Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20201117 - Design Review Board - Meeting MinutesTOWN OF HOPKINTON  DESIGN REVIEW BOARD    Minutes  Tuesday, November 17, 2020  7:00 PM    REMOTE MEETING    Members Present: Ria McNamara, Sue-Ellen Stoddard, Amy Ritterbusch, Deb  Fein-Brug, Greg Maze    Members Absent: Jeff Doherty, Jeanette Thomson    Also Present: John Gelcich, Principal Planner; Kathi Sherry, REC Hopkinton, John  Kucich, Bohler Engineering    Ms. Stoddard is serving as the Chair for this meeting.     Ms. Stoddard called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.     Ms. Fein-Brug read the script for remotely conducted open meetings.     1.0 South Street - Site Plan Application - REC Hopkinton LLC    Mr. Kucich presented the proposed site plan in detail.     Mr. Gelcich reviewed the scope of the DRB review.     Ms. Stoddard asked where the driveway accesses South Street in conjunction  with 23 South Street. Mr. Kucich showed on the plan. The DRB discussed  that the property would be renumbered.     Ms. Stoddard asked if the lighting would shine into the sky. Mr. Kucich said  the lights proposed are dark sky compliant and no lighting will spill over the  property lines.     Ms. McNamara asked if any signage will be planned. Mr. Kucich said when  they have tenants on board they will come back with the proposed signs. Mr.  Kucich said there will be a monument sign located near the entrance.     Ms. Ritterbusch asked if the property will be wooded in the front. Mr. Kucich  said yes, it will be tucked into the back of the site.     Ms. Fein-Brug asked if the building will be screened from I-495. Mr. Kucich  said there will be a buffer between the building and I-495 that will remain.  He said depending on the angle of the cars on the road, there may be a  possibility to see the building from I-495.     Ms. Fein-Brug asked about the topography of the site. Mr. Kucich said the  building is located about 10 feet lower than the driveway. Ms. Fein-Brug said  she is concerned with the screening along the highway. Mr. Kucich said they  could find topography for I-495.     Ms. Ritterbusch asked about the tree waiver for the perimeter of the site.  Mr. Kucich said the existing trees are assumed to serve that same purpose.     Ms. McNamara asked if there are loading docks or loading bays. Mr. Kucich  said there are loading docks.     Ms. Stoddard asked if there are any other details of the building. Ms. Sherry  said they are planning on doing a prefabricated steel building. She said there  may be neutral colors for the roof and side with some canopies when  tenants are signed.     Mr. Maze said he believes the buildings on South Street are more readily  seen during the winter versus during the summer.     Ms. Ritterbusch asked if the roof would be suitable for solar. Mr. Kucich said  he wasn’t sure if the trees would be an issue for that.     Mr. Kucich said they could plant some evergreens along the back side  abutting I-495.     Ms. Stoddard said she is concerned about the loading dock visual. Mr. Kucich  said planting evergreens along the back would essentially take the loading  docks out of the equation.     Mr. Maze asked about the wetland boundary. Mr. Kucich explained the  location of the wetland area.     Ms. Fein-Brug asked if the roof slope will be an issue for the vehicles parked  in the front of the building. She asked how the building will be drained. Mr.  Kucich said the drainage on-site will be directed to the drainage basin on-site.  He said the roof will be hard piped to the infiltration basin.     Ms. Fein-Brug asked if the tenants will be industrial tenants. Mr. Kucich said  the tenants will likely be warehousing tenants with a small office component.  Ms. Sherry said the mix of tenants they have seen is landscaping tenants,  warehouse tenants, etc.     Ms. Stoddard moved that the Design Review Board recommend approval of  the plan as shown with the suggested conditions that signage is to be  reviewed when the tenants have been identified, that there be plantings of  evergreen at the rear of the site between the parking area and I-495, and  that the Board would like to review the building facade once the colors and  other details are known. Ms. McNamara seconded the motion. The Board  voted unanimously (5-0-0) to approve the motion.     2.Minutes of October 20, 2020    Ms. McNamara moved to accept the minutes as written. Mr. Maze seconded  the motion. The Board voted unanimously (5-0-0) to approve the motion.     Ms. Ritterbusch moved to adjourn, Ms. McNamara seconded the motion.  The Board voted unanimously (5-0-0) to approve the motion. Meeting  adjourned at 7:41 PM.     Approved:December 15, 2020    Documents:Site Plan Application for 0 South Street  Minutes of October 20, 2020