Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutLTC 018-2018 Legislative Session Week 3 Report – January 22-26, 2018BAL HARBOUR - VILLAGE - OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE MANAGER LETTER TO COUNCIL NO. 018-2018 To: Mayor Gabriel Groisman and Members of the Village Council From: Jorge M. Gonzalez, Village Manager iwzr Date: February 2, 2018 Subject: Legislative Session Week 3 Report - January 22-26, 2018 The purpose of this Letter to Council (LTC) is to transmit the attached Legislative Session Week 3 Report provided by Ron L. Book. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. JMG/AC Ronald l. Book, I? fl. LOOS 0111(11 PROF[SSI000L 0110(101100 2018 Session Week 3 Report Enclosed is our 2018 Session, Week 3 Report. Please let us know if you have questions on issues included in this report, or on any other issue of concern. We will be happy to provide information to you. ➢ BUDGET INFORMATION: Both the House and Senate have released their proposed budgets. Going forward, we expect that the full Appropriations Committees in both the House and Senate will meet and pass their respective budgets during week 4. Budgets will pass the full House and Senate during week 5, and then the budgets will be available for conference as of week 6. BUDGET REQUESTS ➢ Bal Harbour Village - Bal Harbour Village Bakers Haulover Inlet Bypassing Project HB 4109: This project will reconfigure the north jetty at the inlet to enhance sand deposition to keep sand out of the ebb and flood shoals. The jetty will be configured for fishing and public access. At regular intervals, the beach (updrift, to the north) will be dredged and sand bypassed to "downdrift" areas of the County, thereby maximizing inlet bypassing. The interval of dredging will be every 2-4 years. Local Match: 50% Sponsors: Senator Campbell, Representative Geller Amount Requested: $750,000 ➢ Update: The Senate budget contains $200,000 and the House budget does not include funding at this time. The Senate budget contains the following proviso. Additionally, we are pursuing a budget amendment to increase the funding amount prior to budget conference. 1597B GRANTS AND AIDS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND NONSTATE ENTITIES - FIXED CAPITAL OUTLAY GRANTS AND AIDS - BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE BAKERS HAULOVER INLET BYPASSING FROM GENERAL REVENUE FUND 200,000 From the funds in Specific Appropriation 1597B, $200,000 in nonrecurring funds from the General Revenue Fund is provided for the Bal Harbour Village Bakers Haulover Inlet Bypassing Project (Senate Form 1909). 1 �' Bal Harbour Village  Roadway infrastructure improvements and rehabilitation HB 4127: Funding will provide improvements for traffic flow, pedestrian flow, and the safety of roadways and sidewalks of Collins Avenue and 96th Street in Bal Harbour Village. This will include removal, relocation and introduction of new signals, intersections, curb -cuts and sidewalks. Additionally, this will significantly improve traffic flow as this intersection is a main ingress and egress point for evacuation routes. Local Match: $8 million Sponsors: Senator Campbell, Representative Geller Amount Requested: $ 1,618,576 �' Update: The Senate budget contains $500,000 and the House budget does not include funding at this time. LEGISLATIVE ISSUES Public Meetings and Records/ Imminent Litigation: SB 560 by Senator Steube and HB 439 by Representative Donalds SB 560 expands the current public meeting exemption that allows a governmental entity and its attorney to meet privately to discuss pending litigation. Under this bill, the governmental entity and its attorney may also meet to discuss "imminent litigation." Litigation is defined to be imminent when the entity has received notice of a claim or demand by a party threatening litigation before a court of administrative agency. For the meeting to be legal, the attorney must identify the name of the potential claimant or litigant at a public meeting, in addition to meeting other existing requirements. If the imminent litigation does not begin, the transcript of the private meeting must be made part of the public record after a reasonable time or when the underlying statute of limitations expires. SB 560 has passed its three committees of reference. HB 439 passed the House Oversight, Transparency and Administration Subcommittee, 13  0 during week two, but was not heard during week three. Vacation Rentals: There are three very different versions of the vacation rental regulation filed this session. As originally filed, SB 1400 and HB 773, by Senator Steube and Representative La Rosa, are opposed by the Florida League of Cities, and SB 1640 by Senator Simmons, is supported by the Florida League of Cities, and is also summarized below. A proposed committee substitute combining elements of the following two Senate bills (SB 1400 and SB 1640) will be heard in Community Affairs on 1/30. This proposed committee substitute accomplishes the following: " Creates the "Florida Vacation Rental Act." " Sets forth local government parameters for addressing vacation rentals: 2 o States that a local government may regulate activities that arise when a property is used as a vacation rental, provided such regulation applies uniformly to all residential properties without regard to whether the property is used as a vacation rental or as a long-term rental subject to part II of chapter 83 or whether a property owner chooses not to rent the property. o A local government may require a vacation rental owner to submit a copy of the vacation rental license required under this chapter, a copy of the certificate of registration required under s. 212.18, and the owner's emergency contact information. o The submission of such documents and information is for informational purposes only. The local government may assess a reasonable fee for the submission and may assess fines for failure to comply. For the purposes of this subparagraph only, a vacation rental also includes any part of a unit in a condominium or cooperative or any individually or collectively owned single-family, two-family, three-family, or four -family house or dwelling unit that is rented to guests for periods of less than 6 months. o A local law, ordinance, or regulation may not prohibit vacation rentals or regulate the duration or frequency of rental of vacation rentals. This paragraph does not apply to any local law, ordinance, or regulation adopted on or before June 1, 2011, *including when such law, ordinance, or regulation is being amended to be less restrictive. • Requires each vacation rental to acquire a license through the Division of Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR), sets forth regulations, and provides for penalties if no license is secured. • Clarifies tax implications • Creates a provision for inspections, regulations, and penalties • Defines "Vacation rental" to mean any unit in a condominium or cooperative or any individually or collectively owned single family, two-family, three-family, or four -family house or dwelling unit that is rented to guests for periods of less than 6 months. • Creates a new type of vacation rental, a "Commercial vacation rental" which would mean one that is (a) Is managed by one licensed agent under a single license, pursuant to for five or more vacation rental units; or (b) Is part of five or more vacation rental units under common ownership, control, or management, either directly or indirectly. • Adds vacation rental into current law, which grants the ability for refusal of admission and ejection of undesirable guests; notice; procedure; and penalties for refusal to leave the premises • Includes vacation rentals into current law, that regulates conduct on premises, and a right of refusal of service. As noted above, the proposed committee substitute, combining elements of SB 1400 and SB 1640, will be heard in Senate Community Affairs this week, on 1/30. Link to the vacation rental amendment summarized above: http://flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/1400/Amendment/660498/PDF The House bill, HB 773, was not heard during week three. Red Light Cameras: Senator Hutson and Representative Avila have filed SB 176 and HB 6001, which would repeal the State law allowing local governments to use red-light cameras. All regulation and use of red light cameras is preempted to the state. HB 6001 has passed the full House with a vote of 83 — 18. 3 The Senate companion has four committee references but was not heard during week three. Beach Re -Nourishment: SB 174 by Senator Hukill, and HB 131 by Representative Peters The proposal as currently drafted, would set state's minimum annual contribution to fund beach renourishment, to a minimum $50 million annually, and the funding source would be the state's Land Acquisition Trust Fund. The fund, which receives one-third of real estate stamp taxes, was established to acquire and protect wildlife habitat, water resources and park land. The bills, as currently drafted, seeks to revamp the way the state prioritizes beach and inlet -management projects. It includes a detailed scoring system that would be used in determining which projects should be priorities for funding. The proposed committee bill will follow this same path, however, again, it has not yet been filed. SB 174 has been scheduled for the Senate Appropriations committee for on 1/31. HB 131 has not been heard to date. County and Municipal Public Officers and Employees: HB 815 by La Rosa The bill addresses two areas, financial reporting by municipal candidates and elected officials, and travel by municipal elected officials and staff. This bill would accomplish the following: • At the time of qualifying to be a candidate for elective municipal office, each candidate would be required to provide a full disclosure of financial interests, which would then be posted on a municipal website. This provision is currently required for qualifying for federal, state, county, or district office. • The bill requires county and municipal public officers to comply with the applicable financial disclosure requirements of s. 8, Art. II of the Florida Constitution by January 1, 2019. This provision would require both county and municipal public officers to file CE Form 6, "Full and Public Disclosure of Financial Interests," • Requires any request for travel, by elected official or staff, to be approved at their publicly noticed meeting. • Requires the reporting of travel, and travel expenses to either the local ethics commission if one exists, or state commission on ethics. • The bill prohibits payment of or reimbursement for the foreign travel expenses of any county or municipal public officer or employee under any circumstances. The bill provides an exemption from this specific section, for elected, county constitutional officers. Lastly, this strike all amendment by the bill sponsor, removed the requirements in the original bill that put a $120 cap on travel for elected officials and staff HB 815 as amended passed its first committee by a vote of 12 — 2, but was not heard during week three. The senate companion, SB 1 180 by Senator Steube, was not heard during week three. 4