Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutLTC 010-2014 - Update Bal Harbour Police DepartmentSAL H OUR F LO RI DA'S PARADISE OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE MANAGER NO. 010-2014 LETTER TO COUNCIL To: Mayor Jean Rosenfield and Members of the Village Council FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, Village Manager �✓"� DATE: July 30, 2014 SUBJECT: Update — Bal Harbour Police Department The purpose of this Letter to Council (LTC) is to inform you of recent correspondence and activities in the Bal Harbour Police Department (BHPD) relative to our standing with law enforcement partners, including the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). Since my appointment as Village Manager, one of my priorities has been the Bal Harbour Police Department and working toward regaining the public trust. My appointment of Chief of Police Mark Overton on January 6, 2014, after a thorough recruitment process, was the first step in restoring confidence in our Police Department. As you know Bal Harbour Village, has been under intensive scrutiny by various law enforcement agencies over the past few years. Much effort has been made to bring to closure these investigations by our new Chief and myself. I am pleased to inform you that significant progress has been made. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) — Criminal Investigation The FBI Miami Division had initiated an investigation based on a complaint of alleged corruption by members of the Bal Harbour Police Department Tri-County Task Force. On July 3, 2014, the FBI advised that after a careful and thorough investigation of the complaint, the investigation will be closed pending new information of value and/or evidence of criminal activity (Attachment A). As a result, we took specific personnel actions with the affected employees. U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division — Re -Admittance into the Equitable Sharing Program The Bal Harbour Police Department was suspended form the Equitable Sharing Program in November 2012, as a result of an Office of the Inspector General (OIG) investigation into the use of equitable sharing funds obtained from the BHPD's participation in the Tri-County Task Force. LTC # 009.2014 Update — Bal Harbour Police Department Page 2 of 3 In 2012, the Village received a letter from the Department of Justice summarizing the actions taken as a result of OIG findings, which included suspension from the Equitable Sharing program, required repayment of seized monies, and finally, the Village's ban from participation in the Equitable Sharing Program in the future (Attachment B). One measure for the Village to regain standing is through having the ban lifted on participation. Since his appointment, Chief Overton and I have been meeting with representatives from the U.S. Attorney's Office, the Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS) and other law enforcement partners regarding the closure of this case and the re -admittance of the Bal Harbour Police Department to the Equitable Sharing Program (Attachment C). On June 17, 2014, the Department of Justice Criminal Division, upon completing its due diligence process with the Department of Justice and the Department of Treasury, advised us that we have been readmitted to the Department of Justice Equitable Sharing Program subject to certain conditions. In order to participate, the BHPD will be required to the following: • The BHPD must ensure that none of its officers participate in any state/local led taskforces similar to the Tri-County Task Force; • The BHPD may only request sharing on seizures obtained as a result of joint investigations with federal agencies; • Equitable sharing funds obtained through future participation may not be used to fund or support any undercover money laundering operations unless a federal law enforcement agency is actively participating in the investigation; and, • Additional audit review and oversight controls may be implemented if appropriate. Failure to comply with audit requests will be a basis for future suspension from the Program. Currently, the BHPD is working on submitting the required 2013 Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification form, in accordance with the Department of Justice's requirements for re - admittance. Re -admittance does not necessarily mean we will immediately detach an officer and fully participate in the program — but we are now able to. I have asked the Chief to first fully ensure that we are meeting our public safety needs before we consider any outside agency activities. However, re -admittance does bring closure to a very unfortunate episode for Bal Harbour Village. Florida Department of Law Enforcement — Notification of Non -Compliance with FCIC/NCIC System Use (2011-2012) As you may know, the BHPD was audited for the agency's use of the FCIC/NCIC system and handling of criminal history information by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for the period of December 2011 through December 2012. On January 10, 2014, the FDLE provided the department with a letter transmitting their findings — that one of the BHPD's operating procedures was out of compliance with the FCIC/NCIC policy. Specifically, the BHPD was accessing FCIC/NCIC for non -criminal purposes, such as non -authorized state/federal fingerprint -based background checks were run on employees of a condominium in the Village. In addition, the department performed name -based record checks on coaches participating in the Police Athletic League. Accessing the FCIC/NCIC system, which is linked to state and federal databases, for non -criminal purposes, is not allowed per the user agreement and system LTC # 009-2014 Update — Bal Harbour Police Department Page 3 of 3 policy (Attachment D). Chief Mark Overton immediately addressed the audit findings by instituting the use of the Vex System. This system allows the BHPD to provide Village residents and businesses with background checks by accessing local databases, and without violating any FDLE regulations. On April 17, 2104, upon review of documentation and information provided by the department regarding actions taken to rectify audit findings, FDLE advised that the BHPD was once again operating in compliance with the FCIC User Agreement and FCIC/NCIC rules and regulations (Attachment E). Conclusion The nearly two-year federal investigation of the Bal Harbour Police Department related to the activities and participation in the Tri-County Task Force has now been concluded, with no determination of criminal activity by members of the BHPD. While closure to these episodes is welcome, it should not be construed as complete exoneration of past activities. We should all note that significant and costly financial penalties have been imposed upon the Village by these entities. The closure, however, can be construed as an acknowledgment by these entities that Bal Harbour Village has taken appropriate steps to make corrections to its policies and practices, as well as put in place new leadership to ensure compliance with all federal, state and local laws and policies in the future. Our next step is to conduct an internal review of the activities of the Taskforce to determine if any violations of department policies and procedures occurred, and whether any disciplinary action is warranted as a result. As your Village Manager, my charge was to conclude this process, restore public confidence and ensure that the BHPD refocused its efforts toward community policing and meeting the public safety demands of this community. I am proud to report that over the last six (6) months, we have been able to work with our federal law enforcement partners to close out these pending issues related to the BHPD's participation in the Tri-County Task Force. More importantly, these important steps will serve as the cornerstone for the continued transformation of the BHPD into a more community -oriented policing and professional agency. My commitment to this community is that I will make changes in order to improve efficiency of operations, increase the level of service and professionalism of Village staff, and most importantly, ensure that this Administration exemplifies the principles of good government. I have attached for your reference copies of the correspondence received by Bal Harbour Village and the Bal Harbour Police Department regarding these matters. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. JMG/MNO/DM F:\PD ADMIN\DOLORES\LTCs\LTC - Police Dept Update FINAL 7.14.docx ATTACHMENT In Reply, Please Refer to File No. Chief Mark Overton 655 96's Street Ball Harbour, Florida 33154 RE: Tri County Task Force Dear Chief Overton: U.S. Department of.lustice Federal Bureau of Investigation 16320 NW 2nd Avenue North Miami Beach, FL 33169 July 3, 2014 The FBI Miami Division initiated an investigation based on a complaint of alleged corruption by members of the Bal Harbour Police Department Tri County Task Force. After a careful and thorough investigation of the complaint, and upon consulting with the United States Attorney's Office in the Middle District of Florida, we have determined that there does not appear to be a violation within the FBI's jurisdiction, which could be successfully prosecuted and proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a Federal District Court. This investigation will be closed pending any new information of value and/or evidence of criminal activity. Sincerely, George L. Piro Special Agent in Charge BY: (" tit'126G L- y/Qi'/( rq v try Antonio E. Castaneda Supervisory Special Agent Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT B U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Wnsloln$W, D.C. 205JO Chief Thomas E. Hunker Dal Harbour Police Department 655 96th Street Bal Harbour, FL 33154 Jean Rosenfield Mayor Village of Bal Harbour 655 96th Street Dal Harbour, FL 33154 October 26, 2012 Re: Deparduenr of Justice Investigation of Dal Harbour Police Department Equitable Sharine Con+nliance. ]Vntlfleatlar nflnelleibillty. and Return of Funds Dear Chief Bunker and Mayor Rosenfield: This letter concerns the findings of investigations conducted by the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (010) and Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS) of the Dal Harbour Police Department's (BHPD) participation in the DOJ Equitable Sharing Program (Program). The Program is intended to foster cooperation among federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies by working together to combat and deter crime, and providing valuable resources to participating state and local law enforcement ageneies through the sharing of forfeited property. While we believe the Program has been a tremendous success, we are keen) aware of the inherent sensitivities surrounding the sharing of forfeited property with participant slate and local law enforcement agencies. As a result, Program participants are required to adhere to rigorous standards and procedures, including those set forth in the Guide to Equitable Sharing far State and Local Law Enforcemenr Agencies (Guide), the Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification Form (CSAC), and the National Code of Professional Conduct for Asset Forfeiture (Code). Violations of the requirements set forth in the Guide, ESAC, and Code can result in a range of sanctions against Program participants, including: Denial of an agency's sharing request; " Temporary or permanent exclusion from further participation in the equitable sharing program; " Offsets from future sharing in amounts equal to impermissible uses; " Civil enforcement actions in U.S. District Courts for breach of contract; or, " Where warranted, federal criminal prosecution for false statements under 18 U.S.C. � 1001, fraud involving theft of federal program funds under 18 U.S.C. � 666, or other sections of the criminal code, as applicable.' In August 2011, AFMLS notified BHPD that it had been selected for a compliance review of its participation in the Program and its use of fedora] equitable sharing money. After BIIPD's repeated failure to fully cooperate with this review, AFMLS referred the matter to the 010. In February 2012, the 010 and AFMLS initiated a joint compliance review to determine if federal asset forfeiture funds were properly expended by BHPD. On September 27, 2012, the 010 released the conclusions of its investigation that revealed serious financial deficiencies and compliance failures both by BHPD and by the Tri-County Task Force (TCTF), which BHPD led. Records indicate that BHPD established the TCTF in 2009 as a money laundering and narcotics task force. The TCTF was composed of officers from the BHPD; a contract employee from the BHPD who is the commander of the task force; a BHPD contract employee who works out of the Orange County, California, U.S. Immigration and Customs Etrforcement Office; and deputies from the Glades County, Florida, Sheriff's Office (GCSO). The Old determined that from 2008 to 2011, TCTF conducted transactions involving over $56 million without adequate written policies or procedures, prosecutorial oversight, or audits of undercover bank accounts. Moreover, BHPD and GCSO failed to follow their own Memorandum of Understanding regarding the operations of the'fCTF. The OIG and AFMLS also uncovered numerous instances of BHPD making improper use of equitable sbaruig money it received through the Program. During fiscal years 2010 and 2011, BHPD used $709,836.17 in equitable sharing [Honey to pay employee salaries and benefits, despite the Guide's express prohibition against the use of equitable sharing money for such purposes. The 010 and AFMLS found that in August 2011, equitable sharing funds were used to pay an American Express credit card account used by the TCTF for travel and other investigative related expenses. They also found several examples where BHPD used equitable sharing money to pay hotel, food, and airline bills in excess of federal per diem rates.  Time findingsare consistentvvith-the-conclusions-ofBal-Hmtyour's hidependeat-aaditm; which in 2011 issued a "Material Weakness" finding against BHPD based on what it determined to be a "lack of adequate internal controls over compliance avid knowledge of the requirements of Federal Equitable Sharing Programs" In light of these findings, and pursuant to its oversight and policy authority over the Program, AFMLS has decided to make BIiPD ineligible from participation in the Program, and to require reimbursement of equitable sharing money received by BHPD. According to its fiscal year 2011 LSAC filing, BHPD had $3,109,813.51 in its federal DOJ equitable sharing account. 'See Guide, Section XI. Subsequently, BHPD has received additional sharing of $407,969.71, for a total amount of $3,517,783.22. This total amount must be returned prormptly. Under separate letter, AFMLS will provide instructions for returning BHPD's federal equitubte sharing balances. BHPD should be aware that the return of sharing funds received from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund may he addressed in a separate notification from officials of the Department of the Treasury. BHPD will also be required to return all previously expended amounts found to be impermissible uses of Program funds, As noted, AFMLS has determined that BHPD impermissibly spent $709,836,37 in equitable sharing money on employee salaries and benefits. This money also must be reimbursed. A final review of expenditures occurring after the OIG and AFMLS investigations were concluded will be performed to determine whether there were additional impermissible expenditures that must be reimbursed. Also be advised that as long as 1311PD remains ineligible from the Program, no equitable sharing requests from 1311111) will be accepted or processed, nor will BHPD be eligible to receive any Joint Law Enforcement Operations or overtime payments. The matters addressed in this letter relate solely to Program compliance and in no way limit other sanctions that may be warranted. If you have questions about the return of funds or our review of expenditures made after the effective date of the investigation, please contact AFMLS Assistant Deputy Chief Gene Patton at (202) 514-1263. ey Copy: Eric Hamel, Director Treasury Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture Departmentofthe-l'reasury---_ Melissa Nasrah, Legal Counsel Treasury Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture Department of the Treasury Jackie Jackson, Program Manager Treasury Executive Office of Asset Forfeiture Department of the Treasury U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Washington, D.C. 20530 10/21/2013 Dan Gelber Gelber Schachter & Greenberg, P.A. 1441 Brickell Avenue Suite 1420 Miami, Florida 33131-3426 Via email: dan@gsgpa.com Dear Mr. Gelber: This letter serves as a follow up to our telephone conversation on October 1, 2013, regarding Bat Harbour Police Department's (BHPD) participation in the Department of Justice's Equitable Sharing Program (Program). As we discussed, BHPD and the Village of Bat Harbour have taken measures to address the actions of the Tri-County Task Force (Task Force) and BHPD as a result of the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) audit. These measures include the removal of the Village of Bat Harbour's Chief of Police, who was the head of the Task Force, and the dissolution of the Task Force. In addition, at the request of the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS), BHPD returned $1,279,872.83, which was the balance of its equitable sharing account, to the U.S. Department of Justice. As a result of these remedial actions, AFMLS will not require BHPD to return any additional funds because of impermissible expenditures identified by the Department of Justice's OIG audit, which included the identification of $657,858 in overtime payments. BHPD, however, remains ineligible to participate in the Program. This designation means that BHPD will not be allowed to submit requests for future equitable sharing awards and all pending sharing requests and equitable sharing disbursements will be extinguished. Please be aware that the matters addressed by AFMLS in this letter relate solely to Program compliance. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, please contact me by phone at (202) 514-1263 or by email at alice.dery(a.usdol.gov. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Alice W�.Dery, Deputy Asset Forraiture and M Laundering Section ATTACHMENT C U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Washington, D.C. 20530 JUN 17 20% Chief Mark N. Overton Bal Harbour Village Police Department 655 961h St. Surfside, Fl 33154 Dear Chief Overton: This letter is in response to your recent conversations with the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (AFMLS) requesting that the Bal Harbour Village Police Department (BHPD) be readmitted to the Equitable Sharing Program (Program). After consultation with both Department of Justice and Department of the Treasury agencies who worked with BHPD, AFMLS will readmit BHPD to the Department of Justice Program subject to the conditions set forth below. BI-IPD was suspended from the Program in November 2012 as a result of an Office of Inspector General investigation into the use of equitable sharing funds obtained from BHPD's participation in the Tri-County Task Force (TCTF). While TCTF has been dissolved, as a condition of readmission to the Program, BHPD must ensure that none of its officers participate in any state/local led task forces similar to TCTF. In addition, BHPD may only request sharing on seizures obtained as a result of joint investigations with federal agencies; no adoptions will be accepted for processing. Equitable sharing funds obtained from future participation may not be used to fund or support any undercover money laundering operations unless a federal law enforcement agency is actively participating in the investigation. In the future, AFMLS will coordinate equitable sharing training with BHPD, Additional audit review and oversight controls may be implemented if appropriate. Failure to comply with audit requests will be a basis for future suspension from the Program. Previously, BHPD returned the remaining balance of its Department of Justice sharing account. In addition, all pending sharing requests have been extinguished. In order to return to compliance, BHPD must file its 2013 Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification form indicating a zero ending balance. The return of funds to the Department of Justice should be reported as an `other" expense on line j. As a participant in the Program, BHPD must also comply with the policies and procedures outlined in Justice's Guide to Eguitahle Sharing for State and Local Law Egforcernent Agencies (April 2009). If you have any questions, please contact Brian Boykin, Equitable Sharing Program Manager, at 202-598-2306 or Brian.Bovkin@usdoi.gov. Sincerely, For Alice W. Dery, Deputy Chief Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section cc: Wifredo Ferrer, U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida U.S. Department of Justice Eric Harnp►, Director Treasury Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture Department of the Treasury Jackie Jackson, Program Manager Treasury Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture Departinent of the Treasury Matthew Rasnake, Chief Forfeiture and Seized Property Unit Federal Bureau of Investigation Vicki Rashid, Forfeiture Counsel Office of Chief Counsel Drug Enforcement Administration Michele Munsie, Assistant Program Manager Asset Forfeiture Financial Services United States Marshals Service Wanda Bossa, Chief Asset Forfeiture and Seized Property Division Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Apr+ ATTACHMENT D ■ ®« Florida Department of Criminal Justice Information Services Rick Scott, Governor Law Enforcement Post Office Box 1489 Pam Bondl, Attorney General Tallahassee, Florida 32302.1489 Jeff Atwater, Chief Financial Officer Gerald M. Bailey (850) 410-71DO Adam Putnam, Commissioner ofAgriculture Commissioner www,fdle.stats.11.us January 10, 2014 Mr. Michael Daddario Interim Chief Sal Harbour Village Police Department 655 961h Street Sal Harbour, Florida 33154 Subject: FCIC/NCIC Audit Dear Interim Chief Daddario: This is written confirmation of the findings from our audit of your agency's use of the FCIC/NCIC system and handling of criminal history information. Our auditors, Operations Review Specialists (ORS) Graham Culbertson and Amanda Wiggins discussed these findings with Ms. Pamela Flanders at the conclusion of the audit. We found one of your agency's operating procedures out of compliance with FCIC/NCIC policy, The enclosed findings provide a description of the area of non-compliance and the required corrective action. Please implement the procedural changes and notify us in writing of your progress within 30 days. We have also enclosed a chart showing the results of the comparison between a sample of your entries and the information in the corresponding case files. If you have any questions regarding this audit, please contact me or ORS Culbertson at (850) 410-7126. Sincerely, Cia"a Donna M. Uzzell Director DMU/gc Enclosure cc: Ms. Isis Crespo, Information Delivery Team Ms. Pamela Flanders, Terminal Agency Coordinator Service • Integrity • Respect • Quality Area of Non-Comoliance: The agency is using its access to FCIC/NCIC for non -criminal justice purposes. Non. authorized state/federal fingerprint -based background checks were run on employees of a condominium in Bal Harbour. The agency also performs name -based record checks on coaches participating in a Police Athletic League. Corrective Action: According to the FDLE Criminal Justice User Agreement, Section II, 1., "Use of the CJNet and any system accessed via the CJNet Is restricted to the administration of criminal Justice or as otherwise specifically authorized or required by statute. Information obtained from the FCIC/NCIC files, or computer interfaces to other state or federal systems, by means of access granted through CJNet, can only be used for authorized purposes in compliance with FCIC/NCIC and III rules, regulations and operating procedures, and state and federal law. It is the responsibility of the User to insure access to CJNet is for authorized purposes only, and to regulate proper use of the network and information at all times. The User must establish appropriate written standards, which may be incorporated with existing codes." Records Review Report Records in Records Errors in Incomplete System Reviewed Records Records BOATS GUNS 8 8 0 1 VEHICLES 4 4 0 1 WRITS _ INJUNCTIONS MISSING PERSONS WARRANTS _ VEHICLE/BOAT PARTS _ LINCENSE PLATES/TAGS 8 8 0 _ 0 Records Error Report The following is a list of all the records that contained errors in the FCICINCIC entries at the time the records were pulled for the audit. Errors in FCIC records can result in missed hits, impacting officer and public safety. OVERALL ERROR RATE N/A % Incomplete Record Report The following is a list of all the records that do not include all of the information in the case files and/or do not include all available information in the case files in the FCICINCIC entries at the time the records were pulled for the audit, OVERALL INCOMPLETE RECORD RATE N/A % OF RECORD CASE NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF ERROR OR PROBLEM [tYPE - Gunsw_,--_ 19-0712 -'_ EntWot validated Vehicles 13-3283 VIN in case rile, not in entry F ®L E ATTACHMENT E Florida Department of Criminal Justice Information Services Rick Scott, Governor Law Enforcement Post Office Box 1489 Pam Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1489 Jeff Atwater, Chief Financial Officer Gerald K Bailey (850) 410-7100 Adam Putnam, Commissioner or Agriculture Commissioner www.fdle.state.8.us April 17, 2014 Mr. Mark Overton Chief Be] Harbour Village Police Department 655 Ninety -Sixth Street Sal Harbour, Florida 33154 Subject: FCIC/NCIC Audit Dear Chief Overton: We received your agency's correspondence regarding the area of non-compliance cited during our recent FCIC/NCIC audit of your agency. Upon review of the documentation, we are pleased to advise that your agency is now operating in compliance with the FCIC User Agreement and FCIC/NCIC rules and regulations. We wish to thank you and members of your agency for your response and continuing efforts to operate in compliance with FCIC/NCIC requirements. If you have any questions regarding this audit, please contact me or Operations Review Specialist Graham Culbertson at (850) 410- 7126. Sincerely, �.0 Jennifer Cook Pritt Director JCP/gc cc: Ms. Pamela Flanders, Terminal Agency Coordinator Service -Integrity • Respect -Quality