HomeMy Public PortalAbout20161114_PC_PACKET.pdfPLANNING COMMISSION
Demery Bishop
Ron Bossick
Marianne Bramble
Tina Gann
John King
Charles Matlock
David McNaughton
A. Call to Order:
CITY MANAGER
Diane Schleicher
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
George Shaw
Planning Commission Meeting
AGENDA
November 14, 2016 — 7:00 p.m.
for City Council Meeting December 8, 2016 — 7.•00 p. m.
B. Consideration of Minutes:
1. Meeting of October 17, 2016
C. Disclosures/ Recusal:
D. Old Business:
CITY ATTORNEY
Edward M. Hughes
1. Text Amendment- to the Land Development Code to amend Sec. 3-080D to create a use table with
parking requirements and adjust parking requirements. Additionally to amend Sec. 2-010 Definitions
to add a definition of shopping center.
E. New Business:
Adjournment:
Lisa L. Schaaf
LOCATION: N/A
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: October 17, 2016
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 10, 2016
APPLICANT: City of Tybee Island
EXISTING USE: N/A
ZONING: N/A
COMMUNITY CHARACTER MAP: N/A
OWNER: N/A
PROPOSED USE: N/A
USE PERMITTED BY RIGHT: NIA
APPLICATION: Text amendment to Sec. 3-080 Off -Street parking requirements and Sec. 2-010 Terms and
definitions.
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting amend Sec. 3-080 (D) replacing existing list of requirements with more
extensive table of uses as well as adding a definition of shopping center to Sec. 2-010.
ANALYSIS: The purpose of this text amendment is to create a more extensive list of uses and to reduce some of
the current requirements to reflect the multimodal traffic patterns on the island.
STAFF FINDING
This amendment is designed to make parking requirements clearer and ease the parking restrictions for some uses.
Staff recommends approval.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Text amendment
1
This Staff Report was prepared by George Shaw.
Sec. 3-080. - Off-street parking requirements.
(A) In all zoning districts, handicapped parking shall be provided as required by the O.C.G.A. tit. 30,
Accessibility Code.
(B) Residential district parking requirements and residential off-street parking requirements. Off-street
parking facilities shall be provided and maintained on site for all buildings, structures or premises
being used in whole or in part for residential purposes, or for any other use permitted in residential
districts.
(1) Residential dwelling units. For every dwelling unit, there shall be provided at least two off-street
parking spaces. A caretaker's cottage is a separate dwelling unit and shall be provided at least
two off-street parking spaces.
(2) Nursing homes, hospitals. One parking space for each five patient beds, plus one space for
each staff doctor, plus one space for each employee on the largest shift.
(3) Theaters, auditoriums, gymnasiums and other places of assembly. One parking space for each
four seats provided in the main auditorium or for each 50 square feet of floor area available for
the accommodation of movable seats in the largest assembly room or area.
(4) Public and private elementary and secondary schools (except assembly halls, auditoriums and
gymnasium used in conjunction therewith). One parking space for each 200 square feet of
gross floor area devoted to such use.
(5) Private docks. At least two off-street parking spaces must be provided for any private dock
proposed for construction on a lot that has not been otherwise improved. In the event that a
private dock is proposed on a lot that has not been improved, the parking must be off-street (not
on city right-of-way) and pervious.
(C) Control of access to structures used for residential purposes including but not limited to single family,
duplex, triplex, two family, multifamily, townhomes, apartments, time shares, and condominiums
whether owner occupied or held for rental. In order to promote the safety of motorists and
pedestrians, the following regulations shall apply to all newly constructed driveways:
(1) A driveway opening which connects a lot with a public street shall not be greater than 25 feet in
width at the property line. Driveways that serve duplex lots shall not have a width greater than
15 feet per unit measured at the property line. This section is not intended to prevent the
installation of flared driveway ends. These flared ends, when constructed in accordance with
adopted standards and specifications, shall not count towards the width of the driveway.
(2) There shall be no more than two driveway openings on any lot of any width. The total of the
widths at the property line of two driveway openings shall not be greater than 25 feet.
(3) No driveway opening shall be constructed within 25 feet of an intersection, measuring from the
nearest improved portion of the right-of-way. However, in any instance where there is not
adequate space available and other access is not feasible, staff may permit a reduction in the
distance to an intersection from a driveway in order to permit safe access to the property
provided the speed limit on abutting or adjacent roads is 30 miles per hour or less.
(4) No curb on any city street or right-of-way shall be cut or otherwise altered without prior written
approval of the designated city official. Driveway requirements specified in this section,
notwithstanding, staff may issue a permit to a residential property owner to place approved
materials in the city right of way, provided the owner is informed and acknowledges that the city
will maintain the right to initiate any required action within the right of way and that permitting
materials in the right of way shall not create any vested rights in the property owner and such
permission may be terminated at any time. In addition, such permit by staff may only be made in
the event the improvement does not create a safety issue or interfere with city metered parking
and does not violate any city ordinance including, but not limited to, the requirements of section
3-165 to maintain 65 percent of the property setback area as greenspace. If the staff of the
Page 1
building and zoning department finds that a request under this section needs or should have
additional review for any reason, it may request review by the mayor and council or, if the staff
of the building and zoning department declines the applicant's request, the applicant may apply
for the granting of the permit which will result in the application going to the mayor and council.
However, before the mayor and council, a public hearing is not required but action may only be
taken at a public meeting of the mayor and council.
(5) For water quality purposes, all newly constructed driveways and replacements of more than 50
percent of existing driveways serving residential uses shall be constructed of materials
designed to allow retention of the first one inch of stormwater. A new driveway includes the
initial placement of any material on bare soil. Such new driveways and replacements of more
than 50 percent of an existing driveway are subject to permitting and inspection(s). A permit and
inspection(s) are also required for repair of less than 50 percent of an improved driveway. The
retention requirement is based on a 24-hour, 25 -year Tybee III SCS storm. A permit is required
for installation of a new or replacement driveway. An inspection is required of each layer prior to
the next layer being installed. The permit applicant shall be responsible for all engineering fees
incurred by the city for review of materials, even when a material is not approved. Acceptable
materials include:
a. Stone must be either AASHTO #57, #67, #78, or #89 open graded with no fines, or pea
gravel with no fines, or a combination of two or more. Graded aggregate base (also known
as "crusher run" or "crush and run") is not allowed.
b. Standard brick pavers are four -inch by eight -inch with minimum five -sixty -fourths -inch
average continuous joints/borders with eight one -eighth -inch wide spacers per paver filled
with masonry sand. See item (c) for base and header requirements. if larger bricks are
used, thereby creating less linear joint and surface area joint, calculations by a state
licensed design professional must be reviewed and approved by the city. See engineering
fee information in subsection (1).
c. Permeable interlocking concrete pavers (PICP) are solid structural units installed with
openings as described in the coastal stormwater supplement (CSS) through which
stormwater runoff can rapidly pass into the underlying reservoir of a four -inch minimum
depth open -graded stone, no fines. Openings may be filled only with pea gravel or larger
stone, or with masonry sand. A concrete header curb or paver/concrete block ribbon with a
maximum width of eight inches must be installed around the perimeter of the pavers.
Building foundations and garage floors may serve as a portion of the perimeter. The edge
of a paved road may not serve as a perimeter. Flush headers and ribbons are included in
the driveway measurements. To not be included in the driveway measurements a header
or ribbon must be installed lower than the driveway pavers, covered with adequate top soil,
and seeded or sodded to facilitate vegetation.
d. Ribbon driveway designs are normally constructed of concrete but other materials may be
considered. The ribbons are to be a maximum of 18 inches wide with a one to two percent
cross slope to route runoff to adjacent pervious areas rather than down the strips to the
street. The area between the strips may be either grass or stone as described in
subsection (a). The area between the drive strips is to be flush or one -eighth -inch below
the driving strip to encourage the percolation of stormwater runoff between the driving
strips.
Concrete grid pavers (CGP) are precast concrete units that allow rainfall and stormwater
runoff to pass through large openings that are filled with pea gravel, sand or topsoil and
turf. A concrete header curb or brick/concrete block ribbon with a maximum width of 12
inches (flush or one -eighth -inch higher than the contained permeable pavement) must be
installed around the perimeter of the permeable pavement. Building foundations and
garage floors may serve as a portion of the perimeter. The edge of a paved road may not
serve as a perimeter. Header and ribbons are included in the driveway measurements. To
not be included in the driveway measurements a header or ribbon must be installed lower
Page 2
than the driveway pavers, covered with adequate top soil, and seeded or sodded to
facilitate vegetation.
f. Plastic grid pavers (PGP) consist of flexible, interlocking plastic units that allow rainfall and
stormwater runoff to pass through large openings that are filled with gravel, sand or topsoil
and turf. A header curb is required and is included in the driveway measurement.
g. Pervious concrete (also known as porous concrete) is similar to conventional concrete in
structure and form, but consists of a special open -graded surface course, typically four to
eight inches thick, that is bound together with Portland cement.
h. Porous asphalt is similar to pervious concrete, and consists of a special open -graded
surface course bound together by asphalt cement.
For all other proposed materials, calculations are required from a state licensed design
professional demonstrating compliance with the retention requirement of this section.
(D) Commercial off-street parking. Off-street parking facilities shall be provided and maintained for all
structures or premises being occupied or used in whole or in part for commercial activity as follows:
With the submission of an application for a business license for either a new business or a
business that has expanded the occupancy load of the principle structure, changed use, or
created additional occupant loads through other structures where permitting has been required
by the city, a parking plan must be submitted with the application for approval by the designated
city official. If the plan represents significant changes in parking, the plan may be determined to
require site plan approval by the mayor and council.
spaG9 fer each four seats -h—ASP-d- emn —A maximum Seating capacity of 15 sq�are feet Der perr,
rooting square feetage ir.gh,dmng outdoor seating n
Commercial Parking Requirements
Use
Parking Requirement
Retail
1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area
Shopping center
1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area
Page 3
(2) For all uses, a rack able to accommodate eight bicycles may be substituted for one required
standard parking space based on the schedule below. The calculation to meet the handicap
parking requirement of subsection (A) shall be based on the number of required parking spaces
prior to any rack substitution.
Required Parking Spaces Number Of Substitute
Racks Allowed
10 or fewer 1
Page 4
1 space per every 6 seats based on a maximum seating of 15
square feet per person plus one space for every two employees.
Maximum seating capacity is calculated on entire seating area
Restaurants, bars, and similar
including outdoor seating
1 space per employee, one space for customer waiting area, two
Drive through business -no seating
spaces per walk up window
Miniature golf
1 space per 2 holes
1 space per guest unit
1 space per managers unit
1 space per 2 employees per busiest shift
1 designated delivery/loading zone
Associated retail or restaurant/bar parking requirements shall
be calculated at 50% of requirement as listed elsewhere in this
Hotel, motel
table
Grocery store
1 space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area
Office
1 space per 350 square feet of gross floor area
Assembly
1 space per 5 seats
Day Care
1 space per employee plus 2 additional spaces
Beauty salon/barber shop
1 space per chair plus one space per every 2 employees
1 space per 4 washing and/or drying machines plus 1 space per
Public laundromat
employee
Auto repair/service center
3 spaces per repair bay
Dry cleaner
1 space per employee plus 2 additional spaces
Parking requirements for uses not listed shall be determined by the Community Development Director
by determining most similar use
These requirements will only be applicable to new development or redevelopment after the date of
the second reading of this ordinance to be inserted here
(2) For all uses, a rack able to accommodate eight bicycles may be substituted for one required
standard parking space based on the schedule below. The calculation to meet the handicap
parking requirement of subsection (A) shall be based on the number of required parking spaces
prior to any rack substitution.
Required Parking Spaces Number Of Substitute
Racks Allowed
10 or fewer 1
Page 4
11-49 I 2
50 or more I 3
(3) Maritime district.
a. Parking shall be in conformance with the off-street requirements of the uses referenced in
this section and the required dimensions of section 3-090.
b. Dock operators must provide one parking space for every 20 linear feet of each side of
dock designated for recreational boaters. Docks leased to commercial boats must allow for
one space per boat, plus one space per crew member and one space per each four seats
for charter passengers.
c. All changes to parking in the maritime district that involve loading, unloading and
transporting of boats will require a parking plan submitted to the city detailing the turn radii
of drive aisles.
(E) Off-street parking dimensions.
Standard I Aisle Width Parking Angle Traffic Direction
I
8 x 20 feet 12 feet Parallel One-way
_ I _
8 x 20 feet 24 feet Parallel Two-way
9 x 18 feet 15 feet 45 degrees One-way
9 x 18 feet 18 feet 60 degrees One-way
9 x 18 feet 24 feet 60 degrees Two-way
9 x 18 feet 22 feet 75 degrees One-way
9 x 18 feet 24 feet 90 degrees One-way or Two-way
Low Speed Vehicles & Golf Carl
(without a charging station)
6 x 11 feet
Motorcycles & Scooters
5x9feet
Page 5
Dimensions
Angle
of angle parking spaces:
Distance from curb
15'
16'
Curb distance
Offset
15' - —
45
60
12' 7"
10'4"
9'
75
17'
9' 41'
41611
90
18'
9'
0
Curb distance
4--30.
Offset
(F) Exemptions from off-street parking requirements.
(1) Existing structures with 2,000 square feet or less of floor area that exist in a C-1 zoning district
may expand the floor area up to 4,000 square feet without having to meet the off-street parking
requirements as long as the structure is completely located within 1,000 feet of a municipal
parking lot.
(2) A structure whose primary use is a church or place of religious worship shall be exempt from all
off-street parking requirements.
(Ord. No. 2000-08, 2-11-2000; Ord. No. 1995-17, 12-7-1995; Ord. Correction to dates, amended
4-14-2005; Ord. No. 2004-12, amended 1-31-2005; Ord. No. 2004-10, amended 10-12-2004;
Ord. No. 2004-10, amended 6-10-2004; Ord. No. 2000-08,5-24-2000; Manual, amended 11-10-
1999; Ord. of 1-12-2006; Ord. No. 13-2011, 4-14-2011; Ord. No. 04A-2013, 2-14-2013; Ord.
Page 6
No. 18-2013, § 1, 5-23-2013; Ord. No. 03-2014, § 1, 1-9-2014; Ord. No. 28-2014, § 1, 4-10-
2014; Ord. No. 13B-2014, § 1, 8-14-2014; Ord. No. 07-A-2015 1 4-23-2015)
Page 7
Sec. 2-010. —Terms and definitions.
(B) Definitions. Specific definitions include the following:
Shopping center-- a group of two or more retail stores, service establishments and/or other businesses
which are adjacent to and utilize a common parking area. i he parcel is usually under single ownership
or unified management.
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
Meeting date: October 17, 2016
Project Name/Description: Sec. 3-080D & Sec. 2-010
Action Requested: Create table & adjust parking requirements and add definition of shopping
center
Special Review Subdivision:
Site Plan Approval Sketch Plan Approval _ Conceptual
Variance Preliminary Plan Approval
Map Amendment Final Plat Approval
Text Amendment X Minor Subdivision _ Major Subdivision
Petitioner has met all documentation requirements, all external approval requirements, and all
code requirements, except for the following:
COMMISSIONER
FOR
AGAINST COMMENTS
Bishop
Chair - absent
Bossick
X
Vice Chair
Bramble
absent
Gann
X
King
X
Second
Matlock
absent
McNaughton
X
Motion
The Planning Commission recommends: ❑ Approval ❑ Denial
Planning Commission Chair:
Planning & Zoning Manager:
® Continued
Date: i D --zo. _16
Date: Gb - �i-- /
PLANNING COMMISSION
Demery Bishop
Ron Bossick
Marianne Bramble
Tina Gann
John King
Charles Matlock
David McNaughton
CITY MANAGER
Diane Schleicher
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
George Shaw
Planning Commission Meeting
MINUTES
October 17, 2016
CITY ATTORNEY
Edward M. Hughes
Vice Chair Bossick called the October 17, 2016 Tybee Island Planning Commission meeting to order. Commissioners
present were John King, David McNaughton, Tina Gann and Ron Bossick. Commissioners absent were Demery Bishop,
Charles Matlock and Marianne Bramble.
Consideration of Minutes:
Vice Chair Bossick asked for consideration of September 19, 2016 meeting minutes. Commissioner McNaughton
made a motion to approve the minutes, Commissioner Gann seconded and the vote to approve was unanimous.
Disclosures/ Recusal:
Vice Chair Bossick asked if there were any disclosures or recusals, there were none.
Old Business:
Text Amendment -to the Land Development Code to amend Sec. 3-080D to create a use table with
parking requirements and adjust parking re uirements. Additionally to amend Sec. 2-010 Definitions to
add a definition of shopping „center:
Mr. Shaw stated he amended the previous ordinance to encompass what he believed to be all of the Planning
Commissions comments and changes. Commissioner McNaughton stated that his preference would be to wait
until everyone was present. Commissioner King asked Mr. Shaw if Gas Stations are treated as retail which he did
not see listed. Mr. Shaw stated yes because a stand-alone Gas Station almost never exist anymore and that is why
he did not put it in the list. He stated the two we have now are also convenience stores so they are treated as retail.
Commissioner McNaughton stated in the Shopping center definition the last sentence is not needed. Mr. Shaw
stated that he agrees and will strike that sentence. Commissioner McNaughton made a motion to continue for
consideration of changes until the November 14th Planning Commission meeting, Commissioner King seconded the
vote to continue was unanimous.
New Business:
Text Amendment -to the Land Develol2ment Code to remove Sec. 4-050H- TBR transitional business -
residential district and to amend Sec. 4-050F —C2 highway business district to allow for residential uses
by -right -and above commercia[ districts:
Mr. Shaw stated right now the City has a zoning district in the ordinance as TBR which is not on our zoning map, it
is described somewhat and as zoning administrator he was never comfortable with where it existed, and in his
opinion you can't have a zoning district that is not on your map if you have something zoned that way. He stated this
is neither an overlay or a district itself it is an interpretation that he is not comfortable with so he would like to
remove the TBR and make the R2 uses by right in the C2. Commissioner McNaughton stated that he does not
understand the second sentence at all. Mr. Shaw stated as an example a home occupation is allowed after special
review in R2 so if they want a home occupation in C2 that would also require special review. Commissioner King
asked if the idea of this new one is that they would use the C2 or the R2 setbacks if it was a residential use. Mr.
Shaw stated perhaps he should add that to be sure and that is an important point. Vice Chair Bossick asked if an
R2 comes in and it is in a C2 area will there have to be a buffer requirement. Mr. Shaw stated there is one in the C2
and he thinks that does need to be stated. Commissioner McNaughton made a motion to continue until the
November 14th Planning Commission meeting, Commissioner Gann seconded the vote to continue was unanimous.
Variance and Special Review -consideration of request to place materials in a marsh. Marsh Hen Trail
north side of Hwy 80 zone r2 in 4-0024-02-036 4-0024-02-034 4-0023-01-001 and 4-0022-01-001:
Mr. Shaw stated this is a continuation of our bike route and will be an off road portion from Byers to the base of
Lazaretto Creek the Trail will stop at Battery Row until the Bridge is fixed, which will have a bike lane. This was
approved by Planning Commission and City Council a couple years ago and DNR also approved the Marsh Buffer their
approval is good for 5 years where ours is only good for a year and has since expired. That is why this if before you
again. Commissioner Gann made a motion to approve, Commissioner McNaughton seconded and the vote to
approve was unanimous.
Commissioner McNaughton made the motion to adjourn and Commissioner King seconded, vote to adjourn
was unanimous.
Meeting adjourned 7:30pm
Lisa L. Schaaf
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
Meeting date: September 19, 2016
Project Name/Description: Section 3-080 C-2 Zone
Action Requested: new parking requirements
Special Review Subdivision:
Site Plan Approval Sketch Plan Approval _ Conceptual
Variance Preliminary Plan Approval
Map Amendment Final Plat Approval
Text Amendment X Minor Subdivision _ Major Subdivision
Petitioner has met all documentation requirements, all external approval requirements, and all
code requirements, except for the following:
COMMISSIONER
FOR
AGAINST COMMENTS
Bishop
Chair
Bossick
X
Vice Chair
Bramble
X
Se.condcd
Gann
Absent
King
X
Matlock
X
McNaughton
X
Made Motion
The Planning Commission recommends:
Planning Commission Chair:
Planning & Zoning Manager:
❑ Approval ❑ Denial ® Continued
Date:
Date:
PLANNING COMMISSION
Demery Bishop
Ron Bossick
Marianne Bramble
Tina Gann
John King
Charles Matlock
David McNaughton
CITY MANAGER
Diane Schleicher
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
George Shaw
Planning Commission Meeting
MINUTES
September 19, 2016 — 7:00 p.m.
CITY ATTORNEY
Edward M. Hughes
Chair Bishop called the September 19, 2016 Tybee Island Planning Commission meeting to order. Commissioners
present were Marianne Bramble, John King, Charles Matlock, David McNaughton and Ron Bossick.
Commissioner Gann was not present.
Consideration of Minutes:
Chair Bishop asked for consideration of August 15, 2016 meeting minutes. Commissioner Bramble made a
motion to approve the minutes, Commissioner King seconded, and the vote to approve was unanimous.
Disclosures/ Recusal:
Chair Bishop asked if there were any disclosures or recusals, there were none.
Old Business:
Chair Bishop asked if there were any old business, there were none.
New Business:
Text Amendment — Section 3-080 — off street parking requirements:
Mr. Shaw approached the commission and stated that City Council has expressed interest in changes to our C-2
parking requirements. The last time he went to City Council with Planning Commission's recommendation of no
changes, they decided to rethink this in another way. So he came up with a use table for all commercial properties
that expands the number of uses, he said he tried to think of as many uses as he could, on a couple of items he
reduced the parking requirements from what it currently is. Commissioner Bossick stated that Sec. D page 3 were
it talks about commercial off street parking it doesn't reference zoning only activity so does that mean any of those
homes on Laurel that are C-2 could open a surf shop without a review. Mr. Shaw stated yes, and it is his
understanding that all those homes on Laurel were offered the chance to not be commercial and they turned it down
so they should be aware that their neighbor could be a surf shop at any second. Planning Commission could put a
clause in there to require a review. Commissioner Bossick stated where it states commercial activity about
charging a fee for profit, does that mean short term rentals will fall into that category. Mr. Shaw stated that our
attorney Bubba Hughes opinion is because the transactions do not take place in the house that they are just
residences. Commissioner Matlock asked why the parking plan is marked out in D2. Mr. Shaw stated that he
could put it back in. Commissioner McNaughton asked since this reduces parking can the current businesses
under the current rule eliminate parking and add more space to the building. And he would like more definitions to
what staff listed as businesses. Mr. Shaw answered yes they would be able to eliminate parking and add on.
Commissioner Bramble stated this request is not in the proper line because in the next month we're going to be
looking at rezoning two parcels in the commercial district. Mr. Shaw stated that was last month. The October
meeting will have a text amendment allowing residential in the C-2 and if that passes the rezoning you approved last
month would be withdrawn. Commissioner Bramble commented this should be tabled and brought back after text
amendment. Chair Bishop commended Mr. Shaw on answering questions that the Planning Commission has had
with this proposal. He also stated in D-1 of the proposal is that Owner or Lease. Mr. Shaw stated he is looking at
the use of the building. Chair Bishop asked if retail could be struck out of the description. And also the drive
through business needs some tweaking. Mr. Shaw stated yes that could be done and he agrees. Commissioner
McNaughton asked what is the potential loss of public parking spaces. Mr. Shaw stated he was not sure but would
try to look into that. Chair Bishop stated that he
would like to see the changes that were raised tonight fixed and come back to them before they move forward with a
recommendation. Also there should be an applicable date added so current established businesses would not be able
to add on. Commissioner King stated that this proposal is a great start. Commissioner McNaughton made a
motion to continue till next month's meeting with the answers to our questions. Commissioner Bramble seconded,
the vote to continue was unanimous.
Text Amendment — request to amendment to the soil erosion, sedimentation and pollution control —
Article 15 — Section IV number 17:
Mr. Shaw stated that recently the state changed their marsh buffer rules, they brought it back so they want us to
change our soil erosion, sedimentation and pollution control amendment which is a model ordinance that the state
sends down to everyone, to reflect the change. The change is under Section IV number 17 and that spells out the
buffer requirements under state law. And we also have a marsh buffer in our ordinance in another section of the Land
Development Code. Commissioner McNaughton asked if they had to made changes to Tybee's code. Mr. Shaw
answered no Tybee uses the jurisdiction line to go off of. Commissioner Matlock made a motion to approve,
Commissioner Bramble seconded, the vote to approve was unanimous.
Mr. Shaw asked if the Planning Commission would like to change the November and December meetings to the third
week currently November is on the second week and December is on the third week. Commissioner Bossick
motioned to keep the November meeting on November 14th, and Commissioner McNaughton seconded, the vote
was unanimous. Chair Bishop stated that the five members that are here tonight do not have a problem with
December 191h meeting date so that date will stay the same, so no vote was needed.
Commissioner Bramble made the motion to adjourn and Commissioner King seconded, vote to adjourn was
unanimous.
Adjourned 8:00pm
Lisa L. Schaaf