Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20170209AmendedPacket.pdf AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF TYBEE ISLAND CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 9, 2017 7:00PM Please silence all cell phones during Council Meetings I. Consideration of Items for Consent Agenda 6:30PM II. Executive Session III. Opening Ceremonies 1 Call to Order 2 Invocation: Ken Douberly, St Michael’s 3 Pledge of Allegiance IV. Recognitions and Proclamations 1 Rising TYde Food Pantry 2 Tybee Island Post Office – Don Hamilton and David Clark 3 Arbor Day V. Consideration of the approval of the minutes of the regular meetings of the Tybee island City Council 1 City Council Minutes, January 12, 2017 with attachments VI. Consideration of Boards, Commissions and Committee Appointments 1 Master Plan Implementation Committee (15 seats available) i. Sue Bentley ii. Alan Robertson iii. Amy Gaster iv. Dottie Kluttz v. Keith Gay vi. Charlene Grissom VII. Reports of Staff, Boards, Standing Committees and/or Invited Guest. Limit reports to 10 minutes. 1 Duane McClain, Morehouse, Promotional Specialist 2 Julia Pearce, Donations for Sister City, Africa VIII. Citizens to be Heard: Please limit comments to 3 minutes. Maximum allowable times if 5 minutes. IX. Consideration of Approval of Consent Agenda X. Public Hearings XI. Consideration of Local Requests & Applications – Funding, Special Events, Alcohol License 1 Tybee Time Inc., dba Tybee Time Bar, Alcohol License Request: Sunday Sales XII. Consideration of Bids, Contracts, Agreements and Expenditures 1 Request approval of the First Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with GEFA regarding the city’s cost for the Test of Deep Aquifer Production for Abatement of Saltwater Intrusion. Increase of $115,100. Budget line Item: TBD – Sewer Department Reimbursement 2 2017 Memorandum of Agreement: Tybee Island Information (Info) Hut Partnership 3 Request City Council’s approval to apply for grant proceeds from the Georgia Emergency Management Agency under their 404 and 406 Hazard Mitigation Program. 4 Marsh Hen Trail: Consider revising the scope of the project to eliminate the costly bridge element from Hwy 80 to the Marsh Hen Trail Railroad Bed and approach the trail through the 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 1 of 226 20170209/jrl existing GDOT ROW and City ROW for connectivity. Engineering cost estimates from Thomas & Hutton to re-design, apply for GDOT encroachment permits and bid out is $18,500. XIII. Consideration of Ordinances, Resolutions 1 Resolution to Approve the Application for a GDNR Coastal Incentive Grant for the second phase of the Carrying Capacity Study 2 Second Reading, 2017-3A, Alcohol Consumption XIV. Council, Officials and City Attorney Considerations and Comments 1 Bubba Hughes i. North Beach Grill Lease and Update 2 Barry Brown i. FEMA restrictions with Placement of Hand Dryer ii. Marsh Hen Trail 3 Wanda Doyle i. Extend complimentary parking after 5:00PM through the month of February XV. City Manager’s Report XVI. Minutes of Boards and Committees 1 Development Authority/Main Street BOD Minutes, December 21, 2016 2 Historic Preservation Commission, Minutes November 21, 2016 3 Ethics Commission Minutes, December 12, 2016 XVII. Executive Session 1 Discuss litigation, personnel and real estate acquisition XVIII. Possible vote on litigation, personnel and real estate acquisition discussed in executive session XIX. Adjournment *PLEASE NOTE: Citizens wishing to speak on items listed on the agenda, other than public hearings, should do so during the citizens to be heard section. Citizens wishing to place items on the council meeting agenda must submit an agenda request form to the City Clerk’s office by Thursday at 5:00PM prior to the next scheduled meeting. Agenda request forms are available outside the Clerk’s office at City Hall and at www.cityoftybee.org. THE VISION OF THE CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND “is to make Tybee Island the premier beach community in which to live, work, and play.” THE MISSION OF THE CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND “is to provide a safe, secure and sustainable environment by delivering superior services through responsible planning, preservation of our natural and historic resources, and partnership with our community to ensure economic opportunity, a vibrant quality of life, and a thriving future.” 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 2 of 226 20170209/jrl PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, on Friday, October 7th and Saturday October 8th, 2016 the City of Tybee Island and Chatham County were hit with Category 2 hurricane winds and significant flooding from Hurricane Matthew; and WHEREAS, the volunteers of the Rising TYde Community Food Pantry volunteered their time and efforts to raise money for those in our community who were hardest hit by the hurricane; and WHEREAS, thanks to the assistance of Rising TYde, many in our community were able to recover from the storm more quickly and completely; and WHEREAS, Rising TYde has been and continues to be an important part of the fabric of our community thanks to their ongoing efforts to assist those amongst us most in need; and WHEREAS, the City of Ty bee Island wishes to honor the Tybee Island Rising TYde Community Food Pantry and recognizes its Board of Directors for their efforts in lending critical aid to families in need in the wake of Hurricane Matthew; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I Jason Buelterman and members of the Tybee Island City Council declare the week of January 23rd to January 27th 2017 as “Rising TYde Community Food Pantry Week” on Tybee Island and urge our resident’s to thank their dedicated Board members and volunteers for their support during Hurricane Matthew. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereto set my hand and cause the seal of the City of Tybee Island to be affixed this 17th day of January 2017. _________________________ Jason Buelterman, Mayor Tybee Island, Georgia 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 3 of 226 20170209/jrl PROCLAMATION Arbor Day WHEREAS, Arbor Day was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska on 1972; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderated the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen and provide habitat for wildlife; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products; and WHEREAS, trees in our city increase the property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, caring for and preserving our natural environment is the responsibility of every citizen; NOW THEREFORE, I, Jason Buelterman, Mayor of the City of Tybee Island, do hereby proclaim, Friday, April 28, 2017 as Arbor Day on Tybee Island and urge all citizens to support the City of Tybee’s efforts to care for the island’s trees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby set my hand and cause the seal of the City of Tybee Island be affixed this 9th day of February 2017. _____________________ Jason Buelterman, Mayor City of Tybee Island 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 4 of 226 20170209/jrl City Council Minutes 20161027 Consideration of Items for Consent Agenda Mayor Buelterman called the consent agenda to order at 6:30PM on January 12, 2017. Those present were Julie Livingston, Monty Parks, John Major, Wanda Doyle, Barry Brown and Bill Garbett. Also attending were Diane Schleicher, City Manager; Bubba Hughes, City Attorney; George Shaw, Director, Community Development; and Janet LeViner, Clerk of Council. Mayor Buelterman listed the following items on the consent agenda: • Minutes, Special City Council Meeting November 30, 2016, As Amended • Minutes, Special City Council Meeting, December 6, 2016 • Minutes, City Council Meeting, December 8, 2016 • Minutes, Special City Council Meeting, December 21, 2016 • Beachview Bed and Breakfast: Beer/Wine/Liquor – Sunday Sales by Drink for Consumption on Premises Only, 2017. Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing approved for 2017 on December 8, 2016 • Intergovernmental Hold Harmless Agreement, Conditional Approval of Private Property Debris Removal • North Beach Parking Lot Post Hurricane Restoration Project. Discussion: The Infrastructure Committee recommended approval. Ms. Livingston asked Ms. Schleicher to bring to the next council meeting the plan for the parking lot to show sidewalks, etc. Ms. Schleicher confirmed. • Water Line Replacement Project: Request for extended work hours (some night time work during the weekdays) for this Public Works Project during the months of January, February, March and April of 2017 in order to get the section of the water line in the parking lane on Highway 80 from the Curve to the North Campbell intersection before the GDOT resurfacing project begins this spring. Discussion: Mayor Buelterman asked Ms. Schleicher to get a written paving schedule from the Department of Transportation to ensure paving is completed prior to the summer season. Ms. Schleicher confirmed. • Resolution, Conditional approval of Private Property Debris Removal • Second Reading, 2017-02-Sec 3-080, Off-Street Parking Mayor Buelterman called the regular meeting to order at 7:00PM. All those present for the consent agenda were present. Opening Ceremonies • Call to Order • In Memorial 2016 • Invocation Susan Hill • Pledge of Allegiance Recognitions and Proclamations Post Office, Tybee Island, GA. Deferred to February 2017 Consideration of Boards, Commissions and Committee Appointments (ballots attached) Tybee Island Planning Commission (3 seats open). • Marianne Bramble (re-appointment) • John Branigin 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 5 of 226 20170209/jrl " Charles Matlock (re-appointment) " David McNaughton (re-appointment) " Alan Robertson Jan LeViner, Clerk, read the results of the vote: " Marianne Bramble receiving 3 votes " John Branigin receiving 2 votes " Charles Matlock receiving 4 votes " David McNaughton receiving 5 votes " Alan Robertson receiving 5 votes Mayor Buelterman voted in the affirmative for Charles Matlock. Bill Garbett made a motion to approve Charles Matlock, David McNaughton and Alan Robertson for the Planning Commission. John Major seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6-0. Downtown Authority/Main Street BOD (2 seats open) (Ballots attached) " Sarah Bernzott " Marianne Bramble Jan LeViner, Clerk, read the results of the vote. Each candidate received 6 votes. Bill Garbett made a motion to approve Sarah Bernzott and Marianne Bramble to the Downtown Authority/Main Street BOD. John Major seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6-0. Ethics Commission (4 seats open) (Ballots attached) " Katherine Garlington (re-appointment) " Michael Pappas (re-appointment) " Lynda Stoller " Frances Kay Strickland (re-appointment) " Sheldon Tenenbaum Jan LeViner, Clerk, read the results of the vote: " Katherine Garlington receiving 5 votes " Michael Pappas receiving 5 votes " Lynda Stroller receiving 4 votes " Frances Kay Strickland receiving 5 votes " Sheldon Tenenbaum receiving 4 votes Mayor Buelterman voted in the affirmative for Sheldon Tenenbaum. John Major made a motion to approve Katherine Garlington, Michael Pappas, Frances Kay Strickland and Sheldon Tenenbaum to the Ethics Commission. Julie Livingston seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6-0. Reports of Staff, Boards, Standing Committees and/or Guests Meredith Lipton, CPA, Partner of Maudlin & Jenkins, LLC approached Mayor and Council to present the annual June 30, 2016 audited Financial Statements to the City Council. Ms. Lipton stated Mayor and Council have received a copy of the Audit and gave a brief summary and complimented Ms. Hudson for her work with the budget and managing City funds. Ms. Lipton explained the Fund Balance is at $8.1M which is strong and would be a 10 month reserve. There was a short discussion regarding future accounting practices of the Municipal Court which once in place will ensure proper record keeping. Ms. Lipton congratulated the City as there were no other findings or recommendations. Mayor and Council thanked Ms. Hudson and her staff for all their hard work. Sarah Jones and Chantel Morton approached Mayor and Council to give an overview on Historic Preservation which includes the Resources Survey for Phase I and II. Ms. Morton 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 6 of 226 20170209/jrl stated that Surveys can be found at City Hall and Tybee Island Library. Ms. Jones gave a brief presentation on “Why We Focus on Preservation”. She explained that preservation gives a sense of place for our citizens and provides economic stability. Mayor Buelterman thanked Ms. Jones and Ms. Morton. John Branigin approached Mayor and Council to speak in opposition of the proposed Ordinance, 2017-3, Alcohol Consumption (attached). He expressed his concerns with the enforcement of the proposed ordinance as currently other ordinances are in place which needs to be enforced. Mayor Buelterman responded this is a result of not only past shootings but bad behavior during the spring break months. Recommendations were brought forward in the past to ban alcohol consumption which were not acted upon. He stated the does not have an issue with spring breakers but does not want the City to become a spring break destination. His main concerns are with Orange Crush. Mayor Buelterman stated he wants to stop Orange Crush and is open to other recommendations. Mr. Branigin responded that according to Chief Bryson, alcohol is not a problem with Orange Crush; it is guns, drugs and lewd behavior. He recommended that aggressive and effective enforcement of the current ordinances will send a message that Tybee Island will not tolerate bad behavior. Mayor Buelterman thanked Mr. Branigin for his recommendations. Kathryn Williams approached Mayor and Council to commend Angela Hudson and staff on a positive 2017 Audit Report. Ms. Williams stated in the past there were numerous reportable conditions regarding the audit and with the current Finance Director and Staff there is a tremendous improvement. She would like to commend Ms. Hudson, the City Manager and staff for their diligence and attention to these matters. Mayor Buelterman thanked Ms. Williams. Monty Parks made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Wanda Doyle seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6-0. Public Hearings 1113 Venetian Drive, Minor Subdivision: Combine 3 lots and subdivide into 2 lots. Zone R-2; PIN 4-0012-01-001; Christopher and Melissa Freeman. Mr. Shaw approached Mayor and Council explaining the proposed Minor Subdivision. He stated it is the petitioners desire to combine three lots and then subdivide into two. He indicated the Planning Commission unanimously approved this request and Staff supports as well. Mr. Major confirmed this has previously been before Mayor and Council as the variance request has expired and the plat was not recorded. Mr. Shaw stated this will now become an implied variance in regards to the second lot and the only requirements the owner(s) would have to meet are the set-back requirements with new construction. Barry Brown made a motion to approve. John Major seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6-0. Text Amendment: Sec 3-090, Schedule of Development Regulations to address height limitations. Mayor Buelterman stated it is his understanding the Planning Commission is requesting the proposed ordinance be continued. Ms. Doyle commended the Planning Commission for their due diligence. Monty Parks made a motion to send back to the Planning Commission for additional review. Barry Brown seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6- 0. Consideration of Bids, Contracts, Agreements and Expenditures Bid #2016 – 691, Repairs to Gymnasium Building; Budget Line Item Number: 100-00-11-1999. Diane Schleicher stated this is being withdrawn as a separate roof bid is 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 7 of 226 20170209/jrl being done. Mayor Buelterman asked if there was any hurricane damage. Ms. Schleicher responded that the damages to the gym building are due to the hurricane. She also confirmed this is eligible for reimbursement. Mayor pro tem Brown stated the roof is leaking every time it rains. Withdrawn, No Action Taken Consideration of Ordinances, Resolutions Resolution, Comcast, Franchise Agreement. Mayor Buelterman asked Mr. Hughes for a clarification. Mr. Hughes stated Comcast is currently paying the 5% franchise fee for video service in addition to the cable service. The City is not currently in their franchise territory under their State Certificate and this will be a benefit to the City as it will increase revenue. Wanda Doyle made a motion to approve. Monty Parks seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6- 0. First Reading, 2017-A-03, Sec 6-8, Alcohol Consumption. Ms. Doyle stated the current Tybee Island Police Department is doing the best possible job they can but with the influx of Orange Crush and spring breakers on the beach and parking lots it is extremely hard to control the people. She does not recommend a ban of alcohol on the beach but does recommend hiring qualified officers which can be sworn in and write tickets. Mr. Major expressed his concerns with not banning alcohol and feels restricting alcohol is worth trying. He supports the banning of alcohol on the beach. Mayor Buelterman commended Chief Bryson for his diligence in finding officers to work during Orange Crush to ensure public safety and crowd control. Mayor pro tem Brown recommended stopping access to the Island when capacity is reached to help with traffic. Mr. Garbett spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance and recommended moving forward with the control of alcohol consumption. Mr. Major expressed his concerns with the size of the permitted container. Ms. Doyle stated she contacted several establishments and they use 16 oz. containers. Mr. Parks stated his preference would be the proposed ordinance is amenable to everyone. Ms. Livingston expressed her concerns as this could be a bad time for the businesses with a possible ban, as the events could move to Memorial Park or other City parks and away from their establishments. She stated Mayor and Council cannot continue to do nothing. Other venues have put a ban in place to deter this behavior which will alleviate problems and hopefully avoid a tragedy. Mr. Garbett stated the proposed ordinance does not ban alcohol from public parks, parking lots, streets and public beaches. Bill Garbett made a motion to approve as amended to include parking lots adjacent to the beaches; to change the container size to 18 oz.; and to extend through the first Saturday in May (March, April and through the first Saturday in May). John Major seconded. Discussion: Mayor pro tem Brown recommended more law enforcement; do not allow visitors on the Island when parking is at capacity; and no parking on Butler Avenue which will give better police presence. Voting in favor were Julie Livingston, John Major and Bill Garbett. Voting against were Monty Parks, Wanda Doyle and Barry Brown. Mayor Buelterman voting in the affirmative, motion passed 4-3. First Reading, 2017-05, Sec 23-1, Ethics. Mr. Hughes stated there are significant changes which include the positions Mayor and Council control: City Attorney; City Judge; Clerk and City Manager. Changes were made in regards to procedures which is included in the red-line version in their packets before them. Mr. Hughes stated everyone is subject to the same standard of behavior and the distinction is where the complaint is directed. Complaints against City employees are directed the City Manager and not to the Ethics Commission. He continued, the only complaints that are heard by the Ethics Commission are Mayor and Council, City Attorney, City Manager, Judge and City Clerk. Mayor Buelterman asked if attorney fees would not be subsidized by the City. Mr. Hughes confirmed. Danny Hill approached Mayor and Council to answer questions. Mr. Hill made reference to the memorandum sent to Mayor 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 8 of 226 20170209/jrl and Council outlining changes which is included in the packet before them. He made reference to the time of year complaints could be filed and it is the recommendation of the Ethics Commission there not be any time of the year ethics complaints cannot be filed. Delay would deny the public knowledge of any pending ethics violation. Another recommendation from the Ethics Commission is any member of another organization will be allowed to serve on the Commission. There might be an occasion when a member of the Ethics Commission would recuse themselves from a complaint and would be considered on a case by case basis. Mr. Hill stated the Ethics Commission also recommended that neither the party initiating the complaint nor the respondent shall seek compensation or be granted compensation from the City for their legal fees and expenses. Mr. Major asked Mr. Hughes for clarification of the payment of legal fees. Mr. Hughes stated due to the City being responsible for legal fees in the past and not being addressed, it was recommended clarification is needed. By definition, unethical behavior is outside the scope of the responsibility of the office. Ms. Doyle expressed her disappointment in the proposed changes as she will not support the proposed ordinance as written. Ms. Livingston commended the Ethics Commission for their work but feels the Commission can be used in the negative. In researching other municipalities that have ethics ordinances, they have black-out dates, which would be used as a tool to possibly affect an election. Ms. Livingston would like black-out dates included in the proposed ordinance. Mr. Major supports black-out dates. Mr. Hill disagrees with a black-out period as an ethics claim needs to be heard when it is filed and not postponed until after the election cycle. Mr. Major disagreed as someone could file an inaccurate charge which could affect the election. Mr. Hill clarified that with the proposed ordinance there is a section that allows for an informal meeting to discuss the charge prior to it going forward. Mayor pro tem Brown asked Mr. Hill if there was consequences for anyone filing an inaccurate charge which could possibly affect a council member. Mr. Hill responded no. Mayor Buelterman thanked Mr. Hill for his hard work. He recommended putting a cap on legal fees; window which would be longer than qualifying through election; and clarification of recusals if membership in political actions groups. Mr. Major questioned if an ethics charge could be filed during the election cycle against a non-candidate. Mayor Buelterman clarified it could be filed but not accepted during the black-out window if it is the will of Mayor and Council. After a short discussion, Mayor Buelterman recommended acceptance of the changes as written but amend to provide for a window when those officials who are up for election are not subject to complaints for a certain window of time. He feels the window should be broader than qualification through the second Tuesday in November. Mr. Major supports a cap on legal fees and should only be paid for those who had a complaint filed against them. Mayor and Council agreed. John Major made a motion to approve as written with the following amendments: (1) a time frame in included in which ethics complaints cannot be filed against those city officials who are running for office, 30 days prior to qualification until election day; and (2) legal fees be covered for the city official against whom the complaint has been filed with a cap of $5,000. Monty Parks seconded. Discussion: Ms. Schleicher confirmed the proposed ordinance applies to all City committee members who might qualify for office. Mayor Buelterman confirmed. Mr. Hughes stated the benefit of the black-out period is to protect the election process and try to discourage individuals to use the ethics procedures for political gain. Mr. Hughes stated he work on language and send to Mr. Barrow for his comments and bring back to Mayor and Council. Mr. Major withdrew his motion. Mr. Parks withdrew his second. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the black-out dates. No Action. Deferred until a future City Council meeting. Second Reading, 2017-04, Special Events. Mayor Buelterman clarified this would be deferred to February. No Action. Deferred until February 2017. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 9 of 226 20170209/jrl Council, Officials and City Attorney Considerations and Comments Mayor Buelterman expressed his concerns with the lack of signage for sand bar on south-end. Ms. Doyle responded the Public Safety Committee has spent hours to find a way to alert beach goers of the dangers of the sandbar. Mayor Buelterman asked Ms. Schleicher to coordinate Chief Fields attending the January Public Safety Committee Meeting to give his recommendations. Mayor Buelterman recommended Ms. Schleicher develop plan for obtaining public feedback regarding City’s response to Hurricane Matthew whether it be a town hall meeting, email survey or on the monthly water bill. In this way, the citizens can share their feedback from the hurricane. Wanda Doyle asked Mayor Buelterman to defer the discussion regarding Sec 6-1, Business Hours Specified; Responsibility for Compliance – Sunday Sales (3) – (6) until the first meeting in February. Mayor Buelterman confirmed. Deferred till February 2017 meeting. Ms. Doyle stated she has been in communication with Mr. Hughes regarding funding for Marine Science Center and her recommendation is to contact Chatham County Recreational Authority for possible funding. She explained the Marine Science Center would qualify for funding if there is a recreational concept with Center. Ms. Doyle is asking Mayor and Council approve her moving forward in working with the County and Mr. Hughes for possible funding. Mayor Buelterman expressed his concerns with repayment. Ms. Doyle confirmed she has a funding source. Mr. Hughes will reach out to Mr. Hart for his recommendations. Wanda Doyle made a motion to adjourn. John Major seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:55PM. ______________________ Janet LeViner, CMC Clerk 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 10 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 11 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 12 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 13 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 14 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 15 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 16 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 17 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 18 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 19 of 226 20170209/jrl MAYOR Jason Buelterman CITY COUNCIL Barry Brown Mayor pro tem Wanda Doyle Bill Garbett Julie Livingston John Major Monty Parks CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND CITY MANAGER Diane Schleicher CITY CLERK Janet LeViner CITY ATTORNEY Edward M. Hughes P.O. Box 2749 – 403 Butler Avenue, Tybee Island, Georgia 31328-2749 (866) 786-4573 – FAX (866) 786-5737 www.cityoftybee.org MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE APPLICATION Thank you for your interest in serving on the Master Plan Implementation Committee of the City of Tybee Island. The Master Plan Implementation Committee is charged with ensuring that the City’s Master Plan is a vital resource in directing the City’s future. Its mission is to review the current Master Plan of the City and Carrying Capacity Report, recommend strategies for implementation of these reports and report quarterly to the City on their implementation. The Master Plan Implementation Committee will include 7 to 15 members. Meeting frequency and times will be decided at an initial organizational meeting once the membership is determined. To apply for the Master Plan Implementation Committee opening, complete the attached form and submit it with your resume to the Clerk of Council. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 20 of 226 20170209/jrl P.O. Box 2749 – 403 Butler Avenue, Tybee Island, Georgia 31328-2749 (866) 786-4573 – FAX (866) 786-5737 www.cityoftybee.org MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE MEMBER APPLICATE QUESTIONS Alan W Robertson 1. Why do you want to be a member of the Tybee Island Master Plan Implementation Committee? I have been an active member of the Master Plan Working Group and Carrying Capacity Working Group. Last year, over the several months in which we developed the Plan, I have come to understand and appreciate the opportunities and challenges before our community, especially as it pertains to our resource. It seems to me the Master Plan Implementation Committee (“MPIC”) is the appropriate place for me to continue to work on behalf of the City Council to help assure and promote a more sustainable community through energy efficiency, water conservation, general and environmental needs, food security, and efficient transportation. 2. What do you believe to be the most important aspect of the role of the Master Plan Implementation Committee? The Master Plan Implementation Committee (“MPIC”) should be the committee of the City Council that offers the best, most effective venue to gather public input on resource issues, sustainability, carrying capacity, and broad environmental issues. It can also, over time and with experience, bring expertise to better inform Council in its deliberation of these types of resource matters. I would expect the MPIC to develop recommendations to Council for its consideration and be directed by Council to explore a variety of important long-term issues. I also expect this committee would undertake its work in close coordination with those bodies already in existence whose purview may include any particular issue, most notably the Planning Commission and the Beach Task Force. Signature: ___________________________ Date: January 14, 2017 Address: PO Box 1417, Tybee Island, GA 31328 Telephone: 847-525-5040 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 21 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 22 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 23 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 24 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 25 of 226 20170209/jrl Damon L Phillips Assistant Director of Development Albany State University 504 College Drive Albany, Georgia 31705 Mrs. Julia Pearce Martin Luther King Jr. Parade Director Tybee Island, Georgia 31328 RE: Recommendation for Mr. Duane McClain This letter of recommendation is in full support of the marketing and management of the rebranded Orange Crush to fall under the direction of Duane McClain. Mr. McClain is an established project management professional with well over 10 years of experience branding and marketing products and properties. His extensive knowledge of cross-integration of entertainment, event management and culture mining would bring a new focus and energy to the Tybee Island community as they host Spring Break. He has managed numerous marketing programs, ranging from music industry events with Red Zone Music to bringing new brands to market like Perfect Vodka. He has found a masterful expertise to blend creativity and authenticity while maintaining the integrity of the vision of the client. He has the fiscal and administrative knowledge to keep project on budget and on time. Having learned of his desire to take on this project, I know that his vision for the new “Orange Crush” will meet or exceed expectations and create opportunities for Tybee Island to attract other festivals and events. He understands the historic challenges that have faced past events associated with Orange Crush and will produce viable and sustainable solutions that produce a safe and enjoyable environment for students and families. I confidently recommend Mr. Duane McClain to serve as the event director for the new “Orange Crush” spring break festival on Tybee Island. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 678- 524-6526 or damonlphillips@gmail.com Sincerely Damon L. Phillips, MBA 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 26 of 226 20170209/jrl The Rebranding of Orange Crush Tybee Island, GA: Where community, commerce, and culture on Georgia’s Coast make the quality of life exceptional! PF Mission: To execute a beach festival that offers culturally enriching activities that brings awareness to diversity, equality, and unity. Paid Forward is an event planning agency specializing in safe and strategic event planning for the demographic of 18- 25. The PF agency has strong networks in civic organizations, college campuses, community outreach programs, music labels, and top marketing companies in Georgia. The executive staff of Paid Forward has over 30 years of combined experience! We offer amazing events that are safe from start to finish. The new “Spring Crush” offer festival attendees a safe environment to enjoy the beautiful Tybee Island beach and take part in activities and events that showcase diversity, equality, and unity. The original “Orange Crush” has been tainted by past occurrences of isolated violence, unorganized crowds, and lack of communication between event promoters and the Tybee Island city officials. “Spring Crush”- the new name of the annual beach festival that attracts young spring breakers from the top colleges and universities in Georgia. It will be a safe space for fun in the sun! A 3 day itinerary of activities and events highlighted by the Biggest Beach Foam Party in Georgia and a Stop the Violence Unity Service and beach cleanup on the last day. • Spring Crush is safe and secure with checkpoints • Spring Crush creates economic gains for the city - Kickoff Event- Networking Mixer - Mr. & Ms. “Spring Crush” pageant - Fashion Show - Foam beach party - Inflatable Obstacle course - Vendors area(food/ artists) - Step show - Beach Volleyball - Stop the Violence Rally and beach cleanup Proposed Activities Paid Forward Entertainment Duane McClain Atlanta, GA Phone (770) 896-3733 Spring Crush 2017!! 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 27 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 28 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 29 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 30 of 226 20170209/jrl City Council Agenda Item Request Agenda Item Requests and supporting documentation must be submitted to the Clerk of Council by 4:00PM on the Thursday prior to the next scheduled Council meeting. If this form is received after the deadline, the item will be listed on the next scheduled agenda. Council Meeting Date for Request: 2.9.17 Item: Request Approval of the First Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement with GEFA regarding the city’s costs for the Test of Deep Aquifer Production for Abatement of Saltwater Intrusion, GEFA- SD12014-02. This is an increase of $115,100 to account for the additional costs of extending the WWTP outfall due to the emergency nature of the project to accommodate the deep well schedule. Explanation: Time Sensitive Budget Line Item Number (if applicable): TBD – Sewer Department Reimbursement Paper Work: __X___ Attached* ______ Audio/Video Presentation** Submitted by: Diane D, Schleicher Phone / Email: dsch@cityoftybee.org Comments: 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 31 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 32 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 33 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 34 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 35 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 36 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 37 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 38 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 39 of 226 20170209/jrl City Council Agenda Item Request Council Meeting Date for Request: February 9, 2017 Item: Request City Council’s approval to apply for grant proceeds from the Georgia Emergency Management Agency under their 404 and 406 Hazard Mitigation Program. Explanation: As a result of Hurricane Matthew in October of 2016, the Georgia Emergency Management Agency (“GEMA”) received $10 million dollars to municipal and county government agencies in the Southeast region under the 404 and 406 Hazard Mitigation Program. The process to receive notice of an award from GEMA may take up to 18 months. The process for applying for a grant includes the following: • Identify and create a list of eligible projects; • Have City Council approve the list of eligible projects and approve applying for the hazard mitigation grant proceeds; • Complete GEMA Pre-Application Worksheets; • Request a letter of endorsement for the projects from the Chatham County Emergency Management Agency’s (“CEMA”), EMA Director; • On or prior to March 10, 2017, submit GEMA Pre-Application Worksheets and endorsement letter from CEMA’s EMA Director to the GEMA agency; • GEMA will review the City’s pre-application to determine if the projects are eligible to apply for Hazard Mitigation grant; • Upon approval GEMA’s approval of the pre-application, the City shall complete the formal application and submit it to GEMA on or prior to October 10, 2017. The letter of notice of award from GEMA may take up to a year. A. The Water & Sewer Director identified two projects that are eligible for the Hazard Mitigation program. The projects include the following: • Purchase and install permanent generators for 12 sewer lift stations locations to ensure that the lift stations continue operating during an electrical power failure. The installation of permanent lift station generators will eliminate sewage backing up, and allow citizens and the government to have toilet services during any electrical power outage event. The approximate cost of the project is $500,000. • Construct devices to attach the Aerator Motors to keeping the Aerator Motor from flipping over when the equipment is flooded. The flooding caused by Hurricane Matthew caused the equipment to flip over and become inoperative. B. The Hazard Mitigation programs also provide funding to acquire storm shutters for specified buildings owned by the City; therefore, the staff wishes to apply for funding to purchase storm shutters for as many 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 40 of 226 20170209/jrl City buildings as possible. Those buildings include the following: • City Hall building • Fire Department building • Police Department building • Water & Sewer building • Marine Science Center building • Campground manager’s house • Campground store • Public works office Paper Work: X___ Attached* Already Distributed Submitted by: Fire Department February 1, 2017 Date given to Clerk of Council 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 41 of 226 20170209/jrl City Council Agenda Item Request Agenda Item Requests and supporting documentation must be submitted to the Clerk of Council by 4:00PM on the Thursday prior to the next scheduled Council meeting. If this form is received after the deadline, the item will be listed on the next scheduled agenda. Council Meeting Date for Request: 2.9.17 Item: Marsh Hen Trail: Consider revising the scope of the project to eliminate the costly bridge element from Hwy 80 to the Marsh Hen Trail Railroad Bed and approach the trail through the existing GDOT ROW and City ROW for connectivity. Engineering cost estimates from Thomas & Hutton to re-design, apply for GDOT encroachment permits and bid out is $18,500. Explanation: Project bids for project in October 2016 exceeded estimates due to the cost of the bridge element. If the city were to use the existing public ROW’s instead of constructing an expensive bridge, the cost savings would make the public project feasible. Recommend adding a privacy fence at the eastern entrance on the city ROW with a gate to prevent trail users’ access to Estill Avenue at that location in Sandy Shores and North Wave subdivision. Budget Line Item Number (if applicable): 100-6230-54-140 (Cultural & Recreation – Parkways and Boulevards Infrastructure) Paper Work: __X__ Attached* Submitted by: Diane D, Schleicher on behalf of Mayor Pro Tem Brown (chairman of the infrastructure committee. Phone / Email: dsch@cityoftybee.org Comments: 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 42 of 226 20170209/jrl MARSH HEN TRAIL HISTORIC PEDESTRIAN GREENWAYABSTRACT OF BIDSContracted Work - US 80 Shoulder Work and High Bridge to Rail BedItem No. DescriptionQuantity Units Unit Price TotalThey say Unit Price Total Unit Price Total150-1000 Traffic Control1 LS 7,692.00$ 7,692.00$ 7,692.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 163-0232 Temporary Grassing0.4 AC 4,615.00$ 1,846.00$ 185.00$ 1,400.00$ 560.00$ 1,000.00$ 400.00$ 163-0300 Construction Exit2 EA 3,846.00$ 7,692.00$ 7,692.00$ 2,520.00$ 5,040.00$ 1,600.00$ 3,200.00$ 165-0010 Maintenance of Temporary Silt Fence Type A305 LF0.77$ 234.85$ 235.00$ 1.05$ 320.25$ 1.00$ 305.00$ 165-0030 Maintenance of Temporary Silt Fence Type C1660 LF1.50$ 2,490.00$ 2,490.00$ 4.20$ 6,972.00$ 1.50$ 2,490.00$ 165-0101 Maintenance of Construction Exit2 EA 769.00$ 1,538.00$ 1,538.00$ 1,120.00$ 2,240.00$ 600.00$ 1,200.00$ 167-1000 Water Quality Monitoring and Sampling2 EA 308.00$ 616.00$ 616.00$ 420.00$ 840.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 167-1500 Water Quality Inspections6 MO 308.00$ 1,848.00$ 1,848.00$ 700.00$ 4,200.00$ 1,300.00$ 7,800.00$ 171-0010 Temporary Silt Fence Type A330 LF5.00$ 1,650.00$ 1,650.00$ 1.75$ 577.50$ 2.50$ 825.00$ 171-0030 Temporary Silt Fence Type C1660 LF9.00$ 14,940.00$ 14,940.00$ 4.25$ 7,055.00$ 3.50$ 5,810.00$ 210-0100 Grading Complete1 LS 70,769.00$ 70,769.00$ 70,769.00$ 26,600.00$ 26,600.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 310-5060 Graded Aggregate Base Course, 6", Incl Matl770 SY29.00$ 22,330.00$ 22,330.00$ 28.00$ 21,560.00$ 23.00$ 17,710.00$ 402-3130 Recyc. Asph. Conc. 12.5 mm, GP 2 Only, Incl. Bitum56.5 TN 362.00$ 20,453.00$ 20,453.00$ 420.00$ 23,730.00$ 100.00$ 5,650.00$ 441-0104 Concrete Sidewalk, 4"233 SY85.00$ 19,805.00$ 19,805.00$ 49.00$ 11,417.00$ 36.00$ 8,388.00$ Stamped Concrete Sidewalk, 4"78 SY 146.00$ 11,388.00$ 11,388.00$ 56.00$ 4,368.00$ 50.00$ 3,900.00$ 441-5004 Concrete Header Curb, 10", Typ 4106 LF45.00$ 4,770.00$ 4,770.00$ 28.00$ 2,968.00$ 20.00$ 2,120.00$ 456-2012 Indention Rumble strips-Grnd-in-Place (continuous)0.15 GLM 76,920.00$ 11,538.00$ 11,535.00$ 140,000.00$ 21,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 750.00$ 500-3201 Class B Concrete (gravity wall)45 CY 923.00$ 41,535.00$ 41,535.00$ 630.00$ 28,350.00$ 600.00$ 27,000.00$ 636-5500Signage (incl. sign plate, refl. matl & post furnished & installed)11 EA 615.00$ 6,765.00$ 6,765.00$ 231.00$ 2,541.00$ 55.00$ 605.00$ 653-1704 Thermoplastic Solid Traffic Stripe, 24", White31 LF58.00$ 1,798.00$ 1,798.00$ 42.00$ 1,302.00$ 8.00$ 248.00$ 653-1804 Thermoplastic Solid Traffic Stripe, 8", White380 LF34.00$ 12,920.00$ 12,920.00$ 4.90$ 1,862.00$ 3.00$ 1,140.00$ 700-6910 Permanent Grassing0.4 AC 6,154.00$ 2,461.60$ 246.00$ 1,400.00$ 560.00$ 1,820.00$ 728.00$ 700-7000 Agricultural Lime0.4 TN 308.00$ 123.20$ 123.00$ 700.00$ 280.00$ 125.00$ 50.00$ 700-8100 Fertilizer Nitrogen Content12 LB 154.00$ 1,848.00$ 1,848.00$ 4.25$ 51.00$ 4.50$ 54.00$ 900-1000 High Timber Boardwalk (w/ Railing)122 LF 1,575.00$ 192,150.00$ 192,150.00$ 1,204.00$ 146,888.00$ 175.00$ 21,350.00$ Construction Total461,200.65$ 457,321.00$ 328,281.75$ 137,723.00$ Contingency (10%)13,772.30$ Total 151,495.30$ This is a true and correct Abstract of Bids received on October 31, 2016.Project ManagerE & D Contracting ServicesYes, NavigatorsYes, 1, 2, & 3GCC0000862Contractor License No.Reciept of AddendaGCQA005312All Required DocumentsYes, 1, 2, & 3Savannah Construction & Preservation, LLCBid BondAmerican SouthernBIDDEREngineers Opinion of Probable Construciton CostZ:\23987\23987.0000\Documents\Specifications\23987 Abstract.xlsx20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 43 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 44 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 45 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Historic Bicycle/Pedestrian Greenway Trail Improvement Project Design 12,600$ Assistance During Bidding 3,000$ Permitting 2,900$ Total Fee 18,500$ SUMMARY Thomas & Hutton 1 of 1 2/1/2017 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 46 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Historic Bicycle/Pedestrian Greenway Trail Improvement Project Design Project ManagerProject EngineerEngineering TechnicianClericalField RepresentativeHourly Rate 160$ 140$ 115$ 80$ 125$ Hours FEE ITEM TASK Sub-Total Sub-Total 1 Revise Geometric Layout 1 4 5 600$ 2 Revise Profile Grade 1 4 5 600$ 3 Revise Cross Sections 4 4 460$ 4 Revise Quantity Take-Off &Cost Estimate t 1 4 2 7 950$ 5 Revise Cover 1 1 115$ 6 Review & Revise Index 1 1 115$ 7 Revise General Notes & Legend 1 1 115$ 8 Revised Typical Section Sheets- 2 each 1 1 115$ 9 Revise and update 3 of 7 Construction Plan Sheets 1 6 7 830$ 10 Revise and update 2 of 4 Profile Sheets 1 4 5 600$ 11 Revise Cross Section Sheets 3 of 11 1 6 7 830$ 12 Revise Erosion, Sedimentation Control plans - 11 of 23 Sheets 2 5 7 855$ 13 Utility Coordination 4 4 560$ 14 QC/QA Review 1 2 4 3 10 1,275$ 15 Meeting #1 with City 2 2 4 600$ 16 Review & Update Details 1 2 3 370$ 17 QC/QA Review 1 2 5 8 1,065$ 18 Meeting #2 with City 2 2 4 600$ 19 Revise Specifications 1 4 6 11 1,200$ Sub-Total - Personnel 8 28 45 6 8 95 11,855$ Sub-Consultants -$ Sub-Total - Sub-Consultants -$ Reimbursables Printing, Travel, Materials, Reproduction (Approx 6% of Personnel Cost)730.00$ Total - Design 12,600.00$ Design Tasks Construction Plan Tasks Miscellaneos Design Tasks Thomas & Hutton 1 of 1 2/1/2017 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 47 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Historic Bicycle/Pedestrian Greenway Trail Improvement Project Assistance During Bidding Project ManagerProject EngineerClericalHourly Rate 160$ 140$ 80$ Hours FEE ITEM TASK Sub-Total Sub-Total 1 Revised Bid Package 1 2 3 6 680$ 2 Attend Pre-Bid Conference 2 2 4 600$ 3 Answer Contractor Quesitons 1 3 3 7 820$ 4 Evaluate Bids 1 2 2 5 600$ Sub-Total - Personnel 5 9 8 22 2,700$ Reimbursables Printing, Travel, Materials, Reproduction (Approx 10% of Personnel Cost)270.00$ Total - Bidding 3,000.00$ Thomas & Hutton 1 of 1 2/1/2017 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 48 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Historic Bicycle/Pedestrian Greenway Trail Improvement Project Permitting Project ManagerProject EngineerEngineering TechnicianField RepresentativeHourly Rate 160$ 140$ 115$ 125$ Hours FEE ITEM TASK Sub-Total Sub-Total 1 Revise Permit Application and Submittal Package 1 4 4 1,180$ 2 Permit Coordination, Revisions, Approvals 1 6 4 1,460$ 2 10 0 0 2,640$ Reimbursables Printing, Travel, Materials, Reproduction (Approx 6% of Personnel Cost)200.00$ Total -Permitting 2,900.00$ Thomas & Hutton 1 of 1 2/1/2017 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 49 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 50 of 22620170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 51 of 22620170209/jrl City Council Agenda Item Request Agenda Item Requests and supporting documentation must be submitted to the Clerk of Council by 4:00PM on the Thursday prior to the next scheduled Council meeting. If this form is received after the deadline, the item will be listed on the next scheduled agenda. Council Meeting Date for Request: 2.9.17 Item: Resolution to Approve the Application for a GDNR Coastal Incentive Grant for the second phase of the Carrying Capacity Study – Implementation Phase – Tasks for this grant are described in the attached pre- application exhibit. Time sensitive to meet grant deadline. Year One Year Two (if multi-year project) Federal Funds Requested $ 55,000 $ 45,000 In-Kind Match Provided $ 55,489 $ 45,386 (Match MUST be 1:1 for each year) Total Cost Per Year: $ 110,489 $ 90,386 Budget Line Item Number (if applicable): TBD Paper Work: X Attached* ______ Audio/Video Presentation** Submitted by: Diane D, Schleicher Phone / Email: dsch@cityoftybee.org Comments: 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 52 of 226 20170209/jrl State of Georgia City of Tybee Island RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF TYBEE ISLAND IN SUPPORT OF GRANT FUNDS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY WHEREAS, Tybee Island is a national tourism destination which results in a significant increase the overnight and day trip populations during the peak season; WHEREAS, protection of the islands natural, cultural and historic resources is vital to Tybee Island’s economy, environment, and quality of life; WHEREAS, the City of Tybee Island was previously awarded a Coastal Incentive Grant to completed a Carrying Capacity Study to better understand the carrying capacity of the island’s resources; WHEREAS, the City of Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study recommended several action items that are of immediate importance to sustainable management of tourism and growth on the island; WHEREAS, the City of Tybee Island is desirous of obtaining a Coastal Incentive Grant City to implement the recommendations of the Carrying Capacity Study; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Tybee Island Council does hereby endorse an application for grant assistance through the Department of Natural Resources – Coastal Resources Division and agrees to provide matching funds necessary to ensure grant implementation and completion. Adopted, the ____day of ________, 2017 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA ______________________________________ Attest:_________________________ 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 53 of 226 20170209/jrl GEORGIA COASTAL INCENTIVE GRANT 2017-2018FY Cycle 20 CIG CERTIFICATIONS FORM On behalf of (Applicant) and in support of (Project Name) I certify that: (1) no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, or physical or mental handicap for any program, activity, or facility sponsored, operated, or constructed under the grant project; (2) all project activities will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the mission, goals, and policies of the Georgia Coastal Management Program; (3) any user fees charged to the public for use or participation in any program, activity, or facility sponsored, operated, or constructed under the grant project will not be so large as to be exclusionary; (4) any facility or on-going service or program included as a component of this proposed project will be maintained as part of the community’s infrastructure for a reasonable length of time after grant money is no longer available; (5) no protected or endangered species or historic or cultural resource will be adversely impacted; (6) all necessary local, state, and federal permits will be obtained before commencing work; (7) Applicant will not hold the State of Georgia liable for any injuries or damage that may result from activities conducted under projects funded by Coastal Incentive Grants; (8) Applicant (governmental organization) will comply with 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards; and 48 CFR 31.2 (as applicable); (9) Applicant (educational institution) will comply with 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards; and 48 CFR 31.2 (as applicable); (10) Applicant will comply with any other provisions of statuary law that apply to receiving funds; (11) Applicant has reported all sources of funding for completing this project and certifies that completion is not dependent on future funding from another source; 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 54 of 226 20170209/jrl (12) all other sources for funding for the project have been disclosed, and that Applicant will notify the Georgia Coastal Management Program of any awards of additional funding from other sources during the duration of this project; (13) Applicant will adhere to the reporting requirements outlined in the RFP and will submit required status reports in a timely manner, to the Georgia Coastal Management Program. Failure to comply with the reporting requirements of the Coastal Incentive Grants Program may result in revocation of the Applicant’s funding. Typed Name Title Signature Date Subscribed and affirmed before me this _______ day of __________________, 20__ Notary Public _______________________________ My Commission expires:__________ 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 55 of 226 20170209/jrl Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Incentive Grant Program 2017-2018 FY Cycle 20 Application Cover Sheet Project Title: Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Implementation Applicant Information (Contracting Organization) Applicant (Institution): City of Tybee Island, GA Federal Employer ID #: 58-6000661 Contact Name (receives contract notices): Diane Schleicher Street Address: 403 Butler Ave City: Tybee Island State: GA Zip Code: 31328 Phone: 912.472.5070 Email: dschleicher@cityoftybee.org Financial Contact (invoicing and payment): Angela Hudson Street Address: 403 Butler Ave City: Tybee Island State: GA Zip Code: 31328 Phone: 912.472.5021 Email: ahudson@cityoftybee.org Project Manager/Principal Investigator (If different from above) Name: George Shaw Title: Planning & Zoning Manager Street Address: 403 Butler Ave City: Tybee Island State: GA Zip Code: 31328 Phone: 912.472.5031 Email: gshaw@cityoftybee.org Year One Year Two (if multi-year project) Federal Funds Requested $ 55,000 $ 55,000 Match Provided $ 55,489 $ 55,489 (Match MUST be 1:1 for each year) Total Cost Per Year: $ 110,489 $ 110,489 Primary Funding Theme (select one): Oceans and Wetlands Disaster Resiliency and Coastal Hazards Non-Point Source Pollution Sustainable Communities Public Access and Land Conservation Typed Name of Authorizing Official: Diane Schleicher Title of Authorizing Official: City Manager Signature of Authorizing Official: ______________________________Date: 12/02/16 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 56 of 226 20170209/jrl A. Background & Justification 1. Project Overview: Tybee Island is a premier regional and national tourism destination and an important economic engine for the Savannah metropolitan area. However, because of the wealth of community resources, there is also great development pressure facing this island. The City’s water, sewer, and roadway infrastructure systems, as well as City functions such as solid waste removal and energy usage, are severely strained by the massive increase in summer population. Further compounding these issues are threats posed by rising sea levels and climate change, which are likely to increase flooding risk, shrink the amount of buildable land, affect egress on and off the island via U.S. Highway 80, and further limit the amount of development the island can support. In order to understand the full scope of these issues, the City of Tybee Island applied for, and received, a Coastal Incentive Grant (CIG) Cycle 18 to conduct a Carrying Capacity Study (CCS). This study, completed in September 2016, was designed to quantify (where possible) the island’s resources and to better understand how much development these limited resources can support without degrading the quality of life that makes Tybee such a unique coastal community. Through a robust community engagement effort, the CCS identified the resources, issues, and infrastructure systems essential to supporting the economy and quality of life of Tybee Island. The study projected the maximum amount of resident, overnight and daytime populations that Tybee Island currently experiences, as well as the maximum amount of people that can be supported with existing resources and infrastructure. Some of the key issues related to population growth and seasonal variability that were identified by this analysis are as follows: 1) Limit in the permitted water withdrawal from the Floridan Aquifer; 2) Significant increases in water withdrawal, wastewater discharge, and solid waste/litter generation during tourism season; 3) Effects of king tides and sea level rise on the stormwater drainage system; 4) Development pressure in the R-2 zoning district, the highest density residential district which is also subject to king tide flooding; and 5) Energy usage by the City in its daily operations. It is imperative that the City begin to address carrying capacity issues sooner rather than later, in an effort to protect the City’s resources and infrastructure from the impact of future growth and seasonal population variability. The overall approach recommended by the CCS is twofold: 1) Make improvements to the City’s existing infrastructure systems to provide additional capacity to accommodate more growth in a more sustainable manner, and 2) Identify ways to better manage future growth to limit stresses on infrastructure and environmental impacts from future development. The City Council has recently adopted an ordinance creating the citizen Master Plan Implementation Committee (MPIC) to oversee and track implementation of the Islands Masterplan and CCS. In fact, the City has already begun to implement some of the 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 57 of 226 20170209/jrl recommendations, mostly related to water supply and the wastewater treatment plant capacity upgrades. It is the goal of this grant application to provide the resources necessary for the MPIC to complete their proposed mission and implement the priority recommendations of the CCS over the next two years, as outlined in the CCS Work Plan. 2. Coastal Management Relevance The newly-formed MPIC will guide the process, but other project partners will also be invited to participate as needed, depending on the task at hand. Other project partners who participated in development of the CCS, and who will be asked to continue to contribute their time and expertise as the CCS is implemented include: Tybee Island Tourism Council, local Real Estate/Rental agencies, Tybee Island Beach Task Force, Chatham County – Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission (MPC), Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA), University of Georgia (UGA), and the Coastal Resources Division (CRD). By including local stakeholders in a relevant and meaningful manner, the City will be more likely to successful accomplish the tasks outlined in the CSS. Community buy-in is essential to ensuring that the recommendations are implemented through future outreach, planning and development regulation efforts by the City. An important achievement of the CCS was to create a protocol for performing a CCS that was shared with other communities. Many communities in Coastal Georgia, such as Jekyll Island and St. Simons Island, are experiencing similar challenges with regard to future planning and the management of anticipated growth with geographically-limited community resources. The City of Tybee Island wants to further expand the tools that can be shared with other island communities to include model ordinances, strategies to better manage solid waste, and educational materials targeted at beach litter and sustainable behaviors for recycling and water use in a vacation destination. This project touches on all of the funding themes adopted by the Coastal Advisory Council for 2016-2017, though the primary scope of the project falls within the purview of the Sustainable Communities theme. A sustainable community is one that does not stress its resources beyond their ability to rebound. The key to planning for sustainability is first to understand the limits of a community’s resources, which is precisely what the CCS did. Implementation of the CCS recommendations will achieve the following goals of the CRD’s Sustainable Communities theme: • Increasing communities’ ability to achieve sustainable development goals, improve quality of life, and become more economically and environmentally sustainable; • Strengthening local capacity to implement sustainable approaches; • Increasing the understanding of costs and benefits associated with sustainable approaches to coastal development; and • Implementing and evaluating of coastal management practices in support of sustainable development. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 58 of 226 20170209/jrl 3. Project Goals It is the goal of this grant to provide the resources necessary for the MPIC to continue the work of the original CIG-funded CCS through completion of the following recommendations of the CCS over the next two (2) years. a) Work with the Real Estate/Rental companies to create education campaign that addresses water conservation, energy efficiency, recycling, and litter/pollution prevention. b) Perform a water & sewer rate study to address needed infrastructure improvements and "peak usage rates" to encourage water conservation during peak tourism season, and to prepare for future needed infrastructure investments. c) Draft revisions to the City’s code that will reduce stormwater impacts from new development. d) Implement a solid waste reduction initiative that addresses beach litter, recycling contamination, and improvement to solid waste disposal programming for residential, commercial and public areas. e) Draft revisions to the City’s code that will reduce the density and impact of future development in the R-2 District, and direct it away from areas of King Tide flooding. If awarded this grant project will include continued coordination with the Tybee Island Comprehensive Plan 2016 process. This plan was developed in collaboration with the CCS and many of the recommendations so the CCS correspond to the Community Work Program. The Comprehensive Plan set the City’s vision, objectives and implementation strategies for land use; infrastructure; transportation; natural, historic and cultural resources; housing, etc. for the next ten (10) years, and implementation of the CCS is key to achieving this vision. While the CCS was under development, UGA Mar Ex and Stetson University completed and issued the “Tybee Island Sea Level Adaptation Plan”. This plan made several recommendations with regards to the impacts of sea level rise and King Tides on the City’s stormwater drainage system. Achieving the goals outlined above will allow the City to begin taking the initial steps necessary to prepare for these impacts. B. Task Descriptions Year One Task 1: Master Plan Implementation Committee (MPIC) Task 1 Description: The City will convene the MPIC bi-monthly to provide information, represent various community interests, provide input on the implementation of the CCS, and to foster community support. The MPIC will provide guidance to City staff and contractors throughout the process, as the official body of the City charged with implementation of the CSS. The MPIC will work with the City to allocate resources and funding to the various tasks outlined within this grant, and will help identify the most successful methods for outreach and community involvement. Additional project partners will also be invited to participate in the process as needed. Agendas, meeting presentations and materials, and meeting summaries will be generated by the City for each meeting. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 59 of 226 20170209/jrl Deliverables: Agendas, meeting presentations and materials, and meeting summaries. Anticipated Date of Completion: September 2019 Task 2: Sustainable Tybee Education Campaign Task 2 Description: The City of Tybee will work with the MPIC, the Tybee Tourism Council, Real Estate/Rental companies, and marketing professionals to build on the existing “Keep Tybee Tidy” education effort and create a comprehensive education campaign that addresses opportunities for recycling, litter/pollution prevention, water use efficiency, and energy efficiency. This campaign will target multiple audiences including day trippers, overnight guests, Island residents, City employees, and Island business. The Tybee Island Youth Council will be included to assist with development of materials/messaging targeting children. Issues to be addressed include: • Reducing beach litter • Encouraging recycling participating and reducing recycling contamination • Alternatives to single use/disposal items • Opportunities to retrofit residences and businesses to reduce water and energy usage Avenues for outreach will include point of sale, point of contact, point of disposal, point of entry, and direct distribution. Deliverables will likely include signage, stickers, in- property educational materials (for short term rentals), and materials/inserts for local tourism publications. As part of this activity, the City will identify the locations of existing educational messages and signage, and where this can be improved and/or expanded. Deliverables: Hard copies and original electronic files for all educational materials. Anticipated Date of Completion: September 2018 Task 3: Water & Sewer Rate Study Task 3 Description: A water and sewer utility rate structure should provide enough revenue to operate and upgrade its infrastructure as necessary to meet new regulatory permitting standards and engineering best practices now and in the future. The City will work with a consultant to perform a rate study to ensure that the City’s current and future water and sewer rate structure will generate the revenue necessary to construct and operate the Cretaceous well, or other water system improvements, and the recommended wastewater treatment plan upgrades. The rate study will also consider "peak usage rates," increasing block rates, and other tools to encourage water conservation during the peak season. “Aid to construction” and tap fees will be reviewed, and other innovative rate methodologies will be considered. The study will provide recommended updates to the City’s rate structure and will also provide draft utility ordinance amendments for consideration by the City Council. Deliverables: A Water and Sewer Rate Study, draft ordinance amendments, and presentation of revised ordinance to City Council. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 60 of 226 20170209/jrl Anticipated Date of Completion: September 2018 Year Two Task 4: City Code Updates Task 4 Description: The City will work with the MPIC, planning consultants, and legal staff to draft revisions to the City’s code that will reduce stormwater impacts from new development and to mitigate flood risk to current and future structures in areas subject to King Tide flooding. This task will include drafting revisions to the City’s code that will a) reduce impervious surface related to new development and b) reduce the density and impact of future development, directing it away from areas of King Tide flooding. These draft revisions will be presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council for their consideration. Deliverables: Draft ordinance amendments, a presentation to Planning Commission, and a presentation to City Council. Anticipated Date of Completion: September 2019 Task 5: Solid Waste Initiatives Task 5 Description: The City will work with the MPIC and other project partners to implement various initiatives to address beach litter and litter in general, reduce waste generation, reduce recycling contamination, and increase recycling participation. Activities to be accomplished as part of this task include: • Development of a solid waste/recycling receptacle masterplan for the beach, commercial areas, and residential district. This will include an assessment of the suitability and effectiveness of the current number and location of trash and recycling containers, as well as the method and schedule for pickup. This masterplan will take industry and professional standards into account to formulate a map for future locations of trash can and recycling containers on the beach, along commercial corridors, and in residential areas where parking is allowed and tourist traffic exists. This masterplan will be utilized by the City to seek funding and allocate resources to ensure that there are enough containers, and a sufficient collection process to maximize litter disposal and recycling participation. • Researching alternative for glass recycling, now that it can no longer be accepted, and preparing recommendations for council. • Working with the City’s solid waste contractor to identify ways to improve service to more effectively manage solid waste and recycling on the island. Specific issues to be reviewed include, but are not limited to seasonal pick up schedule, and the cost/benefit of segregated recycling. Deliverables: Solid Waste/Recycling Receptacle Masterplan, Recommendations on Glass Recycling, Recommendations on changes to Solid Waste Contract Services, Presentation to City Council Anticipated Date of Completion: September 2019 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 61 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 62 of 226 20170209/jrl C. Estimated Budget Budget Category (YEAR 1) CIG Request (Federal) Match Provided (Non-Federal) Total (Federal + Non Federal) Personnel $38,650 $38,650 Fringe $10,158 $10,158 Travel Supplies $5,000 $5,000 Subcontract $50,000 $50,000 Other $1,800 $1,800 Indirect (10%) $4,881 $4,881 TOTAL $55,000 $55,489 $110,489 Budget Category (YEAR 2) CIG Request (Federal) Match Provided (Non-Federal) Total (Federal + Non Federal) Personnel $38,650 $38,650 Fringe $10,158 $10,158 Travel Supplies $5,000 $5,000 Subcontract $50,000 $50,000 Other $1,800 $1,800 Indirect (10%) $4,881 $4,881 TOTAL $55,000 $55,489 $110,489 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 63 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study September 2016 35 Abercorn Street, Suite 210 Savannah, Georgia 31401 www.ecologicalplanning.net 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 64 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY i Acknowledgements This study was prepared by the City of Tybee Island under a Coastal Incentive Grant awarded from the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and from the Office for Coastal Management (OCM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of DNR, OCM or NOAA. Ecological Planning Group, LLC assisted the City of Tybee Island with preparation of this report. Many thanks to the elected and appointed City officials, as well as the citizens, business owners and visitors who dedicated their time, expertise and resources for this project. Their assistance and participation in the planning process and data gathering exercises made this study possible. A special thanks to the Georgia DNR, Coastal Resources Division. This project would not have been possible without the funding and assistance provided through the Coastal Management Program. 35 Abercorn Street, Suite 210 Savannah, Georgia 31401 www.ecologicalplanning.net 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 65 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. STUDY SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 Technical Advisory Group (TAG) ................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Community Resource Assessment & Inventory ........................................................... 2 1.2.3 Analysis of Community Resource Limitations ............................................................. 3 1.2.4 Recommendations & Implementation ........................................................................ 3 1.2.5 Presentation of the Carrying Capacity Study .............................................................. 4 1.3. WHAT IS CARRYING CAPACITY? ............................................................................................... 4 1.4. CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY GOALS ......................................................................................... 4 2. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 6 2.1. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE .......................................................................................... 6 2.2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS ........................................................................................................ 6 3. POPULATION DYNAMICS ON TYBEE ISLAND.................................................................... 7 3.1. RESIDENT POPULATION ......................................................................................................... 8 3.2. OVERNIGHT POPULATION ...................................................................................................... 9 3.3. DAYTIME POPULATION ........................................................................................................ 12 3.4. POPULATION SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 14 4. RESOURCE LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................. 15 4.1. WATER WITHDRAWAL & WATER USE .................................................................................... 15 4.1.1 Correlation of Overnight Population with Water Usage .......................................... 16 4.1.2 Tybee Island Water Withdrawal Permit Limitations................................................. 17 4.1.3 Water Distribution Infrastructure System ................................................................. 19 4.1.4 Alternative Water Supply .......................................................................................... 20 4.2. WASTEWATER DISCHARGE ................................................................................................... 21 4.3. TRANSPORTATION & PARKING .............................................................................................. 23 4.3.1 U.S. Highway 80 (US 80) Capacity and Road Network Capacity .............................. 23 4.3.2 Parking ...................................................................................................................... 26 4.4. STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY ................................................................................. 32 4.4.1 Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan ............................................................ 33 4.5. SOLID WASTE .................................................................................................................... 40 4.5.1 Solid Waste Collection ............................................................................................... 40 4.5.2 Disposal Trends ......................................................................................................... 41 4.6. ENERGY USE ..................................................................................................................... 42 4.6.1 Solarize Tybee ........................................................................................................... 43 4.6.2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory ............................................................ 44 4.7. ZONING ............................................................................................................................ 47 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 66 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY iii 4.7.1 Zoning Analysis ......................................................................................................... 48 4.7.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 49 4.7.3 Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 49 4.7.4 Population in the R-2 District Based on Current Development ................................. 50 4.7.5 Full Build-Out Scenario .............................................................................................. 51 4.7.6 Additional Population Based on Build-Out Scenario ................................................. 53 4.7.7 Zoning Assessment Findings ..................................................................................... 53 5. RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES AND WORK PLAN ........................................................... 55 5.1. CARRYING CAPACITY WORK PLAN .......................................................................................... 63 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................. 73 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 67 of 226 20170209/jrl 1. INTRODUCTION Ecological Planning Group (EPG) has prepared this report to present the findings of the City’s Carrying Capacity Study. The purpose of this Carrying Capacity Study is to determine the population size that can be supported by the City of Tybee Island, the limiting factors for population growth, and how the City can prepare for future growth. Primary limiting factors can be either resource-based, i.e. available water supply, or infrastructure-based, i.e. the ability of the sanitary distribution and treatment system to safely convey and adequately treat domestic wastewater. This study is also intended to inform the City’s concurrent Master Planning Process. The City’s 2008 Master Plan is being updated in accordance with the requirements of the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Rules Chapter 110-12-1: Minimum Standards and Procedures for Local Comprehensive Planning. The purpose of the masterplan is to present the City’s Vision for the Future and to provide a framework for achieving that Vision. The data, goals, issues and strategies presented herein have been incorporated into the City’s Master Plan, as appropriate, and this report should be considered one element of the overall City Master Plan. 1.1. BACKGROUND Tybee Island is a premier regional and national tourism destination and an important economic engine for the Savannah metropolitan area. Whether it is families visiting the beach, people enjoying the various eco- tourism opportunities, history buffs exploring Ft. Pulaski or the Tybee Lighthouse, or visitors supporting the local artisan community, the unique resources of the island play a significant role in driving the tourism industry. However, because of the wealth of community resources, there is also great development pressure facing Tybee Island. The City’s water, sewer, and roadway infrastructure systems are severely strained by the massive seasonal fluctuations in population. Further compounding this issues are threats posed by rising sea levels and climate change, which are likely to increase flooding risk, shrink the amount of developable land, affect egress on and off the island, and further limit the amount of development the island can support. The City of Tybee Island is in a unique position as one of the few locally-governed, developed barrier islands in Georgia, and as such has strong local influence over the management and Tybee Island Historical Society 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 68 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 2 preservation the island. As such, the City of Tybee Island applied for a Coastal Incentive Grant (CIG) through the Coastal Resources Division (CRD) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to conduct a Carrying Capacity Study to gain a better understanding of the island’s resources and how much development these limited resources can support without degradation of the quality of life that makes Tybee Island such a unique coastal community. Through a comprehensive stakeholder engagement program, the Carrying Capacity Study will identify which resources are essential to supporting the economy and quality of life of Tybee Island, and what, if any limitations there are on those resources. The study will identify the maximum amount of resident, overnight and daytime populations that can be supported with existing services/infrastructure. The study will also attempt to identify upgrades to infrastructure that may be necessary to support future increases in population. 1.2. STUDY SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work for the Carrying Capacity Study is outlined below. 1.2.1 Technical Advisory Group (TAG) The City implemented a community engagement program that consisted of numerous public meetings in an effort to provide an opportunity for the citizens of Tybee Island and any other interested parties to participate in this process. Participants at these meetings were afforded the opportunity to provide information, represent community interests, and to provide input on the planning process and results. This public and transparent process was designed to foster community support for the findings and recommendations of the study. Participation in the TAG was not restricted. Meetings were open to the public and advertised on the City’s website and posted at City Hall. 1.2.2 Community Resource Assessment & Inventory The City performed an assessment of existing community resources in an effort to inventory and identify limitations. The following community resources were analyzed: • Population dynamics, including trends and impacts of the on-island resident population, overnight/short term rental population, and daytime population. • Water supply capacity, including existing water distribution infrastructure, Floridan Aquifer water withdrawal permit limits, and the impact of the future proposed Cretaceous well. • Capacity of the City’s wastewater plant (Water Pollution Control Plant or WPCP), future required upgrades, effluent limits and assimilative capacity of receiving waterways. • Stormwater infrastructure condition, needed upgrades, flooding issues, king tides and the effects of sea level rise on infrastructure capacity. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 69 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 3 • Current roadway capacity and level of service, including the proposed Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) Highway 80 project and its impact on roadway level of service. • Parking limitations and availability of alternative modes of transportation • Energy consumption including greenhouse gas footprint of City operations, alternative energy sources, availability and cost of fuel, and any known energy grid concerns. • Capacity of solid waste services, beach litter, and participation in the City’s curbside recycling program and its impact on solid waste collection. • Development regulations, and the impact of additional development on island resources. 1.2.3 Analysis of Community Resource Limitations After completion of the community resources inventory and assessment, the City reviewed availability, level of service and future limitations of the inventoried community resources. This analysis included the following: • The projected limit of resident, overnight and daytime populations that can be supported by existing infrastructure systems based on commonly accepted metrics. • Upgrades, capital projects, etc., that would be necessary to increase these limits, where feasible. • Measures to regulate development and/or protect environmental resources. 1.2.4 Recommendations & Implementation Based on the inventory and assessment of resources and the limitations that were identified, the City and the TAG worked together to identify recommendations to encourage more sustainable development and protect island resources that included the following: • Future land use/zoning amendments • Capital improvements for water, sewer, stormwater and transportation • Additional protection for environmental resources The recommendations have also been incorporated into the City’s Comprehensive Master Plan, which is due to be updated by October 2016. It was the desire of the City and the TAG to integrate the Carrying Capacity Study process with the Comprehensive Planning process, as much as possible, such that the results of this project will be included in both the Community Vision and Future Land Use Plan as well as within the Short Term Work Program. Integrating these efforts has also allowed the City to maximize the public involvement in both. Maximizing the opportunities for public input should improve public acceptance of the final recommendations. Furthermore, including the results of this study in the City Comprehensive Plan will provide a method of implementation and reinforce the City’s accountability. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 70 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 4 1.2.5 Presentation of the Carrying Capacity Study The City has developed a Carrying Capacity Study process that is described herein, including the methods the City used to perform the assessment and inventory of community resources and to identify resource limitations. This report also describes the procedures used to gather data, engage community stakeholders, and integrate the Carrying Capacity Study into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City will present the process and results of the Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study to coastal managers at the September 2016 CRD Brownbag Presentation, and at the GA Climate Ready Conference to be held in Jekyll Island in November 2016. The purpose of this presentation will be to convey project results, communicate impacts and benefits to coastal managers and/or the general coastal public, and describe the stakeholder process. 1.3. WHAT IS CARRYING CAPACITY? The Wave Ecology and Highway 80 Challenge Study was commissioned in 2011 by Chatham County in partnership with the City of Tybee Island and the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) to define localized solutions to issues surrounding the safety of citizens and visitors on Hwy 80, as traffic, and traffic related impacts increase. This plan explored the concept of urban ecology, “a school of thought that seeks to understand the natural systems of urban areas and the threats that face them.” Understanding the urban environment and the impacts of human populations on that environment can allow planners to design healthier, more resilient communities. In particular, many coastal communities across the world contend with population impacts related to tourism that stress the capacity of the community. The Tybee Island Wave Ecology Study defined Carrying Capacity as: I = P x A x T I = Environmental Impact P = Population A = Affluence T = Technology This equation demonstrates that human carrying capacity is not strictly related to population size, but to many levels of consumption, which are in turn impacted by technology and the economy. Local governments have the opportunity to impact these variables through regulatory and policy choices related to land use, infrastructure improvements, growth management, and the local economy. 1.4. CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY GOALS The TAG felt that it was important to identify guiding principles for the Carrying Capacity Study, in order to provide the framework under which carrying capacity issues could be identified and 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 71 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 5 solutions proposed. The guiding principles identified by the TAG for this Carrying Capacity Study are as follows:  Diverse and stable year-round population with a high quality of life  Sustainable tourism-based economy that also serves year-round population and business owners in the off-season  Balance between the needs of the tourism industry and year-round residents  Protection of Tybee Island’s environmental, historic and cultural resources  Safe multi-modal access to, from and within Tybee Island for residents and visitors  Adapting to a changing climate  Political and public support for implementation of the plan recommendations 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 72 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 6 2. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study included a robust community engagement process that was designed to be inclusive and to garner public support for the planning process and the final recommendations of the study. 2.1. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE A total of five (5) meetings were held over the course of this project with a total of 40+ people participating in one or more of the TAG public meetings. TAG meeting summaries and presentations are included in Appendix A. A brief summary of each meeting is included below: Meeting Date Meeting Agenda October 12, 2015 Project kick off; identification of data needs December 8, 2015 Review of Wave Ecology Report; review of data analysis; identification of resources and infrastructure to be studied; outstanding data needs March 29, 2016 Identify goals; identify impacts of population growth on resources and infrastructure June 1, 2016 HWY 80 project update; greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory update; identification of strategies to address impacts from population August 10, 2016 GHG inventory results; review of issues, strategies and considerations; development of work plan items In addition to the five (5) official TAG meetings, the community engagement process was coordinated closely with the 2008 Master Plan update. Data, issues, goals and other elements of the Carrying Capacity Study were presented at public meetings held for the Master Plan, and input provided at both the TAG meetings and the Master Plan public meetings informed the findings of this report. 2.2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS Throughout the planning process presentations were made to City Council on July 28th and September 8th, 2016. The purpose of these presentations was to update the elected officials on the planning process and to present the final recommendations of the study. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission members were also invited to participate in the TAG meetings. The Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study was also presented to coastal managers at the September 15, 2016 CRD Brownbag Presentation, and will be presented at the Georgia Climate Ready Conference to be held in Jekyll Island in November 2016. The purpose of these presentations is to present the final recommendations and describe the planning process. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 73 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 7 3. POPULATION DYNAMICS ON TYBEE ISLAND Due to Tybee Island’s prominence as a tourism and vacation destination, there are three distinct types of population that must be considered, as each type of population is necessary for the economic viability of the island but may be affected by a different grouping of limiting factors: 1.) Resident Population. This number includes homeowners and long-term rentals. 2.) Overnight Population. This number includes the resident population, but it also includes the short- term rental population which is proportionately significant, when compared to the resident population, and highly variable throughout the year. Also included in this population is the “second home” owners who own a second home on Tybee Island, which they do not rent, but at which they periodically vacation. 3.) Daytime Population. This number includes the resident and overnight populations as well as the day-tripper population, which is even more variable than the overnight population and the largest population during certain holidays such as the 4th of July. This report includes a summary of the following information regarding the City’s population:  Census data from 2000 and 2010  Analysis of the 2010 Census Data conducted by Tybee Island in support of the 2012 Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) negotiation  Data from the City’s Business License database regarding short-term rental units and hotel/motel rooms.  Occupancy data from the Tybee Island Campground and short-term rental agencies  Assessment of water use and sewage discharge data and its correlation to proposed resident population  City of Tybee Island Tourism Study This report also includes a projection of overnight and daytime populations based on the following information:  Data on rental units provided by the City’s Business License Tax Database and private rental agencies.  Water withdrawal data  Transportation studies maintained and/or performed by Tybee Island Daytime Population Overnight Population Resident Population 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 74 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 8 3.1. RESIDENT POPULATION Table 1 shows the Census data and trends related to population for 2000 and 2010. Table 2 presents the Census data and percentage change for every census since 1900. Please note that the 2010 Census showed the first population decrease on the island since 1920. Table 1: Population for Tybee Island, GA Source: Census Bureau Table 2: Historical Population Trends Source: Census Bureau Census Pop. % Change 1900 381 — 1910 786 106.3% 1920 117 −85.1% 1930 202 72.6% 1940 644 218.8% 1950 1,036 60.9% 1960 1,385 33.7% 1970 1,786 29.0% 1980 2,240 25.4% 1990 2,842 26.9% 2000 3,392 19.4% 2010 2,990 −11.9% Est. 2014 3,082 3.1% Table 3 presents the Housing Occupancy characteristics and associated trends over the same time period. Between the time period of 2000 and 2010, while resident population was decreasing, the number of total housing units increased. The increase in the total number of living units combined with the reduction in the number of permanently occupied units, resulted in a significant increase in the number of units that are not occupied by a permanent resident. Per the 2010 Census, approximately 60% of the units on the island are not permanently occupied. Census Data Type 2000 2010 Percent Change Population 3,392 2,990 -11.9% 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 75 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 9 Table 3: Housing Occupancy Characteristics for Tybee Island, GA Source: US Census Bureau Housing Unit Type 2000 Percent 2000 2010 Percent 2010 Percent Change Total Housing Units 2,696 -- 3,366 -- 24.9% Occupied Housing Units 1,568 58.2% 1,360 40.4% -13.3% Owner-Occupied 1,078 40.0% 918 27.3% -14.8% Renter-Occupied 490 18.2% 442 13.1% -9.8% Vacant Housing Units 1,128 41.8% 2,006 59.6% 77.8% Seasonal, Recreational, Occasional Use 676 25.1% 1,473 43.8% 117.9% For Rent/For Sale/Other 452 16.8% 533 15.8% 17.9% 3.2. OVERNIGHT POPULATION As a national tourist destination, it is reasonable to assume that Tybee Island has a significant increase in overnight (non-resident) population that stresses the City’s infrastructure and resources. Since tourism on Tybee Island is an economic driver for the region, it is necessary to assess and plan for the impact of increased summertime population. Tybee Island is a national tourism destination and this overnight, short-term population places a significant burden, in the form of “peak usage” upon Tybee Island’s services and infrastructure, including water, sewer, and roadways. Peak usage can be defined as the result of a period of simultaneous, strong consumer demand. In order to quantify this additional population and the associated demand placed on City infrastructure and services, EPG has prepared an estimate of overnight population based on data provided by the 2010 Census, the City’s Occupational Tax records for short-term rentals and hotel/motel units. In addition to the short-term rental units, the City of Tybee Island operates a campground that contains RV and tent campsites that would not have been included in the Census. Adding the total number of short-term rental units and hotel/motel units to the total number of campsites results in a total number of 1,738 short-term rental opportunities, as shown in Table 4 on the following page. The different types of short-term rental units (i.e. house/condo, hotel/motel, and RV/campsite), have different rental characteristics, and therefore are likely to have a different average number of people per rental event. For example, rental houses and condominiums on Tybee Island are typically rented by families, and therefore the number of people per occupied short-term rental units is estimated to be five or greater. Hotel and motel units typically fit less people, so an average number of people per rental event was estimated to be less at 2.5. The campsite actually maintains data on the average number of people per rental event, which was reported as 2.58 in the LOST Study referenced above. Utilizing the average number of people per rental event, Table 4 also projects the maximum short term rental population that would result from 100% occupancy of all short term rental opportuntiies. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 76 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 10 Table 4: Short Term Rental Unit Occupancy for Tybee Island, GA Source: City of Tybee Occupational Tax Database and Tybee Island Campground Rental Unit Type Number of Units Average Persons Per Unit Maximum Rental Population Hotel 420 2.5 1,050 Housing Unit 1,200 5 6,000 Campground 118 2.6 306 Total 1,738 7,356 * The Tybee Tourism Study does not differentiate between short-term rental unit types and estimates 4.3 people per unit, which equals a maximum short-term rental population of 7,473. In order to estimate the average overnight population associated with the short-term rental units and campsites on Tybee Island, the LOST Population Study conducted by Tybee Island in 2012 was referenced. As part of this study, information was solicited from the various rental agencies and campsite operator, including the estimated average percent occupancy per month, and the average number of people per rental event. This information was further updated as part of this Carrying Capacity Study, and confirmed through comparison to the City of Tybee Island Tourism Study (2014). This report also included percentage occupancy averages for short-term rental units on Tybee Island for each month of the year (Table 5). Utilizing the average number of people per rental event for the various short-term rental unit types, the monthly average short-term overnight population is projected in Table 6. Table 5: Short-Term Rental Occupancy Rates Source: Short-Term Rental Agencies on Tybee Island Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 22% 31% 62% 70% 64% 91% 96% 74% 57% 52% 33% 24% Table 6: Short-Term Rental Population by Month Rental Unit Type Hotel Unit House/Condo Campground Total Short- Term Rental Population Number of Units 420 1,200 118 Average Persons Per Unit 2.5 5 2.6 Occupancy Hotel Unit Rental Population House/Condo Unit Rental Population Campground Rental Population Jan 22% 231 1,319 67 1,617 Feb 31% 329 1,883 96 2,308 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 77 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 11 Rental Unit Type Hotel Unit House/Condo Campground Total Short- Term Rental Population Number of Units 420 1,200 118 Average Persons Per Unit 2.5 5 2.6 Occupancy Hotel Unit Rental Population House/Condo Unit Rental Population Campground Rental Population Mar 62% 649 3,711 190 4,550 Apr 70% 735 4,200 215 5,150 May 64% 674 3,851 197 4,721 Jun 91% 952 5,438 278 6,667 Jul 96% 1,011 5,780 296 7,086 Aug 74% 773 4,419 226 5,418 Sep 57% 595 3,401 174 4,169 Oct 52% 545 3,114 159 3,818 Nov 33% 346 1,976 101 2,422 Dec 24% 253 1,443 74 1,769 Annual Average 56% 591 3,378 173 4,141 Based on this information, the annual average for additional overnight population from short- term rentals is 4,141, the minimum (in January) is 1,617 and the maximum (in July) is 7,086. Adding the annual average for short term rental population to the 2014 estimated year-round average resident population of 3,082, results in an average overnight population of 7,223. Based on the occupancy rates during the months of July and January, the peak monthly average overnight population is 10,168 and the minimum monthly average population is 4,699. It is important to note that the overnight population numbers above do not address one segment of the overnight population, and that is “second home” owners, i.e. those people who own a second home on Tybee Island, which they do not rent, but at which they occasionally vacation. The second home owners also have the potential to affect the peak overnight population numbers as they are likely to be occupying their second homes during peak tourism months. This number, however, is more difficult to quantify and can only be estimated using the data sources described herein, and this estimated population is described in Table 7. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 78 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 12 Table 7: Second Home Maximum Overnight Population Source: US Census and Tybee Island Occupational Tax Database Total number of “vacant units” per the 2010 Census 2,006 Total number of vacation rental units per Tybee Island 1,200 Number of remaining units, with the potential to be “Second Home” Units 806 Average number of guests per “Second Home” unit 5 Maximum “Second Home” overnight population 4,030 If you add the maximum short term rental population of 7,356 to the 2014 resident population number of 3,082, the resulting maximum overnight population (not including second homes) for the island is 10,438. Adding the maximum “second home” overnight population number of 4,030 to the maximum population of 10,438, results in a potential maximum overnight population of 14,468. While peak occupancy may only happen during the summer season, and the maximum estimated overnight population may be unlikely to occur, the City of Tybee Island must maintain the infrastructure to service this maximum overnight population year-round. 3.3. DAYTIME POPULATION As a popular beach destination, Tybee Island not only has an increase in overnight population during the peak summer months, it also has an increase in daytime population. This metric is important because daytime visitors also place an additional strain on the City of Tybee Island’s infrastructure and services during their brief stay on the Island. In an attempt to quantify the additional daytime population during the summer months, EPG has reviewed the following transportation studies/information sources to gather data on traffic counts:  City of Tybee Island Pedestrian and Traffic Study (2010)  Tybee Island Wave Ecology and The Highway 80 Challenge (2011)  City of Tybee Island Tourism Study (2014)  City of Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Study (2016) The City of Tybee Island Police Department also maintains a traffic counter on Highway 80 near Breezy Point that has been fully operational since May 2014. The graph in Figure 1 was generated utilizing the available data from this counter and illustrates the average, weekend day average, and peak daily one-way traffic counts by month for the time period of May 2014 – September 2015. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 79 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 13 Figure 1: Automobile Trips onto Tybee Island The highest volume of traffic is during the peak summer months of May through July, further corroborating the projected increase in summertime overnight population. As expected, the average number of one-way trips onto Tybee Island is also greater on the weekends than during mid-week, and the difference increases during summer months. The Tybee Island Traffic and Parking Study reported that “during the summer, traffic on the weekend (Saturday) represents an increase of between 38 and 60 percent over a typical weekday (Thursday).” The Tybee Island Wave Ecology Report provides a peak daily traffic count of 16,173 for the week of July 3, 2010, and estimates that each trip would represent an average of 2 people. The report goes on to estimate that during peak times/events, such as the July 3rd fireworks event, the daytime population could exceed 30,000 people. If the metric of 2 people per trip were applied to the daily traffic count data during the twelve-month period from October 2014 – September 2015, this would result in the daytime population estimates provided in Table 8. Table 8: Traffic Counts and Daytime Population Estimate Source: Tybee Island Police Department Traffic Counts On-Island Trips Daytime Population Daily Average 6,726 13,452 Peak Day (July 2015) 14,233 28,466 The data above is fairly consistent with the data presented in the Wave Ecology Study, and while peak daily on-island trips can vary by a few thousand trips each year depending on which part of the week major events like the July 3rd fireworks fall on, both studies indicate that there is currently potential for a peak daytime population of at least 30,000 people. As much of the overnight and resident populations are likely to say “on-island” during big events, it is reasonable 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 One-Way Trips Month Average Weekend Day Average Peak Day 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 80 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 14 to assume that these populations may not be fully included in this estimate, and that the maximum daytime population likely exceeds 30,000 people. 3.4. POPULATION SUMMARY A summary of the various populations for Tybee Island is presented in Table 9 and Figure 2. Table 9: Population Count Summary 1Does not account for second home population 2Assumes 100% occupancy of all units on Tybee Figure 2: Populations on Tybee Island Population Metric Population Resident Population (2014, est.) 3,082 Annual Average Overnight Population 7,223 Annual Average Daytime Population 13,453 Peak July Overnight Population1 10,168 Maximum Overnight Population2 14,468 Peak Daytime Population 30,000 + Daytime Ave. 13,453 Peak 30,000+ Overnight Ave. 7,223 Peak 10,168 Max. 14,468 Resident 3,082 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 81 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 15 4. RESOURCE LIMITATIONS Due to Tybee Island’s status as a national tourism and vacation destination, the resident population, as presented in the Census, is not an accurate metric to use to determine the resources necessary to provide City services. City infrastructure and public services must be sufficient to serve the overnight and daytime populations, even as they peak during summer months. Since tourism focused on Tybee Island is a significant regional economic driver, it is to the benefit of the region as a whole that the City has the resources necessary to serve the tourist population. 4.1. WATER WITHDRAWAL & WATER USE The City of Tybee Island operates a water supply system that consists of three (3) water withdrawal wells that pull water from the Upper Floridan Aquifer. The City is currently permitted to withdraw an annual average of 0.916 million gallons per day (MGD), with a monthly average limit of 1.6 MGD to allow for the peak usage associated with the summer tourism season. In order to project peak water demands, it is first necessary to understand the per capita daily water usage on Tybee Island. The Chatham County Water Supply Plan 2006 Update reported the per capita daily water usage for Tybee Island at 216.7 gallons. However, this number is misleading because it was calculated by simply dividing the annual average daily water usage in 2005 by the 2005 resident population number. The average annual daily water usage will include the following elements that will skew the per capita water usage number 1) peak summer water usage associated with peak short-term rental season, 2) the increase in commercial water usage that occurs during the summer season, and 3) water used for irrigation purposes during the growing season. All three of these factors will cause per capita water usage to appear larger than it truly is. In addition, the resident population number was used, not the overnight population. At no point during the year are the short-term rental units at 0% occupancy so not including these people in the calculation further compounds the skew in the per capita water usage. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, the City of Tybee Island has implemented a comprehensive Water Conservation Program since the per capita water usage number was calculated in 2006, and it is likely that the per capita water usage has decreased as a result. Accordingly, EPG has utilized the following methodology to limit the undesirable variables and recalculate the City’s per capita water usage for 2015. In order to reduce water usage attributed to tourism, commercial use, and irrigation, the daily average water usage for the months of January only from 2010 – 2014 was used and is presented in Table 10. Furthermore, this number was divided by the minimum overnight population calculated in the month of January (4,699). This number is greater than the resident population because, even though January represents the low point of the tourism season, there is still a non-resident overnight population on the island based on the occupancy numbers presented in the section above. As shown in Table 11, the resulting per capita water usage is 117 gallons per day (GPD) which is almost half of the usage presented in the 2006 report. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 82 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 16 Table 10: January Average Daily Water Usage Source: Tybee Island Water and Sewer Department Year January Daily Average Water Withdrawal (MGD) 2010 0.56 2011 0.50 2012 0.51 2013 0.54 2014 0.65 5-Year Average 0.55 Table 11: Per Capita Water Usage 5-Yr Ave Water Withdrawal in January (GPD) Minimum Overnight Population in January Per Capita Water Usage (GPD) 550,000 4,699 117 4.1.1 Correlation of Overnight Population with Water Usage In an effort to provide documentation of the surge in summertime overnight population, EPG reviewed the City’s monthly average water usage. The graph in Figure 3 illustrates the significant increase in water usage, primarily associated with an increase in population during summer months. Figure 3: Monthly Average and Maximum Water Withdrawal 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Jan-10Mar-10May-10Jul-10Sep-10Nov-10Jan-11Mar-11May-11Jul-11Sep-11Nov-11Jan-12Mar-12May-12Jul-12Sep-12Nov-12Jan-13Mar-13May-13Jul-13Sep-13Nov-13Jan-14Mar-14May-14Jul-14Sep-14Nov-14Monthly Water Withdrawal (MGD) Daily Average Daily Max 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 83 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 17 Tybee Island’s peak summer month for tourism is July. An obvious and significant peak in usage occurs during this month in all five years. In fact, in 2010, the water usage during the peak month of July was 2.8 times greater than the usage in the off-season month of February. 4.1.2 Tybee Island Water Withdrawal Permit Limitations The Water Withdrawal Permit for the City of Tybee Island contains the following withdrawal limits from the Floridan Aquifer:  Monthly Average of 1.6 MGD  Existing Annual Average of 0.916 MGD  2020 Annual Average of 0.916 MGD  2025 Annual Average of 0.516 MGD Figures 4 and 5 show the permit limits as they compare with the 2010 – 2014 water usage data. Figure 4: Monthly Average Water Usage and Permit Limit Figure 4 indicates that during summer months in four out of the last five years, the maximum daily withdrawal exceeded 1.6 MGD, but the monthly daily average for all years was still within the water withdrawal permit. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Jan-10Mar-10May-10Jul-10Sep-10Nov-10Jan-11Mar-11May-11Jul-11Sep-11Nov-11Jan-12Mar-12May-12Jul-12Sep-12Nov-12Jan-13Mar-13May-13Jul-13Sep-13Nov-13Jan-14Mar-14May-14Jul-14Sep-14Nov-14Monthly Water Withdrawal (MGD) Daily Average Daily Max Permit Limit 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 84 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 18 Figure 5. Annual Daily Average Water Usage and Permit Limits While Figure 5 shows that the City has not exceeded its annual average permit limitation during the time period of 2010 – 2014, it shows that the City’s current water usage exceeds the proposed annual average permit limit for 2025. Compared with the annual average water usage from 2010 – 2014 (0.827 MGD), annual water usage needs from the Floridan Aquifer must be reduced by 38% to reach the proposed permit limit for 2025. Using the per capita water usage number calculated above (117 GPD), the maximum overnight population that could be supported under Tybee Island’s current and future Floridan Aquifer water withdrawal permit is calculated in Table 12. Table 12: Projected Maximum Population Supported under Floridan Aquifer Water Withdrawal Permit Limits Water Withdrawal MGD Overnight Population Supported Monthly Average (Peak) 1.6 13,675 Existing Annual Average 0.916 7,829 2025 Annual Average 0.516 4,410 When comparing the numbers in Table 12 above with the overnight population estimates below, it is apparent that Tybee Island is currently close to or at the water withdrawal capacity from the Floridan Aquifer needed to serve the existing average annual population. Furthermore, the City’s 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Annual Daily Average and Permit Limitations Annual Daily Average 2015 Annual Ave. Permit Limit 2025 Annual Ave. Permit Limit 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 85 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 19 future water usage related to annual average overnight population will exceed the 2025 water withdrawal limit, even without consideration for any population or tourism industry growth. While the peak overnight population for the month of July can be accommodated within the current and future permit limits, the maximum potential overnight population number exceeds the population that could be supported under the current permit limitations in 2016 and 2025. This is consistent with the water usage data illustrated in Figure 5 above. It is also important to consider that there will be additional withdrawal capacity needed to serve the additional commercial and irrigation needs in the summer, and that is not necessarily accounted for in the estimates in Table 13, nor is additional population related to future growth. Table 13: Population that Can Be Supported within Water Withdrawal Permit Limits 4.1.3 Water Distribution Infrastructure System The City’s water distribution system is relatively new, and the City’s engineer estimates that 80% of the system is less than 20 years old. There is still about 100 ft. of asbestos pipe that needs to be replaced, but the majority of the capital improvements needed to address deficiencies in the distribution system have been completed. The well pump houses associated with Tybee Island’s three wells are located on Van Horne Ave, Butler Ave, and 14th Street. The Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Study has found that these well houses, due to their low elevation at 11.3’, 8.0’, and 9.3’ respectively, are vulnerable to flooding, storm surge, and sea level rise. After performing a cost benefit analysis based on the potential capital damage and economic loss associated with flooding, the report recommends elevating the Butler Ave and 14th Street well houses above the 100-year floodplain, (the area subjected to a 1% chance of flooding in any given year). Discussions with the City’s engineer recommended elevating the wells to 21.5 feet above MHT (mean high tide) which would be above the projected storm surge for a Category 4 Hurricane. All three wells would need to be elevated to exceed this benchmark and the project cost would be approximately $600,000. Metric Population Projection Population Supported by Water Permit 2016 Population Supported by Water Permit 2025 Annual Average Overnight Population 7,223 7,829 4,410 Peak Overnight Population (July) 10,168 13,675 13,675 Maximum Potential Overnight Population 14,468 13,675 13,675 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 86 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 20 4.1.4 Alternative Water Supply Due to the future limitations on the City’s current water supply source, the Upper Floridan Aquifer, the City is working in partnership with the State of Georgia to install and test a Cretaceous well, in the hope that this will provide an alternative source for potable water, as it has on Hilton Head Island. Hilton Head Island had to decommission several Upper Floridan Wells due to high chlorides resulting from the same salt water intrusion event that is the cause of Tybee Island’s current permit limitations for water withdrawal from this aquifer. This $5 million project was made possible by a grant from the Georgia Environmental Finance Authority. At the time of this report, the well is being drilled and the test is ongoing; however, it is expected that Tybee’s Cretaceous well is likely to produce sufficient water for the projected additional need of approximately 0.8 MGD. In fact, the well will be sized to produce up to 1.5 to 2.0 MGD. Due to its depth, the water it will produce is expected to be hot and relatively high in chlorides, requiring treatment through a chiller and a reverse osmosis (RO) system, as well as mixing with Upper Floridan water. The anticipated capital costs for the treatment system for a 1.0 MGD well is $5 million with another $1.5 million needed to address discharge of the briny wastewater produced through the RO process. In addition to the capital costs of building the RO treatment plan, operational costs to produce water on an ongoing basis are expected to increase from approximately $0.25 - $0.30/1,000 gallons of water withdrawal from the Upper Floridan to as much as $1.50/1,000 gallons for RO of water from the Cretaceous Aquifer. Hilton Head’s current treatment costs to operate their RO plant are reported to be approximately only $0.60/1,000 gallons; however, that would still be a 100% increase in the cost to produce 1,000 gallons of water. There is also the challenge of disposing of the brine produced as a waste product of the RO treatment process. Disposal may be achieved through pipes that run under the bed of the Savannah Harbor, or through diffusers that are directed out into the open ocean. Both of these options have significant challenges related to environmental permitting, impacts to aquatic life, and construction. The City may also consider mixing the brine with the discharge from the WPCP, to reduce the potential environmental impacts of discharging briny water into the local estuarine environment. However, this would necessitate an additional or upsized discharge pipe as the current WPCP discharge pipe is not sized to handle the combined capacity. Construction on the current WPCP discharge pipe would also have environmental permitting challenges; nevertheless, discussion with the City’s engineer indicated that this may be the least impactful way of discharging the briny waste from a future RO water treatment plant. The alternative of buying and pumping water from the City of Savanah is currently viewed as a viable option. Aside from the $10 - $12 million cost of the infrastructure to deliver Savannah water to Tybee Island, it would also require additional treatment due to holding time in the long conveyance system, further increasing the cost. In addition, environmental permitting of the infrastructure would be difficult as the pipes would travel through some major wetland areas. If the City elects to use the Cretaceous well for water supply and invests in construction of the RO treatment plant, the construction and operation of the new well and associated treatment system will have a major impact on water rates. Further compounding this effect, is Tybee 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 87 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 21 Island’s limited ability to collect aide-to-construction, impact or tap fees from new construction to pay for the capital costs of building the RO treatment system. The capital and operational costs must instead be included in the water use rates. The City completed a rate study several years ago and the recommendations have since been implemented; however, the potential costs associated with the Cretaceous Well were not considered. 4.2. WASTEWATER DISCHARGE Tybee Island operates a water pollution control plant (WPCP), and the permitted discharge limitations are described in Table 14. Table 14: Tybee Island NPDES Wastewater Discharge Permit Limits Months Monthly Average (MGD) Weekly Average (MGD) May – September 1.15 1.44 October – April 0.89 1.11 A review of Tybee Island’s monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) from October 2012 through August 2015, submitted to EPD per the City’s NPDES Wastewater Discharge Permit, indicates that the wastewater discharge has exceeded or come close to exceeding permitted limitations during the summer seasons of 2013, 2014, and 2015 (Figure 6). This has occurred despite the higher discharge limitations afforded to the City of Tybee Island during the summer months to allow for peak demands associated with the tourism season. Figure 6: Wastewater Discharge Flow and Permit Limits 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Oct-12Dec-12Feb-13Apr-13Jun-13Aug-13Oct-13Dec-13Feb-14Apr-14Jun-14Aug-14Oct-14Dec-14Feb-15Apr-15Jun-15Aug-15Wastewater Discharge Flow (MGD) Flow Average Flow Ave. Permit Limit Flow Maximum Flow Max Permit Limit 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 88 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 22 Tybee Island’s WPCP has also experienced a few daily water quality violations for ammonia and total suspended solids (TSS), and there were historic permit violations for ammonia, as shown in Figure 7. To address this issue, the City has recently installed a new digester which will ameliorate the WPCP’s ability to process TSS and ammonia. Figure 7: WPCP Ammonia Discharge and Permit Limits Review of the discharge data and discussions with the City’s Engineer indicate that the WPCP is essentially at capacity for treatment. The WPCP in its current configuration can process 1.6 MGD of wastewater flow for treatment; however, the WPCP discharge pipe is sized to handle 3.0 MGD. Due to space limitations at the site, there is not room for expansion of the existing WPCP. Therefore, if the City elects to upgrade the plant, the type of treatment process will have to be upgraded from aerobic digesters to a membrane system in order to occupy the same footprint. A permit increase for wastewater discharge flow will also result in the need to upgrade the WPCP treatment system. As discharge flow allowances are increased, the limits for the individual water quality parameters will be reduced, necessitating a higher level of treatment. A membrane system would also allow the City to treat wastewater discharge to a higher degree, but the cost to upgrade the WPCP would be substantial. Combined with the looming costs associated with the RO treatment system for the Cretaceous well, the implications for the water and sewer rate payers on Tybee Island is significant. While the City can treat its wastewater discharge to reuse standards, distribution of reuse water (as opposed to direct discharge) is not a viable option due to the limited places that could receive the irrigation water, the tight location of existing utilities, and the need for an entirely new distribution system that would likely be cost prohibitive. 0 10 20 30 Ammonia (mg/L) Monthly Average Maximum Monthly Average Limit Weekly Average Limit 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 89 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 23 The City’s Engineer reports that the wastewater collection system is in good condition, and that 50% of the collection system is less than 20 years old or has been relined in the last 20 years. The City completed an Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Study a few years ago, and 90% of the recommended projects have been completed. The I&I projects left to be completed are limited, and it is the belief of the City Engineer that I&I is no longer a significant problem on the island. The City is in the process of upgrading the pump stations and the associated force mains, which should further reduce any remaining I&I. The City is performing these upgrades at a rate of one per year; two have been completed and there are seven pump stations remaining. The cost of the pump station upgrades are between $25,000 and $100,000 each. 4.3. TRANSPORTATION & PARKING 4.3.1 U.S. Highway 80 (US 80) Capacity and Road Network Capacity The City of Tybee Island is connected to the mainland by US 80. Between Talahi Island and Tybee Island, US 80 is an approximately 5.5 mile, two-way, two-lane rural highway with intermittent passing lanes. Two bridges exist along this stretch of US 80, 1) the Bull River Bridge and 2) Lazaretto Creek Bridge. This roadway is the only connection from Tybee Island to the mainland and is the sole evacuation route for Tybee Island residents and visitors. It has also been designated as a future bikeway in the Coastal Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO)’s Long Range Plan. Currently, US 80 does not have any dedicated bicycle or pedestrian facilities and the Bull River and Lazaretto Creek Bridges only support one lane of traffic in each direction with limited to no shoulders to allow for traffic to pass an accident or for pedestrian/bicycle access. The McQueen’s Island Historic Trail, a six-mile, former railroad right-of-way turned multi-use trail, runs along the north side of US 80 between Bull River and the Fort Pulaski National Monument. Currently, this trail can only be accessed by driving to the trail and parking at either the Fort Pulaski National Monument or at a small parking area east of Bull River Bridge that is dedicated parking for trail access. Currently, this trail does not extend to or connect to either of the bridges along US 80. The trail is well utilized by the local community as well as tourists, but its use and ability to serve as a safe alternative transportation route to and from Tybee Island, is limited because of its lack of connectivity. Travel between Tybee Island and the mainland and Talahi Island is also currently hampered by limited passing lanes along this stretch of US 80 and these limitations become more challenging when traffic incidents occur and during peak tourism season, weekends, special events and festivals. The existing roadway also experiences flooding during King Tide events and coastal storms, and, as a result, is periodically closed. The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) has also determined that Lazaretto Creek Bridge is structurally deficient and eligible for replacement. Various improvements to this corridor have been suggested and studied over the past 20 years because of these community concerns about the reliability and safety of access to and from Tybee Island. These various improvements and studies have at times been the subject of political and public debate because of conflicting needs and concerns regarding public safety and road 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 90 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 24 congestion, environmental impacts, and construction costs, as well as concerns regarding potential impacts to the “character” of Tybee Island that could indirectly result from expansion of Highway 80. After completing various studies and gathering public input, GDOT and CORE MPO concluded that widening US 80 into a four-lane highway was infeasible because their transportation models indicated this highway functions at a high level of service most of the time and that construction and environmental impacts would be too costly. Planning efforts subsequently focused on roadway and bridge improvements that could be made to the existing two-lane highway. In May 2011, the CORE MPO helped coordinate a study of US 80 and Tybee Island to document the mobility challenges associated with tourism and special events on Tybee Island and develop short-term strategies to address public safety concerns along US 80. The results of the Study were presented in a Technical Report titled Tybee Island Wave Ecology and The Highway 80 Challenge, dated May 2011. Four short-term strategies were selected for implementation to address transportation deficiencies along US 80, including: 1) Installing road public safety signage 2) Establishing a bus or shuttle service during special events and during peak tourism events as well as an ongoing bus/shuttle service 3) Utilizing signal timing and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) 4) Using social media for dissemination of information to the general public. Concurrently, the CORE MPO also commissioned an additional study that began in 2010 to examine current and future transportation deficiencies along the segment of US 80 that connects Tybee Island to the mainland, including Bull River and Lazaretto Creek bridges, and recommended alternatives to address those deficiencies. The Study, titled “US 80 Bridges Replacement Study (P.I. No. 0009379),” was concluded and released in 2012. A copy of this Study may be accessed through the CORE MPO’s website at: http://www.thempc.org/docs/lit/corempo/studies/us80/finalreport.pdf The CORE MPO’s Study of deficiencies along this US 80 corridor included an evaluation of current and future deficiencies related to travel demand and operational conditions (i.e., road capacity), system linkages, safety, and roadway design. The following is a summary of findings from this study:  Roadway capacity was found to be generally sufficient, according to a comparison of the capacity calculations with the estimated demand from the travel demand model and with the observed demand from special traffic counts during a summer holiday period. Capacity is sometimes exceeded when holidays overlap weekends.  System linkages are poor for bicyclists and pedestrians, due to current characteristics of the road and bridges and lack of connections to the existing McQueen’s Island Trail. Narrow shoulders, or shoulders filled with rumble strips, as well as high motor vehicle speeds are the problematic characteristics for bicyclists and pedestrians. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 91 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 25  Regarding safety in general, the concerns include crash rates, bridge sufficiency ratings, and roadway flooding. The crash rate, from 2006 through 2008, was higher in the corridor than the statewide average for rural principal arterials in that period, 45% higher on average, although there was much variation among years.  The Lazaretto Creek Bridge had a sufficiency rating of 41.45 at the time of this evaluation; a rating below 50 means it is a candidate for some type of improvement in the bridge prioritization process by the Georgia Department of Transportation.  Flooding, due to peak high tides, affects both directions of travel on US 80 for one to three hours and for an average of three days per year. The eastbound lane is affected for an additional two times per year.  The usable shoulders on the bridges and the causeway are narrower than recommended for a high-speed road that serves as a bikeway, and also do not allow space for disabled vehicles to be adequately cleared from traffic flow. Expectations of drivers wishing to go through the corridor with no delay are in conflict with the needs of some drivers to access local sites [Ft. Pulaski and McQueen’s Trail], as the latter must slow or stop in the travel lane, sometimes even in a passing lane. The CORE MPO’s Study developed suggested options to address the identified deficiencies and then combined these into six Alternatives that were then scored and evaluated for feasibility. The construction of additional thoroughfares (i.e., road widening by constructing additional lanes along this stretch of US 80) were not included in these Alternatives. “Alternative 3” scored the highest in the Study evaluation and was recommended as the option to move forward in the next stages of project development overseen by GDOT. Recommendations for improvements to the existing two-lane highway for this Alternative included the following:  Replacement of the Lazaretto Creek and Bull River Bridges with new bridges that included two traffic lanes, ten-foot bikeable shoulders and a ten-foot barrier separated multi-use path. The new bridges would be located adjacent to the existing bridges on the north side of US 80 and the existing bridges would be removed.  Roadway improvements in the form of ten-foot paved bikeable shoulders along each lane of US 80;  Re-striping the roadway near Fort Pulaski to allow for a left hand and right hand turn lane;  Extension of the existing McQueen’s Island Trail to the new Lazaretto Creek Bridge; and  Construction of an 18-space parking area at the entrance to McQueen’s Island Trail with a left hand turn lane. A side-path would connect the existing trail to the path on the new Bull River Bridge. GDOT is using the results and recommendations from the CORE MPO’s 2012 US 80 Bridges Replacement Study as a baseline for their ongoing, multi-phase planning efforts for this corridor. Possible roadway elevations in some sections will also be evaluated for sections of US 80 where flooding has been an issue. GDOT has also proposed that, if constructed, the ten-foot paved bikeable shoulders along each lane of Highway 80 could be used as additional lanes for automobile traffic in the event of an emergency to ease traffic congestion. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 92 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 26 GDOT is now funding the implementation project (US 80 Bridges and Road Improvements, P.I. No. 0010560). GDOT’s Scoping and Preliminary Engineering Phase is expected to start by July 2017. GDOT’s scoping phase will look at need, feasibility, and issues that may arise if the recommended improvements are implemented. Scoping will take three years due to the various required phases such as surveying, environmental analysis, and public involvement. Environmental studies required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) will be conducted, including environmental approval of a preferred Alternative. Future phases will include right-of-way (ROW) assessments and acquisitions and a Final Design study. According to GDOT, the National Park Service (NPS) owns 90% of the land within the project limits and GDOT maintains an easement for the current US 80 ROW. The schedule for these future projects has not been released to the general public at this time. As noted above, GDOT has proposed that side path connections from both bridges be constructed to connect to the McQueen’s Island Historic Trail, and these side path connections will be designed and funded by GDOT in conjunction with the other US 80 improvements. However, while GDOT does support the eastern extension of the McQueen’s Island Historic Trail towards Lazaretto Creek Bridge, they are not currently assuming financial or planning and design responsibility for this trail extension. 4.3.2 Parking The average number of day trips on to the island, as reported in Section 1.3, was 6,726, and the maximum number recorded during the July 4th weekend in 2015 was 14,233. The Tybee Island Tourism Report found that Tybee Island has 1,044,000 visitors annually. Understandably, a percentage of these trips represent the automobiles of island residents or overnight visitors commuting onto the island, and their vehicles would be parked at their home or rental unit. However, if every resident and one person from every occupied short-term rental unit made one vehicle trip a day on and off of Tybee Island, that would only reduce the daily average to 2,762 trips and daily maximum to 9,505 trips. Each trip likely results in a need to park for some length of time. While trip counts are recorded over the course of a 24-hour period, this still represents a significant parking need, especially at peak hours during festival events and during “beach hours” in the summer months. The Tybee Island Tourism Study looked at peak travel issues and provided the following graph, in Figure 8, to illustrate typical travel patterns onto Tybee Island during the month of June. This graph clearly demonstrates that majority of vehicles traveling onto Tybee Island during the peak summer season do so between the hours of 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM, creating a significant parking demand during those hours. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 93 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 27 Inevitably the demand for and lack of available parking during peak hours can have an impact on the island and its residents. Vehicles idling and circling the island looking for available parking can cause traffic congestion; present a safety hazard for pedestrians, bicyclists and other vehicles accessing the beach; and cause air quality issues. During these high demand periods, some residential property owners have also experienced illegal parking on their private property, limiting their access and potentially damaging their property. Parking Space Inventory & Availability The City of Tybee Island completed a Traffic and Parking Study in 2005 to evaluate existing traffic and parking conditions in the City of Tybee Island and to make recommendations to address identified issues. As part of the parking inventory, observations were made regarding utilization of the available spaces. The following observations were made during the peak mid-day period on Saturday, July 17, 2004.  North Beach Parking Lot was full by 2:00 PM.  South Beach Parking Lots were full by 1:00 PM.  Mid-Island Beach Access On-Street Parking (metered spaces located at the beach access points and along US 80) were predominantly utilized, but no single location was 100%, except for Tybrisa Street. As part of this study, a Parking Facility Inventory was completed and included public pay lots, private lots and on-street parking along the US 80/Butler Avenue corridor. At the time this study was conducted, the consultant identified 1,654 public parking spaces. The Study went on to make Figure 8: Volume of Vehicle Flow During the Peak Season 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 94 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 28 the following observations and recommendations regarding the actual and perceived lack of parking on Tybee Island. 1. Beach Access Signage The utilization of on-street parking along US 80, especially in the Mid-Island area, is relatively low; however, visitors believe that there is no available parking. Signage should be added indicating the location of public beach access to encourage utilization of this available parking, and spread out the demand focused on the pay lots serving the North Beach and South Beach areas. 2. Satellite Parking and Shuttle System The City needs to increase its overall inventory of available parking spaces; however, there is limited available land to do so in the South and North Beach areas near beach access. Identify satellite/remote parking areas and use shuttle service to deliver people to South Beach and North Beach. 3. Parking Lot Improvements The circulation patterns, at that time, in the North Beach and South End Public Parking Lots was poor and in the North Beach area, parking spots were not completely defined. This study stated that “[future] visitor demand will be limited to the availability of parking spaces on the island,” as opposed to access to the island provided by the Level of Service on US 80. Since this time, the City has made some improvements to public parking lots and has converted much of the public parking meters to Pay and Display (P&D) Parking Kiosks. This has allowed for expansion of the parking inventory and better tracking of utilization. The City’s current inventory of public, delineated spaces is 2,091. There are also a total of 234 approved private parking spaces, for a total of 2,325 total delineated parking spaces. The private parking space inventory can vary from year to year as private parking lots require annual permit approval by the Tybee Island City Council. The 2016 private parking lots are described in Table 15. Table 15: 2016 Private Parking Inventory Name Location Number of Spots Sunrise Parking 1511 Butler Ave 39 Ocean Plaza Beach Resort 1401 Strand 128 Renee G Bridges 1001 Butler Ave 30 Bramble Family 215 Lovell 13 Joyce Prescott 214 2nd Ave 12 Jack Rosenberg 203 14th Street 12 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 95 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 29 Interviews with Tybee Island’s Parking Services staff indicate that there are still some non- delineated public parking locations within the City ROW. If the ROW area is not near a P&D kiosk, then Parking Services does not typically consider these areas to be delineated spaces and will not ticket the vehicle for not paying. The City has determined that it is not financially beneficial to purchase and maintain P&D kiosks in remote areas where parking only occurs on busy summer weekends. In addition, many local visitors to Tybee Island may know someone who owns a residential property on the island where friends and relatives are permitted to park when they visit the island. Estimating the number of additional private parking spots this creates is not possible; however, it is important to recognize that these areas do represent additional parking opportunities for visitors to Tybee Island. Parking Issues Summary In order to identify current issues related to parking availability on Tybee Island, EPG reviewed the findings of the 2005 Traffic and Parking Study, conducted interviews with City staff, and received comments from stakeholders. The following issues were identified. 1) Perception of Parking Availability In order to address the issues with perceived availability of parking, first identified in the 2005 Traffic and Parking Study, the City created a Parking Application for smart phones. This app is designed to let visitors know where parking is available on the island and the percent utilization. Parking Services staff update this app on an hourly basis during the summer to show how full (percentage-wise) the three main parking areas are. Parking Services divides the Island into three parking areas: 1) South End (south of 14th), 2) Middle Island (14th north to 2nd), and 3) North Beach (the Lighthouse area). The app does not currently store previously entered information regarding the percent utilization of the parking areas; however, Parking Service staff who enter the data into the app reported that every weekend in the summer and on big holidays and festival days, North Beach and South End parking areas are 99% full and Mid-Island is typically 85%, mirroring the findings in the 2005 Traffic and Parking Study. 2) South End Parking Demand Parking Services staff stated that the South End is the most overtaxed parking area. During summer weekends, visitors potentially spend significant time circling the area looking for parking, as opposed to looking for parking in other areas such as Mid-Island. The City has implemented, and then discontinued, a couple of initiatives to address this issue to little effect. The City erected gates on Butler Ave. past Tybrisa Ave. to block traffic from entering the South End when parking was at capacity; however, cars then proceeded to line up on Butler Ave, outside the gate, causing a traffic issue. Public Works has also used signage in the South End to direct people to other parking areas with limited success. Parking Services staff explained that, in their experience, people would prefer to wait to park close to the beach area they wished to visit, i.e. the Pier and Pavilion area, as 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 96 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 30 opposed to parking in a more distant location and carrying all of their belongings to the beach. 3) Commercial Parking Requirements The City Planning and Zoning staff have received comments from potential commercial developers that parking requirements are hampering future commercial development along US 80. The Zoning ordinance requires that any new commercial development or use provide parking on-site if it is not within 1,000 feet of a public parking lot. Therefore, vacant buildings and properties on US 80 that are developed as commercial businesses have to provide on-site parking. Because space available for commercial development along this corridor is already limited, the requirements for on-site parking can be cost- prohibitive and impede commercial development of this corridor. The City has had preliminary discussions regarding using some portion of the City’s unopened ROWs along this corridor to provide public parking. The potential benefits to pursuing this concept would be: 1) to provide public parking so that future business on US 80 don’t have to use their valuable lot space to do so and 2) to provide additional parking for visitors to Tybee Island. 4) Satellite Parking Lots There have been previous attempts at staging satellite parking areas and operating a shuttle service to move people from their vehicles to their desired beach access point, but the City staff did not perceive it as a successful initiative. As stated above, there was consensus that most visitors to the beach want to be within walking distance to their car since they are likely carrying a lot of personal items. Furthermore, there was concern about how the City would charge for this service. Specifically, if the City charged for the remote parking itself, the City staff felt that any parking shuttle service must be free of charge lest it become cost prohibitive for people to use. However, under this model, the cost burden of the shuttle service would fall on the City, and would likely need to be subsidized. 5) Parking Garage Due to their perceived cost/benefit ratio, the City has never seriously considered the construction of a public parking garage, despite the fact that it has been mentioned in several planning documents including the 2005 Traffic Study and the City’s 2008 Master Plan. Parking Services staff stated that while there is a great deal of pressure for parking during summer weekends and special events, there is sufficient available parking during the rest of the year. Their perspective is that a public garage would only be full for approximately 16 – 24 weekends per year, and it would not result in a viable financial model for such a project. However, Parking Services staff did identify the Hotel Tybee property as a location with the potential to support a parking garage, due to its proximity to the beach. The City could potentially consider a public/private partnership to build a parking garage at this location which could make the project more feasible. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 97 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 31 Public input provided by a member of the TAG expressed support for the idea of a parking garage in the C1 district on the South End of the island and called attention to the cost to the City in terms of lost revenue from visitors and quality of life for island residents to NOT address the parking issue. A parking garage could be sited to “funnel” visitors to the downtown commercial district with places to shop, dine, and lay in the sun. Having ample parking in C1 could accomplish the following:  Direct traffic to a parking facility conveniently located near the most popular beach for day visitors - with the pier, public restrooms, and tourism-based businesses. This could provide additional support to these business by pedestrian use in this commercial zone once visitors find a parking spot.  Reduce traffic congestion and idling cars circling for parking in the South End where it is most difficult to find parking during peak weekends.  Reduce illegal parking in residents’ front and side yards.  Reduce traffic overflowing into neighboring residential areas west of Butler Ave., thereby protecting the quality of life and pedestrian environment in these residential neighborhoods A parking garage could be designed to serve dual purposes. In addition to parking, it could offer public green space or recreational area on top, such as a pool, waterslide, or putt- putt. Public restrooms and/or a public safety office could also be located in the structure. This would increase the benefit and utilization of the structure in the off season, and potentially address stormwater issues created by the construction of the garage. 6) Special Events Parking City staff do not feel that lack of parking prevents people from holding or attending special events on Tybee Island. The City requires special event planners to identify parking areas and use remote parking when necessary. The event planner is then responsible for providing signage and volunteers to direct vendors/visitors to the satellite parking and providing shuttle service when necessary. For example, if an event is planned on the south end of Tybee Island, event planners often identify satellite parking at the North Beach parking lot. City staff did note that there have been instances where illegal parking on residential ROWs became a problem during certain events, and they are more likely to experience these types of issues when the event takes place in a parking lot and parking spaces are lost. 7) Lack of Alternative Modes of Transportation It is generally accepted that if there were more viable alternative transportation opportunities, there would be less of a need for visitors to drive and park their vehicles on Tybee Island, thereby lessening parking concerns and reducing traffic congestion. However, there are very limited options for getting to or around the island for people without a personal vehicle. Staff indicated that the City is reluctant to develop a formal program for shuttling visitors on and off island due to the liability and cost implications. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 98 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 32 The Coastal Regional Commission previously operated the Savannah – Tybee Island Shuttle, which runs Friday – Sunday, four times per day. However, due to low ridership, this service has been canceled, as of the date of this report. TAG members felt that there was not enough promotion of this service locally to ensure its success.. 4.4. STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY The City of Tybee Island operates a public drainage system that serves to convey stormwater runoff to local rivers, tidal creeks, marshes, and the ocean. The system components have been inventoried and are summarized in the table below. Table 16: Stormwater System Inventory Structure Number or Length Inlets & Catch Basins 363 Outfalls 38 Ditches 10,000 feet Storm Sewer Lines 41,700 feet The City is required to implement a stormwater management program in compliance with the NPDES Phase I Medium MS4 Permit, as required by provisions of the Georgia Water Quality Control Act and the Federal Clean Water Act. This permit requires the development of a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP), to address the following program elements, as stipulated in CFR 122.26(d)(2)(iv)(A) through 122.26(d)(2)(iv)(D): • Structural and Source Control Measures • Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination • Industrial Facility Stormwater Runoff Control • Construction Site Runoff Management The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) has previously required the City of Tybee Island to expand its SWMP to include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address the following required modifications: • Impaired Waterways, i.e. 303(d) listed stream segments • Highly Visible Pollutant Sources • Public Education/Public Involvement • Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping • Development of an Enforcement Response Plan • Development of a Green Infrastructure Plan 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 99 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 33 • Post Construction Stormwater Control Compliance with this permit and implementation of the City’s SWMP is intended to protect and improve water quality in local rivers, marshes and creeks by reducing the amount of non-point source pollution that is conveyed through the City’s drainage system. Through this program, the City has educated the public and businesses about best practices to reduce stormwater pollution, and has developed a more proactive approach to drainage system maintenance. The City also performs illicit discharge and water quality monitoring that will provide useful data, over time, to evaluate the success of this program. 4.4.1 Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan As a barrier island, Tybee Island has unique stormwater and flooding issues which are complicated by tidal influences and sea level rise. The “Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan” explores several steps that the City of Tybee Island can take to become more resilient over time to sea level rise and the resulting flooding issues. Overall, the report serves as an initial effort to characterize vulnerabilities, explore potential adaptation actions, and recommend implementation of those identified actions that show clear benefit. The City of Tybee Island partnered with researchers and outreach professionals from Georgia Sea Grant, the University of Georgia, and Stetson University on this project. Figure 9: Flooding on U.S. Highway 80 during a King Tide Event in October 2015 (Photo Credit: Tybee Island Police Department) Sea-level rise has been documented from a long-term, NOAA tide gauge at Fort Pulaski, located within several miles of the City of Tybee Island. Since installation in 1935, sea-level has risen 10 inches. Records from this station have also shown the frequency of “nuisance” flooding steadily increasing in the past several decades, including a record of 23 separate “nuisance” floods in 2015, the most of any year since the tide gauge was installed. NOAA defines a “nuisance” flood when the water level exceeds 5.2 ft. above NAVD88 (~9.2 ft. above MLLW), and at this depth, minor saltwater flooding occurs on roads and yards in Tybee Island. Figure 9 shows an example of US 80 being flooded during a king tide event in October 2015. When this roadway is flooded, it has significant impact on public safety and the local economy, as it is the sole access road for 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 100 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 34 the Island. Adaptive planning efforts for the City of Tybee Island were focused on a 50-year time frame. When meeting participants worked with the project team to decide on the rate of sea-level rise to be used in the planning efforts, they decided on three scenarios of sea-level rise: (1) Low, (2) Intermediate, and (3) High. The Low scenario was based on a linear extrapolation of the Fort Pulaski record, and the Intermediate and High scenarios were based on the widely cited sea-level rise curves that were developed by climate scientists Martin Vermeer and Stefan Ramhstorf.1 Using 2010 as the base year, the predicted sea-level rise by 2060 is 6 in., 14 in., and 31 in. for the Low, Intermediate, and High scenarios, respectively. Figure 10 presents NOAA’s predictions for global sea level rise. Table 17 illustrates the expected increase in flooding events over the 50-year planning horizon for US 80 under the three sea level rise scenarios. Table 17. Analysis of Flooding Frequency and Duration Metric 2009-2012 Average Sea-Level Rise Scenario (2060) Low Intermediate High Annual Frequency of Flood Events 8 30 125 540 Annual Duration of Flooding (hours) 5.5 37 200 1,250 Note: Flood conditions are categorized as nuisance flooding (5.2 ft. above NAVD88). Figure 10: NOAA Predictions for Global Sea Level Rise (Courtesy of Evans et al., 2016) 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 101 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 35 Tidal flooding during king tide conditions is regularly observed in several areas on Tybee Island, including many in the southwestern quadrant of island. Many of these flooding events are caused by a back-up of stormwater systems when higher tides push flow back into swales, ditches, and underground pipe conveyances. This problem is exacerbated when high tide events occur simultaneous with significant rain events. An example is presented in Figure 11. Figure 11: Saltwater Flooding of Yards and Streets during a King Tide on November 14, 2012 (Courtesy of Evans et al., 2016) Based on topography from the 1-foot LIDAR as well as the assessed value of property, the authors identified those areas on Tybee Island most at risk for flooding and economic damage due to King Tide event in a 1-foot sea level rise scenario. The map in Figure 12, illustrates potential economic losses due to high tide flooding on a block by block basis. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 102 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 36 Figure 12: Annual Expected Damage from High Tide Flooding (Courtesy of Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Executive Summary) 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 103 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 37 Through a series of public meetings, researchers solicited input from public officials and local citizens about unique flooding issues they face. The authors worked with the public to identify local assets at-risk from sea-level rise, review sea-level rise adaptation strategies, and choose the rates of sea-level rise to be used in the adaptation planning process. This process was essential to gain institutional knowledge on vulnerable areas and anecdotal information on historic flooding events. The five major adaptation actions that were identified through this process are: 1. Elevate the first floor of the City’s three well houses and electronic components to 3 ft. above the 100-year floodplain. 2. Elevate the US 80 causeway between Wilmington Island and Tybee Island to 3 ft. above current grade. 3. Retrofit low-lying stormwater infrastructure to prevent flooding from tidewater backflow. 4. Construct a back-island sea wall, at a height of 3 ft. over the current nuisance tidal flooding level, to prevent bank overflow in low-lying areas. 5. Increase frequency of beach nourishment relative to increased sea-level rise out to 2060. For three of the five action items, a benefit-cost ratio was calculated by evaluating the potential in cost savings from avoided capital and economic damage. The cost savings from damage avoided and the benefit-cost ratios for these action items are summarized in Table 18. When the benefit-cost ratio is less than 1.0, pursuing the action item is not favorable at this time. Details of the benefit-cost analysis and calculations can be found in the report. As a reference, the estimated cost to elevate a well pump house was $150,000 each, add stormwater backflow preventers and upgrade the stormwater system (including recent expansion of capacity along the 14th St. corridor) was $3 million, and install an engineered concrete sea wall at a height of 8.2 ft. above NAVD88 was $35 million. Table 18: Summary of Sea Leve Rise Mitigation Actions with Calculated Benefit-Cost Ratios. Action Item (Cost) Evaluation Method Estimated Cost of Damage for Each Sea Level Rise Scenario Low Intermediate High Elevate Well House on Van Horne Ave. ($150,000) Cumulative 50-yr Total Loss Damage Assessment $17,034 $29,713 $65,551 Benefit-Cost Ratio 0.11 0.2 0.44 Elevate Well House on 14th St. ($150,000) Cumulative 50-yr Total Loss Damage Assessment $458,740 $534,054 $828,181 Benefit-Cost Ratio 3.06 3.56 5.52 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 104 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 38 Action Item (Cost) Evaluation Method Estimated Cost of Damage for Each Sea Level Rise Scenario Low Intermediate High Elevate Well House on Butler Ave. ($150,000) Cumulative 50-yr Total Loss Damage Assessment $2,125,737 $2,329,927 $2,974,840 Benefit-Cost Ratio 14.17 15.53 19.83 Stormwater Backflow Preventers and Stormwater System Upgrades ($3,000,000) Damage Avoided (Net Present Value) $15,400,000 $36,200,000 $39,200,000 Benefit-Cost Ratio 5.13 12.07 13.07 Sea Wall ($35,000,000) Damage Avoided (Net Present Value) $700,000 $3,600,000 $60,800,000 Benefit-Cost Ratio 0.02 0.1 1.74 Note: Highlighted cells indicate that Benefit-Cost ratio is greater than 1.0, meaning that the potential cost savings from capital and economic damage avoided outweighs the cost of installing the action item. Based on the assessment for elevating the well pump houses, the Butler Ave. pump house had the highest risk of flooding and highest benefit-cost ratio (range: 14.17–19.83), so it should be elevated as soon as is practical. The 14th St. pump house should also be elevated in the near term because it had a benefit-cost ratio ranging from 3.06 to 5.52. The benefit-cost results for the third pump house, Van Horne Ave., did not indicate an immediate need for action. The authors noted that conservative estimates of water supply disruption following a catastrophic flood event were used, and the results do not account for possible contamination of the water source associated with storm surge flooding. Therefore, the Van Horne Ave. pump house should still be included in future assessments to determine suitability for elevation or other improvements to improve flooding resilience. Stormwater backflow preventers alone are expected to provide significant prevention of floodwater penetration for tides up to 6.2 ft. NAVD88, 1 ft. above the current tidal flooding stage, but then bank overflow would render the backflow preventers ineffective as a stand-alone flood prevention strategy. Overall, the stormwater retrofits were considered to be a good initial investment. The sea wall is not expected to provide benefit until the tides regularly exceed 6.2 ft. Based on the large cost of the sea wall, the High sea-level rise scenario is the only one where cost-saving benefits outweigh the cost, but it is only marginal (1.74). Further pursuit of a sea wall adaptation is not recommended at this time. Beach Renourishment The Army Corps of Engineers recently completed the most recent beach renourishment project in early 2016. The 3.5-mile-long project was initially constructed in 1974 with a 50-year project 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 105 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 39 life, with periodic renourishments planned to occur every 7 years. The beach was last renourished in 2008. The renourishment process involves using a cutterhead dredge to move about 1.7 million cubic yards of high quality sand from an area located 1.5 miles from the southern tip of Tybee Island. The deposited sand would be enough to compensate for the erosion expected to occur over the subsequent nine years. The project included placing sand up to the north terminal groin. The Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan noted that beach renourishment is an important action item for flood protection and the tourism economy. In 2024, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer’s current authorization from Congress for beach renourishment projects on Tybee Island expires. The Plan suggests that a priority for future beach renourishment projects and the negotiation of a new authorization should include maintenance of flood protection under a condition of accelerating sea-level rise. Based on the damages sustained by some communities in the Northeast during Superstorm Sandy, the City of Tybee Island is already investigating the possibility of augmenting their sand dune system to help protect the Island from storm surge during hurricanes. US Highway 80 Considerations The authors did not include a benefit-cost analysis for raising US 80 because the project lacked the scope to perform an engineering-scale benefit-cost assessment of a major highway corridor. However, the substantial tidal flooding of US 80 in 2015 (23 separate events) highlights the vulnerabilities of the existing roadway elevation and provides renewed motivation for ensuring that concerns about long-term public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and disaster resilience are incorporated into the final US 80 bridge replacement and road bed improvement project. As described earlier in this plan, GDOT is in the process of planning and designing Highway 80 improvements which will include elevation of the road bed. In the recently released letter, issued by GDOT on June 13, 2016 in response to public comments received at the November 17, 2015 Public Information Open House, DOT states that they are currently considering elevating the road surface to 7.5 above MSL, which equates to an elevation of approximately 12 to 18 in. above the current road surface. Per the comment and recommendation in the Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan related to worsening flooding conditions on the sole access road for Tybee Island, US 80; it is important for sea-level rise to be factored into ongoing engineering plans when replacing the two bridges along US 80 and modernizing and elevating the roadway. The Plan recommends that the road be elevated to approximately three (3) feet above its current elevation. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 106 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 40 4.5. SOLID WASTE 4.5.1 Solid Waste Collection Atlantic Waste Services currently provides municipal solid waste collection, yard waste collection, and recycling services to the City of Tybee Island. The Island is split into (4) four zones, each representing a service day Monday through Thursday. Garbage and recycling are picked up on the same day in each of the four zones. Yard waste will be collected on the entire island on Fridays. Garbage collection of “landfill only waste” will be picked up once per week in 96 gallon carts with identifying colors. Recycling is collected single stream in 96 gallon carts with identifying colors, and includes paper, cardboard, newspapers, magazines, junk mail, plastics (1-7), and metal cans (aluminum and steel). Grocery store plastic bags, styrofoam, film, glass and bubble wrap are not accepted. Atlantic Waste Services reports that the current market does not support glass recycling because it costs more to process, and it’s a lower quality material than the raw virgin sand material needed to make new glass. In an effort to address the issue of plastic bag littering and marine plastics pollution, the City has initiated a plastic film recycling program that is detailed in the image to the right. Drop off locations are located at the Campground, Chu’s Department Store, City Hall, Tybee Market IGA, Visitor’s Center, and the YMCA. The Tybee Island Department of Public Works collects the trash and recyclables daily from solid waste and recycling stations located at the beach and other public facilities and brings that material to the transfer station at the Polk Street Yard, where they are collected by Atlantic Waste. VisitTybee.com reports that the Tybee Island Department of Public Works collects approximately 4 tons of trash daily from the beach areas during the off-season. In-season, the amount of trash removed ranges from 6 to 15 tons daily. The day after special events, the total 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 107 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 41 can reach 35 tons. The Department of Public Works will accept municipal solid waste, recycling and yard waste from residents at the transfer station for a fee; however, residents are strongly encouraged to use the curbside service provided by Atlantic Waste. 4.5.2 Disposal Trends Information regarding disposal trends was provided to the City by the City’s previous solid waste contractor, Waste Pro. Monthly data on disposal of municipal solid waste and recycling was provided for the time period of October 2008 through August 2015. Weight of municipal solid waste and recycling collected through curbside collection service as well as directly from Public Works transfer stations is summarized in the Figures 13 and 14, respectively. Figure 13: Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling Collection and Trends for Curbside Collection Figure 13 illustrates an increase in both municipal solid waste disposal and recycling over the time period of 2008 through 2015, which indicates an increase in the generation of solid waste over that time period. There is also an obvious increase in solid waste disposal during the summer months each year, coinciding with the tourism season. There does not appear to be a similar cyclical trend in recycling tonnage, which indicates that tourist are not properly utilizing recycling services. It is also important to note that glass is currently not accepted, and as one of the heaviest materials that is typically recycled, it is likely to decrease the tonnage of materials being recycled in the future. Also not included in these figures is the solid waste tonnage associated with condominium developments that contract separately, as commercial customers, with private waste haulers. There is no requirement that condominium developments contract with private haulers for recycling services. The data provided for solid waste and recycling collected from Public Works only spans the time period of April 2013 through September of 2015. This data shows a substantial increase in the tonnage of solid waste collected. This can be attributed primarily to collection of trash from the beach and other public facilities, as most residents utilize the curbside service for disposal of their 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Oct-08Jan-09Apr-09Jul-09Oct-09Jan-10Apr-10Jul-10Oct-10Jan-11Apr-11Jul-11Oct-11Jan-12Apr-12Jul-12Oct-12Jan-13Apr-13Jul-13Oct-13Jan-14Apr-14Jul-14Oct-14Jan-15Apr-15Jul-15Monthly Weight of Curbside Collection (Tons) Solid Waste Recycling 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 108 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 42 household garbage. There is also a dramatic cyclical nature to the amount of trash collected, with the peaks again occurring during tourist season. There are not similar trends in recyclables collection, which remained relatively steady during this time period. Figure 14: Solid Waste and Recycling Collection and Trends for Department of Public Works 4.6. ENERGY USE Electrical demand continues to increase in the Southeast, and one of the fastest growing regions is Georgia. Georgia Power, a division of Southern Company that services the City of Tybee Island, estimates that by 2025, Georgia expects almost 1.5 million new residents, and by 2030, electrical demand is projected to increase 27% in the Southeast. According to Georgia Power Company, the utility company has been able to reliably meet Tybee’s current electrical demands, even during peak demand, and has sufficient electrical generating capacity to meet increased energy demands in the future as population growth continues. Georgia Power utilizes a variety of power generating sources, and its main sources include nuclear, coal and natural gas, and to a lesser extent, renewables such as solar, hydroelectric, and wind. According to Georgia Power, nuclear energy, which is the most economical method of producing electricity and does not produce greenhouse gases, will continue to be an important power generating source to meet current and future electrical demands in Georgia, including Tybee Island, and for complying with current and pending environmental standards that regulate coal-generated electricity. Georgia Power already operates two nuclear facilities: Hatch and 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Apr-13May-13Jun-13Jul-13Aug-13Sep-13Oct-13Nov-13Dec-13Jan-14Feb-14Mar-14Apr-14May-14Jun-14Jul-14Aug-14Sep-14Oct-14Nov-14Dec-14Jan-15Feb-15Mar-15Apr-15May-15Jun-15Jul-15Aug-15Sep-15Monthly Weight of Public Works Collection (Tons) Muncipal Solid Waste Recycling 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 109 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 43 Vogtle, both with multiple generating units. Plant Vogtle, located near Augusta, Georgia, is currently under construction to expand, with two new nuclear units expected to be operational by 2019 and 2020. Georgia Power is also constructing a new transmission line to add the infrastructure needed to support these new units. To keep up with the growth, Georgia Power has made extensive upgrades to its electrical system, including an $80 million upgrade to the Savannah underground network. Within the last few years, the utility company has also made upgrades to the electrical infrastructure for Tybee Island, including the large transmission lines along the US 80 corridor connecting Tybee Island to Talahi Island, the City’s substation, and distribution systems along Butler Avenue and other areas. The majority of planned upgrades for the City of Tybee Island have now been completed. Georgia Power offers a commercial rebate program that provides cost incentives for incorporating energy-efficient improvements. Rebates are offered to help offset initial costs associated with replacement of outdated, inefficient equipment or installation of high-efficiency equipment during new construction. The utility company also offers free audits that provide recommendations for increased energy efficiency. Georgia Power has previously worked with the City to conduct an audit of Tybee’s Memorial Park buildings as part of a Georgia Environmental Facilities Agency (GEFA) funded energy efficiency program. Tybee received a total of $300,000 in grant funding from GEFA for upgrades and renewable installations of city and county buildings located in Memorial Park. Once the park buildings were improved, all energy cost savings, based upon a 2008 baseline, were to be invested into the Tybee Energy Loan Fund and the Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing Program. Recommendations from this audit included the following: • Continue to incorporate occupancy sensors in strategic locations of the buildings for lighting savings • Consider energy efficient construction practices and premium efficiency equipment when renovating the city hall building or when equipment fails • Double check the programmable thermostat settings in the gymnasium to make sure they are set to adjust during unoccupied times. They appeared to be on hold temps when visited. • Replace the water heater in the YMCA building. At its age, scale on the elements is likely and will cause the heater to operate much less efficiently. • Continue to promote energy management/conservation to city employees and tenants of city building space. • Make sure all computers are set to go into energy management mode when they are not in use. 4.6.1 Solarize Tybee Approved by the Georgia Public Service Commission in November 2012, the original Georgia Power Advanced Solar Initiative (GPASI) is an innovative solar program designed to procure 210 MW of solar capacity. GPASI was primarily created to spur economic growth within the solar 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 110 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 44 community in Georgia, while offering pricing that encourages more renewable development and avoids any upward rate pressure and reliability impacts to Georgia Power customers. With this goal in mind, Georgia Power designed two programs to continue to develop solar in Georgia: 1) offer existing Georgia Power customers additional options to sell distributed solar generation back to Georgia Power through small- and medium-scale power purchase programs; and 2) offer solar developers the opportunity to bring large photovoltaic (PV) solar arrays to market through a competitive utility-scale RFP. In July 2013, the Public Service Commission approved an additional 525 MW of solar capacity as part of the 2013 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) order. These additional megawatts of solar capacity were similarly allocated between the distributed generation and utility-scale programs. In 2015, the City of Tybee Island, in cooperation with the Tybee Community Resources Committee, initiated the Solarize Tybee program to bring solar power to Tybee Island and Chatham County, Georgia, by eliminating some of the complexity of selecting a qualified installer and by driving down costs through the power of bulk purchasing. This program offered competitive pricing in a tiered system, i.e., prices decreased with increased participation. The solar contractor, Hannah Solar, performed free assessments for interested property owners to determine if their building was suitable for solar panel installation. Once a site was judged suitable, and the customer scheduled installation directly with Hannah Solar. Solarize Tybee was open to all residents, businesses, and governmental entities within Chatham County, Georgia, provided the governing body in each jurisdiction did not object to having its citizens participate. In total, 61 contracts for solar panel installation were completed, generating 335 KW of renewable energy. 4.6.2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory Many scientific studies have demonstrated a link between greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from human activities with global climate change. Current thinking by many within the scientific community is that GHGs contribute to climate change by trapping heat within Earth’s atmosphere. Gases that are classified as “greenhouse gases” include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases. In response, local governments are identifying policy changes and other measures that can reduce GHG emissions at both the community level and within their own operations. Policy changes at a community level can reduce GHG emissions but often these policy changes are difficult to implement and enforce because they involve measures that are outside the control of the local government’s policies and programs. In contrast, local governments have direct control over their own emissions-generating activities. For example, GHG emissions generated from local government operations can be dramatically lowered by reducing energy usage in buildings and facilities; reducing fuel consumption in fleet vehicles and equipment; reducing the amount of government-disposed solid waste that is sent to a landfill; and relying more on alternative energy sources. While reducing emissions from just one local government may be seen as a “drop in the bucket” to some, many local governments are moving forward with GHG emissions reduction initiatives as examples of good global citizenry. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 111 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 45 The objective of this GHG emissions inventory was to identify the sources and quantities of GHG emissions resulting from government operations within the City of Tybee Island in 2015, the chosen base year for this inventory. By identifying the areas of government operations that contribute the most greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, this inventory provides baseline data to reduce GHG emissions and assist the City with future planning efforts to address, plan, and mitigate the impacts of climate change. A summary of the inventory is included below, and the full study is included in Appendix B. The City of Tybee Island focused on the following categories of government operations to quantify GHG emissions for base year 2015 (Figure 15): • Buildings and Facilities: Emissions from grid electricity used to power City Hall; the YMCA (including the gym); Fire Station, Guard House, Department of Public Works (garage/office); and the Public Safety Building. This includes interior lighting, operation of heating and cooling systems, and other electrical uses within these buildings. • Water Transport: Emissions from grid-electricity used to power water delivery systems (drinking water well pumps) and the pumps/lift station associated with the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WPCP). Emissions from wastewater treatment methods were not included as part of this inventory. • Public Lighting: Emissions from grid electricity used to power street lights, park lighting, signage, traffic control lighting, and other miscellaneous forms of public lighting that is owned and/or controlled by the City of Tybee Island. Emissions from interior lighting are included within the Buildings and Facilities sector. Street lighting for the City of Tybee Island that is owned and operated by the Georgia Department of Transportation as well as outdoor lighting that is not metered is not included within this inventory assessment. • Vehicle Fleet: Emissions from city-owned vehicles, large equipment, small maintenance equipment, and marine related equipment used by the City’s police, fire, and other departments. • Employee Commute: Emissions generated from fuel usage associated with employees commuting to and from work For the City of Tybee Island, the energy used to run and operate local government facilities is supplied by Georgia Power, the local electric utility. Natural gas is not used by the City of Tybee Island to power government buildings and operations. Utility power bills for 2015 were utilized to supply the bulk of data used to identify and assess the amount of energy used to power buildings, water/wastewater delivery systems, and supply public lighting, which are all stationary sources of GHG emissions. The types of energy and emissions associated with these operations vary based on the different government functions as well as the source of energy. Correspondingly, the way in which GHG emissions may be assessed and quantified for these operations vary. For example, electricity used at a government building is measured in kWh while the emissions from vehicle fleet activities and employee commuting patterns are measured in miles traveled, or gasoline/diesel used. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 112 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 46 During 2015, government operations at the City generated roughly 3,735 metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e). The use of electricity at City buildings and facilities account for roughly 9% of CO2e. Water transport was the largest sector, accounting for over 50% CO2e. Public lighting and the vehicle fleet were responsible for 20% and 9% of CO2e, respectively, with the employee commute sector having the lowest percentage of greenhouse gas emissions at 7%. The British Thermal Unit (BTU) is the standard unit for measurement of energy. The MMBtu represents one million BTUs and is the unit of measurement used for comparing the various sectors of government operations in the table below. Tybee Island used a total of 28,330 units of energy (MMBtu) during the 2015 base year. Again, the water transport sector accounts for the highest energy usage at 50%. Lighting and employee commute have the second highest percentages at 18% and 13% respectively. Fleet vehicles and buildings are the smallest in total percentage of energy usage for the sectors analyzed. For a more detailed breakdown of energy usage and CO2e generated within each sector, please see the full report in Appendix B. Table 19: Energy Usage and GHG Emissions for All Sectors Category of Government Operations Equivalent CO2 Percent Energy (MMBtu) Percent Buildings 344.0 9% 2,377.0 8% Water Treatment 2,031.9 54% 14,040.3 50% Public Lighting 749.3 20% 5,177.8 18% Fleet Vehicles 336.7 9% 3,123.8 11% Employee Commute 273.5 7% 3,610.8 13% 9% 54%20% 9%7% Figure 15: GHG Emissions by Sector (% CO2e) Buildings Water Treatment Lighting Fleet Vehicles Employee Commute 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 113 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 47 The GHG Emissions Inventory resulted in the following recommendations to reduce energy consumption, thereby reducing GHG emissions from local government operations: 1. Continuation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: This inventory provides a great starting place for the City of Tybee as it provides a baseline year for which reduction goals and future impacts can be measured and compared. The City should review the strategies outlined in this inventory and set emission reduction goals and measure success based on the baseline year. The City should also develop an action plan / implementation plan to assist with tracking and achieving reduction goals. 2. Third-Party Audit: The City may want to consider having a third-party energy audit conducted by an objective and credentialed firm that specializes in these types of audits. The results of this greenhouse gas emissions inventory can be used in conjunction with a third-party audit to identify specific energy reduction strategies for the City of Tybee that have the greatest impact. This audit should also include a detailed analysis of the City’s current billing setup with Georgia Power to ensure that all current billing practices are most economically beneficial to the City. The audit should investigate measures to reduce energy consumption during peak energy usage times (both within a 24-hr period and seasonally). In conjunction with, or as an alternative to this if the City cannot hire a third-party, the City should also request that Georgia Power conduct additional energy audits of its other City buildings and operations. 3. Public Education and Incentive Programs: The City should continue to promote energy conservation to city employees and tenants of city building space. Incentive programs, perhaps groped by department and/or building, could be set up to encourage employees to reduce energy consumption. 4. Energy Efficiency: There are a variety of energy efficiency measures that should be considered to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions at City facilities and associated with City operations, some of which may also reduce electricity costs. These include: a. Energy efficient wastewater treatment methods should be considered when designing and upgrading the City’s wastewater treatment plant. As discussed within this report, over 50% of the City’s energy usage and GHG emissions result from wastewater treatment. b. Explore the potential cost savings associated with a 4-day work week as a mean to reduce electricity usage at some or all public facilities; c. Explore alternative energy sources for interior and outdoor public lighting (ie. Solar power) as well as switching to more energy-efficient lighting (i.e., LED lights); and d. Increase use of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in all City Hall buildings; 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 114 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 48 e. The City of Tybee should ensure that all City Hall renovations plan for and incorporate the energy efficiency recommendations provided by Georgia Power during its April 2015 Memorial Park Energy Audit. This includes incorporation of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in the gymnasium and other areas. These same recommendations can be expanded to other City hall buildings. f. Increase recycling efforts and reduce the amount of government-disposed solid waste that is sent to a landfill (this will reduce fugitive greenhouse gas emissions associated with landfills) g. Explore alternative cost and benefits associated with alternative fuel sources for fleet vehicles. For example, the City could explore the use of bio-diesel as an alternative to gasoline and diesel in fleet vehicles. h. Identify incentives available to encourage employees to utilize alternative forms of transportation when commuting to work; and i. Providing incentives for employees to live closer to work. Carpooling and public transportation options could also be explored as a means to reduce emissions related to commuting. An additional option could be the exploration of a 4-day work week as mentioned above. 4.7. ZONING 4.7.1 Zoning Analysis Since most of the island has been developed, subdivision and subsequent development of existing residential parcels presents the greatest opportunity for growth on the island. Recent development activity indicates that there is a growing trend in subdivisions of parcels zoned R-2. In addition, much of the remaining undeveloped residential property on the island is zoned R-2, which allows for the high density of residential development. The City of Tybee Island’s R-2 zoning category was established to allow for one and two family residential development, and allows for the smallest minimum lot size for residential parcels on the island. The schedule of development regulations (Sec 3-090) defines the allowable lot sizes for residentially zoned property in the City. The minimum lot size for development of a single family dwelling unit is 4,500 square feet in the R-2 district. The minimum lot size for a two-family structure in this district is 6,750 square feet. These numbers are the basis for determining the impact of potential future build out. Roughly 40% of the island is currently zoned R-2, much of which is currently developed as a single- family residential use. There is reason for concern from a carrying capacity perspective when considering the future development potential for these properties. The following analysis evaluates these properties to determine the population impact that different development scenarios would have on the City. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 115 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 49 4.7.2 Methodology The methodology used for this analysis began with the identification of all parcels currently zoned R-2. These properties were then broken down into the following categories based on lot size:  Less the 6,750 square feet. Parcels in this category could only be developed as single- family homes.  6,750 - 11,250 square feet. Parcels in this category could be developed as two-family residential, either as a duplex, or as two, single-family residential parcels (if over 9,000 square feet).  11,250 - 13,500 square feet. These parcels could be split and developed with one-single family and one, two-family structure.  Over 13,500 square feet. Parcels that can be developed as two, two-family structures.  Unique. Certain unique conditions were also considered. This includes significantly large parcels that could be sub-divided a number of different ways. For example, a large property with a significant amount or marsh may limit its development potential. Additionally, a large undeveloped property may have be large enough for a larger subdivision of land. 4.7.3 Analysis There are currently 1,694 R-2 parcels in the City. Roughly 80% of these parcels are currently developed. The general land uses shown in Table 20 were determined using data from the Chatham County Tax Assessors Office. This data was then vetted in GIS using aerial photography and other online resources. Table 20 shows the current breakdown of land uses within the R-2 zoning district. Table 20: Number of R-2 Parcels and Residential Units Category Number of R-2 Parcels Number of Units Single Family 1,337 1,337 Duplex 85 170 Non-Residential 11 0 Undeveloped 261 0 Total 1,694 1,507 Please note, one of the undeveloped R-2 properties listed above is not developable, one is in a conservation easement, and the last parcel (shown in Figure 15), is likely the last parcel on Tybee with significant developable acreage, approximately 600,000 square feet. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 116 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 50 Figure 16: Large Undeveloped Parcel on Tybee 4.7.4 Population in the R-2 District Based on Current Development The 2010 Census reports that only about 40% of housing units in the City of Tybee Island are occupied by year-round, full-time residents. Therefore, the remaining 60% of housing on the island is potentially available as seasonal rentals or vacation housing (i.e., second homes), both of which can have a dramatic effect on peak population numbers during summer months. As stated earlier in this report, the US Census Bureau found that the average household size for residents of Tybee Island is 2.1 people per unit, while the number of people occupying a short- term rental or vacation unit can vary greatly. The Carrying Capacity Stakeholder group agreed to use an estimate of 5 people per unit when approximating short-term rental or vacation overnight population. Table 21 shows the maximum population (both resident and short-term rental) that is likely supported within the R-2 district, in its current development state. Table 21: Maximum Population Based on Current Development Category Number of R-2 Parcels Number of Units Resident Population 40% (2.1 people/ unit) Short Term / Vacation Population 60% (5 people/ unit) Single Family 1,337 1,337 1,124 4,011 Duplex 85 170 143 510 Non-Residential 11 0 0 0 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 117 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 51 Category Number of R-2 Parcels Number of Units Resident Population 40% (2.1 people/ unit) Short Term / Vacation Population 60% (5 people/ unit) Undeveloped 261 0 0 0 Total 1,694 1,507 1,267 4,521 This analysis shows that the maximum potential overnight population in the R-2 at 100% occupancy for both resident and short-term rental/vacation units is currently 5,788 people. 4.7.5 Full Build-Out Scenario In order to understand the potential impacts of a full build-out scenario in the R-2 district, it was first necessary to determine the maximum number of units that could be developed within the areas zoned R-2. Based on current land use breakdown shown in Table 20, the total number of residential units in R-2 today is 1,507. However, if these same parcels were subdivided and developed to the maximum extent, in accordance with the lot size standards for R-2, the number residential units would increase by 1,321, for a total of 2,828 residential units, as presented in Table 22. This represents an increase of approximately 88% in the number of residential units in R-2. This analysis assumes that each parcel, both developed and undeveloped, are built out to their maximum capacity, based on the current standards for R-2. The map in Figure 17 illustrates the breakdown of lots based on their developable acreage. Table 22: Full R-2 Build-Out Scenario Category Developable Area within Parcel Total Existing Parcels Potential Units Single Family Residential Less than 6,750 Sq. Ft 1,087 1,087 Two Family Residential 6,750 - 11,250 Sq. Ft 335 670 One Single Family, One 2-Family 11,250 - 13,500 Sq. Ft 93 279 Two 2-Family Structures Greater than 13,500 Sq. Ft 176 704 Residential development* 600,000 Sq. Ft of Developable Area 1 88 Total 1,692 2,828 * For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that 50% of the developable acreage could be included in the parcels, and that the parcels would be 6,750 Sq Ft, each containing a duplex unit. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 118 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 52 Figure 17: R-2 Parcels by Lot Size 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 119 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 53 4.7.6 Additional Population Based on Build-Out Scenario Table 23 shows the total potential population (both resident and short-term rental) that would result from the full-build out scenario described above. Table 23: Maximum Population of Build-Out Scenario Category Total Existing Parcels Potential Units Resident Population 40% (2.1 people/ unit) Short Term / Vacation Population 60% (5 people/ unit) Single Family Residential 1,087 1,087 914 3,260 Two Family Residential 335 670 563 2,010 One Single Family, One 2-Family 93 279 235 835 Two 2-Family Structures 176 704 592 2,110 Residential development* 1 88 74 264 Total 1,692 2,828 2,378 8,479 This analysis shows that the maximum potential overnight population in the R-2 at 100% occupancy for both resident and short-term rental/vacation units in the full build-out scenario would be 10,857. This represents a potential maximum population increase of 5,069. 4.7.7 Zoning Assessment Findings Table 24 summarizes the findings of the R-2 analysis. Table 24: R-2 Buildout Population Increase Summary Condition Potential Units Resident Population 40% (2.1 people/ unit) Short Term / Vacation Population 60% (5 people/ unit) Total Overnight Population Existing Development 1,507 1,267 4,521 5,788 Build-Out Scenario 2,828 2,378 8,479 10,857 Increase 1,321 1,111 3,958 5,069 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 120 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 54 Based on the existing zoning standards for the R-2 District, this build-out scenario has the potential to significantly increase the overnight population on the island, resulting in a dramatic impact on peak demand issues related to water supply, wastewater discharge, and transportation discussed earlier in this report. In Section 3.2 of this report, it was calculated that the maximum overnight population on the island under current development conditions is 14,468. Adding the additional overnight population that could be experienced under a full-build out scenario for R-2, brings the maximum overnight population to 19,327. This is well beyond the peak capacity of both the current water supply and wastewater discharge systems, and would clearly increase congestion along US 80 and the internal road network. Furthermore, it exceeds the future expected capacity of the Cretaceous Well and future permitted withdrawal from the Floridan Aquifer. It is also important to note that areas currently subject to King-tide flooding now and as part of a future sea level rise are within the R-2 zone, which is the highest density residential zoning classification. Table 25: Future Water Usage Projections Under Full Build-Out Scenario This future build out scenario is affected by both the geographic extent of the R-2 district as well as standards for subdivision and development of the R-2 district. While subdivisions and redevelopments of parcels within this district are currently happening slowly, parcel by parcel, the pace at which it is occurring is likely to increase as property value increases and available land for development on Tybee Island decreases. This analysis is not suggesting that the full build-out scenario is likely to occur in the near future, only that over time it is possible that development density could significantly increase to the levels proposed here. Furthermore, the City needs to consider the impacts of this zoning classification under a post-disaster redevelopment scenario. Population Daily Water Usage (GPD) Peak Demand (Maximum Overnight Population) 14,468 1,692,756 Future Additional Potential Peak Demand (Build Out R2 Scenario) 4,735 553,995 Total Potential Peak Demand Water Withdrawal 19,203 2,246,751 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 121 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 55 5. RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES AND WORK PLAN The analyses of the population study and the resources limitations were shared with City staff, the City’s consulting engineer, and the TAG. Collectively, this process resulted in the identification of carrying capacity issues and recommended strategies for each of the functional areas identified. The overall approach recommended by this process and its participants is twofold: 1) Make improvements to the City’s existing infrastructure systems to provide additional capacity to accommodate more growth, and 2) Identify ways to better manage future growth to limit stresses on infrastructure and environmental impacts from future development. It was the belief of the TAG that any comprehensive and realistic solution to address carrying capacity issues on Tybee Island should be inclusive of both approaches. As the City continues to experience the significant financial impact of the infrastructure improvements that will be necessary to accommodate future growth, strategies regarding growth management and development regulation may become more favorable. In an effort to make this plan a more user friendly document, table formatting has been utilized to outline the carrying capacity issues, recommended strategies, considerations, and action items related to each resource area. The resulting action items will form the basis of the City’s Carrying Capacity Work Plan. Ideally, this format will make implementation of the Carrying Capacity Study easier to undertake and track over time. ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS WATER SUPPLY  Water withdrawal permit limitations  Peak water usage associated with tourism  Installation of a Cretaceous Well and construction of a Treatment Facility  Water conservation education targeting tourists and o Cost of capital construction o Increased costs associated with treatment o Discharge of briny wastewater 1. Perform a rate study to ensure that current and future water rate structure will generate the revenue necessary to construct and operate the Cretaceous well. Rate study should also consider "peak usage rates" to encourage water use reduction during peak season. 2. Determine how much treatment capacity the RO Plant should be designed to provide. 1.0 MGD is the maximum. Table 24: Carrying Capacity Issues, Strategies, Considerations and Action Items 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 122 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 56 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS development community  Alternative water sources including: gray water usage, rainwater capture, shallow wells, and reuse (after the WPCP upgrade) o Limited space available for construction of treatment facility o Tourists can be a difficult audience to reach. o Current plumbing code may not allow for gray water usage. 3. Develop a conceptual design and financial plan for the treatment plant. This should include land acquisition (if necessary) proposed construction and operational costs, proposed revenue sources, proposed discharge method, and evaluation of any regulatory permitting requirements. 4. Construct RO Treatment Plant. 5. Work with the Real Estate/Rental companies to create water conservation education campaign for tourists. 6. Provide better information to water customers regarding the volume of water they use. 7. Evaluate current code and adopt/amend local ordinances as necessary to allow for gray water use, rainwater harvesting, and reuse. 8. Encourage the use of alternative water sources for irrigation and outdoor showers. WASTEWATER TREATMENT  Peak wastewater discharge issues associated with tourist season.  Capacity of WPCP infrastructure to accommodate more flow  Potential water quality issues from discharge.  Future permitted discharge  Upgrade WPCP to accommodate more flow and to treat to a higher standard. o Lack of space for WPCP expansion o Potential combined discharge from Cretaceous well treatment plant increases the need for capacity in discharge pipes. o Permitting and environmental impacts of upgrading discharge pipe 9. Perform a rate study to determine if current rates are appropriate and adequate to support future capital construction needs. This should be conducted in conjunction with the water use rate study. 10. Submit a Waste Load Allocation to the Georgia EPD for additional flow. 11. Develop a conceptual design for upgrades to the WPCP. This design should include land acquisition (if necessary) proposed construction and operational costs, proposed discharge method and evaluation of any regulatory permitting requirements. Design considerations for the discharge pipe should be made in conjunction with the plans for the Cretaceous Well Treatment Plan discharge. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 123 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 57 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS standards may be higher. o Costs associated with infrastructure improvements 12. Develop a plan for reuse water use, including the ballfields. 13. Continue program to upgrade pump stations. 14. Construct upgrades to WPCP. STORMWATER AND FLOODING  Nuisance flooding associated with king high tide and rain events.  Sea level rise is exacerbating flooding  Water quality issues that result from flooding  Implement priority recommended improvements from the Sea Level Rise Study.  Advocate for elevation of Highway 80.  Limit new impervious surfaces.  Limit new construction in areas subject to flooding. o Cost of infrastructure upgrades o Lack of control over Hwy 80 project. o Current status of Hwy 80 project has limited elevation of the road bed due to settlement concerns. o There are development rights associated with property that is already subject to King Tide flooding. 15. Elevate the Butler Ave and 14th Street Pump Houses. 16. Install backflow preventers on stormwater outfalls as recommended in Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan. 17. Continue to work with ACOE on Beach Re-Nourishment Program 18. Consider program to augment the dune system. 19. Work directly with DOT and lobby for additional elevation of Hwy 80 to high sea level rise scenario elevations, i.e. 31” or more. 20. Consider an ordinance to limit the amount of impervious surface in new or redevelopment. Especially in drainage basins subject to King Tide flooding. 21. Require infiltration of the water quality volume (1.2” of stormwater) for all new development and redevelopment. 22. Revise the City code to allow for and incentivize rainwater harvesting. 23. Investigate the potential to receive FEMA funding to purchase repetitive flood loss properties. 24. Develop a program to encourage and incentivize green infrastructure for single family home development. SOLID WASTE/LITTER  Litter on beach  Municipal solid waste (MSW)  Reduction of waste generation on island o Tourists are a hard audience to reach 25. Perform a solid waste study to further evaluate the issues identified here and identify additional feasible solutions. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 124 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 58 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS disposal trends are still increasing despite the availability of recycling.  Recycling receptacles are often contaminated by MSW.  Yard waste is being left on the road/curb and not being picked up  Alternatives for solid waste disposal in landfills off island  Waste reduction education & litter education for tourists  Enforcement of litter ordinance o Enforcement of litter ordinance is difficult and requires staff o The recycling market is volatile o Contamination of recycling affects its marketability. o There is more MSW than available receptacles for short- term rentals or for the beach causing contamination of recycling. 26. Consider requiring Short-Term Rentals to have summer schedule (i.e. twice per week) for solid waste and recycling pickup. 27. Work with tourism board and solid waste contractor to develop an education program targeted at tourists to discourage littering, increase participation in recycling, and decrease recycling contamination. 28. Implement program for increased beach litter patrols. 29. Review MSW disposal and recycling program on beach to determine if more receptacles or a different format would work better. 30. Work with local businesses to identify and encourage alternatives to single use items. 31. Study potential for glass crusher, and City-sponsored glass recycling program. 32. Consider requirements for condominiums to have dumpsters as opposed to individual trash cans and to provide recycling options for residents/renters. 33. Work with solid waste contractor to identify and address obstacles to yard waste pickup. 34. Work with solid waste contractor to study the cost/benefits of segregated recycling. 35. Research and identify potential purchase and operation of beach cleaning equipment, i.e. sifters. ENERGY CONSUMPTION  City operations result in energy use, which contributes to  Reduce energy usage within City facilities. o The City has already made great strides in alternative energy usage through solar 36. Have a third party perform and energy audit that includes an assessment of the City’s electrical meters and Georgia Power billing system. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 125 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 59 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS greenhouse gas emissions.  The billing system of Georgia Power makes tracking and analyzing energy usage difficult.  Promote energy efficiency through education and incentives.  Work with Georgia Power to review and simplify billing system. power and through energy efficiency audits. 37. Promote energy conservation to city employees and tenants of city building space. Incentive programs could be set up to encourage employees to reduce energy consumption. 38. Explore the potential cost savings associated with a 4-day work week to reduce electricity usage at public facilities as well as commuting time for employees. 39. Explore alternative energy sources for interior and outdoor public lighting (i.e. solar power) as well as switching to more energy-efficient lighting (i.e., LED lights). 40. Increase use of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in all City buildings. 41. Ensure that all City Hall renovations plan for and incorporate the energy efficiency recommendations 42. Explore alternative cost and benefits associated with alternative fuel sources for fleet vehicles. For example, the City could explore the use of bio-diesel as an alternative to gasoline and diesel in fleet vehicles or the purchase of hybrid vehicles. TRAFFIC AND PARKING  Peak traffic flow issues related to day-trippers and events creates congestion and makes accessing or traveling around the island difficult.  Traffic resulting from accidents and  Improve Hwy 80 to provide passable shoulders and an elevated road bed.  Provide additional parking opportunities  Provide multi- modal opportunities for o There are no transit opportunities to Tybee Island. o There is currently no public harbor to allow for ferry service to Savannah. o The City does not control Hwy 80 Improvements. 43. Advocate with GDOT to elevate the road surface and create passable and bikeable shoulders as part of the bridge and road improvements on Hwy 80. 44. Work with the NPS, Fort Pulaski and the County to extend the McQueen’s trail to the Lazaretto Creek Bridge. Continue work to connect the Marsh Hen Trail to the Lazaretto Creek Bridget. 45. Continue to operate parking application for smart phones to notify people of available parking. Work with Tybee 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 126 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 60 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS flooding on Hwy 80 cuts off access to the island resulting in economic losses and emergency situations.  Lack of parking creates congestion and illegal parking problems during peak tourism season transportation to and within Tybee Island  Notify people about traffic congestion and parking issues before they get on- island. o There is limited land to accommodate additional parking. o More parking could encourage additional visitors resulting in more impact. o Legal ROW parking is not known and/or clearly marked. o Historic attempts at remote parking have not been well utilized because people want to park near the beach when they have a lot of beach gear. o Potential to eliminate parking in C2 could reduce future available parking opportunities. Tourism Council to promote this application. Record data from application to track trends in parking usage. 46. Work with the County to operate electronic signage at Johnny Mercer Blvd. and Hwy 80 to notify visitors of traffic conditions. 47. Perform a study to identify all of the ROWs that are owned by the City, and develop a parking plan for these ROWs that includes a clear delineation of ROWs where parking is allowed and where it is prohibited, i.e. yellow curb. 48. Consider on-island electronic signage to notify visitors of available parking. 49. Work with churches and school to provide additional parking on peak days, if they so choose. 50. Consider the construction of a parking garage in the C1 area, potentially through a public private partnership. Consider duel uses such as downstairs commercial or rooftop mini-golf to make it more cost effective. 51. Review parking rates and determine if demand-based rates could help address peak traffic and parking issues. SHORT-TERM RENTALS  Peak water and wastewater usage on the island is driven largely by short-term rentals.  Regulate the short-term rental industry. o Short-term rentals are a component of all above elements, but are also important to the economy of the island. 52. Review the data gathered through the current Short- Term Rental Ordinance, and reevaluate the need for additional regulation. 53. Consider a limit on Short-Term Rental Occupational Tax Certificates. This could be by total number or a percentage of housing units on the island. 54. Consider limiting the advertised capacity for short-term rental units by their available parking spaces. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 127 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 61 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS  The R-2 Zoning District has a lot of room for additional development through subdivision and redevelopment of existing lots.  The area subject to flooding during King tides and rain events, is in the R-2 District.  Restrict future development and redevelopment in the R-2 District, especially areas that are subject to flooding. o Building is already restricted on Tybee Island through height. restrictions and lots sizes. o Private property rights. o More impervious surface from additional development in the R-2 district will make flooding issues worse. o The additional population that would result from a full buildout will have a serious effect on the Island’s resources, services, and facilities. 55. Consider amending the R-2 district to a. Increase the minimum lot size for duplexes. b. Increase the minimum lot size necessary for subdivisions 56. Consider rezoning areas subject to flooding to R-1 or a more restrictive zoning district. 57. Consider a transfer of development rights program that will direct development away from lots subject to flooding and towards other areas that have the ability to accommodate more dense development. 58. Provide a tax incentive for R-2 property owners to under- develop their lots. 59. Purchase and permanently protect undeveloped property in the R-2 district. Prioritize purchase of repetitive loss housing. 60. Restrict new impervious surface in the R-2 district. CITY FUNDING AND RESOURCES  The City does not currently have the funding necessary to implement needed capital improvements.  The city needs staff resources to focus on issues identified in this plan.  Adjust utility rate structure to ensure that the city can fund future capital improvements and operations.  Identify other funding sources for improvements o The resident population may be burdened by the cost to support the tourist population. o A large proportion of the City’s budget is for services and infrastructure that services the tourism industry. 61. Perform a comprehensive water and sanitary sewer rate study to: a. Provide adequate funding for future improvements and operations b. Incentivize water conservation. c. Consider peaking factors and/or seasonal rates to reduce peak usage and to shift the cost burden off of the residential population 62. Perform a stormwater utility feasibility study to determine if a stormwater fee would be a potential funding source for stormwater improvements 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 128 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 62 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS  City needs reserves for disaster preparedness and infrastructure improvements.  Identify or hire staff to focus on Carrying Capacity Issues o The tourism industry drives the economy on Tybee Island. 63. Investigate GEFA loan and principal forgiveness program as a potential funding source for water, sewer, and stormwater improvements. 64. Look for regional partners who also benefit from the tourism industry to assist with the cost of improvements to address impact of tourists on island resources. 65. Work with Chatham County on future SPLOST referendum to identify opportunities for additional funding. 66. Perform a Reserve Fund Study to determine the amount of reserve funds needed for disaster preparedness and response. 67. Consider adding staff to focus on implementation of this work plan. 68. Consider using available funds in the Tybee Energy Loan Fund to finance energy efficiency recommendations. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 129 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 63 5.1. CARRYING CAPACITY WORK PLAN The following table constitutes the Work Plan that was developed based on the recommended strategies produced by the TAG. The Work Plan includes the list of action items, a general time frame for implementation (i.e. tasks should be implemented within a two, five or ten year timeframe), and a cost implication, if known. The activities included within the Work Plan should be viewed as a subset of the Community Work Program that is part of the Tybee Island Comprehensive Plan Update 2016. ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) WATER SUPPLY 1. Perform a rate study to ensure that current and future water rate structure will generate the revenue necessary to construct and operate the cretaceous well. Rate study should also consider "peak usage rates" to encourage water use reduction during peak season. X $40,000 2. Determine how much treatment capacity the RO Plant should be designed to provide. 1.0 MGD is the maximum. X Staff Time 3. Develop a conceptual design and financial plan for the RO treatment plant. This should include land acquisition (if necessary) proposed construction and operational costs, proposed revenue sources, proposed discharge method, and evaluation of any regulatory permitting requirements. X $20,000 4. Construct the RO Treatment Plant X $7 Million Table 25: Carrying Capacity Work Plan 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 130 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 64 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) 5. Work with the Real Estate/Rental companies to create water conservation education campaign for tourists. X $10,000 6. Provide better information to water customers regarding the volume of water they use. X TBD 7. Evaluate current code and adopt/amend local ordinances as necessary to allow for gray water use, rainwater harvesting, and reuse. X Staff Time 8. Encourage the use of alternative water sources for irrigation and outdoor showers. X Staff Time WASTEWATER 9. Perform a rate study to determine if current rates are appropriate and adequate to support future capital construction needs. This should be conducted in conjunction with the water use rate study. X $15,000 10. Submit a Waste Load Allocation to the Georgia EPD for additional flow. X $3,000 11. Develop a conceptual design for upgrades to the WPCP. This design should include land acquisition (if necessary) proposed construction and operational costs, proposed discharge method and evaluation of any regulatory permitting requirements. Design considerations for the discharge X $25,000 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 131 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 65 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) pipe should be made in conjunction with the plans for the Cretaceous Well Treatment Plan discharge. 12. Develop a plan for reuse water use, including the ballfields. X Included in Concept Plan 13. Continue program to upgrade pump stations. X $25,000 - $100,000 per station 14. Construct upgrades to WPCP. X $16 - $20 Million STORMWATER AND FLOODING 15. Elevate the Butler Ave and 14th Street Pump Houses. X $400,000 16. Install backflow preventers on stormwater outfalls as recommended in Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan. X $3 Million 17. Continue to work with ACOE on Beach Re-Nourishment Program X TBD 18. Consider program to augment the dune system. X TBD 19. Work directly with DOT and lobby for additional elevation of Hwy 80 to high sea level rise scenario elevations, i.e. 31” or more. X Staff Time 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 132 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 66 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) 20. Consider an ordinance to limit the amount of impervious surface in new or redevelopment. Especially in drainage basins subject to King Tide flooding. X Staff Time 21. Require infiltration of the water quality volume (1.2” of stormwater) for all new development and redevelopment. X 22. Revise the City code to allow for and incentivize rainwater harvesting. X Staff Time 23. Investigate the potential to receive FEMA funding to purchase repetitive flood loss properties. X TBD 24. Develop a program to encourage and incentivize green infrastructure for single family home development. X Staff Time SOLID WASTE AND LITTER 25. Perform a solid waste study to further evaluate the issues identified here and identify additional feasible solutions. X $50,000 26. Consider requiring Short-Term Rentals to have summer schedule (i.e. twice per week) for solid waste and recycling pickup. X Staff Time 27. Work with tourism board and solid waste contractor to develop an education program targeted at tourists to discourage littering, increase participation in recycling, and decrease recycling contamination. X $10,000 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 133 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 67 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) 28. Implement program for increased beach litter patrols. X Staff Time for Additional Officers 29. Review MSW disposal and recycling program on beach to determine if more receptacles or a different format would work better. X Part of Study 30. Work with local businesses to identify and encourage alternatives to single use items. X Staff Time 31. Study potential for glass crusher, and City-sponsored glass recycling program. X Part of Study 32. Consider requirements for condominiums to have dumpsters as opposed to individual trash cans and to provide recycling opportunities for residents/rentors. X Part of Study 33. Work with solid waste contractor to identify and address obstacles to yard waste pickup. X Part of Study 34. Work with solid waste contractor to study the cost/benefits of segregated recycling. X Part of Study 35. Research and identify potential purchase and operation of beach cleaning equipment, i.e. sifters. X Part of Study 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 134 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 68 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) ENERGY CONSUMPTION 36. Have a third party perform and energy audit that includes an assessment of the City’s electrical meters and Georgia Power billing system. X Percentage of Cost Savings 37. Promote energy conservation to city employees and tenants of city building space. Incentive programs could be set up to encourage employees to reduce energy consumption. X Staff Time 38. Explore the potential cost savings associated with a 4-day work week to reduce electricity usage at public facilities as well as commuting time for employees. X Staff Time 39. Explore alternative energy sources for interior and outdoor public lighting (i.e. solar power) as well as switching to more energy-efficient lighting (i.e., LED lights). X TBD 40. Increase use of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in all City buildings. X $5,000 41. Ensure that all City Hall renovations plan for and incorporate the energy efficiency recommendations X TBD 42. Explore alternative cost and benefits associated with alternative fuel sources for fleet vehicles. For example, the City could explore the use of X Staff Time 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 135 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 69 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) bio-diesel as an alternative to gasoline and diesel in fleet vehicles or the purchase of hybrid vehicles. TRAFFIC AND PARKING 43. Advocate with GDOT to elevate the road surface and create passable and bikeable shoulders as part of the bridge and road improvements on Hwy 80. X Staff Time 44. Work with the NPS, Fort Pulaski and Chatham County to extend the McQueen’s trail to the Lazaretto Creek Bridge. Continue work to connect the Marsh Hen Trail to the Lazaretto Creek Bridget. X Staff Time 45. Continue to operate parking application for smart phones to notify people of available parking. Work with Tybee Tourism Council to promote this application. Record data from application to track trends in parking usage. X Staff Time 46. Work with the County to operate electronic signage at Johnny Mercer Blvd. and Hwy 80 to notify visitors of traffic conditions. X Staff Time 47. Perform a study to identify all of the ROWs that are owned by the City, and develop a parking plan for these ROWs that includes a clear delineation of ROWs where parking is allowed and where it is prohibited, i.e. yellow curb. X TBD 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 136 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 70 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) 48. Consider on-island electronic signage to notify visitors of available parking. X TBD 49. Work with churches and school to provide additional parking on peak days, if they so choose. X Staff Time 50. Consider the construction of a parking garage in the C1 area, potentially through a public private partnership. Consider duel uses such as downstairs commercial or rooftop mini-golf to make it more cost effective. X ≈ $19,000 per space (if GI/LID is included) 51. Review parking rates and determine if demand-based rates could help address peak traffic and parking issues. X Staff Time SHORT-TERM RENTALS 52. Review the data gathered through the current Short-Term Rental Ordinance, and reevaluate the need for additional regulation. X Staff Time 53. Consider a limit on Short-Term Rental Occupational Tax Certificates. This could be by total number or a percentage of housing units on the island. X Staff Time 54. Consider limiting the advertised capacity for short-term rental units by their available parking spaces. X Staff Time 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 137 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 71 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 55. Consider amending the R-2 district to: a. Increase the minimum lot size for duplexes. b. Increase the minimum lot size necessary for subdivisions. X Staff Time 56. Consider rezoning areas in R-2 District that subject to flooding to R-1 or a more restrictive zoning district. X Staff Time 57. Consider a transfer of development rights program that will direct development away from lots subject to flooding and towards other areas that have the ability to accommodate more dense development. X TBD 58. Provide a tax incentive for R-2 property owners to under-develop their lots. X Staff Time 59. Purchase and permanently protect undeveloped property in the R-2 district. Prioritize purchase of repetitive loss housing. X TBD 60. Restrict new impervious surface in the R-2 district. X Staff Time CITY FUNDING AND RESOURCES 61. Perform a comprehensive water and sanitary sewer rate study to: a. Provide adequate funding for future improvements and operations b. Incentivize water conservation. X $40,000 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 138 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 72 ACTION ITEM SCHEDULE COST IMPLICATION IMMEDIATE (2 YR) SHORT TERM (5 YR) LONG TERM (10 YR) c. Consider peaking factors and/or seasonal rates to reduce peak usage and to shift the cost burden off of the residential population 62. Perform a stormwater utility feasibility study to determine if a stormwater fee would be a potential funding source for stormwater improvements X $15,000 63. Investigate GEFA loan and principal forgiveness program as a potential funding source for water, sewer, and stormwater improvements. X $5,000 64. Look for regional partners who also benefit from the tourism industry to assist with the cost of improvements to address impact of tourists on island resources. X Staff Time 65. Work with Chatham County on future SPLOST referendum to identify opportunities for additional funding. X Staff Time 66. Perform a Reserve Fund Study to determine the amount of reserve funds needed for disaster preparedness and response. X $25,000 67. Consider adding staff to focus on implementation of this work plan. X Staff Time 68. Consider using available funds in the Tybee Energy Loan Fund to finance energy efficiency recommendations. X Staff Time 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 139 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY 73 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY CDM Smith. US 80 Bridges Replacement Study, Coastal Regional MPO, Final Report, 2012. Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. City of Key West Carrying Capacity Traffic Study, City of Key West, December 2011. Center for Regional Analysis, Armstrong State University. Tybee Island Tourism Study, City of Tybee Island ad Armstrong Public Service Center, May 2015. Ecological Planning Group, Population Assessment 2010, City of Tybee Island, June 2012 Evans, Jason et al. Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan, National Sea Grant Program, April 2016. Evans, Jason et al. Tybee Island Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan Executive Summary, Georgia Sea Grant and the University of Georgia Carl Vincent Institute of Government, June 2013. HDR Engineering, Inc. Tybee Island Traffic and Parking Study, City of Tybee Island, January 2005. RS&H. City of Tybee Island Pedestrian and Traffic Study, City of Tybee Island, January 2010. Tybee Island Wave Ecology & the Highway 80 Challenge. Chatham County & the City of Tybee Island, May 2011. URS Corporation. Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study: Draft Final Report First Revision, US Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida Department of Community Affairs, September 2002. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 140 of 226 20170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY A1 APPENDIX A: MEETING SUMMARIES 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 141 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Coordination Meeting #1 October 12, 2015 3:00 PM – 5:00 PM Attendees: Freda Rutherford, Community Resources Committee (CRC) Ed DiTommaso, EPG Bud Matlock, CRC Tim Arnold, CRC George Shaw, City of Tybee Island Kathryn Propst, CRC Bill Garbett, Tybee Island City Council Monty Parks, Tybee Island City Council Courtney Reich, EPG Diane Schleicher, City of Tybee Island, Meeting Summary 1. Scope of Project a. Scope & Schedule Courtney gave some background on the grant and the general scope and schedule. This included and summary of the outcomes and the requirements associated with each. Task 1 is primarily information gathering. EPG will work with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to gather relevant data. The second major task will be to assess will various resources and how they impacted by, and/or limit, the daytime, overnight, and permanent populations. It is anticipated that this will reveal hard limits, i.e. where a resource absolutely limits the amount of people that can be supported, as well as soft limits, where a resource as it is currently could limit future population if nothing is done to address the limitation. Lastly, this information will be used to develop a series of recommendations for the City consideration. Additionally, the process will be well documented and EPG will produce an outline of how another communities could replicate the process. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 142 of 226 20170209/jrl 2. Data Needs The group discussed data needs and existing data sources. In some cases, EPG already has some of the needed datasets, other cases will require coordination with appropriate City staff and/or CRC members. The following datasets were discussed, and resource and/or responsible party identified: Freda asked about when the 2015 Census data will be available. Also asked about when the master plan is due and how the Carrying Capacity Study can be coordinated and included in the Master Plan. The Master Plan is due next October (2016). EPG already contacted the Department of Community Affairs to see if they would allow the City an extension to because of this grant, but no extension was given. The requirements for the comprehensive is different than is was in 2007, but the City can complete the plan based on the existing DCA schedule and adopt the Carrying Capacity as an addendum later. Data Source GIS Data Critical Habitats EPG, from CRD data Water, Sewer, Stormwater Infrastructure Joe Wilson & George Reese at COTI Flood Zones (Current and future) EPG will get these Zoning CRC, George to update & EPG will request Land Use 2008 land use plan, EPG will request & update Tree Canopy Cover EPG Parking COTI, Pete Ryerson in Parking Rental Units EPG to try to develop this layer using Business tax info from Sharon and websites for rental agencies Bikeways EPG and Tybee Emergency response/evacuation routes EPG to get from CEMA Critical infrastructure EPG to get from CEMA Other Data Population Study EPG has this, will look to update as needed Traffic Counts Diane to provide two calendar years’ worth of data Water & Sewer Permits Diane to provide Parking See above Electrical Grid Capacity Chris Tatasco (sp?) From GA Power Solid Waste & Recycling Kathryn to provide Rental Units See above Housing (workforce) Census, survey Alternative energy sources & opportunities Paul Wolff and Bill Garbett Highway 80 Expansion EPG Saltwater Intrusion Study EPG 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 143 of 226 20170209/jrl Discussion regarding the data included the following:  There was some discussion of why and how we determined which types of data to review. The original list was not intended to be all inclusive and will likely be modified as we move through the process.  EPG will review the critical habitats data to see where the priority areas are located throughout the City.  EPG to get with George to obtain the water/sewer/stormwater datasets and determine the usefulness of the data. We can request the data from CRC, Joe and George. EPG will work with the city to determine how reliable the data is. Diane said the data is generally accurate and to work with Hunter Key to get.  Flood. EPG already has the existing flood maps, but will try and obtain the future flood maps, since they will be in effect before this project is complete.  Zoning. Get from Hunter at CRC. George is going to confirm that Hunter has the most updated zoning based on a couple recent re-zonings. EPG will perform an analysis of existing R-2 zoning and determine whether there are 2 houses or if they are currently SFR and can be developed as 2. A significant area of the City is zoned R-2 and there is often demand to make existing SFRs into duplexes. EPG will also evaluate lot size as part of the analysis to make sure the use would be allowed by right versus needing a variance.  Land Use. The City has not updated the existing land use layer since the 2008 master plan. EPG will use the Tax assessors land use code and perform a desktop update.  Tree Canopy Cover. EPG has access to this data in a GIS format.  Parking. The city has a map of parking. Each metered parking space was included in this. The beach management plan included a count of all metered parking on the island. Pete Ryerson, would be the contact for this and also might have data that shows golf cart parking. Work with parking staff at the City to verify and update as needed.  Rental Units. EPG might have a list containing some data about rental units, but single owner properties are difficult to track. Might be some able to use the business license database since renters are supposed to get a license, per city ordinance. Many get a license thought larger sites (Air B&B) and the city does not have a way to track this. City is trying to develop a better way to track this. The CRC team believes this is important. Start with business license list. Get with Sharon from the City as a starting place. The city is seeing a trend in long term rentals being converted to short-term rentals. Driving out workforce housing, which forces that population group off the island. Look at cases where the renter has to put a deposit down vs owners that bundle utilities. There is a perception that the population on the island is decreasing. Is this the case? EPG discussed making a web survey to try and understand these trends.  Bikeways. There are existing maps showing bikeways on the island. Get with George or view city website. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 144 of 226 20170209/jrl  Emergency response / evacuation and critical infrastructure. EPG will get with CEMA and Jimmy. EPG also has the Highway 80 study  Population. EPG completed a population study that EPG completed as part of the LOST negotiations. The focus of the study was to determine the daytime population numbers. There has been a jump in short term rentals over the last few years, which has changed the population make up on the island. EPG will update this study with new data.  Traffic Counts. Get info from police department. The city has a new system that tracks cars coming onto the island. The City will provide two calendar years worth of data. 2013 – to date. Courtney mentioned the public involvement element of the Hwy 80 project. She will to send out information to the group about joining the DOT highway 80 notification list. DOT is going to host a charrette in November to discuss the widening project.  W/S permits. City to provide list from EPD. Including the new Cretaceous well.  Parking. Get an understanding of the number of public parking spots in addition to private parking. Issues with golf cart parking since they take up the same parking spaces, but the golf cart shuttles make a difference because saves parking. EPG will look at alterative options. The assessment will make an assumptions about how much parking is associated with houses. For example, 4 spots for SFR, 8 for MF. EPG will come up with these assumptions and bring back to the group. Get data on the number of seasonal passes / decals. Three categories, resident, sold, given away.  Electrical grid capacity. Data from GA power. This will be difficult to get. GA power just upgraded. Chris Tidasko from GA power is someone to contact about getting this type of information. Power to the island is a single point failure.  Solid waste and recycling, CRC has a lot of data and will provide, but is missing information from Condos. Ask condos to share this information and let them know we are only interested in quantity and are not concerned with the prices. Also need this information for commercial customers. If we are not successful getting real data we can make assumptions based on container size and pick up frequency.  Maybe develop a survey for businesses on the island. Ask how much of your workforce lives on the island?  Alternative energy. Paul and Bill will be able to provide information. How many people went solar? Final report is being completed, so we should be able to get info from Hannah. How many kilowatts were installed? Other studies completed by the city, such as wind energy. Installation of solar energy is more difficult for the City to implement because tax benefits are for residential customers and not extended to government because they don’t pay taxes.  Salt Water intrusion. EPG has this data. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 145 of 226 20170209/jrl 3. ICLEE Greenhouse Gas Footprint Analysis There was a brief discussion about the GHG analysis and the type of information that would be gathered and included in the analysis. Public lighting was left off the list on the meeting agenda, but will be included in the assessment. The CRC stated that solar power is already being used on many poles located on the island. It was noted to be sure to include the campground as part of this analysis. 4. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) There will be a TAC that meets quarterly as part of this meeting, and the following people were discussed as potential members of the TAC:  CRC  Planning Commission  George Reese  Joe Wilson  Tybee Tourism Council rep.  Deb from DNR  George Shaw  Open invitation to City Council (“may be a quorum present” noted on agendas)  Discuss with Chantel to get people from the business community, represent “Main Street”  Brett Loher (sp?) (Hotel Tybee)  Local Realtor (Shirley Sessions)  Restaurant industry (Sarah from Social Club) EPG will work with George to develop a final list and provide it back to the City for their review. The first TAC meeting will be in November. Next Meeting  EPG will attend and provide updates as part of the regular CRC meeting schedule. Some meetings might require more time on the agenda.  The group discussed a proposed agenda for the kick off meeting for TAC. EPG will prepare a community snapshot showing some of the data we are discussing to help illustrate the impact these factors have on a specific area. This will include a one block area of GIS information.  The TAC meeting will take place in November. EPG will look at some dates and check them against the City calendar. The group will need to get member list finalized before meeting. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 146 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Carrying Capacity Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting #1 Meeting Summary December 8, 2015 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM 1. Scope of Project Introduction  Courtney Reich opened up the meeting by introducing EPG employees. TAC members introduced themselves.  Meetings are open to any interested citizen. The purpose is to gather information and receive feedback from as many interested stakeholders as possible, in an effort to represent different views as well as verify the accuracy of data used for this study.  The meeting invitation went out to a well-rounded group of citizens. George is going to check with some other citizens again and committee members were asked to invite interested citizens to attend the next meeting as well. Project Tasks & Schedule  Technical Advisory Committee. (This is the first meeting, which will be held quarterly. The Grant is to be completed October 2016).  Community Resources Inventory & Assessment  Analysis of community Resources Limitations  Recommendations and Implementation Plan  Coordination with Comprehensive Plan process. This project will attempt to coordinate with the Comprehensive Planning process as much as feasible, although the deadlines aren’t an exact match. The Carrying Capacity Study has to be completed by September 30th, however the Comprehensive Plan must be submitted by August 2016 for approval by October 2016. 2. Review of Wave Ecology Report Findings  In 2011, a similar study was conducted titled “Tybee Island Wave Ecology and The Highway 80 Challenge Study.” This was essentially a Carrying Capacity Study that focused on the Highway 80 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 147 of 226 20170209/jrl corridor near Tybee Island. The study was commissioned by Chatham County to assist the City of Tybee Island (and a committee of government and agency leaders) in defining localized solutions to issues affecting the safety of citizens and visitors specific to the Hwy 80 corridor. A copy can be downloaded from the MPC’s website at http://thempc.org/Transportation/WaveEcologyStudy.html. EPG will email a copy to Committee attendees. Many Tybee residents were active participants with this study. Recommendations for this Study  Committee members discussed the following recommendations from this Study, and their implementation status since the report was completed in 2011: o Install road signage to address special features related to safety concerns. o Establish a bus or shuttle service during special events and inter-island options during peak tourism periods. o Establish and maintain an ongoing bus/shuttle service through the Coastal Regional Commission. o Utilize signal timing and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) during special events. o Utilize social media to disseminate information to the public. 3. Data Analysis Courtney presented on the data collected and the analysis conducted to date on the following data sets. She will provide a copy of the power point presentation to the TAC and the City for posting on the website. A brief summary of the discussion is below.  Water Withdrawal o A question was asked about how per capita water use was going to be examined in this study. This study is going to look at other communities and other organizations where people have tried to estimate % of water use for outdoor watering. Often, studies look at per capita water use during the growing season and per capita water use when it is not growing season and use the difference to estimate how much water is used to water lawns and landscaped areas. o A suggestion was made to look at shallow wells for irrigation. We don’t think these well are requires to be permitted; where could we obtain this data? If we don’t have the data, then we can make a recommendation in the report to start collecting the data for future analysis. o Another recommendation is to notify citizens about how much water they are using so they can see a real “number” as to their water consumption. o Water Withdrawal-Future Permit Limits: Courtney Reviewed data from 2010 – 2015 that indicates that the City of Tybee consistently exceeds its water withdrawal permit limits during peak summer months. Courtney reviewed a bar graph that shows Annual Daily average, the 2015 Permit Limit, and 2025 Permit Limit. Georgia EPD is assuming Tybee will rely on the use of a deep well in the Cretaceous aquifer to reduce water withdrawals from the Floridan Aquifer water consumption as mandated by the 2025 Permit. Water conservation measures alone will not allow the City to achieve this amount of water reduction. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 148 of 226 20170209/jrl �� Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP) Discharge o Monthly WTP discharge data from 2012  2015 indicates that discharge from the WTP also exceeds permit limits during peak summer months. o There was a question regarding the water quality standards in the permit, and if the WTP is currently exceed water quality standards. Courtney stated that EPD has that data, but has not performed that review yet. �� Solid waste o Solid waste data was provided by Waste Pro. o There was a question regarding whether dry trash numbers are included in the Waste Pro data. EPG will work to determine that. o The general trend is an increase in both municipal solid waste (MSW) and recycling, although the upward trend in recycling appears to be greater than the upward trend in MSW disposal. �� Population/Housing o Overall, the trend is that resident population is decreasing, the percentage of owner/renter occupied housing is shrinking, and short term rentals are on the rise. Several graphs and charts were reviewed to provide better understanding of the changing dynamics of Tybee s resident versus short and long-term renter populations. The TAC discussed trying to encourage participation by people in the short-term rental industry on Tybee to verify capacity and per/unit population data. �� Traffic o Daily traffic counts from 2014  2015 (since the City s traffic count equipment was corrected) were reviewed. They indicated that the daily capacity of the Hwy 80 corridor was only exceeded a few times per year. However a look at the 15-minute interval counts may tell a different story regarding road capacity. EPG will look further into this. �� Zoning Analysis o This was not done in the Wave Ecology Study and it was a recommendation of that study to look at zoning. Ed gave a presentation of some maps he generated with existing Geographic Information System (GIS) data. This included a R-2 Zoning Analysis to show what potential increases in living units there could be possible under the R-2 zoning designation. EPG will be conducting a more complete zoning analysis as more GIS data is gathered and assessed. 4. Data Gathering: Outstanding Data Needed/Recommendations for Future Analysis �� EPG reviewed the status of data that has been gathered thus far and outstanding data needs. �� Jackie asked if the dry trash # is included in the Solid Waste-Residential Trends line graph; EPG will check. �� Question was asked for the Housing Units table: what was included/grouped in the  Other category for vacant rentals (was this for second homes that aren t being rented and are not up for sale)? EPG will check. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 149 of 226 20170209/jrl �� A TAC member suggested that a good project for Tybee would be to look at other methods (other than tear down/ new construction) to encourage historic cottages to be elevated out of the floodplain as opposed to torn down. Lewis Avenue is a prime example. �� Suggestions were made to examine wastewater quality, focusing on TMDL limits (what is the next generation of wastewater permit limits?), & beach water quality. �� This is a good time to look at the technology of Tybee s WWTP to see if it can handle variable flow and whether its treatment processes need updated or modified. This study won t be able to examine this in depth-it would require an engineering study but this may be a recommendation of this particular study. EPG can also talk to the City s engineers to get some preliminary information. �� EPG to obtain sea level rise data and new flood map data. �� For traffic evaluations, maybe should look at citations and accidents on US 80. �� EPG to check with CORE MPO to obtain 15-minute interval traffic counts for US 80 (what exceeds the capacity on the Tybee portion of US 80). �� EPG will look at lot sizes and determine which lots are big enough to build upon. Study needs to look at possible sea rise-how much is that expected to shrink the buildable lots? �� How do we quantify the infrastructure upgrades that would needs to happen to support the potential population increase under the R-2 zoning scenario? �� We also need to look at the effect of these possible population changes: how do we make sure that what we are looking at is supportive of the local economy? How is this affecting the work force? What does this do to local businesses that can t find local workers? 5. Next Meeting �� Next Meeting to take place in March 2016. The exact date will be provided to the TAC in 2016. �� The TAC was asked to reach out to encourage people to attend the next meeting and participate in the TAC. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 150 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Carrying Capacity Study Parking & Infrastructure Meeting Meeting Summary February 11, 2016 3:00 PM – 5:00 PM Attendees: George Shaw, City of Tybee Island Chantel Morton, City of Tybee Island Pete Ryerson, City of Tybee Island Courtney Reich, EPG Beverly Davis, RS&H Rachel Hatcher, RS&H Chris Stovall, Thomas & Hutton 1. Parking  The Parking study completed by Tybee Island included only public, delineated spots. It did not include public ROW parking areas, such as Lovell Ave or Hwy 80. Is also did not include private parking spaces at the City’s approved private parking lots. The current total for public, delineated spaces is 2,091. See attached list of parking spots.  There are a total of 234 private parking spaces, for a total of 2,325 total delineated parking spaces. The private parking lots are: Name Location Number of Spots Sunrise Parking 1511 Butler Ave 39 Ocean Plaza Beach Resort 1401 Strand 128 Renee G Bridges 1001 Butler Ave 30 Bramble Family 215 Lovell 13 Joyce Prescott 214 2nd Ave 12 Jack Rosenberg 203 14th Street 12  There is some non-delineated public parking, and this may be a lost revenue issue for the City. If the ROW areas is not near a Pay & Display (P&D) unit, then Parking Services will not ticket the vehicle for not paying. It is not seen as financially beneficial to put P&D’s in remote areas where parking only occurs on busy summer weekends. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 151 of 226 20170209/jrl �� The Parking Application was created to let visitors know where available parking is on the island. Pete (or someone from Parking Services) would update this app on an hourly basis during the summer to state how full (percentage-wise) the three main parking areas were. Parking services divides the island into three parking areas: 1) South end, south of 14th, 2) Middle Island 14th north to 2nd, and 3) North beach, the Lighthouse area. o The Parking app is currently being updated by Tybee Island IT �� Since Pete was responsible for updating the App, he had historical knowledge of how full these parking areas typically get. Every weekend in the summer and on big holidays/festival days, North Beach and South End parking areas are 99% full. Mid Island is typically 85%. �� All felt that the South End parking area is the most overtaxed parking area and that during summer weekends, visitors could potentially spend a lot of time circling the area looking for parking. However, there is currently no way to verify how long people circle. Historically, Tybee had tried setting up gated to block further traffic from entering the South end when it was full, but then cars just lined up on the road outside the gate causing a traffic issue. Public Works has used signage in the past to direct people to another parking area with limited success. �� George discussed a perceived issue with the parking requirements and future commercial development on Hwy 80. The Zoning ordinance requires that new commercial development or use provide parking on-site if it is not within 1,000 ft of a public parking lot. Therefore vacant buildings and properties on Hwy 80 that are developed as commercial businesses have to provide on-site parking. The perception is, that there is already limited space and that this requirement is cost-prohibitive and impeding commercial development of this corridor. o Tybee is looking at opening the City s ROWs in that area to provide public parking, which will achieve two goals, providing public parking so that business on Hwy 80 don t have to use up their valuable lot space to do so, and to provide additional parking for visitors to Tybee in General. Tybee could look at where else this may work to provide additional parking. �� There has been previous attempts at staging satellite parking areas and shuttling people back and forth, and it was not perceived as very successful. There was consensus that most visitors to the beach want to be within walking distance to their car since they are likely to be carrying a lot of items. Furthermore, since the City charges for the parking itself, it was felt that any parking shuttles should be free. �� Parking Garages, due to their expense have never been seriously considered. There is a great deal of pressure for parking during summer weekends and special events, but other than that there is more than sufficient parking. If the garage is only filling up 16  20 weekends per year, it would not make financial sense. Hotel Tybee is seen as the only location with potential to locate a parking garage due to its proximity to the beach. A public/private partnership might be the only way to make the financials work for a parking garage. �� Special Event parking issues: o It was agreed by the attendees at the meeting that parking issues are not preventing people from holding or attending special events. o Special event planners must identify parking areas and often use remote parking and shuttle people to the location. They must also use signage and volunteers to direct vendors/visitors to the satellite parking. For example, if your event is on the south end, you can have satellite parking at the North Beach parking lot and shuttle people. o There have been instances where parking on residential ROWs became a problem during certain events. o Overflow parking has been located at Jaycee Park and the Police Dept. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 152 of 226 20170209/jrl o There is more likely to be issues when the event takes up a parking lot, but you can only do that off-season.  Coastal Regional Commission operates the Savannah – Tybee Island Shuttle. It runs Friday – Sunday, four times per day. The ridership is low, and it was felt that there is not enough promotion of this service locally.  The City is reluctant to get into the business of shuttling people on and off island due to the liability and cost. They also don’t want to compete with local businesses offering these services.  There is a potential to lose parking to the new Tybee Island Marine Science Center, which would also be a revenue loss to the City.  NIMBY is also an issue as it relates to people parking in the ROW on residential streets. Most residents are not for additional parking this way. 2. Water System  Tybee’s Cretaceous well is likely to produce sufficient water for the projected need of 800,000 GPD, and it will be sized to produce up to 2.0 MGD.  The water it will produce will be hot and high in chlorides. It will require a chiller and a reverse osmosis (RO) system for treatment. This will cause the capital and operations budgets to increase accordingly.  The anticipated capital costs for the treatment system for a 1.0 MGD well is $5 million with another $1.5 million for addressing discharge of the brine.  Operational costs will go from approximately $0.25 - $0.30/1,000 gallons of water withdrawal from the Upper Floridan to $1.50/1,000 gallons for RO. However, Hilton Head’s current treatment costs for RO are only $0.57/1,000 gallons so it may be less than expected.  There will also be salty brine produced as a waste produce of the RO treatment process that must be disposed of. o Disposal may be under the river bed, but is more likely to be through diffusers out in the ocean. o The city may also consider mixing the salty brine with the discharge from the WWTP, however this would necessitate an additional or upsized discharge pipe as the current WWTP discharge pipe can’t handle the combined capacity.  The alternative of pumping water from Savanah is not really an option. Aside from the $10 - $12 million cost of the infrastructure to deliver Savannah water to Tybee, it will also require treatment once it gets here, further increasing the cost. In addition, permitting would be difficult at best.  This new well will have a major impact on water rates. Especially because Tybee Island has limited ability to collect aide-to-construction, impact or tap fees from new construction to pay for the capital costs of constructing the well. The capital and operational costs will be to be included in the water usage rates.  The City completed a rate study 3 – 4 years ago and the recommendations have been implemented. However, this needs to be revisited in relation to the new well and potential WWTP upgrades.  The water distribution system is relatively new, and it is estimated that 80% of the system is less than 20 years old. There is still about 100 ft. of asbestos pipe that needs to be replaced.  Existing wells need to be raised to 21.5 feet above MHT prepare for storm surge (Cat 4) and sea level rise. There are three (3) wells that need to be elevated and it will cost about $200,000 each. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 153 of 226 20170209/jrl 3. Wastewater  During the summer the City does occasionally exceed its permitted wastewater discharge (primarily on July 4th and Labor Day.  There have also been a few daily violation NOVs for ammonia and solids, however the monthly totals are okay.  The City is currently in the process of installing a new digester and that will help with the solids and ammonia violations.  Reuse could be an option except there are limited places that could receive the irrigation water, the tight location of existing utilities, and putting in an entirely new distribution system is cost prohibitive. This could be a requirement of new development and public facilities.  The WWTP is pretty much at capacity for treatment – 1.6 MGD for treatment, and the discharge pipe can handle 3.0 MGD.  There is not room on site for expansion. Therefore if an upgrade is desired for additional capacity, a membrane system will be necessary in order to fit into the same footprint as the current WWTP.  There is also a need to upgrade the UV system since it is old and nearing its useful lifespan.  If the City requests a discharge permit with greater discharge flow allowances, the limits for the individual water quality parameters will go down requiring a higher level of treatment. The membrane system would also address this need.  50% of the WW collection system is less than 20 years old or has been relined in the last 20 years. There is still some inflow and infiltration (I&I) to address but it is limited.  HGBD did an I&I study some years back and 90% of the recommended projects have been implemented.  Pump stations are currently being upgraded and this includes addressing the associated force mains. This should further reduce any remaining I&I. The City is performing these upgrades at a rate of one per year. Two have been completed and there are 7 to go. They cost about $25,000 - $100,000 apiece.  The pump stations are not in the 100 year flood plain and there is no reason to take them higher. 4. Stormwater  Influence of sea level rise, high tides, and storm surge and a very flat, low-lying topography complicate stormwater issues.  Public works is directed to address nuisance flooding in yards and typically drops a yard inlet and pipe. This works during rain events, but during King Tides it allows the tide to flow back up the system and flood the yard.  Tide gates have been installed on some major stormwater stems to prevent the tide from flowing back up.  Need to work with Jason Evans on the results of his study to determine if there are other capital needs related to this issue. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 154 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 1 of 3 City of Tybee Carrying Capacity Study Meeting #2 Meeting Summary March 29, 2016 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM 1. Presentation of New Data Courtney made a presentation to attendees that included a summary of data already presented as well as new data from the Tybee Island Tourism Study and the Draft Sea Level Rise workshop. 2. Identification of Carrying Capacity Goals The Group discussed the goals of the Carrying Capacity Study and the following goals were identified. a. Diverse and stable year-round population with a high quality of life i. Issues related to this goal that should be considered: 1. Transition to a retirement community 2. Conversion of year-round housing to short term rentals b. Healthy and sustainable tourism-based economy that also serves year-round population and business owners in the off-season. c. Balance between the tourism industry and year round residents. d. Protection of Tybee Island’s environmental, historic and cultural resources e. Safe multi-modal access to, from and within Tybee Island for residents and visitors. f. Political and public support for implementation of the plan recommendations. g. Adapting to a changing climate h. Affordability 3. Identification of Impacts/Issues Related to Population Growth a. Water Withdrawal i. Permit limitation ii. Peak usage associated with tourist population iii. Cretaceous well 1. Capital costs for construction 2. Higher cost of treatment 3. Space/available land for construction of treatment plant iv. Opportunities to address issues 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 155 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 2 of 3 1. Education for tourist, kids, development community 2. Gray water usage 3. Rate study to prepare for cretaceous well 4. Incentives for conservation b. Wastewater Discharge i. Peak wastewater discharge issues associated with tourist season and the compounding effects of I&I. ii. Capacity of WWTP infrastructure to accommodate more flow (including potential discharge from Cretaceous well treatment plant) iii. Potential water quality issues from discharge iv. Lack of space for WWTP expansion v. Need for future upgrades to WWTP vi. Permitting and environmental impacts of upgrading discharge pipe vii. Costs associated with infrastructure improvements c. Stormwater Management/Flooding i. Nuisance flooding associated with king high tide and rain events. ii. Sea level rise is exacerbating flooding iii. Need for infrastructure upgrades including tide gates iv. Cost of infrastructure upgrades v. Water quality issues that result from flooding vi. Cost of flood insurance 1. Historic properties below the BFE 2. Non-conforming properties (especially those on slab which are more difficult to elevate) vii. Opportunity: Sea Level Rise Study has recommendations for stormwater system improvements that are prioritized and have cost estimates. These should be considered as part of this plan and in the Comprehensive Plan. d. Solid Waste/Litter i. Litter on beach ii. Solid waste disposal trends are still increasing not decreasing as was expected with the advent of recycling iii. Reduction of waste generation on island iv. Alternatives for solid waste disposal in landfills off island v. Waste reduction education & litter education e. Traffic Counts & Parking i. Peak traffic flow issues related to day-trippers and events ii. Flooding of Hwy 80 and other roads on-island iii. Traffic related to accidents on Hwy 80 iv. Parking availability and available land to accommodate it v. Parking/traffic in residential areas 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 156 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 3 of 3 vi. Lack of alternative modes of transportation vii. No public harbor to allow for ferry service to Savannah viii. Cost of infrastructure improvements i.e. parking garages ix. Opportunities: 1. Cost/benefit analysis of parking lots 2. Remote parking with transportation 3. Multi-modal opportunities for transportation to and within Tybee Island 4. Notifying people about traffic congestion and parking issues f. Short Term Rental Units i. Peak water & wastewater usage on the island is driven by short term rentals ii. Short-term rentals are a component of all above elements, but are also important to the economy of the island iii. Conversion from short-term rental to year round also has impacts that need to be considered g. City Funding/Resources i. City position for coordination with tourism industry ii. Need for reserves in the general fund for disaster preparedness and infrastructure improvements iii. Rate study for water & wastewater infrastructure improvements iv. Capital costs for known projects h. Zoning i. R-2 Zoning build out – is this a code problem or is it the amount of area zoned R2? ii. R-2 zoning, subdivision of lots, new construction and the resulting density in the area of Tybee that is already flooding at King tides. iii. Building is already limited by height restrictions and lot sizes. iv. Could development be spread out over a long period of time through permitting limitations? v. Identify areas appropriate for growth (Commercial districts) and steer growth there instead of in the residential areas. This could be done through a transfer of development rights program. 4. Next Meeting a. Next Meetings of Comprehensive Plan i. April 5, 6 PM – Public Meeting # 2 ii. April 12, 6 PM – Advisory Working Group 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 157 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 1 of 4 City of Tybee Carrying Capacity Study Meeting #3 Meeting Summary June 1, 2016 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM General Comments:  Change minutes from last meeting-amend the listing under “Goals” so it’s clear these are topics discussed, not Goals.  CCS will be done by the end of September; the City and its consultant team is working to incorporate the recommendations and findings of the Carrying Capacity Study into the Comp Plan. At the very least the Comprehensive Plan will incorporate by reference the recommendations from the CCS if the plan isn’t far enough along to include specific references in the Comp Plan itself. 1. Update on Hwy 80 DOT Project (s)  Todd Barker, with Adrian Collaborative, provided an update on GDOT’s planning efforts for improvements to Highway 80.  Road improvements do not include construction of additional throughfares (i.e., 4-lanes); instead, improvements being evaluated include road widening to include 10-ft paved shoulders for each lane and bridge replacements.  GDOT’s full response letter to November 17, 2015 Open House meeting has been approved and will be posted online in near future. Respondents that included their name and address will receive a letter via mail.  GDOT and its consultants (Adrian Collaborative, T.Y. Lin International) are evaluating elevating Highway 80 as part of the improvement process to meet the same elevation of Tybee Island (approximately 7.5 feet above mean sea level, which will result in up to 18” elevation for the approximate 3-mile stretch prone to flooding.  Purpose of road elevation is two-fold: to address current flooding issue and as well as plan for continued sea level rise & associated flooding.  Draft environmental assessment (EA) will include overview of local planning efforts. Goals/findings generated from City’s comprehensive planning process and CCS will be included as part of the EA. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 158 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 2 of 4  Fort Pulaski located a document from the 1930s that conveyed ownership from the State of GA to federal jurisdiction except for a 150-foot ROW; this makes the project easier to implement since the State of Georgia has the legal right to perform improvements within that ROW.  Adrian Collaborative is also assisting the NPS with a separate but related NEPA process for Fort Pulaski and its bridge improvement project, which is being coordinated with the HWY 80 project. 2. Update on Status of Greenhouse Gas Air Emissions Inventory  As a part of the CCS, EPG is conducting a greenhouse gas (GG) air emissions inventory to identify energy use/GG emissions that result from local government operations.  Goal is to identify ways to reduce GG emissions/reduce the City’s “Carbon footprint” and/or save money by implementing energy efficiency measures (resulting in lower electric utility bills).  Measures that will be recommended by the GG emissions inventory will be specific to the areas where energy/emission reductions are most needed and/or have the greatest impact to reduce emissions and energy usage.  Sectors that will be evaluated include: Buildings and Facilities (i.e., physical buildings); Public Lighting; Vehicle Fleet (city-owned vehicles and equipment that rely on fuels for power); Water Transport (water delivery systems for potable/sanitary/stormwater); Employee Commute (measured in miles driven to and from work); and Process and Fugitive Emissions from other activities.  The question was asked whether the inventory would also assess GG emissions generated from waste collection and disposal activities. This is a sector that can be included as part of the inventory if the necessary data is available; EPG will determine this once all of the data has been collected. At the least, fuel usage related to waste collection may be included. 3. Identification of Strategies Attendees discussed the table of Issues & Strategies (attached) and the following is a summary of their comments. A general suggestion was made to create sub-headings and/or re-categorize the issues and strategies to highlight the main issue (i.e., water limitations) and the main strategies that address this issue, with other issues and strategies as subsets. A comment was made that strategies should address “conserving what we have or working with what we have to make improvements to get more.” a. Water Withdrawal  Courtney explained that in the final report, strategies may be grouped as long and short-term strategies in order to highlight what can be started and what measures require more long range planning and/or additional studies. The goal is not to “over-inform” or confuse the reader but rather provide a listing of strategies that should be evaluated.  Water Conservation Education is important for Residents and Tourists.  Expand upon “outdoor water restrictions. Tybee’s situation is somewhat unique because it’s not so much a daily peak water usage issue but rather a seasonal water peak usage issue.  Add a strategy to participate in regional water supply planning efforts.  Require low-flow fixture (beyond what is required in current code). 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 159 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 3 of 4 b. Wastewater Discharge  Generally, plant is already operating at capacity by July  Review need to expand wastewater discharge pipe capacity. There was a comment that this will be sufficient for the future R/O plant discharge as well as the WWTP discharge. c. Stormwater Management/Flooding  Three strategies are the most important: Perform the upgrades; limit impervious area increases; and elevate Highway 80.  List Low Impact Development as a Strategy (for green roofts and other measures)  The strategy to work with HPC to have homes designated as historic homes may need to fall under the comprehensive planning process, not CCS.  Investigate incentives that could be provided to encourage reduction of existing impervious surfaces.  Tybee may want to look into code amendments that would allow stormwater to be used as greywater/reclamation water and not need to be treated to potable water standards.  The City may want to adopt a policy that pervious surfaces be under consideration whenever additional roads or parking areas need constructed or retrofitted to ensure impervious surfacing is used only when absolutely needed. d. Traffic & Parking  The TAC discussed at length the need (and challenges) presented by potentially increasing parking spaces on Tybee.  Some expressed concern that constructing additional parking areas would increase imperious surfaces and increase traffic congestion by encouraging more people to visit Tybee.  Others felt that additional parking is needed to address existing parking issues (ie, that it’s already inadequate for the number of visitors) and that providing additional parking could reduce illegal parking, reduce property damage related to illegal parking, and relieve traffic congestion due to inability to find parking, etc.  A discussion was also held about alternative transportation including the CRC shuttle, CAT bus service, and high-speed ferry service that could be potentially be provided through CAT or even by the City itself. One concern mentioned was that Tybee doesn’t have the population numbers to support such a cost investment but others commented that that is hard to determine w/o proper infrastructure in place to assess usage.  Parking west of Bull River (with bus service from there to Tybee Island) should be considered. A discussion was briefly held to discuss the feasibility of this and whether visitors would actually use such a service given the amount of beach gear that is often brought along when visiting Tybee.  Bus service is currently available twice/day to and from Tybee and should be more heavily promoted to increase public awareness. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 160 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 4 of 4 e. Electricity/Power  Change name of this category to “Energy Consumption” to better reflect the goal f. Solid Waste/Litter  Suggestion was made to include as a strategy that condos and businesses should have a mandatory recycling program.  A suggestion was made regarding purchase of a glass crusher so that class could be recycled on the island. Another comment was made that the expense and impact of this type of machinery was not acceptable and that there is currently no market for glass. Many communities have stopped recycling glass.  Add “power usage” to the issue that states peak water and wastewater usage are driven by short term rentals  Check with Charlotte at the MPC for info about short term rentals and possibly regulatory limits that could be utilized  Data is available regarding the affordability of 2nd homes g. Short Term Rentals  Affordability issues also force second home owners to become short term rentals.  The new short term rental ordinance will result in data collection about their use. After a year of data collection, these strategies should be reviewed again and updated.  Need to find strategies to make it more affordable for people to keep permanent residences on the island. h. Zoning  No Comments 4. Next Meeting Next meeting is June 13th-presentation to the Planning Commission for the Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan). 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 161 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Issues & Strategies Page 1 of 4 MUNICIPAL FUNCTION ISSUE STRATEGY Potable Water  Water withdrawal permit limitation in the Upper Floridan Aquifer  Peak usage associated with summer tourism  Cost of Reverse Osmosis (RO) Treatment Plant Construction  Cost of RO Treatment Plant Operation  Available space for construction of RO Treatment Plant  Disposal of briny wastewater from RO Treatment Plan can have water quality impacts  Construction of the Cretaceous well and RO Treatment Plant  Water Conservation Education for Tourists  Peak usage water conservation rates  Outdoor watering restrictions  Gray water use  Stormwater reclamation/cisterns  Seek funding assistance for capital construction of RO Treatment Plant  Perform financial analysis and rate study to determine how much capital and operational costs will be and set water & sewer rates accordingly.  Develop conceptual plan and cost estimate for RO Treatment Plant  Begin planning and environmental permitting for RO Treatment Plant wastewater discharge Wastewater Discharge  Peak wastewater discharge issues associated with summer tourism  Compounding effects of Inflow & Infiltration on peak discharge  Capacity of WPCP to accommodate more flow (including potential discharge from RO Treatment Plant  Permitting and environmental impacts from upgrading discharge pipe  Potential water quality problems from discharge  Lack of space for WPCP expansion  Need for future upgrades to WWTP  Costs associated with infrastructure improvements  Complete recommended infrastructure improvements for I&I study  Develop concept plan, cost estimate, and funding to upgrade the wastewater treatment plant to a membrane system.  Perform financial analysis and rate study to determine how much capital and operational costs will be and set water & sewer rates accordingly. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 162 of 22620170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Issues & Strategies Page 2 of 4 MUNICIPAL FUNCTION ISSUE STRATEGY Stormwater Management/ Flooding  Nuisance flooding associated with king high tide and rain events.  Additional impervious area from new development  Sea level rise is exacerbating flooding  Cost for needed infrastructure upgrades including tide gates  Water quality issues that result from flooding  Cost of flood insurance can affect affordability for island residents  Floodplain management requirements impact on historic properties below the BFE  Floodplain management requirements impact on non-conforming pre-FIRM properties  Flooding of Highway 80 impacts accessibility for residents and can result in economic losses related to tourism  Perform recommended upgrades from Sea Level Rise Study  Encourage green infrastructure techniques as opposed to hard engineering techniques that provide a conduit for salt water to come up through the drainage system  Limit increases in impervious area  Implement recommendations from Sea Level Rise Study  Perform a Stormwater Funding Feasibility Study  Stormwater pollution prevention education  Green infrastructure  Continue to work to maintain the CRS rating of 5  Provide education & assistance to homeowners to mitigate their flood risk and reduce cost  Work with HPC to provide assistance to property owners to have their home/building officially designated as historic  Provide education & assistance to homeowners to mitigate their flood risk and reduce cost  Elevate Highway 80 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 163 of 22620170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Issues & Strategies Page 3 of 4 Electricity  Greenhouse gas generation exacerbates climate change, which accelerates sea level rise  Reduce municipal greenhouse gas emissions  Perform greenhouse gas inventory for entire City  Support alternative power generation/use including solar and wind  Have a 3rd party audit conducted to identify potential cost savings/decrease power usage (evaluate utility company fee schedule and cost saving programs, review energy efficiency measures for City buildings, etc.) Traffic & Parking  Peak traffic flow issues related to day- trippers and festivals/events  Hwy 80 congestion related to traffic accidents  Flooding of HWY 80 and other roads on-island  Parking availability and available land to accommodate it in desirable locations, i.e. walking distance to beach  Parking and traffic in residential neighborhoods  Lack of alternative modes of transportation onto the island o No public dock to allow for ferry service to Savannah  Cost of infrastructure improvements, including parking garage  Notify drivers about traffic congestion and parking issues  Identify remote parking locations and operate shuttle for events and festivals  Widening of Highway 80 to include drivable shoulders  Elevate Highway 80  Support continued planning efforts w/Chatham County and Fort Pulaski to extend McQueen’s Trail to serve as safe alternative transportation  Develop a road closure plan for King Tide and Storm Events  Consider the use of unopened ROW for parking  Construct a parking garage in the C1 commercial district o Consider public/private partnership to construct parking garage o Duel commercial use for parking garage structure  Promote and expand CRC shuttle service from Savannah to Tybee  Consider the future creation of a Ferry Dock on Lazaretto Creek 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 164 of 22620170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Issues & Strategies Page 4 of 4 Solid Waste/Litter  Litter on the beach  Solid waste disposal trends are show the amount of waste disposal is increasing despite the opportunities provided by recycling  Recycling bins being contaminated with trash  Reduce waste generation  Waste reduction and litter education  Increase enforcement of litter ordinance  Alternatives for solid waste disposal in landfills off island Short Term Rentals  Peak water & wastewater usage on the island is driven by short term rentals  Short term rentals are essential to the islands economy but must be managed  Conversion of year-round residential to short term rental  Consider regulation short term rentals to moderate peak population numbers.  Increased homestead exemptions and senior exemption for property tax Zoning  Impacts of R-2 build out on population  Allowing more development in areas already subject to flooding from King tides  Exacerbated impacts of development occurring all at once, or over a short period of time  Consider revising R2 zoning code standards to increase lot sizes and limit future subdivisions  Consider rezoning areas subject to King Tides to R-1 or conservation zoning  Consider an annual limit on development permits 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 165 of 22620170209/jrl Page 1 of 3 City of Tybee Carrying Capacity Study Meeting #4 Meeting Summary August 10, 2016 4:00 PM – 6:00 PM Attendees: Sign-In Sheet Attached 1. Update on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory Update EPG provided an update on the results of the GHG Inventory project, and it is summarized below: GHG Emissions were broken down by Sector  Buildings and Facilities: Emissions from powering City Hall; the YMCA/gym; Fire Station, Guard House, Department of Public Works (garage/office); and the Public Safety Building. Interior lighting, operation of heating and cooling systems, misc. uses inside  Water Transport: Emissions from powering water delivery systems (drinking water well pumps) and WWTP pumps/lift station. Did NOT include emissions from wastewater treatment methods but likely minor for what goes on there currently.  Public Lighting: Emissions from powering street lights, park lighting, signage, traffic control lighting, etc. Does not include GDOT owned street lighting or outdoor lighting that is not metered.  Vehicle Fleet: Emissions from city-owned vehicles  Employee Commute: Emissions generated from fuel usage associated with employee commute to and from work Energy Usage and GHG Emissions for All Sectors  Overall, biggest electrical use/GHG emissions came from water transport (ie, operation of WWTP, small extent water pumps for drinking water); followed by public lighting (mostly park lighting). 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 166 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 2 of 3 Equivalent CO2 Percent Energy (MMBtu) Percent Buildings (Tybee YMCA gym and Public Safety Bldg. 2 largest users-almost 75% of all electricity used by buildings) 343.9918 9% 2,376.987 8% Water Transport (water delivery was small electrical user-most of this [85%] due to powering WWTP) 2031.85 54% 14,040.3 50% Public Lighting (most power went to park lighting- street/traffic lighting very small portion of this-2%) 749.3131 20% 51,77.805 18% Fleet Vehicles (66% emissions from vehicles, rest from other equipment) 336.719 9% 3,123.8 11% Employee Commute 273.45 7% 3,610.8 13% Recommendations:  Continuation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory-we did the baseline year, could continue if you wanted to track electrical use/GHG emissions over time if you implement any recommendations.  Third Party Energy Audit of the City’s billing, meters, and rates.  Public Education and Incentive Programs  Upgrades to WWTP should include energy efficiency measures.  Consider a 4 day work week for various departments as appropriate.  Explore alternative energy sources for interior and outdoor public lighting (ie. Solar power) as well as switching to more energy-efficient lighting (i.e., LED lights.)  Increase use of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in all City Hall buildings.  Increase recycling efforts and reduce the amount of government-disposed solid waste that is sent to a landfill (this reduce fugitive greenhouse gas emissions associated with landfills).  Explore alternative cost and benefits associated with alternative fuel sources for fleet vehicles. For example, the City could explore the use of hybrid, electric, or bio-diesel as an alternative to gasoline and diesel in fleet vehicles.  Identify opportunities and incentives available to encourage employees to utilize alternative forms of transportation when commuting to work. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 167 of 226 20170209/jrl Page 3 of 3 2. Review Of Issues, Strategies & Considerations EPG reviewed the list of issues, strategies and considerations that were generated after the last Carrying Capacity Study meeting. The updates, based on this discussion are included in the attached Work Plan document. 3. Development of Work Plan Attendees discussed potential action items to address the identified issues. The results of this discussion are also represented in the attached Work Plan document. 4. Next Steps EPG will present the Carrying Capacity Study to the Planning Commission and City Council in September. There will also be a lunch and learn for the Carrying Capacity Study at the Coastal Resources Division in Brunswick, GA on September 15th. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 168 of 226 20170209/jrl Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Work Plan – August 11, 2016 Page 1 of 7 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS Water Supply  Water Withdrawal Permit Limitations  Peak Water Usage associated with Tourism  Installation of a Cretaceous Well and construction of a Treatment Facility  Water conservation education targeting tourists and development community  Alternative water sources including: gray water usage, rainwater capture, shallow wells, and reuse (after the WWTP upgrade) o Cost of capital construction o Increased costs associated with treatment o Discharge of briny wastewater o Limited space available for construction of treatment facility o Tourists can be a difficult audience to reach. o Current plumbing code may not allow for gray water usage. 1. Perform a rate study to ensure that current and future water rate structure will generate the revenue necessary to construct and operate the cretaceous well. Rate study should also consider "peak usage rates" to encourage water use reduction during peak season. 2. Determine how much treatment capacity the R/O Plant should be designed to provide. 1.0 MGD is the maximum. 3. Develop a conceptual design and financial plan for the treatment plant. This should include land acquisition (if necessary) proposed construction and operational costs, proposed revenue sources, proposed discharge method, and evaluation of any regulatory permitting requirements. 4. Work with the Real Estate/Rental companies to create water conservation education campaign for tourists. 5. Provide better information to water customers regarding the volume of water they use. 6. Evaluate current code and adopt/amend local ordinances as necessary to allow for gray water use, rainwater harvesting, and reuse. 7. Encourage the use of alternative water sources for irrigation and outdoor showers. Wastewater Treatment  Peak wastewater discharge issues associated with tourist season.  The compounding effects of Inflow and Infiltration.  Capacity of WWTP infrastructure to  Upgrade WWTP to accommodate more flow and to treat to a higher standard. o Lack of space for WWTP expansion o Potential combined discharge from Cretaceous well treatment plant increases the need for capacity in discharge pipes. 8. Perform a rate study to determine if current rates are appropriate and adequate to support future capital construction needs. This should be conducted in conjunction with the water use rate study. 9. Submit a Waste Load Allocation to the Georgia EPD for additional flow. 10. Develop a conceptual design for upgrades to the WWTP. This design should include land acquisition (if necessary) proposed construction and operational costs, proposed discharge method and evaluation of any 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 169 of 22620170209/jrl Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Work Plan – August 11, 2016 Page 2 of 7 ISSUE STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS ACTION ITEMS accommodate more flow  Potential water quality issues from discharge.  Future permitted discharge standards may be higher. o Permitting and environmental impacts of upgrading discharge pipe o Costs associated with infrastructure improvements regulatory permitting requirements. Design considerations for the discharge pipe should be made in conjunction with the plans for the Cretaceous Well Treatment Plan discharge. 11. Develop a plan for Reuse water use, including the ballfields. Stormwater and Flooding  Nuisance flooding associated with king high tide and rain events.  Sea level rise is exacerbating flooding  Water quality issues that result from flooding  Implement priority recommended improvements from the Sea Level Rise Study.  Advocate for elevation of Highway 80.  Limit new impervious surfaces.  Limit new construction in areas subject to flooding. o Cost of infrastructure upgrades o Lack of control over Hwy 80 project. o Current status of Hwy 80 project has limited elevation of the road bed due to settlement concerns. o There are development rights associated with property that is already subject to King Tide flooding. 12. Elevate the Butler Ave and 14th Street Pump Houses. 13. Install backflow preventers on stormwater outfalls as recommended in Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan. 14. Continue to work with ACOE on Beach Re- Nourishment Program 15. Consider program to augment the dune system. 16. Work directly with DOT and lobby for additional elevation of Hwy 80 to high sea level rise scenario elevations, i.e. 31” or more. 17. Consider an ordinance to limit the amount of impervious surface in new or re-development. 18. Revise the City code to allow for and incentivize rainwater harvesting. 19. Investigate the potential to receive FEMA funding to purchase repetitive flood loss properties. 20. Develop a program to encourage and incentivize green infrastructure for single family home development. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 170 of 22620170209/jrl Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Work Plan – August 11, 2016 Page 3 of 7 Solid Waste/Litter  Litter on beach  Municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal trends are still increasing despite the availability of recycling.  Recycling receptacles are often contaminated by MSW.  Yard waste is being left on the road/curb and not being picked up  Reduction of waste generation on island  Alternatives for solid waste disposal in landfills off island  Waste reduction education & litter education for tourists  Enforcement of litter ordinance o Tourists are a hard audience to reach o Enforcement of litter ordinance is difficult and requires staff o The recycling market is volatile and affects the ability to o Contamination of recycling affects its marketability. o There is more MSW than available receptacles for short term rentals or for the beach causing contamination of recycling. 21. Perform a solid waste study to further evaluate the issues identified here and identify additional feasible solutions. 22. Consider requiring Short Term Rentals to have summer schedule (i.e. twice per week) for solid waste and recycling pickup. 23. Work with tourism board and solid waste contractor to develop an education program targeted at tourists to discourage littering, increase participation in recycling, and decrease recycling contamination. 24. Implement program for increased beach litter patrols. 25. Review MSW disposal and recycling program on beach to determine if more receptacles or a different format would work better. 26. Work with local businesses to identify and encourage alternatives to single use items. 27. Study potential for glass crusher, and City-sponsored glass recycling program. 28. Consider requirements for condominiums to have dumpsters as opposed to individual trash cans. 29. Work with solid waste contractor to identify and address obstacles to yard waste pickup. 30. Work with solid waste contractor to study the cost/benefits of segregated recycling. 31. Research and identify potential purchase and operation of beach cleaning equipment, i.e. sifters. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 171 of 22620170209/jrl Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Work Plan – August 11, 2016 Page 4 of 7 Energy Consumption  City operations result in energy use, which contributes to greenhouse gas emissions.  The billing system of Georgia Power makes tracking and analyzing energy usage difficult.  Reduce energy usage within City facilities.  Promote energy efficiency through education and incentives. o The City has already made great strides in alternative energy usage through solar power and through energy efficiency audits. 32. Have a third party perform and energy audit that includes an assessment of the City’s electrical meters and Georgia Power billing system. 33. Promote energy conservation to city employees and tenants of city building space. Incentive programs could be set up to encourage employees to reduce energy consumption. 34. Explore the potential cost savings associated with a 4- day work week to reduce electricity usage at public facilities as well as commuting time for employees. 35. Explore alternative energy sources for interior and outdoor public lighting (i.e. solar power) as well as switching to more energy-efficient lighting (i.e., LED lights). 36. Increase use of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in all City buildings. 37. The City of Tybee should ensure that all City Hall renovations plan for and incorporate the energy efficiency recommendations 38. Explore alternative cost and benefits associated with alternative fuel sources for fleet vehicles. For example, the City could explore the use of bio-diesel as an alternative to gasoline and diesel in fleet vehicles or the purchase of hybrid vehicles. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 172 of 22620170209/jrl Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Work Plan – August 11, 2016 Page 5 of 7 Traffic and Parking  Peak traffic flow issues related to day-trippers and events creates congestion and makes accessing or traveling around the island difficult.  Traffic resulting from accidents and flooding on Hwy 80 cuts off access to the island resulting in economic losses and emergency situations.  Lack of parking creates congestion and illegal parking problems during peak tourism season  Improve Hwy 80 to provide passable shoulders and an elevated road bead.  Provide additional parking opportunities  Provide multi-modal opportunities for transportation to and within Tybee Island  Notify people about traffic congestion and parking issues before they get on- island. o There are no transit opportunities to Tybee Island. o There is currently no public harbor to allow for ferry service to Savannah. o The City does not control Hwy 80 Improvements. o There is limited land to accommodate additional parking. o More parking could encourage additional visitors resulting in more impact. o Legal ROW parking is not known and/or clearly marked. o Historic attempts at remote parking have not been well utilized because people want to park near the beach when they have a lot of beach gear. o Potential to eliminate parking in C2 could reduce future available parking opportunities. 39. Advocate with GDOT to elevate the road surface and create passable and bikeable shoulders as part of the bridge and road improvements on Hwy 80. 40. Work with the NPS, Fort Pulaski and the County to extend the McQueen’s trail to the Lazaretto Creek Bridge. Continue work to connect the Marsh Hen Trail to the Lazaretto Creek Bridget. 41. Continue to operate parking application for smart phones to notify people of available parking. Work with Tybee Tourism Council to promote this application. Record data from application to track trends in parking usage. 42. Work with the County to operate electronic signage at Johnny Mercer Blvd. and Hwy 80 to notify visitors of traffic conditions. 43. Perform a study to identify all of the ROW that are owned by the City, and develop a parking plan for these ROW that includes a clear delineation of ROWs where parking is allowed and where it is prohibited, i.e. yellow curb. 44. Consider on-island electronic signage to notify visitors of available parking. 45. Work with churches and school to provide additional parking on peak days, if they so choose. 46. Consider the construction of a parking garage in the C1 area, potentially through a public private partnership. Consider duel uses such as downstairs commercial or rooftop mini-golf to make it more cost effective. 47. Review parking rates and determine if demand-based rates could help address peak traffic and parking issues. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 173 of 22620170209/jrl Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Work Plan – August 11, 2016 Page 6 of 7 Short Term Rentals Peak water & wastewater usage on the island is driven largely by short term rentals Regulate the short term rental industry. Short-term rentals are a component of all above elements, but are also important to the economy of the island 48. Review the data gathered through the current Short Term Rental Ordinance, and reevaluate the need for additional regulation. 49. Consider a limit on Short Term Rental Occupational Tax Certificates. This could be by total number or a percentage of housing units on the island. Zoning  The R-2 Zoning District has a lot of room for additional development through subdivision and redevelopment of existing lots.  The area subject to flooding during King tides and rain events, is in the R-2 District.  Restrict future and re-development in the R-2 District, especially areas that are subject to flooding. o Building is already restricted on Tybee Island through height restrictions and lots sizes. o Private property rights o More impervious surface from additional development in the R- 2 district will make flooding issues worse. o The additional population that would result from a full buildout will have a serious effect on the Island’s resources, services, and facilities. 50. Consider amending the R-2 district to a. Increase the minimum lot size for duplexes. b. Increase the minimum lot size necessary for subdivisions 51. Consider rezoning areas subject to flooding to R-1 or a more restrictive zoning district. 52. Consider a transfer of development rights program that will direct development away from lots subject to flooding and towards other areas that have the ability to accommodate more dense development. 53. Provide a tax incentive for R2 property owners to under-develop their lots. 54. Purchase and permanently protect undeveloped property in the R-2 district. Prioritize purchase of repetitive loss housing. 55. Restrict new impervious surface in the R-2 district. 56. Require infiltration of the water quality volume (1.2” of stormwater) for all new development and redevelopment. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 174 of 22620170209/jrl Tybee Island Carrying Capacity Study Work Plan – August 11, 2016 Page 7 of 7 City Funding and Resources  The City does not currently have the funding necessary to implement needed capital improvements.  The city needs staff resources to focus on issues identified in this plan.  City needs reserves for disaster preparedness and infrastructure improvements.  Adjust utility rate structure to ensure that the city can fund future capital improvements and operations.  Identify other funding sources for improvements  Identify or hire staff to focus on Carrying Capacity Issues o The resident population may be burdened by the cost to support the tourist population. o A large proportion of the City’s budget is for services and infrastructure that services the tourism industry. o The tourism industry drives the economy on Tybee Island. 57. Perform a comprehensive water and sanitary sewer rate study to: c. Provide adequate funding for future improvements and operations d. Incentivize water conservation. e. Consider peaking factors and/or seasonal rates to reduce peak usage and to shift the cost burden off of the residential population 58. Perform a stormwater utility feasibility study to determine if a stormwater fee would be a potential funding source for stormwater improvements 59. Investigate GEFA loan and principal forgiveness program as a potential funding source for water, sewer, and stormwater improvements. 60. Look for regional partners who also benefit from the tourism industry to assist with the cost of improvements to address impact of tourists on island resources. 61. Work with Chatham County on future SPLOST referendum to identify opportunities for additional funding. 62. Perform a Reserve Fund Study to determine the amount of reserve funds needed for disaster preparedness and response. 63. Consider adding staff to focus on implementation of this work plan. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacketPage 175 of 22620170209/jrl TYBEE ISLAND CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY A2 APPENDIX B: GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 176 of 226 20170209/jrl C ITY OF T YBEE I SLAND , G EORGIA S EPTEMBER 2016 G EORGIA D EPARTMENT OF N ATURAL R ESOURCES C OASTAL R ESOURCES D IVISION C OASTAL I NCENTIVE G RANT - C YCLE 18 G REENHOUSE G AS E MISSIONS I NVENTORY FOR L OCAL G OVERNMENT O PERATIONS 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 177 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory ii Table of Contents 1. Special Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................... 2 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 3 Resources Utilized .............................................................................................................................. 3 Inventory Scope .................................................................................................................................. 3 Inventory Categories .......................................................................................................................... 3 4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Results .............................................................................. 6 Buildings and Facilities ....................................................................................................................... 6 Water Transport ................................................................................................................................. 7 Public Lighting .................................................................................................................................... 8 Vehicle Fleet ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Employee Commute ......................................................................................................................... 10 Summary of GHG Emissions Inventory Results ................................................................................ 10 5. Reduction Strategies and Recommendations ............................................................................. 12 Electric Utility Incentives and Programs ........................................................................................... 12 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 12 6. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 15 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 178 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 1 1. Special Acknowledgements This inventory was prepared on behalf of the City of Tybee Island, Georgia, under grant award No. XXX to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) from the Office for Coastal Management (OCM), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of DNR, OCM or NOAA. Ecological Planning Group, LLC assisted the City of Tybee Island with preparation of this report. 35 Abercorn Street, Suite 210 Savannah, Georgia 31401 www.ecologicalplanning.net 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 179 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 2 2. Introduction and Background While the cause of climate change has been highly debated, there is widespread scientific consensus that climate change is causing increased temperatures, melting of glaciers, altering precipitation patterns, and sea level rise. The changing dynamics associated with these resources can threaten both the natural and economic structure of local communities. Modern development patterns, technological changes, and increasing populations have all been implicated as potential causes of global climate change. Many scientific studies have demonstrated a link between greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from human activities with global climate change. Current thinking by many within the scientific community is that GHGs contribute to climate change by trapping heat within Earth’s atmosphere. Gases that are classified as “greenhouse gases” include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases. In response, forward-thinking local governments are identifying policy changes and other measures that can reduce GHG emissions at both the community level and within their own operations. Policy changes at a community level can reduce GHG emissions but often these policy changes are difficult to implement and enforce because they involve measures that are outside the control of the local government’s policies and programs. In contrast, local governments have direct control over their own emissions-generating activities. For example, GHG emissions generated from local government operations can be dramatically lowered by reducing energy usage in buildings and facilities; reducing fuel consumption in fleet vehicles and equipment; reducing the amount of government-disposed solid waste that is sent to a landfill; and relying more on alternative energy sources. By identifying and quantifying emissions from its operations, jurisdictions can select an effective approach to reducing its contribution to climate change. The process of conducting such a quantitative analysis is called a local government operations greenhouse gas emissions inventory. In October 2015, the City of Tybee Island, Georgia was awarded a Georgia Coastal Management Program Coastal Incentive Grant (Cycle 18) by the Georgia DNR, Coastal Resources Division to conduct a Carrying Capacity Study to identify which resources are essential to supporting the economy and quality of life of Tybee Island, and then determine how large of a population can be supported within the limits of those resources. As part of this Carrying Capacity Study, the City of Tybee also conducted a local government operations greenhouse gas emissions inventory, the results of which are discussed herein. This objective of this inventory is to identify the sources and quantities of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from government operations within the City of Tybee in 2015, the chosen base year for this inventory. By identifying the areas of government operations that contribute the most greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, this inventory will provide baseline data to reduce GHG emissions and assist the City with future planning efforts to address, plan, and mitigate the impacts of climate change. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 180 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 3 3. Methodology Resources Utilized The City of Tybee is a participating member of the International Council of Local Government Initiatives (ICLEI). ICLEI has developed a set of guidelines to assist with quantifying and reporting GHG emissions associated with community and local government operations. To complete this inventory, the following resources were utilized:  ClearPath emissions calculator, a software program that is the backbone of this inventory;  Master Data Workbook, a comprehensive data collection tool used in conjunction with ClearPath; and  Local Government Operations Protocol, developed in partnership between ICLEI and the California Air Resources Board, California Climate Action Registry and The Climate Registry. Inventory Scope This inventory evaluates three GHGs that are internationally-recognized under the Kyoto Protocol, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Emissions for these gases are reported separately in metric tons for each gas and metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). The global-warming potential (GWP) of each non-CO2 gas is used to calculate CO2e. (Carbon dioxide equivalency is a quantity that describes, for a given mixture and amount of greenhouse gas, the amount of CO2 that would have the same GWP, when measured over a specified timescale [generally, 100 years]). By converting all GHGs to CO2e, comparisons can more easily be made when discussing different GHGs. Energy usage (i.e., consumption of electricity) is reported within this inventory by kilowatt-hours (kWh). The kWh is a unit of energy equivalent to one kilowatt of power expended for one hour (of time. The kilowatt-hour is not a standard unit in any formal system, but it is commonly used in electrical applications and is an ICLEI reporting standard. Energy usage is also reported within this inventory by British Thermal Units (BTU), another standard unit of for measurement of energy. The MMBtu represents one million BTUs and is the unit of measurement used for comparing the various sectors of government operations covered within this report. This inventory includes emissions of GHGs during the calendar year of 2015, otherwise known as the base year. Reporting GHG inventories on a calendar year basis and designating a baseline year (the year that future inventories may be compared to for purposes of tracking changes in GHG emissions) is considered standard internationally. Inventory Categories The City of Tybee focused on the following categories of government operations to quantify GHG emissions for base year 2015 (Figure 1): 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 181 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 4  Buildings and Facilities: This includes emissions from grid electricity used to power City Hall; the YMCA (including the gym); Fire Station, Guard House, Department of Public Works (garage/office); and the Public Safety Building. This includes interior lighting, operation of heating and cooling systems, and other electrical uses within these buildings.  Water Transport: This includes emissions from grid-electricity used to power water delivery systems (drinking water well pumps) and the pumps/lift station associated with the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Emissions from wastewater treatment methods were not included as part of this inventory.  Public Lighting: This includes emissions from grid electricity used to power street lights, park lighting, signage, traffic control lighting, and other miscellaneous forms of public lighting that is owned and/or controlled by the City of Tybee. Emissions from interior lighting are included within the Buildings and Facilities sector. Street lighting for the City of Tybee that is owned and operated by the Georgia Department of Transportation is not included within this inventory assessment. In addition, any outdoor lighting that is not metered (i.e., billed by a tariff to the City of Tybee based on a fixed cost) is not included.  Vehicle Fleet: This includes emissions from city-owned vehicles, large equipment, small maintenance equipment, and marine related equipment used by the City’s police, fire, and other departments).  Employee Commute: This includes emissions generated from fuel usage associated with employee commute to and from work Stationary sources of greenhouse gases include any facility, operation, or activity, that produces emissions in a fixed location. The most common type of stationary source emission for most local government operations result from the combustion of fossil fuels used to power the jurisdictions’ buildings (Building and Facilities); water and wastewater delivery systems (Water Transport) and power street lights, traffic signals, park lighting, and other forms of outdoor lighting (Public Lighting). For the City of Tybee, the energy used to run and operate fixed local government facilities is supplied by Georgia Power, the local electric utility. Natural gas is not used by the City of Tybee to power government buildings and operations. Utility power bills for 2015 were utilized to supply the bulk of data used to identify and assess the amount of energy used to power buildings, water/wastewater delivery systems, and supply public lighting, which are all stationary sources of GHG emissions. Greenhouse gas emissions were also quantified for non-stationary Figure 1: Government Sectors and Categories 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 182 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 5 sources, including city-owned vehicles used for city operations (Vehicle Fleet) and from City employee commute to and from the work (Employee Commute). The types of energy and emissions associated with these operations vary based on the different government functions as well as the source of energy. Correspondingly, the way in which GHG emissions may be assessed and quantified for these operations vary. For example, electricity used at a government building is measured in kWh while the emissions from vehicle fleet activities and employee commuting patterns are measured in miles traveled, gasoline and/or diesel. To level the playing field, the City utilized the ClearPath emission inventory software developed by ICLEI to assist with the analysis of data related to the sectors defined above. The tools provided in the ClearPath software covert the various GHG emissions to equivalent tons of carbon dioxide (CO2e) to allow for an "apples-to-apples" comparison between reporting sectors and emission sources. Emissions for methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) were also calculated; however, for comparative purposes and ease of reference, the results and discussions within this report will focus primarily on emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2e reported in metric tons during base year 2015 and energy by kWh and BTU. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 183 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 6 4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Results Buildings and Facilities GHG emissions from grid electricity used to power City buildings and facilities were assessed and subdivided into 6 building and/or department “categories” based on the availability of data and accounts already established by Georgia Power and the City of Tybee for utility billing purposes. GHG emissions from grid electricity used to power the WWTP, including lift stations, and drinking water wells, are categorized as their own separate “Water Transport” sector in accordance with ICLEI reporting standards and are discussed separately within this report. Buildings and/or departments included within this sector inventory were:  City Hall;  the YMCA (including the gym);  Guard House;  Department of Public Works (garage/office);  Fire Station;  Public Safety Building (police department and courtroom); and Table 1 includes a breakdown of energy consumption (kWh) and GHG emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) as well as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) generated from electrical use within City buildings and/or departments. Figure 2 shows the percentage (%) of CO2e emissions generated by each building and/or department. The YMCA and associated gym, and the Public Safety Building consumed the most electricity and generated the most CO2e of Tybee’s city-owned buildings. Operating the YMCA/gym generated 146 metric tons of CO2e (MtCO2e), which equates to 43% of CO2e emissions within this sector, and operating the Public Safety Building generated 101 MtCO2e (30% of CO2e emissions). Approximately 95 MtCO2e (27% of CO2e emissions) were generated by City Hall, Department of Public Works (the garage and office), and the Guard House combined. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 184 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 7 Table 1 Energy Usage and GHG Emissions by Building/Department Building/Department Total 2015 Annual Usage (kWh) C02 (MT) CH4 (MT) N20 (MT) C02e (MT) % C02e City Hall 84,457 41 8.5314 x10-4 7.9606 x10-4 42 12% YMCA/GYM 297,520 146 0.0030054 0.0028043 147 43% Guard House 11,886 6 1.2007 x10-4 1.1203 x10-4 6 2% Department of Public Works (garage/office) 61,360 30 6.1983 x10-4 5.7836 x10-4 30 9% Fire Station 34,761 17 3.5114 x10-4 3.2765 x10-4 17 5% Public Safety Building 206,480 101 0.0020858 0.0019462 102 30% Water Transport GHG emissions from grid electricity used to power the City’s WWTP, including lift stations, and water delivery pumps (drinking water well pumps) were assessed and subdivided within this category. Table 2 includes a breakdown of energy consumption (kWh) and GHG emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) as well as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) generated from electrical use to power water pump delivery systems and the WWTP. 12% 43% 2% 9% 5% 30% Figure 2 GHG Emissions by Building/Department (% C02e ) City Hall YMCA/GYM Guard House Department of Public Works (garage/office) Fire Station Public Safety Building 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 185 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 8 As demonstrated in Table 2 below, most of the City’s energy usage for water transport, and therefore the majority of GHG emissions as measured by CO2e from energy usage, comes predominately from operating the WWTP (847 MtCO2e which equates to 84% of CO2e within this sector). Operation of the water delivery pumps generated significantly less (163 MtCO2e which equates to 16% of CO2e). Table 2 Energy Usage and GHG Emissions for Water Transport Water Transport Total 2015 Annual Usage (kWh) C02 (MT) CH4 (MT) N20 (MT) C02e (MT) % C02e Water delivery pumps (drinking water wells) 331,664 163 0 0 164 16% WWTP (lift stations, etc.) 1,725,237 847 0 0 852 84% Public Lighting This includes emissions from grid electricity used to power street lights, traffic control lighting, signage, park lighting, and other miscellaneous forms of outdoor public lighting (dock lighting, etc.), that are metered and controlled and/or owned by the City of Tybee. Table 1 includes a breakdown of energy consumption (kWh) and GHG emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) as well as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) generated for public lighting. For comparative purposes, the public lighting sector was subdivided into 2 categories: street and traffic lighting (which encompasses street lighting, traffic control lighting, and signage) and “other” outdoor lighting (park lighting, dock lighting, etc.) Operation of park lighting consumed the most electricity and generated the majority of GHG emissions within public lighting (368 MtCO2e which equates to 98% of CO2e within this sector) while operation of street and traffic lighting consumed far less electricity and generated significantly less GHGs (7 MtCO2e which equates to 2% of CO2e). 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 186 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 9 Table 3 Energy Usage and GHG Emissions for Public Lighting Public Lighting Total 2015 Annual Usage (kWh) C02 (MT) CH4 (MT) N20 (MT) C02e (MT) % C02e Street & Traffic Lighting 14,300 7 1.4445 x10-4 1.3479 x10-4 7 2% Park and Other Outdoor Lighting 744,235 365 0.01 0.01 368 98% Vehicle Fleet The City of Tybee Island compiled information about vehicles and equipment that make up the City's vehicle fleet. The list was broken down by vehicles, large equipment, small maintenance equipment, and marine related equipment. The type of GHG emissions generated in this sector is based on the usage of gasoline and diesel by city owned and operated vehicles and equipment. The vehicle fleet for the City of Tybee Island contributes 336.7 equivalent MtCO2 units, which accounts for approximately 9% of total greenhouse gas emissions in the City. The vehicle fleet has been broken down by general type and summarized in the chart below. 66%3% 23% 8% Figure 3 Vehicle Fleet GHG emissions (% C02e) Vehicles Small Maintenance Equipment Large Equipment Marine Related 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 187 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 10 Due to the number of vehicles, the police department accounts for a large percentage of the total GHG emissions in the vehicle fleet sector. Water operations, public works, parking, marine rescue, and the fire department are the other departments that make up vehicle fleet sector. Employee Commute The employee commute sector consists of the total distance employees travel to and from work and is measured in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The City analyzed the commuting patterns of employees and place of residence to determine the total VMT for each employee. The resulting data was entered in to the ClearPath emission inventory software to determine the GHG emissions generated by employee commuting patterns. The employee commute sector accounts for 273.45 MtCO2e, which represents 7% of the total government generated emissions. Based on commuting patterns and place of residence, employees of Tybee Island drive roughly 589,000 miles annually just traveling to and from work. This equates to the consumption of more than 29,000 gallons of gasoline, a cost which is incurred by the employees. The average commute is 10.8 miles each way. Summary of GHG Emissions Inventory Results This section provides details with regard to the amounts of greenhouse gas emissions and energy usage resulting from the government operations at the City. During the 2015 base year, government operations at the City generated roughly 3,735 MtCO2e. The use of electricity at city buildings and facilities account for roughly 9% of CO2e. Water transport was the largest sector, accounting for over 50% CO2e. Public lighting and the vehicle fleet were responsible for 20% and 9% of CO2e, respectively, with the employee commute sector having the lowest percentage of greenhouse gas emissions at 7%. The British Thermal Unit (BTU) is the standard unit of for measurement of energy. The MMBtu represents one million BTUs and is the unit of measurement used for comparing the various sectors of government operations in the table below. Tybee Island used a total of 28,330 units of energy (MMBtu) during the 2015 base year. Again, the water treatment sector accounts for the highest energy usage at 50%. Lighting and employee commute have the second highest percentages at 18% and 13% respectively. Fleet vehicles and buildings are the smallest in total percentage of energy usage for the sectors analyzed. Table 4 Energy Usage and GHG Emissions for All Sectors Equivalent CO2 Percent Energy (MMBtu) Percent Buildings 343.9918 9% 2,376.987 8% Water Transport 2031.85 54% 14,040.3 50% Public Lighting 749.3131 20% 51,77.805 18% Fleet Vehicles 336.719 9% 3,123.8 11% Employee Commute 273.45 7% 3,610.8 13% 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 188 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 11 9% 54%20% 9%7% Figure 4 GHG Emissions by Sector (% CO2e) Buildings Water Treatment Lighting Fleet Vehicles Employee Commute 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 189 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 12 5. Reduction Strategies and Recommendations Electric Utility Incentives and Programs Georgia Power, the local utility that supplies electricity to the City of Tybee, offers a commercial rebate program that provides cost incentives for incorporating energy-efficient improvements. Rebates are offered to help offset initial costs associated with replacement of outdated, inefficient equipment or installation of high-efficiency equipment during new construction. The utility company also offers free audits that provide recommendations for increased energy efficiency. In April 2015, Georgia Power conducted an audit of Tybee’s Memorial Park buildings, which includes the City Hall building and the YMCA/gym. Recommendations from Georgia Power to increase energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption (which in turn reduces GHG emissions), and a summary of the City’s current status with respect to implementation of these strategies, are included below:  Continue to incorporate occupancy sensors in strategic locations of the buildings; consider energy efficient construction practices and premium efficiency equipment when renovating the City Hall building or when equipment fails; continue to promote energy management/conservation to city employees and tenants of city building space; and set programmable thermostat settings in the gymnasium to make sure they are set to adjust during unoccupied times. The City has installed occupancy sensors and programmable thermostats in some of the Memorial Park buildings, although some of the programmable thermostats need to be re-located to ensure optimal temperature regulation. The City plans to address these recommendations when they renovate City Hall, which the City is currently planning.  Replace the water heater in the YMCA building;  Ensure all computers are set to go into energy management mode when they are not in use. Recommendations The following recommendations should be considered on a city-wide basis to reduce energy consumption, thereby reducing GHG emissions from local government operations: Continuation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory This inventory provides a great starting place for the City of Tybee as it provides a baseline year for which reduction goals and future impacts can be measured and compared. The City should review the strategies outlined in this inventory and set emission reduction goals and measure success based on the baseline year. The City should also develop an action plan / implementation plan to assist with tracking and achieving reduction goals. Third-Party Audit The City may want to consider having a third-party energy audit conducted by an objective and credentialed firm that specializes in these types of audits. The results of this greenhouse gas emissions inventory can be used in conjunction with a third-party audit to identify specific energy 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 190 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 13 reduction strategies for the City of Tybee that have the greatest impact. This audit should also include a detailed analysis of the City’s current billing setup with Georgia Power to ensure that all current billing practices are most economically beneficial to the City. The audit should investigate measures to reduce energy consumption during peak energy usage times (both within a 24-hr period and seasonally). In conjunction with, or as an alternative to this if the City cannot hire a third-party, the City should also request that Georgia Power conduct additional energy audits of its other City buildings and operations. Public Education and Incentive Programs The City should continue to promote energy conservation to city employees and tenants of city building space. Incentive programs, perhaps groped by department and/or building, could be set up to encourage employees to reduce energy consumption. Energy Efficiency There are a variety of energy efficiency measures that should be considered to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions at the City, some of which may also reduce electricity costs. These include:  Energy efficient wastewater treatment methods should be considered when designing and upgrading the City’s wastewater treatment plant. As discussed within this report, over 50% of the City’s energy usage and GHG emissions result from wastewater treatment.  Explore the potential cost savings associated with a 4-day work week as a mean to reduce electricity usage at some or all public facilities;  Explore alternative energy sources for interior and outdoor public lighting (ie. Solar power) as well as switching to more energy-efficient lighting (i.e., LED lights); and  Increase use of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in all City Hall buildings;  The City of Tybee should ensure that all City Hall renovations plan for and incorporate the energy efficiency recommendations provided by Georgia Power during its April 2015 Memorial Park Energy Audit. This includes incorporation of occupancy sensors and re-location and setting of programmable thermostats in the gymnasium and other areas. These same recommendations can be expanded to other City hall buildings. Other Recommendations  Increase recycling efforts and reduce the amount of government-disposed solid waste that is sent to a landfill (this reduce fugitive greenhouse gas emissions associated with landfills);  Explore alternative cost and benefits associated with alternative fuel sources for fleet vehicles. For example, the City could explore the use of bio-diesel as an alternative to gasoline and diesel in fleet vehicles.  Identify incentives available to encourage employees to utilize alternative forms of transportation when commuting to work; and 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 191 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 14  Providing incentives for employees to live closer to work. Carpooling and public transportation options could also be explored as a means to reduce emissions related to commuting. An additional option could be the exploration of a 4-day work week as mentioned above. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 192 of 226 20170209/jrl City of Tybee Island Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Page 15 6. Conclusion This Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory analyzed energy usage and GHG emissions generated by government operations within the City of Tybee Island. The biggest contributors to GHG emission from government operations for the City of Tybee Island are Water Transport and Lighting. Employee Commute and Vehicle Fleet emissions account for a smaller percentage off overall emissions, which could be related to the relatively small size of the island and the fact that many city employees have very short commutes. The impact from the building sector was also small when compared to the other sectors. While the City of Tybee cannot solve the issue of global climate change by itself, it can do its part and take steps to directly reduce greenhouse gas emissions from its own governmental operations. By identifying and quantifying emissions from its operations, jurisdictions can select an effective approach to reducing its contribution to climate change. This inventory provides a great starting place for the City of Tybee as it provides a baseline year for which reduction goals and future impacts can be measured and compared. In addition to mitigation of global climate change, reducing GHG emissions from government operations has other direct and indirect benefits to the City. Improving air quality by reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions would result in an improvement to the environmental as well as the quality of life for existing residents and future residents of the City. Reducing energy consumption will also lead to a reduction in energy costs for the City, which would allow for the reallocations of funds toward other needs or projects. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 193 of 226 20170209/jrl ORDINANCE NO. 03-2017-CA AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA, PERTAINING TO SECTION 6-8, CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC AREAS, REGARDING THE PUBLIC CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL FROM OPEN CONTAINERS, TO ESTABLISH RESTRICTIONS THEREON IN REFERENCE TO LOCATIONS AND TIMES WHEN PERMISSIBLE AND WHEN NOT PERMISSIBLE AND TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE RESTRICTION OF THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL OUTDOORS DURING CERTAIN TIMES OF THE YEAR AND/OR DURING EVENTS WHEREAS, the duly elected governing authority for the City of Tybee Island, Georgia, is authorized under Article 9, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the Constitution of the State of Georgia to adopt reasonable ordinances to protect and improve the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Tybee Island, Georgia; and WHEREAS, the duly elected governing authority for the City of Tybee Island, Georgia, is the Mayor and Council thereof; and WHEREAS, the governing authority desires to adopt ordinances under its police, zoning and home rule powers; and WHEREAS, the public welfare and safety of the citizens of Tybee Island requires that action be taken so as impose restrictions on the outdoor consumption of alcohol, particularly in the case of unpermitted special events and/or during traditional spring break periods. NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby ordained by the Mayor and Council of the City of Tybee Island that The Code of the City of Tybee Island, Georgia, Section 6-8, Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public areas, be amended as provided herein. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 194 of 226 20170209/jrl SECTION 1 The Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as to Section 6-8, Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public areas, shall hereafter read as follows: Sec. 6-8. Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public areas. (a) Except as specifically permitted in connection with special events approved by the Mayor and Council, consumption of alcohol on the beaches, in the parking lots located adjacent to beaches and in or on the adjoining beach waters of the City of Tybee Island is prohibited during the months of March, April and in May through Midnight of the first Saturday until the next to the last Friday before Memorial Day in May of each calendar year. At other times when not prohibited herein, alcoholic beverages may be consumed from a metal can or a non-glass container cup with a capacity of 16 25.4 fluid ounces or less, in public areas; however, the Mayor and Council may designate areas of public property where all consumption of alcohol is prohibited and/or may limit the type of containers that are prohibited or permissible in any particular areas of the City by amendment hereto or in connection with the approval of any special event or application for a special event. (b) Any person violating the any provisions of this chapter, upon a first conviction in a municipal court shall be fined not less than $350.00 nor more than $1,000.00 and/or be imprisoned for a term not exceeding 90 days, either or both, plus court costs, and for a second offense within 5 years of a previous conviction or offense, such person shall be fined not less than $600.00 nor more than $1,000.00 and/or imprisoned for a term not exceeding 120 days, plus court costs, either or both, in the discretion of the judge of the municipal court. Further, it shall be considered to be a second conviction hereunder for any individual previously cited for a violation of this section for which a subsequent conviction is secured to have received a 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 195 of 226 20170209/jrl subsequent citation which also results in a conviction. , rules, or regulations of this article, upon conviction, shall be subject to punishment as provided in Section 1-8 and as provided by law. SECTION 2 The sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared illegal or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such illegality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance. SECTION 3 All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are expressly repealed. SECTION 4 It is the intention of the governing body, and it is hereby ordained, that the provisions of this ordinance shall become effective and be made a part of the Code of Ordinances, City of Tybee Island, Georgia, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered to accomplish such intention. SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption by the Mayor and Council pursuant to the ordinances of the City. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 2017. ______________________________ MAYOR 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 196 of 226 20170209/jrl ATTEST: CLERK OF COUNCIL FIRST READING: ______ SECOND READING: ______ ENACTED: Ordin 2017/3-2017 alcohol 12.14.16 Ordin 2017/3-2017-A alcohol 12.20.16 Ordin 2017/3-2017-A alcohol 01.03.17 Ordin 2017/3-2017-C alcohol 01.19.17 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 197 of 226 20170209/jrl ORDINANCE NO. 03-2017-C AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA, PERTAINING TO SECTION 6-8, CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC AREAS, REGARDING THE PUBLIC CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL FROM OPEN CONTAINERS, TO ESTABLISH RESTRICTIONS THEREON IN REFERENCE TO LOCATIONS AND TIMES WHEN PERMISSIBLE AND WHEN NOT PERMISSIBLE AND TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE RESTRICTION OF THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL OUTDOORS DURING CERTAIN TIMES OF THE YEAR AND/OR DURING EVENTS WHEREAS, the duly elected governing authority for the City of Tybee Island, Georgia, is authorized under Article 9, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the Constitution of the State of Georgia to adopt reasonable ordinances to protect and improve the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Tybee Island, Georgia; and WHEREAS, the duly elected governing authority for the City of Tybee Island, Georgia, is the Mayor and Council thereof; and WHEREAS, the governing authority desires to adopt ordinances under its police, zoning and home rule powers; and WHEREAS, the public welfare and safety of the citizens of Tybee Island requires that action be taken so as impose restrictions on the outdoor consumption of alcohol, particularly in the case of unpermitted special events and/or during traditional spring break periods. NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby ordained by the Mayor and Council of the City of Tybee Island that The Code of the City of Tybee Island, Georgia, Section 6-8, Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public areas, be amended as provided herein. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 198 of 226 20170209/jrl SECTION 1 The Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as to Section 6-8, Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public areas, shall hereafter read as follows: Sec. 6-8. Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public areas. (a) Except as specifically permitted in connection with special events approved by the Mayor and Council, consumption of alcohol on the beaches, in the parking lots located adjacent to beaches and in or on the adjoining beach waters of the City of Tybee Island is prohibited during the months of March, April and in May through Midnight of the first Saturday in May of each calendar year. At other times when not prohibited herein, alcoholic beverages may be consumed from a metal can or a non-glass container with a capacity of 16 fluid ounces or less, in public areas; however, the Mayor and Council may designate areas of public property where all consumption of alcohol is prohibited and/or may limit the type of containers that are prohibited or permissible in any particular areas of the City by amendment hereto or in connection with the approval of any special event or application for a special event. (b) Any person violating the provisions of this chapter, upon a first conviction in a municipal court shall be fined not less than $350.00 nor more than $1,000.00 and/or be imprisoned for a term not exceeding 90 days, either or both, plus court costs, and for a second offense within 5 years of a previous conviction or offense, such person shall be fined not less than $600.00 nor more than $1,000.00 and/or imprisoned for a term not exceeding 120 days, plus court costs, either or both, in the discretion of the judge of the municipal court. Further, it shall be considered to be a second conviction hereunder for any individual previously cited for a violation of this section for which a subsequent conviction is secured to have received a subsequent citation which also results in a conviction. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 199 of 226 20170209/jrl SECTION 2 The sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable and, if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared illegal or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such illegality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance. SECTION 3 All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are expressly repealed. SECTION 4 It is the intention of the governing body, and it is hereby ordained, that the provisions of this ordinance shall become effective and be made a part of the Code of Ordinances, City of Tybee Island, Georgia, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered to accomplish such intention. SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption by the Mayor and Council pursuant to the ordinances of the City. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 2017. ______________________________ MAYOR 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 200 of 226 20170209/jrl ATTEST: CLERK OF COUNCIL FIRST READING: ______ SECOND READING: ______ ENACTED: Ordin 2017/3-2017 alcohol 12.14.16 Ordin 2017/3-2017-A alcohol 12.20.16 Ordin 2017/3-2017-A alcohol 01.03.17 Ordin 2017/3-2017-C alcohol 01.19.17 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 201 of 226 20170209/jrl TIDA/MS BOD approved: 1/18/17 Page 1 of 2 TYBEE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY / MAIN STREET BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Minutes: December 21, 2016 Vision: To improve the quality of life for those that live, work, and visit Tybee Island and enhance the cultural experience while preserving the community's barrier island heritage. The Mission of the Tybee Island Development Authority / Main Street Program is to: - facilitate efforts to revitalize, redevelop, and enhance that which improves the quality of life; - create a sense of place and improve the quality of life for residents, business owners, and visitors using the Main Street Four Point Approach; - encourage quality economic growth and development while preserving Tybee Island's unique architectural and community heritage; - support and encourage the arts as a cultural endeavor and economic engine on the Island. ATTENDANCE (Present) Director: Angela Caldwell, Vicki Hammons, Diane Kaufman, Steve Kellam, Julie Livingston, Ted Lynch, Brenda Marion Ex-Officio Director: Sarah Bernzott, Melissa Turner Program City Staff: Chantel Morton (Absent) Ex-Officio Director: Melissa Memory CALL TO ORDER Ted called the meeting to order at 6pm. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY / MAIN STREET BOARD OF DIRECTORS MINUTES Motion was made by Brenda, which was seconded by Vicki, to approve the minutes of the Tybee Island Development Authority / Main Street Board of Directors November 16, 2016 meeting. Motion carried. PLANNING FOR 2017 Chantel confirmed that two voting positions for the board are being advertised. Directors whose terms are expiring are welcome to reapply. Brenda confirmed she will not be reapplying. Directors expressed their appreciation for everything she has done for the Program through promotions. Angela is considering reapplying. The four ex-officio seats will need to be approved by Directors as individuals request consideration. Chantel confirmed that the 2017 meeting schedule was emailed to Directors and requested feedback regarding a planning session the beginning of 2017 to include a review the Program’s vision and mission, accomplishments of the 2016 committee work plans, and to set the 2017 committee work plans with details. Directors confirmed the time of the January board meeting should be extended in order to incorporate the planning session. REVIEW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED PROJECTS Julie reviewed the discussion that occurred at the December 8 City Council meeting regarding the city using the tools available through the Development Authority portion of the Program for properties that they lease. Discussion ensued regarding the benefits of using the Program in order to maintain the character, cultural aspects, and community services of the island, have more flexibility with RFPs, and funding options by putting the structure in place now for future lease renewals. Directors discussed the projects that have been proposed for the city to pursue through the Program. Julie shared that city staff has told her that increasing the funding for the Façade Improvement Grant match cannot be done right now due to financial constraints of hurricane cleanup, pending reimbursements, and scheduled city projects. Discussion ensued regarding including the match increase 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 202 of 226 20170209/jrl TIDA/MS BOD approved: 1/18/17 Page 2 of 2 and the Tybrisa Street improvements with the next fiscal year budget process. Details are being worked on regarding the proposals for the buildings. COMMITTEE UPDATES Business Assistance Ted reported that a few businesses have shared their sales are down drastically compared to last year due to the hurricane. Chantel confirmed she is hearing the same and that most merchants are anxious for springtime so they can start seeing increased foot traffic and sales. Diane reported that overnight stays are up. Directors discussed a new business that is planning to open at the corner of First Street and North Campbell. Design Façade Improvement Grant Application: (see above re: the Façade Improvement Grant discussion) Public Mural Project Update: Vicki reported that Denise Vernon will be the muralist for the next two murals. A call for volunteers to help with painting will be announced so the May 2017 installation of the murals can be met. Denise will present her sketches, based on the approved design concepts, at the January board meeting for approval. Sarah confirmed she is still hearing positive feedback about the mural that is hanging up. Promotions Brenda reported that Decorating Day, Small Business Saturday, Lights on for Tybee Celebration, and the Christmas Parade went well. She noted that the attendance at Lights on for Tybee Celebration was higher than she has seen in the past and that restaurants ran out of their complimentary treats early. Directors expressed their appreciation for Brenda’s dedication to the Program and promotions. Chantel confirmed that the survey about events and activities hosted by the Program has been posted on the Main Street Facebook page. She will include a link to the survey in the next Main Street Talk e-newsletter. The responses will be compiled and reviewed at the next Promotions Committee meeting. OTHER BUSINESS Melissa shared that ticket sales for the 2017 Polar Plunge are going well. She also shared that there are a number of shows taking place at the Tybee Post Theater. In January they will be launching their first game show night that will be similar to the television version of Family Feud. ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 6:51pm. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 203 of 226 20170209/jrl HPC approved: 1-16-17 Page 1 of 1 TYBEE ISLAND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 21, 2016 ATTENDANCE (Present) Commissioner: Jane Coslick, Susan Estroff, Neca Stoller Advisor: Sarah Jones Staff: Chantel Morton (Absent) Commissioner: Sue Bentley, Dottie Kluttz City Council Representative: Bill Garbett CALL TO ORDER Neca called the meeting to order at 6:15pm. OPEN RECORDS/MEETINGS LAW INFORMATION Chantel confirmed that all commissioners were sent an email with the Open Records/Meetings Law information that the Clerk of Council sent her to forward to them. The signature page should be returned to the Clerk of Council. HPC MINUTES: AUGUST 15, 2016 Motion was made by Neca, which was seconded by Susan, to approve the HPC meeting minutes of August 15, 2016. The motion passed unanimously. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE Sarah reported that Chantel and she will be giving a presentation about the competition of the Historic Resources Survey: Phase I report and an update about preservation at the January 12 City Council meeting. UPDATE: HPC PERMIT REVIEW Sarah reported that there are no updates at this time. Susan shared that her interest in purchasing and moving the home at 1809 Chatham Avenue will not come to fruition. Commissioners discussed the process of demolition permitting. Sarah confirmed she will let commissioners know when she receives more information from the city’s Community Development Department’s Planning and Zoning staff. OTHER Sarah suggested the HPC meet every other month unless there is a need to meet more often. She has talked with Bill G. and Sue. They had no objection. Commissioners present agreed. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:40pm. 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 204 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 205 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 206 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 207 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 208 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 209 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 210 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 211 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 212 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 213 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 214 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 215 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 216 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 217 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 218 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 219 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 220 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 221 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 222 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 223 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 224 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 225 of 226 20170209/jrl 20170209AmendedCityCouncilPacket Page 226 of 226 20170209/jrl