“SIX”) OR ON ANY OTHER STOCK EXCHANGE
OR REGULATED TRADING FACILITY IN SWITZERLAND. THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT HAS
BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE DISCLOSURE STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE
PROSPECTUSES UNDER ART. 652A OR ART. 1156 OF THE SWISS CODE OF OBLIGATIONS OR
THE DISCLOSURE STANDARDS FOR LISTING PROSPECTUSES UNDER ART. 27 FF. OF THE
SIX LISTING RULES OR THE LISTING RULES OF ANY OTHER STOCK EXCHANGE OR
REGULATED TRADING FACILITY IN SWITZERLAND. NEITHER THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT
NOR ANY OTHER OFFERING OR MARKETING MATERIAL RELATING TO THE BONDS OR
THE OFFERING MAY BE PUBLICLY DISTRIBUTED OR OTHERWISE MADE PUBLICLY
AVAILABLE IN SWITZERLAND.
NONE OF THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFFERING OR MARKETING
MATERIAL RELATING TO THE OFFERING, THE ISSUER OR THE BONDS HAVE BEEN OR
WILL BE FILED WITH OR APPROVED BY ANY SWISS REGULATORY AUTHORITY. IN
PARTICULAR, THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT WILL NOT BE FILED WITH, AND THE OFFER OF
THE BONDS WILL NOT BE SUPERVISED BY, THE SWISS FINANCIAL MARKET
SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY (“FINMA”), AND THE OFFER OF BONDS HAS NOT BEEN AND
WILL NOT BE AUTHORIZED UNDER THE SWISS FEDERAL ACT ON COLLECTIVE
INVESTMENT SCHEMES (“CISA”). ACCORDINGLY, INVESTORS DO NOT HAVE THE
BENEFIT OF THE SPECIFIC INVESTOR PROTECTION PROVIDED UNDER THE CISA.
NOTICE TO INVESTORS IN SINGAPORE
THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT HAS NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED AS A
PROSPECTUS WITH THE MONETARY AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE. ACCORDINGLY, THIS
OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENT OR MATERIAL USED IN
CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER OR SALE, OR INVITATION FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR
PURCHASE, OF THE BONDS MAY NOT BE CIRCULATED OR DISTRIBUTED, NOR MAY THE
BONDS BE OFFERED OR SOLD, OR BE MADE THE SUBJECT OF AN INVITATION FOR
SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE, WHETHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO PERSONS IN
SINGAPORE OTHER THAN (I) TO AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN SECTION
4A OF THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CHAPTER 289 OF SINGAPORE) (THE “SFA”)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 274 OF THE SFA, (II) TO A RELEVANT PERSON PURSUANT TO
SECTION 275(1), OR ANY PERSON PURSUANT TO SECTION 275(1A), AND IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 275, OF THE SFA; OR (III) OTHERWISE
PURSUANT TO, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF, ANY OTHER
APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE SFA. WHERE THE BONDS ARE SUBSCRIBED OR
PURCHASED UNDER SECTION 275 OF THE SFA BY A RELEVANT PERSON THAT IS: (A) A
CORPORATION (WHICH IS NOT AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 4A
OF THE SFA)) THE SOLE BUSINESS OF WHICH IS TO HOLD INVESTMENTS AND THE
ENTIRE SHARE CAPITAL OF WHICH IS OWNED BY ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS, EACH OF
WHOM IS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR; OR (B) A TRUST (WHERE THE TRUSTEE IS NOT AN
ACCREDITED INVESTOR) WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO HOLD INVESTMENTS AND EACH
BENEFICIARY OF THE TRUST IS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR,
SECURITIES (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 239(1) OF THE SFA) OF THAT CORPORATION OR THE
BENEFICIARIES’ RIGHTS AND INTEREST (HOWSOEVER DESCRIBED) IN THAT TRUST
SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERRED WITHIN 6 MONTHS AFTER THAT CORPORATION OR THAT
TRUST HAS ACQUIRED THE BONDS PURSUANT TO AN OFFER MADE UNDER SECTION 275
OF THE SFA EXCEPT: (I) TO AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR OR TO A RELEVANT PERSON
AS DEFINED IN SECTION 275(2) OF THE SFA, OR TO ANY PERSON ARISING FROM AN
OFFER REFERRED TO IN SECTION 275(1A) OR SECTION 276(4)(I)(B) OF THE SFA; (II) WHERE
NO CONSIDERATION IS OR WILL BE GIVEN FOR THE TRANSFER; (III) WHERE THE
TRANSFER IS BY OPERATION OF LAW; (IV) AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 276(7) OF THE SFA;
OR (V) AS SPECIFIED IN REGULATION 32 OF THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES (OFFERS OF
INVESTMENTS) (SHARES AND DEBENTURES) REGULATIONS 2005 OF SINGAPORE.
NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS IN TAIWAN
THE OFFER OF THE BONDS HAS NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED OR
FILED WITH, OR APPROVED BY, THE FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY COMMISSION OF TAIWAN
AND/OR OTHER REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF TAIWAN PURSUANT TO RELEVANT
SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AND THE BONDS MAY NOT BE OFFERED, ISSUED
OR SOLD IN TAIWAN THROUGH A PUBLIC OFFERING OR IN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH
CONSTITUTE AN OFFER WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT
OF TAIWAN THAT REQUIRES THE REGISTRATION OR FILING WITH OR APPROVAL OF THE
FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY COMMISSION OF TAIWAN. THE BONDS MAY BE MADE
AVAILABLE OUTSIDE TAIWAN FOR PURCHASE BY INVESTORS RESIDING IN TAIWAN
(EITHER DIRECTLY OR THROUGH PROPERLY LICENSED TAIWAN INTERMEDIARIES), BUT
MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD IN TAIWAN EXCEPT TO QUALIFIED INVESTORS VIA A
TAIWAN LICENSED INTERMEDIARY. ANY SUBSCRIPTIONS OF BONDS SHALL ONLY
BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON ACCEPTANCE BY THE ISSUER OR THE RELEVANT DEALER
OUTSIDE TAIWAN AND SHALL BE DEEMED A CONTRACT ENTERED INTO IN THE
JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OF THE ISSUER OR RELEVANT DEALER, AS THE CASE
MAY BE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE SUBSCRIPTION DOCUMENTS RELATING
TO THE BONDS SIGNED BY THE INVESTORS.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1
Purpose of the Official Statement .................................... 1
The District ...................................................................... 1
Purpose of and Authority for the Series
2019B&C Bonds ..................................................... 2
Security and Sources of Payment for the Series
2019B&C Bonds ..................................................... 2
Other Indebtedness .......................................................... 5
Continuing Disclosure Information .................................. 5
Additional Information .................................................... 5
THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS ............................................ 6
General ............................................................................ 6
Redemption Provisions .................................................... 7
Effect of Notice of Redemption ..................................... 10
Book-Entry Only System ............................................... 11
Registration, Transfer and Exchange of Series
2019B&C Bonds ................................................... 13
Persons Deemed Owners of Series 2019B&C
Bonds .................................................................... 13
SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE
SERIES 2019B&C BONDS .......................................... 14
General .......................................................................... 14
Pledged Revenues .......................................................... 14
Pro Forma Statement of Pledged Revenues and
Debt Service Coverage .......................................... 16
Flow of Funds ................................................................ 18
Rate Covenant ................................................................ 21
Senior and Subordinate Bonds ....................................... 22
Other Indebtedness ........................................................ 22
PLAN OF FINANCE ............................................................. 22
Purpose of and Authority for the Series
2019B&C Bonds ................................................... 22
Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds............................ 23
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE .............................................. 25
THE DISTRICT ..................................................................... 26
General ................................................................................... 26
Organization and Management ...................................... 27
Board of Trustees ........................................................... 28
Administration ............................................................... 28
The System .................................................................... 30
Employees and Employee Relations .............................. 30
Economic Conditions in the District .............................. 31
Security .......................................................................... 31
Insurance ........................................................................ 31
THE CIRP .............................................................................. 32
General .......................................................................... 32
Historical Capital Improvement Expenditures ............... 32
Financing Plans for the CIRP ........................................ 33
Total Capital Expenditures under CIRP ......................... 34
Capital Finance Plans Contemplated Under
Consent Decree ..................................................... 34
FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OF THE DISTRICT ............... 36
General .......................................................................... 36
Budget and Appropriation Process................................. 36
Finance Department ....................................................... 36
Fund Structure ............................................................... 37
Basis of Accounting ....................................................... 37
Financial Statements ...................................................... 38
Cash and Investments .................................................... 38
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OVERVIEW .................................................................. 38
2019 Financial Audit ..................................................... 38
2018 Financial Audit ..................................................... 39
Sewer Rates and Revenues ............................................. 40
Other Sources of Revenue .............................................. 41
Rate Commission and Rate Setting Process ................... 41
Billing and Collections ................................................... 43
Rate Increases ................................................................ 44
Historical and Projected Sewer Rates and
Charges .................................................................. 45
Customer Accounts ........................................................ 48
Largest User Charge Customers ..................................... 48
User Charge Revenues ................................................... 48
Outstanding Indebtedness .............................................. 49
Employee Benefits ......................................................... 51
Other Post-Employment Benefits ................................... 52
Tax Limitation Amendment – Hancock
Amendment ........................................................... 52
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ..................................... 52
General ........................................................................... 52
Regulatory Matters – Consent Decree ............................ 53
RISK FACTORS .................................................................... 53
Factors Affecting the District ......................................... 54
Summary Financial Information .................................... 55
Certain Bankruptcy Risks............................................... 55
Secondary Markets and Prices ....................................... 55
Risk of Taxability of Series 2019B Bonds ..................... 55
Risk of Audit of Series 2019B Bonds ............................ 56
Limited Obligations ....................................................... 56
Loss of Premium Upon Early Redemption ..................... 56
LITIGATION ......................................................................... 56
TAX MATTERS .................................................................... 56
Tax Status of the Series 2019B Bonds –
Opinion of Co-Bond Counsel ................................ 57
Series 2019B Bonds – Other Tax
Consequences ........................................................ 57
Tax Status of the Series 2019C Bonds ........................... 58
Series 2019C Bonds – Other Tax
Consequences to U.S. Beneficial Owners .............. 59
Series 2019C Bonds – Other Tax
Consequences to Non-U.S. Beneficial
Owners ................................................................... 61
LEGAL MATTERS ............................................................... 64
RATINGS .............................................................................. 64
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE .............................................. 65
UNDERWRITING ................................................................. 66
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS ............................................... 67
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY CONSULTANT ...................... 67
VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL
CALCULATIONS ......................................................... 67
CO-MUNICIPAL ADVISORS .............................................. 67
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ............................................... 67
MISCELLANEOUS ............................................................... 68
APPENDIX A Independent Auditors’ Report, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Basic Financial Statements
of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District for the
Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
APPENDIX B Information Regarding the District’s Service
Area
APPENDIX C Definitions and Summaries of Certain
Provisions of the Bond Ordinance and the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement
APPENDIX D Report on the Financial Feasibility of The
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B
APPENDIX E Forms of Opinions of Co-Bond Counsel
1
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
$52,130,000
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds
Series 2019B
$276,260,000
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Taxable Wastewater System Refunding Revenue
Bonds
Series 2019C
INTRODUCTION
The following introductory information is not a summary of this Official Statement. It is only a
brief description of, and is qualified by and subject in all respects to more complete and detailed
information contained elsewhere in, this Official Statement, including the cover page and appendices
hereto and the documents described herein. The order and placement of materials in this Official
Statement, including the appendices hereto, are not to be deemed a determination of relevance,
materiality or relative importance. This Official Statement, including the cover page and appendices,
should be considered in its entirety. The offering of the Series 2019B&C Bonds to potential investors is
made only by means of the entire Official Statement. All capitalized terms used in this Official Statement
and not otherwise defined herein, including in Appendix C – “DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARIES OF
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE BOND ORDINANCE AND THE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
AGREEMENT”, have the meanings set forth in the Bond Ordinance, as defined below.
Purpose of the Official Statement
The purpose of this Official Statement is to set forth certain information concerning The
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (the “District”), a body corporate, municipal corporation and
political subdivision organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri (the “State” or
“Missouri”), and the District’s Charter (Plan), approved by the voters of The City of St. Louis, Missouri
(the “City”) and St. Louis County, Missouri (the “County”) at a special election on February 9, 1954, as
amended, and approved by the voters of the City and the County at special elections on November 7,
2000 and June 5, 2012 (collectively and as amended, the “Charter”), the $52,130,000 principal amount
of Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B (the “Series 2019B Bonds”) and the $276,260,000
principal amount of Taxable Wastewater System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019C (the “Series
2019C Bonds”, together with the Series 2019B Bonds, collectively, the “Series 2019B&C Bonds”) to be
issued by the District. See the sections herein captioned “THE DISTRICT” and “THE SERIES
2019B&C BONDS.”
The District
The District was created in 1954 to provide a metropolitan-wide system of wastewater treatment
and sanitary sewerage facilities for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage to serve the City and
most of the more heavily populated areas of the County. When the District began operations, it took over
the publicly owned wastewater and stormwater drainage facilities within its jurisdiction and began the
construction of an extensive system of collector and interceptor sewers and treatment facilities. The
District’s service area now encompasses approximately 520 square miles, including approximately all 66
square miles of the City and approximately 454 square miles (approximately 87%) of the County. The
current population served by the District is approximately 1.3 million. A map of the District’s service area
is included on the back cover hereof. See the sections herein captioned “THE DISTRICT”, “THE
CIRP”, “FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OF THE DISTRICT”, “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW” and “REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS”.
2
Purpose of and Authority for the Series 2019B&C Bonds
At a special election held on April 5, 2016, District voters approved the issuance by the District
of $900,000,000 in sewer system revenue bonds (the “Current Authorization”). The Current
Authorization enables the District to comply with federal and State clean water requirements. The District
may use the proceeds of such sewer system revenue bonds for the purpose of designing, constructing,
improving, renovating, repairing, replacing and equipping new and existing District sewer and drainage
facilities and systems.
The District previously issued bonds in a par amount of $249,441,204 from the Current
Authorization, consisting of $152,500,000 of the Series 2017A Bonds representing a portion of the
project portion of the Series 2017A Bonds, $47,722,204 of the Series 2018A Bond (each as defined
herein), $25,267,000 of the District’s Subordinate Wastewater System Revenue Bonds (State of Missouri –
Direct Loan Program), Series 2018B and $23,952,000 of the District’s Subordinate Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds (State of Missouri – Direct Loan Program), Series 2019A. After the issuance of the
Series 2019B&C Bonds, the remaining amount of the Current Authorization will be $598,428,796. No
other bonds have been issued from the Current Authorization.
The District will issue the Series 2019B&C Bonds pursuant to the Current Authorization and the
Master Bond Ordinance No. 11713 (the “Master Bond Ordinance”) that was adopted by the Board of
Trustees of the District (the “Board”) on April 22, 2004, as supplemented by Ordinance No. 15311 (the
“2019B Ordinance”) and as supplemented by Ordinance No. 15312 (the “2019C Ordinance”, together
with the Master Bond Ordinance and the 2019B Ordinance are collectively referred to herein as, the
“Bond Ordinance”). Pursuant to the Current Authorization and the Master Bond Ordinance, as
supplemented by the 2019B Ordinance, the District will issue the Series 2019B Bonds to provide funds to
(a) pay a portion of the costs of the Series 2019B Project (as defined herein), and (b) pay the Costs of
Issuance (as defined in Appendix C to this Official Statement) of the Series 2019B Bonds. Pursuant to
the Current Authorization and the Master Bond Ordinance, as supplemented by the 2019C Ordinance the
District will issue the Series 2019C Bonds to provide funds to (a) refund a portion of the District’s Series
2012A Bonds, Series 2012B Bonds, Series 2013B Bonds and Series 2015B Bonds (each as defined herein
and collectively the bonds to be refunded are defined herein as the “Refunded Bonds”), and (b) pay the
Costs of Issuance of the Series 2019C Bonds. For more information, see the sections herein captioned
“THE CIRP” and “PLAN OF FINANCE - Purpose of and Authority for the Series 2019B&C
Bonds” (which also includes the outstanding principal amounts of the Refunded Bonds as of November
1, 2019).
A description of the Series 2019B&C Bonds is contained in this Official Statement under the
caption “THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS.” All references to the Series 2019B&C Bonds are qualified
in their entirety by the definitive form thereof and the provisions with respect thereto in the Bond
Ordinance, as applicable.
Security and Sources of Payment for the Series 2019B&C Bonds
General. The Series 2019B&C Bonds are sewer system revenue bonds secured by and payable
from certain revenues of the District received from operation of its sanitary sewer system (as further
defined herein, the “System”) on a parity with the prior outstanding series of bonds (the “Prior Senior
Bonds”) issued by the District as shown in the following table.
3
Name of Issue
Series
Designation
Issue
Date
Original Principal
Amount
Outstanding
Principal
Amount as of
Nov. 1, 2019
Taxable Wastewater
System Revenue Bonds
(Build America Bonds –
Direct Pay), Series 2010B
(“Series 2010B Bonds”) 01/28/2010 $85,000,000 $85,000,000
Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds, Series
2011B
(“Series 2011B Bonds”) 12/22/2011 $52,250,000 $15,945,000
Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds, Series
2012A
(“Series 2012A Bonds”)* 08/23/2012 $225,000,000 $154,040,000
Wastewater System
Refunding Revenue
Bonds, Series 2012B
(“Series 2012B Bonds”)* 11/14/2012 $141,730,000 $128,840,000
Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds, Series
2013B
(“Series 2013B Bonds”)* 12/18/2013 $150,000,000 $113,615,000
Wastewater System
Improvement and
Refunding Revenue
Bonds, Series 2015B
(“Series 2015B Bonds”)* 12/15/2015 $223,855,000 $190,135,000
Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds, Series
2016C
(“Series 2016C Bonds”) 12/20/2016 $150,000,000 $144,535,000
Wastewater System
Improvement and
Refunding Revenue
Bonds, Series 2017A
(“Series 2017A Bonds”) 12/14/2017 $316,175,000 $312,760,000
Wastewater System
Revenue Bond (WIFIA -
Deer Creek Sanitary
Tunnel Pump Station and
Sanitary Relief Project),
Series 2018A
(“Series 2018A Bond”) 12/19/2018 $47,722,204** $261,479.86
______________________
* Denotes Prior Senior Bonds, a portion of each series of which will be refunded by the Series 2019C Bonds.
Outstanding Principal amounts are as of November 1, 2019 and therefore include the principal amounts to be
refunded by the Series 2019C Bonds.
** The Series 2018A Bond was issued in a principal amount of not to exceed $47,722,204 of which $261,479.86 has
been drawn on as of November 1, 2019.
4
Collectively, the Series 2019B&C Bonds, any Outstanding Prior Senior Bonds and any additional
Bonds then Outstanding issued with a right to payment and secured by a lien on a parity therewith are
referred to herein as the “Senior Bonds.” The Senior Bonds are also secured by amounts in the Renewal
and Extension Fund (as defined herein). See the section herein captioned “SECURITY AND SOURCES
OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS.”
The Series 2019B&C Bonds and the interest thereon are limited obligations of the District,
payable solely from the Pledged Revenues, as defined herein, on a parity with the other Senior Bonds.
The Series 2019B&C Bonds and the interest thereon shall not constitute a general or moral obligation of
the District nor a debt, indebtedness, or obligation of, or a pledge of the faith and credit of, the District,
the State or any political subdivision thereof, within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter
provision whatsoever. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the District, the State, or any
political subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of the Principal of, premium, if any, or interest on
the Series 2019B&C Bonds or other costs incident thereto. The District has no authority to levy any taxes
to pay the Series 2019B&C Bonds. Neither the members of the Board nor any person executing the Series
2019B&C Bonds shall be liable personally on the Series 2019B&C Bonds by reason of the issuance
thereof.
Pledged Revenues. The Series 2019B&C Bonds are sewer system revenue bonds secured by a
pledge of certain revenues of the System, referred to herein as “Pledged Revenues.” See the sections
herein captioned “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2019B&C
BONDS – Pledged Revenues” and “ – Flow of Funds” and “FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OF THE
DISTRICT” for further discussion of the specific District revenues constituting Pledged Revenues under
the Bond Ordinance.
Renewal and Extension Fund. The Bond Ordinance establishes a Renewal and Extension Fund
into which the District may deposit a portion of the Pledged Revenues. See “SECURITY AND
SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS – Flow of Funds - Deposits to
and Uses of Moneys in the Renewal and Extension Fund.”
Series 2019B&C Bonds Not Secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account. The Bond
Ordinance also establishes a Debt Service Reserve Account for the Senior Bonds, excluding any Senior
SRF Bonds (as defined in Appendix C to this Official Statement) and Senior Uncovered Bonds. “Senior
Uncovered Bonds” means all series of Senior Bonds, other than Senior SRF Bonds, with respect to
which the District has specified pursuant to a Series Ordinance (as defined in Appendix C to this Official
Statement) that such series of Senior Bonds will not be secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account.
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are Senior Uncovered Bonds and therefore are not secured by the Debt
Service Reserve Account. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES
2019B&C BONDS − Flow of Funds − Deposits to and Uses of Moneys in the Debt Service Reserve
Account.”
Additional Bonds. The Bond Ordinance authorizes the District to issue additional Bonds
thereunder which may be either “Senior Bonds” or “Subordinate Bonds,” subject to certain
requirements of the Bond Ordinance. The Bond Ordinance defines “Senior Bonds” as Bonds that have a
right to payment and are secured by a lien on a parity with the Outstanding Senior Bonds and any
additional Bonds issued on a parity (except with respect to any Credit Facility which may be available
only to one or more series of Senior Bonds and except that Senior SRF Bonds and Senior Uncovered
Bonds are not secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account) with respect to the Pledged Revenues. The
Master Bond Ordinance defines “Subordinate Bonds” as Bonds, including Subordinate SRF Bonds (as
defined in Appendix C to this Official Statement), issued with a right to payment from the Pledged
Revenues and secured by a lien on the Pledged Revenues expressly junior and subordinate to the Senior
5
Bonds. The Series 2019B&C Bonds and any other Senior Bonds or Subordinate Bonds issued by the
District previously or in the future under the Master Bond Ordinance are referred to herein collectively as
the “Bonds.” See “DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARIES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE
BOND ORDINANCE AND THE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT” in Appendix C
hereto for a discussion of the requirements that must be satisfied under the Master Bond Ordinance prior
to the issuance of additional Bonds thereunder.
Other Indebtedness
There are twenty-four series of Outstanding Bonds previously issued by the District (not
including the Series 2019B&C Bonds), which are payable from Pledged Revenues of the System for the
purpose of financing or refinancing the cost of designing, constructing, improving, renovating, repairing,
replacing and equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities. As of November 1, 2019, the
aggregate principal amount of Senior Bonds Outstanding is $1,145,131,480. In addition to the nine series
of outstanding Senior Bonds (not including the Series 2019B&C Bonds), the District has five additional
series of outstanding Subordinate Bonds payable from Pledged Revenues on a subordinate basis to the
Senior Bonds outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $114,320,000 that were purchased by the
State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority of the State of Missouri (the
“Authority”) through the Missouri State Revolving Fund Program (the “SRF Program”) of the
Authority and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”). The District also has ten
additional series of Outstanding Bonds payable from Pledged Revenues on a subordinate basis to the
Senior Bonds, which are outstanding as of November 1, 2019 in the aggregate principal amount of
$252,361,900.56 under the State’s Direct Loan Program, which were issued as Subordinate Bonds under
the Master Bond Ordinance and the applicable Series Ordinances. For additional information on the
fifteen series of Subordinate Bonds (collectively, the “Subordinate SRF Bonds”), see the section herein
captioned “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS –
Other Indebtedness”.
Continuing Disclosure Information
At the time of issuance of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, the District will enter into a Disclosure
Dissemination Agent Agreement dated as of December 1, 2019 (the “Continuing Disclosure
Agreement”) with Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C. (“DAC”), under which the District will
designate DAC as Disclosure Dissemination Agent (as defined in Appendix C to this Official Statement).
Pursuant to the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, the District will covenant to provide certain financial
and operating information with respect to the District on an on-going basis and notice of certain events in
accordance with Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time (“Rule 15c2-
12”). These covenants have been made in order to assist the Underwriters (as defined herein) in
complying with Rule 15c2-12. See the section herein captioned “CONTINUING DISCLOSURE” and
“DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARIES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE BOND ORDINANCE
AND THE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT” in Appendix C hereto.
Additional Information
Appendix A to this Official Statement contains the Independent Auditors’ Report, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Basic Financial Statements of the District for the Fiscal Years ended
June 30, 2019 and 2018. Appendix B to this Official Statement contains certain information regarding
the service area of the District. Appendix C to this Official Statement includes definitions of certain
capitalized terms used in this Official Statement and summaries of certain provisions of the Bond
Ordinance and the Continuing Disclosure Agreement. Appendix D to this Official Statement contains the
6
Report on the Financial Feasibility of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B prepared on behalf of the District with respect to the Series 2019B&C
Bonds (the “Feasibility Report”). Appendix E to this Official Statement contains the proposed forms of
the opinions that are anticipated to be rendered by Co-Bond Counsel at the time of delivery of the Series
2019B&C Bonds.
Brief descriptions of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, the Bond Ordinance and the District are
included in this Official Statement. Such descriptions, information and summaries provided herein do not
purport to be comprehensive or definitive. All references herein to any documents are qualified by the
terms of such documents in their entirety. Until the issuance and delivery of the Series 2019B&C Bonds,
copies of the documents described herein may be obtained from the District. After delivery of the Series
2019B&C Bonds, copies of such documents will be available for inspection at the corporate trust office of
UMB Bank, N.A. in St. Louis, Missouri, as the Paying Agent under the Bond Ordinance (the “Paying
Agent”).
THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS
General
The Master Bond Ordinance authorizes the issuance of Bonds thereunder from time to time in
one or more series substantially in the form set forth in the related Series Ordinance. The 2019B
Ordinance further authorizes the execution, issuance and delivery of a series of Bonds thereunder and
under the Master Bond Ordinance to be designated as “The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B” in the aggregate principal amount of $52,130,000
which series of Bonds shall be executed, issued and delivered under, and secured by, the Master Bond
Ordinance and the 2019B Ordinance. The 2019C Ordinance further authorizes the execution, issuance
and delivery of a series of Bonds thereunder and under the Master Bond Ordinance to be designated as
“The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Taxable Wastewater System Refunding Revenue Bonds,
Series 2019C” in the aggregate principal amount of $276,260,000 which series of Bonds shall be
executed, issued and delivered under, and secured by, the Master Bond Ordinance and the 2019C
Ordinance. Additional Senior Bonds and Subordinate Bonds may also be issued from time to time as
provided in, and subject to the limitations set forth in, the Master Bond Ordinance, the 2019B Ordinance
and the Series 2019C Ordinance, as applicable. See “DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARIES OF
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE BOND ORDINANCE AND THE CONTINUING
DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT” in Appendix C hereto.
The Series 2019B&C Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form in the denomination of
$5,000 each or integral multiples thereof and shall be dated the date of delivery thereof. Each Series
2019B&C Bond shall be numbered in a convenient manner, established by UMB Bank, N.A. in St. Louis,
Missouri (the “Bond Registrar”), and shown on the Bond Register. The Series 2019B&C Bonds shall
bear interest at the rates per annum set forth on the inside cover pages hereof, computed on the basis of a
360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, payable on May 1, 2020, and semiannually thereafter
on May 1 and November 1 of each year and shall mature in the principal amounts as set forth on the
inside cover pages hereof, unless earlier called for redemption.
So long as any of the Series 2019B&C Bonds are in book-entry form, the Principal, redemption
premium, if any, and interest on such Series 2019B&C Bonds are payable by check or draft mailed, or
wire transfer, to Cede & Co. as Registered Owner thereof and will be redistributed by DTC and the
7
participants as described below under “Book-Entry Only System.” So long as Cede & Co. is the
registered owner of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, as nominee of DTC, references herein to the
Bondowners, Owners or Registered Owners shall mean Cede & Co., as aforesaid, and shall not mean the
Beneficial Owners (herein defined) of the Bonds.
Redemption Provisions
Optional Redemption of Series 2019B Bonds. At the District’s option, the Series 2019B Bonds
or portions thereof maturing on May 1, 2030 and thereafter may be called for redemption and payment
prior to their stated maturity on May 1, 2029, and thereafter, in whole or in part on any date in such order
of maturity as shall be determined by the District at the redemption price of 100% of the principal amount
thereof plus accrued interest thereon to the redemption date.
Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption of Series 2019B Bonds. The Series 2019B Bonds
maturing in the years 2044 and 2049 are Term Bonds and are subject to mandatory redemption prior to
maturity on May 1 in each of the years set forth below (each a “mandatory redemption date”), at 100% of
the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date, without premium:
Series 2019B Bonds Maturing May 1, 2044
Year Principal Amount
2040 $2,115,000
2041 2,220,000
2042 2,330,000
2043 2,445,000
2044+ 2,570,000
_____________
+Final maturity
Series 2019B Bonds Maturing May 1, 2049
Year Principal Amount
2045 $2,700,000
2046 2,830,000
2047 2,975,000
2048 3,125,000
2049+ 3,280,000
_____________
+Final maturity
The District shall redeem such an aggregate Principal amount of the Series 2019B Bonds that are
Term Bonds at a redemption price equal to the Principal amount thereof plus the interest due thereon to
the mandatory redemption date.
Optional Redemption of Series 2019C Bonds (Par Call). At the District’s option, the Series
2019C Bonds or portions thereof maturing on May 1, 2030 and thereafter may be called for redemption
and payment prior to their stated maturity on May 1, 2029, and thereafter, in whole or in part on any date
in such order of maturity as shall be determined by the District at the redemption price of 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus accrued interest thereon to the redemption date.
Optional Redemption of Series 2019C Bonds (Make-Whole Call). At the District’s option, the
Series 2019C Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity on any date prior to May 1, 2029, in
8
whole or in part, and if in part from such maturities and interest rates as shall be determined by the
District on any Business Day at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (A) the principal amount of
such Series 2019C Bonds to be redeemed, or (B) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled
payments of principal and interest on such Series 2019C Bonds to be redeemed, not including any portion
of those payments of interest accrued and unpaid as of the date such Series 2019C Bonds are to be
redeemed, discounted to the date of redemption of such Series 2019C Bonds to be redeemed on a
semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate
(defined below) plus 20 basis points plus accrued interest on such Series 2019C Bonds being redeemed to
the date fixed for redemption.
The make whole optional redemption price of any Series 2019C Bonds to be redeemed will be
calculated by an independent accounting firm, investment banking firm or financial advisor (the
“Calculation Agent”) retained by the District at the District’s expense. The Paying Agent and the District
may rely on the Calculation Agent’s determination of the make whole optional redemption price and will
not be liable for such reliance. The District shall confirm and transmit the redemption price as so
calculated on such dates and to such parties as shall be necessary to effectuate such redemption.
“Treasury Rate” means, as of any make-whole redemption date for a Series 2019C Bond, the
yield to maturity as of such redemption date of United States Treasury securities with a constant maturity,
excluding inflation indexed securities (as compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve
Statistical Release H.15 (519) that has become publicly available at least two Business Days prior to the
call notice date or, if such statistical release is no longer published, any publicly available source of
similar market data) most nearly equal to the Make Whole Period (defined below); provided, however,
that if the Make Whole Period is less than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded United
States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year will be used. The Treasury Rate will
be determined by the Calculation Agent.
“Make Whole Period” means the period between the redemption date of the Series 2019C Bonds
to be redeemed pursuant to the make-whole optional redemption and the stated maturity date of the Series
2019C Bonds to be redeemed.
Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption of Series 2019C Bonds. The Series 2019C Bonds
maturing in the years 2038 and 2045 are Term Bonds and are subject to mandatory redemption prior to
maturity on May 1 in each of the years set forth below (each a “mandatory redemption date”), at 100% of
the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the redemption date, without premium:
Series 2019C Bonds Maturing May 1, 2038
Year Principal Amount
2036 $6,575,000
2037 6,780,000
2038+ 7,000,000
_____________
+Final maturity
9
Series 2019C Bonds Maturing May 1, 2045
Year Principal Amount
2040 $40,290,000
2041 41,595,000
2042 42,955,000
2043 6,485,000
2044 5,670,000
2045+ 5,860,000
_____________
+Final maturity
The District shall redeem such an aggregate Principal amount of the Series 2019C Bonds that are
Term Bonds at a redemption price equal to the Principal amount thereof plus the interest due thereon to
the mandatory redemption date.
Selection of Bonds to be Redeemed; Redemption Among Series. If less than all of the Bonds of
like maturity of any series shall be called for redemption, the particular Bonds, or portions of Bonds, to be
redeemed shall be selected by the Paying Agent in such equitable manner as the Paying Agent may
determine. The portion of any Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 to be redeemed shall be in the
Principal amount of $5,000 or an integral multiple thereof, and, in selecting portions of such Bonds for
redemption, the District shall treat each such Bond as representing that number of Bonds which is
obtained by dividing the Principal of such Bond to be redeemed in part by $5,000. Subject to the
redemption provisions of any Series Ordinance, the District in its discretion may redeem the Bonds of any
series, or a portion of the Bonds of any such series, before it redeems the Bonds of any other series.
Within any particular series, any redemption of Bonds shall be effected in the manner provided in the
Master Bond Ordinance and in any Series Ordinance.
Selection of Series 2019C Bonds to be Redeemed. The District will designate which maturities
of the Series 2019C Bonds are to be redeemed. If the Series 2019C Bonds are not registered in book-entry
only form, any redemption of less than all of a maturity of the Series 2019C Bonds shall be effected by
the Paying Agent on a pro-rata basis subject to minimum authorized denominations. If less than all of the
Series 2019C Bonds of like maturity shall be called for redemption, the particular Series 2019C Bonds, or
portions of Series 2019C Bonds, to be redeemed shall be selected by the Paying Agent in such equitable
manner as the Paying Agent may determine. So long as DTC or a successor securities depository is the
sole registered owner of the Series 2019C Bonds, if less than all of the Series 2019C Bonds of a maturity
are called for prior redemption, the particular Series 2019C Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed
shall be selected on a “Pro Rata Pass-Through Distribution of Principal” basis in accordance with DTC
procedures, provided that, so long as the Series 2019C Bonds are held in book-entry form, the selection
for redemption of such Series 2019C Bonds will be made in accordance with the operational
arrangements of DTC then in effect that at issuance provided for adjustment of the principal by a factor
provided pursuant to DTC operational arrangements.
If the Paying Agent does not provide the necessary information and identify the redemption as on
a Pro Rata Pass-Through Distribution of Principal basis, the Series 2019C Bonds shall be selected for
redemption by lot in accordance with DTC procedures. Redemption allocations made by DTC, the Direct
Participants or such other intermediaries that may exist between the District and the beneficial owners are
to be made on a “Pro Rata Pass-Through Distribution of Principal” basis as described above. If the DTC
operational arrangements do not allow for the redemption of the Series 2019C Bonds on a Pro Rata
Pass-Through Distribution of Principal basis as described above, then the Series 2019C Bonds will be
selected for redemption by lot in accordance with DTC procedures.
10
Notice of Redemption. Unless waived by any registered owner of Bonds to be redeemed and
except as may be otherwise provided in a Series Ordinance, official notice of any such redemption shall
be given by the Bond Registrar on behalf of the District by mailing a copy of an official redemption
notice by first class mail, at least 30 days and not more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption
to the registered owner of the Bond or Bonds to be redeemed at the address shown on the Bond Register
or at such other address as is furnished in writing by such registered owner to the Bond Registrar.
All official notices of redemption shall be dated, shall contain the complete official name of the
Bond issue, and shall state: (1) the redemption date; (2) the redemption price; (3) the interest rate and
maturity date of the Bonds being redeemed; (4) if less than all the Outstanding Bonds are to be redeemed,
the Bond numbers, and, when part of the Bonds evidenced by one Bond certificate are being redeemed,
the respective Principal amounts of such Bonds to be redeemed; (5) that on the redemption date the
redemption price will become due and payable upon each such Bond or portion thereof called for
redemption and that interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after such date; and (6) the place
where such Bonds are to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price (which place of payment
shall be the principal payment office of the Paying Agent or at such other office designated by the Paying
Agent for such purpose) and the name, address, and telephone number of a person or persons at the
Paying Agent who may be contacted with respect to the redemption.
Any notice of redemption of any Bonds may specify that the redemption is contingent upon the
deposit of moneys with the Paying Agent in an amount sufficient to pay the redemption price (which
price shall include the redemption premium, if any) of all the Bonds or portions of Bonds which are to be
redeemed on that date. Prior to any redemption date, the District shall deposit with the Paying Agent an
amount of money sufficient to pay the redemption price of all the Bonds or portions of Bonds which are
to be redeemed on that date.
For so long as DTC is effecting book-entry transfers of the Bonds, the Bond Registrar shall
provide the notices specified in the Bond Ordinance to DTC. It is expected that DTC shall, in turn, notify
its participants and that the participants, in turn, will notify or cause to be notified the Beneficial Owners.
Any failure on the part of DTC or a participant, or failure on the part of a nominee of a Beneficial Owner
of a Bond (having been mailed notice from the Bond Registrar, a participant or otherwise) to notify the
Beneficial Owner of the Bond so affected, shall not affect the validity of the redemption of such Bond.
Any defect in any notice of redemption shall not affect the validity of proceedings for redemption
of the Bonds.
Effect of Notice of Redemption
Official notice of redemption having been given in the manner and under the conditions provided
in the Bond Ordinance and moneys for payment of the redemption price being held by the Paying Agent
as provided in the Bond Ordinance, the Bonds or portions of Bonds called for redemption shall, on the
redemption date designated in such notice, become and be due and payable at the redemption price
provided for redemption of such Bonds or portions of Bonds on such date, and from and after such date
interest on the Bonds or portions of Bonds called for redemption shall cease to accrue, such Bonds or
portions of Bonds shall cease to be entitled to any lien, benefit, or security under the Bond Ordinance, and
the owners of such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall have no rights in respect thereof except to receive
payment of the redemption price thereof. Upon surrender for partial redemption of any Bond, there shall
be prepared for and delivered to the registered owner a new Bond or Bonds of the same series, maturity,
and interest rate in the amount of the unpaid Principal.
11
Book-Entry Only System
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are available in book-entry only form. Purchasers of the Series
2019B&C Bonds will not receive certificates representing their interests in the Series 2019B&C Bonds.
Ownership interests in the 2019B&C Bonds will be available to purchasers only through a book-entry
system (the “Book-Entry System”) maintained by DTC, New York, NY. The information provided
immediately below concerning DTC and the Book-Entry Only System, as it currently exists, has been
obtained from DTC and is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness by, and is not to be construed as
a representation by, the District. The District makes no assurances that DTC, Direct Participants, Indirect
Participants or other nominees of the Beneficial Owners will act in accordance with the procedures
described herein or in a timely manner.
General. DTC, New York, NY, will act as securities depository for the Series 2019B&C Bonds.
The Series 2019B&C Bonds will be issued as fully-registered bonds registered in the name of Cede & Co.
(DTC’s partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of
DTC. One fully-registered Series 2019B&C Bond certificate will be issued for each maturity of the
Series 2019B&C Bonds, each in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited
with the Paying Agent as DTC’s “FAST Agent.”
DTC and Participants. DTC, the world’s largest securities depository, is a limited-purpose trust
company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of
the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within
the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to
the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds and provides asset
servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt
issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC’s participants (“Direct
Participants”) deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct
Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic
computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants’ accounts. This eliminates the
need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S.
securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other
organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation
(“DTCC”). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users
of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and
non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear
through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly
(“Indirect Participants”). DTC has an S&P Global Ratings’ rating of AA+. The DTC Rules applicable
to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about
DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com.
Purchases of Ownership Interests. Purchases of Series 2019B&C Bonds under the DTC system
must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Series 2019B&C
Bonds on DTC’s records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Series 2019B&C Bond
(“Beneficial Owner”) is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants’ records. Beneficial
Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are,
however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as
periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial
Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Series 2019B&C Bonds are to
be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of
Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests
12
in the Series 2019B&C Bonds, except in the event that use of the Book-Entry System for the Series
2019B&C Bonds is discontinued.
Transfers. To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Series 2019B&C Bonds deposited by Direct
Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC’s partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such
other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Series 2019B&C
Bonds with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not
effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the
Series 2019B&C Bonds; DTC’s records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose
accounts such Series 2019B&C Bonds are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The
Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of
their customers.
Notices. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by
Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to
Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory
requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of the Series 2019B&C Bonds
may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with
respect to the Series 2019B&C Bonds, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults and proposed amendments
to the Series 2019B&C Bond documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of the Series 2019B&C Bonds
may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Series 2019B&C Bonds for their benefit has agreed to
obtain and transmit notice to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to
provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly
to them.
Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Series 2019B&C Bonds within an
issue are being redeemed, DTC’s practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct
Participant in such issue to be redeemed.
Voting. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with
respect to Series 2019B&C Bonds unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC’s
MMI Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the District as soon as
possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.’s consenting or voting rights to
those Direct Participants to whose accounts Series 2019B&C Bonds are credited on the record date
(identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy).
Payments of Principal, Redemption Price and Interest. Redemption proceeds, distributions, and
dividend payments on the Series 2019B&C Bonds will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as
may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC’s practice is to credit Direct Participants’
accounts, upon DTC’s receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from the District or the
Paying Agent on payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC’s records.
Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary
practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in
“street name,” and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC nor the Paying Agent, nor
the District, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
Payment of redemption proceeds, distributions, and dividend payments to Cede & Co. (or such other
nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the District
or the Paying Agent, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of
DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct
and Indirect Participants.
13
Discontinuation of Book-Entry Only System. DTC may discontinue providing its services as
depository with respect to the Series 2019B&C Bonds at any time by giving reasonable notice to the
Paying Agent or the District. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor depository is not
obtained, Series 2019B&C Bond certificates are required to be printed and delivered.
The Direct Participant holding a majority position in the Series 2019B&C Bonds may decide to
discontinue use of the system of book-entry transfer through DTC (or a successor securities depository).
In that event, Series 2019B&C Bond certificates will be printed and delivered to DTC.
The information above concerning DTC and DTC’s book-entry system has been obtained from
DTC and is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness by and is not to be construed as a
representation by the District. The District does not make any assurance that DTC, Direct Participants,
Indirect Participants or other nominees of the Beneficial Owners will act in accordance with the
procedures described above or in a timely manner.
Registration, Transfer and Exchange of Series 2019B&C Bonds
The Paying Agent has been appointed the Bond Registrar and as such shall maintain the Bond
Register for the registration and transfer of Series 2019B&C Bonds as provided in the Bond Ordinance, as
applicable.
Any Series 2019B&C Bond may be transferred only upon the books kept for the registration and
transfer of Series 2019B&C Bonds upon surrender thereof to the Paying Agent duly endorsed for transfer
or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney
or legal representative in such form as shall be satisfactory to the Paying Agent. Upon any such transfer,
the District shall execute and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver in exchange for such Series
2019B&C Bond a new fully registered Series 2019B&C Bond or Series 2019B&C Bonds, registered in
the name of the transferee, of any denomination or denominations authorized by the Bond Ordinance.
Any Series 2019B&C Bond, upon surrender thereof at the principal corporate trust office of the
Paying Agent together with a written instrument of transfer duly executed by the registered owner or his
attorney or legal representative in such form as shall be satisfactory to the Paying Agent, may at the
option of the registered owner thereof, be exchanged for an equal aggregate principal amount of Series
2019B&C Bonds of the same series and maturity and bearing interest at the same rate.
In all cases in which Series 2019B&C Bonds shall be exchanged or transferred, the District shall
execute and the Paying Agent shall authenticate and deliver, at the earliest practicable time, Series
2019B&C Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Bond Ordinance, as applicable. All Series
2019B&C Bonds surrendered in any such exchange or transfer shall forthwith be cancelled by the Paying
Agent. The District or the Paying Agent may charge the Bondholder requesting the same for every such
exchange or transfer of Series 2019B&C Bonds sufficient to reimburse it for any tax or other
governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or transfer, and such charge shall
be paid before any such new Series 2019B&C Bond shall be delivered.
Persons Deemed Owners of Series 2019B&C Bonds
The person in whose name any Series 2019B&C Bond shall be registered as shown on the Bond
Register required to be maintained by the Paying Agent shall be deemed and regarded as the absolute
owner thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the principal of and redemption premium,
if any, and interest on any such Series 2019B&C Bond shall be made only to or upon the order of the
Registered Owner thereof or his legal representative. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to
14
satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Series 2019B&C Bond, including the interest thereon, to the
extent of the sum or sums so paid.
SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES 2019B&C BONDS
General
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are sewer system revenue bonds secured by and payable from
Pledged Revenues on a parity with the District’s Outstanding Senior Bonds and any other Senior Bonds
issued under the terms of the Master Bond Ordinance. The Senior Bonds are also secured by amounts on
deposit in the Renewal and Extension Fund and, except with respect to Senior Uncovered Bonds, the
Debt Service Reserve Account. The Series 2019B&C Bonds are Senior Uncovered Bonds and therefore
are not secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account.
The Series 2019B&C Bonds and the interest thereon are limited obligations of the District
payable solely from the Pledged Revenues on a parity with the other Senior Bonds. The Series 2019B&C
Bonds and the interest thereon shall not constitute a general or moral obligation of the District nor a debt,
indebtedness or obligation of, or a pledge of the faith and credit of, the District or the State or any
political subdivision thereof, within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter provision
whatsoever. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the District, the State or any political
subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of the Principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the
Series 2019B&C Bonds or other costs incident thereto. The District has no authority to levy any taxes to
pay the Series 2019B&C Bonds. Neither the members of the Board nor any person executing the Series
2019B&C Bonds shall be liable personally on the Series 2019B&C Bonds by reason of the issuance
thereof.
Pledged Revenues
Pursuant to the Master Bond Ordinance, the District has pledged all Pledged Revenues to the
payment of the Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on all Bonds issued thereunder. Such pledge is
for the equal and proportionate benefit and security of the District’s Outstanding Senior Bonds and any
other Senior Bonds issued under the terms of the Master Bond Ordinance regardless of the time or times
of their issuance or maturity. In the Master Bond Ordinance, the District covenants that it will not issue
obligations of any kind or nature payable from, or with a lien on, the Pledged Revenues or any part
thereof having priority over or, except as permitted in the Master Bond Ordinance for the issuance of
Senior Bonds, on a parity with the Series 2019B&C Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Master
Bond Ordinance permits the issuance of Subordinate Bonds secured by the Pledged Revenues on a
subordinate basis to the Senior Bonds.
“Pledged Revenues” means (a) Net Operating Revenues (as defined herein) of the System (as
defined in the directly below paragraph), (b) Investment Earnings (as defined in the Bond Ordinance as
all interest received on and profits derived from investments of moneys in all funds and accounts of the
District other than investments derived from or with respect to (i) stormwater revenues, as described
below, (ii) all funds and accounts established in connection with SRF Bonds and (iii) obligations issued
by the District on behalf of any of its subdistricts), (c) Hedge Receipts and (d) all moneys paid or required
to be paid into, and all moneys and securities on deposit from time to time in, the funds and accounts
specified in the Bond Ordinance, but excluding any amounts required in the Bond Ordinance to be set
aside pending, or used for, rebate to the United States of America government pursuant to Section 148(f)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), including, but not limited to, amounts in
the Rebate Fund created in the Bond Ordinance.
15
The Bond Ordinance defines the “System” as the sanitary sewer system of the District, as it now
exists and as it may be added to, extended, improved and equipped, either from the proceeds of the Bonds
or from any other sources at any time, including without limitation, (a) all sanitary sewers, all combined
sewers, all pumping stations, all wastewater treatment plants, and all equipment used in connection
therewith, all facilities for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage and wastewater, including
industrial wastes, and (b) all other facilities or property of any nature or description, real or personal,
tangible or intangible, owned or used by the District in the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage.
The Bond Ordinance defines “Net Operating Revenues” as all Operating Revenues, after
provision for payment of all Expenses of Operation and Maintenance. The Bond Ordinance defines
“Operating Revenues” as all income and revenue of any nature derived from the operation of the
System, including periodic wastewater billings, service charges, other charges for wastewater service and
the availability thereof (other than any special assessment proceeds), connection or tap fees (whether
accounted for as revenues or as contributed capital), net proceeds from business interruption insurance,
the principal of gifts, bequests, contributions, grants and donations available to pay debt service of Bonds,
and any amounts deposited in escrow in connection with the acquisition, construction, remodeling,
renovation and equipping of facilities to be applied during the period of determination to pay interest on
Bonds.
The Bond Ordinance expressly excludes the following from the definition of Operating
Revenues: (1) any profits or losses on the early extinguishment of debt or on the sale or other disposition,
not in the ordinary course of business, of investments or fixed or capital assets, and local, state or federal
grants or other moneys received for the payment of Expenses of Operation and Maintenance (See
Appendix C for definition of “Expenses of Operation and Maintenance”), (2) local, state, or federal
grants, loans (including Government Loans), capital improvement contract payments, or other moneys
received for capital improvements to the System, (3) Investment Earnings, (4) any stormwater charges
(referred to herein as the “Stormwater Service Charges”) and (5) any property tax revenues. Although
revenues from the Stormwater Service Charge are not included in Operating Revenues and thus are not
available for payment of debt service on any Bonds issued under the Bond Ordinance, including the
Series 2019B&C Bonds, such revenues are accounted for and included in the amount of Operating
Revenues identified in the Independent Auditor’s Report and Financial Statements included as Appendix
A to this Official Statement.
The schedule of Pledged Revenues shown on the following page was prepared to show the
amount of Pledged Revenues available historically to pay debt service on the Bonds.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
16
WASTEWATER SEGMENT
SCHEDULE OF PLEDGED REVENUES
For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2015 Through 20191
(In Thousands)
2015 2016 2017
2018 2019
Operating Revenues
Sewer service charges2 $282,957 $304,685 $330,883 $364,171 $399,932
Recovery (provision) of doubtful
sewer services charge account
(2,230) (4,062) (2,534)
(3,010) (4,361)
Licenses, permits and other fees 6,657 3,620 4,036 3,777 3,063
Other 1,452 14,221 1,085 3,355 2,474
Total Operating Revenues $288,836 $318,464 $333,470 $368,293 $401,109
Nonoperating Revenues3
Investment income $2,556 $3,894 $2,457 $6,356 $14,439
Total Operating and
Nonoperating Revenues
$291,392 $322,358 $335,926
$374,649 $415,548
Operating Expenses
Pumping and treatment $60,766 $59,100 $60,203 $60,735 $63,197
Collection system maintenance 32,141 33,292 33,477 29,266 29,309
Engineering 4,589 3,523 4,722 2,840 1,153
General and administrative 48,580 51,744 51,256 54,588 58,699
Water backup claims 3,862 7,631 5,035 1,548 5,436
Asset Management 13,374 12,969 14,143 14,048 12,791
Total Operating Expenses $163,311 $168,258 $168,836 $163,026 $170,585
Total Expenses $163,312 $168,259 $168,835 $163,026 $170,585
Pledged Revenues $128,080 $154,099 $167,091 $211,622 $244,963
Senior Bond Debt Service $38,352 $46,381 $58,182 $67,923 $77,941
Subordinate Bond Debt Service 23,496 27,379 31,178 32,476 36,192
Total Debt Service2 $61,848 $73,760 $89,361 $100,399 $114,133
Senior Bond Debt Coverage Ratio
3.3x 3.3x 2.9x 3.1x 3.1x
Total Debt Service Coverage Ratio 2.1x 2.1x 1.9x 2.1x 2.1x
______________________
Source: District
1 For the purposes of this Official Statement figures have been rounded.
2 These numbers are based on the District’s year end audited financial statements and may differ from the historical numbers shown on Page
17 hereof and Table 9 of the Feasibility Report. These differences are due to presentation requirements for auditing purposes.
3 Audited figures exclude Build America Bond federal subsidy payments from nonoperating revenues and reduce the total annual debt service
figure by the corresponding amount.
Pro Forma Statement of Pledged Revenues and Debt Service Coverage
The following table shows actual wastewater revenues and expenditures and debt service
coverage for Fiscal Year 2019 and pro forma statements(1) showing projected wastewater revenues and
expenditures and debt service coverage on existing and anticipated revenue bonds during the current
Fiscal Year and the next four Fiscal Years.
17
COMPARISON OF PROJECTED PLEDGED REVENUES
AND PROJECTED DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE(1)(2)
FY 2019
Actual
FY 2020
Projected
FY 2021
Projected
FY 2022
Projected
FY 2023
Projected
FY 2024
Projected
User Charge
Revenue
$392,320,783
$436,558,237
$444,443,064
$460,556,043
$477,091,823
$495,258,179
Other
Miscellaneous
Revenue
Other Operating
Revenue(3)
7,865,362
4,428,400
4,806,981
5,160,542
5,558,069
6,004,056
Connection Fee
Revenue
922,979
1,308,000
1,321,080
1,334,291
1,347,634
1,361,110
Subtotal Other
Miscellaneous
Revenue
$8,788,341
$5,736,400
$6,128,061
$6,494,833
$6,905,702
$7,365,166
Interest Income
– Operating and
Capital
$14,438,669
$10,345,302
$8,689,947
$8,866,747
$8,865,405
$9,576,044
Total Wastewater
Revenue
$415,547,793
$452,639,939
$459,261,072
$475,917,623
$492,862,930
$512,199,389
Gen. Fund
Operating
Expenses
$156,514,816
$169,834,496
$176,143,995
$180,155,670
$186,270,637
$191,227,068
Other Operating
Expenses
14,070,328
9,839,888
18,161,068
14,401,765
15,023,034
14,718,106
Subtotal
Operating
Expenses
$170,585,144
$179,674,385
$194,305,063
$194,557,436
$201,293,671
$205,945,174
Net Revenue
Available for Debt
Service
$244,962,649
$272,965,554
$264,956,009
$281,360,187
$291,569,259
$306,254,216
Actual and
Projected Debt
Service (Payments
To Bondholders)
Senior Bonds(4) $77,941,363 $79,146,919 $84,005,094 $91,349,302 $98,304,576 $109,121,807
Subordinate SRF
Bonds
36,191,352
38,125,131
41,088,555
45,413,349
52,400,170
60,099,093
Total Projected
Debt Service
$114,132,715
$117,272,050
$125,093,649
$136,762,651
$150,704,746
$169,220,900
Total Projected
Senior Debt
Coverage
3.14x
3.45x
3.15x
3.08x
2.97x
2.81x
Total Projected
Coverage for all
Debt
2.15x
2.33x
2.12x
2.06x
1.93x
1.81x
_________
Source: Feasibility Report
(1) See Appendix D – Feasibility Report page D-32 for detailed discussion of principal assumptions upon which projections are based.
(2) For the purposes of this Official Statement figures have been rounded.
(3) Includes interest earned from the Missouri American Water Loan and the City of Arnold, Missouri.
(4) Does not include lower debt service after 2019 refunding.
18
Flow of Funds
Funds and Accounts. The Bond Ordinance establishes or ratifies the establishment of the
following funds and accounts and provides that the moneys deposited in such funds and accounts are held
by U.S. Bank, N.A., St. Louis, Missouri, as the depository (the “Depository”) for the account of the
District, in trust for the purposes set forth in the Bond Ordinance:
(1) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Revenue Fund (the “Revenue
Fund”);
(2) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Sinking Fund (the “Sinking
Fund”), and within such Sinking Fund a Payments Account and a Debt Service Reserve Account;
(3) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Renewal and Extension Fund (the
“Renewal and Extension Fund”);
(4) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rebate Fund (the “Rebate
Fund”), and within such Rebate Fund a Series 2019B Rebate Account; and
(5) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Project Fund (the “Project
Fund”), and within such Project Fund a Series 2019B Project Account and a Series 2019B&C Costs of
Issuance Account.
In addition to the funds described directly above, the Escrow Agreement (as defined herein)
establishes the “2019 Escrow Fund for The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds” (the “Escrow Fund”) to be held and administered by the Escrow Agent (as defined
herein) in accordance with the provisions of the Escrow Agreement.
Deposits to and Uses of Moneys in the Revenue Fund. The Bond Ordinance requires that the
District deposit all Operating Revenues into the Revenue Fund from time to time as and when received.
The Bond Ordinance also requires that the District apply moneys in the Revenue Fund, prior to the
occurrence and continuation of an Event of Default under the Bond Ordinance, in the following order of
priority:
(1) to pay Expenses of Operation and Maintenance;
(2) to deposit into the Sinking Fund the amounts required by the Bond Ordinance, as
described below under the heading captioned “Deposits to and Uses of Money in the Sinking Fund”;
(3) to make Replenishment Payments (as defined herein) to the Debt Service Reserve
Account and to pay to any Credit Facility Provider any amounts due under any Credit Facility Agreement,
including Additional Interest;
(4) to deposit into the Rebate Fund the amounts required by the Bond Ordinance;
(5) to pay any amounts due any Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider pursuant to a
Reserve Account Credit Facility Agreement;
(6) to deposit the amounts required to be deposited into the funds and accounts created by
any Series Ordinance authorizing the issuance of Subordinate Bonds, for the purpose of paying Principal
of (whether at maturity, upon mandatory redemption or as otherwise required by a Series Ordinance
19
relating to Subordinate SRF Bonds) and interest on Subordinate Bonds, making Hedge Payments under
Subordinate Hedge Agreements, and accumulating reserves for such payments;
(7) to make Accumulation Payments to the Debt Service Reserve Account in accordance
with the Bond Ordinance; and
(8) to pay any amounts required to be paid with respect to any Other System Obligations.
In addition to, and after, the deposits described above, the District may from time to time deposit
into the Renewal and Extension Fund any moneys and securities held in the Revenue Fund in excess of
45 days’ estimated Expenses of Operation and Maintenance.
If at any time the amounts in any account of the Sinking Fund are less than the amounts required
by the Bond Ordinance, and there are not on deposit in the Renewal and Extension Fund available
moneys sufficient to cure any such deficiency, as described herein under the subsection captioned
“Deposits to and Uses of Moneys in the Renewal and Extension Fund,” then the District shall
withdraw from the funds and accounts of the District relating to Subordinate Bonds which are not
Subordinate SRF Bonds and deposit in such account of the Sinking Fund, as the case may be, the amount
necessary (or all the moneys in such funds and accounts, if less than the amount required) to make up
such deficiency.
Deposits to and Uses of Moneys in the Sinking Fund. After the District deposits all Operating
Revenues into the Revenue Fund and applies such moneys to pay Expenses of Operation and
Maintenance, then the Master Bond Ordinance provides for deposits to and uses of moneys in the
accounts and subaccounts in the Sinking Fund as follows:
Payments Account – General. Sufficient moneys shall be paid in periodic installments from the
Revenue Fund into the Payments Account for the purpose of paying the Principal of and interest
(excluding Additional Interest) on the Senior Bonds as they become due and payable and for the purpose
of making Hedge Payments under Senior Hedge Agreements. Amounts held in the Payments Account
shall be used solely to pay interest (excluding Additional Interest) and Principal of the Senior Bonds as
the same become due and payable (whether at maturity or upon redemption) and to pay Hedge Payments
under Senior Hedge Agreements when due. As of the date of this Official Statement, there are no Senior
Hedge Agreements in effect.
Interest. Except as otherwise provided in any Series Ordinance authorizing Senior SRF Bonds, on
or before the 30th day preceding each Interest Payment Date for Senior Bonds (or, in the case of Senior
Bonds bearing interest at a Variable Rate, on or before the Business Day preceding each Interest Payment
Date), the District shall deposit in the Payments Account an amount which, together with any other
moneys already on deposit therein and available to make such payment and, in the case of Senior SRF
Bonds, anticipated investment earnings on reserve funds held by a bond trustee relating to such Senior
SRF Bonds, is not less than the interest (excluding Additional Interest) coming due on such Senior Bonds
on such Interest Payment Date. The District shall also deposit and continue to deposit all Hedge Receipts
under Senior Hedge Agreements in the Payments Account from time to time as and when received.
Principal. Except as otherwise provided in any Series Ordinance authorizing Senior SRF Bonds,
on or before the 30th day preceding each Principal Maturity Date for Senior Bonds, the District shall
deposit in the Payments Account an amount which, together with any other moneys already on deposit
therein and available to make such payment, is not less than the Principal coming due on such Senior
Bonds on such Principal Maturity Date.
20
Hedge Payments. On or before the 30th day preceding each payment date for Hedge Payments
under Senior Hedge Agreements, the District shall deposit in the Payments Account an amount which,
together with any other moneys already on deposit therein and available to make such payment, is not less
than such Hedge Payments coming due on such payment date.
Application of Moneys in Payments Account. No further payments need be made into the
Payments Account whenever the amount available in the Payments Account, if added to the amount then
in the Debt Service Reserve Account (without taking into account any amount available to be drawn on
any Reserve Account Credit Facility), is sufficient to retire all Senior Bonds then Outstanding and to pay
all unpaid interest accrued and to accrue prior to such retirement. No moneys in the Payments Account
shall be used for or applied to the optional purchase or redemption of Senior Bonds prior to maturity
unless: (i) provision shall have been made for the payment of all the Senior Bonds; or (ii) such moneys
are applied to the purchase and cancellation of Senior Bonds which are subject to mandatory redemption
on the next mandatory redemption date, which falls due within 12 months, such Senior Bonds are
purchased at a price not more than would be required for mandatory redemption, and such Senior Bonds
are cancelled upon purchase; or (iii) such moneys are applied to the purchase and cancellation of Senior
Bonds at a price less than the amount of Principal which would be payable on such Senior Bonds,
together with interest accrued through the date of purchase, and such Senior Bonds are cancelled upon
purchase; or (iv) such moneys are in excess of the then required balance of the Payments Account and are
applied to redeem a part of the Senior Bonds Outstanding on the next succeeding redemption date for
which the required notice of redemption may be given.
Deposits to and Uses of Moneys in the Debt Service Reserve Account. The Bond Ordinance
provides that with respect to Senior Bonds which are not Senior Uncovered Bonds that the Debt Service
Reserve Account will be funded in an amount equal to the Debt Service Reserve Requirement for the
Senior Bonds which are not Senior Uncovered Bonds. The Bond Ordinance requires that the District
deposit into the Debt Service Reserve Account the amounts specified in the Series Ordinances with
respect to Senior Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there shall be no deposit into the Debt Service
Reserve Account with respect to any SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered Bonds nor shall the Debt Service
Reserve Account secure any SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered Bonds. The Series 2019B&C Bonds are
Senior Uncovered Bonds and therefore are not secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account.
Whenever for any reason the amount in the Payments Account is insufficient to pay all interest or
Principal becoming due on the Senior Bonds within the next seven days (or, in the case of Senior Bonds
bearing interest at a Variable Rate, on the next Business Day), the District shall make up any deficiency
by transfers first from the Renewal and Extension Fund and second from the funds and accounts of the
District relating to Subordinate Bonds which are not Subordinate SRF Bonds. Whenever, on the date that
such interest or Principal is due, there are insufficient moneys in the Payments Account available to make
such payment on Senior Bonds (except with respect to Senior SRF Bonds and Senior Uncovered Bonds
which are not secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account), the District shall, without further
instructions, apply so much as may be needed of the moneys in the Debt Service Reserve Account to
prevent default in the payment of such interest or Principal, with priority to interest payments. Whenever
by reason of any such application or otherwise (other than required Accumulation Payments, as required
in the Bond Ordinance) the amount remaining to the credit of the Debt Service Reserve Account is less
than the amount then required to be in the Debt Service Reserve Account, such deficiency shall be
remedied by monthly deposits (“Replenishment Payments”) from the Revenue Fund, to the extent funds
are available in the Revenue Fund for such purpose after all required transfers set forth above have been
made.
The District may elect to satisfy in whole or in part the Debt Service Reserve Requirement by
means of a Reserve Account Credit Facility, subject to certain requirements as set forth in the Bond
21
Ordinance. See “DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARIES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE BOND
ORDINANCE AND THE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT” in Appendix C hereto.
Deposits to and Uses of Moneys in the Renewal and Extension Fund. All sums accumulated
and retained in the Renewal and Extension Fund shall be used first to prevent default in the payment of
interest on or Principal of the Senior Bonds when due and then shall be applied by the District from time
to time, as and when the District shall determine, to the following purposes and, prior to the occurrence
and continuation of an Event of Default, in the order of priority determined by the District in its sole
discretion: (a) for the purposes for which moneys held in the Revenue Fund may be applied pursuant to
the Bond Ordinance and as described above; (b) to pay any amounts which may then be due and owing
under any Hedge Agreement (including termination payments, fees, expenses, and indemnity payments);
(c) to pay any governmental charges and assessments against the System or any part thereof which may
then be due and owing; (d) to make acquisitions, betterments, extensions, repairs, or replacements or
other capital improvements (including the purchase of equipment) to the System deemed necessary by the
District (including payments under contracts with vendors, suppliers, and contractors for the foregoing
purposes); (e) to acquire Senior Bonds by redemption or by purchase in the open market at a price not
exceeding the callable price as provided and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bond
Ordinance, which Senior Bonds may be any of the Senior Bonds, prior to their respective maturities, and
when so used for such purposes the moneys shall be withdrawn from the Renewal and Extension Fund
and deposited into the Payments Account for the Senior Bonds to be so redeemed or purchased; and
(f) for any other purpose of the District.
Rate Covenant
The Bond Ordinance provides that the District shall continuously own, control, operate, and
maintain the System in an efficient and economical manner and on a revenue producing basis and shall at
all times prescribe, fix, maintain, and collect rates, fees, and other charges for the services, facilities, and
commodities furnished by the System fully sufficient at all times to:
(1) provide for 100% of the Expenses of Operation and Maintenance and for the
accumulation in the Revenue Fund of a reasonable reserve therefor; and
(2) produce Net Operating Revenues in each Fiscal Year which, together with Investment
Earnings:
(a) will equal at least 125% of the Debt Service Requirement on all Senior Bonds
then Outstanding for the year of computation and 115% of the Debt Service Requirement
on all Bonds then Outstanding for the year of computation;
(b) will enable the District to make all required payments, if any, into the Debt
Service Reserve Account and the Rebate Fund and to any Credit Facility Provider, any
Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider, and any Qualified Hedge Provider;
(c) will enable the District to accumulate an amount to be held in the Renewal and
Extension Fund which, in the judgment of the District, is adequate to meet the costs of
major renewals, replacements, repairs, additions, betterments, and improvements to the
System, necessary to keep the same in good operating condition or as is required by any
governmental agency having jurisdiction over the System; and
(d) will remedy all deficiencies in required payments into any of the funds and
accounts established under the Bond Ordinance from prior Fiscal Years.
22
If the District fails to prescribe, fix, maintain, and collect rates, fees, and other charges, or to
revise such rates, fees, and other charges, in accordance with these provisions of the Bond Ordinance, the
owners of not less than 25% in aggregate Principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding, without regard
to whether any Event of Default shall have occurred, may institute and prosecute in any court of
competent jurisdiction an appropriate action to compel the District to prescribe, fix, maintain, or collect
such rates, fees, and other charges, or to revise such rates, fees, and other charges, in accordance with the
requirements of the Bond Ordinance.
Senior and Subordinate Bonds
Upon satisfaction of certain conditions, the Bond Ordinance permits the District, for specified
purposes, to issue additional Senior Bonds without express limit as to principal amount, which will be
equally and ratably secured on a parity basis with the Series 2019B&C Bonds and Outstanding Prior
Senior Bonds under the Bond Ordinance. The Debt Service Requirement, as defined in the Bond
Ordinance, which is used in the calculation of the additional bonds test, allows the District to take into
account the anticipated receipt of U.S. Treasury Interest Subsidy payments to arrive at a net debt service
figure with respect to the Series 2010B Bonds issued as “Build America Bonds.” The District may issue
additional Senior Bonds in the future to finance part of the cost of capital improvements identified in the
District’s Capital Improvement & Replacement Program (the “CIRP”). See the section herein captioned
“THE CIRP.” The Bond Ordinance also permits the District to issue Subordinate Bonds which would be
secured by a lien on the Pledged Revenues that would be junior and subordinate to the Series 2019B&C
Bonds and any other Senior Bonds. See “DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARIES OF CERTAIN
PROVISIONS OF THE BOND ORDINANCE AND THE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
AGREEMENT” in Appendix C hereto.
Other Indebtedness
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are sewer system revenue bonds secured by and payable from
Pledged Revenues on a parity with the Prior Senior Bonds. The District has also issued fifteen series of
outstanding Subordinate Bonds. See the section herein captioned “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW – Outstanding Indebtedness - Other Outstanding Debt” for a
summary of the outstanding long-term debt of the District. For more information on the District’s long-
term liabilities, see Note 6 in the District’s Notes to Financial Statements contained in Appendix A to this
Official Statement.
PLAN OF FINANCE
Purpose of and Authority for the Series 2019B&C Bonds
As previously discussed herein, at a special election held on April 5, 2016, voters within the
District approved the Current Authorization. The Current Authorization enables the District to comply
with federal and State clean water requirements. The District may use the proceeds of such sewer system
revenue bonds for the purpose of designing, constructing, improving, renovating, repairing, replacing and
equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities.
The District will issue the Series 2019B Bonds to (a) pay a portion of the costs of the Series
2019B Project as described below under the heading “THE CIRP − Capital Finance Plans
Contemplated Under Consent Decree”, and (b) pay the Costs of Issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds.
The District will issue the Series 2019C Bonds to (a) refund the Refunded Bonds, and (b) pay the Costs of
Issuance of the Series 2019C Bonds.
23
The Refunded Bonds consist of (i) the Series 2012A Bonds maturing in the year 2042,
outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $103,120,000, (ii) the Series 2012B Bonds maturing in
the years 2028 through 2034, inclusive, except the 2031 maturity bearing interest at the rate of 2.75%,
outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $83,925,000, (iii) the Series 2013B Bonds maturing in
the years 2031, 2032, 2038 and 2043, outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $67,985,000, and
(iv) a portion of the Series 2015B Bonds maturing in the year 2045, outstanding in the aggregate principal
amount of $18,400,000. The District has elected to refund the Refunded Bonds pursuant to the provisions
of the Master Bond Ordinance, the Series 2012A Ordinance, the Series 2012B Ordinance, the Series
2013B Ordinance and the Series 2015B Ordinance. A portion of the proceeds of the Series 2019C Bonds
will be deposited into the Escrow Fund established under an Escrow Trust Agreement dated as of
December 1, 2019 (the “Escrow Agreement”), between the District and UMB Bank, N.A., as Escrow
Agent (the “Escrow Agent”), and will be used by the Escrow Agent to pay the costs of refunding the
Refunded Bonds. The Series 2012A Bonds and the Series 2012B Bonds being refunded will be redeemed
on May 1, 2022; the Series 2013B Bonds being refunded will be redeemed on May 1, 2023; and the
Series 2015B Bonds being refunded will be redeemed on May 1, 2025; all at a redemption price of par
plus redemption premium, if any, and accrued interest to the respective redemption dates pursuant to the
Master Bond Ordinance and the Series Ordinances authorizing the issuance of each series of Refunded
Bonds.
Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds
The following table summarizes the anticipated sources and uses of funds in connection with the
issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds:
Sources of Funds
Par amount of Series 2019B Bonds $52,130,000.00
Plus Original Issue Premium 12,059,976.80
Total: $64,189,976.80
Uses of Funds
Deposit to Series 2019B Project Account $63,814,012.41
Costs of Issuance1 375,964.39
Total: $64,189,976.80
__________
1 Includes Underwriters’ discount.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
24
The following table summarizes the anticipated sources and uses of funds in connection with the
issuance of the Series 2019C Bonds:
Sources of Funds
Par amount of Series 2019C Bonds $276,260,000.00
Release from Debt Service Reserve Account 26,045,141.79
Total: $302,305,141.79
Uses of Funds
Deposit to Escrow Fund under Escrow Agreement $300,519,359.34
Costs of Issuance1 1,785,782.45
Total: $302,305,141.79
__________
1 Includes Underwriters’ discount.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
25
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
The following table sets forth the debt service requirements for all Outstanding Prior Senior
Bonds, the Series 2019B&C Bonds, the Subordinate Bonds and total debt service on all System revenue
bonds.
Year
Ending
June 30
Debt Service on
Outstanding Prior
Senior Bonds(1)
Debt Service on
Series 2019B&C
Bonds
Debt Service on
Subordinate
Bonds(2)
Total
Debt
Service
2020 $ 71,246,848.38 $ 4,457,586.32 $37,780,130.50 $ 113,484,565.20
2021 64,552,561.30 13,266,537.96 37,922,004.59 115,741,103.85
2022 64,152,882.87 13,272,154.36 39,374,849.39 116,799,886.62
2023 64,501,481.53 13,263,536.72 39,833,492.60 117,598,510.85
2024 64,393,857.35 13,271,136.72 40,480,816.88 118,145,810.95
2025 64,441,351.88 13,264,734.22 40,569,628.21 118,275,714.31
2026 67,609,401.88 13,273,161.36 37,239,495.91 118,122,059.15
2027 70,199,651.88 13,266,287.12 27,389,040.41 110,854,979.41
2028 60,561,401.88 23,699,007.72 26,096,510.65 110,356,920.25
2029 60,344,151.88 23,693,926.82 26,207,006.03 110,245,084.73
2030 62,688,614.44 23,702,061.42 23,125,527.24 109,516,203.10
2031 57,838,464.44 28,167,208.02 21,280,574.76 107,286,247.22
2032 56,666,064.44 29,131,022.62 19,660,700.26 105,457,787.32
2033 59,262,976.94 23,168,314.92 19,752,261.91 102,183,553.77
2034 59,064,326.94 23,167,951.72 18,554,397.28 100,786,675.94
2035 70,698,026.94 8,740,658.92 11,424,961.50 90,863,647.36
2036 63,928,471.44 15,317,908.92 8,979,831.10 88,226,211.46
2037 64,697,389.44 15,313,204.68 8,383,220.50 88,393,814.62
2038 64,753,909.44 15,317,774.48 3,009,730.50 83,081,414.42
2039 74,615,004.44 8,100,894.48 3,018,548.80 85,734,447.72
2040 35,914,169.38 48,390,144.48 3,027,391.20 87,331,705.06
2041 35,913,319.38 48,381,343.36 2,256,856.40 86,551,519.14
2042 35,915,719.39 48,384,762.32 1,483,309.40 85,783,791.11
2043 35,918,969.38 10,513,358.86 - 46,432,328.24
2044 26,938,469.38 9,489,762.70 - 36,428,232.08
2045 26,940,219.38 9,496,477.40 - 36,436,696.78
2046 26,939,219.39 3,440,500.00 - 30,379,719.39
2047 17,393,219.38 3,444,000.00 - 20,837,219.38
2048 4,241,969.39 3,445,250.00 - 7,687,219.39
2049 4,241,969.38 3,444,000.00 - 7,685,969.38
2050 4,241,969.38 - - 4,241,969.38
2051 4,241,969.39 - - 4,241,969.39
2052 4,241,969.39 - - 4,241,969.39
2053 4,241,969.31 - - 4,241,969.31
Totals: $1,553,541,961.03 $523,284,668.62 $496,850,286.02 $2,573,676.915.67
_________________
(1) Excludes the debt service on the Refunded Bonds. Debt service figures are reduced by a 33% federal interest rate subsidy on the District’s
Series 2010B Bonds for the year 2020 through 2029 and by a 35% federal interest rate subsidy thereafter. Such subsidy may be changed or
eliminated at any point in the future.
(2) Amounts are net of trustee fees, DNR fees and reserve fund earnings.
26
THE DISTRICT
General
The District is organized pursuant to Article VI, Section 30 of the Missouri Constitution which
empowers the people of the County and the City “to establish a metropolitan district for functional
administration of services common to the area included therein.” The District is the only special district in
the State established pursuant to that section of the Missouri Constitution. The Charter established the
District. The District was created to provide a metropolitan-wide system of wastewater treatment and
sanitary sewerage facilities for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage to serve the City and most
of the more heavily populated areas of the County. Before the District’s creation, the City, various
municipalities in the County and private sewer companies provided sewer service that primarily included
only collecting and transporting sewage from small geographic areas to nearby rivers and streams with
little or no treatment. Most of the municipalities or private sewer companies serving the area did not have
the jurisdictional authority or financial resources needed to eliminate health hazards from untreated
sewage.
When the District began operations in 1956 it took over the publicly-owned wastewater and
stormwater drainage facilities within its jurisdiction and began the construction of an extensive system of
collector and interceptor sewers and treatment facilities. In 1977, voters approved the District’s
annexation of a 270 square mile area of the lower Missouri River and lower Meramec River watersheds in
the County. The District purchased the Fee Fee Trunk Sewer Company and the Missouri Bottoms Sewer
Company in 1978. The District has since acquired other investor-owned or municipally-operated systems.
The District operates the fourth largest wastewater treatment system in the United States of
America. The District’s service area now encompasses approximately 520 square miles including
approximately all 66 square miles of the City and approximately 454 square miles (approximately 87%)
of the County. Only the far western section of the County is not served by the District. The District
provides sanitary sewer collection and treatment and stormwater management to a current population of
approximately 1.3 million. As of June 30, 2019, the District served approximately 427,000 accounts,
including approximately 361,000 single family residences, approximately 41,000 multi-family apartments
and condos, and approximately 24,000 commercial/industrial businesses. For further description of the
District’s service area, see the service area map located on the back cover of this Official Statement. For
certain economic and demographic information regarding the City and the County, see Appendix B to
this Official Statement.
The Charter describes the District as “a body corporate, a municipal corporation and a political
subdivision of the state.” The District’s Charter was amended in 2000 in order to update the District’s
procedures and improve its operations. The amendments provided additional flexibility and structure to
several aspects of District operations, including (1) establishment of an independent 15-member Rate
Commission to review adjustments to the District’s wastewater and stormwater charges before the Board
acts on them; (2) authorization for the District to issue revenue bonds on a District-wide basis and
lowering the margin required for passage of both revenue and general obligation bonds to be consistent
with the Missouri Constitution; (3) requiring a mandatory rotation of outside auditors every five years and
the appointment of an internal auditor; (4) requiring a periodic independent management audit; and (5)
permitting the investment of the District’s funds in the same manner as authorized by the Missouri
Constitution for the investment of State funds. Other amendments to the Charter include (1) limiting the
term of (a) Board trustees to two full consecutive terms plus any portion of an unexpired term (provided,
however, that a Board trustee shall serve until his/her successor shall be appointed and qualified), and (b)
commissioners on the three-member civil service commission (the “Civil Service Commission”) to two
terms plus any portion of an unexpired term (provided, however, that each commissioner shall serve until
27
his/her successor shall be appointed and qualified), (2) requiring the publication of Board vacancies, and
(3) requiring the Board to make a written report to the Mayor and Board of Alderman of the City and to
the County Executive and County Council of the County on an annual basis.
Eight additional amendments to the Charter were approved by voters at the special election held
on June 5, 2012. The approved changes (1) remove the actual boundaries of the District from the Charter
so that boundary changes do not require Charter amendment and are kept by the Office of the
Secretary-Treasurer; (2) streamline the process of forming subdistricts; (3) more clearly delineate the
District’s responsibility for stormwater management; (4) allow use of electronic media, or such other
form of communication as may be required by Missouri law; (5) provide that the budget include a list of
capital projects to be undertaken; (6) allow the District to use the design-build approach for projects;
(7) provide that each Rate Commission representative organization shall serve until its successor shall be
appointed and qualified; and (8) support gender neutrality.
The Charter requires the District to adopt a continuing five-year strategic and operating plan on
an annual basis. The strategic and operating plan states the District’s objectives for the succeeding five
years and includes objective targets against which the District’s performance in meeting these objectives
is measured.
The District is subject to the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (commonly referred to and defined herein as the, “Clean Water Act”), the stated
objective of which is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the
nation’s waters. The District is also subject to the Missouri Clean Water Law, Sections 644.006 through
644.141 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, as amended (the “Missouri Clean Water Law”), and other
laws and regulations. The regulatory requirements are administered by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (“EPA”) through the DNR. See the section herein captioned “REGULATORY
REQUIREMENTS”.
Organization and Management
General. The Charter established the Board as the governing body of the District. The Board is
composed of six members, with three members appointed by the Mayor of the City and three members
appointed by the County Executive of the County. No more than two trustees from each area can be of the
same political affiliation. According to the Charter, the Board enacts District ordinances, determines
policies, and appoints the Executive Director, the Secretary-Treasurer and the Internal Auditor. The
Executive Director appoints all other District officers. Among its duties, the Board makes all
appropriations, approves contracts for improvements, and engages an accounting firm to perform the
annual independent audit of the District. The Board’s standing committees include Audit, Finance,
Pension, Program Management and Stakeholder Relations.
Administration of district-wide operations is by the executive staff under the direct supervision of
the Executive Director. The Civil Service Commission serves in an advisory position regarding personnel
administration and civil service matters, and hears appeals of disciplinary actions. The 15-member Rate
Commission, an advisory body established pursuant to the amendments to the Charter adopted on
November 7, 2000 (the “Rate Commission”) makes recommendations to the Board regarding all
proposed changes in wastewater rates, stormwater rates and tax rates or regarding changes in structure to
the foregoing. See the section herein captioned “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OVERVIEW – Rate Commission and Rate Setting Process”.
28
Board of Trustees
The current members of the Board are as stated below.
Name Current Term Expires
Michael Yates, Chair March 15, 2022
Annette Mandel, Vice Chair March 15, 2020
James Faul, Member March 15, 2021
James I. Singer, Member March 15, 20171
Freddie Dunlap, Member March 15, 2022
Amy Fehr, Member March 15, 2024
_____________________
1 Pursuant to Section 5.010 of the District’s Charter, members continue to serve until a successor is appointed.
Set forth below is certain biographical information on the members of the Board.
Michael Yates, Chair (St. Louis County). Mr. Yates recently retired as a business representative
for the Operating Engineers Local 148 and has served on the Board since January 17, 2012.
Annette Mandel, Vice Chair (St. Louis City). Ms. Mandel is an attorney with the law firm of
Mandel & Mandel, L.L.P and a former mayor of the City of Creve Coeur, Missouri. She has served on the
Board since April 13, 2012.
James Faul (St. Louis City). Mr. Faul is an attorney with the law firm of Hartnett Gladney
Hetterman, L.L.C. Mr. Faul has served on the Board since April 17, 2013.
James I. Singer (St. Louis County). Mr. Singer is a partner in the law firm of Schuchat, Cook &
Werner. Mr. Singer has served on the Board since January 12, 2016.
Freddie Dunlap (St. Louis City). Mr. Dunlap is a former City administrator, having served most
recently as the City Assessor. Mr. Dunlap has served on the Board since January 1, 2018.
Amy Fehr (St. Louis County). Ms. Fehr is an attorney with the law firm of Capes, Sokol,
Goodman & Sarachan, P.C. She has served on the Board since September 6, 2019.
Administration
Management of the District is provided by a management team that reports to the Board,
including an Executive Director, Secretary-Treasurer, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer, Internal Auditor,
General Counsel, and Directors of Finance, Engineering, Human Resources, Operations and Information
Systems. Set forth below is certain biographical information regarding selected members of the executive
management staff of the District.
Brian Hoelscher, P.E., Executive Director. Mr. Hoelscher served as the District’s Director of
Engineering for more than nine years before his appointment as Executive Director on March 27, 2013.
As the Director of Engineering, he was responsible for the delivery of the District’s CIRP as well as other
environmental and regulatory duties. Mr. Hoelscher held several other management positions in the
District’s engineering department prior to his tenure as Director of Engineering. Before joining the
District in May 1995, Mr. Hoelscher served as the St. Louis area office manager for consulting engineers
Consoer, Townsend, Envirodyne Engineers of Missouri, Inc. (now AECOM). Mr. Hoelscher has a
Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from Washington University in St. Louis, and is licensed as
a professional engineer in Missouri and Illinois.
29
Tim R. Snoke, Secretary-Treasurer. Mr. Snoke joined the District as Secretary-Treasurer in May
2014. Before becoming Secretary-Treasurer, he spent 21 years at the former Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. in
various finance and treasury management positions, most recently as Assistant Treasurer. Mr. Snoke
holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Valparaiso University and a Masters
of Business Administration from Saint Louis University.
John Strahlman, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer. Mr. Strahlman was hired by the District in
January 2015. His previous experience includes treasury management positions at Metropolitan Pier and
Exposition Authority in Illinois, and at the Cook County, Illinois Treasurer’s office. He holds a Bachelor
of Science degree in Public Finance from Indiana University and a Masters of Business Administration
from DePaul University.
Susan M. Myers, General Counsel. Ms. Myers has been employed by the District as in-house
counsel since 2001 and was promoted to General Counsel in 2011. Prior to joining the District, she served
as an environmental engineer for two years with EPA Region VII in RCRA Permitting and for nine years
on a billion dollar Department of Energy Superfund clean-up project. Ms. Myers earned her law degree
from the Saint Louis University School of Law and a Bachelor of Science in Geological Engineering from
the University of Missouri-Rolla (currently Missouri University of Science and Technology).
Marion M. Gee, Director of Finance. Mr. Gee was hired by the District in September 2015.
Mr. Gee most recently served as Assistant Finance Director for the City of San Antonio, Texas. He
previously served as the Finance Director for the Louisville Metropolitan Sewer District for 11 years.
Mr. Gee is a certified public accountant and has a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and a
Masters of Business Administration, both from the University of Louisville.
Richard Unverferth, P.E., Director of Engineering. Mr. Unverferth has served as the District’s
Director of Engineering since May 2013. Prior to his current position, he held numerous positions in the
District’s Engineering and Operations departments. Mr. Unverferth has a Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (currently Missouri University of Science and
Technology), and is a licensed professional engineer in Missouri.
Tracey Coleman, Director of Human Resources. Ms. Coleman has served as the Director of
Human Resources at the District since 2018. Before her promotion to her current position, Ms. Coleman
was the Manager of Training and Organizational Development at the District. Before joining the District,
she held positions at Laclede Gas, Edward Jones, HealthLink and A.G. Edwards. Ms. Coleman received
her Master’s Degree from Webster University and a Chancellor’s Certification in Database Technology
from the University of Missouri-St. Louis.
Bret A. Berthold, P.E., Director of Operations. Mr. Berthold was named the District’s Director
of Operations in December 2018. Mr. Berthold joined the District in April 2009 as the Operation
Division Manager at the Bissell Point Wastewater Treatment Plant and transitioned to the Assistant
Director of Operations position in September 2011. Before joining the District, Mr. Berthold held several
positions at Spectrum Brands, Inc. Mr. Berthold received a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical
Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology (formerly, University of Missouri –
Rolla) and a Masters of Business Administration from Webster University.
Jonathon C. Sprague, P.E., Director of Information Systems. Mr. Sprague has been the Director
of Information Systems for the District since December 2018. Before his promotion to his current
position, he joined the District in May 2005 as Assistant Director of Operations and became the District’s
Director of Operations in 2007. Mr. Sprague has a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from
30
The University of Akron and a Masters of Business Administration from the College of William and
Mary.
The System
The District owns and operates the System, which consists of sanitary, stormwater and combined
collection sewers, pumping stations, and wastewater treatment facilities in its service area. The District
provides sewer collection, pumping and treatment services within three major watersheds located within
the District’s service area, including the Mississippi River watershed, the Missouri River watershed and
the Meramec River watershed. In addition, the District provides a variety of other services, including
sanitary sewer maintenance, stormwater sewer maintenance, floodwater control, monitoring of industrial
waste, issuance of pretreatment discharge permits, engineering design and specification, construction of
sewer lines, plan review and approvals, issuance of connection permits, public education and customer
service.
Collection and Trunk Sewers. As of October 10, 2019, the District owns and maintains 9,347
miles of collection and trunk sewers and force mains, ranging in size from six inches to 29 feet in
diameter. They are classified as one of three types: wastewater, storm or combined. Sanitary sewers
accommodate household and industrial waste. Storm sewers carry rainwater and surface water runoff.
Combined sewers carry both types of waste. The System currently includes approximately 4,698 miles of
wastewater sewers and force mains, approximately 2,979 miles of stormwater sewers and force mains,
and approximately 1,670 miles of combined sewers that handle both wastewater and stormwater flows.
Maintenance of the System is controlled and conducted out of three regional facilities.
Pumping Stations and Force Mains. The District currently owns and maintains 279 pumping
stations and 134 miles of force mains (which are included in the sewer system totals above). Pump station
and force main support is divided into three geographic regions under a pump station manager. All pump
stations are maintained regularly and monitored continuously by telemetry. Of the 279 stations, 38 are
floodwall (overflow regulation and wet weather relief tank stations), 4 are stormwater and the remaining
237 are wastewater and combined sewage pump stations which move the flow of wastewater through the
wastewater system and into District treatment plants.
Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The District currently owns and operates seven wastewater
treatment facilities. These facilities treated an average flow of 331 million gallons of wastewater per day
for the District’s previous five Fiscal Years 2015 to 2019. The Bissell Point and Lemay wastewater
treatment plants are the District’s two largest plants. Both of these plants serve the Mississippi River
watershed. The Coldwater Creek and Missouri River wastewater treatment plants service the Missouri
River watershed. The remaining wastewater treatment plants serve the Meramec River watershed.
Employees and Employee Relations
The District had 1,027 budgeted positions for Fiscal Year 2019, of which 952 are filled.
Approximately 63% of the District’s employees within the Operations Department are represented by one
of five unions: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; Bricklayers;
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; International Union of Operating Engineers; and Service
Employees International. The District considers its employee relations to be excellent. The District
entered into new collective bargaining agreements in 2016, which extend through June 30, 2020.
Negotiations for the next collective bargaining agreements are expected to begin in the first quarter of
2020. Salary increases between FY 2019 and FY 2022 average 3% annually. The District also retains
private companies and consultants from time to time to supplement and expand its existing staffing
resources.
31
Economic Conditions in the District
Generally, the District’s major revenue sources do not fluctuate with the local and national
economies as much as local governments that depend on sales or income taxes for their major sources of
revenue. The District uses several measures to forecast economic development in the District. Such
factors are listed below for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2019:
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Sewer Plan Reviews:
Number of Plans Approved 529 613 524 673 514
Number of Miles of Sewers 22 38 34 49 46
Sewer Construction Permits:
Number of Permits Issued 3,447 4,546 4,523 3,769 3,792
Number of Miles of Sewers 33 30 23 25 24
Customer Connections:
Number of Connection
Permits Issued 2,017 2,165 2,490 2,178 2,384
Connection Fee Revenue $1,808,160 $1,691,032 $2,076,413 $1,249,104 $922,979
Value of Sewers Dedicated to the
District by Developers
$12,304,126
$11,271,085
$6,807,147
$24,800,000
$16,600,00
_________
Source: District
Over the years, the City and County’s economies have each undergone a transformation from
reliance on traditional manufacturing industries to those industries based on advanced technology and
service. The St. Louis area is a center for health care, banking, finance, transportation, tourism, and
education and has a strong and diverse manufacturing economy. The combined unemployment rate for
the City and County was 3.5% in June 2019, which was lower than the national unemployment rate of
3.7% for the same time period. For more information on economic and demographic trends in the City
and the County, see Appendix B hereto.
Security
The System is subject to safety and security inspections on a continuing basis by the District. All
treatment plants are maintained as secure facilities with fences, locked gates and electronic surveillance
equipment. The District does not represent that any existing or additional safety or security measures will
be adequate in the event that terrorist activities are directed at the System. Further, damage to components
of the System could have a material adverse impact on the District’s expenditures for repairs to the
System.
Insurance
The District maintains third-party commercial insurance coverage for various risks while
self-insuring for other risks and liabilities. Presently commercial insurance coverage is maintained for
officers’, directors’ and general liability, property, boiler and machinery, excess flood, combined liability,
cyber liability, business auto liability, excess liability, excess workers’ compensation, public entity
fiduciary liability, crime, major facility pollution liability and sewer backup (blocked line and
overcharged line). Such policies contain liability limits, deductions and retentions that management of the
District believes to be customary for similar enterprises. Total premiums for third-party insurance
coverage for Fiscal Year 2019 were $3,813,207, an approximately 7% increase from Fiscal Year 2018.
32
In addition, the District has established a risk management program and self-insures a portion of
the risk related to its obligation to provide workers’ compensation and medical and hospitalization
benefits to its employees and water backup claims of its customers. The estimated liabilities for payment
of incurred (both reported and unreported) but unpaid claims relating to these matters are included in the
District’s financial statements as a component of current deposits and accrued expenses. As of June 30,
2019 and 2018, these liabilities amounted to $7,920,684 and $4,026,003, respectively. The District
obtains periodic funding valuations from the third-party administrators managing the self-insurance
programs and adjusts the charges as required to maintain the appropriate level of estimated claims
liability. For more information regarding the District’s self-insurance program, see Note 10,
Self-Insurance Programs, to the District’s Notes to Financial Statements contained in Appendix A to this
Official Statement.
The District has taken several actions to mitigate cyber threats and the business disruptions
associated therewith, including enhancing the District’s security in relation to cyber threats. The District
has reorganized its Information Technology Department to include a security division with two full time
security specialists and has hired a Chief IT Security Officer that is shared with other government service
providers. The focus of these new hires is to improve the District’s cybersecurity tools, operating
procedures and incident response protocols. The District has also added security and disaster recovery
initiatives to its Fiscal Year 2020 strategic plan. These actions provide for additional resources for
monitoring and provide for disaster recovery to help prevent and minimize the risk of a cybersecurity
incident.
THE CIRP
General
The District developed the CIRP in 2004 which identifies proposed expenditures by the District
for capital improvements to the District’s sewer facilities over the next several decades. The general
objectives of the CIRP are to meet federal and State requirements and District policy regarding water
pollution control, to provide a satisfactory level of service to users of the District’s sewer system,
including reduction of building back-ups, and to continue the District’s program to rehabilitate its
infrastructure system. The CIRP addresses the District’s infrastructure capital improvement projects
involving the construction, repair, replacement and upgrade of sanitary and combined sewers, force
mains, pump stations, tanks, tunnels, treatment plants, and stormwater sewers. The District has designated
the portion of the CIRP improvements agreed to under the Consent Decree (as defined herein), hereinafter
defined, as “Project Clear.” Project Clear has an estimated cost of over $5 billion dollars. As of
November 1, 2019, the District has met all requirements related to Project Clear dictated by the Consent
Decree within mandated deadlines and within budget.
Historical Capital Improvement Expenditures
Before 2004, the District financed substantially all of the capital improvements to its facilities
from available revenues on a “pay-as-you-go” basis. Since Fiscal Year 2004 the District has paid for more
than $2.2 billion in capital improvements through a combination of debt financing and “pay-as-you-go”
financing. Since the District began implementation of the CIRP in 2004, the District has completed
project improvements in the following categories:
• increasing wastewater treatment capacity;
• increasing quality of treatment levels to meet new regulations;
• finishing construction of a new wastewater treatment plant;
• improving infrastructure to reduce combined sewer overflows;
• improving infrastructure to reduce sanitary sewer overflows; and
• rehabilitating and replacing aging infrastructure.
33
Financing Plans for the CIRP
There are two primary funding sources for financing the capital improvements identified in the
CIRP: (1) debt, including certain Bonds issued under the Bond Ordinance; and (2) available Operating
Revenues on a “pay-as-you-go” basis. The District will use the proceeds of previously issued Bonds, a
portion of the proceeds of the Series 2019B Bonds and any Bonds issued by the District in the future
under the Bond Ordinance to finance the infrastructure projects identified in the CIRP.
The voters approved the issuance of $1,720,000,000 of sewer system revenue bonds, all of which
have been issued in furtherance of the CIRP, at special elections held on February 3, 2004, August 5,
2008 and on June 5, 2012 (the “Prior Authorizations”, together with the Current Authorizations being
referred to herein as, the “Authorizations”). As previously discussed herein, at a special election held on
April 5, 2016, voters within the District approved the Current Authorization in furtherance of the CIRP.
After the issuance of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, the remaining amount of the Current Authorization will
be $598,428,796.
The following table sets forth voter approval percentages at the special election for each
Authorization.
Year of Election Percentage in Favor of Each Authorization
2004 68%
2008 75%
2012 85%
2016 76%
Some of the major projects constructed in part or in whole with proceeds of the Prior
Authorizations were the Lower Meramec Treatment Plant, $177,000,000; Coldwater Creek Treatment
Plant Improvements, $61,000,000; Missouri River Treatment Plant Rehab and Improvements,
$52,000,000; Grand Glaize Plant Improvements, $35,000,000; CSO/SSO Collection System
Improvements, $80,000,000; Lemay Treatment Plant Improvements, $40,000,000; Maline Creek CSO BP
051 & 052 Local Storage, $86,000,000; Lemay Pump Station No. 1 Redundant Force Main, $25,000,000;
Coldwater Sanitary Relief Section B, C, and D Wet Weather Storage Facility Tank C, $20,000,000;
Lemay WWTP Secondary Improvements, $15,000,000; Missouri River WWTP Secondary Treatment
Expansion and Disinfection, $20,000,000; Maplewood – Blendon Combined Sewer Relief, $11,000,000;
Bissell & Lemay WWTP Incinerator Scrubber Replacement, $8,000,000; and FF-11 Fee Fee Creek
Sanitary Relief, $7,000,000.
Some of the major projects to be constructed in part or in whole with the proceeds of the Current
Authorization include: Lower Meramec River System Improvements – Baumgartner to Fenton WWTF
Tunnel, $210,000,000; Deer Creek Sanitary Tunnel (Clayton Road to RDP), $150,000,000; Maline
Creek CSO BP 051 & 052 Local Storage Facility, $86,000,000; DC-02 & DC-03 Sanitary Relief
(Brentwood Boulevard to Conway Road) Phases II, III, and IV, $72,000,000; Lemay No. 3 Pump Station
and Force Main, $40,000,000; Gravois Trunk Sanitary Storage Facility (Pardee Ln and Pardee Rd),
$35,000,000; and Upper Maline Trunk Sanitary Relief Phase IV Section A, $18,000,000.
34
Total Capital Expenditures under CIRP
The following table sets forth the District’s historic capital improvement expenditures for
improvements to the System for Fiscal Years 2010 through 2019, including expenditures funded both by
Bond proceeds and on a “pay-as-you-go” basis:
Fiscal Year
Ending June 30
Capital Improvement
Expenditures
2010 $116,125,747
2011 99,958,334
2012 134,909,742
2013 151,321,500
2014 158,323,507
2015 196,100,162
2016 216,933,464
2017 249,487,948
2018 225,481,370
2019 221,248,644
Total: $1,769,890,418
___________________
Source: District
Capital Finance Plans Contemplated Under Consent Decree
The District is currently constructing a multi-billion dollar, multi-decade CIRP to update and
rehabilitate District’s aging wastewater collection and treatment system. The Board has approved a
budget that identifies proposed appropriations by the District for wastewater capital improvements of
approximately $335 million during the District’s Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2020, for a portion of the
projects that are included in the CIRP. The District estimates that the cost of the CIRP for the period of
Fiscal Year 2020 through Fiscal Year 2022 will be approximately $1 billion.
Approximately 40% of the total major capital improvement expenditures for Fiscal Year 2020 to
Fiscal Year 2022 are anticipated to be funded from operating revenues and the drawdown of available
fund balances and the remaining approximately 60% is expected to be funded by the issuance of
additional debt, including the Series 2019B Bonds, pursuant to the Current Authorization as further
described herein.
The District’s capital program in Fiscal Year 2020 includes more than 100 projects, a portion of
which will be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2019B Bonds (the “Series 2019B Project”), “pay-
as-you-go” revenues of the System and future financings under the Bond Ordinance. Among these
projects, some of which are multi-year efforts, are the following projects which are budgeted at $5 million
or more in Fiscal Year 2020:
35
Project Name Task Description Budget
DEER CREEK SANITARY TUNNEL (CLAYTON RD TO RDP) Construction (Supplemental
Appropriation)
$38,000,000
CAULKS CREEK FORCEMAIN (RIVER VALLEY RD TO L-52) Construction $15,000,000
DEER CREEK SANITARY TUNNEL (CLAYTON RD TO RDP) –
PUMP STATION
Construction $15,000,000
LEMAY NO. 3 PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN Construction $14,000,000
DC-02 & DC-03 SANITARY RELIEF (BRENTWOOD BLVD TO
CONWAY RD) PHASE III AND PHASE IV
Construction $13,000,000
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES -
TANK/TREATMENT/PUMP STATION FACILITIES
Professional Services $10,400,000
GRAVOIS TRUNK (WHITECLIFF TO RDP) SANITARY
REHABILITATION (FANNIE AVE TO PARDEE LANE)
Construction (Supplemental
Appropriation)
$10,000,000
MALINE CREEK CSO BP 051 & 052 LOCAL STORAGE
FACILITY (CHAIN OF ROCKS DR TO CHURCH DR)
Construction (Supplemental
Appropriation)
$8,200,000
KINGSLAND SANITARY STORAGE FACILITY
(ENGELHOLM)
Construction, Design-Build $8,000,000
GRAVOIS TRUNK SANITARY STORAGE FACILITY (PARDEE
LN AND PARDEE RD)
Construction (Supplemental
Appropriation)
$7,100,000
INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIRS (WASTEWATER) (2020) Work Order Repair Costs
(Capital)
$7,000,000
MISSISSIPPI FLOODWALL ORS PUMP STATIONS
REHABILITATION PHASE II
Construction, Design-Build $7,000,000
BISSELL & LEMAY WWTF FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATORS Design Services $6,000,000
BADEN CITYSHED MITIGATION BASINS (CALVARY,
FREDERICK, PARTRIDGE AND TILLIE)
Construction $6,000,000
BISSELL POINT WWTF MAIN SUBSTATION SWITCHGEAR
AND MCC REPLACEMENT
Construction $6,000,000
BISSELL - COLDWATER - MISSOURI - MERAMEC PUBLIC I/I
REDUCTION (2020) CONTRACT C
Construction $5,900,000
BISSELL - COLDWATER - MISSOURI - MERAMEC PUBLIC I/I
REDUCTION (2020) CONTRACT A
Construction $5,700,000
CAULKS CREEK FORCEMAIN REHABILITATION Construction (Supplemental
Appropriation)
$5,600,000
JEFFERSON BARRACKS TUNNEL CONSOLIDATION
SEWERS
Construction $5,180,000
82ND STREET TO I-170 SANITARY RELIEF (UR-08, UR-09) Construction (Supplemental
Appropriation)
$5,100,000
Source: District
Other planned CIRP improvements in Fiscal Years 2020 through 2022 expected to be included in
the approximately $1 billion of capital projects during this timeframe include:
• infrastructure improvements to reduce combined sewer overflows;
• infrastructure improvements to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows;
• collection systems renewal and replacement activity; and
• planning and capacity, management, operation and maintenance activity.
See Appendix D – “FEASIBILITY REPORT – CIRP Financing” for a summary of the
projected CIRP Financing Plan for Fiscal Years 2021 through 2024.
36
FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OF THE DISTRICT
General
The District is supported by various taxes and user charges imposed on taxpayers and users of its
facilities within its boundaries. The District has the power, subject to voter approval, to issue general
obligation bonds, District-wide revenue bonds, sub-district revenue bonds, or special assessment bonds.
The Executive Director is responsible for preparing the annual budget of the District and is
responsible for drawing warrants to meet the financial obligations of the District. The Executive Director
appoints the Director of Finance, who is responsible for assisting the Executive Director in preparing the
annual budget, maintaining the accounting records of the District, and certifying that all warrants are
proper and valid under the District’s Charter. The Secretary-Treasurer is appointed by the Board and is
responsible for custody of the funds of the District and investing the funds of the District pursuant to the
Charter of the District and State law.
Budget and Appropriation Process
The Executive Director of the District is responsible for preparing the District’s annual budget.
Not later than the fifteenth day of March in each year, the Executive Director must submit to the Board a
budget for the ensuing year. The Charter requires that the Board adopt the budget no later than June 30. In
the event that the Board does not pass a new budget by June 30, the prior year’s budget continues in force
until the Board adopts a new budget. The proposed budget is available for public inspection and the
District conducts public hearings on the proposed budget prior to its adoption. On or before the thirtieth
day of June in each Fiscal Year the Board determines the amount of taxes that will be required during the
next succeeding Fiscal Year to pay the principal of and interest on general obligation bonds issued and
certain costs of operations, maintenance, construction and improvements. At this time, there are no
general obligation bonds outstanding. The budget provides a complete financial plan for the budget year
for all District funds. In no event can the total amount of expenditures for the budget year from any fund
exceed the estimated revenues to be actually received plus any unencumbered balance or less any deficit
estimated for the beginning of the budget year. After submittal of the budget to the Board, the Board must
hold a public hearing at least 21 days before adoption of the budget in order to obtain public comment on
the proposed budget.
The Board instituted “zero-based budgeting” in the development of the District’s annual budget.
This budgeting process breaks the District’s budget into two distinct sections: (i) a base budget
representing the cost to run basic operations and (ii) an incremental budget representing initiatives that are
tied directly to the District’s Strategic Business and Operating Plan. Both sections undergo multiple
reviews to ensure that planned expenditures are justified and appropriate for the supported business
activity. For the incremental budget, an expenditure cannot be justified solely by a like expenditure in a
previous year; the expenditure has to clearly support a business objective from the District’s Strategic
Business and Operating Plan. The use of zero-based budgeting has played a strong part in helping to keep
key areas of the District’s budget at or below the rate of annual inflation.
Finance Department
The Finance Department is enhancing its efforts to substantially reduce its portfolio of accounts
receivable, using a combination of internal collection efforts, liens and service shut-off. In addition, a
portion of the District’s billing and past-due collections has been outsourced to several outside vendors
(collection agencies and law firms). These agencies and firms focus on collecting overdue sewer bills
37
from rate payers and during Fiscal Year 2019 they collected approximately $29.5 million on behalf of the
District.
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States of America and Canada has
honored the District for excellence in budgeting, financial accounting and full disclosure. In 2019, for the
32nd consecutive year, the District earned the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award, the highest form
of recognition in governmental budgeting. In 2019, for the 31st consecutive year, the District also
received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting, the highest recognition in
governmental accounting and financial reporting.
Fund Structure
The General Fund was established to provide for the ordinary operations of the District. Since
1978, all operation and maintenance has been funded out of the General Fund. The General Fund receives
revenues from ad valorem property taxes levied on all property, real and personal, within the District’s
boundaries based on assessed valuations established by the City and County assessors. Tax rates vary by
subdistrict and purpose, and are levied in accordance with the Charter of the District. The District
discontinued levying real and personal property taxes after Fiscal Year 2008 as a result of the impervious
stormwater charge which it began collecting in March 2008. The District rescinded its stormwater
impervious charge as a result of a July 9, 2010 court decision which declared the charge unconstitutional.
Property taxes were reinstated effective December 31, 2010, to partially replace this stormwater funding.
On April 5, 2016, a special election was held in which 62% of voters in the District’s service area
approved Proposition S. The approval of Proposition S put all District customers under the same property
tax rates to pay for stormwater service and, in turn, all District customers would receive the same level of
stormwater service. This process occurred gradually throughout Fiscal Year 2017. Proposition S allows
the District to rollback and eliminate several existing taxes, eliminate the stormwater fee and, in lieu of
these funding mechanisms, institute or leave in place two taxing districts that cover the District’s entire
service area; however, stormwater revenues do not constitute Pledged Revenues securing and payable to
the Series 2019B&C Bonds. Currently, a main source of income for the General Fund is a wastewater
user charge. The General Fund also receives miscellaneous income from a number of sources, and
reimbursement of engineering services provides other non-operating funds.
The District’s Revenue Funds consist of the Wastewater Revenue Fund and the Stormwater
Revenue Fund. Wastewater user charge revenues are deposited into the Wastewater Revenue Fund and
revenues from the District’s stormwater service charge are deposited into the Stormwater Revenue Fund.
The District also maintains two emergency funds − the Wastewater Emergency Fund and the Stormwater
Emergency Fund. These funds were created for the purpose of providing funding for emergency work or
repairs requiring prompt attention in the operation and maintenance of the District. The work or repairs
are of such a nature as to be non-measureable in the budgeting and appropriation of annual revenues.
District policy requires minimum balances of $500,000 and $250,000 be maintained in the Wastewater
Emergency Fund and the Stormwater Emergency Fund, respectively. As of June 30, 2019, the
Wastewater Emergency Fund and the Stormwater Emergency Fund had fund balances of $3,592,562 and
$2,266,805, respectively.
Basis of Accounting
Throughout a Fiscal Year, the District maintains its detailed accounting records on a modified
accrual basis of accounting. In order to account for the transactions related to certain subdistricts and
restricted resources, separate fund accounting records are maintained. For financial reporting purposes,
the District reports its operations as a single enterprise fund and the District’s financial statements are
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as
38
applied to government units. Accordingly, the accounting records are converted to the accrual basis of
accounting and all interfund transactions are eliminated. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues
are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized when the related liability is incurred.
Financial Statements
The accounts of the District are audited annually by an independent firm of certified public
accountants. The accounting firm of CliftonLarsonAllen LLP served the District as auditor for the Fiscal
Year ended June 30, 2019. The District’s audited financial statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2019, which includes audited financial statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2018, are attached
hereto as Appendix A.
Cash and Investments
The following table shows the historic cash and investments for the previous five Fiscal Years.
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019
Unrestricted Cash &
Investments (Current)
$132,950,967
$182,927,020
$286,332,159
$300,591,076
$241,181,876
Total Unrestricted Cash &
Investments
$298,732,325
$339,921,143
$347,607,159
$367,855,784
$409,831,492
Days Cash on Hand (No
Long-Term Unrestricted) 297 397 619
673
516
Days Cash on Hand (Adds
Long-Term Unrestricted) 668 737 751
824
877
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW
For the Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the District includes the independent auditors’
report, management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), and the financial statements accompanied by
notes essential to the user’s understanding of the financial statements.
Management of the District has provided the MD&A to be used in combination with the
District’s financial statements. This narrative is intended to provide the reader with more insight into the
management’s knowledge of the transactions, events, and conditions reflected in the financial statements
and certain of the fiscal policies that govern the District’s operations.
2019 Financial Audit
The District’s financial position improved in Fiscal Year 2019, as evidenced by the increase in net
position of $129.2 million. The improvement is due primarily to an increase in net investment in capital
assets, debt service funds and unrestricted funds of $94.8 million, $2.9 million and $36.6 million,
respectively; offset by a decrease of $5.1 million in subdistrict construction and improvement funds. Net
capital assets increased $185.5 million while debt related to the capital assets increased $22.7 million and
when netted with the $109.4 million decrease in unspent cash proceeds received upon the issuance of
senior debt in Fiscal Year 2018, net debt decreased net investment in capital assets $86.7 million. The
increase in construction-related liabilities of $3.2 million and the amortization of the deferred loss of $0.8
million also decreased net investment in capital assets.
39
Current, restricted and other assets decreased $61.6 million or 7.0% in Fiscal Year 2019. The
decrease is predominately due to a decrease in investments offset by an increase in cash due to higher
sewer rates charged and maturity of investments. Capital assets net of accumulated depreciation increased
by $185.5 million or 5.4% in Fiscal Year 2019 as the result of continued high levels of construction and
acquisition of assets by the District. Current liabilities increased by $9.9 million or 7.1% due primarily to
an increase in deposits and accrued expenses and retainage held on capital projects which correlate with the
increase in construction. Non-current liabilities increased by $1.7 million or 0.1% primarily due to a
$26.0 million increase in net pension liability, offset by $24.3 million net decrease in bonds and notes
payable. The net decrease in bonds and notes payable is comprised of a $52.6 million decrease for Fiscal
Year 2020 senior and subordinate debt payments reclassified to current liabilities and a $7.0 million
decrease in unamortized premium net of discount offset by a $35.3 million increase in new debt.
The District ended the Fiscal Year 2019 with $56.8 million in cash and cash equivalents for an
increase of $22.4 million or 65.0% from Fiscal Year 2018. Cash flows from operating activities increased
by $24.2 million or 15.1% as a result of increased receipts from customers offset by an increase in
payments to suppliers for goods and services and an increase in payments to employees. Cash flows from
non-capital financing activities increased by $0.7 million or 2.0%. Cash flow from capital and related
financing activities decreased by $237.5 million or 327.4% due primarily to $229.8 million decrease in
bond proceeds and premiums received in Fiscal Year 2019 compared to Fiscal Year 2018 and $11.8
million increase in principal, interest and fees paid on bonds, offset by $5.4 million decrease in spending
for capital assets. Cash flows from investing activities increased by $248.7 million or 183.7%. The
increase primarily stems from more investments maturing than purchased in Fiscal Year 2019 while the
opposite occurred in Fiscal Year 2018 – more investments were purchased than matured.
Total capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, increased by $185.5 million or 5.4% over Fiscal
Year 2018. Construction in progress contained the majority of the increase with net additions of $120.2
million or 14.4% consisting of $244.0 million in additions offset by $123.8 million of assets placed into
service. The net increase in collection and pumping plant assets was $95.6 million or 5.3%, primarily for
capitalization of assets including new and improved sewers, dedicated assets and infrastructure repairs.
Land increased $1.0 million or 1.4% due to the acquisition of easements and other land. General plant
and equipment increased $2.3 million or 10.7% primarily due to fleet replacements and plant upgrades.
These increases are offset by net treatment and disposal plant and equipment decrease of $33.7 million or
4.8% due to no large projects being capitalized in fiscal 2019 to offset the depreciation charge for the
year. For more detailed information, see Note 4, Capital Assets, in the District’s Notes to Financial
Statements contained in Appendix A to this Official Statement. See also Appendix A for a more
in-depth analysis of the District’s financial position.
2018 Financial Audit
Current, restricted and other assets increased $139.1 million or 18.7% in Fiscal Year 2018. The
increase is predominately due to an increase in cash and investments due to higher sewer rates charged,
with a corresponding increase in cash collected from customers, and due to the unspent cash received on
the senior debt issued in Fiscal Year 2018. Capital assets net of accumulated depreciation increased by
$194.0 million or 6.0% in Fiscal Year 2018 as the result of continued high levels of construction and
acquisition of assets by the District. Current liabilities in Fiscal Year 2018 increased by $6.4 million or
4.8% due primarily to an increase in the current portion of bonds and notes payable and retainage held on
capital projects which correlates with the increase in construction. Non-current liabilities in Fiscal Year
2018 increased by $206.8 million or 13.6% primarily due to a $209.0 million increase in bonds and notes
payable relating to the $343.3 million new senior and subordinate debt issued in Fiscal Year 2018 and the
related net increase in premiums on debt of $42.4 million, offset by $125.8 million advance refunding of
existing debt and $50.9 million for Fiscal Year 2019 senior and subordinate debt payments reclassified to
40
current liabilities. In addition, non-current liabilities increased by $24.2 million in Fiscal Year 2018 as the
District implemented GASB Statement No. 75 resulting in recognition of the District’s total OPEB
liability. Decreases in the net pension liability of $18.7 million and in deposits and accrued expenses of
$8.1 million for the removal of the net OPEB obligation previously recorded under GASB Statement No.
45 are the other components primarily accounting for the change in non-current liabilities in Fiscal Year
2018.
The District ended Fiscal Year 2018 with $34.4 million in cash and cash equivalents or a decrease of
$13.7 million or 28.5% from Fiscal Year 2017. Cash flows from operating activities increased by $12.9
million or 8.7% in Fiscal Year 2018 as a result of increased receipts from customers offset by an increase
in payments to suppliers for goods and services and an increase in payments to employees. Cash flows
from non-capital financing activities increased by $1.2 million or 3.6% in Fiscal Year 2018. Cash flow
from capital and related financing activities increased by $74.0 million or 50.5% due to decreased
spending for capital assets, offset by an increase in bond proceeds and premiums received in Fiscal Year
2018 compared to Fiscal Year 2017, and increased principal, interest and fees paid on bonds. Cash flows
from investing activities decreased by $100.6 million or 289.9% in Fiscal Year 2018. The decrease
primarily stems from a greater change in the purchase of investments than in the proceeds from sale and
maturity of investments from Fiscal Year 2017 to Fiscal Year 2018.
In Fiscal Year 2018, total capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, increased by $194.0 million
or 6.0% over Fiscal Year 2017. Construction in progress contained the majority of the increase with net
additions of $128.4 million or 18.1% consisting of $249.7 million in additions offset by $121.3 million of
assets placed into service. The net increase in collection and pumping plant assets was $96.9 million or
5.6%, primarily for capitalization of assets including new and improved sewers, dedicated assets and
infrastructure repairs. Net treatment and disposal plant and equipment decreased $33.6 million or 4.6% due
to no large projects being capitalized in Fiscal Year 2018 to offset the depreciation charge for the year.
Land increased $2.6 million or 3.6% due to the acquisition of easements and other land. General plant and
equipment decreased $0.3 million or 1.4% primarily due to depreciation of existing assets. See also
Appendix A for a more in-depth analysis of the District’s financial position.
Sewer Rates and Revenues
The primary source of funding for the operation and maintenance of the System is a user charge.
The following table shows the typical bill amount for a single family residence using 7 centum cubic-feet
per month with the rates approved by the Board for the year indicated and the percentage increase in such
charge over the prior year:
Fiscal Year Monthly Rate Percentage Change
2016 $40.72 13.14%
2017 44.59 9.50
2018 49.31 10.59
2019 54.63 10.79
2020 60.44 10.64
The District’s charges for residential wastewater service are tied to the amount of measured water
usage during a winter quarter. For residential properties without water meters, the charges are based on
housing attributes (such as the number of rooms, baths, and toilets) that correlate to water usage. That
methodology is the same billing methodology used by the City of St. Louis Water Division for its non-
metered properties. Multi-family residential and commercial and industrial rates are proportionate to the
single-family charge and are based on water consumption and the strength of the discharge.
41
Other Sources of Revenue
The District has other sources of revenue not securing and pledged to the repayment of the Series
2019B&C Bonds. Real and personal property taxes are levied by the District. The District discontinued
levying real and personal property taxes after Fiscal Year 2008 as a result of the impervious stormwater
charge which it began collecting in March 2008; however, the District suspended collection of the
impervious stormwater charge and resumed collection of real and personal property taxes in Fiscal Year
2011 as a result of the July 9, 2010 court decision concerning the impervious stormwater charge in which
the court determined that the impervious stormwater charge was in violation of the Hancock Amendment.
See page 104 of the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Statements included as Appendix A to
this Official Statement for a discussion of the impervious stormwater charge. In Fiscal Year 2019, the
total real and personal property taxes levied for stormwater was $33.3 million. On April 5, 2016, a special
election was held in which 62% of voters in the District’s service area approved Proposition S. The
approval of Proposition S put all District customers under the same property tax rates to pay for
stormwater service and, in turn, all District customers would receive the same level of stormwater service.
This process occurred gradually throughout Fiscal Year 2017. Proposition S allows the District to
rollback and eliminate several existing taxes, eliminate the stormwater fee and, in lieu of these funding
mechanisms, institute or leave in place two taxing districts that cover the District’s entire service area;
however, stormwater revenues do not constitute Pledged Revenues securing and payable to the Series
2019B&C Bonds.
The District also receives some federal, state, and local grants to help defray the cost of
constructing sewage treatment and drainage facilities and improvements. The District also charges fees
for plan review, permits, construction inspection of new system development, and special discharges. The
District charges a uniform connection fee in all service areas.
The District may issue general obligation bonds and revenue bonds to finance the cost of
improvements and extensions to the sewer system. The District also may issue, on behalf of each of its
subdistricts, general obligation bonds or revenue bonds. The issuance of general obligation bonds,
payable from a general tax levy on all taxable property within the District or a subdistrict, requires the
approval of either a four-sevenths or two-thirds majority of the voters voting at an election held in the
District or subdistrict, as the case may be. General obligation bonds outstanding cannot exceed five
percent of the assessed valuation of the area benefitted. At this time, there are no general obligation bonds
outstanding. Subdistricts may also issue revenue bonds, payable from user charges (which do not
constitute Pledged Revenues) after a similar procedure, but require only a simple majority vote.
Rate Commission and Rate Setting Process
General. The District’s Rate Commission reviews and makes recommendations to the Board
regarding all proposed changes in wastewater rates, stormwater rates and tax rates or change in the
structure of any of the foregoing. Upon receipt of a rate change notice from the District pursuant to the
Charter, the Rate Commission recommends changes in rates to the Board that will be necessary to pay
interest and principal falling due on bonds issued to finance assets of the District, the costs of operation
and maintenance and such amounts as may be required to cover emergencies and anticipated
delinquencies.
The Rate Commission has reviewed and recommended all rate increases that were approved by
the Board since August 2003. The Board accepted the 2015 Rate Commission’s recommendation report
on October 8, 2015. On June 9, 2016, the Board adopted Ordinance 14395, approving the rates for Fiscal
Years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020.
42
On March 4, 2019, the District submitted a rate change proposal for Fiscal Years 2021-2024 to go
through the Rate Commission review process. The rate change proposal included recommended changes
to the District’s revenues and expenses. See “Rate Increases”, below, for a discussion on the status of the
acceptance of the proposal.
Membership. The Rate Commission consists of one representative from each of fifteen
organizations within the District, each of which have been identified and designated by the Board as a
“Rate Commission Representative Organization.” The organizations selected by the Board are diverse
and represent residential customers, commercial and industrial customers, environmental interests, labor
interests, community and neighborhood organizations and nonprofit organizations. The previous Rate
Commission Representative Organizations were as follows:
Missouri Coalition for the Environment
Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers
North County Incorporated
St. Louis County Municipal League
Engineers Club of St. Louis
League of Women Voters of St. Louis
The Mound City Bar Association
Missouri Botanical Garden
Associated General Contractors of St. Louis
Education Plus
City of Ladue, Missouri
Home Builders Association
St. Louis Council of Construction Consumers
Greater St. Louis Labor Council
Lutheran Senior Services
Term of Membership. Pursuant to Section 7.240 of the Charter, each Rate Commission
Representative Organization selected by the Board shall have the right to designate a Rate Commission
Delegate to the Rate Commission for a term of six (6) years or completion of any unexpired term. The
Board shall designate organizations within the District to succeed such Rate Commission Representative
Organization, provided, however, that each Rate Commission Representative Organization shall serve
until its successor shall be appointed and qualified. Nothing herein shall bar a Rate Commission
Representative Organization from being named to successive terms.
Rate Setting Process. Pursuant to the Charter, whenever the District proposes or recommends a
change in rates, it shall give written notice (“Rate Change Notice”) to the Board and the Rate
Commission. Upon receipt of a Rate Change Notice and after review of same, the Rate Commission shall
cause at least one public hearing to be held on the record regarding the proposed rate change. The Rate
Commission shall issue its rate recommendation report (“Rate Commission Report”) to the Board and to
the public no later than 120 days after receipt of a Rate Change Notice. If the Board accepts the Rate
Commission Report or if the Board is deemed to have accepted a Rate Commission Report as set forth in
the Charter, the Board enacts an ordinance consistent with the Rate Commission Report. The Board may
reject, or fail to accept, the Rate Commission Report only upon a finding that such report does not
conform to the requirements of the Charter. No ordinance to effect a change in rates shall be introduced
for adoption under the Charter prior to the earlier of 45 days after receipt of the Rate Commission Report
or 45 days after the date on which the Rate Commission Report is due.
43
Pursuant to the Charter, any change in a rate recommended to the Board by the Rate Commission
must be accompanied by a statement of the Rate Commission that the proposed rate change and all
portions thereof:
(1) is consistent with constitutional, statutory or common law as amended from time to time;
(2) enhances the District’s ability to provide adequate sewer and drainage systems and
facilities, or related services;
(3) is consistent with and not in violation of any covenant or provision relating to any
outstanding bonds or indebtedness of the District;
(4) does not impair the ability of the District to comply with applicable Federal or State laws
or regulations as amended from time to time; and
(5) imposes a fair and reasonable burden on all classes of rate payers.
Billing and Collections
The District bills residential and commercial customers monthly for sewer service charges. As
previously described herein (See first paragraph under Sewer Rates and Revenues, above), sewer bills
are calculated upon several different bases, including the amount of water used each quarter, the winter
quarter usage only or, when water meters are not in use, the structure of the building. For customers
whose bills are based upon water usage, the District purchases data from the three water agencies serving
the metropolitan area: the St. Louis City Water Division, Missouri-American Water Company and
Kirkwood Water.
In the City, most single family homes and smaller multi-unit buildings are not equipped with
water meters. There are also a small number of properties in the County that use well water. When no
water meter reading is available, the District calculates the bill based on the attributes of the structure,
including the number of rooms, toilets, baths and separate showers.
Single family residential properties that have water meters are billed based on the winter quarter
water usage. The winter quarter is defined as the 3-month water meter reading taken in February, March
or April. With each July sewer bill the service charges are calculated on a 91-day prorated amount using
the previous winter quarter water meter reading. The monthly usage remains the same until the following
July, when the process is repeated. For single-family customers who have limited income, the District
offers a Customer Assistance program. For eligible customers, the monthly sewer bill is reduced by 50%
each month.
Commercial and multi-unit properties are billed based on the amount of water used each quarter
or, in a few cases, each month. The District’s monthly bill is based on one-third of the prior quarter’s
reading and remains the same amount for three months. The process is repeated for the next three months.
In the case of commercial properties, there is an additional compliance charge on each month’s bill and
the bill may include a surcharge for difficult to treat industrial waste or there may be a reduction factor,
based on water used in processing and not entering the sewer system. Multi-unit property owners also
have the option of being billed on the winter quarter reading or on each quarter reading.
44
Rate Increases
Pursuant to the rate review and setting procedures discussed under the caption “Rate
Commission and Rate Setting Process” above, the District submitted to the Rate Commission a request
to increase wastewater user charge rates. A Wastewater Rate Change (the “Rate Change”) was presented
to the Rate Commission on March 4, 2019. The Rate Commission then initiated proceedings to provide
for the submission of written testimony, technical conferences, discovery procedures, a public hearing and
post hearing briefs. Pursuant to the Charter, the Rate Commission is required to submit a rate
recommendation to the District’s Board of Trustees upon conclusion of its deliberations. On August 16,
2019, the Rate Commission submitted its recommendation to the Board. In that report the Rate
Commission found that the Rate Change is necessary to pay (i) interest and principal due on bonds issued
to finance assets of the District, (ii) the costs of operation and maintenance of the System, and (iii) such
amounts as may be required to cover emergencies and anticipated delinquencies. The Rate Commission
recommended rates to the Board for Fiscal Years 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. The Board accepted the
Rate Commission’s recommendation on October 10, 2019. The Board is expected to introduce and
approve an ordinance setting rates consistent with such report in early 2020.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
45
Historical and Projected Sewer Rates and Charges
The following table sets forth the wastewater sewer user charge rates in effect on July 1 for Fiscal
Years 2016 through 2020.
Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
Type of Monthly Charge July 1, 2015
(FY 2016)
Actual
July 1, 2016
(FY 2017)
Actual
July 1, 2017
(FY 2018)
Actual
July 1, 2018
(FY 2019)
Actual
July 1, 2019
(FY 2020)
Current
Base Charge ($/Bill)
Billing & Collection Charge $ 3.70 $ 5.44 $ 6.02 $ 6.67 $ 7.38
System Availability Charge 14.55 14.02 15.50 17.16 18.97
Total Base Charge (Residential) $ 18.25 $ 19.46 $ 21.52 $ 23.83 $ 26.35
Compliance Charge ($/Bill)
Tier 1 $ 2.15 $ 2.86 $ 2.95 $ 3.05 $ 3.14
Tier 2 44.50 57.20 58.94 60.89 62.61
Tier 3 94.80 125.84 129.67 133.96 137.75
Tier 4 139.00 185.90 191.56 197.91 203.49
Tier 5 183.15 243.10 250.50 258.79 266.10
Total Non-Residential Service Charge $ 20.40 $ 22.32 $ 24.47 $ 26.88 $ 29.49
Volume Charge
Metered ($/Ccf) $ 3.21 $ 3.59 $ 3.97 $ 4.40 $ 4.87
Unmetered ($/Bill per fixture)
Per Room 2.09 2.12 2.35 2.61 2.89
Per Water Closet 7.83 7.92 8.76 9.70 10.72
Per Bath 6.53 6.60 7.30 8.08 8.93
Per Separate Shower 6.53 6.60 7.30 8.08 8.93
Extra Strength Surcharges ($/ton)
Suspended Solids over 300 mg/l $251.88 $ 262.00 $ 269.07 $ 277.03 $ 283.87
Biological Oxygen Demand over
300 mg/l
$632.38 $ 654.00 $ 671.63 $ 691.50 $ 708.56
Chemical Oxygen Demand over
600 mg/l
$316.19 $ 327.00 $ 335.82 $ 345.76 $ 354.30
________________________
Source: Feasibility Report except for the “Total Non-Residential Service Charge” information, which was provided by the District.
Key: Ccf = hundred cubic feet (approx. 748 gallons); mg/l = milligram per liter
The recommended Rate Change is for a term of four years, Fiscal Years 2021 through 2024. The
Rate Commission Report states that the record of proceedings supports a finding that the District’s CIRP
would allow the District to meet the near-term capital improvements needs through 2024. The Rate
Commission further believed that the Rate Change and/or the issuance of debt are required to comply
with the Consent Decree. See “REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS – Regulatory Matters – Consent
Decree” herein.
The following table sets forth the current sewer rates and the rate increases recommended by the
Rate Commission and accepted by the Board on October 10, 2019, as to Fiscal Years 2021 through 2024.
46
The Board is expected to introduce and approve an ordinance in early 2020 imposing these rates for
Fiscal Years 2021 through 2024. See “Rate Commission and Rate Setting Process” herein.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
47
Type of Monthly Charge
Effective
July 1, 2019
(FY 2020)
Current
Effective
July 1, 2020
(FY 2021)
Proposed
Effective
July 1, 2021
(FY 2022)
Proposed
Effective
July 1, 2022
(FY 2023)
Proposed
Effective
July 1, 2023
(FY 2024)
Proposed
Base Charge ($/Bill)
Billing & Collection Charge $ 7.38 $ 5.11 $ 5.29 $ 5.48 $ 5.68
System Availability Charge
18.97 21.29 22.02
22.78
23.61
Total Base Charge
$ 26.35 $ 26.40 $ 27.31
$ 28.26
$ 29.29
Compliance Charge ($/Bill)
Tier 1 $ 3.14 $ 4.44 $ 4.55 $ 4.71 $ 4.85
Tier 2 62.61 62.16 63.64 65.80 67.67
Tier 3 137.75 133.20 136.37 140.99 144.98
Tier 4 203.49 177.60 181.83 187.98 193.30
Tier 5 266.10 222.00 227.29 234.98 241.63
Volume Charge
Metered ($/Ccf) $ 4.87 $ 5.00 $ 5.17 $ 5.35 $ 5.55
Unmetered ($/Bill)
Per Room $ 2.89 $ 2.95 $ 3.06 $ 3.17 $ 3.29
Per Water Closet 10.72 11.02 11.40 11.80 12.23
Per Bath 8.93 9.19 9.51 9.84 10.20
Per Separate Shower 8.93 9.19 9.51 9.84 10.20
Extra Strength Surcharges
($/ton)
Suspended Solids over 300
mg/l
$ 283.87 $ 302.67 $ 321.47
$ 332.35 $ 341.76
Biochemical Oxygen
Demand over 300 mg/l
708.56 812.94 917.32
948.34 975.18
Chemical Oxygen Demand
over 600 mg/l
354.30 406.47 458.66
474.17 487.59
_________
Source: Feasibility Report
Key: Ccf = hundred cubic feet (approx. 748 gallons); mg/l = milligram per liter
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
48
Customer Accounts
The District imposes a user charge on all customers that use its system of sewers, treatment plants
and other facilities. The number of customers per category of accounts is as follows:
Number of Customers by Type
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year
Single
Family
Residential
Multi-
Family
Residential
Commercial/
Industrial
Total
Accounts1
2010 387,670 50,867 31,939 470,476
2011 362,739 43,471 24,702 430,912
2012 360,354 41,648 24,568 426,570
2013 359,243 41,117 24,441 424,801
2014 358,928 40,951 24,297 424,176
2015 359,317 41,131 24,389 424,837
2016 356,926 41,585 24,001 422,512
2017 360,534 41,697 24,253 426,484
2018 360,957 41,355 24,296 426,608
2019 361,288 41,288 24,095 426,671
_________________
Source: District
1 These numbers are based on the District’s year-end financial statements and may differ from the historical numbers shown on Table 4 of the
Feasibility Report. These differences are due to presentation requirements for auditing purposes.
Largest User Charge Customers
The following table lists the District’s ten largest wastewater user charge customers for the Fiscal
Year ended June 30, 2019:
Customer User Charges Percent of Total
Anheuser-Busch InBev $5,380,744 1.36%
The City of St. Louis, Missouri 2,626,558 0.67%
Washington University in St. Louis 2,109,156 0.53%
Sigma-Aldrich 1,674,339 0.42%
The Boeing Company 1,251,265 0.32%
Jost Real Estate, L.L.C. 1,085,769 0.27%
BJC HealthCare 1,036,583 0.26%
Saint Louis University 1,033,565 0.26%
Missouri-American Water Co. 1,015,558 0.26%
GKN Aerospace 891,863 0.23%
Subtotal (10 largest) $18,105,400 4.58%
Balance from other customers $377,474,503 95.42%
Grand Totals $395,579,903 100.00%
__________________________
Source: District
User Charge Revenues
The following table shows the amount of wastewater user charge revenues which were billed and
collected by the District for the Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2010 through June 30, 2019:
49
Collections as a
Fiscal Wastewater Wastewater % of Wastewater
Year Charges Billed Charges Collected Charges Billed
2010 $204,248,506 $198,138,619 97.01%
2011 213,503,732 203,520,769 95.32%
2012 222,425,957 217,396,623 97.74%
2013
2014
233,882,795
245,555,628
233,877,875
241,549,548
99.99%
98.37%
2015
2016
2017
279,555,881
300,803,084
326,663,167
275,049,684
299,932,808
322,829,334
98.39%
99.71%
98.83%
2018 359,628,200 351,107,233 97.63%
2019 394,518,583 386,033,225 97.85%
__________________________
Source: District
Outstanding Indebtedness
General Obligation Indebtedness. As of the date of this Official Statement, the District has no
outstanding general obligation indebtedness on either a District-wide or subdistrict basis.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
50
Other Outstanding Debt. The District ended Fiscal Year 2019 with approximately $1.51 billion
in long-term sewer system revenue bond debt outstanding. The following table summarizes the
outstanding long-term debt for the District at the end of Fiscal Years 2017, 2018, and 2019:
Total Long-Term Debt
Outstanding (000s) 2017 2018 2019
Prior Senior Bonds:
Series 2010B $85,000 $85,000 $85,000
Series 2011B 43,410 18,055 15,945
Series 2012A* 214,700 159,340 154,040
Series 2012B (Refunding
of Series 2004A)* 134,710
131,935
128,840
Series 2013B* 146,000 116,615 113,615
Series 2015B*(Refunding
of Series 2006C and
Series 2008A)
221,355
192,810
190,135
Series 2016C 150,000 147,295 144,535
Series 2017A -316,175 312,760
Series 2018A1 -- 261
Subordinate SRF Bonds:
Series 2004B 81,545 73,190 64,590
Series 2005A 3,800 3,465 3,120
Series 2006A 25,600 23,315 20,965
Series 2006B 8,860 8,140 7,400
Series 2008B 25,605 23,700 21,765
Series 2009A 16,441 15,342 14,218
Series 2010A 6,222 5,849 5,468
Series 2010C 28,361 26,656 24,906
Series 2011A 35,692 33,988 32,241
Series 2013A 47,786 45,596 43,349
Series 2015A2 67,149 69,246 65,902
Series 2016A3 147 3,094 13,129
Series 2016B4 8,986 27,418 45,583
Series 2018B5 -- 2,880
Series 2019A6 -- -
Bonds No Longer
Outstanding
Series 2006C - - -
Series 2008A --
Non-Bond Related Debt: -
Energy Loan Program 68 51 16
TOTALS: $1,351,437 $1,526,275 $1,510,664
_______________________________
Source: District
* Denotes Prior Senior Bonds, a portion of each series of which will be refunded by the Series 2019C Bonds.
1 This series was issued in an original principal amount of not to exceed $47,722,204, of which $261,479.86 has been drawn as of November 1, 2019.
2 This series was issued in an original principal amount of not to exceed $75,000,000, of which $64,200,000 has been drawn as of November 1, 2019.
3 This series was issued in an original principal amount of not to exceed $20,000,000, of which $14,607,772 has been drawn as of November 1, 2019
4 This series was issued in an original principal amount of not to exceed $75,500,000, of which $55,849,080 has been drawn as of November 1, 2019.
5 This series was issued in an original principal amount of not to exceed $25,267,000, of which $7,472,837 has been drawn as of November 1, 2019.
6 This series was issued in an original principal amount of not to exceed $23,952,000, of which $174,712 has been drawn as of November 1, 2019.
51
Employee Benefits
The District currently maintains three pension plans for its employees: (i) a noncontributory
single employer defined benefit plan (the “Defined Benefit Plan”) providing retirement benefits as well
as death and disability benefits to all full-time District employees commencing services prior to
December 31, 2010, (ii) a defined contribution plan (the “Defined Contribution Plan”) and (iii) a
deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”).
A Pension Committee (consisting of two members of the District’s Board, two elected employee
members and four members of the District’s management staff) administers the Defined Benefit Plan. The
Defined Benefit Plan is exempt from the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (“ERISA”) and, as such, is not subject to ERISA’s reporting requirements. As a noncontributory
plan, the District’s employees do not contribute to the Defined Benefit Plan. Ordinances establishing the
Defined Benefit Plan provide for actuarially determined annual contributions, paid solely by the District,
that are sufficient to pay benefits when due. Contributions of $12,609,689 and $12,411,025, excluding
certain professional fees paid by the District, were made to the Defined Benefit Plan during the District’s
Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These contributions were made in accordance
with actuarially determined contribution requirements based on actuarial valuations performed at
December 31, 2018, and 2017, respectively. For 2019, the actuarially determined contribution consists of
(a) $5,238,812 normal cost plus (b) $7,001,606 amortization of the actuarial accrued assets in excess of
the actuarial accrued liability and prior changes (c) multiplied by an inflation factor of 1.02%, which
totals $12,493,916. For 2018, the actuarially determined contribution consists of (a) $5,157,148 normal
cost plus (b) $6,364,434 amortization of the actuarial accrued assets in excess of the actuarial accrued
liability and prior changes (c) multiplied by an inflation factor of 1.07%, which totals $12,328,093. In the
2019 valuation, the number of active members included in the valuation decreased from 595 to 545 and
the number of retirees and beneficiaries increased from 722 to 748. The Funded Ratio for December 31,
2018, is 82.6%, down 0.60% from the period ended December 31, 2017. The District provides certain
professional fees, office space, utilities, and other services to the Defined Benefit Plan at no cost. Other
costs of administering the Defined Benefit Plan are financed from plan net assets. For more information
regarding the District’s Defined Benefit Plan, see Note 7, Pension Plan, in the District’s Notes to
Financial Statements contained in Appendix A to this Official Statement.
Effective January 1, 2011, the District started the Defined Contribution Plan for all new hires.
Current employees with less than 10 years of service on December 31, 2010, could voluntarily elect to
transfer from the Defined Benefit Plan into the Defined Contribution Plan. The Defined Contribution Plan
provides a basic contribution of 7% of employee annual earnings and provides a matching contribution of
50% of the first 4% of earnings the employee defers into the Deferred Compensation Plan. (This is a
maximum matching contribution of 2% of earnings.) Employees decide upon the investment of these
contributions and investment earnings from funds offered by Vanguard. Initial participation consisted of
twenty-three employees who transferred balances totaling $70,869 from the Defined Benefit Plan. At
December 31, 2018, the Defined Contribution Plan consisted of 459 participants with account balances
just over $8.6 million in net position. For more information regarding the District’s Defined Contribution
Plan, see Note 8, Other Retirement Plans at Defined Contribution Plan, in the District’s Notes to Financial
Statements contained in Appendix A to this Official Statement.
The District also offers its employees the Deferred Compensation Plan created in accordance with
Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The Deferred Compensation Plan, available to all District employees,
permits them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not
available to employees until separation from service, or in special approved circumstances due to
financial hardship as defined by the Deferred Compensation Plan. Plan assets are held in trust for the
exclusive benefit of participants and their beneficiaries. As a result, the assets and liabilities of the
52
Deferred Compensation Plan are not included in the District’s financial statements. For more information
regarding the District’s Deferred Compensation Plan, see Note 8 in the District’s Notes to Financial
Statements contained in Appendix A to this Official Statement.
Other Post-Employment Benefits
The District pays 80% to 91% of the monthly group health insurance premium for the individual
until the retiree becomes eligible for Medicare. During Fiscal Years 2019 and 2018, expenses of
$2,586,148 and $2,557,327, respectively, were recognized for post-retirement health care premiums as
those premiums were paid. The District’s total OPEB liability at June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively,
were $24,164,395 and $24,193,972. It is estimated that for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2019, the
District’s unfunded accrued liability will be approximately $24 million assuming a 6.90% return on
investment. For more information regarding the District’s OPEB plans, see Note 9 in the District’s Notes
to Financial Statements contained in Appendix A to this Official Statement. Also see the section herein
captioned “FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OF THE DISTRICT – Selected Financial Data of the
District.”
Tax Limitation Amendment – Hancock Amendment
An amendment to the Missouri Constitution (the “Hancock Amendment”) limits the rate of
increase and the total amount of taxes on property which may be imposed in any year, and the limit may
not be exceeded without voter approval. Provisions are included in the amendment for rolling back tax
rates to produce an amount of revenues equal to that of the previous year if the definition of the tax base
is changed or if property is reassessed. The tax levy on the assessed valuation of new construction is
exempt from this limitation.
The Hancock Amendment also requires a political subdivision of the State to seek voter approval
in order to increase any “tax, license or fee” over existing rates. A Missouri court has held that the
District’s current wastewater user charge structure does not constitute a “tax, license or fee” for purposes
of the Hancock Amendment’s voter approval requirements. Since the Series 2019B&C Bonds are
approved by the voters, the Hancock Amendment does not prohibit an increase in the District’s
wastewater user charges to pay debt service on the Series 2019B&C Bonds.
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
General
The District is subject to the provisions of the (a) Clean Water Act, the stated objective of which
is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters, (b) the
Missouri Clean Water Law, and (c) other laws and regulations. The regulatory requirements are
administered by the EPA through DNR. The District is currently not subject to the federal Safe Drinking
Water Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq., which is also administered by the EPA.
The Clean Water Act imposes several permit and regulatory requirements on wastewater
treatment systems. Public sewage treatment plant owners and operators such as the District are required to
provide secondary treatment as established by federal regulation for all wastewater discharge from
treatment plants into waters of the United States of America. Under the Clean Water Act, states also
establish water quality standards, classifying water body uses, and pollutant control criteria to protect
those uses. All sewage system discharges require National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(“NPDES”) permits specifying the permissible pollutant levels in wastewater effluent discharged from
the plants. In addition to secondary treatment requirements for publicly-owned treatment plants, all
53
discharges from plants and combined sewer overflows (“CSO”) may be subject to additional stringent
controls (which are then incorporated into NPDES permits) if such discharges are required to achieve the
water quality standards established by the state pursuant to federal regulations. Under State law, the State
also requires treatment plants to obtain state surface water discharge permits, which, in the discretion of
EPA and DNR, may be issued jointly with the NPDES permit. Major wastewater treatment systems also
must adopt and enforce pretreatment regulations for industries and other non-domestic sources
discharging into sewers. Treatment plants are also subject to Clean Water Act and State regulations
governing sludge use and disposal.
The Clean Water Act is enforced by EPA through administrative orders and procedures.
Violations may be the basis for federal lawsuits brought on EPA’s behalf by the U.S. Department of
Justice or by private citizens.
Regulatory Matters – Consent Decree
In 2007, the Department of Justice filed suit on behalf of the EPA against the District for various
alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The District had been the subject of several investigatory
actions by EPA over the prior several years. The District, EPA, DNR, represented by the Missouri
Attorney General, and an environmental group allowed to intervene in the lawsuit engaged in several
years of litigation. In 2011, the District and the EPA negotiated the Consent Decree (the “Consent
Decree”) that resulted in settlement and dismissal of the original lawsuit. See Note 12, Commitments and
Contingencies, in the District’s Notes to Financial Statements contained in Appendix A to this Official
Statement for additional information regarding this litigation.
The District’s Board adopted Ordinance No. 13277 at its June 29, 2011, meeting that authorized
the District’s Executive Director and General Counsel to sign the Consent Decree. Under the Consent
Decree, the District agreed to spend over $5 billion dollars over the next 23 years to implement various
system improvements and programs designed to eliminate or reduce overflows from the combined and
separate sewer system in order to improve water quality and protect human health and the environment.
Most of the improvements enumerated in the Consent Decree were already addressed in the District’s
long-term over $5 billion dollars CIRP. The State did not agree to sign the Consent Decree in its present
form. However, all parties, including the State, accepted language in a motion filed with the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (the “Court”) in August 2011, which indicated that there were
no issues remaining to be resolved in the proceedings. On August 4, 2011, the Consent Decree was
lodged with the Court. An extended public comment period ended October 10, 2011. On April 27, 2012,
the Court entered the Consent Decree, thus concluding the litigation of this lawsuit. On that same day the
Court entered a Memorandum and Order which realigned the State as a defendant and reaffirmed a 2009
decision by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that the State had waived its sovereign immunity.
Although this litigation matter has concluded, the District is working diligently to implement the Consent
Decree on schedule.
On June 22, 2018, the Court approved an amendment to the Consent Decree to extend it by five
years from a 23-year program to a 28-year program. This amendment to the Consent Decree allows the
District to deliver an accelerated schedule of regulatorily required non-Consent Decree work without
placing an additional financial burden on the District’s ratepayers.
RISK FACTORS
The following is a discussion of certain risks and other considerations that should be considered
in conjunction with all other information contained in this Official Statement, including the Appendices
hereto, by prospective investors in evaluating the Series 2019B&C Bonds. Such discussion is not, and is
54
not intended to be, exhaustive and should not be considered as a comprehensive or exhaustive discussion
of risks or other considerations which may be relevant to an investment in the Series 2019B&C Bonds. In
addition, the order in which the following information is presented is not intended to reflect the relative
importance of any such considerations. There can be no assurance that other risk factors not discussed
herein will not become material in the future.
Factors Affecting the District
One or more of the following factors or events, or the occurrence of other unanticipated factors or
events, could adversely affect the District’s operations and financial performance to an extent
indeterminable at this time.
Changes in Management or Policies. Changes in key management personnel or policies of the
District could adversely affect the financial performance of the District.
Future Economic Conditions. Increased unemployment or other adverse economic conditions or
changes in the demographics of the District; an inability to control expenses in periods of inflation and
difficulties in increasing charges could adversely affect the District’s financial performance. For more
information on the District’s rate setting process see “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OVERVIEW – Rate Commission and Rate Setting Process.”
Insurance Claims. Increases in the cost of the District’s insurance coverages and the amounts paid
in settlement of claims not covered by insurance could adversely affect the financial performance of the
District.
Organized Labor Efforts. Certain employees of the District’s Operations Department are
represented by collective bargaining units. Labor disputes with these collective bargaining units could
result in adverse labor actions or increased labor costs.
Environmental Regulation. Sewer utilities are subject to continuing environmental regulation.
Federal, state and local standards and procedures that regulate the environmental impact of water or sewer
utilities are subject to change. These changes may arise from continuing legislative, regulatory and
judicial action regarding such standards and procedures. Consequently, there is no assurance that facilities
in operation will remain subject to the regulations currently in effect, will always be in compliance with
further regulations or will always be able to obtain all required operating permits. An inability to comply
with environmental standards could result in reduced operating levels and fines. Legislative, regulatory,
administrative or enforcement actions involving environmental controls could also adversely affect the
operation of the System. For example, if property of the District is determined to be contaminated by
hazardous materials, the District could be liable for significant clean-up costs even if it were not
responsible for the contamination.
Natural Disasters/Climate. The occurrence of natural disasters, such as tornados, earthquakes,
floods or droughts, could damage the facilities of the District, interrupt services or otherwise impair
operations and the ability of the District to produce revenues.
Terrorist Attacks. Although potential terrorist attacks could temporarily disrupt wastewater
treatment service, the District has taken and continues to take precautions to minimize this risk, but does
not represent that any existing or additional safety or security measures will be adequate in the event that
terrorist activities are directed at the System.
55
Miscellaneous Factors. The sewer industry in general has experienced, or may in the future
experience, problems including (a) the effects of inflation on the costs of operation of facilities,
(b) increased financing requirements coupled with the increased cost and uncertain availability of capital,
and (c) compliance with rapidly changing environmental, safety and licensing regulations and
requirements.
Summary Financial Information
Certain summarized historical financial information and certain projected revenues and
expenditures of the District are summarized in this Official Statement and its appendices. There can be
no assurance that the financial results achieved by the District in the future will be similar to historical
results or the projections contained herein. Such future results will vary from historical results, and actual
variations may be material. Information as to the projected figures and the assumptions upon which they
are based are contained in this Official Statement and its appendices. No assurance can be given that
assumptions used in preparing projected revenues are accurate including, but not limited to, those as to
water usage volume, operating and maintenance expenses, and the stability of the customer base.
Significant variations in such assumptions may affect the actual operating and financial results. Therefore,
the historical operating results of the District’s System contained in this Official Statement cannot be
viewed as a representation that the District will be able to generate sufficient revenues in the future to
make timely payment of principal of, redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Series 2019B&C
Bonds.
Certain Bankruptcy Risks
The remedies available to the owners of the Series 2019B&C Bonds upon an event of default
under the Bond Ordinance, as applicable are in many respects dependent upon judicial actions that are
often subject to discretion and delay. Under existing constitutional and statutory law and judicial
decisions, including specifically the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. the
remedies provided in the Bond Ordinance may not be readily available or may be limited. The various
legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Series 2019B&C Bonds will be
qualified as to the enforceability of the various legal instruments by limitations imposed by general
principles of equity and by bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or other similar laws, affecting the
rights of creditors generally.
Secondary Markets and Prices
The Underwriters will not be obligated to repurchase any of the Series 2019B&C Bonds and no
representation is made concerning the existence of any secondary market for the Series 2019B&C Bonds.
No assurance can be given that any secondary market will develop following the completion of the
offering of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, and no assurance can be given that the initial offering prices for
the Series 2019B&C Bonds will continue for any time period.
Risk of Taxability of Series 2019B Bonds
For information with respect to events occurring subsequent to issuance of the Series 2019B&C
Bonds that may require that interest on such Series 2019B Bonds be included in gross income for
purposes of federal income taxation, see the caption “TAX MATTERS” in this Official Statement.
56
Risk of Audit of Series 2019B Bonds
The Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) has established an ongoing program to audit tax-
exempt obligations to determine whether interest on such obligations should be included in gross income
for federal income tax purposes. Owners of the Series 2019B Bonds are advised that, if the Service does
audit such Series 2019B Bonds, under current Service procedures, at least during the early stages of an
audit, the Service will treat the District as the taxpayer, and the owners of such Series 2019B Bonds may
have limited rights to participate in the audit. Public awareness of any audit could adversely affect the
market value and liquidity of Series 2019B Bonds during the pendency of the audit, regardless of the
ultimate outcome thereof.
Limited Obligations
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are limited obligations of the District, payable solely from the
Pledged Revenues generated from the operation of the System. The Series 2019B&C Bonds and the
interest thereon shall not constitute a general or moral obligation of the District nor a debt, indebtedness,
or obligation of, or a pledge of the faith and credit of, the District, the State or any political subdivision
thereof, within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter provision whatsoever. The taxing
power of the District, the State or any political subdivision is not pledged to the payment of the Series
2019B&C Bonds or the interest thereon. The District has no authority to levy any taxes to pay the Series
2019B&C Bonds.
Loss of Premium Upon Early Redemption
Purchasers of the Series 2019B&C Bonds at a price in excess of their principal amount should
consider the fact that the Series 2019B&C Bonds are subject to redemption at a redemption price equal to
their principal amount plus accrued interest under certain circumstances. See “THE SERIES 2019B&C
BONDS – Redemption Provisions.”
LITIGATION
Except as described in the “REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS – Regulatory Matters –
Consent Decree” above, as of the date hereof, to the knowledge of the District there is no legal action,
suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body
for which the District has been served with process or official notice or threatened against or affecting the
District or any reasonable basis therefor, wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding would
adversely affect the transaction contemplated by this Official Statement or the validity of the Series
2019B&C Bonds, the Bond Ordinance, or any agreement or instrument to which the District is a party
and which is used or contemplated for use in the transactions contemplated by this Official Statement, and
no member, employee or agent of the District has been served with any legal process regarding such
litigation or other proceeding.
TAX MATTERS
The following is a summary of the material federal and State of Missouri income tax
consequences of holding and disposing of the Series 2019B Bonds and the Series 2019C Bonds. This
summary is based upon laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions now in effect, all of which are
subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis). This summary does not discuss all aspects of federal
income taxation that may be relevant to investors in light of their personal investment circumstances or
describe the tax consequences to certain types of owners subject to special treatment under the federal
income tax laws (for example, dealers in securities or other persons who do not hold the Series 2019B
57
Bonds or the Series 2019C Bonds as a capital asset, tax-exempt organizations, individual retirement
accounts and other tax deferred accounts, and foreign taxpayers), and, except for the income tax laws of
the State of Missouri, does not discuss the consequences to an owner under any state, local or foreign tax
laws. The summary does not deal with the tax treatment of persons who purchase the Series 2019B
Bonds or the Series 2019C Bonds in the secondary market. Prospective investors are advised to consult
their own tax advisors regarding federal, state, local, foreign and other tax considerations of holding and
disposing of the Series 2019B Bonds and the Series 2019C Bonds.
Tax Status of the Series 2019B Bonds – Opinion of Co-Bond Counsel
Opinion of Co-Bond Counsel Regarding the Series 2019B Bonds
In the opinion of Gilmore & Bell, P.C. and White Coleman & Associates, LLC, Co-Bond Counsel
to the District, under the law existing as of the issue date of the Series 2019B Bonds:
Federal and State of Missouri Tax Exemption. The interest on the Series 2019B Bonds is
excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is exempt from income taxation by the
State of Missouri.
Alternative Minimum Tax. Interest on the Series 2019B Bonds is not an item of tax preference
for purposes of computing the federal alternative minimum tax.
Bank Qualification. The Series 2019B Bonds have not been designated as “qualified tax-exempt
obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code.
Co-Bond Counsel’s opinions are provided as of the date of the original issue of the Series 2019B
Bonds, subject to the condition that the District comply with all requirements of the Code that must be
satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds in order that interest thereon be, or
continue to be, excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The District has
covenanted to comply with all of these requirements. Failure to comply with certain of these requirements
may cause the inclusion of interest on the Series 2019B Bonds in gross income for federal and State of
Missouri income tax purposes retroactive to the date of issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds. Co-Bond
Counsel is expressing no opinion regarding other federal, state or local tax consequences arising with
respect to the Series 2019B Bonds but has reviewed the discussion under the heading “TAX
MATTERS”.
Series 2019B Bonds – Other Tax Consequences
Original Issue Premium. For federal income tax purposes, premium is the excess of the issue
price of a Series 2019B Bond over its stated redemption price at maturity. The issue price of a
Series 2019B Bond is generally the first price at which a substantial amount of the Series 2019B Bonds of
that maturity have been sold to the public. Under Section 171 of the Code, the purchaser of that
Series 2019B Bond must amortize the premium over the term of that Series 2019B Bond using constant
yield principles, based on the purchaser’s yield to maturity. As premium is amortized, the owner’s basis
in that Series 2019B Bond and the amount of tax-exempt interest received will be reduced by the amount
of amortizable premium properly allocable to the owner. This will result in an increase in the gain (or
decrease in the loss) to be recognized for federal income tax purposes on sale or disposition of that
Series 2019B Bond prior to its maturity. Even though the owner’s basis is reduced, no federal income tax
deduction is allowed. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the
calculation and accrual of bond premium.
58
Sale, Exchange or Retirement of Series 2019B Bonds. Upon the sale, exchange or retirement
(including redemption) of a Series 2019B Bond, an owner of the Series 2019B Bond generally will
recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash and the fair
market value of any property received on the sale, exchange or retirement of the Series 2019B Bond
(other than in respect of accrued and unpaid interest) and such owner’s adjusted tax basis in the Series
2019B Bond. To the extent a Series 2019B Bond is held as a capital asset, such gain or loss will be
capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Series 2019B Bond has been held for
more than 12 months at the time of sale, exchange or retirement.
Reporting Requirements. In general, information reporting requirements will apply to certain
payments of principal, interest and premium paid on the Series 2019B Bonds, and to the proceeds paid on
the sale of the Series 2019B Bonds, other than certain exempt recipients (such as corporations and foreign
entities). A backup withholding tax will apply to such payments if the owner fails to provide a taxpayer
identification number or certification of foreign or other exempt status or fails to report in full dividend
and interest income. The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to an owner will be allowed
as a credit against the owner’s federal income tax liability.
Collateral Federal Income Tax Consequences. Prospective purchasers of the Series 2019B
Bonds should be aware that ownership of the Series 2019B Bonds may result in collateral federal income
tax consequences to certain taxpayers, including, without limitation, financial institutions, property and
casualty insurance companies, individual recipients of Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefits,
certain S corporations with “excess net passive income,” foreign corporations subject to the branch profits
tax, life insurance companies, and taxpayers who may be deemed to have incurred or continued
indebtedness to purchase or carry or have paid or incurred certain expenses allocable to the Series 2019B
Bonds. Co-Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding these tax consequences. Purchasers of Series
2019B Bonds should consult their tax advisors as to the applicability of these tax consequences and other
federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Series 2019B Bonds,
including the possible application of state, local, foreign and other tax laws.
Tax Status of the Series 2019C Bonds
Introduction. The following discussion summarizes certain material U.S. federal income tax
considerations generally applicable to the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Series 2019C
Bonds by the Beneficial Owners thereof. The discussion is limited to the tax consequences to the initial
Beneficial Owners of the Series 2019C Bonds who purchase the Series 2019C Bonds at the issue price,
within the meaning of Section 1273 of the Code. The discussion does not address the tax consequences to
subsequent purchasers of the Series 2019C Bonds, including but not limited to the impact of the so-called
“market discount” rules set forth in Sections 1276-1278 of the Code.
The discussion does not purport to be, and is not, a complete analysis of all of the potential U.S.
federal income tax consequences relating to the purchase, ownership, and disposition of the Series 2019C
Bonds. For example, the discussion does not address any state, local, non-U.S., U.S. federal estate, or
U.S. federal gift tax consequences. The U.S. federal income taxation with respect to an investment in the
Series 2019C Bonds is complex and may involve, among other things, significant issues as to the timing,
character, source, and allocation of gains and losses. The discussion is necessarily general and is not
intended to be applicable to all categories of purchasers, some of which, such as banks, thrifts, insurance
companies, regulated investment companies, real estate mortgage investment conduits, dealers and traders
in securities that elect to mark to market their securities portfolios, Beneficial Owners who do not own the
Series 2019C Bonds as capital assets, and Non-U.S. Beneficial Owners (as hereinafter defined) classified
for U.S. federal income tax purposes as “controlled foreign corporations,” “passive foreign investment
companies,” “personal holding companies,” or “expatriates,” may be subject to special rules. The
59
discussion also does not address the special rules applicable to purchasers who hold the Series 2019C
Bonds as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion, constructive ownership or constructive sale transaction, or
other risk reduction transaction. The discussion assumes the Series 2019C Bonds are held as capital
assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.
The discussion is based on the Code, Treasury Regulations issued under the Code (the “Treasury
Regulations”), administrative rulings, and judicial decisions as in effect at the time this Official
Statement is being written, all of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect) or different
interpretations. No assurance can be given that future legislation, administrative guidance, administrative
rulings, or judicial decisions will not modify the conclusions set forth herein. The actual tax and financial
consequences of the ownership or sale of the Series 2019C Bonds will vary depending upon each
Beneficial Owner’s circumstances.
The legislation commonly referred to as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (“2017 Tax Reform Act”)
significantly changed the U.S. taxation of individuals, sole proprietorships, corporations, and
pass-through entities. Most provisions in the 2017 Tax Reform Act which apply to individuals are set to
expire on December 31, 2025, which means U.S. federal income tax law as applied to individuals reverts
back to the law as it existed prior to the effectiveness of the 2017 Tax Reform Act. Although this section
of the Official Statement summarizes certain key changes made by the 2017 Tax Reform Act and
explains, where appropriate, how an expiration of those provisions may affect Beneficial Owners, it is not
intended to be an exhaustive discussion of those provisions.
Nomenclature. This section uses certain nomenclature to distinguish between the tax treatment
applicable to different types of Beneficial Owners. For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Beneficial
Owner” is a Beneficial Owner of a Series 2019C Bond that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is: (i) a
citizen or resident of the United States of America (as such residency is determined for U.S. federal
income tax purposes); (ii) a corporation, or an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, in either case created or organized in or under the laws of the United States of America or of
any political subdivision thereof; (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source; or (iv) a trust, the administration of which is subject to the primary
supervision of a court within the United States of America and which has one or more United States of
America persons (as described in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) with the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust, or a trust that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury
Regulations to be treated as a United States of America person (as described in Section 7701(a)(30) of the
Code). For purposes of this discussion, a “Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner” is a person that is not a United
States of America person (as described in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code).
No Federal or State of Missouri Tax Exemption. The interest on the Series 2019C Bonds is
included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, in accordance with an owner’s normal method
of accounting, and is not exempt from income taxation by the State of Missouri.
No Opinions. Co-Bond Counsel is expressing no opinion regarding federal, state, local, or
foreign tax consequences arising with respect to the Series 2019C Bonds. Beneficial Owners of Series
2019C Bonds should consult their tax advisors as to the applicability of these tax consequences and other
federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Series 2019C Bonds,
including the possible application of state, local, foreign and other tax laws.
Series 2019C Bonds – Other Tax Consequences to U.S. Beneficial Owners
In General. Interest received or accrued, as well as any gain or loss on the sale, exchange,
redemption, or other disposition of the Series 2019C Bonds, will not be exempt from U.S. federal income
60
tax in the hands of a U.S. Beneficial Owner. Instead, subject to the more detailed discussion in this
section, interest received or accrued on the Series 2019C Bonds will be taxable to a U.S. Beneficial
Owner at ordinary income tax rates and any gain on the sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition
of a Series 2019C Bond generally will be taxable to the U.S. Beneficial Owner at the tax rates applicable
to capital gains. The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Beneficial Owner may also be
affected if a U.S. Beneficial Owner acquires a Series 2019C Bond at a discount or at a premium. If a
partnership, or an entity taxable as a partnership, holds the Series 2019C Bonds, then the U.S. federal
income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the tax status of
the partnership. Partners of partnerships holding the Series 2019C Bonds should consult their own tax
advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the purchase, ownership, and disposition
of the Series 2019C Bonds.
Stated Interest. Stated interest on the Series 2019C Bonds will be taxable to a U.S. Beneficial
Owner as ordinary income and generally at the time the interest is received or accrued in accordance with
the U.S. Beneficial Owner’s method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Original Issue Discount. For federal income tax purposes, original issue discount (“OID”) is the
excess of the stated redemption price at maturity of a Series 2019C Bond over its issue price. The issue
price of a Series 2019C Bond is the first price at which a substantial amount of the Series 2019C Bonds of
that maturity have been sold to the public. If the original issue discount on a Series 2019C Bond is more
than a de minimis amount (generally ¼ of 1% of the stated redemption price at maturity of the Series
2019C Bond multiplied by the number of complete years to its maturity date), then that Series 2019C
Bond will be treated as issued with original issue discount. The amount of original issue discount that
accrues to a U.S. Beneficial Owner of a Series 2019C Bond during any accrual period generally equals
(1) the issue price of that Series 2019C Bond, plus the amount of original issue discount accrued in all
prior accrual periods, multiplied by (2) the yield to maturity on that Series 2019C Bond (determined on
the basis of compounding at the close of each accrual period and properly adjusted for the length of the
accrual period), minus (3) any interest payable on that Series 2019C Bond during that accrual period. The
amount of original issue discount accrued in a particular accrual period will be considered to be received
ratably on each day of the accrual period, will be included in gross income for federal income tax
purposes, and will increase a U.S. Beneficial Owner’s tax basis in that Series 2019C Bond. Prospective
investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the calculation and accrual of original issue
discount.
Original Issue Premium. For federal income tax purposes, premium is the excess of the issue
price of a Series 2019C Bond over its stated redemption price at maturity. The issue price of a
Series 2019C Bond is generally the first price at which a substantial amount of the Series 2019C Bonds of
that maturity have been sold to the public. Under Section 171 of the Code, a U.S. Beneficial Owner of a
Series 2019C Bond having bond premium may elect to amortize the premium over the term of the Series
2019C Bond using constant yield principles, based on the purchaser’s yield to maturity. A U.S. Beneficial
Owner of a Series 2019C Bond amortizes bond premium by offsetting the qualified stated interest
allocable to an accrual period with the bond premium allocable to that accrual period. This offset occurs
when the U.S. Beneficial Owner takes the qualified stated interest into income under the U.S. Beneficial
Owner’s regular method of accounting. If the premium allocable to an accrual period exceeds the
qualified stated interest for that period, the excess is treated by the U.S. Beneficial Owner as a deduction
under Section 171(a)(1) of the Code. As premium is amortized, a U.S. Beneficial Owner’s basis in the
Series 2019C Bond will be reduced by the amount of amortizable bond premium properly allocable to the
U.S. Beneficial Owner. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning the
calculation and accrual of bond premium.
61
Principal Payments. Subject to certain exceptions (including the special rules for de minimis
OID described under the Original Issue Discount section above), principal payments on the Series 2019C
Bonds generally will constitute a tax-free return of capital that will reduce a U.S. Beneficial Owner’s
adjusted tax basis in the Series 2019C Bond to which the principal payment relates.
Sale, Exchange, Redemption, or Other Disposition. If a U.S. Beneficial Owner of a Series
2019C Bond sells, exchanges, redeems, or otherwise disposes of the Series 2019C Bond, then the U.S.
Beneficial Owner will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized
on the sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition (other than amounts representing accrued but
unpaid interest, which amounts will be treated as a payment of interest) and the U.S. Beneficial Owner’s
adjusted tax basis in the Series 2019C Bond. The U.S. Beneficial Owner’s adjusted tax basis of a Series
2019C Bond generally will equal the U.S. Beneficial Owner’s cost of acquiring such bond, increased by
any OID previously included by the U.S. Beneficial Owner in income with respect to such bond, and
decreased by the amount of any bond premium previously amortized with respect to such bond and by the
amount of principal payments received by the U.S. Beneficial Owner with respect to such bond. Further,
if the District establishes a legal defeasance of any Series 2019C Bond, that Series 2019C Bond may be
deemed to be retired and “reissued” for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the defeasance.
Effect of Recent Changes in U.S. Tax Laws. Under the 2017 Tax Reform Act, a U.S. Beneficial
Owner that uses an accrual method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes and prepares an
“applicable financial statement” (within the meaning of Section 451 of the Code) generally would be
required to include certain amounts in income no later than the time such amounts are reflected on such
financial statements. This rule generally is effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018,
but for debt instruments issued with OID, this rule is effective for tax years beginning on or after January
1, 2019. The application of this rule may require the accrual of income earlier than would be the case
under the general tax rules previously discussed for certain U.S. Beneficial Owners. Prospective
purchasers should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential applicability of these rules to
their ownership and disposition of the Series 2019C Bonds.
Series 2019C Bonds – Other Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Beneficial Owners
In General. The United States of America currently taxes the worldwide income of United States
of America citizens, resident aliens, and domestic corporations without regard to whether the income
arose from a transaction or activity that originated outside its geographic borders. Nonresident aliens and
foreign corporations are generally taxed in the same manner as United States of America citizens, resident
aliens, and domestic corporations on income that is effectively connected with a trade or business in the
United States of America. Stated differently, foreign persons are subject to United States of America tax
on any income that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States of
America.
Different rules apply when the income is not effectively connected with a trade or business in the
United States of America. For example, income not effectively connected with a trade or business in the
United States of America, but which is fixed, determinable, annual or periodical, generally is taxed at a
rate equal to thirty percent (30%), unless a lower rate applies pursuant to United States of America law or
an applicable income tax treaty. Pursuant to Sections 1441 and 1442 of the Code, tax due on fixed,
determinable, annual or periodical income is generally required to be withheld from each payment made
to the foreign person and remitted by the withholding agent to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. In
general, interest (including OID) is fixed, determinable, annual or periodical income, and as such, interest
(including OID) is typically subject to U.S. withholding tax, unless an exception applies. Pursuant to
Sections 871(h) and 881(c) of the Code, so-called “portfolio interest” is exempt from U.S. withholding
62
tax. Prospective purchases should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential applicability of
the “portfolio interest” exemption from United States of America withholding tax.
Payments of Interest. Subject to the discussion below under the headings “FATCA” and
“Backup Withholding and Information Reporting,” payments of interest (including OID) with respect to a
Series 2019C Bond held by a Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner generally may not be subject to United States
of America withholding tax, provided that the statement requirement set forth in Section 871(h) or
Section 881(c) of the Code (each described below) has been fulfilled with respect to such Non-U.S.
Beneficial Owner.
Payments of Principal. Subject to the discussion below under the headings “FATCA” and
“Backup Withholding and Information Reporting,” payments of principal with respect to a Series 2019C
Bond held by a Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner generally may not be subject to United States of America
withholding tax.
Sale, Exchange, Redemption, or Other Disposition. Subject to the discussion below under the
headings “FATCA” and “Backup Withholding and Information Reporting,” a Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner
generally will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax on gain realized from the sale, exchange,
redemption, or other disposition of a Series 2019C Bond, unless: (i) such Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner is
an individual who is present in the United States of America for 183 or more days in the taxable year of
such sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition and certain other conditions are met; or (ii) such
gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner of a trade or business in
the United States of America (and, under certain income tax treaties, is attributable to a United States of
America permanent establishment maintained by such Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner). Further, if the
District establishes a legal defeasance of any Series 2019C Bond, that Series 2019C Bond may be deemed
to be retired and “reissued” for United States of America federal income tax purposes as a result of the
defeasance.
Required Certifications to Obtain Exemption from Withholding. Sections 871(h) and 881(c) of
the Code require that, in order for a Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner to obtain the above-described exemptions
from United States of America withholding tax, either the Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner or a securities
clearing organization, bank, or other financial institution that holds customers’ securities in the ordinary
course of its trade or business (“Financial Institution”) and that is holding the Series 2019C Bond on
behalf of such Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner, must file a statement with the District, its paying agent, or
other applicable withholding agent to the effect that the Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner is not a United States
of America person (as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code). Such requirement will be met if the
Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner: (i) provides his, her, or its name and address; (ii) certifies under penalties of
perjury that he, she, or it is not a United States of America person (as defined in Section 7701(a)(30) of
the Code); and (iii) so certifies on the appropriate IRS Form, which is IRS Form W-8BEN for an
individual, Form W-8BEN-E for an entity, Form W-8EXP for a foreign government, international
organization, foreign central bank of issue, foreign tax-exempt organization, foreign private foundation,
or government of a United States of America possession, or any successor form. Such requirement will
also be met if any Financial Institution holding the Series 2019C Bond on behalf of the Non-U.S.
Beneficial Owner files a statement with the District, its paying agent, or other applicable withholding
agent to the effect that it has received such a statement from the Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner (and
furnishes the District, its paying agent, or other applicable withholding agent with a copy thereof). In
addition, in the case of Series 2019C Bonds held by a foreign intermediary (other than a “qualified
intermediary”) or a foreign partnership (other than a “withholding foreign partnership”), the foreign
intermediary or partnership, as the case may be, generally must provide a properly executed IRS Form W-
8IMY (or successor form) and attach thereto an appropriate certification by each foreign beneficial owner
or payee. A certificate is generally effective only with respect to payments of interest (including OID)
63
made to the certifying Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner after issuance of the certificate in the calendar year of
its issuance and the two immediately succeeding calendar years. Thus, Non-U.S. Beneficial Owners will
be required to provide these certifications more than once.
Non-U.S. Beneficial Owners Engaged in a Trade or Business in the United States. If a Non-
U.S. Beneficial Owner is engaged in a trade or business in the United States of America, and if interest
(including OID) or gain realized on the sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition of a Series 2019C
Bond is effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, then the Non-U.S. Beneficial
Owner, although exempt from United States of America withholding tax, generally will be subject to
regular United States of America federal income tax on such effectively connected income or gain in the
manner as if it were a U.S. Beneficial Owner. In addition, if such Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner is a foreign
corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to thirty percent (30%) (or such lower rate
provided by an applicable treaty) of its effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year,
subject to certain adjustments. Interest income (including OID) or gain that is effectively connected with
a trade or business in the United States of America will not be subject to withholding tax if the Non-U.S.
Beneficial Owner provides a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI (or successor form) to the District, its
paying agent, or other applicable withholding agent in order to claim an exemption from withholding tax.
Effect of Not Providing the Required Exemption Certificate. A Non-U.S. Beneficial Owner
who does not satisfy the exemption requirements is generally subject to United States of America
withholding tax on payments of interest (including OID).
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
(“FATCA”) generally imposes United States of America withholding tax on interest payments and gross
proceeds of the sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition of the Series 2019C Bonds paid to certain
foreign financial institutions (which is broadly defined for this purpose to generally include most
non-United States of America banks and investment funds) and certain other non-United States of
America entities, unless certain disclosure and due diligence requirements related to financial accounts
held by United States of America, taxpayers or by foreign entities in which United States of America
taxpayers hold substantial ownership interests are satisfied. A foreign financial institution or other entity
that is subject to FATCA, but which fails to meet the requirements imposed by FATCA, generally will be
subject to a United States of America withholding tax with respect to any “withholdable payments.” For
this purpose, withholdable payments generally include United States of America-source payments
otherwise subject to nonresident withholding tax (e.g., United States of America-source interest, including
OID) and the entire gross proceeds from the sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition of any debt
instruments of United States of America issuers, even if the payment would otherwise not be subject to
United States of America nonresident withholding tax (e.g., because the proceeds are a capital gain).
Thus, if a Beneficial Owner is a foreign financial institution or other entity that is subject to FATCA, but
that institution or entity does not comply with FATCA, then such Beneficial Owner would be subject to a
thirty percent (30%) United States of America withholding tax. An intergovernmental agreement
between the United States of America and an applicable non-United States of America country may
modify these requirements.
The District will not pay any additional amounts in respect of any amounts withheld, including
pursuant to FATCA, and Beneficial Owners or beneficial owners of the Series 2019C Bonds will have no
recourse against the District.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. There will be reported annually to the IRS,
and to each Beneficial Owner, the amount of interest (including OID) paid on, or the proceeds from the
sale, exchange, redemption, or other taxable disposition of, the Series 2019C Bonds and the amount
withheld for United States of America federal income tax purposes, if any, for each calendar year, except
64
as to certain exempt recipients, such as corporations, tax-exempt organizations, qualified pension and
profit sharing trusts, individual retirement accounts, or nonresident aliens who provide an appropriate
certification as to their tax status. Each Beneficial Owner, other than a Beneficial Owner who is not
subject to the foregoing reporting requirements, will be required to provide, under penalties of perjury, a
certificate containing its name, its address, its correct United States of America federal taxpayer
identification number, and a statement that the Beneficial Owner is not subject to back-up withholding. If
any Beneficial Owner fails to provide the required certification, or if there are other related compliance
failures, then there will be withheld amounts at a prescribed rate from the interest otherwise payable to the
Beneficial Owner or the proceeds from the sale, exchange, redemption, or other taxable disposition of the
Series 2019C Bonds, and the withheld amounts will be remitted to the U.S. Department of the Treasury
and credited against the Beneficial Owner’s United States of America federal income tax liability. In
addition, Beneficial Owners will be required to provide to the District or designated agents all
information, documentation, or certifications acceptable to the District or its agents to permit compliance
with tax reporting obligations under applicable law, including any applicable cost basis reporting
obligations. Non-U.S. Beneficial Owners should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
possible applicability of United States of America withholding and other taxes with respect to their
holding the Series 2019C Bonds.
State, Local, and Foreign Taxes. Beneficial Owners of Series 2019C Bonds may be subject to
state, local, or foreign taxes with respect to an investment in the Series 2019C Bonds. In light of the
potential impact of state, local, and foreign taxes (including the limitations on deductibility of state, and
local taxes imposed by the 2017 Tax Reform Act), prospective investors are urged to consult their tax
advisors with respect to the state, local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the Series 2019C
Bonds.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters incident to the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the Series
2019B&C Bonds are subject to the approval of Gilmore & Bell, P.C., St. Louis, Missouri, and White
Coleman & Associates, LLC, St. Louis, Missouri, Co-Bond Counsel, whose approving legal opinions will
be delivered with the Series 2019B&C Bonds in substantially the form of Appendix E hereto. Certain
other legal matters will be passed on for the District by its General Counsel and by its Disclosure
Counsel, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, Missouri. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the
Underwriters by their co-counsel, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, Missouri, and Richard G. Hughes &
Associates, LLC, St. Louis, Missouri.
The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Series 2019B&C
Bonds express the professional judgment of the attorneys rendering the opinions as to the legal issues
explicitly addressed therein. By rendering a legal opinion, the opinion giver does not become an insurer or
guarantor of that expression of professional judgment, of the transaction opined upon, or of the future
performance of parties to such transaction, nor does the rendering of an opinion guarantee the outcome of
any legal dispute that may arise out of the transaction.
RATINGS
S&P Global Ratings, a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business and Fitch Ratings,
Inc. (collectively, the “Rating Agencies”) have assigned the Series 2019B Bonds the ratings of “AAA”
and “AA+,” respectively, based on each Rating Agency’s evaluation of the creditworthiness of the
District. The Rating Agencies have assigned the Series 2019C Bonds the ratings of “AAA” and “AA+,”
respectively, based on each Rating Agency’s evaluation of the creditworthiness of the District. Such
ratings reflect only the views of the Rating Agencies at the time such ratings are given, and the
65
Underwriters, Co-Municipal Advisors and the District make no representation as to the appropriateness of
such ratings. An explanation of the significance of such ratings may be obtained only from the Rating
Agencies.
The District has furnished the Rating Agencies with certain information and materials relating to
the Series 2019B&C Bonds and the District that have not been included in this Official Statement.
Generally, rating agencies base their ratings on the information and materials so furnished and on
investigations, studies and assumptions by the rating agencies. There is no assurance that a particular
rating will be maintained for any given period of time or that it will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely
if, in the judgment of the agency originally establishing such rating, circumstances so warrant. Neither the
District, nor the Co-Municipal Advisors nor the Underwriters have undertaken any responsibility to bring
to the attention of the holders of the Series 2019B&C Bonds any proposed revision or withdrawal of a
rating of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, as applicable, or to oppose any such proposed revision or
withdrawal. Any revision or withdrawal of a rating could have an adverse effect on the market price and
marketability of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, as applicable.
Securities ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to
revision or withdrawal at any time.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, under which the District has designated DAC
as Disclosure Dissemination Agent, the District has covenanted for the benefit of the holders and
beneficial owners of the Series 2019B&C Bonds to provide, or cause to be provided, certain financial
information and operating data relating to the District to certain parties by not later than 180 days
following the end of the District’s Fiscal Year (the “Annual Report”), commencing with the report for
the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2020, and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated
events, if material. The Annual Report and any notices of material events will be submitted by the
Disclosure Dissemination Agent on behalf of the District with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board (“MSRB”) through its Electronic Municipal Market Access system (“EMMA”) pursuant to Rule
15c2-12. EMMA is an internet-based, online portal for free investor access to municipal bond
information, including offering documents, material event notices, real-time municipal securities trade
prices and education resources available at www.emma.msrb.org. Nothing contained on EMMA relating
to the District or the Series 2019B&C Bonds is incorporated by reference in this Official Statement.
These covenants have been made in order to assist the Underwriters in complying with Rule 15c2-12. The
specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report and in the notices of material
events is summarized in “DEFINITIONS AND SUMMARIES OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF
THE BOND ORDINANCE AND THE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT” in
Appendix C hereto.
During the previous five years, the District believes it has materially complied with its continuing
disclosure undertakings to provide financial and operating information required by Rule 15c2-12.
The Disclosure Dissemination Agent has only the duties specifically set forth in the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement. The Disclosure Dissemination Agent’s obligation to deliver the information at the
times and with the contents described in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement is limited to the extent that
the District has provided such information to the Disclosure Dissemination Agent as required by the
Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The Disclosure Dissemination Agent has no duty with respect to the
content of any disclosures or notice made pursuant to the terms of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
The Disclosure Dissemination Agent has no duty or obligation to review or verify any information in the
Annual Report, the District’s audited financial statements, a Notice Event (as defined in the Continuing
66
Disclosure Agreement), or any other information, disclosures or notices provided to it by the District and
shall not be deemed to be acting in any fiduciary capacity for the District, the holders of the Series
2019B&C Bonds or any other party. The Disclosure Dissemination Agent has no responsibility for the
District’s failure to report to the Disclosure Dissemination Agent a Notice Event or a duty to determine
the materiality thereof. The Disclosure Dissemination Agent shall have no duty to determine, or liability
for failing to determine, whether the District has complied with the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
The Disclosure Dissemination Agent may conclusively rely upon certifications of the District at all times.
UNDERWRITING
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are being purchased for reoffering by the group of underwriters
shown on the cover page hereof (collectively, the “Underwriters”), pursuant to a purchase contract
between the District and the Underwriters (the “Purchase Contract”). The Purchase Contract provides
that the Underwriters shall purchase all, but not less than all, of the Series 2019B Bonds at the aggregate
purchase price of $63,990,432.37, which amount is equal to the principal amount of the Series 2019B
Bonds of $52,130,000.00, less underwriters’ discount of $199,544.43, plus original issue premium of
$12,059,976.80. The Purchase Contract provides that the Underwriters shall purchase all, but not less
than all, of the Series 2019C Bonds at the aggregate purchase price of $275,196,960.86, which amount is
equal to the principal amount of the Series 2019C Bonds of $276,260,000.00, less underwriters’ discount
of $1,063,039.14.
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, an underwriter of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, has entered into a
retail distribution arrangement with its affiliate Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. As part of the
distribution arrangement, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC may distribute municipal securities to retail
investors through the financial advisor network of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. As part of this
arrangement, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC may compensate Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC for its
selling efforts with respect to the Series 2019B&C Bonds.
Stern Brothers & Co., an underwriter of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, has entered into agreements
(each, a “Stern Brothers Agreement”) with 280 Securities LLC (“280 Securities”) and BNY Mellon
Capital Markets, LLC (“BNYMCM”) for the distribution of certain municipal securities offerings at the
original issue price. Pursuant to each Stern Brothers Agreement, Stern Brothers & Co. may sell the Series
2019B&C Bonds to 280 Securities and BNYMCM and will share a portion of its selling concession
compensation with each, as applicable.
The Underwriters may offer and sell the Series 2019B&C Bonds to certain dealers (including
dealers depositing the Series 2019B&C Bonds into investment trusts) and others at prices lower than the
public offering price stated on the inside cover pages hereof. The initial public offering price may be
changed from time to time by the Underwriters.
The Underwriters and their respective affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in
various activities, which may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial
advisory, investment management, principal investment, hedging, financing and brokerage activities.
Certain of the Underwriters and their respective affiliates have, from time to time, performed, and may in
the future perform various investment banking for the District for which they received or will receive
customary fees and expenses.
In the ordinary course of their various business activities, the Underwriters and their respective
affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or
related derivative securities), and financial instruments (which may include bank loans and/or credit
67
default swaps) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers. Such investment and
securities activities may involve securities and instruments of the District.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS
White Coleman & Associates, LLC has represented certain of the Underwriters in transactions
unrelated to the issuance of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, but is not representing any of the Underwriters in
connection with the issuance of the Series 2019B&C Bonds.
Armstrong Teasdale LLP and Thompson Coburn LLP each represent the District in certain
matters unrelated to the issuance of the Series 2019B&C Bonds.
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY CONSULTANT
The District has retained Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., to serve as the Financial Feasibility
Consultant to the District in connection with the issuance of the Series 2019B&C Bonds. See
Appendix D – “Report on the Financial Feasibility of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B”.
VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL CALCULATIONS
The accuracy of the mathematical computations (i) of the adequacy of the maturing principal
amounts of the United States of America Government Obligations, together with the interest income
thereon and uninvested cash, if any, to pay when due the principal of and redemption premium, if any,
and interest on the Refunded Bonds; and (ii) relating to the yields related to the United States of America
Government Obligations, will be verified by Samuel Klein and Company, Certified Public Accountants.
Such verification of arithmetical accuracy and mathematical computations shall be based upon
information and assumptions supplied by the Co-Municipal Advisors and on interpretations of the Code,
provided by Co-Bond Counsel.
CO-MUNICIPAL ADVISORS
PFM Financial Advisors LLC, Cleveland, Ohio, and Independent Public Advisors, LLC, Kansas
City, Missouri, have served as Co-Municipal Advisors to the District in connection with the Series
2019B&C Bonds, relative to a plan of financing and assisting the District in drafting certain portions of
this Official Statement for the sale of the Series 2019B&C Bonds. The Co-Municipal Advisors have
participated in the compilation and editing of this Official Statement. The Co-Municipal Advisors have
not, however, independently verified the factual information contained in this Official Statement nor have
they conducted an investigation of the affairs of the District for the purpose of determining the accuracy
or completeness of any of the information contained herein. The Co-Municipal Advisors have relied on
the diligence and accuracy of the District which has certified that this Official Statement contains no
material misstatement or omission of information.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Independent Auditors Report, Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Basic Financial
Statements of the District for the Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 included in Appendix A of
this Official Statement has been audited by CliftonLarsonAllen LLP.
68
MISCELLANEOUS
The references, excerpts and summaries of all documents referred to herein do not purport to be
complete statements of the provisions of such documents, and reference is made to all such documents for
full and complete statements of all matters of fact relating to the Series 2019B&C Bonds, the security for
the payment of the Series 2019B&C Bonds and the rights of the owners thereof. During the period of the
offering, copies of drafts of such documents may be examined at the offices of the Co-Municipal
Advisors; following delivery of the Series 2019B&C Bonds, copies of such documents may be examined
at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in St. Louis, Missouri. The information contained in this
Official Statement has been compiled from official and other sources deemed to be reliable, and while not
guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy, is believed to be correct as of this date.
It is anticipated that CUSIP identification numbers will be printed on the Series 2019B&C Bonds,
but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Series 2019B&C Bonds nor any error in printing of
such numbers will constitute cause for a failure or refusal by the purchaser thereof to accept delivery of
and pay for any Series 2019B&C Bonds.
The attached appendices are integral parts of this Official Statement and must be read together
with all of the foregoing statements.
The closing documents will include a certificate by the proper official or officer of the District
that, to the best of his knowledge and belief at the time of the acceptance of the delivery of the Series
2019B&C Bonds, this Official Statement and any information furnished by the District supplementary
thereto did not and do not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading in any material respect.
Any statement made in this Official Statement involving matters of opinion or of estimates,
whether or not expressly so stated, are set forth as such and not as representations of fact, and no
representation is made that any of the estimates will be realized. The information and expressions of
opinion herein are subject to change without notice and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor
any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no
change in the information presented herein since the date hereof. This Official Statement is not to be
construed as a contract or agreement between the District, the Paying Agent, or the Underwriters and the
purchasers or Owners of any Series 2019B&C Bonds.
This Official Statement has been authorized and approved by the District. For purposes of
compliance with Rule 15c2-12, this Official Statement constitutes an official statement of the District that
has been deemed final by the District as of its date except for the omission of no more than the
information permitted by Rule 15c2-12. The Official Statement has been duly executed and delivered on
its behalf by the officials or officers signing below.
By: /s/ Brian L. Hoelscher, P.E.
Executive Director
By: /s/ Tim R. Snoke
Secretary-Treasurer
APPENDIX A
Independent Auditors’ Report, Management’s Discussion and Analysis
and Basic Financial Statements of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
for the Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT • ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI
FENTON WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT
FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 AND 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS
SEWER DISTRICT
ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 AND 2018
Report Prepared And Submitted By The
Department of Finance
Marion M. Gee
Director Of Finance
Contents
Page
Part I – Introductory Section:
Letter Of Transmittal ................................................................................................................... i
Organization Chart ................................................................................................................... xiii
Certificate Of Achievement For Excellence In Financial Reporting ...................................... xiv
Part II – Financial Section:
Independent Auditors’ Report ..................................................................................................... 1
Management’s Discussion And Analysis .................................................................................... 3
Basic Financial Statements
Statements Of Net Position ................................................................................................. 16
Statements Of Revenues, Expenses, And Changes In Net Position ................................. 18
Statements Of Cash Flows .................................................................................................. 19
Notes To Financial Statements ........................................................................................... 21
Required Supplementary Information
Schedule Of Changes In Net Pension Liability And Related Ratios ................................ 93
Schedule Of Employer Contributions – Employees’ Pension Plan ................................... 94
Schedule Of Changes In Total OPEB Liability .................................................................. 95
Part III – Statistical Section:
Net Position By Component ................................................................................................ 96
Changes In Net Position ...................................................................................................... 97
Operating Revenues By Source ........................................................................................... 98
Operating Expenses ............................................................................................................. 99
Non-Operating Revenues And Expenses .......................................................................... 100
User Charge Rates ............................................................................................................. 101
User Charge Revenues....................................................................................................... 102
Sewer User Charges (Composite-Annual) ........................................................................ 103
Number Of Customers By Type ........................................................................................ 104
Ten Largest Customers...................................................................................................... 105
Ratios of Outstanding Debt By Type ................................................................................ 106
Computation Of Overlapping Debt ................................................................................... 107
Pledged Revenue Coverage ................................................................................................ 108
Demographic And Economic Statistics ............................................................................. 109
Principal Employers (St. Louis Metropolitan Area) ........................................................ 110
Employment Level ............................................................................................................. 111
Average Flow ...................................................................................................................... 112
Operating And Capital Indicators .................................................................................... 113
Introductory Section
Vision Statement
Quality Service Always
Mission Statement
To protect the public’s health, safety, and water
environment by responsibly providing wastewater
and stormwater management
Values
Integrity
Teamwork
Excellence and Innovation
The District Employees
Customer Satisfaction
Mission, Vision, Value statements are important elements of a
strategic business plan. The Mission statement keeps the
District focused on its essential activity, the Vision statement
points to its ideal purpose, and the Value statement conveys the
principles that must shape our actions.
i
October 9, 2019
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (“CAFR”) of The Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District (“MSD” or the “District”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 is
submitted herewith. The District’s Finance Department prepared this report. The
District is responsible for the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of
the presentation of the financial statements and other information presented herein. We
believe the presentation is accurate in all material respects and includes all disclosures
necessary to enable the reader to gain a reasonable understanding of the District’s
financial activities. In the CAFR, the District’s financial activities are measured on a
single enterprise fund basis where all funds of the District and its sub-districts are
consolidated.
The District’s CAFR includes an Introductory Section, a Financial Section, and a
Statistical Section. The Introductory Section includes this transmittal letter, an
organization chart as of June 30, 2019 which lists the District’s Board of Trustees, Rate
Commission Chair, members of the Civil Service Commission, and management staff and
the Government Finance Officers Association’s Certificate of Achievement For Excellence
In Financial Reporting presented to the District for its Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The Financial Section includes the
independent auditors’ report, management’s discussion and analysis, and the District’s
basic financial statements. The Statistical Section includes financial, economic, and
demographic information, generally presented on a multi-year basis.
The CAFR includes all funds of the District. The operations of these funds, as reflected
in the financial statements, are under the control of the District’s governing body. The
District has determined there were no other agencies or entities that met the established
criteria for inclusion in the reporting entity.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
ii
Organization
MSD was created in 1954 to provide a metropolitan-wide sewer system to serve the City
of St. Louis and most of the more heavily populated areas of St. Louis County. Before
MSD’s creation, the City of St. Louis, various municipalities, and private sewer
companies provided sewer service that primarily included only collecting and
transporting sewage from small geographic areas to nearby rivers and streams with little
or no treatment. Most of the municipalities or private sewer companies serving the area
did not have the jurisdictional authority or financial resources needed to eliminate health
hazards from untreated sewage.
When the District began operations, it took over the publicly owned wastewater and
stormwater drainage facilities within its jurisdiction and began the construction of an
extensive system of collector and interceptor sewers and treatment facilities. In 1977,
voters approved the District’s annexation of a 270 square mile area of the lower Missouri
River and lower Meramec River watersheds. The District purchased the Fee Fee Trunk
Sewer Company and the Missouri Bottoms Sewer Company in 1978. MSD has since
acquired other investor-owned or municipally operated systems.
The District’s service area now encompasses 520 square miles including all 66 square
miles of the City of St. Louis and 454 square miles of St. Louis County. The current
population served by the District is approximately 1.3 million representing
approximately 427,000 accounts.
MSD is organized pursuant to Article VI, Section 30 of the Missouri State Constitution
that empowers the people of St. Louis County and the City of St. Louis “to establish a
metropolitan district for functional administration of services common to the area.” MSD
is the only district established pursuant to that section of the Missouri State Constitution.
The Charter of MSD (“Plan”), approved by voters in 1954 and amended in 2000 and 2012,
established the District. The Plan describes the District as “a body corporate, a municipal
corporation, and a political subdivision of the state.” As a political subdivision of the
state, MSD is comparable to a county or city, such as St. Louis County or the City of St.
Louis.
The Plan established the governing body of the District as a six-member Board of
Trustees (“Board”) with three members appointed by the Mayor of St. Louis and three
members appointed by the St. Louis County Executive. Each Trustee shall be appointed
for a term of four years. No Trustee shall serve more than two full consecutive terms plus
any portion of an unexpired term. Provided, however, that each Trustee shall serve until
his/her successor shall be appointed and qualified. No more than two trustees appointed
from the City or County can be affiliated with the same political party.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
iii
Unlike a corporation’s board of directors that is responsible solely to the stockholders who
choose to invest in the corporation, MSD’s Board members are trustees of public property
and public funds. They are responsible to all citizens within the District.
According to the Plan, the Board enacts District ordinances, determines policies, and
appoints the Executive Director, the Secretary-Treasurer, and the Internal Auditor. The
Executive Director appoints all other District officials. Among its duties, the Board
makes all appropriations, approves contracts for improvements, and engages an
accounting firm to perform the annual independent audit of the District.
The Plan prescribes other duties of the Board and grants numerous broad powers, subject
to federal and state laws, to the District and the Board of Trustees. Among other things,
the Plan outlines the following requirements or provisions:
Requires that MSD operate with a balanced budget;
Details how MSD can tax property and requires an annual public hearing
on all taxes levied by the District;
Details how MSD can establish user charges;
Requires MSD to establish civil service rules and regulations governed by a
Civil Service Commission;
Provides how the original boundaries of the District may be extended to
include any area in St. Louis County; and
Requires MSD to approve all plans and designs for proposed construction,
alteration, or reconstruction of sewer or drainage facilities within the
District’s boundaries.
The District is also governed by the Missouri State Constitution and various federal and
state laws that among other requirements mandate the following:
MSD must hold permits for all sanitary discharges. These permits require a
minimum of secondary treatment;
MSD must provide wastewater treatment in an area-wide manner to qualify
for federal and state grants;
MSD must operate, maintain, and replace facilities to provide proper
wastewater treatment or be subject to penalties and fines; and
MSD must set user charge rates in compliance with the Federal Clean
Water Act. These rates must be submitted to the Missouri Department of
Natural Resources to receive future construction grants and to avoid the
possibility of refunding past grants.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
iv
During fiscal 2019 the primary source of funding for the operation and maintenance of
MSD’s wastewater system was a user charge averaging $602.76 per year or $50.23 per
month for a single-family residence. The District’s charges for residential wastewater
service are tied to the amount of measured water usage during a winter quarter. For
residential properties without water meters, the charges are based on housing attributes
(such as the number of rooms, baths, and toilets) that correlate to water usage. That
methodology is the same billing methodology used by the City of St. Louis Water Division
for their non-metered properties. Multi-family residential and non-residential rates are
proportionate to the single-family charge and are based on water consumption and the
strength of the discharge.
During fiscal 2019 the District’s stormwater system was funded through property taxes
of 1.9¢ per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for stormwater regulatory activities
and 9.8¢ per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for operations and maintenance of
the District’s stormwater utility. The District also performs limited capital
improvements with the revenues generated by the 9.8¢ tax.
Prior to fiscal year 2017, the operation and maintenance of the District’s stormwater
system was funded by a combination of property taxes and flat fee billing of 24¢ per
month for residential and commercial properties and 18¢ per month per unit for multi-
unit properties. On April 5, 2016, over 62% of voters in MSD’s service area approved
Proposition S which placed all MSD customers under the same property tax rates to fund
stormwater services. The flat fee billings were eliminated.
MSD also receives some federal, state, and local grants to help defray the cost of
constructing sewage treatment and drainage facilities and improvements. The District
also charges fees for plan review, permits, construction inspection of new system
development, and special discharges. The District charges a uniform connection fee in
all service areas.
The District, itself, may issue general obligation bonds and revenue bonds to finance the
cost of improvements and extensions to the sewer system. The District also may issue,
on behalf of each of its subdistricts, general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, or special
assessment bonds.
Major Initiatives Affecting The Financial Resources Of The District
Throughout MSD’s service area, there are hundreds of points where a combination of
rainwater and wastewater discharges into local waterways from the wastewater sewer
system during moderate to heavy rainstorms. These sewer overflow points act as relief
valves when too much rainwater enters the sewer system, and without them, our
community could experience thousands of basement backups and/or extensive street
flooding. (Even with these overflows points, basement backups can easily number in the
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
v
dozens or hundreds during particularly heavy rains). Depending on where sewer
overflows are located within MSD’s system, they are classified as combined sewer
overflows --or-- constructed separate sewer overflows. Many of these overflows are a
legacy of the way our wastewater systems were first built. Though most overflows
predate the District’s creation in 1954, they are still MSD’s responsibility and efforts to
address the problem must continue.
Sewer overflows have been a significant focus of MSD’s work for many years. From 1992
to 2012, MSD spent approximately $2.7 billion to eliminate over 380 overflows. Today,
our work to address sewer overflows and improve water quality continues through a
Consent Decree that stems from a lawsuit filed against MSD by the State of Missouri and
the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in June 2007. The State of
Missouri and the EPA were later joined in the lawsuit by the Missouri Coalition for the
Environment.
After lengthy mediation, the EPA announced a settlement agreement in August
2011. On April 27, 2012, the United States District Court for The Eastern District of
Missouri entered a Consent Decree, thus concluding the litigation. The Consent Decree
calls for $6 billion in upgrades to the existing wastewater sewer system (in 2018
dollars). Also known as MSD Project Clear, this work was originally scheduled to take
place over 23 years and addresses our community’s wastewater collection and treatment
capabilities on a system-wide basis. The work is a mammoth undertaking that will
benefit St. Louisans – and our environment – for generations to come.
On June 22, 2018, a United States District Judge approved an amendment to the Consent
Decree that extends the schedule from 23 years to 28 years. (Necessary approvals were
also received from the State of Missouri on August 13, 2018.) The motivation behind the
amendment is regulatory changes that compel MSD to accelerate certain projects that do
not fall within the scope of the Consent Decree. The time extension will allow MSD to
address new regulatory requirements in a fiscally responsible way, while better
projecting and controlling needed rate increases.
MSD submits rate proposals to an independent Rate Commission. The Rate Commission
was established in 2000 through voter approved amendments to MSD’s Charter. The
commission is composed of 15 member organizations representing a broad cross-section
of MSD customers and is meant to provide the public with a formal role in MSD’s rate
setting process.
In March 2019, the Rate Commission received a wastewater rate proposal from staff for
fiscal years 2021 – 2024. The wastewater rate proposal seeks to fund a four-year, $1.58
billion capital improvement program to meet regulatory and system improvement needs.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
vi
After thoroughly reviewing the proposal, with assistance from its own team of experts
working at its direction, the Rate Commission held a series of public hearings to garner
ratepayers’ feedback on the proposed rates. The Commission approved a resolution and
Rate Recommendation Report with proposed increases for fiscal years 2021 – 2024 with
or without bonding. The table below depicts recommended rate increases proposed by
MSD staff and the Rate Commission.
The Rate Commission submitted its Rate Recommendation Report to the Board on
August 16, 2019. The Rate Commission chair briefed the Board of Trustees on their
report on September 12, 2019. If approved by the Board, voters will decide in Spring 2020
or Spring 2021 whether to authorize the District to issue an additional $500 million in
bonds. Changes to rates would be effective July 1, 2020.
Combined with similar bond elections held in 2004, 2008, 2012 and 2016, voters residing
within MSD’s service area have authorized a total issuance of $2.6 billion in wastewater
revenue bonds. As of June 30, 2019, MSD has issued $1.9 billion of the total
authorization. Consistent with past financing strategies, MSD anticipates funding
future Consent Decree and other work related to the wastewater collection and treatment
system through a combination of rate increases and voter approved bond issuances.
On April 5, 2016 over 62% of voters in MSD’s service area approved Proposition S. The
approval of Proposition S placed all MSD customers under the same property tax rates
to pay for stormwater service. In turn, all MSD customers will receive the same level of
stormwater service. This process occurred gradually throughout MSD’s fiscal year 2017
(July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017).
Prior to July 1, 2016, MSD’s stormwater services were paid for through a variety of
property taxes and a flat stormwater fee on each month's MSD bill. With the approval of
Proposition S and the implementation of a new funding structure for stormwater services,
FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24
MSD Staff Proposal 1.9% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8%
Rate Commission Proposal 1.5% 3.4% 3.5% 3.7%
MSD Staff Proposal 1.9% 15.1% 17.1% 13.1%
Rate Commission Proposal 1.5% 15.4% 17.1% 13.0%
Increase with Bond Authorization
Increase without Bond Authorization
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
vii
MSD had “fund balances” left over from the former taxing and fee system. However, this
limited and set amount of money barely begins to address the overall need for stormwater
projects throughout MSD’s service area. In February 2018, staff submitted a Stormwater
Capital Rate to the Rate Commission calling for an impervious-area-based Stormwater
Capital Rate to fund capital improvements to address localized flooding and erosion
problems throughout MSD’s service area.
After thoroughly reviewing the proposal, the Rate Commission made a recommendation
to MSD’s Board of Trustees in August 2018. Accordingly – and pursuant to MSD’s
Charter – the Board considered the Rate Commission’s recommendation and accepted it
in September 2018. In April 2019, voters rejected the proposal, thus no districtwide
funding is available for stormwater capital projects.
Prior to Proposition S in 2016, the District collected additional personal property taxes
in 18 taxing subdistricts throughout the service area. These taxing subdistricts are
formally called OMCI or Operation, Maintenance, and Construction Improvement Funds
and are generally located west of the City of St. Louis and east of I-270. Each OMCI
subdistrict was authorized to levy a tax up to $.10 per $100 of assessed property
valuation, and all taxes collected in the subdistricts had to be spent within the taxing
district boundaries. Customers who did not live within an OMCI subdistrict did not pay
this tax and did not receive the associated services. Following the passage of Proposition
S in 2016, the Board of Trustees set the tax rates in the OMCI subdistricts to zero. The
district is currently in discussion with municipalities and community stakeholders within
those OMCI subdistricts to determine if there is a desire to resume levying those taxes
so the District could construct projects to address flooding and erosion control within the
subdistricts.
For fiscal year 2018 (“FY18”), the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“District”)
enforced two cost saving measures during the budget development process. The first
measure was to limit discretionary wastewater operations and maintenance spending to
FY17 budget levels. Non-discretionary items were defined as salary and wages and
benefits for existing employees and existing vacancies. The second cost saving measure
was to disallow acceleration of Consent Decree projects funded with sewer service charge
revenues. Both of these cost saving measures were necessary to offset shortfalls in sewer
service charge revenues experienced in FY17 and anticipated to continue throughout the
current approved rate period which spans FY17 through FY20. Revenues projected in
the District’s approved rate plan have not been realized in the most part due to lower
water usage by our customers; however, the District has been able to manage this
revenue shortfall by reducing expenses.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
viii
Operations
The Executive Director and his staff administer the operation and maintenance of the
District’s collection and treatment systems. The District’s wastewater, stormwater, and
combined sewer collection system includes more than 9,400 miles of pipe and channel and
will grow larger over the long term due to new development. Some years may actually
see a reduction in total miles of pipe. This is due to the replacement of inefficiently placed
pipe with shorter, more direct lines of pipe. The District’s responsibilities for stormwater
drainage range from cleaning and maintaining street inlets to operating and maintaining
the floodwall pump stations along the Mississippi River.
MSD currently operates seven wastewater treatment facilities. These facilities treated
an average flow of 396.4 million gallons per day (“MGD”) in fiscal 2019 compared to 270.1
MGD in fiscal 2018. Significant rain events in fiscal 2019 contributed to the increase in
average flow when compared to fiscal 2018. The design capacity and average flow, by
watershed, in MGD was as follows in fiscal 2019:
MAJOR
WATERSHED
LEVEL OF
TREATMENT
NUMBER
OF
FACILITIES
DESIGN
CAPACITY
(MGD)
AVERAGE FLOW
FISCAL 2019
(MGD)
Mississippi River Secondary Two 472.00
304.70
Missouri River Secondary Two 78.00
52.00
Meramec River Secondary Three 42.75
39.70
Total Seven 592.75
396.40
In addition to construction initiated by the District to protect the public’s health and
property from raw sewage and flooding, the District also provides various engineering-
related design review and inspection services for the construction of wastewater and
stormwater sewers by individuals, businesses, and municipalities in the community.
Economic Conditions In The St. Louis Metropolitan Area
As a rule, the District’s major revenue sources do not fluctuate with the local and national
economy as much as local governments that depend on sales or income taxes for their
major sources of revenue. The combined unemployment rate for the City of St. Louis and
St. Louis County was 3.5 percent in June 2019 and lower than the national
unemployment rate of 3.7 percent for the same time period.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
ix
MSD has its own internal barometers for measuring economic development within the
District. These are listed below for fiscal 2019 and 2018:
2019 2018
Sewer Plan Reviews:
Number of Plans Approved 514 673
Number of Miles of Sewers 46 49
Sewer Construction Permits:
Number of Permits Issued 3,792 3,769
Number of Miles of Sewers 24 125
Customer Connections:
Number of Connection Permits Issued 2,384 2,178
Connection Fee Revenue (in millions) $0.9 $1.2
Value of Sewers Dedicated to
MSD by Developers (in millions) $16.6 $24.8
Over the years, the St. Louis economy has undergone a transformation from reliance on
traditional manufacturing industries to those industries based on advanced technology
and services. The St. Louis area is a center for health care, biotechnology, banking,
finance, transportation, tourism, and education and has a strong and diverse
manufacturing economy. The area has an abundance of energy, water, and sewerage
facilities and can sustain future economic growth.
Financial Information
Proprietary Operations. The current financial condition of MSD remains stable. The
District realized a net operating income of $110.4 million in fiscal 2019 compared to a net
operating income of $94.5 million the prior year. The increase in operating revenues of
$32.8 million is explained by an increase in sewer service revenue as a result of rate
increases. Operating expenses increased $16.9 million due primarily to increases in
pension expenses to comply with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement
No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions (Employer Reporting) (“GASB
68”), additional wastewater backup claims due to the occurrence of several significant
rain events, increases in billing and collection expenses and the recording of additional
depreciation expense. A more in-depth analysis of the District’s financial position and
the magnitude of the capital improvement and replacement program (“CIRP”) is provided
in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section that appears later in this report.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
x
Budgetary Controls. The District’s Plan requires MSD to submit a proposed budget to
the Board by March 15th each year. After Board review, a final budget is approved in
June. The District’s Plan also requires MSD to maintain budgetary controls and to adopt
a balanced budget. The objective of these budgetary controls is to ensure compliance with
legal provisions embodied in the appropriation process approved by the Board. The
annual appropriated budget includes activities of the District’s operating and debt service
funds. The Board adopts ordinances to appropriate funds for capital improvement
expenditures at the time of the contract award and acceptance of any grant offers.
Budgetary control is by Division and major expenditure category within the General
Fund, each Debt Service Fund, and each capital improvement contract. The District
utilizes an encumbrance accounting system in conjunction with internal variance and
projection analysis to maintain budgetary control. Certain encumbrances carry over from
one year to the next as approved by the Board during the budget process.
Monthly and year-end financial reports are prepared in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles for Enterprise Funds. Adjustments are made to
the accounting records, where necessary, to reflect the full accrual method of accounting.
Under the full accrual method of accounting, revenues are recognized when earned and
expenses are recorded as liabilities when incurred. Encumbrances and unearned capital
and operating grants are eliminated under the full accrual method of accounting. These
amounts are disclosed as commitments in the notes to financial statements.
Cash Management. In compliance with its Plan, the District invests temporarily idle
funds in cash, cash equivalents and investments such as collateralized certificates of
deposit, collateralized repurchase agreements, obligations of any agency of the United
States, and United States Treasury instruments. The District utilizes competitive
bidding for investment purchases and monitors market conditions daily.
Risk Management. In-house staff and consultants jointly conduct risk management
activities. MSD maintains third-party commercial insurance coverage for various risks
while self-insuring for other risks and liabilities at levels customary for similar
enterprises. The District maintains replacement cost property and casualty insurance
with a policy limit of $1.25 billion on certain facilities and equipment that have an
estimated replacement cost of $1.5 billion. The District assumes the risk of loss
(including payment of water backup claims to its customers) on the majority of its
underground pumping facilities and collection system. MSD is one of the few sewer
districts in the country known to provide water backup claim coverage to its customers.
The underground pumping facility and collection system assets have an estimated
replacement cost of $9.9 billion. To minimize exposure to loss, the District inspects its
facilities regularly and performs preventative maintenance on them.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
xi
MSD maintains automobile, general liability and excess liability insurance. The District
is self-insured for workers’ compensation and funds those costs through annual
appropriations from the District’s general insurance fund. The District maintains
reinsurance for workers’ compensation liabilities in excess of specified limits up to the
statutory limit. Risk control activities include using a third-party claims administrator,
maintaining a computerized claim tracking system, and annually reevaluating workers’
compensation cost. The District also has programs designed to promote safety in the
workplace and employee wellness.
The District provides group medical coverage for its employees and offers dependent
medical coverage on a contributory basis through a self-insured plan. Effective
February 1, 2014, the District maintained stop loss coverage for specific claims exceeding
$175,000 per year and for total annual claims greater than 125 percent of the annual
claims estimate. The District provides its employees with contributory group dental
insurance coverage and non-contributory life insurance and contributory optional life
insurance coverage. The District also contributes $100 every fiscal year, up to a
maximum of $300, to a vision care program for employees. Effective July 1, 2013, spouses
were eligible to use the benefits; effective July 1, 2016, dependent children up to age 26
were eligible to use the benefits; however, the amount could not exceed the maximum
amount of $300. The District reevaluates insurance coverage and providers annually by
reevaluating medical insurance claims and health benefit costs.
For most construction projects, insurance is obtained by the individual contractor and
included in the contract price.
Internal Controls. District Management is responsible for designing, establishing, and
maintaining an internal control system that protects District assets from loss, theft, or
misuse and ensures that adequate accounting data is compiled to prepare financial
statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control systems are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance
that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that the
cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and that the evaluation
of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. The District’s
internal control system is subject to periodic evaluation by Management, the Board and
the District’s independent accountants.
Other Information
Audit Requirements. The District’s Plan requires an annual audit by independent
certified public accountants. The District’s CAFR includes a report on the District’s
financial statements by the accounting firm of CliftonLarsonAllen LLP.
The Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
xii
Besides meeting the requirements set forth in the Plan, the annual audit is also designed
to meet the requirements of the 2013 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”) that was
issued by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”). A Single Audit Report will be
issued for the year ended June 30, 2019.
The financial statements of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Employees’
Pension Plan, The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Deferred Compensation Plan
and Trust and The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Defined Contribution Plan are
also audited annually. These audit reports were issued for the periods ending
December 31, 2018 and 2017 and are available to interested parties upon request.
Awards. The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada
(“GFOA”) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to
MSD for its CAFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The Certificate of Achievement
is a prestigious national award that recognizes conformance with the highest standards
for preparation of state and local government financial reports.
To be awarded the Certificate of Achievement, a government unit must publish an easily
readable and efficiently organized CAFR, the contents of which conform to program
standards. The CAFR must satisfy both U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for one year
only. The District has received a Certificate of Achievement for the last thirty-one
consecutive years. We believe the current CAFR continues to conform to the GFOA’s high
standards, as reflected in the Certificate of Achievement program requirements, and are
submitting it again this year for consideration.
The District also received the GFOA’s Distinguished Budget Presentation award for its
fiscal 2019 annual budget. The District has received this award for thirty-two consecutive
years. We believe the fiscal year 2020 budget presentation continues to meet the GFOA’s
high standards and submitted it on July 2, 2019, for consideration.
Marion M. Gee
Director of Finance
xiii
ORGANIZATION
(As of June 30, 2019)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Michael Yates, Chair; Annette Mandel, Vice Chair;
James Faul; James I. Singer; Freddie Dunlap; 1 vacant position (1)
OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDITOR
RATE COMMISSION
Leonard P. Toenjes, Chair
OFFICE OF SECRETARY
TREASURER
Tim R. Snoke
Secretary/Treasurer
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
Annette Adams
Daniel Gonzales
1 vacant position (2)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Brian L. Hoelscher/CEO
FINANCE
Marion M. Gee
Director
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Susan M. Myers
General Counsel
OPERATIONS
Bret A. Berthold
Director
ENGINEERING
Rich Unverferth
Director
OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Tracey Coleman
Director
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jonathon C. Sprague
Director
(1) Amy Fehr was appointed to the Board of Trustees on 9-6-19
(2) Rev. Michael F. Jones, Sr. was appointed to the Civil Service
Commission on 7-5-19
xiv
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate Of
Achievement
For Excellence
In Financial
Reporting
Presented to
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Missouri
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2018
Executive Directors/CEO
Financial Section
METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
SERVICE AREAS
(1)
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
St. Louis, Missouri
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the business-type activity of The
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (the District), as of and for the years ended June 30, 2019 and
2018, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the District’s
financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes
the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from
material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or
error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our audit opinions.
Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
(2)
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
respective financial position of the business-type activity of the District as of June 30, 2019 and 2018,
and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows thereof for the years then ended in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management’s
Discussion and Analysis, Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios for the
Employees’ Pension Plan, Schedule of Employer Contributions to Employees’ Pension Plan and
Schedule of Changes in Total OPEB Liability, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to
supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial
statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an
essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate
operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required
supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the
information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our
inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic
financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information
because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or
provide any assurance.
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively
comprise the District’s basic financial statements. The introductory section and statistical section are
presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial
statements. These sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of
the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance
on them.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated October 9,
2019, on our consideration of the District’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other
matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over
financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the
effectiveness of the District’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an
integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering
the District’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
!
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
October 9, 2019
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 3
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
For The Years Ended June 30, 2019 And 2018
The annual report of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“MSD” or the “District”)
includes the independent auditors’ report, management’s discussion and analysis
(“MD&A”), and the financial statements accompanied by notes essential to the user’s
understanding of the financial statements.
Management of the District has provided this MD&A to be used in combination with the
District’s financial statements. This narrative is intended to provide the reader with
more insight into management’s knowledge of the transactions, events, and conditions
reflected in the accompanying financial statements and the fiscal policies that govern the
District’s operations.
2019 Financial Highlights
The District increased capital assets by $185.5 million as a result of increases in
construction in progress ($120.2 million), land ($1.0 million) and depreciable
capital assets net of depreciation ($64.3 million).
The District placed $150.2 million of capital assets into service during fiscal year
2019. The continued high level of capitalization reflects the District’s work to meet
long-term plans. Capitalized assets included:
Collection and pumping plant $140.6 million
General plant and equipment $6.9 million
Treatment and disposal plant and equipment $1.7 million
Land $1.0 million
The net increase to accumulated depreciation was $76.6 million which takes into
consideration the recording of depreciation relating to new assets in addition to
depreciation on existing assets, offset by the accumulated depreciation relieved for assets
retired during the year.
During the 2019 fiscal year, the District implemented Governmental Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 88, Certain Disclosures Related to Debt, Including Direct
Borrowing and Direct Placements (“GASB Statement No. 88”). This Statement amends
Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements—and Management’s Discussion and
Analysis—for State and Local Governments, paragraph 119 and Statement No. 38,
Certain Financial Statement Note Disclosures, paragraphs 10 and 12. The primary
objective of this Statement is to improve the information that is disclosed in notes to
government financial statements related to debt, including direct borrowings and direct
placements. The requirements of this Statement will improve financial reporting by
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 4
providing users of financial statements with essential information that currently is not
consistently provided.
2018 Financial Highlights
The District increased capital assets by $194.0 million as a result of increases in
construction in progress ($128.4 million), land ($2.6 million) and depreciable
capital assets net of depreciation ($63.0 million).
The District placed $149.0 million of capital assets into service during fiscal year
2018. The continued high level of capitalization reflects the District’s work to meet
long-term plans. Capitalized assets included:
Collection and pumping plant $139.0 million
General plant and equipment $4.0 million
Treatment and disposal plant and equipment $3.4 million
Land $2.6 million
The net increase to accumulated depreciation was $73.3 million which takes into
consideration the recording of depreciation relating to new assets in addition to
depreciation on existing assets, offset by the accumulated depreciation relieved for assets
retired during the year.
During the 2018 fiscal year, the District implemented Governmental Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for
Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions (“GASB Statement No. 75”) which
replaces the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other
than Pensions (“GASB Statement No. 45”), as amended. This Statement improves
accounting and financial reporting by state and local governments for postemployment
benefits other than pensions (other postemployment benefits or “OPEB”). This
Statement also establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred
outflows and inflows of resources, and expense. The impact of implementing GASB
Statement No. 75 resulted in the District recording a $24.2 million total OPEB liability,
recording a total of $1.3 million OPEB-related deferred outflows of resources, restating
beginning net position by $14.1 million and calculating OPEB expense according to the
new Statement. No assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria of paragraph
4 of GASB Statement No. 75 to pay OPEB-related benefits.
Required Financial Statements
The financial statements presented by the management of the District include the
Statements of Net Position; Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net
Position; and Statements of Cash Flows. These statements are prepared using the
accrual basis of accounting. This method of accounting recognizes revenue at the time it
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 5
is earned and expenses when the related liability occurs. As a result of using this method
of accounting, the District’s performance over the time period being reported is more
easily determinable.
The Statements of Net Position provide a report of the District’s current, restricted, and
other non-current assets such as cash, investments, receivables, and capital assets. Also,
the Statements of Net Position provide a summary of the District’s current, restricted,
and non-current liabilities, including contracts and accounts payable, deposits and
accrued expenses, pension and OPEB liabilities and bonds and notes payable. Deferred
outflows and inflows, where applicable, are also included. The final section of the
Statements of Net Position, the net position section, contains earnings retained for use
by the District. Increases or decreases in the net position section may be indicative of an
improving or declining financial position. This statement provides the basis for
computing rate of return, evaluating the capital structure of the District, and assessing
the liquidity and financial flexibility of the District.
The Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position summarize all of
the year’s revenue and expense. These statements indicate how successful the District
was at maintaining expenses below the level of revenue earned.
The Statements of Cash Flows account for the net change in cash and cash equivalents
by summarizing cash receipts and cash disbursements resulting from operating
activities, non-capital financing activities, capital and related financing activities, and
investing activities. These statements assist the user in determining the sources of cash
coming into the District, the items for which cash was expended, and the beginning and
ending cash balances.
Financial Analysis
The District’s financial position improved in the current year, as evidenced by the
increase in net position of $129.2 million. The improvement is due primarily to an
increase in net investment in capital assets, debt service funds and unrestricted funds of
$94.8 million, $2.9 million and $36.6 million, respectively; offset by a decrease of $5.1
million in subdistrict construction and improvement funds. Net capital assets increased
$185.5 million while debt related to the capital assets increased $22.7 million and when
netted with the $109.4 million decrease in unspent cash proceeds received upon the
issuance of senior debt in 2018, net debt decreased net investment in capital assets $86.7
million. The increase in construction-related liabilities of $3.2 million and the
amortization of the deferred loss of $0.8 million also decreased net investment in capital
assets.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 6
Condensed Financial Statements and Analysis
2019 Analysis
Current, restricted and other assets decreased $61.6 million or 7.0% in the current year.
The decrease is predominately due to a decrease in investments offset by an increase in
cash due to higher sewer rates charged and maturity of investments.
Capital assets net of accumulated depreciation increased by $185.5 million or 5.4% in the
current year as the result of continued high levels of construction and acquisition of assets
by the District.
Current liabilities increased by $9.9 million or 7.1% due primarily to an increase in
deposits and accrued expenses and retainage held on capital projects which correlate with
the increase in construction.
Increase Increase
June 30, June 30, (Decrease) June 30, (Decrease)
2019 2018 2019-2018 2017 2018-2017
Assets:
Current, restricted, and other assets 821,030$ 882,667$ (61,637)$ 743,572$ 139,095$
Capital assets (net of accumulated depreciation)3,631,716 3,446,232 185,484 3,252,238 193,994
Total Assets 4,452,746 4,328,899 123,847 3,995,810 333,089
Deferred Outflows of Resources:
Bonds and notes payable-Deferred loss on refunding 11,343 12,099 (756) 11,321 778
Pension-related outflows 34,238 17,333 16,905 37,666 (20,333)
OPEB-related outflows 1,246 1,278 (32) — 1,278
46,827 30,710 16,117 48,987 (18,277)
Liabilities:
Current liabilities 149,991 140,082 9,909 133,679 6,403
Non-current liabilities 1,723,830 1,722,146 1,684 1,515,345 206,801
Total Liabilities 1,873,821 1,862,228 11,593 1,649,024 213,204
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
Pension-related inflows 4,341 6,065 (1,724) 4,605 1,460
887 — 887 — —
5,228 6,065 (837)4,605 1,460
Net Position:
Net investment in capital assets 2,063,519 1,968,740 94,779 1,876,249 92,491
Restricted 127,414 129,579 (2,165) 135,259 (5,680)
Unrestricted 429,591 392,997 36,594 379,660 13,337
Total Net Position 2,620,524$ 2,491,316$ 129,208$ 2,391,168$ 100,148$
Condensed Statements of Net Position
(000's)
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 7
Non-current liabilities increased by $1.7 million or 0.1% primarily due to a $26.0 million
increase in net pension liability, offset by $24.3 million net decrease in bonds and notes
payable. The net decrease in bonds and notes payable is comprised of a $52.6 million
decrease for fiscal 2020 senior and subordinate debt payments reclassified to current
liabilities and a $7.0 million decrease in unamortized premium net of discount offset by
a $35.3 million increase in new debt.
Net deferred outflows and inflows increased $17.0 million or 68.8% due primarily to
updates to various information provided by the District’s actuary such as
economic/demographic gains or losses, assumption changes or inputs, and investment
gains or losses related to the District’s net pension liability or total OPEB liability.
2018 Analysis
Current, restricted and other assets increased $139.1 million or 18.7% in the current
year. The increase is predominately due to an increase in cash and investments due to
higher sewer rates charged, with a corresponding increase in cash collected from
customers, and due to the unspent cash received on the senior debt issued in fiscal 2018.
Capital assets net of accumulated depreciation increased by $194.0 million or 6.0% in the
current year as the result of continued high levels of construction and acquisition of assets
by the District.
Current liabilities increased by $6.4 million or 4.8% due primarily to an increase in the
current portion of bonds and notes payable and retainage held on capital projects which
correlates with the increase in construction.
Non-current liabilities increased by $206.8 million or 13.6% primarily due to a $209.0
million increase in bonds and notes payable relating to the $343.3 million new senior and
subordinate debt issued in fiscal 2018 and the related net increase in premiums on debt
of $42.4 million, offset by $125.8 million advance refunding of existing debt and $50.9
million for fiscal 2019 senior and subordinate debt payments reclassified to current
liabilities. In addition, non-current liabilities increased by $24.2 million as the District
implemented GASB Statement No. 75 resulting in recognition of the District’s total
OPEB liability. Decreases in the net pension liability of $18.7 million and in deposits and
accrued expenses of $8.1 million for the removal of the net OPEB obligation previously
recorded under GASB Statement No. 45 are the other components primarily accounting
for the change in non-current liabilities.
Net deferred outflows and inflows decreased $19.7 million or 44.5% due primarily to
updates to various information provided by the District’s actuary such as
economic/demographic gains or losses, assumption changes or inputs, and investment
gains or losses related to the District’s net pension liability, offset by the establishment
of the District’s OPEB-related outflows.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 8
For the Fiscal For the Fiscal Increase For the Fiscal Increase
Year Ended Year Ended (Decrease) Year Ended (Decrease)
June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018 2019-2018 June 30, 2017 2018-2017
Operating Revenues:
Sewer service charges 399,929$ 364,165$ 35,764$ 330,873$ 33,292$
Recovery (provision) for doubtful
sewer service charge accounts (4,349) (2,990) (1,359) (2,513) (477)
Licenses, permits, and other fees 3,063 3,777 (714) 4,036 (259)
Other 2,478 3,359 (881) 1,095 2,264
Total Operating Revenues 401,121 368,311 32,810 333,491 34,820
Non-operating Revenues:
Property taxes levied by the District 34,108 33,749 359 32,458 1,291
Investment income 16,699 7,406 9,293 2,903 4,503
Rent and other income 301 254 47 106 148
Total Non-operating Revenues 51,108 41,409 9,699 35,467 5,942
Total Revenues 452,229 409,720 42,509 368,958 40,762
Operating Expenses:
Pumping and treatment 63,197 60,735 2,462 60,203 532
Collection system maintenance 45,617 44,786 831 43,928 858
Engineering 11,447 11,218 229 11,290 (72)
General and administrative 67,462 59,012 8,450 58,535 477
Water backup claims 5,600 1,557 4,043 5,035 (3,478)
Depreciation 83,640 81,326 2,314 81,194 132
Asset management 13,755 15,131 (1,376) 14,893 238
Total Operating Expenses 290,718 273,765 16,953 275,078 (1,313)
Non-operating Expenses:
Net loss on disposal and sale of capital assets 971 1,834 (863) 673 1,161
Non-recurring projects and studies 15,628 9,296 6,332 7,459 1,837
Interest expense 33,082 36,695 (3,613) 31,251 5,444
Total Non-operating Expenses 49,681 47,825 1,856 39,383 8,442
Total Expenses 340,399 321,590 18,809 314,461 7,129
Income Before Capital
Grants And Contributions 111,830 88,130 23,700 54,497 33,633
Capital Grants And Contributions 17,378 26,077 (8,699) 9,614 16,463
Change in Net Position 129,208 114,207 15,001 64,111 50,096
Net Position - Beginning of Year, As Previously Stated 2,491,316 2,391,168 100,148 2,327,057 64,111
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 — (14,059) 14,059 — (14,059)
Net Position - Beginning of Year, As Restated 2,491,316 2,377,109 114,207 2,327,057 50,052
Net Position - End of Year 2,620,524$ 2,491,316$ 129,208$ 2,391,168$ 100,148$
Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position
(000's)
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 9
2019 Analysis
Net position increased $129.2 million or 5.2% over the prior year. The largest impact to
net position was the increase in sewer service charges revenue which increased due to
rate increases.
Total revenue increased by $42.5 million or 10.4%. Sewer service charges increased $35.8
million or 9.8% and the provision for doubtful accounts increased correspondingly by $1.4
million or 45.5%. Other operating revenue decreased $0.9 million or 26.2% due to a
reduction in forfeited construction deposits. Investment income increased $9.3 million or
125.5% due to the increase in unrealized gain and purchase interest gain.
Total expenses increased by $18.8 million or 5.8% resulting primarily from the increase
in operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $17.0 million or 6.2% with the
largest increase in general and administrative expense of $8.5 million or 14.3% due to
higher pension expense and costs related to system upgrades and water backup claims of
$4.0 million or 259.7% due to spring flooding and pump station failures. Non-operating
expenses increased $1.9 million or 3.9% with a large increase in non-recurring projects
and studies of $6.3 million or 68.1% due primarily to the increase in green infrastructure
expenditures and treatment plant concrete repairs offset by interest expense decrease of
$3.6 million or 9.8% due to more interest capitalized to large capital projects.
Capital grants and contributions decreased $8.7 million or 33.4% with the majority of the
decrease resulting from capital contributions as the number of capital projects
contributed to the District decreased significantly in fiscal 2019.
2018 Analysis
Net position increased $100.1 million after the $14.1 million restatement decreased
beginning net position due to GASB Statement No. 75 or 4.2% over the prior year. The
largest impact to net position was the increase in sewer service charges revenue which
increased due to rate increases.
Total revenue increased by $40.8 million or 11.0%. Sewer service charges increased $33.3
million or 10.1% and the provision for doubtful accounts increased correspondingly by
$0.5 million or 19.0%. Other operating revenue increased $2.3 million or 206.8% due to
a reduction in insurance recoveries recorded in fiscal 2017 not repeated in fiscal 2018 and
an increase in forfeited construction deposits. Investment income increased $4.5 million
or 155.1% due to the increase in cash from unspent bond proceeds available to be invested
and higher interest rates.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 10
Total expenses increased by $7.1 million or 2.3% resulting primarily from the increase in
interest expense of $5.4 million or 17.4% due to the new Senior debt issued in December
2017. Operating expenses actually decreased $1.3 million or 0.5% with the largest
decrease in water backup claims of $3.5 million or 69.1% due to fewer significant rain
events in fiscal 2018. Total non-operating expenses, including the interest expense
referenced above, increased $8.4 million or 21.4%.
Capital grants and contributions increased $16.5 million or 171.2% with the majority of
the increase resulting from capital contributions. The number of capital projects
contributed to the District increased significantly in fiscal 2018 due to the improving
economy and the average value per project also increased in fiscal 2018.
2019 Analysis
The District ended the year with $56.8 million in cash and cash equivalents for an
increase of $22.4 million or 65.0% from the prior year. Cash flows from operating
activities increased by $24.2 million or 15.1% as a result of increased receipts from
customers offset by an increase in payments to suppliers for goods and services and an
increase in payments to employees. Cash flows from non-capital financing activities
increased by $0.7 million or 2.0%. Cash flow from capital and related financing activities
For the Fiscal For the Fiscal Increase For the Fiscal Increase
Year Ended Year Ended (Decrease) Year Ended (Decrease)
June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018 2019-2018 June 30, 2017 2018-2017
Cash flows from operating
activities 185,226$ 160,989$ 24,237$ 148,108$ 12,881$
Cash flows from non-capital
financing activities 33,850 33,181 669 32,013 1,168
Cash flows from capital
and related financing
activities (310,046) (72,534) (237,512) (146,484)73,950
Cash flows from investing
activities 113,338 (135,363) 248,701 (34,720) (100,643)
Net increase (decrease) in
cash and cash equivalents 22,368 (13,727)36,095 (1,083) (12,644)
Cash and cash equivalents
at beginning of year 34,386 48,113 (13,727)49,196 (1,083)
Cash And Cash Equivalents
At End Of Year 56,754$ 34,386$ 22,368$ 48,113$ (13,727)$
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(000's)
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 11
decreased by $237.5 million or 327.4% due primarily to $229.8 million decrease in bond
proceeds and premiums received in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 and
$11.8 million increase in principal, interest and fees paid on bonds, offset by $5.4 million
decrease in spending for capital assets. Cash flows from investing activities increased by
$248.7 million or 183.7%. The increase primarily stems from more investments maturing
than purchased in fiscal 2019 while the opposite occurred in fiscal 2018 – more
investments were purchased than matured.
2018 Analysis
The District ended the year with $34.4 million in cash and cash equivalents or a decrease
of $13.7 million or 28.5% from the prior year. Cash flows from operating activities
increased by $12.9 million or 8.7% as a result of increased receipts from customers offset
by an increase in payments to suppliers for goods and services and an increase in
payments to employees. Cash flows from non-capital financing activities increased by
$1.2 million or 3.6%. Cash flow from capital and related financing activities increased by
$74.0 million or 50.5% due to decreased spending for capital assets, offset by an increase
in bond proceeds and premiums received in fiscal year 2018 compared to fiscal year 2017,
and increased principal, interest and fees paid on bonds. Cash flows from investing
activities decreased by $100.6 million or 289.9%. The decrease primarily stems from a
greater change in the purchase of investments than in the proceeds from sale and
maturity of investments from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018.
Capital Assets
Condensed Statements of Capital Assets
Net of Depreciation
(000's)
Increase Increase
June 30, June 30, (Decrease) June 30, (Decrease)
2019 2018 2019-2018 2017 2018-2017
Land 74,274$ 73,262$ 1,012$ 70,695$ 2,567$
Construction in progress 956,321 836,105 120,216 707,739 128,366
Treatment and disposal plant
and equipment 660,732 694,390 (33,658) 727,949 (33,559)
Collection and pumping plant 1,916,993 1,821,344 95,649 1,724,422 96,922
General plant and equipment 23,396 21,131 2,265 21,433 (302)
Total 3,631,716$ 3,446,232$ 185,484$ 3,252,238$ 193,994$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 12
2019 Analysis
Total capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, increased by $185.5 million or 5.4%
over the prior year. Construction in progress contained the majority of the increase with
net additions of $120.2 million or 14.4% consisting of $244.0 million in additions offset by
$123.8 million of assets placed into service. The net increase in collection and pumping
plant assets was $95.6 million or 5.3%, primarily for capitalization of assets including
new and improved sewers, dedicated assets and infrastructure repairs. Land increased
$1.0 million or 1.4% due to the acquisition of easements and other land. General plant
and equipment increased $2.3 million or 10.7% primarily due to fleet replacements and
plant upgrades. These increases are offset by net treatment and disposal plant and
equipment decrease of $33.7 million or 4.8% due to no large projects being capitalized in
fiscal 2019 to offset the depreciation charge for the year. For more detailed information,
see Note 4, Capital Assets, in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
2018 Analysis
Total capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, increased by $194.0 million or 6.0%
over the prior year. Construction in progress contained the majority of the increase with
net additions of $128.4 million or 18.1% consisting of $249.7 million in additions offset by
$121.3 million of assets placed into service. The net increase in collection and pumping
plant assets was $96.9 million or 5.6%, primarily for capitalization of assets including
new and improved sewers, dedicated assets and infrastructure repairs. Net treatment
and disposal plant and equipment decreased $33.6 million or 4.6% due to no large projects
being capitalized in fiscal 2018 to offset the depreciation charge for the year. Land
increased $2.6 million or 3.6% due to the acquisition of easements and other land.
General plant and equipment decreased $0.3 million or 1.4% primarily due to
depreciation of existing assets. For more detailed information, see Note 4, Capital Assets,
in the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 13
Long-Term Debt
Increase Increase
June 30, June 30, (Decrease) June 30, (Decrease)
2019 2018 2019-2018 2017 2018-2017
Senior Revenue Bonds:
Series 2010B 85,000$ 85,000$ —$ 85,000$ —$
Series 2011B 15,945 18,055 (2,110) 43,410 (25,355)
Series 2012A 154,040 159,340 (5,300) 214,700 (55,360)
Series 2012B 128,840 131,935 (3,095) 134,710 (2,775)
Series 2013B 113,615 116,615 (3,000) 146,000 (29,385)
Series 2015B 190,135 192,810 (2,675) 221,355 (28,545)
Series 2016C 144,535 147,295 (2,760) 150,000 (2,705)
Series 2017A 312,760 316,175 (3,415) — 316,175
Water Infrastructure Finance &
Innovation Act (WIFIA) Bonds:
Series 2018A 262 — 262 — —
Subordinate Revenue Bonds:
Series 2004B 64,590 73,190 (8,600) 81,545 (8,355)
Series 2005A 3,120 3,465 (345) 3,800 (335)
Series 2006A 20,965 23,315 (2,350) 25,600 (2,285)
Series 2006B 7,400 8,140 (740) 8,860 (720)
Series 2008AB 21,765 23,700 (1,935) 25,605 (1,905)
Missouri DNR:
Series 2009A 14,218 15,342 (1,124) 16,441 (1,099)
Series 2010A 5,468 5,849 (381) 6,222 (373)
Series 2010C 24,906 26,656 (1,750) 28,361 (1,705)
Series 2011A 32,241 33,988 (1,747) 35,692 (1,704)
Series 2013A 43,349 45,596 (2,247) 47,786 (2,190)
Series 2015A 65,902 69,246 (3,344) 67,149 2,097
Series 2016A 13,129 3,094 10,035 147 2,947
Series 2016B 45,583 27,418 18,165 8,986 18,432
Series 2018B 2,880 — 2,880 — —
Energy Loan Program 16 51 (35) 68 (17)
T otal 1,510,664$ 1,526,275$ (15,611)$ 1,351,437$ 174,838$
Condensed Statements of Long-Term Debt
(000's)
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 14
2019 Analysis
The District ended fiscal year 2019 with $1.5 billion in long-term debt outstanding. The
District added one new Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (“WIFIA”) bond
(“Series 2018A”) totaling $0.3 million. In addition, the District added one new State
Revolving Fund (“SRF”) bond (“Series 2018B”) totaling $2.9 million and the District
withdrew $10.9 million and $21.3 million in loan proceeds from the Series 2016A and
Series 2016B SRF bonds, respectively. These amounts represent new borrowings and do
not reflect the principal payments made in fiscal 2019 on Series 2016A and Series 2016B.
For more detailed information, see Note 6, Long-Term Liabilities, in the accompanying
notes to the financial statements.
2018 Analysis
The District ended fiscal year 2018 with $1.5 billion in long-term debt outstanding. The
District had one senior revenue bond addition this year (“Series 2017A”) for a total of
$316.2 million of which $116.2 million was used to partially advance refund the Series
2011B, Series 2012A, Series 2013B and Series 2015B. Premium related to the refunding
received on the new Series 2017A and excess funds in the bond reserve account were also
used to partially advance refund principal and interest on the four Series referenced
above. In addition, the District withdrew $5.4 million, $3.4 million and $18.4 million in
loan proceeds from the Series 2015A, Series 2016A and Series 2016B State Revolving
Fund (“SRF”) bonds, respectively. These amounts represent new borrowings and do not
reflect the principal payments made in fiscal 2018 on Series 2015A and Series 2016A.
For more detailed information, see Note 6, Long-Term Liabilities, in the accompanying
notes to the financial statements.
Decisions Impacting the Future
Integral to helping MSD’s rate payers understand the Consent Decree (“CD”) with the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the State of Missouri, and the Missouri Coalition
for the Environment, which settled a lawsuit for alleged violations of the Clean Water
Act, was the initiation of MSD Project Clear. See Note 12, Commitments And
Contingencies, for additional information regarding this litigation. The goal of MSD
Project Clear is to help MSD’s rate payers have a clear understanding of MSD’s goals and
objectives. MSD Project Clear consists of three main components:
Getting The Rain Out which is focused on reducing excess stormwater from
entering the sewer system infrastructure to help reduce basement back-ups and
overflows;
Performing Repair and Maintenance to the existing infrastructure to ensure it
operates as well as possible for as long as possible, and
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Management’s Discussion And Analysis (Continued)
Page 15
Building System Improvements where needed to increase the capacity of
the system.
MSD Project Clear will greatly affect the daily lives of many of our rate payers and is
needed to help the rate payer understand the individual and regional, as well as the
immediate and long-term, benefits of the program.
Since February 2004, the voters in the District’s service area have authorized the District
to issue a total of $2.6 billion in wastewater revenue bonds. As of June 30, 2019, the
District has issued $1.9 billion of the total authorization. The District’s long-term
wastewater capital improvement program will continue to be funded through a
combination of additional bonds and wastewater rate increases.
Requests For Information
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the District’s finances
to interested parties. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report
or requests for additional financial information should be addressed or e-mailed to:
Marion M. Gee, Director of Finance
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, MO 63103-2555
314-768-6200
mgee@stlmsd.com
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
See the accompanying notes to financial statements. Page 16
STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION
Continued on Next Page
June 30,
Assets 2019 2018
Current Assets
Unrestricted Current Assets
33,303,010$ 13,134,990$
219,636,085 303,522,982
$58,429,895 in 2018 66,032,777 60,544,838
Unbilled sewer service charges receivable 31,773,136 29,140,461
Property taxes receivable, less allowance of $9,806 in 2019 and $22,544 in 2018 479,914 689,128
1,927,804 1,669,319
5,331,693 4,495,551
8,306,515 8,109,878
366,790,934 421,307,147
Restricted Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 1,747,847 1,009,872
15,117,921 26,469,179
115,556 54,092
16,981,324 27,533,143
383,772,258 448,840,290
Non-Current Assets
Restricted Assets
21,703,207 20,241,459
152,079,763 249,558,518
73,020,492 79,334,215
Property taxes receivable, less allowance of $20,954 in 2019 and $45,453 in 2018 1,355,724 1,379,842
Accrued income on investments 536,365 474,478
248,695,551 350,988,512
Other Assets
11,156,415 11,814,529
177,405,293 71,023,440
188,561,708 82,837,969
Capital Assets
Depreciable:
1,277,635,246 1,276,275,567
2,749,946,498 2,612,344,501
99,318,349 97,380,391
4,126,900,093 3,986,000,459
1,525,779,330 1,449,135,797
2,601,120,763 2,536,864,662
Non-depreciable:
74,274,584 73,261,965
956,321,065 836,105,343
3,631,716,412 3,446,231,970
4,068,973,671 3,880,058,451
4,452,745,929 4,328,898,741
Deferred Outflows of Resources
11,342,745 12,099,160
34,238,270 17,332,857
1,246,327 1,278,437
46,827,342 30,710,454
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
See the accompanying notes to financial statements. Page 17
STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION (Continued)
June 30,
Liabilities 2019 2018
Current Liabilities
Current Liabilities-Payable From Unrestricted Assets
Contracts and accounts payable 36,098,219$ 34,527,687$
Deposits and accrued expenses 43,703,869 38,885,341
Retainage payable 15,855,232 13,894,496
Current portion of bonds and notes payable 52,603,763 50,942,663
148,261,083 138,250,187
Current Liabilities-Payable From Restricted Assets
Contracts and accounts payable 801,529 1,100,845
Retainage payable 928,645 731,026
1,730,174 1,831,871
149,991,257 140,082,058
Non-Current Liabilities
7,352,522 7,329,985
74,396,737 48,388,938
24,164,395 24,193,972
1,617,916,402 1,642,233,069
1,723,830,056 1,722,145,964
1,873,821,313 1,862,228,022
Deferred Inflows of Resources
4,341,116 6,064,985
886,686 —
5,227,802 6,064,985
Net Position
2,063,518,988 1,968,740,050
58,262,631 55,329,147
69,150,974 74,249,353
429,591,563 392,997,638
2,620,524,156$ 2,491,316,188$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
See the accompanying notes to financial statements. Page 18
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN NET POSITION
2019 2018
399,929,150$ 364,165,372$
(4,349,247) (2,990,148)
3,063,458 3,777,200
2,477,778 3,359,053
401,121,139 368,311,477
63,197,081 60,735,056
45,616,891 44,785,482
11,446,900 11,217,590
67,461,720 59,012,162
5,600,419 1,557,385
83,639,843 81,326,342
13,754,655 15,131,189
290,717,509 273,765,206
110,403,630 94,546,271
34,107,619 33,748,932
16,699,153 7,405,957
301,446 253,799
51,108,218 41,408,688
970,825 1,833,908
15,628,590 9,296,358
33,082,384 36,695,083
49,681,799 47,825,349
111,830,049 88,129,610
16,635,468 24,799,116
742,451 1,278,558
17,377,919 26,077,674
129,207,968 114,207,284
2,491,316,188 2,391,168,054
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 — (14,059,150)
Net Position - Beginning Of Year, As Restated 2,491,316,188 2,377,108,904
2,620,524,156$ 2,491,316,188$
For The Years
Ended June 30,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
See the accompanying notes to financial statements. Page 19
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Continued on Next Page
2019 2018
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Received from customers 395,246,801$ 356,658,318$
Paid to employees for services (101,374,404) (96,464,294)
Paid to suppliers for goods and services (108,646,478) (99,205,100)
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities 185,225,919 160,988,924
Cash Flows Provided By Non-Capital Financing Activities
Taxes levied and collected 33,850,110 33,180,969
Cash Flows From Capital And Related Financing Activities
Proceeds from capital grants 130,670 1,634,250
Proceeds from issuance of debt 35,149,238 227,157,189
Premium on sale of bonds — 37,823,556
Principal paid on debt (50,942,662) (43,667,013)
Interest and fees paid on debt (65,117,717) (60,603,135)
Payments for capital assets (231,228,233) (236,673,660)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 331,346 170,578
Build America Bond tax credit 1,630,662 1,624,563
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Capital And Related
Financing Activities (310,046,696) (72,533,672)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchase of investments (649,590,176) (774,026,450)
Proceeds from sale and maturity of investments 752,424,000 630,795,000
Investment income 10,275,355 7,614,739
Proceeds from rents 229,231 253,799
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities 113,338,410 (135,362,912)
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents 22,367,743 (13,726,691)
Cash And Cash Equivalents At Beginning Of Year 34,386,321 48,113,012
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Year 56,754,064$ 34,386,321$
Statements of Net Position Classification
Current Assets - Unrestricted Cash and cash equivalents 33,303,010$ 13,134,990$
Current Assets - Restricted Cash and cash equivalents 1,747,847 1,009,872
Non-Current Assets - Restricted Cash and cash equivalents 21,703,207 20,241,459
Statements of Net Position Total Cash And Cash Equivalents 56,754,064$ 34,386,321$
Non-Cash Capital And Investing Activities
Proceeds from debt issuance placed into escrow to refund bonds —$ 116,175,000$
Principal amount reduced and placed in escrow less reserve funds — (124,825,675)
Capital asset additions included in accounts payable 18,871,621 18,008,669
Capital assets contributed by other governments and developers 16,635,468 24,799,116
Fair value investment adjustment loss (gain)(6,621,441) 185,620
742,451 1,172,306
For The Years
Ended June 30,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
See the accompanying notes to financial statements. Page 20
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
2019 2018
Reconciliation Of Operating Income To Net Cash Flows
Provided By Operating Activities
Operating Income 110,403,630$ 94,546,271$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 83,639,843 81,326,342
Non-recurring projects and studies (15,628,590) (9,296,358)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) in billed and unbilled sewer service
charges receivable (8,120,614) (9,530,516)
Decrease in other receivables 954,005 1,012,988
(Increase) in supplies inventory (196,637) (438,672)
Decrease (increase) in pension-related outflows (16,905,413) 20,332,929
Decrease (increase) in OPEB-related outflows 32,110 (1,278,437)
Increase in contracts and accounts payable 382,247 954,822
(Decrease) increase in deposits and accrued expenses 5,524,299 (9,585,487)
(Decrease) increase in net pension liability 26,007,799 (18,650,247)
(Decrease) increase in total OPEB liability (29,577) 10,134,822
(Decrease) increase in pension-related inflows (1,723,869) 1,460,467
Increase in OPEB-related inflows 886,686 —
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities 185,225,919$ 160,988,924$
For The Years
Ended June 30,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2019 AND 2018
1. Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“District”) was authorized by the
voters, established and chartered under the provisions of the Constitution of
Missouri as a municipal corporation and a political subdivision of the State of
Missouri. Upon creation in 1954, the District assumed responsibilities to provide
for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the sewer facilities within its
defined boundaries. The District’s service area now comprises all of the City of St.
Louis and most of St. Louis County. Subdistricts within the District’s total service
area represent separate geographic areas within which specific taxes can be levied
for the retirement of indebtedness issued to finance construction of wastewater or
stormwater facilities within the area or to operate, maintain, or construct
improvements within the subdistrict. The District also maintains all of the
publicly owned stormwater sewers within its original boundaries and is continuing
to accept maintenance of the stormwater sewers in the remainder of its service
area.
Pursuant to provisions of its Charter and subject to limitations imposed by the
Constitution of Missouri, all powers of the District are vested in a six-member
Board of Trustees (“Board”), three of whom are appointed by the Mayor of the City
of St. Louis and three of whom are appointed by the County Executive of St. Louis
County. Not more than two Trustees appointed from said City or County, as the
case may be, shall be affiliated with the same political party.
Reporting Entity
The District defines its financial reporting entity to include all component units
for which the District’s governing body is financially accountable. To be considered
financially accountable, the component unit must be fiscally dependent on the
District and the District must either 1) be able to impose its will on the component
unit or 2) the relationship must have the potential for creating a financial benefit
or imposing a financial burden on the District.
Based on the foregoing, the District’s financial statements include all funds that
are established under the authority of the District’s charter. There are no agencies,
boards, commissions, or authorities that are controlled by or dependent on the
District.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 22
Measurement Focus, Basis Of Accounting And Financial Statement
Presentation
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) is the accepted
standard-setting body for establishing accounting and financial reporting
standards for U.S. state and local governments that follow generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”). As a political subdivision of the State of Missouri,
the District follows GASB Pronouncements as codified under GASB Statement No.
62, Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance Contained in
Pre-November 30, 1989 FASB and AICPA Pronouncements.
Throughout the year, the District maintains its detailed accounting records on a
modified accrual basis of accounting. In order to account for the transactions
related to certain subdistricts and restricted resources, separate fund accounting
records are maintained. For financial reporting purposes, the District reports its
operations as a single enterprise fund and the financial statements are prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America as applied to government units. Accordingly, the accounting records
are converted to the accrual basis of accounting and all interfund transactions are
eliminated. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when
earned and expenses are recognized when the related liability is incurred. The
District’s measurement focus is on the flow of economic resources.
Revenues and expenses are divided into operating and non-operating items.
Operating revenues generally result from providing services in connection with the
District’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the
District are user fees, licenses, and permits for wastewater treatment services.
Operating expenses include the costs associated with the conveyance and
treatment of wastewater and stormwater, administrative expenses, and
depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting these
definitions are reported as non-operating revenues and expenses. Non-recurring
projects and studies (shown as non-operating expenses) consist of expenses related
to unusual charges or losses that are unlikely to occur again in the formal course
of business such as work related to federally declared disasters, projects originally
intended to be capitalized that changed scope when a decision was made to no
longer build an asset, and any non-reimbursed work performed on assets not
owned or maintained by the District but is necessary to protect District owned
assets or to mitigate a threat to the health and safety of the general public.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 23
The District follows GASB Statement No. 33, Accounting and Financial Reporting
for Nonexchange Transactions, which establishes accounting and financial
reporting standards for nonexchange transactions involving financial or capital
resources.
GASB Statement No. 33 groups nonexchange transactions into the following four
classes, based upon their principal characteristics: derived tax revenues, imposed
nonexchange revenues, government-mandated nonexchange transactions, and
voluntary nonexchange transactions.
The District recognizes assets from imposed nonexchange revenue transactions in the
period when an enforceable legal claim to the assets arises or when the resources are
received, whichever occurs first. Revenues are recognized in the period when the
resources are required to be used for the first period that use is permitted. The
District recognizes revenues from property taxes, net of estimated refunds and
estimated uncollectible amounts, in the period for which the taxes are levied. Imposed
nonexchange revenues also include licenses, permits, and other fees.
Intergovernmental revenues, representing grants and assistance received from
other governmental units, are generally recognized as revenues in the period when
all eligibility requirements, as defined by GASB Statement No. 33, have been met.
Any resources received where all requirements are met with the exception of the
time requirement are recorded as deferred inflows. All other resources received
before any other eligibility requirements are met are reported as unearned
revenues.
Cash And Cash Equivalents
The District considers highly liquid investments that have original maturity of less
than 91 days to the District to be Cash Equivalents.
Investments
The District accounts for its investments at fair value. The District categorizes its
fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally
accepted accounting principles pursuant to GASB Statement No. 72. The hierarchy
is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level
1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are
significant other observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable
inputs. Changes in unrealized gain (loss) on the carrying value of investments are
reported as a component of investment income in the Statements of Revenues,
Expenses and Changes in Net Position.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 24
Restricted Cash, Cash Equivalents And Investments
Cash, cash equivalents and investments that are externally restricted are
classified as restricted assets. These assets are used to make debt service
payments, maintain sinking or reserve funds, purchase or construct capital or
other non-current assets or for other restricted purposes.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable is composed primarily of charges to customers for wastewater
services. Accounts are considered past due 30 days from the invoice date.
Receivables are reported at their gross values net of an allowance for uncollectible
amounts. This allowance for uncollectible amounts is based on historical collection
experience. Unbilled sewer service charge revenues are accrued by the District
based on estimated billings for services provided through the end of the current
fiscal year.
Capital Assets
Acquired capital assets are recorded at historical cost on the acquisition date. In
accordance with GASB Statement No. 72, donated capital assets are recorded at
acquisition value at the time the asset is considered operational. Interest cost is
capitalized as part of the historical cost of acquiring certain assets when the effect
of such capitalization is material to the financial statements. Interest is not
capitalized on assets constructed with contributions from other governmental
sources. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following
estimated useful lives:
Treatment and disposal plant and
equipment 3 to 100 years
Collection and pumping plant 7 to 100 years
General plant and equipment 3 to 12 years
When developing user charge rates, the District includes funding for replacement
cost of assets, which may differ from depreciation expense recorded for financial
reporting purposes.
Normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or
materially extend asset lives are not capitalized. Betterments are capitalized and
depreciated over the remaining useful lives of the related assets, as applicable.
The District defines capital assets as assets with an initial, individual cost between
$5,000 and $15,000, depending on the asset category, and an estimated useful life
in excess of three years.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 25
Costs incurred for capital construction and acquisition are carried in construction
in progress until completion of the related projects. The major components of
construction in progress are the costs incurred to construct new tunnels, storage
facilities and sewer lines, rehabilitate and separate existing sewer lines, and to
make improvements to pump stations and treatment plants. Costs related to
projects not pursued are expensed when terminated.
Capitalization Of Interest
Interest costs are capitalized as part of the costs of capital assets during the period
of construction based on the related weighted average net borrowing costs
incurred. Interest earned on temporary investments acquired with the proceeds
of such borrowed funds, from the date of the borrowing until the assets are ready
for their intended use, is used to reduce the interest costs capitalized on the
constructed assets. Interest is not capitalized for outlays financed by capital
grants (or other outside parties) externally restricted for the acquisition of
specified assets. In fiscal 2019 and 2018, the District’s total net interest cost
incurred on tax-exempt borrowings during the fiscal year was $47,228,368 and
$48,114,072, respectively. Of this net interest cost, $19,476,685 and $17,494,620
was capitalized and $27,751,683 and $30,619,452 was expensed in fiscal 2019 and
2018, respectively.
Supplies Inventory
Supplies inventory consists of parts and supplies to be used to operate and
maintain treatment facilities and various treatment-related equipment at the
District. This inventory figure is netted against those materials and supplies
deemed to be obsolete. All inventory is stated at weighted average cost and
expenses are recognized when the inventory is consumed.
Net Position
One component of the District’s net position is the net investment in capital assets
which consists of capital assets, including restricted capital assets, net of
accumulated depreciation, reduced by the net outstanding debt and construction-
related liabilities, including premiums and discounts on such debt, which is
attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets. The
outstanding debt is net of the cash and investments from the debt that has not yet
been expended. Deferred losses on refundings are also included in the net
investment in capital assets net position.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 26
The restricted component of net position consists of assets and liabilities regulated
by external constraints imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, laws, or
regulations of other governments or constraints imposed by law through
constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Property taxes levied by the
various subdistricts and other revenues received for construction in those sub-
districts have also been restricted for that use. Sewer extension and connection
fees, grants, and other revenues received for construction within certain sub-
districts have been restricted for that use. In addition, a portion of wastewater
sewer charges have been restricted for the payment of principal and interest,
including accrued interest, on certain debt of the District.
The unrestricted net position component of net position consists of net position that
does not meet the definition of restricted or net investment in capital assets. The
District first applies restricted resources when an expense is incurred for purposes
for which both restricted and unrestricted net position is available.
Deferred Outflows Of Resources And Deferred Inflows Of Resources
In addition to assets, financial statements may report a separate section for
deferred outflows of resources. Deferred outflows of resources consists of the
consumption of net position that is applicable to a future reporting period and so
will not be recognized as an outflow of resources until then. Deferred outflows of
resources related to refunding long-term debt is reported in the Statements of Net
Position. A deferred bond refunding amount results from the difference in the
carrying value of refunded debt and its reacquisition price, and is amortized over
the shorter of the life of the refunded or refunding debt. The pension related
deferred outflows of resources represent contributions made to the plan between
the measurement date of the pension liabilities and the beginning of the next fiscal
year as well as certain actuarial differences and changes that are amortized over
future periods. The other postemployment benefit (“OPEB”) related deferred
outflows of resources represent benefit payments made between the measurement
date of the total OPEB liability and the beginning of the fiscal year following the
measurement date and certain actuarial differences and changes that are
amortized over future periods.
In addition to liabilities, financial statements may report a separate section for
deferred inflows of resources. Deferred inflows of resources consists of the
acquisition of net position that is applicable to a future reporting period and so will
not be recognized as an inflow of resources until then. The District’s deferred
inflows of resources relate to certain changes in pension and OPEB obligations that
are amortized over future periods.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 27
Capital Contributions
Capital contributions to the District represent government grants and other aid
used to fund capital projects. In accordance with GASB Statement No. 33, capital
contributions are recognized as revenue when the expenditure is made and the
amount becomes subject to claim for reimbursement.
Bonds, Bond Premiums, Discounts And Issuance Costs
Bonds and notes payable are recorded at the principal amount outstanding and
are reported net of any applicable bond premium or discount. In the District’s
financial statements, bond premiums and discounts are amortized over the life of
the bonds using the effective interest method. Bond issuance costs are expensed
when incurred pursuant to GASB Statement No. 65, Items Previously Reported as
Assets and Liabilities.
Bonds which have been advance refunded and in substance defeased, are not
included in long-term debt and the related assets deposited in an irrevocable trust
with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the
refunded debt are not included in investments.
Compensated Absences
Vacation
Under the terms of the District’s personnel policies, employees are allowed to carry
a maximum of 30 to 45 days of vacation (depending on length of service) from one
calendar year to the next. Since vacation accrued at year-end is expected to be
used by the employee during the following fiscal year, the accrual is reported as a
component of current deposits and accrued expenses payable.
Sick Leave
Employees earn sick pay benefits at accrual rates ranging from 10 days per year
to 12 days per year (depending on length of service). Unused sick leave can be
carried over at year-end without limitation. An employee retiring from the District
with five or more years of service will be compensated for any unused accrued sick
leave at the rate of 1.25% for each year of District service multiplied by the unused
accrued sick leave remaining at the employee’s current rate of pay up to a
maximum of $50,000. The District has recorded a liability which has been
actuarially determined to be equal to the accumulated expense charge that will
amortize the employees’ benefits over their period of District service. The liability,
included in current deposits and accrued expenses payable, includes vested
accumulated rights to receive sick leave benefits estimated to be paid within one
year. The portion of sick leave expected to be paid after one year is recorded as a
component of non-current deposits and accrued expenses payable.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 28
Pensions
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows of resources
and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, the
fiduciary net position of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Employees’
Pension Plan (“Plan”) and additions to/deductions from the Plan’s fiduciary net
position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by the Plan,
which has a December 31 reporting period. For this purpose, benefit payments are
recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms.
Investments are reported at fair value.
Use Of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Income Tax Status
The District is exempt from federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code
as a political subdivision of the State of Missouri.
Adoption Of New Accounting Standards
During fiscal year 2019, the District implemented GASB Statement No. 88,
Certain Disclosures Related to Debt, Including Direct Borrowing and Direct
Placements (“GASB Statement No. 88”). This Statement amends Statement No.
34, Basic Financial Statements—and Management’s Discussion and Analysis—for
State and Local Governments, paragraph 119 and Statement No. 38, Certain
Financial Statement Note Disclosures, paragraphs 10 and 12. The primary
objective of this Statement is to improve the information that is disclosed in notes
to government financial statements related to debt, including direct borrowings
and direct placements. The requirements of this Statement will improve financial
reporting by providing users of financial statements with essential information
that currently is not consistently provided. This Statement requires that
additional essential information related to debt be disclosed in notes to financial
statements, including unused lines of credit; assets pledged as collateral for the
debt; and terms specified in debt agreements related to significant events of default
with finance-related consequences, significant termination events with finance-
related consequences, and significant subjective acceleration clauses. The
disclosures required by this Statement are presented in Note 6, Long-Term
Liabilities.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 29
The following GASB Statement which became effective during fiscal year 2019 is
not applicable to the District and there is no implementation impact on the
District’s financial reporting at this time.
• Statement No. 83, Certain Asset Retirement Obligations
During fiscal year 2018, the District implemented GASB Statement No. 75,
Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than
Pensions (“GASB Statement No. 75”). This Statement replaces the requirements
of Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for
Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions (“GASB Statement No. 45”), as
amended. This Statement improves accounting and financial reporting by state
and local governments for postemployment benefits other than pensions (other
postemployment benefits or “OPEB”). This Statement also establishes standards
for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows and inflows of
resources, and expense. In addition, this Statement requires the identification of
the methods and assumptions that are required to be used to project benefit
payments, discount projected benefit payments to their actuarial present value,
and attribute that present value to periods of employee service. The disclosures
required by this Statement are presented in Note 9, Postemployment Benefits
Other Than Pensions (“OPEB”), and new required supplementary information is
also presented.
The District’s adoption of GASB Statement No. 75 in fiscal year 2018 resulted in
restating the beginning balance of net position due to the recognition of a beginning
total OPEB liability, a beginning deferred outflow of resources for the amount paid
by the District for OPEB subsequent to the measurement date of the beginning
total OPEB liability but before the beginning of the District’s fiscal year and for
the removal of the net OPEB obligation previously recorded based on GASB
Statement No. 45. It was not practical to retroactively restate prior periods due to
the implementation of GASB Statement No. 75 as the cost and time to develop the
required actuarial calculations would be prohibitive. The cumulative effect of
applying GASB Statement No. 75 and the resulting restatement of beginning net
position on the District’s Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net
Position is detailed as follows:
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 30
Recent Accounting Standards
GASB has issued additional guidance that is not yet effective. The District is
currently reviewing the provisions of the following GASB Statements to determine
the impact of implementation in future periods.
• Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities (fiscal 2020)
• Statement No. 87, Leases (fiscal 2021)
• Statement No. 89, Accounting for Interest Cost Incurred Before the End of a
Construction Period (fiscal 2021)
• Statement No. 90, Majority Equity Interests, an amendment of GASB
Statements No. 14 and No. 61 (fiscal 2020)
• Statement No. 91, Conduit Debt Obligations (fiscal 2022)
Reclassifications
Prior period financial statement amounts may have been reclassified to conform to
current period presentation. These reclassifications, if any, had no effect on the
changes in net position or total net position.
July 1,
2017
Net Position - Beginning Of Year, As Previously Stated 2,391,168,054$
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 (14,059,150)
Net Position - Beginning Of Year, As Restated 2,377,108,904$
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 - Restatement Consists Of
Total OPEB liability reported as a noncurrent liability at July 1, 2017 (22,838,813)$
Benefit payments made subsequent to the beginning total OPEB
liability's measurement date of December 31, 2016 but before
July 1, 2017 are reported as deferred outflows of resources 716,582
Removal of GASB 45 net OPEB obligation balance as of July 1, 2017 8,063,081
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 (14,059,150)$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 31
2. Deposits and Investments
Deposits
At June 30, 2019 the reported amount of the District’s deposits was $26,062,172
and the bank balance was $32,463,138. Of the bank balance, $1,060,057 was
covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”); $31,403,081 was
collateralized with securities held by a third party financial institution in the
District’s name. In addition, the District has money market mutual funds of
$19,225,251 held in a trusted escrow account for the State that will be used to
make future bond payments.
At June 30, 2018 the reported amount of the District’s deposits was $13,048,424
and the bank balance was $17,112,744. Of the bank balance, $1,013,392 was
covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”); $16,099,352 was
collateralized with securities held by a third party financial institution in the
District’s name. In addition, the District has money market mutual funds of
$18,849,126 held in a trusted escrow account for the State that will be used to
make future bond payments.
Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of bank failure, the
District’s deposits may not be returned to the District. Deposits in each bank are
insured by the FDIC in the amount of $250,000 for interest bearing accounts and
noninterest bearing accounts. The District’s investment policy complies with the
provisions of state laws and requires collateralization on repurchase agreements,
time certificates of deposit and deposits with banking institutions, not covered by
the FDIC, and the collateralization level shall be 103% and shall be based on the
market value of the pledged collateral.
Investments
The Secretary-Treasurer is authorized to invest, with the approval of the Board,
funds not immediately needed for the purpose to which said funds are applicable,
in the same manner as the state treasurer may invest funds of the State of
Missouri pursuant to Section 15, Article IV of the Constitution of Missouri, as
amended from time to time. The District’s investment policy conforms to the
investment policy guidelines for the State of Missouri. The District’s investment
policy authorizes the District to invest in the following instruments: U.S. Treasury
obligations, certificates of deposit, obligations of any agency or instrumentality of
the U.S., repurchase agreements, bankers’ acceptances, and commercial paper, all
according to terms specified in the policy. The District also has investments in
money market mutual funds that hold securities approved by the District’s
investment policy. At June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, all of the District’s
investments were in compliance with the District’s investment policy and charter.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 32
A summary of deposits and investments as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 is
as follows:
Reconciliation to the financial statements:
Investment Type Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value
Deposits 26,062,172$ 26,062,172$ 13,048,424$ 13,048,424$
Money Market Mutual Funds 19,225,251 19,225,251 18,849,126 18,849,126
U.S. Treasury and
Agency Obligations 499,933,657 503,997,289 584,981,410 582,563,488
Commercial Paper 143,707,677 144,728,906 148,952,277 149,833,617
Total 688,928,757$ 694,013,618$ 765,831,237$ 764,294,655$
20182019
2019 2018
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Unrestricted Current 33,303,010$ 13,134,990$
Restricted Current 1,747,847 1,009,872
Restricted Non-Current 21,703,207 20,241,459
Investments
Unrestricted Current 219,636,085 303,522,982
Restricted Current 15,117,921 26,469,179
Restricted Non-Current 152,079,763 249,558,518
Long-Term Investments
Restricted Non-Current 73,020,492 79,334,215
Other 177,405,293 71,023,440
Total 694,013,618$ 764,294,655$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 33
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District had the following investments and
maturities:
In accordance with the District’s investment policy, the District will minimize the
risk that the fair value of debt securities in the portfolio will fall due to increases
in general interest rates by:
1. Structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash
requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell
securities on the open market prior to maturity.
2. Investing operating funds primarily in short-term securities.
3. State law limits the maximum stated maturities to five years on any
investment from the date of purchase.
Long-Term Investments
While the majority of the District’s portfolio is made up of short-term investments,
the District also categorizes a sizeable amount as long-term under the categories
discussed in Note 1, Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
The District is allowed to purchase long-term callable securities. These callable
securities give the issuer the right to redeem at predetermined prices at a specific
time prior to maturity. When a security is called, the District reflects an
immediate reclassification from long-term investment to cash.
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Maturity Maturity
Investment Type Fair Value (Years) Fair Value (Years)
U.S. Treasury Obligations 166,467,925$ 0.48 264,811,868$ 0.64
U.S. Agency Obligations 337,529,364 1.38 317,751,620 1.05
Commercial Paper 144,728,906 0.18 149,833,617 0.19
Total 648,726,195$ 0.88 732,397,105$ 0.73
2019 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 34
Custodial/Credit Risk
The District will minimize credit risk for investments, the risk of loss due to failure
of the security issuer or backer, by:
1. Prequalifying the financial institutions, broker/dealers, intermediaries, and
advisors with which the District will do business.
2. Diversifying the portfolio so that potential losses on individual securities
will be minimized.
In accordance with its investment policy, the District limits its investments in
these investment types to the top rating issued by Nationally Recognized
Statistical Rating Organizations. As of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, the
District’s investments in commercial paper were rated A-1 by Standard & Poor’s
(“S&P”) and P-1 by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”). The District’s
investments in U.S. Agency obligations that do not carry the explicit guarantee of
the U.S. Government all carry a rating a ssigned by S&P of AA+ or higher. Money
market investments are rated as AAAm and Aaa-mf by S&P and Moody’s,
respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The District’s investment policy places no limit on the amount the District may
invest in any one issuer with respect to collateralized time and demand deposits.
U.S. Treasury obligations are not limited. U.S. Agency obligations and
government-sponsored enterprises are limited to 60% of the portfolio, with no more
than 30% of the total portfolio invested in securities of any one agency; and
collateralized repurchase agreements are limited to 50% of the portfolio. U.S.
Agency callable securities are limited to 30% of the portfolio, and commercial paper
and bankers’ acceptances are limited to 25% each, with no more than 5% of the
total portfolio invested in any one issuer. The following table lists investments in
issuers that represent 5% or more of total investments at June 30, 2019 and
June 30, 2018:
Issuer 2019 2018
Treasury Notes 25.7 36.2
Federal Home Loan Bank 16.1 22.1
Tennessee Valley Association 11.0 2.6
Federal Farm Credit Funding Corp 9.1 2.2
Federal National Mortgage Association 5.8 8.2
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 5.1 6.4
Federal Agriculture Mortgage Association 5.0 1.8
Total Investments
Percent Of
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 35
Fair Value Measurement and Application
The District categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value
hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles pursuant to
GASB Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application. The hierarchy
is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level
1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are
significant other observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable
inputs.
The District has the following recurring fair value measurements as of June 30,
2019 and 2018:
Money Market Mutual Funds of $19.2 million and $18.8 million,
respectively, are valued using a market approach to measuring fair
value prices that considers relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or similar assets or groups of assets.
(Level 2 inputs)
U.S. Treasury and Agency Obligations of $504.0 million and $582.6
million, respectively, are valued using a market approach to
measuring fair value prices that considers relevant information
generated by market transactions involving identical or similar
assets or groups of assets. (Level 2 inputs)
Commercial Paper of $144.7 million and $149.8 million, respectively,
is valued using a market approach to measuring fair value prices that
considers relevant information generated by market transactions
involving identical or similar assets or groups of assets. (Level 2
inputs)
3. Notes Receivable
The District has a note receivable with Missouri American Water Company
(“MOAM”) for its portion of the capital costs related to the Lower Meramec
Wastewater Treatment Plant. The original loan bears interest at 4.35%, while the
two loans added during fiscal year 2013 bear interest at 4.50% and 3.52%. The
current portion of this note is included in the Unrestricted Other Receivables line
on the Statements of Net Position. The note receivable will mature in fiscal year
2033.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 36
At June 30, 2019, future payments are as follows:
At June 30, 2018, future payments were as follows:
The District also has a note receivable due to its participation in the Contractor
Loan Fund, a consortium of local organizations desiring to pool bank loans, private
investment, and new market tax credits to provide access to capital for Minority
and Women-owned Business Enterprise companies that are certified through a
City of St. Louis agency. At June 30, 2019 and 2018, MSD’s note receivable related
to the Contractor Loan Fund is $59,786 and $60,860, respectively.
2020 1,154,696$
2021 1,154,696
2022 1,154,696
2023 1,154,696
2024 1,154,696
2025-2029 5,773,479
2030-2033 4,027,886
15,574,845
Less: Amount representing interest 3,821,176
Total Notes Receivable 11,753,669$
Classification in Statement of Net Position:
Current - Other receivables 657,040$
Non-current - Notes receivable 11,096,629
Total Notes Receivable 11,753,669$
2019 1,154,696$
2020 1,154,696
2021 1,154,696
2022 1,154,696
2023 1,154,696
2024-2028 5,773,479
2029-2033 5,182,581
16,729,540
Less: Amount representing interest 4,346,474
Total Notes Receivable 12,383,066$
Classification in Statement of Net Position:
Current - Other receivables 629,397$
Non-current - Notes receivable 11,753,669
Total Notes Receivable 12,383,066$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 37
4. Capital Assets
The following is a summary of capital assets changes for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2019 and 2018:
Note to Schedules:
The Accumulated depreciation numbers (Balance June 30, 2017, Additions and Balance June 30, 2018) for both the
Treatment and disposal plant and equipment and Collection and pumping plant categories were adjusted with offsetting
amounts to properly reflect depreciation and accumulated depreciation in the correct categories.
Balance Balance
June 30, 2018 June 30, 2019
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 73,261,965$ 1,012,619$ —$ 74,274,584$
Construction in progress 836,105,343 244,064,243 (123,848,521) 956,321,065
Total capital assets not being depreciated 909,367,308 245,076,862 (123,848,521) 1,030,595,649
Capital assets being depreciated:
Treatment and disposal plant
and equipment 1,276,275,567 1,727,943 (368,264) 1,277,635,246
Collection and pumping plant 2,612,344,501 140,626,577 (3,024,580) 2,749,946,498
General plant and equipment 97,380,391 6,864,804 (4,926,846) 99,318,349
Total capital assets being depreciated 3,986,000,459 149,219,324 (8,319,690) 4,126,900,093
Less: Accumulated depreciation:
Treatment and disposal plant
and equipment (581,885,579) (35,374,280) 356,361 (616,903,498)
Collection and pumping plant (791,000,584) (43,873,740) 1,920,449 (832,953,875)
General plant and equipment (76,249,634) (4,391,822) 4,719,499 (75,921,957)
Total accumulated depreciation (1,449,135,797) (83,639,842) 6,996,309 (1,525,779,330)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 2,536,864,662 65,579,482 (1,323,381) 2,601,120,763
Total Capital Assets 3,446,231,970$ 310,656,344$ (125,171,902)$ 3,631,716,412$
Additions Deletions
Balance Balance
June 30, 2017 June 30, 2018
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 70,695,016$ 2,566,949$ —$ 73,261,965$
Construction in progress 707,738,709 249,651,675 (121,285,041) 836,105,343
Total capital assets not being depreciated 778,433,725 252,218,624 (121,285,041) 909,367,308
Capital assets being depreciated:
Treatment and disposal plant
and equipment 1,279,143,367 3,402,355 (6,270,155) 1,276,275,567
Collection and pumping plant 2,475,709,689 138,979,030 (2,344,218) 2,612,344,501
General plant and equipment 94,793,873 4,024,990 (1,438,472) 97,380,391
Total capital assets being depreciated 3,849,646,929 146,406,375 (10,052,845) 3,986,000,459
Less: Accumulated depreciation:
Treatment and disposal plant
and equipment (551,194,569) (35,872,561) 5,181,551 (581,885,579)
Collection and pumping plant (751,287,382) (41,205,127) 1,491,925 (791,000,584)
General plant and equipment (73,360,462) (4,248,654) 1,359,482 (76,249,634)
Total accumulated depreciation (1,375,842,413) (81,326,342) 8,032,958 (1,449,135,797)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 2,473,804,516 65,080,033 (2,019,887) 2,536,864,662
Total Capital Assets 3,252,238,241$ 317,298,657$ (123,304,928)$ 3,446,231,970$
Additions Deletions
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 38
5. Property Tax
On or before October 1 of each year, the District levies ad valorem taxes on all
taxable tangible property, real and personal, within its boundaries based on
assessed valuations established by the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County
Assessors. Taxes levied are used for stormwater operations and maintenance, debt
service, and construction. Taxes are recorded as non-operating revenues and
recognized, net of estimated refunds and estimated uncollectible amounts, in the
period for which the taxes are levied. Property tax bills are typically mailed in
October. They become delinquent and represent a lien on the related property if
not paid by December 31. All property taxes are billed and collected by the City of
St. Louis and St. Louis County Collectors of Revenue and are remitted to the
District monthly.
In fiscal years 2019 and 2018, the District recorded revenue from property taxes
in the amount of $34,107,619 and $33,748,932, respectively.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 39
6. Long-Term Liabilities
The following is a summary of changes in the District’s long-term liabilities for the
year ended June 30, 2019:
Original Balance Balance
Issuance June 30,June 30, Current
Amounts 2018 Additions Retirements 2019 Portion
Bonds and Notes Payable:
Wastewater System Senior Revenue Bonds:
Series 2010B 85,000,000$ 85,000,000$ —$ —$ 85,000,000$ —$
Series 2011B 52,250,000 18,055,000 — 2,110,000 15,945,000 2,220,000
Series 2012A 225,000,000 159,340,000 — 5,300,000 154,040,000 5,300,000
Series 2012B 141,730,000 131,935,000 — 3,095,000 128,840,000 3,390,000
Series 2013B 150,000,000 116,615,000 — 3,000,000 113,615,000 3,250,000
Series 2015B 223,855,000 192,810,000 — 2,675,000 190,135,000 2,785,000
Series 2016C 150,000,000 147,295,000 — 2,760,000 144,535,000 2,840,000
Series 2017A 316,175,000 316,175,000 — 3,415,000 312,760,000 3,520,000
Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Bonds:
Series 2018A 47,722,204 — 261,480 — 261,480 —
Water Pollution Control and Drinking Water Subordinate Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Funds Program):
Series 2004B 161,280,000 73,190,000 — 8,600,000 64,590,000 8,860,000
Series 2005A 6,800,000 3,465,000 — 345,000 3,120,000 355,000
Series 2006A 42,715,000 23,315,000 — 2,350,000 20,965,000 2,415,000
Series 2006B 14,205,000 8,140,000 — 740,000 7,400,000 750,000
Series 2008A/B 40,000,000 23,700,000 — 1,935,000 21,765,000 1,970,000
Missouri Department of Natural Resources:
Energy Loan Program 223,793 51,025 — 34,862 16,163 16,163
Series 2009A 23,000,000 15,342,000 — 1,123,900 14,218,100 1,149,900
Series 2010A 7,980,700 5,849,100 — 380,900 5,468,200 388,700
Series 2010C 37,000,000 26,656,000 — 1,750,000 24,906,000 1,795,000
Series 2011A 39,769,300 33,988,300 — 1,747,000 32,241,300 1,792,000
Series 2013A 52,000,000 45,596,000 — 2,247,000 43,349,000 2,305,000
Series 2015A 75,000,000 69,246,000 — 3,344,000 65,902,000 3,424,000
Series 2016A 20,000,000 3,093,765 10,878,299 843,000 13,129,064 861,000
Series 2016B 75,500,000 27,417,916 21,311,710 3,147,000 45,582,626 3,217,000
Series 2018B 25,267,000 — 2,880,349 — 2,880,349 —
2,012,472,997$ 1,526,275,106$ 35,331,838$ 50,942,662$ 1,510,664,282 52,603,763$
Add:
Unamortized premium, net of discount 159,855,883
Total Bonds and Notes Payable 1,670,520,165$
Current Portion of Bonds and Notes Payable 52,603,763$
Non-Current Bonds and Notes Payable 1,617,916,402
Total Bonds and Notes Payable 1,670,520,165$
Net Pension Liability 48,388,938$ 26,007,799$ —$ 74,396,737$ —$
Total OPEB Liability 24,193,972$ (29,577)$ —$ 24,164,395$ —$
Deposits and Accrued Expenses
Landfill closure and
postclosure costs 565,493$ 53,891$ —$ 619,384$ —$
Compensated absences 9,019,323 808,146 849,952 8,977,517 2,244,379
Net OPEB obligation — — — — —
Total Deposits and Accrued Expenses 9,584,816$ 862,037$ 849,952$ 9,596,901$ 2,244,379$
Current Portion (Compensated absences) in Current Deposits and Accrued Expenses 2,244,379$
Non-Current Deposits and Accrued Expenses 7,352,522
Total Deposits and Accrued Expenses 9,596,901$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 40
The following is a summary of changes in the District’s long-term liabilities for the
year ended June 30, 2018:
Original Balance Balance
Issuance June 30,June 30, Current
Amounts 2017 Additions Retirements 2018 Portion
Bonds and Notes Payable:
Wastewater System Senior Revenue Bonds:
Series 2010B 85,000,000$ 85,000,000$ —$ —$ 85,000,000$ —$
Series 2011B 52,250,000 43,410,000 — 25,355,000 18,055,000 2,110,000
Series 2012A 225,000,000 214,700,000 — 55,360,000 159,340,000 5,300,000
Series 2012B 141,730,000 134,710,000 — 2,775,000 131,935,000 3,095,000
Series 2013B 150,000,000 146,000,000 — 29,385,000 116,615,000 3,000,000
Series 2015B 223,855,000 221,355,000 — 28,545,000 192,810,000 2,675,000
Series 2016C 150,000,000 150,000,000 — 2,705,000 147,295,000 2,760,000
Series 2017A 316,175,000 — 316,175,000 — 316,175,000 3,415,000
Water Pollution Control and Drinking Water Subordinate Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Funds Program):
Series 2004B 161,280,000 81,545,000 — 8,355,000 73,190,000 8,600,000
Series 2005A 6,800,000 3,800,000 — 335,000 3,465,000 345,000
Series 2006A 42,715,000 25,600,000 — 2,285,000 23,315,000 2,350,000
Series 2006B 14,205,000 8,860,000 — 720,000 8,140,000 740,000
Series 2008A/B 40,000,000 25,605,000 — 1,905,000 23,700,000 1,935,000
Missouri Department of Natural Resources:
Energy Loan Program 223,793 68,135 — 17,110 51,025 34,863
Series 2009A 23,000,000 16,440,500 — 1,098,500 15,342,000 1,123,900
Series 2010A 7,980,700 6,222,400 — 373,300 5,849,100 380,900
Series 2010C 37,000,000 28,361,000 — 1,705,000 26,656,000 1,750,000
Series 2011A 39,769,300 35,692,300 — 1,704,000 33,988,300 1,747,000
Series 2013A 52,000,000 47,786,000 — 2,190,000 45,596,000 2,247,000
Series 2015A 75,000,000 67,148,734 5,363,265 3,265,999 69,246,000 3,344,000
Series 2016A 20,000,000 146,500 3,362,265 415,000 3,093,765 843,000
Series 2016B 75,500,000 8,986,258 18,431,658 — 27,417,916 3,147,000
1,939,483,793$ 1,351,436,827$ 343,332,188$ 168,493,909$ 1,526,275,106 50,942,663$
Add:
Unamortized premium, net of discount 166,900,626
Total Bonds and Notes Payable 1,693,175,732$
Current Portion of Bonds and Notes Payable 50,942,663$
Non-Current Bonds and Notes Payable 1,642,233,069
Total Bonds and Notes Payable 1,693,175,732$
Net Pension Liability 67,039,185$ (18,650,247)$ —$ 48,388,938$ —$
Total OPEB Liability —$ 24,193,972$ —$ 24,193,972$ —$
Deposits and Accrued Expenses
Landfill closure and
postclosure costs 508,422$ 57,071$ —$ 565,493$ —$
Compensated absences 8,754,916 816,576 552,169 9,019,323 2,254,831
Net OPEB obligation 8,063,081 — 8,063,081 — —
Total Deposits and Accrued Expenses 17,326,419$ 873,647$ 8,615,250$ 9,584,816$ 2,254,831$
Current Portion (Compensated absences) in Current Deposits and Accrued Expenses 2,254,831$
Non-Current Deposits and Accrued Expenses 7,329,985
Total Deposits and Accrued Expenses 9,584,816$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 41
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds Payable
In February 2004, the District received voter authorization for $500,000,000 of
revenue bonds. In August 2008, the District received voter authorization for an
additional $275,000,000 of revenue bonds. In June 2012, the District received
voter authorization for another $945,000,000 of revenue bonds and finally, in April
2016, the District received voter authorization for another $900,000,000 of revenue
bonds. From the total voter authorization of $2,620,000,000, $674,510,796 has not
been issued as of June 30, 2019. These funds were sought to enable the District to
comply with federal and state clean water requirements.
In December 2017, the District issued $316,175,000 of Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds Series 2017A (“Series 2017A”). These bonds were issued for two
purposes: $116,175,000 was issued to partially advance refund the Series 2011B
bonds maturing in fiscal years 2022 through 2029 totaling $23,345,000, the Series
2012A bonds maturing in fiscal years 2023 through 2032 totaling $50,060,000
(excludes $240,000 of the May 2030 principal payment due), the Series 2013B
bonds maturing in fiscal years 2024 through 2029 totaling $26,385,000, and the
Series 2015B bonds maturing in fiscal years 2026 through 2029 totaling
$25,970,000. The remaining $200,000,000 was issued for the purpose of
constructing, repairing, replacing, and equipping new and existing District
wastewater facilities and as of June 30, 2019, $115,667,763 has been expended.
Approximately $47,500,000 was issued pursuant to the June 2012 authorization
and $152,500,000 was issued pursuant to the April 2016 authorization. A premium
of $37,823,556 was received on the $200,000,000 portion of the Series 2017A. The
2017A senior bonds have interest rates ranging from 2.0% to 5.0% and are payable
in semiannual installments at varying amounts through May 1, 2047.
The Series 2017A refunding net proceeds of $141,343,662 (including a premium of
$25,967,878 and additional proceeds of $1,220 and after payments of $428,483 in
underwriting fees and $371,953 in issuance costs) and the $934,325 in excess debt
service reserves the District contributed were used to purchase U.S. government
securities. These securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow
agent to provide for the future debt service payments defined above on the Series
2011B, Series 2012A, Series 2013B, and Series 2015B bonds. The sum of the
$142,277,987 deposited into escrow and the earnings on the U.S. government
securities will fund the $125,760,000 advanced refunded principal payments on
their call dates (May 1, 2021 for Series 2011B, May 1, 2022 for Series 2012A, May
1, 2023 for Series 2013B, and May 1, 2025 for Series 2015B) and the interest
thereon. Interest only payments of $6,017,025 were made from the escrow account
in fiscal year 2019. All $125,760,000 debt defeased in substance to be paid from
the escrow account remains outstanding as of June 30, 2019. As a result of placing
the cash with an escrow agent in a trust, Series 2011B, Series 2012A, Series 2013B,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 42
and Series 2015B bonds were partially defeased and the related liability for those
bonds were removed from the District’s financial statements in fiscal 2018. This
advance refunding decreased total debt service payments over the next 14 years
by $12,623,385, resulting in an economic gain (difference between the present
values of the debt service requirements on the old and new debt adjusted for the
additional cash paid) of $9,481,147.
In December 2016, the District issued $150,000,000 of Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds Series 2016C (“Series 2016C”). These bonds were issued pursuant
to the June 2012 authorization; in this case for the purpose of construction,
repairing, replacing, and equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities.
All funds from this issuance have been expended. A premium of $17,678,054 was
received on the issuance of Series 2016C. These 2016C senior bonds have interest
rates ranging from 2.0% to 5.0% and are payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through May 1, 2046.
In December 2015, the District issued $223,855,000 of Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds Series 2015B (“Series 2015B”). These bonds were issued for two
purposes: $73,855,000 was issued to advance refund the Series 2006C and Series
2008A bonds and $150,000,000 was issued pursuant to the June 2012
authorization; in this case for the purpose of constructing, repairing, replacing, and
equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities. All funds from this
issuance have been expended. These 2015B senior bonds have interest rates
ranging from 3.0% to 5.0% and are payable in semiannual installments at varying
amounts through May 1, 2045; however, in December 2017, there was an advance
refunding of the non-refunding Series 2015B bonds for the years 2026 through
2029 totaling $25,970,000. As a result of this advance refunding, Series 2015B
bonds are considered partially defeased. See the explanation for Series 2017A
above for further information.
The Series 2015B refunding net proceeds of $86,848,034 (including a premium of
$13,623,487 and after payments of $337,848 in underwriting fees and $292,605 in
issuance costs) and the $8,945,557 in excess debt service reserves the District
contributed were used to purchase U.S. government securities. These securities
were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future
debt service payments on the Series 2006C and Series 2008A bonds. All principal
and interest payments on the advance refunded Series 2006C and Series 2008A
bonds have been paid from escrow and no amounts remain outstanding on these
bonds. As a result of placing the cash with an escrow agent in a trust, Series 2006C
and Series 2008A bonds were defeased and the liability for those bonds were
removed from the District’s financial statements in fiscal 2016. The original
$60,000,000 2006C bonds were issued pursuant to the February 2004
authorization and the original $30,000,000 2008A bonds were issued pursuant to
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 43
the August 2008 authorization. This refunding decreased total debt service
payments over the next 22 years by $33,032,176, resulting in an economic gain
(difference between the present values of the debt service requirements on the old
and new debt adjusted for additional cash paid) of $14,544,866.
In December 2013, the District issued $150,000,000 of Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds Series 2013B (“Series 2013B”). These bonds were issued pursuant
to the June 2012 authorization; in this case for the purpose of constructing,
repairing, replacing, and equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities.
All funds from this issuance have been expended. These senior bonds have interest
rates ranging from 2.0% to 5.0% and are payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through May 1, 2043; however, in December 2017, there was an
advance refunding of the Series 2013B bonds for the years 2024 through 2029
totaling $26,385,000. As a result of this advance refunding, Series 2013B bonds
are considered partially defeased. See the explanation for Series 2017A above for
further information.
In November 2012, the District issued $141,730,000 of Wastewater System
Refunding Bonds Series 2012B (“Series 2012B”). These bonds were issued to
advance refund the Series 2004A bonds maturing in fiscal years 2015 and
thereafter. These 2012B senior bonds have interest rates ranging from 1.3% to
5.0% and are payable in semiannual installments at varying amounts through May
1, 2034. The Series 2012B’s net proceeds of $169,991,298 (including a premium of
$29,613,138 and after payments of $761,593 in underwriting fees and $590,247 in
issuance costs) were used to purchase U.S. government securities. These securities
were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future
debt service payments on the bonds. All principal and interest payments on the
advance refunded Series 2004A bonds have been paid from escrow and no amounts
remain outstanding on these bonds. As a result of placing the cash with an escrow
agent in a trust, Series 2004A bonds were partially defeased and the liability for
those bonds related to a date after May 1, 2014 were removed from the District’s
financial statements in fiscal 2013. The original $175,000,000 2004A bonds were
issued pursuant to the February 2004 authorization. This refunding decreased
total debt service payments over the next 22 years by $28,601,189, resulting in an
economic gain (difference between the present values of the debt service
requirements on the old and new debt) of $22,439,375.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 44
In August 2012, the District issued $225,000,000 of Wastewater System Revenue
Bonds Series 2012A (“Series 2012A”). These bonds were issued pursuant to the
June 2012 authorization; in this case for the purpose of constructing, repairing,
replacing, and equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities. All funds
from this issuance have been expended. These senior bonds have interest rates
ranging from 2.5% to 5.3% and are payable in semiannual installments at varying
amounts through May 1, 2042; however, in December 2017, there was an advance
refunding of the Series 2012A bonds for the years 2023 through 2032 totaling
$50,060,000 (excludes $240,000 of the May 2030 principal payment due). As a
result of this advance refunding, Series 2012A bonds are considered partially
defeased. See the explanation for Series 2017A above for further information.
In December 2011, the District issued $52,250,000 of Wastewater System Revenue
Bonds Series 2011B (“Series 2011B”). These bonds were issued pursuant to the
August 2008 authorization; in this case for the purpose of constructing, repairing,
replacing, and equipping new and existing District wastewater facilities. All funds
from this issuance have been expended. These senior bonds have interest rates
ranging from 3.0% to 5.0% and are payable in semiannual installments at varying
amounts through May 1, 2032; however, in December 2017, there was an advance
refunding of the Series 2011B bonds for the years 2022 through 2029 totaling
$23,345,000. As a result of this advance refunding, Series 2011B bonds are
considered partially defeased. See the explanation for Series 2017A above for
further information.
In January 2010, the District issued $85,000,000 of Taxable Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds (Build America Bonds – Direct Pay) Series 2010B (“Series 2010B”).
These bonds were issued pursuant to the August 2008 authorization; in this case
for the purpose of constructing, repairing, replacing, and equipping new and
existing District wastewater facilities. All funds from this issuance have been
expended. These senior bonds have an interest rate of 5.9% and are payable in
semiannual installments at varying amounts through May 1, 2039. As Build
America Bonds under The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”) of
2009, the District receives a subsidy payment from the Federal government equal
to a percentage of the interest paid. In fiscal years 2013 and prior, the rate was
35%. Beginning with refund payments processed on March 1, 2013 and annually
beginning on October 1, 2013, the IRS has adjusted this rate as part of the
sequestration. In fiscal year 2019 the subsidy percentage was 32.8% while for 2018
the subsidy percentage was 32.7%. In fiscal year 2020 the subsidy percentage is
expected to be 32.9%.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 45
The revenue bonds do not constitute a legal debt or liability for the District, the
State of Missouri, or for any political subdivision thereof and do not constitute
indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation
or restriction. Revenue derived from the operations of the Wastewater System is
pledged for the retirement of the outstanding Wastewater System Revenue Bonds
listed above. Under the provisions of the bond indentures, the District covenants
to establish rates for the services of the Wastewater System sufficient to fund
operations, maintain reserves, and provide revenues to apply principal and
interest on these bonds.
The issuance of the revenue bonds does not obligate the District to levy any form
of taxation or to make any appropriation for their payments in any fiscal year. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues.
Water Pollution Control And Drinking Water Revenue Bonds Payable
In October 2008, the State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources
Authority (“Authority”) authorized and issued $69,435,000 of Water Pollution
Control and Drinking Water Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Funds Programs)
Series 2008A/B (“Series 2008A/B”). The Series 2008A/B bonds provided funds to
issue loans to 14 Missouri political subdivisions that used the funds to finance
water pollution control and drinking water projects. A portion of the proceeds of
the Series 2008A/B bonds issued by the Authority were used to purchase
subordinate Participant Revenue Bonds (“Participant Bonds”) authorized and
issued by the District from the February 2004 authorization in the aggregate
principal amount of $40,000,000, the proceeds of which were used for constructing,
repairing, and equipping new and existing wastewater facilities. All funds from
this issuance have been expended. The District’s Participant Bonds have interest
rates ranging from 4.0% to 5.7% and are payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through January 1, 2029.
In November 2006, the Authority authorized and issued $22,105,000 of State
Revolving Funds Programs Series 2006B (“Series 2006B”). The Series 2006B
bonds provided funds to issue loans to 7 Missouri political subdivisions that used
the funds to finance water pollution control and drinking water projects. A portion
of the proceeds of the Series 2006B bonds issued by the Authority were used to
purchase Participant Bonds authorized and issued by the District from the
February 2004 authorization in the aggregate principal amount of $14,205,000,
the proceeds of which were used for constructing, repairing, and equipping new
and existing wastewater facilities. All funds from this issuance have been
expended. The District’s Participant Bonds have interest rates ranging from 4.0%
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 46
to 5.0% and are payable in semiannual installments at varying amounts through
July 1, 2027.
In May 2006, the Authority authorized and issued $87,505,000 of State Revolving
Funds Programs Series 2006A (“Series 2006A”). The Series 2006A bonds provided
funds to issue loans to 13 Missouri political subdivisions that used the funds to
finance water pollution control and drinking water projects. A portion of the
proceeds of the Series 2006A bonds issued by the Authority were used to purchase
subordinate Participant Bonds authorized and issued by the District from the
February 2004 authorization in the aggregate principal amount of $42,715,000,
the proceeds of which were used for constructing, repairing, and equipping new
and existing wastewater facilities. All funds from this issuance have been
expended. The District’s Participant Bonds have interest rates ranging from 3.5%
to 4.5% and are payable in semiannual installments at varying amounts through
July 1, 2026.
In May 2005, the Authority authorized and issued $53,060,000 of State Revolving
Funds Programs Series 2005A (“Series 2005A”). The Series 2005A bonds provided
funds to issue loans to 10 Missouri political subdivisions and one Missouri non-
profit corporation that were used to finance water pollution control and drinking
water projects. A portion of the proceeds of the Series 2005A bonds issued by the
Authority were used to purchase subordinate Participant Bonds authorized and
issued by the District from the February 2004 authorization in the aggregate
principal amount of $6,800,000, the proceeds of which were used for constructing,
repairing, and equipping new and existing wastewater facilities. All funds from
this issuance have been expended. The District’s Participant Bonds have interest
rates ranging from 3.0% to 5.0% and are payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through July 1, 2026.
In May 2004, the Authority authorized and issued $179,780,000 of State Revolving
Funds Programs Series 2004B (“Series 2004B”). The Series 2004B bonds provided
funds to issue loans to 7 Missouri political subdivisions that were used to finance
water pollution control projects. A portion of the proceeds of the Series 2004B
bonds issued by the Authority were used to purchase subordinate Participant
Bonds authorized and issued by the District from the February 2004 authorization
in the aggregate principal amount of $161,280,000, the proceeds of which were
used to finance the District’s three water pollution control construction projects
outlined in the agreement. All funds from this issuance have been expended. The
District’s Participant Bonds have interest rates ranging from 2.0% to 5.3% and are
payable in semiannual installments at varying amounts through January 1, 2027.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 47
The Series 2004B, 2005A, 2006A, 2006B, and 2008A/B bonds do not constitute a
legal debt or liability for the District, the State of Missouri, or for any political
subdivision thereof and do not constitute indebtedness within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. The issuance of the Series
2004B, 2005A, 2006A, 2006B, and 2008A/B bonds and the Series 2009A, 2010A,
2010C, 2011A, 2013A, 2015A, 2016A, 2016B and 2018B direct loans (pages 49-55)
do not obligate the District to levy any form of taxation or to make any
appropriation for their payments in any fiscal year. The principal and interest on
the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater revenues.
In connection with the District’s issuance of the Participant Bonds, which were
purchased with the proceeds of the Series 2004B, 2005A, 2006A, 2006B, and
2008A/B bonds, the District participates in the State Revolving Loan Program
established by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (“DNR”). Monies
from federal capitalization grants and state matching funds are used to fund a
bond reserve account for the participants.
As the District incurred approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimbursed the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account and deposited in a
bond reserve account, in the District’s name, an additional 60% of the expenditure
amount for the Series 2004B bonds and 70% for the Series 2005A, 2006A, and
2006B bonds. For the Series 2008A/B bonds, 70% of the entire anticipated
borrowed amount was deposited into this bond reserve account at the beginning of
the loan versus as the expenditures were reimbursed. Interest earned from this
bond reserve account can be used by the District to fund interest payments on the
bonds.
On the date of each payment of the principal amount of the District’s Participant
Bonds, the trustee transfers from this bond reserve account to the master trustee
account an amount equal to 60% of the principal payment for the Series 2004B
bonds and 70% for the Series 2005A, 2006A, 2006B and 2008A/B bonds.
In accordance with the District’s Master Bond Ordinance No. 11713, adopted April
22, 2004, the District’s annual net operating revenues from wastewater activities,
as defined in the agreement, coupled with investments earnings, must be at least
125% of the current year’s principal and interest due on all senior bonds and at
least 115% of the current year’s principal and interest due on all bonds. At
June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District was in compliance with this covenant.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 48
Principal And Interest Requirements On Revenue Bonds Payable
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on revenue bonds
payable outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Series 2018A
In December 2018, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued to the
District an amount totaling $47,722,204 for the purpose of constructing the Deer
Creek Sanitary Tunnel Pump Station and Sanitary Sewers Project. The principal
and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater revenues
and the bonds are issued from the April 2016 authorization. The Series 2018A
bonds are not subordinated. The District’s interest rate is 3.06% and is payable in
semiannual installments at varying amounts through May 1, 2053.
Principal And Interest Requirements on Water Infrastructure Finance
and Innovation Act Series 2018A
As the District incurs approved capital expenditures, the EPA reimburses the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. The District repays
the loan at an interest rate of 3.06% based on the amount that has been borrowed.
As of June 30, 2019 the outstanding loan balance was $261,480. The payment
requirements to maturity will be determined after the debt is fully issued.
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 37,655,000$ 57,029,166$ 94,684,166$
2021 38,990,000 55,659,732 94,649,732
2022 39,775,000 54,309,582 94,084,582
2023 41,080,000 52,817,649 93,897,649
2024 42,295,000 51,342,758 93,637,758
2025-2029 218,025,000 230,741,846 448,766,846
2030-2034 239,465,000 178,620,137 418,085,137
2035-2039 276,175,000 119,489,730 395,664,730
2040-2044 266,260,000 50,311,550 316,571,550
2045-2047 62,990,000 5,453,000 68,443,000
Total 1,262,710,000$ 855,775,150$ 2,118,485,150$
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds Payable/
Water Pollution Control and Drinking Water
Revenue Bonds Payable
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 49
Energy Efficiency Leveraged Note Payable
In February 2012, the DNR loaned $223,793 to the District. The Energy Efficiency
Leveraged Note Payable bears interest at a rate of 2.5% per annum and is payable
through July 1, 2019. The purpose of this note was to finance the design,
acquisition, installation, and implementation of energy conservation measures.
The principal and interest on this note will be paid from the energy savings from
the projects or avoided costs resulting from the projects.
Principal And Interest Requirements On Energy Efficiency Leveraged
Note Payable
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on the Energy
Efficiency Leveraged Note Payable outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2018B
In December 2018, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the District
an amount totaling $25,267,000 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues and the bonds are issued from the April 2016 authorization. The
District’s interest rate is 1.38% and is payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through January 1, 2041.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2018B
As the District incurs approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimburses the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. The District repays
the loan at an interest rate of 1.38% based on the amount that has been borrowed.
As of June 30, 2019 the outstanding loan balance was $2,880,349. The payment
requirements to maturity will be determined after the debt is fully issued.
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2016B
In December 2016, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the District
an amount totaling $75,500,000 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 16,163$ 202$ 16,365$
Total 16,163$ 202$ 16,365$
Energy Efficiency Leveraged Note Payable
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 50
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues and the bonds are issued from the June 2012 authorization. The
District’s interest rate is 1.2% and is payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through July 1, 2037.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2016B
As the District incurs approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimburses the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. The District repays
the loan at an interest rate of 1.2% based on the amount that has been borrowed.
As of June 30, 2019 the outstanding loan balance was $45,582,626. After taking
into consideration the $3,147,000 principal paid in fiscal 2019, the balance to be
borrowed is $26,770,374. The payment requirements to maturity will be
determined after the debt is fully issued.
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2016A
In December 2016, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the District
an amount totaling $20,000,000 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues and the bonds are issued from the June 2012 authorization. The
District’s interest rate is 1.2% and is payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through January 1, 2037.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2016A
As the District incurs approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimburses the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. The District repays
the loan at an interest rate of 1.2% based on the amount that has been borrowed.
As of June 30, 2019 the outstanding loan balance was $13,129,064. After taking
into consideration the $1,258,000 principal paid in fiscal 2018 and 2019, the
balance to be borrowed is $5,612,936. The payment requirements to maturity will
be determined after the debt is fully issued.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 51
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2015A
In August 2015, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the District
an amount totaling $75,000,000 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues and the bonds are issued from the June 2012 authorization. The
District’s interest rate is 1.2% and is payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through January 1, 2035.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2015A
As the District incurred approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimbursed the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. All funds have been
drawn on this loan.
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on the State of
Missouri Direct Loan Series 2015A outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2013A
In October 2013, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the District
an amount totaling $52,000,000 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues and the bonds were issued from the June 2012 authorization. The
District’s interest rate is 1.6% and is payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through July 1, 2034.
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 3,424,000$ 793,622$ 4,217,622$
2021 3,505,000 751,605 4,256,605
2022 3,589,000 708,588 4,297,588
2023 3,674,000 664,546 4,338,546
2024 3,762,000 619,455 4,381,455
2025-2029 20,220,000 2,382,264 22,602,264
2030-2034 22,833,000 1,078,163 23,911,163
2035 4,895,000 44,866 4,939,866
Total 65,902,000$ 7,043,109$ 72,945,109$
State of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2015A
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 52
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2013A
As the District incurred approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimbursed the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. All funds have been
drawn on this loan.
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on the State of
Missouri Direct Loan Series 2013A outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2011A
In November 2011, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the
District an amount totaling $39,769,300 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues and the bonds were issued from the August 2008 authorization. The
District’s interest rate is 1.5% and is payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through January 1, 2034.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2011A
As the District incurred approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimbursed the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. All funds have been
drawn on this loan.
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on the State of
Missouri Direct Loan Series 2011A outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 2,305,000$ 663,036$ 2,968,036$
2021 2,365,000 627,076 2,992,076
2022 2,427,000 590,178 3,017,178
2023 2,490,000 552,319 3,042,319
2024 2,555,000 513,476 3,068,476
2025-2029 13,811,000 1,948,211 15,759,211
2030-2034 15,708,000 813,277 16,521,277
2035 1,688,000 13,082 1,701,082
Total 43,349,000$ 5,720,655$ 49,069,655$
State of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2013A
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 53
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2010C
In December 2010, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the District
an amount totaling $37,000,000 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues and the bonds were issued from the August 2008 authorization. The
District’s interest rate is 1.7% and is payable in semiannual installments at
varying amounts through January 1, 2031.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2010C
As the District incurred approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimbursed the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. All funds have been
drawn on this loan.
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on the State of
Missouri Direct Loan Series 2010C outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 1,792,000$ 483,304$ 2,275,304$
2021 1,838,000 455,891 2,293,891
2022 1,884,000 427,778 2,311,778
2023 1,932,000 398,959 2,330,959
2024 1,982,000 369,403 2,351,403
2025-2029 10,690,000 1,376,641 12,066,641
2030-2034 12,123,300 516,321 12,639,621
Total 32,241,300$ 4,028,297$ 36,269,597$
State of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2011A
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 1,795,000$ 403,590$ 2,198,590$
2021 1,842,000 373,783 2,215,783
2022 1,890,000 343,192 2,233,192
2023 1,939,000 311,809 2,250,809
2024 1,989,000 279,609 2,268,609
2025-2029 10,748,000 885,052 11,633,052
2030-2031 4,703,000 97,647 4,800,647
Total 24,906,000$ 2,694,682$ 27,600,682$
State of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2010C
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 54
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2010A
In January 2010, the State of Missouri’s Direct Loan Program - ARRA issued to
the District an amount totaling $7,980,700 for the construction, improvement,
renovation, repair, replacement and equipping of its Wastewater System, under
the authority of and in full compliance with the District’s Charter (“Plan”) and the
bonds were issued from the August 2008 authorization. The District’s interest rate
is 1.5% and is payable in semiannual installments at varying amounts through
July 1, 2031.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2010A
As the District incurred approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimbursed the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. All funds have been
drawn on this loan.
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on the State of
Missouri Direct Loan Series 2010A outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
State Of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2009A
In October 2009, the DNR loaned $23,000,000 to the District. The State of Missouri
Direct Loan Series 2009A note bears interest at a rate of 1.5% per annum and is
payable through January 1, 2030. The purpose of this note was to finance the
designing, constructing, improving, renovating, repairing, replacing and equipping
of new and existing sewer facilities within the District. The principal and interest
on the note are expected to be paid from future wastewater revenues and the note
was issued from the August 2008 authorization.
Principal And Interest Requirements On State Of Missouri Direct Loan
Series 2009A
As the District incurred approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimbursed the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account. All funds have been
drawn on this loan.
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 388,700$ 79,498$ 468,198$
2021 396,600 73,717 470,317
2022 404,600 67,817 472,417
2023 412,900 61,799 474,699
2024 421,300 55,657 476,957
2025-2029 2,237,900 181,712 2,419,612
2030-2032 1,206,200 26,958 1,233,158
Total 5,468,200$ 547,158$ 6,015,358$
State of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2010A
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 55
The annual principal and interest requirements to maturity on the State of
Missouri Direct Loan Series 2009A outstanding as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:
In accordance with the Direct Loan Series 2009A, 2010A, 2010C, 2011A, 2013A,
2015A, 2016A, 2016B and 2018B ordinances, the District’s annual net operating
revenues from wastewater activities, as defined in the agreement, coupled with
investments earnings must be at least 115% of the current year’s principal and
interest due on all bonds. At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District was in
compliance with this covenant.
Wastewater System Cash And Investments
The following accounts have been established in accordance with bond ordinances
and financing agreements that require receipts generated from operations be
segregated and certain reserve accounts be established:
Revenue Fund
The Revenue Fund will be used for the purpose of depositing wastewater and
stormwater operating revenues, providing funds to pay for expenses related to the
operation and maintenance of the District, and fulfilling Sinking Fund
requirements in accordance with the bond ordinances.
Sinking Fund
The bond ordinances provide for deposits to and the use of monies in the Sinking
Fund to be used for the sole purpose of principal and interest payments on the
bonds. Sufficient monies shall be paid in periodic installments from the Revenue
Fund.
Debt Service Fund
The Debt Service Fund shall be used by the Trustee for the sole purpose of paying
the principal and interest on the bonds, as and when the same become due.
Years ending June 30, Principal Interest Total
2020 1,149,900$ 203,411$ 1,353,311$
2021 1,176,500 186,526 1,363,026
2022 1,203,700 169,251 1,372,951
2023 1,231,600 151,575 1,383,175
2024 1,260,000 133,491 1,393,491
2025-2029 6,751,100 381,212 7,132,312
2030 1,445,300 15,856 1,461,156
Total 14,218,100$ 1,241,322$ 15,459,422$
State of Missouri Direct Loan Series 2009A
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 56
Debt Service Reserve Fund
After initial deposit of the amount required pursuant to the bond ordinances and
financing agreements of the Series 2010B, 2011B, 2012A, 2012B and 2013B bonds,
monies in the Debt Service Reserve Fund shall be disbursed and expended by the
District solely for the payment of the principal and interest on the bonds and notes
to the extent of any deficiency in the Debt Service Fund for such purpose. The
District may disburse and expend monies from the Debt Service Reserve Fund for
such purpose immediately. As of June 30, 2019 and 2018, cash and investments
in the Debt Service Reserve Fund totaled $50,460,508 and $48,117,908,
respectively.
Series 2015B was issued without a debt service reserve fund requirement and at
that time $8,945,557 in excess debt service reserves along with part of the Series
2015B proceeds were used to advance refund Series 2006C and Series 2008A.
Series 2016C was issued without a debt service reserve fund requirement.
Series 2017A was issued without a debt service reserve fund requirement and at
that time $934,325 in excess debt service reserves along with part of the Series
2017A proceeds were used to partially advance refund Series 2011B, Series 2012A,
Series 2013B and Series 2015B.
Series 2018A was issued without a debt service reserve fund requirement.
Special Participant Bond Reserve Account
For the Series 2004B, 2005A, 2006A, 2006B, and 2008A/B bonds, the DNR
deposited into the Special Participant Bond Reserve Account, amounts in
accordance with the bond ordinances, which shall be disbursed and expensed by
the District solely for the payment of the principal and interest on the Participant
Bonds to the extent of any deficiency in the Sinking Fund for such purpose. At
June 30, 2019 and 2018, cash and investments in the Special Participant Bond
Reserve Account held on behalf of the District totaled $77,260,600 and
$86,670,343, respectively. Monies in this account are not considered to be District
funds. However, interest earnings on this account are used by the District to
reduce interest payments on the bonds outstanding.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 57
Renewal And Extension Fund
All sums accumulated and retained in the Renewal and Extension Fund shall be
first used to prevent default in the payment of principal and interest on the bonds
when due and shall then be applied by the District for purposes pursuant to the
trust indenture. No monies have been deposited into this account at June 30, 2019.
Project Fund
The Project Funds for all bond issuances outstanding will be used for the purpose
of providing monies to pay project costs. The proceeds from the bonds and notes,
after a deposit into the Debt Service Reserve Fund for the amounts required
pursuant to the bond ordinances and note agreements of Series 2010B, 2011B,
2012A, 2012B and 2013B bonds, shall be deposited into the Project Fund. At June
30, 2019 and 2018, cash and investments in the Project Fund totaled $126,410,864
and $235,843,731, respectively.
Rebate Fund
The bond ordinances provide for the creation of a Rebate Fund into which shall be
deposited such amounts as are required to be deposited therein pursuant to the
arbitrage instructions regarding the calculation and payment of rebate amounts
due. The District does not have any rights in or claims to such money; provided,
however, any funds remaining in the Rebate Fund after redemption and payment
of all bonds and payment of any rebatable arbitrage amount, or provision having
been made therefore, shall be remitted to the District. At June 30, 2019 and 2018,
cash and investments in the Rebate Fund totaled $229,164 and $227,132,
respectively.
Administrative Fee Fund
The Administrative Fee Fund will be used for the payment of the Trustee’s fees
and other administrative fees pursuant to the note agreement. The Trustee has
the ability to immediately withdraw the fee amounts when due. Monies held in
this account shall not be invested.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 58
Pledged Revenues
The District pledges revenues to ensure the repayment of all outstanding revenue
bonds. These bonds’ proceeds are used for the District’s capital improvement and
replacement program and their repayment comes from, and is collateralized by,
the District’s wastewater revenues. These revenues are pledged through 2047 at
an approximate amount of $2.1 billion. The proportion of future pledged revenues
to future wastewater revenues is not estimable as annual total revenues fluctuate.
Principal and interest paid out during fiscal year 2019 was $114.1 million with
pledged revenues of $245.0 million. This provided a coverage ratio of 2.1 and
pledged revenues represented 61.1% of all net operating revenues.
Direct Borrowings and Direct Placements
The District did not have any bonds and notes from direct borrowings or direct
placements in the fiscal years ending June 30, 2019 and 2018. In addition, the
District had no unused lines of credit and had no assets pledged as collateral for
notes from direct borrowings and direct placements in the fiscal years ending
June 30, 2019 and 2018.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 59
7. Pension Plan
General Information About The Pension Plan
Pension Plan Description. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Employees’
Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”) is a noncontributory single employer defined benefit
plan providing retirement benefits as well as death and disability benefits. As a
condition of employment, all full-time employees of the District commencing
service prior to January 1, 2011, were eligible to be covered by the Pension Plan.
As of January 1, 2011, the Pension Plan was frozen to new employees. Instead,
new employees of the District may participate in The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer
District Defined Contribution Plan (“DC Plan”) and/or The Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust. Current employees with
less than ten years of service on January 1, 2011 could also voluntarily elect to
transfer from the Pension Plan and enter the DC Plan.
Benefits Provided. All benefits vest after five years of credited service. Members
retiring at or after age 65 with five or more years credited service are entitled to a
pension benefit. The Pension Plan permits early retirement with reduced benefits
beginning at age 55 if the member has completed five years of employment.
Ordinance No. 10664 provides for unreduced retirement benefits to any member
whose combined age and term of service is equal to 75.
Effective August 1, 2004, Ordinance No. 11781 amended the Pension Plan to
change the benefit formula to 1.7% of final average earnings plus 0.4% of final
average earnings that are in excess of covered earnings multiplied by the period of
years and months of credited service not to exceed 35 years without including
accrued sick leave. For vested employees who retire or die while in active service,
sick leave is paid out at 1.25% per year of service multiplied by the amount of the
unused accrued sick leave remaining at the employee’s current rate of pay, up to a
maximum of $50,000. Also, the Pension Plan was amended to provide the retiring
member with a 10% partial lump sum payment option. The balance of the
distribution will be paid in accordance with any one of the other payment options
available under the Pension Plan.
The retirement benefit payable to a member who retires after the normal
retirement date is the greater of a) the benefit that would have been payable on
the normal retirement date plus a special annual retirement benefit provided by
the accumulated value, at 4% per annum interest, of the monthly benefit that
would have been received prior to the postponed retirement date or b) the benefit
determined as of the postponed retirement date under the normal formula.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 60
Effective August 27, 2011, Ordinance No. 13288 amended the Pension Plan to
include the following: “Upon termination or complete discontinuance of
contributions under the Plan, the rights of all Members to benefits accrued to the
date of such termination or discontinuance shall be non-forfeitable, to the extent
then funded.”
Amounts in participants’ accounts are distributed upon retirement, death,
disability, or termination of employment. The normal form of retirement benefit
is either a lump sum payment or equal monthly installments.
The Pension Plan reports financial data on a calendar year basis and issues a
publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required
supplementary information. That report may be obtained by writing: The
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, 2350 Market Street, St. Louis, MO 63103-
2555.
Employees Covered by Benefit Terms. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the
financial reporting period of the Pension Plan, the following employees were
covered by the benefit terms:
Required Employer Contributions. The District’s employees do not contribute to
the Pension Plan. Ordinances establishing the Pension Plan provide for
actuarially determined annual contributions, paid solely by the District, that are
sufficient to pay benefits when due. The Entry Age Normal actuarial funding
method is used to determine contributions.
Contributions of $12,609,689 and $12,411,005, excluding certain professional fees
paid by the District, were made to the Pension Plan during the District’s fiscal
years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These contributions were made
in accordance with actuarially determined contribution requirements based on
actuarial valuations performed at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Increase
2018 2017 (Decrease)
Active plan members 545 595 (50)
Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 748 722 26
Terminated members entitled to receive benefits 181 178 3
Total 1,474 1,495 (21)
For the Years Ended
December 31,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 61
Net Pension Liability
The net pension liability was measured as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the
total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by
an actuarial valuation as of that date.
Actuarial Assumptions. The total pension liability in the December 31, 2018 and
2017 actuarial valuations were determined using the following actuarial
assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement:
Effective December 31, 2018 and 2017, for current employees, mortality rates were
based on the RP-2014 Employees Mortality Table, male and female rates, with
generational projection from 2006 based on the MP-2018 improvement scale and
MP-2017 improvement scale (improvement scale updates published annually),
respectively. For retirees, the RP-2014 Healthy Annuitant Mortality Table, male
and female rates, with generational projection from 2006 based on the MP-2018
improvement scale was assumed for the December 31, 2018 valuation while the
MP-2017 improvement scale was assumed for December 31, 2017. For disabled
lives, the RP-2014 Disabled Mortality Table, male and female rates, was utilized
for both the December 31, 2018 and 2017 valuations.
The actuarial assumptions are based on prior and current year experiences.
Inflation 2.50 percent
Salary Increases 4.25 percent, average, including inflation
Investment Rate of Return 6.90 percent, net of pension plan investment expense,
including inflation for December 31, 2018 and 2017
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 62
Long-Term Expected Rate of Return. The long-term expected rate of return is
determined by adding expected inflation to expected long-term real returns and
reflecting expected volatility and correlation. The capital market assumptions at
December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
Discount Rate. The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability at
December 31, 2018 and 2017, was 6.90 percent. The Pension Plan’s fiduciary net
position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments
of current active and inactive employees. Therefore, the discount rate for
calculating the total pension liability is equal to the long-term expected rate of
return.
Long-Term
Expected
Arithmetic
Target Real Rate
Asset Class Allocation of Return
Large Cap US Equity 25.0%4.0%
Small Cap US Equity 10.0%4.5%
Developed International Equity 12.0%5.0%
Emerging Markets Equity 6.0%5.7%
Domestic Fixed Income 27.0%1.2%
Global Fixed Income 8.0%4.3%
Real Estate 12.0%3.0%
Total 100.0%
Long-Term
Expected
Arithmetic
Target Real Rate
Asset Class Allocation of Return
Large Cap US Equity 25.0%4.5%
Small Cap US Equity 10.0%5.5%
Developed International Equity 12.0%4.9%
Emerging Markets Equity 6.0%6.1%
Domestic Core Plus Fixed Income 14.0%1.5%
Core "Plus" Bonds 13.0%0.9%
Global Fixed Income 8.0%0.7%
Real Estate 12.0%4.0%
Total 100.0%
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 63
Increase (Decrease)
Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Pension
Liability Net Position Liability
Changes in Net Pension Liability (a)(b)(a) - (b)
Balances as of December 31, 2017 326,365,153$ 277,976,215$ 48,388,938$
Changes for the year:
Service cost 5,238,812 — 5,238,812
Interest 22,306,950 — 22,306,950
Effect of economic/demographic gains or losses (2,041,843)— (2,041,843)
Effect of assumptions changes or inputs — — —
Benefit payments (16,911,759) (16,911,759)—
Employer contributions — 12,493,916 (12,493,916)
Net investment income — (12,997,796) 12,997,796
Balances as of December 31, 2018 334,957,313$ 260,560,576$ 74,396,737$
Increase (Decrease)
Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Pension
Liability Net Position Liability
Changes in Net Pension Liability (a)(b)(a) - (b)
Balances as of December 31, 2016 318,049,216$ 251,010,031$ 67,039,185$
Changes for the year:
Service cost 5,157,148 — 5,157,148
Interest 22,078,790 — 22,078,790
Effect of economic/demographic gains or losses (4,728,693)— (4,728,693)
Effect of assumptions changes or inputs 1,667,047 — 1,667,047
Benefit payments (15,858,355) (15,858,355)—
Employer contributions — 12,328,093 (12,328,093)
Net investment income — 30,496,446 (30,496,446)
Balances as of December 31, 2017 326,365,153$ 277,976,215$ 48,388,938$
Changes in Net Pension Liability for the Year Ending December 31, 2017
Changes in Net Pension Liability for the Year Ending December 31, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 64
Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate. The
following presents the net pension liability calculated using the 6.90 percent
discount rate for December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, as well as what the
District’s net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate
that is 1-percentage-point lower or 1-percentage-point higher than the current rate
for each year:
Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position. Fiduciary net position is the market value of
all plan assets. Net pension liability is the plan’s total pension liability less its
fiduciary net position, i.e., the plan’s unfunded accrued liability.
Pension Expense And Deferred Outflows Of Resources And Deferred
Inflows Of Resources Related To Pensions
For the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District recognized pension
expense of $19,988,206 and $15,554,154, respectively, after accounting for all
deferred outflows and inflows of resources. The District reported deferred outflows
of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the
following sources:
1% Current 1%
Decrease Discount Rate Increase
(5.90%) (6.90%) (7.90%)
Net Pension Liability 111,394,809$ 74,396,737$ 42,914,274$
1% Current 1%
Decrease Discount Rate Increase
(5.90%) (6.90%) (7.90%)
Net Pension Liability 85,063,996$ 48,388,938$ 17,214,436$
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2018
Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred
Outflows of Inflows of Outflows of Inflows of
Resources Resources Resources Resources
Differences between expected and actual experience —$ 4,341,116$ —$ 6,064,985$
Changes of assumptions 3,895,543 — 8,319,328 —
Net difference between projected and actual earnings 23,546,115 — 2,332,690 —
Contributions made subsequent to measurement date 6,796,612 — 6,680,839 —
Total 34,238,270$ 4,341,116$ 17,332,857$ 6,064,985$
June 30, 2018June 30, 2019
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 65
In the years ending June 30, 2019 and 2018, amounts currently reported as
deferred outflows of resources, $6,796,612 and $6,680,839, respectively, related to
the District’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized
as a reduction of the net pension liability in the years ended June 30, 2020 and
2019, respectively.
Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of
resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Payable To The Pension Plan
At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District did not have outstanding required
contributions to the pension plan.
8. Other Retirement Plans
Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust
The District offers its employees a deferred compensation plan created in
accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust (“Plan”), available to all
District employees, permits them to defer a portion of their salary up to Internal
Revenue Code limits. The District does not contribute to the Plan except where
mandated by the Internal Revenue Service to compensate participants for lost
deferral contributions. The deferred compensation is not available to employees
until termination, retirement, death, disability or due to financial hardship as
defined by the Plan.
At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District had outstanding liabilities owed to the
Plan of $124,996 and $98,234, respectively.
Net Deferrals of
Resources
Year ended June 30,:
2020 9,285,541$
2021 3,829,063
2022 3,591,978
2023 6,393,960
23,100,542$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 66
The Plan was amended and restated to comply with the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (“Act”). The Act made significant changes to
Section 457(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as previously amended. The
Plan assets are held in trust for the exclusive benefit of participants and their
beneficiaries under Section 1448 of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996.
As a result, the assets and liabilities of the Plan are not included in the
accompanying financial statements.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust
issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and
required supplementary information. That report may be obtained by writing: The
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, 2350 Market Street, St. Louis, MO 63103-
2555.
Defined Contribution Plan
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Defined Contribution Plan (“DC Plan”)
was established by the District’s Board of Trustees, through Ordinance 13180,
which became effective January 1, 2011. The following full time employees are
eligible to participate in the DC Plan: (i) employees first hired on or after
January 1, 2011, and (ii) employees hired prior to January 1, 2011 who elected to
terminate participation in The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Employees’
Pension Plan (“Pension Plan”), effective as of April 1, 2011, in accordance with the
provisions of such Pension Plan, and (iii) employees rehired on or after January 1,
2011 who are not eligible to accrue benefits under the Pension Plan. An employee
shall become a participant in the DC Plan on the first day on which he or she
performs an hour of service for the District.
The District’s Board of Trustees, primarily to improve benefits to members,
amends the DC Plan in all its respects. A pension committee consisting of two
members of the District’s Board of Trustees, two elected employee members and
four members of the District’s management staff administer the DC Plan. A
committee of the District’s Board of Trustees, with the aid of an investment
advisor, reviews and evaluates the DC Plan’s investment options and the related
rates of return on a periodic basis.
This DC Plan is intended to provide a means whereby the District may provide
retirement benefits to eligible employees and encourage such employees to
establish a regular method of savings, thereby providing a measure of financial
security for such employees and their beneficiaries upon retirement or in the event
of death or disability. All assets of the DC Plan are the sole property of the DC
Plan and are not subject to the claims of creditors of the District and the assets
and liabilities of the DC Plan are not included in the accompanying financial
statements.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 67
Employer Basic Contributions: For each payroll period, the District contributes an
amount equal to 7% of the covered compensation earned during such period by
each participant entitled to an allocation of such contribution. Upon a participant’s
severance from service, the unvested amount credited to his/her individual account
shall be forfeited and credited to the Employer Basic Contributions account and
shall be used to reduce future Employer Basic Contributions. If a participant is
rehired before incurring two consecutive years break in service, the amount
previously forfeited will be restored. If rehired after two consecutive years of break
in service, the amounts previously forfeited will not be restored.
Employer Matching Contributions: For each payroll period, the District
contributes an amount equal to 50% of the covered compensation of such
participant withholding as an annual deferral (as defined in The Metropolitan
St. Louis Sewer District Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust) pursuant to The
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Deferred Compensation Plan and Trust;
provided that, before-tax contributions in excess of 4% of the covered compensation
of the participant for the payroll period shall not be considered for purposes of
Employer Matching Contributions. Employer Matching Contributions shall be up
to the maximum amount of compensation that may be taken into account for the
DC Plan year and the amount credited to the participant’s Employer Matching
Contributions Account shall be fully vested at all times.
In no event shall the sum of the employer contributions and employee
contributions allocated to the account of a participant for the DC Plan year exceed
the lesser of:
(a) The amount specified in the applicable Internal Revenue Code, as
adjusted annually for any applicable increases in the cost of living.
(b) 100% of the participant’s compensation for such year.
The compensation limit referred to in (b) shall not apply to any contribution from
medical benefits after separation from service.
The District’s contributions to the DC Plan amounted to $2,069,859 and $1,736,675
for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Forfeitures were $46,347
and $29,460, for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and the
balances in the prepaid forfeitures account as of June 30, 2019 and 2018 were $13
and $890, respectively. At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District had outstanding
liabilities owed to the DC Plan of $56,997 and $42,630, respectively.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 68
Vesting: As of any time before the normal retirement age of a participant, the first
day of the month coinciding with or next following a person’s sixty-fifth birthday
and completion of sixty months of continuous service (other than upon death or
permanent disability), the vested percentage of the amounts credited to the
participant’s Employer Basic Contributions account shall be determined in
accordance with the following schedule:
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Defined Contribution Plan issues a
publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required
supplementary information. That report may be obtained by writing: The
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, 2350 Market Street, St. Louis, MO 63103-
2555.
9. Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions (“OPEB”)
General Information About The OPEB Plan
Plan Description. The District’s defined benefit OPEB plan, The Metropolitan St.
Louis Sewer District Retiree Medical Coverage Plan (“Plan”), provides OPEB for
all permanent full-time employees who retire from the District on or after age 62
with five years of service or whose age plus years of service equal 75 points (“Rule
of 75”) as part of a total compensation package effective August 1, 2004 for general
employees and, with respect for union members, the later of August 1, 2004 or the
date of union ratification of a Memorandum of Understanding with respect to this
Plan modification. The Plan is a single-employer defined benefit OPEB plan
administered by the District. The Plan was established by Ordinance No. 9826
and became effective January 1, 1996. This ordinance has been repealed and new
ordinances enacted in lieu thereof with Ordinance No. 15109 covering defined
contribution retirees and Ordinance No. 15110 covering defined benefit retirees,
both of which were adopted on February 14, 2019, being the most current
ordinances covering the Plan in its entirety. The District offers two medical plan
options, a traditional open access plan and a high deductible health plan, and both
plans offer wellness rates for those employees who qualify. No assets are
Months Of
Continuous Service
Vested(Non-
Forfeitable)
Percentage
Less than 12 0%
12 but less than 24 20%
24 but less than 36 40%
36 but less than 48 60%
48 but less than 60 80%
60 100%
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 69
accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement
No. 75.
Benefits Provided. The Plan provides healthcare for qualified retirees and their
dependents. The District pays the same amount of the monthly group health
insurance premium for the qualified retiree as it would for an active single
employee until the retiree becomes eligible for Medicare at age 65. In fiscal year
2019 and 2018 the monthly amount the District paid towards the retiree’s
premium was $580.25 for retirees qualifying for the wellness incentive. The
$580.25 paid by the District equates to 85% of the traditional plan’s premium and
91% of the high deductible plan’s premium. For retirees not qualifying for the
wellness incentive, the District pays $547.75 of the premium which equates to 80%
for the traditional plan and 86% for the high deductible plan. The retiree pays
100% of the spousal, children or family premium incremental increases in addition
to the remaining 9-20% of the retiree’s total monthly premium. The Plan also
provides life insurance coverage for a very small closed group of disabled former
employees.
The monthly premiums for both plans and coverage tiers are as follows:
Total Retiree OPEB Benefit Net Cost
Coverage Tier Premium Paid by District to Retiree
Traditional Plan with wellness incentive
Retiree 684.69$ 580.25$ 104.44$
Retiree + Spouse 1,458.58 580.25 878.33
Retiree + Child(ren)1,325.27 580.25 745.02
Retiree + Family 2,021.51 580.25 1,441.26
Traditional Plan with no wellness incentive
Retiree 684.69 547.75 136.94
Retiree + Spouse 1,458.58 547.75 910.83
Retiree + Child(ren)1,325.27 547.75 777.52
Retiree + Family 2,021.51 547.75 1,473.76
High Deductible Plan with wellness incentive
Retiree 637.05 580.25 56.80
Retiree + Spouse 1,357.08 580.25 776.83
Retiree + Child(ren)1,233.05 580.25 652.80
Retiree + Family 1,880.84 580.25 1,300.59
High Deductible Plan with no wellness incentive
Retiree 637.05 547.75 89.30
Retiree + Spouse 1,357.08 547.75 809.33
Retiree + Child(ren)1,233.05 547.75 685.30
Retiree + Family 1,880.84 547.75 1,333.09
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 70
The ordinance establishing the Plan assigned the authority to establish and amend
Plan benefit provisions to the District. The contribution requirements of the
District and Plan members are established by the District and may be amended by
the District. The Plan does not issue a publicly available report.
Employees Covered by Benefit Terms. At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the following
employees were covered by the benefit terms:
June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018
Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefit payments 120 120
Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefit payments — —
Active employees 935 952
Total 1,055 1,072
Total OPEB Liability
The District’s total OPEB liability, measured as of December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017 was $24,164,395 and $24,193,972, respectively. The District’s
total OPEB liabilities were determined by an actuarial valuation as of the
valuation date, June 30, 2017, and were calculated based on the discount rate and
actuarial assumptions below, and were then projected forward to the measurement
dates. There have been no significant changes between the valuation date of June
30, 2017 and the reporting fiscal year end dates of June 30, 2019 and June 30,
2018.
Actuarial Assumptions and Other Inputs. The total OPEB liabilities based on the
June 30, 2017 actuarial valuation were determined using the following actuarial
assumptions and other inputs, applied to all periods included in the measurement,
unless otherwise specified:
Inflation 2.50 percent
Healthcare cost trend rates 5.90 percent for 2018, gradually decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.00
percent for 2091 and beyond
6.10 percent for 2017, gradually decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.00
percent for 2091 and beyond
Salary increases 4.25 percent, average, including inflation
Retiree's share of benefit-
related costs
9-20 percent of projected health insurance premiums for retirees depending
on plan selected (traditional or high deductible) and wellness qualification
Discount rate 4.10 percent for December 31, 2018 measurement date
3.44 percent for December 31, 2017 measurement date
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 71
The discount rate was based on the 20 Year Bond General Obligation Index.
Mortality rates were based on the RP-2014 Mortality for Employees and Healthy
Annuitants, with generational projection per Scale MP-2018 for December 31, 2018
measurement date and Scale MP-2017 for December 31, 2017 measurement date
and Disabled Lives: RP-2014 Disabled Mortality, male and female rates for both
measurement dates.
The actuarial assumptions are based on prior and current year experiences. The
plan has not had a formal actuarial experience study performed.
Changes in the Total OPEB Liability
Changes of assumptions or other inputs reflect a change in the discount rate from
3.44 percent in 2017 to 4.10 percent in 2018.
Sensitivity of the Total OPEB Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate. The
following presents the total OPEB liability of the District as of December 31, 2018,
calculated using the discount rate of 4.10%, as well as what the District’s total
OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-
percentage-point lower (3.10%) or 1-percentage-point higher (5.10%) than the
current discount rate.
Changes in the Total OPEB Liability for the Years Ending
Increase (Decrease)
December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Total OPEB Liability Beginning Balance 24,193,972$ 22,838,813$
Changes for the year:
Service cost 1,780,999 1,622,390
Interest on total OPEB liability 864,738 894,674
Changes of assumptions or other inputs (986,538)438,058
Benefit payments (1,688,776)(1,599,963)
Net changes (29,577)1,355,159
Total OPEB Liability Ending Balance 24,164,395$ 24,193,972$
1%Current 1%
Decrease Discount Rate Increase
(3.10%)(4.10%) (5.10%)
Total OPEB Liability 25,636,528$ 24,164,395$ 22,759,445$
December 31, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 72
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the District as of December 31,
2017, calculated using the discount rate of 3.44%, as well as what the District’s
total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-
percentage-point lower (2.44%) or 1-percentage-point higher (4.44%) than the
current discount rate.
Sensitivity of the Total OPEB Liability to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend
Rates. The following presents the total OPEB liability of the District as of
December 31, 2018, calculated using the current healthcare cost trend rates, as
well as what the District’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using
healthcare cost trend rates that were 1-percentage-point lower (4.90% decreasing
to 3.00%) or 1-percentage-point higher (6.90% decreasing to 5.00%) than the
current healthcare cost trend rates of 5.90% decreasing to 4.00%.
The following presents the total OPEB liability of the District as of December 31,
2017, calculated using the current healthcare cost trend rates, as well as what the
District’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost
trend rates that were 1-percentage-point lower (5.10% decreasing to 3.00%) or 1-
percentage-point higher (7.10% decreasing to 5.00%) than the current healthcare
cost trend rates of 6.10% decreasing to 4.00%.
1%Current 1%
Decrease Discount Rate Increase
(2.44%)(3.44%) (4.44%)
Total OPEB Liability 25,619,420$ 24,193,972$ 22,823,906$
December 31, 2017
Current
Healthcare
Cost Trend
1% Decrease Rates 1% Increase
(4.9% (5.9% (6.9%
decreasing decreasing decreasing
to 3.00%) to 4.00%) to 5.00%)
Total OPEB Liability 21,668,741$ 24,164,395$ 27,109,050$
December 31, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 73
OPEB Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows
of Resources Related to OPEB
For the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District recognized OPEB expense
of $2,586,148 and $2,557,327, respectively. At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the District
reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related
to OPEB from the following sources:
In the years ending June 30, 2019 and 2018, amounts currently reported as
deferred outflows of resources, $888,795 and $880,642 respectively, related to the
District’s benefit payments subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized
as a reduction of the total OPEB liability in the years ended June 30, 2020 and
2019, respectively.
Current
Healthcare
Cost Trend
1% Decrease Rates 1% Increase
(5.1% (6.1% (7.1%
decreasing decreasing decreasing
to 3.00%) to 4.00%) to 5.00%)
Total OPEB Liability 21,894,452$ 24,193,972$ 26,898,217$
December 31, 2017
Deferred Deferred
Outflows of Inflows of
Resources Resources
Changes of assumptions or other inputs 357,532$ 886,686$
Benefit payments made subsequent to measurement date 888,795 —
Total 1,246,327$ 886,686$
Deferred Deferred
Outflows of Inflows of
Resources Resources
Changes of assumptions or other inputs 397,795$ —$
Benefit payments made subsequent to measurement date 880,642 —
Total 1,278,437$ —$
June 30, 2019
June 30, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 74
Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of
resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense as follows:
10. Self-Insurance Programs
The District is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to,
and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural
disasters. The District has established a risk management program and retains
the risk related to its obligation to provide workers' compensation and medical and
hospitalization benefits to its employees; and to pay water backup claims to its
customers. The estimated liabilities for payment of incurred (both reported and
unreported) but unpaid claims relating to these matters are included as a
component of current deposits and accrued expenses, and as such, are expected to
be paid within one year of the date of the Statement of Net Position. At June 30,
2019 and 2018, these liabilities amounted to $7,920,684 and $4,026,003,
respectively.
The claims liabilities reported are based on the requirements of GASB Statement
No. 10, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Risk Financing and Related
Insurance Issues, which requires that a liability for claims be reported if
information obtained prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be
reasonably estimated. Changes in the balance of claims liabilities during fiscal
2019, 2018, and 2017 were as follows:
Net Deferrals of
Resources
Year ended June 30,:
2020 (59,589)$
2021 (59,589)
2022 (59,589)
2023 (59,589)
2024 (59,589)
Thereafter (231,209)
(529,154)$
2019 2018 2017
Liability - Beginning of Year 4,026,003$ 4,461,069$ 4,076,994$
Current year claims and changes in estimates 19,320,396 15,939,863 17,648,177
Claim payments (15,425,715) (16,374,929) (17,264,102)
Liability - End of Year 7,920,684$ 4,026,003$ 4,461,069$
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 75
The District obtains periodic funding valuations from the third-party
administrators managing the self-insurance programs and adjusts the charges as
required to maintain the appropriate level of estimated claims liability. The
District also maintains excess liability insurance coverage for workers'
compensation and medical and hospitalization claims; general liability; and water
backup damage to customers’ property.
The District purchases commercial insurance for all other risks of loss. Settled
claims have not exceeded this commercial coverage in any of the past three years.
11. Closure And Post-Closure Care Costs
State and federal laws and regulations require the District to place a final cover
on its Prospect Hill Reclamation Project landfill site when it stops accepting waste
and to perform certain maintenance and monitoring functions at the site for 30
years after closure. Although closure and post-closure care costs will be paid only
near or after the date that the landfill stops accepting waste, the District reports
a portion of these closure and post-closure care costs as an operating expense in
each fiscal year. The $619,384 and $565,493 reported as landfill closure and post-
closure care liabilities at June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, represent the
cumulative amounts reported at fiscal year-end and represent 71.2% and 66.2% of
the estimated closure and post-closure care costs of the landfill for fiscal years
ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts are based on what it
would cost to perform all closure and post-closure care in 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
The remaining disposal life estimate was calculated in 2009 and was estimated at
eight years factoring in a future annual average disposal rate of 96,500 cubic yards.
It was noted in the 2009 Black and Veatch study that this life could be extended
further if the actual disposal rate is less than projected or alternative uses and off-
site beneficial options for the incinerator ash are later developed. Since the actual
average disposal rate has been less than 96,500 cubic yards, the landfill is not at
capacity and MSD expects the landfill to be in use for another 9-11 years and the
total capacity of the landfill and the available space as of 2017 was adjusted in
2017. In addition, a new survey of the landfill was performed in December of 2017
which increased the remaining capacity due to settlement and minor vehicle
compaction. The District will continue to accrue the remaining estimated cost of
closure and post-closure care annually.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 76
The District is required to demonstrate that it has the financial capability to close
the landfill to the State of Missouri through the use of a financial test as specified
in 10 CSR 80-2.030(4)(D)6 of the Missouri Solid Waste Management Rules. The
District has complied with the State’s requirement. The District recognizes that
estimates of closure costs may change as a result of inflation, deflation, and/or
changes in technology and applicable laws and regulations. If closure cost
estimates change, the liability currently reported on the Statements of Net
Position will be adjusted accordingly.
12. Commitments And Contingencies
United States And State Of Missouri V. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer
District; In The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of
Missouri; Case No. 07-1120.
On April 27, 2012, the Court entered the consent decree (“CD”) involving the
Environmental Protection Agency, Missouri Department of Natural Resources,
Missouri Coalition for the Environment and The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer
District (“MSD”). The CD required the District to spend approximately $4.7
billion, in 2010 dollars, over a 23-year implementation period. Throughout this
period improvements will be made to the District’s separate sewer system,
combined sewer system, and wastewater treatment plants. On June 1, 2011, the
State of Missouri approved Chapter 11, Chapter 12, and Appendix Q of the
District’s Combined Sewer Overflow Long-Term Control Plan Updated Report,
dated February 2011.
On June 22, 2018, a United States District Judge approved an amendment to the
CD to extend it by five years from a 23-year program to a 28-year program. Recent
regulatory changes have compelled MSD to accelerate certain non-consent decree
work. This amendment will allow MSD to meet these new regulatory requirements
in a fiscally responsible way while better controlling rate increases over the coming
years. The District continues to comply with the CD.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
The District is a defendant in various other matters of litigation. Of these matters,
management and District’s legal counsel do not anticipate any material effect on
the June 30, 2019 and 2018 financial statements.
The District has entered into construction and other contracts amounting to
approximately $510,000,000 at June 30, 2019, and through the audit report date.
The District had $674,510,796 in revenue bonds authorized by the voters but
unissued as of June 30, 2019. These funds were sought to enable the District to
comply with federal and state clean water requirements.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 77
13. Restricted Net Position
The Statements of Net Position report $127,413,605 and $129,578,500 of restricted
net position at June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which $69,150,974 and
$74,249,353 are restricted due to enabling legislation, as of June 30, 2019 and
2018, respectively.
14. Segment Information
The District issued wastewater revenue bonds to finance wastewater
infrastructure projects. The District accounts for both wastewater and stormwater
activities in a single enterprise fund, but investors in those bonds rely solely on the
revenue generated by the wastewater activities for repayment. Fiscal year 2019
and 2018 summary financial information for each business segment is presented
below.
The District’s adoption of GASB Statement No. 75 in fiscal year 2018, as noted in
the Adoption Of New Accounting Standards section of Note 1, resulted in restating
the beginning balance of net position due to the recognition of a beginning total
OPEB liability, a beginning deferred outflow of resources for the amount paid by
the District for OPEB subsequent to the measurement date of the beginning total
OPEB liability but before the beginning of the District’s fiscal year and for the
removal of the net OPEB obligation previously recorded based on GASB Statement
No. 45. The impact of this change on the District’s Wastewater and Stormwater
Segment Statements’ net position, as presented in the Statements of Revenues,
Expenses and Changes in Net Position is as follows:
Wastewater Stormwater Total
Net Position - Beginning Of Year, As Previously Stated 1,835,146,655$ 556,021,399$ 2,391,168,054$
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 (11,020,906) (3,038,244) (14,059,150)
Net Position - Beginning Of Year, As Restated 1,824,125,749$ 552,983,155$ 2,377,108,904$
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 - Restatement Consists Of
Total OPEB liability reported as a noncurrent liability at July 1, 2017 (19,702,154)$ (3,136,659)$ (22,838,813)$
Benefit payments made subsequent to the beginning total OPEB
liability's measurement date of December 31, 2016 but before
July 1, 2017 are reported as deferred outflows of resources 618,167 98,415 716,582
Removal of GASB 45 net OPEB obligation balance as of July 1, 2017 8,063,081 — 8,063,081
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 (11,020,906)$ (3,038,244)$ (14,059,150)$
Fiscal Year 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 78
A segment is an identifiable activity reported as a stand-alone entity for which one
or more revenue bonds are outstanding. A segment has a specifically identifiable
revenue stream pledged in support of the revenue bonds and has related expenses,
gains and losses and assets, deferred outflows, liabilities and deferred inflows that
are required by external parties to be accounted for separately. The wastewater
system is the only reportable segment that meets the requirements of GASB
Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements - and Management’s Discussion and
Analysis - for State and Local Governments. The stormwater system is reported
on for informational purposes only.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 79
Financial information as of and for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 of the
District’s Wastewater Segment is as follows:
Assets 2019 2018
Current Assets
Unrestricted Current Assets
32,084,339$ 12,544,280$
209,097,537 288,046,796
$61,613,442 in 2019 and $58,289,381 in 2018 65,960,589 60,455,316
Unbilled sewer service charges receivable 31,773,363 29,140,850
1,869,825 1,630,002
5,331,693 4,495,551
8,306,515 8,109,878
354,423,861 404,422,673
Restricted Current Assets
115,556 54,092
115,556 54,092
354,539,417 404,476,765
Non-Current Assets
Restricted Assets
19,561,186 19,193,048
133,552,809 222,080,295
45,067,528 66,231,790
Property taxes receivable, less allowance $0 for 2019
(18,019) (16,200)
193,262 232,053
198,356,766 307,720,986
Other Assets
11,156,415 11,814,529
168,649,616 67,264,708
179,806,031 79,079,237
Capital Assets
1,277,635,246 1,276,275,567
2,092,478,890 1,966,893,455
82,305,964 79,666,689
3,452,420,100 3,322,835,711
1,309,151,371 1,241,579,256
2,143,268,729 2,081,256,455
66,853,796 66,103,288
931,353,208 815,408,534
3,141,475,733 2,962,768,277
3,519,638,530 3,349,568,500
3,874,177,947 3,754,045,265
Deferred Outflows of Resources:
11,342,745 12,099,160
28,929,459 14,757,358
1,075,940 1,102,858
41,348,144 27,959,376
WASTEWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION
June 30,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 80
Liabilities 2019 2018
Current Liabilities-Payable From Unrestricted Assets
36,091,535$ 34,518,350$
Deposits and accrued expenses 35,444,449 31,095,559
15,855,232 13,893,951
52,603,763 50,942,663
Total Current Liabilities-Payable From Unrestricted Assets 139,994,979 130,450,523
Current Liabilities-Payable From Restricted Assets
— 265,865
237,442 204,936
Total Current Liabilities-Payable From Restricted Assets 237,442 470,801
140,232,421 130,921,324
Non-Current Liabilities
Deposits and accrued expenses 7,352,522 7,329,985
Net pension liability 63,238,325 41,435,535
Total OPEB liability 20,846,404 20,871,199
1,617,916,402 1,642,233,069
1,709,353,653 1,711,869,788
1,849,586,074 1,842,791,112
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
3,702,250 5,147,399
743,324 —
4,445,574 5,147,399
Net Position
Net investment in capital assets 1,574,725,932 1,486,430,468
Restricted for:
58,262,631 55,329,147
1,991,530 3,709,735
Unrestricted 426,514,350 388,596,780
2,061,494,443$ 1,934,066,130$
June 30,
WASTEWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION (Continued)
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 81
2019 2018
399,932,002$ 364,170,182$
(4,360,646) (3,009,705)
3,063,458 3,777,200
2,474,310 3,355,085
401,109,124 368,292,762
63,197,081 60,735,056
29,309,082 29,266,441
1,153,099 2,839,996
65,630,150 57,984,124
5,435,759 1,548,048
73,522,926 71,366,228
12,790,959 14,048,473
251,039,056 237,788,366
150,070,068 130,504,396
(1,857) 2,565
14,438,669 6,356,029
301,446 253,799
14,738,258 6,612,393
869,490 1,682,939
14,095,510 6,510,082
33,082,384 36,695,083
48,047,384 44,888,104
116,760,942 92,228,685
9,924,920 16,433,138
742,451 1,278,558
10,667,371 17,711,696
127,428,313 109,940,381
1,934,066,130 1,835,146,655
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 — (11,020,906)
1,934,066,130 1,824,125,749
2,061,494,443$ 1,934,066,130$
WASTEWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION
For The Years
Ended June 30,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 82
2019 2018
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Received from customers 394,747,976$ 357,876,141$
Paid to employees for services (101,374,404) (96,464,294)
Paid to suppliers for goods and services (79,155,315) (70,486,503)
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities 214,218,257 190,925,344
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) Non-Capital Financing Activities
Taxes levied and collected 3,942 (930)
Cash Flows From Capital And Related Financing Activities
Proceeds from capital grants 130,670 1,634,250
Proceeds from issuance of debt 35,149,238 227,157,189
Premium on sale of bonds — 37,823,556
Principal paid on debt (50,942,662) (43,667,013)
Interest and fees paid on debt (65,117,717) (60,603,135)
Payments for capital assets (221,248,644) (225,481,370)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 279,867 136,134
Build America Bond tax credit 1,630,662 1,624,563
Net Cash (Used In) Capital And Related Financing Activities (300,118,586) (61,375,826)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchase of investments (551,116,152) (672,970,851)
Proceeds from sale and maturity of investments 647,477,312 525,720,153
Investment income 9,214,193 6,387,181
Proceeds from rents 229,231 253,799
Net Cash (Used In) Investing Activities 105,804,584 (140,609,718)
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents 19,908,197 (11,061,130)
Cash And Cash Equivalents At Beginning Of Year 31,737,328 42,798,458
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Year 51,645,525$ 31,737,328$
Ended June 30,
WASTEWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For The Years
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 83
Financial information as of and for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 of the
District’s Stormwater Segment is as follows:
Assets 2019 2018
Current Assets
Unrestricted Current Assets
1,218,671$ 590,710$
10,538,548 15,476,186
$126,120 in 2019 and $140,514 in 2018 72,188 89,522
Unbilled sewer service charges receivable (227) (389)
and $22,544 in 2018 479,914 689,128
57,979 39,317
12,367,073 16,884,474
Restricted Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 1,747,847 1,009,872
15,117,921 26,469,179
16,865,768 27,479,051
29,232,841 44,363,525
Non-Current Assets
Restricted Assets
2,142,021 1,048,411
18,526,954 27,478,223
27,952,964 13,102,425
Property taxes receivable, less allowance of $20,954 in 2019
and $45,320 in 2018 1,373,743 1,396,042
343,103 242,425
50,338,785 43,267,526
Other Assets
8,755,677 3,758,732
8,755,677 3,758,732
Capital Assets
657,467,608 645,451,046
17,012,385 17,713,702
674,479,993 663,164,748
216,627,959 207,556,541
457,852,034 455,608,207
7,420,788 7,158,677
24,967,857 20,696,809
490,240,679 483,463,693
549,335,141 530,489,951
578,567,982 574,853,476
Deferred Outflows of Resources:
5,308,811 2,575,499
170,387 175,579
5,479,198 2,751,078
STORMWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION
June 30,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 84
Liabilities 2019 2018
Current Liabilities-Payable From Unrestricted Assets
6,684$ 9,337$
8,259,420 7,789,782
— 545
Total Current Liabilities-Payable From Unrestricted Assets 8,266,104 7,799,664
Current Liabilities-Payable From Restricted Assets
801,529 834,980
691,203 526,090
Total Current Liabilities-Payable From Restricted Assets 1,492,732 1,361,070
9,758,836 9,160,734
Non-Current Liabilities
11,158,412 6,953,403
3,317,991 3,322,773
14,476,403 10,276,176
24,235,239 19,436,910
Deferred Inflows of Resources:
638,866 917,586
143,362 —
782,228 917,586
Net Position
Net investment in capital assets 488,793,056 482,309,582
Restricted for:
67,159,444 70,539,618
Unrestricted 3,077,213 4,400,858
559,029,713$ 557,250,058$
June 30,
STORMWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION (Continued)
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 85
2019 2018
(2,852)$ (4,810)$
11,399 19,557
3,468 3,968
12,015 18,715
16,307,809 15,519,041
10,293,801 8,377,594
1,831,570 1,028,038
164,660 9,337
10,116,917 9,960,114
963,696 1,082,716
39,678,453 35,976,840
(39,666,438) (35,958,125)
34,109,476 33,746,367
2,260,484 1,049,928
36,369,960 34,796,295
101,335 150,969
1,533,080 2,786,276
1,634,415 2,937,245
(4,930,893) (4,099,075)
6,710,548 8,365,978
6,710,548 8,365,978
1,779,655 4,266,903
557,250,058 556,021,399
Effect of Adoption of GASB 75 — (3,038,244)
557,250,058 552,983,155
559,029,713$ 557,250,058$
STORMWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION
For The Years
Ended June 30,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 86
2019 2018
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Received from customers 498,825$ (1,217,823)$
Paid to suppliers for goods and services (29,491,163) (28,718,597)
Net Cash (Used In) Operating Activities (28,992,338) (29,936,420)
Cash Flows Provided By Non-Capital Financing Activities
Taxes levied and collected 33,846,168 33,181,899
Cash Flows From Capital And Related Financing Activities
Payments for capital assets (9,979,589) (11,192,290)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 51,479 34,444
Net Cash (Used In) Capital And Related Financing Activities (9,928,110) (11,157,846)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchase of investments (98,474,024) (101,055,599)
Proceeds from sale and maturity of investments 104,946,688 105,074,847
Investment income 1,061,162 1,227,558
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities 7,533,826 5,246,806
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents 2,459,546 (2,665,561)
Cash And Cash Equivalents At Beginning Of Year 2,648,993 5,314,554
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Year 5,108,539$ 2,648,993$
Ended June 30,
STORMWATER SEGMENT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For The Years
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 87
15. Tax Abatements
Tax abatements, as defined by Governmental Accounting Standards Board
(“GASB”) Statement No. 77, Tax Abatement Disclosures (“GASB Statement No.
77”), are agreements between a government and an individual or entity in which
the government promises to forgo tax revenues and the individual or entity
promises to subsequently take a specific action that contributes to economic
development or otherwise benefits the government or its citizens. This Statement
requires disclosure of tax abatement information about (1) a reporting
government’s own tax abatement agreements and (2) those that are entered into
by other governments and that reduce the reporting government’s tax revenues.
Since the District does not and has not entered into tax abatement agreements
directly with any individuals or entities, the following estimates are from tax
abatements entered into by other governments, specifically the county and
municipalities within the District’s boundary, that have reduced the District’s tax
revenues.
Tax Abatements Entered Into By St. Louis County and Cities Located In St. Louis
County
The District’s property tax revenues were reduced through four programs that are
utilized by cities located in St. Louis County and the County itself. Summaries of
these four programs are as follows:
Enhanced Enterprise Zone: provides real property tax abatements to new or
expanding businesses in certain specified geographic areas designated by
local governments and certified by the Missouri Department of Economic
Development.
Industrial Development Bonds: finances industrial development projects for
private corporations, partnerships and individuals.
Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority: assists with the
redevelopment of blighted or insanitary areas for residential, recreational,
commercial, industrial or public uses.
Urban Redevelopment Corporations: provides real property tax abatements
to encourage the redevelopment of blighted areas by an eligible city or
county.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 88
The amount of the District’s tax revenues that were abated by the county and cities
initiating the programs are reported in the following tables.
Land
Enhanced Industrial Clearance for Urban
St. Louis County Enterprise Development Redevelopment Redevelopment Total Tax
or City Zones Bonds Authority Corporations Abatements
St Louis County —$ 121,961$ —$ 3,176$ 125,137$
Bellerive — 7,094 — — 7,094
Bridgeton — 768 — — 768
Brentwood — — — 7,652 7,652
Clayton — 21,044 — — 21,044
Edmundson — — — 9,752 9,752
Eureka — 198 — — 198
Ferguson — 3,673 — 587 4,260
Hazelwood 2,264 947 — 40,501 43,712
Kinloch 17,022 — — 24,092 41,114
Jennings — 274 — — 274
Maplewood — — — 8,349 8,349
Maryland Heights — — — 3,818 3,818
Normandy — — — 3,008 3,008
Overland — — — 4,631 4,631
Richmond Heights — — — 4,928 4,928
Rock Hill — — — 2,658 2,658
Sunset Hills — — — 551 551
University City — — 6,827 112 6,939
Wellston — — — 505 505
Total Tax Abatements 19,286$ 155,959$ 6,827$ 114,320$ 296,392$
For the Year Ended June 30, 2019
Land
Enhanced Industrial Clearance for Urban
St. Louis County Enterprise Development Redevelopment Redevelopment Total Tax
or City Zones Bonds Authority Corporations Abatements
St Louis County —$ 110,522$ —$ 14,519$ 125,041$
Bellerive — 9,107 — — 9,107
Berkeley 408 — — — 408
Bridgeton — 62 — — 62
Brentwood — — — 7,585 7,585
Clayton — 20,872 — — 20,872
Edmundson — — — 8,911 8,911
Eureka — 199 — — 199
Ferguson — 3,711 — 582 4,293
Hazelwood 4,685 1,951 — 11,377 18,013
Kinloch 17,090 — — 5,571 22,661
Jennings — 347 — — 347
Maryland Heights — — — 473 473
Normandy — — — 2,979 2,979
Overland — — — 4,561 4,561
Richmond Heights — — — 4,888 4,888
Rock Hill — — — 2,578 2,578
Sunset Hills — — — 546 546
University City — — 6,726 112 6,838
Wellston — — — 501 501
Total Tax Abatements 22,183$ 146,771$ 6,726$ 65,183$ 240,863$
For the Year Ended June 30, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 89
Tax Abatements Entered Into By St. Louis City
The City of St. Louis offers a real estate tax abatement program as a development
tool designed to assist developers, businesses and individuals with renovation and
new construction projects. The tax abatement freezes the tax assessment in
improvements to property at the pre-development level. To be eligible for tax
abatement, a significant investment must be made in the property; generally
either new construction on vacant land or gut rehabilitation of an existing building.
The application must be made before construction begins and the usual term for
tax abatement is five to ten years.
The amount of the District’s tax revenues calculated at the District’s tax rates of
$.1170 and $.1159 per $100 of assessed value for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively,
that were abated by St. Louis City are reported in the following tables.
Reduced
Unabated Tax Abated Tax Tax
St. Louis City Values Revenue Values Revenue Revenue
Residential 170,087,710$ 199,003$ 35,565,190$ 41,611$ 157,392$
Commercial 331,824,840 388,235 126,055,310 147,485 240,750
Total 501,912,550$ 587,238$ 161,620,500$ 189,096$ 398,142$
For the Year Ended June 30, 2019
Reduced
Unabated Tax Abated Tax Tax
St. Louis City Values Revenue Values Revenue Revenue
Residential 140,187,310$ 162,477$ 33,987,320$ 39,391$ 123,086$
Commercial 328,519,340 380,754 117,961,490 136,717 244,037
Total 468,706,650$ 543,231$ 151,948,810$ 176,108$ 367,123$
For the Year Ended June 30, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 90
Tax Increment Financing Utilized By St. Louis County, Cities Located in St. Louis
County and St. Louis City
Missouri’s Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act enables
cities to finance certain redevelopment costs with the revenue generated from (i)
payments in lieu of real estate taxes, as measured by the net increase in assessed
valuation resulting from redevelopment and (ii) a portion of the increase in other
local tax revenue associated with new economic activity. When a tax increment
financing (“TIF”) plan is adopted, real estate taxes in the redevelopment are frozen
at their current level. By applying the real estate tax rate of all taxing districts
having taxing power within the redevelopment area to the increased assessed
valuation resulting from redevelopment, a tax “increment” is produced. The real
estate tax increments are referred to as payments in lieu of taxes, or “PILOTs”,
and are deposited in a special allocation fund.
The estimated TIF incremental values and the District’s net reduced tax revenue
resulting from the TIFs adopted in St. Louis County and the cities located in the
County and adopted in the City of St. Louis are as follows:
TIF TIF
Incremental Reduced Incremental Reduced
St. Louis County or City Values Tax Revenues Values Tax Revenues
St. Louis County and Cities Located
in St. Louis County 480,084,710$ 561,699$ 555,120,680$ 643,385$
St. Louis County PILOTs Received — (5,307) — (41,338)
St. Louis City 1,308,525,243 325,396 1,311,535,243 329,770
St. Louis City PILOTs Received — (83,074) — (5,268)
Total 1,788,609,953$ 798,714$ 1,866,655,923$ 926,549$
June 30, 2019
For the Years Ended
June 30, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 91
In summary, the District’s total tax revenues reduced during fiscal 2019 and
2018 as a result of the programs of other governments are as follows:
16. Subsequent Events
In preparing these financial statements, the District has evaluated events and
transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through October 9, 2019, the
date the financial statements were available to be issued.
On July 9, 2019, the IRS announced a decrease in the sequestration rate for
refundable credit amounts submitted on IRS Form 8038-CP for qualified bonds
from 6.2% to 5.9%. This will be effective for all refund payments processed from
October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020. Since the District participates in Build
America Bonds, the District will receive 94.1% of the amount requested during its
fiscal year 2020. The District received 93.8% of the amount requested during fiscal
year 2019.
On September 24, 2019, the State of Missouri Direct Loan Program issued to the
District an amount totaling $23,952,000 for the purpose of improving, renovating,
repairing, replacing and equipping the District’s Wastewater System. The
principal and interest on the bonds are expected to be paid from future wastewater
revenues. The District’s interest rate is 0.98% and is payable in semiannual
installments at varying amounts through July 1, 2042.
Reduced Reduced
St. Louis County or City Tax Revenues Tax Revenues
St. Louis County and Cities Located
in St. Louis County - Tax Abatements 296,392$ 240,863$
St. Louis City - Tax Abatements 398,142 367,123
St. Louis County and Cities Located
in St. Louis County - TIFs 556,392 602,047
St. Louis City - TIFs 242,322 324,502
Total Reduced Tax Revenues 1,493,248$ 1,534,535$
For the Years Ended
June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Notes To Financial Statements (Continued)
Page 92
As the District incurs approved capital expenditures, the DNR reimburses the
District for the expenditures from the bond proceeds account and deposits the
approved amount in a bond reserve fund. The District repays the loan at an
interest rate of 0.98% based on the amount that has been borrowed. As of the date
of this report, the outstanding loan balance was $174,712. The payment
requirements to maturity will be determined after the debt is fully issued.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 93
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY
AND RELATED RATIOS
June 30, 2019
Calendar Year Ending December 31,
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Total Pension Liability
Service cost 5,239$ 5,157$ 5,107$ 5,253$ 5,409$
Interest on total pension liability 22,307 22,079 20,609 20,199 19,901
Effect of plan changes — — — — —
Effect of economic/demographic gains or (losses)(2,042) (4,729)(883) (4,577) (3,668)
Effect of assumption changes or inputs — 1,667 11,665 — 6,500
Benefit payments (16,912) (15,858) (15,261) (14,475) (13,387)
Net Change in Total Pension Liability 8,592 8,316 21,237 6,400 14,755
Total Pension Liability - Beginning 326,365 318,049 296,812 290,412 275,657
Total Pension Liability - Ending (a)334,957 326,365 318,049 296,812 290,412
Plan Fiduciary Net Position
Employer contributions 12,494 12,328 10,146 10,059 10,676
Member contributions — — — — —
Investment income net of investment expenses (12,998) 30,496 11,913 (1,888) 6,980
Benefit payments (16,912) (15,858) (15,261) (14,475) (13,387)
Administrative expenses — — — — —
Net Change in Plan Fiduciary Net Position (17,416) 26,966 6,798 (6,304) 4,269
Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Beginning 277,976 251,010 244,212 250,516 246,247
Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Ending (b)260,560 277,976 251,010 244,212 250,516
Net Pension Liability - Ending = (a) - (b)74,397$ 48,389$ 67,039$ 52,600$ 39,896$
Fiduciary Net Position as a % of Total Pension Liability 77.79% 85.17% 78.92% 82.28% 86.26%
Covered Payroll 39,437$ 41,869$ 42,055$ 43,345$ 44,664$
Net Pension Liability as a % of Covered Payroll 188.65% 115.57% 159.41% 121.35% 89.32%
Notes to Schedule:
1. Changes of Assumptions. The actuarial discount rate and the long-term expected rate of return were both reduced to
6.90% in 2017 while both rates were 7.00% in all prior years. In 2016, the amount reported as change of assumptions
resulted from changing to the RP-2014 Mortality for Employees and Healthy Annuitants and Disabled Mortality tables,
while the 2014 change resulted primarily from adjustments to the discount rate and employee rate increases.
2. This schedule will ultimately present ten years of information when available.
Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios
In (000's)
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 94
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)
SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS TO EMPLOYEES’ PENSION
PLAN
June 30, 2019
Schedule of Employer Contributions
To Employees' Pension Plan
Fiscal Year Actuarially Contribution Contribution
Ending Determined Annual Deficiency Covered as a % of
June 30, Contribution Contribution (Excess)Payroll Covered Payroll
2015 10,359,139$ 10,359,139$ —$ 46,584,987$ 22.24%
2016 10,096,075 10,096,075 — 44,996,070 22.44%
2017 11,236,828 11,236,828 — 43,818,487 25.64%
2018 12,411,005 12,411,005 — 42,751,918 29.03%
2019 12,609,689 12,609,689 — 38,166,848 33.04%
Notes to Schedule:
1. This schedule will ultimately present ten years of information when available.
2. Valuation Date: Actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of January 1 of the fiscal year in which
the contributions are reported.
Methods and assumptions used to determine contribution rates:
Actuarial Cost Method:Entry Age Normal
Amortization Method:Level dollar layered, 20 year periods
Asset Valuation Method:3-year smoothing period
Inflation:2.50%
Salary Increases:4.25%, average, including inflation
Investment Rate of Return:6.90%, net of pension plan investment expense, including inflation for 2018
7.00%, net of pension plan investment expense, including inflation for all
years prior to 2018
Mortality:In the 2019, 2018 and 2017 actuarial valuations, assumed life expectancies were
calculated using the RP-2014 Employee and Healthy Annuitant Mortality
Table (with generational projections from 2006 based on the most current
MP improvement scale which is updated annually) and the RP-2014 Disabled
Mortality Table. In the 2016 and 2015 actuarial valuations, assumed life
expectancies were calculated using the RP-2000 Healthy Annuitant Mortality
Table and the RP-2000 Disabled Mortality Table.
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 95
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued)
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY
June 30, 2019
Calendar Year Ending December 31,
2018 2017
Total OPEB Liability
Service cost 1,781$ 1,622$
Interest on total OPEB liability 865 895
Changes of assumptions or other inputs (987) 438
Benefit payments (1,689)(1,600)
Net change in total OPEB liability (30)1,355
Total OPEB Liability - Beginning 24,194 22,839
Total OPEB Liability - Ending 24,164$ 24,194$
Notes to Schedule:
1. Changes of assumptions and other inputs reflect the effects of changes in the discount rate each period.
The following are the discount rates used in each period:
2018 4.10%
2017 3.44%
2016 3.78%
2. No assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement No. 75
to pay related benefits.
3. This schedule will ultimately present ten years of information when available.
4. Contributions to the OPEB plan are not based on a measure of pay so accordingly, no measure of payroll
is presented.
In (000's)
Schedule of Changes in Total OPEB Liability
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive
annual financial reports for the relevant year.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Statistical Section
This part of the District’s comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed
information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial
statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the
District’s overall financial health.
Contents
Page
Financial Trends
These schedules contain trend information to help the
reader understand how the District’s financial
performance and well-being have changed over time .......................................... 96 – 97
Revenue Capacity
These schedules contain information to help the reader
assess the District’s most significant local revenue
sources, the user charge ...................................................................................... 98 – 105
Debt Capacity
These schedules present information to help the reader
assess the affordability of the District’s current levels of
outstanding debt and the District’s ability to issue
additional debt in the future ............................................................................. 106 – 108
Demographic And Economic Information
These schedules offer demographic and economic
indicators to help the reader understand the
environment within which the District’s financial
activities take place ........................................................................................... 109 – 111
Operating Information
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data
to help the reader understand how the information in the
District’s financial report relates to the services the
District provides and the activities it performs ............................................... 112 – 113
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 96
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Net Position
Net investment in
capital assets 1,868,974$ 1,915,233$ 1,928,200$ 1,877,692$ 1,845,394$
Restricted 80,782 94,926 106,693 111,066 142,764
Unrestricted 257,894 186,860 175,010 251,300 279,794
Total Net Position 2,207,650$ 2,197,019$ 2,209,903$ 2,240,058$ 2,267,952$
2015 a 2016 a 2017 a 2018 a 2019 a
Net Position
Net investment in
capital assets 1,805,453$ 1,809,386$ 1,876,249$ 1,968,740$ 2,063,519$
Restricted 142,445 136,547 135,259 129,579 127,414
Unrestricted 330,218 381,124 379,660 392,997 429,591
Total Net Position 2,278,116$ 2,327,057$ 2,391,168$ 2,491,316$ 2,620,524$
a Years 2015 to current include a change in the calculation of the net position components which is
not reflected in years prior.
NET POSITION BY COMPONENT
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(000's)
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 97
Non-operating Income/(Loss) Capital Change
Fiscal Operating Operating Operating Revenue/ before Capital Grants and in Net
Year Revenues Expenses Income/(Loss) (Expenses) Contributions Contributions Position
2010 246,587,174$ 228,778,874$ 17,808,300$ (17,560,670)$ 247,630$ 19,786,012$ 20,033,642$
2011 219,444,257 244,503,099 (25,058,842) 4,329,032 (20,729,810) 10,098,552 (10,631,258)
2012 225,999,720 216,307,965 9,691,755 1,370,329 11,062,084 9,658,857 20,720,941
2013 241,946,337 230,158,434 11,787,903 832,056 12,619,959 17,534,919 30,154,878
2014 265,772,853 241,297,635 24,475,218 (3,682,863) 20,792,355 7,102,480 27,894,835
2015 290,386,589 256,521,148 33,865,441 (13,074,700) 20,790,741 12,996,754 33,787,495
2016 319,857,731 273,095,705 46,762,026 (9,858,327) 36,903,699 12,036,784 48,940,483
2017 333,490,989 275,077,675 58,413,314 (3,916,119) 54,497,195 9,613,746 64,110,941
2018 368,311,477 273,765,206 94,546,271 (6,416,661) 88,129,610 26,077,674 114,207,284
2019 401,121,139 290,717,509 110,403,630 1,426,419 111,830,049 17,377,919 129,207,968
CHANGES IN NET POSITION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 98
OPERATING REVENUES BY SOURCE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Licenses,
Fiscal Sewer Service Permits, and
Year Charges, Net Other Fees Other
2010 241,495,357$ 3,084,552$ 2,007,265$ 246,587,174$
2011 214,653,310 2,976,253 1,814,694 219,444,257
2012 220,765,581 2,683,823 2,550,316 225,999,720
2013 235,980,065 2,731,497 3,234,775 241,946,337
2014 257,343,344 6,562,607 1,866,902 265,772,853
2015 282,270,193 6,656,831 1,459,565 290,386,589
2016 302,011,893 3,620,240 14,225,598 319,857,731
2017 328,359,526 4,036,362 1,095,101 333,490,989
2018 361,175,224 3,777,200 3,359,053 368,311,477
2019 395,579,903 3,063,458 2,477,778 401,121,139
Total Operating
Revenues
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 99
Fiscal Employment Materials and Contracted Chemical
Year Costs Utilities Supplies Services Supplies
2010 84,049,800$ 12,355,232$ 11,331,222$ 33,342,027$ 1,478,605$
2011 84,284,762 14,148,746 11,329,023 44,011,352 1,415,826
2012 87,098,037 12,634,274 12,737,240 26,056,481 1,355,113
2013 91,960,314 14,534,075 12,249,397 33,670,887 1,455,725
2014 93,542,222 14,986,387 11,097,857 36,875,093 2,440,843
2015 96,759,245 16,499,964 12,651,008 41,500,864 3,964,165
2016 102,458,574 16,624,434 11,838,551 48,450,272 3,498,796
2017 106,441,619 16,783,922 12,170,738 46,502,512 3,569,449
2018 105,555,411 16,154,516 11,005,087 48,390,986 2,501,712
2019 114,570,104 16,896,093 12,446,227 52,496,518 3,667,207
Fiscal
Year Insurance Other
2010 3,196,628$ 29,013,584$ 174,767,098$ 54,011,776$ 228,778,874$
2011 2,557,850 19,901,275 177,648,834 66,854,265 244,503,099
2012 2,470,343 7,214,413 149,565,901 66,742,064 216,307,965
2013 2,696,416 3,561,780 160,128,594 70,029,840 230,158,434
2014 2,737,491 5,530,535 167,210,428 74,087,207 241,297,635
2015 2,791,622 3,713,021 177,879,889 78,641,259 256,521,148
2016 3,218,041 3,023,288 189,111,956 83,983,749 273,095,705
2017 3,293,267 5,121,777 193,883,284 81,194,391 275,077,675
2018 3,371,910 5,459,242 192,438,864 81,326,342 273,765,206
2019 3,819,449 3,182,068 207,077,666 83,639,843 290,717,509
Note: Balances in all years have been restated to accurately reflect expenses in the appropriate
category. The majority of the changes are increases to Employment Costs and Other and decreases to
Materials and Supplies and Contracted Services.
OPERATING EXPENSES
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Subtotal,
Expenses
before
Depreciation
Total
Operating
ExpensesDepreciation
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 100
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Non-operating revenues
Property taxes levied by the District 1,401,100$ 27,125,451$ 24,604,173$ 26,016,135$ 27,450,319$
Investment income 6,553,760 3,847,324 2,407,485 1,056,966 2,966,549
Rent and other income 265,004 442,968 294,591 293,159 302,506
Total non-operating revenues 8,219,864 31,415,743 27,306,249 27,366,260 30,719,374
Non-operating expenses
Interest expense 13,189,283 7,971,088 16,365,309 21,062,474 25,661,127
Net loss on disposal and sale
of capital assets 2,719,163 3,485,952 3,162,723 795,527 5,248,443
Non-recurring projects and studies 9,872,088 10,800,843 6,402,888 4,676,203 3,492,667
Legal claims — 4,828,828 5,000 — —
Total non-operating expenses 25,780,534 27,086,711 25,935,920 26,534,204 34,402,237
Net non-operating revenue (expense)(17,560,670)$ 4,329,032$ 1,370,329$ 832,056$ (3,682,863)$
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Non-operating revenues
Property taxes levied by the District 24,764,324$ 25,671,058$ 32,458,054$ 33,748,932$ 34,107,619$
Investment income 3,000,591 4,635,866 2,902,624 7,405,957 16,699,153
Rent and other income 37,321 102,865 106,562 253,799 301,446
Total non-operating revenues 27,802,236 30,409,789 35,467,240 41,408,688 51,108,218
Non-operating expenses
Interest expense 27,138,546 28,943,200 31,250,777 36,695,083 33,082,384
Net loss on disposal and sale
of capital assets 1,420,902 324,513 673,044 1,833,908 970,825
Non-recurring projects and studies 12,317,488 11,000,403 7,459,538 9,296,358 15,628,590
Total non-operating expenses 40,876,936 40,268,116 39,383,359 47,825,349 49,681,799
Net non-operating revenue (expense)(13,074,700)$ (9,858,327)$ (3,916,119)$ (6,416,661)$ 1,426,419$
NON-OPERATING REVENUES AND EXPENSES
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 101
Type of Monthly Charge Unmetered c Residential c Non-Residential
Wastewater User Charge
Base Charge 23.83$ 23.83$ 23.83$
Compliance Charge a
Tier 1 — — 3.05
Tier 2 — — 60.89
Tier 3 — — 133.96
Tier 4 — — 197.91
Tier 5 — — 258.79
Volume Charges
per Ccf b — 4.40 4.40
per room 2.61 — —
per water closet 9.70 — —
per bath 8.08 — —
per separate shower 8.08 — —
Extra Strength Surcharges a
Suspended Solids ("SS") over 300 milligrams per liter — — 277.03
Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") over 300 — — 691.50
milligrams per liter
Chemical Oxygen Demand ("COD") over 600 m illigrams — — 345.76
per liter
Notes:
a Applicable only to non-residential customers, Extra Strength Surcharges priced per ton
b Ccf = Hundred cubic feet
c User charges for certain low income residential users will be 50 percent of the regular user charge
Source: Finance Department
USER CHARGE RATES
As Of June 30, 2019
Metered
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 102
Fiscal
Year
Wastewater
Charges Billed1
Wastewater
Charges Collected2
Collections as a %
of Wastewater
Charges Billed
2010 204,248,506$ 198,138,619$ 97.01%
2011 213,503,732 203,520,769 95.32%
2012 222,425,957 217,396,623 97.74%
2013 233,882,795 233,877,875 99.99%
2014 245,555,628 241,549,548 98.37%
2015 279,555,881 275,049,684 98.39%
2016 300,803,084 299,932,808 99.71%
2017 326,663,167 322,829,334 98.83%
2018 359,628,200 351,107,233 97.63%
2019 394,518,583 386,033,225 97.85%
Note: The table shows the amount of wastewater user charge revenues which were
billed and collected by the District for the last ten fiscal years.
1 Wastewater Charges Billed includes wastewater user charge revenues billed and
accrued for the year.
2 Wastewater Charges Collected includes wastewater user charge revenues collected
for the current year and previous years billings.
USER CHARGE REVENUES
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 103
2010 a 2011 b 2012 2013 c 2014
Residential:
Single-Family/Unit 3 351.12$ 1 333.60$ 1 347.64$ 379.56$ 421.08$
Multi-Family/Unit 305.04 285.12 296.28 324.12 360.36
Commercial/Industrial:
Service Charge/Unit 2 486.60 507.00 525.60 478.56 412.56
Sanitary Sewer Usage Charge per Ccf 1.92 2.02 2.11 2.28 2.50
Storm Sewer Usage Charge/100 sq. feet of impervious area 0.14 — — — —
Extra Strength Surcharges:
SS over 300 parts per million/ton 218.90 222.62 231.35 231.35 231.35
BOD over 300 parts per million/ton 551.52 596.72 620.14 620.14 620.14
COD over 600 parts per million/ton 275.76 298.36 310.07 310.07 310.07
2015 2016 2017 d 2018 2019
Residential:
Single-Family/Unit 3 434.76$ 491.52$ 535.08$ 591.72$ 602.76$
Multi-Family/Unit 434.04 490.80 492.00 544.08 602.76
Commercial/Industrial:
Service Charge/Unit 2 348.12 296.80 336.69 363.53 395.42
Sanitary Sewer Usage Charge per Ccf 2.82 3.21 3.59 3.97 4.40
Storm Sewer Usage Charge/100 sq. feet of impervious area — — — — —
Extra Strength Surcharges:
SS over 300 parts per million/ton 244.03 251.88 262.00 269.07 277.03
BOD over 300 parts per million/ton 620.14 632.38 654.00 671.63 691.50
COD over 600 parts per million/ton 310.07 316.19 327.00 335.82 345.76
Notes:
1 Years 2009-2010 saw an impervious rate charge that averaged $36 per year per customer. This was discontinued in 2011.
2 Service Charge/Unit for Commercial/Industrial is calculated by using the sum of annualized base charge and compliance charge.
Starting FY 2013, MSD implemented 5-tier Compliance Charge Rate Model, so the Service Charge/Unit is based on calculated weighted
average compliance charge. FY 2013, FY 2014 & FY 2015 Service Charge/Unit were adjusted to reflect the weighted average com pliance
charge calculations. Prior to FY 2013, there was only one tier compliance charge.
3 Based on average usage of a typical single-family during the fiscal year listed.
a Ordinance 12754, effective July 1, 2009, changed wastewater rates.
b Ordinance 13021, effective July 1, 2010, changed wastewater rates through FY 2012.
c Ordinance 13402, effective July 1, 2012, changed wastewater rates through FY 2016.
d Ordinance 14395, effective July 1, 2016, changed wastewater rates through FY 2020.
Source: Finance Department
SEWER USER CHARGES (COMPOSITE-ANNUAL )
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 104
Single-Multi-
Fiscal Family Family Non-Total
Year Residential Residential Residential Accounts
2010 387,670 50,867 31,939 470,476 a
2011 362,739 43,471 24,702 430,912 b
2012 360,354 41,648 24,568 426,570
2013 359,243 41,117 24,441 424,801
2014 358,928 40,951 24,297 424,176
2015 359,317 41,131 24,389 424,837
2016 356,926 41,585 24,001 422,512
2017 360,534 41,697 24,253 426,484
2018 360,957 41,355 24,296 426,608
2019 361,288 41,288 24,095 426,671
Source: Finance Department
a Due to the implementation of the impervious area charge in 2008, approximately
46,000 additional stormwater only accounts were billed each month. This charge
was challenged and a court decision was entered on 7/9/10. Based on that decision
the impervious charge was discontinued in FY 2011.
b The number of accounts were revised as stormwater accounts were underreported.
Note: Total accounts listed above are as of June 30 for each fiscal year listed.
NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS BY TYPE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 105
Customer Amount %
InBev Anheuser-Busch 5,380,744$ 1.36%
City of St. Louis 2,626,558 0.67%
Washington Unversity 2,109,156 0.53%
Sigma-Aldrich 1,674,339 0.42%
The Boeing Company 1,251,265 0.32%
Jost Real Estate LLC 1,085,769 0.27%
BJC Health System 1,036,583 0.26%
St Louis University 1,033,565 0.26%
Missouri-American Water Co.1,015,558 0.26%
GKN Aerospace N America Inc.891,863 0.23%
Subtotal (10 largest)18,105,400 4.58%
Balance from other customers 377,474,503 95.42%
Grand totals 395,579,903$ 100.00%
Customer Amount %
Anheuser-Busch 5,518,959$ 2.29%
Washington University 1,309,287 0.54%
City of St Louis 1,266,572 0.52%
Mallinckrodt Inc 1,250,530 0.52%
Boeing Co.667,443 0.28%
Zoological Gardens 597,152 0.25%
Sigma-Aldrich 512,958 0.21%
BJC Health System 512,642 0.21%
Sensient Colors Inc.462,261 0.19%
Cott Beverages Inc 438,501 0.18%
Subtotal (10 largest)12,536,305 5.19%
Balance from other customers 228,959,052 94.81%
Grand totals 241,495,357$ 100.00%
User Charges
TEN LARGEST CUSTOMERS
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Fiscal Year 2019
User Charges
Fiscal Year 2010
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 106
Unamortized
Fiscal Subordinate Capital Premium, Net
Year Senior Subordinate Direct Loans Lease of Discount Amount Per Capita
2010 342,370,000$ 224,505,000$ 31,017,371$ 7,263,687$ 1,457,910$ 606,613,968$ 446$ 1.00
2011 340,590,000 212,655,000 25,259,899 6,095,981 862,654 585,463,534 431 0.97
2012 390,880,000 200,692,500 63,727,722 3,096,139 5,805,206 664,201,567 484 1.09
2013 594,715,000 188,600,000 93,751,658 — 56,252,401 933,319,059 660 1.45
2014 740,655,000 184,075,000 116,090,820 — 82,274,845 1,123,095,665 852 1.86
2015 736,775,000 171,455,000 148,279,465 — 78,591,961 1,135,101,426 860 1.83
2016 860,460,000 158,765,000 184,141,916 — 112,035,478 1,315,402,394 997 2.09
2017 995,175,000 145,410,000 210,851,827 — 124,465,181 1,475,902,008 1,127 2.33
2018 1,167,225,000 131,810,000 227,240,106 — 166,900,626 1,693,175,732 1,297 2.70
2019 1,145,131,480 117,840,000 247,692,802 — 159,855,883 1,670,520,165 1,285 2.65
Notes:
Calculation of "Per Capita" for 2011 through 2013 is based on estimated population levels.
Calculation of "As a Share of Personal Income" for 2011 through 2013 is based on estimated income levels.
In FY 2012, a decision was made to discontinue considering SRF receivable amounts as liabilities. The liability is now recorded when the funds are received.
Sources: Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Census Bu reau
Income (%)
RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Total
Revenue Bonds As a Share
of Personal
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 107
Amount of Debt Percentage of Debt
within within
Governmental Unit Debt Outstanding District Boundary District Boundary
City of St. Louis 74,565,000$ 74,565,000$ 100.0%
St. Louis County 87,375,000 86,676,000 99.2
Municipalities 125,162,376 122,587,376 97.9
City of St. Louis School District 231,121,477 231,121,477 100.0
St. Louis County School Districts 1,621,799,535 1,602,981,175 98.8
Fire Districts 133,413,236 124,365,407 93.2
2,273,436,624$ 2,242,296,435 98.6%
Total Direct Debt 1,670,520,165
Total Direct and Overlapping Debt 3,912,816,600$
Sources:
City of St. Louis, Office of Comptroller
St. Louis County, Department of Revenue
St. Louis Public Schools, Financial/Treasurer Office
Missouri Department of Education, School Finance
Polled Governments
Polled Fire Districts
Note: Although the District comprises all of the St. Louis City and most of St. Louis County, it does not entirely
match the County's boundaries. The calculation of overlapping debt is based on the percentage that a political
jurisdiction's territory lies within the District's territory. These percentages are weighted against the debt
outstanding thus providing the amount of debt within District Boundary.
COMPUTATION OF OVERLAPPING DEBT
As Of June 30, 2019
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 108
Less:
Operating
Expenses
(excluding
Non-depreciation, Net
Fiscal Operating operating Gross GASB 68 & Available
Year Revenues Revenues Revenues GASB 75) Revenues
2010 204,697,929$ 4,908,296$ 209,606,225$ 145,598,505$ 64,007,720$
2011 217,011,360 3,202,219 220,213,579 160,572,145 59,641,434
2012 224,882,086 2,058,300 226,940,386 135,232,302 91,708,084
2013 240,597,715 956,664 241,554,379 146,372,419 95,181,960
2014 264,422,401 2,670,333 267,092,734 153,221,914 113,870,820
2015 288,835,877 2,555,654 291,391,531 163,311,194 128,080,337
2016 318,463,297 3,894,305 322,357,602 168,258,133 154,099,469
2017 333,469,677 2,456,677 335,926,354 168,835,676 167,090,678
2018 368,292,762 6,356,029 374,648,791 163,026,313 211,622,478
2019 401,109,124 14,438,669 415,547,793 170,585,143 244,962,650
Fiscal Coverage
Year Principal Interest Total Ratio
2010 13,022,500$ 20,187,151$ 33,209,651$ 1.9
2011 14,576,800 20,140,021 34,716,821 1.7
2012 16,540,200 22,517,473 39,057,673 2.3
2013 18,749,700 31,191,190 49,940,890 1.9
2014 10,037,200 34,399,261 44,436,461 2.6
2015 20,252,200 41,596,192 61,848,392 2.1
2016 29,588,000 44,171,592 73,759,592 2.1
2017 38,026,700 51,333,869 89,360,569 1.9
2018 42,716,800 57,682,698 100,399,498 2.1
2019 50,907,800 63,224,915 114,132,715 2.1
Fiscal Coverage
Year Principal Interest Total Ratio
2010 1,595,000$ 13,396,341$ 14,991,341$ 4.3
2011 1,780,000 15,467,269 17,247,269 3.5
2012 1,960,000 16,488,587 18,448,587 5.0
2013 3,805,000 24,451,656 28,256,656 3.4
2014 4,060,000 30,161,408 34,221,408 3.3
2015 3,880,000 34,472,415 38,352,415 3.3
2016 10,170,000 36,211,319 46,381,319 3.3
2017 15,285,000 42,897,077 58,182,077 2.9
2018 18,365,000 49,558,285 67,923,285 3.1
2019 22,355,000 55,586,363 77,941,363 3.1
Note: The methodology used to calculate the net available revenues and the coverage ratio was adjusted during fiscal
year 2013 and all previous years were restated for comparative purposes. The 2013 change in methodology consisted of
removing agency fees, previously reflected as a deduction from net available revenues, and now combining them with
interest in the debt service section. Additionally, in fiscal years 2010 and 2011, the change in methodology consisted of
removing the Build America Bond Tax Credit from the pledged revenue section and reapplying the credit to interest
expense in the debt service section. This was made to ensure consistency with fiscal years 2012 and 2013. In fiscal year
2017 the methodology was changed to exclude GASB non-cash transactions from the debt service coverage calculation.
PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Senior and Subordinate Debt Service
Senior Debt Service
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 109
Per
Personal Capita Total
Fiscal Income Personal Labor Number of
Year Populations (millions) Income City County State Force Households (1)
2010 1,356,289 60,792 44,822 12.3 9.4 9.3 682,165 551,388
2011 1,357,035 60,420 44,523 11.8 8.9 9.0 692,071 546,744
2012 1,360,085 60,283 44,323 9.7 6.9 7.0 672,945 546,744
2013 1,328,610 60,399 45,460 10.5 7.3 7.1 665,086 543,851
2014 1,318,610 60,968 46,237 9.6 6.9 6.6 666,200 543,991
2015 1,319,295 61,910 46,926 7.1 5.5 5.8 703,317 543,945
2016 1,319,047 62,983 47,749 5.9 4.6 4.9 718,821 542,223
2017 1,309,985 63,295 48,317 4.7 3.7 4.9 692,644 541,394
2018 1,305,352 62,771 48,087 4.3 3.3 3.5 699,882 541,832
2019 1,299,783 63,008 48,476 4.3 3.3 3.3 699,494 542,048
Notes:
(1) The number of households was taken from http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US-MO, the 2019 figure is based on
the 2013-2017 data. The 2018 figure is based on the 2012-2016 data. The 2017 figure is based on 2011-2015 data. The 2016 figure
(2010-2014). The 2015 figure is based on 2013 data. The 2011-2012 figures are based on 2010 data. Information for prior years is
unavailable; therefore, the 2000 census information is used for the other years in this table.
Sources: Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce,
and Missouri Economic Resource and Information Center (MERIC)
Footnotes- http://www.bea.gov/regional/reis/scb.cfm
http://www.meric.mo.gov/regional-profiles/st-louis
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Unemployment Rate
Saint Louis
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 110
Percentage Percentage
Employer Employees (1)of Total Rank
Employees (1)of Total Rank
BJC Health System 28,516 4%1 23,592 4%1
Mercy 23,011 3%2
Washington University in St. Louis 17,442 3%3 13,167 2%3
Boeing Defense, Space & Security 14,566 2%4 16,000 3%2
SSM Health 13,500 2%5 12,367 2%4
Scott Air Force Base 13,000 2%6 11,242 2%5
Schnuck Markets Inc.10,702 2%7 10,700 2%7
Archdiocese of St. Louis 10,000 1%8
City of St. Louis 7,368 1%9
St. Louis University 7,221 1%10
Wal-Mart Stores Inc 10,800 2%6
United States Postal Service 10,249 2%8
St. John's Mercy Health Center 9,793 1%9
McDonald's 9,000 1%10
145,326 21%126,910 21%
Total Employment 674,783 100%613,467 100%
Notes:
(1) Employees are for the St. Louis area which includes several counties not served by the District.
Sources:
St. Louis Business Journal's Book of Lists 2019 (as of April 2019)
St. Louis Business Journal's Book of Lists 2010
PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS (ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN AREA)
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2010
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 111
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 112
Average Sewage
Fiscal Treatment in Millions
Year of Gallons per Day
2010 395.5
2011 370.6
2012 300.0
2013 326.7
2014 273.8
2015 327.5
2016 335.2
2017 328.9
2018 270.1
2019 396.4
Source: Operations Department
AVERAGE FLOW
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
Page 113
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Miles of sewers 9,900 9,843 9,738 9,578 9,563
Number of treatment plants 7 7 7 7 7
Treatment capacity (MGD) a 423 528 528 528 533
Annual engineering maximum plant capacity
(millions of gallons)154,395 192,629 192,629 192,629 194,454
Amount treated annually (millions of gallons)144,358 135,269 109,518 119,253 99,945
Unused capacity (millions of gallons)10,037 57,360 83,111 73,376 94,509
Percentage of capacity utilized 93% 70% 57% 62% 51%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Miles of sewers 9,531 9,700 9,400 9,400 9,400
Number of treatment plants 7 7 7 7 7
Treatment capacity (MGD) a 538 538 593 593 593
Annual engineering maximum plant capacity
(millions of gallons)196,279 196,279 216,354 216,354 216,354
Amount treated annually (m illions of gallons)119,547 122,366 120,033 96,534 144,754
Unused capacity (millions of gallons)76,732 73,913 96,321 119,820 71,600
Percentage of capacity utilized 61% 62% 55% 45%67%
Sources: Operations Department and Engineering Department
Note:
a Million gallons per day.
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
OPERATING AND CAPITAL INDICATORS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT
ST. LOUIS, MO 2350 MARKET STREET, ST. LOUIS, MO 63103
WWW.STLMSD.COM • 314-768-6260
APPENDIX B
Information Regarding the District’s Service Area
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
B-1
INFORMATION REGARDING THE DISTRICT’S SERVICE AREA
The Series 2019B&C Bonds are special, limited obligations of the District and are not obligations
of The City of St. Louis, Missouri (the “City”), St. Louis County, Missouri (the “County”), the State of
Missouri (the “State”), or any political subdivision of the City, the County or the State. The Series
2019B&C Bonds are payable solely from the revenues described in this Official Statement. As described
elsewhere in this Official Statement, the service area of the District consists of the City and most of the
County. The following information regarding the City and the County has been obtained from sources
that the District believes to be reliable, but should not be construed as an indication that the Series
2019B&C Bonds are payable from any source other than the revenues of the District described in this
Official Statement. See “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE SERIES
2019B&C BONDS,” “THE DISTRICT,” and “THE CIRP” in this Official Statement. Such
information is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness by the Underwriters and is not to be
construed as a representation by the Underwriters. The Underwriters have not verified this information.
No representation is made by the Underwriters as to the accuracy or adequacy of such information or as to
the absence of material adverse changes in such information subsequent to the date as to which such
information is provided.
The delivery of this Official Statement, including this Appendix B, is not intended to create any
implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the District, the City or the County since the
date hereof or that the information contained or incorporated by reference in this Appendix B is correct
as of any time subsequent to its date.
THE SERVICE AREA
As more fully described in this Official Statement under the caption “THE DISTRICT -
General”, the District was created in 1954 pursuant to Article VI, Section 30 of the State Constitution,
which empowers the people of the City and the County “to establish a metropolitan district or districts for
the functional administration of services common to the area included therein.” The District provides a
metropolitan-wide system of wastewater treatment and sanitary sewerage facilities for the collection,
treatment and disposal of sewage within the City and most of the more heavily populated areas of the
County. When the District began operations, it took over the publicly-owned wastewater and stormwater
drainage facilities within its then-existing jurisdiction and began the construction of an extensive system
of collector and interceptor sewers and treatment facilities. In subsequent years, voters have approved the
District’s annexation of a 270 square mile area of the lower Missouri River and lower Meramec River
watersheds in the County, and the District purchased various investor-owned or municipally-operated
systems serving areas of the County. The District’s service area now encompasses approximately 520
square miles, including all of the City’s approximately 66 square miles and approximately 454 square
miles (approximately 87%) of the County. A map showing the District’s current service area appears on
the back cover of this Official Statement. The current population served by the District is approximately
1.3 million.
The City of St. Louis, Missouri
The history of the City dates to 1764 when Pierre Laclède and Auguste Chouteau selected the site
as a fur trading post due in large part to its proximity to the confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri
Rivers. The City was incorporated in 1823, and its current boundaries were established in 1876, when
voters approved separation from the County and establishment of a home rule charter. The City is a
constitutional charter city not a part of any county, and exists under and pursuant to its Charter and the
laws of the State. The eastern boundary of the City is formed by the Mississippi River, and the City is
bordered on the north, west and south by the County. The City occupies approximately 66 square miles,
all of which lie within the service area of the District.
B-2
St. Louis County, Missouri
The County was formed by a proclamation of Governor William Clark on October 1, 1812, nine
years before Missouri attained statehood in 1821. In 1876, by vote of the entire county (which at the time
included both City and County), the City separated itself from the County. The City of Clayton, Missouri
is the County seat and located in the east central part of the County. Approximately sixty-six percent of
the land area of the County is occupied by 89 self-governing municipalities, containing approximately
two-thirds of the County’s population. The remaining unincorporated area comes under the direct
jurisdiction of the County government. The County is a constitutional charter county operating and
existing under its Charter and the laws of the State. The County covers an area of approximately 524
square miles, approximately 454 square miles of which lie within the service area of the District.
ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
Population
The City and the County are a part of the St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan Statistical
Area (the “St. Louis MSA”), comprised of: the City, the County, and the counties of Franklin, Jefferson,
Lincoln, St. Charles, and Warren in Missouri; the counties of Bond, Calhoun, Clinton, Jersey, Macoupin,
Madison, Monroe and St. Clair in Illinois; and a portion of the City of Sullivan located in Crawford
County, Missouri.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the population patterns for the City, the County, and the
St. Louis MSA have been as stated directly below.
City County St. Louis MSA(1)
Percentage Percentage Percentage
Year Population Change(2) Population Change(2) Population Change(2)
2000 348,189 - 1,016,315 - 2,698,687 -
2010 319,294 -8.30% 999,954 -1.61% 2,787,701 +3.30%
2011 319,294 0.00 999,961 0.00 2,793,811 +0.22
2012 319,387 +0.03 1,000,742 +0.08 2,796,903 +0.11
2013 318,459 -0.29 1,000,471 -0.03 2,800,154 +0.12
2014 317,395 -0.33 1,000,588 +0.01 2,804,862 +0.17
2015 315,878 -0.48 1,001,213 +0.06 2,808,330 +0.12
2016 312,389 -1.10 998,025 -0.32 2,807,002 -0.05
2017 307,866 -1.45 996,648 -0.14 2,805,850 -0.04
2018 302,838 -1.63 996,945 +0.03 2,805,465 -0.01
_____________________
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population for the years 2000 and 2010. Annual Estimates of the Resident
Population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 of the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division for the years
2010 through 2018
(1) Washington County, Missouri was removed from the St. Louis MSA statistics effective retroactively to
the 2010 Census.
(2) Percentages are rounded to the nearest hundredth.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
B-3
The largest municipalities within the District’s service area are as follows:
Population Population Population
Municipality 2010 2000 1990
St. Louis (City) 319,294 348,189 396,685
Florissant 52,158 50,497 51,206
Chesterfield 47,484 46,802 37,991
University City 35,371 37,428 40,087
Ballwin 30,404 31,283 21,816
Kirkwood 27,540 27,324 27,291
Maryland Heights 27,472 25,756 25,407
Hazelwood 25,703 26,206 15,512
Webster Groves 22,995 23,230 23,097
Ferguson 21,203 22,406 22,286
______________
Source: Missouri Census Data Center
Employment
The below table sets forth information relating to the average composition of non-farm
employment in the City and the County for the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.
City
Employment
County
Employment
Private Employment: 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010
Manufacturing 48,675 35,503 36,243 118,736 87,687 29,431
Agriculture 631 N/A N/A 5,072 6,931 279
Mining 234 N/A N/A 1,241 1,227 801
Construction 9,977 10,067 11,903 34,149 45,746 49,020
Transportation,
Communication and
Utilities
27,154 25,951 18,622 38,254 51,152 26,599
Wholesale Trade 19,399 15,224 15,691 42,228 46,961 28,334
Retail Trade 36,083 29,934 17,222 121,977 134,854 135,148
Finance, Insurance
and Real Estate
28,422 25,436 13,738 62,176 77,300 79,435
Services 99,547 109,830 134,345 215,147 279,413 342,429
Total Private
Employment
270,122 252,951 183,081 638,980 731,271 507,530
Governmental
Employment
51,100 47,092 32,051 53,783 59,826 55,402
Total 321,222 300,043 215,132 692,763 791,097 562,932
___________________
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Missouri State Census Data
Center
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
B-4
The below table sets forth the total labor force, number of employed and unemployed workers in
the City and the County, for 2009 through 2018.
City(1)
County(1)
Labor Force Labor Force
Year Employed Unemployed Total Employed Unemployed Total
2009 139,938 18,505 158,443 468,644 46,207 514,851
2010 145,882 18,956 164,838 487,113 47,758 534,871
2011 147,357 16,983 164,340 492,327 41,897 534,224
2012 146,972 13,896 160,868 491,787 34,282 526,069
2013 146,058 13,330 159,388 490,219 32,633 522,852
2014 148,789 12,411 161,200 499,383 31,066 530,449
2015 151,051 9,726 160,777 512,366 24,754 537,120
2016 152,364 8,686 161,050 516,815 22,604 539,419
2017 147,475 6,866 154,341 508,197 18,113 526,310
2018 147,800 5,878 153,678 509,324 15,801 525,125
_________________________________________
(1) Figures are annual averages based on estimates and are not seasonally adjusted.
Source: Missouri Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) as produced by Missouri Economic
Resource and Information Center (MERIC) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics
The below table sets forth unemployment rates for the City, County, State and the United States
of America (the “Country”) for 2010 through 2019.
Unemployment Rates
Fiscal
Year City(1)County(1)State (1)Country(2)
2010 12.3% 9.4% 9.3% 9.7%
2011 11.8 8.9 9.0 9.2
2012 9.7 6.9 7.0 8.5
2013 10.5 7.3 7.1 7.7
2014 9.6 6.9 6.6 6.7
2015 7.1 5.5 5.8 5.6
2016 5.9 4.6 4.9 4.9
2017 4.7 3.7 4.9 4.6
2018 4.3 3.3 3.5 4.1
2019 4.3 3.3 3.3 3.7
_______________________________________
(1) Source: District Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
(2) Source: United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Statistics from the
Current Population Survey, Seasonally Adjusted
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
B-5
Principal Employers
The below table sets forth the names and approximate number of employees of principal
employers within the St. Louis area as of April 2019.
St. Louis MSA
Principal Employers
Company
Nature of Business
Approximate Number
of Employees(1)
BJC HealthCare Healthcare 28,516
Mercy Healthcare 23,011
Washington University in St. Louis Education 17,442
The Boeing Company Manufacturing 14,566
SSM Health Healthcare 13,500
Scott Air Force Base Government 13,000
Schnuck Markets Inc. Retail 10,702
Archdiocese of St. Louis Religious 10,000
The City of St. Louis, Missouri Government 7,368
Saint Louis University Education 7,221
____________________
Source: District Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
citing to the St. Louis Business Journal’s Book of Lists 2019 (as of April 2019)
(1) Employees are for the St. Louis area, which includes several counties not served by the District.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
B-6
Per Capita Personal Income
The below table presents per capita personal income for the District, the State and the Country for
the years 2010 through 2019, the latest date for which such information is available.
District State(2)Country(3)
Year(1) Per Capita Personal
Income
Per Capita Personal
Income
Per Capita Personal
Income
2010 $44,822 $36,830 $40,517
2011 44,523 38,339 42,709
2012 44,323 40,124 44,581
2013 45,460 40,320 44,816
2014 46,237 41,767 47,036
2015 46,926 43,090 48,961
2016 47,749 44,324 49,861
2017 48,317 45,742 51,868
2018 48,087 47,740 54,420
2019 48,476 49,190 56,179
_______________________________________
Source: District Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 and
2018, citing to Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S.
Department of Commerce, and Missouri Economic Resource and Information Center (MERIC); and
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Per Capita Personal
Income in Missouri and Personal Income Per Capita, retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis, October 24, 2019.
(1) Figures are presented on a fiscal-year basis for the District and on a calendar-year basis for the
State and the Country.
(2) Figures for 2010-2018 are based on the seasonally adjusted average annual rate, average annual
frequency. Figures for 2019 are based on the seasonally adjusted annual rate, average semiannual
frequency as of on or about September 26, 2019.
(3) Figures for 2010-2018 are based on the seasonally adjusted average annual rate, average annual
frequency. Figures for 2019 are based on the seasonally adjusted annual rate, average semiannual
frequency as of on or about September 26, 2019.
***
APPENDIX C
Definitions and Summaries of Certain Provisions of the Bond Ordinance and the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
C-1
The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the Master Bond Ordinance adopted by
the District on April 22, 2004, as supplemented by the Ordinance adopted by the District on
November 14, 2019 authorizing the issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds and by the Ordinance adopted by
the District on November 14, 2019 authorizing the issuance of the Series 2019C Bonds (collectively,
the “Bond Ordinance”). This summary is not to be considered as a full statement of the provisions of
such documents and is qualified by reference to and is subject to the complete Bond Ordinance, copies of
which may be obtained from PFM Financial Advisors, LLC or Independent Public Advisors, LLC, as Co-
Financial Advisors to the District. After delivery of the Series 2019B Bonds and the Series 2019C Bonds,
copies of such documents will be available for inspection at the corporate trust office of the Paying Agent
in St. Louis, Missouri or at such other office as shall be designated by the Paying Agent.
DEFINITIONS
The definitions of certain words and terms used in this Official Statement with respect to the
Series 2019B Bonds and the Series 2019C Bonds are set forth below:
“Accumulation Payments” shall have the meaning ascribed therefor under the caption “Sinking
Fund – Debt Service Reserve Account” in this Appendix C.
“Additional Interest” means, for any period during which any Pledged Bonds are owned by a
Credit Facility Provider pursuant to a Credit Facility or Credit Facility Agreement, the amount of interest
accrued on such Pledged Bonds at the Pledged Bond Rate less the amount of interest which would have
accrued during such period on an equal Principal amount of Bonds at the Bond Rate.
“Annual Budget” means the annual budget of the District relating to the System (which shall
include all costs, obligations and expenses properly allocable to the System), as amended or supplemented
in accordance with established procedures of the District, adopted or in effect for a particular Fiscal Year.
“Bond Counsel” means any firm of nationally recognized bond counsel experienced in matters
relating to tax-exempt financing, appointed by the District.
“Bond Ordinance” means the Master Bond Ordinance adopted by the Board of Trustees of the
District on April 22, 2004, the Ordinance adopted by the Board of Trustees of the District on
November 14, 2019 authorizing the issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds and the Ordinance adopted by
the Board of Trustees of the District on November 14, 2019 authorizing the issuance of the Series 2019C
Bonds, as the same may from time to time be modified, supplemented or amended by Supplemental
Ordinances.
“Bond Rate” means the rate of interest per annum payable on specified Bonds other than
Pledged Bonds.
“Bond Register” means the books for the registration, transfer and exchange of Bonds
maintained by the Bond Registrar.
“Bond Registrar” means any bank or trust company designated as such by the District in the
Bond Ordinance with respect to any of the Bonds. Such Bond Registrar shall perform the duties required
of the Bond Registrar in the Bond Ordinance. UMB Bank, N.A. has been designated as Bond Registrar
for the Bonds; provided, however, that in connection with the issuance of any SRF Bonds, the District
shall appoint such separate Bond Registrar designated by the issuer of the SRF Bonds.
C-2
“Bondholder” means the registered owner of one or more Bonds.
“Bonds” means any revenue bonds authorized by and authenticated and delivered pursuant to the
Bond Ordinance, including the Series 2019B Bonds, the Series 2019C Bonds, any other Senior Bonds,
and any Subordinate Bonds.
“Business Day” means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or holiday on which the Paying
Agent, Bond Registrar or applicable Credit Facility Provider is scheduled in the normal course of its
operations to be open to the public for conduct of its banking operations.
“Charter” means the District’s Charter (Plan) approved by the voters of the City of St. Louis,
Missouri and St. Louis County, Missouri on February 9, 1954 and amended on November 7, 2000 and on
June 5, 2012, and as further amended from time to time in accordance with its terms.
“Chief Financial Officer” means the individual presently holding the office of
Secretary-Treasurer of the District or the individual presently holding the office of Assistant
Secretary-Treasurer of the District, and any successors who might hereafter hold either such office, and
any individual, body or authority to whom or to which may hereafter be delegated by law the duties,
powers, authority, obligations or liabilities of either such office.
“Chief Officer” means the individual presently holding the office of Executive Director or
Acting Executive Director of the District as appointed by the Governing Body and any successor who
might hereafter hold such office, and any individual, body or authority to whom or which may hereafter
be delegated by law the duties, powers, authority, obligations or liabilities of such office.
“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the applicable regulations of
the Treasury Department proposed or promulgated thereunder.
“Consultant” means an independent engineer or utility consultant or firm of independent
engineers or utility consultants experienced in the planning and management of wastewater systems and
having a nationally recognized reputation for such work.
“Continuing Disclosure Agreement” means (i) with respect to the Series 2019B Bonds and the
Series 2019C Bonds, the Disclosure Dissemination Agent Agreement dated as of December 1, 2019
between the District and Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., as Dissemination Agent, as amended
from time to time in accordance with its terms, in substantially the form attached as an exhibit to the Bond
Ordinance, and (ii) with respect to any other series of Bonds, the continuing disclosure agreement relating
to such series of Bonds, as amended from time to time in accordance with its terms.
“Costs,” with respect to any Project, means the total cost, paid or incurred, to study, plan, design,
finance, acquire, construct, reconstruct, renovate, repair, replace, equip, install, or otherwise develop such
Project and shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following costs and expenses relating to such
Project and the reimbursement to the District for any such items previously paid by the District:
(i) the cost of all lands, real or personal properties, rights, easements, and franchises
acquired;
(ii) the cost of all machinery and equipment, financing charges, and interest prior to
and during construction and for six months after completion of construction;
C-3
(iii) the cost of the acquisition, construction, reconstruction or installation of such
Project;
(iv) the cost of engineering, architectural, development and supervisory services,
fiscal agents’ and legal expenses, plans and specifications, and other expenses necessary or
incident to determining the feasibility or practicability of any Projects, administrative expenses,
and such other expenses as may be necessary or incident to any financing by Bonds;
(v) the cost of placing such Project in operation;
(vi) the cost of condemnation of property necessary for such construction and
operation;
(vii) Costs of Issuance; and
(viii) any other costs which may be incident to such Project.
“Costs of Issuance” means issuance costs with respect to the Bonds, including but not limited to
the following: underwriters’ spread (whether realized directly or derived through purchase of Bonds at a
discount below the price at which they are expected to be sold to the public), management fee and
expenses; Credit Facility fees and Reserve Account Credit Facility fees; counsel fees (including Bond
Counsel, underwriter’s counsel, District’s counsel, as well as any other specialized counsel fees incurred
in connection with the borrowing); financial advisor fees of any financial advisor to the District incurred
in connection with the issuance of the Bonds; rating agency fees; escrow agent and paying agent fees;
accountant fees and other expenses related to issuance of the Bonds; printing costs (for the Bonds and of
the preliminary and final official statement relating to the Bonds); and fees and expenses of the District
incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds.
“Credit Facility” means any letter of credit, insurance policy, guaranty, surety bond, standby
bond purchase agreement, line of credit, revolving credit agreement, or similar obligation, arrangement,
or instrument issued by a bank, insurance company, or other financial institution which is used by the
District to perform one or more of the following tasks: (i) enhancing the District’s credit by assuring
owners of any of the Bonds that Principal of and interest on such Bonds will be paid promptly when due;
(ii) providing liquidity for the owners of Bonds through undertaking to cause Bonds to be bought from the
owners thereof when submitted pursuant to an arrangement prescribed by a Series Ordinance; or
(iii) remarketing any Bonds so submitted to the Credit Facility Provider (whether or not the same Credit
Facility Provider is remarketing the Bonds). The term Credit Facility shall not include a Reserve Account
Credit Facility.
“Credit Facility Agreement” means an agreement between the District and a Credit Facility
Provider pursuant to which the Credit Facility Provider issues a Credit Facility and may include the
promissory note or other instrument evidencing the District’s obligations to a Credit Facility Provider
pursuant to a Credit Facility Agreement. The term Credit Facility Agreement shall not include a Reserve
Account Credit Facility Agreement.
“Credit Facility Provider” means any issuer of a Credit Facility then in effect for all or part of
the Bonds. The term Credit Facility Provider shall not include any Reserve Account Credit Facility
Provider. Whenever in the Bond Ordinance the consent of the Credit Facility Provider is required, such
consent shall only be required from the Credit Facility Provider whose Credit Facility is issued with
respect to the series of Bonds for which the consent is required.
C-4
“Debt Service Requirement” means the total Principal and interest coming due on Senior
Bonds, or all Bonds, as applicable, whether at maturity or upon mandatory redemption, in any specified
period; provided, however, that (i) Debt Service Requirement with respect to SRF Bonds shall mean the
net amount of Principal and interest coming due on such SRF Bonds after taking into account any so-
called “SRF Subsidy” (i.e., the amount of anticipated investment earnings which will accrue on any
reserve account relating to the SRF Bonds and which will reduce the debt service payments of the District
with respect to such SRF Bonds), and (ii) Debt Service Requirement with respect to Bonds issued as
“build America bonds” shall mean the net amount of Principal and interest coming due on such Bonds
after taking into account the anticipated receipt of U.S. Treasury Interest Subsidy payments on such
Bonds. If any Bonds Outstanding or proposed to be issued shall bear interest at a Variable Rate, the
interest coming due in any specified future period shall be determined as if the Variable Rate in effect at
all times during such future period equaled the average of the BMA Municipal Bond Index (formerly PSA
Municipal Bond Index) for the prior 5 calendar years, or any successor index as certified by a Financial
Advisor. With respect to any Bonds secured by a Credit Facility, Debt Service Requirement shall include
(i) any upfront or periodic commission or commitment fee obligations with respect to such Credit
Facility, (ii) the outstanding amount of any Reimbursement Obligation owed to the applicable Credit
Facility Provider and interest thereon, (iii) any Additional Interest owed on Pledged Bonds to a Credit
Facility Provider, and (iv) any remarketing agent fees. With respect to any Hedged Bonds, the interest on
such Hedged Bonds during any Hedge Period and for so long as the provider of the related Hedge
Agreement has not defaulted on its payment obligations thereunder shall be calculated by adding (x) the
amount of interest payable by the District on such Hedged Bonds pursuant to their terms and (y) the
amount of Hedge Payments payable by the District under the related Hedge Agreement and subtracting
(z) the amount of Hedge Receipts payable by the provider of the related Hedge Agreement at the rate
specified in the related Hedge Agreement; provided, however, that to the extent that the provider of any
Hedge Agreement is in default thereunder, the amount of interest payable by the District on the related
Hedged Bonds shall be the interest calculated as if such Hedge Agreement had not been executed. In
determining the amount of Hedge Payments or Hedge Receipts payable or receivable for any future
period which are not fixed throughout the Hedge Period (i.e., which are variable), such Hedge Payments
or Hedge Receipts for any period of calculation (the “Determination Period”) shall be computed by
assuming that the variables comprising the calculation (e.g., indices) applicable to the Determination
Period are equal to the average of the actual variables which were in effect (weighted according to the
length of the period during which each such variable was in effect) for the most recent twelve-month
period immediately preceding the date of calculation for which such information is available (or shorter
period if such information is not available for a twelve-month period). The Principal of and interest on
Bonds and Hedge Payments shall be excluded from the determination of Debt Service Requirement to the
extent that (1) the same were or are expected to be paid with amounts on deposit on the date of calculation
(or Bond proceeds to be deposited on the date of issuance of proposed Bonds) in the Project Fund, the
Sinking Fund or a similar fund for Subordinate Bonds or (2) cash or non-callable Government Securities
are on deposit in an irrevocable escrow or trust account in accordance with the provisions of the Bond
Ordinance (or a similar escrow or trust account for Subordinate Bonds) and such amounts (including,
where appropriate, the earnings or other increment to accrue thereon) are required to be applied to pay
Principal or interest and are sufficient to pay such Principal or interest.
“Debt Service Reserve Account” means the account by that name within the Sinking Fund
established in the Bond Ordinance.
“Debt Service Reserve Requirement” means an amount determined from time to time by the
District as a reasonable reserve for the payment of Principal of and interest on Senior Bonds which are not
Senior SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered Bonds. On the date of issue of a series of Senior Bonds, this
amount shall be the least of (a) 10% of the stated Outstanding Principal amount of the Senior Bonds
which are not Senior SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered Bonds, (b) the maximum annual Principal and
C-5
interest requirements (taking into account the anticipated receipt of U.S. Treasury Interest Subsidy
payments on the Series 2010B Bonds) on the Senior Bonds which are not Senior SRF Bonds or Senior
Uncovered Bonds (determined as of the issue date of each series of Senior Bonds which are not Senior
SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered Bonds), or (c) 125% of the average annual Principal and interest
requirements (taking into account the anticipated receipt of U.S. Treasury Interest Subsidy payments on
the Series 2010B Bonds) on the Senior Bonds which are not Senior SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered
Bonds (determined as of the issue date of each series of Senior Bonds which are not Senior SRF Bonds or
Senior Uncovered Bonds). The District may in its sole discretion change, reduce or increase this amount
from time to time by Supplemental Ordinance, but in no event may the District reduce this amount
(A) below the greater of (1) while the Series 2010B Bonds, the Series 2011B Bonds, the Series 2012A
Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds or the Series 2013B Bonds are Outstanding, the least of (x) the aggregate
of 10% of the stated Outstanding Principal amounts of the Series 2010B Bonds, the Series 2011B Bonds,
the Series 2012A Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds and the Series 2013B Bonds, (y) the aggregate of the
maximum annual Principal and interest requirements on the Series 2010B Bonds, the Series 2011B
Bonds, the Series 2012A Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds and the Series 2013B Bonds (taking into
account the anticipated receipt of U.S. Treasury Interest Subsidy payments on the Series 2010B Bonds)
(determined as of their respective issue dates), or (z) the aggregate of 125% of the average annual
Principal and interest requirements on the Series 2010B Bonds, the Series 2011B Bonds, the
Series 2012A Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds and the Series 2013B Bonds (taking into account the
anticipated receipt of U.S. Treasury Interest Subsidy payments on the Series 2010B Bonds) (determined
as of their respective issue dates), or (2) 50% of the average annual Debt Service Requirement with
respect to Senior Bonds (other than Senior SRF Bonds and Senior Uncovered Bonds) in the then current
or any succeeding Fiscal Year, and (B) unless each Rating Agency indicates in writing to the District that
such reduction will not, by itself, result in a reduction or withdrawal of its current Rating on the Senior
Bonds. If the aggregate initial offering price of a series of Bonds to the public is less than 98% or more
than 102% of par, such offering price shall be used in lieu of the stated Principal amount.
Notwithstanding anything in the Bond Ordinance to the contrary, (1) when all or a portion
(the “Refunding Portion”) of a series of Senior Bonds is issued to refund a portion of a series of
Outstanding Senior Bonds (the “Refunded Series”), the annual Principal and interest requirements to be
used for purposes of clauses (b), (c), (A)(1)(y) and (A)(1)(z) above shall not include both the Principal
and interest requirements of the Refunding Portion and the Refunded Series, but instead shall be, as
between the Refunding Portion and the Refunded Series, the one that, when added to the Principal and
interest requirements for all other Senior Bonds included in such computation, results in the greatest
aggregate amount; (2) in no event shall the deposit to the Debt Service Reserve Requirement for each
series of Senior Bonds exceed an amount permitted for a reasonably required reserve fund under the
Code; and (3) the Debt Service Reserve Requirement, if any, in connection with any Senior SRF Bonds or
any Subordinate Bonds, including Subordinate SRF Bonds, shall be as provided in the Series Ordinance
authorizing the issuance of such Senior SRF Bonds or such Subordinate Bonds.
“Depository” means the depository of each fund established under the Bond Ordinance, and any
successor depository of such fund hereafter designated by the District from time to time by Supplemental
Ordinance. The Depository for the Senior Bonds is U.S. Bank, N.A., St. Louis, Missouri.
“District” means The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, a body corporate, a municipal
corporation and a political subdivision duly created and existing under the laws of the State, and any
successor thereto.
“DTC” means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, or its nominee, or its
successors and assigns, or any other depository performing similar functions under the Bond Ordinance.
C-6
“Escrow Agent” means UMB Bank, N.A., St. Louis, Missouri, and any successors or assigns.
“Escrow Agreement” means the Escrow Trust Agreement dated as of December 1, 2019
between the District and the Escrow Agent, in substantially the form attached as an exhibit to the Bond
Ordinance.
“Escrow Fund” means the fund by that name established pursuant to the Escrow Agreement.
“Escrowed Securities” means the securities described in the Escrow Agreement which will be
delivered to and deposited in the Escrow Fund.
“Event of Default” means any of the events defined as such in the Bond Ordinance.
“Expenses of Operation and Maintenance” means all expenses reasonably incurred in
connection with the operation, maintenance and repair of the System, including salaries, wages, the cost
of materials and supplies, rentals of leased property, if any, management fees, payments to others for the
treatment and disposal of sewage, the cost of audits and periodic Consultant’s reports, Paying Agent’s and
Bond Registrar’s fees and expenses, payment of premiums for insurance required by the Bond Ordinance
and other insurance which the District deems prudent to carry on the System and its operations and
personnel, obligations (other than for borrowed money or for rents payable under capital leases) incurred
in the ordinary course of business, liabilities incurred by endorsement for collection or deposit of checks
or drafts received in the ordinary course of business, short-term obligations incurred and payable within a
particular Fiscal Year, other obligations or indebtedness incurred for the purpose of leasing (pursuant to a
true or operating lease) equipment, fixtures, inventory or other personal property, and, generally, all
expenses, exclusive of interest on the Bonds and depreciation or amortization, which under accounting
principles generally accepted for municipal utility purposes are properly allocable to operation and
maintenance; however, only such expenses as are reasonable and necessary or desirable for the proper
operation and maintenance of the System shall be included. “Expenses of Operation and Maintenance”
also includes the District’s obligations under any contract with any other political subdivision or public
agency or authority of one or more political subdivisions pursuant to which the District undertakes to
make payments measured by the expenses of operating and maintaining any facility which constitutes part
of the System and which is owned or operated in part by the District and in part by others.
“Financial Advisor” means an investment banking or financial advisory firm, commercial bank,
or any other Person who or which is appointed by the District for the purpose of passing on questions
relating to the availability and terms of specified types of Bonds and is actively engaged in and, in the
good faith opinion of the District, has a favorable reputation for skill and experience in underwriting or
providing financial advisory services in respect of similar types of securities.
“Fiscal Year” means the 12-month period used by the District for its general accounting
purposes, as it may be changed from time to time. The Fiscal Year at the time the Bond Ordinance was
adopted begins on July 1 and ends on June 30 of the immediately following calendar year.
“Fitch” means Fitch, Inc. or, if such corporation is dissolved or liquidated or otherwise ceases to
perform securities rating services, such other nationally recognized securities rating agency as may be
designated in writing by the District. At the time the Bond Ordinance was adopted, the notice address of
Fitch is One State Street Plaza, New York, New York 10004.
“Forecast Period” means a period of three consecutive Fiscal Years commencing with the Fiscal
Year in which any proposed Senior Bonds are to be issued.
C-7
“Governing Body” means the Board of Trustees of the District and any predecessor or successor
in office to such present body, and any Person to whom or which may hereafter be delegated by law the
duties, powers, authority, obligations, or liabilities of the present body, either in whole or in relation to the
System.
“Government Loans” means loans to the District by the government of the United States or the
State, or by any department, authority or agency of either, for the purpose of acquiring, constructing,
reconstructing, improving, bettering or extending any part of the System.
“Government Obligations” means (a) direct obligations of the United States of America for the
full and timely payment of which the full faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged or
(b) obligations issued by a person controlled or supervised by and acting as an instrumentality of the
United States of America, the full and timely payment of the principal of and the interest on which is fully
and unconditionally guaranteed as a full faith and credit obligation of the United States of America
(including any securities described in (a) or (b) issued or held in book-entry form on the books of the
Department of the Treasury of the United States of America), which obligations, in either case, (i) are not
subject to redemption or prepayment prior to maturity except at the option of the holder of such
obligations and (ii) may include U.S. Treasury Trust Receipts.
“Hedge Agreement” means, without limitation, (i) any contract provided by a Qualified Hedge
Provider known as or referred to or which performs the function of an interest rate swap agreement,
currency swap agreement, forward payment conversion agreement, or futures contract; (ii) any contract
provided by a Qualified Hedge Provider providing for payments based on levels of, or changes or
differences in, interest rates, currency exchange rates, or stock or other indices; (iii) any contract provided
by a Qualified Hedge Provider to exchange cash flows or payments or series of payments; (iv) any type of
contract provided by a Qualified Hedge Provider called, or designed to perform the function of, interest
rate floors, collars, or caps, options, puts, or calls, to hedge or minimize any type of financial risk,
including, without limitation, payment, currency, rate, or other financial risk; and (v) any other type of
contract or arrangement provided by a Qualified Hedge Provider that the District determines is to be used,
or is intended to be used, to manage or reduce the cost of any Bonds, to convert any element of any Bonds
from one form to another, to maximize or increase investment return, to minimize investment return risk,
or to protect against any type of financial risk or uncertainty.
“Hedge Contingency Payments” means amounts payable by the District pursuant to any Hedge
Agreement as termination payments, fees, expenses and indemnity payments.
“Hedge Payments” means amounts payable by the District pursuant to any Hedge Agreement,
other than Hedge Contingency Payments.
“Hedge Period” means the period during which a Hedge Agreement is in effect.
“Hedge Receipts” means amounts payable by any provider of a Hedge Agreement pursuant to
such Hedge Agreement, other than termination payments, fees, expenses and indemnity payments.
“Hedged Bonds” means any Bonds for which the District shall have entered into a Hedge
Agreement.
“Independent Certified Public Accountant” means a certified public accountant, or a firm of
certified public accountants, who or which is “independent” as that term is defined in Rule 101 and
related interpretations of the Code of Professional Ethics of the American Institute of Certified Public
C-8
Accountants, of recognized standing, who or which does not devote his or its full time to the District (but
who or which may be regularly retained by the District).
“Interest Payment Date” means each date on which interest is to become due on any Bonds, as
established in the Series Ordinance for such Bonds, and with respect to the Series 2019B Bonds and the
Series 2019C Bonds, shall be as specified in the Bond Ordinance.
“Investment Earnings” means all interest received on and profits derived from investments of
moneys in all funds and accounts of the District other than investments derived from or with respect to
(a) stormwater revenues, (b) all funds and accounts established in connection with SRF Bonds and
(c) obligations issued by the District on behalf of any of its subdistricts.
“Maximum Annual Debt Service” means the maximum amount of Debt Service Requirements
as computed for the then current or any future Fiscal Year.
“Net Operating Revenues” means Operating Revenues, after provision for payment of all
Expenses of Operation and Maintenance.
“Operating Revenues” means all income and revenue of any nature derived from the operation
of the System, including periodic wastewater billings, service charges, other charges for wastewater
service and the availability thereof (other than any special assessment proceeds), connection or tap fees
(whether accounted for as revenues or as contributed capital), net proceeds from business interruption
insurance, the principal of gifts, bequests, contributions, grants and donations available to pay debt
service of Bonds, and any amounts deposited in escrow in connection with the acquisition, construction,
remodeling, renovation and equipping of facilities to be applied during the period of determination to pay
interest on Bonds, but excluding (a) any profits or losses on the early extinguishment of debt or on the
sale or other disposition, not in the ordinary course of business, of investments or fixed or capital assets,
and local, state or federal grants or other moneys received for the payment of Expenses of Operation and
Maintenance, (b) local, state, or federal grants, loans (including Government Loans), capital improvement
contract payments, or other moneys received for capital improvements to the System, (c) Investment
Earnings, (d) any stormwater charges and (e) any property tax revenues.
“Other System Obligations” means obligations of any kind, including but not limited to,
Government Loans, general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, capital leases, installment purchase
agreements, or notes (but excluding Bonds and related obligations to Credit Facility Providers, Reserve
Account Credit Facility Providers and Qualified Hedge Providers), incurred or issued by the District to
finance or refinance the cost of acquiring, constructing, reconstructing, improving, equipping, bettering,
or extending any part of the System.
“Outstanding” means, when used in reference to Bonds, all Bonds which have been duly
authenticated and delivered under the Bond Ordinance, with the exception of (a) Bonds in lieu of which
other Bonds have been issued under agreement to replace lost, mutilated, stolen, or destroyed obligations,
(b) Bonds surrendered by the owners in exchange for other Bonds under the Bond Ordinance, and
(c) Bonds for the payment of which provision has been made in accordance with the Bond Ordinance.
“Paying Agent” means any bank or trust company, including any successors and assigns thereof,
authorized by the District in the Bond Ordinance to pay the Principal of, premium, if any, or interest on
any Bonds on behalf of the District. Such Paying Agent shall perform the duties required of the Paying
Agent in the Bond Ordinance. UMB Bank, N.A. is designated as Paying Agent for the Series 2010B
Bonds, the Series 2011B Bonds, the Series 2012A Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2013B
C-9
Bonds, the Series 2015B Bonds, the Series 2016C Bonds, the Series 2017A Bonds, the Series 2019B
Bonds and the Series 2019C Bonds.
“Payments Account” means the account by that name within the Sinking Fund established in the
Bond Ordinance.
“Permitted Investments” means obligations in which the District is permitted to invest moneys
of the District pursuant to applicable law, which have (or are collateralized by obligations which have) a
Rating by any Rating Agency which is equal to or greater than the third highest long-term Rating of such
Rating Agency, or which bears (or are collateralized by obligations which bear) the second highest short-
term Rating of such Rating Agency. As of the date of adoption of the Master Bond Ordinance,
obligations in which the District is permitted to invest proceeds of Bonds are described in Section 7.020
of the Charter.
“Person” or “person” means any individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability company,
joint venture, association, joint stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, body, authority,
government, or agency or political subdivision thereof.
“Pledged Bond” means any Bond purchased and held by a Credit Facility Provider pursuant to a
Credit Facility Agreement. A Bond shall be deemed a Pledged Bond only for the actual period during
which such Bond is owned by a Credit Facility Provider pursuant to a Credit Facility Agreement.
“Pledged Bond Rate” means the rate of interest payable on Pledged Bonds, as may be provided
in a Credit Facility or Credit Facility Agreement.
“Pledged Revenues” means Net Operating Revenues, Investment Earnings, Hedge Receipts, and
all moneys paid or required to be paid into, and all moneys and securities on deposit from time to time in,
the funds and accounts specified in the Bond Ordinance, but excluding any amounts required in the Bond
Ordinance to be set aside pending, or used for, rebate to the United States government pursuant to Section
148(f) of the Code, including, but not limited to, amounts in the Rebate Fund.
“Principal” means, with respect to a Current Interest Bond, the principal amount of such Bond.
“Principal Maturity Date” means each date on which Principal is to become due on any Bonds,
by maturity or mandatory sinking fund redemption, as established in the Series Ordinance for such Bonds.
“Project” means the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, betterment,
extension or equipping of the System, in whole or in part, with the proceeds of a series of Bonds,
including, but not limited to, the Series 2019B Project.
“Project Fund” means the fund by that name established in the Bond Ordinance.
“Purchase Contract” means (i) with respect to the Series 2019B Bonds and the Series 2019C
Bonds, the Purchase Contract between the District and the Underwriter of the Series 2019B Bonds and
the Series 2019C Bonds and, (ii) with respect to any additional Bonds, the Purchase Contract between the
District and the Underwriter relating to such series of Bonds.
“Qualified Hedge Provider” means an entity whose senior unsecured long term obligations,
financial program rating, counterparty rating, or claims paying ability, or whose payment obligations
under the related Hedge Agreement are absolutely and unconditionally guaranteed by an entity whose
senior unsecured long term obligations, financial program rating, counterparty rating, or claims paying
C-10
ability, are rated either (i) at least as high as the third highest Rating of each Rating Agency, but in no
event lower than any Rating on the related Hedged Bonds at the time of execution of the Hedge
Agreement, or (ii) in any such lower Rating which each Rating Agency indicates in writing to the District
will not, by itself, result in a reduction or withdrawal of its Rating on the related Hedged Bonds that is in
effect prior to entering into the Hedge Agreement. An entity’s status as a “Qualified Hedge Provider” is
determined only at the time the District enters into a Hedge Agreement with such entity and shall not be
redetermined with respect to that Hedge Agreement.
“Rating” means a rating in one of the categories by a Rating Agency, disregarding pluses,
minuses, and numerical gradations.
“Rating Agencies” or “Rating Agency” means Fitch and S&P or any successors thereto and any
other nationally recognized credit rating agency then maintaining a rating on any Bonds at the request of
the District. If at any time a particular Rating Agency does not have a rating outstanding with respect to
the relevant Bonds, then a reference to Rating Agency or Rating Agencies shall not include such Rating
Agency.
“Rebate Fund” means the fund by that name established in the Bond Ordinance.
“Record Date” means, with respect to any semiannual Interest Payment Date, the 15th day of the
calendar month immediately preceding such Interest Payment Date, and any record dates designated by
the District in a Series Ordinance.
“Refunded Bonds” means, collectively, those certain maturities of the Series 2012A Bonds, the
Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2013B Bonds and the Series 2015B Bonds, being refunded with the
proceeds of the Series 2019C Bonds.
“Reimbursement Obligation” means the obligation of the District to directly reimburse any
Credit Facility Provider for amounts paid by such Credit Facility Provider under a Credit Facility,
whether or not such obligation to so reimburse is evidenced by a promissory note or other similar
instrument.
“Renewal and Extension Fund” means the fund by that name established in the Bond
Ordinance.
“Replenishment Payments” shall have the meaning ascribed therefor in under the caption
“Sinking Fund – Debt Service Reserve Account” in this Appendix C.
“Reserve Account Credit Facility” means any letter of credit, insurance policy, line of credit, or
surety bond, together with any substitute or replacement therefor, if any, complying with the provisions of
the Bond Ordinance, thereby fulfilling all or a portion of the Debt Service Reserve Requirement.
“Reserve Account Credit Facility Agreement” means any agreement between the District and a
Reserve Account Facility Provider relating to the issuance of a Reserve Account Credit Facility, as such
agreement may be amended from time to time.
“Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider” means any provider of a Reserve Account Credit
Facility.
“Revenue Fund” means the fund by that name established in the Bond Ordinance.
C-11
“Senior Bonds” means the Series 2010B Bonds, the Series 2011B Bonds, the Series 2012A
Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2013B Bonds, the Series 2015B Bonds, the Series 2016C
Bonds, the Series 2017A Bonds, the Series 2018A Bond, the Series 2019B Bonds, the Series 2019C
Bonds and any Bonds, including Senior SRF Bonds and Senior Uncovered Bonds, issued with a right to
payment and secured by a lien on a parity with the Series 2010B Bonds, the Series 2011B Bonds, the
Series 2012A Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2013B Bonds, the Series 2015B Bonds, the
Series 2016C Bonds, the Series 2017A Bonds, the Series 2018A Bond, the Series 2019B Bonds and the
Series 2019C Bonds (except with respect to any Credit Facility which may be available only to one or
more series of Senior Bonds and except that Senior SRF Bonds and Senior Uncovered Bonds shall not be
secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account) pursuant to the Bond Ordinance.
“Senior Hedge Agreements” means Hedge Agreements relating to Hedged Bonds which are
Senior Bonds.
“Senior SRF Bonds” means SRF Bonds which are Senior Bonds.
“Senior Uncovered Bonds” means all series of Senior Bonds, other than Senior SRF Bonds,
with respect to which the District has specified pursuant to a Series Ordinance authorizing such series of
Senior Bonds that such series of Senior Bonds will not be secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account.
“Series 2019B Bonds” means the District’s Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B,
in the original aggregate Principal amount of $52,130,000 authorized under the Bond Ordinance.
“Series 2019B Project” means the project as particularly described in plans and specifications on
file from time to time with the District.
“Series 2019B Project Account” means the account by that name within the Project Fund
established in the Bond Ordinance
“Series 2019B Rebate Account” means the account by that name within the Rebate Fund
established in the Bond Ordinance.
“Series 2019B&C Costs of Issuance Account” means the account by that name within the
Project Fund established in the Bond Ordinance.
“Series 2019C Bonds” means the District’s Taxable Wastewater System Refunding Revenue
Bonds, Series 2019C, in the aggregate Principal amount of $276,260,000 authorized under the Bond
Ordinance.
“Series Ordinance” means a bond ordinance or bond ordinances of the District (which may be
supplemented by one or more bond ordinances) to be adopted prior to and authorizing the issuance and
delivery of any series of Bonds. The Master Bond Ordinance shall constitute a Master Bond Ordinance
for Senior Bonds and Subordinate Bonds. Such a bond ordinance as supplemented shall establish the date
or dates of the pertinent series of Bonds, the schedule of maturities of such Bonds, whether any such
Bonds will be capital appreciation bonds, the name of the purchaser(s) of such series of Bonds, the
purchase price thereof, the rate or rates of interest to be borne thereby, whether fixed or variable, the
interest payment dates for such Bonds, the terms and conditions, if any, under which such Bonds may be
made subject to redemption (mandatory or optional) prior to maturity, the form of such Bonds, and such
other details as the District may determine.
C-12
“Sinking Fund” means the fund by that name established in the Bond Ordinance.
“SRF Bonds” means such Bonds or other obligations issued in connection with the District’s
participation in the Missouri State Revolving Fund Program of the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources and the State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, which SRF Bonds
may be Senior SRF Bonds or Subordinate SRF Bonds.
“Standard and Poor’s” or “S&P” means S&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.,
or, if such corporation is dissolved or liquidated or otherwise ceases to perform securities rating services,
such other nationally recognized securities rating agency as may be designated in writing by the District.
At the time the Master Bond Ordinance was adopted, the notice address of S&P is 25 Broadway, New
York, New York 10004.
“State” means the State of Missouri.
“Subordinate Bonds” means Bonds, including Subordinate SRF Bonds, issued with a right to
payment from the Pledged Revenues and secured by a lien on the Pledged Revenues expressly junior and
subordinate to the Senior Bonds.
“Subordinate Hedge Agreements” means Hedge Agreements relating to Hedged Bonds which
are Subordinate Bonds.
“Subordinate SRF Bonds” means SRF Bonds which are Subordinate Bonds.
“Supplemental Ordinance” means (a) any Series Ordinance and (b) any modification,
amendment, or supplement to the Master Bond Ordinance other than a Series Ordinance.
“System” means the sanitary sewer system of the District, as it now exists and as it may be
hereafter added to, extended, improved and equipped, either from the proceeds of the Bonds or from any
other sources at any time hereafter, including, without limitation, (a) all sanitary sewers, all combined
sewers, all pumping stations, all wastewater treatment plants, and all equipment used in connection
therewith, all facilities for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage and wastewater, including
industrial wastes, and (b) all other facilities or property of any nature or description, real or personal,
tangible or intangible, now or hereafter owned or used by the District in the collection, treatment and
disposal of sewage. The District may own a partial interest in any sanitary sewer facility, the remaining
interest in which may be owned by or on behalf of a political subdivision of the State or any agency or
authority thereof. In case of such ownership, the rights and interests possessed by the District in such
facility shall be included as part of the System.
“Tax-Exempt Bonds” means any Bonds the interest on which has been determined, in an
opinion of Bond Counsel, to be excludable from the gross income of the owners thereof for federal
income tax purposes.
“Underwriter” means (i) with respect to the Series 2019B Bonds and the Series 2019C Bonds,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the original purchasers of the Series 2019B Bonds and
the Series 2019C Bonds, and (ii) with respect to any additional series of Bonds, the underwriter(s)
specified in the Series Ordinance authorizing such series of Bonds.
“U.S. Treasury Trust Receipts” means receipts or certificates which evidence an undivided
ownership interest in the right to the payment of portions of the principal of or interest on obligations
described in clauses (a) or (b) of the term Government Obligations, provided that such obligations are
C-13
held by a bank or trust company organized under the laws of the United States acting as custodian of such
obligations, in a special account separate from the general assets of such custodian.
“U.S. Treasury Interest Subsidy” means any interest subsidy paid by the United States
Treasury to the District.
“Variable Rate” means a rate of interest applicable to Bonds, other than a fixed rate of interest
which applies to a particular maturity of Bonds, so long as that maturity of Bonds remains Outstanding.
FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS
The District establishes or ratifies the establishment of the following funds and accounts, and the
moneys deposited in such funds and accounts shall be held in trust for the purposes set forth in the Bond
Ordinance:
(a) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Revenue Fund
(the “Revenue Fund”), to be held by the Depository for the account of the District.
(b) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Sinking Fund
(the “Sinking Fund”), to be held by the Depository for the account of the District, and within
said Sinking Fund a Payments Account and a Debt Service Reserve Account.
(c) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Renewal and Extension
Fund (the “Renewal and Extension Fund”), to be held by the Depository for the account of the
District.
(d) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Rebate Fund
(the “Rebate Fund”), to be held by the Depository for the account of the District, and within said
Rebate Fund a Series 2019B Rebate Account.
(e) The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater Project Fund
(the “Project Fund”), to be held by the Depository for the account of the District, and within
said Project Fund a Series 2019B Project Account and a Series 2019B&C Costs of Issuance
Account.
Each account listed above shall be held within the fund under which it is created. The District
reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to create additional subaccounts or to abolish any subaccounts
within any account from time to time.
In addition to the funds described above, the Escrow Agreement establishes the Escrow Fund to
be held and administered by the Escrow Agent in accordance with the provisions of the Escrow
Agreement.
Revenue Fund
The District shall deposit and continue to deposit all Operating Revenues in the Revenue Fund
from time to time as and when received. Moneys in the Revenue Fund shall be applied by the District
from time to time to the following purposes and, prior to the occurrence and continuation of an Event of
Default, in the following order of priority: (1) to pay Expenses of Operation and Maintenance, (2) to
deposit into the Sinking Fund the amounts required by the Bond Ordinance and described below under
C-14
the caption “FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS – Sinking Fund,” (3) to make Replenishment Payments to the
Debt Service Reserve Account and to pay to any Credit Facility Provider any amounts due under a Credit
Facility Agreement, including Additional Interest, in accordance with the Bond Ordinance and described
below under the caption “FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS – Sinking Fund – Debt Service Reserve
Account,” (4) to deposit into the Rebate Fund the amounts required by the Bond Ordinance, (5) to pay
any amounts due any Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider pursuant to the Reserve Account Credit
Facility Agreement, (6) to deposit the amounts required to be deposited into the funds and accounts
created by any Series Ordinance authorizing the issuance of Subordinate Bonds, for the purpose of paying
Principal of (whether at maturity, upon mandatory redemption or as otherwise required by a Series
Ordinance relating to Subordinate SRF Bonds) and interest on Subordinate Bonds, making Hedge
Contingency Payments under Senior Hedge Agreements, making Contingency Payments under Senior
Hedge Agreements, making Hedge Payments and making Hedge Contingency Payments under
Subordinate Hedge Agreements, and accumulating reserves for such payments, (7) to make Accumulation
Payments to the Debt Service Reserve Account in accordance with the Bond Ordinance and described
below under the caption “FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS – Sinking Fund – Debt Service Reserve
Account,” and (8) to pay any amounts required to be paid with respect to any Other System Obligations.
In addition to, and after, the deposits described above, the District may from time to time deposit
into the Renewal and Extension Fund any moneys and securities held in the Revenue Fund in excess of
45 days’ estimated Expenses of Operation and Maintenance.
Any money withdrawn from the funds and accounts described in clause (6) above relating to
Subordinate Bonds for use in making payments described in said clause (6) shall be released from the lien
of the Bond Ordinance. If at any time the amounts in any account of the Sinking Fund are less than the
amounts required by the Bond Ordinance, and there are not on deposit in the Renewal and Extension
Fund available moneys sufficient to cure any such deficiency, then the District shall withdraw from the
funds and accounts of the District relating to Subordinate Bonds and deposit in such account of the
Sinking Fund, as the case may be, the amount necessary (or all the moneys in such funds and accounts, if
less than the amount required) to make up such deficiency.
Sinking Fund
Payments Account-General. Sufficient moneys shall be paid in periodic installments from the
Revenue Fund into the Payments Account for the purpose of paying the Principal of and interest
(excluding Additional Interest) on the Senior Bonds as they become due and payable and for the purpose
of making Hedge Payments under Senior Hedge Agreements. Amounts held in the Payments Account
shall be used solely to pay interest (excluding Additional Interest) and Principal of the Senior Bonds as
the same become due and payable (whether at maturity or upon redemption) and to pay Hedge Payments
under Senior Hedge Agreements when due. Amounts held in the Payments Account shall not be used to
pay Additional Interest.
Interest. Except as otherwise provided in any Series Ordinance authorizing Senior SRF Bonds,
on or before the 30th day preceding each Interest Payment Date for Senior Bonds (or, in the case of
Senior Bonds bearing interest at a Variable Rate, on or before the Business Day preceding each Interest
Payment Date), the District shall deposit in the Payments Account an amount which, together with any
other moneys already on deposit therein and available to make such payment and, in the case of Senior
SRF Bonds, anticipated investment earnings on reserve funds held by a bond trustee relating to such
Senior SRF Bonds, is not less than the interest (excluding Additional Interest) coming due on such Senior
Bonds on such Interest Payment Date. The District shall also deposit and continue to deposit all Hedge
Receipts under Senior Hedge Agreements in the Payments Account from time to time as and when
received.
C-15
Principal. Except as otherwise provided in any Series Ordinance authorizing Senior SRF Bonds,
on or before the 30th day preceding each Principal Maturity Date for Senior Bonds, the District shall
deposit in the Payments Account an amount which, together with any other moneys already on deposit
therein and available to make such payment, is not less than the Principal coming due on such Senior
Bonds on such Principal Maturity Date.
Hedge Payments. On or before the 30th day preceding each payment date for Hedge Payments
under Senior Hedge Agreements, the District shall deposit in the Payments Account an amount which,
together with any other moneys already on deposit therein and available to make such payment, is not less
than such Hedge Payments coming due on such payment date.
Application of Moneys in Payments Account. No further payments need be made into the
Payments Account whenever the amount available in the Payments Account, if added to the amount then
in the Debt Service Reserve Account (without taking into account any amount available to be drawn on
any Reserve Account Credit Facility), is sufficient to retire all Senior Bonds then Outstanding and to pay
all unpaid interest accrued and to accrue prior to such retirement. No moneys in the Payments Account
shall be used or applied to the optional purchase or redemption of Senior Bonds prior to maturity unless:
(i) provision shall have been made for the payment of all of the Senior Bonds; or (ii) such moneys are
applied to the purchase and cancellation of Senior Bonds which are subject to mandatory redemption on
the next mandatory redemption date, which falls due within 12 months, such Senior Bonds are purchased
at a price not more than would be required for mandatory redemption, and such Senior Bonds are
cancelled upon purchase; or (iii) such moneys are applied to the purchase and cancellation of Senior
Bonds at a price less than the amount of Principal which would be payable on such Senior Bonds,
together with interest accrued through the date of purchase, and such Senior Bonds are cancelled upon
purchase; or (iv) such moneys are in excess of the then required balance of the Payments Account and are
applied to redeem a part of the Senior Bonds Outstanding on the next succeeding redemption date for
which the required notice of redemption may be given.
Debt Service Reserve Account. With respect to Senior Bonds which are not Senior Uncovered
Bonds, there shall be deposited into the Debt Service Reserve Account the amounts specified in Series
Ordinances with respect to Senior Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there shall be no deposit into
the Debt Service Reserve Account with respect to any SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered Bonds nor shall
the Debt Service Reserve Account secure any SRF Bonds or Senior Uncovered Bonds. After the issuance
of any Senior Bonds, the increase in the amount of the Debt Service Reserve Requirement resulting from
the issuance of such Senior Bonds shall be accumulated, to the extent not covered by deposits from Bond
proceeds or funds on hand, over a period not exceeding 61 months from the date of delivery of such
Senior Bonds in monthly deposits (“Accumulation Payments”), none of which is less than 1/60 of the
amount to be accumulated. The balance of the Debt Service Reserve Account shall be maintained at an
amount equal to the Debt Service Reserve Requirement (or such lesser amount that is required to be
accumulated in the Debt Service Reserve Account in connection with the periodic accumulation to the
Debt Service Reserve Requirement after the issuance of Senior Bonds or upon the failure of the District to
provide a substitute Reserve Account Credit Facility in certain events). There shall be transferred from
the Revenue Fund on a pro rata basis (1) to the Debt Service Reserve Account the amount necessary to
restore, as further described below, the amount of cash and securities in the Debt Service Reserve
Account to an amount equal to the difference between (a) the Debt Service Reserve Requirement (or such
lesser monthly amount that is required to be deposited into the Debt Service Reserve Account after the
issuance of Senior Bonds or upon the failure of the District to provide a substitute Reserve Account
Credit Facility in certain events) and (b) the portion of the required balance of the Debt Service Reserve
Account satisfied by means of a Reserve Account Credit Facility, and (2) to any Reserve Account Credit
Facility Provider the amount necessary to reinstate any Reserve Account Credit Facility which has been
drawn down. Whenever for any reason the amount in the Payments Account is insufficient to pay all
C-16
interest or Principal becoming due on the Senior Bonds within the next seven days (or, in the case of
Senior Bonds bearing interest at a Variable Rate, on the next Business Day), the District shall make up
any deficiency by transfers first from the Renewal and Extension Fund and second from the funds and
accounts of the District relating to Subordinate Bonds which are not Subordinate SRF Bonds. Whenever,
on the date that such interest or Principal is due, there are insufficient moneys in the Payments Account
available to make such payment, the District shall, without further instructions, apply so much as may be
needed of the moneys in the Debt Service Reserve Account to prevent default in the payment of such
interest or Principal, with priority to interest payments. Whenever by reason of any such application or
otherwise (other than required Accumulation Payments), the amount remaining to the credit of the Debt
Service Reserve Account is less than the amount then required to be in the Debt Service Reserve Account,
such deficiency shall be remedied by monthly deposits (“Replenishment Payments”) from the Revenue
Fund, to the extent funds are available in the Revenue Fund for such purpose after all required transfers
set forth above have been made.
The District may elect to satisfy in whole or in part the Debt Service Reserve Requirement by
means of a Reserve Account Credit Facility, subject to the following requirements: (A) the Reserve
Account Credit Facility Provider must have a credit rating issued by a Rating Agency not less than the
then current Rating on the related series of Senior Bonds (or, in the case of a series of Senior Bonds
supported by a Credit Facility, the underlying rating on such Senior Bonds); (B) the District shall not
secure any obligation to the Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider by a lien equal to or superior to the
lien granted to the related series of Senior Bonds; (C) each Reserve Account Credit Facility shall have a
term of at least one (1) year (or, if less, the remaining term of the related series of Senior Bonds) and shall
entitle the District to draw upon or demand payment and receive the amount so requested in immediately
available funds on the date of such draw or demand; (D) the Reserve Account Credit Facility shall permit
a drawing by the District for the full stated amount in the event (i) the Reserve Account Credit Facility
expires or terminates for any reason prior to the final maturity of the related series of Senior Bonds, and
(ii) the District fails to satisfy the Debt Service Reserve Requirement by the deposit to the Debt Service
Reserve Account of cash, obligations, a substitute Reserve Account Credit Facility, or any combination
thereof, on or before the date of such expiration or termination; (E) if the Rating issued by the Rating
Agency to the Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider is withdrawn or reduced below the Rating
assigned to the related series of Senior Bonds immediately prior to such action by the Rating Agency, the
District shall provide a substitute Reserve Account Credit Facility within sixty (60) days after such rating
change, and, if no substitute Reserve Account Credit Facility is obtained by such date, shall fund the Debt
Service Reserve Requirement in not more than twenty-four (24) equal monthly deposits commencing not
later than the first day of the month immediately succeeding the date representing the end of such sixty
(60) day period; (F) if the Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider commences any insolvency
proceedings or is determined to be insolvent or fails to make payments when due on its obligations, the
District shall provide a substitute Reserve Account Credit Facility within sixty (60) days thereafter, and, if
no substitute Reserve Account Credit Facility is obtained by such date, shall fund the Debt Service
Reserve Requirement in not more than twenty-four (24) equal monthly deposits commencing not later
than the first day of the month immediately succeeding the date representing the end of such sixty (60)
day period; and (G) the prior written consent of the Credit Facility Provider, as to the provider and the
structure of the Reserve Account Credit Facility, shall be obtained by the District. If the events described
in either clauses (E) or (F) above occur, the District shall not relinquish the Reserve Account Credit
Facility at issue until after the Debt Service Reserve Requirement is fully satisfied by the provision of
cash, obligations, or a substitute Reserve Account Credit Facility or any combination thereof. Any
amount received from the Reserve Account Credit Facility shall be deposited directly into the Payments
Account, and such deposit shall constitute the application of amounts in the Debt Service Reserve
Account. Repayment of any draw-down on the Reserve Account Credit Facility (other than repayments
which reinstate the Reserve Account Credit Facility) and any interest or fees due the Reserve Account
Credit Facility Provider under such Reserve Account Credit Facility shall be secured by a lien on the
C-17
Pledged Revenues subordinate to payments into the Sinking Fund and the Rebate Fund and payments to
any Credit Facility Provider securing Senior Bonds.
Any such Reserve Account Credit Facility shall be pledged to the benefit of the owners of all of
the Senior Bonds. The District reserves the right, if it deems it necessary in order to acquire such a
Reserve Account Credit Facility, to amend the Bond Ordinance without the consent of any of the owners
of the Bonds in order to grant to the Reserve Account Credit Facility Provider such additional rights as it
may demand, provided that such amendment shall not, in the written opinion of Bond Counsel filed with
the District, impair or reduce the security granted to the owners of Senior Bonds or any of them.
The Series 2019B Bonds and the Series 2019C Bonds are Senior Uncovered Bonds and
therefore are not secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account.
Renewal and Extension Fund
In addition to the deposits to be made to the Renewal and Extension Fund pursuant to the Bond
Ordinance, the District shall deposit in the Renewal and Extension Fund all termination payments
received under any Hedge Agreements. All sums accumulated and retained in the Renewal and Extension
Fund shall be used first to prevent default in the payment of interest on or Principal of the Senior Bonds
when due and then shall be applied by the District from time to time, as and when the District shall
determine, to the following purposes and, prior to the occurrence and continuation of an Event of Default,
in the order of priority determined by the District in its sole discretion: (a) for the purposes for which
moneys held in the Revenue Fund may be applied under the Bond Ordinance, (b) to pay any amounts
which may then be due and owing under any Hedge Agreement (including termination payments, fees,
expenses, and indemnity payments), (c) to pay any governmental charges and assessments against the
System or any part thereof which may then be due and owing, (d) to make acquisitions, betterments,
extensions, repairs, or replacements or other capital improvements (including the purchase of equipment)
to the System deemed necessary by the District (including payments under contracts with vendors,
suppliers, and contractors for the foregoing purposes), (e) to acquire Senior Bonds by redemption or by
purchase in the open market at a price not exceeding the callable price as provided and in accordance with
the terms and conditions of the Bond Ordinance, which Senior Bonds may be any of the Senior Bonds,
prior to their respective maturities, and when so used for such purposes the moneys shall be withdrawn
from the Renewal and Extension Fund and deposited into the Payments Account for the Senior Bonds to
be so redeemed or purchased and (f) for any other purpose of the District. Payments for the purposes set
forth in clause (e) of the preceding sentence are not “required payments” for purposes of the District’s
rate covenant set forth in the Bond Ordinance.
Rebate Fund
The District shall calculate, from time to time, as required in order to comply with the provisions
of Section 148(f) of the Code, the amounts required to be rebated (including penalties) to the United
States and shall deposit or cause to be deposited into the Rebate Fund any and all of such amounts
promptly following a determination of any such amount.
The District shall direct the Depository of the Rebate Fund to keep all moneys held therein
invested in Permitted Investments. To the extent and at the times required in order to comply with
Section 148(f) of the Code, the District may withdraw funds from the Rebate Fund for the purpose of
making rebate payments (including penalties) to the United States as required by Section 148(f) of the
Code. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Bond Ordinance, moneys in the Rebate Fund may
not be withdrawn from the Rebate Fund for any other purpose.
C-18
All earnings on investments held in the Rebate Fund shall be retained in the Rebate Fund and
shall become part of the Rebate Fund. Moneys held in the Rebate Fund, including the Investment
Earnings thereon, if any, shall not be subject to a pledge in favor of the owners of the Bonds under the
Bond Ordinance and may not be used to pay amounts due on the Bonds or under any Credit Facility
Agreements or Hedge Agreements or amounts required for the operation, maintenance, enlargement, or
extension of the System.
Project Fund
The District shall establish within the Project Fund a separate account for each Project. Except as
may be otherwise provided in the Series Ordinance authorizing the issuance of SRF Bonds, moneys in the
Project Fund shall be held by the Depository, or such other bank as may from time to time be designated
by the District, and applied to the payment of the Costs of the Project, or for the repayment of advances
made for that purpose in accordance with and subject to the provisions and restrictions set forth in the
Bond Ordinance. The District covenants that it will not cause or permit to be paid from the Project Fund
any sums except in accordance with such provisions and restrictions; provided, however, that any moneys
in the Project Fund not presently needed for the payment of current obligations during the course of
construction may be invested in Permitted Investments maturing not later than (i) the date upon which
such moneys will be needed according to a schedule of anticipated payments from the Project Fund filed
with the District by the Consultant in charge of the Project or (ii) in the absence of such schedule, 36
months from the date of purchase, in either case upon written direction of the District. Any such
investments shall be held by the Depository, in trust, for the account of the Project Fund until maturity or
until sold, and at maturity or upon such sale the proceeds received therefrom including accrued interest
and premium, if any, shall be immediately deposited by the Depository in the Project Fund and shall be
disposed of in the manner and for the purposes provided in the Bond Ordinance.
At such time as the Depository is furnished with a certificate from the Chief Financial Officer
stating that all Costs of Issuance have been paid, and in any case not later than 6 months after the date of
issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds and Series 2019C Bonds, the Depository shall transfer any remaining
proceeds of the Series 2019B Bonds in the Series 2019B&C Costs of Issuance Account to the
Series 2019B Project Account of the Project Fund and any remaining proceeds of the Series 2019C Bonds
in the Series 2019B&C Costs of Issuance Account to the Payments Account of the Sinking Fund.
Moneys in each separate account in the Project Fund shall be used for the payment or
reimbursement of the Costs of the Project for which such account was established as provided in the Bond
Ordinance.
All payments from the Project Fund shall be made upon draft except as provided in the Bond
Ordinance, signed by an officer of the District properly authorized to sign on its behalf, but before such
officer shall sign any such draft, there shall be filed with the Depository a requisition for such payment, in
substantially the form attached as an exhibit to the Bond Ordinance, stating each amount to be paid and
the name of the person to whom payment is due, and certifying:
(a) That an obligation in the stated amount has been incurred by the District and that
the same is a proper charge against the Project Fund and has not been paid and stating that the bill
or statement of account for such obligation, or a copy thereof, is on file in the office of the
District;
C-19
(b) That the signer has no notice of any vendor’s, mechanic’s, or other liens or rights
to liens, chattel mortgages, or conditional sales contracts which should be satisfied or discharged
before such payment is made; and
(c) That such requisition contains no item representing payment on account of any
retained percentages which the District is, at the date of any such certificate, entitled to retain.
In the event the United States government or government of the State, or any department,
authority, or agency of either, agrees to allocate moneys to be used to defray any part of the Cost of any
Project upon the condition that the District appropriate a designated amount of moneys for such purpose,
and it is required of the District that its share of such cost be deposited in a special account, the District
shall have the right to withdraw any sum so required from the Project Fund by appropriate transfer and
deposit the same in a special account for that particular Project; provided, however, that all payments
thereafter made from such special account shall be made only in accordance with the requirements set
forth in the Bond Ordinance.
Withdrawals for investment purposes only may be made by the Depository to comply with
written directions from the District without any requisition other than such direction.
For each series of Bonds, the District shall, when a Project has been completed, and may, when a
Project has been substantially completed, file with the Depository a certificate signed by the Chief
Financial Officer estimating what portion of the funds remaining in the separate account relating to such
Project will be required by the District for the payment or reimbursement of the Costs of such Project.
The Chief Financial Officer shall attach to his or her certificate a certificate of the supervising engineer
certifying that such Project has been completed or substantially completed, as the case may be, in
accordance with the plans and specifications therefor and approving the estimates of the Chief Financial
Officer with respect to the portion of funds in the account required for Costs of the Project. Such funds
that will not be used shall be (1) transferred to the Payments Account and used to redeem Bonds of the
related series on the next redemption date or to pay Principal of such Bonds on the next Principal
Maturity Date, or (2) transferred to the Payments Account and used to pay interest on Bonds of the related
series, provided that the District shall first obtain an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, under
existing law, the application of such moneys to pay interest on such Bonds (a) is allowed under State law,
and (b) if such Bonds are Tax-Exempt Bonds, will not, by itself and without more, adversely affect the
exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes of interest payable on such Bonds. When
all moneys have been withdrawn or transferred from any separate account within the Project Fund in
accordance with the provisions of the Bond Ordinance, such separate account shall terminate and cease to
exist.
DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS
All moneys in the funds and accounts established under the Bond Ordinance, except those funds
and accounts created by a Series Ordinance in connection with the issuance of SRF Bonds, shall be held
by the District in one or more Depositories qualified for use by the District. Uninvested moneys shall, at
least to the extent not guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, be secured to the fullest
extent required by the laws of the State for the security of public funds.
Moneys in the funds and accounts established under the Bond Ordinance, except those funds and
accounts created by a Series Ordinance in connection with the issuance of SRF Bonds, shall be invested
and reinvested in Permitted Investments bearing interest at the highest rates reasonably available (except
to the extent that a restricted yield is required or advisable under Section 148 of the Code) and containing
C-20
such maturities as are deemed suitable by the District; provided, however, that without the prior written
consent of the Credit Facility Provider, investments of moneys in the Debt Service Reserve Account shall
not have maturities extending beyond five years. Investment of moneys in funds and accounts created by
a Series Ordinance in connection with the issuance of SRF Bonds shall be as set forth in such Series
Ordinance.
Investment Earnings in each fund and account (except the Debt Service Reserve Account) shall
be retained therein. Investment Earnings from the investment of moneys in the Debt Service Reserve
Account shall be retained in the Debt Service Reserve Account at all times the balance is less than the
Debt Service Reserve Requirement; thereafter and at all times the balance of the Debt Service Reserve
Account is equal to or greater than the Debt Service Reserve Requirement, such Investment Earnings
shall be deposited in the Payments Account.
The Series Ordinance authorizing the issuance of any Subordinate Bonds shall specify any
maturity limitations and allocations of Investment Earnings on investments of moneys in the funds and
accounts relating to such Subordinate Bonds.
Moneys in each of such funds shall be accounted for as a separate and special fund apart from all
other District funds, provided that investments of moneys therein may be made in a pool of investments
together with other moneys of the District so long as sufficient Permitted Investments in such pool, not
allocated to other investments of contractually or legally limited duration, are available to meet the
requirements of the foregoing provisions.
All investments made under the Bond Ordinance shall, for purposes of the Bond Ordinance, be
valued at fair market value on the 45th day (or the next succeeding Business Day if such 45th day is not a
Business Day) prior to each Interest Payment Date. The valuation of the investment of moneys in funds
and accounts created by a Series Ordinance in connection with the issuance of SRF Bonds shall be as set
forth in such Series Ordinance.
MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEM
The District covenants that it will enforce reasonable rules and regulations governing the System
and the operation thereof, that it will operate the System in an efficient and economical manner and will
at all times maintain the System in good repair and in sound operating condition, that it will make all
necessary repairs, renewals, and replacements to the System, and that it will comply with all valid acts,
rules, regulations, orders, and directions of any legislative, executive, administrative, or judicial body
applicable to the System and the District’s operation thereof.
RATE COVENANT
See the heading “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE BONDS – Rate
Covenant.”
INSURANCE
With respect to the System, the District will carry adequate public liability, fidelity and property
insurance, such as is maintained by similar utilities as the System.
C-21
The District shall indemnify itself against the usual hazards incident to the construction of any
Project, and without in any way limiting the generality of the above, shall: (a) require each construction
contractor and each subcontractor to furnish a bond, or bonds, of such type and in amounts adequate to
assure the faithful performance of their contracts and the payment of all bills and claims for labor and
material arising by virtue of such contracts; and (b) require each construction contractor or the
subcontractor to maintain at all times until the completion and acceptance of the Project adequate
compensation insurance for all of their employees and adequate public liability and property damage
insurance for the full and complete protection of the District from any and all claims of every kind and
character which may arise by virtue of the operations under their contracts, whether such operations be by
themselves or by anyone directly or indirectly for them, or under their control.
All such policies shall be for the benefit of and made payable to the District and shall be on
deposit with the District; provided, however, the District may elect to be a self-insurer with respect to any
risks for which insurance is required under the Bond Ordinance. The cost of such insurance may be paid
as an Expense of Operation and Maintenance.
All moneys received for losses under any such insurance policies, except public liability policies,
are pledged by the District as security for the Bonds until and unless such proceeds are paid out in making
good the loss or damage in respect of which such proceeds are received, either by repairing the property
damaged or replacing the property destroyed or by depositing the same in the Renewal and Extension
Fund. Adequate provision for making good such loss and damage shall be made within 120 days from
the date of the loss. Insurance proceeds not used in making such provision shall be deposited in the
Renewal and Extension Fund on the expiration of such 120-day period. Such insurance proceeds shall be
payable to the District by appropriate clause to be attached to or inserted in the policies.
NO SALE, LEASE OR ENCUMBRANCE; EXCEPTIONS
Except as expressly permitted in the Bond Ordinance, the District irrevocably covenants, binds,
and obligates itself not to sell, lease, encumber, or in any manner dispose of the System as a whole or in
part until all of the Bonds and all interest thereon shall have been paid in full or provision for payment has
been made in accordance with the Bond Ordinance.
The District shall have and reserves the right to sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of any of the
property comprising a part of the System in the following manner, if any one of the following conditions
exists: (i) such property is not necessary for the operation of the System; (ii) such property is not useful
in the operation of the System; (iii) such property is not profitable in the operation of the System; or (iv)
the disposition of such property will be advantageous to the System and will not adversely affect the
security for the Bondholders. All proceeds of any such sale, lease or other disposition shall be deposited
in the Renewal and Extension Fund.
Prior to any such sale, lease or other disposition, there shall be filed with the District: (i) an
opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that such sale, lease or other disposition will not adversely affect
the extent to which interest on any Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income
tax purposes (provided that such opinion shall not be required if the Chief Financial Officer determines
that such portion of the System was not financed with the proceeds of any Tax-Exempt Bonds); and (ii)
an opinion of a Consultant expressing the view that such sale, lease or other disposition will not result in
any diminution of Net Operating Revenues to the extent that in any future Fiscal Year the Net Operating
Revenues and Investment Earnings will be less than (A) 125% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service
Requirement on all Senior Bonds to be Outstanding after such sale, lease or other disposition or (B) 115%
of the Maximum Annual Debt Service Requirement on all Bonds to be Outstanding after such sale, lease
C-22
or other disposition. In reaching this conclusion, the Consultant shall take into consideration such factors
as the Consultant may deem significant, including (i) anticipated diminution of Operating Revenues, (ii)
anticipated increase or decrease in Expenses of Operation and Maintenance attributable to the sale, lease
or other disposition, and (iii) reduction in the annual Debt Service Requirement attributable to the
application of the proceeds of such sale, lease or other disposition to the provision for payment of Bonds
theretofore Outstanding. Such sale, lease or other disposition may include a partial interest in a sanitary
sewer facility owned or to be owned in whole or in part by the District.
The District reserves the right to transfer the System as a whole to any political subdivision or
authority or agency of one or more political subdivisions of the State to which may be delegated the legal
authority to own and operate the System, or any portion thereof, on behalf of the public, and which
undertakes in writing, filed with the District, the District’s obligations under the Bond Ordinance,
provided that there shall be first filed with the District: (i) an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that
such sale will not adversely affect the extent to which interest on any Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded
from gross income for federal income tax purposes; and (ii) an opinion of a Consultant expressing the
view that such transfer will not result in any diminution of Net Operating Revenues to the extent that in
any future Fiscal Year the Net Operating Revenues and Investment Earnings will be less than (A) 125%
of the Maximum Annual Debt Service Requirement on all Senior Bonds to be Outstanding after such
transfer or (B) 115% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service Requirement on all Bonds to be Outstanding
after such transfer. In reaching this conclusion, the Consultant shall take into consideration such factors
as the Consultant may deem significant, including any rate schedule adopted by the transferee political
subdivision, authority, or agency.
Upon receipt of an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that such action will not adversely
affect the extent to which interest on any Tax-Exempt Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal
income tax purposes, the District may enter into such management contracts and sale/leaseback
agreements as the District may deem appropriate, and such management contracts and sale/leaseback
agreements shall not constitute a sale, lease or other disposition within the meaning of the Bond
Ordinance.
ENFORCEMENT OF CHARGES AND CONNECTIONS
Except as otherwise determined in accordance with District policy and provided that such action
or inaction will not materially impair the rights of the Bondholders, the District shall compel the prompt
payment of rates, fees, and charges imposed for service rendered on every lot or parcel connected with the
System, and to that end will vigorously enforce all of the provisions of any resolution or ordinance of the
District having to do with sanitary sewer connections and with sanitary sewer charges, and all of the
rights and remedies permitted the District under law. The District expressly covenants and agrees that
such charges will be enforced and promptly collected to the full extent permitted by law, including the
requirement for the making of reasonable deposits by customers of the System to the extent required by
the District and the securing of injunctions against the disposition of sewage or industrial waste into the
System by any premises delinquent in the payment of such charges.
None of the facilities or services afforded by the System will be furnished to any user without a
reasonable charge being made therefor.
C-23
ANNUAL BUDGET
The District agrees to adopt an Annual Budget for the System for each Fiscal Year in compliance
with the Charter and the rate covenants as stated in the Bond Ordinance.
BOOKS AND AUDITS
The District will install and maintain proper books, records and accounts for the System
according to standard accounting practices for the operation of facilities comparable to the System.
Annual audits will be made by a certified public accountant.
SENIOR AND SUBORDINATE LIEN BONDS
No Prior Lien Bonds nor Senior Bonds Except as Permitted in the Bond Ordinance
All Senior Bonds shall have complete parity of lien on the Pledged Revenues despite the fact that
any of the Senior Bonds may be delivered at an earlier date than any other of the Senior Bonds. The
District may issue Senior Bonds in accordance with the Bond Ordinance, but the District shall issue no
other obligations of any kind or nature payable from or enjoying a lien on the Pledged Revenues or any
part thereof having priority over or, except as permitted in the Bond Ordinance, on a parity with the
Senior Bonds.
Refunding Bonds
Any or all of the Senior Bonds may be refunded prior to maturity, upon redemption in accordance
with their terms, or with the consent of the owners of such Senior Bonds, and the refunding Bonds so
issued shall constitute Senior Bonds, if:
(a) The District shall have obtained a report from an Independent Certified Public
Accountant or a Financial Advisor demonstrating that the refunding will reduce the total debt
service payments on Outstanding Senior Bonds on a present value basis.
(b) As an alternative to, and in lieu of, satisfying the requirements of paragraph
(a) above, all Outstanding Senior Bonds are being refunded under arrangements which
immediately result in making provision for the payment of the refunded Bonds.
(c) The requirements described in paragraphs (e) and (g) below under the caption
“SENIOR AND SUBORDINATE LIEN BONDS – Senior Bonds”) are met with respect to
such refunding Bonds.
Senior Bonds
Bonds (including refunding Bonds which do not meet the requirements of the Bond Ordinance
described above under the caption “SENIOR AND SUBORDINATE LIEN BONDS – Refunding
Bonds”) may also be issued on a parity with the Outstanding Senior Bonds and any Senior Bonds
hereafter issued pursuant to a Series Ordinance, and the Bonds so issued shall constitute Senior Bonds, if
all of the following conditions are satisfied:
C-24
(a) There shall have been filed with the District either:
(i) a report by an Independent Certified Public Accountant to the effect that
the historical Net Operating Revenues and Investment Earnings for a period of 12
consecutive months of the most recent 18 consecutive months prior to the issuance of the
proposed Senior Bonds were equal to at least (A) 125% of the Maximum Annual Debt
Service Requirement on all Senior Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after
the issuance of the proposed Senior Bonds and (B) 115% of the Maximum Annual Debt
Service Requirement on all Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the
issuance of the proposed Senior Bonds, or
(ii) a report by a Consultant to the effect that the forecasted Net Operating
Revenues and Investment Earnings for each Fiscal Year in the Forecast Period are
expected to equal at least (A) 125% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service Requirement
on all Senior Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of the
proposed Senior Bonds and (B) 115% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service
Requirement on all Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of
the proposed Senior Bonds.
The report by the Independent Certified Public Accountant that is required by the Bond
Ordinance and described in subparagraph (i) above may contain pro forma adjustments to historical Net
Operating Revenues equal to 100% of the increased annual amount attributable to any revision in the
schedule of rates, fees, and charges for the services, facilities, and commodities furnished by the System,
adopted prior to the date of delivery of the proposed Senior Bonds and not fully reflected in the historical
Net Operating Revenues actually received during such 12-month period. Such pro forma adjustments
shall be based upon a report of a Consultant as to the amount of Operating Revenues which would have
been received during such 12-month period had the new rate schedule been in effect throughout such 12-
month period.
The report by the Consultant that is required by the Bond Ordinance and described in
subparagraph (ii) above may not take into consideration any rate schedule to be imposed in the future,
unless such rate schedule has been adopted by ordinance of the Governing Body. Such rate schedule
adopted by ordinance may contain, however, future effective dates.
(b) The District shall have received, at or before issuance of the Senior Bonds, a
report from an Independent Certified Public Accountant to the effect that the payments required
to be made into each account of the Sinking Fund have been made and the balance in each
account of the Sinking Fund is not less than the balance required by the Bond Ordinance as of the
date of issuance of the proposed Senior Bonds.
(c) Except with respect to Senior SRF Bonds, the Series Ordinance authorizing the
proposed Senior Bonds must either (a) state that the proposed Senior Bonds are Senior
Uncovered Bonds and thus not secured by the Debt Service Reserve Account or (b) require (i)
that the amount to be accumulated and maintained in the Debt Service Reserve Account be
increased to not less than 100% of the Debt Service Reserve Requirement computed on a basis
which includes all Senior Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of the
proposed Senior Bonds and (ii) that the amount of such increase be deposited in such account on
or before the date and at least as fast as specified in the Bond Ordinance.
(d) The Series Ordinance authorizing the proposed Senior Bonds must require the
proceeds of such proposed Senior Bonds to be used solely to make capital improvements to the
C-25
System, to fund interest on the proposed Senior Bonds, to acquire existing or proposed sanitary
sewer utilities, to refund other obligations issued for such purposes (whether or not such
refunding Bonds satisfy the requirements of the Bond Ordinance described above under the
caption “SENIOR AND SUBORDINATE LIEN BONDS – Refunding Bonds”), and to pay
expenses incidental thereto and to the issuance of the proposed Senior Bonds.
(e) If any Senior Bonds would bear interest at a Variable Rate, the Series Ordinance
under which such Senior Bonds are issued shall provide a maximum rate of interest per annum
which such Senior Bonds may bear.
(f) The Chief Officer shall have certified, by written certificate dated as of the date
of issuance of the Senior Bonds, that the District is in compliance with all requirements of the
Bond Ordinance.
(g) The District shall have received an opinion of Bond Counsel, dated as of the date
of issuance of the Senior Bonds, to the effect that the Series Ordinance and any related
Supplemental Ordinance authorizing the issuance of Senior Bonds have been duly adopted by the
District.
Subordinate Bonds
Bonds may also be issued on a subordinate basis to the Outstanding Senior Bonds and any Senor
Bonds hereafter issued pursuant to a Series Ordinance, and the Bonds so issued shall constitute
Subordinate Bonds, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) There shall have been filed with the District either:
(i) a report by an Independent Certified Public Accountant to the effect that
the historical Net Operating Revenues and Investment Earnings for a period of 12
consecutive months of the most recent 18 consecutive months prior to the issuance of the
proposed Subordinate Bonds were equal to at least (A) 125% of the Maximum Annual
Debt Service Requirement on all Senior Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately
after the issuance of the proposed Subordinate Bonds and (B) 115% of the Maximum
Annual Debt Service Requirement on all Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately
after the issuance of the proposed Subordinate Bonds, or
(ii) a report by a Consultant to the effect that the forecasted Net Operating
Revenues and Investment Earnings for each Fiscal Year in the Forecast Period are
expected to equal at least (A) 125% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service Requirement
on all Senior Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of the
proposed Subordinate Bonds and (B) 115% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service
Requirement on all Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of
the proposed Subordinate Bonds.
The report by the Independent Certified Public Accountant that is required by the Bond
Ordinance and described in subparagraph (i) above may contain pro forma adjustments to historical Net
Operating Revenues equal to 100% of the increased annual amount attributable to any revision in the
schedule of rates, fees, and charges for the services, facilities, and commodities furnished by the System,
adopted prior to the date of delivery of the proposed Subordinate Bonds and not fully reflected in the
historical Net Operating Revenues actually received during such 12-month period. Such pro forma
adjustments shall be based upon a report of a Consultant as to the amount of Operating Revenues which
C-26
would have been received during such 12-month period had the new rate schedule been in effect
throughout such 12-month period.
The report by the Consultant that is required by the Bond Ordinance and described in
subparagraph (ii) above may not take into consideration any rate schedule to be imposed in the future,
unless such rate schedule has been adopted by ordinance of the Governing Body. Such rate schedule
adopted by ordinance may contain, however, future effective dates.
(b) The Series Ordinance authorizing the Subordinate Bonds shall provide that such
Subordinate Bonds shall be junior and subordinate in lien and right of payment to all Senior
Bonds Outstanding at any time.
(c) The Series Ordinance authorizing the Subordinate Bonds shall establish funds
and accounts for the moneys to be used to pay debt service on the Subordinate Bonds, to pay
Hedge Payments under Subordinate Hedge Agreements, and to provide reserves therefor.
(d) The requirements of the Bond Ordinance described in paragraphs (d), (e) and (g)
above under the caption “SENIOR AND SUBORDINATE LIEN BONDS – Senior Bonds” are
met with respect to such Subordinate Bonds (as if such Bonds constituted Senior Bonds).
In the event of any insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings, and any receivership, liquidation,
reorganization, or other similar proceedings in connection therewith, relative to the District or to its
creditors, as such, or to its property, and in the event of any proceedings for voluntary liquidation,
dissolution, or other winding up of the District, whether or not involving insolvency or bankruptcy, the
owners of all Senior Bonds then Outstanding and related Qualified Hedge Providers shall be entitled to
receive payment in full of all Principal and interest due on all such Senior Bonds in accordance with the
provisions of the Bond Ordinance and related Hedge Payments in accordance with the provisions of the
Senior Hedge Agreements before the owners of the Subordinate Bonds or related Qualified Hedge
Providers are entitled to receive any payment from the Pledged Revenues or the amounts held in the funds
and accounts created under the Bond Ordinance on account of Principal of, premium, if any, or interest on
the Subordinate Bonds or Hedge Payments under Subordinate Hedge Agreements.
In the event that any of the Subordinate Bonds are declared due and payable before their
expressed maturities because of the occurrence of an Event of Default (under circumstances when the
provisions of preceding paragraph are not be applicable), no owners of Subordinate Bonds or related
Qualified Hedge Providers may receive any accelerated payment from the Pledged Revenues or the
amounts held in the funds and accounts created under the Bond Ordinance of Principal of, premium, if
any, or interest on the Subordinate Bonds or Hedge Payments under Subordinate Hedge Agreements,
until the owners of all Senior Bonds Outstanding and related Qualified Hedge Providers have received
timely payment when due of all Principal of and interest on all such Senior Bonds and all Hedge
Payments under related Senior Hedge Agreements.
If any Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing (under circumstances when the
provisions of second preceding paragraph are not applicable), the owners of all Senior Bonds then
Outstanding and related Qualified Hedge Providers shall be entitled to receive payment in full of all
Principal and interest then due on all such Senior Bonds and all Hedge Payments under related Senior
Hedge Agreements before the owners of the Subordinate Bonds or related Qualified Hedge Providers are
entitled to receive any Payment from the Pledged Revenues or the amounts held in the funds and accounts
created under the Bond Ordinance of Principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Subordinate Bonds
or Hedge Payments under Subordinate Hedge Agreements.
C-27
The obligations of the District to pay to the owners of the Subordinate Bonds the Principal of,
premium, if any, and interest thereon in accordance with their terms and to pay Hedge Payments to
related Qualified Hedge Providers in accordance with the terms of the Subordinate Hedge Agreements
shall be unconditional and absolute. Nothing in the Bond Ordinance shall prevent the owners of the
Subordinate Bonds or related Qualified Hedge Providers from exercising all remedies otherwise permitted
by applicable law or under the Bond Ordinance or the Subordinate Hedge Agreements upon default
thereunder, subject to the rights contained in the Bond Ordinance of the owners of Senior Bonds and
related Qualified Hedge Providers to receive cash, property, or securities otherwise payable or deliverable
to the owners of the Subordinate Bonds and related Qualified Hedge Providers, and any Series Ordinance
authorizing Subordinate Bonds may provide that, insofar as a trustee or paying agent for the Subordinate
Bonds is concerned, the foregoing provisions shall not prevent the application by such trustee or paying
agent of any moneys deposited with such trustee or paying agent for the purpose of the payment of or on
account of the Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on such Subordinate Bonds and Hedge
Payments under Subordinate Hedge Agreements if such trustee or paying agent did not have knowledge
at the time of such application that such payment was prohibited by the foregoing provisions.
Any series of Subordinate Bonds and related Subordinate Hedge Agreements may have such rank
or priority with respect to any other series of Subordinate Bonds and related Subordinate Hedge
Agreements as may be provided in the Series Ordinance authorizing such series of Subordinate Bonds
and may contain such other provisions as are not in conflict with the provisions of the Bond Ordinance.
Accession of Subordinate Bonds and Related Subordinate Hedge Agreements to Senior Status
By proceedings authorizing all or any Subordinate Bonds, the District may provide for the
accession of such Subordinate Bonds and related Subordinate Hedge Agreements to the status of
complete parity with the Senior Bonds and related Senior Hedge Agreements if, as of the date of
accession, the conditions of the Bond Ordinance described in subparagraphs (a), (e) and (f) above under
the caption “SENIOR AND SUBORDINATE LIEN BONDS – Senior Bonds” are satisfied, on a basis
which includes all Outstanding Senior Bonds and such Subordinate Bonds, and if on the date of
accession:
(a) the Debt Service Reserve Account contains an amount equal to the Debt Service
Reserve Requirement computed on a basis which includes all Outstanding Senior Bonds and such
Subordinate Bonds (but which excludes, in the case of both Outstanding Senior Bonds and such
Subordinate Bonds, any SRF Bonds and Senior Uncovered Bonds); and
(b) the Payments Account contains the amount which would have been required to
be accumulated therein on the date of accession if the Subordinate Bonds had originally been
issued as Senior Bonds.
Credit Facilities and Hedge Agreements
In connection with the issuance of any Bonds under the Bond Ordinance, the District may obtain
or cause to be obtained one or more Credit Facilities providing for payment of all or a portion of the
Principal of, premium, if any, or interest due or to become due on such Bonds, providing for the purchase
of such Bonds by the Credit Facility Provider, or providing funds for the purchase of such Bonds by the
District. In connection therewith the District shall enter into Credit Facility Agreements with such Credit
Facility Providers providing for, among other things, (i) the payment of fees and expenses to such Credit
Facility Providers for the issuance of such Credit Facilities; (ii) the terms and conditions of such Credit
Facilities and the Bonds affected thereby; and (iii) the security, if any, to be provided for the issuance of
such Credit Facilities. The District may secure any Credit Facility by an agreement providing for the
C-28
purchase of the Bonds secured thereby with such adjustments to the rate of interest, method of
determining interest, maturity, or redemption provisions as are specified by the District in the applicable
Series Ordinance. The District may in a Credit Facility Agreement agree to directly reimburse such
Credit Facility Provider for amounts paid under the terms of such Credit Facility, together with interest
thereon; provided, however, that no Reimbursement Obligation shall be created for purposes of the Bond
Ordinance until amounts are paid under such Credit Facility. Any such Reimbursement Obligation shall
be deemed to be a part of the Bonds to which the Credit Facility relates which gave rise to such
Reimbursement Obligation, and references to Principal and interest payments with respect to such Bonds
shall include Principal and interest (except for Additional Interest and Principal amortization requirements
with respect to the Reimbursement Obligation that are more accelerated than the amortization
requirements for the related Bonds, without acceleration) due on the Reimbursement Obligation incurred
as a result of payment of such Bonds with the Credit Facility. All other amounts payable under the Credit
Facility Agreement (including any Additional Interest and Principal amortization requirements with
respect to the Reimbursement obligation that are more accelerated than the amortization requirements for
the related Bonds, without acceleration) shall be fully subordinate to the payment of debt service on the
related class of Bonds. Any such Credit Facility shall be for the benefit of and secure such Bonds or
portion thereof as specified in the applicable Series Ordinance.
In connection with the issuance of any Bonds or at any time thereafter so long as such Bonds
remain Outstanding, the District may enter into Hedge Agreements with Qualified Hedge Providers, and
no other providers, with respect to any Bonds. The District shall authorize the execution, delivery, and
performance of each Hedge Agreement in a Supplemental Ordinance, in which it shall designate the
related Hedged Bonds. The District’s obligation to pay Hedge Payments may be secured by a pledge of,
and lien on, the Pledged Revenues on a parity with the lien created by the Bond Ordinance to secure the
related Hedged Bonds, or may be subordinated in lien and right of payment to the payment of the Bonds,
as determined by the District.
Other Obligations
The District expressly reserves the right, at any time, to adopt one or more other bond ordinances
and reserves the right, at any time, to issue any other obligations not secured by the amounts pledged
under the Bond Ordinance.
DEFAULT AND ENFORCEMENT
Events of Default
An “Event of Default” shall mean the occurrence of any one or more of the following:
(a) failure to pay the Principal or redemption price of any Bond when the same shall become
due and payable, either at maturity or by proceedings for redemption or otherwise; or
(b) failure to pay any installment of interest on any Bond when and as such installment of
interest shall become due and payable; or
(c) default shall be made by the District in the performance of any obligation in respect to the
Debt Service Reserve Account and such default shall continue for 30 days thereafter; or
(d) the District shall (1) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they
become due, (2) file a petition in bankruptcy or take advantage of any insolvency act, (3) make an
C-29
assignment for the benefit of its creditors, (4) consent to the appointment of a receiver of itself or of the
whole or any substantial part of its property, or (5) be adjudicated a bankrupt; or
(e) a court of competent jurisdiction shall enter an order, judgment, or decree appointing a
receiver of the System or any of the funds or accounts established in the Bond Ordinance, or of the whole
or any substantial part of the District’s property, or approving a petition seeking reorganization of the
District under the federal bankruptcy laws or any other applicable law or statute of the United States of
America or the State, and such order, judgment, or decree shall not be vacated or set aside or stayed
within 60 days from the date of the entry thereof; or
(f) under the provisions of any other law for the relief or aid of debtors, any court of
competent jurisdiction shall assume custody or control of any of the funds or accounts established in the
Bond Ordinance, or of the whole or any substantial part of the District’s property, and such custody or
control shall not be terminated or stayed within 60 days from the date of assumption of such custody or
control; or
(g) the District shall fail to perform any of the other covenants, conditions, agreements, and
provisions contained in the Bonds or in the Bond Ordinance (other than the covenant in the Bond
Ordinance relating to continuing disclosure) on the part of the District to be performed, and such failure
shall continue for 90 days after written notice specifying such failure and requiring it to be remedied shall
have been given to the District by the owners of not less than, or a Credit Facility Provider securing not
less than, 25% in aggregate Principal of the Bonds then Outstanding; provided, however, if the failure
stated in such notice can be corrected, but not within such 90-day period, the District shall have 180 days
after such written notice to cure such default if corrective action is instituted by the District within such
90-day period and diligently pursued until the failure is corrected; or
(h) (1) an Event of Default relating to the non-payment of the Principal or redemption price
or installment of interest shall occur under any Series Ordinance or (2) an Event of Default, other than as
described in clause (h)(1) shall occur under any Series Ordinance; or
(i) failure by any Credit Facility Provider to pay the purchase price of Bonds under any
Credit Facility then in effect; or
(j) delivery to the District by a Credit Facility Provider of written notice stating that an
“Event of Default” has occurred under any Credit Facility Agreement; or
(k) delivery to the District by a Qualified Hedge Provider of written notice stating that an
“event of default” has occurred under any Senior Hedge Agreement.
Remedies
Upon the happening and continuance of any Event of Default described in clauses (a), (b) and
(h)(1) above under the caption “Events of Default” as to any Senior Bond, then and in every such case,
upon the written declaration of the owners of more than 50% in aggregate Principal of all Senior Bonds
then Outstanding or upon the written demand of a Credit Facility Provider securing more than 50% in
aggregate Principal of the Senior Bonds then Outstanding, the Principal of all Senior Bonds then
Outstanding shall become due and payable immediately, together with the interest accrued thereon to the
date of such acceleration, at the place of payment provided therein, and interest on the Senior Bonds shall
cease to accrue after the date of such acceleration, anything in the Bond Ordinance or in the Senior Bonds
to the contrary notwithstanding. With respect to any Senior Bonds secured by a Credit Facility, only the
C-30
applicable Credit Facility Provider may give written demand to declare the Principal of and accrued
interest on such Senior Bonds to be immediately due and payable.
Upon the happening and continuance of any Event of Default described in clause (i) above under
the caption “Events of Default”, then and in every such case, upon the written declaration of the owners
of more than 50% in aggregate Principal of the Senior Bonds of the affected series then Outstanding, the
Principal of all Senior Bonds of the affected series then Outstanding shall become due and payable
immediately, together with the interest accrued thereon to the date of such acceleration, at the place of
payment provided therein, and interest on the Senior Bonds of the affected series shall cease to accrue
after the date of such acceleration, anything in the Bond Ordinance or in the Senior Bonds of the affected
series to the contrary notwithstanding.
Upon the happening and continuance of any Event of Default described in clause (k) above under
the caption “Events of Default”, then and in every such case, upon the written declaration of the owners
of more than 50% in aggregate Principal of the Senior Bonds of the affected series then Outstanding, the
Principal of all Senior Bonds of the affected series then Outstanding shall become due and payable
immediately, together with the interest accrued thereon to the date of such acceleration, at the place of
payment provided therein, and interest on the Senior Bonds of the affected series shall cease to accrue
after the date of such acceleration, anything in the Bond Ordinance or in the Senior Bonds of the affected
series to the contrary notwithstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any Senior Bonds
secured by a Credit Facility, only the applicable Credit Facility Provider may give written demand to
declare the Principal of and accrued interest on such Senior Bonds to be immediately due and payable.
Upon any declaration of acceleration under the Bond Ordinance, the District shall immediately
draw under the applicable Credit Facility to the extent permitted by the terms thereof that amount which,
together with other amounts on deposit under the Bond Ordinance, shall be sufficient to pay the Principal
of and accrued interest on the related Senior Bonds so accelerated.
The above provisions, however, are subject to the condition that if, after the Principal of the
Senior Bonds shall have been so accelerated, all arrears of interest upon such Bonds, and interest on
overdue installments of interest at the rate on such Bonds, shall have been paid by the District, the
Principal of such Bonds which has matured (except the Principal of any Bonds not then due by their terms
except as provided above) have been paid, and the District shall also have performed all other things in
respect to which it may have been in default under the Bond Ordinance, and, if applicable, each Credit
Facility Provider shall have reinstated the Credit Facility in the full amount available to be drawn
thereunder by written notice to the District, then, in every such case, the owners of more than 50% in
aggregate Principal of all Senior Bonds then Outstanding by written notice to the District, may waive
such default and its consequences and such waiver shall be binding upon the District and upon all owners
of the Bonds; but no such waiver shall extend to or affect any subsequent default or impair any right or
remedy consequent thereon. Notwithstanding the foregoing, as long as the applicable Credit Facility
Provider shall not then continue to dishonor draws under the Credit Facility, no Event of Default with
respect to the related Senior Bonds may be waived without the express written consent of such Credit
Facility Provider.
Upon the happening and continuance of any Event of Default, any owner of Senior Bonds then
Outstanding affected by the Event of Default or a duly authorized agent for such owner may proceed to
protect and enforce its rights and the rights of the owners of Senior Bonds by such of the following
remedies as it shall deem most effectual to protect and enforce such rights:
(1) by mandamus or other suit, action, or proceeding at law or in equity, enforce all
rights of the owners of Senior Bonds, including the right to require the appointment of a receiver
C-31
for the System or to exercise any other right or remedy provided by the Constitution and laws of
the State and the Charter and to require the District to perform any other covenant or agreement
contained in the Bond Ordinance;
(2) by action or suit in equity, require the District to account as if it were the trustee
of an express trust for the owners of the Senior Bonds;
(3) by action or suit in equity, enjoin any acts or things which may be unlawful or in
violation of the rights of the owners of the Senior Bonds; or
(4) by pursuing any other available remedy at law or in equity or by statute.
In the enforcement of any remedy under the Bond Ordinance, owners of Senior Bonds shall be
entitled to sue for, enforce payment on, and receive any and all amounts then or during any default
becoming, and at any time remaining, due from the District for Principal, redemption premium, interest,
or otherwise, under any provision of the Bond Ordinance or of the Senior Bonds, and unpaid, with
interest on overdue payments at the rate or rates of interest specified in such Senior Bonds, together with
any and all costs and expenses of collection and of all proceedings under the Bond Ordinance and under
such Senior Bonds, without prejudice to any other right or remedy of the owners of Senior Bonds, and to
recover and enforce a judgment or decree against the District for any portion of such amounts remaining
unpaid, with interest, costs, and expenses, and to collect from any moneys available for such purpose, in
any manner provided by law, the moneys adjudged or decreed to be payable.
If no Senior Bonds are then Outstanding or if no Event of Default with respect to any Senior
Bonds has then occurred and is continuing, in the enforcement of any remedy under the Bond Ordinance,
owners of Subordinate Bonds shall be entitled to sue for, enforce payment on, and receive any and all
amounts then or during any default becoming, and at any time remaining, due from the District for
Principal, redemption premium, interest, or otherwise, under any provision of the Bond Ordinance or of
the Subordinate Bonds, and unpaid, with interest on overdue payments at the rate or rates of interest
specified in such Subordinate Bonds, together with any and all costs and expenses of collection and of all
proceedings under the Bond Ordinance and under such Subordinate Bonds, without prejudice to any other
right or remedy of the owners of Subordinate Bonds, and to recover and enforce a judgment or decree
against the District for any portion of such amounts remaining unpaid, with interest, costs, and expenses,
and to collect from any moneys available for such purpose, in any manner provided by law, the moneys
adjudged or decreed to be payable. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to diminish the rights of the
owners of Subordinate Bonds described in clauses (1) through (4) above.
No remedy conferred upon or reserved to the Bondholders is intended to be exclusive of any
other remedy or remedies, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to
every other remedy given under the Bond Ordinance or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by
statute.
Application of Moneys After Default
If an Event of Default occurs and shall not have been remedied, the District or a receiver
appointed for the purpose shall apply all Pledged Revenues (except with respect to the Debt Service
Reserve Account which does not secure Subordinate Bonds, Senior SRF Bonds and Senior Uncovered
Bonds) as follows and in the following order of priority:
C-32
(a) Expenses of Receiver and Paying Agent and Bond Registrar - to the payment of
the reasonable and proper charges, expenses, and liabilities of any receiver and the Paying Agent
and Bond Registrar under the Bond Ordinance;
(b) Expenses of Operation and Maintenance and Renewals and Replacements - to the
payment of all reasonable and necessary Expenses of Operation and Maintenance and major
renewals and replacements to the System;
(c) Principal or Redemption Price, Interest, and Hedge Payments Relating to Senior
Bonds - to the payment of the interest and Principal or redemption price then due on the Senior
Bonds and Hedge Payments then due under Senior Hedge Agreements, as follows:
(i) Unless the Principal of all the Senior Bonds shall have become due and
payable, all such moneys shall be applied as follows:
first: To the payment to the persons entitled thereto of all installments of
interest then due on the Senior Bonds, in the order of the maturity of such
installments (with interest on defaulted installments of interest at the rate or rates
borne by the Senior Bonds with respect to which such interest is due, but only to
the extent permitted by law), and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient
to pay in full any particular installment, then to the payment ratably, according to
the amounts due on such installment, to the persons entitled thereto, without any
discrimination or preference. If some of the Senior Bonds bear interest payable
at different intervals or upon different dates and if at any time moneys from the
Debt Service Reserve Account must be used to pay any such interest, the moneys
in the Debt Service Reserve Account shall be applied (to the extent necessary) to
the payment of all interest becoming due on the dates upon which such interest is
payable to and including the next succeeding semiannual Interest Payment Date
specified for the Senior Bonds. After such date, moneys in the Debt Service
Reserve Account plus any other moneys available in the Payments Account shall
be set aside for the payment of interest on Senior Bonds of each class (a class
consisting of all Senior Bonds payable as to interest on the same dates) pro rata
among Senior Bonds of the various classes on a daily basis so that there shall
accrue to each owner of a Senior Bond throughout each Fiscal Year the same
proportion of the total interest payable to such owner of a Senior Bond as shall
so accrue to every other owner of a Senior Bond during such Fiscal Year.
second: To the payment of the Hedge Payments due under any Senior
Hedge Agreements pursuant to their terms.
third: To the payment to the persons entitled thereto of the unpaid
Principal of any of the Senior Bonds which shall have become due at maturity or
upon mandatory redemption prior to maturity (other than Senior Bonds called for
redemption for the payment of which moneys are held pursuant to the provisions
of the Bond Ordinance), in the order of their due dates, with interest upon such
Senior Bonds from the respective dates upon which they became due, and, if the
amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full Senior Bonds due on any
particular date, together with such interest, then to the payment first of such
interest, ratably according to the amount of such interest due on such date, and
then to the payment of such Principal, ratably according to the amount of such
Principal due on such date, to the persons entitled thereto without any
C-33
discrimination or preference. If some of the Senior Bonds mature (including
mandatory redemption prior to maturity as a maturity) upon a different date or
dates, and if at any time moneys from the Debt Service Reserve Account must be
used to pay any such Principal becoming due, the moneys in the Debt Service
Reserve Account not required to pay interest under paragraph first above shall be
applied to the extent necessary to the payment of all Principal becoming due on
the dates upon which such Principal is payable to and including the final annual
Principal Maturity Date specified for the Senior Bonds. After such date, moneys
in the Debt Service Reserve Account not required to pay interest plus any other
moneys available in the Payments Account shall be set aside for the payment of
Principal of Senior Bonds of each class (a class consisting of all Senior Bonds
payable as to Principal on the same date) pro rata among Senior Bonds of the
various classes which mature or must be redeemed pursuant to mandatory
redemption prior to maturity throughout each Fiscal Year in such proportion of
the total Principal payable on each such Senior Bond as shall be equal among all
classes of Senior Bonds maturing or subject to mandatory redemption within
such Fiscal Year.
fourth: To the payment of the redemption premium on and the Principal
of any Senior Bonds called for optional redemption pursuant to their terms.
(ii) If the Principal of all the Senior Bonds shall have become due and payable, all
such moneys shall be applied to the payment of the Principal and interest then due and unpaid
upon the Senior Bonds, with interest thereon as aforesaid, and due and unpaid Hedge Payments
under Senior Hedge Agreements, without preference or priority of Principal over interest or
Hedge Payments or of interest over Principal or Hedge Payments, or of Hedge Payments over
Principal or interest, or of any installment of interest over any other installment of interest, or of
any Senior Bond over any other Senior Bonds, or of any such Hedge Payment over any other
such Hedge Payment, ratably, according to the amounts due respectively for Principal, interest,
and Hedge Payments, to the persons entitled thereto without any discrimination or preference.
Rights of Credit Facility Provider
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Bond Ordinance, in the event that the District shall
draw under a Credit Facility any amount for the payment of Principal of or interest on any Bonds, then
upon such payment the related Credit Facility Provider shall succeed to and become subrogated to the
rights of the recipients of such payments and such Principal or interest shall be deemed to continue to be
unpaid and Outstanding for all purposes and shall continue to be fully secured by the Bond Ordinance
until the Credit Facility Provider, as successor and subrogee, has been paid all amounts owing in respect
of such subrogated payments of Principal and interest. Such rights shall be limited and evidenced by
having the District note the Credit Facility Provider’s rights as successor and subrogee on its records, and
the District shall, upon request, deliver to the Credit Facility Provider (i) in the case of interest on the
Bonds, an acknowledgment of the Credit Facility Provider’s ownership of interest to be paid on the Bonds
specifying the amount of interest owed, the period represented by such interest, and the CUSIP numbers
of the Bonds on which such interest is owed and (ii) in the case of Principal of the Bonds, either the
Bonds themselves duly assigned to the Credit Facility Provider or new Bonds registered in the name of
the Credit Facility Provider or in such other name as the Credit Facility Provider shall specify. Whenever
moneys become available for the payment of any interest then overdue, the Credit Facility Provider shall
be treated as to interest owed to it as and as if it had been the Bondholder of the Bonds upon which such
interest is payable on any special record date therefor.
C-34
No Obligation to Levy Taxes
Nothing contained in the Bond Ordinance shall be construed as imposing on the District any duty
or obligation to levy any taxes either to meet any obligation incurred in the Bond Ordinance or to pay the
Principal of or interest on the Bonds.
DEFEASANCE
Except as otherwise provided in any Series Ordinance with respect to Bonds secured by a Credit
Facility, Bonds for the payment or redemption of which sufficient moneys or sufficient Government
Obligations shall have been deposited with the Paying Agent or the Depository of the Sinking Fund
(whether upon or prior to the maturity or the redemption date of such Bonds) shall be deemed to be paid
and no longer Outstanding under the Bond Ordinance; provided, however, that if such Bonds are to be
redeemed prior to the maturity thereof, notice of such redemption shall have been duly given as provided
in the Bond Ordinance or firm and irrevocable arrangements shall have been made for the giving of such
notice; and, provided, further, that Bonds bearing interest at a Variable Rate shall not be deemed to have
been paid and discharged within the meaning of the Bond Ordinance unless the interest rate payable on
such Bonds is calculated at the maximum interest rate specified for such Bonds to the earlier of the first
tender or redemption date. Government Obligations shall be considered sufficient for purposes of the
Bond Ordinance only: (i) if such Government Obligations are not callable by the issuer of the
Government Obligations prior to their stated maturity; and (ii) if such Government Obligations fall due
and bear interest in such amounts and at such times as will assure sufficient cash to pay currently
maturing interest and to pay Principal and redemption premiums, if any, when due on the Bonds without
rendering the interest on any Tax-Exempt Bonds includable in gross income of any owner thereof for
federal income tax purposes.
The District may at any time surrender to the Bond Registrar for cancellation by it any Bonds
previously authenticated and delivered under the Bond Ordinance which the District may have acquired in
any manner whatsoever. All such Bonds, upon such surrender and cancellation, shall be deemed to be
paid and retired.
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDINANCES
Supplemental Ordinances Not Requiring Consent of Bondholders
The District, from time to time and at any time, subject to the conditions and restrictions in the
Bond Ordinance, may adopt one or more Supplemental Ordinances which thereafter shall form a part of
the Bond Ordinance, for any one or more or all of the following purposes:
(a) To add to the covenants and agreements of the District in the Bond Ordinance
other covenants and agreements thereafter to be observed or to surrender, restrict, or limit any
right or power reserved in the Bond Ordinance to or conferred upon the District (including but
not limited to the right to issue Senior Bonds);
(b) To make such provisions for the purpose of curing any ambiguity, or of curing,
correcting, or supplementing any defective provision contained in the Bond Ordinance, or in
regard to matters or questions arising under the Bond Ordinance, as the District may deem
necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the Bond Ordinance;
C-35
(c) To subject to the lien and pledge of the Bond Ordinance additional revenues,
receipts, properties, or other collateral;
(d) To evidence the appointment of successors to any Depository, Paying Agent, or
Bond Registrar;
(e) To modify, amend, or supplement the Bond Ordinance in such manner as to
permit the qualification of the Bond Ordinance under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 or any
federal statute hereinafter in effect, and similarly to add to the Bond Ordinance such other terms,
conditions, and provisions as may be permitted or required by such Trust Indenture Act of 1939
or any similar federal statute;
(f) To make any modification or amendment of the Bond Ordinance required in
order to make any Bonds eligible for acceptance by DTC or any similar holding institution or to
permit the issuance of any Bonds or interests therein in book-entry form;
(g) To modify any of the provisions of the Bond Ordinance in any respect if such
modification shall not become effective until after the Bonds Outstanding immediately prior to
the effective date of such Supplemental Ordinance shall cease to be Outstanding and if any Bonds
issued contemporaneously with or after the effective date of such Supplemental Ordinance shall
contain a specific reference to the modifications contained in such subsequent proceedings;
(h) Subject to the provisions of the Bond Ordinance relating to the Project Fund, to
modify the provisions of the Bond Ordinance with respect to the disposition of any moneys
remaining in the Project Fund upon the completion of any Project;
(i) To increase the size or scope of the System, to add other utilities to the System,
to create additional subaccounts or to abolish any subaccounts within any account, or to change
the amount of the Debt Service Reserve Requirement, but not below the amount specified in such
definition;
(j) To modify the Bond Ordinance to permit the qualification of any Bonds for offer
or sale under the securities laws of any state in the United States of America;
(k) To modify the Bond Ordinance to provide for the issuance of Senior Bonds or
Subordinate Bonds, and such modification may deal with any subjects and make any provisions
which the District deems necessary or desirable for that purpose;
(l) To make such modifications in the provisions of the Bond Ordinance as may be
deemed necessary by the District to accommodate the issuance of capital appreciation bonds or
Bonds which bear interest at a Variable Rate; and
(m) To modify any of the provisions of the Bond Ordinance in any respect (other than
a modification of the type described below under the caption “SUPPLEMENTAL
ORDINANCES – Supplemental Ordinances Requiring Consent of Bondholders”) requiring
the unanimous written consent of the Bondholders); provided that for (i) any Outstanding Bonds
which are assigned a Rating and which are not secured by a Credit Facility providing for the
payment of the full amount of Principal and interest to be paid thereon, each Rating Agency shall
have given written notification to the District that such modification will not cause the then
applicable Rating on any Bonds to be reduced or withdrawn, and (ii) any Outstanding Bonds
which are secured by Credit Facilities providing for the payment of the full amount of the
C-36
Principal and interest to be paid thereon, each Credit Facility Provider shall have consented in
writing to such modification.
Any Supplemental Ordinance of the District may modify the provisions of the Bond Ordinance in
such a manner, and to such extent and containing such provisions, as the District may deem necessary or
desirable to effect any of the purposes stated above.
As used in the Bond Ordinance, the term “modify” shall mean “modify, amend, or supplement”
and the term “modification” shall mean “modification, amendment, or supplement.”
Supplemental Ordinances Requiring Consent of Bondholders
With the consent (evidenced as provided in the Bond Ordinance) of the owners of not less than a
majority in aggregate Principal of the Outstanding Bonds of each class (senior and subordinate), voting
separately by class, the District may from time to time and at any time adopt a Supplemental Ordinance
for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the
provisions of the Bond Ordinance or of any Supplemental Ordinance; provided, however, that no such
Supplemental Ordinance shall: (1) extend the maturity date or due date of any mandatory sinking fund
redemption with respect to any Bond Outstanding under the Bond Ordinance; (2) reduce or extend the
time for payment of Principal of, redemption premium, or interest on any Bond Outstanding under the
Bond Ordinance; (3) reduce any premium payable upon the redemption of any Bond under the Bond
Ordinance or advance the date upon which any Bond may first be called for redemption prior to its stated
maturity date; (4) give to any Senior Bond or Senior Bonds (or related Senior Hedge Agreements) a
preference over any other Senior Bond or Senior Bonds (or related Senior Hedge Agreements); (5) permit
the creation of any lien or any other encumbrance on the Pledged Revenues having a lien equal to or prior
to the lien created under the Bond Ordinance for the Senior Bonds; (6) reduce the percentage of owners of
senior or subordinate classes of Bonds required to approve any such Supplemental Ordinance; or (7)
deprive the owners of the Bonds of the right to payment of the Bonds or from the Pledged Revenues
(except as otherwise provided herein with respect to the Debt Service Reserve Account), without, in each
case, the consent of the owners of all the affected Bonds then Outstanding. No amendment may be made
under the Bond Ordinance which affects the rights or duties of any Credit Facility Provider securing any
of the Bonds or any Qualified Hedge Provider under any Hedge Agreement without its written consent.
If the District intends to enter into or adopt any Supplemental Ordinance as described in this
caption, the District shall mail, by registered or certified mail, to the registered owners of the Bonds at
their addresses as shown on the Bond Register, a notice of such intention along with a description of such
Supplemental Ordinance not less than 30 days prior to the proposed effective date of such Supplemental
Ordinance. The consents of the registered owners of the Bonds need not approve the particular form of
wording of the proposed Supplemental Ordinance, but it shall be sufficient if such consents approve the
substance thereof. Failure of the owner of any Bond to receive the notice required in the Bond Ordinance
shall not affect the validity of any Supplemental Ordinance if the required number of owners of the Bonds
of each class shall provide their written consent to such Supplemental Ordinance.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Bond Ordinance to the contrary, upon the issuance of a
Credit Facility to secure any Bonds and for the period in which such Credit Facility is outstanding, the
Credit Facility Provider may have the consent rights of the owners of the Bonds which are secured by
such Credit Facility pertaining to some or all of the amendments or modifications of the Bond Ordinance,
to the extent provided in the applicable Series Ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Credit
Facility Provider is granted the consent rights of the owners of any Bonds in a Series Ordinance and
refuses to exercise such consent rights, either affirmatively or negatively, then the registered owners of
the Bonds secured by the related Credit Facility may exercise such consent rights.
C-37
Notice of Supplemental Ordinances
The District shall cause the Bond Registrar to mail a notice by registered or certified mail to the
registered owners of all Bonds Outstanding, at their addresses shown on the Bond Register or at such
other address as has been furnished in writing by such registered owner to the Bond Registrar, setting
forth in general terms the substance of any Supplemental Ordinance which has been adopted and
approved.
* * *
C-38
SUMMARY OF THE CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of certain provisions and covenants contained in the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement. Such summary does not purport to be a complete statement of the terms of the
Continuing Disclosure Agreement and accordingly is qualified in its entirety by reference thereto and is
subject to the full text thereof.
Definitions
In addition to the definitions set forth in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, the following
capitalized terms shall have the following meanings:
“Annual Filing Date” means the date, set in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, by which the
Annual Report is to be filed with the MSRB.
“Annual Financial Information” means annual financial information as such term is used in
paragraph (b)(5)(i) of the Rule and specified in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
“Annual Report” means an Annual Report containing Annual Financial Information described
in and consistent with the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
“Audited Financial Statements” means the annual financial statements (if any) of the District
for the prior fiscal year, certified by an independent auditor as prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles or otherwise, as such term is used in paragraph (b)(5)(i)(B) of the Rule
and as specified in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
“Certification” means a written certification of compliance signed by the Disclosure
Representative stating that the Annual Report, Audited Financial Statements, Notice Event notice, Failure
to File Event notice, Voluntary Event Disclosure or Voluntary Financial Disclosure delivered to the
Disclosure Dissemination Agent is the Annual Report, Audited Financial Statements, Notice Event
notice, Failure to File Event notice, Voluntary Event Disclosure or Voluntary Financial Disclosure
required to be submitted to the MSRB under the Continuing Disclosure Agreement. A Certification shall
accompany each such document submitted to the Disclosure Dissemination Agent by the District and
shall include the full name of the Bonds and the 9-digit CUSIP numbers for all Bonds to which the
document applies.
“Disclosure Dissemination Agent” means Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C., acting in its
capacity as Disclosure Dissemination Agent (“DAC”) under the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, or
any successor Disclosure Dissemination Agent designated in writing by the District pursuant to the
Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
“Disclosure Representative” means the Secretary-Treasurer of the District or his or her
designee, or such other person as the District shall designate in writing to the Disclosure Dissemination
Agent from time to time as the person responsible for providing Information to the Disclosure
Dissemination Agent.
“Failure to File Event” means the District’s failure to file an Annual Report on or before the
Annual Filing Date.
“Financial Obligation” as used in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement is defined in the Rule,
as may be amended, as (i) a debt obligation; (ii) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or
C-39
pledged as a security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or (iii) guarantee
of (i) or (ii). The term “Financial Obligation” shall not include municipal securities as to which a final
official statement has been provided to the MSRB consistent with the Rule.
“Force Majeure Event” means: (i) acts of God, war, or terrorist action; (ii) failure or shut-down
of the Electronic Municipal Market Access system maintained by the MSRB; or (iii) to the extent beyond
the Disclosure Dissemination Agent’s reasonable control, interruptions in telecommunications or utilities
services, failure, malfunction or error of any telecommunications, computer or other electrical,
mechanical or technological application, service or system, computer virus, interruptions in Internet
service or telephone service (including due to a virus, electrical delivery problem or similar occurrence)
that affect Internet users generally, or in the local area in which the Disclosure Dissemination Agent or
the MSRB is located, or acts of any government, regulatory or any other competent authority the effect of
which is to prohibit the Disclosure Dissemination Agent from performance of its obligations under this
Disclosure Agreement.
“Holder” means any person (a) having the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with
respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, any Bonds (including persons holding Bonds through nominees,
depositories or other intermediaries) or (b) treated as the owner of any Bonds for federal income tax
purposes.
“Information” means, collectively, the Annual Reports, the Audited Financial Statements, the
Notice Event notices, the Failure to File Event notices, the Voluntary Event Disclosures and the
Voluntary Financial Disclosures.
“MSRB” means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, or any successor thereto,
established pursuant to Section 15B(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
“Notice Event” means any of the events enumerated in paragraph (b)(5)(i)(C) of the Rule and
listed in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
“Obligated Person” means any person, including the District, who is either generally or through
an enterprise, fund, or account of such person committed by contract or other arrangement to support
payment of all, or part of the obligations on the Bonds (other than providers of municipal bond insurance,
letters of credit, or other liquidity facilities).
“Official Statement” means that Official Statement prepared by the District in connection with
the Bonds.
“Rule” means Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time.
“Voluntary Event Disclosure” means information of the category specified in any of
subsections (e)(vi)(1) through (e)(vi)(10) of Section 2 of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement that is
accompanied by a Certification of the Disclosure Representative containing the information prescribed by
Section 7(a) of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
“Voluntary Financial Disclosure” means information of the category specified in any of
subsections (e)(vii)(1) through (e)(vii)(9) of Section 2 of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement that is
accompanied by a Certification of the Disclosure Representative containing the information prescribed by
Section 7(b) of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
C-40
Provision of Annual Reports
The District shall provide, annually, an electronic copy of the Annual Report and Certification to
the Disclosure Dissemination Agent, not later than the Annual Filing Date. Promptly upon receipt of an
electronic copy of the Annual Report and the Certification, the Disclosure Dissemination Agent shall
provide an Annual Report to the MSRB not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal year of the
District, commencing with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020. Such date and each anniversary thereof
is the Annual Filing Date. The Annual Report may be submitted as a single document or as separate
documents comprising a package, and may cross-reference other information as provided in the
Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
If on the fifteenth (15th) day prior to the Annual Filing Date, the Disclosure Dissemination Agent
has not received a copy of the Annual Report and Certification, the Disclosure Dissemination Agent shall
contact the Disclosure Representative by telephone and in writing (which may be by e-mail) to remind the
District of its undertaking to provide the Annual Report. Upon such reminder, the Disclosure
Representative shall either (i) provide the Disclosure Dissemination Agent with an electronic copy of the
Annual Report and the Certification) no later than two (2) business days prior to the Annual Filing Date,
or (ii) instruct the Disclosure Dissemination Agent in writing that the District will not be able to file the
Annual Report within the time required under the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, state the date by
which the Annual Report for such year will be provided and instruct the Disclosure Dissemination Agent
to immediately send a Failure to File Event notice to the MSRB in substantially the form specified in the
Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
If the Disclosure Dissemination Agent has not received an Annual Report and Certification by
10:00 a.m. Eastern time on the Annual Filing Date (or, if such Annual Filing Date falls on a Saturday,
Sunday or holiday, then the first business day thereafter) for the Annual Report, a Failure to File Event
shall have occurred and the Issuer irrevocably directs the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to immediately
send a Failure to File Event notice to the MSRB in substantially the form specified in the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement.
If Audited Financial Statements of the District are prepared but not available prior to the Annual
Filing Date, the District shall, when the Audited Financial Statements are available, provide at such time
an electronic copy to the Disclosure Dissemination Agent, accompanied by a Certification for filing with
the MSRB.
The District may adjust the Annual Filing Date upon change of its fiscal year by providing
written notice of such change and the new Annual Filing Date to the Disclosure Dissemination Agent,
Paying Agent (if any) and the MSRB, provided that the period between the existing Annual Filing Date
and new Annual Filing Date shall not exceed one year.
Content of Annual Reports
Each Annual Report shall contain Annual Financial Information with respect to the District,
including the information provided in the Official Statement under the headings: “MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Historical and Projected Sewer Rates and Charges,” “-
Customer Accounts,” “- Largest User Charge Customers,” and “ – User Charge Revenues.” Each
Annual Report shall include Audited Financial Statements prepared as described in the Official
Statement. If Audited Financial Statements are not available, then, unaudited financial statements,
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or alternate accounting principles as
described in the Official Statement will be included in the Annual Report.
C-41
Any or all of the items listed above may be included by specific reference from other documents,
including official statements of debt issues with respect to which the District is an Obligated Person (as
defined by the Rule), which have been previously filed with each of the Securities and Exchange
Commission or available on the MSRB Internet Website. If the document incorporated by reference is a
final official statement, it must be available from the MSRB. The District will clearly identify each such
document so incorporated by reference.
Reporting of Notice Events
The occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds constitutes a Notice
Event:
1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies;
2. Non-payment related defaults, if material;
3. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties;
4. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties;
5. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform;
6. Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final
determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other
material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other
material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds;
7. Modifications to rights of Bondholders, if material;
8. Bond calls, if material, and tender offers;
9. Defeasances;
10. Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material;
11. Rating changes;
12. Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the Obligated Person;
For the purposes of the event described in this subsection, the event is considered to
occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or
similar officer for an Obligated Person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental
authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the
Obligated Person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing
governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and
orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of
reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having
supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the Obligated
Person.
C-42
13. The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an Obligated
Person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Obligated Person, other
than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake
such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions,
other than pursuant to its terms, if material;
14. Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if
material;
15. Incurrence of a Financial Obligation of an Obligated Person, if material, or agreement to
covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a
Financial Obligation of an Obligated Person, any of which affect security holders, if
material; and
16. Default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms, or other similar
events under the terms of a Financial Obligation of an Obligated Person, any of which
reflect financial difficulties.
The District shall, in a timely manner not later than nine business days after its occurrence, notify
the Disclosure Dissemination Agent in writing of the occurrence of a Notice Event. Such notice shall
instruct the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to report the occurrence and shall be accompanied by a
Certification. Such notice or Certification shall identify the Notice Event that has occurred, include the
text of the disclosure that the District desires to make, contain the written authorization of the District for
the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to disseminate such information, and identify the date the District
desires for the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to disseminate the information (provided that such date is
not later than the tenth business day after the occurrence of the Notice Event).
The Disclosure Dissemination Agent is under no obligation to notify the District or the Disclosure
Representative of an event that may constitute a Notice Event. In the event the Disclosure Dissemination
Agent so notifies the Disclosure Representative, the Disclosure Representative will within two business
days of receipt of such notice (but in any event not later than the tenth business day after the occurrence
of the Notice Event, if the District determines that a Notice Event has occurred), instruct the Disclosure
Dissemination Agent that either (i) a Notice Event has not occurred and no filing is to be made or (ii) a
Notice Event has occurred and the Disclosure Dissemination Agent is to report the occurrence pursuant to
the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, together with a Certification. Such Certification shall identify the
Notice Event that has occurred, include the text of the disclosure that the District desires to make, contain
the written authorization of the District for the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to disseminate such
information, and identify the date the District desires for the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to
disseminate the information (provided that such date is not later than the tenth business day after the
occurrence of the Notice Event).
If the Disclosure Dissemination Agent has been instructed by the District to report the occurrence
of a Notice Event, the Disclosure Dissemination Agent shall promptly file a notice of such occurrence
with the MSRB in accordance with the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
Voluntary Filings
The District may instruct the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to file a Voluntary Event
Disclosure or a Voluntary Financial Disclosure with the MSRB, from time to time pursuant to a
Certification of the Disclosure Representative.
C-43
Nothing in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement shall be deemed to prevent the District from
disseminating any other information through the Disclosure Dissemination Agent using the means of
dissemination set forth in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement or including any other information in any
Annual Report, Audited Financial Statement, Notice Event notice, Failure to File Event notice, Voluntary
Event Disclosure or Voluntary Financial Disclosure, in addition to that required by the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement. If the District chooses to include any information in any Annual Report, Audited
Financial Statement, Notice Event notice, Failure to File Event notice, Voluntary Event Disclosure or
Voluntary Financial Disclosure in addition to that which is specifically required by the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement, the District shall have no obligation under the Continuing Disclosure Agreement
to update such information or include it in any future Annual Report, Audited Financial Statement, Notice
Event notice, Failure to File Event notice, Voluntary Event Disclosure or Voluntary Financial Disclosure.
Termination of Reporting Obligation
The obligations of the District and the Disclosure Dissemination Agent under the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement shall terminate with respect to the Bonds upon the legal defeasance, prior
redemption or payment in full of all of the Bonds, when the District is no longer an Obligated Person, or
upon delivery by the Disclosure Representative to the Disclosure Dissemination Agent of an opinion of
counsel experienced in federal securities laws to the effect that continuing disclosure is no longer
required.
Disclosure Dissemination Agent
The District has appointed Digital Assurance Certification, L.L.C. (“DAC”) as exclusive
Disclosure Dissemination Agent under the Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The District may, upon
thirty days written notice to the Disclosure Dissemination Agent, replace or appoint a successor
Disclosure Dissemination Agent. Upon termination of DAC’s services as Disclosure Dissemination
Agent, whether by notice of the District or DAC, the District agrees to appoint a successor Disclosure
Dissemination Agent or, alternately, agrees to assume all responsibilities of Disclosure Dissemination
Agent under the Continuing Disclosure Agreement for the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds.
Notwithstanding any replacement or appointment of a successor, the District shall remain liable to the
Disclosure Dissemination Agent until payment in full for any and all sums owed and payable to the
Disclosure Dissemination Agent. The Disclosure Dissemination Agent may resign at any time by
providing thirty days’ prior written notice to the District.
Remedies in Event of Default
In the event of a failure of the District or the Disclosure Dissemination Agent to comply with any
provision of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, the Holders’ rights to enforce the provisions of the
Continuing Disclosure Agreement shall be limited solely to a right, by action in mandamus or for specific
performance, to compel performance of the parties’ obligation under the Continuing Disclosure
Agreement. Any failure by a party to perform in accordance with the Continuing Disclosure Agreement
shall not constitute a default on the Bonds or under any other document relating to the Bonds, and all
rights and remedies shall be limited to those expressly stated in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
Amendment; Waiver
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, the District and
the Disclosure Dissemination Agent may amend the Continuing Disclosure Agreement and any provision
of the Continuing Disclosure Agreement may be waived, if such amendment or waiver is supported by an
opinion of counsel expert in federal securities laws acceptable to both the District and the Disclosure
C-44
Dissemination Agent to the effect that such amendment or waiver does not materially impair the interests
of Holders of the Bonds and would not, in and of itself, cause the undertakings in the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement to violate the Rule if such amendment or waiver had been effective on the date of
the Continuing Disclosure Agreement but taking into account any subsequent change in or official
interpretation of the Rule; provided neither the District or the Disclosure Dissemination Agent shall be
obligated to agree to any amendment modifying their respective duties or obligations without their
consent thereto.
Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, the Disclosure Dissemination Agent shall have the
right to adopt amendments to the Continuing Disclosure Agreement necessary to comply with
modifications to and interpretations of the provisions of the Rule as announced by the Securities and
Exchange Commission from time to time by giving not less than 20 days written notice of the intent to do
so together with a copy of the proposed amendment to the District. No such amendment shall become
effective if the District shall, within 10 days following the giving of such notice, send a notice to the
Disclosure Dissemination Agent in writing that it objects to such amendment.
* * *
APPENDIX D
Report on the Financial Feasibility of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater
System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Appendix D
Report on the Financial Feasibility of
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank]
3013 Main Street
Kansas City, MO 64108
www.raftelis.com
November 19, 2019
Board of Trustees
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
2350 Market Street
St. Louis, MO 63103-2555
Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (“Raftelis”) is submitting herewith the Report on the Financial
Feasibility of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Revenue Bonds,
Series 2019B prepared at the request of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“District”) in
connection with the issuance of its Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B (the “Series
2019B Bonds”). The purpose of the report is to summarize findings of studies performed by
Raftelis related to the wastewater system of the District (“System”). The report provides a financial
feasibility analysis of the District’s Capital Improvement and Replacement Program (“CIRP”) as
it relates to the issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds. The report also addresses other technical and
financial issues that affect the operation of the System and the District’s ability to issue and repay
wastewater revenue bonds issued during the study period of fiscal years 2020 through 2024. The
District’s fiscal year ends on June 30 of each year.
In preparing the report, Raftelis has examined the financial operations of the District through
reviews of financial reports, operating and capital budgets, and other statistical and financial
information as well as through discussions with the District’s management and financial staff. We
have performed various financial tests and analyses necessary to support our findings and opinions.
In the development of the forecast of future financial operations summarized in the report, Raftelis
has made certain assumptions with respect to conditions, events, and circumstances which may
occur in the future. The methodologies utilized in performing our studies follow generally accepted
industry practice. While Raftelis believes such assumptions are reasonable and attainable for the
purpose of forecasting the District’s future operations, the actual results may differ materially from
the forecasts as influenced by the conditions, events, and circumstances which actually occur.
Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the report is based on information not within the control
of Raftelis. Raftelis has not been requested to make an independent analysis, to verify the accuracy
of information provided to us, or to render independent judgment of the validity of information
provided by others. As such, Raftelis cannot, and does not, guarantee the accuracy thereof to the
extent that such information, data, or opinions were based on information provided by others.
Page 2
November 19, 2019
D-2
Use of the report, or any information contained therein, by a third party shall constitute a waiver
and release of Raftelis from and against all claims and liability, including, but not limited to,
liability for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages in connection with such use. In
addition, to the extent permitted by applicable law, use of the report, or any information contained
therein by a third party (other than the underwriters of the Series 2019B Bonds), shall constitute
an agreement to defend and indemnify Raftelis from and against any claims and liability,
including, but not limited to, liability for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages in
connection with such use. The benefit of such releases, waivers, or limitations of liability shall
extend to the related companies and subcontractors of any tier of Raftelis and the directors,
officers, partners, employees, and agents of all released or indemnified parties.
Raftelis shall have no liability to a third party for any losses or damages arising from or in any way
related to this report and/or the information contained therein. Such express waiver of liability by
the third party shall include all claims that the third party may allege in connection with Raftelis’
report including, but not limited to, breach of contract, breach of warranty, strict liability,
negligence, and/or negligent misrepresentation.
Our principal findings and opinions, which are discussed more fully in the report, are as follows:
Wastewater System Financing
The District has developed a detailed CIRP required to meet regulatory requirements, maintain
the integrity of the System, and continue to address water quality issues. During the five-year
study period (“study period”) the District plans to spend approximately $2 billion on major
capital improvements to the System.
As shown in Table 2 of the report, capital program requirements are projected to be funded
from a combination of available funds on hand, senior and subordinate revenue bond proceeds,
annual operating revenues, grants and contributions and interest income. Approximately 37
percent of total major capital improvement expenditures are anticipated to be funded from
operating revenues and the drawdown of available fund balances and the remaining
approximately 63 percent will be debt financed. Less than one percent of major capital
improvements are anticipated to be financed by grants and contributions and interest earned
on construction funds.
The average number of wastewater customers served by the District during fiscal year 2019
was approximately 427,100. Slight increases in the number of customers are projected during
the study period based on analysis of historical trends.
District revenue is derived principally from charges for wastewater service. The existing
schedule of wastewater rates has been in effect since July 1, 2019. The Board adopted these
wastewater rates on June 9, 2016 by Ordinance 14395.
Page 3
November 19, 2019
D-3
The District has nine senior revenue bond issues currently outstanding (excluding the Series
2019B Bonds and the District’s Taxable Wastewater System Refunding Revenue Bonds,
Series 2019, which are being issued contemporaneously with the Series 2019B Bonds) and
fifteen subordinate series of revenue bonds issued under the state’s revolving fund program
(“SRF”) and Department of Natural Resources Direct Loan program currently outstanding.
The nine senior revenue bonds include a loan with the United States Environmental Protection
Agency under the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (“WIFIA”) loan program
in December 2018. The District’s previous bond authorizations from elections on February 3,
2004 ($500 million), August 5, 2008 ($275 million), and June 5, 2012 ($945 million) have
been fully utilized. Four debt issues totaling $249.4 million have been made from the District’s
bond authorization of $900 million approved by voters on April 5, 2016. After issuance of the
Series 2019B Bonds the District will have $598 million of remaining bond authorization
approved by voters on April 5, 2016.
The proceeds of the Series 2019B Bonds will be used to pay a portion of the costs of the
District’s CIRP and pay the costs of issuance of the 2019B Bonds.
The Master Bond Ordinance adopted by the Board on April 22, 2004, as supplemented and
amended by ordinances adopted by the Board for each bond issue, including the ordinance
adopted by the Board for the Series 2019B Bonds (the “Bond Ordinance”), establishes
covenants between the District and bondholders and various terms and conditions related to
the Bonds.
The cash flow analysis of projected wastewater utility revenue and revenue requirements
presented in Table 9 of the report shows that projected revenues, including projected revenue
increases, will be sufficient to fund the operation and maintenance of the System, provide debt
service coverage in excess of the requirements of the Bond Ordinance and continue full
funding of the CIRP.
Based on the financial projections and analyses presented in the report, it is our opinion that
the District will be able to adequately finance the CIRP, meet all known cash requirements of
the System, and comply with all Bond Ordinance financial and rate covenants during the study
period.
Bond Covenant Compliance
The proposed wastewater charges for fiscal years 2020 through 2024 will allow the District to
issue additional revenue bonds within the study period as currently anticipated and make
needed improvements and replacements of the System.
Indicated debt service coverage levels are above the minimum Bond Ordinance requirements.
The additional bonds test required for the issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds has been met.
Page 4
November 19, 2019
D-4
Conclusion
Based on the financial study performed by Raftelis related to the System, we believe that the
District’s organizational structure, planned CIRP, and financing plans are sound for purposes
of supporting the Series 2019B Bonds and subsequent bonds required to support the full
implementation of the CIRP for the 2020 through 2024 fiscal years.
The summary statements presented in this letter do not address all of the issues examined and
described in the full report. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions presented herein should not
be considered complete except in the context of the detailed descriptions and information
contained in the report.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the District in this important matter.
Very truly yours,
RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Thomas A. Beckley
Senior Manager
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Contents
D-5
Contents
Page
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... D-6
Purpose .............................................................................................................................. D-6
Scope ................................................................................................................................. D-6
Raftelis Financial Consultants' Qualifications .................................................................. D-7
Wastewater System Financing .............................................................................................. D-8
Capital Improvement and Replacement Program ............................................................. D-8
CIRP Financing ............................................................................................................... D-10
Wastewater Service Charges .......................................................................................... D-12
Wastewater Service Charge Components ................................................................... D-12
Other Charges and Fees .............................................................................................. D-14
Revenues ......................................................................................................................... D-15
Customer Growth ........................................................................................................ D-15
Wastewater Volumes .................................................................................................. D-16
Wastewater Revenues Under Projected Rates ............................................................ D-18
Other Operating Revenues .......................................................................................... D-19
Revenue Requirements ................................................................................................... D-20
Operation and Maintenance Expense .......................................................................... D-20
Routine Capital Improvements ................................................................................... D-22
Cash Financing of Capital Improvements ................................................................... D-22
Debt Service ................................................................................................................ D-22
Operating Reserve Allowance ........................................................................................ D-24
Financial Analysis ........................................................................................................... D-24
Wastewater Bill Comparison .......................................................................................... D-27
Bond Covenant Compliance ............................................................................................... D-29
Rate Covenants ............................................................................................................... D-29
Reasonable Charges ........................................................................................................ D-29
Adequate Maintenance ................................................................................................... D-30
Additional Bonds Tests ................................................................................................... D-30
Principal Assumptions ........................................................................................................ D-33
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-6
Report on the Financial Feasibility of
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
Wastewater System
Revenue Bonds, Series 2019B
Introduction
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“District”) is responsible for providing
wastewater and stormwater services for the City of St. Louis, Missouri (“City”) and most of
St. Louis County, Missouri (“County”). In order to continue to improve and expand its
wastewater system (“System”) and maintain compliance with state and federal regulations, the
District has developed a major capital improvement and replacement program (“CIRP”). In
order to provide for equitable recovery of capital financing costs from existing and future
wastewater customers, the District plans to partially finance System improvements through the
issuance of long-term debt. The remainder of the funds required to finance the CIRP will be
obtained from annual operating revenues, interest income, grants and contributions, and funds
on hand.
Revenue bonds are issued pursuant to the District’s Charter, which was approved by
the voters of the City and the County at a special election held on February 4, 1954 and
amended at special elections held on November 7, 2000 and June 5, 2012 (“Charter”). All
bonds are issued under the provisions of the Master Bond Ordinance adopted by the Board of
Trustees (“Board”) on April 22, 2004, as supplemented and amended by ordinances adopted
by the Board for each bond issue including the ordinance expected to be adopted by the Board
on November 14, 2019 (the “Bond Ordinance”) for the Wastewater System Revenue Bonds,
Series 2019B (the “Series 2019B Bonds”).
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to summarize findings of the financial feasibility study
performed by Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (“Raftelis”) related to the System and
independently assess the financial feasibility of the District’s issuance of the Series 2019B
Bonds. This report addresses financial issues that affect the operation of the System and the
District’s ability to issue and repay wastewater revenue bonds.
Scope
This report addresses the organization and management of the District. Also included
are the results of analyses related to existing and future financial requirements of the System
based on a review of financial reports, ordinances, budgets and other information. Information
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-7
from these documents was supplemented through meetings and conversations with key District
representatives. Projections of revenue and revenue requirements of the System are shown in
this report for a study period that includes fiscal years 2020 through 2024.
Evaluation of the financial feasibility of the Series 2019B Bonds is based upon a review
of historical financial information provided by the District, an examination of revenue and
expenditure projections by District staff and Raftelis, and the preparation of cash flow analyses
examining projected System operation and capital programming financing through fiscal year
2024. The level of debt service coverage for the Series 2019B Bonds and subsequent bonds
projected to be issued through fiscal year 2024 is determined and compared with requirements
of the Bond Ordinance.
Raftelis Financial Consultants' Qualifications
Raftelis was founded in 1993 and has grown to become one of the largest and most
respected utility financial, rate, and management consulting firms in the nation. Raftelis has
experience providing these services to hundreds of utilities across the country and abroad.
Raftelis staff has provided bond feasibility reports for dozens of utilities throughout the United
States for billions of dollars in bonds. Raftelis currently has a professional staff of over 100
consultants located in seventeen offices throughout the United States providing financial and
management consulting services to municipal water and wastewater utilities. Raftelis is a
Registered Municipal Advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board.
Raftelis has been working with the District since 2007 as the Consultant to the Rate
Commission and was selected by the District in 2012 and 2017 to provide bond feasibility and
rate consulting services to the District for a five-year period.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-8
Wastewater System Financing
The general objectives of the District’s wastewater CIRP are to provide the facilities
necessary to meet federal and state requirements, maintain the integrity of the System, and
provide satisfactory levels of service and performance to customers. To accomplish these
objectives, the District must have sufficient operating revenues and adequate funding for CIRP
projects.
The District uses proceeds of revenue bonds along with wastewater service charge
revenues, grants, other revenues and available fund balances to meet the costs of the ongoing
CIRP.
Capital Improvement and Replacement Program
Table 1 presents a summary of the projected CIRP for fiscal years 2020 through 2024.
These costs were obtained from the District’s supplemental budget documents and other data
provided by District staff. The costs for projects benefiting special assessment districts are not
included in Table 1 since they are fully funded by subdistrict tax revenues and thus do not
impact the magnitude of the proposed bonds or required revenue increases.
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-9 Table 1: Capital Improvement & Replacement ProgramFiscal Year Ending June 302019 - 2024Capital Improvement and Replacement Progam Needs FY 2019FY 2020FY 2021FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024TotalActual Budget Projected (1) Projected (1) Projected (1) Projected (1)1. Asset Management - Capacity34,076,000$ 41,923,308$ 112,421,324$ 157,559,290$ 108,524,936$ 102,850,743$ 557,355,600$ 2. Asset Management - Renewal35,080,000 46,490,426 38,697,125 20,356,695 16,000,094 35,558,913 192,183,252 3. Cityshed14,751,000 9,336,947 26,442,859 22,236,141 18,443,810 2,607,119 93,817,876 4. Combined Sewer Overflow26,585,000 37,976,044 20,709,340 33,302,375 44,937,697 34,819,217 198,329,673 5. Districtwide10,593,789 11,326,429 14,460,977 14,263,687 15,573,771 15,410,768 81,629,421 6. Other50,000 (44,034) (69,890) (12,184) (518) - (76,625) 7. Sanitary Sewer Overflow (2)162,097,500 159,323,009 152,512,684 71,582,467 80,306,077 41,580,028 667,401,765 8. Treatment Plants (3)6,422,000 21,301,765 31,263,225 71,674,635 166,934,349 226,742,948 524,338,924 9.Subtotal: CIRP289,655,289$ 327,633,895$ 396,437,645$ 390,963,105$ 450,720,216$ 459,569,736$ 2,314,979,887$ 10. Less: Capital Funded in O&M (Asset Management) (12,790,959) (9,727,869) (10,748,699) (10,855,175) (11,647,245) (11,322,418)$ (67,092,365) 11. Less: Non-recurring Projects & Studies(5,402,440) (9,223,454) (8,567,302) (8,861,820) (8,777,901) (9,129,015) (49,961,932) 12. Less: Project Liquidations13. Plus: Capitalized Internal Labor10,488,913 10,803,580 8,758,000 9,020,740 9,291,362 9,570,103 57,932,698 14.Total: CIRP Needs (4)281,950,803$ 319,486,152$ 385,879,645$ 380,266,851$ 439,586,432$ 448,688,405$ 2,255,858,288$ (1) Projected CIRP amounts include 2.75% inflation from the estimated costs in FY 2018 dollars.(2) The investment is driven by Consent Decree requirements to eliminate at least 85% of all constructed SSO's by 12/31/2023.(3) The investment is necessary to repair aging infrastructure and to meet regulatory requirements.(4) CIRP costs for FY 2019 represent new appropriations approved in that year, and FY 2020 through FY 2024 represent estimated appropriations adjusted for inflation and net of prior years’ unspent appropriations released for future use.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-10
Table 3 Capital Improvement and Replacement Program
The proposed CIRP is primarily focused on collection system improvements projects to meet
the District’s Consent Decree requirements that include an estimated $667 million to eliminate
sanitary sewer overflows and $198 million to reduce or eliminate combined sewer overflows.
About $749 million is earmarked for system improvements throughout the District that
includes asset management and collection system improvements. Improvements related to
existing treatment plants are expected to cost about $524 million during the five-year study
period.
CIRP Financing
Table 2 presents the proposed CIRP financing plan and summarizes the projected
source and application of funds over the five-year study period. This plan reflects the
recommendations of the Rate Commission and anticipates that proposed capital improvements
will be financed from a combination of bond proceeds, annual operating revenues, and interest
income.
Interest income earned on invested capital improvement funds is available to meet
capital improvement expenditures. Interest earnings recognize an assumed 0.50 percent
average annual interest rate on funds maintained in the construction account. Line 10 indicates
the estimated interest income earned on capital improvement program balances.
D-11
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
t Table 2: Capital Improvement & Replacement Program Financing PlanFiscal Year Ending June 302019 - 2024FY 2019FY 2020FY 2021FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024TotalActual Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedSources of Funds1. Beginning Year Balance (1)246,392,481$ 189,978,208$ 142,639,119$ 114,753,524$ 55,788,091$ 2,903,395$ 752,454,818$ 2. Revenue Bond Proceeds (2)- 64,189,977 138,513,852 93,895,364 144,567,675 266,163,859 707,330,726 3. Cash Financing of Construction (PAYGO) 130,524,075 121,366,038 169,500,000 116,500,000 111,000,000 109,000,000 757,890,113 4. State Revolving Loan Proceeds (2)25,267,000 69,952,000 35,000,000 95,000,000 115,000,000 55,000,000 395,219,000 5. WIFIA Loan47,460,160 - - - - - 47,460,160 6. Capitalized Internal Labor10,488,913 10,803,580 8,758,000 9,020,740 9,291,362 9,570,103 57,932,698 7. Commercial Paper- - - - - - - 8. Line of Credit- - - - - - - 9. Grants & Contributions742,451 657,040 685,899 716,027 747,480 780,317 4,329,215 10. Interest Income11,218,167 6,010,000 7,050,000 7,660,000 8,190,000 8,880,000 49,008,167 11.Subtotal: Available Funds472,093,246$ 462,956,843$ 502,146,870$ 437,545,655$ 444,584,608$ 452,297,674$ 2,771,624,897$ Uses of Funds12. Major Capital Improvements(281,950,803)$ (319,486,152)$ (385,879,645)$ (380,266,851)$ (439,586,432)$ (448,688,405)$ (1,807,169,883)$ 13. Issuance Costs(164,236) (831,572) (1,513,702) (1,490,713) (2,094,781) (2,832,953) (6,095,004) 14. Commercial Paper & Line of Credit Payments- - - - - - - 15.Subtotal: Uses of Funds(282,115,039)$ (320,317,724)$ (387,393,347)$ (381,757,564)$ (441,681,213)$ (451,521,358)$ (1,813,264,887)$ 16.End of Year Balance189,978,208$ 142,639,119$ 114,753,524$ 55,788,091$ 2,903,395$ 776,316$ (1) Includes balance in Sanitary Replacement Fund, Project Bond Funds, WW OMCI and Construction Funds, Capital Improvement Surcharge Fund, and the Bond Place Special Taxing Subdistrict Fund. (2) Issuance costs are included in the total proceeds shown.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-12
Wastewater Service Charges
Table 3 presents a summary of the District-wide charges imposed by the District since
the beginning of fiscal year 2014 as well as the proposed charges for the forecast period.
Wastewater Service Charge Components
The current wastewater rates were adopted on June 9, 2016 and became effective on
July 1, 2016, with a schedule of rate increases to take effect on July 1 of 2016, 2017, 2018 and
2019. These rates are part of the fifth set of rates to go through the Rate Commission review
procedures mandated by the Charter. A new wastewater rate change proposal was submitted
to the Rate Commission on March 4, 2019. Under this proposal wastewater bills for typical
residential customers were projected to increase by about 3 percent per year in fiscal years
2021 through 2024. The Rate Commission completed its deliberations and submitted a Rate
Recommendation Report to the Board of Trustees on August 16, 2019. The Rate Commission
proposed changes to certain assumptions that impact revenues and operation and maintenance
expenditures and those changes have been incorporated into this feasibility report. The Board
accepted the Rate Commission’s Report on October 10, 2019 and this report assumes that the
Board of Trustees will adopt the accepted recommendations as they have in the past.
The rates consist of a monthly base charge, a uniform volume charge, and extra strength
surcharges for biochemical oxygen demand (“BOD”) in excess of 300 milligrams per liter
(“mg/l”) or chemical oxygen demand (“COD”) in excess of 600 mg/l, and suspended solids
(“SS”) in excess of 300 mg/l. The base charge includes a billing and collection charge
component and a system availability charge component that are applicable to all customer
classes. A compliance charge is applied to non-residential customers, in addition to the base
charge, to recover monitoring and pretreatment program related costs. As a part of the 2011
Rate Commission proceedings, the District further differentiated the compliance charge into
tiers to better reflect the cost of providing these services to different non-residential customers
served by the District.
D-13
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
Table 3. Historical and Projected Wastewater Rates Fiscal Year Ending June 30FY 2014FY 2015FY 2016FY 2017FY 2018FY 2019FY 2020FY 2021FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Current Proposed Proposed Proposed ProposedBase Charge ($/Bill)Billing & Collection Charge3.45$ 3.55$ 3.70$ 5.44$ 6.02$ 6.67$ 7.38$ 5.11$ 5.29$ 5.48$ $ 5.68System Availability Charge11.40$ 12.70$ 14.55$ 14.02$ 15.50$ 17.16$ 18.97$ 21.29$ 22.02$ 22.78$ $ 23.61Total: Base Charge 14.85$ 16.25$ 18.25$ 19.46$ 21.52$ 23.83$ 26.35$ 26.40$ 27.31$ 28.26$ $ 29.29Compliance Charge ($/Bill) (b)Tier 116.00$ 9.00$ 2.15$ 2.86$ 2.95$ 3.05$ 3.14$ 4.44$ 4.55$ 4.71$ $ 4.85Tier 241.85$ 43.55$ 44.50$ 57.20$ 58.94$ 60.89$ 62.61$ 62.16$ 63.64$ 65.80$ $ 67.67Tier 389.15$ 92.75$ 94.80$ 125.84$ 129.67$ 133.96$ 137.75$ 133.20$ 136.37$ 140.99$ $ 144.98Tier 4130.70$ 136.00$ 139.00$ 185.90$ 191.56$ 197.91$ 203.49$ 177.60$ 181.83$ 187.98$ $ 193.30Tier 5172.25$ 179.25$ 183.15$ 243.10$ 250.50$ 258.79$ 266.10$ 222.00$ 227.29$ 234.98$ $ 241.63Volume ChargeMetered ($/Ccf)2.50$ 2.82$ 3.21$ 3.59$ 3.97$ 4.40$ 4.87$ 5.00$ 5.17$ 5.35$ $ 5.55Unmetered ($/Bill)Per Room1.63$ 1.83$ 2.09$ 2.12$ 2.35$ 2.61$ 2.89$ 2.95$ 3.06$ 3.17$ $ 3.29Per Water Closet6.10$ 6.88$ 7.83$ 7.92$ 8.76$ 9.70$ 10.72$ 11.02$ 11.40$ 11.80$ $ 12.23Per Bath5.08$ 5.73$ 6.53$ 6.60$ 7.30$ 8.08$ 8.93$ 9.19$ 9.51$ 9.84$ $ 10.20Per Separate Shower5.08$ 5.73$ 6.53$ 6.60$ 7.30$ 8.08$ 8.93$ 9.19$ 9.51$ 9.84$ $ 10.20Extra Strength Surcharges ($/ton) (b)Suspended Solids over 300 mg/l231.35$ 244.03$ 251.88$ 262.00$ 269.07$ 277.03$ 283.87$ 302.67$ 321.47$ 332.35$ 341.76$ Biochemical Oxygen Demand over 300 mg/l 620.14$ 620.14$ 632.38$ 654.00$ 671.63$ 691.50$ 708.56$ 812.94$ 917.32$ 948.34$ 975.18$ Chemical Oxygen Demand over 600 mg/l 310.07$ 310.07$ 316.19$ 327.00$ 335.82$ 345.76$ 354.30$ 406.47$ 458.66$ 474.17$ 487.59$ Ccf = hundred cubic feet (approx. 748 gallons)mg/l = milligram per liter
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-14
Other Charges and Fees
In addition to the normal and excess strength wastewater service charges, the District
also imposes a number of other charges to meet cost related to growth and system operations.
The District imposes District-wide sewer system connection fees per Ordinance 14854 adopted
in 2018. Under this system of capital recovery charges, new customers buy into the wastewater
system so that they are on an equal equity basis with customers having similar service
requirements. The current charge is based on a unit equity value of $2.73 per gallon of
wastewater per day attributed to each new customer. For all single family residential
customers, the sewer system connection fee is $1,126. For non-residential customers, the
charge varies from $1,126 for customers served by a 5/8 or 3/4-inch water meter to $65,493
for customers served by a 10-inch water meter.
A $0.08 per gallon charge for septage or other wastewater hauled to the Bissell
Wastewater Treatment Plant is imposed on all permitted waste haulers that serve customers
having septic tanks, cesspools, private treatment facilities, or customers otherwise not
connected to the District’s sewer system per Ordinance 12716, adopted on August 14, 2008.
Costs incurred for sampling and testing wastewater samples from industrial users are recovered
by a system of wastewater monitoring fees. These fees are typically published in ordinances
updating the wastewater service charges. A number of engineering and service fees are also
applied to reimburse the District for various services such as plan review, construction permits,
construction related inspections, machine taps, project bid fees, provision of blueprint and
microfilm copies, and permitting pretreatment customers.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-15
Revenues
District revenue is derived primarily from charges for wastewater service, including
revenues from extra strength surcharges. Other sources of income include dedicated subdistrict
assessments, connection fees, waste hauler permits, industrial monitoring charges, various
engineering fees, interest earnings, late charges and other operating income.
Customer Growth
Table 4 presents a summary of the historical and projected average number of
wastewater customers served by the District. All customer projections are based on an analysis
of historic growth patterns by customer class during the past five years. As indicated by Table
4, the number of metered customers is projected to increase from 349,700 in 2019 to 351,403
in 2024 and the number of unmetered customers is projected to increase from 77,400 in 2019
to 78,105 in 2024. The total number of customer accounts is expected to increase at an average
rate of 0.1 percent per year over the study period.
Table 4. Historical and Projected Average Customer Accounts
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
Metered Customers
1. Single Family 304,900 305,205 305,510 305,816 306,122 306,428
2. Multi-Family 20,600 20,682 20,765 20,848 20,931 21,015
3. Non-Residential 24,200 24,152 24,104 24,056 24,008 23,960
4.Subtotal: Metered Customers 349,700 350,039 350,379 350,720 351,061 351,403
Unmetered Customers
5. Single Family 56,600 56,657 56,714 56,771 56,828 56,885
6. Multi-Family 20,800 20,883 20,967 21,051 21,135 21,220
7. Non-Residential - - - - - -
8.Subtotal: Unmetered Customers 77,400 77,540 77,681 77,822 77,963 78,105
Total Customer Accounts
9. Single Family 361,500 361,862 362,224 362,587 362,950 363,313
10. Multi-Family 41,400 41,565 41,732 41,899 42,066 42,235
11. Non-Residential 24,200 24,152 24,104 24,056 24,008 23,960
12.Total: Customer Accounts 427,100 427,579 428,060 428,542 429,024 429,508
13.% Change 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-16
Wastewater Volumes
Table 5 presents a summary of historical and projected contributed or billed wastewater
volumes. Billed wastewater volume is the amount of wastewater flow contributed to the
System by residential and non-residential customers. The determination of contributed
wastewater volume for unmetered residential customers is based on an analysis of customers
with similar characteristics using statistical methods and was updated in the past two years for
the most recent Rate Change Proposal. The indicated unit volumes which became effective on
July 1, 2016 are shown along with the current allowance below:
14.5 gallons per day (“gpd”) for each room
54.2 gpd for each water closet
45.2 gpd for each bath or separate shower
Billable wastewater volumes for all single family customers with metered water usage
are determined on the basis of water billed during the period best equated to contributed
wastewater volume. For District customers, this period is from January 15 through April 30.
Billed wastewater volume for non-residential customers is equal to actual metered water usage
less exemption allowances for any water that does not enter the sewer system. Multifamily
customers are either billed based on actual annual water usage or the average annual water
usage established during the best equated period for wastewater contribution, depending on the
billing method selected by each multifamily customer. The selected billing basis is permanent
and cannot be changed. Projected volumes are based on the recognition of historical billing
volumes and trends. Also considered are projections of numbers of customers and average
historic billed volume per customer.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-17
Table 7 Historical an
Table 5. Historical and Projected Contributed Wastewater Volumes (Ccf)
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
Metered Customers
1. Single Family 20,869,408 20,542,620 20,196,292 19,855,854 19,521,207 19,192,251
2. Multi-Family 8,037,326 8,198,761 8,362,659 8,529,835 8,700,354 8,874,283
3. Non-Residential 21,271,053 21,526,306 21,784,622 22,046,037 22,310,589 22,578,316
4.Subtotal: Metered Customers 50,177,787 50,267,687 50,343,573 50,431,726 50,532,150 50,644,850
Unmetered Customers
5. Single Family 6,273,423 6,288,779 6,282,760 6,276,749 6,270,742 6,264,743
6. Multi-Family 4,059,313 4,053,257 4,037,544 4,021,898 4,006,315 3,990,796
7. Non-Residential - - - - - -
8.Subtotal: Unmetered Customers 10,332,735 10,342,036 10,320,304 10,298,647 10,277,057 10,255,539
Total Contributed Wastewater Volume
9. Single Family 27,142,831 26,831,399 26,479,052 26,132,603 25,791,949 25,456,994
10. Multi-Family 12,096,639 12,252,018 12,400,203 12,551,733 12,706,669 12,865,079
11. Non-Residential 21,271,053 21,526,306 21,784,622 22,046,037 22,310,589 22,578,316
12.Total: Contributed Volumes 60,510,522 60,609,723 60,663,877 60,730,373 60,809,207 60,900,389
13.% Change 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-18
Wastewater Revenues Under Projected Rates
A summary of historical revenues for fiscal year 2019 and projected wastewater
revenues under approved and recommended rates for fiscal years 2020 through 2024 is
presented in Table 6. Projected billed wastewater revenues do not include allowances for bad
debt, refunds or billing adjustments. These billing adjustments are included with other
operating revenues in Table 7.
Other Operating Revenues
Projected other wastewater utility revenues are presented in Table 7. These revenues
are grouped in the same manner as summarized in the District’s budget documents. All of these
revenues are used to offset operating costs.
The District anticipates receiving contributions from Missouri American Water for a
share of capacity in the Lower Meramec River Wastewater Treatment Plant. This revenue
averaged approximately $1 million in FY 2018 and FY 2019 and District staff estimates that
this revenue will average about $1.4 million per year for FY 2020-2024.
Table 8 Historical and Projected Billed Wastewater Service Revenue
Table 6. Historical and Projected Wastewater Revenues under Approved and Recommended Rates
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
Metered
1. Residential 237,507,195$ 265,381,898$ 244,474,079$ 252,064,194$ 260,088,800$ 268,982,935$
Non-Residential
2. Normal Strength 104,959,335 115,366,444 119,485,324 124,852,430 130,590,901 136,901,521
3. Extra Strength 5,630,899 6,198,691 6,288,346 6,897,564 7,045,199 7,157,842
4.Subtotal: Metered Customers 348,097,429$ 386,947,033$ 370,247,749$ 383,814,188$ 397,724,900$ 413,042,298$
Unmetered
5. Residential 44,223,353$ 49,611,204$ 74,195,315$ 76,741,855$ 79,366,923$ 82,215,881$
Total Wastewater Revenues
6. Residential 281,730,548$ 314,993,102$ 318,669,394$ 328,806,050$ 339,455,722$ 351,198,817$
7. Non-Residential 110,590,234 121,565,135 125,773,670 131,749,994 137,636,100 144,059,362
8.Total: Wastewater Revenues 392,320,783$ 436,558,237$ 444,443,064$ 460,556,043$ 477,091,823$ 495,258,179$
9.% Change - 11.3% 1.8% 3.6% 3.6% 3.8%
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-19
Table 7. Projected Other Wastewater Operating Revenues
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
Other Operating Revenue
1. Billing Adjustments (1)6,548,828$ 4,325,400$ 4,713,411$ 5,136,250$ 5,597,044$ 6,099,203$
2. Bad Debt Provision (4,349,247) (5,385,600) (5,520,240) (5,727,249) (5,942,021) (6,164,847)
Other Fees
3. Construction Inspection Fees 748,249$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$
4. Waste Hauler Fees 577,754 835,000 835,000 835,000 835,000 835,000
5. All Other Fees (2)707,502 597,500 597,500 597,500 597,500 597,500
6.Subtotal: Other Fees 2,033,505$ 2,068,500$ 2,068,500$ 2,068,500$ 2,068,500$ 2,068,500$
7. Miscellaneous Revenues (3)3,632,276 3,420,100 3,545,310 3,683,041 3,834,545 4,001,200
8.Subtotal: Other Operating Revenue 7,865,362$ 4,428,400$ 4,806,981$ 5,160,542$ 5,558,069$ 6,004,056$
9. Other Non-Operating Revenue (4)(669,379) 521,000 521,000 521,000 521,000 521,000
10. Connection Fee Revenue 922,979 1,308,000 1,321,080 1,334,291 1,347,634 1,361,110
11.Total: Other Miscellaneous Revenue 8,118,962$ 6,257,400$ 6,649,061$ 7,015,833$ 7,426,702$ 7,886,166$
% Change -22.9% 6.3% 5.5% 5.9% 6.2%
(1) Includes late charges, refunds, adjustments, lien interest and fees, and other adjustments.
(2) Includes plan review fees, submittal fees, monitoring cost fees, pretreatment discharge permits, and all other fees.
(3) Includes reimbursements, reimbursable engineering and maintenance, Missouri American contributions, and all other miscellaneous reven
(4) Includes rental income, clean water surcharge, and sale of fixed assets.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-20
Revenue Requirements
The revenue required to provide for the continued operation of the District must be
sufficient to meet the cash requirements for System operation. Revenue requirements include
(1) total System operation and maintenance expenses; (2) expenditures for routine and major
capital improvements met directly from revenues; (3) total System debt service (consisting of
principal and interest payments); and (4) provision for an adequate operating reserve.
Projections of the cash requirements to meet these System expenditures for the period of 2020
through 2024 from the rates approved by the Board for fiscal year 2020 and recommended to
the Board for fiscal years 2021 through 2024 are presented in this section.
Operation and Maintenance Expense
Operation and maintenance expense includes the total annual salaries and wages of
District personnel, costs for materials and supplies, fuel and electrical power costs and other
costs such as employee benefits, insurance, and contract services. Since these costs are an
ongoing annual obligation of the District, they are met from wastewater and stormwater
operating revenues as they are incurred. Wastewater related operation and maintenance
expense for fiscal year 2019 are actual results while fiscal years 2020 through 2024 are based
on the fiscal year 2020 budget using the escalation rates as documented in the most recent Rate
Change Proposal.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-21
Routine Capital Improvements
Expenditures for routine annual capital improvements
include those costs that tend to be routinely incurred each year
for normal replacements such as vehicles and office
equipment, and minor improvements or repairs. Since the costs
of these improvements are a continuing expense to be met each
year, the District appropriately finances these expenditures
from current wastewater revenues. These expenditures are
included in the District's annual budgets as Capital Outlay
costs.
Cash Financing of Capital Improvements
In addition to cash financing routine capital
improvements, the District partially finances major capital
improvements on a cash or pay-as-you-go basis. The District is
expected to continue to cash finance all routine capital
improvements and a portion of the CIRP. The amount of
projected cash financing of the major capital improvement
program was previously identified on Line 3 of Table 2.
Debt Service
The District issued its first District-wide series of
revenue bonds in April 2004 and additional Senior Bonds were
issued in November 2006, November 2008, January 2010,
December 2011, August 2012, November 2012, December
2013, December 2015, December 2016, December 2017, and
December 2018, with the 2010 issue being issued under the
Build America Bond federally subsidized program and the
2018A WIFIA loan with the EPA that is on parity with the
District’s Senior Bonds. Total Parity Debt issued to date totals
$1,656,732,000 as indicated by the adjoining table. The
District has also issued fifteen subordinate series of revenue
bonds through the Missouri State Revolving Fund (“SRF”) and
Department of Natural Resources Direct Loan program. The
total amount of Subordinate Bonds issued to date is
$644,469,000.
Additional revenue bonds are assumed to have 30-year
terms and with an assumed true interest rate of approximately
Series Amount
Revenue Bonds
2004A (1) (4) 175,000,000$
2006C (2) (4) 60,000,000
2008A (2) (4) 30,000,000
2010B 85,000,000
2011B (3) 52,250,000
2012A (3) 225,000,000
2012B (1) 141,730,000
2013B (3) 150,000,000
2015B (2) (3) 223,855,000
2016C 150,000,000
2017A (3) 316,175,000
2018A 47,722,204
Total 1,656,732,204$
State Revolving Fund Loans
2004B 161,280,000$
2005A 6,800,000
2006A 42,715,000
2006B 14,205,000
2008B 40,000,000
2009A 23,000,000
2010A 7,980,700
2010C 37,000,000
2011A 39,769,300
2013A 52,000,000
2015A 75,000,000
2016A 20,000,000
2016B 75,500,000
2018B 25,267,000
2019A 23,952,000
Total 644,469,000$
Existing Debt Issues
(1) The Series 2012B Bonds
partially refunded the Series
2004A Bonds.
(2) The Series 2015B Bonds
refunded the Series 2006C and
2008A Bonds.
(3) The Series 2017A Bonds
partially refunded the 2011B,
2012A, 2013B, and 2015B bonds.
(4) The Series 2004A, 2006C, and
2008A have been fully paid.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-22
3.34 percent for issuances in fiscal years 2020 through 2024. Additional revenue bonds issued
as part of the SRF loan program are expected to have 20-year terms and a net effective annual
interest and administration cost of about 2.25 percent per year to 3.00 percent per year. Table
9 presents debt service in two ways: by Payments to Sinking Fund, which is used for modeling
the District's cash flow in Table 10, and Payments to Bondholders, which is used to determine
coverage in accordance with the District's bond covenants. The Payments to Bondholders for
FY 2019 through FY 2024 shown in Table 8 was provided by the District's co-Financial
Advisor, PFM Financial Advisors, LLC.
The scheduling of the proposed revenue bond issues and SRF loans reflects current
planning considerations, as recognized for purposes of this report. This is not intended to
preclude the possible modification or rescheduling of issues, if desirable, due to market
conditions, local financing policy, or other practical considerations.
Table 8. Projected Debt Service Requirements
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected
Payments to Sinking Fund
Revenue Bonds
Existing 77,962,008$ 78,123,917$ 78,198,040$ 77,923,075$ 78,185,172$ 78,085,875$
Projected - 1,637,904 7,197,283 14,483,402 21,610,090 33,774,908
Subtotal: Revenue Bonds 77,962,008$ 79,761,821$ 85,395,323$ 92,406,477$ 99,795,262$ 111,860,782$
SRF Loans
Existing 37,673,555$ 38,029,639$ 38,270,893$ 39,541,794$ 40,040,602$ 40,629,964$
Projected - 1,775,150 4,280,650 9,130,714 16,395,602 18,931,239
Subtotal: SRF Loans 37,673,555$ 39,804,789$ 42,551,543$ 48,672,508$ 56,436,204$ 59,561,203$
Total: Debt Service to Sinking Fund 115,635,563$ 119,566,610$ 127,946,866$ 141,078,985$ 156,231,466$ 171,421,985$
Payments to Bondholders
Revenue Bonds
Existing 77,941,363$ 78,082,598$ 78,224,061$ 77,824,383$ 78,172,982$ 78,065,357$
Projected - 1,064,321 5,781,033 13,524,919 20,131,594 31,056,449
Subtotal: Revenue Bonds 77,941,363$ 79,146,919$ 84,005,094$ 91,349,302$ 98,304,576$ 109,121,807$
SRF Loans
Existing 36,191,352$ 37,780,131$ 37,922,005$ 39,374,849$ 39,833,493$ 40,480,817$
Projected - 345,000 3,166,550 6,038,500 12,566,678 19,618,276
Subtotal: SRF Loans 36,191,352$ 38,125,131$ 41,088,555$ 45,413,349$ 52,400,170$ 60,099,093$
Total: Debt Service to Bondholders 114,132,715$ 117,272,050$ 125,093,649$ 136,762,651$ 150,704,746$ 169,220,900$
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-23
Operating Reserve Allowance
The operating reserve allowance is a recommended balance to accommodate
fluctuations in annual revenues and expenditures. The existing revenue bond covenants require
the District to maintain a minimum balance equal to 45 days of operation and maintenance
expense. For this report, an operating reserve allowance equal to 60 days or about 16.4 percent
of annual operating expense is assumed to be maintained, as provided by the current budget.
Operating expense, as routinely presented in the District's annual budgets, is equal to the sum
of operation and maintenance expense and routine annual capital improvements. The operating
reserve for wastewater operations is projected to decrease to about $36.6 million in fiscal year
2024.
Financial Analysis
A pro forma cash flow statement showing projected wastewater revenues and revenue
requirements for the District during the study period is presented in Table 9. System revenues
must be at least sufficient to finance the costs of operation and maintenance expense, routine
annual capital improvements, and debt service costs on existing and proposed debt, while
maintaining adequate operating reserve funds and complying with all revenue bond debt
service coverage requirements. Annual revenues can also be used to finance a portion of the
major capital improvement program.
Table 9 presents annual wastewater revenues and expenditures under the District’s
approved or recommended rates for the study period. Line 1 of Table 9 shows projected
revenue under the approved or recommended rates for each year of the study period.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-24
Table 9. Comparison of Projected Wastewater Revenue with Projected Revenue Requirements
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
Wastewater Revenue
1 User Charge Revenue 392,320,783$ 436,558,237$ 444,443,064$ 460,556,043$ 477,091,823$ 495,258,179$
Other Miscellaneous Revenue
2. Other Operating Revenue (1)7,865,362$ 4,428,400$ 4,806,981$ 5,160,542$ 5,558,069$ 6,004,056$
3. Connection Fee Revenue 922,979 1,308,000 1,321,080 1,334,291 1,347,634 1,361,110
4.Subtotal: Other Miscellaneous Revenue 8,788,341$ 5,736,400$ 6,128,061$ 6,494,833$ 6,905,702$ 7,365,166$
5. Interest Income - Operating and Capital 14,438,669 10,345,302 8,689,947 8,866,747 8,865,405 9,576,044
6.Total: Wastewater Revenue 415,547,793$ 452,639,939$ 459,261,072$ 475,917,623$ 492,862,930$ 512,199,389$
Operating Expenses
7. General Fund Operating Expenses
156,514,816$ 169,834,496$ 176,143,995$ 180,155,670$ 186,270,637$ 191,227,068$
8. Other Operating Expenses 14,070,328 9,839,888 18,161,068 14,401,765 15,023,034 14,718,106
9.Subtotal: Operating Expenses (O&M)170,585,144$ 179,674,385$ 194,305,063$ 194,557,436$ 201,293,671$ 205,945,174$
10.Net Revenue Available for Debt Service 244,962,649$ 272,965,554$ 264,956,009$ 281,360,187$ 291,569,259$ 306,254,216$
Debt Service (Payments to Sinking Fund)
Revenue Bonds (2)
11. Existing 77,962,008$ 78,123,917$ 78,198,040$ 77,923,075$ 78,185,172$ 78,085,875$
12. Projected - 1,637,904 7,197,283 14,483,402 21,610,090 33,774,908
13.Subtotal: Revenue Bonds 77,962,008$ 79,761,821$ 85,395,323$ 92,406,477$ 99,795,262$ 111,860,782$
SRF Loans
14. Existing 37,673,555$ 38,029,639$ 38,270,893$ 39,541,794$ 40,040,602$ 40,629,964$
15. Projected
- 1,775,150 4,280,650 9,130,714 16,395,602 18,931,239
16.Subtotal: SRF Loans 37,673,555$ 39,804,789$ 42,551,543$ 48,672,508$ 56,436,204$ 59,561,203$
17.Total: Debt Service 115,635,563$ 119,566,610$ 127,946,866$ 141,078,985$ 156,231,466$ 171,421,985$
Other Revenues and Expenditures
18. Other Non-Operating Revenue (669,379)$ 521,000$ 521,000$ 521,000$ 521,000$ 521,000$
19. Routine Annual Capital Improvements 3,387,531 6,458,852 6,594,488 6,732,972 6,874,365 7,018,727
20. Cash Financing of Capital Improvements (3)
141,742,242 127,376,038 176,550,000 124,160,000 119,190,000 117,880,000
21. Non-recurring Projects & Studies 5,402,440 9,223,454 8,567,302 8,861,820 8,777,901 9,129,015
22. Commercial Paper & Line of Credit Payments - - - - - -
23.Subtotal: Other Expenditures 150,532,213$ 143,058,345$ 191,711,790$ 139,754,792$ 134,842,266$ 133,506,742$
24.Net Annual Balance (4)(21,874,507)$ 10,861,599$ (54,181,646)$ 1,047,410$ 1,016,527$ 1,325,489$
25. Beginning Balance (5)98,441,078$ 76,566,571$ 87,428,170$ 33,246,524$ 34,293,935$ 35,310,462$
26. Ending Balance (5)76,566,571 87,428,170 33,246,524 34,293,935 35,310,462 36,635,950
Debt Service (Payments to Bondholders)
27. Revenue Bonds (2)
77,941,363$ 79,146,919$ 84,005,094$ 91,349,302$ 98,304,576$ 109,121,807$
28. SRF Loans 36,191,352 38,125,131 41,088,555 45,413,349 52,400,170 60,099,093
29.Total: Debt Service 114,132,715$ 117,272,050$ 125,093,649$ 136,762,651$ 150,704,746$ 169,220,900$
Debt Service Coverage
30. Revenue Bonds 3.14 3.45 3.15 3.08 2.97 2.81
31. Total Debt 2.15 2.33 2.12 2.06 1.93 1.81
(1) Includes interest earned from the Missouri American Water Loan and City of Arnold.
(2) Does not include lower debt service after 2019 refunding.
(3) Includes return of interest to capital funds.
(4) Net Annual Balance is Net Revenue Available for Debt Service (Line 10) less Debt Service and Other Expenditures (Lines 17 a nd 23) plus Other
Non-Operating Revenue (Line 18)
(5) Includes funds set aside for a minimum operating reserve equal to 60 days of operating expenses.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-25
As indicated on Lines 2 and 3 of Table 9, other operating revenue and connection fee
revenue, previously projected in Table 7, are available for the wastewater system. Projected
revenue from District-wide connection fees are expended as part of the cash financing of major
improvements line item (Line 20), which is the sum of Line 3 and Line 10 of Table 2. Interest
income that is available from restricted or reserve funds for operating purposes is shown on
Line 5 of Table 9. Interest income is estimated based on a 1.0 percent annual interest rate
applied to the average beginning and end of year fund balances. A slightly higher rate of 1.2
percent is assumed for funds held in the revenue bond reserve fund to reflect the ability to
invest these funds for a longer term.
Total revenue available for wastewater utility operations is shown on Line 6 of Table
9. Total operation and maintenance expense for the wastewater system, is shown on Lines 7
and 8 of Table 9. Line 10 shows the estimated net revenue remaining after deducting total
projected operation and maintenance expense (Line 9) from total wastewater revenue (Line 6).
This net wastewater revenue is available or pledged for debt service coverage purposes.
Debt service requirements on existing and projected revenue bonds and SRF loans are
presented on Lines 11 through 17. This debt financing program will provide a mechanism to
spread the costs of major capital improvements over a portion of their useful lives and more
equitably recover these costs from both current and future users of the improvements.
Line 18 of Table 9 shows other non-operating revenue of the wastewater utility,
previously shown on Line 9 of Table 7. Line 19 of Table 9 shows the total amount of routine
annual improvements which are completely financed by annual revenues. Funds used to
finance a portion of the major capital improvement program are reported as a cost on Line 20
of Table 9 and as a source of funds on Line 3 of Table 2. The net annual balance of annual
revenues less expenditures is presented on Line 24. Lines 25 and 26 of Table 9 show the
projected combined beginning and ending cash balances of the wastewater utility for each year
of the study period exclusive of the targeted operating reserve balances. District staff provided
information regarding the unencumbered balance of funds available at the beginning of fiscal
year 2020.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-26
Wastewater Bill Comparison
Table 10 presents a comparison of typical wastewater service bills under approved and
recommended rates for fiscal years 2021 through 2024 for various billable wastewater volumes
and customer types. As indicated in the table, the monthly wastewater bill for the average
metered residential customer contributing 6 Ccf of wastewater per month will increase by 1
percent in 2021 with additional increases averaging 3.5 percent in FY 2022 through 2024.
T
Table 11 presents the results of a rate survey of the 50 largest U.S. cities based on
published rates as of October 2019. St. Louis’ rates have risen more quickly than some of the
other large cities in this survey, resulting in above average residential charges while the
commercial charges are still below average for the representative customers.
Table 10. Typical Bill Comparison
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Wastewater Bills
Single Family Residential (Metered)
1. 1 Ccf per month $ 28.23 $ 31.22 $ 31.40 $ 32.48 $ 33.61 $ 34.84
2. 5 Ccf per month $ 45.83 $ 50.70 $ 51.40 $ 53.16 $ 55.01 $ 57.04
3. 6 Ccf per month $ 50.23 $ 55.57 $ 56.40 $ 58.33 $ 60.36 $ 62.59
4. 10 Ccf per month $ 67.83 $ 75.05 $ 76.40 $ 79.01 $ 81.76 $ 84.79
5. 15 Ccf per month $ 89.83 $ 99.40 $ 101.40 $ 104.86 $ 108.51 $ 112.54
6. 20 Ccf per month $ 111.83 $ 123.75 $ 126.40 $ 130.71 $ 135.26 $ 140.29
Multi-Family Residential (Metered)
7. 20 Ccf per month $ 111.83 $ 123.75 $ 126.40 $ 130.71 $ 135.26 $ 140.29
8. 40 Ccf per month $ 199.83 $ 221.15 $ 226.40 $ 234.11 $ 242.26 $ 251.29
9. 60 Ccf per month $ 287.83 $ 318.55 $ 326.40 $ 337.51 $ 349.26 $ 362.29
Non-Residential (Normal Strength Wastewater)
10. 70 Ccf per month $ 334.88 $ 370.39 $ 380.84 $ 393.76 $ 407.47 $ 422.64
11. 100 Ccf per month $ 466.88 $ 516.49 $ 530.84 $ 548.86 $ 567.97 $ 589.14
12. 160 Ccf per month $ 730.88 $ 808.69 $ 830.84 $ 859.06 $ 888.97 $ 922.14
Non-Residential (Excess Strength Wastewater) (1)
13. 70 Ccf per month $ 538.43 $ 579.43 $ 593.27 $ 618.49 $ 639.80 $ 661.54
14. 100 Ccf per month $ 694.64 $ 750.34 $ 771.16 $ 804.56 $ 832.32 $ 860.96
15. 160 Ccf per month $ 982.86 $ 1,067.35 $ 1,099.05 $ 1,145.73 $ 1,185.34 $ 1,226.89
(1) The 70, 100, and 160 Ccf bills assume excess strength of 150, 200, and 250 mg/l, respectively,
of suspended solids and BOD.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Wastewater System Financing
D-27
Table 11 - Survey of Typical Monthly Wastewater Bill - 50 Largest US Cities
Meter Size 5/8"5/8"3/4"1"2"
Gallons 4488 5984 11221 74805 7480500
Ccf 6.0 Rank 8.0 Rank 15.0 Rank 100.0 Rank 10000.0 Rank
Population Rank ($)($)($)($)($)
Albuquerque 32 NM 13.08 49 16.45 49 28.22 44 174.10 44 17,128.35 43
Arlington 50 TX 34.26 26 41.36 26 66.24 34 378.84 29 35,620.11 29
Atlanta 40 GA 63.06 6 108.08 3217.94 11,551.59 1 156,882.56 1
Austin 14 TX 54.67 9 79.64 6 149.22 5679.80 9 66,960.78 10
Baltimore 21 MD 60.63 7 76.59 7 139.77 6838.22 5 79,950.09 7
Boston 22 MA 37.32 22 59.71 16 111.97 9746.48 7 74,647.91 8
Charlotte 17 NC 34.67 25 44.65 22 79.58 24 519.92 18 49,966.94 17
Chicago 3 IL 53.61 10 61.57 11 89.43 18 427.73 27 39,829.73 26
Cleveland 45 OH 48.63 13 62.72 10 112.05 8711.01 8 70,472.66 9
Colorado Springs 41 CO 30.48 31 35.50 36 53.07 38 305.63 36 27,530.63 37
Columbus 15 OH 30.47 32 39.21 30 69.80 27 441.25 23 47,104.25 21
Dallas 9 TX 28.84 34 36.85 33 66.69 33 316.90 35 30,773.36 35
Denver 26 CO 32.56 27 39.31 29 69.10 29 368.16 31 33,835.68 31
Detroit 18 MI 41.15 16 53.67 17 99.29 13 634.98 11 62,628.72 13
El Paso 19 TX 28.71 35 32.83 39 47.25 40 243.62 41 20,700.73 40
Fort Worth 16 TX 30.14 33 38.02 32 65.90 35 267.80 39 25,728.30 38
Fresno 34 CA 25.75 43 25.75 43 25.75 45 197.30 43 19,730.00 42
Houston 4 TX 47.72 14 59.91 15 102.59 11 621.36 14 60,980.21 14
Indianapolis 12 IN 49.64 12 59.93 14 98.27 14 361.46 32 33,993.88 30
Jacksonville 11 FL 38.11 18 46.06 21 84.12 19 530.88 17 47,969.60 20
Kansas City 37 MO 66.34 4 82.02 5 136.90 71,116.20 4 109,026.20 4
Las Vegas 30 NV 20.50 44 20.50 45 20.50 49 - -
Long Beach 36 CA 9.67 51 10.39 51 12.89 51 46.86 48 3,650.46 48
Los Angeles 2 CA 30.66 30 40.88 27 76.65 25 511.00 20 51,100.00 16
Louisville 27 KY 37.48 21 44.37 23 68.46 30 431.02 26 41,444.32 25
Memphis 20 TN 10.17 50 13.57 50 25.44 47 169.58 45 16,958.29 45
Mesa 38 AZ 26.76 37 29.98 42 44.96 41 219.07 42 20,066.33 41
Miami 44 FL 25.82 42 38.48 31 82.79 22 632.86 13 80,795.01 6
Milwaukee 28 WI 14.02 48 16.48 48 25.12 48 132.36 47 12,359.09 47
Minneapolis 48 MN 31.06 28 39.48 28 71.85 26 435.50 24 42,146.40 23
Nashville 25 TN 26.58 38 36.06 35 83.25 21 466.69 22 33,707.66 33
New York City 1 NY 38.04 19 50.72 18 95.10 15 634.00 12 63,400.00 12
Oakland 47 CA 14.84 47 17.38 47 25.55 46 133.62 46 12,667.02 46
Oklahoma City 31 OK 26.27 41 33.02 38 56.64 37 343.40 33 33,743.09 32
Omaha 42 NB 54.68 8 60.88 12 82.58 23 264.24 40 17,099.09 44
Philadelphia 5 PA 26.89 36 33.38 37 57.77 36 337.44 34 32,492.90 34
Phoenix 6 AZ 19.34 46 24.29 44 41.60 42 267.87 38 24,754.53 39
Portland 29 OR 66.48 3 88.64 4 166.20 41,130.40 3 109,080.00 3
Raleigh 43 NC 38.54 17 47.60 20 84.08 20 478.64 21 45,377.95 22
Sacramento 35 CA 19.85 45 19.85 46 19.85 50 - -
San Antonio 7 TX 26.38 39 36.44 34 67.96 31 434.04 25 41,626.31 24
San Diego 5 CA 36.75 23 43.95 24 69.14 28 392.05 28 37,687.33 27
San Fransisco 13 CA 85.47 2 113.23 2210.39 3831.19 6 82,902.19 5
San Jose 10 CA 63.48 5 73.07 8 92.26 16 545.58 16 48,185.67 19
Seattle 23 WA 86.88 1 115.84 1217.20 21,448.00 2 144,800.00 2
Tucson 33 CZ 34.77 24 42.03 25 67.44 32 375.90 30 36,303.00 28
Tulsa 46 OK 47.53 15 60.83 13 107.38 10 678.17 10 66,524.21 11
Virginia Beach 39 VA 30.81 29 30.81 41 30.81 43 39.32 117.98
Washington 24 DC 37.93 20 49.93 19 92.01 17 602.28 15 60,003.77 15
Wichita 49 KS 26.34 40 31.95 40 51.59 39 290.03 37 28,074.89 36
St. Louis MO 50.23 11 65.31 9 99.40 12 516.49 19 48,729.49 18
Median 34.26 41.36 71.85 431.02 39,829.73
Average 37.53 47.63 81.57 474.92 46,024.66
(a) Las Vegas and Virginia Beach Commercial Rates are based on the type of business and number of fixtures. Each customer will have a different rate.
(b) Oklahoma City Rates are based on a meter multiplier. This must be combined with the base rate in order to bet an exact bill .
(c ) Sacramento's commerical sewer rate is charged based on a factor associated with square footage, not consumption as in our analysis.
(d) Half of Washington's combined Water and Sewer Metering Fee is included.
(e) Median Household Income estimate for each City (does not include any outside city areas served) from the United States Cens us Bureau,
American Factfinder "2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates".
Residential Non-Residential
Small Medium Large Commercial Industrial
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Bond Covenant Compliance
D-28
Bond Covenant Compliance
Rate Covenants
The majority of all District wastewater and stormwater revenues are deposited into and
accounted for by separate wastewater and stormwater operating funds. Portions of these
revenues are transferred to the General Fund, as required, to pay each utility’s portion of
operation and maintenance expense and routine capital expenditures.
Section 6.1 of the Master Bond Ordinance requires the District to operate the System
on a revenue producing basis and at all times to prescribe, fix, maintain, and collect rates, fees,
and other charges for the services, facilities, and commodities
furnished by the System fully sufficient at all times to pay annual
operation and maintenance expense, provide a reasonable operating
reserve, produce net revenues in each fiscal year equal to at least 1.25
times the Debt Service Requirement on all Senior Bonds currently
outstanding and 1.15 times the Debt Service Requirement on all Bonds then outstanding and
accumulate sufficient funds to meet the costs of major renewals, replacements, repairs,
additions, betterments, and improvements to the System to keep it in good working condition.
In addition, Section 3.020(16) of the Charter requires the District to establish fair and
reasonable schedules of charges and Section 7.130 of the Charter requires a balanced budget.
Based on a detailed analysis of the System’s revenue and revenue requirements, as
presented in the Wastewater System Financing section of this report, the District will continue
to meet the rate covenant requirements after issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds. In addition,
the existing wastewater rates in effect for fiscal year 2020 and the rates recommended for fiscal
years 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 are projected to provide sufficient user charge revenues,
together with other available revenue sources, to meet all projected revenue requirements
related to the proposed CIRP and remain in compliance with the rate covenants throughout the
study period.
Reasonable Charges
Section 6.7 of the Master Bond Ordinance requires that:
“None of the facilities or services afforded by the System will be furnished
to any user without a reasonable charge being made therefor.”
Current and future rates for the System are based on detailed cost of service analyses
to provide reasonable assurance that each customer class pays its proportionate share of the
costs required to provide utility service. All users of the System are required to pay their
Capitalized terms
are defined in the
Bond Ordinance.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Bond Covenant Compliance
D-29
proportionate share of operating and maintenance expenses in compliance with the Master
Bond Ordinance requirement and Federal user charge requirements. No free service is being
provided by the District.
Adequate Maintenance
Section 6.2 of the Bond Ordinance requires the District to operate the System in an
efficient and economical manner and maintain the System at all times in good repair and sound
operating condition. The System has historically been adequately maintained and found to be
in good working order. Although costs are considered reasonable and result in rates
comparable to similar sized utilities, the District is continuously looking at ways to reduce
costs and keep utility rates as low as possible.
Additional Bonds Tests
In order to issue additional revenue bonds on parity with prior Senior Bonds, the
District must have sufficient revenues to meet either a preceding year or ensuing year
additional bonds coverage test. Section 5.3 of the Master Bond Ordinance requires historical
Net Operating Revenues and Investment Earnings (“net revenues”) for a period of 12
consecutive months of the most recent 18 consecutive months prior to the issuance of the
proposed Senior Bonds to be at least equal to (i) 1.25 times the Maximum Annual Debt Service
Requirement on all Senior Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of
the proposed Senior Bonds, and (ii) 1.15 times the Maximum Annual Debt Service
Requirement on all Bonds which will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of the
proposed Senior Bonds.
For the ensuing year additional bonds test, the Master Bond Ordinance requires the
forecasted net revenues for each fiscal year in the Forecast Period (the three consecutive fiscal
years commencing with the fiscal year in which any proposed Senior Bonds are to be issued)
to be at least (i) 1.25 times the Maximum Annual Debt Service Requirement on all Senior
Bonds that will be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of the proposed Senior Bonds,
and (ii) 1.15 times the Maximum Annual Debt Service Requirement on all Bonds which will
be Outstanding immediately after the issuance of the proposed Senior Bonds.
Revenue adjustments are allowed for the preceding year test for any rate increase
enacted prior to the delivery date of the proposed Senior Bonds and not fully reflected in the
historical Net Operating Revenues actually received during the 12-month period. A similar
adjustment is allowed for the ensuing year test if the rates were actually adopted by ordinance
prior to issuance of the bonds. Without a future rate adjustment provision for the ensuing year
test, the normal inflationary increases in operation and maintenance expenses could outpace
the revenues obtained from a relatively stable customer base such that future net revenues and
ensuing year debt service coverage may significantly decrease towards the end of the Forecast
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Bond Covenant Compliance
D-30
Period. This may require the District to enact multiple year rate increases prior to issuance of
the bonds, set rates at a current year debt service coverage level of 1.50 times the Debt Service
Requirement or higher to account for the expected coverage deterioration, or only rely on the
historic year test to issue additional Senior Bonds.
The Master Bond Ordinance also specifies additional bond tests for the issuance of any
Subordinate Bonds. These tests are identical to the additional Senior Bond tests.
The District has never defaulted on any District-wide or subdistrict revenue bond
payment and is expected to be able to issue additional revenue bonds throughout the study
period. Table 12 presents the results of the rate covenant and additional bond coverage tests
during the study period and projects revenue based on the recommended rate increases through
2024. As indicated by Line 4 of Table 12, the indicated annual rate covenant coverage ranges
from 2.81 times annual debt service to 3.45 times annual senior lien debt service, exceeding
the 1.25 minimum requirement. Likewise, the additional bond coverage levels for Senior
Bonds, as shown on Lines 11 and 16 of Table 12, exceed their 1.25 minimum requirements
throughout the study period. Coverage indicated for total debt is also above the 1.15 minimum
requirement throughout the study period, as shown on Lines 12 and 17 of Table 12. Lines 19
and 20 present the ensuing year additional bonds test as calculated for the Series 2019B Bonds
and does not consider the potential impact of future rate increases or bond issues. The District
is in compliance with the ensuing year additional bonds test as the senior lien coverage exceed
1.25 times and total debt coverage exceed 1.15 times in each of the next three years.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Bond Covenant Compliance
D-31
a
Table 12. Debt Service Coverage under Projected Revenue Levels
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected
Rate Covenant Coverage
1. Projected Net Revenue (1)244,962,649$ 272,965,554$ 264,956,009$ 281,360,187$ 291,569,259$ 306,254,216$
Projected Debt Service to Bondholders (2)
2. Senior Lien Bonds 77,941,363$ 79,146,919$ 84,005,094$ 91,349,302$ 98,304,576$ 109,121,807$
3. Total Debt (3)114,132,715$ 117,272,050$ 125,093,649$ 136,762,651$ 150,704,746$ 169,220,900
Debt Service Coverage Levels
4. Senior Lien Bonds (4)3.14 3.45 3.15 3.08 2.97 2.81
5. Total Debt (5)2.15 2.33 2.12 2.06 1.93 1.81
Additional Parity Test Coverage
Projected Maximum Annual Debt Service (6)
6. Senior Lien Bonds 86,842,258$ 90,293,758$ 98,787,758$ 104,546,508$ 113,409,008$ 129,727,758$
7. Total Debt 118,682,480 122,123,730 133,478,420 141,461,063 156,508,313 180,485,808
Preceding Year Test
8. Net Revenue for Prior Fiscal Year 215,631,803$ 244,962,649$ 272,965,554$ 264,956,009$ 281,360,187$ 291,569,259$
9. Net Revenue Adjustment (7)22,964,787 25,721,078 6,005,242 9,008,504 9,706,926 10,496,493
10. Adjusted Net Revenue 238,596,590$ 270,683,727$ 278,970,796$ 273,964,514$ 291,067,114$ 302,065,752$
Preceding Year Debt Service Coverage Levels
11. Senior Lien Bonds (8)2.75 3.00 2.82 2.62 2.57 2.33
12. Total Debt (9)2.01 2.22 2.09 1.94 1.86 1.67
Ensuing Year Test
13. Net Revenue for Ensuing Fiscal Year 272,965,554$ 264,956,009$ 281,360,187$ 291,569,259$ 306,254,216$ 338,974,527$
14. Net Revenue Adjustment (10)- - - - - -
15. Adjusted Net Revenue 272,965,554$ 264,956,009$ 281,360,187$ 291,569,259$ 306,254,216$ 338,974,527$
Ensuing Year Debt Service Coverage Levels
16. Senior Lien Bonds (11)3.14 2.93 2.85 2.79 2.70 2.61
17. Total Debt (12)2.30 2.17 2.11 2.06 1.96 1.88
Ensuing Year Additional Bonds Test - Current Issue
18. Net Revenue for Ensuing Year (13)184,450,583$ 223,501,140$ 259,457,617$
19. Senior Lien Bonds (13)2.04 2.48 2.87
20. Total Debt (13)1.51 1.83 2.12
(1) Net revenue as shown on Line 10 of Table 9. Includes the impact of approved rate increases each year.
(2) Projected actual payments to of principal and interest from the sinking fund to bondholders.
(3) Includes senior revenue bonds and subordinate debt obligations.
(4) Line 1 / Line 2. The Bond Ordinance requires net revenue to equal or exceed 1.25 times actual senior lien debt service.
(5) Line 1 / Line 3. The Bond Ordinance requires net revenue to equal or exceed 1.15 times actual total debt service.
(6) Maximum future debt service for all series of revenue bonds issued in previous years or during the current fiscal year.
(7) Adjustment for revenues increases to be fully operative July 1 of the current fiscal year as allowed by the Bond Ordinance.
(8) Line 10 / Line 6. The Bond Ordinance requires adjusted net revenue for the preceding fiscal year to equal or exceed 1.25 times
the maximum annual debt service on all then outstanding senior lien obligations.
(9) Line 10 / Line 7. The Bond Ordinance requires adjusted net revenue for the preceding fiscal year to equal or exceed 1.15 times
the maximum annual debt service on all then outstanding debt obligations.
(10) Adjustment for revenues increases not permitted for ensuing year coverage test unless already adopted by the Board.
(11) Line 15 / Line 6. The Bond Ordinance requires net revenue for the ensuing three fiscal years to equal or exceed 1.25 times
the maximum annual debt service on all then outstanding senior lien revenue bonds.
(12) Line 15 / Line 7. The Bond Ordinance requires net revenue for the ensuing three fiscal years to equal or exceed 1.15 times
the maximum annual debt service on all then outstanding bonds.
(13) The test for the currently proposed issue considers the next three fiscal years, with adjustments for future rate increases adopted
by the Board.
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District Principal Assumptions
D-32
Principal Assumptions
In conducting our analyses and in forming an opinion of future operations summarized
in this report, Raftelis has made certain assumptions with respect to conditions, events, and
circumstances that may occur in the future. The methodology utilized by Raftelis in performing
the analysis follows generally accepted practices for such projections. Such assumptions and
methodologies are summarized in this report and are reasonable and appropriate for the
purpose for which they are used. While we believe the assumptions are reasonable and the
projection methodology valid, actual results may differ materially from those projected, as
influenced by the conditions, events, and circumstances that actually occur. The principal
assumptions used in the forecast of future operations are as follows:
1. In preparation of this report, Raftelis has relied on certain historical, financial, and
statistical data supplied by District staff. While such data is considered reliable, Raftelis
has not independently verified the detailed accuracy of such data.
2. The District’s estimates of content, scheduling, and cost of the capital improvement
program present a reasonable projection of the future construction program and
complies with the initial terms of the Consent Decree.
3. Billed wastewater volume will continue to decrease but will level off towards the end
of the study period.
4. Debt service for the revenue bonds proposed to be issued, including the Series 2019B
Bonds, will be approximately as estimated as of the date of this report
5. The District will maintain a minimum operating reserve balance at all times that is at
least equal to 60 days of operating expenditures.
6. There will be no material changes in federal and state laws or regulations that would
adversely impact the District’s ability to secure tax-exempt financing for its System,
place more stringent limitations on wastewater effluent discharges, materially increase
the cost of constructing or operating the wastewater system, or otherwise adversely
impact operations of the System.
7. The general economy that impacts System costs and users’ capabilities to pay
wastewater service charges will remain relatively stable at current conditions.
APPENDIX E
Forms of Opinions of Co-Bond Counsel
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
E-1
FORM OF OPINION OF CO-BOND COUNSEL
(SERIES 2019B BONDS)
Gilmore & Bell, P.C., St. Louis, Missouri, and White Coleman & Associates, LLC, St. Louis,
Missouri, Co-Bond Counsel, propose to issue their approving opinions upon the issuance of the
Series 2019B Bonds in substantially the following form:
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
St. Louis, Missouri
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.,
as representative of the Underwriters
Chicago, Illinois
Re: $52,130,000 The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Wastewater System Revenue
Bonds, Series 2019B
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as co-bond counsel in connection with the issuance by The Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District (the “District”), of the above-captioned bonds (the “Series 2019B Bonds”). In this
capacity, we have examined the District’s Charter, the law and the certified proceedings, certifications
and other documents that we deem necessary to render this opinion.
The Series 2019B Bonds are issued pursuant to Master Bond Ordinance No. 11713 adopted by
the Board of Trustees of the District on April 22, 2004, as supplemented by Ordinance No. 15311 adopted
by the Board of Trustees of the District on November 14, 2019 (collectively, the “Bond Ordinance”).
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such
terms in the Bond Ordinance.
Regarding questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon the certified proceedings
and other certifications of public officials furnished to us without undertaking to verify the same by
independent investigation.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion, under existing law, as follows:
1. The Series 2019B Bonds have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the
District and are valid and legally binding limited obligations of the District, payable solely from the
Pledged Revenues of the District’s sanitary sewer system, after providing for the costs of operation and
maintenance thereof. The Series 2019B Bonds do not constitute general obligations of the District nor do
they constitute an indebtedness of the District within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or
charter provision, limitation or restriction, and the taxing power of the District is not pledged to the
payment of the Series 2019B Bonds.
2. The Bond Ordinance has been duly adopted by the Board of Trustees of the District and
constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of the District enforceable against the District. The
Bond Ordinance creates a valid lien on the revenues and other funds pledged by the Bond Ordinance for
E-2
the security of the Series 2019B Bonds on a parity with any Senior Bonds issued or to be issued as
provided under the Bond Ordinance.
3. The interest on the Series 2019B Bonds (i) is excludable from gross income for federal
income tax purposes, (ii) is exempt from income taxation by the State of Missouri, and (iii) is not an item
of tax preference for purposes of computing the federal alternative minimum tax. The opinions set forth
in this paragraph are subject to the condition that the District complies with all requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) that must be satisfied subsequent to the
issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds in order that interest thereon be, or continue to be, excludable from
gross income for federal income tax purposes. The District has covenanted to comply with all of these
requirements. Failure to comply with certain of these requirements may cause the interest on the Series
2019B Bonds to be included in gross income for federal and State of Missouri income tax purposes
retroactive to the date of issuance of the Series 2019B Bonds. The Series 2019B Bonds have not been
designated as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b) of the Code.
We express no opinion regarding the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of the Official
Statement or other offering material relating to the Series 2019B Bonds (except to the extent, if any, stated
in the Official Statement). Further, we express no opinion regarding the perfection or priority of the lien
on revenues or other funds pledged under the Bond Ordinance or tax consequences arising with respect to
the Series 2019B Bonds other than as expressly set forth in this opinion.
The rights of the owners of the Series 2019B Bonds and the enforceability of the Series 2019B
Bonds and the Bond Ordinance may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium
and other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and by equitable principles, whether considered
at law or in equity, and their enforcement may be subject to the exercise of judicial discretion in
appropriate cases.
This opinion is given as of its date, and we assume no obligation to revise or supplement this
opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may come to our attention or any changes in law that
may occur after the date of this opinion.
Very truly yours,
E-3
FORM OF OPINION OF CO-BOND COUNSEL
(SERIES 2019C BONDS)
Gilmore & Bell, P.C., St. Louis, Missouri, and White Coleman & Associates, LLC, St. Louis,
Missouri, Co-Bond Counsel, propose to issue their approving opinions upon the issuance of the
Series 2019C Bonds in substantially the following form:
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
St. Louis, Missouri
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.,
as representative of the Underwriters
Chicago, Illinois
Re: $276,260,000 The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Taxable Wastewater System
Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019C
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as co-bond counsel in connection with the issuance by The Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District (the “District”), of the above-captioned bonds (the “Series 2019C Bonds”). In this
capacity, we have examined the District’s Charter, the law and the certified proceedings, certifications
and other documents that we deem necessary to render this opinion.
The Series 2019C Bonds are issued pursuant to Master Bond Ordinance No. 11713 adopted by
the Board of Trustees of the District on April 22, 2004, as supplemented by Ordinance No. 15312 adopted
by the Board of Trustees of the District on November 14, 2019 (collectively, the “Bond Ordinance”).
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such
terms in the Bond Ordinance.
Regarding questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied upon the certified proceedings
and other certifications of public officials furnished to us without undertaking to verify the same by
independent investigation.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion, under existing law, as follows:
1. The Series 2019C Bonds have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the
District and are valid and legally binding limited obligations of the District, payable solely from the
Pledged Revenues of the District’s sanitary sewer system, after providing for the costs of operation and
maintenance thereof. The Series 2019C Bonds do not constitute general obligations of the District nor do
they constitute an indebtedness of the District within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or
charter provision, limitation or restriction, and the taxing power of the District is not pledged to the
payment of the Series 2019C Bonds.
2. The Bond Ordinance has been duly adopted by the Board of Trustees of the District and
constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of the District enforceable against the District. The
Bond Ordinance creates a valid lien on the revenues and other funds pledged by the Bond Ordinance for
E-4
the security of the Series 2019C Bonds on a parity with any Senior Bonds issued or to be issued as
provided under the Bond Ordinance.
We express no opinion regarding tax consequences arising with respect to the Series 2019C
Bonds.
We express no opinion regarding the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of the Official
Statement or other offering material relating to the Series 2019C Bonds (except to the extent, if any, stated
in the Official Statement). Further, we express no opinion regarding the perfection or priority of the lien
on revenues or other funds pledged under the Bond Ordinance.
The rights of the owners of the Series 2019C Bonds and the enforceability of the Series 2019C
Bonds and the Bond Ordinance may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium
and other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and by equitable principles, whether considered
at law or in equity, and their enforcement may be subject to the exercise of judicial discretion in
appropriate cases.
This opinion is given as of its date, and we assume no obligation to revise or supplement this
opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may come to our attention or any changes in law that
may occur after the date of this opinion.
Very truly yours,
THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT • WASTEWATER SySTEM REvENUE BONDS, SERIES 2019B AND TAxABLE WASTEWATER SySTEM REfUNDINg REvENUE BONDS, SERIES 2019C!(
!(
!(
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
§¨¦44
§¨¦55
§¨¦64
§¨¦70
§¨¦270
§¨¦170
§¨¦255
§¨¦44
§¨¦70
§¨¦64
§¨¦270 §¨¦55
C LAYTON
BALLASPAGE NEW HALLS
FERRYWI
LDHORS
ECREEKDELMAR LUCAS N HUNTS T ALBANS
LAD
U
E
LACLEDE STATIONU S HIGHWAY6 6
E A R T H CITYWOODS MILLHANLEYPA
G
E
HANLEYFO
R
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
OLIVE
MO109GRAVO
I
SMO364MO100
T EL E G RAPHMO30MO141
WATSON
S
T
C
H
A
R
L
E
S
R
O
C
K
LEM
A
Y
F
E
R
R
Y
TESSONFER R YLEWISNCLARKCLARKSONCHIPPEWA
R IV ERVIEWNATURAL
B
RID
G
E
MAN C H E S T E R
MANCHESTER
MO370
MO3
4
0
£¤67
£¤67
MINTERT
SULPHUR
GRAND GLAIZE
Lemay
Fenton
Coldwater
Grand Glaize
Lower Meramec
Bissell Point
Missouri River
LEMAYLEMAY
MISSOURI RIVERMISSOURI RIVER
BISSELL POINTBISSELL POINT
COLDWATERCOLDWATER
LOWER MERAMECLOWER MERAMEC
¶
SERVICE AREAS
ST. CHARLES COUNTY
ST. CLAIR COUNTY
MADISON
COUNTY
LEGEND
#*TREATMENT PLANTS
!(MAINTENANCE YARDS
ST. LOUIS COUNTY
MSD BOUNDARY
BISSELL POINT
COLDWATER
LEMAY
MISSOURI RIVER
LOWER MERAMEC
The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
JEFFERSON COUNTYFRANKLIN COUNTYMiles of Pipe & Force Mains:
(as of 06/30/2019)
Sanitary Sewers = 4,700 Miles
Storm Sewers = 3,000 Miles
Combined Sewers = 1,700 Miles
Total = 9,400 Miles