Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout033-1989-APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE CUMMULATIVE CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUNDAN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE CUMMULATIVE CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 21-1987 created a Cumulative Capital Development Fund pursuant to Public Law 44-1984; and WHEREAS, I.C.36-9-16-2 allows the purchase, construction, equiping and maintenance of buildings for municipal purposes, including the acquisition of land and improvements thereon, the demolition of such improvements and preparation of such land and the acquisition, improvement or construction of land or rights -of way to be used as a public way or other means of ingress or egress to land acquired for the construction of a municipal building; WHEREAS, it has been determined that it is now necessary to appropriate more money than was appropriated in the annual budget: NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, WAYNE COUNTY, INDIANA: SECTION 1. That for the expenses of said municipal corporation the following additional sums of money are hereby appropriated and set apart out of the fund named and for the purposes specified. Said sum being subject to the laws governing the same. AMOUNT AMOUNT BEQUESTED APPROPRIATED CUMMULATIVE CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND $200,000. $200,000. These funds are to be appropriated for the following: 3000-Other Services and Chrges AMOUNT APPROPRIATED $200,000. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval by the Mayor and is subject to the laws of the State of Indiana governing emergency appropriations. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana this -31 day of 1989, President of Common Council ATTEST: 22?,'�i J City CIA PRESENTED by me to the Mayor of the City of Richmond, Indiana this day of ,1989. _ Gtit� City Clerk APPROVED by me, Frank H. Waltermann, Mayor of the City of . hmond, Indiana this ML-6L .—Lday of 1989. ayor Ordinance No. 33-1989 (4A) ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION AND TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Richmond, Wayne County, Indiana, hereby certify to the Auditor of Wayne County that the attached is a complete transcript of the proceedings had with respect to additional appropriations adopted by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Wayne County, Indiana at a meeting held on July 3, 1989. Mary Me6bhantfiouse City Clerk EXCERPTS OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMON ( QL!NCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA The Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana, met in regular session in the Council Chambers in the Municipal Building of said City on July 3, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. Councilmember Hutton presided with the following members present: Councilmembers: Elstro, Lundy, Brookbank, Hankinson, McBride, Morris, and Paust. Absent: Parker The following business was had to -wit: (OTHER BUSINESS HAD) The Clerk presented Proof of Publication of Notice to Taxpayers printed in the Richmond Palladium Item, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Richmond, Indiana, on the date of June 16 1989. Said notice stated that a public hearing would be held on the 3rd day of July, 1989, by the Common Council to consider additional appropriations in excess of the budget for the year 1989 within the City of Richmond, Indiana. The Proof of Publication was examined and found to be in order. Councilmember Morris moved the Proof of Publication be received and filed, seconded by Councilmember McBride and on unanimous voice vote the motion was carried. The Clerk read on second reading Ordinance No. 33-1989, President Hutton announced Ordinance No. 33-1989 was on public hearing. After hearing all persons present, Ordinance No. 33-1989 was placed on final passage or rejection and on a calf of the roll the following was recorded: Ayes: Elstro, Lundy, Brookbank, Hankinson, McBride, Morris, Paust and Hutton Nays: None Absent: Parker The vote being 8 to 0 in favor of the passage of Ordinance No. 33-1989. (OTHER BUSINESS HAD) There being no further business, on a motion duly made, seconded and passed the meeting was adjourned. /s/ Sarah L. Hutton President of Common Council Dept of Finance August, 1984 Form 103 City of Richmond Additional Appropriation From Fund Balance Council Action Required (For use by Finance Dept Only) Fund: CC�� Dept: W-/W& From: TO: A/C Amt $ oi00, OOy $ Reason & Source of. Funds:����_ City Controller Assigned Ord #: J 3 U/9V3 Council Agenda Date: �2 Passed by Council: SBTC Approval: Posted to Budgetary: By: ff5ZOo ril :E, 1, City„i x:CnMotid 7�0�rth RiFtn �tre" R C: alc)nv. 'N 4 3 i Ylrs. Rita Stout Dear airs, Stout: The following construction, condition and recommendation reports on tl?e City Hall and Firehouse 41)' are below per your request. Richmond Citv Hail Car�struction i, Decking is primarily structural concrete with 20 gage Steal ar7t�ytu rr perimeters. Z. First root insulation is 3 inch perlite applied in cold adhesive. 3. Roof membrane is organic 3-4 p1v asphalt built up riu+f. l I o! i 4. Surfacing is asphalt and gravel over concrete decking, smooth surface asphalt only around perimeters. Second Insj.:lation 1 /? inch urethane slip sheet loose laid. Mechanically attached Gates EPD 4. Condition 1, Continual leak problem as early as 1983. Leaking currentiv. 2. 1985 Sd NIRH wind severely damaged sheet. EPDNI roof membrane has been ripped away from the metal batten strips that hold the roof membrane to the roof deck. J. When the membrane ripped away from the batten strips almost all of the seams opened up at the perimeters. All seams have been repaired at least once, many have been repaired 3-4 times and have reopened again. 4. Severe water entry into the system has allowed the metal batten strips to rust and disintegrate completely in many areas. This lack, of attachment is of severe risk to the City. 0 FZ5500o �. Severe water entr}" into both rocfind s�:stems has saturated thy, roe t insulation creating severe heat loss conditions where the wet insulation conducts heating and coolie; dollars instead of insulating tile!'?. �. Trapped Grater into ,oth roofing systems is causing SLrUCLUCaI deCkin'a damage. Even on dr< days water continues to seep out through cracks in the deck dripping :gut in front f door ways below. deter freezing cc>rdititans will spail and crack this concrete. If a spalling situation occurs over tlZese doorways, allowing falling concrete to fall onto people below, liability becomes a big question. Continual ;yet conditions will continue rusting of the structural steel reinforcements further cracking the concrete. Structural deck repair is extremely expensive and difficult. Degree of damage is not able to be determined until boLh roofing systems are removed, Leak damage inside is w°ettirg asbestos sprayed on fireproofing causing it to dry and faii down onto suspended drop ceiling tiles. ASiseSLOS exposure rl'gks are increased significantly from, exposure risk calculated iil Jrigin 'ai Stub"-, Q. Leal damage into the board room has ruined many ceiling L.les and Rill continue. 1Ianv tether leak areas continually ruin ceiling tiles as';ell. Leaks in other areas of the building are damaging plaster ceiling structures and peeling paint off the wall. 10, Leaks into permanent light fixtures' inside « outside' are creating easy opportunities for short circuiting of these and other electrical systems w-iLhin the buildirigi alarm syste.ms, coillputers, light banks. ...etc, E. 11. Screws attaching the metal batten strips into the root- structure are loosening and backing out from their original positions puncturing the single ply EPDA4 membrane allowing water in from this point as well. Additionally the batten strips are expanding and buckling up popping more seams open. 12. A critical structural support for the radio tower has been ripped out of the roof system and structural deck significantly reducing tower stability. 13- Approximately- 50 of the seams on the roof membrane have opened. many now because of the amount of water trapped within the system. Hot summer days are Going to cause this water to vaporize creating internal Pressure resulting in blisters which will stress the sheet and open more seams in the system, 14. Concrete pavers have been placed in the middle of the roof to help prevent this root from blowing off. However, around the perimeters, evidently. support capabilities are not sufficient to allow for the pavers_ This roof is going to blow off at the perimeters if another large windstorm occurs. Repaired areas have already torn away from the edge again. The original s M f755ZOo ^eritneter attachment was ver7 inadequate. This anpears to ha —a been a design and application problem. Ti,is entire roof has been constantly- patched and complete - incapabte of nerforming as intended waterproofing function. \ecci merldatlon 1. Complete removal off both roofing systems down to the structural decll,ing is the only sound roof decision based on current construction and conditions. 2. Installation of a new roofing system and new insutation €11=15 'that can meet the rooting requirements of this situation. Budget $1,70,000-i90,000 FfreMuse,�, 1. M a d-,I oYimately 1 5/I 1 ch fib glass i su on. 3. 4 ply asp at Wit up oot h asphal and g z-a s rfa 4II. Waf sh, gs co , pris I Itiple f ashing f ts. i,ondition 1. Leafs prey by at front -all of liv, ,g om w tere .>f is splitting out along gravel stop/ sci . Z. rreviouS 1 ak epa" at east cor r of rooea. 3. ore cuts eve e f damental x -Aructicn rob .s. Be z r_ he bottom (' stip and e top re e t s. In rply m pi Q rere Ytremelt; heavy!appr 80-1 1 G per 1 sq. t. wher 22 b.. is re- m ende This heavy a e ion of sp It is d becau enera 1v a we s =stem strength is hie ieadi o prem t littin It a pe s that p a,e construct.o pr• bably ccur ed wh. h.is a recom e ed roofing pi c a Usually _° en this happe only th fi sL ply ,s constr• ed at the time leaving t e s -stein open to' 'eathe ibefore uonst Usig the remaining 3 O UMdzoo three plie It is mue. beta r to 6, nstruct all 'cur plies the same t.i to tc ep malstu :tom jettt o In to �' den th p er fel s b 'ore fin i ping the at .lication. �'. iiliSt?rS are reSe it 1nCllCating 1 'u e 1S ore. nt In t11 fC}(iIl n syste . These blister -iil split au 4ver tll] . The iesence of isture also LellS us at we! InSUi tlIl IS vsenL 1 J he'• t loss Lhrougl 1heS�- w aL areas al 1 1ng damage. 5. Ridgi, of th v bra e is also occurr ng ' eating that his of system is old nd the and no onaer has th fl xibi 'ty to acc pt the ,ail= stresses withou suckling up_ Spli 'ng proble are nor allt, t e next result. n. Ar s of the of membrane ha e lost 4 -60% of the w- erprooting layers ram r/Uurai athering. 1. Re a immediate lea areas. Budget $i, (lG onsider replacement du to age, co struction problem, and current t c r_ ' ion with another built up r f. Budget $24 WO 3. able roof cons would b� very expensive and is not practical due to b 'dine desi!R Rita. I realize this report is lengthy, if you have any questions pie -use cal!. Best Regards. r David L. Hart Field Advisor Tremco. Inc. 4 DISPOSITION OF ORDINANCE NO. -3.3 -i9s 7 RESOLUTION NO. -198 by Common Council Ordinance No.33 Resolution No. _ Elstro Lundy Brookbani Hankinson McBrica Parkei Hutton Paust Morris Date -1.2 Susp. rules Ist read Title only ------------------ Seconded ------ ------ -------- ---------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ --- Proof of Publiicaton ------------------ Seconded ------ ------ -------- ---------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- Move to 2nd read ---- Seconded ------ ------ -------- Engrossment Seconded -------- ---------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- Susp rules 3rd read ----------------- Seconded ------ ------ -------- ---------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---------- Passage ----- ---------- ------- ------ ------- Rejection ------ - - Date Passed 7 -J —S-7 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: Committee Date Commitee Hearing Date Reassigned to Council Agenda PUBLICATION DATES: -,p 9 AMENDMENTS: COMMENTS: Snv. 061689-1 3000.0334 Form Prescribed by State Board of Accounts General Form N.. 99 P (Rev. 1987) Gity,,,Af„RiC,t1;t}and,- ty,,,,GlAYX,,,,,,,,,,,,, To ..... :.............. Palladiu... ....Pub.lis...hing Corporation......... Dr. .... (Governmental Unit) 1175 North A Street . Wayne ............... county,Indiana ,Richmond: Indiana 47374 PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Display !Matter (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the advertisement is set) _ number of equivalent lines Head — number of lines """""...3..•""" Body — number of lines ..........4.2 • • • • • • • • • Tail — number of lines ............. Z.... • • • • • Total number of lines in notice " ..........4.7.......... COMPUTATION OF CHARGES ......4.x......... lines, .......9.3.0..... columns wide equals ......4.7........ equivalent lines at ........2 4.3........ cents per line Additional charge for notices containing rule or tabular work ........................ (50 per cent of above amount) Charge for extra proofs of vublication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) ........................ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $ "g 9 2'•""""•" DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column 8 ems Number of insertions ...1.... Size of type 6 point Size of quad upon which type is cast Pursuant to the procisions and penalties of Ch. 155, Acts 1953, I hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount is 1 all due, fter lowi all ju ,credits and th part of the same has been paid. Date:..... June...20........................ , 19 ..a-9 Title ................................Cashier.................... PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT State of Indiana ) ...... Wayne ...... County) ss Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state, Rebekah Ro �i Cashier the undersigned ................................ o, being duly sworn, says that�te is ................ of the Palladium -Item a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the English language in the (city) of Richmond, Indiana in state and county aforesaid, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly published in said paper for- - ...... time...... the dates of publication being as follows: ........................................... _...IT+�.. �.g.,.... 1 9.$g.......,............................................................................. ................................._........................................................... _ _...... _......,........... Subscribed a� oorr �o before me this ........2.0.t* k.........dday of �...... JJ�1.li0_....... 19 .. .9 .............. .... ..��..��CC. r �C .. ..�7/�GlG,2� [a aei•••••....................... Vi inia C. Coleman Notary Public My commission exiresl..2.4.,....1.3.9.1....