HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 2020-10-06 LSAThis Agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Copies of the Staff reports or
other written documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the Office of
the City Clerk and are available for public inspection. Any person who has a question concerning any of the
agenda items may call the City Manager at (310) 603-0220, ext. 200.
Procedures for Addressing the Council
IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE
COUNCIL SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN ADVANCE TO CITYCLERK@LYNWOOD.CA.US OR FILL OUT A FORM
PROVIDED AT THE PODIUM, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE
MEETING. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN
THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL.
AGENDA
City of Lynwood as Successor Agency
to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency
TO BE HELD ON
October 6, 2020
Live Meeting in Council Chamber - 11350 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA 90262 - or -
Web conference via ZOOM - To participate please join via Zoom or by telephone:
1-669-900-9128 or 1-253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 878 0665 1907 Passcode: 2020.
If interpretation services are needed, please dial (310) 372-7549; conference code
673120 - Duly Posted 10/1/20 by MQ
6:00 PM
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY SECRETARY
3.ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Aide Castro, Mayor
Jorge Casanova, Mayor Pro Tem
Salvador Alatorre, Council Member
Marisela Santana, Council Member
Jose Luis Solache, Council Member
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Regarding Agenda Items Only)
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
THIS PORTION PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE LYNWOOD SUCCESSOR
AGENCY ON ITEMS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE LYNWOOD SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND NOT LISTED
ON THE AGENDA. IF AN ITEM IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, THERE SHOULD BE NO SUBSTANTIAL DISCUSSION
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 1 of 31
OF THE ISSUE BY LYNWOOD SUCCESSOR AGENCY, BUT LYNWOOD SUCCESSOR AGENCY MAY REFER THE
MATTER TO STAFF OR SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIVE DISCUSSION FOR A FUTURE MEETING. (The Ralph M.
Brown Act, Government Code Section 54954.2 (a).)
CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT CALENDAR WILL BE ACTED UPON BY ONE MOTION
AFFIRMING THE ACTION RECOMMENDED ON THE AGENDA. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION ON
THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO VOTING UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL OR STAFF REQUEST SPECIFIC
ITEMS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.
4.PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES
Comments:
Approving previous meeting minutes for Lynwood Successor Agency (CC)
September 15, 2020
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Lynwood Successor Agency approve the following minutes:
September 15, 2020
5.ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE
(ROPS 20-21B) AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
Comments:
The City Council, as Successor to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency will consider approving
an amendment to the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the period January
1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 (ROPS 20-21B Period), to facilitate the payment of “enforceable
obligations”. (CD)
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council, as Successor to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency,
adopt the attached resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SUCCESSOR TO THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE COVERING
THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2021 TO JUNE 30, 2021 (ROPS 20-21B PERIOD)."
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF LYNWOOD AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY MEETINGS WILL BE POSTED AS NEEDED. THE NEXT MEETING WILL BE HELD
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL ANNEX, 11350 BULLIS ROAD, CITY OF
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 2 of 31
Agenda Item # 4.
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 6, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Michelle G. Ramirez, Acting City Manager
PREPARED BY: Maria Quinonez, City Clerk
Silvia Pineda, Assistant to the City Clerk
SUBJECT: PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Lynwood Successor Agency approve the following minutes:
September 15, 2020
Background:
N/A
Discussion and Analysis:
N/A
Fiscal Impact:
N/A
Coordinated With:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Regular Meeting LSA 09/15/20
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 3 of 31
1
CITY OF LYNWOOD AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING MINUTES
September 15, 2020
01. CALL TO ORDER
Live Meeting in Council Chamber - 11350 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA 90262 - or - Web
conference via ZOOM - To participate please join via Zoom or by telephone: 1-669-900-
9128 or 1-253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 878 0249 8972 Passcode: 2020
Meeting was called to order at 6:49 p.m.
Mayor Castro presiding.
02. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY CITY CLERK
City Clerk Quinonez announced the Agenda has been duly posted in accordance with
the Brown Act.
03. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS ALATORRE, SANTANA, SOLACHE, MAYOR
PRO TEM CASANOVA AND MAYOR CASTRO
ABSENT: NONE
STAFF PRESENT: Acting City Manager Ramirez, City Attorney Tapia, City Clerk
Quinonez, Technology Director Han, City Treasurer Camacho
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Regarding Agenda Items Only)
NONE
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
CONSENT CALENDAR
04. PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES
MOTION: It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Casanova seconded by Council Member
Santana to approve the consent calendar. Motion carried by unanimous consent.
ROLL CALL:
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 4 of 31
2
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ALATORRE, SANTANA, SOLACHE,
MAYOR PRO TEM CASANOVA AND MAYOR CASTRO
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ADJOURNMENT
Having no further discussion, it was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Casanova, seconded by
Council Member Solache to adjourn the City of Lynwood as Successor Agency to the
Lynwood Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 6:51 p.m. Motion passed by unanimous
consent
ROLL CALL:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ALATORRE, SANTANA, SOLACHE,
MAYOR PRO TEM CASANOVA AND MAYOR CASTRO
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
__________________________ __________________________
Maria Quinonez, City Clerk Aide Castro, Mayor
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 5 of 31
Agenda Item # 5.
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 6, 2020
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
APPROVED BY: Michelle G. Ramirez, Acting City Manager
PREPARED BY: Michelle G. Ramirez, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT
SCHEDULE (ROPS 20-21B) AND ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council, as Successor to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency, adopt the
attached resolution entitled: “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE LYNWOOD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION
PAYMENT SCHEDULE COVERING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2021 TO JUNE 30, 2021 (ROPS 20-
21B PERIOD)."
Background:
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 34177.7(o)(1)(E), once per Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule
(ROPS) period, and no later than October 1st, a Successor Agency may submit one amendment to the
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, if the Consolidated Oversight Board makes a finding that a revision is
necessary for the payment of approved enforceable obligations during the second one-half of the Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule period, which shall be defined as January 1st to June 30th, inclusive.
The Amended ROPS 20-21B was due to the California Department of Finance (DOF) on October 1, 2020. To
meet this deadline, staff scheduled the Amended ROPS 20-21B for consideration and approved by the
Consolidated Oversight Board on September 25, 2020.
Discussion and Analysis:
On January 31, 2020, DOF received the Consolidated Oversight Board approved ROPS 20-21. On April 14,
2020, the DOF rendered its final determination on the Successor Agency’s 2020-21 Annual Recognized
Obligation Payment Schedule, attached hereto as Attachment B.
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 6 of 31
Staff requests the following amendments to ROPS 20-21B:
Item
No.
Description.
Total
Outstanding
Balance
ROPS
20-21B
Amount
Amended
ROPS
20-21B
Funding
Source
6
Bond issue to
fund non housing
$16,168,644*
*(Adjust per
Finance)$0 $800,000
Bond Proceeds
(2011 TAB
Series A
Findings that Revisions are Necessary
The Consolidated Oversight Board must make a finding that a revision is necessary for the payment of approved
enforceable obligations during the second one-half of the ROPS period (January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021). The
resolution approving these Amended ROPS includes the ability for City’s Finance Director, or his designee, to
make changes to the Amended ROPS to comport with any revision requests from the Finance and Administration
Services Department.
Item No. 6
Item No. 6 represents the balance of 2011 tax allocation Bond proceeds held by the Successor Agency due to the
dissolution of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency. Health and Safety Code Section 34191.4(c) allows for the
expenditure of limited bond proceeds provided certain requirements be satisfied. Based on the criteria outlined is
this section, the Agency qualifies to use up to 5% of the balance in the 2011 Series A Tax Allocation Bond Series.
Due to the recent events befallen on Lynwood and the need for financial resources, funds were recently identified
for use as a resource to stabilize Successor Agency obligations and to provide additional improvements
consistent with the intended use for the benefit of the Successor Agency Project Areas. As a result, the
Successor Agency requests that the submitted 20-21 ROPS be amended to include a bond proceed allocation
adjustment for 20-21B period line item No. 6 from zero to an amount of $800,000.
Administrative Budget
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(j), a Successor Agency is required to prepare a proposed
administrative budget and submit it to the Consolidated Oversight Board for its approval. Item 60 on the Amended
ROPS 20-21B reflects the administrative budget request. Staff is requesting no changes to the administrative
cost allowance for the ROPS 20-21B period.
Fiscal Impact:
If the Successor Agency had not submitted an amended ROPS 20-21B by October 1, 2020, then the Successor
Agency may not have been able to meet some of its obligations.
Coordinated With:
Executive Director's Office
Agency Counsel
Finance and Administration Department
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 7 of 31
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Attachment A - Resolution
Exhibit A – Amended ROPS 20-21B
Attachment B - California Department of Finance – April 14, 2020 Letter
Attachment C – COB Approved ROPS 20-21
Attachment D – DOF Finding of Completion
Attachment E - Health and Safety Code 34191.4(c)
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 8 of 31
1
SUCCESSOR AGENCY RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SUCCESSOR TO THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION
PAYMENT SCHEDULE COVERING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2021
TO JUNE 30, 2021 (ROPS 20-21B PERIOD)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 34177(o)(1)(E),
the Successor Agency may submit one Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule
(ROPS) amendment for each period; and
WHEREAS, the amended ROPS must be approved by the Consolidated Oversight
Board and submitted to the State Department of Finance no later than October 1; and
WHEREAS, the Consolidated Oversight Board must make a finding that the
revision is necessary for payment of approved enforceable obligations during the second
half of the ROPS period (January 1 to June 30); and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency may only amend the amounts authorized for
payment of approved enforceable obligations.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated
herein by reference.
Section 2. Finding that Revision is Necessary. To the extent necessary and
appropriate, the Successor Agency ratifies, approves, and agrees with the Consolidated
Oversight Board finding that a revision is necessary for the payment of approved
enforceable obligations during the second one-half of the Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule period.
Section 3. Approval to adopt the Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule
20-21B. The Successor Agency hereby approves the Amended ROPS 20-21B, in
substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 4. Authorization to Make Changes. To avoid any civil penalty that may be
imposed, the Successor Agency authorizes the Lynwood Finance Director or his or her
designee to make any reformatting changes pursuant to any direction from the State
Department of Finance or correct validation errors.
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 9 of 31
2
Section 5. Posting; Transmittal to Appropriate Agencies. The Lynwood Finance
Director is authorized and directed to post a copy of the Amended ROPS 20-21B on the
City’s website. The Lynwood Finance Director or his or her designee is further authorized
and directed to transmit, by mail or electronic means, to the County Auditor-Controller,
the State Controller, County Chief Administrative Officer and the State Department of
Finance a copy of the Amended ROPS 20-21B and to respond to questions and request
for documents, and information from the County and State agencies relating to the
Amended ROPS.
Section 6. Approval to adopt the Administrative Budget. The Successor Agency adopts
the Administrative Budget as included in the Amended ROPS 20-21B.
Section 7. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption.
Section 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and hereafter the
same shall be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 6th day of October 2020.
________________________________
Aide Castro
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________ ________________________________
Maria Quinonez Michelle Ramirez
City Clerk Acting City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Noel Tapia
City Attorney
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 10 of 31
Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 20-21B) - Summary
Filed for the January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 Period
Successor Agency: Lynwood
County: Los Angeles
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
ROPS 20-21B
Authorized
Amounts
ROPS 20-21B
Requested
Adjustments
ROPS 20-21B
Amended
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ 800,000 $ 800,000
B Bond Proceeds - 800,000 800,000
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 2,242,023 $ - $ 2,242,023
F RPTTF 2,117,023 - 2,117,023
G Administrative RPTTF 125,000 - 125,000
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 2,242,023 $ 800,000 $ 3,042,023
Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:
Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 11 of 31
Lynwood
Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 20-21B) - ROPS Detail
January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Authorized Amounts
Total
Requested Adjustments
Total Notes Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
$58,067,346 $- $- $- $2,117,023 $125,000 $2,242,023 $800,000 $- $- $- $- $800,000
6 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds Series A Bonds Issued After 12/
31/10
$14,723,030 - - - - - $- 800,000 - - - - $800,000
7 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds Series A Reserves $1,596,376 - - - 1,100,688 - $1,100,688 - - - - - $-
8 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds Series B Bonds Issued After 12/
31/10
$8,068,199 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
9 Bond Oversight Project Management
Costs
$- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
11 1999 City and Agency Cooperation Agreement (#7) City/County Loan (Prior
06/28/11), Cash
exchange
$338,836 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
15 Agreement - The Gardens OPA/DDA/Construction $989,430 - - - 23,010 - $23,010 - - - - - $-
18 Agreement -Unemployment Miscellaneous $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
20 Notice of Entry of Judgment - Rogel v LRA (Case No.
BS106592) SEE NOTES FOR SUPPLEMENT
Litigation $19,475,284 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
21 Notice of Entry of Judgment - Rogel v LRA (Case No.
BS106592) SEE NOTES FOR SUPPLEMENT
Litigation $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
22 Order Awarding Plaintiffs Attorneys' Fees and Costs.(Case No.
BS106592) SEE NOTES FOR SUPPLEMENT
Litigation $1,943,315 - - - 103,484 - $103,484 - - - - - $-
23 Notice of Entry of Judgment - Rogel v LRA (Case No.
BS106592) SEE NOTES FOR SUPPLEMENT
Litigation $150,000 - - - 75,000 - $75,000 - - - - - $-
24 Notice of Entry of Judgment - Rogel v LRA (Case No.
BS106592) SEE NOTES FOR SUPPLEMENT
Litigation $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
44 Cox Castle & Nicholson (LRA v. Barry Ross, et all (Case No.
CV11 02207)) & Recoup Clean up Cost and Damages at
Brownfield areas
Litigation $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
45 Contract- Remediation Remediation $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
48 Agreement -All Counsels- Pending Litigations Litigation $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
50 LRA v. Barry Ross, et all (Case No. CV11 02207) - Recoup
Clean up Cost and Damages
Litigation $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
57 Bond Funded Projects Improvement/
Infrastructure
$- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
60 Administrative Cost Allowance Admin Costs $250,000 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
68 Oversight Agreement - DTSC Professional Services $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 12 of 31
Item
# Project Name Obligation Type
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Authorized Amounts
Total
Requested Adjustments
Total Notes Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
69 Agreement - DTSC Project Management
Costs
$- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
73 Agreement OPA/DDA/Construction $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
74 Agreement Project Management
Costs
$- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
76 Property Disposition of Successor Agency properties Property Dispositions $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
81 ENA - Northgate OPA/DDA/Construction $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
86 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds Series B Bonds Issued After 12/
31/10
$194,031 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
87 Difference between approved actual RPTTF funding received
and DOF approved enforceable obligations
RPTTF Shortfall $778,611 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
92 Tax Allocation Revenue Refunding Bonds (Project Area A),
Series 2013 A
Revenue Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
$8,052,796 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
93 Tax Allocation Revenue Refunding Bonds (Project Area A),
Series 2013 A -Reserve
Reserves $912,244 - - - 771,122 - $771,122 - - - - - $-
94 Alameda Project Area Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series
2013A
Revenue Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
$557,694 - - - 6,219 - $6,219 - - - - - $-
95 Alameda Project Area Tax Allocation Refunding Bond, Series
2013A- Reserve
Revenue Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
$37,500 - - - 37,500 - $37,500 - - - - - $-
101 2010 Promissory Note City/County Loan (Prior
06/28/11), Cash
exchange
$- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 13 of 31
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 14 of 31
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 15 of 31
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 16 of 31
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 20-21) - Summary
Filed for the July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 Period
Successor Agency: Lynwood
County: Los Angeles
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
20-21A Total
(July -
December)
20-21B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 20-21
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ -
B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 6,346,619 $ 2,242,023 $ 8,588,642
F RPTTF 6,221,619 2,117,023 8,338,642
G Administrative RPTTF 125,000 125,000 250,000
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 6,346,619 $ 2,242,023 $ 8,588,642
Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:
Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 17 of 31
Lynwood
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 20-21) - ROPS Detail
July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
20-21
Total
ROPS 20-21A (Jul - Dec)
20-21A
Total
ROPS 20-21B (Jan - Jun)
20-21B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
$58,067,346 $8,588,642 $- $- $- $6,221,619 $125,000 $6,346,619 $- $- $- $2,117,023 $125,000 $2,242,023
6 2011 Tax
Allocation
Bonds Series A
Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
03/07/
2011
03/01/2038 US Bank Corp Bond issue to fund
non housing
projects
Project
Area A
14,723,030 N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
7 2011 Tax
Allocation
Bonds Series A
Reserves 03/07/
2011
03/01/2038 US Bank Corp H&S34171(d)(1)(A)
To hold reserve for
future Debt Service
payment due to
uneven semi-
annual debt service
payment.
Project
Area A
1,596,376 N $1,596,376 - - - 495,688 - $495,688 - - - 1,100,688 - $1,100,688
8 2011 Tax
Allocation
Bonds Series B
Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
03/07/
2011
03/01/2038 US Bank Corp Bond issue to fund
housing projects
Project
Area A
8,068,199 N $391,394 - - - 391,394 - $391,394 - - - - - $-
9 Bond Oversight Project
Management
Costs
10/02/
1999
03/01/2038 Various
vendors,
staffing cost,
City of
Lynwood,
misc. costs
and legal cost.
Costs relating
to disclosure
(NBS, BLX)
Oversight on bonds
to ensure
compliance with
covenants,
accounting and
disclosure
requirements.
Financial
Statements. Bank
Fees. Adjustments
made the the
Trustees to cover
reserve
requirements. Bond
disclosures
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
11 1999 City and
Agency
Cooperation
Agreement (#7)
City/County
Loan (Prior
06/28/11),
Cash
exchange
09/07/
1999
09/30/2019 City of
Lynwood
Loan to carry out
3100 E. Imperial
Hwy project
(34167(d)(2) H&S)
Project
Area A
338,836 N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
15 Agreement -
The Gardens
OPA/DDA/
Construction
02/23/
2009
02/23/2064 Atlantic
Gardens
formerly
Cedars
Engineering
Annual Rental
Subsidy (The
Gardens). Rental
apartment housing
to qualified seniors.
Low and Very Low
Income.
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
989,430 N $23,010 - - - - - $- - - - 23,010 - $23,010
18 Agreement
-Unemployment
Miscellaneous 07/01/
2016
06/30/2018 Various
employees,
misc. cost, &
Unemployment
obligation incurred if
Agency ceases to
Project
Area A
&
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 18 of 31
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
20-21
Total
ROPS 20-21A (Jul - Dec)
20-21A
Total
ROPS 20-21B (Jan - Jun)
20-21B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
staffing cost exist or employees
are terminated.
(H&S
34171(d)(1)(C)(H&S
34167(d)(3))
Alameda
20 Notice of Entry
of Judgment -
Rogel v LRA
(Case No.
BS106592)
SEE NOTES
FOR
SUPPLEMENT
Litigation 03/23/
2009
06/30/2015 Housing
Authority:
LMIHAF
Re. Notice of Ruling
Re. Order March
23, 2009 and Notice
of Entry of
Judgment April 23,
2013 . Taking into
account units
already
constructed, 65
units remain to be
produced by March
31, 2015. 51 units
must be restricted
to very low income.
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
19,475,284 N $4,000,000 - - - 4,000,000 - $4,000,000 - - - - - $-
21 Notice of Entry
of Judgment -
Rogel v LRA
(Case No.
BS106592)
SEE NOTES
FOR
SUPPLEMENT
Litigation 04/23/
2013
06/30/2015 LMIHAF Notice of Entry of
Judgment (April 23,
2013). Outstanding
debt to the LMIHF.
(Case #
BS106592)]
Project
Area A
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
22 Order Awarding
Plaintiffs
Attorneys' Fees
and
Costs.(Case
No. BS106592)
SEE NOTES
FOR
SUPPLEMENT
Litigation 03/23/
2009
06/30/2015 Counsels for
Plaintiffs
(Public
Counsel Law
Center)
Order Awarding
Plaintiffs Attorneys'
Fees and Costs.
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
1,943,315 N $206,968 - - - 103,484 - $103,484 - - - 103,484 - $103,484
23 Notice of Entry
of Judgment -
Rogel v LRA
(Case No.
BS106592)
SEE NOTES
FOR
SUPPLEMENT
Litigation 03/23/
2009
06/30/2015 Consultant to
serve as
"Administrator"
Re. Notice of Ruling
Re. Order March
23, 2009 and Notice
of Entry of
Judgment April 23,
2013 . Court Ruling
requires hiring of
"Administrator."
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
150,000 N $150,000 - - - 75,000 - $75,000 - - - 75,000 - $75,000
24 Notice of Entry
of Judgment -
Rogel v LRA
(Case No.
BS106592)
SEE NOTES
Litigation 03/23/
2009
06/30/2015 Staffing
cost,MDG,
misc. costs,
Kane Ballmer
and Berkman;
Agency
Re. Notice of Ruling
Re. Order March
23, 2009 and Notice
of Entry of
Judgment April 23,
2013 .Order
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 19 of 31
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
20-21
Total
ROPS 20-21A (Jul - Dec)
20-21A
Total
ROPS 20-21B (Jan - Jun)
20-21B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
FOR
SUPPLEMENT
Counsel;
Oversight
Board
Counsel.
Awarding Plaintiffs
Attorneys' Fees and
Costs.(Case No.
BS106592)
44 Cox Castle &
Nicholson (LRA
v. Barry Ross,
et all (Case No.
CV11 02207))
& Recoup
Clean up Cost
and Damages
at Brownfield
areas
Litigation 07/01/
2016
06/30/2018 Cox Castle
and Nicholson
& Agency
Counsel &
staffing costs
Complaint for
Damages -Agency
Special Counsel for
remediation of
Imperial Hwy
(Alameda Triangle;
State/East Imperial;
and Northgate
project Brownfield
area. Long Beach
Blvd./Josephine St.
Project
Area A
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
45 Contract-
Remediation
Remediation 07/01/
2016
06/30/2018 Special
counsel,
Agency
Counsel &
Environmental
Consultants
Agency Special
Counsel for
remediation of
Imperial Hwy. and
other Brownfield
area
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
48 Agreement -All
Counsels-
Pending
Litigations
Litigation 07/01/
2016
06/30/2018 Special
counsels,
Agency
Counsel,
staffing costs,
fiscal
consultants,
environmental
consultants
Attorneys costs
(pending litigation)
& (LAUSD v County
of Los Angeles, et
al (3/29/2007);
Northgate; etc.).
legal fees incurred
in connection with
Lynwood and DOF
v. Rogel, Case No.
23-2013-80001520
H&S 34171d;
Lynwood Successor
Agency v. DOF
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
50 LRA v. Barry
Ross, et all
(Case No.
CV11 02207) -
Recoup Clean
up Cost and
Damages
Litigation 03/15/
2011
06/30/2018 Special
counsels;
Agency
Counsel;
Complaint for
Damages -Agency
Counsel for
remediation of
Imperial Hwy
(Alameda Triangle;
State/East Imperial;
and Northgate
project Brownfield
area. Long Beach
Blvd./Josephine St.
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
57 Bond Funded
Projects
Improvement/
Infrastructure
10/01/
1999
03/01/2038 Various
vendors, City
of Lynwood,
misc. cost and
Use of bond
proceeds per bond
covenants and
funds held by
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 20 of 31
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
20-21
Total
ROPS 20-21A (Jul - Dec)
20-21A
Total
ROPS 20-21B (Jan - Jun)
20-21B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
staffing costs Trustees.
60 Administrative
Cost Allowance
Admin Costs 07/01/
2016
06/30/2018 Various
staffing cost,
vendors, City
of Lynwood, &
misc.
expenses.
County Auditor
Controller did not
allocate an
administrative cost
allowance in the
2nd ROPS because
the DOF approved
RPTTF exceeds
actual tax increment
distribution. H & S
34171 (b) limits
administrative
expenses to 3% for
2012-13 per DOF
Project
Area A
and
Alameda
250,000 N $250,000 - - - - 125,000 $125,000 - - - - 125,000 $125,000
68 Oversight
Agreement -
DTSC
Professional
Services
06/01/
2010
06/30/2018 Dept. of Toxic
Substances
Control
Process used to
evaluate
Brownfields
properties and
reimburse DTSC for
its costs. Covers
properties within
project areas.
Project
Area A
and
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
69 Agreement -
DTSC
Project
Management
Costs
06/01/
2010
06/30/2018 Staffing cost,
legal cost
Environmental
oversight
Project
Area A
and
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
73 Agreement OPA/DDA/
Construction
10/27/
2005
06/30/2018 Various
developers
Developers' deposit
releases and use of
deposits
Project
Area A
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
74 Agreement Project
Management
Costs
01/01/
2016
06/30/2018 Staffing Cost Release of deposits
and project closures
to meet terms of
releases
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
76 Property
Disposition of
Successor
Agency
properties
Property
Dispositions
07/01/
2016
06/30/2018 Various
Vendors,
Agency
Counsel ,
misc. cost and
staffing cost
Preparation of
Successor Agency
property for
disposal including
maintenance,
fencing, listing,
posting etc.
Project
Area A
&
Alameda
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
81 ENA -
Northgate
OPA/DDA/
Construction
12/01/
2009
06/30/2014 Various
vendors, legal
cost, staffing
cost
ENA- wind down
ENA
Project
Area A
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
86 2011 Tax
Allocation
Bonds Series B
Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
03/07/
2011
03/01/3038 US Bank Corp H&S34171(d)(1)(A)
To hold reserve for
Debt Service
Project
Area A
&
194,031 N $194,031 - - - 194,031 - $194,031 - - - - - $-
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 21 of 31
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
20-21
Total
ROPS 20-21A (Jul - Dec)
20-21A
Total
ROPS 20-21B (Jan - Jun)
20-21B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
payment due to
uneven semi-
annual debt service
payment. Assist in
the debt service
coverage ratio for
continuing
disclosure.
Alaemda
87 Difference
between
approved
actual RPTTF
funding
received and
DOF approved
enforceable
obligations
RPTTF
Shortfall
01/01/
2016
06/30/2017 Various
vendors,
staffing cost,
legal costs,
and others
Per DOF direction
to list difference
between approved
enforceable
obligations and
actual RPTTF
Project
Area A
and
Alameda
778,611 N $778,611 - - - 778,611 - $778,611 - - - - - $-
92 Tax Allocation
Revenue
Refunding
Bonds (Project
Area A), Series
2013 A
Revenue
Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
12/24/
2013
09/01/2028 US Bank Corp Refunding of 1999
Tax Allocation
Bonds Project Area
A. Tax Allocation
Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Project Area
A), Series 2013 A
Project
Area A
8,052,796 N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
93 Tax Allocation
Revenue
Refunding
Bonds (Project
Area A), Series
2013 A
-Reserve
Reserves 12/24/
2013
09/01/2028 US Bank Corp H&S34171(d)(1)(A)
To hold reserve for
Debt Service
payment due to
uneven semi-
annual debt service
payment. Assist in
the debt service
coverage ratio for
continuing
disclosure.
Project
Area A
912,244 N $912,244 - - - 141,122 - $141,122 - - - 771,122 - $771,122
94 Alameda
Project Area
Tax Allocation
Refunding
Bonds, Series
2013A
Revenue
Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
12/24/
2013
09/01/2024 US Bank Corp Refunding of 1999
Tax Allocation
Alameda bonds.
Alameda Project
Area Tax Allocation
Refunding Bonds,
Series 2013A
Alameda 557,694 N $48,508 - - - 42,289 - $42,289 - - - 6,219 - $6,219
95 Alameda
Project Area
Tax Allocation
Refunding
Bond, Series
2013A-
Reserve
Revenue
Bonds Issued
After 12/31/10
12/24/
2013
09/01/2024 US Bank Corp H&S34171(d)(1)(A)
To hold reserve for
Debt Service
payment due to
uneven semi-
annual debt service
payment. Assist in
the debt service
Alameda 37,500 N $37,500 - - - - - $- - - - 37,500 - $37,500
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 22 of 31
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
20-21
Total
ROPS 20-21A (Jul - Dec)
20-21A
Total
ROPS 20-21B (Jan - Jun)
20-21B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
coverage ratio for
continuing
disclosure.
101 2010
Promissory
Note
City/County
Loan (Prior
06/28/11),
Cash
exchange
05/04/
2010
06/30/2014 City of
Lynwood
2010 Promissory
Note between the
City and former
Lynwood
Redevelopment
Agency
Project
Area A
- N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 23 of 31
Lynwood
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 20-21) - Report of Cash Balances
July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other
funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.
A B C D E F G H
ROPS 17-18 Cash Balances
(07/01/17 - 06/30/18)
Fund Sources Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.
Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/17)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
-
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/18)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 17-18 total
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
6,351,708 2G. Amount includes received Agency
RPTTF and County held funds for bond
payments: $2,338,408 for Period A;
$4,013,300 Period B.
3 Expenditures for ROPS 17-18 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/18)
6,153,973 3G. Includes total SA expenditure and tax
increment withheld by county for bond
payment: Intercepted bod payments totaled
$2,596,208; Agency paid expenditures totaled
$3,557,765.
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/18)
RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 24 of 31
5 ROPS 17-18 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 17-18 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required
1,199,743 G5. Taken from prior year ending cash deficit
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/18)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$- $- $- $- $(1,002,008)
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 25 of 31
Lynwood
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 20-21) - Notes
July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021
Item # Notes/Comments
6
7
8
9
11
15
18
20
21
22
23 Litigation expenses related to Judgment for Rogel v.Lynwood Redevelopment Agency (LRA) Case No.
BS106592. Per DOF, to the extent the Agency can provide documentation, such as executed
contracts that include a detailed scope of work outlining the role of an 'Administrator' mentioned under
the description of the item to support the requested amount, this item may be considered enforceable
on future ROPS. The Agency has entered into a contract for Administrator services pursuant to the
Court order/Settlement Agreement.
24
44
45
48
50
57
60
68
69
73
74
76
81
86
87 Shortfall from Line Item #20 during ROPS 19-20 period.
92
93
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 26 of 31
94
95
101
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 27 of 31
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 28 of 31
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 29 of 31
Regarding the Use of Bonds Issued After January 2011
HSC 34191.4 (c)
(c) (1) (A) Notwithstanding Section 34177.3 or any other conflicting provision of law, bond
proceeds derived from bonds issued on or before December 31, 2010, in excess of the
amounts needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations shall thereafter be expended
in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants. Enforceable obligations may be
satisfied by the creation of reserves for projects that are the subject of the enforceable
obligation and that are consistent with the contractual obligations for those projects, or by
expending funds to complete the projects. An expenditure made pursuant to this
paragraph shall constitute the creation of excess bond proceeds obligations to be paid
from the excess proceeds. Excess bond proceeds obligations shall be listed separately
on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule submitted by the successor agency.
The expenditure of bond proceeds described in this subparagraph pursuant to an excess
bond proceeds obligation shall only require the approval by the oversight board of the
successor agency.
(B) If remaining bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on or before December 31,
2010, cannot be spent in a manner consistent with the bond covenants pursuant to
subparagraph (A), the proceeds shall be used at the earliest date permissible under the
applicable bond covenants to defease the bonds or to purchase those same outstanding
bonds on the open market for cancellation.
(2) Bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on or after January 1, 2011, in
excess of the amounts needed to satisfy approved enforceable obligations, shall
be used in a manner consistent with the original bond covenants, subject to the
following provisions:
(A) No more than 5 percent of the proceeds derived from the bonds may be
expended, unless the successor agency meets the criteria specified in
subparagraph (B).
(B) If the successor agency has an approved Last and Final Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule pursuant to Section 34191.6, the agency may expend no more than
20 percent of the proceeds derived from the bonds, subject to the following adjustments:
(i) If the bonds were issued during the period of January 1, 2011, to January 31, 2011,
inclusive, the successor agency may expend an additional 25 percent of the proceeds
derived from the bonds, for a total authorized expenditure of no more than 45 percent.
(ii) If the bonds were issued during the period of February 1, 2011, to February 28, 2011,
inclusive, the successor agency may expend an additional 20 percent of the proceeds
derived from the bonds, for a total authorized expenditure of no more than 40 percent.
(iii) If the bonds were issued during the period of March 1, 2011, to March 31, 2011,
inclusive, the successor agency may expend an additional 15 percent of the proceeds
derived from the bonds, for a total authorized expenditure of no more than 35 percent.
(iv) If the bonds were issued during the period of April 1, 2011, to April 30, 2011,
inclusive, the successor agency may expend an additional 10 percent of the proceeds
derived from the bonds, for a total authorized expenditure of no more than 30 percent.
(v) If the bonds were issued during the period of May 1, 2011, to May 31, 2011,
inclusive, the successor agency may expend an additional 5 percent of the proceeds
derived from the bonds, for a total authorized expenditure of no more than 25 percent.
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 30 of 31
(C) Remaining bond proceeds that cannot be spent pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and
(B) shall be used at the at the earliest date permissible under the applicable bond
covenants to defease the bonds or to purchase those same outstanding bonds on the
open market for cancellation.
(D) The expenditure of bond proceeds described in this paragraph shall only
require the approval by the oversight board of the successor agency.
(3) If a successor agency provides the oversight board and the department with
documentation that proves, to the satisfaction of both entities, that bonds were approved
by the former redevelopment agency prior to January 31, 2011, but the issuance of the
bonds was delayed by the actions of a third-party metropolitan regional transportation
authority beyond January 31, 2011, the successor agency may expend the associated
bond proceeds in accordance with clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of this
section.
(4) Any proceeds derived from bonds issued by a former redevelopment agency after
December 31, 2010, that were issued, in part, to refund or refinance tax-exempt bonds
issued by the former redevelopment agency on or before December 31, 2010, and which
are in excess of the amount needed to refund or refinance the bonds issued on or before
December 31, 2010, may be expended by the successor agency in accordance with
clause (i) of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of this section. The authority provided in
this paragraph is conditioned on the successor agency providing to its oversight board
and the department the resolution by the former redevelopment agency approving the
issuance of the bonds issued after December 31, 2010.
(d) This section shall apply retroactively to actions occurring on or after June 28, 2011.
The amendment of this section by the act adding this subdivision shall not result in the
denial of a loan under subdivision (b) that has been previously approved by the
department prior to the effective date of the act adding this subdivision. Additionally, the
amendment of this section by the act adding this subdivision shall not impact the
judgments, writs of mandate, and orders entered by the Sacramento Superior Court in
the following lawsuits:
(1) City of Watsonville v. California Department of Finance, et al. (Sac. Superior Ct. Case
No. 34-2014-80001910);
(2) City of Glendale v. California Department of Finance, et al. (Sac. Superior Ct. Case
No. 34-2014-80001924).
Lynwood Successor Agency - Page 31 of 31