The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About005-1991- ORDINANCE AMENDING SEC 96 OF THE RICHMOND CITY CODE.pORDINANCE NO. 5-1991 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 96 OF THE RICHMOND CITY CODE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond that Section 96.10 (D) (1) (c) be amended as follows: Require the payment of a Twenty -Five Dollar ($25). PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana, this day of'_` , 1991. 1�111X444- President of Common Council �I' PRESENTED by me to the Mayor of the City of Richmond, Indiana this day of, 1991. APPROVED by me, Frank H. Waltermann, Mayor of the City of Richmond, Indiana this Z day of �7 -Gift— 1991. - - �" �"" ""Iy' A) � & Mayor INTER -OFFICE MEMO DATE: January 4, 1991 To: Common Council FROM: Dan Dooley SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 4-1991 COPY TO: Petitioner: Charles and Sheila Focht, Raymond and Minnie McDaniel, Ivora Bundy and Elmer Russell, owners; Robert Burton, agent. Request: rezoning from R-2 to C-2. If the rezoning is approved, it is proposed that a motel, being Fairfield Inn, be constructed on the property. However, the change in zoning would allow any use permitted in the C-2 Zoning District. Location: 910, 912 and 914 Mendleson Drive. Ordinance No. 4-1991 Page 2 neighborhood concerns about traffic safety, the poor condition of Mendleson Drive, drainage problems and the encroachment of a commercial use into a stable residential area. The Plan Commission also received a letter from the Green Acres Rehabilitation Center Board of Directors indicating their opposition to the petition, citing concerns about the safety of group home residents on Mendleson Drive. The City's Comprehensive Plan has designated the area adjacent to Chester Boulevard as a special development area because of the area's unique locational characteristics. These characteristics include access to one of only four 1-70 interchanges, i.e. a gateway to the City, access off of the City's principle north -south thoroughfare and the location of existing developments of significance to the overall community such as IU East and Reid Hospital. Because the development of the Chester Boulevard area is significant to the overall community, the Plan Commission has historically encourage the use of plan unit development as a means to accomplish growth in this area. The plan unit development approach requires that a minimum acreage be assembled for a project . PUD also requires the approval of a development plan based on good engineering, consideration for traffic safety, consideration for good design and compatibility with surrounding uses. The property in question is too small, being approximately 2 acres, to request a plan unit development. The subject petition is only requesting a change in zoning so that little opportunity is available for the City to provide input into the project. Therefore, the Plan Commission voted six (6) to two (2) to recommend to Council that Ordinance No. 4-1991 be denied. Respectfully submitted, Daniel S. Dooley, Ex cutive Secretary Richmond Advisory Plan Commission +Ig10123-Ieg0 _Ieg0$ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING[ ON ORDINANCE NO.5-1991 [ Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Wayne County, Indiana will hold a public hearing on Monday, February 4, 1991 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Richmond Municipal Building located at 50 North 51h Street, on the following:[ ORDINANCE NO.5-1991 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 96 OF THE RICHMOND CITY CODE All parties interested in or affected by these Ordinances are invited to attend the public hearing to speak in favor of or in opposition to said Ordinance.[ Mary Merchanthouse[ City Clerk[ Publish Date: January 25, 1991 [== CITY OF RICHMOND of RicN�. 2 u Ji a SD NORTH FIFTH STREET RICHMOND, INDIANA 47374 TELEPHONE [317] 9B3-7237 January 16, 1991 DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Mary Merchanthouse City Clerk p FROM: Robert D. Wiwi R Director of Public Works FRANK H. WALTERMANN MAYOR ROBERT D. WIWI DIRECTOR OERARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RE: Request for revision of City Ordinance - Section 96.10(D)(1) COPY: Mayor Frank Waltermann Bill Smith T request that the permit fee to dig or make excavation in a city street, alley or sidewalk be increased. I recommend the increase be to $25.00. The present cost for a permit is $5.00. The fee was part of the ordinance as passed in 1961. The current cost to the city to process and follow-up on these excavations is much more than $5.00. 1 request that Common Council approve this revision. RDW/dk File, (WP)L375-91 DISPOSITION OF ORDINANCE NO. -�- .199 ( RESOLUTION NO. -199 by Common Council Ordinance No. 5— Resolution No. _ Elstro Lundy Brookbank Hankinson McBride Parker Morris Paust Hutton Date/-22-1! Susp, rules Ist read Title only ------------------------- Seconded ------ ---------- --------- -------- -------------- ------ ------ Proof of Publicaton ------------------------- Seconded ------ ---------- v --------- ------------------------------------- Move to 2nd read ---------------------- Seconded - ------ ----------------------------- Engrossment ------------------------- Seconded ------ ---------- ----------------------------------------------- Susp rules 3rd read ------------------------- Seconded ------ ---------- --------- -------- ---- ------------------------ Passage -----..... 0 OR-- ---- ------ - - - ------ ------- -------- ------- Rejection p Date Passed—OL-q - I COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: Committee Date Commitee Hearing Date Reassigned to Council Agenda PUBLICATION DA AMENDMENTS: COMMENTS: Inv. 012591--1 30000334 Form Prescribed by State Board of Accounts General Form No. 99 P (Rev, 1987) ........... city— of..Riq.hm.Q071City._Cler}: To ..... Palladium Publishing Corppration,,,,,,,,, Dr. (Governmental Unit) 1175 North A Street ..................................... Wayne............... County, Indiana .......... Richmond, Indiana 47374 .......................................................... PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Display Matter (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the advertisement is set) number of equivalent lines Head — number of lines ................. .......... Body -- number of lines IS .................. Tail — number of Iines 2 ............... Total number of lines in notice 22 COMPUTATION OF CHARGES ........22...... Iines, .... !7�nP........ columns wide equals .. Penes at ........211....... cents per line Additional charge for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) Charge for extra proofs of Publication ($1.50 for each proof in excess of two) TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column 8 ems Number of insertions ... .. 2........... equivalent ........................ Size of type 6 point Size of quad upon which type is cast ..... .............. I......... S ....4.6.4..... ......... Pursuant to the precisions and penalties of Ch. 155, Acts 1953, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount is � gally due, ter all ing a l�just cre 'ts, a at n art of the same has been paid. ......... ..... Date:....... 7ranga,1;y..2.$............... . 19.911. Tit .............................................. PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT State of Indiana ) .... Wayne ...... County) ss Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state, 2e'�ekaht2oh?ain g the undersigned,,,,,,,',,,,,,�ho, being duly sworn, says that he is ...... Cashier .......... of the Palladium -Item a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the English language in the (city) of Richmond, Indiana in state and county aforesaid, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly published in said paper for-1...... time ...... the dates of publication being as follows; ........................................... ........Janui3 y...25.r.... 19,9.1............................................................................. ............................................................................................................................ Subscribed rid sworn to before pe this ....28th....... day of ....January..... 19 91 ......... . IYbsemary Sheets Notary Public My commission expires ...... J.anUata:.y., 9,