Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutLTC 017-2015 - 2015 Florida Legislative Session - Committee Week Update��h SAL H*S1BOUR F L O R I D AA R A D I S E OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE MANAGER NO. 01 7-2015 LETTER TO COUNCIL TO: Mayor Martin Packer and Members of the Village Council FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, Village Manager ` DATE: January 30, 2015/J' SUBJECT: 2015 Florida Legislative Session  Committee Week Update The purpose of this Letter to Council (LTC) is to transmit the 2015 Florida Legislative Session Committee Week Update for the week of January 201h provided by Ron L. Book. Please let me know if you need additional information. Ronald 1. Book, P, A, low offi(B PROIIffIook 010(101100 COMMITTEE WEEK UPDATE JANUARY 20 — 23, 2015 As we close out the second committee week in January, the schedule and pace have intensified and gained speed. Several big issues are on the horizon that pertain to local governments, for example: pension reform, enterprise zone programs, local government financial oversight, sober homes, vacation rentals, and cuts to the communication services tax. We expect another hectic session and will continue to keep you updated on issues as they move through the process. As bills continue to be filed and heard throughout the upcoming committee weeks, we will add to our weekly reports. Should you have any questions regarding legislation or legislative action, please do not hesitate to call or email us. Water project funding alert We continue to work with your staff on water project funding request. This deadline for the online form submission to the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Appropriations Subcommittee, is February 7H Pension Reform: The outlook for municipal pension reform seems to be more of the same, with both the House and Senate acknowledging that legislation negotiated with cities, police and fire entities at the end of last session, deserves another review. FRS reform will be considered as well, but the potential is high for all of the pension reform issues to bog down in the politics of session. We expect pension reform to be at the forefront of the legislative agenda this session and will continue to update you as we move through the legislative season. Local Government Pension Reform: This week, the Senate committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability heard one bill, SB 172 by Senators Bradley and Ring, regarding local government pension reform. In his presentation of the bill, Senator Ring made the point several times that this bill is the exact same bill passed out of the Senate, 40 — 0 during the 2014 Session, which was agreed to by all entities affected. However, after the Senator's presentation, the League of Cities did speak before the committee, opposing this bill. The League's stated opposition this session, is based on further research into the effects of the bill, since last session. Harbour Centre 118851 N.E. 29th Ave., Ste. 1010 1 Aventura, FL 33180 Phone: 305.935.1866 1 Fax: 305.935.9737 104 West Jefferson Street I Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: 850.224.3427 1 Fax 850.224.3361 Based on the League of Cities member vote over the summer, the League supports two pension reform measures: first, the elimination of the 1999 "extra benefits" law, and second, that the legislature adopt the Department of Management Services (DMS), "Naples letter" interpretation, in statute. More specifically, the League's directive is to oppose anything that undermines the Naples interpretation. Additionally, the two areas of concern for the League are as follows: the increase in the minimum benefit level, and that current interpretation dictates that if there is no mutual consent reached, the employer would have the authority to impose a contract, to continue city business. Under the bill, that provision is removed, even in the event of an impasse. Bill Summary: The bill addresses two areas of reform: the minimum benefit accrual rate and the insurance premium tax revenues. • Minimum Benefit Accrual Rate The bill changes the minimum benefit accrual rate from 2.0 percent to 2.75 percent annual accrual. However if a plan is below 2.75% accrual rate on July 1, 2014, the city must maintain the rate as of July 1, 2014. If the plan is currently above or goes above the 2.75% accrual rate in the future, you must remain at 2.75% or greater. • Insurance Premium Tax Revenues Senator Ring explained that this section of the bill is bifurcated into two tracts. First, it addresses pre-1997 insurance premium taxes, where those revenues are used to meet plan minimums. Over the 2013 level, of the additional premium taxes, 50% go to fund minimums and 50% go into a defined contribution plan. And secondly, post-1997 to 2012, insurance premium taxes are used to pay for benefits above the minimum. If the insurance premium tax revenue funds full cost of the benefits over minimum, any excess revenue is to be used for 50% defined contribution plan and 50% plan minimums. In addition, any new plans created after July 1 2014, must meet new plan minimums, and 50% of taxes would be used for defined benefits and 50% to be used for defined contribution. By mutual consent of the negotiating entities — the members' collective bargaining representative or, if there is none, by majority consent of the members' of the fund, and the consent of the municipality (or special fire control district) — plans may deviate from the above use of premium taxes, as long as minimums are met. If a plan is below minimums on October 1, 2012, it may continue under mutual consent. Without mutual consent, all accumulated dollars from 1997 to 2013, for plans under 100% funded, are split 50% to the plans' participants and 50% to the UAL. Without mutual consent, all accumulated dollars from 1997 to 2013, for plans at 100% funded, are going 100% to special benefits. Senator Ring explained, that this bill is meant to push the cities and unions to negotiate in good faith toward mutual consent. If there is none, both the cities and unions will be subject to a more strict interpretation. In other words, this bill removes the idea of `impasse' and forces the cities and unions to work toward mutual consent. -2- The bill will next be heard in Senate Community Affairs committee and finally in the Senate Fiscal Policy Committee. Link to full committee staff analysis: http://www.flsenate. gov/Committees/Show/GO/Meeting%20Packet/2771 Link to bill: http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2015/0172BillText/cl/PDF The House companion bill, HB 341 sponsored by Representative Cummings, was filed on January 19th. Enterprise Zone Program Sunset: The Florida Enterprise Zone program set forth in statute, sunsets, or expires, in 2015. Senator Detert, Chairman of the Commerce and Tourism committee, has made it known that she would like a full revision of the program, if the program sunset extension were to be extended. She has stated in past years and again recently, that she feels the program needs to expire or needs an extensive overhaul. Enterprise Zones (EZs) and their effectiveness around the state vary. For example, Tampa and Jacksonville have productive and impactful EZs. Senator Bean from Jacksonville and Senator Latvala from the Pinellas/Clearwater region, who have strong EZs in their areas, have stated that many areas of the state have been significantly helped through EZs. Senator Latvala recommends a careful review of the entire program, so that elements of the EZ Program that are working, can continue through a reauthorized EZ program. This week, the Florida League of Cities and several in the lobby corps who represent those supporting the renewal of the Enterprise Zone program, met and agreed to put together a list of success stories of the EZ program to use to develop an alternative to allowing the program to end. SB 392 sponsored by Senator Clemens substantially revises the policies and the purpose of the Florida Enterprise Zone Act; it revises the conditions under which a county and/or municipality may apply for the designation of an area as an enterprise zone; provides that the municipality or county that applies for designation of an enterprise zone has jurisdiction over the enterprise zone's administration and does extend the expiration date of the Florida Enterprise Zone Act. Regional Planning Councils: SB 484 filed this week by Senator Simpson, would eliminate the 11 Regional Planning Councils across the state, by eliminating duties and shifting responsibilities to local government entities. This bill would also authorize local governments to enter into agreements to create regional planning entities if they so choose. House Finance and Tax Committee Workshop - Local Government Uncollected Capital Recovery Collections: In his overview of goals for the upcoming session and his committee's work, Chairman Gaetz discussed his research in local government uncollected capital recovery collections. In the interim, the Chairman Gaetz wrote letters requesting information from some of the largest counties around Florida, asking to what extent those entities have fully optimized their own capital recovery collections processes. -3- Of the information gathered, the Chairman briefly outlined the responses: Of five (5) of the major urban counties of Florida, accounts receivables total uncollected sums of over $400 million. For example, Polk County has an outstanding collections total in the range of $25 million, Lee County, over $5 million. Chairman Gaetz then asked the committee members to look further into a review of local governments, as part of the committees work, to determine if they have developed any programs on collections, utilizing best practices of collections, and of those that have had successes, bring these best practices forward to use as possible legislation to assist local governments in capital recovery collections. House Finance and Tax Committee Workshop - Local Governmental Entity Financial Oversight: Also in the committee action packet as part of the committee's work during the upcoming session, was a proposal draft of concepts to improve financial oversight of local governments. This draft would revise reporting and transparency requirements, and auditing of local governments. No votes were taken. As they began the review, Representative Gaetz noted that many of the concepts in this bill were recommendations in the 2014 Auditor General's Annual Report. We have done a section by section preliminary summary for your review. A link to the bill draft is included at the end of this summary. Section 1 addresses if a local government fails to comply with recommendations from the Auditor General's office. Currently, only the Auditor General, the Department of Financial Services or the Division of Bond Finance, at the SBA, can refer the non compliant local government entity to the Joint Legislative Auditing Committee (JLAC). The draft makes the recommendation to add the Governor and the Commissioner of Education to the group of those who can refer to the JLAC. This was explained as a technical correction — within the Financial Emergencies Act they are currently included and this conforms the JLAC statute to mirror the same. This section also includes a provision to address any local entity that will not comply, by withholding compensation of the entity's governing body and chief financial officer. Section 2 Currently the Auditor General must send a list of local entities, (school districts, charter schools, charter technical career centers, Florida College System institutions, state universities), which are in non compliance, to the Senate President, The House Speaker and the Department of Financial Services. This section does two things, it adds local governmental entities to that list, and adds that notification also be given to the local legislative delegation membership within the geographic bounds of the local government entity in non compliance. Section 3 creates a quarterly reporting process with similar notification requirements for Clerks of Courts. Section 4 addresses County budget preparation and availability to the public. Currently, County proposed budgets must be posted on that County's website at least 2 days before the public hearing. The bill would then require that this proposed budget remain on the website for at least 30 days. Additionally, current law requires that a County's final budget must be posted on the website within 30 days after adoption. This bill would require that the final budget remain on the website for at least 5 years. Section 5 adds the same requirements of County budget amendments as addressed in section 4, for posting on the County website for 30 days and 5 years respectively. Section 6 addresses Redevelopment Trust Funds, and strengthen Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA) audit requirements as they are outlined in s. 218.39 F.S., so that rather than simply stating the CRA must do an annual audit of the redevelopment trust funds, the bill would require an annual audit of its accounts and records completed within nine months after the end of its fiscal year, by an independent certified public accountant retained by it and paid from its public funds. Section 7 amends statute to apply to cities in regard to proposed and final budgets. (same as Section 4). Section 8 amends statute to apply to cities in regard to budget amendments (same as Section 5) Section 9 currently, state agencies and the judicial branch are required to have management systems and internal controls to prevent fraud and safeguard assets. The Auditor General recommends language that more clearly defines provisions that prevent fraud, waste, and abuse, to comply with all applicable law. It also requires that state agency heads testify to these provisions under oath. The draft states that each agency head and the State Courts Administrator shall file a certificate with the Auditor General attesting under oath, in writing, to the existence and efficacy of the management systems and internal controls. Section 10 current law provides that each local government that is required to provide an audit, must submit a copy of the audit report and annual financial report to the department within 45 days after the completion of the audit report but no later than nine months after the end of the fiscal year. This bill would require that certified public accountants conducting audits of local governmental entities shall report, as part of the audit, whether or not the annual financial report is in agreement with the audit report, and, if not in agreement, shall provide an explanation as to the significant differences. This section also provides for notification of the local legislative delegation. Section 11 requires of local governments the attestation requirements and fraud prevention requirements as in section 9 of this draft. This section provides that each local governmental entity shall establish and maintain internal controls designed to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse, and to promote and encourage compliance with applicable laws, rules, contracts, grant agreements, and best practices; economic, efficient, and effective operations; reliability of financial records and reports; and safeguarding of assets. Each member of the local government entity' s governing board and the entity' s chief financial officer, or person charged with similar duties, shall file a certificate with the Auditor General attesting under oath, in writing, to the existence and efficacy of the internal controls. -5- Section 12 strengthens the makeup and responsibilities of audit committees for local governments which currently exist in statute. In current statute there is no requirement that there is auditor review or rotation, this section works to provide a method of review, and a more strict method of complying with a selection process for auditor. This would require a more frequent review of the auditor selection process. In this section, the committee debated whether to remain with an RFP process, how to address whether or not the same auditor is chosen time after time, or require that new auditors are chosen. For example, should an auditor know that they will be rotated off every five years, more scrutiny in auditing may be achieved. Section 13 is a conforming technical change. Section 14 addresses local government inventorying of tangible personal property. Currently, in Ch. 274, counties and special taxing districts are required to inventory their tangible personal property, this bill would expand this requirements to all local governments. The law also requires the CFO to adopt rules of recording property and details of that property, and puts forth a uniform recording of an annual physical inventory. This would be extended to apply to all local and municipal governments. Section 15 as in section 4, this section addresses Water Management Districts' budget preparation and transparency. Currently, Water Management Districts' (WMD) proposed budgets must be posted on the WMD website at least 2 days before the public hearing. The bill would then require that this proposed budget remain on the website for at least 30 days. Additionally, current law requires that a WMD's final budget must be posted on the website within 30 days after adoption. This bill would require that the final budget remain on the website for at least 5 years. Link to the House Finance and Tax committee packet, bill draft begins on page 12: http.//myfloridahouse gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc asnx?PublicationTyne=Committees&Co mmitteeld=2856&Session=2015&DocumentTyne=Action%20Packets&FileName=ftc%201-22- 15%20REVISED.ndf Communication Services Tax (CST): Governor Scott has proposed a significant cut in CST, which is the tax on cell phone and cable service, by $470 million or approximately 3.6%. His proposal would cut more than a third of the money paid to the state in communication services taxes, which are split between local and state governments. However, the Governor has indicated that in his proposal, his plan is for the state to cover the local governments' revenue reductions, and has said, "we are going to hold [local governments] harmless." SB 110 has been filed by Senator Hukill which cuts the CST paid by customers, and reduces the percentage of allocation of CST to the state from 63% to 54.5%, which in theory maintains the current percentage allocated to local governments. However, as the overall intake is reduced, so then is the portion that is allocated to local governments. This act would apply to taxable transactions which are dated on or after January 1, 2016. This issue is a key part of the Governor's overall tax cut package. Sober Homes: SB 326 sponsored by Senator Clemens and HB 21 by Representative Hagar, would create a voluntary certification program for recovery residences or "sober homes" that -6- function as halfway treatment houses. The bill requires the Department of Children and Families to create a voluntary certification program for sober of "halfway" houses, administer a certification program, and to publish a list of credentialed facilities to the public. Lastly the bill would require background screening of recovery residence employees. This is the same bill as filed last session. Gaming: As we reported last committee week, portions of the Seminole Indian Gaming Compact expire in 2015. Senate President Gardiner has made it clear it is not mandatory that the legislature address or accept a renewal of the Compact. If these portions were not to be renewed, this would mean that Florida would no longer recognize the Tribe's right to have card games at their casinos and that Florida would forfeit the revenue stream dedicated to the state coffers as a condition of the compact. Should the State choose to move toward a renewal of the expiring portions of the compact, Florida gaming entities are positioning themselves to be part of the discussion and of the outcome. Issues that would be in the discussion regarding Florida gaming entities are parity in tax rate, parity in gaming product, decoupling of races, and slots availability to areas outside of Miami -Dade and Broward County. This by no means is a simple issue, and will likely be front and center through to the end of the legislative session. Vacation Rentals / Public Lodging Establishments: HB 4009 by Representative Eagle would delete the term and definition of vacation rentals and transient apartments, from classification and regulation as public lodging establishments. At this time there is no Senate companion. In 2014, the legislature passed a law that addressed vacation rentals, in that it prohibited local governments from regulating vacation rentals or the frequency of rentals or to set minimum stay requirements of greater than seven days. It also removed the exemption in the bill for any local law, ordinance, or regulation adopted on or before June 1, 2011. Entertainment Industry Tax Credit Program: HB 451 by Representative Miller revises tax credit applications process by providing procedures for queuing applications; providing procedures for certifying tax credits; requires provision of workforce data; requiring certified production companies to contribute a portion of tax credit award to other entities; requiring production companies to provide internship opportunities; requiring certified production companies to promote Florida, and revising provisions related to distributions and certifications of tax credits. Red Light Cameras: At this time, no bill has been filed to specifically prohibit red light cameras, though committee meetings have only just begun, and we expect that an attempt to preempt the regulation of red light cameras to the state will come about again this session. Of note however, the following bill has been filed this week. Traffic Enforcement Agencies and Traffic Citations: SB 264 by Senators Bradley and Brandes and HB 421 by Representative Rodrigues designates counties and municipalities as traffic enforcement agencies, to prohibit them from establishing traffic citation quotas. This bill would require a county or municipality to submit a report of its traffic citation revenue and its expenses for operating a law enforcement agency annually to the State Legislative Auditing Committee. -7- Taxi, Chauffeured Limousines and Uber Preemption of Local Governments: Last session, we fought to prevent preemption of ride sharing entities, such as Uber and Lyft, from being allowed to operate without complying with local government regulation of taxis and limousines. Our firm expects this issue to heat up again this session. We will continue to keep you updated as committees and session develops. Amendment 1 Implementation: One of the most anticipated issues for the upcoming session is how the legislature will interpret Amendment 1, which deals with funding for Florida water and land conservation. This constitutional amendment that passed by approximately 75% in November's election. Amendment 1 dedicates funding for water and land conservation, management, and restoration by setting aside one third (33 %) of Florida's existing documentary stamp tax ("doc stamp") revenues collected when real estate is sold. Amendment i is slated to take effect July 1, 2015 and is expected to raise approximately $640 million in its first year from doc stamp taxes on real estate sales. Over the next 20 years, it is estimated to raise an estimated $15 to $20 billion. Senate President Gardiner has cautioned that the required redirection of funds to go toward the Amendment 1 will certainly reduce funds from areas also funded through real estate taxes, such as transportation, affordable housing and economic development programs. Speaker Crisafilli, has made it clear that water quality is his first priority, and has stated that all potential water issues fit into the purview of the intent of Amendment 1. Leadership is developing legislation that would set into statute just how these funds will be allocated. We expect a draft to be put forth in the next few weeks, and we expect that in some form, this legislation will address land management, conservation, water, beach renourishment, storm water and flood control, and other issues surrounding the environment. Amendment 1 and its interpretation, will fundamentally reshape the state's budget. We will continue to update you on all developments throughout Session. SCHEDULE: The committee week and Session dates are below for your review Interim Committee Meeting Schedule • February 2nd — 6th, 2015 • February 9th — 13th, 2015 • February 16th — 20th, 2015 2015 Regular Legislative Session Dates • March 3, 2015 — Day 1 of the regular session (Article III, section 3(b), Constitution) • May 1, 2015 — 60°i and last day of the regular session (Article III, section 3(d), Constitution)