Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
PKT-CC-2013-09-24
Moab City Council September 24, 2013 PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP 6:30 PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CENTER (217 East Center Street) Page 1 of 198 Page 2 of 198 September 2 013 Su Mo September 2013 October 2013 Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Sep 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Labor Day - Offices Closed ' 3:00pm GC Council . Work 17.00pm CV-PWC I 13.30pm MARC 15.30pm MMAD I 13:30pm GCSDBE WorkSession 4.00pm GCWB 6.00pm GCAB 5:00pm KZMU Board 7:00pm GC Council I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13:00pm SFSC I 12:30pm GCCOA I 112:00pm TRAIL • 12:00pm HASUB I GWSSA I I 1:30pm GCSDBE Site Visit 6:00pm GC PC 14:OOpm 14:00pm GCSWSSD I 1-6.00pm TSSSFD I 3.00 m MVFPD 15:00pm GCLB I 1-7:00pm TSSD I 5:00pm GCCMD 16:30pm Moab PC I 6:30pm Moab CC 17:00pm CVFP I 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I 3:00pm GC Council Work 6 OOpm GCSDBE I 5 30pm MATCAB I 16.00pm GCRSSD I 7.00pm GC Council I 16.30pm CVTC I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12:00pm MTPSC 116:00pm GC PC I I CHCSSD I 5:00pm SEUDHD I 16:30pm Moab PC I 6:30pm Moab CC I 29 30 Oct 1 2 3 4 5 Rachel E. Stenta 1 Page 3 of 198 9/6/2013 5:36 PM Entry Full Description Meeting location Dates CHCSSD Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District CCC 390 Williams Way Last Thursday CJC Grand County Children's Justice Center Moab Fire Department 45 South 100 East CVFP Castle Valley Fire Protection CV Fire Station #1 Castleton/LaSal Loop 2nd Thursday CV-PLUC Castle Valley Planning Land Use Committee Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive 1st Wednesday CVTC Castle Valley Town Council Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive 3rd Wednesday GC Council Meeting Grand County Council Meeting 125 East Center Street 1st & 3rd Tuesday GCAB Grand County Airport Board 125 East Center Street 1st Monday GCCMD Grand County Cemetary Maintenance District Sunset Memorial Cemetary 2nd Tuesday GCCOA Grand County Council on Aging Grand Center 182 N 500 W 2nd Monday GCHEC Grand County Higher Education Committee USU Extension Office 4th Thursday GCHPC Grand County Historic Preservation Committee Moab Library 257 E. Center St. 2nd Thursday Qtrly GCLB Grand County Library Board 257 East Center Street 3rd Wednesday GCPC Grand County Planning Commission 125 East Center Street 2nd & 4th Wednesday GCRSSD Grand County Recreation Special Service District 217 East Center Street 3rd Wednesday GCSDBE Grand County School District Board of Education 264 South 400 East 3rd Wednesday GCSWSSD Grand County Solid Waste Special Service District 100 Sand Flats Road 1st Thursday GCWB Grand County Weed Board Grand Center 182 N 500 W 1st Monday GWSSA Grand Water & Sewer Service Agency 3025 East Spanish Trail Road 1st & 3rd Thursday HASUB Housing Authority of Southeaster Utah Board City Council Chambers 217 E. Center 2nd Wednesday LPC Legislative Policy Committee Utah Local Governments Trust No. SLC 3rd Monday MARC Moab Arts and Recreation Center Advisory Board 111 E. 100 North 1st Thursday MATCAB Moab Area Travel Council Advisory Board 125 East Center Street 4th Thursday MC Council Meeting Moab City Council Meeting 217 East Center Street 2nd & 4th Tuesday MCPC Moab City Planning Commission 217 East Center Street 2nd & 4th Thursday MMAD Moab Mosquito Abatement Distrcit 1000 East Sand Flats Road 1st Thursday MTPSC Moab Tailings Project Steering Company County Council Chanbers 125 E. Center 4th Tuesday Qtrly MVFPD Moab Valley Fire Protection District Commission Moab Fire Department 45 South 100 East 2nd Tuesday SEUALG South Eastern Utah Association of Local Government Price 2nd Thursday SEUDHD South Eastern Utah District Health Department Green River City Offices 2nd Tuesday SFSC Sand Flats Stewardship Committee 885 S. Sand Flats Road 2nd Thursday TRAIL MIX Trail Mix Grand Center 182 N 500 W 2nd Tuesday noon TSSD Thompson Special Service District Thompson Springs Fire Station 2nd Wednesday TSSFD Thompson Special Service Fire District Thompson Springs Fire Station 2nd Thursday Updated on: 7/13/2012 RACalendarAzoiz\Community Calendar\zou calendar entities.xlsx Page 4 of 198 Moab City Recorder's Office October 2 013 Su Mo TOctober 2013 November 2013 u We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Sep 29 30 Oct 1 2 3 4 5 I 3:00pm GC Council Work 7 OOpm CV -PLUG I I 3 30pm MARC I 15.30pm MMAD I I3:30pm GCSDBE WorkSession 5:00pm KZMU Board 7:00pm GC Council I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14:00pm GWSSA I r4:00pm GCWB I 112:00pm TRAIL • 12:00pm HASUB I 4:00pm GCSWSSD I r6:00pm GCAB I I 1:30pm GCSDBE Site Visit 6:00pm GC PC I 15:00pm GCLB I 1-6.00pm TSSSFD I 3.00 m MVFPD 16:30pm Moab PC I 1-7:00pm TSSD I 5:00pm GCCMD I 17:00pm CVFP I 6:30pm Moab CC I 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 12.30pm GCCOA I I 3:00pm GC Council Work 6 OOpm GCSDBE I 5 30pm MATCAB I 16.00pm GCRSSD I 7.00pm GC Council I 16.30pm CVTC I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 12:00pm MTPSC I 16:00pm GC PC 16.30pm Moab PC I 6:30pm Moab CC I 27 28 29 30 31 Nov 1 2 CHCSSD Rachel E. Stenta 2 Page 5 of 198 9/6/2013 5:36 PM Entry Full Description Meeting location Dates CHCSSD Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District CCC 390 Williams Way Last Thursday CJC Grand County Children's Justice Center Moab Fire Department 45 South 100 East CVFP Castle Valley Fire Protection CV Fire Station #1 Castleton/LaSal Loop 2nd Thursday CV-PLUC Castle Valley Planning Land Use Committee Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive 1st Wednesday CVTC Castle Valley Town Council Community Center #2 Castle Valley Drive 3rd Wednesday GC Council Meeting Grand County Council Meeting 125 East Center Street 1st & 3rd Tuesday GCAB Grand County Airport Board 125 East Center Street 1st Monday GCCMD Grand County Cemetary Maintenance District Sunset Memorial Cemetary 2nd Tuesday GCCOA Grand County Council on Aging Grand Center 182 N 500 W 2nd Monday GCHEC Grand County Higher Education Committee USU Extension Office 4th Thursday GCHPC Grand County Historic Preservation Committee Moab Library 257 E. Center St. 2nd Thursday Qtrly GCLB Grand County Library Board 257 East Center Street 3rd Wednesday GCPC Grand County Planning Commission 125 East Center Street 2nd & 4th Wednesday GCRSSD Grand County Recreation Special Service District 217 East Center Street 3rd Wednesday GCSDBE Grand County School District Board of Education 264 South 400 East 3rd Wednesday GCSWSSD Grand County Solid Waste Special Service District 100 Sand Flats Road 1st Thursday GCWB Grand County Weed Board Grand Center 182 N 500 W 1st Monday GWSSA Grand Water & Sewer Service Agency 3025 East Spanish Trail Road 1st & 3rd Thursday HASUB Housing Authority of Southeaster Utah Board City Council Chambers 217 E. Center 2nd Wednesday LPC Legislative Policy Committee Utah Local Governments Trust No. SLC 3rd Monday MARC Moab Arts and Recreation Center Advisory Board 111 E. 100 North 1st Thursday MATCAB Moab Area Travel Council Advisory Board 125 East Center Street 4th Thursday MC Council Meeting Moab City Council Meeting 217 East Center Street 2nd & 4th Tuesday MCPC Moab City Planning Commission 217 East Center Street 2nd & 4th Thursday MMAD Moab Mosquito Abatement Distrcit 1000 East Sand Flats Road 1st Thursday MTPSC Moab Tailings Project Steering Company County Council Chanbers 125 E. Center 4th Tuesday Qtrly MVFPD Moab Valley Fire Protection District Commission Moab Fire Department 45 South 100 East 2nd Tuesday SEUALG South Eastern Utah Association of Local Government Price 2nd Thursday SEUDHD South Eastern Utah District Health Department Green River City Offices 2nd Tuesday SFSC Sand Flats Stewardship Committee 885 S. Sand Flats Road 2nd Thursday TRAIL MIX Trail Mix Grand Center 182 N 500 W 2nd Tuesday noon TSSD Thompson Special Service District Thompson Springs Fire Station 2nd Wednesday TSSFD Thompson Special Service Fire District Thompson Springs Fire Station 2nd Thursday Updated on: 7/13/2012 RACalendarAzoiz\Community Calendar\zou calendar entities.xlsx Page 6 of 198 Moab City Recorder's Office 2013 Municipal Election Dates September 2 013 Su Mo September 2013 October 2013 Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Sep 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5:00pm Electronic voter website - profile submission due 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5:00pm Primary - campaign finance due if not proceeding to general 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 First day to display election signs (General) l 15:00pm last day to declare write-in 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Oct 1 2 3 4 5 Rachel E. Stenta 1 Page 7 of 198 9/6/2013 5:41 PM 2013 Municipal Election Dates October 2013 Su Mo TThOctober 2013 November 2013 u We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Sep 29 30 Oct 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 voter registration - last day to establish residency 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 5:00pm Last day a candidate can withdraw from race 2:00pm Campaign finance - mail reminder to candidates 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Governing Body must appoint poll workers General Election - Early voting begins Voter registration - last day to register 8:00am publish notice oil 27 28 29 30 31 Nov 1 2 8:00am campaign finance - post disclosures online 8:00am mail sample ballot to candidates/It. gov & post 5:00pm Campaign finance due (General pre -election) Rachel E. Stenta 2 Page 8 of 198 9/6/2013 5:41 PM City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Main Number (435) 259-5121 Fax Number (435) 259-4135 www.moabcity.org Moab City Council Regular Council Meeting City Council Chambers Tuesday, September 24, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SECTION 1: APPROVAL OF MINUTES SECTION 2: CITIZENS TO BE HEARD SECTION 3: DEPARTMENTAL UPDATES 3-1 Community Development Department 3-2 Engineering Department 3-3 Planning Department 3-4 Police Department 3-5 Public Works Department SECTION 6: SPECIAL EVENTS 6-1 Approval of a Special Business Event License for Canyonlands Natural History Association to Conduct a Navajo Rug Auction on September 28, 2013 at the Grand Center 6-2 Approval of a Special Business Event License for Moab Half Marathon Inc. to Conduct the Other Half Road Running Event on October 19 — 20, 2013 at the Moab Valley Inn 6-3 Approval of a Special Business Event License for the Grand County Prevention of Child Abuse Foundation to Conduct a Back to School Carnival October 5, 2013 at Rotary Park 6-4 Approval of a Special Event License for the Youth Garden Project to Conduct the Pumpkin Chuckin' Festival on Saturday, October 26, 2013 6-5 Approval of Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp Special Event 6-5.1 Approval of a Special Business Event Application for the Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp to Conduct a Music Festival and Art Instruction Camp October 27 to November 3, 2013 at various locations 6-5.2 Approval of Special Use of Center Street Ball Fields for Melissa Schmaedick, Friends of Moab Folk Festival to Conduct a Music Festival November 1 to 4, 2013 6-5.3 6-5.4 6-5.5 Approval of a Park Alcohol Permit for the Friends of the Moab Folk Festival to Conduct a Music Festival November 2 — 3, 2013 at the Center Street Ball Fields Approval of a Class IV Special Event Beer Application for Eric Jones, d.b.a. Friends of the Moab Folk Festival to Conduct a Music Festival November 2-3, 2013 at the Center Street Ball Fields Approval of a Local Consent of a Temporary State of Utah Beer Permit for the Friends of the Moab Folk Festival to Conduct a Music Festival November 2 — 3, 2013 at the Center Street Ball Fields 6-6 Approval of a Special Business Event License for Scott Newton — Poison Spider Bicycles to Conduct Gran Fondo Moab, a Timed Cycling Event May 2 — May 3, 2014 at Various Locations SECTION 7: NEW BUSINESS 7-1 Adoption of Proposed Resolution #17-2013 Approving the Natural Hazards Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan for the Southeastern Region of Utah 7-2 Approval of Change Order #1 for Horrocks Engineering for the City of Moab Impact Fee Study 7-3 Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2013-14 — An Ordinance Amending Moab Municipal Code Chapter 17.36.020, Use Requirements, Amending the Listed Uses in the I-1 Industrial Zone and Chapter 17.36.050 Location Requirements 7-4 Approval of Proposed Ordinance #2013-19 — An Ordinance Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code, Chapter 12.08.060, Sidewalks, Curbs and Gutters Required at the Time of Construction, Amending the Requirements for the Construction of Streets, Curb, Gutter and Sidewalks When Single Family Residential Lots Adjacent to Partially Developed Streets are Deemed Excessive in Width 7-5 Approval of Proposed Resolution #18-2013 — A Resolution Revising the Fee Structure for the Moab Recreation and Aquatic Center 7-6 Award of the Public Defender Services Proposal 7-7 Approval of the Public Defender Services Professional Services Agreement 7-8 Approval of a Settlement Agreement Among the City of Moab and Billie A. Klepzig, et al 7-9 Approval of a Road Easement Deed and Agreement among the City of Moab and Billie A. Klepzig, et al SECTION 8: MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS SECTION 9: READING OF CORRESPONDENCE SECTION 10: ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS SECTION 11: REPORT ON CITY/COUNTY COOPERATION SECTION 12: APPROVAL OF BILLS AGAINST THE CITY OF MOAB / MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 Agenda item #: 6-1 / Title: Approval of Special Event Licenses for Canyonlands Natural History Association for a Navajo Rug Auction Fiscal Impact: None Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler/Rachel Stenta Department: Administration Applicant: Canyonlands Natural History Association Background/Summary: The City Special Events Committee has reviewed the Special Event Business License for the Navajo Rug Show. This is new event is being held at the Grand Center. There are no issues requiring coordination outside of the Grand Center. The Special Events Committee recommends approval of the Special Business Event License Applications for the Navajo Rug Show on September 28, 2013 Options: For each item, the Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommend approval of all items. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve a Special Event License for the Navajo Rug Show." Attachment(s): Special Business Event License Applications 1 Page 11 of 198 DATE PAID: (// / a-/�� AMOUNT PAID: rY 0 o0 RECEIPT NO.: / / r 6 (" CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE: $80.00 PLUS (CHECK ONE): El TRANSIENT ($80): OR CURRENT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: LICENSE #: ZONE: NAME OF EVENT: ;K1q V ( b 12- t 1 11-ZA_Uf o r� DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: � P l( Arpr 0.1 S a �s ari e1 d 1/-PiY LOCATION OF EVENT: ) i V AAA d Cam e-r PREMISES TO BE USED: 2ti0 ri1S .Stk-( a6uttcv� rtb r t{S2 mom/ 4ryv TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IF ANY): l ! pr DATE(S) AND TIME(S) OF EVENT: ;94. ash /��I� ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: _ SO NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: j TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: t) Ott I V `� ' C ( A C � S - Sl�� 1 �> a�Y A�� rk 1 J °gip f) tk\i,k -- C r• J EXPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): Aoejw<<s;�4,, iS ee- -j' erc is c'(-\,,,A(, -'3( `(‘.ke\ iff1r a1 ('�!S 0,-ti`lel %11) 196xrC�ri Se' S . /.VGlVei j o -Pc() -,SA-t-eo �t ,Sti51�-s 'l--h..-Aiij, Ti Dh .1 Ij J t1 1� �1 iJ J EVENT SPONSORS NAME: }G yA \I (YY + G�}h"' , S �� A� i+ S 1 D r `! )y�-nSS Ll i� o PHONE: S ----a J j " (C% SPONSOR'SADDRESS: �CI ] -�- rt� y 111 CITY: IP 164 � STATE: Ltl- ZIP: 4-t-5 SPONSORS DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: SPONSORS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: DATE OF BIRTH: TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: ❑ PROPRIETORSHIP 0 PARTNERSHIP 0 CORPORATION OOTHER (SPECIFY): EVENT SPONSORS SALES TAX ID #: _ AME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: e iLn if o'n IGti\ kS 4'4 ti�kr a t ►tib y kzouK-1 THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. INVE C M H i4 Ci6,161Y At'-1'A4\ (me. LEAS4 PRINT NAMES) BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. INVE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION _AND APPLICANT (SPONSOR INVE AGREA O FILE,THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. ore o State of Utah ✓ ) ) SS J County of Grand ) SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this (, day of A LLJ u.4+ , 020a . HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY C10a NOTARY BLIC JENNIE ROSS Notary Public State o1 Utah Comm. No. 661521 My Comm. Expires Dec 11, 2016 SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT! Page 12 of 198 SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LIST OF VENDORS (MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF MOAB PRIOR TO THE EVENT) 5.09.030 Sales Tax Collection. A. Unless exempted by state law, each special business event licensee shall be responsible for obtaining a state sales tax license and shall require that all vendors either: 1. Provide proof of a sales tax license and agree to be responsible for direct remittance of all sales tax proceeds to the state; or 2. Execute a sales tax remittance agreement whereby the vendor delivers sales tax proceeds to the licensee for remittance to the state under the licensee's sales tax license. NAME OF EVENT: I! DATE(S) OF EVENT: ST+ , g COI BUSINESS NAME OWNER'S NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE # ITEMS TO BE SOLD TEMPORARY SALES TAX LICENSE NO./SALES TAX ,,(1�' 431'lei or, / i'\i, ek_v' vi...�� `C«..C_ 0 s -9 1/ W O COCO 4f 09/08/03 217 E CENTER STREET MOAB, UT 84532 PHONE: (435) 259-5129 - Ple " 1( a FAx: (435) 259-4135 FOR ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY PARKING: �/?UC2i11•161 MOAB CITY CODE: 11 • Opt • 9%940 SIGN PERMIT: ReQU 12b-r MOVED -ON NECESSARY: ❑ YES tti NO REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL ❑ YES tid NO REVIEWED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: DATE: 9.1 a - I3 NAME OF APPLICANT: ,t(AAgonkfkr{-ktS-i)r.+1 YiSNLPHONE: S-DJ1-6003 Lik-ct n A A_ d�rtive APPLICANT'S MAILING ADDRESS: DjS- III( CITY: r ( okh STATE: Rj- ZIP: BUSINESS NAME: 0 4,, , i a.v, A s NI Al�rI- ( 1-10.1 n/ ,th, o i t,--1-1 DO y„,, BUSINESS LOCATION: D ` S 6, H P 1114 % iyl. o � i 1 lj `� s � c�- EVL-.1-(' - RAN© C�NT� ` 1(6 of 14. � \N . ZONE: C� - �G ht-EV�-T ' DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: W e (,.j j ve. ;A r n^ li--i- 1 t o ex, i1 S'- f ( nil t s )/a 6 !6S -0 /`}- Ile\A-Sw\9rW47- (Y)6Ii,19 !v��. VIbi�Ys , I"LEI kre, non—�Y0#{ b`ra �vkt2a-+(ay. + ,Q �� Mat r�b1i� \Gi-V\ E �tL-k C.&4j-er11 lit`I%k ana ,Saurtli_ vv-�s„}'-ern C616,410. r.{\.5 (, i\.T111 00,, @,}A-Ztakl54..,� +„ 41.4si„1 1l'2 .;i:l,G,.'k1-(-i,- ,-,1 z41,-t-igi,,,,i 8-40Yir-3 c?1" Noi .1 eo-dc. ‘.2(0Ce, ,124,tre.&LL a� IO.,v,d vV«vt& e,hr."vTVl.� j ah -2. tc&O 6 F6lie,* 5- -rkii' 2, Jr1 1 ,S0 ���-s1- ,,. t,tT • a3 .5�,.�k� 4.,e.s4- C 0. j � Page 14 of 198 5/05 '44.1 P I ..11 31.1 4 • • _ I 8 1118= .1 • 11/X 31f. BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOAB, UT THIS CERTIFICATE OF LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED TO N NI„„N • • LICENSE NO. 1083 Not Transferable FROM: 07/01/2013 EXPIRES: 06/30/2014 CANY • NLANDS aAT. HIST. ASSOC. LOCATED AT: MOAB INFORMATION CTR/25 S MAIN In conformity with the ordinances of the City of Moab, Utah, to conduct a RETAIL BOOK SALES business located within the City of Moab, Grand County, State of Utah commencing on 07/01/2013 and ending on 06/30/2014 subject to the provisions of the City of Moab ordinances, and having paid to the MOAB CITY TREASURER the sum of $80.00 dollars. LICENSE TYPE: RETAIL • 0 .70.711191.011NWTireaginIgg"1.11E9V0WVIR.VVW4.14.000VIV•0.1.....P1.-1.__._ In accordance with the order of the Moab City Council, this license is hereby duly authorized, given under my hand and the seal of the City of Moab on June 18, 2013. CITY RECORDER relip Page 15 of 198 / AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 1 Agenda ltem #: 6-2 / Title: Approval of a Special Business Event License for Moab Half Marathon Inc. to Conduct the Other Half Road Running Event on October 19 - 20, 2013 at the Moab Valley Inn Fiscal Impact: n/a Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler, City Manager Department: Administration Applicant: Moab Half Marathon Background/Summary: The Other Half is a recurring event. The main running event happens outside of city limits. However, registration, retail sales and an "expo" occur at Moab Valley Inn. The Special Business Event License is to cover the activities happening at Moab Valley Inn. 1 Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of the license as submitted. Recommended Motions: "I move to approve the Special Business Event License for Moab Half Marathon Inc. to Conduct the Other Half Road Running Event on October 19 - 20, 2013 at the Moab Valley Inn." Attachment(s): Application materials Page 16 of 198 CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE: PLUS (CHECK ONE): $80.00 DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT NO.: off SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION r3 TRANSIENT ($80): QreecupzRE OR 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB NT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: LICENSE #: ZONE: NAME OF EVENT: r/I DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: raleC = , 5 7i-14-7 i e t, { 6 Z C LOCATION OF EVENT: /Z )cci ') 1,5i/tc y„.. /�+�a7� /4-/ y rz-e Sao Y" / krVCI PREMISES TO BE USED: A4,°f,v; �j Vfit f ;.Z, e TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IF ANY): DATE(S) AND TIME(S) OF EVENT: d)tIlL, 1/ 1 2c t5 PA ir' `7 f,o— * eft 2e; -c'6 �' ?Li:4_ t-+ i: L.,e .� ,-f0 ANTICIPATED# OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: 2I NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: �/ TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: !ft.1-4,? I X i?-C//€�- LGy A ce t. / -- q 1 'r'?J� )--4-f �V ) ,rt, , EXPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): .e.i't �� / -e j I, uv re-tett'1 5Ei to EVENTSPONSOR'S NAME: /1/1 b77t l' —414,- cat7/Z CPO h 1C . PHONE: 2 5 et H.S r SPONSORS ADDRESS: ecK r7y" j / .3/ S ICZj E- CITY: .44 v t •-1' STATE: V/ ZIP: 6 (15.3 SPONSORS DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: SPONSORS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: O PROPRIETORSHIP O PARTNERSHIP YOORPORATION OOTHER (SPECIFY): EVENT SPONSORS SALES TAX ID #: NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: DATE OF BIRTH: — r ceti50- f4-6 1'f MoireAn; (.1)4, laic. THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. UWE AllItit Cirl�jGLilAti%0V) i I IC. LEASE PRINT NA E(S) BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FOR INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. INV AND APPLICANT (SPONSOR). I AGREE TO FIL C Y HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE ERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION E PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. L bignature o bponsor State of Utah ) ) SS County of Grand ) SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this Vi day of --ceAm„ inn NOTARY PUBLIC � /13 SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT! EVE C. BRANNAN Notary Public State of Utah My Commission Expires on: July 21, 2015 Comm. Number: 610047 Page 17 of 198 ATTACH LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OPERATING UNDER THIS LICENSE. ATTACH SITE PLAN FOR THE EVENT GROUNDS (IF APPLICABLE). ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICATED BELOW: LICENSE APPROVALS CITY STAFF ❑ APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED REASON(S): LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: SIGNATURE OF CITY STAFF MOAB CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED O NO ❑ YES AGENDA DATE: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED REASON(S): EVENT COST RECOVERY SURCHARGE: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Page 18 of 198 CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE COMPLIANCE FORM 217 E CENTER STREET MOAB, UT 84532 PHONE: (435) 259-5121 FAx: (435) 259-4135 FOR ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY PARKING: X I S TI MOAB CITY CODE: I1 •01 . aj2j01 SIGN PERMIT: IIZMU I P-a) MOVED -ON NECESSARY: ❑ YESNO REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL ❑ YES )70NO REVIEWED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: DATE: "'a ' A 1 1 NAME OF APPLICANT: APPLICANTS MAILING ADDRESS: f�ctb1Fi�. R eS ,k-€ ?,t fox'743 PHONE: C- 41--6:)2j CITY: STATE: l) ZIP: k- 1 i 2_ BUSINESS NAME: All COI) irk •C .AA rtred-itC:- [ 11C - BUSINESS LOCATION: 3 (--, 5 (CC E_ ZONE: C,12, ] PI r 6'1 01 I v 1� j DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: Ls'‘, t v l 1 f, / 11 --,..f 06, Page 19 of 198 " " " 6 P " P 3 , 1 I B Y T H E A U T H O R I T Y O F T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L O F M O A B , U T T H I S C E R T I F I C A T E O F L I C E N S E I S H E R E B Y G R A N T E D T O " A " A L F A " A T H C . L I C E N S E N O . 2 2 1 1 N o t T r a n s f e r a b l e F R O M : 0 7 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 3 E X P I R E S : 0 6 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 4 L O C A T E D A T : 3 6 S 1 0 0 E I n c o n f o r m i t y w i t h t h e o r d i n a n c e s o f t h e C i t y o f M o a b , U t a h , t o c o n d u c t a E V E N T S / R E T A I L b u s i n e s s l o c a t e d w i t h i n t h e C i t y o f M o a b , G r a n d C o u n t y , S t a t e o f U t a h c o m m e n c i n g o n 0 7 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 3 a n d e n d i n g o n 0 6 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 4 s u b j e c t t o t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e C i t y o f M o a b o r d i n a n c e s , a n d h a v i n g p a i d t o t h e M O A B C I T Y T R E A S U R E R t h e s u m o f $ 8 0 . 0 0 d o l l a r s . L I C E N S E T Y P E : E V E N T S / R E T A I L k k I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e o r d e r o f t h e M o a b C i t y C o u n c i l , t h i s l i c e n s e i s h e r e b y d u l y a u t h o r i z e d , g i v e n u n d e r m y h a n d a n d t h e s e a l o f t h e C i t y o f M o a b o n J u n e 1 8 , 2 0 1 3 . C I T Y R E C O R D E R P a g e 2 0 o f 1 9 8 / / AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 1 Agenda ltem #: 6-3 / Title: Approval of a Special Business Event License for Grand County Family Support Center and Grand County Prevention of Child Abuse to Conduct a Back to School Carnival on October 5, 2013 at Rotary Park Fiscal Impact: n/a Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler, City Manager Department: Administration Applicant: Grand County Family Support Center and Grand County Prevention of Child Abuse Background/Summary: The Back to School Carnival is a recurring event. The event is small in scale and there have been no issues with the event in the past. Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of the license as submitted. Recommended Motions: "I move to approve the Special Business Event License for the Grand County Family Support Center and Grand County Prevention of Child Abuse to Conduct a Back to School Carnival on October 5 at Rotary Park." Attachment(s): Application materials Page 21 of 198 DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT NO.: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE: PLUS (CHECK ONE): 173 TRANSIENT MO): OR ❑ CURRENT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: LICENSE #: ZONE: $80.00 8'3° 00 �-a NAME OF EVENT: GOLC.K \U yC1AL C? �Gr V� t \�� t` a rnt 4.1.; :..;'0-2a • Cycn4 c ki- y91-•e vl tAL,rt (D e- e , ld � b LAS-2 DESCRIPTION OFEVENT�(t��5 �� i. C, to c.,1SSt�_ ., Food. , Vi tLei;'14iOil �() LOCATION OF EVENT: PJk0gb` (,_1� -1-e,. PREMISES TO BE USED: � O�C/ vac K TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IF ANY): C, (1 Sikc t (,t �-e,vvk 4 k ,001 es' DATE(S) AND TIME(S) OF EVENT: � rCA(,lta ` `� C 'VT) � l' S,' 1 a d 2 ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: \ NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: 3 ( dA 0 _S 0 Ve.,S,) TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: ' ) c.),(l W .'; - - 6 (2L3[ (-(^t.DCi �" d {it g - G v .2.0 (m S V.14-PY CGc�� ,1�tu-V�y S �V iNC>)`k"t,-\ �,\W,;k.AS�Q?ntr4 Lc.Pe k eC\..:v1.k nsJ;-5`� (c�� I EXPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): C\C-r2.,_ Pc..., \ yn k•-:‘ n5 i S\. i YXC/ f C of �l vn ; c\A-siS f �� (-\._,A. ov) V-t-D ry-, cm cs.ci,`nS j - E.SS --Ba1.1. / \Jc-1 i_)-(i,01 EVENT SPONSOR'SNAMECiChAA. COLIVr-P,..,Jet'k);\ Ok \ 01,kA-Q- SPONSORS ADDRESS: ;)..; ` l lJ 400 � CITY: 'n ;\ rzt an VD STATE: ZIP: LIs, PHON‘Lt ) SPONSORS DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: SPONSORS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: DATE OF BIRTH: TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: ❑ PROPRIETORSHIP O PARTNERSHIP O CORPORATION OTHER (SPECIFY): \ ) — (�� 1 EVENT SPONSORS SALES TAX ID #:' t .AME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: \ f� f -e ;1 C (A. � j to tt UtAl THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. C1 � INVE - J 1 r-QI't n tYl�lHEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY �J PLEASE PRINT NAME(s BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. INVE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION AND APPLICANT (SPONSOR). INVE AGREE TO FILE THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. Signature of Sponsor State of Utah ) ) SS County of Grand ) SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of Sepl- , a0 0. R(Sz2h=1--- NOTARY BLIC JENNIE ROSS Notary Public ` Stall of Utah Comm. No. 661521 1 My Comm. Expires Dec 11. 2016 SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT! Page 22 of 198 SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LIST OF VENDORS (MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF MOAB PRIOR TO THE EVENT) 5.09.030 Sales Tax Collection. A. Unless exempted by state law, each special business event licensee shall be responsible for obtaining a state sales tax license and shall require that all vendors either: 1. Provide proof of a sales tax license and agree to be responsible for direct remittance of all sales tax proceeds to the state; or 2. Execute a sales tax remittance agreement whereby the vendor delivers sales tax proceeds to the licensee for remittance to the state under the licensee's sales tax license. NAME OF EVENT: DATE(S) OF EVENT: o) m ti w o oc BUSINESS NAME OWNER'S NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE # ITEMS TO BE SOLD TEMPORARY SALES TAX LICENSE NO./SALES TAX ID \ , \ \)'-e RA o ys C I 1 C)--)1 - �� ii 0 a r `'__ 09/08/03 CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE COMPLIANCE FORM 217 E CENTER STREET MOAB, UT 84532 PHONE: (435) 259-5121 FAx: (435) 259-4135 71 No ❑ YES FOR ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY PARKING: (_ )4. l Sk- MOAB CITY CODE: 4 -1 ' 2O SIGN PERMIT: LC( TCA MOVED -ON NECESSARY: ❑ YES p No REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL REVIEWED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: DATE: F NAME OF APPLICANT: Cry rct Co v a \ \ ‘,$ e bkty C N< 6CHo� (9, APPLICANT'S MAILING ADDRESS: V / aob ecc,�4 CITY: R000 STATE: LA+ ZIP: BUSINESS NAME: `�m ik---S �P-)0v : BUSINESS LOCATION: S,:pit--i/VVC_ Pk-S Y\--e4)\_*- ZONE: 2—k q� - S QLW 1 E Uei\-\-- \kon C ` ll 1 i3(hCK DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: + !,,,,jA C , a \IN,N0 b cl vM i 1 ` t-L n CsG� 1� Page 24 of 198 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 1 Agenda. ltem #: 6-4. Title: Special Event License for the Youth Garden Project to Conduct the Pumpkin Chuckin' Festival on Saturday, October 26, 2013 Fiscal Impact: None Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler, City Manager Department: Administration Applicant: Youth Garden Project Background/Summary: The Youth Garden Project has applied for a Special Business Event License for the annual Pumpkin Chuckin' Festival that has previously been held outside of city limits. The Youth Garden Project has decided to move the festival to a more central, accessible location within city limits. The first location requested was the Center Street Ball Field, however the Special Event Review Committee did not feel that parking could be adequately addressed at that location and that parking congestion would negatively impact the surrounding residential neighborhood. City Staff could not recommend approval of the event at the Center Street Ball Field location. Youth Garden Project has chosen another location, the Grand County High School Soccer Field. The Special Event Review Committee recommends this location and sees no issues with parking, congestion or capacity. 1 Options: The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or postpone the item Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends Approval of the Special Business Event Events License as presented. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the Special Business Event License and for the Pumpkin Chuckin' Festival as presented." Attachment(s): Special Business Event License Application Page 25 of 198 DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT NO.: NAME OF EVENT: DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: LOCATION OF EVENT: PREMISES TO BE USED: TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE USED (IF ANY): DATE(S) AND TIME(S) OF EVENT: Ctrs of MOAB SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPUCATIO 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO; CITY OF MOAB jrni7 riY) C h(il,L;r) PS-4Iva 1 1 rci t SP.r - r- Alr)( -)A-h &A rcie q PrU 1P c-'— 46-E . �(1 "9��-31 ? ,e_ }-� oti, C(nbol 560-9,r 41 elour het; askin SPECIAL EVENT FEE: PLUS (CHECK ONE): ❑ TRANSIENT ($80): OR RRENT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES. ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: (,(11A Z u� 4-ex-Ths, �I ( t Ztn (Ca cxv- , - PrY-, I (DO Vf f1Ci41S �altir h SNUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: ' 200 TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: c,r-44 non LICENSE #: ZONE: 1-6- s $80.00 8o r f'a6 EXPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): ad jr_n_Mj tjfT C t iQ l-ei s a 014(r ��s vr�>� �b� -(�,�fe o-F Yt �Aor--. -N1 woe* s) � r t -i�D Ls�,� �� r,1,A L+u\Cc-f- - EVENTSPONSOR'S NAME: U UU�V ' avaA� py�\ ck- PHONE: � LCA " - 2-32k} SPONSOR S ADDRESS:4:5) L} - J CITY: MC fi (,9 STATE: Ur ZIP: 94532- SPONSORS DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY:-{-7',0( I d Yl l i (r‘ ,Y--- c.� —, r ,,,,-. , DATE OF BIRTH: TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: O PROPRIETORSHIP O PARTNERSHIP O CORPORATION OOTHER (SPECIFY): nCO.prrr ,+- EVENT SPONSORS SALES TAX ID #. NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: 1-161,4t,-) (--Y:t1iP vi R-tr,,•-e(,f SPONSORS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. j �i IMIE �( ji,),IIP,j1 t't-7-' �(C HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY 1\ FLEEEAAASE PRINT NAMES JA BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. I/WE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION AND APPLICANT (SPONSOR). INVE AGREE TO FILE THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. State of Utah Signature of Sponsor iJ ) SS County of Grand ) ji''- SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this .-7( day of („.E041,15� - NOTARY PUBLIC -25 _. , a��3 SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUI Page 26 of 198 RACHEL E. STENTA Notary Public State of Utah Comm. No. 804155 My Coa>ro. Expos Dye !b. 2014 CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE COMPLIANCE FORM 217 E CENTER STREET MOAB, UT 84532 PHONE: (435) 259-5121 FAx: (435) 259-4135 FOR ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY PARKING: {/ 1(�-1. IA et MOAB CITY CODE: I ` ' 41 • 99\V MOVED -ON NECESSARY: REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL REVIEWED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: ❑ YES ❑ YES �No SIG DATE: I ` PI; (‘ NAME OF APPLICANT: APPLICANTS MAILING ADDRESS: �iNit4, 9Urri CITY: (iv ,f, P31N0 1-1-35 -25g - 232{P Mb STATE: (It ZIP: ��32_ BUSINESS NAME: L ol't-1 bxrdre f Y-0 6-- r BUSINESS LOCATION: l WS� S ��%CI�I Y ` ZONE: i` ' / ✓ 'l, l 011 E Y -Cat it .1nOiDi S)/j/j�1 i Id DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: V NL� (--A\--(k jPr6rd-- ', s al nor) DC -Cc n..c) ilit-K\ prz=}(--ii- -11,-Z u ClrC I n PrilACArN PS-h v a1 r LOP ark sep LA 0 C. r;16a -Etie./tf— l -' ae.4,1c4 4-7j hold -(n o R rn r1 b i_ui dci y-i 4 �s'(-i 1-Q .Y iv-) l .r i i 1M iT� ILi Tv,rnOUr, awr,\(:,r. -f7s-1-;v0,-Q v\))11 Doll lv,r-e nave, ;4u,s 4tAoi- eiri (Aim, ns k-Qss --k-io , - -F9-1 oc, 0,',r c&'7,,bns n.,-;►1 Le 64(6vg,) '10 lG1- . ios Page 27 of 198 Youth Garden Project 530 South 400 East Moab, Utah 84532 435-259-2326 www.youthgardenpro j ect.org The Youth Garden Project has held the Pumpkin Chuckin' Festival for the past seven years at the Old Airport Runway south of town. In 2013, we are looking to move the festival into town to make it more accessible to more community members. In order to accomplish this we will be making several changes to the Festival. The biggest change will be the ban on air cannons. There will not be any air cannons allowed in this year's festival. Only trebuchets and sling shots that launch pumpkins less than 250 feet. Other changes that we are anticipating are changing some activities to be appropriate for the venue. Dogs will not be allowed at the festival and we will not have a large sand box as in past years. Other accommodations may be made as the planning continues for this year's event. Biking will be encouraged and additional bike racks will be brought in and placed at the festival entry way to accommodate for bikers. A team of parking volunteers will assist to ensure safe parking and traffic flow. As always, safety is our number one concern at this event. We will have an experienced safety crew in the Chucker area to enforce rules and boundaries. We have a booklet of rules in place for all chuckers and for the construction of machines. Each machine is inspected before it is allowed to set up. We will also have volunteers, board members, and staff throughout the festival to ensure overall security and safety for participants and passerby. If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact me at delite@youthgardenproject.org or at 435-259-2326 or my cell 435-210-1329. Thank you! Sincerely, Delite Primus Executive Director, Youth Garden Project The Youth Garden Project cultivates healthy children, families and community through educational programs and the profound act of connecting with food from seed to table. Page 28 of 198 Vu p I t,� 4--- �NlNavd 101 9NINIIVd AalN3 a331NMOA 101 9NIAlt/d 31t/9 NIV1N woongeg lual iopuaA 0Tx0I lalln0 leoulaa13 O 14. A3?I A ,s£ 0,14z i ,LtiZ > < ,S9 1/01 v =S V MOONIM 13NJIl 0• < ,SOS —a VRIV 9NINJf1HJ ,££ < ,99t < ,S9Z ,9Z "u,S6 A ,6ZS ,S'ZSZ A ,SIV Ail1N3 3101H3A lel} Aianpelai OE loads uo O < ,06Z ,iZ laa.ls uo O Page 29 of 198 r / MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2°13 / / Agenda item #: 6-4 Title: Approval of Permits for Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp Fiscal Impact: This event requires minimal law enforcement or other city services for support. The special event, park and beer permit fees provide revenue to the city, as does the sales tax generated by the purchase of goods and services by the participants of the event. Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler/Rachel Stenta Department: Administration Applicant: Melissa Schmaedick/Friends of the Moab Folk Festival Background/Summary: Friends of the Moab Folk Festival have submitted all of the required applications to hold the annual Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp, utilizing the Center Street Ball Fields, the MARC, Star Hall, the Grand County High School, Three Dogs and A Moose and A Moab Guest House. The Moab Folk Camp will be conducting workshops at the Three Dogs and A Moose as well as A Moab Guest House. Staff is requiring an alternate parking plan for those locations to accommodate participants. The Moab Folk Festival is a long-standing event with established protocols and procedures. This event rarely generates complaints and is well -run. The event provides broad -based benefits to the community, justifying use of the Center Street Ball Fields for the event. Please note that several of the required/permits are contingent upon other approvals. The following approvals are needed: 1. Approval of a Special Business Event License 2. Approval of a Class IV Special Event Beer License 3. Approval of a Park Use Permit for Center Street Ball Fields 4. Conditional Approval of a Park Alcohol Permit for Center Street Ball Fields 5. Approval of Local Consent for a state -issued Special Event Beer Permit The City Special Events Committee has reviewed the applications for the required permits and licenses for the Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp. We have conferred with the coordinator for the event and are of the opinion that all issues have been or .J Page 30 of 198 will be adequately dealt with. Approval of the Park Alcohol Permit should be conditioned upon securing state approval of the Special Event Beer Permit and submitting said permit and documentation to the City. Options: For each item, the Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny or postpone the item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommend approval of all items with the following conditions: 1. An alternate parking plan for Three Dogs and a Moose and A Moab Guest House be submitted 14 days prior to the event for staff review. 2. A vendor list is provided prior to the event and an updated list is provided within seven days after the event. 3. All fees must be paid seven days prior to the event. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve (insert name of agenda item), subject to the three conditions outlined in the Agenda Summary for the Approval of Permits for the Moab Folk Festival/Moab Folk Camp" Attachment(s): Special Business Event License Application Class IV Special Event Beer License Application Application for the Special Use of City Parks Park Alcohol Permit Application Application for Local Consent for a Special Event Beer Permit Page 31 of 198 DATE PAID: S1 aJ //3 cS0 AMOUNT PAID: d7C1 � RECEIPT NO.: o ctC/ o CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE: PLUS (CHECK ONE): ❑ TRANSIENT ($80): OR 2111,CURRENT CITY OR COUNTY LICENSE (ATTACH COPY) TOTAL FEES: LICENSE #: ZONE: $80.00 rf.3 NAME OF EVENT: M v a 10 '.G 11cL. 'e5"F-1"VttQ / IVI. 00t10 1� k (C_. cet m e DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: A r'Y►1.i5it_ (,'mot AA- iM.si-rvt, t-A9 0 Cat4- 9 (Oct .71 Nov ‘ ) Mirstt . t-,2s--1V� LOCATION OF EVENT: MACLc. 1 3 P°5- `. MOr>s - '-- Ntva.9 'LZU ••,'ems 1 P1A-C.0 I srzt.r �4 ( Nic5v. ( " 4 ) PREMISES TO BE USED: GC N^ SE^ SA" c=v ( TEMPORARY STRUCTURES BE USED (IF ANY): 00 to O vQ� -` e vl i 5 t S i Lt 5 <__ DATE(S)AND TIME(S)OF�VENT: _0I t (7'-IOeM) t3uJ L ;'3 ali arf -( (111-FG) Oct ol-7- sr,..(civI zui Aa.,»,„ ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: WO 1 , 5 Ub (AA PC) 6 S NUMBER OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING: '3(, -40 TYPES OF VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN EVENT: a j }S GZ.•t t Gt e t0--f t.S CA. 0114:• kri t 4-iic0 ok I ed I . fes r yo e rc L. EXPLAIN FEES GENERATED BY THE EVENT (I.E. ADMISSION CHARGES, BOOTH FEES, RENTAL CHARGES, ETC.): ti0in1 44 1450 1 P , 0/1:F1- 41-Cr- S 43jr4i1at) l Mart- Vavdo-e Fees = `11. (40 / bvoi�. (to Kip) EVENT SPONSORS NAME: t-ri e (AGE 5 6 SPONSORS ADDRESS: \--1?`tk � �r.t1\/'c-CA PHONE: 3`J' l[�,�,ri - 3l.61 CITY: Nit OGl STATE: (t,ZIP: au S 3 2 SPONSORS DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STATE OR OTHER PROOF OF IDENTITY: ti1r_Lt SSC1 Y 1�[Y�Gt.eGL� C SPONSORS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: DATE OF BIRTH: TYPE OF ORGANIZATION: ❑ PROPRIETORSHIP O PARTNERSHIP O CORPORATION IXOTHER (SPECIFY): (�) 0 V ` F trD r' EVENT SPONSORS SALES TAX ID #: t _ NAME REGISTERED WITH THE STATE FOR TAX ID: -Fr SY1- THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSE WILL BE DELAYED. I/WE r1tt"� LEASE PRINT NAME(S) BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TRUE. I/VVE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION AND APPL•1 AN:F(SPONSOR)'ME AGREE/3 FILE THE PROPER REPORTS WITH THE STATE OF UTAH. 9/ZS ate HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID BUSINESS STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB CITY Signature of Sponsor State of Utah ) ) SS County of Grand ) SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 0Z3 day of A k�t.��-f- , .20/ 3. NOTARY ' BLIC 1 JE+tgNE ROBS Notify Public State of Utah Comm. No. 661521 SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL12EQ1NREMBNplomm. Expo,: Dee It 2016 Page 13 of 25 Page 3Z of 198 86 6 Jo £E abed SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LIST OF VENDORS (MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF MOAB PRIOR TO THE EVENT) 5.09.030 Sales Tax Collection. A. Unless exempted by state law, each special business event licensee shall be responsible for obtaining a state sales tax license and shall require that all vendors either: 1. Provide proof of a sales tax license and agree to be responsible for direct remittance of all sales tax proceeds to the state; or 2. Execute a sales tax remittance agreement whereby the vendor delivers sales tax proceeds to the licensee for remittance to the state under the licensee's sales tax license. NAME OF EVENT: DATE(S) OF EVENT: BUSINESS NAME OWNERS NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE # ITEMS TO BE SOLD TEMPORARY SALES TAX LICENSE NOJSALES TAX ID i O 12) 42, ` �] f"0 V i 6k, e e,( A_ W e .e LC. r-) O r -h b C/ e_A".k Page 17 of 25 09/08/03 CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE COMPLIANCE FORM 217 E CENTER STREET MOAB, UT 84532 PHONE: (435) 259-5121 FAX: (435) 259-4135 FOR ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY PARKING: MOAB CITY CODE: SIGN PERMIT: MOVED -ON NECESSARY: REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL REVIEWED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: • • Uo • 2aV 12 Qutevp ❑ YES ft No ❑ YES 16 No DATE: IJ ' a (9) NAME OF APPLICANT: Meli55« Gkr‘rvtccP.c14 PHONE: '43S -0toC- aq APPLICANTS MAILING ADDRESS: ggt.) S 000E CITY: skit UCR•Ir7 STATE: AT ZIP: O 4-S32_ BUSINESS NAME: ---r-1 .Q U. pl _S e7 .k--- -'11,4--2 NA- C- 0 , p Ile_ / �,e.,D 4-4-va...t BUSINESS LOCATION:(] 110, �-- ZONE: A.-. S? G i A. PlV tiT p f- OL.- t.' ---C-kd-J 1-'c- vie_ ryku S C DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY: -ProGL`.•�L1��Y\ ruAA air A- 1 Yt s i-Tvc_i-, c.. C e,► , e au,. at U; 3 -- aa� r ri u s, z 4 -tiv ca.. 06, 5 Page 15 of 25 Page 34 of 198 I . • 0.. P. P.„I •.IP . P BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOAB, UT THIS CERTIFICATE OF LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED TO FRIENDS OF THE MOAB FOLK FESTIVAL D A ►ti . .1 IP I LICENSE NO. 1935 Not Transferable FROM: 07/01/2013 EXPIRES: 06/30/2014 OAB FOLK FESTIVA LOCATED AT: 290 S 200 E In conformity with the ordinances of the City of Moab, Utah, to conduct a ON-LINE & PHONE TICKET SALES business located within the City of Moab, Grand County, State of Utah commencing on 07/01/2013 and ending on 06/30/2014 subject to the provisions of the City of Moab ordinances, and having paid to the MOAB CITY TREASURER the sum of $80.00 dollars. LICENSE TYPE: ENTERTAINMENT % In accordance with the order of the Moab City Council, this license is hereby duly authorized, given under my hand and the seal of the City of Moab on June 18, 2013. 0.0 .• CITY RECORDER 001110 p40. Page 35 of 198 City of Moab APPLICATION FOR THE SPECIAL USE OF CITY PARKS Swanny Park, located, between 100 and 200 West from 30 to 400 North, is a non -reservation park that is meant to be open to the public on a first -come, first served basis. Special Use of Swanny Park and other non -reservation parks within the City is subject to approval by the Moab City Council. The City Council may approve use applications for events that provide clear benefits to the community. Requests for usage by private businesses that serve a limited clientele will not be approved. This application must be submitted, along with any special events license application, to the City Recorder's office at least six weeks prior to the scheduled event. Upon approval of the application by the City Council, a Special Park Use Permit will be issued upon payment of the appropriate fee, provided for in the Schedule of Fees. PLEASE PRINT OR FILL ELECTRONICALLY Applicant Information Name of Person Responsible for Use of Park: Met, SS c1nc» a e Ck- Name of Organization and Event if applicable: Fr; eve( S o > -11,i (Vt vtib Fe 1 K -.e,54-zvet) Address: ��D S 2.co C ( pop, lu8a , RA0, 0, 1A i 4s4532, Day Phone: 436-21e0 (c) Email: Sch( eted='cie..0.5d.4_ C; f 5414. = ,rt�� i y`- o rri Data. .-�1 pS 1 itio� . c6tfy-% Proposed Park Usage Information Which park to you intend to use? Swanny Park: Other (please indicate name of park. Please indicate the proposed dates and times of use: Proposed Start Date: (J(14 • ‘ Start Time. 4, am/0 End Time. _ am/pm Proposed End Date: HOJ 4 Start Time: am/pm End Time. -5 am/r r� Please specify what areas of the park are proposed for use. I\/l.o' E"6 -Ck. i-► e -- ccLl area- j For Swanny Park, please show in detail on the attached diagrams, which areas of the park are proposed to be used. Show locations of all structures and facilities. Number of participants you expect. `1UP? I owl Number of spectators that you expect: ve Az 4100 ti,P l G(l+24-^ ix0m t.Svv 1-3� csre or+ Nov. 411, #0NI t es/ a-13 Please describe structures, tents, canopies, portable restrooms, etc. that you propose to set up at the park: Va�ays canvr t�u�s e� d�(�Qr�:. =z�s �vc Jeer c s . St-rt • e all-a6l 42- r 1 Yea. 1-- roc3,� S Will amplification be required for your event? Yes X No Please specify any electrical needs for your event: <curia Sk.IS�ey1/1-1 1 iaood v'Q,Act-o r to0crn/ S Please describe the parking and traffic plan for your event. Location of parking, signage, traffic control devices, use of volunteers, etc. should be described. e. t " rtx yviz) kkio e =2"-r eiy, EVe U Abe s vial'- covtGl � pe.A..w l62, v6 If you anticipate any street closures for your event, please describe below, and show on the accompanying diagram. o vt +l PLEASE COMPLETEggof OTHER SIDE Page Sh7 bit Do you intend for the park to be open to the public during your event? Yes No Do you intend to serve/sell alcohol (if so, additional requirements apply) Yes_ X No For non-Swanny Park events: Do you plan to charge for admission to the park? Yes No Please describe any security or crowd control measures you plan for use of the park: Q✓e r ; 8tA- Low_ tie (n1- re04 Oa,/ 1 'off. Tiei€,1- Qc re? S 6t t- J 4;� Paz � rr, a � J For groups over 100 people, please describe your refuse control and recycling plan: tk) e, ;,�0Y46.r t�l1j L, VV'`s .-A-7 hi5(4. a.,4. ei,, �a Lw fi'o,rc. S Please describe your clean-up plan during and after the event: Valort-ee.r g"\--a_Q-t re5av`s.10le ��r C eao-vp UY�►^� E.0 Q.0 C eu.t a LtJ. ARL� �Y '�.a- v e_LA- C 1.10v 4 ) J Please describe your restroom facility plan: ji,) e_ �n,v��1e Pv(te.10 to YostrDailis v (c, A --Lk week Other Information Please describe how your organization, your event, and/or your use of the park will provide broad -based benefits to the community: r 11 l eccrs -� Yv�ltSCL / Ci.tt-h.raS E1t� F eSi-IVu.t taS frvUf0(11CA •i1A- Ct)mrnV►VID Wrtl-- QVei,sr --11,,A,r k/kaS YeSVIfe1c-A tri 1inCrc,a5 e_ V'Y►S �j 6 xc (vl � v fv► e pr-:� A Q d iAC ctt�`oYtc+� f iC2 C f�f�ct l� p to c G-�� A t-Iv i-14 -66 Please specify and describe other community or city facilities that you plan to use: r -Awe- e°v rr nir, u r, , -II lj { r k } a (t j {vi ft 1= ) M i 0_ O "cl C. U ri� i--66L. Sc•-ii, a Di CAA.-eka fiY � u rn Have you applied for a Special Event Permit for this use? Yes X No Will you be able to provide proof of insurance, showing the City as an additional insured? Yes X No I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct. I agree to abide by the City of Moab Parks Policies and any conditions attached to this permit. Signature of Contact Person: Date. g P v 13 Public Works Review: Police Department Review: Administrative Review. Park Use Fee: Date Fee Paid: Date of City Council Approval: Insurance Received: Final Set up Diagram Received• Special Conditions or Requirements: Other Required Permits and Approvals Page 10 of 25 Page 37 of 198 Page 38 of 198 City of Moab Park Alcohol Permit Application and Checklist A Park Alcohol Permit may be granted if the City Recorder certifies that the applicant meets the conditions on the following checklist. The Applicant should complete the information on this form and submit the form along with the Park Use Application and the Special Business Event License Application. Applicant is responsible to abide by all applicable terms and conditions of this permit and all other required permits and approvals. Upon successful completion of all items on this checklist, the City Recorder will certify completion and issue the permit. PLEASE PRINT Applicant Information Name of Person Responsible for Use of Park: Name of Organization and Event if applicable: (-=-eten.lt65 OP a Ike / DAM F-tAt,.41 Address: 2.410 2.75:ii14- 20() EAfii - NtaaR i F-45321-- Day Phone: �3 2,59 ° 31gS Email: Date(s) of Event: h.iadcMx.D &t2_ Z.`,t1 4 •:3 rcl Park Alcohol Permit Checklist (for internal use only I certify that the event sponsor has completed all of the following approvals and is hereby issued a Park Alcohol Permit: ❑ Event Sponsor has obtained approval for a State of Utah Single Alcohol Permit or Temporary Special Event Beer Permit (applicable permit is attached) ❑ Event Sponsor has obtained approval for all applicable City of Moab alcohol licenses. ❑ Event Sponsor has obtained approval for City of Moab Special Event License for the event. ❑ Event Sponsor has obtained approval for a City of Moab Park Use Permit for the event. City Recorder's Signature Date Page 20 of 25 Page 39 of 198 DATE PAID: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT No.: 8 a: /0 9 91,7 CITY OF MOAB RETAIL BEER* LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB ❑ CLASS I FEE: ❑ CLASS II FEE: ❑ PRIVATE CLUB ❑ CLASS III FEE: 14 CLASS IV FEE: LICENSE #: $180.00 $180.00 $650.00 $80.00 $80.00 APPLICANT'S PERSONAL INFORMATION FULL NAME: E121C:.. CJOAjF� HOME PHONE: 43,4 2. i 00l 4- HOME ADDRESS: /e2 (G, IAA/ CITY: _ 440/48 STATE: ZIP: f?�{�jj SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: DATE OF BIRTH: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER tic STATE: Orzu-I BUSINESS INFORMATION BUSINESS NAME: R-2.( E.IAi� l�� F � F !1/lc�aTt; 1-pLjL Tl\//;t. SALES TAX ID #: BUSINESS ADDRESS: 2-q0 14 ? no EALNAY l . BUSINESS PHONE: 4- , . 3i-c)f?) BUSINESS MAILING ADDRESS: p, O. CITY: M(j/21,e, STATE: U 1 ZIP: FM-S32_ WARNING!! ALL LICENSES, EXCEPT CLASS III, REQUIRE A STATE LICENSE! STATE APPROVAL COULD TAKE 30 DAYS OR MORE TO PROCESS! CONTACT THE STATE NOW! THIS APPLICATION IS MADE FOR A LICENSE TO SELL BEER* UNDER THE FOLLOWING LICENSE: (CHECK ONE) 1. ❑ CLASS I O CLASS II 0 Retail License shall entitle Licensee to sell Beer only on the premises licensed on draught and in original containers, for consumption on or off the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer in the original containers, on the premises for consumption on the premises, in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and Ordinances of the City, and shall be issued solely to Restaurants, Cafes and other establishments whose primary purpose is the dispensing of food. O PRIVATE CLUB Same conditions as Class I and Class II Beer Licenses. O CLASS III 0 CLASS IV Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed in original containers, for consumption off the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City. Retail License shall entitle the Licensee to sell Beer on the premises licensed on draught and in original containers, for consumption on the premises in accordance with the Liquor Control Act and the Ordinances of the City limited to the dates specified. Will you also serve liquor, wine or heavy beer (over 3.2% by weight)? ® NO O YES (Requires `Local Consent' approved by City Council prior to State approval.) 2. List brands of beer proposed to be sold by the applicant within the City of Moab: l ti iTl E rzE- uu i M -i *Beer application is for 3.2% by weight only. Also requires a State license. 09/21/05 Page 21 of 25 Page 40 of 198 RETAIL BEER LICENSE APPLICATION Submit completed application and attachments to the City Treasurer for processing. The applicant represents that they possess all the qualifications of a licensee as set forth in Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 and that they will faithfully comply with and have faithfully complied with the Utah Liquor Control Act. This application is submitted to the City of Moab as an inducement for the issuance of a retailer's business beer license in accordance with Section 32, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953. The undersigned applicant hereby agrees and promises that if such beer license is granted, the applicant will faithfully comply with all provisions of the Utah Liquor Control Act and regulations of the Utah Liquor control Commission adopted pursuant thereto, and the ordinances of the City of Moab, and in particular that they will faithfully comply with Section 32, Chapter 6 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953 relating to reporting and payment of excise tax, and with regulation 4 relating to advertising, regulation 4-A relating to labeling and advertising, and regulation 5 relating to unfair competition and unlawful practice. STATE OF UTAH : ss COUNTY OF GRAND Applicant's Signature 'END C )011eS. , being first duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says: That he/she is the applicant above named; that he /she has read the foregoing application, and knows and understands the contents thereof; that the same is true to his/her own knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of f\-10 L w 3_ Notary Public y brrAI MARIA SHUPE # F`� d'., Notary Public State of Utah �. My Commission Expires on: March 1, 2015 F Comm. Number: 605157 Page 23 of 25 Page 41 of 198 CLASS IV SPECIAL EVENT BEER LICENSE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATON 1. Please specify the dates, times, location, nature and description of the proposed event: !ham til ;h 1=c�1 l�v is a 114,cjiJk--��,,��i:�%i'ly /_ire �r�sr� ?revioc��`6-14 Cj'ccc./�rri'vct/ /llOtfAvYi �'S�f--Aryl.).+g4 grd "f� Wafi:6 Ifactes. .r zaies Wrt/� bo. LriYl�it'�L "E5i f e Cem-%� *ea JP.ove_; 1P.&fr_a_ 14d`)N avid 5:04 pot AiittanL¢r Pc etd S`Y 2. Please provide a floor plan or detailed description of the following: a. The sites from which you propose that beer be sold or served, including all dispensing points. Dispensing points include storage areas, booths, tables, bars, and other areas set apart for the sale of beer; b. The areas in which you propose that beer be allowed to be consumed; 3. Please state the purpose of the association or entity conducting the event: rileods a 4-kr2_ ey,:b � sfi"�/4 � ,s trr 5ri "ny-°% nto5i'call pe.r-riri,714(o 5 :vt 441364 / fj,rir� rtc�w J /21-z.vr'tirh - carimoa r nr'ce6. , fa [a14_ ,J air -A arte.76_ /46,-54440,4 Low,( lu.sr°rr2�s. 4. I EeIC._ sJo. nee hereby grant Moab City Officials, including but not limited to, law enforcement officers or City code enforcement officials, an unrestricted right to enter the premises of this event, during the event to take place on /Lkit. 3 , starting at a:©© PM, and located at c`3OD GtSf Cekte,i, for purposes of monitoring compliance with all license terms and City ordinances. SIGNED: STATE OF UTAH SS COUNTY OF GRAND SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY —till lV` DAY OF��;� MARIA SHUPE Notary Public State of Utah My Commission Expires on: March 1, 2015 Comm. Number: 605157 &IC) i3Y16S , 1)12 . DATE: ;:'->' 7` / 3 ON OTARY PUBLIC Page 24 of 25 Page 42 of 198 a I ./.; 't,04 , Z. et.? ! ajrSL - -kJ . ye:vie , !' -, ! ...,'"--t .•.1 :4, : -.---,-; I--•-, (1"-27_,.. ,-.,- .7-c_--1,1e. e:.-1. A ,..., v • 1.,. i ---,?' <,..!..._--.'.7:-..- ' . --ri 1 '.:..') -,•,-. i apt..74-C, ,.., X e:oC.) '>,,- '''' f ;=-1 t e.../ A,.. c . •:--.; 1 . ,,, / t ' j_. i 4-1 fl 1 1 ' n eo i _ &„eer C./•.); l',L.,,L) o,-,1,:...„1-. c2)1,-, i '..-,. i !i,\,-, i T (='-' ''..A "--0 4, -te ii\e„.C1 Cf. (re.,,,,,,,„, »)._.1 . 0-I t„..)171- , ,'. ,f',..i. 0.e.:(''.,L'?-;::c.:T , CO 1-',. i rt.) ( ! f,,e, d., ,,..,:,,,., -'1.,„i"-. <1.176. .( 2 ,P I e ,IY1 I ::::., eC, (_:!.',"-- f l'-''''' •, n ..,,,,,A.y, ,i,.....,,f,.: • '''..- ,^ I.. L's". CI-..O.:: 1.1 ci ,,...1, ciL,,,l'i's tw o , -t-at,-;:- 1 SiecL)r 4:1 1 ,;Dc:ff: i ti c.)1- ( '-'...I LI/ 1 t'.). 1 iq_L. •,":-, ,,eek.., ''"' reCre"-(C:t-; (JaCcef-_,S et-Oby-S,. Page 43 of 198 Control Measures for minimizing the occurrence of minors accessing alcohol or adult over -service Moab Folk Festival Center Street Ballfield Beer Garden The perimeter of the venue is secured by a high, chain -link fence with a single entrance event for ticket - holders. The beer garden is situated in a corner of the venue with chain -link fence on two sides. The remaining perimeter of the beer garden will have a pipe and drape barrier segregating it from the larger venue. The beer garden will be relatively small, approximately 40 feet by 60 feet, minimizing the opportunity for anyone who might to breach security to blend into the crowd and go undetected. The beer garden will have a single entrance posted with two festival security staff whowill check the ID of all entrants. The security staff will be trained to verify the age of every person who wishes to enter the beer garden. Once proof of age has been verified, the entrant will be marked or wrist -banded. We are confident that these control measures will prevent anyone under the legal age to enter the beer garden. No vending other than beer will occur in the beer garden. All beer storage will be at the back of the beer garden, secured between the fence --the back barrier of the venue --and the servers. Servers will have completed a Utah alcohol server training seminar. Also note: The Moab Folk Festival draws a mature audience that is decidedly underrepresented by the adolescent age group. Most attendees at the Center Street Ballfield venue --the only venue to serve alcohol -- have purchased tickets for and will be attending an evening performance at a different venue, and so have incentive not to over drink. Page 44 of 198 EVENT PERMIT "TEMPORARY BEER" Local Consent PURPOSE: Local business licensing authority provides written consent to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission to issue an event permit to an organization for the purposes of storage, sale, offer for sale, furnish, or allow the consumption of an alcoholic product on the event premises AUTHORITY: Utah Code 32B-9-201 4 t Q 61, V] City [ ] Town [ ] County Local business license authority hereby grants its consent to the issuance of aI single event permit license to: ) Ji--I Applicant Entity/Organization: I-f j e /1cJ, 4 q-A ,e,_ (--) f---eS'1L Event location address: eeA44.-y- S--cc_e.k- 177yct( t C` --e-L a S ,ix) 6-aSt- (-et-}ez- S. L--1"c}i) street city state zip CAT- ec(63 C-y _ On the IWO v 2 a,, A 3 day(s) of NO V_ tv-\ 6e-r , 7c--) (3 dates month year during the hours of VZ Cx) - 5=C6PU-k , pursuant to the provision of Utah Code 32B-9. defined hours from —to Authorized Signature Name/Title Date This is a suggested format. A locally produced city, town, or county form is acceptable. Local consent may be faxed to the DABC at 801-977-6889 or mailed to: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, PO Box 30408, Salt Lake City, UT 84130-0408 Single Event Local Consent (02/2012) Page 45 of 198 / / AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 Agenda item #: 6-6 / / 1 Title: Approval of a Special Event License Application for Scott Newton (Poison Spider Bicycles) to Conduct the Gran Fondo Timed Cycling Event Fiscal Impact: This event entails approximately $100 in traffic control costs. The event brings visitors to the area. Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler Department: Administration Applicant: Scott Newton (Poison Spider Bicycles) Background/Summary: The City Special Events Committee has reviewed the application for the Special Business Event License for the Grand Fondo event to be held on May 3, 2014. We have conferred with the coordinator for the event and are of the opinion that all issues with the event can be adequately addressed. This event no longer conflicts with the Red Rock Relay event. The Special Events Committee recommends approval of the Special Business Event License subject to the following conditions: The applicant needs to secure a permit form UDOT and then submit a copy of the UDOT permit to the City. The applicant needs to review and confirm traffic control needs with the City Police Department and Public Works Department. Options: Approve, Approve with conditions, Postpone, or Deny this item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this item, with the conditions that the applicant secures a permit from UDOT and confirms traffic control needs with the City Police Department and Public Works Department. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve the Special Event License for Scott Newton (Poison Spider Bicycles to conduct the Grand Fondo Timed Cycling Event, subject to the conditions outlined in the staff memo." Attachment(s): Application Materials Page 46 of 198 DATE PAID:/ ! b J !� AMOUNT PAID: U RECEIPT NO.: f O ` (1 CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION 217 EAST CENTER STREET MOAB, UTAH 84532 (435) 259-5121 / FAX (435) 259-4135 PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOAB SPECIAL EVENT FEE_ $80.00 LICENSE #: ZONE: pk- NAME OF EVENT: �\ \ DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: -\\4WA �\�J�\\� l Gtt/\ '" \` tAN \4e \O , `�\,Q, �\%\\.)e, ��, 4.% `\p*, LOCATION OF EVENT: \.\�J S'\'4 ' 4 ' lC "" r\`�\ Q. \1���4 —. \"1 - 1; \- ��`��.-\ ')\':'. . \� \ `' \( \ C ` \V. '� � a ',.k PREMISES TO BE USED: q.'OS�q\Y \v 1V\\ TEMPORARY STRUCTURES TO BE US (IF ANY): Nti —\k�ti it-0\4\ ` 4\ - 1 a � � y DATE(S) AND TIME(S) OF EVENT: �\v\��, ` \\lvai 1 %, \N \� � M� 1 Vo,:\L.� \ i v ��� ANTICIPATED # OF EVENT PARTICIPANTS: .2 Q ‘,4) EVENT SPONSORS NAME: SPONSORS ADDRESS: \* %•; `.1 \5 \1N.N,3 SPONSORS DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER & STerF nA flTuco PRnnF nF InFNTITY: PHONE: CITY: STATE: \� ZIP: 1`-\' 'w SPONSORS SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: DATE OF BIRTH: THIS FORM IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE. THE ACTUAL LICENSE WILL BE ISSUED AFTER CITY STAFF OR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO ENGAGE IN SUCH ACTIVITY WITHIN THE CITY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A LICENSE. ALL INFORMATION MUST BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED OR THE ISSLtC;OF A it�ENS� WILL BE DELAYED..\ t I/VVE\ CITY S \P L EVENT L\ ENSE REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOAB CITY CODE, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, AND SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THE IN�ORMATIPN gONTAINEQ HEREIN IS TRUE. INVE UNDERSTAND THIS LICENSE IS NON -TRANSFERABLE AND VALID ONLY FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED LOCATION AN PLEASE PRINT NAME(S) HEREBY AGREE TO CONDUCT SAID SPECIAL EVENT STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOAB 8-/6-/-3 Uafe State of Utah '`' ) ) SS County of Grand ) SUBCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / G, day of , a() /3. NOTARY PU IC JENNIE ROSS Notary Public State of Utah ` Comm. No. 661521 - _My Comm. Ex rea Dec 11, 2Q16 SEE BACK OF FORM FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS! Page 47 of 198 CITY OF MOAB BUSINESS LICENSE COMPLIANCE FORM 217 E CENTER STREET MOAB, UT 84532 PHONE: (435) 259-5121 FAx: (435) 259-4135 FOR ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY PARKING: `Nr(1 STD MOAB CITY CODE: 0°1 FAO SIGN PERMIT: 0 2E MOVED -ON NECESSARY: ❑ YES O REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL ❑ YES NO REVIEWED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: DATE: `ems I W 1.27 NAME OF APPLICANT: APPLICANTS MAILING ADDRESS: .* \ 1 \_vt CITY: � � STATE: \\ , ZIP: PHONE: y�Z �5ti �a� BUSINESS NAME: ""\' "v \ % O l'N ��V + BUSIN S LOCATION: V� " ' �C • ��4\J\tib-, — �� \ ' 4\� lV1',\\\ ZONE: �,�k \-6k:* \\.A( \ vA `�N� � W *, DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF BUS NESS ACTIVITY: C`k' .* \\ \\1\k.v; sL \\* M\ 4\.' _"\,‘,- `-\\\A- \AP-, \?, ‘A\',\\VV-- A , \\t. ., �"U k\.v, w.\\, �� \�), \� "\� ., , � ��N� Lei\K 3 \ t:t.-- 0 Page 48 of 198 J f • �► -:,. �* --60q ' kr: r a. •AW3411 Ave • 41;�+ ; • r. .a • • e% per y - _• rr �_� �.• lo •▪ • -•s S �# _ ._ n 1t� I, 3:14 a 4'{'{ • • ,• !' - • • i •"1e•''-‘'' S ... • K53f a 'FYI r w L S ,State Police 1,0 • r . !- ►Alfe Escort •T a�l�s c : + T •"• It antic! J 7•- N - �- �— 1N� - Er11K-001AY "r w rit 4 4, '� x I .; �. r _• S: 411 v •'Ch�nle.A`v,e 4?ii�rtat;: �,� fi Moab t city Police A w Grand Riders will venue on the Nor-11i sicie on n st am in the school marking lot. , Moab City police will provide ese�rt a control to 191 ul3 599 west _ State !Daliee will then take ever- on -191 and iders clown 191 M1 and 128 River road to the road tlJ r-11 _ Riders vvi11 obey the yellow line rule a1 all tit r+r+ tondo f P + T�Pax � Moab • m6. dire {- + ; •t II 4� ✓ gin � r r + - _ a �tglEtizav : [ w 191 ,r . x„ Start , - PoliCeat start I,.0 State-raf u .h 1 - 201.) Gc oal� - 1 1 4 • • 38'35 J 5 71 "i .� C-441 � r 7�/F• y ,s �r _c' 2009 A4- $1:106' "09`33' 20 00" W -014 ,4 38 �! E-3ODiH 71i Ey- Gran Fondo Moab 2014 Traffic Plan Date of Event: One day event, May 3, 2012 lam to 3pm Course: Ride will start at Swanny Park at 8 AM. Proceed out 400 North to 500 West (right) Then out to Route 191 North to Route 128 East. Next 16 miles to Lasal Mt Loop Road(right). Follow the Loop road to S. Spanish Valley Drive heading for Moab. Follow S. Spanish Valley Drive to the 4 way stop sign and take a right onto E Spanish Trail Road. Go up the hill to the rotary and onto S. Murphy Lane and then left into Old City Park Rd where we will finish. .S Murphy Lane will be closed from the rotary to Old City Park from 10:30 AM to 1:30PM. Number of riders expected: 500 Contact ride official: Scott Newton 435-654-8650 cell Karen Guzman -Newton 260-9889 cell Emergency responders: Mobil/enroute---Eddie Morandi 260-9054 cell Finish ----Karen Guzman -Newton 260-9889 Communications HAM Net Control: Kendal Glad 970-242-9273 Based at Geyser Pass Road turn aid station. We will have ham radios in 3 support vehicles and one at the geyser Pass turn aid station. Saturday May 7 will be a mass start at 8 am. Our plan is to go out the River road(128) early to minimize impact to local and tourist traffic. Most riders will be off the river road by 8:30 -9:00 am Law Enforcement and traffic control requirements: Moab City Police: Supply traffic control at Swanny Park at 6:30am -lam start on 400 North and 500 West. Hold traffic during mass start on 400 North. Assist State Police at 191 and 500 West while riders cross 191. Assist County police at 4 way stop on Spanish Valley Drive and also on E. Spanish Trail Road to the rotary and on to S. Murphy Lane to the finish 10:30am to 1:30 pm. State Highway Patrol: Close intersection at 191 and 500 West until all riders thru lam to 7:20am. Have State patrol car/cars lead down 191 and 128 to Castle Valley turn to slow on coming traffic and deal with any other traffic issues. The nature of a Gran Fondo Event is that the riders are going for the fastest time possible to finish the route. Therefore we would like to have 3 vehicles moving along with the larger groups of riders to again control traffic as the groups breakup and to insure that the riders do not cross the yellow line on 128. We will do the utmost to educate the participants to follow all the rules of the road and that all roads are open to traffic. State police to assist in any and all emergency situations. Grand and San Juan County Sheriff: Assist wherever necessary on the Lasal Loop Road, S Spanish Valley Drive, at the 4 way stop, and the rotary onto Murphy Lane to Old City Park at the finish. We would like the Count Sheriff to close the road from the rotary to Old city Park with police control wherever necessary. This is a timed event. We will have a professional timing company at the finish with 2 people and 2 cameras. There will be a small aid station at Old City Park. After the riders cross the finish line on Murphy Lane they will proceed to Old City Park. Notes: 1. Event participants will be made aware of all safety issues, including riding single file where necessary, obeying traffic laws and signs, being courteous to local traffic, and generally conducting themselves in a manner that will allow this event to take place in the future. Instructions will be given to all riders on our website (granfondomoab.com) as well as in the printed info at registration. We will also have a series of road signs on the course to help inform the riders. 2. Aid stations will be located at the following sites; 7th Day Adventists Lot, Kokopelli Parking lot at 8200 ft And on the Loop Road , and at the Geyser Pass. We will also have marshals at all turns and 2 flaggers on the down hill section to alert riders of sharp curves. Page 50 of 198 -an Fondo I\Aplo Course overview /.-_,- hovvs Start, Finish, Aid tations, and Marshall i cations r• • fJ 1 • " #42e G'6nd Oigg • fts . - fond° Steil e FINISH at or,•• - fi - (alir Pack 77" ALWay-Stiv.59 mi L_Z"211'412:APP: • r 128 _ _ • AP. station re' if +' r-le;.:0„... e 7 10-ard'S‘tation 22ffii 7th Day Adventists -or -Or - - 4 r Am • ro %thy •'• arMia. — 'rat aDJOBle& Roundabout AriortiNA, @t1(111 . ^ ' • • .-•••44e ' CO=G:d0 ff Moab .kr• •-AL- - ii-nage•LISDA Farm Service Agency 3Er:33'19. 11" hi 109'21'41.39" Of elev 7219 ft 'to - !NT-. t.• .„ LAS AL 4-0 P ROAD Right turn marshall 3D rni • . , • ' - 7;sle .; • . •• • 4, 2nd aid elation Castle v_aq,ey..,oy,errook '44 - .yr t -14 411,•,„ • •-• station Geyser -Pass turn-42 mi Ai-10F.4/C1011.1K42 mi y overlook ‘%.94 114 1, - _ 2nd mal:SnAl Brumley 4641711;..;.,. trejoit %,h) • " r„. '1•-• " • • Image 20'10 DigitaIG lobe ".14- • -;s; ", • •-• 2010 Gregle 1niage Slate of Utail Virr- M. • re.74... ; • 40. 7 ...r ••. -„-_ '.711"r • --- • . - • 2 - - • sX • - -sit'. 30i2 • • 20 • r• 4 ; Dates Jun 21. 2003 - Aug 22. 2007 « r y ` fir #r it �1 • •; . 1 r V '1.1 County 4, 5.:006 Police co P County Police Barrier • • + 4V .r . stopitfall 40 ; r.z., f Control 4.; ; . r Point Police coming �PSi1 •T:1rEif r+ _ •' • w i? Roam ~Closure Barrier Dert Hills DR r Control-2nd Roundabout i _ r J.� f1lc will dors will finish frorn 1❑:30 al No pm I.idors will go to CIci City Par. �. il, the finish tiVi e `I11 1-iavc a finish sign ov across the road 1.13e will need 2 road c'loSrrrc b one at acrsrl. i-lills Drive and ti below the C>Id City Park r- 1 I. aN, - 7Jr� +r _ .,,,,,r r r yr',Mu _r{ �, : 2009G 01 -w r. - 4 . + +y + r f i need 4 country polio }'} ! I-M .10. f AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIIf. Santamhar "n13 PL-13-121 Agenda item #7-1 Title: Adoption of Proposed Resolution# 17-2013 Approving Natural Hazards Pre-Disas er Mitigation Plan for the Southeastern Region of Utah Fiscal Impact: Unknown Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, City Planner and Rebecca Andrus, City Engineer Department: Planning and Zoning and Engineering Applicant: N/A Background/Summary: In October 2000, President Clinton signed the Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act into law. Under this law all jurisdictions are required to develop and adopt a Pre -disaster Mitigation Plan to be eligible for FEMA post -disaster funds. For the past two years, city staff, special district representatives, county and state officials have been meeting and gathering information that was critical to the development of the plan. The plan identifies potential hazards, potential losses, and possible mitigation measures to limit losses due to natural disasters. The plan was submitted to FEMA for review and it was approved in July. The final step is for each jurisdiction to adopt the plan. Grand County adopted the plan on August 20, 2013. Upon approval by the City Council, the signed resolution and a copy of the September 24, 2013 agenda will be sent to SEUALUG who will forward the documents to FEMA. A letter will be sent out acknowledging the official approval. Options: Council can: 1. Approve Ordinance #17-2013; 2. Vote to not approve Ordinance #2013-17 and state their reasons; Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the resolution be adopted. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Resolution #17-2013 as written." Attachment(s): Memo from Amy Peters to Grand County Jurisdictions Page 53 of 198 Page 2 of 2 Memo from Eric Martineau to Amy Peters Proposed Resolution #17-2013 Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool Adoption status of the plan by jurisdictions in Southeastern Utah Copy of the Natural Hazards Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan p:\planning department\2013\correspondence \p1-13-121 cc predisaster mitigation plan.docx Page 54 of 198 RESOLUTION 17- 2013 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE UPDATED NATURAL HAZARDS: PRE -DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE SOUTHEASTERN REGION OF UTAH AS REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL DISASTER MITIGATION AND COST REDUCTION ACT OF 2000. WHEREAS, President William J. Clinton signed H.R. 707, the Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 2000, into law on October 30, 2000. WHEREAS, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all jurisdictions to be covered by a Pre - Disaster Mitigation Plan to be eligible for Federal Emergency Management Agency post -disaster funds, WHEREAS, Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments (SEUALG) has been contracted by the State of Utah to prepare a Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan covering all of the jurisdictions in the SEUALG area except Utah Navajo portion, and WHEREAS, Moab City is within the SEUALG Area, and WHEREAS, the Moab City Council is concerned about mitigating potential losses from natural hazards/disasters before they occur, and WHEREAS, the plan identifies potential hazards, potential losses and potential mitigation measures to limit losses, and WHEREAS, the Moab City Council has determined that it would be in the best interest of the community as a whole to adopt the Natural Hazard Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan as it pertains to the City, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL THAT: The attached updated "NATURAL HAZARDS: PRE -DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE SOUTHEASTERN REGION OF UTAH" be adopted to meet the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 2000. This resolution shall be effective on the date it is adopted. DATED this ATTEST: day of , 2013. Mayor David L. Sakrison Rachel E. Stenta, City Recorder CX Page 55 of 198 Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments 375 S. Carbon Ave. (P.O. Box 1108) Price. UT 84601 Phone: 435 837-5444 - Fax: 435 837-5448 MEMORANDUM TO: City/Town Mayor and Council Members of Grand County Jurisdictions FROM: Amy L Peters, Planning Coordinator, apetersnseualg.utah.gov DrQ DATE: July 29, 2013 SUBJECT: Recommendation to Adopt the Natural Hazards: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan For The Southeastern Region Of Utah. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has completed their review of the plan and request each participating jurisdiction to adopt the plan through a resolution (a copy of the Review Tool and Sample Resolution are provided). After two and one half years of dedicated participation from Grand County public employees, Special Service Districts, Educational Systems and Officials from City and Towns like yours, the plan is complete. The Grand County Emergency Manager and the representative from the SEUALG are recommending your city or town to adopt the Natural Hazards: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan for the Southeastern Region of Utah. There are prepared copies of relevant parts of the plan; these are Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 9. These copies will provide an overall review of the plan's contents. Part 9 is the Grand County section of the plan that includes action projects that were gathered from your local area. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact one of us. Please place this item on the council or town meeting agenda; if it is required that the Emergency Manager or AOG representative attend that meeting please contact us immediately so we may make the appropriate arrangements. Once the resolution has been signed, the AOG representative requests a copy of your City or Town's Council Meeting Agenda and Resolution of the plan's adoption. Please send or fax this information. We appreciate your time and response on this matter. Page 56 of 298 To: Amy Peters Subject: Southeastern Mitigation Plan Update Amy, Congratulations! FEMA accepted the mitigation plan update. I have attached a document. Here is their response: FEMA Region VIII has completed its review of the Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan for the Southeastern Utah Region update and has determined that it meets the mitigation planning requirements established by 44 CFR Part 201.6, pending its adoption. The Region will deliver the FEMA approval letter upon receipt of adoption resolutions from the jurisdictions listed on the Multi jurisdiction Summary Sheet found in the attached Plan Review Tool. We recommend the jurisdictions coordinate the adoption process to ensure they are all eligible to apply for all Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant programs for the full five years. Now the jurisdictions need to adopt the plan. Make sure that Emery County adopts the plan as soon as possible because they already have a mitigation grant. Eric Martineau Mitigation Specialist Utah Division of Emergency Management 1110 State Office Building Salt Lake City, UT 84114 801-946-4022 emartineauftutah.gov Page 562of 298 Southeastern Utah Region 1 2013 LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW TOOL The Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool demonstrates how the Local Mitigation Plan meets the regulation in 44 CFR §201.6 and offers States and FEMA Mitigation Planners an opportunity to provide feedback to the community. • The Multi-iurisdiction Summary Sheet should be used to document contact information for each jurisdiction and if each met the requirements of the Plan, if a multi - jurisdictional plan. • The Regulation Checklist provides a summary of FEMA's evaluation of whether the Plan has addressed all requirements. • The Plan Assessment identifies the plan's strengths as well as documents areas for future improvement. The FEMA Mitigation Planner must reference this Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide when completing the Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool. Jurisdiction: Southeastern Utah Region Title of Plan: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan for the Southeastern Utah Region Date of Plan: July 2013 Local Point of Contact: Amy L. Peters Title: Coordinator/Planner Agency: Southeastern Utah Association of Governments Address: 375 South Carbon Ave. P.O. Box Drawer 1106 Price, UT 84501 Phone Number: 435-637-5444 Ext. 404 E-Mail: apeters@seualg.utah.gov State Reviewer: Title: Date: FEMA Reviewer: Margaret Doherty Title: Community Planner Date: July 10, 2013 Date Received In FEMA Region VIII June 20, 2013 Plan Not Approved Plan Approvable Pending Adoption July 11, 2013 Plan Approved Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool Paac 58 of 208 1 80Z Jo 89 abed Southeastern Utah Region I 20 i 3 SECTION 1: MULTI -JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type Jurisdiction Contact MULTI -JURISDICTION SUMMARY SH Email x^ 1 Carbon County Jason Llewelyn jason.11ewelyn@carbon.utah.gov 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Emery Helper East Carbon Price Scofield Sunnyside Wellington Castle Dale Clawson Cleveland Elmo Emery City City City Town City City County City Town Town Town Town Dean Armstrong Jason Llewelyn Gary Sonntag Mike Erkkila Gail Raby Kelly Maynes Kyle Ekker Kyle Ekker Kyle Ekker Kyle Ekker Kyle Ekker Kyle Ekker deanarmstrone@heloercitv.net jason.11ewelyn@carbon.utah.gov garv@oriceutah.net rmerkkila@hotmail.com sunnl@emerytelcom.net kmavnes@emervtelcom.net kylee@ecso.com kvlee@ecso.com kylee@ecso.com kylee@ecso.com kvlee@ecso.com kylee@ecso.com Requirements Met (WM A. Planning Process B. HIRA C. Mitigation Strategy D. Update Rgtms. & Adoption Resolution r Y Y - Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N I Mitigation Plan Review Tool 2 f N A N N N N N A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A axrueropa3Ruow@AllaN norr-au!puelq@Jalsoyq nxunopuenlues@nallegw.i bio n;pgeow@eapagau woD• yerAellenapsep@aanep lau•laui!aluoilgrpew uosJuad Allah JalsoH �a�g Aal!eg via snipud e»agaa Aap3 p!nea poi nnainaa ueid uoge2mil A;unop Ag!J Aiunop ollaonuoyu Su!puelg gem Aallen alisep uenr ues £Z ZZ TZ o OZ o 6I puea9 8I N N 1 N A A A A A A A A A A A A woros3a@a31n01 woYos33n@aeln)i pu•nla@els!nuaiel N uopniosay uopdopy A itulby elfin .a A AgeWAS uogeeptw A tllllH .s (N/A) PIN sluauiannbay F,TOZ A sse3oid 8utuueld -v woYos33@aalki Iletu3 ii]Hs Aabwwns NoLuiaslinr- urnni uo!2au gem tualseatpnos Javi3 ;IAN Hama aIAN 41!wS uaieN Jam3 aIAN Peluo, uom!pslonr A�IJ AID AID all!na2ueio uonBununH Jan!a u93.19 LT 9I ST A-1!D WA' uoplpslinf uwJa j oweN uopowspnf bT Southeastern Utah Region 2013 SECTION 2: REGULATION CHECKLIST REGULATION CHECKLIST Location in Plan (section and/or Not Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 LOCaI Mitigation Pl(ins) page number) Met Met ELEMENT A. PLANNING PROCESS A1. Does the Plan document the planning process, including how it was prepared and who was involved in the process for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(1)) Pages 3-1-3-19 and Appendix I X A2. Does the Plan document an opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, agencies that have the authority to regulate development as well as other interests to be involved in the planning process? (Requirement §201.6(b)(2)) Pages 3-5-3-7, 3- 12-3-19, and Appendix F X A3. Does the Plan document how the public was involved in the planning process during the drafting stage? (Requirement §201.6(b)(1)) Pages 3-5-3-7, 3- 12-3-19, and Appendix F X A4. Does the Plan describe the review and incorporation of existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information? (Requirement §201.6(b)(3)) Pages 3-4-3-5 and 3-19 X A5. Is there discussion of how the community(ies) will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(iii)) Pages 11-18-11-20 X A6. Is there a description of the method and schedule for keeping the plan current (monitoring, evaluating and updating the mitigation plan within a 5-year cycle)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(i)) Pages 11-1-11-2 X ELEMENT A: REQUIRED REVISIONS ELEMENT B. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT Bl. Does the Plan include a description of the type, location, and extent of all natural hazards that can affect each jurisdiction(s)? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(1)) Pages 4-1-4-23, 6- 1-6-24, and Parts 7-10 X B2. Does the Plan include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)0)) Pages 4-1-4-23, 6- 1-6-24, and Parts 7-10 X B3. Is there a description of each identified hazard's impact on the community as well as an overall summary of the community's vulnerability for each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)) Pages 4-1-4-23, 6- 1-6-24, and Parts 7-10 X B4. Does the Plan address NFIP insured structures within the jurisdiction that have been repetitively damaged by floods? (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)) Page 5-6 X ELEMENT B: REQUIRED REVISIONS Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool Page 60 of 298 4 Southeastern Utah Region 2 ®13 REGULATION CHECKLIST Regulation (:14 t:1=ld 0 t J Local Mitigation Plans) Location in Plan (section and/or Not page number) Met Met ELEMENTC. MITIGATION STRATEGY Cl. Does the plan document each jurisdiction's existing authorities, policies, programs and resources and its ability to expand on and improve these existing policies and programs? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)) Pages 5-1-5-7 X C2. Does the Plan address each jurisdiction's participation in the NFIP and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii)) Pages 5-6, 7-36, and Appendix D X C3. Does the Plan include goals to reduce/avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(0) Pages 2-6-2-7 and Parts 7-10 X C4. Does the Plan identify and analyze a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects for each jurisdiction being considered to reduce the effects of hazards, with emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii)) Parts 7-10 and Appendix B X C5. Does the Plan contain an action plan that describes how the actions identified will be prioritized (including cost benefit review), implemented, and administered by each jurisdiction? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(iv)); (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(iii)) Parts 7-10 X C6. Does the Plan describe a process by which local governments will integrate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other planning, mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate? (Requirement §201.6(c)(4)00) Page 11-3 X ELEMENT C: REQUIRED REVISIONS ELEMENT D. PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION (applicable to plan updates only) D1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) Parts 7-10 X D2. Was the plan revised to reflect progress in local mitigation efforts? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) Parts 7-10 and Appendix H X D3. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in priorities? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3)) Parts 7-10 and Appendix H X ELEMENT D: REQUIRED REVISIONS ELEMENT E. PLAN ADOPTION E1. Does the Plan include documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval? (Requirement §201.6(c)(5)) NA Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 5 Southeastern Utah Region 2013 REGULATION CHECKLIST Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans) Location in Plan (section and/or page number) Met Not Met X E2. For multi -jurisdictional plans, has each jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan documented formal plan adoption? (Requirement §201.6(c)(5)) ELEMENT E: REQUIRED REVISIONS E2. Pending FEMA approval. ELEMENT F. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS (OPTIONAL FOR STATE REVIEWERS ONLY; NOT TO BE COMPLETED BY FEMA) F1. NA F2. NA ELEMENT F: REQUIRED REVISIONS Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool Page 62 of 298 6 Southeastern Utah Region 12 013 SECTION 3: PLAN ASSESSMENT A. Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement This section provides a discussion of the strengths of the plan document and identifies areas where these could be improved upon as part of the next plan update. Element A: Planning Process The process established by the AOG appears to have been effective in eliciting comments from the local decision -makers as well as providing ample opportunity for the public to be involved in the process. The Acknowledgements in the Appendix is a nice way to thank all the people that contributed to the process while documenting participation. Element B: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment The risk assessment is exceptionally thorough and provides specific vulnerability detail for each participating jurisdiction within each County. The "Countywide Problem Identification" statements are a good way to summarize the key issues just prior to the list of mitigation actions. As part of the next plan update, consider including these problem statements in the executive summary. Element C: Mitigation Strategy The capability assessment is particularly well done; as part of the next plan update explore more ideas for how these capabilities can be expanded or improved upon. The mitigation action descriptions should be more explicit as to the implementation and administrative responsibilities of each of the Cities and Towns. As part of the next plan update, consider including an action plan table of all the mitigation actions in the executive summary, for quick reference. Element D: Plan Review, Evaluation, and Implementation The plan is clear as to which sections were revised and the process completed to review the plan with each participating jurisdiction. The narrative descriptions in Appendix H that provide the status of the previous plan's mitigation actions is a nice way to tell the story of how priorities shifted over the planning cycle. Page 63 of 298 Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 7 & jurisdiction Price City Helper Completed _ Scotieldl Oorrlp'fete[i Wellington Completed Sunnyside City Completed East Carbon Carbon County Elmo Completed Orangeville _ Completed Completed Huntington Emery Town Castle Dale Completed Cleveland Clawson Green River Ferron pnery County !Completed Castle Valley Town Completed 'Moab Completed 1 Blanding Completed In Process Page 662bf 298 NATURAL HAZARDS: PRE -DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE SOUTHEASTERN REGION OF UTAH Southeastern Counties CARBON EMERY GRANO SAN JUAN Produced by The Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments in Conjunction with Carbon, Emery, Grand, San Juan Counties, their Municipalities and Special Service Districts. Page 66 of 298 rtcr,-111JAJ I Lit 1V11111z1-V 11V1r rL1-xn Southeastern Region of Utah 2013 Prepared by Amy L. Peters, with Assistance from Michael Bryant and Staff from the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments. Guidance provided by Brad Bartholomew from the Utah Division of Emergency Management. Pictures from Sun Advocate and Times Independent Page 66 of 298 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 68 of 298 Authority 1-4 Goals and Objectives 2-6 Part 3 Planning Process 3-1 A. Planning and Review Process 3-1 Table 3-1 Technical Team 3-2 Table 3-2 Local Planning Teams 3-2 Table 3-3 Date of Plan Adoption... 3-7 Table 3-4 Planning Timeline 3-8 B. Public Involvement 3-12 Table 3-5 Public Involvement 3-12 Figure 3-1 Sun Advocate Newspaper Ad for October 2003 3-14 Figure 3-2 Emery County Progress Newspaper Ad for October 7, 2003 3-15 Figure 3-3 San Juan Record Newspaper Ad for October 29, 2003 3-16 Figure 3-4 San Juan Record Newspaper Ad for August 2011 3-17 Figure 3-5 Times -Independent Newspaper Ad for September 29, 2011 3-17 Figure 3-6 Emery County Progress News Announcement July 26, 2011 3-17 Figure 3-7 Sun Advoacte News Announcement July 22, 2011 3-18 Figure 3-8 Public Advertisement... 3-18 Figure 3-9 Public Announcement... 3-18 C. Information Sources 3-19 Part 4 Regional Data 4-1 1. Physiography of each County 4-1 2. Regional Geology 4-3 Table 4-2 Geologic Time Scale 4-4 3. Regional Climate 4-5 4. Major Rivers 4-5 5. Regional Hazard Risk Assessment 4-5 a) Severe Weather 4-6 b) Drought 4-8 Figure 4-1 Palmer Z Index 4-10 Figure 4-2 Palmer Drought Index May 2012 4-11 c) Earthquake 4-11 Figure 4-3 Average Number of Earthquakes Occurring in the Utah Region 4-13 Map 4-1 Utah Quaternary Fault Map 4-14 Carbon County Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment 4-16 Table 4-2 Casualties 4-16 Part 1: Table Of Contents Page iv Page 68 of 298 Table 4-3 Building Damage by... 4-16 Table 4-4 Critical Facilities Damage 4-16 Table 4-5 Debris Generated... 4-16 Table 4-6 Fire Following Event... 4-16 Table 4-7 Hazard Vulnerablity Analysis (HVA) 2012 4-17 Emery County Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment 4-18 Table 4-8 Emery County's Transportatation System Lifeline Inventory 4-18 Table 4-9 Utility System Lifeline Inventroy 4-19 Table 4-10 Casualty Estimates 4-20 Table 4-11 Building Damage by ... 4-20 Table 4-12 Critical Facilities Damage 4-21 Grand County Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment 4-21 Table 4-13 Casualty Estimates 4-21 Table 4-14 Building Damage by... 4-22 Table 4-15 Critical Facilities Damage 4-22 Table 4-16 Debris Generated... 4-22 Table 4-17 Fire Following Event... 4-22 San Juan County Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment 4-23 Table 4-18 Casualty Estimates 4-23 Table 4-19 Building Damage by... 4-23 Table 4-20 Critical Facilities Damage 4-23 Table 4-21 Debris Genreated... 4-23 Table 4-22 Fire Following Event... 4-23 Part 5 Capability Assessment 5-1 A. Local Organizational and Technical Capability 5-1 Table 5-1 State and Regional Hazard Mitigation Resources 5-2 Table 5-2 Local Level Hazard Mitigation Capability 5-3 B. Policy and Program Capability 5-4 Table 5-3 Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) 5-6 Table 5-4 Community Ranking System Scores 5-6 C. Fiscal Capability 5-6 D. Political Willpower 5-7 Part 6 Risk Assessment A. Hazard Identification Table 6-1 Hazard Identification Table 6-2 County Hazard Identification B. Hazard Profile Table 6-3 Hazard Profile 6-1 6-1 6-2 6-4 6-4 6-5 C. Vulnerability Analysis 6-5 6-7 6-8 6-8 6-9 D. Mitigation Goals, Objectives, Actions 6-9 E. Hazard Description 6-10 Earthquake 6-10 Flood 6-13 Table 6-4 Housing Unit Values for Each County Table 6-5 Road Construction Costs Table 6-6 2010 Construction Cost on Interchanges Table 6-7 Power and Gas Line Cost Part 1: Table Of Contents n.,..f,. nn ..a Sono Page v B. Economy /-.3 Table 7-2 Carbon County's Largest Employers 74 Table 7-3 Carbon County's Labor Force Historical Data 74 C. Transportation and Commuting Patterns 7-4 D. Land Use and Development Trends 7-5 Chart 7-1 Carbon County Land Use and Acreage 7-6 Table 74 Carbon County Issued Building Permits 7-6 E. Risk Assessment 7-8 1. Dam Failure 7-9 Table 7-5 Dam Hazard Rating for Carbon County 7-10 Figure 7-1.1 Scofield Dam Inundaton 2011 7-12 Figure 7-1.2 Grassy Trail Dam Inudation 2011 7-13 2. Flood 7-14 3. Wild Land Fire 7-15 Table 7-6 Structures and Population in Wildfire Area 7-16 Table 7-7 Wildfire Risk Area 7-17 Table 7-8 Infrastructure Affected by Wildfire 7-17 Table 7-9 Wildfire Hazard History 7-17 4. Landslide 7-19 Table 7-10 Inventories of Properties in Landslide Risk Areas 7-20 Table 7-11 Infrastructure Affected by Landslide 7-20 5. Problem Soil 7-20 6. Infestation 7-22 7. Hazardous Materials 7-24 F. Hazard History 7-25 Table 7-12 Hazard History 7-25 G. Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions 7-30 Table 7-13 County Summary of Natural Hazard Risk 7-30 H. Maps H-7-1 Map 7-1.1 ADS Manti-LaSal national Forest H-7-2 Map 7-2.1 Problem Soil H-7-3 Map 7-3.1 Earthquake Epicenters and Fault Lines H-74 Map 74.1 Peak Ground Acceleration H-7-5 Map 7-5.1 Wild Land Fire Risk H-7-6 Map 7-6.1 Dam Inundation Risk H-7-7 Map 7-7.1 Landslide Risk H-7-8 Map 7-8.1 Critical Facilities and Census Block Population H-7-9 Map 7-9.1 Road Fire Breaks H-7-10 Map 7-10.1 Price River Canals (1 of 2) H-7-11 Map 7-10.2 Price River Canals (2 of 2) H-7-12 Part 1: Table Of Contents Page vi Page 70 of 298 Part 8 Emery County 8-1 A. Demographics and Population Growth 8-2 Table 8-1 Utah State and Emery County Population Change Comparison 8-3 Table 8-2 Emery County Human Population 8-3 B. Economy 8-3 Table 8-3 Unemployment Rates 8-4 C. Transportation and Commuting Patterns 8-4 Table 8-4 Emery County Mode of Transportation for Employment 8-5 D. Land Use and Development Trends 8-5 Graph 8-1.1 Emery County Land Use per Acres 8-5 Table 8-5 Emery County Building Permits Issued... 8-6 E. Risk Assessment 8-7 1. Dam Failure 8-7 Table 8-6 Dam Risk 8-8 2. Flood 8-10 3. Landslide 8-12 Table 8-7 Infrastructure in Landslide Area 8-13 4.Wild Land Fire 8-14 Table 8-8 Structures and Population in Wildfire Area 8-15 Table 8-9 Wildfrie Risk Area 8-15 Table 8-10 Infrastructure Affected by Wildfire 8-16 Table 8-11 Wildfire Hazard History 8-16 5. Problem Soil 8-17 6. Infestation 8-18 F. Hazard History 8-20 Table 8-12 Hazard History 8-20 G. Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions Table 8-13 Natural Hazard Ranking 8-26 8-27 H. Maps H-8-1 Map 8-1.1 Problem Soils H-8-2 Map 8-2.1 Earthquake Epicenters and Fault Lines H-8-3 Map 8-3.1 Peak Ground Acceleration H-8-4 Map 84.1 Wild Fire Risk H-8-5 Map 8-5.1 Dam Inundation Risk H-8-6 Map 8-6.1 Landslide Risk H-8-7 Map 7-8.1 Critical Facilities and Census Block Population H-7-9 Part 9 Grand County 9-1 A. Demographics and Population Growth 9-3 Table 9-1 Grand County Population In Relation to Utah State 9-3 Table 9-2 Community Population 9-3 B. Economy 9-4 Table 9-3 Employment and Wage Data 94 C. Transportation and Commuting Patterns 9-4 D. Land Use and Development Trends 9-4 Table 94 Land Use per Acre 9-5 Chart 9-1.1 Land Use Per Acres 9-5 E. Risk Assessment 9-6 Panc 7`D of 91:1A Part 1: Table Of Contents Page vii F. Hazard History 9-17 Table 9-14 Hazard History 9-17 G. Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions 9-32 Table 9-15 Natural Hazard Ranking 9-32 H. Maps 9-48 Map 9-1.1 Cover Page/Picture H-9-1 Map 9-2.1 Earthquake Epicenters and Fault Lines H-9-2 Map 9-3.1 Peak Ground Acceleration H-9-3 Map 9-4.1 Dam Inundation Risk H-94 Map 9-5.1 Wild Fire Risk H-9-5 Map 9-6.1 Landslide Risk H-9-6 Map 9-7.1 Critical Facilities and Census Block Population H-9-7 Map 9-7.2 Map Notation Page H-9-8 Map 9-8.1 Problem Soil H-9-9 Map 9-9.1 Dams, Epicenters, and Faultlines in Grand County H-9-10 Map 9-10.1 Wild Fire History H-9-11 Part 10 San Juan County 10-1 A. Demographics and Population Growth 10-3 Table 10-1 San Juan County Population... 10-3 Table 10-2 Population Projections... 104 B. Economy 10-4 Table 10-3 Largest Employers... 10-5 C. Transportation and Commuting Patterns 10-5 D. Land Use and Development Trends 10-6 Chart 10-1.1 Land Ownership 10-6 Table 104 Land Use per Acre 10-7 E. Risk Assessment 10-7 1. Wild Land Fire 10-8 Table 10-5 Wild Land/Interface Fire Statistics 10-8 Table 10-6 Households and Population in Wildfire Area 10-9 Table 10-7 Businesses in Wildfire Area 10-9 Table 10-8 Wildfire Risk Area 10-10 Table 10-9 Critical Facilities in Wildfire Zones 10-10 Table 10-10 Infrastructure in Wildfire Area 10-10 Table 10-11 NWCG Fire Code Standard 10-11 Table 10-12 Historical Wildfires 10-11 2. Flood 10-15 3. Dam Failure 10-17 Part 1: Table Of Contents Page viii Page 72 of 298 Table 10-13 San Juan County Dams 10-18 Table 10-14 Dam Breach Downstream Town 10-19 4. Infestation 10-20 5. Landslide 10-21 6. Problem Soils 10-22 7. Hazardous Materials 10-23 F. Hazard History 10-25 Table 10-15 Hazard History 10-25 G. Mitigation Goals, Objectives, and Actions 10-27 Table 10-16 Hazard Rating 10-28 H. Maps H-10-1 Map 10-1.1 Dams, Epicenters, and Faultlines in Grand County H-10-2 Map 10-1.2 Epicenters and Fault Lines H-10-3 Map 10-1.3 Peak Ground Acceleration H-104 Map 10-2.1 Problem Soil H-10-5 Map 10-3.1 Dam Inundation Risk H-10-6 Map 104.1 Wild Fire History H-10-7 Map 104.2 Wild Fire Risk H-10-8 Map 10-5.1 Landslide Risk H-10-9 Map 10-5.1 Critical Facilities and Census Block Population H-10-10 Part 11 Maintenance and Implementation Procedures 11-1 A. Maintenance 11-1 B. Implementation 11-3 C. Continued Public Involvement 11-18 Appendices Appendix A Environmental Considerations A-1 Environmental Acts A-1 Utah Noxious Weed List A-3 Appendix B General Mitigation Strategies B-1 Section 1 Mitigation Category Examples B-1 Section 2 General Mitigation Strategies B-3 Appendix C Critical Facilities C-1 Appendix D National Flood Insurance Policy (NFIP) Table D-1 NFIP Status for Southeastern Utah Appendix E Flood Hazard Identification Study Appendix F Mitigation Workbooks and Surveys Appendix G Glossary & Acronyms Appendix H Completed Mitigation Actions Appendix I Acknowledgements Appendix J Carbon County Flow Study Appendix K Source References D-1 D-1 E-1 F-1 G-1 H-1 I-1 J-1 K-1 Pane 7a of R0A Part 1: Table Of Contents Page ix Part 2: Executive Summary Plan's Mission The mission of the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments (SEUALG) Pre - Disaster Mitigation Plan (PDM) is to substantially and permanently reduce the region's vulnerability to natural hazards. The plan is intended to promote sound public policy designed to protect citizens, critical facilities, infrastructure, private property, and the natural environment. This can be achieved by increasing public awareness, documenting resources for risk reduction and loss -prevention, and identifying activities to guide the development of less vulnerable and more sustainable communities. Plan Review and Update 2010-2013 This plan represents an update of the PDM plan that was approved by the counties, the state, and FEMA in 2003. The PDM plan had an extensive review to reflect the most current demographic data, maps, vulnerability assessments, and mitigation projects. The plan review included the revision of names, critical facilities, hazard history, and economic development that has occurred overtime throughout the region. The plan was reorganized in some areas such as the mitigation goals, objectives, and actions to provide an overall ease to reading and for identifying projects. There were minor changes to the appendices as well as general maintenance parts. Other parts had information that does not need to change for it still depicts accurate information about the region. Organization The Southeastern Regional Natural Hazards PDM plan was developed and organized within the rules and regulations established under CFR Title 44, Part 201.6. The plan contains a discussion on the purpose and methodology used to develop the plan, a profile on communities within the region, and a vulnerability analysis of eight hay ds. To assist in the explanation of the above - identified contents there are several appendices included which provide more detail on specific subjects. This plan is intended to provide a basis of capabilities for the communities within the Southeastern Region of Utah. It enables these communities to develop projects that are mindful to safety of their populations and environment. Plan Financing The Southeastern Regional Natural Hazards PDM Plan was financed and developed under the PDM Program guidelines established by the FEMA and the Utah Department of Public Safety DEM. The SEUALG and County Municipalities aided in the funding by providing a 25% in -kind match. Plan Participation The original Southeastern Regional PDM Plan was completed as a result of a collaborative effort between The Wasatch Front Regional Council, Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments, the Utah Department of Public Safety DEM, County Emergency Managers, Fire Departments, Sheriff Departments, Public Works Departments, Planning Commissions, Pno 7S of 9>Llq Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-1 ... A....,..._ ..... _b.._. J .._.._---a- , _ _ __--- - ---- - Emergency Managers from each County (Carbon, Emery, Grand, and San Juan), Public Works Departments, City and County GIS Departments, Fire Departments, Federal entities (BLM and FFSL) and the Citizens of the these county municipalities. Two types of surveys were distributed, one was sent in the initial invitational letter to all County Commissioners/Council, Mayors, and Town Council, County/City Public Fire/Police Departments while the second one was available to All General and Public Officials and distributed at Council Meetings, City and County Events/Fairs, and City and County buildings. Comments from these surveys were noted as well as comments and questions from all meetings where consideration was given to each during the review of this plan. Hazards Identified Division of Emergency Management (DEM) suggested, at minimum, the plan addresses the following hazards: earthquake, flood, landslide, problem soils, wildfire, dam failure, severe weather, and drought. However, there are other hazards that were identified which are not in the minimum criteria established by DEM but were added to the discussion and are addressed in specific county sections. The original hazard identification study recognized the following hazards as being the most prevalent and posing the most potential risk to the counties and towns within the Southeastern Utah Region. During the review of the plan, it was verified that each of these hazards remain a threat still. Additionally, Hazardous Materials was added to the list despite the fact that disasters related thereto are manmade. Hazardous Materials does not show in the table or risk assessments; however, certain counties included a risk assessment and mitigation projects in their Section G. Below is a copy of Table 6-2 from Part 6 to show which natural hazards were identified for each county. ✓ Earthquake ✓ Landslide ✓ Wild Land Fire ✓ Problem Soil ✓ Dam Failure ✓ Flood ✓ Drought ✓ Infestation ✓ Severe Weather Carbon County Emery County Grand County San Juan County Earthquake Landslide ° ii i Wild Land Fire Problem Soils r s r Dam Failure r r Flood/Flash Flood Drought r r ° i Infestation i r Severe Weather r r `' Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-2 Page 76 of 298 A. Introduction The State of Utah is vulnerable to natural, technological, and man-made hazards that have the possibility of causing serious threat to the health, welfare, and security of our citizens. This document will address the Utah Southeastern Region and includes Carbon, Emery, Grand and San Juan Counties. The cost of response to and recovery from potential disasters can be substantially reduced when attention is turned to mitigating disaster impacts and effects before they occur or re -occur. This plan's mission is to identify the region's natural and man-made hazards, understand our vulnerabilities, and form solutions that can significantly reduce threat to life and property. The plan is based on the premise that hazard mitigation works. With increased attention to managing natural hazards, communities can do much to reduce existing threats to citizens and avoid creating new problems in the future. Also, many solutions can be implemented at minimal cost. This plan is neither an emergency response nor a management plan. Without doubt, the plan can be used to identify weaknesses and aid in emergency response planning, which is an important mitigation strategy. However, the focus of this plan is to sustain better decision making that is directed toward avoiding future risks, and the implementation of activities or projects that will eliminate or reduce the risk for those areas that may already have exposure to a natural hazard threat. Table 2-1 lists the participating Southeastern Utah Counties and municipalities. Table 2-1: Southeastern Utah Regional Participants County Municipality Carbon East Carbon, Helper, Price, Scofield, Sunnyside, and Wellington Emery Clawson, Cleveland, Castle Dale, Elmo, Emery Town, Perron, Green River, Huntington, and Orangeville Grand Castle Valley and Moab San Juan Blanding and Monticello Capital investment decisions must be considered in conjunction with natural hazard vulnerability. Capital investments can include; homes, roads, public utilities, pipelines, power plants, chemical plants, warehouses, and public works. These decisions can influence the degree of hazard vulnerability of a community. Once a capital facility is in place very few opportunities will present themselves over the useful life of the facility to correct any errors in location or construction with respect to hazard vulnerability. It is for these reasons that zoning ordinances, which restrict development in high vulnerability areas, and building codes, which ensure that new buildings are built to withstand the damaging forces of hazards, are the most useful mitigation approaches a community can implement. In the past, mitigation has been the most neglected aspect within emergency management. Since the priority to implement mitigation activities is generally low in comparison to the perceived threat, some important mitigation measures are neglected in favor of high -profile events. Mitigation success can be achieved, however, if accurate information is portrayed through complete hazard identification and impact studies, followed by effective mitigation management. Hazard mitigation is the key to greatly reducing long-term risk from natural hazards and their Panes 7ih of 7Q1z1 Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-3 GGUilUlily, G11V11U11111G111 t111U LUG WG11 UGillg Ul 111G U1 V LCLLl. l Ina yicui iJ 111.0v4.1a1%.0 w v1u1u11vv the awareness of and provide mitigation strategies for elected officials, agencies and the public. It is also the intent of this plan to provide solutions for relief from the various hazards and their associated threats to life and property. C. Scope The Utah Southeastern Regional Natural Hazards Pre -disaster Mitigation (PDM) Plan was developed in accordance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in Regulations Section 322, the Utah Division of Emergency Management (DEM), and local planning agencies. The Disaster Mitigation Act 2000 was amended by Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, this gave way to the Mitigation Planning section 322 and rule 44 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 201 was established for the mitigation planning requirements for States, Tribes, and local communities. The goal of this plan is to assist the region that consists of Carbon, Emery, Grand, and San Juan Counties. The plan establishes a basis for the region to help reduce the costs associated with natural disasters through mitigation practices. This plan provides comprehensive hazard identification, risk assessment, vulnerability analysis, mitigation actions, and an implementation schedule for the region. Regulations set forth by FEMA were followed during development of this plan. Future monitoring, evaluating, updating and implementation will take place as new incidents occur, and/or every five years as funding is available. D. Authority Federal: Public Law 93-288 as amended, established the basis for federal hazard mitigation activity in 1974. A section of this Act requires the identification, evaluation, and mitigation of hazards as a prerequisite for state receipt of future disaster assistance outlays. Since 1974, many additional programs, regulations, and laws have expanded on the original legislation to establish hazard mitigation as a priority at all levels of government. When PL 93-288 was amended by the Stafford Act, several additional provisions were also added that provide for the availability of significant mitigation measures in the aftermath of Presidential declared disasters. Civil Preparedness Guide 1-3, Chapter 6- Hazard Mitigation Assistance Programs places emphasis on hazard mitigation planning directed toward hazards with a high impact and threat potential. Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-4 Page 78 of 298 President Clinton signed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) into Law on October 30, 2000. Section 322, defines mitigation planning requirements for state, local, and tribal governments. Under Section 322 States are eligible for an increase in the Federal share of hazard mitigation, if they submit a mitigation plan (which is a summary of local and/or regional mitigation plans) that identifies natural hazards, risks, vulnerabilities, and which describes proposed actions to mitigate the hazards risks and vulnerabilities in that plan. State: The Governor's Emergency Operation Directive, The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, amendments to Public Law 93-288, as amended, Title 44, CFR, Federal Emergency Management Agency Regulations, as amended, State Emergency Management Act of 1981, Utah Code 53-2, 63-5, Disaster Response Recovery Act, 63-5A, Executive Order of the Governor, Executive Order 11, Emergency Interim Succession Act, 63- 5B. Local: Local governments play an essential role in implementing effective mitigation. Each local government will review all present or potential damages, losses, and related impacts associated with natural hazards to determine the need or requirement for mitigation action and planning. In the counties and cities making up the Southeastern Utah Region, the local executive responsible for carrying out plans and policies are the County Commissioners and City or Town Mayors. Local governments must be prepared to participate in the post disaster Hazard Mitigation Team process and the pre -mitigation planning as outlined in this document. Association of Governments: The Association of Governments have been duly constituted under the authority of Title XI, Chapter 13, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended (The Inter -local Cooperation Act); and pursuant to Section 3 of the Executive Order of the Governor of the State of Utah, dated May 27, 1970, with the authority to conduct planning studies and to provide services to its constituent jurisdictions. Paae 78 of 708 Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-5 These goals form the basis for the development of the PDM Plan and are shown from highest to lowest priority. 1. Protection of life before, during, and after the occurrence of a disaster 2. Preventing loss of life and reducing the impact of damage where problems cannot be eliminated. 3. Protection of emergency response capabilities (critical infrastructure) 4. Protect and/or create communication and warning systems 5. Protect emergency medical services and medical facilities 6. Ensure mobile resource availability and survivability 7. Ensure government continuity 8. Protect developed property, homes and businesses, industry, education opportunities and the cultural fabric of the community. While utilizing hazard loss reduction within the community's environmental, social and economic needs. 9. Protect natural resources and the environment, when considering mitigation measures. 10. Promote public awareness through education of community hazards and mitigation measures. 11. Preserve and/or restore natural features. Long Term Local Goals: 1. Eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property from identified natural and technologic hazards. 2. Aid both the private and public sectors in understanding the risks they may be exposed to and find mitigation strategies to reduce those risks. 3. Avoid risk of exposure to identified hazards. 4. Minimize the impacts of those risks when they cannot be avoided. 5. Mitigate the impacts of damage as a result of identified hazards. 6. Accomplish mitigation strategies in such a way that negative environmental impacts are minimized. 7. Provide a basis for funding; prioritizing of hazard mitigation projects. 8. Establish a regional platform to enable the community to take advantage of shared goals and resources. Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-6 Page 89 of 298 Objectives: The following objectives are meant to serve as a measure to evaluate hazard mitigation projects. The criterion becomes especially important when two or more projects are competing for limited resources. 1. Identification of persons, agency or organization responsible for implementation. 2. Project a time frame for implementation. 3. Explanation of how the project will be financed including the conditions for financing and implementing (as information is available). 4. Identifying alternative measures, should financing not be available. 5. Be consistent with, support, and help implement the goals and objectives of hazard mitigation plans already in place. 6. Projects should significantly reduce potential damages to public and/or private property and/or reduce the cost of state and federal recovery for future disasters. 7. Projects should have practical, cost-effective, and environmentally sound alternatives after options are considered. 8. Projects should address repetitive problem(s), or one that has the potential to have a major impact on an area. 9. Projects should meet applicable permit requirements where development in hazardous areas is avoided. 10. Projects should contribute to both the short and long term solutions to the hazard vulnerability risk problem assuring the benefits of a mitigation measure is equal to or exceeds the cost of implementation. 11. Projects should have manageable maintenance and modification costs when possible. 12. Projects should accomplish multiple objectives including improvement of life -safety risk, damage reduction, restoration of essential services, protection of critical facilities, and security of economic development, recovery, and environmental enhancement whenever possible. 13. Projects should use existing resources, agencies and programs when possible. Ong. RR) of 9Afd Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-7 Part 2: Executive Summary Plan's Mission The mission of the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments (SEUALG) Pre - Disaster Mitigation Plan (PDM) is to substantially and permanently reduce the region's vulnerability to natural hazards. The plan is intended to promote sound public policy designed to protect citizens, critical facilities, infrastructure, private property, and the natural environment. This can be achieved by increasing public awareness, documenting resources for risk reduction and loss -prevention, and identifying activities to guide the development of less vulnerable and more sustainable communities. Plan Review and Update 2010-2013 This plan represents an update of the PDM plan that was approved by the counties, the state, and FEMA in 2003. The PDM plan had an extensive review to reflect the most current demographic data, maps, vulnerability assessments, and mitigation projects. The plan review included the revision of names, critical facilities, hazard history, and economic development that has occurred overtime throughout the region. The plan was reorganized in some areas such as the mitigation goals, objectives, and actions to provide an overall ease to reading and for identifying projects. There were minor changes to the appendices as well as general maintenance parts. Other parts had information that does not need to change for it still depicts accurate information about the region. Organization The Southeastern Regional Natural Hazards PDM plan was developed and organized within the rules and regulations established under CFR Title 44, Part 201.6. The plan contains a discussion on the purpose and methodology used to develop the plan, a profile on communities within the region, and a vulnerability analysis of eight hazards. To assist in the explanation of the above - identified contents there are several appendices included which provide more detail on specific subjects. This plan is intended to provide a basis of capabilities for the communities within the Southeastern Region of Utah. It enables these communities to develop projects that are mindful to safety of their populations and environment. Plan Financing The Southeastern Regional Natural Hazards PDM Plan was financed and developed under the PDM Program guidelines established by the FEMA and the Utah Department of Public Safety DEM. The SEUALG and County Municipalities aided in the funding by providing a 25% in -kind match. Plan Participation The original Southeastern Regional PDM Plan was completed as a result of a collaborative effort between The Wasatch Front Regional Council, Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments, the Utah Department of Public Safety DEM, County Emergency Managers, Fire Departments, Sheriff Departments, Public Works Departments, Planning Commissions, Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-1 Emergency Managers from each County (Carbon, Emery, Grand, and San Juan), Public Works Departments, City and County GIS Departments, Fire Departments, Federal entities (BLM and FFSL) and the Citizens of the these county municipalities. Two types of surveys were distributed, one was sent in the initial invitational letter to all County Commissioners/Council, Mayors, and Town Council, County/City Public Fire/Police Departments while the second one was available to All General and Public Officials and distributed at Council Meetings, City and County Events/Fairs, and City and County buildings. Comments from these surveys were noted as well as comments and questions from all meetings where consideration was given to each during the review of this plan. Hazards Identified Division of Emergency Management (DEM) suggested, at minimum, the plan addresses the following hazards: earthquake, flood, landslide, problem soils, wildfire, dam failure, severe weather, and drought. However, there are other hazards that were identified which are not in the minimum criteria established by DEM but were added to the discussion and are addressed in specific county sections. The original hazard identification study recognized the following hazards as being the most prevalent and posing the most potential risk to the counties and towns within the Southeastern Utah Region. During the review of the plan, it was verified that each of these hazards remain a threat still. Additionally, Hazardous Materials was added to the list despite the fact that disasters related thereto are manmade. Hazardous Materials does not show in the table or risk assessments; however, certain counties included a risk assessment and mitigation projects in their Section G. Below is a copy of Table 6-2 from Part 6 to show which natural hazards were identified for each county. ✓ Earthquake ✓ Landslide ✓ Wild Land Fire ✓ Problem Soil ✓ Dam Failure ✓ Flood ✓ Drought ✓ Infestation ✓ Severe Weather Carbon County Emery County Grand County San Juan County Earthquake ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Landslide ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Wild Land Fire ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Problem Soils ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Dam Failure ✓ ✓ ✓ Flood/Flash Flood ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Drought ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Infestation ✓ ✓ ✓ Severe Weather ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-2 Page 82 of 298 A. Introduction The State of Utah is vulnerable to natural, technological, and man-made hazards that have the possibility of causing serious threat to the health, welfare, and security of our citizens. This document will address the Utah Southeastern Region and includes Carbon, Emery, Grand and San Juan Counties. The cost of response to and recovery from potential disasters can be substantially reduced when attention is turned to mitigating disaster impacts and effects before they occur or re -occur. This plan's mission is to identify the region's natural and man-made hazards, understand our vulnerabilities, and form solutions that can significantly reduce threat to life and property. The plan is based on the premise that hazard mitigation works. With increased attention to managing natural hazards, communities can do much to reduce existing threats to citizens and avoid creating new problems in the future. Also, many solutions can be implemented at minimal cost. This plan is neither an emergency response nor a management plan. Without doubt, the plan can be used to identify weaknesses and aid in emergency response planning, which is an important mitigation strategy. However, the focus of this plan is to sustain better decision making that is directed toward avoiding future risks, and the implementation of activities or projects that will eliminate or reduce the risk for those areas that may already have exposure to a natural hazard threat. Table 2-1 lists the participating Southeastern Utah Counties and municipalities. Table 2-1: Southeastern Utah Regional Participants County Municipality Carbon East Carbon, Helper, Price, Scofield, Sunnyside, and Wellington Emery Clawson, Cleveland, Castle Dale, Elmo, Emery Town, Ferron, Green River, Huntington, and Orangeville Grand Castle Valley and Moab San Juan Blanding and Monticello Capital investment decisions must be considered in conjunction with natural hazard vulnerability. Capital investments can include; homes, roads, public utilities, pipelines, power plants, chemical plants, warehouses, and public works. These decisions can influence the degree of hazard vulnerability of a community. Once a capital facility is in place very few opportunities will present themselves over the useful life of the facility to correct any errors in location or construction with respect to hazard vulnerability. It is for these reasons that zoning ordinances, which restrict development in high vulnerability areas, and building codes, which ensure that new buildings are built to withstand the damaging forces of hazards, are the most useful mitigation approaches a community can implement. In the past, mitigation has been the most neglected aspect within emergency management. Since the priority to implement mitigation activities is generally low in comparison to the perceived threat, some important mitigation measures are neglected in favor of high -profile events. Mitigation success can be achieved, however, if accurate information is portrayed through complete hazard identification and impact studies, followed by effective mitigation management. Hazard mitigation is the key to greatly reducing long-term risk from natural hazards and their iati4«:*-i.,.iliot. Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-3 economy, C11V11V1ll11C11L WILL LUC VVCll UClll�,' Vl u1C cmLC vl UKltl. 1111J picu11J llll,111.1 u .v �lulwavv the awareness of and provide mitigation strategies for elected officials, agencies and the public. It is also the intent of this plan to provide solutions for relief from the various hazards and their associated threats to life and property. C. Scope The Utah Southeastern Regional Natural Hazards Pre -disaster Mitigation (PDM) Plan was developed in accordance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in Regulations Section 322, the Utah Division of Emergency Management (DEM), and local planning agencies. The Disaster Mitigation Act 2000 was amended by Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, this gave way to the Mitigation Planning section 322 and rule 44 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 201 was established for the mitigation planning requirements for States, Tribes, and local communities. The goal of this plan is to assist the region that consists of Carbon, Emery, Grand, and San Juan Counties. The plan establishes a basis for the region to help reduce the costs associated with natural disasters through mitigation practices. This plan provides comprehensive hazard identification, risk assessment, vulnerability analysis, mitigation actions, and an implementation schedule for the region. Regulations set forth by FEMA were followed during development of this plan. Future monitoring, evaluating, updating and implementation will take place as new incidents occur, and/or every five years as funding is available. D. Authority Federal: Public Law 93-288 as amended, established the basis for federal hazard mitigation activity in 1974. A section of this Act requires the identification, evaluation, and mitigation of hazards as a prerequisite for state receipt of future disaster assistance outlays. Since 1974, many additional programs, regulations, and laws have expanded on the original legislation to establish hazard mitigation as a priority at all levels of government. When PL 93-288 was amended by the Stafford Act, several additional provisions were also added that provide for the availability of significant mitigation measures in the aftermath of Presidential declared disasters. Civil Preparedness Guide 1-3, Chapter 6- Heard Mitigation Assistance Programs places emphasis on hazard mitigation planning directed toward hazards with a high impact and threat potential. Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-4 Page 85 of 298 President Clinton signed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) into Law on October 30, 2000. Section 322, defines mitigation planning requirements for state, local, and tribal governments. Under Section 322 States are eligible for an increase in the Federal share of hazard mitigation, if they submit a mitigation plan (which is a summary of local and/or regional mitigation plans) that identifies natural hazards, risks, vulnerabilities, and which describes proposed actions to mitigate the hazards risks and vulnerabilities in that plan. State: The Governor's Emergency Operation Directive, The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, amendments to Public Law 93-288, as amended, Title 44, CFR, Federal Emergency Management Agency Regulations, as amended, State Emergency Management Act of 1981, Utah Code 53-2, 63-5, Disaster Response Recovery Act, 63-5A, Executive Order of the Governor, Executive Order 11, Emergency Interim Succession Act, 63- 5B. Local: Local governments play an essential role in implementing effective mitigation. Each local government will review all present or potential damages, losses, and related impacts associated with natural hazards to determine the need or requirement for mitigation action and planning. In the counties and cities making up the Southeastern Utah Region, the local executive responsible for carrying out plans and policies are the County Commissioners and City or Town Mayors. Local governments must be prepared to participate in the post disaster Hazard Mitigation Team process and the pre -mitigation planning as outlined in this document. Association of Governments: The Association of Governments have been duly constituted under the authority of Title XI, Chapter 13, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended (The Inter -local Cooperation Act); and pursuant to Section 3 of the Executive Order of the Governor of the State of Utah, dated May 27, 1970, with the authority to conduct planning studies and to provide services to its constituent jurisdictions. 1-1-1— oc c wnn Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-5 These goals form the basis for the development of the PDM Plan and are shown from highest to lowest priority. 1. Protection of life before, during, and after the occurrence of a disaster 2. Preventing loss of life and reducing the impact of damage where problems cannot be eliminated. 3. Protection of emergency response capabilities (critical infrastructure) 4. Protect and/or create communication and warning systems 5. Protect emergency medical services and medical facilities 6. Ensure mobile resource availability and survivability 7. Ensure government continuity 8. Protect developed property, homes and businesses, industry, education opportunities and the cultural fabric of the community. While utilizing hazard loss reduction within the community's environmental, social and economic needs. 9. Protect natural resources and the environment, when considering mitigation measures. 10. Promote public awareness through education of community hazards and mitigation measures. 11. Preserve and/or restore natural features. Long Term Local Goals: 1. Eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to human life and property from identified natural and technologic hazards. 2. Aid both the private and public sectors in understanding the risks they may be exposed to and find mitigation strategies to reduce those risks. 3. Avoid risk of exposure to identified hazards. 4. Minimize the impacts of those risks when they cannot be avoided. 5. Mitigate the impacts of damage as a result of identified hazards. 6. Accomplish mitigation strategies in such a way that negative environmental impacts are minimized. 7. Provide a basis for funding; prioritizing of hazard mitigation projects. 8. Establish a regional platform to enable the community to take advantage of shared goals and resources. Part 2: Executive Summary Page 2-6 Page 863 of 298 Objectives: The following objectives are meant to serve as a measure to evaluate hazard mitigation projects. The criterion becomes especially important when two or more projects are competing for limited resources. 1. Identification of persons, agency or organization responsible for implementation. 2. Project a time frame for implementation. 3. Explanation of how the project will be financed including the conditions for financing and implementing (as information is available). 4. Identifying alternative measures, should financing not be available. 5. Be consistent with, support, and help implement the goals and objectives of hazard mitigation plans already in place. 6. Projects should significantly reduce potential damages to public and/or private property and/or reduce the cost of state and federal recovery for future disasters. 7. Projects should have practical, cost-effective, and environmentally sound alternatives after options are considered. 8. Projects should address repetitive problem(s), or one that has the potential to have a major impact on an area. 9. Projects should meet applicable permit requirements where development in hazardous areas is avoided. 10. Projects should contribute to both the short and long term solutions to the hazard vulnerability risk problem assuring the benefits of a mitigation measure is equal to or exceeds the cost of implementation. 11. Projects should have manageable maintenance and modification costs when possible. 12. Projects should accomplish multiple objectives including improvement of life -safety risk, damage reduction, restoration of essential services, protection of critical facilities, and security of economic development, recovery, and environmental enhancement whenever possible. 13. Projects should use existing resources, agencies and programs when possible. Part 2: Executive Summary page 2_7 Part 3. Pre -Disaster Mitigation Planning Process Preparation for this plan's review was acknowledged by the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments (SEUALG) and appointed staff member, Amy L. Peters. Input from the following agencies was critical in completing this review: SEUALG employees, County Emergency Managers, Fire Departments, Sheriff Departments, Public Works Departments, Geographic Information System Offices (GIS) from the State and Counties, Elected Officials, Public Employees, Special Districts, and Citizens of the Cities and Towns within Carbon, Emery, Grand, and San Juan Counties. Upon the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) the planning review process was based upon the Mitigation Planning Update Scope of Work from the Utah Division of Emergency Management (DEM). This planning review incorporated Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Local Multi -hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance, July 1, 2008. As required at 44CFR 201.6(d), Local Mitigation Plans and How -To Guides. A. The Planning and Review Process: 1. Resource Organization 2. Public Officials Outreach 3. Establish Continuity in the Planning Process 4. Data Acquisition 5. Hazard Risk Identification and Analysis 6. County Vulnerability Assessment and Review 7. Community Goals Assessment & Survey 8. Collection of Community Action Projects 9. Crosswalk Implementation 10. State Plan Review 11. Adoption Process Step 1: Resource Organization The seven regional Associations of Government's (AOG) were recommended to conduct the planning efforts by the Utah League of Cities and Towns and the Governors office of Planning and Budget to ensure coordination with elected officials, emergency managers, planners, public works departments, and information technology specialists. Utah DEM contracted with the seven AOG's as sub -grantees to coordinate, develop, and review the seven regional hazard mitigation plans under planning guidelines included in the DMA 2000. The Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments (SEUALG) utilized its employee sources to lead the coordination and review of the adopted Southeastern Region National Hazards: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan 2003. SEUALG conducted the planning for the four county region based on local and state technical capabilities. For coordination, SEUALG assigned a staff member to act as a SEUALG lead to update the plan. The person was assisted by associates within SEUALG that supported the update of the plan directly and indirectly. Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-1 Page 88 of 298 The planning teams are identified in the following tables (Table 3-1 and 3-2). There was approximately 24 hours per week that was devoted to the plan by the lead coordinator, while other employees assisted with set up of meetings and retyping of the plan from original PDF and paper documents. Retyping of the plan into a Word Document was crucial for there was no original WordPerfect or Word File Document that could be directly edited. Table 3-1 Technical Team Name Organization/Title Amy Peters Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments, Lead Coordinator Michael Bryant Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments, Regional Planner Brad Bartholomew Division of Emergency Management, State Hazard Mitigation Officer Josh Groeneveld Division of Emergency Management, GIS Delia Paletta Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments, Accounts Payable Ben Clement Carbon County IT/GIS Mellissa Lasslo Carbon County IT/GIS Rudy Sandoval Forest Fire and State Lands, Area Fire Management Officer Rebecca Andrus City of Moab, City Engineer Gary Sontag Price City, Public Works Director/City Engineer Scott Stoddard US Army Corps of Engineers, Intermountain States Liaison Table 3-2 Local Planning Teams Carbon County Organization/Title Jason Llewelyn Carbon County Sherriff's Office, Emergency Manager Angelia Crowther Carbon County Sherriff's Office, Assistant Floyd Johnson Bureau of Land Management, Jeffrey Brown Bureau of Land Management Dave Horsley Division of Water Rights Paul Bedont Price City Fire, Chief Ben Clement Carbon County, IT/GIS Russell Seeley Price City Public Works, Engineer Gary Sontag Price City Public Works Director/City Engineer Rex Sacco Carbon County Public Lands, Roads, and Safety Dean Armstrong Helper City, Mayor Kerry Jensen Carbon County School District Ben Blackburn Wellington City, Mayor Kelly Maynes Wellington Police Department and Sunnyside City Mike Erkkila Scofield Town, Mayor Mike S. Zamantakis Helper City Fire Department Trent Anderson Helper City Police Department Gail Raby Sunnyside City Emery County Organization/Title Greg Funk Sheriff Kyle Ekker /Emery County Sheriff's Office/LEPC Chair/Emergency Manager Tom Harrison Emery County Sherriff's Office Janalee Luke Emery County Sheriff's Office Page 3-2 Part 3 Planning Process Page 89 of 298 David Blackwell Emery County Attorney Jeff Guymon Emery County IT/GIS Greg Oliver Emery County Fire Protection Special Service District Jeff Horrocks Emery County Commissioner Jay Humphrey Emery Water Conservancy District Karen Smith City of Green River Wayde Nielsen Emery County Road Department Menial Johansen Johansen & Tuttle Engineering Jacob Sharp Castle Valley Special Service District J.R. Nelson Emery County Commissioner Darce Guymon PacifiCorp Mike McCandless Emery County Planning Department Grand County Organization/Title Corky Brewer Moab Valley Fire, Grand County Emergency Manager Phillip Mosher Moab Valley Fire, Battalion Chief David Vaughn Grand County Road Mark Sovine Grand Water Rebecca Andrus City of Moab, Engineer David Olsen City of Moab, Jeff Reinhart City of Moab, David D. Erley Town of Castle Valley, Mayor Steve White Grand County Sheriff Mary Hofhine Grand County, Planning Alison McClusky Forest Fire and State Lands Bill Jackson Grand County Road Jeff Whitney Grand County, Building Greg Holliday Castle Valley Town, San Juan County Organization/Title Rick Bailey San Juan County Administrator/Emergency Manager Chris Webb Blanding City Administrator (Previous) Bret Hosler Blanding City Planner Kelly Pehrson Monticello City Administrator Doug Allen Monticello Mayor Step 2: Public Officials Outreach For the initial creation of the plan and to ensure the planning process had backing from the elected officials, a representative from SEUALG met with each County Commission and each City Mayor to inform them of the need for the plan and how it can better help the communities. With local support in place, the intent of the plan was introduced to commissioners and other elected officials along with public entities through an informational brochure that was created by the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC). During the 2011-2013 review of the plan the Executive Director and Regional Planner of SEUALG sent out letters to all county and city officials asking for their commitment to the Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-3 Page 90 of 298 review of the PDM plan. Once the commitment letters were received by SEUALG and DEM, the project was given to the Coordinator and Planner to advance with the review of the plan. Throughout the 2011 year, numerous letters were sent to city and county officials to request their participation as well as gather the requested information; thereafter, once individuals were identified with a municipality or entity, the communication between SEUALG and them was mainly done by electronic or voice means. These local communities were instrumental in providing detailed knowledge of their county, political make, capabilities, and above all both hazard and area specific mitigation projects. Step 3: Establish Continuity in the Planning Process During the initial creation of the plan and to meet the requirements set forth by DMA 2000, the seven AOG's were contracted by the Utah DEM to assist all counties within Utah in completing the seven multi -regional PDM plans. The seven AOG's formed a Technical Team Planning Committee to share ideas and ensure the plans were similar and that there was little duplication of effort. Carbon, Emery, Grand, and San Juan County's set up mitigation planning steering committees during the creation of this plan. These committees were formed of individuals with an interest in mitigation and public employees with technical expertise pertinent to mitigation. Participants were tasked with completing the Mitigation Strategies Workbook issued by the DEM. During the 2011-2013 review of the plan, an initial meeting or phone conference(s) were held with the Southeastern Regional Emergency Mangers to establish expectations and initiate a list of personnel that should be directly involved with the review from each of their county's municipalities. This list involved elected officials, city planners, city engineers, county and city GIS staff, floodplain managers, and school officials. The main contact from each county is the Emergency Managers, while city officials and general public were requested to attend; they were given the opportunity for their municipality to participate. Step 4: Data Acquisition During the creation of the plan, contact was made with the GIS technician or planning commission in each city and county to assess what data was available on a local level. Agreements were put in place to allow the exchange of data between the local jurisdictions, SEUALG, and WFRC. Data layers obtained included some or all of the following: local roads, plot maps, county tax assessor's data, hazard data, flood maps, topographic data, aerial photographs, and land development data. This step also included a survey sent to each jurisdiction to ascertain what hazards each jurisdiction felt they were vulnerable to, what natural disaster had occurred, and what mitigation plans and ordinances are in place. During the 2011-2013 review of the plan, contact was made with GIS technicians at the local level as well as with the State. Maps were developed and placed into a local hazard files for each county. A current list of critical facilities and 2010 Census Data were collected and used when creating maps and reports. Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-4 Page 92 of 208 Step 5: Hazard Risk Identification and Analysis These steps were conducted by gathering data on the hazards that occurred within the planning region. This information was gathered from local, state, and federal agencies and organizations, as well as, from newspaper and other local media accounts, state and local weather records, conversations with the public and local officials, surveys, interviews, and meetings with key informants within the planning area. Table 3-4, Pre -Disaster Mitigation Planning Process, provides a timeline of meetings which includes the document creation as well as this review of the plan. To include detail from the creation of the plan provides a basis of how the plan was created and the timeline shows how it was reviewed by using the initial plan as a platform to change and update it. Mitigation planning meetings were held during this process and are explained in further detail. During these meetings attendees had the opportunity to review the general information on previous hazards and comment on them in a more specific manner. These meetings also provided a forum for discussion on the background information that was needed to gain a general understanding of the geography, geology, recreation, natural resources, and water resources of the region. Step 6: County Vulnerability Assessment & Review For the creation of the plan, a review of local base maps, topographical maps, floodplain maps, USGS and UGS maps, AGRC maps, FEMA hazard maps, and county hazard maps. A detailed vulnerability assessment was completed with the use of GIS software for each county within the SEUALG region. HAZUS MH was used to determine vulnerability to earthquakes, floods, landslides, and wildfire. Loss estimation methodology was developed by the core planning team, with assistance from the technical team, to determine vulnerability from each identified hazard. As available county parcel data was used to estimate the number of residents that could be affected by the hazard. If county parcel data was unavailable the Census 2000 and 2010 block data was used respectively. During the review meetings participants had the opportunity to review the specific information generated by GIS products and to review areas of vulnerability in association with specific hazards. Further, PDM participants received electronic copies of the essential lists for their area and parts of the plan at various times throughout the review years. They were able to make comment and edit the plan accordingly. Step 7: Community Goals Assessment & Survey This step was conducted through a review of the governing documents of the planning region, as well as, conversations, interviews, and meetings with interested community members. This step identified what goals were established and adopted for the planning area and whether or not they promote or deter mitigation activities. During the 2010-2013 review of the plan, an initial survey was sent out to all municipalities and governing bodies to complete. A second survey was given during county fairs and events as well as being available at some city offices for the general public to partake. It was also set up on the SEUALG website and advertised in local newspapers to gain public awareness and input to the Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-5 Page 92 of 298 plan. Each survey and its results are presented in Appendix F: Mitigation Workbooks and Surveys. Step 8: Collection of Community Action Projects Developing the mitigation strategies was a process in which all of the previous steps were taken into account. Each County that participated in the County PDM Planning Grant was asked to evaluate the vulnerability assessment completed by SEUALG and complete a Mitigation Strategies Workbook found in Appendix F: Mitigation Workbooks and Surveys. Mitigation strategies were determined on a community and countywide level. To obtain a better understanding of the risks that each jurisdiction and/or county faces, each participant reviewed maps created by WFRC and local GIS specialists that profiled hazards and vulnerability assessments. During the review of this plan, each County PDM Team reviewed the Mitigation Goals, Objects, and Actions during the initial meetings to comprehend the type of projects the plan contained. Throughout those reviews, participants commented on the status of each action project. Each action was reviewed by the appropriate planning team. Each objective and action was discussed with the participants or appropriate individuals were contacted to make comment. Each comment was recorded as to who made the comment and why the change in project status. The economy may change year to year; therefore, action priorities also change in parallel. County and City authorities may place a high emphasis on projects due to environmental and economic conditions. Those comments are accessible on the draft for each county section under SEUALG PDM Draft Files. Each planning team, elected officials, special districts, and canal companies were advised multiple times to submit new mitigation projects. The DMA 2000 requires state, tribal, and local governments to show how mitigation actions were evaluated and prioritized. This was completed by the SEUALG with assistance from each county and city. Prioritization was done using the STAPLEE method explained in the FEMA How to Guide, 386-3. Step 9: Crosswalk Implementation During the start up for the review of this plan, the old FEMA crosswalk was accessed through the DEM personnel. There were a couple of items that FEMA advised the plan to consider for the 2010-2013 review. The lead SEUALG coordinator continually recommended that the PDM teams address these items; a fitting comment was made by each PDM team and recorded appropriately in the plan. The Essential Needs List located in Appendix F: Mitigation Workbooks and Surveys, identifies these items. Step 10: State Plan Review The DEM's Sate Hazard Mitigation Officer (SHMO) attended several of the county meetings where he answered concerns from the participants that guided them on the review process. This Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-6 Page 98 of 298 enabled direct guidance to the lead coordinator allowing the SHMO direct knowledge as to the overall review of the plan and insuring requirements of DMA 2000 were being met. Step 11: Adoption Process The Natural hazards: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan for the Southeastern Region of Utah was developed as a multi jurisdictional plan; therefore, to meet the requirements of Section 322 of the local hazard planning regulations the final plan was to be adopted by each of the municipalities as well as the four counties. This section documents the adoption process of each local government in order to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. The plan was submitted to FEMA Region VIII where a review of the updated Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan for the Southeastern Utah Region was submitted and has been determined that it meets the mitigation planning requirements established by 44 CFR Part 201.6, pending its adoption. The Region will deliver the FEMA approval letter upon receipt of adoption resolutions from the jurisdictions listed on the Multi jurisdiction Summary Sheet found in the Plan Review Tool. FEMA recommend the jurisdictions coordinate the adoption process to ensure they are all eligible to apply for all Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant programs for the full five years. Table 3-3 identifies the communities that participated in the planning process and have adopted the plan. The adoption summaries from each County and Municipality are included in Part 11 Maintenance and Implementation Procedures of this plan. Table 3-3 Date of Plan Adoption by Southeastern Counties and Municipalities unicipa[ity Carbon Comity . Scofield Helper Price Wellington Fast Carbon 4unnysitic EMCly County Elmo Cleveland llnntington Castle Dale Orangeville Date 1 ype of r1doptiiin Part 3 Planning Process Page 95 of 299 Page 3-7 Municipality (:la so n Ferrol] Vinery Town Green River Grand County - Nina!) Castle Valley San Juan County 1` onticello Blanding Date hype of Adoption Table 3-4 Planning Timeline The Creation of and the Update of the PDM Plan 2001-2004 (original entries) Date Activity Purpose 29-Mar-2002 Letter of Intent distributed to identO Association of Governments in State of Utah as sub -grantees of the state to write the PDM plans. The AOG's were chosen by the Utah Interagency Technical Team who is part of Nature -Safe Utah (Utah's Pre -Disaster Mitigation Program). Continue the relationship with local council members and municipalities. 15-16 May 2002 Utah's first regional mitigation planning training piloted toward the seven AOG's Establish a guideline and timeframe. 12 July 2002 News Release from Governor Michael Leavitt announcing the new program to develop local hazard mitigation plans statewide. Conduct public awareness and involvement. Aug-2002 Gather information Data Collection. 10-Sep-2002 Meeting. Met with all AOG's and DESHS to discuss the planning process. Identffr planning team and available resources 30-Sep-2002 Public Meeting. Met with Emergency Managers in the Southeastern region Ident6 level of involvement Part 3 Planning Process Page 96 of 298 Page 3-8 The Creation of and the Update of the PDM Plan . 31-Oct-2002 Meeting. Met with DESHS Discuss timeline and planning process. Nov-2002 Gathered community data for regional data section of the plan. Data Collection. 18-Nov-2002 Public Meeting. Carbon County meeting with local and state DESHS, city and county officials including Helper City Fire Department, Wellington community member, Price City Emergency Preparation Committee, Carbon County emergency manager Kick off meeting. Handed out questionnaires and brochures for local comment and awareness. 18-Nov-2002 Public Meeting. Emery County meeting with public safety officials from Orangeville City, Building Inspector from Huntington City, Emery City, Clawson Ciry, Cleveland City, Elmo City and Ferron City mayor's. Sheriff and Road Department from Emery County, Castle Dale city planning and zoning, Huntington Ciry and Green River City local community members Kick off meeting. Handed out questionnaires and brochures for local comment and awareness. 22-Nov-2002 Solicit public involvement, Army Corps proposal for flood study, GIS training timeline, review the regional plans Meeting. Met with technical team members Dec-2002 Gathering data Data Collection Jan-2003 Gathering data Data Collection. 22-Jan-2003 Public Meeting. AOG executive director's meeting Signed contracts for Army Corps flood proposal 13-Feb-2003 Public Meeting. Grand County (in Moab Ciry). Local community member Kick off meeting. Handed out questionnaires and brochures for local 2010-2013 Review and Revise Fourth Quarter 2009 Who: SEUALG Executive Director What: Sends out letters to city and county officials for participation. Request Letter or Commitment Third Quarter 2010 Who: SEUALG Planner What: Attends Pre -Disaster Mitigation Workshop Understanding of Process Fourth Quarter 2010 Who: SEUALG Coordinator/Planner What: Initiates contact with Carbon, Emery, Grand and San Juan County Generating participation and expectations 11-Jan-2011 Who: Carbon & Emery EMs What: Plan of action, initial introductions, reimbursement and SOW distributed. Introductions and Planning 18-Jan-2011 Who: Carbon County and Municipalities What: Letter, initial meeting and information on plan. Request to participate. 20-Jan-2011 Who: Grand County What: Discussion of lead contact, meeting set up and dates to meet, public involvement for the pan, hazard Introduction, planning and public involvement plan. Part 3 Planning Process Page 963 of 298 Page 3-9 The Creation of and the Update of the PDM Plan history, maps, and overall review of the plan. 24-Jan-2011 Who: Emery County Municipalities Mayors What: Letter to notify them of the meeting and reason for the plan. Official Notification & Project comments requested. 25-Jan-2011 Who: Emery County and Municipalities What: Letter of invitation for February meeting and information about the plans requirement. Sent PDM Project Survey along with letter to some. Invitation for participation & project survey. 8-Feb-2011 Who: San Juan County and Municipalities What: Letter sent Initial meeting held in March 2011. 3-Feb-200011 Who: Grand Water & Sewer Service Agency & City Planner What: Review of Drought action projects; collected information. Presented current status on PDM review project with the GWSSA Board meeting. Verification & collection of information plus public presentation. 4-Feb-2011 Who: Grand County planning officials What: Review of Mitigation Action Projects, collected informational changes to projects to update Part 10, section G Verification & information collection. 15-Feb-2011 Who: Carbon and Emery County Public What: Newspaper article by the local newspaper (Sun Advocate and Emery County Progress) to inform the public and initiate concern and participation. Public notification. 18-Feb-2011 Who: Emery and Carbon County What: Letter sent to inform of meeting dates, request to fill out Project Survey and risk assessment survey. Project and risk assessment survey, comment requested and information on meeting dates. 23-Feb-2011 Who: Emery County What: Presentation included participant's role and introduction of the plan and review process. Question and answer session for the general public and city/county officials. Workshop that covered an extensive review of the mitigation actions and the solicitation for new mitigation actions. Selection of dates for more meetings. General Overview, Mitigation Actions Workshop, and Essential Needs for the plan. 24-Feb-2011 Who: Carbon County What: Presentation included participant's role and introduction of the plan and review process. Handed out SOW/contract copies from DEM. Question and answer session for the general public and city/county officials. Workshop that covered an extensive review of the mitigation actions and the solicitation for new mitigation actions. Selection of dates for more meetings. General Overview, Mitigation Actions Workshop, and Essential Needs for the plan. 1-Mar-2011 Who: San Juan County What: Plan Introduction, planning team identification, and review of Section G. Plan introduction and expectations. 19-Mar-2011 Who: BLM and FFSL What: Discussion on all southeastern counties wild land fire information, contacts and other hazards. Provided insight to land hazards Part 3 Planning Process Page 98 of 298 Page 3-10 The Creation of and the Update of the PDM Plan 21-Mar-2011 Who: Carbon County Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) What: Official presentation of plan and request for participation. Public presentation with participation request. 23-Mar-2011 Who: Emery County PDM Team What: Finished mitigation review, workshop included the review of handouts provided on sections of the document for PDM team to update regional data update; risk assessment, capabilities overview, and information on the HAZUS Flood Event Report were considered. The Essential Needs List was given as a guide and for the team to acknowledge what information needs to be collected for the plan review. Workshop on Risk Assessment, Capabilities, and Essential Needs List 23-Mar-2011 Who: Carbon County What: Letter requesting participation, giving meeting date, and plan information. Request of participation. 29-Mar-2011 Who: Carbon County PDM Team What: Brief overview of plan for new participants, discussion and gathering information review on Mitigation Actions. The group was introduced to the essential needs of the plan and requests were relayed to the group as to who could provide these. Mitigation Action review continued, document review, and essential needs list. 11-Apr-2011 Who: Insurance Service Office —ISO What: Letter requesting the Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEG) for all counties. Request for data. 19-Apr-2011 Who: Sunnyside City Council Meeting What: Plan presentation and request for participation. Public presentation. 25-Apr-2011 Who: San Juan County and Cities/Towns What: Letter Notification to participate at May 2011 planning meeting. 9-May-2011 Who: San Juan County PDM Team What: Public Presentation and Mitigation Strategy workshop, Essential Information and Task Assignments, hazard history request, review of Part 5: Capabilities Assessment, and comments on Mitigation Projects. Public presentation and request for information. 10-May-2011 Who: Grand County PDM Team What: Public presentation, workshop included essential information list (requesting information/data for the plan), capabilities assessment, regional data and began the risk assessment. Review of plan, collection of data, and decision making. 11-May-2011 Who: Carbon County PDM Team What: Discussion of building code effectiveness, critical facilities, local capability, and resources. Workshop included a look at several parts of the plan, and began the risk assessment review. Gathered changes for the plan and risk assessment review. 15-Jul-2011 Who: Emery County officials and municipalities What: Letter to inform those officials and city representatives of another meeting and chance to participate in the plan. Notification 4-Aug-2011 Who: Emery County PDM Team What: Workshop on risk assessment with review of Risk Assessment and gathered new data and requested data. Part 3 Planning Process Page 98 of 298 Page 3-11 The Creation of and the Update of the PDM Plan handouts of HAZUS-MH reports on flood and earthquake. Gave handout C out with critical facilities to have updated. 6-Oct-2011 Who: Carbon County PDM Team What: Discussion on essential needs list that include risk assessment completion, participants agreed to submit into via electronic means over the next few months when requested and submit items included on the essential needs list as required for the plans update. Gather information and reminder of submitting information readily. 12-Oct-2011 Who: Emery County PDM What: Request for material, maps, essential needs list, critical facilities and review of crosswalk. Group consensus on electronic correspondence. Review of Part 8 and initiate follow up with Essential Needs List 21-Mar-2012 Who: Emery County PDM Team What: Review of Part 8 and Plan request for additional information, discussion on community involvement and correspondence. Review Part 8 and follow up with additional information. 3-Apr-2012 Who: Carbon County PDM Team What: Review of PDM Plan —Part 7 and discussion on items that have not been submitted, due date on changes/additions to plan by June 30 and use of the new crosswalk. Review PDM Plan —Part 7 submission due dates. 4-Apr-2012 Who: San Juan County PDM Team What: Meeting with County/city administration on Part 10, critical facilities and action plans request. Gather data. 8-May-2012 Who: Emery County COG What: Short presentation and request for action projects. Awareness and gather information 16-May-2012 Who: Grand County PDM Team What: Review of the plan, assignment of missing information, setting of last submission of information, and discussion on follow up. Gather information and request support. 18-Jul-2012 Who: Emery County PDM Team What: Preparation of FEMA crosswalk, discussion of changes/edits. Plan review tool utilization and final edit(s) to plan. 31-Jul-2012 Who: Carbon County PDM Team What: Preparation of FEMA crosswalk, discussion of changes/edits. Plan review tool utilization and fmal edit(s) to plan. 1-Aug-2012 Who: Grand County PDM Team What: Preparation of FEMA crosswalk, discussion of changes/edits. Plan review tool utilization and final edit(s) to plan. 2-Aug-2012 Who: San Juan County PDM Team What: Preparation of FEMA crosswalk, discussion of changes/edits. Plan review tool utilization and final edit(s) to plan. Sep 2012-Jan 2013 Who: SEUALG Lead and Regional Planner What: Performance of a though review by gathering requested information, entering data gathered, revising the entire document and making final edits to the content and appearance of the plan. Finalizing document Part Planning Process FPaglE13E0aff21318 Page 3-12 The Creation of and the Update of the PDM Plan Jan-2013 Who: SEUALG AOG Board and Executive Director What: MEMO (request approval of plan for state review) and posting plan on SEUALG Website. Approving for State Review March -May 2013 Who: Emergency Managers and Key Stakeholders What: Additional Information Submitted May -July 2013 Who: FEMA review plan What: PDM Plan was reviewed Review and Approval of Plan July -September 2013 Who: County and Municipalities What: Formal Adoption by Resolution and Letter sent to FEMA providing proof of adoption. Commission and Council meetings were attended presented completed plan. Plan was officially adopted. Who: FEMA What: Official Letter of Plan Approval Letter Received from FEMA and given to each County and Municipality as listed on the Plan Review Tool Sheet B. Public Involvement Emergency managers, fire departments, sheriff departments, state and local agencies, community members, business leaders, educators, non-profit organizations, private organizations, and other interested people were all a part of the planning process. Public involvement opportunities were available throughout the drafting of this plan and initial review of the plan. Table 3-5 offers a quick glance at a timeline that was associated with undertaking this documents review as well as the creation of the plan. Table 3-5 Public Involvement Plan Status and Dates Activity Plan Creation 2002-2004 Public website for comment and review, public meetings, and newspaper articles announcing the public meetings. Each plan of the seven natural hazard mitigation plans was placed on the DES website. Allowed viewers to submit comments electronically by clicking on a submit comments button. August of 2002 The state presented the concept of PDM planning at the elected official's conference in and received numerous comments. Intent to complete a mitigation plan was presented at each of the four county commission meetings (open to the public). The Appropriate measures were taken to include those comments that would benefit the plan. October 2003 Newspaper clippings see Figures 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3. Plan Review 2010-2013 February 23, 2011 Press Release: Public request of meeting in Emery County. February 24, 2011 Press Release: Public request to attend meeting in Carbon County. March 21, 2011 Public Newspaper Announcement: Emery County meeting. Part Planning Process 0 2':, Page 3-13 April 3, 2011 Public Newspaper Announcement: Carbon County meeting. July 29-30, 2011 Public Newspaper Announcement: Fill out survey during the International Days Celebration SEUALG booth. August 12-13, 2011 Public Newspaper Announcement: Fill out survey during the San Juan County Fair SEUALG booth. January 2012-April2012 Public Newspaper Announcement for "Community Input is Needed" to fill out a survey online or in person at SEUALG office. January 2013-Present Draft Plan Posted to SEUALG Website for general access. February 2013 Plan submitted to Utah DEM for review. May/June 2013 Plan submitted to FEMA for review July 2013 FEMA approves plan pending adoption On the following pages there are figures, several original news clippings are presented to allow readers the insight into the creation of the plan. During the first review of the plan during 2010- 2013 articles and public advertisements are presented to allow the viewers to gain the sense of how much advertisement is bought to aid in the review of this document. It is encouraged that each following review includes some or all of the articles to gain a timeline of sorts. Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-14 Page 102 of 208 Figure 3-1: Sun Advocate Newspaper Ad for October 2003 S• Ers: r rgc es v f r e a. rmc rtc a r• Chiri}.•c r 2003 Hazard Mitigation Hazard tn ttt• 444.111,4 l of h arntrds 4)n people and properly ',Vti •re entem,04..nev t•es{1t►nse is pritttu- rity eopeerrtedwith reacting fAT'tstt._ pre-utsuster utitigation works to identify and relative the Brisk of p4tiett. tint !MAMAS before :hey caviar. I -Inward klicigat ton e4itsies in tt►•ar i+ttAC fttttvor-s: tivose de3igit,.41 to set►arate hazards from ne•twie. property. and 4i rurt ones. ( like retain - log %%ails mat lire tine aks) and those that keep peoph.-. property and strue- 1tires aivruy front ha zards ',gait as 44iniag ► odes that tlrut;'t Gt•t 11440111V 1)tailai tct flocattplains.).. . l'racsr City tt[tlt Carbon County ,are working tog l'i r to erent rttnits shovvitig i*'t'Jt're catastrophic events might 'weer They do this hv taking 44110 " (sty VY. ►lr rltt tse hill 1 It y tha• ty,t. -4i• 44 a flood ordain failure deluge might t4t1,014, atttt! 111;440 Ilg it over another "!later" 4-it) the sstrne,m ap :l:sat shows where houses and bttiltlittgs ttre lrt- tated h� •et t lIeSe t err+ layers are t ombitieti it is . ns.% to 101 :ti tittsll peruses. and stores z. ill he its ttie patch of the Mind Ono, the hazards are nu -loped, city and elitutty leaders. e;gitte•+ers. plan- ners. and other experts come together r to pilot- .0.e the hazards. This is done tvy Inking two ideas. namely, ! lie risk factor t"is this rc•tslly likely tlt htwpolfr") troti the damage tlu+tenti:it t 'how many people ► uuid this hurt'?'"1 ,and creating it priority fable. 'lluw litrzont* Kltt►t hare lodir t high riot titstear eind n high damage potential have the higtunt priority and are ad- dressed list "rhe Inani then takes these WO priority items ,and set% fiery broad goals, For 494.44tnple. if limo faUttr't• %%as identified its both highly likely and dangerous to ninny ale. n gtwat aught be as loilcw►-4 "to tlrel'r•a►,e.• the potential atflood-related deaths and ink:m.10g." t%rheas hazards st:re identified :Intl (4021.11N are s.j)1413P4ti r,u:. the plan LS sub- mitted to the state Mid 01 tht• F.•►!a,•r,.ti Emergency Management :Agency i Fk.'r1 AI for atmt►t'ovat. Once ap- ppia. •d. this fan al oas stale anti W- eal a-uintrtunities to olitaaltt h ENIA grants to he used for mitigation mesa- :.sans'-, Part 3 Planning Process Page 102 of 208 Page 3-1 S Figure 3-2: Emery County Progress Newspaper Ad for October 7, 2003. County Prepares for Emergencies By PATSY STODDARD Editor Is Emery County prepared for a disaster? That is exactly the question that the Local Emergency Planning Committee is trying to answer. The LEPC is made up of representatives from local agencies such as the Emery County Sheriff's Office, mayors of local communities, school board representative, neighborhood watch, health department, road department, water conservancy district and many others. You might wonder what all of these organizations have in common. In the event of a disaster these agencies all need to coordinate and cooperate to facilitate an organized effective response to whatever situation arises. Martin Wilson is a sergeant from the Emery County Sheriff's Office and is chairman of the LEPC committee. He recently named Jed Jensen as the co-chairman for the committee. The committee meets monthly to coordinate efforts and address needs. A the recent LEPC meeting, Sgt. Wilson called for a list of items on hand in each of the cities that would be available for use should an emergency situation arise. This inventory of items would include ambulances, heavy equipment- type and amount and other items. Part of the planning procedure is the development of a list of hazards and a history of past emergencies to develop a current list and develop as part of the hazard plan. Identifying and prioritizing possible hazards such as earthquakes, flooding and others to identify those most likely to happen in Emery County and to prepare accordingly. The Association of Governments has listed hazards as a starting point for evaluation by the LEPC committee. Areas where flood plains have been identified and maps of such plains are in existence with the AOG and can be utilized in emergency planning. Planning ahead to remedy flood situations or at least being aware of where floods will occur is part of the process. Daryl Wilcox, Elmo mayor, was also concerned about maps, which show the power lines and gas transmission lines in the event of a disaster. He said these types of maps would be helpful to have on hand and in place in emergency response vehicles. His concern also was for other areas of the country, which rely on the Emery County power plants for their power supply. He also said that overlays of these transmission lines can be obtained from the various utility companies and can be used on geographic reference visual maps, which they already have. A part of the disaster plan should also include who is responsible for the costs associated with a hazardous chemical spill from trucking or railroad. Terry Wright from the health department said that she will be working on a list of nurses, EMT's, firefighters and mental health workers who might be available to help in a disaster, even if they are not currently working in the medical field, but who are trained to do so. Sgt. Wilson reported that as always they are looking for avenues of funding to increase the EMT skills of already practicing EMT's in the county. SEUALG Community Planning Director Jeff Adams talked about the steps toward having a workable emergency plan. One step is to have a valuation of property in any given emergency situation and to be able to prioritize risk factors and situations. For example with a wildfire the priority could be low, but a wildfire near a subdivision of mountain homes becomes top priority for action. These risk factors would be identified and gauged by probability of its occurrence in our area. A tornado for example would be listed as low risk and low priority, but a flood would be given much higher priority in the plan and appropriate action plans identified and implemented. Each strategy for each hazard has goals. The goal in a flood situation would be to keep people from drowning. Human life is the first priority and property comes in second. Goals also include action plans for preventing flooding, such as shoring up a canal or other measures which would involve the road department and the water conservancy district. Funding to complete these goals also must be looked into. Plans for what should be done in the event of a dam break will also be addressed in the plan and determining the flood zone for each of the dams. Mayor Wilcox also requested that plans for the surveying of the dams and data and information be kept as well as seismic analysis of the dams in the county. There is an emergency preparedness fair in Carbon County on Oct. 9 at the St. Matthew's church beginning at 2 p.m., which should provide useful information for interested county residents. Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-16 Page 104 of 208 Figure 3-3 San Juan Record Newspaper Ad for October 29, 2003 sL+�rtiC.,c+cia.:y, - Open House for hazards plan 1-3 Jtia��a ��. saanE,W 1t• <Lau rlr-rr� zsLf� C :`r® yw+ I M H4)./ 'Alit t ri C!! tine =iF11aro Jta..ata 4'r,tx.x�t� �,.cisxasr�- is.ix iiwei 14_K.,!te.c.1 *at l't ,F44-rt/S-t-arer:t ft200 on csTio� �xiat be 3- 4 at 7 p. rra. 11.7.1771e2 LarI± rs"er`*.91 �ti tii�..a�+r-• ; = r 1'tan k:C= kal.iC a3:1A.r:a.r4::, "2 7 Z.1Via nta :Artie kti�il l Med... 1. := =1.M A ��- L.1 .�I 1 T. C. `L7 1 ] ri .r %" s Y.- timats :rand tEa pr+oplase. m.iti..rrst- r-torx t¢:1tttkiEtS• C; rr cl :.i.b.rtg it1.71 l%iB 2+e Iarll.,fiA"tie It:r ate* f�:ci+�.rn1 ita.ti :a.CI131ixxiF. tered. by Liae .1~ keit]eir•_ ,'I?,;1p!asL_: 7114 raeiLg, aT&c2rat t'i s.trtcv tFMNI...a rec31airess rrauiaici��J aztaiver.rticie.rt.it.*s. Lta 1_ e i ra. r3a?!..-roleaiaiiraEr I TE'xa .ros-ir3 gratiora. Pirko. s ka e + 1A.},MFr •l?s roo- ta slab=,- ` n. la c.o.. Tl t o S itee f Li t.ah ti.ats opted taa +ir.ve:l.t.:1 •-xafg.ita*a1 Iltrt r.ra rc1 nitt.i-otiova iaiuras ra.t.h.er Ct-t1LTY kaKikirat.:itaklii elrtl c':ity t own. dLoN'so rid31/4ead.ao.1 ;pi arts. .131u.1t, loar 1-€41 i‘..xan.ral pi.a1ta stagy be, cramet1aingft,11. Nr�.t-eac�a- • n. i cr ri ra. d i n p u t f'r' ono. 'Lb e- +carLa eie at la:A 1 +, °Aar T r*Lrin9-s ii s1 ��Firha•t t'y T•,int�ry-. Csr•artsl,-a.d sari Li art -The. ce•rxst sstrei��_ Lirs.sl.L +sf 1.. cars so 1. CI on..• 4; a- ra rya c?ra#.=+ J: �,1_C:r f , Yams beyari rams i�-a3 c-ct t ha.: ! zwm Lt r:ri" t, r<.at:+.rai i rat sft# i r i ;-c c.s d sle:�.�nr.lirs irag' the reg-iiorta,l pioi 2 for .01:I177 *area.. let)r 1.caatre f-et rola nasat:irj1'1 i:t,1.+=:*a.wkt L:.nrt. tszet. L. ai.rx 11.2.:./x71 C'!•sas,3.rt. t•.• A.ctzit i.ri..i.11l,rt+l..ue R.ic•k S iC.•oriimura:it3- C"lark- r.ila.g Di:arect:gar tra 4 Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-17 Page 105 of 208 Figure 3-4: San Juan Record for August 2011 Ad Community Input Is Needed For The Review Of The Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan Fill -out A Survey During the San Juan County Fair August 12th & nth Stop by the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments Booth or go on-line at http://seualg.utah.gov. For more information, phone 435-637-5444 or e-mail apeters(a,seualg.utah.gov. Figure 3-5: Times -Independent September 29, 2011 Ad. Natural Hazards: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan REVIEW AND UPDATE The meeting is set for Tuesday, October 4,20II at 10 a.m. in the Moab Fire Station. We will review any changes that have been made this year to the plan and to set the stage to adopt the plan early next year. Public comment is required and requested; please submit a survey by going on line to htp://seualg.utah.gov or submit the questionnaire by fax to 435-637-548. You may access the current plan through the SEUALG web site. For questions or concerns, please send electronic correspondence to Amy at apeters@ seualg.utah.gov or call at 435-637-5444ext. 404. Page A3 - The Times -Independent - Thursday, September 29, 2011 Figure 3-6: Emery County Progress July 26, 2011 Ad ovtat� li,Vat ,, , . ±K: pRaka. Ill ttgiF4Tht rut) c1c?� v140-; :.:: Sze ..AE . ty. f ,A2, Apra .Cr o*4 VO . rkit� - fir.:. ,.yydf3� iodV.v .1...gt4 .t%riff eva, d[€ytt. re ... eattEaboliamt J--:;-.4b4,13ftcbtrikraiiiliv- Part 3 Planning Process Page 106 of 208 Page 3-18 Figure 3-7: Sun Advocate July 22, 2011 Ad Community Input Is Needed For The Review Of The Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan Fill -out A Survey During the International Days Celebration July 29th & 30th Stop by the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments Booth or go on-line at http://seualg.utah.gov or phone 435-637- 5444 or e-mail apeters@seualg.utah.gov for more information. In Figure 3-8 shows a public advertisement that was published during November 2011 through April 2012. The ad was displayed on a regular basis approximately 16-18 weeks with each newspaper; Sun Advocate, Emery County Progress, Times -Independent, San Juan Record, and the Blue Mountain Panorama papers. Figure 3-8 Public Advertisement Published In the News Papers of the Southeastern Region During November 2011-Apri12012. Community Input Is Needed On the review of the Southeastern Utah Region's Natural Hazards: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan Fill -out A Survey Online Now through April 30, 2012. http://seualg.utah.gov. It is a community plan, voice your opinion! Or Stop by the Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments building to submit a paper copy. For more information, phone 435-637-5444 or e-mail aneters@seualg.utah.gov. Figure 3-9 Public Announcement Published In the Sun Advocate and Emery County Progress. Announcement! Meetings for the Natural Hazards: Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan are taking place. General Public participation is favored. Emery Co. meeting is Wednesday, March 21 at 9a.m. in the Emery County Court House in Castle Dale. And Carbon Co meeting is Tuesday, April 3, at 9a.m. in the Senior Citizens Center. For more information call or e-mail Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments at 435- 637-5444 or apeters@seualg.utah.gov. It is your community! Be involved! Part Planning Process Page 100 of 209 Page 3-19 C. Information Sources During the 2010-2013 update of this plan the teams drew from the experience that derives from both professional and personal in nature. Research was optimized by team members and SEUALG staff in order to find the most current informational and technical resources for this regional plan. The review, research, or comment was collected from these resources in corroboration and was entered into the plan. ✓ National Weather Service (hazard profile). ✓ National Climate Data Center (drought, severe weather) ✓ Army Corps of Engineers (flood data). ✓ Utah State Division of Emergency Management (GIS data, flood data, HAZUS data for flood and earthquake). ✓ Utah Geologic Survey (GIS data, geologic information). ✓ Utah Division of Forestry Fire and State Lands (fire data). ✓ Utah Avalanche Center, Snow and Avalanches in Utah Annual Report 2010-2011. ✓ Utah Automated Geographic Resource Center (GIS data). ✓ University of Utah Seismic Station (earthquake data) ✓ Utah State University (climate data). ✓ Association of Governments (Bear River, Six County and Five County) ✓ Elected of Officials from participating communities ✓ Carbon County and Municipalities (Mitigation actions, public input, GIS data, assessor data, transportation data, property and infrastructure data). ✓ Emery County and municipalities (Mitigation actions, public input, GIS data, assessor data, transportation data, property and infrastructure data). ✓ Grand County and municipalities (Grand County Storm Drainage Master Plan, Moab City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2000, histories, mitigation actions, public input, GIS data, assessor data, transportation data, property and infrastructure data). ✓ San Juan County and municipalities (San Juan County Drought Plan, San Juan County Water Master Plan, Emergency Operations Plans, histories, mitigation actions, public input, GIS data, assessor data, transportation data, property and infrastructure data). ✓ Private individuals from the region. Part 3 Planning Process Page 3-20 Page 10g of 209 Part 9. Grand County Grand County BOX ELDER TOOP-E *JAB N LGk? D BEAVER RON 1. A3'M VOTON CACHE 9l, VJtIT loAOATCf1 UTAS .?UOM86N@ OAGGSTT uwTrw —re--134 N?ETE (EVIEft 2AArtELO AR8ON EMMY — GRAND Y/AYNE KANE ?AN JUAN Part 9 Grand County Page 9-1 Page 108 of 208 Grand County was founded in 1890, with a current population of 9,225 (Census 2010). Grand County is located in southeastern Utah and was originally named for the Colorado River, which at the time was known as the Grande River. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the county has a total area of 3,694 square mules (9,568 km?), of which, 3,682 square miles (9,535 kmu) is land and 13 square mules (32 km2) 0.34% is water. The Green River forms the western boundary and Colorado State lies on the eastem boundary. The Colorado River flows through the southeast corner. Arches National Park lies in the southern part of the county, just north of Moab. Also, the northernmost extension of Canyonlands National Park lies in the southwest coiner of the county. Incorporated areas are Castle Valley Town and Moab City (County Seat). Other communities are Thompson Springs, Spanish Valley a suburb of Moab and Cisco a ghost town with approximately 10 individuals. (Grand county, Utah, 2012) gintah m tt Ouray ittdit Reseruati (Utah Information Resource Guide) Part 9 Grand County Page 9-2 Page 109 of 208 A. Demographics and Population Growth Table 9-1 shows a comparison between Utah State and Grand County. Details of human population, percent growth change over 10 years, and the percentage of ages and race groups located within the county. Knowledge of the population is important for understanding the impacts that a natural hazard would have on a local community. Table 9-2 shows the population for each Grand County communities. Table 9-1 Grand County Population In Relation To Utah State a opt a , h raa7 # • kL � ; '�` ' a VF r G and. Co ntT • tg'', Population, 2010 9,225 2,763,885 Population, percent growth change, 2000 to 2010 8.7% 23.8% Population, 2000 8,485 2,233,169 Persons under 5 years old, percent, 2010 6.5% 9.5% Persons under 18 years old, percent, 2010 23.0% 31.5% Persons 65 years old and over, percent, 2010 13.6% 9.0% Female persons, percent, 2010 49.6% 49.8% White persons, percent, 2010 (a) 89.0% 86.1% Black persons, percent, 2010 (a) 0.3% 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native 2010 (a) 4.1% 1.2% persons, percent, Asian persons, percent, 2010 (a) 0.8% 2.0% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2010 (a) 0.0% 0.9°0 Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2010 2.0% 2.7% Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2010 (b) 9.6% 13.0% White persons not Hispanic, persons, 2010 /TT._, A.v. _.. - - - -. 84.1 % 80.4% en t of Commerce, Table 9-2 Community Population Coffin .. ' a Moab c_ - CastlValley .k:.z Spanish`s Va ey Thompson. Springs County (not w��a�iuthi�:�n' city llIDlili� Population (2010 Census) 5,046 319 491 360 _ 3009 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-3 Page 110 of 208 B. Economy Currently, Grand County is working to diversify its economy by targeting light manufacturing, tourism and recreation, the fine arts, educational programs, television and motion picture production, agriculture, and the development of natural resources. Tourism is currently at the heart of the comity's economy. Arches and Canyonlands National Parks recreation, mountain biking, rock climbing, and river pinning attract visitors from around the globe. Population is one of the most important indicators of vitality for a rural area like Grand County. In recent years population growth has averaged a healthy 2 percent per year. At the end of 2008, Grand County was feeling the effects of the recession, with significant job losses in construction, real estate, and manufacturing. In the first quarter of 2009, recessionary affects had spread to the tourism industry as well. (Pioneer—Utah's Online Library) Grand County usually has one of the higher unemployment rates in the state. In 2008, the county's unemployment rate of 6.1 percent was the third -highest in the state. The unemployment rate rose to 8.9 percent in 2009, ranking the fourth -highest in Utah. The 2.8 % point increase is from 2008 to 2009 and is very close to the state average of 2.9 % points. "On average the county unemployment rate has been 4% higher than the state and 2% higher than the national average." See Table 9-3 for a quick look at Employment and Wage Data fro the 2010 and 2011 years. (Demographic and Economic Trends and Benchmark Report, 2010),(County and Statewide Information). Table 9-3 Employment and Wage Data Year 2011 2010 Period 1st Quarter Annual Average Non -Farm Jobs 3,333 4,493 Establishments (Demographic and Economic Trends and Benchmark Report, 2010) 489 521 Average Monthly' Verge $2,422 $2,293 Payroll $24,232,645 $123,608,407 C. Transportation and Commuting Patterns The principle transportation routes through Grand County are Interstate 70 (I-70) and U.S. Highway 191(US-191). The principle east -west corridor through Grand County is I-70, which travels through the center of the county to the Colorado border. US-191 is the north -south corridor heading south from Crescent Junction from I-70, through the town of Moab, into San Juan County (Grand County, Utah, 2012) Part 9 Grand County Page 9-4 Page 112 of 208 D. Land Use and Development Trends Historic Grand County uranium mining began in the early 1950's and as a result, the population jumped to nearly 10,000 in three years. Potash and salt mining, as well as nulling operations were another source of economic prosperity in Grand County. Since the 1990's the local economy has been driven primarily by tourism. Over 1 million visitors enjoy mountain biking, river rafting, rock climbing, hiking, and four wheeling each year (Grand Cotmty History). Most land is owned and maintained by federal and state agencies, including the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Forest Service (FS), the National Park Service (NPS), and the Utah Divisions of Forestry, Fire and State Lands (FFSL). In Table 9-4 Land Use per Acre is examined while Chart 9-1.1 shows a quick visual of the county land use. (United states Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2011) Table 94 Land Use per Acre L�dLseM Airc .�� Forest 150,016 Grain Crops 6,100 Grass/Pasture/Haylands 1,664 Orchards/Vineyards 80 Row Crops _ 111 Shrub/Rangeland 137,270 Water 146 Developed 5,825 County Total 301,212 Chart 9-1.1 Land Use Per Acres ® Forest ® Grain Crops © Grass/Pasture/Haylands E3 Orchards/Vineyards ® Row Crops MI Shrub/Rangeland Water Developed Moab City is the largest city within the county and offers a variety of residential and commercial real estate. According to the 2010 Census, there are 4,816* family housing units in Grand County. These housing units include single family, mobile homes, and apartment homes. Because of the Part 9 Grand County Page 9-5 Page 113 of 208 quiet streets and larger sized lots subdivisions and housing complexes in the area are very attractive for area newcomers. The median value of owner -occupied housing units from 2005-2009 is $180.600*. (United States Department of Commerce, 2012) E. Risk Assessment Through a review of the risk assessment process revealed the following Natural Hazards as risks to the County: Drought, Flood, Wild Land Fire, Severe Weather, Landslide, Earthquake, and Problem Soil. Refer to Part 6 for an explanation of the risk assessment process. According to the Pre -Disaster Mitigation Planning Team, they identified 59 critical facilities plus a number of transmission lines (contact Pacific Corp and Rocky Mountain Power for details) in the county area. The complete critical facilities listing are located in Appendix C. The Natural Hazard profiles for Drought, Earthquake, and Severe Weather are regional hazards and have been profiled as in Part 4 Regional Data. County and municipality personnel contributed to the risk assessment analyses review and are located in the following tables and text for Flood, Wild Land Fire, Landslide, and Problem Soil. Risk assessment maps for Grand County were completed for Dams, Epicenters and Faultlines, Wild Land Fire History, and Problem Soil. These maps may be seen under section H Maps. 1. Flood Hazard Profile Potential Magnitude Negligible Less than 10"/0 Limited 10-15% X Critical 25-50% Catastrophic More than 50% Probability Highly Likely Likely X Possible Unlikely Location Section H; Dam locations county. are mainly in the southeastern portion of the Seasonal Pattern or Conditions Rainy Day Failure happens can have some warning time. warning at all can happen mainly during heavy precipitation events, Sunny Day Failure happens with no at any time. Duration Hours, Days. Depends on per second (cfs) discharge, Dam Inventory for more spillway type and area, maximum cubic feet overflow or breach type, dam type. Refer to information. Analysis Used Review of Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) inundation maps and plans, Flood Insurance Studies (FIS), and Water Rights information. Part 9 Grand County Page 9-6 Page 114 of 208 Pescrintion of Location and Extent The local planning team members including the county GIS department were unable to map flood prone areas within the county and complete a risk assessment due to the lack of digitized data. The Army Corps of Engineers compiled a rudimentary Flood Hazard Identification Study in 2003. This study can be found in Appendix E. The Army Corps' study identified the smaller unmapped tributaries of Castle Creek and its tributaries as threats in Castle Valley. Placer Creek in the Town of Castle Valley threatens numerous roads including the Upper -80 connector. The City of Moab recorded 29 of 36 total flood events. Because of its location with streams and rivers, Moab has a very high flood threat. Moab City is the county seat and the largest community in the county and has been designated as a Project Impact Community. As a result, a Moab City Storm Water Management Plan came about as well as flood control issues were identified and put into place for Pack Creek, Mill Creek, and the Colorado River. A Flood Insurance Study with detailed channel analysis has been completed for Mill and Pack creeks within the City of Moab and became effective April 2009. Moab is subject to flash flooding mainly from the frequent thunderstorms and cloudbursts that occur in the steep slick -rock canyons. Local roads, infrastructure, and residences adjacent to these canyons are at greater risk of damage from these types of floods. Detention ponds in White Canyon, Tusher Canyon, and Walker Canyon reduce the intensity of these risks from storm events. However, dam safety becomes a concern. Since these are dry ponds, there is no change of a sunny day failure. Inundation maps have been prepared for each of these dams to identify the flooding potential, and Emergency Action Plans are in place. Other areas subject to repeat flooding from thunderstorms are Stewart Canyon, the Kelling Property, and Williams Way. During the 2010-2013 review of this plan, F2-F4 was taken out of the Section G: G. Mitigation Goals, Objective, and Actions. Due to the following: There is no canal system in Grand County; however, causes of flooding are due to several creeks. The following is a list of the creeks: Pack, Mill, Placer, Castle, Onion, Professor, Kane and Tusher creeks. Pack, Mill, Placer, Castle, Onion, Professor, and Kane are contributories to the Colorado River. While Tusher creek contributes to the Green River. Historically, flooding occurs during June -October months. The Grand County Pre -Duster (PDM) Team identified that there is a need for flood plain studies. The group addressed National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) cost to the county and residents. The group addressed the areas need for a recent flood map to determine local and area flooding. The cost associated with the production of flood -way maps would cost in the millions of dollars; however, to concentrate on developmental land use areas the cost may be significantly less to survey for flood maps. The county is unable to provide such funding due to economic hardships and believe it would further place a greater burden on the residents if the county needed to raise taxes for such a project. The PDM Team identified that creeks and water ways created during heavy down pours tend to shift making new areas that may become flood prone. Therefore, flood maps from the 1960-70's are not accurate. The mitigation action/project SW1 (Sever Weather) was completed using state and federal grants. The objective of this project was to protect the county from adverse effects of severe weather. Through the insight of City and County Emergency Managers, they met the requirements of the Part 9 Grand County Page 9-7 Page 115 of 208 National Weather Service Storm Ready Program The County is now a participant in the Storm Ready Program. Vulnerability Assessment The initial assessment on Mill Creek floodplain flooding events were calculated for 13, 67, 125, and 370 -year events relaying the number of structures lost and approximate dollar losses for each flood event are shown in Table 9-5. Table 9-5 Mill Creek Floodplain Damage Estimates Flood 'Waite. Approximate . rr, re_ Dollar Loss Number of Strnc (renelenhal and commercial), 370 $71,709 848 125 $68,577 772 67 $50,218 486 13 $22,396 86 Flooding Due to Dam Failure Ken's Lake is actually located in San Juan County; however the risk is prevalent for Grand County. Ken's Lake Reservoir is considered to have a high hazard threat. The dam was built in 1981 and is owned by the Grand County Water Conservancy District. The reservoir storage at spillway crest is 2,820 acre-feet and the reservoir storage at dam crest is 2,620 acre-feet. The spillway type is open channel and the maximum dam breach flow is 64,000 cfs with a 3 square mile drainage basin area. The first downstream town is Moab, 6 mules away. 2. Wild Land Fire Hazard Profile Potential Magnitude Negligible Less than 10% Limited 10-15% X Critical 25-50% Catastrophic More than 50% Probability Highly Likely X Likely Possible Unlikely Location URWIN zones near the foothills and in forested areas. See map in Section H Seasonal Pattern or Conditions Summer months. Areas affected by drought and/or heavily overgrown and dry brush debris. Lightning and human triggers. Duration Wildfires typically last days but can last months, depending on climate and fuel load as well as resources (financial, manpower) to extinguish Part 9 Grand County Page 9-8 Page 116 of 298 the fire. Analysis Used Review of plans and data provided by US Forest Service, National Climate Center, FEMA, AGRC, County Hazard Analysis Plans, and DESHS. Description of Location and Extent The Division of Emergency Services assigned five hazard categories to the wildfire risk data provided in the statewide fire risk assessment-- Extreme, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low. These ratings cover all of Grand County and are based on the type and density of vegetation in each area. Factors influencing wild land fire behavior such as weather conditions, wind speed and direction are not considered in this risk assessment. Refer to Table 9-10 for the recorded history of wildfires in the county. Vulnerability Assessment Loss estimates were completed by identifying the wild land fire areas of extreme, high, and moderate within the county then overlaying the municipalities in a GIS database that identifies the vulnerable areas. The following table includes the population and number of commercial and residential structures inside extreme, high and moderate wildfire risk areas within the county are shown in Table 9-6. Table 9-6 Structures and Population in Wildfire Area UseXYPe E tfenii Risk High Rislf Moderate Risk Commercial Units 0 36 20 Residential Units 0 v 417 242 Population 0 828 368 Fire impacts soil, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife habitats and other natural and manmade bodies. The Utah Community Fire Planning document last amended 2008 addresses goals aimed at improving the conditions for both ecological and human communities. The document is a comprehensive in nature and addresses specific information and recommendation for wildfire planning. The document reports seven goals designed to improve the conditions of all characteristics in the watershed area. Detail of these goals and ongoing actions projects may be requested from the Moab Valley Fire Protection District located in the City of Moab. Also, see Wild Land Fires under section G. Mitigation Goals, Objective, and Actions for a list of ongoing and annual projects. Potential Wildfire Loss Estimates Table 9-7 details the annual sales of the businesses inside each wildfire risk area, and the assessed value of residential property in each wildfire risk area. Residential loss estimates do not include contents; including the value of contents would increase the values listed by 50%. No businesses are located in Grand County in Extreme wildfire risk areas. All businesses located in High and Medium Part 9 Grand County Page 9-9 Page 1153 of 208 Wildfire Risk areas except one is in the City of Moab or Castle Valley. The Thompson's Springs Fire Department is the only Critical Facility in Grand County located in a wildfne risk area. Table 9-7 Inventory of Properties Located in Wildfire Risk Areas 56/$42,300,000 Re illential wits Nome lacement`Csta 659/$81,551,909 1,196 Wildfire Risk within Municipal Boundariel The three tables below correlate to risk area, infrastructure affected and the history of wild land fires throughout Grand County. Specifically, Table 9-8 lists the number of acres in each wildfire risk area contained within the municipal boundaries, Table 9-9 identifies the infrastructure found within wildfire areas, and Table 9-10 lists the occurrences of wild land fire since 1984. Table 9-8 Wildfire Risk Area City Name`' �.�A� c es o � a 35.yWJ k- Acre Qf 1�0 ��ate . Moab 635 117 Castle Valley 1,253 2,888 Table 9-9 Infrastructure affected by Wildfire item Local Roads State Highways US Highways US Interstates Power Lines Gas Lines Lengti011ges) 116.09 41.38 0.00 29.41 124.03 26.33 Replacement Cost $232,176,800 $99,877,629 $0 $105,875.280 $5,988,168 $6,355,799 Table 9-10 Wildfire History Date Fire Name k. Cause Acres (Approximate) Cos Estimate Repo from Forest! Fire and State Inds Division/Comments _ June 19,1984 Agate Oilfield Lightning 300-999 June 9,1985 East Cisco Equipment - 300-999 June 25,1985 Cottonwood Lightning 300-999 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-10 Page 118 of 208 Date Fire Name Cause Acres (;approximate) C ustiitimate Repofrom Forrest Fire and State Land Division/Comments _July 4,1985 _ Sager 2 Equipment 300-999 July 7,1985 Little Hole Lightning 300-999 August 14, Border R733 Lightning 300-999 August 16, Mile Post 222 Lightning 300-999 August 31, Brewster 1 Incendiary 300-999 June 8,1986 Westwater 2 Debris Bum 300-999 une iy, t Railroad 300-999 July 6,1986 Harley Lightning 300-999 August 5,1986 July 1, 1989 Bitter Creek Diamond Peak Lightning Lightning 300-999 >5000 July 8,1989 Ryan Creek Lightning 1000-4999 July 10,1993 Whipsaw Flat Lightning 300-999 August 13, Westwater 2 Lightning 300-999 June 9,1994 Thompson Equipment 1000-4999 July 23,1994 Mm 213 Miscellaneous 300-999 August 30, June 19,1995 Westwater 3 Valley City 2 Lightning Lightning 1000-4999 1000-4999 June 24,1995 August 16, July 1,1999 May 28, 2000 Valley City 3 One Eye Little Hole Fisher Miscellaneous Lightning Lightning Lightning 300-999 300-999 1000-4999 300-999 April 29, 2002 Goose Island CainpFire 40.00 $3,146 June 6, 2002 B099 Lightning 0.10 $3,893 June 20, 2002 Black Canyon Lightning 5,968.00 $3,263,595 June 20, 2002 Rattle Lightning 88,347.00 $12,216,186 June 24, 2002 Willow Flats Lightning 0.25 $5,800 April 11, 2003 Bridge Miscellaneous 40.00 $8,160 May 27, 2003 Chemical Children 0.10 $1,070 June 12, 2003 PinHook Lightning 0.25 $1,105 July 13, 2003 Westwater Railroad 16.00 $8,758 July 17, 2003 JB Lightning 1,064.00 $1,025,721 July 23, 2003 Cottonwood Lightning 157.00 $213,977 August 2, 2003 Fisher Lightning 0.50 $4,458 September 1, Trail Blazer Lightning 0.10 $1,108 June 23, 2004 Ruby Island Lightning 17.00 $2,714 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-11 Page 118 of 208 xj,--- i� "x C 1 ; lie x•Y SUgi i ,, 3. }wry NI' Report fro ore a �]r 1 �Sl�lYiro a n a ]� .. y ,�' ` 57 June 25, 2004 Cedar Camp Lightning 0.10 $2,296 July 17, 2004 Hay Canyon 200 June 27, 2005 Gold Bar Miscellaneous 1.00 $1,335 June 29, 2005 Black Spot Lightning 2.50 $1,000 July 6, 2005 Bitter Creek Equipment 825.00 $83,697 July 7, 2005 Spanish Valley Miscellaneous 62.00 $5,718 July 16, 2005 Power Line Lightning 22.00 $1,337 July 17, 2005 Rim Lightning 0.10 $1,640 2006 Bryson Wash Fire 855 (2 miles north of *- 70 & 3 miles west of Utah/Colorado border in Grand County. Contained July 1, 2006 April 20, 2006 Mayberry Debris Burn 0.75 $1,235 May 26, 2006 Willow Creek Lightning 1,264.00 $1,663,044 June 6, 2006 Round Mountain Lightning 231.00 $7,370 June 14, 2006 Westwater 2 Lightning 2,850.00 $35,500/ contained June 17, 2006 June 29, 2006 Mill Creek Miscellaneous 2.00 . $13,900 July 1, 2006 Spark Plug Lightning 0.10 $1,200 July 22, 2006 West Willow Creek Lightning 6.00 $22,400 August 1, 2006 Hole Canyon Lightning 0.10 $2,800 August 25, 2006 Preacher Ridge Lightning 4.90 $2,600 March 11, 2007 Wetlands Miscellaneous 0.25 $2,462 June 10, 2007 Old Highway Debris Burn 600.00 $16,740 June 25, 2007 Old Park Debris Burn 10.00 $4,988 July 9, 2007 Kelly Canyon Lightning 0.25 $4,878 July 11, 2007 Riley Lightning 0.49 $3,785 July 16, 2007 West Willow Lightning 16.00 $63,784 July 23, 2007 Lone Tree Lightning 0.10 $1,492 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-12 Page 129 of 208 Date _ Fire Mane Cause `Lightning Acres (Approximate) Coss Estimate Repprt from Forest Fire and State Division/Comments on/Cmments September 9, 2007 Sinbad Ridge 5.00 $2,915, September 16, 2907 Bailey Children 15.00 $10,104 April 6, 2008 Dewey Bridge Children 9.00 $9,837 June 9, 2008 Tater CampFire 0.50 $1,976 June 11, 2008 Castle Rock CampFire 5.00 $5,772 June 30, 2008 Arena Equipment 5.00 $2,480 my 13, 2008 Cisco Desert Equipment 2.00 $4,672 July 22, 2008 Slough Lightning 89.00 $33,575 July 22, 2008 Moon Lightning 0.10 $1,461 July 23, 2008 Cottonwood Lightning 0.20 $3,067 August 2008 Porcupine Fire 3500 August 5, 2008 South Mesa Lightning 0.75 $3,017 October 21, Slough 2 Miscellaneous 435.00 $153,638 March 4, 2009 Lake Bottom Miscellaneous 83.00 $10,793 June 16, 2009 Valley City CampFire 0.10 $1,489 July 6, 2009 July 13, 2009 Pump Station Polar Mesa Lightning Lightning 0.70 0.20 $1,265 $4,279 July 28, 2009 July 29, 2009 July 30, 2009 Westwater 1 East Willow Creek Cherry Mesa Lightning 90.00 CampFire Lightning 2.00 0.10 $5,605' $11,208 $3,739 July 30, 2009 Cedar Camp Lightning 0.10 $1,302 July 30, 2009 Lookout Lightning 0.25 $8,848 September 14, Gravel Pit Lightning 0.10 $1,148 May 27, 2010 MotorHome Equipment 0.50 $1,090 June 9, 2010 Dunham Lightning 2.75 $3,823 July 5, 2010 Mill Creek Children 1.00 $2,389 August 18, 2010 Cheery Mesa Lightning 0.10 $2,138 September 2, Sego Lightning 5.30 $55,635 September 23, Floy Lightning 0.10 $1,605 Apri114, 2011 Dunham Debris Burn 1.00 $1,377 June 6, 2011 Slough Children 43.00 $65,000 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-13 Page 120 of 208 Date lure Name pause Acres Approximate) Cost Estimate' Report fironaforest Fire and State Lands Divisk Comments June 18, 2011 MM 15 Hwy 128 Incendiary 1.75 $1,467 June 29, 2011 Harley Doane Lightning 459.00 $1,983 June 30, 2011 Sand Arroyo Lightning 0.10 $1,650 July 6, 2011 Bitter Creek Lightning 3.00 $4,070 August 6, 2011 Sally's Hollow Lightning 444.00 $2,910 August 28, 2011 Bar X Lightning 0.20 _ $1,928 August 29, 2011 Long Mesa Lightning 1.00 $2,331 September 2, Buckhom Lightning 5.00 $2,970 3. Landslide Hazard Profile i Potential de Magnitude Negligible Less than 10% Limited 10-15% X Critical 25-50% Catastrophic More than 50% Probability Highly Likely Likely X Possible Unlikely Location See map in Section H. Generally occur in canyon mouths and foothill areas. Manti-LaSal National Forest, near foothills on steep slopes, cliff faces, canyon walls. Seasonal Pattern or Conditions Spring weighted and summer usually caused by the stress release of over - of rock and debris. soils and or loosening Duration Landslides generally last hours or days, but some can last weeks. Analysis Used Information and maps provided by UGS, DESHS, AGRC Part 9 Grand County Page 9-14 Page 122 of 208 pescrintion of Location and Extent The map "Grand County Landslide Hazard" shows the locations of high -risk landslide areas by identifying historical landslide locations. The main historical landslides in Grand County occurred in the Southeastern portion of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, just east of Green River. Generally, landslides are located in well-defined, localized areas such as the Southwest Rim, SR279 and SR128. The identified historical areas will most likely be the location of future landslides. Vulnerability Assessment The hazard analysis indicates that there are no businesses or critical facilities in Grand County that are located within the high landslide risk area. There are residential units as well as general infrastructure within the risk area with replacement cost estimates shown in Tables 9-11. Table 9-12 shows infrastructures that are in the landslide risk area. Table 9-11 Inventory of Properties Located in Landslide Risk Areas in Grand County Businesses � Mra Nutnberl _ '` itles 1 'iResigit ial.�� n��r /Fe it eIment Cost P6putitimi , . 0/$0 97/$24,250,000* 127 age home paces of $250, 000. Table 9-12 Infrastructures in Landslide areas Item Length (miles) Replacement Cost Local Roads 5.77 $11,540,000 State Highways 0.00 $0 US Highways 0.00 $0 US Interstate 0.00 $0 Power Lines 2.56 $123.597 Gas Lines 0.00 $0 4. Problem Soil Hazard Profile Potential Magnitude Nealigible Less than 10% Limited 10-15% X Critical 25-50% Catastrophic More than 50% Probability X Highly Likely L17cely Possible Unlikely Part 9 Grand County Page 9-15 Page 122 of 298 Location See snap in Section H. Central and southem portions of the county. Seasonal Pattern or Conditions Spring and Summer. Duration Constant problem. Analysis Used Reviewed information and maps provided by County soil classification books, UGS, DESHS, AGRC, and local input. Description of Location and Extent In 1991 the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) studied the Canyonlands area just south of the Grand County border. The soils within the study area range from well -drained silty soils to impervious rock. Based upon the soil makeup, permeability in the bluffs of the southeastern portion of the county is considered by the SCS to be generally moderate, meaning they have medium to rapid runoff conditions. The soils according to SCS in the Moab City developed region have moderate to rapid permeability which means they have slow to medium runoff Expansive soil and rock affect the central and southern portions of the county and minor amounts of silica dune are found in the mid - southern portion. Using the problem soils and major roadways map from DESHS developed for the State of Utah and Census 2000 block data, the two maps were overlaid to indicate where households and roadways exist in relation to problem soil areas. The results from the analysis are presented in Table 9-13 below (no households were identified in problem soil areas). Roadway replacement was calculated assuming a cost of $3.5 million/mile. The map "Grand County Problem Soils" shows the areas of Problem Soils within Grand County. Table 9-13 Roadways in Grand County Located on Problem Soil Areas 4rAl oad Wav Fir Miles r Esiimarted Rephacement Custi $148,858,010 $826,729 I-70 42.53 West Main Street 0.41 East Main Street 0.53 $1,065,863 Main St 0.19 $380,063 South Main St 0.51 $1,029,283 North Main St 0.32 $634,556 State Route 10 40.91 $81,814,581 State Route 155 5.64 $11,278,533 State Route 24 4.78 $9,560,011 State Route 29 4.87 $9,737,116 State Route 31 4.50 $8,998,304 State Route 57 9.74 $19,474,253 US Highway 6 35.69 $71,389,921 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-16 Page 124 of 208 F. Hazard History Identifying past hazard events is crucial in predicting where future events are likely to occur. The following available relevant information such as date, location, and area impacted, and damage costs are identified in the table 9-14. Due to the frequency and geographic extent of problem soil, and some severe weather events, may not been recorded and are therefore not identified in the table below. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) defines several "Winter Weather" phrases as Winter Storm Watch means that severe winter conditions, such as heavy snow and/or ice. may affect your area, but its occurrence, location and timing are still uncertain. A winter storm watch is issued to provide 12 to 48 hours notice of the possibility of severe winter weather. A winter stonn watch is intended to provide enough lead time so those who need to set plans in motion can do so. A watch is upgraded to a Winter Storm Warning when hazardous winter weather in the form of heavy snow, heavy freezing rain, or heavy sleet is imminent or occurring. Winter Storm Warnings are usually issued 12 to 24 hogs before the event is expected to begin. Filmier Weather Advisories inform you that winter weather conditions are expected to cause significant inconveniences that may be hazardous. If caution is exercised, advisory situations should not become life - threatening. A Blizzard Warning means that snow and strong winds will combine to produce a blinding snow (near zero visibility), deep drifts, and life -threatening wind chill. (NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory, 2013) According to NOAA reporting system, Grand County is classified into three areas 1) Grand Flat & Arches, 2) Tavputs Plateau, and 3) La Sal & Abajo Mountain region. Table 9-14 Hazard History Hazard Zype Dates Locationarea Impacted Comment(i) Wild Fire June 28, 1905 Bryson Wash Fire (2 Miles North Of I-70 And 3 Miles West Of Utah/Colorado Border In Grand County _ -r855 Acres, contained on July 1, 2006 Clondbm•st storm August 28, 1939 Moab City; Mill Creek $5,000 in damage to homes, businesses and . streets, serious damage to the powerhouse Flood August 31. 1939 Town of Cisco: One death . Flash Flood July 23, 1953 Moab City Thousands of dollars of damage to a movie production set at Fisher Towers Flash Flood August 6, 1957 Grand County: Moab City —Mill Creek Several thousand dollars damage to property and crops, and culinary water lines across Mill Creek Flash Flood August 29-30, 1957 Moab City And Thompson Heavy rains caused flooding along street and highways, destroying several homes. Tornado May 4, 1961 Grand County Fl tornado Part 9 Grand County Page 9-17 Page 125 of 208 liazalt d4 .. y Lm ikFF 1b1 I +A.lyi � I I 1 acted - �., h�� �.rc) . Flash Flood August 25-26, 1961 Thousands of dollars of damage was recorded to motels and homes. Highway 160 was blocked Flood June 29-30, Moab City; Walker Moab City park flooded Flood August 8, 1963 Moab City, Mill Creek And Pack Creek Destroyed sewer mains. Streets and roads were damaged and several hundred acres of land were covered with silt Flood October 15, 1965 Moab City, Mill Creek And Pack $1,500 damage to culverts, roads, and bridges Flood June 5, 1967 Moab City, Northern Moab Worst flood in 20 years. Destroyed homes, businesses, establishments, apartments, and streets, Thousands of dollars of damage Hail August 14, 1968 Grand County 1.75 inches Flood August 17, 1968 Moab City Destroyed homes, businesses, and roads; covered in mud and water. Damage totaled about $5,000 Thunderstorm! April 6, 1969 Tornado June 10, 1970 Grand Comity F2 Tornado Avalanche Winter 1970 Grand County; 1 building destroyed Avalanche Winter 1970 Grand County 2 deaths Flooding July of 1971 Grand County — Thunderstorm/ August 30, 1971 Grand County Earthquake Ivlarch 14, 1974 Grand County; Cisco 3.2 Richter Magnitude Hail June 10, 1976 Grand County 1.75 inches Hail August 30, 1986 Grand County 1.00 inches Avalanche Febnuary 1, Grand County; 4 deaths, 6 buried Funnel Cloud October 7, 1993 Moab City Lightning August 16, 1995 Moab City 1 death, 1 injury Lightning September 29, Moab City 1 injury Lightning August 17, 1996 Moab City 1 death Flash Flood September 6, Moab City $175,000 property damage Hall September 20, Crescent Junction 1.75 inches Winter Storm December 7, 1997 Grand County 1 death, 20 injuries, $200,000 property damage Heavy Rain September 12, Moab City Winter Storm December 19, Grand County 10 injuries. $100,000 property damage Extreme Cold December 21, Grand County $20,000 property damage High Winds April 9, 1999 Grand County 60 kts. $2,000 property damage Lightning May 29, 1999 Cisco 1 death Wildfire June 20-21, Westwater Flash Flood July 8, 1999 Moab City Lightning July 14, 1999 Crescent Junction Part 9 Grand County Page 9-18 Page 126 of 208 E,� Mites r �p po Honi . 9 `- �� co-how� .. Flash Flood July 14, 1999 Moab City $60,000 property damage Heavy Rain July 27, 1999 Moab City $10,000 property damage Flash Flood July 30, 1999 Thompson $2,000 property damage Flash Flood August 11, 1999 Moab City Thunderstorm/ August 30, 1999 Canyonlands 50 kts Tornado April 18, 2000 Moab City FO tornado, $1,000 property damage. Time: 955 MST, 38 37N, 109 33V High Winds April 18, 2000 Grand County 60 kts $20,000 property damage Thunderstorm/ May 24, 2000 Moab City 50 kts Thunderstorm/ May 25, 2000 Canyonlands 50 kts Wildfire July 4, 2000 Cisco Flood July 9, 2000 Moab City Lightning July 9, 2000 Moab City $100,000 property damage Wildfire July 15, 2000 Cisco Lightning July 22, 2000 Moab City $2,000 property damage Wildfire July 24, 2000 Westwater Wildfire August 15, 2000 Westwater . Thunderstorm/ August 20, 2000 Canyonlands 50 kts Tornado September 8, 2000 Grand County; 18 Miles NW Of Moab. FO Tornado 1625 MST, 38 48N, 109 43`W. Hail September 21, Cisco 1.00 inches $10,000 property damage Heavy Snow December 24, Grand County High Winds April 20, 2001 Grand County 50 kts $10,000 property damage Flood July 8, 2001 Moab City Flood July 9, 2001 Moab, Canyonlands Flash Flood July 10, 2001 Moab City Flood August 13, 2001 Moab City Winter Storm January 28, Grand County Drought May 1, 2002 Grand County , Thunderstorm/ May 15, 2002 Cisco Drought June 1, 2002 Grand County Wildfire June 20, 2002 Thompson Wildfire June 22, 2002 Thompson Wildfire June 27, 2002 Thompson Severe Weather- -Heavy Rain August 13, 2003 Grand County, Millcreek, Mount Peale and La Sal Mountains Sheriff's report; Heavy rain developed into flash flood advisory. Flash Flood September 6, 2003 SR 279 Potash Highway and Long Canyon intersection Sheriff's report; flash flood on county road way Wild Fire July 17, 2004 Hay Canyon 200 Acres Part 9 Grand County Page 9-19 Page 120 of 299 Ward Type Date LocatioWArea Impacted Comniierit(ij Flash Flood November 13, 2004 Moab, Long Canyon Sheriffs report; ruined road Flash Flood September 10, 2005 Price, Swasey Rapid Sheriffs report; flash flood recovered fully loaded bike with clothing etc. Wild Fire June 14, 2006 Between West-Water and Cisco -r2,847 Acres, contained on June 17, 2006 Drought October 1, 2006 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Flash Flood October 3, 2006 Moab Property Damage at $40K; NOAA Reports Flash Flood October 5, 2006 Moab NOAA Reports Flood October 6, 2006 Moab Property Damage at $500K; NOAA Reports Flash Flood ' October 9, 2006 Moab Property Damage at $15K; NOAA Reports Flash Flood October 10, 2006 Moab, Chicken ' Comer near San Juan County Sheriffs report; Person lost ATV during flash flood Flash Flood October 14, Moab Property Damage at $20K; NOAA Reports Hall October 16, 2006 Thompson One inch size hail; NOAA Reports Winter Weather _ October 17, 2006 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Frost/Freeze October 21, 2006 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Hail October 25, 2006 Crescent Jct One inch size hail; NOAA Reports Winter Storm November 27, 2006 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports W Heavy Snow November 28, 2006 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 10, 2006 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 18, 2006 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 19, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 4, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather —Heavy Snow January 12, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 30, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-20 Page 12g of 208 s War � r Winter Weather February 10, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 13, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm February 27, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Drought March- December 2007 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm March 27, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 8, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Frost/Freeze April 11, 2007 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 23, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm May 4, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather May 5, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Strong Wind June 5, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains Winds were reported at 49kts with property damage; NOAA Reports Heavy Rain July 23, 2007 Moab NOAA Reports Flash Flood July 23, 2007 Moab Property Damage at $1K; NOAA Reports Heavy Rain August 5, 2007 Moab NOAA Reports Heavy Rain August 5, 2007 Moab NOAA Reports Flash Flood August 28, 2007 Moab, Delicate Arch Sheriff's report; Wolf Ranch area flooding and NOAA Reports property damage at $1K; Flash Flood September 16, 2007 Moab, Hastings Road Sheriff s report; flooding down Hastings leaving several cars stranded on opposite side of wash Strong Wind October 20, 2007 Grand Flat and Arches Winds at 49kts and Property Damage $1K; NOAA Reports Frost/Freeze October 21. 2007 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 23, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm November 30, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 1, Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-21 Page 128 of 208 Y`G J ri Af" �. 1t y �.. Y �. 4 2007 Winter Storm December 1, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 6, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 6, 2007 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 10, 2007 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Drought January March 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm January S, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 8, 2008 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 24, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 27, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 29, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 31, Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather— Heavy Snow February 3, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm February 13, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 20, 2008 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 22, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 23, 2008 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 24, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-22 Page 129 of 208 .. m 'T. ate' .�a+ JA n: p t ' i TL,..c• ifigii/AIT n�' Y Commint( ; y 9. , x r 4 Winter Weather March 1, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 15, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 9, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Frost/Freeze May 2, 2008 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Storm May 21, 2008 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather June 4, 2008 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm October 4, 2008 La Sat & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Frost/Freeze October 13, 2008 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 27, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 7, 2008 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather Storm December 13- 24, 2008 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains Grand Flat NOAA Reports - and Arches Winter Storm January 23, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 24, 2009 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather Storm February 8, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 13, Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather 2ebruary 16, Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Dense Fog February 24, 2009 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 9, 2009 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 22, 2009 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 25, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-23 Page 130 of 208 Hazard Type Date ILocatiaNArea Impacted Comment(*) Frost/Freeze Frost/Freeze Winter Weather Winter Weather March 26, 2009 March 27, 2009 March 29, 2009 March 31, 2009 Mountains Grand Flat and Arches Grand Flat and Arches La Sal & Abajo Mountains La Sal & Abajo Mountains Winter Weather Winter Storm April 1, 2009 Apri12, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains, Tavaputs Plateau La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports NOAA Reports NOAA Reports NOAA Reports NOAA Reports NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 10, 2009 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather Thunderstorm Wind Flash Flood Flash Flood Thunderstorm Wind Heavy Rain Flash Flooding Drought Flash Food High Wind Flash Flood/Debris Flow Drought April 11, 2009 May 11, 2009 May 23, 2009 May 23, 2009 May 24, 2009 May 25, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau Canyonlands Fld Green River; Swazy Beach Elgin, Moab, Potash, Canyonlands Fld Moab NOAA Reports NOAA Reports July 25, 2009 August - September 2009 September 15, 2009 September 30, 2009 Castle Valley —Lot 36 Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains Castle Valley, Placer Creek Grand Flat and Arches Person stranded Property Damage at $3K, $40K, and $70K respectivelx; NOAA Reports Wind at 51kts; NOAA Reports NOAA Reports Drainage ditches plugged and minor damage, .56 inches rain in less than one hour. NOAA Reports Sheriffs office report; major flash flood at creek area. Flood damage to Buchanan, Shafer, Miller, Pope, Holy oak, upper eighty, connector road, and water and mud damage to private property. Flood water washed out Placer Creek crossing,, lower culvert on the creek and connector no longer usable. Mud deposited throughout the creek flood plain, breached fence with STTLA property. Winds at 50kts; NOAA Reports September 2009 October 1, 2009 Placer Creek La Sal & Abajo 6-8,000 cfs NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-24 Page 132 of 298 Hazard , y• i Fv v;Diu �� iow � Co � � 1 � i , s) � r , Mountains Winter Storm October 27, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather October 27, 2009 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Frost/Freeze October 27, 2009 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Storm October 27, 2009 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Drought November - December 2009 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 13, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 13, 2009 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 7, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Storm and Blizzard December 7, 2009 Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 12, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Avalanche December 12, 2009 Middle Cirque Natural Trigger, 60 feet wide, 500 feet vertical, elevation 11800 feet due to Facets Avalanche December 12, 2009 Upper Horse Creek Natural Trigger, 150 feet wide, elevation 11600 feet Dense Fog December 13, 2009 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Dense Fog December 18, 2009 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 22, 2009 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Dense Fog December 23, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 29, 2009 Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Avalanche December 30, 2009 Moab region Natural Trigger, 2 feet depth, 1000 feet vertical at elevation 11600 feet due to Facets Drought January -July 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-25 Page 132 of 208 , _ tiU " .. Abajo Mountains Winter Weather January 18-19 , 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm-- Blizzard January 21, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm January 22, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 26, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 27, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Dense Fog January 28, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Dense Fog January 29, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Dense Fog February 2-4 , 2010 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 6, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Dense Fog February 8, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Avalanche February 12, Observer Low Left Noriegas Natural Trigger, 14 feet depth, 100 feet wide, 400 feet vertical, elevation 10100 feet. Dense Fog February 16, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Storm February 19, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Avalanche February 21, 2010 Arrowhead Slide path and Middle Cirque Natural Trigger, 800 feet wide, 2000 feet vertical, elevation 11200 feet; Natural Trigger 4 feet depth, 500 feet wide 700 feet vertical, elevation 11300 feet, respectively. New snow/old snow interface. Winter Weather March 4, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm March 7, 2010 La Sal & Abajo Mrnmtains NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 9, 2010 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm March 13, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-26 Page 134 of 208 eRita i i — :eY . • ''lsE.a• tImpacted f39 i _ .;,, ;a . tart �` .sr9+45 ',' ft3 `4 . Sal & Abajo Mountains Dense Fog March 14, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Dense Fog March 15.2010 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 18, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports - Winter Weather March 19, 2010 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 22, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 31, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 1, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 2, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 21, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 29, 2010 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather May 1, 2010 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Severe Weather- -Heavy Rain June 13, 2010 Moab NOAA Reports Severe Weather- -Heavy Rain July 26, 2010 Castle Valley, Placer Creek drainage area Standing water on Pope and Miller Lanes, both Placer Creek crossings became impassable with deposits of mud on private property and roads. Severe Weather- -Heavy Rain and Flash Flood July 27, 2010 Moab, Big Bend area NOAA Reports and Sheriffs office report: mud a foot deep with damage to vehicles Flash Flood July 31, 2010 Thompson and Moab Sherriffs report, road washed out in Sego Canyon trapping family at day camp. Flash Flooding through Beaver Creek area from Castle Valley to Gateway Heavy Rain August 4, 2010 Potash NOAA Reports Lightning August 4, 2010 Moab Property Damage at $21C; NOAA Reports Flash Flood August 4, 2010 Moab NOAA Reports Thunderstorm Wind August 16, 2010 Canyonlands Fld Wind at 53kts; NOAA Reports Flash Flood August 17, 2010 Elba Station NOAA Reports Flooding August 19, 2010 _ Grand County; Mineral Bottom Rd —$100,000 and —$125,000, respectively. Overall project —$3 Million Part 9 Grand County Page 9-27 Page 135 of 298 T — ' r 1, DID ,, Lac atWArea � ctW , U R- ,E. a s, Flash Flood August 19, 2010 Potash Property Damage at 2.5M; NOAA Reports Flash Flood August 19, 2010 Castle Valley, Placer Creek drainage area Placer Creek and Miller and Pope Lanes were flooded, excessive mud deposits with impassable crossing and significant repair. NOAA Reports; Flash Flood September 23, 2010 Castle Valley, Placer Creek crossings Crossings significant damage and passable with difficulty Flash Flood September 28, 2010 Castle Valley, Keogh, Taylor, Pope, and Miller Lanes Damage to road surfaces and drainage ditches. Drought October 1, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Flash Flood October 7, 2010 Castle Valley, Placer Creek drainage area Storm water damage to road surface and dangerous to traffic/people. Flash Flood October 25, 2010 Castle Valley, Placer Creek drainage area —Pope and Miller Lanes Crossings impassable, standing water on lanes, water and mud damage to private property Winter Weather November 8, La Sal & Abajo Mounta ins NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 9, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 15, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Storm November 21, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Blizzard November 23, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 28, 2010 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 19, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Avalanche December 23, 2010 Laurel Cirque Trigger was Natural, 600 fee wide 800 feet vertical at 11600 feet elevation, Facets. Winter Storm December 28, 2010 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm December 29, 2010 Tavaputs Plateau, Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Avalanche December 31, 2010 Above Treeline face Pre Laurel park Trigger was Natural, 600 feet wide, 800 feet vertical at 11400 feet elevation with New Snow Winter Weather January 9, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 31, Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-28 Page 136 of 298 Hazard Type Date tr,otati0iiiiteir (' F _ . 2011 Winter Weather February 1, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Extreme Cold/Wind Chill Febniary 1, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 7, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather— Blizzard February 17, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Storm February 19, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 19, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 24, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 25, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather March 7, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Avalanche March 8, 2011 Exxons Folley, Moab region. Trigger was Natural, New snow and Trigger was Natural , Facets, 300 feet wide 1250 feet vertical at 11400 feet elevation Avalanche March 9, 2011 Moab region Trigger was natural, 100 feet wide at 11,000 feet elevation Winter Weather March 17, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports . Winter Weather March 21, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 3, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 9, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather April 23, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Frost/Freeze April 30, 2011 Grand Flat and Arches NOAA Reports Winter Weather May 18, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Flooding July 13, 2011 Castle Valley, Placer Creek drainage area include Keogh, Taylor, Pace Lanes, and Placer Creek crossings Water damage to drainage systems, minor damage to Placer Creek crossings. Heavy Rain July 18, 2011 Moab NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-29 Page 130 of 299 i � '..F1JA i ,, DR ' _ C .� ��` M b�fi° L�� arly i' � _c..'t•.y] k �J�{4- � � rI— ~k �':�29�,Z Flash Flood July 20, 2011 Castle Valley NOAA Reports Thunderstorm Wind August 3, 2011 (Cny)Canyonlands Fld Wind at 51kts; NOAA Reports Flash Flood August 4, 2011 Castle Valley NOAA Reports Severe Weather: Flash Flooding September 16, 2011 Southwestern Region Of County Slow moving thunderstorm with heavy rain exceeding an inch per hour. Severe Weather: Flash Flooding September 17, 2011 Grand County— Castle Valley, Arches National Parr Dead Horse Point State Park, and northern area of the Canyon lands National park, Green River and Moab Cities. Slow moving thunderstorm with very heavy rain exceeding an inch per hour. Winter Weather October 6, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 1, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 5, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Storm November 5, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 7, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather November 30, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 1, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Drought December 1, 2011 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather December 12, 2011 Tavaputs Plateau, La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 21, 2012 Tavaputs Plateau NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 21, 2012 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather January 23, 2012 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 2, 2012 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 5, 2012 La Sal & Abajo Mountains NOAA Reports Winter Weather February 12, La Sal & Abajo NOAA Reports Part 9 Grand County Page 9-30 Page 13g of 298 ��r t i t a z ���� ' M a t t e d , . ' & 6 . 2 0 1 2 M o u n t a i n s W i n t e r W e a t h e r F e b r u a r y 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 T a v a p u t s P l a t e a u N O A A R e p o r t s W i n t e r W e a t h e r F e b r u a r y 1 9 , 2 0 1 2 L a S a l & A b a j o M o u n t a i n s N O A A R e p o r t s W i n t e r W e a t h e r F e b r u a r y 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 L a S a l & A b a j o M o u n t a i n s N O A A R e p o r t s W i n t e r W e a t h e r F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 2 T a v a p u t s P l a t e a u N O A A R e p o r t s D r o u g h t M a r c h - O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2 T a v a p u t s P l a t e a u , G r a n d F l a t a n d A r c h e s , L a S a l & A b a j o M o u n t a i n s N O A A R e p o r t s W i n t e r W e a t h e r M a r c h 1 , 2 0 1 2 T a v a p u t s P l a t e a u , L a S a l & A b a j o M o u n t a i n s N O A A R e p o r t s W i n t e r W e a t h e r M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 2 T a v a p u t s P l a t e a u , L a S a l & A b a j o M o u n t a i n s N O A A R e p o r t s P a r t 9 G r a n d C o u n t y P a g e 9 - 3 1 P a g e 1 3 8 o f 2 0 8 G. Mitigation Goals, Objective, and Actions Notation. The reference to Countywide in this section of the document refers to a mitigation strategy benefiting the cities, to ns and connnunities of Castle Valley, Moab City, and Thompson Springs. Emergency Service Personal Grand County, Moab City, Thompson Fire Department, and Castle Valley Fire Department have certified Emergency Service personnel to include the following: City Police, Grand County Sheriffs, Emergency Medical Technician (EMT), Building Inspectors, and the Moab Valley Fire Department. Documents for Mitigation and Action Plans The following documents were utilized for mitigation and action plans: > The Grand County Storm Drainage Master Plan as amended to date. > The Grand County Land Use Code, specifically Articles 4, 5, & 6, as amended to date. > Moab City Code Chapter 15.40—Flood Damage Reduction as amended to date. > Community Fire Planning as amended to date > International Building codes as adopted > Flood Insurance Study for Mill and Pack creeks. Additional Projects List The tables below provide a "Projects List" gathered for each city or entity in the Grand County area. These lists were collected during the 2010-2013 review of this plan and details may be reviewed by contacting each entity. Gland County 1. Aquifer Study 2. Drainage work in Spanish Valley, Castle Valley and Moab City 3. Flood Control along Mill and Pack Creek 4. Flood plain mapping for Pack Creek 5. County Implementation of a State Approved Drinking Water Source Protection Plan 6. Participation in water quality and quantity study for the Glenn Canyon Aquifer 7. Construction of "A" priority Spanish Valley Conveyance System and Basin Improvements S. Consideration of a GWSSA/County Water Conservation Plan 9. Consideration of future water and waste water treatment needs North of Colorado River. Thou C. 1. Update of the City's Water Conservation Plan 2. Consideration and Possible Implementation of a Water Conservation Rate Part 9 Grand County Page 9-32 Page 139 of 208 3. Finalization of Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilities Master Plan 4. Negotiation with GWSSA for Long Term Wastewater Treatment Plant Services 5. Review and Update of the City's Drinking Water Source Protection Plan 6. Update of the City's Water Rights 7. Update of the City's Water and Sewer Impact Fee Analyses 8. Update of the City's Storm water Drainage Plan 9. Upgrade and Compliance Modifications to Waste Water Treatment Plant 10. Participation in large scale water Quality and Quantity Aquifer Study 11. Construction of Water and Sewer Lines along Hwy 191 to Lion's Park 12. Sewer System Modeling 13. Water System Modeling 14. Analysis of the Development of a Secondary Water System Vietot;e,asSleAVIA1 1. Pin -hook Fire Re -Vegetation with Manti-La Sal National Forest 2. Monitoring well program for the Town of Castle Valley as a Public Water Provider 3. Castle Valley Water Budget Study 4. Beaver education and beaver deceiver program for private landowners (specific to drainage works on east side of the La Sal's) J B .fore y of and Wal agenient u 1. Fence riparian pasture on Pack Creek near Loop Rd. turn off to Pack Creek Ranch 2. Work with GWSSA to modify irrigation structure to address silt issues 3. Modify Steel Bender Rd. crossing upstream of Flat Pass (to reduce erosion and riparian degradation) 4. Eliminate illegal horse use in Rill Canyon to improve riparian conditions/fencing? 5. Simplify trails around Power dam area to one main trail 6. Continue e. Coli sampling/monitoring in Mill Creek power dam area; repeat Microbial Source Tracking la* Denyvend R tto RithateseationdGranst S6131 Invasive removal/ re -vegetation projects --Clearing Tamarisk and Russian Olives from Mill and Pack Creek to improve habitat, stabilize stream banks, improve flood flows and reduce fire fuel hazards. Crean+ Water 8r. Sewer Semice. AgetitriegtWr Additional 8" flow control gate valve at the Sheley Tunnel diversion from Mill Creek to Ken's Lake. Part 9 Grand County Page 9-33 Page 140 of 208 FLOODING (l) Countywide Problem Identification: The rapid development of the county has caused a need to re- evaluate the County Stonn Management Plan. Development also directly impacts the historical drainage ways with culverts, roads, and structures. Flood occurs primarily during the monsoon season with frequent flash flooding occurrences. Identifying and then controlling flooding will assist in responding to flood events. Protection of life and property before, during, and after a flooding event is essential for the county and community residents. Moab hillside flooding poses a threat to life and property damage. IGoal 1: Priority HIGH Objective 1: F1 To mitigate the effects of hillside floods and to improve storm Action projects: F1. Several projects included: Moab area canyon projects including Stewart Canyon, Johnson Canyon, Tusher Canyon, and Walker Canyon. Moab southwest hillside drainage projects. Dam and check Time Frame: 2004-2018 Funding. Federal fiords from FEMA., Transportation Enhancement and others, State hazard Mitigation finds, Utah Department of Transportation and City ftmds Estimated Cost: $7,000,000 Staff: Contracted work with some in kind help Background Much of the City of Moab is in the 100 and 500 year floodplains due to creek and hillside flooding. Damage to Moab pmperties frequently occurs from hillside flooding because the flows are not adequately attenuated nor properly conveyed to a safe area of discharge. The City, County, and Federal Government have built dams and check in an attempt to mitigate damage. Tusher Canyon and Walker Canyon now have detention ponds. However, there are needs for more hillside flooding mitigation in other areas especially in Stewart Canyon and Johnson Canyon. Additional areas of concern exist north of Stewart Canyon along the highway. In these areas, large flows are concentrated and released mostly unimpeded into populated areas. In order to best address these flows, storm drainage conveyance is necessary to safely convey these flows to an area where they can be discharged safely. Part 9 Grand County Page 9-34 Page 142 of 208 Objective 2: F2 Continue to support and update Storm Water Management Plan. Action project: F2. Review and revise Storm Water Management Plan as development warrants. Time Frame: Ongoing —through 2012 with implementation of identified projects. Funding: An income source/stream needs to be identified. Estimated Cost: $32,000 Staff County and Private Contractors Background The Storm Water Management Plan has protected the County from flood losses. This Plan also contains identified storms water basins and other structural control projects. The plan was last dated 1997, it is currently being reviewed for approval from the draft form of August 2009 Grand County Storm Drain Master Plan Update. By Horrocks Engineers Notation: reason for change. There is an impact fee associated with developmental; however, this addresses their impact to the system) Objective 3: F3 Obtain conummication equipment that will allow for timely response to Action project: F3 Obtain communication equipment that will allow for timely response Time Frame: 1 Year Funding: Federal Grants Estimated Cost: $30,000 Staff County Sheriff, County Emergency Management Background An alternate Emergency Operational Centers (EOCs) also need adequate communication capabilities are essential between all response agencies within the County. Objective 4: F4 Support updating of flood hazard data Action project: F4 Support and encourage Grand County for a Pack Creek flood map Time Frame: Ongoing Funding: Federal Estimated Cost: Unknown Part 9 Grand County Page 9-35 Page 142 of 208 Staff. County Engineer and State F000dplain Manager Background Accurate flood maps assist the County in the administration of the pack creek flood way and better reflects flood risk within the County. County shall continue to regulate construction within the Pack Creek flood way. Ninety five percent of the population in the County is exposed to Pack Creek flood area to include Moab City. To have this project accomplished this would protect the majority of Grand County population. Objective 5: FS To mitigate Mill Creek, Pack Creek, and Colorado River floods that Action project: FS Mill Creek Flood Control and parkway Project (includes Pack Creek) Time Frame: 2000-2015 Funding: Federal funds from FEMA, Transportation Enhancement and other, State Hazard Mitigation funds and City funds Estimated Cost: $2,000,000 Staff" Contracted work with some in -kind help Background Since 1990 the City has been working on Mill Creek Flood Control and Parkway project. The City installed two large underpasses to keep flood waters from damming at bridges and spreading throughout the community. The City also installed concrete bottoms under two bridges to keep sediment from building under the bridges and to remove sediment from the bridges without having to obtain permits. City crews work after each storm event to clear these constrictions to best allow flood flows to pass and mitigate the flood's impact. Countywide Problem Identification: Moab City's Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) serves all of the City of Moab, Grand County in Spanish Valley, and potentially San Juan County within Spanish Valley. The plant is located in the Colorado River floodplain and has several components that are below the Base Flood Elevation. Goal 2: I Priority HIGH Objective 1: F6 I To protect Moab City's WWTP from floodwaters of the Colorado Part 9 Grand County Page 9-36 Page 144 of 208 River. Action project: F6 Pmvide terming, prevent floodwaters WWTP. pumps and/or the rising of component walls to from Colorado River from inundating Moab City's Time Frame: 2000-2015 Funding: Funding sources may include FEMA or other mitigation grants, local funding from Moab City or Grand Water and Sewer, or state department of water quality. Estimated Cost: $1,000,000-$7,000,000 Staff Contracted work design and construction of flood control features. Background Moab City's WWTP is located within the 100-year floodplain for the Colorado River. Based on the current configuration, the elevations of several of the plant's components are below the river's base flood elevation. A berm was placed around the plant in 1996, but it is not sufficiently tall to prevent the inflow of floodwater onto the facility. The plant serves a current population of over 10,000 residents including all of the City of Moab, Grand Count in Spanish Valley. In addition to the residents, a couple million visitors come to the area every year. This WWTP is the only public treatment plant in Grand County. A major flood event would cause contamination of the river as well as rendering the WWTP temporarily inoperable and potentially causing significant damage to the facility. Countywide Problem Identification: Grand County initiates projects through the Community Impact Fund Board (CIB) for capital improvements. The following projects are those that mitigate flooding problems in the county and unincorporated areas. These projects are from the Permanent CIB list and are for the terms 2011 and 2012-2016. Goal 3: Priority MEDIUM Objective 1: F7 To continue updating and improving drainage in the Grand County Action project: F7 Grand County Storm Drain Master Plan's C, D, E, & F Priorities. Time Frame: 2012-2016 Funding: CIB; and other sources Local, SID/SSD, other Grants, Utility Fees, and Impact Fees. Estimated Cost: $20,000,000 (50% split between Grant and Loan) Part 9 Grand County Page 9-37 Page 145 of 208 Staff Background County and Contracted Objective 2: F8 To continue improvement with the expansion of growth. Action project: F8 Spanish Valley Water and Sewer Main Line Upgrade Time Frame: 2012-2016 Funding: CIB; and other sources Local sources, SID/SSD, other Grants, Utility Fees, and Impact Fees. Estimated Cost: $5,000,000 ($1 million from local and $4 million from CIB fund loan) Staff Contracted Background Objective 3: F9 To develop a water source for the Thompson SSD. Action project: F9 Develop Culinary Water Source Time Frame: 2012-2016 Funding: CIB; Estimated Cost: $286,000 (CIB Grant) Staff County and Contracted Background Objective 4: F10 To continue updating area. and improving drainage in the Grand County Action project: F10 Grand County Storm Drain Master Plan's A & B Priorities. Time Frame: Short term 2011 Funding: CIB grant/loan, Local, other sources Estimated Cost: $14,000,000 (CIB Grant/ Loan 50% split of $13,850,000) Staff: Cotmty and Contracted Background Objective 5: F11 Moab City continuously improves and updates drainage due to developmental changes and mitigation to flood prone areas. Action project: Fll Hwy 191 Gateway Plan/Storm Water Drainage Improvements Time Frame: Short term 2011 Funding: CIB grant/loan, Local, other sources Estimated Cost: $1,200,000 (CIB Grant/ Loan 50% split of $600,000) Staff: County and Contracted Background Action project: F12 Storm Drainage, Detention Basins, Out Fall Time Frame: I Short term 2011 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-38 Page 146 of 208 Funding: CIB grant/loan, Local, and DWQ sources Estimated Cost: $6,000,000 (CIB Loan of $3,000,000) Staff: County and Contracted Background SEVERE VVEATHER (SVV) Countywide Problem Identification: Winter snowstorms, summer thunderstorms, hail, and high winds over southeastem Utah have a dramatic effect on regional commerce, transportation, and daily activity and are a major forecast challenge for local meteorologists. Goal 1: Priority HIGH Objective 1: SW1 I Protect County from adverse effects of severe weather. Action project: SW1 Encourage avalanche preparedness for county backcountry users in the northeastern portion of the County area. Time Frame: Ongoing Funding: Minimal Estimated Cost: Minimal Staff County Emergency Management and State hazard Mitigation Team members, and the Utah Avalanche Forecast Center. Background Avalanches and avalanche preparedness is not often considered when discussing mitigation on the county or city level, yet several people die each year in Utah's backcountry. While the avalanche terrain is mainly on US Forest Service land the search and rescue for the lost individual in more often than not coordinated by emergency managers with search parties comprised of county and city staff Introductory avalanche awareness training could lessen the costs to Grand County. Most avalanche victims die in avalanches started by themselves or someone in their party. Thus, education can limit the number of avalanche related searches each year. Know Before You Go: An Avalanche Education Program for Young Adults in Utah The Know Before You Go program was introduced into the Utah school system by contacting principals and district superintendents. 80 presentations were given in the 04-05 season and nearly 12,000 students saw the program. At the Utah Avalanche Center Part 9 Grand County Page 9-39 Page 140 of 299 provides numerous ways of education venues. Through classes, workshops available through private companies and web tutorials. The Utah avalanche education program is the best way to avoid getting injured or killed in an avalanche. Parts of the mission are to help educate the public. They also have notification system for terrain areas that show real time data on possible avalanche occurrences for more detailed information visit: 1.10://utahavalanchecenter.orgZ SLOPE FAILURE (SF) (Includes: Landslide and Debris Flow) Cotnitywide Problem Identification: There are potential risks to structures located in areas identified by the team as landslide risk areas. Goal 1: I Priority Medium Objective 1: SF1 Reduce potential landslide risk on commercial and residential Action project: SFl . Assess the probability of landslides and identify specific structures at risk Time Frame: Undetermined Funding: State Funds/Giants Estimated Cost: Unknown Staff Unknown Background Soil surveys and other engineering surveys are needed Action project: SW3. Assess Emergency Operational Centers (EOCs) to ensure they are grounded lightning, to include buildings with towers, etc. Time Frame: Ongoing, to complete fall 2011 Funding: Federal Grants Estimated Cost: —$50,000 Staff County Emergency Management Backgroumd EOCs and alternate EOCs, Sheriffs Dispatch, Coimnand Vehicle(s) and associated equipment need to be protected from severe weather events including lightning. Action project: SW4 Encourage avalanche preparedness for county backcountry users in the northeastern portion of the County area. Time Frame: I Ongoing Part 9 Grand County Page 9-40 Page 14g of 299 Funding: Minimal Estimated Cost: Minimal Staff: County Emergency Management and State hazard Mitigation Team members, and the Utah Avalanche Forecast Center. Backgroumd EARTHQUAKE (E) Countywide Problem Identification: Although there is a limited impact to earthquakes in this area; however, an opporhmity for officials to evaluate transportation and utilities services that could become impacted from secondary effects of an earthquake in the Northern Region of the State. Goal 1: Priority Low Objective 1:El Provide for emergency response and relief. Action project: El. Identify and maintain critical transportation and utility services. Time Frame: Ongoing Funding- Local governments and FEMA grants Estimated Cost: Unknown Stag County, City and Volunteer Staff Members Background Critical transportation, utility and communication systems are essential part of life. DROUGHT (D) Countywide Problem Identification: Cyclical periods of drought place a strain on the availability of community culinary water and irrigation water resources. Goal 1: Priority Medium Objective 1: D1- D3 Provide for emergency response and relief Action project: D1. Conserve culinary water by educating the public. Time Frame: Ongoing Funding: City Estimated Minimal Part 9 Grand County Page 9-41 Page 148 of 208 Cost: Stag City with local businesses Background Use a newsletter to educate the public as well as utility bill notes. In cases of extreme drought, the City/GWSSA/Moab Irrigation Company could limit outdoor watering to certain days and times and put into place other restrictions to conserve water. Information can be sent out with utility bills. Objective 2: D2 Conserve culinary water by conservation efforts. Action project: D2. Maintain and enforce rate policies that encourage water conservation. Time Frame: Ongoing Funding: County Estimated Cost: Minimal Stag Water surveyor and newsletter editor Background County should evaluate a tiered water system Involving both City and GWSSA who provides water for the County. The City is currently looking at this tiered system Objective 3: D3 Meet current and future water needs of the community. Action project: D3. Develop additional source and storage as well as implement conservation plans. Time Frame: Ongoing Funding: City, State, and Federal Government loam/grants Estimated Cost: To be determined. Stag City, Professional Services and Contractors Background To meet the needs of communities' residential and businesses water users; vigilance in locating new and additional sources as well as increasing storage capacity to meet current needs as well as future needs is a must. Moab City has their own water sources, and is continually looking at source and storage issues. They designate water source as a Sole Source Aquifer through the EPA. The County is not a direct supplier of water to the city. The water in the unincorporated areas (and even some in the City) is provided by GWSSA. Objective 4: D4 Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency will continue to develop reliable sources of culinary water. Action project: Culinary Well Interconnect and new Source Development and Part 9 Grand County Page 9-42 Page 150 of 208 D4 Purchase 250VA Genset. Time Frame: Short term 2011 Funding: CIB grant/loan, Local sources Estimated Cost: $260,000 (CIB Grant/ Loan split of $160,000) Staff: County and Contracted Background Wild Land Fire (RF) Countywide Problem Identification: The Mill Creek and Pack Creek floodway corridors pose a threat to life and property damage due to fire and debris flow (flood) events. Goal 1: Priority Medium Objective 1: WF1 To thin vegetation and re -vegetate areas along the creeks to facilitate the protection of life and property from damage from fire and debris flow (flooding). Action project: WFl. Thin and re -vegetate the Mill Creek and Pack Creek floodways Time Frame: 2008-2015 Funding: Utah Partnership for Conservation Development (UPCD), Federal Redesign grants administered by Forestry, Fire and State Lands, City funds and private property fluids and partnerships. Estimated Cost: $200.000 Staff: Contracted work with some in -kind help Background The City of Moab and others have thinned and/or vegetated approximately half the floodways in the City limits. The work has been ongoing for several years. Last year fire damage was mitigated due to the thinning efforts. . Objective 2: WF2 Grand County to improve response time and equipment availability for emergency responses. Action project: WF2 Fire Equipment for Airport Time Frame: Short term 2011 Funding: CIB grant/loan, Local sources . Estimated Cost: $100,000 (CIB Grant $80,000) Staff County and Contracted Background Part 9 Grand County Page 9-43 Objective 3: WF3 Spanish Valley Water & Sewer continuing to prepare for wild land fires nearby. Action project: WF3 Fire Flow Pump for Navajo Ridge Area Time Frame: Short term 2011 Funding: CIB grant/loan Estimated Cost: $150,000 (CAB Grant $100,000) StafE County and Contracted Background Countywide Problem Identification: The Utah Community Fire Planning for the Wildland--Urban Interface, Moab/Spanish Valley Community Wildfire Protection Plan as amended clarifies the Protecting Life, Property, and Community Values Through Community -Based Planning On the following pages below is the copy of the section that addresses Community Prescription: includes the goals and action project details in the wildfire plan dated January 28, 2008. Part 9 Grand County Page 9-44 Page 152 of 208 Utah Community Fire Planning The goals addressed in this plan are aimed at improving conditions in ecological communities and human communities. When fins bums across a landscape a moves through geopolitical boundaries, watersheds. and lands owned or managed by various individuals or agencies. Fire Impacts cal, vegetation communities, hydrology, wildlife habitat, and many other natural and manmade conditions. These goals intend to maintain ecological integrity and community structure and cohesiveness. By addressing thaw concerns, the goals of this plan are designed to improve the conditions of all characteristics of the watershed. Goal At Commuaity will decrease fuels within the community to reduce wildfire impel: In and around the community. _ .. _ _ ... Action(s)t I A. Individ del lot clean up and creation of defensible tpacaaiong Mill Creek 2A. Redaoe the number of noxious weeds, specifically c icmgtsss and tumblevreeds in riparian arras along Mill Creek. 3A. Introduce and reestablish native vegetation along Mill Creek 4A. Remove dead brush and tamarisk build up along Mill Creek _-- 5A, Develop methods to dispose of noxious weed:brush waste along Miff Creek (is it possible Am the county to spray piltz?) 1 B.Individual lot cleanup and creation of defensible space along Pack Creek 213. Reduce the number of noxious weeds, — ' Specifically cheatgrassYand tumbleweeds in riparian areas aloligyick Creek 3B, Introduce and to-osAtblish native vegetation along rack Crock 4B. Remove decal blush and tamarisk build d p along Puck Creek 5B. Develop methods, todisposaofnoxious weedibnssk waste along Pack -Creek (is k passible for the county to spmy.piles?i dotes mad Updates: ~Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing ?imelhtut Responsible Party: Ongoing Ongoing On Private Putties/ Community Wildfire Council FFSL WUI Coordinator FFSL WCSi Coardisittor� Ongoing Private Parties/Fire Wanten _.. Ongoing FFSL Coordinator/County Ongoing PtivatePartieW Community Wildfire Council FFSL WLI Coordinator FFSL WIl1 Coordinator Private Parties Fire Warden PFSL Witt tbwrdinakurCounty Priority: High Me:hum Sh High High Medium Goal: Goal R: Community Mil work with county, state and federal fire officials to deirenae filth on *distant nablk Jamb (o reduce wildfire intensity and impact in and around the community. MONK* Improve condition of disturbed land managed by the county bx re -vegetating with native seeds Protect old growth cottonwood tuts and native • trees in lands managed by. the county Maintain and promote wildlifr habitat in riparian areas by implcriAnting practices to reduce erosion Vases and updates: Tlmegne: Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Responsible Party: Priority: BL.AIAISPSrNPS THigh 131...MAISFSrNPS HigA i -. i BLMA/SFSANIPS Hfgt► 21 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-45 Page 152 of 208 Utah Community Fire Planning Cost C: Community will evaluates upgrade and maintain community wildfire preparation and response (WM* and erminnumt Artion(sit Erns training tbr structural and midland fire —Mutually lighting needs to be of Need to develop schedule for regular and Annually continued inspections thr wildland and structural mil:went Update numbers and signs on peoples' homes Ongoing Developing mare water resources for fire response Ongoing Marrs and Updates: Responsible Party: FFSL FFSL Malty: High Private Parties/Conununity High Wildfire Council FFSL/Private Parties Moderate 1 ; Cosi Ds Community will help educate community members te prepare for and respond to wildfire. , .1 Ardente): . . timeline: Responsible Party: Priority:' Provide there education ahead keeping fire °twig- interagency Effort MixleTrite-7—/ response itiuipment captivate property, e.g.. provide infOrmatien on alternatives tit tire hydrants •,--• • Increase aWarinesi about preparing for Wildhaed Ongoing Interagency Efibrt fire by weidling iitConjusiction with existing events to PrOvide,eduentional Materials: end be available MarisWerrprestione Dens the publie. Sane taverna isMinde: 4th otlitly.Fireworke show, Rodeo, Eirith Day, CourdPeadval, Reek!' fair, . Pumpkin Chucidif. Painter's Market, Senior Citizen Center. didradio talk shows sponsored by High • Coil E: Community Will deVekm and implement s comprehensive eine/gene,/ response plan. Aetionfeir Timeline; Responsible Party; Priority: Please refer to the Orand County Fire and Ongoing FFSL- High Mobilization Plan (.200d) Plan for areas that could be used as safety zones in Ongoing 'ETU) High the event Of a wildiand fire, e.g., Grand County Community Wildfire Middle School Caution \knes and Updates: 22 Part 9 Grand County Page 9-46 Page 154 of 208 Utah Community Fire Planning Coal Ft Community will actively address identified regulative hovel impacting community witdtire prevention and response needs. Actlon(s): f The state of Utah passel House Bill 146 and State i law OM that regulate new construe ion and the ,types of lwifding_tnatariats, that are permitted; Grand County passed an ordln um that regulates new construction and the types of building materials that are permitted The State of Utah established bunt prunes forth* burn season Notes and Updates: T'imelina Responsible Party: Priority: Ongo g Ongoing FFSL FFSL Ongoing FFSL Goal G: Community will regutady evaluate undue and maintain planedng commitments. Attionfs)t Have one mating evety year to re -visit the document and update it as necessary Votes and Updates: igtb Fi'rg6 Timelines The fall season of every year Responsible Party: FFSL National Fite Plan Coordinator and Fire Council Comsnittee Poise%Otnnatd R Ari. Priority: High 2; Part 9 Grand County Page 9-47 Page 155 of 208 H. Maps All of the following maps have been created for the Pre -Disaster Mitigation Plan using the best available data at the time of the review of this plan. Data was obtained from federal, state and other external sources. Grand County, Carbon County, Utah Department of Emergency Managers, Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments (SEUALG) personnel who contributed to the creation of these maps to the best of their knowledge and assessable data cannot accept responsibility for any errors, omissions, or positional accuracy, therefore there are no warranties accompany the maps. These maps may be seen in Part 9 Grand County Section H Maps. Map 9-1.1 Cover Page/Picture Map 9-2.1 Earthquake Epicenters and Fault Lines Map 9-3.1 Peak Ground Acceleration Map 9-4.1 Dam Inundation Risk Map 9-5.1 Wild Fire Risk Map 9-6.1 Landslide Risk Map 9-7.1 Critical Facilities and Census Block Population Map 9-7.2 Map Notation Page Map 9-8.1 Problem Soils Map 9-9.1 Dams, Epicenters, and Faultlines in Grand County Map 9-10.1 Wild Fire History Part 9 Grand County Page 9-48 Page 156 of 208 AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 Agenda item #: 7-2 / / Title: Approval of Change Order #1 for the Impact Fee Study Fiscal Impact: $11,316. This amount will come from the Impact Fee Fund Staff Presenter(s): Rebecca Andrus Department: Engineering Applicant: N/A Background/Summary: During the process of preparing the Impact Fee Study, City Staff noted that there were additional facets of the water and sewer systems that should be considered for assessment of impact fees. These components will be affected substantially by new development, which should cover its share of the costs for expanding the systems' capacities. The additional items to be included in the study are: - Water rights - Culinary water main delivery system (consisting of pumps, wells, springs and disinfection equipment) - Sewer transmission trunk lines City Staff approached the consultant on the project and asked for a revised scope and fee that includes the additional work. The original project fee was $24,944 for the Water and Sewer Impact Fee Study. The fee for the additional work is $11,316 for a total contract sum of $36,260. The Change Order and associated documents are attached. Options: Approve, Deny or Postpone Staff Recommendation: Approve Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Change Order #1 for the Impact Fee Study." Attachment(s): Change Order, Additional Work Letter, Additional Scope, Additional Work Fee Estimate Page 157 of 198 2162 West Grove Parkway Ste 400 Pleasant Grove, Utah 84062 www.horrocks.com September 19, 2013 Rebecca Andrus City Engineer 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 HORROCKS 1141 ENGINEERS Tel: 801.763.5100 Salt Lake line: 801.532.1545 Fax: 801.763.5101 In state toll free: 800.662.1644 Subject: Proposal to Provide Additional Engineering Services for the City of Moab Impact Fee Study Dear Rebecca, We have reviewed your request for additional services on this project. We have prepared a scope of work and associated fee estimate that meets our understanding of Moab's additional needs. Please review them and let me know if they cover all of the areas that you feel are necessary. We will be happy to adjust the scope to meet, more precisely, the items we discussed several weeks ago. Let me know if you need any further information. Sincerely, HORROCKS ENGINEERS Brent R. Ventura, P.E. Principal Page 158 of 198 Additional Scope of Work The attached Fee Estimate is based on the following detailed scope of work. Task 1 General 1.1 Project Administration — This task includes all administrative tasks including accounting, scheduling, coordination amongst team members, and contract administration. 1.2 Progress Meetings — This additional work will create the need for one additional meeting with staff. 1.3 QC/QA — Prior to submitting the final document, we will submit our documents for internal Quality Control. During this process, independent reviewers from applicable departments will evaluate the document for accuracy, defensibility, and even grammar. Comments will be addressed in-house before the document is submitted to the City for implementation. Task 2 Culinary Water Rights and Delivery System 2.1 Define Level of Service (LOS) — In the instance of water rights, the LOS will be determined by state requirements for future needs as well as actual use adjustments. In the case of the delivery system, level of service is determined simply by Moab's current ability to deliver culinary water. We will apply the appropriate requirements to Moab's current population to determine if the required LOS. 2.2 Prepare Existing Facilities Inventory — Work with City staff to identify all culinary water rights and pumping facilities. 2.3 Evaluate Future Needs — Utilizing the City supplied data, we will work together with City staff to identify the City's realistic future needs, based upon the approved demographics, as well as the areas water use history and state requirements. 2.4 Identify Existing Deficiencies/Excess Capacities — We will review existing water rights and staff's current data to check staff's current understanding of water rights deficiencies. We will also verify that pumping requirements are being met practically. 2.5 Identify Proposed Improvements — We will identify water rights and future pumping system projects that the City will need to construct in the future to meet the future needs identified in Tasks 2.1 through 2.3. 2.6 Prepare Impact Fee Facilities Plan — Based upon requirements defined in the Utah State Code, Title 11-36a, we will prepare a six year plan of projects that will need to be constructed and/or water rights that will need to be purchased due to new development. With input from City staff we will prepare a plan of expected projects prioritized as currently anticipated. This will include a 10 year planning window of anticipated projects and anticipated increases or decreases in the impact fee accordingly. 2.7 Prepare Impact Fee Analysis — Our team will prepare an Impact Fee Analysis of these elements as required by the current Impact Fee Act. We will ensure that the analysis covers only those projects required in the next six years. Analysis will include proportionate share analysis, credits due, and impact fee calculations. Culinary Water Rights and Delivery System Impact Fee Milestones and Outputs: • Consensus with City staff regarding demand and growth projections • Prepare Schedule of Future Needs • Review and consensus on projected facility needs, timing and costs • Draft IFFP • Clearly defined level of service standards and proportionate share analysis • Draft IFA • IFFP and IFA Task 3 Sanitary Sewer Collection System 3.1 Define LOS — For sanitary sewer collection system, LOS is defined by state requirements. We will identify the applicable system requirements applicable to Moab's current population. 3.2 Prepare Existing Facilities Inventory — Work with City staff to identify all sanitary sewer trunk lines. Page 159 of 208 2.8 Evaluate Future Needs - Utilizing the City supplied data, we will work together with City staff to identify the City's realistic future needs, based upon the approved demographics, as well as the areas historic sewer data and state requirements. 3.3 Identify Existing Deficiencies — We will review existing sewer facilities and staff's current data to identify any existing collection system deficiencies, if any. 3.4 Identify Proposed Improvements — Using the CFP, we will identify all of the projects that must be completed in order to construct the proposed system to meet the demands of future growth for Moab. 2.9 Prepare Impact Fee Facilities Plan — As required by Utah State Code, Title 11-36a, we will prepare a six year plan of projects that will need to be constructed due to new development. With input from City staff we will prepare a plan of expected projects prioritized as currently anticipated. This will include a 10 year planning window of anticipated projects and anticipated increases or decreases in the impact fee accordingly. 2.10 Prepare Impact Fee Analysis — Our team will prepare an Impact Fee Analysis as required by the current Impact Fee Act. We will ensure that the analysis covers only those projects required in the next six years. Analysis will include proportionate share analysis, credits due, and impact fee calculations. Sanitary Sewer Collection System Impact Fee Milestones and Outputs: • Consensus with City staff regarding demand and growth projections • Prepare Schedule of Future Needs • Review and consensus on projected facility needs, timing and costs • Draft IFFP • Clearly defined level of service standards and proportionate share analysis • Draft IFA • IFFP and IFA Page 160 of 208 Moab City Impact Fee Study Additional Work September 2013 Horrocks Engineers Manhours and Fee Estimate QA/QC Project Engineer Engineer CAD Task Engineer Manager P.E. E.I.T. Tech Clerical Task Hours Cost $114 $132 $97 $85 $61 $49 1.0 General 1.1 Project Administration 4 $528 4 1.2 Progress Meetings 8 $1,056 8 1.3 QC/QA 4 $456 4 Subtotal 16 $2, 040 2.0 Culinary Water Rights and Delivery System 2.1 Define Level of Service (LOS) 10 $1,040 2 8 2.2 Prepare Existing Facilities Inventory 5 $437 1 4 2.3 Evaluate Future Needs 5 $437 1 4 2.4 Identify Existing Deficiencies/Excess Capacities 3 $267 1 2 2.5 Identify Proposed Improvements 13 $1,200 1 4 8 2.6 Prepare Impact Fee Facilities Plan 13 $1,182 1 4 8 2.7 Prepare Impact Fee Analysis 14 $1,332 2 4 8 Subtotal 63 $5, 895 3.0 Sanitary Sewer Collection Lines 3.1 Define Level of Service (LOS) 5 $520 1 4 3.2 Prepare Existing Facilities Inventory 3 $267 1 2 3.3 Evaluate Future Needs 5 $437 1 4 3.4 Identify Existing Deficiencies 3 $267 1 2 3.5 Identify Proposed Improvements 7 $666 1 2 4 3.6 Prepare Impact Fee Facilities Plan 1 $114 1 3.7 Prepare Impact Fee Analysis 9 $860 1 4 4 Subtotal 33 $3,131 Project Subtotal 112 $11,066 6 20 36 50 1 0 0 Direct Costs (mileage, printing, etc) $250 Total Project Cost $11,316 Page 161 of 208 ON2012\PG-116-1207 Moab Impact Fee Study \Administration\Additional Work Fee Estimate.xlsx C,iTY O INN MOAB f / AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL September 24, 2013 PL-13-124 Agenda ltem #:7-3 Title: Approval of Ordinance #2013-14 Amending MMC Chapter 17.36.020, Use Requirements, Amending the listed uses in the I-1, Industrial Zone, and Chapter 17.36.050, Location Requirements Fiscal Impact: n/a Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Department: Planning and Zoning Applicant: N/A Background/Summary: Review of the uses in the Industrial Zone (1-1) by staff and the Planning Commission indicated that the proposed new uses of caretaker residence with a footprint of 800 square feet or less, fitness center or gymnasium, and self -serve warehouse storage facility are desirable in the Industrial Zone. The ordinance also removes billboards that would visually affect residential areas that surround the current I-1 Zone. The ordinance also eliminates a duplication of Location requirements that were erroneously placed under Use requirements. Subsequent to the Planning Commission public hearing on Ordinance #2013-14 on September 12, 2013, the commission unanimously voted to favorably recommend the ordinance to Council. The recommended changes include: 17.36.020 Use requirements. The following buildings, structures and uses of land shall be permitted in the 1-1 industrial zone upon compliance with requirements as set forth in this title: A Fr nt Setback. All buildings and structures shall be set back at least twenty five feet greaser. Manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging, fabrication and warehousing of goods and materials, but not to includecxcept for the processing of animal by- products, and for livestock feed yards, orfeedyards, and except for steel manufacturing, oil refineries, wallboard manufacturing and similar establishments which emit offensive fumes, smoke, noise, odor, etc. BC. Asphalt and concrete mixing plants, coal yards, earthmoving equipment and equipment storage, gas and oil wells, gas and oil storage facilities, public buildings and 1 Page 162 of 198 Page 2 of 3 public utility buildings, craft shops, tire recapping establishments, andbillboards, accessory signs. CD. Automobile wrecking and salvage yards, when surrounded by a well -maintained sight - obscuring fence constructed to a height of at least eight feet so that the material stored in the enclosure cannot be observed from any street adjacent to the yard. D€. Mines, gravel pits, sand pits, clay pits, rock quarries, rock crushers and buildings and structures in connection therewith; also scenic railroads and railroad maintenance yards. E Agriculture, farm machinery storage sheds, self -serve warehouse storage facilities, vegetable and fruit packing and processing plants, and livestock raising. FG. Water wells, utility transmission lines, dams, pumping plants, power plants, sewage treatment plants subject to review and approval of the State Division of Health; solid waste disposal sites. G. Caretaker dwelling consisting of no more than a footprint of 800 square feet when associated with a non-residential use. H. Fitness center or gymnasium H. Fcnccs, walls and hedges. I. Retail commercial uses and cafes. J. Accessory buildings and parking lots incidental and accessory to other permitted uses. AND, chapter 17.36.050, Location requirements, shall be amended to now read: {Ord. 08 03 (part), 2008; Ord. 94 12 (part), 1994; prior codc § 27 13 2) Front Setback. All buildings and structures shall be set back at least twenty-five feet from the front lot line, or fifty-five feet from the centerline of the road, whichever is greater. Options: The process for text amendments is found in Chapter 17.04, Zoning Map Amendments and Text Amendments. In Chapter 17.04.080 paragraph A., the Code requires that a public hearing be held by the Planning Commission. Paragraph B requires that a decision to, "either recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the application", must be reached within thirty (30) days of the public hearing and that the decision is to be conveyed to Council within ten (10) days. Page 163 of 198 Page 3 of 3 According to Chapter 17.04.100 (A), Council may approve the amendment at the next public meeting without a public hearing but, can also, "In its discretion... elect to receive testimony or evidence from the applicant, city staff, and the public prior to taking final action on the ordinance." (17.04.100 C) City Council can: 1. Approve Ordinance #2013-14 as written; 2. Approve Ordinance #2013-14 with amendments; 3. Vote to not approve Ordinance #2013-14 and state their reasons; 4. Table the ordinance until a later date and request additional information; 5. Call for a public hearing and establish a date for the hearing. Staff Recommendation: Staff agrees with the Planning Commission and recommends that the ordinance be approved. The proposed text amendments allow greater flexibility in the uses allowed in the Industrial Zone and can include limited employee housing opportunities. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Ordinance #2013-14 as written." Attachment(s): Ordinance #2013-14 p:\planning department \2013\correspondence \p1-13-124 cc ord 14 izone uses.docx Page 164 of 198 ORDINANCE #2013-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 17.36.020, USE REQUIREMENTS, AMENDING THE LISTED USES OF THE I-1, INDUSTRIAL ZONE, AND CHAPTER 17.36.050, LOCATION REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council ("Council") adopted the Moab Municipal Code ("Code") and especially Chapter 17.00.00, also known as "The Zoning Ordinance of Moab City, Utah" in an effort to encourage and facilitate orderly growth and development in the City of Moab ("City") as well as to promote a more attractive and wholesome environment; and WHEREAS, from time to time the City has determined that there is a need to amend the Code in order to make the text more contemporary, align the language with Utah State Code, and provide for a use that was not anticipated at the time of adoption; and WHEREAS, the City has found that some types of uses would be appropriate uses in the I-1 Industrial Zone; and WHEREAS, the City of Moab Planning Commission ("Commission") in a duly advertised public hearing held on August 22, 2013, met to hear testimony and determine the merits of the changes to Chapter 17.09.220 of the Moab Municipal Code; and WHEREAS the Commission unanimously voted to recommend that Council adopt the amended language and that adoption of Ordinance #2013-04 is in the best interests of the citizens of Moab; and, WHEREAS, the Commission found that the proposed changes to said code chapter would benefit the public at large and the City to insure that appropriate detailed site plans are submitted with a development application; and WHEREAS, Council agrees with the Planning Commission and found that the amendments to the code are in the best interests of the City and residents. NOW, THEREFORE, the Moab City Council hereby ordains that Ordinance #2013-04 is hereby adopted to amend the Municipal Code to repeal section 17.36.020 Use requirements A-J in its entirety and is replaced by with following:: 17.36.020 Use requirements. The following buildings, structures and uses of land shall be permitted in the I-1 industrial zone upon compliance with requirements as set forth in this title: A. Manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging, fabrication and warehousing of goods and materials, but not to include processing of animal by-products, livestock feed yards, or steel manufacturing, oil refineries, wallboard manufacturing and similar establishments which emit offensive fumes, smoke, noise, odor, etc. B. Asphalt and concrete mixing plants, coal yards, earthmoving equipment and equipment storage, gas and oil wells, gas and oil storage facilities, public buildings and public utility buildings, craft shops, tire recapping establishments, and accessory signs. C. Automobile wrecking and salvage yards, when surrounded by a well -maintained sight - Page 165 of 198 obscuring fence constructed to a height of at least eight feet so that the material stored in the enclosure cannot be observed from any street adjacent to the yard. D. Mines, gravel pits, sand pits, clay pits, rock quarries, rock crushers and buildings and structures in connection therewith; also scenic railroads and railroad maintenance yards. E. Agriculture, farm machinery storage sheds, self -serve warehouse storage facilities, vegetable and fruit packing and processing plants, and livestock raising. F. Water wells, utility transmission lines, dams, pumping plants, power plants, sewage treatment plants subject to review and approval of the State Division of Health; solid waste disposal sites. G. Caretaker dwelling consisting of a maximum footprint of 800 square feet when associated with a non-residential use. H. Fitness center or gymnasium I. Retail commercial uses and cafes. J. Accessory buildings and parking lots incidental and accessory to other permitted uses. AND, chapter 17.36.050, Location requirements, shall be amended to now read: Front Setback. All buildings and structures shall be set back at least twenty-five feet from the front lot line, or fifty-five feet from the centerline of the road, whichever is greater. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab in open session this day of , 2013. City of Moab Attest: Rachel Stenta City Recorder Mayor David L. Sakrison p:\planning department \2013\ordinances \ordinance 2013-14 industrial uses.dacx Page 166 of 198 C,iTY O ,adr M MOAB AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL September 24, 2o11 Agenda item #:7-4 PL-13-131 Title: Approval of Ordinance #2013-19 Amending The City Of Moab Municipal Code, Chapter 12.08.060, Sidewalks, Curbs and Gutters Required at Time of Construction, Amending The Requirements For A Certificate Of Occupancy And The Construction Of Streets, Curb, Gutter, And Sidewalks When Single Family Residential Lots Adjacent To Partially Developed Streets Are Deemed Excessive In Width Fiscal Impact: n/a Staff Presenter(s): Jeff Reinhart, City Planner Department: Planning and Zoning Applicant: N/A Background/Summary: Some recent situations have caused staff to consider the impacts of infrastructure development on single family homes. These requests for building permits have been associated with large residential lots located on undeveloped streets and having frontages exceeding those for a typical residential lot. The Moab Municipal Code requires that these street improvements be constructed at the time of final inspection by the building inspector. The requirements for curb, gutter, pavement and sidewalks can be very expensive especially when a significant street frontage must be developed. Attached is recommended language that will allow City Council the opportunity to reduce the financial responsibilities of single family lot owners when they choose to construct a single home on larger properties with undeveloped streets. The first attachment is the current text of MMC Chapter 12.08.060 showing the proposed changes in strikeout/underline. The second attachment is the "clean" version of the ordinance with the changes incorporated into the text. Options: The process for text amendments is found in Chapter 17.04, Zoning Map Amendments and Text Amendments. In Chapter 17.04.080 paragraph A., the Code requires that a public hearing be held by the Planning Commission. Paragraph B requires that a decision to, "either recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the application', must be reached within thirty (30) days of the public hearing and that the decision is to be conveyed to Council within ten (10) days. 1 Page 167 of 198 Page 2 of 2 According to Chapter 17.04.100 (A), Council may approve the amendment at the next public meeting without a public hearing but, can also, "In its discretion... elect to receive testimony or evidence from the applicant, city staff, and the public prior to taking final action on the ordinance." (17.04.100 C) The City Council may: 1. Approve Ordinance #2013-19 as written; 2. Approve Ordinance #2013-19 with amendments; 3. Vote to not approve Ordinance #2013-19 and state their reasons; 4. Postpone the ordinance until a later date and request additional information; 5. Call for a public hearing and establish a date. • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the ordinance be approved as written, with no need for a public hearing. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Ordinance #2013-19 as written." Attachment(s): Ordinance #2013-19 p:\planning department \2013\correspondence \p1-13-131 cc ordinance 19.docz Page 168 of 198 Attachment 1 12.08.060 Sidewalks, streets, curbs and gutters required at time of construction. A. Sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and street paving shall be installed along all street frontage of any building lot at the time of construction upon that lot unless an exception is granted the City Council as established under paragraph C below. B. The location and specifications for said sidewalks, curbs and gutters and streets shall be determined by the Public Works Directorsuperintendent of streets. C. In the event the frontage is excessive, the city council may grant an exception or variation. D. The construction of streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters will be complete at the time of final inspection by the building inspector unless an exception has been granted by the City Council. D. In the event the frontage is excessive, the Ceity Ceouncil may grant an exception as allowed under the following standards: 1. The frontage of the lot exceeds 200 lineal feet; 2. The lot is intended only for a single family residence; 3. Significant topographic, location or other issues exist; 4. The construction of the street, curb and gutter and sidewalks is inconsistent with the street plan; 5. The exception will not create, extend or perpetuate a half -paved street. 6. An amount equal to one and one half times the estimatedactual construction cost s of constructing 200 lineal feet of the required improvements shall be submitted by the property owner to the city for deposit into a street fund for future use to develop and repair sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pedestrian trails, and streets within the city. The Public Works Director shall calculate the lineal foot costs for construction of the improvements by consulting licensed contractors in the area. Formatte grammar Formatte egendaA-24-213\I2.08.180 original with city manager edits.d"^" ' Page 169 of 198 t\jeff AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 Agenda ltem #: 7-5 Title: Addition of Membership Types to MRAC Offerings Fiscal Impact: Probable revenue increase; no increase in expenditures Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler Department: Recreation Applicant: N/A Background/Summary: The MRAC fee schedule and membership options were developed prior to MRAC opening. In January, 2013, the fee schedule was modified to reflect an approximate 5% increase in certain memberships. Three- month, Six-month and fitness memberships were not included in the initial MRAC offerings. Significant public input indicates that demand exists for these membership types and the addition thereof would more fully serve a broader range of users as well as generating additional revenue and consequently reducing the City's dependence on taxpayer subsidy. Resolution #18-2013 would add these new membership types. 1 Options: The City Council may adopt the resolution, adopt the resolution with changes, reject the resolution, or postpone adoption of the resolution until a later date. Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of this resolution. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Resolution #18-2013." Attachment(s): Resolution #18-2013 Page 170 of 198 RESOLUTION #18-2013 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE MOAB RECREATION AND AQUATIC CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Moab establishes fees for city services by resolution; and WHEREAS, the Moab Recreation and Aquatic Center has determined that there are a number of membership types that should be added to the fee structure, pursuant to citizen and user requests. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF MOAB RESOLVE TO ADOPT THE MOAB RECREATION AND AQUATIC CENTER FEE STRUCTURE SHOWN AS EXHIBIT 1 HERETO. Passed and adopted by action of the Governing Body of the City of Moab, Utah in open session this 24th day of September, 2013. Mayor David L. Sakrison ATTEST: Rachel E. Stenta City Recorder Resolution #18-2013 Page 1 of 1 Page 171 of 198 MOAB RECREATION AND AQUATIC CENTER RATES AQUATIC ONLY OR FITNESS ONLY DAILY ADMISSIO. 3 & Under Youth 4-17 Individual (aquatic) Youth 14-17 Individual (fitness) Adult 18+ Senior 55+ Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Resident Free $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 3 $ 12 Non.residenl a 1 4 4 7 5 20 Youth 4-17 Individual (aquatic) Youth 14-17 Individual (fitness) Adult Individual Senior Individual (55 and over) Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 100 100 155 115 235 180 285 40 SUMMER SEASON PASS - AQUATIC ONLY i Youth 4-17 Individual (aquatic) Youth 14-17 Individual (fitness) Adult Individual Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 65 65 85 65 135 105 165 35 alE Youth 4-17 Individual (aquatic) Youth 14-17 Individual (fitness) Adult Individual Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 80 80 100 80 155 120 185 40 Youth 4-17 Individual (aquatic) Youth 14-17 Individual (fitness) Adult Individual Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 60 60 75 60 120 95 140 30 MONTHLY Youth 4-17 Individual (aquatic) Youth 14-17 Individual (fitness) Adult Individual Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 25 25 35 25 55 40 65 10 Youth 4-17 Individual (aquatic) $ Youth 14-17 Individual (fitness) $ Adult Individual $ Senior Individual $ 45 45 90 65 1-WEEK FAMILY PASS - AQUATIC ONLY $ 50 CLASS PUNCH PASSES Members (20-Punch) $ 35 Non -Members (20-Punch) $ 65 AQUATIC AND FITNESS !DAILY ADMISSION 3 & Under Student 14-17 Adult Senior 55+ Family up to 6(14+allowed in Fitness) Resident i N/A 4 5 4 20 Norvresidenl N/A 7 9 7 35 Youth 14-17 Individual Adult Individual Senior Individual (55 and over) Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Members SUMMER SEASON PASS Youth 14-17 Individual $ Adult Individual $ Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 1p-MONTH PASS Youth 14-17 Individual Adult Individual Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member P-MONTH PASS Youth 14-17 Individual Adult Individual Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 175 255 190 395 295 465 65 105 135 105 210 165 265 50 115 165 125 255 190 300 55 90 125 90 190 150 240 45 Youth 14-17 Individual Adult Individual Senior Individual Adult Couple Senior Couple Family up to 6 (14+allowed in Fitness) Additional Family Member 15 PUNCH CARD Youth 14-17 Individual Adult Individual Senior Individual 40 55 40 90 70 110 15 85 120 85 Page 172 of 198 Corporate rates to be negotiated based on needs and circumstances f / / AGENDA SUMMARY MOAB CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 24, 2013 Agenda. ltem #: 7-6, 7-7 / / Title: Approval of the Public Defender Professional Services Agreement/ Approval of the Public Defender Proposal Fiscal Impact: Approving this contract will reduce expenditures for public defender services by approximately $19,000 per year. Staff Presenter(s): Donna Metzler, City Manager Department: Administration/Attorney Applicant: N/A Background/Summary: The City of Moab is required to pay for public defender services for indigent individuals charged with misdemeanors, probation violations, and non -infraction offenses committed within the City of Moab. The City of Moab has historically paid for public defender services on an hourly basis. The hourly rate paid for such services has been $50.00 per hour. Such services were not offered through a formal contract. Over the years, the number of hours charged for public services has increased considerably, increasing the annual cost incurred by the City of Moab. While the hourly rate of $50.00 per hour seemed very reasonable, the costs escalated to over $45,000 per year, more than the City pays for our city prosecution services. It came to the City's attention that it might be possible to have a more efficient arrangement for the provision of public defender services, so the City issued a Request for Proposals for Public Defender Services. The City received two proposals, which are attached. The Proposal from Torgerson Law Offices provided the best price for the most qualified services. If the City approves the Professional Services Agreement with Torgerson Law Offices, the City will reduce our expenditures for this service at least 40%. The term of the agreement is three years. 1 Options: The City may approve the agreement/proposal as written, approve the agreement/proposal with changes, postpone approval of the agreement/proposal, or reject the agreement/proposal. Staff Recommendation: City staff recommends approval of the proposal submitted by Torgerson Law Offices and approval of the Public Defender Professional Service Agreement. Page 173 of 198 Recommended Motions: "I move to award the Public Defender Proposal to Torgerson Law Offices, P.C. in the amount of $24,000 per year" and "I move to approve the Public Defender Professional Services Agreement as presented." Attachment(s): Bid/Proposal Sheet (for bid item only), Submitted Proposals, Professional Services Agreement Page 174 of 198 SAMUEL P. CHIARA DON M. TORGERSON Rachel E. Stenta, Moab City Recorder 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 CHIARA & TORGERSON, PLLC 453 EAST MAIN, SurrE 100 PO Box 955 PRICE, UT 84501 August 12, 2013 Re: Moab City Public Defender Proposal CONFIDENTIAL Dear Chairman and Members of the Moab City Council: (435) 637-7011 FAX (435) 636-0138 www.pricelawyers.com Attached is our proposal to provide public defender legal services to indigent clients in cases where Moab City is prosecuting criminal offenses in the Grand County Justice Court. Enclosed are the following: • Separate letter including statement of qualifications, municipal clients, and professional references; • Proposal for services; and • Resume for Don Torgerson Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, CHIARA & TORGERSON, PLLC Don M. Torgerson don.torgerson@gmail.com Page 175 of 198 SAMUEL P. CHIARA DON M. TORGERSON Rachel E. Stenta, Moab City Recorder 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 CHIARA & TORGERSON, PLLC 453 EAST MAIN, SUITE 100 PO Box 955 PRICE, UT 84501 August 12, 2013 Re: Moab City Public Defender Proposal CONFIDENTIAL Dear Chairman and Members of the Moab City Council: (435) 637-7011 FAX (435) 636-0138 www.pricelawyers.com Over the years, our firm has developed a significant criminal defense focus, with a large portion of our workload dedicated to providing public defender services under contracts with municipalities. As our practice has become more focused, we have trained our staff to efficiently use technology and we have developed efficient office procedures to more effectively represent our clients. Those improvements also allow us to provide reasonably -priced public defender services to the governmental entities with whom we contract. We have earned a reputation for providing quality legal services where indigent clients and private -pay clients receive equal attention. Our office consists of two attorneys with almost twenty-five years of combined criminal defense experience. We also employ two full-time legal assistants. We maintain an office in Moab and local Moab phone numbers. Accordingly, our clients' cases are handled efficiently and unnecessary delays are avoided. Current Municipal Clients We currently provide public defender services to the following municipalities: • Grand County o Primary public defender for district and justice court, including all appellate work and drug court; o Approximately 125 felony cases each year (together with misdemeanors). • San Juan County o Conflict public defender for district and justice courts; o Approximately 12 felony and misdemeanor cases each year. Page 176 of 198 August 12, 2013 Re: Moab City Public Defender Services Page 2 • Carbon County o Conflict public defender for district, juvenile, and justice courts, including all appellate work and drug court; o Approximately 75 felony cases each year (together with misdemeanors). • Carbon County Juvenile Court (DCFS-related parental defense) o Primary parental defender, including all appellate work and drug court; o Approximately 40 cases each year. • Emery County o Third -place public defender; o Approximately 10 felony cases each year. • East Carbon City o Primary public defender; o Approximately 30 cases each year. • Helper City o Primary public defender; o Approximately 20 cases each year. • Price City o Primary public defender; o Approximately 120 cases each year. Professional References Gene Strate Carbon County Attorney 120 East Main Street, Price, UT 84501 (435) 636-3240 Jeremiah C. Humes Deputy Carbon County Attorney East Carbon City Attorney 120 East Main Street Price, UT 84501 (435) 636-3240 Resumes Andrew Fitzgerald Grand County Attorney 125 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 (435) 259-1326 W. Brent Langston Deputy Emery County Attorney PO Box 249 Castle Dale, UT 84513-0249 (435) 381-2543 Attached is a resume for Don Torgerson who would be primarily responsible to provide the representation under this contract. Page 177 of 198 COMPENSATION PROPOSAL DATE: AUGUST 12, 2013 PROJECT: CITY OF MOAB PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CHIARA & TORGERSON, PLLC ("Firm") proposes to provide public defender legal services under contract with the City of Moab according to the following general compensation terms: 1. Fixed monthly fee of $2,000.00, billed on a monthly basis; 2. Firm will arrange for conflict counsel as the need arises and will be responsible to pay for conflict counsel; and 3. Firm will provide services for an initial term of 3 years, commencing November 1, 2013; Notes: By comparison, since 2009, Moab City has spent approximately $30,000.00/year (average) for its primary public defender contract, with additional fees spent for conflict counsel. Page 178 of 198 DON M. TORGERSON 453 East Main Street, Ste. 100; PO Box 955 • Price, Utah 84501 • (435) 637-7011 • dt(a pricelawyers.com PROFESSIONAL Managing Partner, Chiara & Torgerson, PLLC, - General Practice Law Firm including: Business litigation and transactional work, Real Property, Collections, Civil Litigation, Appeals, Estate Planning and Probate, Criminal Law, and Domestic Law. President, Torgerson Law Offices, P.C. 220 East 200 South, Price, UT 84501. (435) 637-1542 - General Practice Law Firm. Managing Partner, Bailey & Torgerson, PLLC, 220 East 200 South, Price, UT 84501. (435) 637-4524 - General Practice Law Firm 2007-Present 2006-2007 2004-July 2006 Intern, Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport, & Toole, P.S. Summer, 2003 Spokane, Washington - Real Estate and Municipal Law firm: Primary workload involved municipal law issues, including zoning and substantive violations of the municipal codes by businesses. EDUCATION University of Idaho School of Law. Moscow, ID - J.D. 2004 - Dean's List 6 Semesters (Top 15%) - Member Phi Alpha Delta Legal Fraternity - McNichols Moot Court Competition Finalist - Judge, Student Appellate Advocacy Arguments - Small Business Legal Clinic 2003-2004 Drafted condominium agreements; LLC filings; operating agreements, and advised small businesses generally. - Trial Advocacy Program Participant Utah State University, Logan, UT - B.S., American Studies, 1998 College of Eastern Utah, Price, UT - A.S., 1993 - Presidential Scholarship Page 179 of 198 COMMUNITY Member, Board of Commissioners 2006-Present Carbon County Planning & Zoning Commission Member, Board of Commissioners 2007-2009 Housing Authority of Carbon County Member, Board of Directors 2008-2011 Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Defense Counsel Staff Member 2006-Present Carbon County Felony Drug Court Member, Board of Directors 2006-Present Southeastern Utah Association of Local Governments' Revolving Loan Fund Member, Board of Directors 2004-Present Spencer's Wishes Foundation REFERENCES Available upon request. Page 180 of 198 SANDRA V. STARLEY ATTORNEY AT LAW Moab Public Defender August 15, 2013 Moab City Recorder Rachel Stenta 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Re: Request for Proposals for Public Defender Services 76 SOUTH MAIN, SUITE 19 MOAB, UTAH 84532 TEL. (435) 259-7475 FAX (435) 259-2418 Enclosed find my proposal and other supporting documents in response to the City of Moab's Request for Proposals for the City's Public Defender Contract. I have successfully, competently, and efficiently provided the indigent defendant/Public Defender services for the City since December 1989 and I believe I am uniquely qualified to continue to provide said service in a fair manner for all parties. I can be reached at my office telephone, 435-259-7475 or by cell phone, 435-253-1115. My email is moablaw@frontiernet.net Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance on this proposal. Sandra V. Starley Enclosures Page 181 of 198 Sandra Starley Attorney at Law 76 South Main, Suite 19 Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-7475 moablaw@frontiernet.net 1. COVER LE 1"1'ER. See enclosed. 2. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS I have provided the indigent defendant/Public Defender services for the City of Moab since December 1989 and I believe that vast experience (23 years) makes me uniquely qualified to continue to provide this service. I believe I have represented my clients in an effective and professional manner. My practice is and has always been focused almost entirely on criminal defense work and I regularly attend criminal defense continuing education to stay up to date in that area and stay proficient. Criminal law is my area of expertise and I believe all defendants (both indigent and not) deserve an attorney who is well versed in criminal law and they should be treated equally. I correspond regularly with other criminal defense attorneys on various legal issues to maintain a high level of competency and professionalism. I conduct legal research on a consistent basis to stay on top of the ever changing criminal code and case law. I believe I have a good working relationship with the Moab City Prosecutor and staff and Judge Tubbs and Judge Anderson and their staff which helps me effectively represent my appointed clients. I feel that I have successfully worked with my clients who are often in very difficult circumstances and hard to communicate with or even locate due to their financial situations, mental health issues and limited resources. Additionally, it should be be noted that I have limited my private practice to minimize conflicts and reduce those costs to the City. I maintain an office in downtown Moab. 3. PAST CLIENT LIST MOAB CITY PUBLIC DEFENDER, handle all aspects (oral and written) of representation for indigent defendants charged with misdemeanor violations in criminal cases: communications with clients, prosecutor and court, arraignments, plea agreements, suppression motions, bench and jury trials in Justice and District courts and appeals. December 1989 to present. GRAND COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, handle all aspects (oral and written) of indigent criminal defense in misdemeanor and felony matters: arraignments, plea agreements, suppression motions, preliminary hearings, bench and jury Page 182 of 198 Sandra Starley Attorney at Law 76 South Main, Suite 19 Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-7475 moablaw@frontiernet.net 5. COMPENSATION PROPOSAL I understand per the Request for Proposals that the City is asking for either flat fee proposals that include counsel's responsibility for conflict of interest fees or hourly proposals which would not include conflict fees or another arrangement. I would propose an alternative or modified flat fee arrangement. I would be willing to provide the Public Defender services for the monthly flat fee of $3,150.00 (yearly amount of $37,800) with the agreement that the City would pay for costs/fees associated with conflict cases. I would agree to continue to do my best to minimize the number of conflicts by limiting my representation of other clients and limiting my private practice. I believe this would be a fair way to address the conflict of interest issues which can be completely out of the control of counsel and should always be determined by the Court and not influenced by any financial incentive for counsel. This amount would be equitable compensation for the average hours involved in providing these services in a competent manner. In the alternative, I would propose an hourly rate of $60.00 with a monthly cap of $3,800.00 and again with the agreement that the City would pay for costs/fees associated with conflict cases. *My records indicate that I was appointed to 26 defendants in 2012 and those 26 people had 33 different cases (with some clients having up to 4 different cases during the year). And those 33 cases represent approximately 80 different charges since most cases have 2 to 4 different charges. *I also noted that my case load increased markedly in 2012 and into 2013 which has significantly increased my billing to the City of Moab. My proposed flat rate compensation is a middle ground between my hours in 2010 and 2011 and those of 2012 and 2013. I am also taking into account that the workload hours are not likely to decrease significantly and are indeed likely to increase. I do understand the limited budget of the City and am trying to craft a solution that is fair to everyone involved. Page 183 of 198 Sandra Vee Starley Attorney at Law 76 South Main, Suite 19 Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-7475 moablaw@frontiernet.net EMPLOYMENT SOLE PRACTITIONER, criminal defense (adult and juvenile), family law (divorce and juvenile court matters) and general practice. January 1994 to present. MOAB CITY PUBLIC DEFENDER, handle all aspects (oral and written) of representation for indigent defendants charged with misdemeanor violations in criminal cases: communications with clients, prosecutor and court, arraignments, plea agreements, suppression motions, bench and jury trials in justice and district courts and appeals. December 1989 to present. GRAND COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, handle all aspects (oral and written) of indigent criminal defense in misdemeanor and felony matters: arraignments, plea agreements, suppression motions, preliminary hearings, bench and jury trials in juvenile, justice, and district courts and appeals. December 1989 to January 1994. ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR, West Valley City, bench and jury trials, arraignments, pretrials, document drafting for trials and appeals. October 1988 to December 1989. DEPUTY ATTORNEY Millard County, research and document preparation in the area of civil rights defense. October 1988 to May 1989. LAWCLERK, Fourth District Court, extensive legal research and writing for Judge Cullen Christensen. September 1987 to September 1988. RESEARCH ASSISTANT, J. Reuben Clark Law School, legal research, writing and course preparation for Professor Lynn Wardle. Apri11986 to May 1987. AUTHOR Callaghan Publishing, Family Law, (treatise) Breach of Promise chapter, coauthor No Fault Divorce chapter. April to September 1986. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS/ CIVIC INVOLVEMENT Current: Utah State Bar (bar #5351) Housing Authority of Southeastern Utah Board -founding member Nationally Certified Quilt Appraiser, Lecturer and Author Past : Moab Chamber of Commerce (Board of Directors) Grand County Solid Waste Management Special Service District (Treasurer) Moab Sign Ordinance Drafting Committee EDUCATION JURIS DOCTORATE, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, 1987. BACHELOR OF ARTS, Communications, Brigham Young University,1984. References are available upon request. REFERENCES Page 184 of 198 City of Moab PUBLIC DEFENDER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective the 1ST day of November 2013, by and between the City of Moab, which shall be called the "City" in this agreement; and TORGERSON LAW OFFICES, P.C., who shall be called the "Public Defender" in this agreement. WHEREAS, the City, in accordance with Title 77, Chapter 32, Utah Code Annotated, 1953 as amended, and other statutes, is required to provide minimum standards for the representation and defense of indigent defendants in criminal and civil matters in the courts and various administrative bodies of the state; and WHEREAS, Section 77-32-6, Utah Code Annotated, 1953 as amended, provides that the City Council may provide the legal services so prescribed through the appointment of a qualified attorney or attorneys to whom the City shall pay a reasonable compensation and expenses, and WHEREAS, representation of defendants is required by statute in certain criminal and civil matters and the City may have the legal obligation to provide legal representation to indigent persons in such matters; and WHEREAS, the Public Defender is a qualified and competent law firm that employs attorneys who are licensed to practice law in the State of Utah and represents to the City that it is willing and able to provide adequate and required legal services to indigents in the City; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual conditions set forth in this agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Compensation. a. The City agrees to pay the Public Defender for the legal services to be rendered pursuant to this agreement compensation in the amount of $24,000 annually. Public Defender will submit monthly invoices of $2,000 each. 2. Terms, Termination and Compensation. a. This contract shall be in effect for a period of three years, beginning November 1, 2013 and ending October 31, 2016. b. In the event that either party hereto shall deem the other to be in breach of any provision hereof, the party claiming the existence of the breach on the other's part shall in writing notify the other party of such breach. The other party shall within fifteen (15) days commence all actions reasonably necessary to cure the breach and shall notify the complaining party in writing of the actions taken to cure the breach. In the event that actions reasonably necessary to cure the breach are not timely commenced, the complaining party may terminate this agreement upon ninety (90) days' written notice. Page 1 of 5 Page 186 of 208 c. In the event of disciplinary action by the Utah State Bar against the Public Defender, this contract may be terminated without notice. d. In the event the Public Defender intends to cease in its contracted relationship with the City as Public Defender, or the City does not intend to renew this contract, ninety (90) days written notice to the other party is required. If 60 days has expired after giving the written notice required by this subsection and the Public Defender has not been relieved of its duties, the Public Defender shall be paid at the rate of $75.00 per hour until the Public Defender is replaced. e. Compensation shall be payable in equal installments on a monthly basis. Invoices should be submitted to the City of Moab Recorder's Office, 217 East Center Street, Moab Utah, 84532. 3. Legal Services. a. The Public Defender shall provide legal services and representation to qualified indigents in all matters involving criminal charges, excluding juvenile delinquency actions, in which the City is obligated to pay for legal services for indigents, subject to the exclusions and qualifications specified in this agreement. b. The legal services and representation to be provided by the Public Defender shall include, but not be limited to, office and telephone conferences with indigent clients, conferences in the jail with indigent clients, arraignments, preliminary hearings, other related hearings, trials, appeals to the district court, and any other proceedings contemplated by this agreement and normally required in the matters and actions involving such indigents and includes first appeals of right by the indigent to the Grand County Seventh District Court. c. The Public Defender shall provide legal services and representation to the following: i.Indigent persons entitled thereto upon appointment by the justice court judge, a judge of the Seventh Judicial District Court, and a justice of the Utah Supreme Court, provided, however, that the indigent is charged under the laws of the State of Utah with a misdemeanor, probation violation, or other non -infraction statutory offense committed in the City of Moab, Utah, or with the violation of any Moab City ordinance. 4. Excluded Services. It is understood and agreed by the parties that the Public Defender shall not be responsible under this agreement to represent indigent clients in dependency cases in the Juvenile Court, juvenile delinquency actions, nor shall the Public Defender be responsible to act as a court appointed guardian ad litem for indigents. 5. Accessibility and Jail Visits. Page 2of5 Page 186 of 208 a. The Public Defender agrees to the following: i.The Public Defender shall make all reasonable efforts to visit indigent clients incarcerated at the earliest possible moment and to be reasonably accessible to such indigent clients. ii.It is understood and agreed that accessibility to indigent clients is an integral consideration in the making of this agreement and therefore the Public Defender agrees to be available and accessible to indigent clients reasonably in advance of any hearings or proceedings for purposes of interviews, gathering information, making decisions, and doing such other things as is reasonably necessary to adequately and properly represent the indigent client. iii.The Public Defender shall maintain a suitable office space to be located within the City of Moab. 6. Non -indigent Clients. Nothing in this agreement shall prevent the Public Defender from representing clients in other criminal or civil cases or in other matters in the county who have not been determined indigent by the court. Public Defender shall be allowed to maintain his private practice of law. 7. Conflicts or Inability to Represent. a. In the event of a conflict of interest, inability or circumstances such that the Public Defender is not able to represent the indigent client, such conflicts shall be made immediately known to the court. The court shall determine whether such conflict of interest, inability or circumstances in fact exist, and upon a determination by the court that the Public Defender should be excused from the case the court may excuse the Public Defender from the case and may appoint another attorney to represent the indigent client. b. In the event of a court determination that the Public Defender cannot represent an indigent pursuant to the immediately preceding paragraph, the Public Defender shall be responsible to employ and pay another attorney to defend or represent the indigent client. 8. Reports and Record Keeping. a. The Public Defender agrees to maintain records of all representation of indigent clients under the terms of this agreement and to submit written reports to the Moab City Administrator of such services every six months. b. Reports shall include historical and annual comparative information as to the number and types of cases or matters handled specifying the types and classes of offenses, courts, particular clients, non -jury trials, jury trials, hearings other than trials, plea -negotiated settlements, and/or such other factors as may be reasonably requested by the City that do not violate attorney -client privilege. Page 3of5 Page 188 of 208 9. Disclaimers. a. It is understood and agreed that neither the Public Defender nor any of its staff or agents are employees of the City. b. The Public Defender will be acting in all respects as an independent contractor and the City will in no way be liable for or on account of the conduct, negligence, or omissions of the Public Defender. 10. Renewal of Contract, or, Transition Upon Termination of Contract. a. In the event this appointment is not renewed by the City: i.The Public Defender agrees to cooperate with its successors including filing the necessary pleadings for withdrawal and to deliver all applicable files, information and materials to his successor. ii.All matters pending at that time shall become the responsibility of the subsequently appointed public defender. iii.In the event the Public Defender is not permitted to withdraw from the representation in any matter by the court upon the conclusion of this agreement and any extensions hereto, the City agrees to compensate the Public Defender at the rate of $75.00 per hour, or as agreed to in special type cases, for services provided beyond the term of this agreement and any extensions thereto. 11. Principal Office and Liaison. The Public Defender shall notify the Moab City Administrator of his physical address in Moab or the Spanish Valley, or change of address or phone number within a week of any change thereof. 12. Public Defender Status. In the event of any change of address, on -going conflict, or inability to practice law, the Public Defender shall promptly notify the City in writing of such change in status. 13. Non -Assignability. This agreement may not be assigned by the Public Defender to any attorney other than Mandie Torgerson (Utah Bar Number 10317) or Don Torgerson (Utah Bar Number 10318), without the prior written consent of City. In addition, the Public Defender may not assign the responsibilities of this contract to another person in Public Defender's firm without the specific written approval of the City. 14. Notice to the Parties. Any notice required by this agreement to be given shall be given in writing at the following address unless designated otherwise in writing: Page 4of5 Page 188 of 208 " M o a b C i t y M a n a g e r , 2 1 7 E a s t C e n t e r S t r e e t , M o a b , U t a h 8 4 5 3 2 . " T o r g e r s o n L a w O f f i c e s , P . C . , 4 5 3 E a s t M a i n S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 0 , P r i c e , U t a h 8 4 5 0 1 o r P O B o x 9 5 5 P r i c e , U t a h 8 4 5 0 1 . I N W I T N E S S W H E R E O F , t h e p a r t i e s h a v e e x e c u t e d t h i s a g r e e m e n t i n d u p l i c a t e , e a c h o f w h i c h s h a l l b e d e e m e d a n o r i g i n a l , o n t h e _ d a y o f , 2 0 1 3 . A T T E S T : R a c h e l E . S t e n t a , C i t y R e c o r d e r C I T Y O F M O A B : M a y o r D a v i d L . S a k r i s o n P U B L I C D E F E N D E R : T O R G E R S O N L A W O F F I C E S , P . C . B y : D o n M . T o r g e r s o n , P r e s i d e n t P a g e 5 o f 5 P a g e 2 6 9 o f 2 0 8 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Mayor David Sakrison, Moab City Council Christopher G. McAnany C-4g)e-AA, 500 West Right of Way Settlement September 19, 2013 The Council has an action item for approval of two documents regarding the 500 West right-of-way dispute: a) the Settlement Agreement; and b) a Road Easement. I write to provide a short summary of the disposition of the case. In connection with the planned 500 West road improvements the City learned that a landowner, the Billie A. Klepzig Revocable Trust, disputed the City's title to the existing roadway. The City brought suit to quiet title to the road, arguing that the area had been dedicated to public roadway use for many decades. We subsequently moved for summary judgment, and the Court granted the City's motion, ruling that the area historically used, including the paved area and shoulders, was a public right-of-way vested in the City. Subsequent to the Court's ruling the City engaged in a dialogue with the Klepzig Trust representatives about additional right-of-way that may be needed for the planned improvements, specifically the areas between the edge of the shoulders and the historic right-of-way fences. As a result of those negotiations the Trust agreed to convey to the City an additional Easement for incidental road improvements, up to the edge of the existing fences along the road. In exchange, the City staff agreed to some minor design concessions, including: a) that the new bike path will be located on the west side of the roadway; b) the replacement of an irrigation line in conjunction with the road improvements; and c) stabilization of banks along the roadway. These terms are reflected in the documents submitted for approval. As additional consideration the Klepzig Trust releases all claims against the City, and it agrees not to appeal or otherwise challenge the Court's decree vesting title in the City. The Decree, Settlement Agreement and Release, and Road Easement Deed and Agreement are attached. The documents have been approved by the Klepzig Trust and its attorneys. This should resolve any remaining title concerns incident to the 500 West improvement project, which is slated for 2014. I am recommending approval of the settlement documents. Page 200 of 208 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTAND RELEASE THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE ("Agreement") is entered into as of the date(s) set forth below between the Billie A. Klepzig Revocable Trust, a Utah trust, Billie A. Klepzig, and Ray Klepzig, individually (collectively: "Klepzig"), and the City of Moab, a Utah municipality ("City"). 1. Nature of Dispute. The City commenced a civil action in the Seventh Judicial District Court, Grand County, Utah, Case No. 110700129 (the "Litigation"), in which it sought to quiet title to certain lands for public road purposes. The Litigation was commenced in anticipation of certain road improvements to the street known as 500 West. The Klepzigs counterclaimed in the Litigation, alleging inverse condemnation of real property in violation of the Utah and United States Constitutions. On April 23, 2013 the Court granted the City's motion for summary judgment in the Litigation. 2. Final Settlement. As a result of negotiations between the parties and their respective counsels, the parties reached this Agreement, which resolves all legal claims of any nature between them. 3. Settlement Consideration. The parties stipulate and agree to the entry of the Court's Order and Decree Quieting Title, as attached as Exhibit A. The Decree is final and binding, and shall not be subject to appeal or attack by any party. The parties further stipulate to execute the Deed of Easement and Agreement, attached as Exhibit B. The Easement is final and binding. The Deed of Easement and Agreement shall specify the easement is restricted to property located between existing fences belonging to Grantor, located on the east and west of 500 West and that the City will restore any damage it causes to the Klepzig fences. a. In conjunction with road improvements planned for 500 West as it runs adjacent to the Klepzig property, the City agrees the road improvements will be restricted to the property located between existing fences located on the east and west of 500 West belonging to Grantor and to replace the existing irrigation culvert constructed by the Klepzigs across 500 West with a new pipeline. The new irrigation pipeline will be sheathed within a new culvert, which shall be installed in approximately the same location as the existing pipeline. As part of the planned 500 West improvements the City will take steps as necessary to stabilize the banks on the east side of the roadway adjacent to the Klepzig fence line, as it is described in Exhibit B. b. The City agrees that the road design for bicycle lanes planned for 500 West as it runs through the Klepzig property will provide for placement of bike lane(s) on the West side of the road. c. The improvements specified above will be completed in conjunction with the remainder of the 500 West project, which is planned for construction in the 2013/2014 fiscal year. 1 Page 202 of 208 d. Each party shall be solely responsible for payment of its own costs and attorney fees incurred in connection with the Litigation. 4. Novation of Prior Agreements. Except with respect to the obligations in this Agreement (including the Decree and the Easement referenced in Section Three, above), the parties agree that this is a full and complete settlement of any and all claims between them, however denominated. As such, this Agreement is a novation of all prior agreements, duties, legal obligations, or legal claims, each and all of which shall be deemed extinguished and superseded by the terms herein. Subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement there shall be no other legal duties, claims, or obligations between the parties, except as are expressly set forth herein. Further, in the event of any dispute between the parties subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement, it is agreed that the sole remedies shall be those pertaining expressly to the enforcement of this Agreement. 5. Scope of Release. Except as is expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement, the Klepzigs hereby release the City, its officers, elected officials, agents, employees, attorneys, and insurers, from each, any, and all claims, liabilities, or causes of action they have, or may have, as of the effective date of this Agreement and arising, directly or indirectly, from the events that are the subject of the Litigation (including counterclaims or affirmative defenses), and from any other transactions, events, or occurrences. 6. Finality; Assumption of Risk. The Klepzigs acknowledge that they are releasing all claims existing as of the date of this Agreement, whether known or unknown, arising out of the events described in the Litigation. They enter into his Agreement with a full understanding that they may have sustained, or will sustain, unknown or unforeseen damages, losses, or liabilities resulting from the underlying facts and occurring through the effective date of this Agreement, or in the future. By executing this Agreement, the Klepzigs intend to release every person and every entity named herein from any liability for all such unknown or unforeseen damages or losses, even if occurring in the future. The Klepzigs hereby assume the risk that this Agreement is entered into as a result of mistake of fact or lack of understanding as to the full nature of the character, extent, or viability of any legal claims or damages each may have sustained, or will sustain in the future. 7. Advice of Counsel. The parties acknowledge that they have been fully and competently advised by their attorneys of the nature of the legal claims and defenses, and of the finality and related consequences of entering into this Agreement. 8. Integration; Modification. All promises and performances owed by the parties are set forth in this Agreement, which is the sole and complete agreement of the parties. No other promise, performance, representation, or obligation shall be binding between the parties unless reduced to writing and executed by all parties. 9. Due Deliberation; Capacity. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement has been executed after due deliberation, and not as a result of any undue influence or coercion. It is personally warranted by all signatories that at the time of signing this document he or she is not under the influence of any alcohol or medication, and that he or she is not suffering from any medical condition which would impair his or her judgment or otherwise render this document unenforceable. 10. Remedies. This Agreement is a binding legal document which shall be enforced according to its terms, including by way of an action for specific performance, injunctive, or declaratory relief and/or damages. In the event any judicial action is filed by any party to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in that action, in addition to any other relief authorized herein. 11. Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be construed pursuant to the laws of the State of Utah. The place of performance is Grand County, Utah, and venue for any future dispute concerning this document shall be in the courts of Grand County, Colorado. 12. Warranties. The parties warrant that: 1) they have not assigned or pledged the instruments or legal claims that are the subject of this Agreement; 2) no third parties are subrogated to their rights in this matter; 3) no other person or entity is otherwise legally entitled to enforce or prosecute any claims that are subject to release here; and 4) that they execute after having obtained all lawful and necessary authority to act and bind that party. In the event of breach of this section, the breaching party shall indemnify any other affected party for all damages accruing as a result of such breach, including reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred defending any such claims. 13. Compromise of Disputed Claims; Confidentiality. This Agreement is a compromise of claims which are disputed as to validity and amount; it shall not be regarded as an admission of fault or wrongdoing by any party. 14. Execution in Counterparts. This document may be executed in counterparts which, when combined, shall evidence the complete Agreement. Electronic or facsimile signatures shall have the same effect as original signatures. 15. Interpretation. This Agreement is the product of mutual bargaining and negotiation as to its terms. It shall be interpreted in accordance with its plain meaning, regardless of the extent to which either party contributed to the drafting. APPROVED AND EFFECTIVE AS OF THE DATE(S) SET FORTH BELOW. Billie A. Klepzig Revocable Trust: By: Title: Date 3 Page 204 of 208 City of Moab/Klepzig Settlement Agreement and Release Signature Page, Contd. Billie A. Klepzig, Indi iuf( ig Ray K epzig, Indiv dually City of Moab, a Utah municipality -ie —>e Date Date By: David Sakrison, Mayor Date Attest: By: Rachel Stenta, City Recorder Date -End of Agreement- 4 Page 205 of 208 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Mayor David Sakrison, Moab City Council Christopher G. McAnany C-4g)e-AA, 500 West Right of Way Settlement September 19, 2013 The Council has an action item for approval of two documents regarding the 500 West right-of-way dispute: a) the Settlement Agreement; and b) a Road Easement. I write to provide a short summary of the disposition of the case. In connection with the planned 500 West road improvements the City learned that a landowner, the Billie A. Klepzig Revocable Trust, disputed the City's title to the existing roadway. The City brought suit to quiet title to the road, arguing that the area had been dedicated to public roadway use for many decades. We subsequently moved for summary judgment, and the Court granted the City's motion, ruling that the area historically used, including the paved area and shoulders, was a public right-of-way vested in the City. Subsequent to the Court's ruling the City engaged in a dialogue with the Klepzig Trust representatives about additional right-of-way that may be needed for the planned improvements, specifically the areas between the edge of the shoulders and the historic right-of-way fences. As a result of those negotiations the Trust agreed to convey to the City an additional Easement for incidental road improvements, up to the edge of the existing fences along the road. In exchange, the City staff agreed to some minor design concessions, including: a) that the new bike path will be located on the west side of the roadway; b) the replacement of an irrigation line in conjunction with the road improvements; and c) stabilization of banks along the roadway. These terms are reflected in the documents submitted for approval. As additional consideration the Klepzig Trust releases all claims against the City, and it agrees not to appeal or otherwise challenge the Court's decree vesting title in the City. The Decree, Settlement Agreement and Release, and Road Easement Deed and Agreement are attached. The documents have been approved by the Klepzig Trust and its attorneys. This should resolve any remaining title concerns incident to the 500 West improvement project, which is slated for 2014. I am recommending approval of the settlement documents. Page 206 of 208 WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Moab City Recorder 217 East Center St. Moab UT 84532 ROAD EASEMENT DEED AND AGREEMENT For valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Billie A. Klepzig, as Trustee for the Billie A Klepzig Revocable Trust, a Utah trust ("Grantor"), hereby grants and conveys, without warranty, to the City of Moab, a Utah municipality ("Grantee"), whose address is 217 East Center Street, Moab Utah 84532, a perpetual easement, upon two parcels of land, restricted to property located between existing fences belonging to Grantor, located on the east and west of 500 West, situated in Grand County, Utah, as more particularly described below: Parcel A: Beginning at the West'/4 corner of Section 1, Township 26 South, Range 21 East, of the Salt Lake Base and Meridian, and running thence N.89°26'48"E. 15.54 feet along the east -west center section line of said Section 1 to the intersection of the extension of a north -south fence line located on the easterly side of 500 West street; thence S.2°10'28"W. 426.06 feet along said fence line and extension thereof to a right of way monument; thence continuing along said fence line S.00°41'17"W. 161.21 feet to a point in the west line of said Section 1 said section line also being the easterly boundary line of a that certain stock driveway recorded as Entry 198975 in the Grand County records; thence N.00° 15'02"E. 586.81 feet along said section line to the point of beginning. Containing 3,667 square feet or 0.084 acre. Parcel B: Beginning at a point N.89°44'58"W. 66.00 feet along the east -west center section line of Section 2 from the East'/4 corner of Section 2, Township 26 South, Range 21 East, of the Salt Lake Base and Meridian said point being in the westerly boundary line of a that certain stock driveway recorded as entry 198975 in the Grand County records, and running thence S.0°15'02"W. 872.00 feet along said stock driveway; thence N.89°49'00"W. 0.76 feet to a point in the fence line located on the westerly side of 500 West street; thence along said fence line the following four (4) courses; (1) thence N.0° 15'46"E. 324.12 feet; (2) thence N.4°54'03"W. 122.77 feet to a right of way monument; (3) thence N.4°04'45"W. 49.99 feet to a right of way monument; (4) thence N.00°19'56"E. 375.75 feet to a point in said east -west center section line; thence S.89°44'58"E. 14.95 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 7,391 square feet or 0.170 acre. 1 Page 206 of 208 1. The two parcels referenced above are referred to as the "Easement," which shall be subject to the following terms. The Easement is a perpetual, non-exclusive grant for public road purposes, which shall include vehicle and pedestrian access, and all ancillary road and public utility uses. Acceptable public road uses shall include the construction, maintenance, repair, replacement or enlargement of: paving, road shoulders, culverts, drainage structures, retaining walls, side slopes, clear areas, fencing, signage, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, underground utilities, landscaping, and all other ancillary facilities which may be convenient or necessary for a safe public roadway. In addition to access by the public, Grantee, its agents, employees, and contractors shall be entitled to access the Easement for purposes of inspection, maintenance, repair and upgrading of any facilities therein. 2. Grantee shall be solely responsible for the maintenance, upgrading, and repair of the Easement and all improvements therein. Maintenance by Grantee shall include cutting and removal of weeds or other vegetation as needed. If the activities of Grantee should cause damage to the Easement or any adjacent property of the Grantor, including but not limited to existing fences along the boundary, Grantee shall be solely responsible for the repair and restoration of same to a condition which is equal to that which existed prior to disturbance. 3. Grantor shall be entitled to utilize the Easement, provided that its use shall not interfere with the use by Grantee or any facilities placed by Grantee within the Easement. Should Grantor cause any damage to the Easement or any facilities located therein it shall be solely responsible for the repair and restoration of same to a condition which is equal to that which existed prior to disturbance. 4. The Easement is appurtenant to the adjacent right-of-way held by Grantee, as more particularly described in Exhibit A (the "Appurtenant Property"). The Easement shall run with the Appurtenant Property in perpetuity, and shall be binding upon the parties, and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns. The Easement shall not be subject to rescission or abandonment, except upon the lawful approval and recording of a notice of abandonment by Grantee. No modification to the terms of this Easement shall be valid unless it shall be in writing, duly executed by both parties, and recorded. 5. This Easement is governed by Utah law, and venue for any dispute arising from same shall be in the courts of Grand County, Utah. 6. In the event of any breach with respect to this Deed of Easement and Agreement the non - breaching party may maintain an action for damages, injunctive relief, or both, as applicable. In any action for injunctive relief the parties waive any requirement for the posting of bond as a condition precedent to the issuance of an injunction. In any such dispute arising out of this Deed of Easement and Agreement the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs, in addition to any other relief specified herein. 2 Page 208 of 208 This document is valid and binding upon execution by the parties, below. Grantor: Billie A. Klepzig Revocable Trust By: j di, Billie A. Klepzig,Trustee Acknowledgement The foregoing Deed of Easement and Agreement was of)00P-e-, 2013 by the Billie A. Klepzig Revocable A. Klepzig, Trustee. Witness my hand and official seal. My expires: tif8O5 Grantee: SETH JOSEPH Notary Pubbc Stab of Utah Comm. No. 606925 My Comm. Expires Aug t, 2015 City of Moab, a Utah municipality By: David Sakrison, Mayor Attest: By: Rachel Stenta, City Recorder Acknowledgement executed before me this 16day Trust, acting by and through Billie commission Notary Public State of Utah The foregoing Deed of Easement and Agreement was executed before me this day of , 2013 by the City of Moab, acting by and through Mayor David A. Sakrison and City Recorder Rachel Stenta. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public State of Utah 3