HomeMy Public PortalAboutJanuary 19, 2021 CC Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED & REGULAR SESSION
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, CA
Tuesday, January 19, 2021
Closed Session: 5:00 PM | Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packets
are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at 550 E. 6th Street during normal business hours
AGENDA
MEETING PARTICIPATION NOTICE
This meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconference communications and will be recorded for live
streaming. All City of Beaumont public meetings will be available via live streaming and made
available on the City's official YouTube webpage. Please use the following link during the meeting for
live stream access.
BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream
Public comments will be accepted using the following options.
1. Written comments will be accepted via email and will be read aloud during the corresponding
item of the meeting. Public comments shall not exceed three (3) minutes unless otherwise
authorized by City Council. Comments can be submitted anytime prior to the meeting as well
as during the meeting up until the end of the corresponding item. Please submit your
comments to: NicoleW@BeaumontCA.gov
2. Phone-in comments will be accepted by joining a conference line prior to the corresponding
item of the meeting. Public comments shall not exceed three (3) minute s unless otherwise
authorized by City Council. Please use the following phone number to join the call:
(951) 922 - 4845
In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office using the above email or call (951) 572 - 3196.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will ensure the best reasonable accommodation
arrangements.
1
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
A Closed Session of the City Council / Beaumont Financing Authority / Beaumont Utility Authority / Beaumont Successor
Agency (formerly RDA)/Beaumont Parking Authority / Beaumont Public Improvement Authority may be held in accordance
with state law which may include, but is not limited to, the following types of items: personnel matters, labor negotiations,
security matters, providing instructions to real property negotiators and conference with legal counsel regarding pending
litigation. Any public comment on Closed Session items will be taken prior to the Closed Session. Any required
announcements or discussion of Closed Session items or actions following the Closed Session with be made in the City
Council Chambers.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Lara, Mayor Pro Tem White, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Fenn , Council
Member Santos
Public Comments Regarding Closed Session
1. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation, Significant Exposure to
Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) or (3) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code
Section 54956.9: One Case: Dispute with Weka, Inc. Regarding Request for Change
Order Due to Groundwater.
2. Conference with Labor Negotiators - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
City Designated Representatives City Manager Todd Parton and Administrative Services
Director Kari Mendoza. Employee Organizations: Beaumont Police Officers Asso ciation
and SEIU
Adjourn to Regular Session
REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Lara, Mayor Pro Tem White, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Fenn, Council
Member Santos
Report out from Closed Session
Action on any Closed Session Items
Action of any Requests for Excused Absence
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval / Adjustments to the Agenda
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
ANNOUNCEMENTS/ RECOGNITION / PROCLAMATIONS / CORRESPONDENCE
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA)
Any one person may address the City Council on any matter not on this agenda. If you wish to speak, please fill out a
“Public Comment Form” provided at the back table and give it to the City Clerk. There is a three (3) minute time limit on
public comments. There will be no sharing or passing of time to another person. State Law prohibits the City Council from
discussing or taking actions brought up by your comments.
2
CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the consent calendar are taken as one action item unless an item is pulled for further discussion here or at the
end of action items. Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
1. Approval of Minutes
Recommended Action:
Approve Minutes dated January 5, 2021.
2. FY 2021 General Fund and Wastewater Fund Budget to Actual through December 2020
Recommended Action:
Receive and file the FY 2021, General Fund and Wastewater Fund Budget to
Actual through December 2020.
3. Resolutions of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept Offers of
Dedication of Parcels for Landscape Maintenance; Approve and Record the Certificates
of Acceptance and Grant Deeds from Pardee Homes to the City of Beaumont
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only the following Resolutions:
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont, Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage and Landscape Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Purposes and Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Open Space Purposes and Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage, Trail and Landscape Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Open Space Purposes and Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage and Landscape Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape and Open Space Purposes and the
Maintenance thereof,” and
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage and Landscape Purposes.”
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
3
4. Public Hearing Regarding Specific Plan Amendment (SP2020-0004) a City Initiated
Request to Amend the Conditions of Approval for the Commonly Referred to Fairway
Canyon/Tournament Hills Specific Plan that Include the Deletion of Condition
30.PLANNING.4 and 30.PLANNING.19, and the Update of Several Conditions to Reflect
City of Beaumont in Place of the County of Riverside
Recommended Action:
Hold a public hearing, and
Adopt Specific Plan Amendment (SP2020-0004) to the Oak Valley SCPGA
Specific Plan Oak Valley Greens, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
ACTION ITEMS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
5. First Amendment to Contract with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC for a One-Year
Extension through March 1, 2022
Recommended Action:
Approve the First Amendment to the contract with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC.
6. Approval of Invoice from Riverside County Fire Department for First Quarter Fire
Services
Recommended Action:
Approve payment of the FY 2021 1st Quarter Fire Services invoice from
Riverside County Fire Department in the amount of $917,453.30.
7. Adopt a Resolution of the City of Beaumont City Council Approving Application for the
State of California Per Capita Grant Funds
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, “A Resolution of the City Council of
the City of Beaumont, California, Approving Application for Per Capita Grant
Funds,” and
Direct staff to submit an application packet to the State of California naming
Three Rings Ranch Park as the identified project for the Prop 68 Per Capita grant
funds.
8. Approval of the Draft Stewart Park Conceptual Plan - Capital Improvement Projects P-01
and P-10
Recommended Action:
Approve the draft conceptual plan and direct staff to proceed with improving
Stewart Park in accordance with Public Works Contract Code and the Beaumont
Municipal Code.
9. Direction to City Staff Regarding the Launch of the Second Round of Beaumont Small
Business Assistance Grant Program (BAP)
Recommended Action:
4
City staff is looking for City Council direction to launch a second round of the
Beaumont Small Business Assistance Grant Program (BAP).
10. COVID-19 Update by City Staff
Recommended Action:
City staff recommends that the City Council receive the report and provide
direction.
11. Approval of City Attorney Invoices for the Month of December 2020
Recommended Action:
Approve invoices in the amount of $72,194.47.
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES AND DISCUSSION
COUNCIL REPORTS
- Santos
- Fenn
- Martinez
- White
- Lara
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Economic Development Committee Report Out and City Council Direction
CITY TREASURER REPORT
Finance and Audit Committee Report Out and City Council Direction
CITY CLERK REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
CITY MANAGER REPORT
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Beaumont City Council, Beaumont Financing Authority, t he Beaumont
Successor Agency (formerly RDA), the Beaumont Utility Authority, the Beaumont Parking Authority and
the Beaumont Public Improvement Agency is scheduled for Tuesday, February 2, 2021, at 5:00 p.m.,
unless otherwise posted.
5
Beaumont City Hall – Online www.BeaumontCa.gov
6
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED & REGULAR SESSION
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, CA
Tuesday, January 05, 2021
Closed Session: 5:00 PM | Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packets
are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at 550 E. 6th Street during normal business hours
MINUTES
CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
A Closed Session of the City Council / Beaumont Financing Authority / Beaumont Utility Authority / Beaumont Successor
Agency (formerly RDA)/Beaumont Parking Authority / Beaumont Public Improvement Authority may be held in accordance
with state law which may include, but is not limited to, the following types of items: personnel matters, labor negotiations,
security matters, providing instructions to real property negotiators and conference with legal counsel regarding pending
litigation. Any public comment on Closed Session items will be taken prior to the Closed Session. Any required
announcements or discussion of Closed Session items or actions following the Closed Session with be made in the City
Council Chambers.
CALL TO ORDER at 5:03 p.m.
Present: Mayor Lara, Mayor Pro Tem White, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Fenn,
Council Member Santos
Absent: Council Member Martinez
Public Comments Regarding Closed Session
No speakers
1. Conference with Labor Negotiators - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 City
Designated Representatives City Manager Todd Parton and Administrative Services Director
Kari Mendoza. Employee Organizations: Beaumont Police Officers Association and SEIU
No reportable action.
2. Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(d)(1) One Case: Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters v. City of
Beaumont
7
Item 1.
Motion by Mayor Lara
Second by Mayor Pro Tem White
To authorize to defend the case once served.
Approved by a 4-0 vote
Absent: Council Member Martinez
3. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant exposure to Litigation
Pursuant to Paragraph (2) or (3) of Subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9 One
case: Dispute with Weka, Inc. Regarding Request for Change Order Due to Groundwater
Motion by Mayor Lara
Second by Council Member Santos
To deny the claim.
Approved by a 4-0 vote
Absent: Council Member Martinez
Adjourn to Regular Session
REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER at 6:07 p.m.
Present: Mayor Lara, Mayor Pro Tem White, Council Member Martinez, Council Member Fenn,
Council Member Santos
Absent: Council Member Martinez
Report out from Closed Session: see above
Action on any Closed Session items: None
Action of any requests for Excused Absence: Council Member Martinez
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval / Adjustments to the Agenda: None
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None
ANNOUNCEMENTS/ RECOGNITION / PROCLAMATIONS / CORRESPONDENCE
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA)
Any one person may address the City Council on any matter not on this agenda. There is a three (3)
minute time limit on public comments. There will be no sharing or passing of time to another person.
State Law prohibits the City Council from discussing or taking actions brought up by your comments.
No speakers
CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the consent calendar are taken as one action item unless an item is pulled for further discussion here or at the
end of action items.
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
8
Item 1.
1. Approval of Minutes
Recommended Action:
Approval of Minutes dated December 15, 2020.
2. Ratification of Warrants
Recommended Action:
Ratification of warrants dated:
September 10, 2020
September 17, 2020
September 24, 2020
October 1, 2020
Motion by Mayor Lara
Second by Council Member Santos
To approve the Consent Calendar
Approved by a 4-0 vote
Absent: Council Member Martinez
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
ACTION ITEMS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
3. FY 2022 Budget Timeline
Motion by Council Member Fenn
Second by Mayor Lara
To receive and file or provide direction to City staff regarding the proposed timeline.
Approved by a 4-0 vote
Absent: Council Member Martinez
4. Authorize Acknowledgement and Consent to ERMAC Subrogation Agreement with George
Hills Company, Inc.
Motion by Council Member Santos
Second by Mayor Pro Tem White
To authorize the City Manager to execute an Acknowledgement and Consent to ERMAC
Subrogation Agreement with George Hills Company, Inc.
Approved by a 4-0 vote
Absent: Council Member Martinez
9
Item 1.
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES AND DISCUSSION
COUNCIL REPORTS
- Santos - No report
- Fenn - No report
- Martinez - No report
- White - No report
- Lara - No report
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Economic Development Committee Report Out
CITY TREASURER REPORT
CITY CLERK REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
5. Status of Pending Litigation
CITY MANAGER REPORT
6. Department Project Updates
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Homeless Campaign
Business Assistance follow up
ADJOURNMENT 6:55 p.m.
10
Item 1.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Mohlenkamp, Finance Director
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: FY 2021 General Fund and Wastewater Fund Budget to Actual
through December 2020
Background and Analysis:
Staff has updated the analysis of the General Fund and Wastewater Fund for FY 2021
with results through December. This analysis of the budget to actual results for FY 2021
is included in the attached spreadsheets.
Fiscal Impact:
City estimates that it cost approximately $390 to prepare this report.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file the FY 2021, General Fund and Wastewater Fund Budget to
Actual through December 2020.
Attachments:
A. FY 2021 General Fund Budget to Actual Report – through December 2020
B. FY 2021 Wastewater Fund Budget to Actual Report – through December 2020
11
Item 2.
FY 2021
Estimated
Results
Notes
1,635,750$ 2,116,836$ 6,174,605$ 6,200,000$ Tracking to be on target or exceed
budget
-$ 41,810$ 267,137$ 312,000$
121,024$ 1,177,597$ 3,019,846$ 3,010,000$
1,953,863$ 2,701,167$ 5,725,048$ 6,300,000$ Reflects 4 months of collections plus
some prior period accruals
761,953$ 924,782$ 7,133,745$ 7,150,000$ VLF is largest portion, collected in
Feb and June
4,472,591$ 6,962,193$ 22,320,381$ 22,972,000$
79,689$ 209,230$ 325,000$ 335,000$
79,689$ 209,230$ 325,000$ 325,000$
2,777,690$ 875,302$ 2,200,000$ 1,850,000$ permit activity less than budgeted
target
189,243$ 124,075$ 210,000$ 330,000$
325,716$ 193,879$ 417,500$ 400,000$
52$ -$ -$
3,292,700$ 1,193,256$ 2,827,500$ 2,580,000$
20,062$ -$ -$
9,257$ -$ -$
29,319$ -$ -$
3,150,068$ 12,659$ -$ -$
44,759$ 25,615$ 119,450$ 60,000$
3,558$ 1,982$ 5,500$ 4,800$
7,860$ 43,520$ 7,900$ 78,000$
4,052$ 6,243$ 54,500$ 19,000$
106,410$ 41,323$ 537,850$ 470,000$
112,902$ 44,894$ 125,000$ 112,000$
FY 2021 General Fund Budget to Actual through December 2020
City of Beaumont, CA
2018-2019
YTD Activity
Through Per
2019-2020
YTD Activity
Through Per
2020-2021
YTD Activity
Through Per
FY 2021
Budget
SubCategory
Fund: 100 - GENERAL FUND
Revenue
Category: 40 - TAXES
400 - Real Property Taxes 1,546,665$
403 - Personal Property Taxes 235,788$
406 - Franchise Fees 6,747,833$
409 - Sales Taxes 1,967,725$
420 - Other Taxes 782,188$
Total Category: 40 - TAXES:11,280,198$
Category: 41 - LICENSES
430 - Business Licenses 128,456$
Total Category: 41 - LICENSES:128,456$
Category: 42 - PERMITS
450 - Building Permits 1,216,347$
453 - Inspections 98,753$
456 - Other Permits 226,416$
515 - Public Works -$
Total Category: 42 - PERMITS:1,541,516$
Category: 45 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL
465 - State -$
470 - Local 2,550$
Total Category: 45 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL:2,550$
Category: 47 - CHARGES FOR SERVICE
500 - Sanitation 112,615$
505 - Animal Control 46,143$
510 - Community Development 2,534$
515 - Public Works 3,829$
525 - Abatements 6,174$
530 - Public Safety 46,255$
535 - Facilities 65,681$
12
Item 2.
68,292$ 500$ 20,000$ 6,000$
60,867$ 30,142$ 148,200$ 139,000$
3,558,768$ 206,879$ 1,018,400$ 888,800$ Charges from services tracking less
than prior years and budget due in
large part to closures
28,972$ 25,168$ 70,000$ 58,000$
8,538$ 15,343$ 45,000$ 37,500$
37,510$ 40,511$ 115,000$ 95,500$
8,139$ -$ 25,000$ 25,000$
235,130$ (22,267)$ 334,000$ 295,000$
243,270$ (22,267)$ 359,000$ 320,000$
78$ 128,594$ 170,000$ 410,000$ More funds invested in LAIF than
prior years/ corrected allocation/
expected higher investment returns
7,123$ 233,509$ 154,500$ 397,000$
7,201$ 362,102$ 324,500$ 807,000$
14,719$ -$ 15,000$ 15,000$
7,500$ -$ -$
22,219$ -$ 15,000$ 15,000$
(190,108)$ 2,556,890$ 8,549,581$ 8,549,000$ All transfers are expected to occur by
year end. Second quarter transfers
are underway.
(190,108)$ 2,556,890$ 8,549,581$ 8,549,000$
11,553,159$ 11,508,793$ 35,854,362$ 36,552,300$ Revenues tracking above budget
5,259,784$ 5,181,725$ 13,179,560$ 12,600,000$
Only 11 or 26 pay periods processed
so far - still tracking below budget
2,501,522$ 2,867,787$ 6,073,295$ 5,850,000$ PERS liability paid for full year in
advance- so tracking higher at mid
point
354,709$ 279,295$ 478,509$ 615,000$
8,116,015$ 8,328,808$ 19,731,364$ 19,065,000$
884,023$ 853,506$ 1,548,533$ 1,750,000$
151,888$ 167,018$ 354,623$ 329,000$
157,509$ 189,462$ 369,669$ 369,000$
336,612$ 463,146$ 741,619$ 837,000$
132,507$ 330,811$ 820,510$ 790,000$
140,103$ 113,993$ 541,570$ 398,000$
540 - Programs 53,737$
545 - Other 25,774$
Total Category: 47 - CHARGES FOR SERVICE:362,741$
Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES
555 - Vehicle 37,998$
557 - Other 19,533$
Total Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES:57,530$
Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY
465 - State 24,854$
565 - Other Income 167,248$
Total Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY:192,102$
Category: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
560 - Investment Earnings (134,577)$
565 - Other Income 149,158$
Total Category: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES:14,581$
Category: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
595 - Sale of Assets 13,400$
599 - Other -$
Total Category: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:13,400$
Category: 90 - TRANSFERS
900 - Transfers 1,408,140$
Total Category: 90 - TRANSFERS:1,408,140$
Total Revenue:15,001,215$
Expense
Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES
600 - SALARIES AND WAGES 5,476,953$
610 - BENEFITS 3,744,691$
615 - OTHER 433,474$
Total Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES:9,655,118$
Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS
650 - UTILITIES 894,882$
655 - ADMINISTRATIVE 202,575$
660 - FLEET COSTS 189,890$
665 - PROGRAM COSTS 359,860$
670 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 150,369$
675 - SUPPLIES 148,305$
13
Item 2.
2,994,474$ 77,201$ 612,000$ 412,000$
1,482,884$ 1,278,400$ 7,325,058$ 6,540,000$ Trending very low but expenditures
expected to pickup in second half of
the year - significant savings still
projected
(356,000)$ -$ -$
938,830$ 1,536,878$ 1,538,766$ 1,540,000$ mostly insurance premium paid at
the beginning of the year
6,862,830$ 5,010,414$ 13,852,348$ 12,965,000$
166,187$ 41,115$ 180,000$ 175,000$
-$ -$ -$
66,175$ 145,597$ 273,816$ 285,000$
-$ -$ -$
232,362$ 186,712$ 453,816$ 460,000$
-$ 23,274$ 150,001$ 140,000$
-$ 23,274$ 150,001$ 140,000$
18,985$ 8,227$ 31,000$ 130,000$ Expected to exceed budget to cover
Covid costs that are not reimbursed
by FEMA
18,985$ 8,227$ 31,000$ 130,000$
15,230,192$ 13,557,435$ 34,218,529$ 32,760,000$ Expenses tracking well under budget
at mid-point in the year
(3,677,033)$ (2,048,641)$ 1,635,833$ 3,792,300$
Assessment: The General Fund is tracking to have a surplus between $3.0 and $4 million at year end. Revenues are estimated to exceed
the initial budget target by over $2 million led by stronger results in sales tax. Expenses are tracking lower than budget
led by estimated savings of approximately $1 million in operating costs along with some savings in personnel costs.
680 - SPECIAL SERVICES 395,743$
690 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,340,078$
697 - ADMIN OVERHEAD (375,000)$
699 - OTHER 1,165,580$
Total Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS:4,472,283$
Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
700 - EQUIPMENT 25,048$
703 - FURNITURE 6,466$
705 - VEHICLE 186,960$
710 - STRUCTURE -$
Total Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:218,473$
Category: 77 - CONTINGENCY
Total Expense:14,351,402$
Total Fund: 100 - GENERAL FUND:649,812$
770 - CONTINGENCY -$
Total Category: 77 - CONTINGENCY:-$
Category: 90 - TRANSFERS
900 - Transfers 5,528$
Total Category: 90 - TRANSFERS:5,528$
14
Item 2.
FY 2021 Estimated
Results Notes
1,750$ -$ -$
1,750$ -$ -$
-$ -$ 6,300$ 6,000$
-$ -$ 6,300$ 6,000$
-$ -$ 37,500$ 35,000$
-$ -$ 37,500$ 35,000$
2,958,341$ 3,328,897$ 10,849,000$ 10,630,000$ tracking a little below budget
2,958,341$ 3,328,897$ 10,849,000$ 10,630,000$
635$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$
635$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$
2,960,726$ 3,328,897$ 10,892,800$ 10,671,000$
199,247$ 427,304$ 1,340,577$ 1,150,000$
80,292$ 150,649$ 501,401$ 385,000$
3,907$ 6,641$ 17,572$ 13,500$
283,445$ 584,594$ 1,859,549$ 1,548,500$ personnel cost savings
expected/ pace of
expenditures will increase with
437,058$ 334,245$ 827,821$ 895,000$
94,388$ 118,297$ 291,216$ 270,000$
3,201$ 13,661$ 31,980$ 28,000$
7,923$ 21,474$ 60,695$ 54,000$
120,127$ 176,562$ 379,610$ 373,000$
FY 2021 Waste Water Fund Budget to Actual through December 2020
City of Beaumont, CA
2018-2019
YTD Activity
Through Per
2019-2020
YTD Activity
Through Per
2020-2021
YTD Activity
Through Per
FY 2021 Budget
SubCategory
Total Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES:-$
Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY
565 - Other Income 6,236$
Fund: 700 - WASTEWATER FUND
Revenue
Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES
557 - Other -$
Total Category: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES:26,907$
Category: 56 - PROPRIETARY REVENUES
570 - WasteWater 3,358,564$
Total Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY:6,236$
Category: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
560 - Investment Earnings 26,907$
3,391,706$
Expense
Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES
Total Category: 56 - PROPRIETARY REVENUES:3,358,564$
Category: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
595 - Sale of Assets -$
599 - Other -$
Total Category: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:-$
Category: 90 - TRANSFERS
900 - Transfers -$
Total Category: 90 - TRANSFERS:-$
650 - UTILITIES 420,336$
655 - ADMINISTRATIVE 46,137$
600 - SALARIES AND WAGES 552,766$
610 - BENEFITS 195,940$
615 - OTHER 9,207$
Total Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES:757,913$
Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS
Total Revenue:
660 - FLEET COSTS 13,870$
670 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE 38,352$
675 - SUPPLIES 89,123$
15
Item 2.
669,620$ 365,342$ 1,062,563$ 927,000$
306,000$ -$ -$ -$
9,845$ 31,796$ 480,137$ 365,000$
1,648,161$ 1,061,376$ 3,134,022$ 2,912,000$ Operating expenses tracking
below budget/ pace of
expenditures expected to
increase in second half of the
1,832$ 24,319$ 153,638$ 150,000$
-$ -$ 103,804$ 100,000$
1,832$ 24,319$ 257,442$ 250,000$
-$ 3,334,344$ 5,641,787$ 5,641,787$ all transfer expected to occur
-$ 3,334,344$ 5,641,787$ 5,641,787$
1,933,438$ 5,004,633$ 10,892,800$ 10,352,287$
1,027,287$ (1,675,736)$ -$ 318,713$
Analysis: Revenues are tracking a bit below budget. Expenditures are also tracking below budget providing an estimated
budget surplus of approximately $300K.
699 - OTHER 90,247$
Total Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS:1,348,383$
690 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 325,316$
697 - ADMIN OVERHEAD 325,000$
Total Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:-$
Category: 90 - TRANSFERS
900 - Transfers 3,013,215$
Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
700 - EQUIPMENT -$
750 - OTHER -$
Total Category: 90 - TRANSFERS:3,013,215$
Total Expense:5,119,510$
Total Fund: 700 - WASTEWATER FUND:(1,727,804)$
16
Item 2.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, Community Services Director
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Resolutions of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to
Accept Offers of Dedication of Parcels for Landscape Maintenance;
Approve and Record the Certificates of Acceptance and Grant Deeds
from Pardee Homes to the City of Beaumont
Background and Analysis:
The City of Beaumont Parks and Recreation staff members have been systematically
reviewing tracts within the City of Beaumont to ensure that parcels for which the City
has assumed maintenance responsibilities have been officially accepted, legally
dedicated to the City, and recorded with the Riverside County Clerk Recorder’s Office.
City staff has identified several parcels from Pardee Homes that were accepted by the
City from 2005 through 2016 that have not yet been recorded in the City’s name.
Attached are the signed grant deeds from Pardee Homes and related resolutions for the
acceptance of park dedications and their recordations.
This is an ongoing project and additional acceptance and recordations may be required.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates it cost $7,800 to prepare this report. All maintenance for
these lots has been included in the current budget.
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only the following Resolutions:
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont, Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage and Landscape Purposes ,”
17
Item 3.
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Purposes and Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Open Space Purposes and Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage, Trail and Landscape Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Open Space Purposes and Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage and Landscape Maintenance Thereof,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape Maintenance Purposes,”
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Landscape and Open Space Purposes and the
Maintenance thereof,” and
“A Resolution of the City of Beaumont Authorizing the City Manager to Accept
the Offers of Dedication for Drainage and Landscape Purposes .”
Attachments:
A. Resolutions
B. Certificates of Acceptance
C. Grant Deeds
18
Item 3.
19
Item 3.
20
Item 3.
21
Item 3.
22
Item 3.
23
Item 3.
24
Item 3.
25
Item 3.
26
Item 3.
27
Item 3.
28
Item 3.
29
Item 3.
30
Item 3.
31
Item 3.
32
Item 3.
33
Item 3.
34
Item 3.
35
Item 3.
36
Item 3.
37
Item 3.
38
Item 3.
39
Item 3.
40
Item 3.
41
Item 3.
42
Item 3.
43
Item 3.
44
Item 3.
45
Item 3.
46
Item 3.
47
Item 3.
48
Item 3.
49
Item 3.
50
Item 3.
51
Item 3.
52
Item 3.
53
Item 3.
54
Item 3.
55
Item 3.
56
Item 3.
57
Item 3.
58
Item 3.
59
Item 3.
60
Item 3.
61
Item 3.
62
Item 3.
63
Item 3.
64
Item 3.
65
Item 3.
66
Item 3.
67
Item 3.
68
Item 3.
69
Item 3.
70
Item 3.
71
Item 3.
72
Item 3.
73
Item 3.
74
Item 3.
75
Item 3.
76
Item 3.
77
Item 3.
78
Item 3.
79
Item 3.
80
Item 3.
81
Item 3.
82
Item 3.
83
Item 3.
84
Item 3.
85
Item 3.
86
Item 3.
87
Item 3.
88
Item 3.
89
Item 3.
90
Item 3.
91
Item 3.
92
Item 3.
93
Item 3.
94
Item 3.
95
Item 3.
96
Item 3.
97
Item 3.
98
Item 3.
99
Item 3.
100
Item 3.
101
Item 3.
102
Item 3.
103
Item 3.
104
Item 3.
105
Item 3.
106
Item 3.
107
Item 3.
108
Item 3.
109
Item 3.
110
Item 3.
111
Item 3.
112
Item 3.
113
Item 3.
114
Item 3.
115
Item 3.
116
Item 3.
117
Item 3.
118
Item 3.
119
Item 3.
120
Item 3.
121
Item 3.
122
Item 3.
123
Item 3.
124
Item 3.
125
Item 3.
126
Item 3.
127
Item 3.
128
Item 3.
129
Item 3.
130
Item 3.
131
Item 3.
132
Item 3.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Carole Kendrick, Senior Planner
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Public Hearing Regarding Specific Plan Amendment (SP2020-0004) a
City Initiated Request to Amend the Conditions of Approval for the
Commonly Referred to Fairway Canyon/Tournament Hills Specific
Plan that Include the Deletion of Condition 30.PLANNING.4 and
30.PLANNING.19, and the Update of Several Conditions to Reflect
City of Beaumont in Place of the County of Riverside
Background and Analysis:
The Oak Valley SCPGA Specific Plan No. 318, encompassing 1,747.9 acres allowing
4,355 dwelling units, was adopted by the County of Riverside on August 14, 2001. The
property was annexed into the City of Beaumont on April 9, 2003 , by the Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO) by LAFCO 2002-43-5. The Oak Valley SCPGA
Specific Plan includes the developments commonly referred to as Fairway Canyon and
Tournament Hills.
The Oak Valley SCPGA Specific Plan consists of an ordinance related to zoning
(County Ordinance No. 348.4013) the conditions of approval and the specific plan
document. Based on a recent review of the document City staff identified a condition of
approval that provided for the expiration of the validity of the specific plan. The condition
in its entirety is provided below.
30.PLANNING.4 SP-DURATION OF SP VALIDITY
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the Specific Plan (i.e.;
tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be
placed on the implementing project:
“The Specific Plan that this project is part of has a life span of twenty (20) years
from the date of the adoption of the resolution adopting the Specific Plan. Should
133
Item 4.
the Specific Plan not be substantially built out in that period of time, the project
proponent shall file a specific plan amendment to be processed concurrently with
this implementing proposal. (For the purposes of this condition, substantial
buildout shall be defined as the issuance of the 3,484th building permit.) The
specific plan amendment will update the entire specific plan document to reflect
current development standards.”
A specific plan is a planning document that implements the goals and policies of which
future projects located within a specified geographic area must adhere.
A specific plan is a common zoning tool used to establish a land use overlay. A land use
overlay applies additional layers of planning control, establishing stricter standards that
go beyond what the underlying zoning would normally regulate. Cities generally
implement overlays to achieve goals that may not ordinarily be attainable through
zoning rules alone.
City staff recommends the deletion of Condition 30.PLANNING.4 for several reasons.
The specific plan is the zoning document for the Fairway Canyon and Tournament Hills
communities. If the specific plan document is allowed to expire, then the zoning would
revert to the previous zoning.
As previously mentioned, the project was approved in the County of Riverside and
subsequently annexed into the City of Beaumont. The previous County zoning for the
subject property is provided below as identified in County of Riverside Resolution No.
2001-328:
R-T – Mobile Home Subdivision and Mobile Home Park,
R-5 – Open Area Combing Zone Residential Development,
R-3 – General Residential,
R-A – Residential Agriculture with various densities between 1 to 2-1/2 acres,
R-R – Rural Residential,
A-1-10 – Light Agriculture 10 Acre Minimum,
C-1/C-P – General Commercial, and
R-1 – One Family Dwelling.
The City of Beaumont zoning map designates the property as a specific plan (see
Attachment No. C). The existing code does not provide the comparable development
standards as the specific plan identified in and Ordinance 348.4013.
134
Item 4.
Furthermore, the expiration has the potential to render existing developed properties as
non-conforming. The project is currently developed with 1,640 single family homes in
Fairway Canyon and approximately 1,094 single family homes in Tournament Hills.
Based on the actual evolution of the project over the past twenty years, the project has
developed at a reduced density and will not built out to the maximum 4,355 dwelling
units that were originally approved. In order to protect the existing single family property
owners and ensure orderly development of the remainder of the project, the
development standards established in the specific plan will need to be retained in
perpetuity.
City staff also recommends the deletion of condition 30.PLANNING.19, which has been
satisfied. The condition in its entirety is provided below:
30.PLANNING.19 COMPLETE CASE APPROVALS
Prior to the approval of any implementing project {i.e. tract map, parcel map, use
permit, plot plan, etc.) within the Specific Plan, the following condition shall be
placed on the implementing project:
“Prior to the approval of any implementing project (tract map, parcel map, use
permit, plot plan, etc.), Specific Plan 318, Circulation GPA 568, Change of Zone
6492, and EIR 418 must have been approved, adopted, and certified by Board of
Supervisors, respectively.
This condition shall be considered as met once the Specific Plan, the GPA, the
Change of Zone, and the EIR have been approved, adopted, and certified by the
Board of Supervisors, respectively. This condition may not be deferred.”
City staff further recommends changes to several other conditions of approval to reflect
the City of Beaumont in place of the County of Riverside, the City Attorney in place of
County Counsel, and other updates related to Beaumont City departments. A redlined
version of the conditions of approval are attached as Attachment A to th is staff report.
Planning Commission:
At the January 12, 2021, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing and by a vote of 4-0 forwarded a recommendation to the
City Council to adopt Specific Plan Amendment (SP2020-0004) to the Oak Valley
SCPGA Specific Plan Oak Valley Greens.
135
Item 4.
Public Communications Received:
Notification of the public hearing was advertised on January 1, 2021, in the Press
Enterprise with an one-eighth page ad (see Attachment E), consistent with Government
Code Section 65091(a)(4) that states when the number of owners is greater than 1,000,
a local agency, in lieu of mailed or delivered notice, may provide notice by placing a
display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general
circulation within the local agency in which the proceeding is conducted at least 10 days
prior to the hearing.
At the time of report preparation, the Planning Department has not received any letters
of comment from the public in favor or opposition to the project. Any comments
received prior to the time of the scheduled City Council meeting will be provided to the
Council at the time of the public hearing.
CEQA Review:
From the standpoint of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified in 2001, for the Oak
Valley SCPGA Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 318) (SCH# 2000051126), with latest
Addendum of the EIR was approved by council in 2014 (13-EIR-03), assessing the
environmental impacts of the overall project and subsequent implementation steps,
including subdivision of the site. The EIR and the findings made by the City Council
remain pertinent and adequate for use for the project. Execution of this amendment will
not have any impact on the project that was not previously analyzed, and the overall
project continues to be required to adhere to the mitigation monitoring program
established for the project.
Fiscal Impact:
The cost for City staff research and preparation of the staff reports is approximately
$1,000.
Recommended Action:
Hold a public hearing, and
Adopt Specific Plan Amendment (SP2020-0004) to the Oak Valley SCPGA
Specific Plan Oak Valley Greens, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
136
Item 4.
Attachments:
A. Redlined Conditions of Approval
B. General Plan Land Use Designation Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Aerial Photograph
E. Proof of Publication
Incorporated herein by Reference:
City of Beaumont General Plan
City of Beaumont Zoning Ordinance
Project Site’s Riverside Conservation Authority Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan Informational Map
Contents of City of Beaumont Planning Department Project File SP2020-0004,
LAFCO 2002-43-5, 02-ANX-02, Development Agreement dated November 18,
2003, Development Agreement Amendment dated June 30, 2020, Oak Valley
SCPGA Specific Plan 318 and Environmental Im pact Report 418.
137
Item 4.
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 1
SPECIFIC PLAN Case#: SP00318
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
EVERY DEPARTMENT
10. EVERY. 1 SP - Hold Harmless
. BY_BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
INEFFECT
The applicant or any successor-in-interest shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of RiversideCity of Beaumont (COUNTYCITY), its agents, officers, or employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the COUNTY, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the COUNTYCITY, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning this SPECIFIC PLAN. The COUNTY CITY will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the COUNTY CITY and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the COUNTY CITY fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action,
or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the COUNTYCITY.
10. EVERY. 2 SP - Definitions INEFFECT
The words identified in the following list that appear in all capitals in the attached conditions of Specific Plan No. 318 shall be henceforth defined as follows:
SPECIFIC PLAN= Specific Plan No. 318.
CHANGE OF ZONE= Change of Zone No. 6492.
GPA= Comprehensive General Plan Amendment No. 568.
EIR = Environmental Impact Report No. 418.
10. EVERY. 3 SP - SP Document INEFFECT
Specific Plan No. 318 shall consist of the following:
a. Specific Plan Document, which must include, but not be limited to, the following items:
1. Board of Supervisors Specific Plan Resolution.
2. Conditions of Approval.
3. Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance Text. 4. Land Use Plan in both 8 1/2" x 11" black-and-white and 11" x 17" color formats.
5. Specific Plan text.
6. Descriptions of each Planning Area in both
AUG 14, 2001
138
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 2
Parcel: 413-300-041
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10. EVERY. 3 SP - SP Document (cont.)
graphical and narrative formats.
b. Environmental Impact Report No. 418 Document, which
must include, but not be limited to, the following items:
1. Mitigation Reporting/Monitoring Program (M/M).
2. Agency Notice of Preparation (NOP). 3. Draft EIR
4. Agency Notice of Completion (NOC). 5. Comments on the NOC. 6. Final EIR, including the responses to comments on
the NOC.
7. Technical Appendices
If any specific plan conditions of approval differ from the specific plan text or exhibits, the specific plan conditions of approval shall take precedence.
10. EVERY. 4 SP - Ordinance Requirements INEFFECT
The development of the property shall be in accordance with the mandatory requirements of all Riverside County ordinances including Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460 and state laws; and shall conform substantially with the adopted SPECIFIC PLAN as filed in the office of the Riverside CountyBeaumont Planning Department, unless otherwise amended.
10. EVERY. 5 SP - Limits of SP DOCUMENT INEFFECT
No portion of the SPECIFIC PLAN which purports or proposes to change, waive or modify any ordinance or other legal
requirement for the development shall be considered to be part of the adopted specific plan.
BS GRADE DEPARTMENT
10.BS GRADE. 2 SP*GSP-1 ORD. NOT SUPERSEDED INEFFECT
Anything to the contrary, proposed by SP 318 and the
Development Agreement, shall not supersede the following: All grading shall conform to the Uniform Building code,
County General Plan, Ordinance 457 and all other relevant laws, rules and regulations governing grading in Riverside County.
139
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 3
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.BS GRADE. 3
SP*GSP-2 GEO/SOIL TO BE OBEYED
INEFFECT
All grading shall be performed in accordance with the
recommendations of the included -County approved- geotechnical/soils reports for this Specific Plan.
10.BS GRADE. 4 SP- MASS GRADING
If mass grading of the entire Specific Plan site is
proposed - usually under a parcel map for the entire site - at the same time that application for further subdivisions
are being made, an exception to Ordinance 460, Section 4.Sb shall be obtained from the Planning Community
Development Director - Ord. 460 Section 3.1 - prior to issuance of the mass grading permit.
10.BS GRADE. 5 SP-ALL CLEARNC'S REQ'D B-4 PMT
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, all certifications affecting grading shall have written clearances. This includes, but is not limited to, additional environmental assessments, erosion control plans, geotechnical/soils reports, and departmental clearances.
10.BS GRADE. 6 SP*-NO GRADING & SUBDIVIDING
If grading of the entire - or any portion there of - Specific Plan site is proposed, UNDER A SUBDIVISION OR LAND USE CASE ALREADY APPROVED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PLAN, at
the same time that application for further subdivision of any of its parcels is being applied for, an exception to Ordinance 460, Section 4.5.B, shall be obtained from the Planning Director, prior to issuance of the grading permit (Ord. 460 Section 3.1). THIS EXCEPTION WILL NOT APPLY TO ANY CASE HAVING ONLY AN APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN.
E HEALTH DEPARTMENT
10.E HEALTH. 2 SP - FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS
The Department of Environmental Health has received and
reviewed the EIR initial study for SP 318 dated 4-11-01 from LSA Associates, and has the following comments: 1. The 1,747.9-acre site consists of a planned golf/recreation-oriented master planned community of
4,355 (single and multi-family residential) units on 852.8 acres, three (3) schools on 40.0 acres, 16.0 acres of neighborhood commercial uses, 30.4 acres of community
INEFFECT
INEFFECT
INEFFECT
INEFFECT
140
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page: 4
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.E HEALTH. 2
SP - FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS (cont.)
INEFFECT
commercial, 38 acres of parks, 500 acres of golf course and 218.3 acres of open space. All tracts and-Parcel Maps require a SAN 53 issued from this Department PRIOR to
Planning Department submittal.
2. The scattered ranch structures with subsurface
sewage disposal systems shall be properly abandoned.
3. The scattered ranch structures with on-site private
water wells shall be properly destroyed. 4. Adherence to regulations related to any hazardous substances shall be complied with Riverside County codes. 5. Schools, park sites, open spaces and the golf course are highly recommended to use recycled water in greenbelt and landscaped areas at their respective sites. 6. The site is not currently served by sanitary sewers. New water treatment facilities may need to be built and sewer treatment facilities will need to be built. Please contact Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District for water supply needs and City of Beaumont for sanitary sewer. 7. Comply with Federal, state and local statues and
regulations related to solid wastes.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
10.FIRE. 1 SP-#71-ADVERSE IMPACTS INEFFECT
The proposed project will have a cumulative adverse impact
on the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service. These impacts include an increased number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures and population. The project proponents/developers shall participate in the
development Impact fee program as adopted by the Riverside County Board of SupervisorsBeaumont City Council to
mitigate a portion of these impacts. This will provide funding for capital improvements such as land/equipment
purchases and fire station construction.
10.FIRE. 2 SP-#56-IMPACT MITIGATION INEFFECT
The project proponents shall participate in the fire protection impact mitigation program as adopted by the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors.
141
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS CCONDITIONS OF
Page: 5
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.FIRE. 3 SP-#95-HAZ FIRE AREA INEFFECT
The specific plan is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area"
of Riverside County as shown on a map on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any building constructed
on lots created by this project shall comply with the special construction provisions contained in Riverside
County Ordinance 787 and the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, and Public Resources Code 4290.
10.FIRE. 4 SP-#86-WATER MAINS INEFFECT
All water mains and fire hydrants providing required fire flows shall be constructed in accordance with the appropriate sections of Riverside County Ordinance 460 and/or No.787, subject to the approval by the Riverside CountyBeaumont Fire Department.
10.FIRE. 5 SP-#96-ROOFING MATERIAL INEFFECT
The proposed project area lies within the VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE as shown on the California Fire Hazard Classification Maps on file. All buildings shall be constructed with a class "A" fire retardant roofing material as per the 1999 California Fire Code. Wood shingles and shakes shall are not recommended as a roof
or other exterior covering material.
10.FIRE. 6 SP-#97-OPEN SPACE INEFFECT
Prior to approval of any development for lands adjacent to open space areas, a fire protection/vegetation
management (fuel modification) plan shall be submitted to the Riverside CountyBeaumont Fire Department for review and
approval. The Homeowner's Association or appropriate management entity shall be responsible for maintaining the
elements to the plan.
10.FIRE. 7 SP-#85-FINAL FIRE REQUIRE INEFFECT
Final fire protection requirements and impact mitigation
measures will be determined when specific project plans are submitted.
142
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 6
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.FIRE. 8 SP-#100-FIRE STATION INEFFECT
Based on national fire standards, one new fire station
and/or engine company could be required for every 2,000 new dwelling units, or 3.5 million square feet of commercial/industrial occupancy. Given the project's proposed development plan, up to 2 fire stations may be needed to meet anticipated service demands, given project
densities.
10. FIRE. 9 SP-#101-DISCL/FLAG LOT INEFFECT
1) FLAG LOTS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
2) This project lies within the VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD
SEVERITY ZONE as shown on the Fire Hazard Zone Maps of California. All roof construction shall meet a minimum class "A" rating as described in the current model building code of California.
3) A fire fuel analysis of the open space/wildlands within and outside the project area may be required prior to submitting a fuel modification plan.
NOTICE: The transferor of real property shall disclose to the transferee that this project lies within a VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD area.
FLOOD RI DEPARTMENT
10.FLOOD RI. 1 SP - FLOOD HAZARD REPORT INEFFECT
Specific Plan 318 is a proposal to develop approximately
1,748 acres with mixed uses including 4,367 residential dwellings. The site is west and south of Calimesa between
San Timoteo Canyon and I-10. The Oak Valley Specific Plan #318 project proposes a Specific Plan to replace the
previous Specific Plans Nos. 216 and 216A on the subject site.
The Specific Plan document has done an excellent job analyzing the tributary watersheds and has proposed a
master drainage plan for this project that would collect, convey, and discharge tributary flows. Storm runoff would be carried in streets, in underground drains, in paved channels, in grass-lined channels through parks and golf courses, and in natural watercourses. Drop structures
143
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 7
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.FLOOD RI. 1 SP - FLOOD HAZARD REPORT (cont.) INEFFECT
and detention basins are proposed.
All facilities should be designed to District standards. Maintenance of joint use facilities beyond that required
for flood control will not be borne by the District.
Developers must contact the California State Department of Fish and Game, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to obtain any permits or agreements needed to construct, operate and
maintain the proposed facilities
10.FLOOD RI. 2 SP GREENBELT, BASIN MAINT INEFFECT
This project proposes detention basins and green belt channels which will require maintenance by a public agency, or a guarantee of maintenance by a public agency in the event the responsible private party fails to meet its maintenance obligations. In particular the detention basin adjacent to Planning Areas 9 and 10 would require such a
guarantee because the proposed downstream development would depend on it for public health and safety. These types of flood control facilities are selected at the discretion of the applicant to complement the nature of the proposed development, and do not have a regional benefit commensurate with the maintenance costs which are anticipated to be excessively high. Therefore, to ensure the public is not unduly burdened for future costs, prior to final approval or recordation of any case protected by these drainage facilities, the District will require an acceptable financial mechanism be implemented to provide for reimbursement of maintenance costs in perpetuity. This may consist of a mechanism to assess individual benefitting property owners, or other means approved by the District. If an acceptable maintenance mechanism cannot be developed, the project should be redesigned to eliminate all high maintenance cost features.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
10.PLANNING. 1 SP - MAINTAIN PLANNING AREAS INEFFECT All planning area numbers shall be maintained throughout the life of the SPECIFIC PLAN, unless changed through the approval of a specific plan amendment or specific plan substantial conformance accompanied by a revision to the
144
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 8
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.PLANNING. 1 SP - MAINTAIN PLANNING AREAS (cont.)
complete specific plan document.
INEFFECT
10.PLANNING. 2 SP - NO P.A. DENSITY TRANSFER INEFFECT
Density transfers between Planning Areas within the
SPECIFIC PLAN shall not be permitted, except through the
Specific Plan Amendment process.
TRANS DEPARTMENT
10.TRANS. 1 SP - TRAFFIC STUDY CONDITIONS INEFFECT
The Transportation Department has reviewed the traffic study submitted by LSA Associates, Inc. for the referenced project. The study has been prepared in accordance with accepted traffic engineering standards and practices, utilizing County-approved guidelines. The study analyzed Year 2020 Buildout Impacts for the project and surrounding intersections. We generally concur with the findings relative to traffic impacts.
The study indicates that it is possible to achieve a Level
of Service "C" for the following intersections (some of which will require additional construction for mitigation at the time of development):
Singleton Road (NS)/I-10 Fwy EB Ramps (EW) Singleton Road (NS)/I-10 Fwy WB Ramps (EW) Singleton Road (NS)/Calimesa Boulevard (EW) Cherry Valley Boulevard (NS)/I-10 Fwy EB Ramps (EW)
Cherry Valley Boulevard (NS)/I-10 Fwy WB Ramps (EW) Cherry Valley Boulevard (NS)/Calimesa Boulevard (EW)
Nancy Avenue (NS)/Cherry Valley Boulevard (EW) Beaumont Avenue (NS)/Cherry Valley Boulevard {EW)
Brookside Avenue (NS)/Desert Lawn Drive (EW)
Nancy Avenue {NS)/Brookside Avenue (EW) 14th Street (NS)/I-10 Fwy EB Ramps (EW)
14th Street (NS)/I-10 Fwy WB Ramps (EW) Beaumont Avenue (NS)/I-10 EB Ramps (EW)
Beaumont Avenue (NS)/I-10 WB Ramps (EW) Potrero Boulevard (NS)/SR-60 EB Ramps (EW) Potrero Boulevard (NS)/Champions Drive (EW) “J” Street (NS)/San Timoteo Canyon Road (EW) “J” Street (NS)/Champions Drive (EW)
"J" Street (NS)/"G" Street (EW)
San Timoteo Canyon Road {NS)/"G" Street (EW)
145
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 9
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.TRANS. 1 SP - TRAFFIC STUDY CONDITIONS (cont.) INEFFECT
The Comprehensive General Plan circulation policies
required a minimum of Level of Service "C", except that Level of Service "D" may be allowed with Board of Supervisors' approval in urban areas at intersections of any combination of major highways, arterials, expressways or state highways within one mile of a freeway interchange.
The study indicates that it is possible to achieve a Level of Service "D" for the following intersections (some of
which will require additional construction for mitigation at the time of development).
Calimesa Boulevard (NS)/Brookside Avenue (EW)
Beaumont Avenue (NS)/Brookside Avenue (EW) Oak Valley Estates (NS)/14th Street (EW)
Nancy Street (NS)/14th Street (EW) Beaumont Avenue (NS)/14th Street (EW) Elm Avenue (NS)/8th Street (EW) California Avenue (NS)/6th Street (EW)
Potrero Boulevard (NS)/SR-60 WB Ramps (EW)
Mitigation to improve operations of the following intersections to the required Level of Service standards of the applicable jurisdictions (LOS "C" within the County of Riverside and the City of Calimesa, and LOS "D" within the City of Beaumont) for Year 2020 Buildout conditions is problematic, due either to existing conditions or to infeasible geometrics:
Singleton Road (NS)/Woodhouse Road (EW) Cherry Valley Blvd (NS)/Robert Road-Desert Lawn Drive (EW) Desert Lawn Drive (NS)/Champions Drive (EW) Singleton Road (NS)/San Timoteo Canyon Road (EW) Champions Drive (NS)/San Timoteo Canyon Drive {EW)
Beaumont Avenue (NS)/6th Street (EW)
The associated conditions of approval incorporate mitigation measures identified in the traffic study which
are necessary to achieve or maintain the required level of service.
10.TRANS. 2 SP - ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS INEFFECT
Roadway links wholly within the boundaries of Oak Valley Specific Plan No. 318, as well as the entirety of Champions Drive, shall be constructed at the time of
146
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 10
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.TRANS. 2
SP - ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (cont.)
INEFFECT
project development per the requirements of the specific
plan. Roadway links along the perimeter of the specific plan area (San Timoteo Canyon Road) shall be constructed to their full half-width section concurrent with development of the adjacent Oak Valley, Specific Plan No. 318 Planning Areas. Intersections located within and adjacent to the
boundaries of Oak Valley Specific Plan No. 318 (San Timoteo Canyon Road at "G" Street and "J" Street,
Champions Drive at "J" Street, Desert Lawn Drive) shall be
constructed concurrent with the roadways with the geometrics illustrated in Figure D.l.12c., unless subsequent traffic impact analyses demonstrate that lesser geometrics can be provided which meet applicable LOS standards, as approved by the Director of Transportation.
10.TRANS. 3 SP - "P" STREET IMPROVEMENTS INEFFECT
"P" Street shall be constructed to County of Riverside Standard No. 102, Modified Secondary Highway (56'/88' R.O.W.) from Champions Drive to San Timoteo Canyon Road.
10.TRANS. 4 SP - WARRANTED TRAFFIC SIGNALS INEFFECT
The project is responsible for the following traffic signals when warranted through subsequent traffic studies done for implementing projects within the boundaries of the specific plan:
San Timoteo Canyon Road/"G" Street
San Timoteo Canyon Road/"J" Street Desert Lawn Drive/Champions Drive Potrero Boulevard/Champions Drive Champions Drive/"J" Street
10.TRANS. 5 SP - GEOMETRICS INEFFECT
The following intersections shall be improved to the
geometrics as described.
Potrero Boulevard (NS)/San Timoteo Canyon Road (EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics:
Southbound: Two left turn lanes, one right turn lane.
Eastbound: One left turn lane, two through lanes.
Westbound: Two through lanes, one right turn lane.
147
Item 4.
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
01/08/02
13:50
Page: 11
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.TRANS. 5 SP - GEOMETRICS (cont.)
Potrero Boulevard {NS)/Champions Drive (EW) shall be
improved to provide the following geometrics:
INEFFECT
Northbound:
Southbound:
Eastbound:
Westbound:
Two left turn lanes, one right turn lane.
NA Two through lanes.
Two left turn lanes, two through lanes.
Desert Lawn Drive (NS}/Champions Drive {EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics:
Northbound:
Southbound: Eastbound: Westbound:
NA Two left turn lanes, one right turn lane.
One left turn lane, two through lanes.
Two through lanes.
11 J 11 Street {NS)/San Timoteo Canyon Road (EW) shall be
improved to provide the following geometrics:
Northbound: Southbound: Eastbound: Westbound:
NA One left turn lane, one right turn lane. One left turn lane, two through lanes.
Two through lanes, one right turn lane.
"J" Street (NS)/Champions Drive (EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics:
Northbound: Southbound: Eastbound: Westbound:
Two through lanes, one right turn lane. Two left turn lanes, two through lanes. NA
One left turn lane, one right turn lane.
11J 11 Street (NS)/ 11 G" Street (EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics:
Northbound:
Southbound: Eastbound:
Westbound:
One left turn lane, two through lanes, one
through/right turn lane. Two left turn lanes, three through lanes. Two left turn lanes, one through/right turn lane. One left turn lane, one through lane, one
through/right turn lane.
"G" Street (NS)/San Timoteo Canyon Road (EW) shall be improved to provide the following geometrics: 148
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 12
Parcel: 413-300-047
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
10.TRANS. 5 SP - GEOMETRICS (cont.) (cont.)
INEFFECT
Northbound: Southbound:
Eastbound: Westbound:
10.TRANS. 6
NA One left turn lane, one right turn lane.
One left turn lane, two through lanes.
Two through lanes, one right turn lane.
SP - TRAP SIG MITIGATION FEE
INEFFECT
The project proponent shall participate in the Traffic
Signal Mitigation Program as approved by the Board of Supervisors.
10.TRANS. 7 SP - "G" STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Concurrent with the construction of "G" Street within the boundaries of Oak Valley Specific Plan No. 318, "G" Street shall be constructed offsite to intersect with "J" Street as a Modified Collector Street (78' R.O.W.).
10.TRANS. 8 SP - "J" STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Concurrent with the construction of "J" Street within the boundaries of Oak Valley Specific Plan No. 318, "J" Street shall be constructed offsite to Roberts Road as an Urban Arterial Highway (134' R.O.W.)
20. PRIOR TO A CERTAIN DATE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
20.PLANNING. 1 SP - 90 DAYS TO PROTEST
The applicant has ninety (90) days from the date of the
approval of these conditions to protest, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020,
the imposition of any and all fees, dedications, reservations, and/or exactions imposed on this project as a result of the approval or conditional approval of this
project.
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
INEFFECT
INEFFECT
INEFFECT
149
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 13
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
PARKS DEPARTMENT
30.PARKS. 1 SP - TRAIL CONSTRUCTION
Prior to the approval of any implementing project,
including but not limited to grading permits, the applicant shall have in place a funding or construction mechanism, as
approved by the Riverside County Regional Park and Open-Space District, to insure the construction of the
regional trail along San Timoteo Canyon Road.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INEFFECT
30. PLANNING. 1 SP - PLANNING AREA STANDARDS INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within
the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project, with the blanks filled in at the implementing project:
"This implementing project is within Planning Area[s] of the SPECIFIC PLAN. Accordingly, this project is subject to these development standards:
1. All residential lots must be at least [square
feet/acres]. 2. The average residential lot size must be at least [square feet/acres]. 3. The target density of this planning area is to
du/ac. 4. The target range of the number of dwelling units in this planning area is to . 5. Entry monumentation is required at the intersection of
and
6. Roadway landscaping is required at 7. Recreational trails are located at 8. This implementing map is conditioned to build a park at prior to the th building permit. 9. [Residential] [Commercial] [Industrial] buildings must conform to the design guidelines on pages to of the SPECIFIC PLAN."
30.PLANNING. 2 SP - M/M PROGRAM (GENERAL) INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed
150
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 14
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 2 SP - M/M PROGRAM (GENERAL) (cont.) INEFFECT
on the implementing project:
"The EIR prepared for the SPECIFIC PLAN imposes specific mitigation measures and monitoring requirements on the
project. Certain conditions of the SPECIFIC PLAN and this implementing project constitute reporting/monitoring
requirements for certain mitigation measures."
30.PLANNING. 3 SP - NON-IMPLEMENTING MAPS INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within
the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"A land division filed for the purposes of phasing or
financing shall not be considered an implementing development application for the purposes of the Planning Department's conditions of approval.
Should this project be an application for phasing or financing, all of the other conditions in this implementing project with a prefix of "SP" will be considered as NOT APPLICABLE, and this condition shall be considered as MET. Should this project not be an application for phasing or financing, this condition shall be considered as NOT APPLICABLE."
30.PLANNING. 4 SP - DURATION OF SP VALIDITY INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within
the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed
on the implementing project:
"The SPECIFIC PLAN that this project is a part of has a
life span of twenty (20) years from the date of the adoption of the resolution adopting the SPECIFIC PLAN. Should the SPECIFIC PLAN not be substantially built out in
that period of time, the project proponent shall file a specific plan amendment to be processed concurrently with
this implementing proposal. (For the purposes of this condition, substantial buildout shall be defined as the
issuance of the 3,484th building permit.) The specific plan amendment will update the entire specific plan
document to reflect current development requirements.
151
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 15
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 4 SP - DURATION OF SP VALIDITY (cont.) INEFFECT
This condition shall be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the implementing
project has been filed within the above listed parameters and shall be
considered as MET if the specific plan amendment has been filed."
30.. PLANNING. 5 SP - SUBMIT FINAL DOCUMENTS INEFFECT
- Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"Fifteen (15) copies of the final SPECIFIC PLAN and EIR documents (SP/EIR) documents shall be submitted to the Planning Department for distribution. The documents shall include all the items listed in the condition titled "SP - Documents". The final SP/EIR documents shall be distributed in the following fashion:
Building and Safety Department 1 copy Department of Environmental Health 1 copy Fire Department 1 copy Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1 copy Transportation Department 1 copy County Planning Department in Riverside 1 copy City of Beaumont Planning Department 1 copy City of Calimesa Planning Department 1 copy Riverside County Planning Department in Indio 2 copies in Murrieta 1 copy
Riverside County Clerk of the Board 2 copies
Any and all remaining documents shall be kept with the Planning Department in RiversideBeaumont, or as otherwise determined by the Planning Community Development Director.
This condition cannot be DEFERRED or considered as NOT APPLICABLE."
30.PLANNING. 6 SP - PA SUMMARY TABLE INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project consistent with the Development Agreement:
152
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 16
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 6 SP - PA SUMMARY TABLE (cont.) INEFFECT
"The following table shows the residential map requirements
of the adopted SPECIFIC PLAN:
Planning Areas: Min. lot
size
[sf. ft.]
Density Range [du/acre] Target Density
1 4,000 5-8 6.0
2 5,000 2-5 4.0
3 5,000 2-5 4.0
4 3,800 8-12 10.0
7B 10,000 .2-2 1.0
8 5,500 2-5 4.0
10 3,800 8-12 10.0
11 6,000 2-5 4.0
12 5,000, 2-5 4.0
14 4,000 12-20 20.0
15 7,000 2-5 4.0
16 6,000 2-5 4.0
18 5,000 5-8 6.0
19 8,000 .2-2 2.0
20 4,000 2-5 4.0
22 5,500 2-5 4.0
23B 10,000 .2-2 1.0
25 3,800 8-12 12.0
26 8,000 2-5 4.0
30 6,000 2-5 4.0
32 4,000 5-8 6.
0
36 4,000 5-8 6.0
38 3,800 8-12 12.0
39 5,000 2-5 4.0
This condition shall be considered MET if the implementing residential land division proposal is within the above-
mentioned standards. This condition may only be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the implementing project is concurrent with a specific plan amendment which proposes to change the above-mentioned standards, or if this implementing project is either commercial or industrial in
nature."
30.PLANNING. 7 SP - PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any implementing project within
the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed
on the implementing project:
"The applicant shall provide to the Planning Department an
153
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont
Page: 17
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 7 SP - PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT (cont.) INEFFECT
8 1/2" x 11" exhibit showing where in the SPECIFIC PLAN
this project is located. The exhibit shall also show all prior implementing projects within the SPECIFIC PLAN that have already been approved.
This condition shall be considered MET once the applicant
provides the Planning Department with the required information. This condition may not be DEFERRED."
30.PLANNING. 8 SP - ACOUSTICAL STUDY REQ'D
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within Planning Areas 1, 10, 32, 36, and 38 of the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL, an acoustical study shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Environmental Health - Industrial Hygiene Division for review and approval.
This condition shall be considered MET if the relevant study has been approved by the Planning Department and the Department of Environmental Health-Industrial Hygiene Division. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the Planning Department determines that the required study is not necessary.
30.PLANNING. 9 SP - OAK TREE PLAN REQ'D
Prior to the approval of any implementing project (i.e.
tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.) within Planning Areas 10, 11, 15, 16, 21A, 21B, 22, and 23B of the
SPECIFIC PLAN, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO PROJECT APPROVAL, an oak tree inventory and conservation plan shall be developed providing detail by planning area. Each oak shall be mapped with its location numbered, its caliper (diameter) at breast height and its drip line (tree canopy) diameter identified, rated as to qualitative condition and desirability for retention, and assigned a recommended mitigation replacement ratio if removal were required. The plan shall also include general mitigation guidelines covering how oak trees to be retained
INEFFECT
NOTAPPLY
154
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page: 18
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 9 SP - OAK TREE PLAN REQ'D (cont.)
will be protected during construction activities, how oak
trees to be removed will be monitored, and how mitigation plantings for those oak trees removed will be accomplished. Additionally, the plan shall include the following
requirements: 1) No mass grading will be permitted within the oak woodlands on site. 2) Residential lots within oak
woodlands will be individually sited to avoid mature oak trees (>12" diameter-breast-height (dbh)) if at all
possible. 3) No slab foundations shall be permitted within the drip-line (widest extent of canopy cover) of oak trees. 4) No irrigated sod shall be planted within the
drip-line of oak trees. The oak tree plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval.
This condition shall be considered MET if the relevant inventory and conservation plan has been approved by the Planning Department. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the Planning Department determines that the required plan is not necessary. The submittal of this study mandates that a CEQA determination of an Addendum to a previously adopted EIR be
made, at a minimum. "
NOTAPPLY
30.PLANNING. 10 SP - DESIGN PLAN REQUIRED INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project (i.e.
tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.) within Planning Areas 1-4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18, 20, 22, 25, 32, 36,
38 or 39 of the SPECIFIC PLAN, the following condition
shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO PROJECT APPROVAL, the developer shall submit a development plan to the Planning Department for review and
approval, showing which amenities described in Exhibit D (which follows this condition) are applicable to this project.
This condition shall be considered MET when the Planning Department approves a plan showing specifically. how a given
development project will implement the general design concepts in Exhibit D. The development plan submittal may
be DEFERRED to prior to building permit issuance when incorporated into the Final Site Plan for the proposed
project. This condition shall not be considered NOT
155
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page: 19
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 10
APPLICABLE."
30.PLANNING. 11
SP - DESIGN PLAN REQUIRED (cont.)
SP - WATER ANALYSIS/AGREEMENT
INEFFECT
INEFFECT
Prior to the recordation of any implementing project (i.e. tract map, parcel map, etc.) or prior to the issuance of a building permit for any use permit (i.e. conditional use permit, plot plan, etc.), whichever comes first, within any planning area of the SPECIFIC PLAN, the Planning Department shall receive an executed agreement between the developer and either (1) the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, (2) the Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District, or
(3) another qualified water service agency. The agreement shall provide for sufficient supplemental water supply to the development for domestic purposes.
This condition shall be considered MET if the applicant submits a satisfactory agreement to the Planning Department. This condition shall be considered NOT APPLICABLE if the Planning Department determines that significant new information (i.e. other documented additions to water supply or documented enhancements to groundwater recharge capability applicable to the project vicinity, etc.} would make such an agreement unnecessary. This condition cannot be DEFERRED.
30.PLANNING. 12 SP - OAK TREE PLAN REQ'D INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project (i.e.
tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.) within Planning Areas 10, 11, 15, 16, 21A, 21B, 22, and 23B of the SPECIFIC PLAN, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO PROJECT APPROVAL, an oak tree inventory and conservation plan shall be developed providing detail by planning area. Each oak shall be mapped with its location numbered, its caliper (diameter) at breast height and its drip line (tree canopy) diameter identified, rated as to qualitative condition and desirability for retention, and
assigned a recommended mitigation replacement ratio if removal were required. The plan shall also include general mitigation guidelines covering how oak trees to be retained will be protected during construction activities, how oak trees to be removed will be monitored, and how mitigation plantings for those oak trees removed will be accomplished.
156
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page 20
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 12 SP - OAK TREE PLAN REQ'D (cont.)
Additionally, the plan shall include the following
requirements: 1) No mass grading will be permitted within the oak woodlands on site. 2) Residential structures within oak woodlands will be individually sited to avoid
mature oak trees (>12" diameter-breast-height (dbh)) if at all possible. 3) No slab foundations shall be permitted
within the drip-line (widest extent of canopy cover) of oak trees. 4) No irrigated sod shall be planted within the
drip-line of oak trees. The oak tree plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval.
This condition shall be considered MET if the relevant inventory and conservation plan has been approved by the Planning Department. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the Planning Department determines that the required plan is no longer necessary. The condition may not be DEFERRED.
The submittal of this study mandates that a CEQA determination of an Addendum to a previously adopted EIR be made, at a minimum."
30.PLANNING. 13 SP - PALEO STUDY REQD INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within any planning area of the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.}, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT ISSUANCE, a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP} study shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
This condition shall be considered MET if the relevant study has been approved by the Planning Department. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the Planning Department determines that the required study is not necessary.
INE
30.PLANNING. 14 SP - GEO STUDY REQUIRED INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.} for which the County GeologistCity Engineer/Public Works Director requires further geotechnical 157
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 21
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30. PLANNING. 14 SP - GEO STUDY REQUIRED (cont.) INEFFECT
analysis, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO PROJECT APPROVAL, a geotechnical investigation and additional seismic analysis shall be submitted to the
Planning Department & Engineering GeologistCity Engineer/Public Works Director for review and approval. The study shall treat the following issues:
1. Slope Stability/ Landslide potential 2. Faulting 3. Treatment of recent alluvium 4. Shallow groundwater areas 5. Any other geological/geotechnical issues identified by
the County GeologistCity Engineer/Public Works Director as pertinent to development within the planning area(s) covered by the implementing development application.
This condition shall be considered MET if the relevant study has been approved by the Planning Department. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the Planning Department determines that the required study is not necessary.
The submittal of this study mandates that a CEQA determination of an Addendum to a previously adopted EIR be made, at a minimum."
30.PLANNING. 15 SP - EA REQUIRED INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementation project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map,
use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"If this implementing project is subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an environmental assessment shall be filed and processed concurrently with
this implementing project. At a minimum, the environmental assessment shall utilize the evaluation of impacts
addressed in the EIR prepared for the SPECIFIC PLAN.
This condition shall be considered as MET if an environmental assessment was conducted for this implementing project. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if this implementing project is not subject
158
Item 4.
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
01/08/02
13:50 Page: 22
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 15 SP - EA REQUIRED (cont.)
to CEQA. This condition may not be DEFERRED."
INEFFECT
30.PLANNING. 16 SP - ADDENDUM EIR INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within
the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"This implementing project has been reviewed in the context
of the EIR, which is associated with this SPECIFIC PLAN. The Planning Department has reviewed this project and its relationship to the EIR and has found that no new environmental impacts have arisen since the certification of the EIR. Although the EIR adequately addressed the environmental impacts of the SPECIFIC PLAN as a whole, more detailed technical information (i.e. traffic studies, updated biological studies, etc.) have been required by the Planning Department and/or other COUNTY CITY land development review departments in order to complete its
environmental review. Therefore, an ADDENDUM to the previously certified EIR has been prepared in conjunction with this implementing application.
This condition shall be considered MET if an ADDENDUM to the EIR has been prepared. Alternatively, this condition shall be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if an ADDENDUM to the EIR is not
required."
30.PLANNING. 17 SP - SUPPLEMENT TO EIR INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit,
plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"This implementing project has been reviewed in the context of the EIR, which is associated with this SPECIFIC PLAN.
The Planning Department has reviewed this project and its relationship to the EIR and has found that although the EIR adequately addressed the environmental impacts of the SPECIFIC PLAN at the time, new environmental impacts have arisen since the certification of the original EIR. The
Planning Department has determined that the new environmental impacts can be mitigated to below a level of
159
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 23
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 17 SP - SUPPLEMENT TO EIR (cont.) INEFFECT
significance. Therefore, a SUPPLEMENT to the previously
certified EIR has been prepared in conjunction with this
implementing application.
This condition shall be considered MET if a SUPPLEMENT to the EIR has been prepared. Alternatively, this condition shall be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if a SUPPLEMENT to the EIR is not required."
30.PLANNING. 18 SP - SUBSEQUENT EIR INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"This implementing project has been reviewed in the context of the EIR, which is associated with this SPECIFIC PLAN. The Planning Department has reviewed this project and its relationship to the EIR and has found that although the EIR adequately addressed the environmental impacts of the SPECIFIC PLAN at the time, new environmental impacts have
arisen since the certification of the original EIR. The Planning Department has determined that this implementing project may have a significant impact to the new environmental impacts that have arisen. Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT EIR has been prepared in conjunction with this implementing application.
This condition shall be considered MET if a SUBSEQUENT EIR has been prepared. Alternatively, this condition shall be
considered as NOT APPLICABLE if a SUBSEQUENT to the EIR is not required."
30.PLANNING. 19 SP - COMPLETE CASE APPROVALS INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project {i.e.
tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.) within the SPECIFIC PLAN, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"Prior to the approval of any implementing project (tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), Specific Plan 318, Circulation GPA 568, Change of Zone 6492, and EIR 418 must have been approved, adopted, and certified by the Board of Supervisors, respectively."
160
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 24
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 19 SP - COMPLETE CASE APPROVALS (cont.) INEFFECT
This condition shall be considered as MET once the SPECIFIC
PLAN, the GPA, the CHANGE OF ZONE, and the EIR have been
approved, adopted, and certified by the Board of
Supervisors, respectively. This condition may not be DEFERRED."
30. PLANNING. 20 SP - AMENDMENT REQUIRED INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"If this implementing project meets any of the following criteria, an amendment to the SPECIFIC PLAN shall be required and processed concurrently with this implementing project:
1. The implementing project adds any area to, or deletes area from, the SPECIFIC PLAN; 2. The implementing project proposes a substantially different use than currently allowed in the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e. proposing a residential use within a commercially designated area); or
3. as determined by the Planning Community Development Director.
Any amendment to the SPECIFIC PLAN, even though it may
affect only one portion of the SPECIFIC PLAN, shall be accompanied by a complete specific plan document which includes the entire specific plan, including both changed and unchanged parts.
This condition shall be considered MET if the specific
plan amendment has been filed, and NOT APPLICABLE if a specific plan amendment is determined to be unnecessary."
30.PLANNING. 21 SP - PARK AGENCY REQUIRED INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing land division project (i.e. tract map, or parcel map) within the SPECIFIC
PLAN, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION of any subdivision, or other residential development application, all portions of this
161
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 25
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 21 SP - PARK AGENCY REQUIRED (cont.) INEFFECT
implementing project not currently within the boundaries of the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation and Park District,
shall be annexed into said District or a similar entity such as a County Service Area/District that has been designated by the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to
Section 10.35(G) of Ordinance No. 460, to receive park dedications and fees. Documentation of said annexation
shall be provided to the Planning Department.
This condition shall be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation and Parks District, a County Service Area/District or other similar entity is unwilling or unable to annex the property in question."
30. PLANNING. 22 SP - PA PROCEDURES (MAP) INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing land division project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map or parcel map), the following condition shall be placed on the
implementing project: ·
"PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION, the planning area[s] for which
this land division application is located must be legally defined. Any of the following procedures may be used in order to legally define this [these] planning area[s]:
1. The project proponent has processed a FINAL CHANGE OF ZONE MAP concurrent with the SPECIFIC PLAN which legally defined this [these] planning area[s]. 2. The project proponent shall file a change of zone
application along with a legal description defining the boundaries of the planning area affected by this land
division application. The applicant will not be changing the allowed uses or standards within the
existing zone but will merely be providing an accurate legal description of the affected planning area. The
change of zone shall be approved and adopted by the Board of Supervisors."
30.PLANNING. 23 SP - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing land division project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e. tract map or parcel
map}, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing app lication:
162
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 26
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30. PLANNING. 23 SP - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE (cont.) INEFFECT
"PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION, the following procedures for
common area maintenance procedures shall be complied with:
a. A permanent master maintenance organization shall be established for the specific plan area, to assume ownership
and maintenance responsibility for all common recreation, open space, circulation systems and landscaped areas. The
organization may be public or private. Merger with an
area-wide or regional organization shall satisfy this condition provided that such organization is legally and financially capable of assuming the responsibilities for ownership and maintenance. If the organization is a
private association then neighborhood associations shall be established for each residential development, where required, and such associations may assume ownership and maintenance responsibility for neighborhood common areas.
b. Unless otherwise provided for in these conditions of
approval, common open areas shall be conveyed to the maintenance organization as implementing development is approved or any subdivision as recorded.
c. The maintenance organization shall be established prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the first land division.
d. The common areas to be maintained by the master maintenance organization shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Planning Areas 5, 7A, 13, 17, 21B, 23A, 24, 31B, 34, and 37."
30.PLANNING. 24 SP*- CC&R RES PUB COMMON AREA INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing land
division project (i.e. tract map or parcel map), the following condition shall be applied to the land division
PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION if the permanent master maintenance organization referenced in the condition entitled "SP - Common Area Maintenance" is a public organization:
"The applicant shall convey to the County City fee simple title, to all common open space areas, free and clear of
all liens, taxes, assessments, leases (recorded or unrecorded) and easement, except those easements which. in
the sole discretion of the County City are acceptable. As a condition
163
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 27
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30. PLANNING. 24 SP *- CC&R RES PUB COMMON AREA {cont.) INEFFECT
precedent to the County City accepting title to such areas,
the applicant shall notify the Planning Department that the following documents shall be submitted to the Office of the County CounselCity Attorney and submit said documents for
review along· with the current fee, which shall be subject to County CounselCity Attorney approval:
l. A cover letter identifying the project for which approval is sought;
2. A signed and notarized declaration of. covenants, conditions and restrictions;
3. A sample document, conveying title to the purchaser, of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference; and,
4. A deposit equaling three (3) hours of the current hourly fee for Review of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions established pursuant to County Ordinance No. 671 at the time the above referenced documents are submitted for County Counsel City Attorney review.
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, b) provide for the establishment of a property
owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common, and c) contain the following provisions verbatim:
"Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provisions shall apply:
The property owners' association established herein shall, if dormant, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the request of the County of RiversideCity of Beaumont, and the property owners' association shall unconditionally accept from the County of RiversideCity of Beaumotn, upon the County's City's demand, title to all or any part of the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit ' ' attached hereto. Such acceptance shall be through the president of the property owner's association, who shall be authorized to execute any documents required to
facilitate transfer of the ‘common area’. The decision to
require activation of the property owners' association and
164
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 28
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 24 SP*- CC&R RES PUB COMMON AREA {cont.)
the decision to require that the association
unconditionally accept title to the 'common area' shall be
at the sole discretion of the County of RiversideCity of Beaumont.
In the event that the 'common area', or any part thereof, is conveyed to the property owners' association, the association, thereafter, shall own such 'common area', shall manage and continuously maintain such 'common area', and shall not sell or transfer such 'common area' or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the
Planning Community Development Director of the County of RiversideCity of Beaumont or the County's City's successor-in-interest. The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the owner of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area', and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the
payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded
subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
This declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended, or property de-annexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the
extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area' established pursuant to this Declaration.
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the
property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control."
Once approved by the Office of County CounselCity
Attorney, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded by the Planning Department with one copy retained for the case file, and one copy
provided to the County Transportation Department - Survey DivisionPublic Works Department."
30.PLANNING. 25 SP*- CC&R RES PRI COMMON AREA INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing land division project within the SPECIFIC PLAN {tract map or parcel map), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing
165
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 29 ·
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30. PLANNING. 25 SP*- CC&R RES PRI COMMON AREA,(cont.) INEFFECT
project PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION if the permanent master
maintenance organization referenced in the condition entitled "SP - Common Area Maintenance" is a private
organization:
"The applicant shall notify the Planning Department that
the following documents shall be submitted to the Office of County Counsel and submit said documents for review along
with the current fee, which shall be subject to County CounselCity Attorney approval:
1. A cover letter identifying the project for which approval is sought;
2. A signed and notarized declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions;
3. A sample document, conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit, which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference; and,
4. A deposit equaling three (3) hours of the current hourly fee for Review if Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions established pursuant to County Ordinance No. 671 at the time the above referenced documents are submitted for County CounselCity Attorney review.
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common, c) provide for ownership of the common area by either the property owners'
association or the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common, and (d) contain the following provisions verbatim:
"Notwithstanding, any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provisions shall apply:
The property owners' association established herein
shall manage and continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit ' ', attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area' or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of
166
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page
Parcel: 413-300-047 "'\
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 25 SP*- CC&R RES PRI COMMON AREA (cont.)
the Community DevelopmentPlanning Director of the County
of RiversideCity of Beaumont or the County's City's
successor-in-interest.
The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
This Declaration shall not be terminated, substantially' amended, or property de-annexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Community Developmetn Director of the County City of Riverside
Beaumont or the County'sCity's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if
it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area' established pursuant to this Declaration.
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control."
Once approved by the Office of County CounselCity Attorney, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded the Planning Department with one copy retained for the case file, and one copy provided to the County Transportation Department - Survey DivisionPublic Works Department."
30.PLANNING. 26 SP - ARCHAEO M/M PROGRAM INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit,
plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, the project applicant shall enter into an agreement with a qualified archaeologist. This agreement shall include, but not be
limited to, the preliminary mitigation and monitoring procedures to be implemented during the process of grading,
as found in the EIR. A copy of said agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Department. No grading permits 167
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 31
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 26 SP - ARCHAEO M/M PROGRAM (cont.) INEFFECT
will be issued unless the preliminary mitigation and monitoring procedures required prior to grading permits as
described in the EIR are substantially complied with."
30.PLANNING. 28 SP - GENERIC M/M PROGRAM INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit,
plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, the project applicant shall provide to the Planning Department a
detailed proposal for complying with the preliminary mitigation and monitoring procedures described in the EIR during the process of grading. Grading permits will not be issued unless the preliminary mitigation and monitoring procedures as described in the EIR are substantially complied with."
30.PLANNING. 29 SP - USFWS/CDFG CLEARANCES INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e. tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.) which may result in the disturbance of on-site habitat occupied by any species determined to be endangered or threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG}, the following condition shall be placed on
the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, the applicant shall obtain necessary take permit(s} from the USFWS and CDFG. A copy of said permit(s) shall be submitted to the
Planning Department."
30.PLANNING. 30 SP - CDFG (SECT 1601/1603) INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.} within Planning Areas 1, 5, 6, 9, 10, 14, 23B, 29, 30, 31B, 32,
33A, 33B, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 39 of the SPECIFIC PLAN, which may propose grading or construction within or along the banks of any blue-lined stream, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
168
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside County LMS City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 32
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 30 SP - CDFG (SECT 1601/1603} (cont.)
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, the applicant
shall obtain written notification to the County Planning
Department that the appropriate California Department of Fish and Game notification pursuant to Sections 1601/1603
of the California Fish and Game Code has taken place, or obtain an "Agreement Regarding Proposed Stream or Lake
Alteration" (Sections 1601/1603 Permit) should any grading or construction be proposed within or along the banks of
any natural watercourse or wetland determined to be jurisdictional, located either on-site or any required off-site improvement areas. Copies of any agreement shall
be submitted with the notification."
INEFFECT
30.PLANNING. 31 SP - ACOE CLEARANCE INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project (i.e. tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.) within Planning Areas 1, 5, 6, 9, 10, 14, 23B, 29, 30, 31B, 32,
33A, 33B, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 39 of the SPECIFIC PLAN, which may propose grading or construction within or along
the banks of any blue-lined stream which is determined to be within the jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, the applicant shall obtain written notification to the County City Planning Department that the alteration of any watercourse or wetland determined to be jurisdictional, located either on-site or on any required off-site improvement areas, complies with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Conditions or obtain a permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act should any
grading or construction be proposed within or along the banks of any natural watercourse or wetland. Copies of any agreement shall be submitted with the notification."
30.PLANNING. 33 SP - ENTRY MONUMENTATION INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit,
plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project;
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, the following
language shall be added to the landscaping requirements of
169
Item 4.
01/08/02
13:50
Riverside county LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page-; 33
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30. PLANNING. 33 SP - ENTRY MONUMENTATION (cont.)
the implementing project:
1. A primary entry monument shall be shown at locations indicated in Figure 4-1, with features as depicted in
Figure 4-2 and Figure 4-3. 2. A secondary entry monument shall be shown at locations indicated in Figure 4-1, with features as depicted in Figure 4-5.
3. The entry monument shall be in substantial conformance with the design guidelines of Planning Area of the
INEFFECT
SPECIFIC PLAN, as shown on pages to "
30.PLANNING. 34 SP - POST GRADING REPORT INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, the project applicant shall provide to the Planning Department a post
grading report. The report shall describe how the mitigation and monitoring program as described in the EIR and pre-grading agreement[s] with the qualified archaeologist and paleontologist were complied with."
30.PLANNING. 35 SP - SCHOOL MITIGATION INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS, impacts to the Beaumont Unified School District shall be mitigated in accordance with the existing mitigation agreement with the developer
dated December 19, 1989. If said agreement shall be rescinded, then impacts to schools shall be mitigated in accordance with state law."
30.PLANNING. 36 SP - PA PROCEDURES (USE) INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any implementing use permit the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: plot plan or conditional use permit), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
170
Item 4.
Riverside County LMS
City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL
01/08/02
13:50
Page: 34
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30. PLANNING. 36 SP - PA PROCEDURES (USE) (cont.) INEFFECT
"PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS, the planning area[s] for which
this use permit application is located must be legally defined. Any of the following procedures may be used in order to legally define this [these] planning area[s]:
1. The project proponent has processed a FINAL CHANGE OF
ZONE MAP concurrent with the SPECIFIC PLAN which legally defined this [these] planning area[s]. 2. The project proponent shall file a change of zone application along with a legal description defining the boundaries of the planning area affected by this use permit application. The applicant will not be changing the allowed uses or standards within the existing zone but will merely be providing an accurate legal description of the affected planning area. The change of zone shall be approved and adopted by the Board of Supervisors."
30.PLANNING. 40 SP - PHASE 1 PARKS INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing residential project within Phase One of the SPECIFIC PLAN, a phasing plan for the design and construction of Phase One parks shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department and the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation and Park District (BCVRPD). The plan shall provide for parks design and construction as well as landscape maintenance and upkeep. The plan shall also document a permanent
maintenance mechanism for the parks and their facilities. Conditions for applicable thresholds will be developed concurrent with approval of the phasing plan.
This condition shall be considered MET if a document is submitted that is acceptable to both the Planning
Department and BCVRPD. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the implementing application is not within Phase One.
30.PLANNING. 41 SP - PHASE 2 PARKS INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing residential project within Phase Two of the SPECIFIC PLAN, a phasing
plan for the design and construction of Phase Two parks shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Department and the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation and
171
Item 4.
Riverside County LMS
City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL
01/08/02
13:50
Page: 35
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 41 SP - PHASE 2 PARKS (cont.) INEFFECT
Park District (BCVRPD). The plan shall provide for parks design and construction as well as landscape maintenance
and upkeep. The plan shall also document a permanent maintenance mechanism for the parks and their facilities.
Conditions for applicable thresholds will be developed concurrent with approval of the phasing plan.
This condition shall be considered MET if a document is submitted that is acceptable to the Planning Department
and BCVRPD. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the implementing application is not within Phase Two.
30.PLANNING. 42 SP - PHASE 3 PARKS INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing residential project within Phase Three of the SPECIFIC PLAN, a phasing plan for the design and construction of the parks within Phase Three shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department and the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Recreation and Park District (BCVRPD). The plan shall provide for parks design and construction as well as landscape maintenance and upkeep. The plan shall also
document a permanent maintenance mechanism for the parks and their facilities. Conditions for applicable thresholds will be developed concurrent with the approval of the phasing plan.
This condition shall be considered MET if the applicable
information is provided to the Planning Department and the BCVRD. This condition may be considered as NOT APPLICABLE if the implementing project is not within Phase Three.
30.PLANNING. 43 SP - BIO MITIGATION INEFFECT
Prior to the approval of any implementing project within
Planning Areas l,5,6,9,10,14,23B, 29, 30, 31B, 32, 33A,
33B, 37, 38, and 39 of the SPECIFIC PLAN (i.e.: tract map, parcel map, use permit, plot plan, etc.), the following condition shall be placed on the implementing project:
"PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, a mitigation program shall be implemented providing for the preservation, creation, or enhancement of replacement riparian woodland or wetland habitat. The initial focus for mitigation shall be within the San Timoteo Canyon Creek
172
Item 4.
Riverside County LMS
City of BeaumontCONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL
01/08/02
13:50
Page: 36
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.PLANNING. 43 SP - BIO MITIGATION (cont.} INEFFECT
corridor where the mitigation shall be implemented to the
greatest extent feasible. The mitigation program must be acceptable to the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG}, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board} under their Section 404, 1603, and 401 or other applicable permitting
process, respectively. The Planning Department must receive written confirmation of the acceptability of the
mitigation measures from the Corps, CDFG and/or the Board.
If the Corps, CDFG, and/or Board will not accept the
mitigation or if the implementation of the program in the San Timoteo Canyon Creek corridor is not feasible, the
mitigation shall be implemented within the site of the SPECIFIC PLAN or at a suitable off site location in
accordance with Exhibit of the EIR.
TRANS DEPARTMENT
30. TRANS. 3 SP - GEN PLAN AMENDMENT REQ'D INEFFECT
The project proponent shall submit an application to amend the Comprehensive General Plan to add the following project roadways to Circulation Element Study Area Map 2:
a. "J" Street - Champions Drive north to Project Boundary - Modified Major Highway (**80'/104' R.O.W.**)
[**Amended@ Board of Supervisors 7/17/01. Previously 78'/102' R.O.W**)
b. "P" Street - San Timoteo Canyon Road to Champions Drive
- Modified Secondary Highway (56 1 /88 1 R.O.W.)
c. Champions Drive - East of Desert Lawn Drive to frontage
road alignment - Secondary Highway (64 1 /88 1 R.O.W.)
30.TRANS. 4 SP - TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIRED INEFFECT
Site specific traffic studies will be required for all
subsequent implementing projects within the boundaries of Specific Plan No. 318, as deemed necessary by the Director
of Transportation. Subsequent traffic studies shall monitor development within the specific plan and its associated trip generation. Traffic signals identified in
10. TRANS.4. will be installed by the project without
173
Item 4.
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 37 01/08/02
13:50
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.TRANS. 4 SP - TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIRED (cont.) INEFFECT
credit for signal mitigation fees unless determined to not be warranted under existing or any future conditions, and
as approved by the Director of TransportationCity Engineer/Public Works Director.
30.TRANS. 5 SP - OFF-SITE MITIGATION INEFFECT
EIR No. 418 proposes mitigation for traffic impacts to off-site roadways and intersections located within various jurisdictions. The following intersections have been identified within the EIR as requiring mitigation:
Singleton Road/I-10 Fwy EB Ramps Singleton Road/I-10 Fwy WB Ramps Singleton Road/Calimesa Boulevard Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road - Desert Lawn Drive Cherry Valley Boulevard/I-10 Fwy EB Ramps Cherry Valley Boulevard/I-10 Fwy WB Ramps Cherry Valley Boulevard/Calimesa Boulevard Nancy Avenue/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Beaumont Avenue/Cherry Valley Boulevard Brookside Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive Brookside Avenue/Calimesa Boulevard
Beaumont Avenue/Brookside Avenue Champions Drive/San Timoteo Canyon Road 14th Street/I-10 Fwy EB Ramps 14th Street/I-10 Fwy WB Ramps 14th Street/Oak Valley Estates Nancy Avenue/14th Street Beaumont Avenue/14th Street Elm Avenue/8th Street
California Avenue/6th Street Beaumont Avenue/I-10 Fwy EB Ramps
Beaumont Avenue/I-10 Fwy WB Ramps Potrero Boulevard/SR-GO EB Ramps Potrero Boulevard/SR-GO WB Ramps
Potrero Boulevard/San Timoteo Canyon Road Singleton Road/San Timoteo Canyon Road
The project developer shall participate on a "fair share basis" in a regional mechanism that provides funding for the necessary improvements. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, the project developer shall make a deposit to the Transportation Department to initiate the process of creating the appropriate funding mechanism. This deposit shall be credited against the developer's "fair share" of the improvement costs identified. Any funds
174
Item 4.
Riverside County LMSCity of Beaumont CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Page: 38 01/08/02
13:50
Parcel: 413-300-047
30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL
30.TRANS. 5 SP - OFF-SITE MITIGATION (cont.) INEFFECT
advanced by the project developer not expended shall be refunded or credited against their "fair share". A "PRIOR
TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE" condition shall be imposed on residential tract maps or commercial site plans, respectively, for the funding of the process to create the appropriate regional mechanism. This condition shall be considered MET upon deposit of the funds for creating the
appropriate funding mechanism with the Transportation Department.
100. PRIOR TO ISSUE GIVEN BLDG PRMT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100.PLANNING. 15 SP - Count Res Build Permits INEFFECT
This condition is applied to assist the Planning Department with tracking the build-out of the SPECIFIC PLAN by automatically counting all the issuance of all new residential building permits on the County's Land Management System which are electronically associated with the Specific Plan. Accordingly, this condition will not allow more than 4,355 residential building permits to be issued within the SPECIFIC PLAN.
175
Item 4.
[ PINKS" ] 11/05/01
14:24
Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page: 1
CHANGE OF ZONE Case#: CZ06492
10. GENERAL CONDITIONS
EVERY DEPARTMENT
10. EVERY. 1 SP - Hold Harmless
Parcel 413-180-021
BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INEFFECT
The applicant or any successor-in-interest shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of RiversideCity of Beaumont (COUNTYCITY), its agents, officers, or employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the COUNTYCITY, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the COUNTYCITY, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning this SPECIFIC PLAN. The
COUNTY CITY will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the COUNTY CITY and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the COUNTY CITY fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the COUNTYCITY.
10. EVERY. 4 SP - Ordinance Requirements INEFFECT
The development of the property shall be in accordance with
the mandatory requirements of all Riverside County ordinances including Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460 and state laws; and shall conform substantially with the adopted SPECIFIC PLAN as filed in the office of the Riverside CountyCity of Beaumont Planning Department, unless otherwise amended.
10. EVERY. 5 SP - Limits of SP DOCUMENT INEFFECT
No portion of the SPECIFIC PLAN which purports or proposes
to change, waive or modify any ordinance or other legal requirement for the development shall be considered to be part of the adopted specific plan.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
10.FIRE. 1 MAP-#15-POTENTIAL FIRE FLOW RECOMMND
The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow 2500 GPM for 2-hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure.
AUG 14 2001
176
Item 4.
Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ll/05/0l 14:24 Page: 2
CHANGE OF ZONE Case#: CZ06492 Parcel: 413-180-021
20. PRIOR TO A CERTAIN DATE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
20.PLANNING. 1 SP - 90 DAYS TO PROTEST
The applicant has ninety (90) days from the date of the approval of these conditions to protest, in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020, the imposition of any and all fees, dedications,
reservations, and/or exactions imposed on this project as a result of the approval or conditional approval of this
project.
80. PRIOR TO BLDG PRMT ISSUANCE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
INEFFECT
8O.FIRE. 1 USE - FIRE FLOW RECOMMND
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT, YOU SHALL PROVIDE PROOF FROM BEAUMONT-CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT THAT YOU ARE CONNECTED TO BEAUMONT-CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TO SERVE THE PROJECT(S)
177
Item 4.
Brookside Ave
Cougar Way
Oak Valley Parkway
Oak Valley Parkway
60
60
7th St
5th St
3rd St
8th St
6th St
1st St
Potrero Blvd
79
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
TOD Overlay
Open Space
Employment District
Industrial
High Density Residential
Traditional Neighborhood
Single Family Residential
Rural Residential 1
Rural Residential 10
Rural Residential 40
Urban Village
Downtown Mixed Use
General Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
Public Facilities Potrero Blvd Veile Ave Elm Ave California Ave Edgar Ave Beaumont Ave Palm Ave Manzanita Park Rd Pennsylvania Ave Starlight Ave Xenia Ave Highland Springs Ave Subject Site
178
Item 4.
Brookside Ave
Cougar Way
Oak Valley Parkway
Oak Valley Parkway
60
60
4th St
7th St
5th St
3rd St
8th St
6th St
1st St
Potrero Blvd
79
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
CITY OF BEAUMONT ZONING
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
TOD Overlay
Specific Plan
Urban Village
Residential Rural
Residential Single Family
Residential Traditional Neighborhood
Residential Multiple Family
Downtown Residential Multifamily
Sixth Street Mixed Use - Residential
Sixth Street Mixed Use
Beaumont Mixed Use
Downtown Mixed Use
Local Commercial
Community Commercial
Commercial Neighborhood
Recreation/Conservation
Manufacturing
Public Facilities Potrero Blvd Veile Ave Elm Ave California Ave Edgar Ave Beaumont Ave Palm Ave Manzanita Park Rd Pennsylvania Ave Starlight Ave Xenia Ave Highland Springs Ave 179
Item 4.
Aerial Photograph
City Boundary
12/14/2020 1:12:31 PM 0 0.5 10.25 mi
0 0.8 1.60.4 km
1:36,112
City of Beaumont
180
Item 4.
181
Item 4.
182
Item 4.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Mohlenkamp, Finance Director
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: First Amendment to Contract with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC for
a One-Year Extension through March 1, 2022
Background and Analysis:
On March 18, 2018, the City entered into a three-year contract with Albert A. Webb
Associates. On May 21, 2018, the contract was assigned to Webb Municipal Finance,
LLC (Webb). The contract allows for the parties to engage in two separate one-year
extensions. This contract is included as Attachment A to this report.
Webb services include community facilities district (CFD) administration and special tax
consulting. This includes tabulating the annual assessment, tracking payments for 78
different assessments for the various CFDs and improvement areas, and filing the City’s
annual continuing disclosure reports.
Management has been very satisfied with the timeliness and service level provided by
Webb and desires to implement the first of the one-year extensions. Webb has agreed
and has drafted the first amendment to the contract, which is included in Attachment B.
If approved, this extends the contract to March 1, 2022.
The schedule of assessment and improvement areas and the cost for the one -year
extension is included as Attachment C and is referenced in the amendment. Webb is
not requesting a fee increase for this amendment.
Fiscal Impact:
This contract provides for an annual cost of $195,135. This is covered through
administrative assessments to the various CFDs and improvement areas as part of the
administration cost associated with managing this program. For comparison purposes,
the City paid Webb $199,095 for services provided last year.
183
Item 5.
Recommended Action:
Approve the First Amendment to the contract with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC.
Attachments:
A. Original Contract with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
B. First Amendment to contract with Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
C. Cost schedule including the list of assessments to be managed by Webb
184
Item 5.
185
Item 5.
186
Item 5.
187
Item 5.
188
Item 5.
189
Item 5.
190
Item 5.
191
Item 5.
192
Item 5.
193
Item 5.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (“Amendment”) is made and effective as of the ____, day of January,
2021 by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT (“CITY”), a general law city, and Webb Municipal
Finance, LLC (“CONTRACTOR”). In consideration of the mutual promises and purpose contained
herein, the parties agree as follow:
RECITALS
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purpose that the parties agree
are true and correct:
A. On March 1, 2018 the City and Albert A. Webb Associates (Webb) entered into that
certain agreement entitled Agreement for Professional Services by Independent Contractor (“Agreement”)
for CFD administration services, special tax consultant services and annual CFD financial reporting
services, which remains in effect.
B. On May 21, 2018, the City and Webb assigned the Agreement to Webb Municipal
Finance, LLC (Contractor).
C. Per Section 1 of the Agreement, the Parties now wish to extend the term of the
Agreement for one-year, to terminate on March 1, 2022 unless otherwise extended or terminated.
Contractor has provided a Schedule of Services, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and
incorporated herein by this reference, to extend the term of the Agreement.
AMENDMENT
The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
A. Section 1 Term of Agreement. Term of the Agreement is amended to add the following
paragraph to the end of existing Section 1:
“The term of this Agreement is extended, and the Agreement shall remain in effect until March 1,
2022, unless otherwise terminated or extended.”
B. The recitals to this Amendment are deemed incorporated herein by this reference. All other terms
of the Agreement not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Amendment to be
effective as of the day and year first above-written.
[signatures on following page]
194
Item 5.
SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR (Webb Municipal Finance, LLC)
CITY OF BEAUMONT
Mike Lara
Mayor
ATTEST:
Steve Melhmen,
City Clerk
CONSULTANT:
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
By:
Name:
Title:
195
Item 5.
Count Phase Code Phase Name Phase Budget
1 IA1 CFD 93-1 IA 1 $3,960.00
2 IA2 CFD 93-1 IA 2 $3,960.00
3 IA3 CFD 93-1 IA 3 $3,960.00
4 IA3S CFD 93-1 IA 3 Service $1,145.00
5 IA4 CFD 93-1 IA 4 $3,960.00
6 IA5 CFD 93-1 IA 5 $3,960.00
7 IA6A CFD 93-1 IA 6A $3,960.00
8 IA6A1 CFD 93-1 IA 6A1 $3,960.00
9 IA6A1S CFD 93-1 IA 6A1 Service $1,145.00
10 IA6B CFD 93-1 IA 6B $0.00
11 IA7A1 CFD 93-1 IA 7A1 $3,960.00
12 IA7A1S CFD 93-1 IA 7A1 Service $1,145.00
13 IA7B CFD 93-1 IA 7B $3,960.00
14 IA7BS CFD 93-1 IA 7B Service $1,145.00
15 IA7C CFD 93-1 IA 7C $3,960.00
16 IA7CS CFD 93-1 IA 7C Service $1,145.00
17 IA7D CFD 93-1 IA 7D $3,960.00
18 IA7DS CFD 93-1 IA 7D Service $1,145.00
19 IA8 CFD 93-1 IA 8 $3,960.00
20 IA8S CFD 93-1 IA 8 Service $1,145.00
21 IA8A CFD 93-1 IA 8A $3,960.00
22 IA8AS CFD 93-1 IA 8A Service $1,145.00
23 IA8B CFD 93-1 IA 8B $3,960.00
24 IA8BS CFD 93-1 IA 8B Service $1,145.00
25 IA8C CFD 93-1 IA 8C $3,960.00
26 IA8CS CFD 93-1 IA 8C Service $1,145.00
27 IA8D CFD 93-1 IA 8D $3,960.00
28 IA8DS CFD 93-1 IA 8D Service $1,145.00
29 IA8E CFD 93-1 IA 8E $3,960.00
30 IA8ES CFD 93-1 IA 8E Service $1,145.00
31 IA8F CFD 93-1 IA 8F $3,960.00
32 IA8FS CFD 93-1 IA 8F Service $1,145.00
33 IA9 CFD 93-1 IA 9 $3,960.00
34 IA9S CFD 93-1 IA 9 Service $1,145.00
35 IA10 CFD 93-1 IA 10 $3,960.00
36 IA10S CFD 93-1 IA 10 Service $1,145.00
37 IA11 CFD 93-1 IA 11 $3,960.00
38 IA11S CFD 93-1 IA 11 Service $1,145.00
39 IA12 CFD 93-1 IA 12 $3,960.00
40 IA12S CFD 93-1 IA 12 Service $1,145.00
41 IA13S CFD 93-1 IA 13 Service $1,145.00
42 IA14S CFD 93-1 IA 14 Service $1,145.00
43 IA14 CFD 93-1 IA 14 $3,960.00
44 IA14A CFD 93-1 IA 14A $3,960.00
45 IA14B CFD 93-1 IA 14B $3,960.00
46 IA15S CFD 93-1 IA 15 Service $1,145.00
City of Beaumont FY 2021-2022
EXHIBIT A
196
Item 5.
Count Phase Code Phase Name Phase Budget
City of Beaumont FY 2021-2022
47 IA16 CFD 93-1 IA 16 $3,960.00
48 IA16S CFD 93-1 IA 16 Service $1,145.00
49 IA17A CFD 93-1 IA 17A $3,960.00
50 IA17AS CFD 93-1 IA 17A Service $1,145.00
51 IA17B CFD 93-1 IA 17B $3,960.00
52 IA17BS CFD 93-1 IA 17B Service $1,145.00
53 IA17C CFD 93-1 IA 17C $3,960.00
54 IA17CS CFD 93-1 IA 17C Service $1,145.00
55 IA18 CFD 93-1 IA 18 $3,960.00
56 IA18S CFD 93-1 IA 18 Service $1,145.00
57 IA19A CFD 93-1 IA 19A $3,960.00
58 IA19AS CFD 93-1 IA 19A Service $1,145.00
59 IA19C CFD 93-1 IA 19C $3,960.00
60 IA19CS CFD 93-1 IA 19C Service $1,145.00
61 IA20 CFD 93-1 IA 20 $3,960.00
62 IA20S CFD 93-1 IA 20 Service $1,145.00
63 IA23S CFD 93-1 IA 23 Service $1,145.00
64 16-1 CFD 2016-1 $3,960.00
65 16-1S CFD 2016-1 Service $1,145.00
66 16-2 CFD 2016-2 $3,960.00
67 16-2S CFD 2016-2 Service $1,145.00
68 16-2PS CFD 2016-2 Public Service $1,145.00
69 16-3 CFD 2016-3 $3,960.00
70 16-3S CFD 2016-3 Service $1,145.00
71 16-3PS CFD 2016-3 Public Service $1,145.00
72 16-4 CFD 2016-4 $3,960.00
73 16-4S CFD 2016-4 Service $1,145.00
74 16-4PS CFD 2016-4 Public Service $1,145.00
75 18-1PS CFD 2018-1 Public Service $1,145.00
76 19-1 CFD 2019-1 $3,960.00
77 19-1S CFD 2019-1 Service $1,145.00
78 19-1PS CFD 2019-1 Public Service $1,145.00
Total $195,135.00
197
Item 5.
Staff Report
TO: Mayor, and City Council Members
FROM: Jeff Mohlenkamp, Finance Director
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Approval of Invoice from Riverside County Fire Department for First
Quarter Fire Services
Background and Analysis:
The City of Beaumont maintains a contract with Riverside County Fire Department for
applicable fire protection services that are provided by The California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection (“Cal Fire”). Cal Fire provides an estimate of costs for the
year during the budgeting process, which is evaluated against the actual invoices as
they are received. Invoices are presented to the City on a quarterly basis and are
based on actual costs except for support services which follow the budgeted cost
estimate.
The City has received the invoice for July 1, 2020, through September 30, 2020, in the
amount of $917,453.30. The invoice has been reviewed by staff and is in compliance
with the contract. The invoice summary has been included as Attachment A.
For FY 2021 the City budgeted $4,565,808 for the Cal Fire contract. The invoice for the
first quarter is $917,453.30. This compares favorably with the billing from the same
quarter in FY 2020, which was $952,444.77. It also represents 20% of the overall
budget and is therefore below the budget for the first quarter of service.
Fiscal Impact:
The cost for this contract is included in the budget and the expenditures were within
budget authority for FY 2021. City staff estimates that it costs approximately $195 to
prepare this report.
Recommended Action:
Approve payment of the FY 2021 1st Quarter Fire Services invoice from
Riverside County Fire Department in the amount of $917,453.30.
198
Item 6.
Attachments:
A. FY 2021 First Quarter Fire Services Invoice from Riverside County Fire
Department
199
Item 6.
200
Item 6.
201
Item 6.
202
Item 6.
203
Item 6.
204
Item 6.
205
Item 6.
206
Item 6.
207
Item 6.
208
Item 6.
209
Item 6.
210
Item 6.
211
Item 6.
212
Item 6.
213
Item 6.
214
Item 6.
215
Item 6.
216
Item 6.
217
Item 6.
218
Item 6.
219
Item 6.
220
Item 6.
221
Item 6.
222
Item 6.
223
Item 6.
224
Item 6.
225
Item 6.
226
Item 6.
227
Item 6.
228
Item 6.
229
Item 6.
230
Item 6.
231
Item 6.
232
Item 6.
233
Item 6.
234
Item 6.
235
Item 6.
236
Item 6.
237
Item 6.
238
Item 6.
239
Item 6.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, Community Services Director
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution of the City of Beaumont City Council Approving
Application for the State of California Per Capita Grant Funds
Background and Analysis:
The State of California Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018, commonly referred to as
Proposition 68 (Prop 68), was approved by voters on June 5, 2018. Prop 68 allocates
funds to local governments on a per capita basis for local park rehabilitation, creation,
and improvements. Recipients are encouraged to utilize awards to rehabilitate existing
infrastructure and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to the
outdoors (PRC §80061(b)).
The City of Beaumont’s preliminary allocation is $177,952 and must be programmed for
capital outlay for recreational purposes, either acquisition or development. Funding can
only be used to supplement and not replace existing funding (PRC §80062(d)).
Similarly, if a project has been approved and a funding source has been identified, as in
the case of the adopted capital improvement program, per capita funds cannot be
swapped in as a new funding source unless the prior funding source is applied to other
identified recreational capital projects.
Staff has identified unfunded recreational features within the community and found that
only Three Rings Ranch Park meets the criteria outlined in the grant program, serves a
severely disadvantaged community, and does not require a 20% match. Although
Stewart Park and Rangel Park meet the criteria and serve severely disadvantaged
communities, they currently have authorized funds in the adopted capital improvement
program and would require that the prior funding sources be applied to other identified
recreational capital projects. Additionally, all other parks within the City would require a
20% match since they do not serve a severely disadvantaged community.
Three Rings Ranch Park sits on 6 acres and is included in Community Facilities District
93-1 Improvement Area 3. It is more than 20 years old and in need of several
240
Item 7.
improvements and upgrades, including an updated playground, ballfield improvements,
new tables and benches, and new landscaping.
The first step in the grant process is adoption of the attached City Council resolution
(Attachment A). The authorizing resolution serves two purposes:
1. It is the means by which the City Council agrees to the terms of the contract; it
provides confirmation that the City has the funding to complete, operate and
maintain projects associated with the contract.
2. Designates a position title to represent the City Council on all matters regarding
projects associated with the contract.
The next step in the grant process is identification of one or more projects, submission
of the application packets, and execution of a contract with State of California
Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services. Applications
are due by December 2021, with project completion required by December 2023.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates that it costs approximately $3,900 to prepare this report.
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, “A Resolution of the City Council of
the City of Beaumont, California, Approving Application for Per Capita Grant
Funds,” and
Direct staff to submit an application packet to the State of California naming
Three Rings Ranch Park as the identified project for the Prop 68 Per Capita
grant funds.
241
Item 7.
Attachments:
A. Resolution
B. Current Photos of Three Rings Ranch Park
242
Item 7.
Resolution 2021 - ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPLICATION FOR PER
CAPITA GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the
responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the Per Capita
Grant Program, setting up necessary procedures governing application(s); and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation
require the grantee’s Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application(s)
before submission of said applications to the State; and
WHEREAS, the grantee will enter into a contract(s) with the State of California to complete
project(s);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Beaumont hereby:
1. Approves the filing of project application(s) for Per Capita program grant project(s); and
2. Certifies that said grantee has or will have available, prior to commencement of project
work utilizing Per Capita funding, sufficient funds to complete the project(s); and
3. Certifies that the grantee has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the
project(s), and
4. Certifies that all projects proposed will be consistent with the park and recreation element
of the City of Beaumont’s general or recreation plan (PRC §80063(a)), and
5. Certifies that these funds will be used to supplement, not supplant, local revenues in
existence as of June 5, 2018 (PRC §80062(d)), and
6. Certifies that it will comply with the provisions of §1771.5 of the State Labor Code, and
7. (PRC §80001(b)(8)(A-G)) To the extent practicable, as identified in the “Presidential
Memorandum--Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in Our National Parks, National Forests,
and Other Public Lands and Waters,” dated January 12, 2017, the City of Beaumont will
consider a range of actions that include, but are not limited to, the following:
(A) Conducting active outreach to diverse populations, particularly minority, low-
income, and disabled populations and tribal communities, to increase awareness within
those communities and the public generally about specific programs and opportunities.
(B) Mentoring new environmental, outdoor recreation, and conservation leaders to
increase diverse representation across these areas.
(C) Creating new partnerships with state, local, tribal, private, and nonprofit
organizations to expand access for diverse populations.
243
Item 7.
(D) Identifying and implementing improvements to existing programs to increase
visitation and access by diverse populations, particularly minority, low-income, and
disabled populations and tribal communities.
(E) Expanding the use of multilingual and culturally appropriate materials in public
communications and educational strategies, including through social media strategies, as
appropriate, that target diverse populations.
(F) Developing or expanding coordinated efforts to promote youth engagement and
empowerment, including fostering new partnerships with diversity-serving and youth-
serving organizations, urban areas, and programs.
(G) Identifying possible staff liaisons to diverse populations.
8. Agrees that to the extent practicable, the project(s) will provide workforce education and
training, contractor and job opportunities for disadvantaged communities (PRC
§80001(b)(5)).
9. Certifies that the grantee shall not reduce the amount of funding otherwise available to be
spent on parks or other projects eligible for funds under this division in its jurisdiction. A
one-time allocation of other funding that has been expended for parks or other projects, but
which is not available on an ongoing basis, shall not be considered when calculating a
recipient’s annual expenditures. (PRC §80062(d)).
10. Certifies that the grantee has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions
contained in the contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and
11. Delegates the authority to the City Manager, or designee to conduct all negotiations, sign
and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements,
amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the
grant scope(s); and
12. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules,
regulations and guidelines.
MOVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of January 2021 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
____________________________
Mike Lara, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
244
Item 7.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, Community Services Director
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Approval of the Draft Stewart Park Conceptual Plan - Capital
Improvement Projects P-01 and P-10
Background and Analysis:
On June 2, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-49 adopting a five-year
capital improvement plan (CIP) for fiscal years 2021/2022 through 2024/2025
(Attachment A). In that plan, Stewart Park was programmed to receive $1,145,000 in
community park development impact fees (Project No. P-01) and $250,000 in
community facilities district (CFD) funds (Project No. P-10).
On October 6, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-43 amending the five-
year CIP and allocating an additional $2,000,000 of CFD pay-go funds for the
redevelopment of Stewart Park (Attachment B). The total project funding for Stewart
Park is $3,395,000.
Current Park Facilities and Conditions
Stewart Park stretches across three blocks on approximately 11 acres of land, mostly
open space, with a few park amenities (Figure 1). One third of the park is a detention
basin for storm water runoff from neighboring streets, with overflow of the basin into the
center section, westerly of the pool facility. Two streets divide the park into three
separate park areas.
245
Item 8.
Figure 1
Park amenities consist of a full basketball court, a pool facility, a restroom/concession
stand, a pavilion with a concrete pad for live entertainment, a skate park, two
playgrounds, a baseball diamond, and a small parking lot.
Pool Facility
In the Fall of 2020, the City retained the services of Counsilman-Hunsaker (CH) to
perform a swimming pool assessment and feasibility study of the existing pool facility
located at Stewart Park. The current pool is more than 55 years old and has several
physical and functional issues, including:
Three major leaks have been found in the swimming pool and mechanical
system. CH observed numerous cracks in the pool shell and in the surrounding
deck which points to structural movement of the pool shell.
The current perimeter overflow system and piping does not sufficiently meet
modern industry standards which is for the system to handle 100% of the
recirculation rate as required by the current State Code (3136B) (Figure 2).
The pool’s turnover rate exceeds the State Code requirement by 1.9 hours.
The pool deck is shifting and has numerous cracks surrounding the pool
necessitating a complete replacement (Figure 3).
The depth and slope of the deep end of the pool does not meet the minimum
requirement for the 1-meter diving board.
The children’s pool does not meet the current 2010 Americans with Disabilities
Act standards or the Model Aquatic Health Code standards for secondary
sanitation.
An evaluation has determined that the in -pool lights are not grounded per
National Electrical Code 680 requirements.
Significant corrosion exists in the swimming pool’s mechanical room
necessitating separate chemical rooms for the pool’s sanitizer (calcium
hypochlorite) and the pH buffer (muriatic acid).
246
Item 8.
Attendance has decreased over the past several years with an increasing
general fund subsidy required for summer pool operations.
The shallow portion of the main pool is too deep for young children, inhibiting the
City’s ability to teach swimming lessons.
The pool does not contain easily accessible exits for pool users. Exit stairs are a
key component of modern swimming pool design to ensure the ingress and
egress to the pool is easily manageable for all pool users.
Today’s expectation for an outdoor aquatic facility has drastically changed from
that of 1963, the year in which the current pool was originally built.
While most outdoor family aquatic centers will still incorporate lap lanes, a
competition pool is not essential since Beaumont Unified School District operates
their pool unless there is a large contention of competitive swimmers within the
immediate area.
Children’s areas are typically designed much larger than the existing one at the
Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool and incorporate perimeter seating for adults in
order to allow them to enjoy the experience and closely monitor their children.
Recreational water has taken a more freeform shape as opposed to the
traditional rectangular pools of the 1960s. It is common for these pools to have
multiple zones that include a zero-beach entry, waterslide plunge areas, moving
water such as a current channel or lazy river, inflatable crossing activities and
deep-water amenities such as climbing walls, drop slides and diving boards or
platforms.
Mechanical systems have also been updated to address the requirements set
forth in the Model Aquatic Health Code. These include increased turnover rates
and secondary disinfection systems.
247
Item 8.
Figure 2
248
Item 8.
Figure 3
Options for Consideration
Option 1 – Complete Renovation of Existing Pool – Cost Estimate = $2,066,754
This would include modifications to the existing pool and pool structure, a new stainless-
steel gutter system, and removal of the 1-meter diving board. The existing children’s
pool would be demolished and a new one built in its place. Mechanical system
upgrades would be made to both pools as well as a renovation to the existing
bathhouse.
Option 2 – Pool Replacement – Cost Estimate = $5,500,000
The second option would entail a complete demolition of the existing Beaumont Plunge
Pool and the construction of a new outdoor swimming pool in its place. The new pool
would contain fitness lap lanes, waterslides, and zero-beach entry with children’s area
and an update to the existing bathhouse.
It must be noted that Options 1 and 2 would not be eligible for the use of restricted
funds allocated in the CIP. Alternative sources of funds would be required.
249
Item 8.
Option 3 – New Spraypad – Cost Estimate = $1,100,000
The third option includes the demolition of the existing Beaumont Plunge Pool and
replacing it with a spraypad.
Skate Park
The current skate park is more than 15 years old and is approximately 6,900 square
feet (Figure 4). It is situated between two playgrounds, with only a fence to separate
the facilities. The skate park is concrete with minimal features for skateboard
enthusiasts. Many of the amenities from the original design have been permanently
removed.
Figure 4
Ballfield
The general condition of the ballfield at Stewart Park is fair to poor and has areas of
poor drainage, weeds, and has historically lacked sufficient turf maintenance (Figure 5).
The ballfield lighting is outdated and in need of total replacement, including an electrical
panel upgrade (Figure 6). An ADA accessible route to the spectator area is not
provided (Figure 7).
250
Item 8.
Figure 5
251
Item 8.
Figure 6
252
Item 8.
Figure 7
Pavilion
The pavilion is in fair to poor condition overall (Figure 8). Over a decade ago, several
rooms were constructed on either side of the pavilion to be used by musicians during
concerts. The rooms were constructed with makeshift plywood and they each have
significant maintenance issues, including mold. To the north of the pavilion is a chain
linked area covering additional electrical panels that were installed for overnight parking
during the Cherry Festival and the former concert programs (Figure 9).
253
Item 8.
Figure 8
Figure 9
254
Item 8.
Restroom/Concession Stand
The condition of the restroom and concession stand is relatively good (Figure 10). The
building has a solid brick exterior and the condition of the roof is in fair to good
condition.
Figure 10
Playgrounds
The park’s two playgrounds are on either side of the skateboard park, separated only by
fencing (Figure 11). The tot lot is approximately 2,600 square feet, while the youth lot is
roughly 6,200 square feet (Figure 12). The equipment is outdated and in need of
replacement and spectator seating is minimal.
255
Item 8.
Figure 11
Figure 12
Basketball Courts
The park has two full size basketball courts that are end-to-end. They are in relatively
good condition, needing minimal improvements. These courts are heavily used by
residents during optimal weather conditions.
Ninth and Tenth Streets
Manual swing arm gates were erected more than a decade ago, closing Ninth Street to
through traffic; however, the asphalt from the original street remains (Figure 13). In the
Fall of 2020, City staff retained a traffic engineer to assess the additional closure of
Tenth Street to through traffic. The traffic engineer concluded, “…that the proposed
256
Item 8.
closure of E. 10th Street segment between Orange Avenue and Maple Avenue within
the boundaries of Stewart Park will not have any adverse impact on the mobility, transit
routing, safety and traffic operations of all the study intersections surrounding t he
subject street.”
Figure 13
Proposed Park Improvements – Draft Conceptual Plan
City staff worked with a landscape architect and the City Engineer to design a
conceptual plan of some proposed park improvements, including a ground spray splash
pad, concrete walking trail throughout the length of the park, picnic pavilions throughout
the park, additional playground equipment with shade structures, a gaga ball court,
increased parking facilities, connection of the park across Ninth and Tenth Streets, and
landscaping (Attachment C) (Figure 14).
257
Item 8.
Figure 14
Ground Spray Pad (New)
City staff proposes the removal of the pool facility and construction of a new ground
spray pad (Figure 15). Ground spray pads have several benefits, including significantly
lower maintenance and operating costs, compliance with the American with Disabilities
Act (ADA), safe play environments for the community members thereby reducing
danger to children, which in turn reduces the risk to the managing jurisdiction (Figure
16). Spray pads also offer more of an interactive experience, and in turn, play time and
visits generally last longer. They offer an enhanced integration to open, public spaces
(Figure 17).
The costs to operate a ground spray pad are one-tenth that of an outdoor public
swimming pool, predominately because of the elimination of the need for lifeguards and
other pool staff.
The American with Disabilities Act requires that facilities built or modified after 1992
must be readily accessible by people with disabilities. The proposed ground spray pad
258
Item 8.
ensures that all individuals, regardless of mobility, can participate in water play and
benefit from this new park feature.
Furthermore, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), drowning is a
significant cause of death and injury to children. Splash parks reduce that danger and
provide a more stress-free environment for parents, especially with younger children.
Splash parks can also be used throughout the year, offering more of a return on
investment to the constituents, whereas swimming pools are generally open only during
the traditional 14-week summer of Memorial Day weekend to Labor Day weekend.
The proposed ground spray pad would consist of approximately 17,000 square feet of
flat surface, with a recirculation system, pumphouse, restroom facility and a required
outside shower. Splash pads with recirculating systems are comparable to pools in that
they are equipped with chemicals, filters, and pumps.
Figure 15
259
Item 8.
Figure 17
Figure 16
260
Item 8.
Gaga Ball Court (New)
City staff recommends a gaga ball court be constructed in the area of the current
pavilion (Figure 18). Gaga ball is similar to dodge ball but played in an oct agon shaped
court. It combines several skills including dodging, running, jumping, and coordination
in trying to hit the opponent below the knees with a soft foam ball (Figure 19).
Figure 18
261
Item 8.
Figure 19
Playgrounds (New)
City staff recommends the current playgrounds be demolished and two, new
playgrounds be constructed away from the skate park.
In a 2018, poll conducted by the National Recreation and Park Association, nearly 9 in
10 Americans say that communities should offer all-inclusive play options at
playgrounds. This includes playground equipment that is suitable for children of all
physical and cognitive abilities (Figure 20). An increasingly popular aspect of
playgrounds are multigenerational recreation swings and challenge courses (Figure 21).
262
Item 8.
Figure 20 (Photo courtesy of GameTime.com)
Figure 21
263
Item 8.
Bandshell Area and Multipurpose Field (New)
One of the City’s premier events is the annual four-day Cherry Festival held in June. In
addition to residents, the festival draws thousands of patrons from around Southern
California who enjoy the Cherry Festival parade, carnival, food vendors, with the largest
attraction being the all-day live music. City staff recommends a new bandshell be
constructed with modern sound and lighting equipment, with the grass area as a new
multipurpose field to replace the current baseball field (Figure 22).
Figure 22
By utilizing the grass area north of the bandshell as a multipurpose field, it will allow for
use by more than one sports branch, giving more residents the ability to utilize the open
space at the park. Multipurpose fields allow for any number of sports, including football,
baseball/softball, soccer, rugby, and field hockey.
264
Item 8.
Skate Park (Upgraded)
City staff recommends the current skate park be upgraded and enhanced, with safety
features and modern equipment.
Basketball Court (Improved)
City staff recommends minor improvements to the current basketball courts, including
erosion control around the courts, and replacement of the current backboards and
baskets, and new court markings.
Overall Theme
City staff is recommending that Stewart Park architecture model the elements found in
Spanish Colonial Revival. Modern designs include red-tile roofs, arched passageways
and bright ceramic tile details. A perfect example of this type of architecture can be
found at Riverside’s famous Mission Inn. To compliment those elements, City staff
recommends four archways, one at each corner of the park (Figure 23). These
archways serve to entice residents to enter the park’s grounds and leisurely meander
through the park, enjoying all the many amenities that the park has to offer (Figure 24).
265
Item 8.
Figure 23
Figure 24
266
Item 8.
These improvements will make Stewart Park a destination for families to enjoy and
increase Beaumont’s social capital. It will transition into a true community icon,
increase overall usage of the park, and serve as a major component for the downtown
revitalization.
Fiscal Impact:
The adopted CIP includes Projects P-01 and P-10 allocating $3,395,000 in funding for
Stewart Park improvements.
Recommended Action:
Approve the draft conceptual plan and direct staff to proceed with improving
Stewart Park in accordance with Public Works Contract Code and the Beaumont
Municipal Code.
Attachments:
A. Resolution No. 2020-49
B. Resolution No. 2020-43
C. Draft Stewart Park Conceptual Plan
267
Item 8.
268
Item 8.
269
Item 8.
270
Item 8.
271
Item 8.
272
Item 8.
273
Item 8.
274
Item 8.
275
Item 8.
276
Item 8.
277
Item 8.
278
Item 8.
279
Item 8.
280
Item 8.
281
Item 8.
282
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
City of Beaumont, California
Beaumont Plunge Pool Study
January 2021
283
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Process Overview
The City of Beaumont,California commissioned Counsilman-Hunsaker (CH)to provide a
swimming pool assessment and feasibility study for the Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool.
The purpose of the swimming pool assessment is to identify items that are substandard in
the pools,identify items not to current industry swimming pool design standards,or
equipment not operating as designed,and to assist in defining a course of action regarding
the future of the aquatic facility.
The Pool was opened in 1963 making it 57 years old and it contains a 3,981 square foot
main pool and 500 square foot children’s pool.Counsilman-Hunsaker typically assigns a
30-to-40-year lifespan for an outdoor aquatic facility.The Beaumont Plunge Swimming
Pool has exceeded that lifespan by 17 years.As pools age,they tend to require more
regular care to remain open.Due to restricted budgets,pool operators are often required
to keep their pools operational with small to medium repairs over the course of several
years.For this reason,the City is looking at long-term goals that need to be considered to
maintain an excellent aquatic experience for its residents.
As with other pools built at this same time,they are facing both physical and functional
obsolescence.Physical obsolescence refers to physical issues such as equipment that
needs to be replaced or is not operating as designed.Functional obsolescence describes
the pools meeting the wants and needs of the community and the various aquatic user
groups.Physical obsolescence requires increasing capital budgets on an annual basis due
to repairs the facility needs to keep it operational.Functional obsolescence typically
requires increased annual subsidies from the City’s general fund due to declining
attendance and the inability to charge a sustainable admission fee since the facility does
not have modern aquatic amenities that drive admission prices and guest length of stay.
Review
Existing
Information
Facility Drawings
Prior Studies/Reports
Observations/Goals of City
Conduct
On-Site
Audit of
Facility
Pools and All Equipment
Support Facilities
Code Compliance including ADA Review
Review
Findings
with City
Recommendations for Physical Issue Corrections
Recommendations for Addressing Functional Issues
Cost Implications of Identified Action Plan
Forecasting Remaining Life of Systems
Identification of “fatal flaws” or Major Concerns
284
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Applicable Codes
The state administrative swimming pool code referenced as “California Building Code”in the report is as follows.
California Building Code
Chapter 31B –Public Pools
Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act (VGB)
ASME/ANSI A112.19.81
Signed into Law on December 19,2007
CPSC Staff Interpretation of Section 1404 issued on June 18,2008
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
U.S.C.12101 et seq.
Signed into Law on July 26,1990 (2010 Update)
The administrative code requirements must be satisfied if a major modification of the pool is undertaken or if a particular item or piece of
equipment is in need of repair.The recommended repairs address all administrative code items identified in this report.
285
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Existing Conditions Assessment
286
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool
General Pool Information
Main Pool
Date Opened:1963
Size:3,981 square feet
Number of Gallons:160,000
Depth Range:3 feet to 10 feet
Turnover Rate:350 GPM (7.9 hours)
Children’s Pool
Size:500 square feet
Number of Gallons:5,000
Depth Range:1 ½feet (constant depth)
Turnover Rate:30 GPM (2.77 hours)
287
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Surface
The swimming pool is a concrete structure with a pebble-tec/sheen finish that
was installed in 2014 and a tile perimeter band.Cracking was prevalent in the
pool’s surface near the main drain covers,and in both the shallow and deep
ends on the slope where the pool wall and floor meet.
When structural cracking in a pool occurs,it can be created by many factors
including shifting soils around the perimeter of the pool.Structural failure will
continue until the issue is addressed.Furthermore,structural cracking allows
water (pool or hydrostatic ground water)to penetrate the concrete and reach
the embedded rebar.The result is corroded and eventual failed rebar,further
weakening the pool structure.
Industry experience has shown that Pebbletec pools,if maintained in a wet or
moist condition,will typically have a lifespan of 7 to 10 years.In most cases
achieving a 10-year life on a Pebbletec surface is expected.
Staff report they started finding black mold on the pool’s surface and have
received a quote from a contractor to acid wash the affected areas.
288
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Surface
The City commissioned So-Cal Leak Detections to perform a leak
detection test in April 2020.Three leaks were confirmed during their
analysis.
▪Leak found under slab approximately 2 feet away from return in
pool on far side of diving board
▪Suction leak found in equipment room approximately 5 feet in front
of pump.
▪Plaster crack on shallow end of pool in 3 ½foot area.
289
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Surface
Staff report the 48-hour water loss with the pumps running goes
from the middle of the blue tile to below the first step on stair entry.
Since the pool did not lose as much water without the pumps
running,there is a leak within the pool’s recirculation system.
Staff have not observed the pool water leaking into the adjacent
park,which likely means the leaking pool water is draining below the
pool,which could be destabilizing the soil surrounding the pool
structure.There are limited solutions to soil stabilization after the
pool structures are in place.
Because of these cracks,coupled with the water loss and shifting
deck,it is recommended that the pool shell not be reused if the
facility undergoes a substantial renovation.It is possible to add a
vinyl or fiberglass pool liner to the facility,purely as a band-aid
approach,in order to get the facility 5 more years of operation.
And,while it is impossible to repair significant cracking in the pool
and pool deck,they can be filled with an epoxy injection.However,
with this type of movement,the cracking will reoccur.
290
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Main Drains
There are two (2)24”x 24”square,fiberglass main drain covers located in the deep
end of the main pool.The main drain grates were broken and unsecured at the time
of the site visit.The grates are suction and hair entrapment certified as required by
the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act (VGB),ASME/ANSI A112.19.81.
All main drains with dimensions 18”x 23”or smaller are classified as “blockable”
and must have a VGB stamped and certified “unblockable”grate cover with tamper
proof screws.
The federal regulations of VGB were passed by Congress in 2008 and are designed
to reduce the potential for suction and hair entrapment in commercial swimming
pools at all suction outlets (e.g.main drains,skimmer equalizer lines,etc.).The
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)is tasked with Federally enforcing all
VGB regulations,but due to the vast number of commercial swimming pools in the
United States,enforcement most commonly is the responsibility of the local
governing agencies (e.g.public health departments,building departments,etc.).
Staff should confirm when the grates were last replaced to ensure it is still within
the stipulated time frame.New grates will be necessary if the pool is brought back
into operation.
291
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Competition Pool
ADA Accessibility
The ADA Act requires that a swimming pool with a perimeter that is
less than 300’to have at least one accessible means of entry,provided
that the primary accessible means of entry is an ADA compliant
swimming pool lift or ADA compliant swimming pool ramp with
handrails.The secondary means of access can be either a ramp,lift or
compliant stair entry.The main pool’s size necessitates one means of
entry which is met with the ADA lift that is on-site.The lift will need to
be installed adjacent to the pool if the pool is brought back into
operation.
292
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Diving
According to Section 3313B:Diving Boards and Platforms,the following
are required for diving boards.
▪Diving boards shall be anchored to the pool deck,constructed of
corrosion resistant material,designed and constructed to be easily
cleanable and finished with a durable slip resistant material.
▪Diving boards greater than 18 inches in height above the deck shall
be provided with a ladder or stairs for access.Handrails shall be
provided at all ladders and stairs leading to diving boards more than
1 meter above the water.Diving boards over 1 meter above the
water shall have guard rails on both sides of the diving board that
extend to a point director above the water’s edge.
▪Dimensions and clearances for the use of diving boards shall
conform to those shown in Figures 31B-1 and 31B-2.Diving boards
shall conform to the USA Diving Rules and Codes,Part 1,Subpart A
and Appendix B.
293
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Diving
Through Counsilman-Hunsaker’s analysis of the existing deep
end of the Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool,the following
has been determined:
▪The depth of the diving well does not meet the minimum
standards stipulated by the State Code.With a depth of
10 feet,the depth fails the standards by 18 inches.
▪The existing slope of the pool floor does not meet the
standards stipulated by the State Code.As shown in the
picture to the right,the white line denotes the existing
pool floor and slope while the red line represents the
depth and slope required by the State Code.The pool
does not meet the slope or the depth requirement.
294
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Perimeter Overflow
The pool has a tiled,concrete gutter overflow system that allows for
continuous surface skimming around the perimeter of the pool.The
gutter system is in poor condition with noticeable cracks in the
concrete and in the connecting coping stone.
The State Code and current industry standards stipulate that overflow
gutters shall be capable of continuously removing no less than 100%
of the recirculated water,which is not met with the current flow rate
and gutter capacity.
A new perimeter overflow system would require a surge tank to be
constructed equal to at least 1 gallon per square foot of pool surface
area.Solutions exist to install a stainless-steel gutter system on this
type of pool by cutting the top off the pool’s perimeter and installing
the gutter system.The installation of this gutter system would bring
the pool’s perimeter overflow system up to code.
Staff reported the perimeter return piping was replaced within the
past 10 years by the City’s grounds maintenance staff.
Based on the location of the scum line in the pictures to the right,it
appears the gutters might not have been properly draining when the
pool was last in operation.If the water level in the gutters is above
the tile lip,then the gutters are not functioning properly.
295
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Deck
Cracking is evident in the pool deck around the entire
perimeter of the pool.Some of the cracks span 10 feet or
longer.Staff reported that they have observed water
bubbling under the cracks in the deck and when the pool is
filled,there is often standing water behind the diving board.
While the facility does meet the California Building Code
requirement of maintaining a minimum deck width of four (4)
feet around the pool perimeter,due to the condition of the
deck,a full replacement is recommended during a future
renovation.
296
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Mechanical System
297
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Mechanical
A single 10-horsepower Marathon pump is provided on the recirculation
system that is under direct suction from the main drains.The pump and
motor both display significant signs of corrosion.The GPM rating for
the pump and the horsepower for the motor were not verified by
nameplate during the site visit.A strainer is provided for the pump as
required by the State Code.
The main drain and skimmer combine to a 6-inch PVC schedule 80 pipe
in the mechanical room that is routed through the required skimmer
basket (3125B.4)and to the high-rate sand filters.The filtered water is
routed back to the pool via a single,6-inch pipe (pressure).A flow
meter was observed as required by 3125B.3.
The California Building Code,Chapter 3124B requires that public pools
be turned over at a minimum rate of six hours.The pool was empty
during the site visit,so the mechanical system was not observed as
operational.Based on the size of the pool’s suction piping at the
current flow rate of 350GPM,the 160,000-gallon pool is turned over
every 7.9 hours,which exceeds the current code requirement.The
minimum flow rate for the swimming pool to achieve the required 6-
hour turnover is 461 GPM.
298
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Mechanical
The pool contains two (2)Eko-3 Systems high-rate sand filters that were
installed in 2014.With 16.5 square feet of filter area,the filters are each
rated for a flow rate of 247 GPM,giving them an overall capacity for 494
GPM at 15 gallons per minute per square foot,which is the industry
standard.The pool’s flow rate of 350GPM is within this rating.
The horizontal filter tanks did not have any noticeable defects and staff
reported they were functional during the 2019 summer season when the
pool was last opened.Staff reported the gaskets and connectors behind
the filter gauges are constantly leaking.
CH typically assigns a lifespan of 15-20 years to pool filters and related
mechanical equipment.Since the pool filters are only 6 years old,CH
would expect them to last another 10+years for the operation of the
pool.
299
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Mechanical
The pool is controlled by an BECSys 3 chemical controller.The
chemical controller automatically adds sanitizer from the
Pulsar 4 system,or muriatic acid as the pH buffer,as necessary
to minimize the peaks and valleys common when the chemical
feed is controlled manually.The controller was installed
within the past few years and is in good working condition.It
is appropriate for this type of usage and could be reused in a
future renovation.
300
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Mechanical
The pools are sanitized with calcium hypochlorite (tablet chlorine)via
a Pulsar erosion feeder system and use muriatic acid as a pH buffer.
The sodium hypochlorite and muriatic acid for the swimming pool are
located in the main pool mechanical room.
Corrosion was evident on several items within the mechanical space,
including the following:
▪Electrical panel
▪Water heater
▪Electrical conduit
▪Electrical box for the Pulsar switch
This is most likely due to the presence of the muriatic acid feeder that
is located within the mechanical room.A separate,dedicated and
ventilated chemical storage room for both the sanitizer and pH buffer
is recommended and is the current industry standard.During a future
renovation,these separate mechanical rooms could be included.In
an ideal setting these two would be in their own separate,ventilated
spaces.
301
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Pool Mechanical
A variable frequency drive is not installed on the
circulation system.A variable-frequency drive (VFD)is a
system for controlling the rotational speed of an
alternating current (AC)electric motor by controlling the
frequency of the electrical power supplied to the motor.
VFDs should be considered on any future mechanical
system upgrades.
VFD Example
302
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Children’s Pool
303
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Children’s Pool
▪The children’s pool is in fair condition overall but does not meet the
current expectations for a children’s area at an outdoor aquatic facility.
The pool holds approximately 5,600 gallons which would necessitate a
flow rate of 85 gallons per minute to reach a one-hour turnover rate as
required by the State Code.
▪Noticeable cracking is evident in the pool’s coping stone and there are
areas that do not contain any grout along the expansion joints.Missing
tiles from the perimeter tile band were also observed.
▪The pool is not compliant with the current ADA Standards for swimming
pools (2010)and would need to add an entry ramp with compliant
handrails in order to meet the current ADA requirements.
▪The main drain grate is compliant with the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and
Spa Safety Act (VGB)but has a lifespan that is noted at 5 years.Staff
should confirm when the grate was last replaced to ensure it is still within
the stipulated time frame.Since the pool contains only one main drain,a
Safety Vacuum Release System (SVRS)system is necessary to protect users
against suction entrapment.
304
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Children’s Pool
▪The pool’s mechanical system contains a Triton Sand Filter,BecSys 2 chemical
controller and a Pulsar 1 unit for the calcium hypochlorite sanitizer.The muriatic
acid and calcium hypochlorite feeders are both located in the mechanical shed
and have caused corrosion on some of the surrounding equipment.This is
especially noticeable on the pool pump motor and electrical outlet.
▪The children’s pool does not have a mechanical system that meets industry design
standards since it does not contain an Ultraviolet Treatment (UV)System on the
pool (picture –bottom right)to provide secondary sanitation.UV has been shown
to be highly effective against chlorine resistant pathogens like Cryptosporidium
and Giardia;as well as the vast majority of bacteria,viruses,yeast,and mold.
▪According to the Model Aquatic Health Code,“Due to the risk of outbreaks of
RWIs associated with the DISINFECTANT tolerant parasite Cryptosporidium,it is
strongly recommended that all AQUATIC FACILITIES include SECONDARY
DISINFECTION SYSTEMS to minimize the risk to the public associated with these
outbreaks.”
UV System Example
305
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Children’s Pool
▪The pool contains a single main drain with two (2)return inlets on the west
side of the pool and a single skimmer box on the east side of the pool.With
2-inch schedule 40 pressure piping that is rated for 105 GPM at 10 feet per
second,the piping can handle the flow rate necessary to meet the required
one-hour turnover rate.
▪The single skimmer suction piping cannot handle the full recirculation flow
rate for the children’s pool.Assuming the maximum flow rate of 63 GPM the
pool would need a 3-inch pipe to handle this flow.
▪The tot pool does not meet the modern definition of a children’s pool
because it lacks a zero-beach entry,children’s play features,tot slides,etc.If
the facility undergoes a future renovation,it is recommended that this area
be replaced with a modern tot pool or interactive spraypad.
306
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Assessment Summary
307
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Assessment Summary
The Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool has several physical and functional issues that are notated below.Due to these issues,it is the opinion of
Counsilman-Hunsaker that the pool has exceeded its expected lifespan and the City should consider options for renovation or replacement.
▪Three major leaks have been found in the swimming pool and mechanical system.CH observed numerous cracks in the pool shell and in the
surrounding deck,which points to structural movement of the pool shell.
▪The current perimeter overflow system and piping does not sufficiently meet modern industry standards,which is for the system to handle
100%of the recirculation rate as required by the current State Code (3136B).
▪The pool’s turnover rate exceeds the State Code requirement by 1.9 hours.
▪The pool deck is shifting and has numerous cracks surrounding the pool necessitating a complete replacement.
▪The depth and slope of the deep end of the pool does not meet the minimum requirement for the 1-meter diving board.
▪The children’s pool does not meet the current 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act standards or the Model Aquatic Health Code standards
for secondary sanitation.
▪An evaluation has determined that the in-pool lights are not grounded per NEC 680 requirements.
▪Significant corrosion exists in the swimming pool’s mechanical room necessitating separate chemical rooms for the pool’s sanitizer (calcium
hypochlorite)and the pH buffer (muriatic acid).
308
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Assessment Summary
▪The Beaumont Plunge Swimming pool has seen decreased attendance over the past several years with an increasing general fund subsidy for the summer
pool operations.
▪The shallow portion of the main pool is still too deep for young children,inhibiting the City’s ability to teach swimming lessons.
▪The pool does not contain easily accessible exits for pool users.Exit stairs are a key component of modern swimming pool design to ensure the ingress and
egress to the pool is easily manageable for all pool users.
▪Today’s expectation for an outdoor aquatic facility has drastically changed from that of 1963.
▪While most outdoor family aquatic centers will still incorporate lap lanes,a competition pool is not essential since the School District operates a competitive
pool for their swimming programs.Likewise,there is not a large contention of competitive swimmers within the immediate area who have requested the
City to build a competition pool.
▪Children’s areas are designed much larger than the existing one at the Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool and incorporate perimeter seating for adults in
order to enjoy the experience and to closely monitor their children.
▪Recreational water has taken a more freeform shape as opposed to the traditional rectangular pools of the 1960s.It’s common for these pools to have
multiple zones that include a zero-beach entry,waterslide plunge areas,moving water such as a current channel or lazy river,inflatable crossing activities
and deep-water amenities such as climbing walls,drop slides and diving boards or platforms.
▪Mechanical systems have also been updated to address the requirements set forth in the Model Aquatic Health Code.These include increased turnover
rates and secondary disinfection systems.
309
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Market Overview
310
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Total City
Population Growth Rate
30-Minute Drive
Time Population Growth Rate
Demographics Dashboard
43,106 3.02%
1,052,155 1.35%
Market Area Maps
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%Age 0-4Age 5-9Age 10-14Age 15-19Age 20-24Age 25-29Age 30-34Age 35-39Age 40-44Age 45-49Age 50-54Age 55-59Age 60-64Age 65-69Age 70-74Age 75-79Age 80-84Age 85+Market Area
Age Distribution
National Average Beaumont, CA
$46,000
$48,000
$50,000
$52,000
$54,000
$56,000
$58,000
0 to 5
Minutes
5-10
Minutes
10-15
Minutes
15-30
Minutes
Market Area Income
Natl Average Beaumont, CA
Beaumont
Demographics
▪Above average number of adults with
ages ranging 30 to 39 and children 0
to 14 reside within the City of
Beaumont.
▪The local area to Stewart Park has
below average household income
(95%);areas 5 to 15 minutes away are
slightly above the national average
(106%).
▪Both the City of Beaumont and the
30-minute drive time market have
increasing population growth.
311
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Area Swimming Pools
Beaumont Plunge, Beaumont, CA City of Banning Repplier Park
Aquatic Center; Banning, CA
12 minutes, 5.8 miles from site
Yucaipa City Swimming Pool;
Yucaipa, CA
17 minutes, 10.6 miles from site
Riverside Aquatics Complex;
Riverside, CA
34 minutes, 27 miles from site
Arlington Park Pool; Riverside, CA
37 minutes, 32.6 miles from site
Islander Park Pool; Riverside, CA
26 minutes, 21.9 miles from site
Sippy Woodhead / Bobby Bonds
Pool, Riverside, CA
31 minutes, 24.2 miles from site
Lancer Aquatic Center CBU;
Riverside, CA
37 minutes, 31.3 miles from site
312
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Area Swimming Pools
Shamel Park Pool, Riverside, CA
33 minutes, 28.6 miles from site
Canyon Crest Country Club,
Riverside, CA
29 minutes, 22.7 miles from site
24 Hour Fitness, Riverside, CA
34 minutes, 29.5 miles from site
Hunt Park Pool; Riverside, CA
38 minutes, 32.1 miles from site
LA Fitness Arlington Ave, Riverside,
CA
34 minutes, 28.6 miles from site
UCR Student Recreation Center,
Riverside, CA
28 minutes, 23.4 miles from site
Riverside Community College,
Riverside, CA
32 minutes, 26.9 miles from site
The Cove Waterpark Camino Real,
Riverside, CA
35 minutes, 30.2 miles from site
313
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Area Swimming Pools
Rialto Fitness and Aquatic Center,
Rialto, CA
30 minutes, 27.8 miles from site
24 Hour Fitness, Rialto, CA
36 minutes, 34.1 miles from site
DVL Aquatic Center Valley-Wide
Recreation, Hemet, CA
30 minutes, 17.9 miles from site
LA Fitness, Hemet, CA
22 minutes, 14.1 miles from site
DropZone Waterpark, Perris, CA
36 minutes, 24.9 miles from site
Palm Springs Swim Center, Palm
Springs, CA
34 minutes, 30.8 miles from site
Crafton Hills College Aquatics
Center, Yucaipa, CA
18 minutes, 12.1 miles from site
Fifth Avenue Swim Club, Redlands, CA
18 minutes, 14.5 miles from site
314
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Area Swimming Pools
Yucaipa Regional Park Swim Complex,
Yucaipa, CA
22 minutes, 14.2 miles from site
University of Redlands, Thompson
Aquatic Center, Redlands, CA
20 minutes, 16.1 miles from site
Jerry Lewis Family Swim Center, San
Bernardino, CA
30 minutes, 27.4 miles from site
YMCA of the East Valley, Redlands, CA
20 minutes, 15.9 miles from site
Tom Sawyer Swimming Pool, Rialto,
CA
30 minutes, 27.8 miles from site
Grand Terrace High School
Swimming Pool, Grand Terrace, CA
31 minutes, 27.8 miles from site
John W. North High School
Swimming Pool, Riverside, CA
28 minutes, 23.6 miles from site
UC Riverside -Glen Mor Pool,
Riverside, CA
28 minutes, 22.2 miles from site
315
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Area Swimming Pools Number Facility
1 Beaumont Plunge
2 City of Banning Repplier Park Aquatic Center
3 Yucaipa City Swimming Pool
4 Riverside Aquatics Complex
5 Arlington Park Public Pool
6 Islander Park Pool
7 Sippy Woodhead / Bobby Bonds Pool
8 Lancer Aquatic Center –CBU
9 Shamel Park Pool
10 Canyon Crest Country Club
11 24 Hour Fitness Madison St.
12 Hunt Park
13 LA Fitness Arlington Ave.
14 UCR Student Recreation Center
15 Cesar E. Chavez Community Center
16 Riverside Community College
17 The Cove Waterpark Camino Real
18 Rialto Fitness and Aquatic Center
19 24 Hour Fitness Rialto
20 Diamond Valley Lake Aquatic Center
21 LA Fitness Hemet
22 DropZone Waterpark
23 Palm Springs Swim Center
24 Crafton Hills College Aquatics Center
25 Fifth Avenue Swim Club
26 Yucaipa Regional Park Swim Complex
27 University of Redlands Thompson Aquatic Center
28 Jerry Lewis Family Swim Center
29 YMCA of the East Valley
30 Tom Sawyer Swimming Pool
31 Grand Terrace High School Swimming Pool
32 John W. North High School Swimming Pool
316
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Options for Consideration
317
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Options for Consideration
▪The first option consists of a complete renovation of
the existing Beaumont Plunge Pool.This would include
modifications to the existing pool and pool structure,a
new stainless steel gutter system,and removal of the
1-meter diving board.The existing children’s pool
would be demolished and a new one built in its place.
Mechanical system upgrades would be made to both
pools,as well as a renovation to the existing
bathhouse.
▪The second option would entail a complete demolition
of the existing Beaumont Plunge Pool and the
construction of a new outdoor swimming pool in its
place.The new pool would contain fitness lap lanes,
waterslides,a zero-beach entry with a children’s area
and an update to the existing bathhouse.
▪The third option includes the demolition of the existing
Beaumont Plunge Pool and replacing it with a
spraypad.
318
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Beaumont Plunge Renovation
▪Renovation of existing Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool
▪Removal of diving board
▪Inclusion of shallow water floatables
▪New children’s pool
▪Spray features
▪ADA accessible
▪Renovation of existing bathhouse and support spaces
319
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Beaumont Plunge Renovation
▪Renovation of existing Beaumont
Plunge Swimming Pool
▪Removal of diving board
▪Inclusion of shallow water
floatables
▪New children’s pool
▪Spray features
▪ADA accessible
▪Renovation of existing bathhouse
and support spaces
*PRELIMINARY Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 11/17/2020
ITEM COST
Beaumont Plunge Swimming Pool $655,631.05
Deck Equipment $32,833.33
Loose Equipment $555.56
Maintenance Equipment $7,694.44
Safety Equipment $3,450.00
Existing Bathhouse Renovation $898,937.50
Children's Pool $320,617.46
Contingency (Design / Construction)$70,016.44
Project Fees (Design, Surveys, Permitting)$77,018.08
Project Total $2,066,753.87
Beaumont, California
320
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Beaumont Plunge Replacement
▪Demolition of existing swimming pool and children’s
pool
▪New 5,000 SF outdoor aquatic center
▪Zero depth entry with spray features
▪Fitness lap lanes
▪Waterslide
▪Renovation of existing support spaces
▪Mechanical room
▪Locker rooms
▪Office
▪Storage
321
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Beaumont Plunge Replacement
▪Demolition of existing swimming
pool and children’s pool
▪New 5,000 SF outdoor aquatic
center
▪Zero depth entry with spray
features
▪Fitness lap lanes
▪Waterslide
▪Renovation of existing support
spaces
▪Mechanical room
▪Locker rooms
▪Office
▪Storage
Description Unit Amount Cost per Unit Opinion of Cost Opinion of Cost
Support Spaces 3,785 238 $898,938 $898,938
Existing Building Renovation Sq. Ft.3,785 238 $898,938
Outdoor Aquatic Center 15,286 165 $2,524,101 $2,524,101
Outdoor Leisure Pool Sq. Ft.5,091 333 $1,695,303
Spray Features Allowance 2 50,000 $100,000
Crossing Activity Allowance 1 50,000 $50,000
Climbing Wall Allowance 1 50,000 $50,000
Waterslide Tower Allowance 1 200,000 $200,000
Waterslide Mechanical Allowance 1 50,000 $50,000
Shade Structures Qty.4 10,000 $40,000
Shade Pavillion Qty.1 20,000 $20,000
Outdoor Deck Sq. Ft.10,184 15 $152,760
Overhead Lighting Sq. Ft.15,286 8 $122,288
Fencing Linear Ft.500 88 $43,750
Unit Sq. Ft.Cost Opinion of Cost Opinion of Cost
Total Building Construction Costs 19,371 $180 3,479,289 3,479,289
Demolition Allowance 1 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
Site Construction Costs (demolition, parking, landscaping, utilities, walks)$484,275 $484,275
..
Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment $117,000 $117,000
Subtotal $4,280,564 $4,280,564
Escalation Allowance (1 year)5.0%$214,028 $214,028
Contingency (Design / Construction)10.0%$449,459 $449,459
Design Fees, Surveys, Permitting 10.0%$494,405 $494,405
Opinion of Probable Cost $5,438,456 $5,438,456
Total Estimated Project Costs:$281 $5,438,456 $5,500,000
Estimate Current as of:11/17/2020
OPINION OF PROJECT COST: Option 2
Source: Counsilman-Hunsaker
322
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Beaumont Plunge Replacement
323
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
New Spraypad
▪New 2,100 SF spraypad with sequencing features and lighting
▪Perimeter concrete deck
▪Shade Pavilions
▪Access walkways from sidewalks and streets
324
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
New Spraypad
▪New 2,100 SF spraypad with
sequencing features and lighting
▪Perimeter concrete deck
▪Shade Pavilions
▪Access walkways from sidewalks
and streets
Description Unit Amount Cost per Unit Opinion of Cost Opinion of Cost
Outdoor Aquatic Center 6,905 88 $608,775 $608,775
Spraypad Sq. Ft.2,100 163 $341,250
Features Allowance 1 100,000 $100,000
Outdoor Pool Mechanical Enclosure Sq. Ft.600 50 $30,000
Shade Structures Qty.4 10,000 $40,000
Outdoor Deck Sq. Ft.4,200 15 $63,000
Overhead Lighting Sq. Ft.6,905 5 $34,525
Unit Sq. Ft.Cost Opinion of Cost Opinion of Cost
Total Building Construction Costs 6,905 $88 608,775 608,775
Demolition Allowance $0 $0
Site Construction Costs (parking, landscaping, utilities, walks)$172,625 $172,625
..
Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment $21,000 $21,000
Subtotal $802,400 $802,400
Escalation Allowance (1 year)5.0%$40,120 $40,120
Contingency (Design / Construction)10.0%$84,252 $84,252
Design Fees, Surveys, Permitting 10.0%$92,677 $92,677
Opinion of Probable Cost $1,019,449 $1,019,449
Total Estimated Project Costs:$148 $1,019,449 $1,100,000
Estimate Current as of:11/17/2020
OPINION OF PROJECT COST: Option 3
Source: Counsilman-Hunsaker
325
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
New Spraypad
326
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
New Spraypad
327
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Operational Analysis
328
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Operational Analysis Overview
The revenue analysis for the swimming pool and spraypad options include special user group usage and facility
per capita spending trends,developing an opinion of revenue for the first five years of operation.Programming
revenue is based on user groups and local programming fees.The fee structure is based on fees from season
passes and other users to project a per capita income.Revenue is estimated,taking recommended fee schedules
into account and current market rates and utilization figures.
The expense analysis includes a detailed budget model for estimating probable expenses for major areas of labor,
contractual services,commodities,and utilities.User projections are made based on programming.Expenses are
estimated taking into account hours of operation,attendance projections,local weather patterns,local utility
rates,and other key items.
329
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Expense Budget Existing Pool New Outdoor Pool Spraypad
Facility Staff
Full Time Employment Not Included Not Included
Part-Time Management $15,120 $0
Lifeguard Personel $120,960 $0
Front Desk Personnel $7,140 $0
Personnel Equipment Cost $1,333 $0
Training $5,000 $0
Total Labor $149,553 $0
Direct Facility Expenses
Insurance Not Included Not Included
Repair and Maintenance $13,600 $2,600
Credit Card Fees $2,444 $0
Operating Supplies $8,160 $1,560
Chemicals $7,020 $2,468
Advertising $3,500 $0
Direct Expenses $34,724 $6,628
Utilities
HVAC $9,970 $0
Electricity $35,290 $13,886
Pool Heating $11,895 $2,063
Data/Communications $0 $0
Trash Service $0 $0
Water & Sewer $11,982 $8,598
Total Utilities $69,136 $24,548
Programs
Program Supplies $5,419 $0
LG Class Materials $666 $0
Food and Beverage $4,744 $0
Part-Time Program Staff $10,711 $0
Total Programs $21,540 $0
Total Operating Expenses $0 $274,952 $31,176
Capital Replacement Fund $0 $27,200 $5,100
Total Expense $0 $302,152 $36,276
Direct Facility Expense Budget
Existing Budget330
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
New Aquatic Facility Revenue
(Option 2)
▪Daily admissions / memberships
▪Swim team revenue
▪Program revenue
▪Food and beverage
▪Rentals
$97,239
$0
$21,421
$7,907
$8,900
Revenue Streams
Daily Admissions / Memberships
Swim Team Revenue
Aquatics Instruction Revenue
Food and Beverage
Rentals
331
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Total Capital Cost
Total Attendance
Operating Cashflow
Cost Recovery
($139,485)
49%
Aquatic Facility Financial Dashboard (Option 2)
$5,500,000
35,940 $0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
1 2 3 4 5
$135,467 $139,338 $155,599 $158,551 $169,672
Annual Revenue
$149,553
$34,724
$69,136
$21,540
Expense Budget Breakdown
Total Labor Direct Expenses
Total Utilities Total Programs
332
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Total Capital Cost
Total Attendance
Operating Cashflow
Cost Recovery
0%
Aquatic Facility Financial Dashboard (Option 3)
$1,100,000
29,856
($31,176)
$0
$0
$0
$1
$1
$1
1 2 3 4 5
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Annual Revenue
$0
$6,628
$24,548
$0
Expense Budget Breakdown
Total Labor
Direct Expenses
Total Utilities
333
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
Options Summary
Total Capital Cost Total Revenue Total Expense Cost Recovery
Total Capital Cost Total Revenue Total Expense Cost Recovery
Total Capital Cost Total Revenue Total Expense Cost Recovery
New
Outdoor
Pool $5,500,000 $135,467 $274,952 49%
Spraypad $1,100,000 $0 $31,176 0%
Summary Dashboard
Existing
Pool $2,066,754 $10,403 $61,150 17%
334
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
General Limiting Conditions
This study is based on information that was current as of January 2021.Every reasonable effort has been made in
order that the data reflects the most timely and current information possible and is believed to be reliable.This
study is based on estimates,assumptions,and other information developed by the consultant from independent
research.
No warranty or representation is made by the consultant that any of the projected values or results contained in
this study will actually be achieved.No responsibility is assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by the client,its
agents,and representatives or any other data source used in preparing or presenting this study.
This entire report is qualified and should be considered in light of the above conditions and limitations.
335
Item 8.
AUDIT STUDY DESIGN OPERATE WEB -APPS COUNSILMANHUNSAKER.COM
City of Beaumont, California
Beaumont Plunge Pool Study
January 2021
336
Item 8.
337Item 8.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Todd Parton, City Manger
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: Direction to City Staff Regarding the Launch of the Second Round of
Beaumont Small Business Assistance Grant Program (BAP)
Background and Analysis:
In August 2020, the City Council launched the City of Beaumont Small Business
Assistance Grant Program (BAP) to provide $3,000 in one-time grants to qualified small
businesses that could demonstrate business losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
City Council allocated $142,069 for this program. Applications were solicited from
September 1 through September 15, 2020, and awards to successful applicants made
in October 2020. A total of 24 grants were deemed qualified and $72,000 awarded
leaving a balance of $70,069 in the program.
The general concept for the BAP was to grant $3,000 to businesses with staffs of 15 or
fewer full-time employees who could demonstrate COVID-19 related losses since March
1, 2020. They were required to have a physical store front, office space, or other
physical location within the City and excluded home-based businesses. Applicants
were also required to have valid business licenses. Grant funds were restricted to direct
costs of the business such as payroll, supply purchases, rent payments, loan payments,
etc. It was established that, should qualified grant application requests exceed the
program funds of $142,000, a drawing would be conducted to distribute the funds.
Priority was also be given to allocating funds to businesses that had not received
financial support through other programs even though such support would not disqualify
an applicant (funds would be first allocated to businesses that have not received such
financial assistance).
With the initial launch of the BAP, the City Council contemplated launching a second
call for grants should a balance of funds remain available after the first call.
Approximately half of the original program funds remain unallocated and local
businesses are still feeling significant impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic; therefore,
338
Item 9.
this item is being presented for City Council discussion and direction regarding the
implementation of a second round of the BAP.
Should the City Council decide to launch a second round, City staff recommends that
the program remain unchanged except as follows:
1. First preference be given to those qualified businesses that did not receive a
BAP grant in the first round,
2. Second preference be given to the Beaumont Area Chamber of Commerce, and
3. Final preference be given to those qualified businesses that received a BAP
grant in the first round.
City staff anticipates that the first call for grant applications would run from February 1
through February 19 with grant awards being disseminated after March 1, 2021.
Fiscal Impact:
City estimates that preparation of this report cost approximately $375.
Recommended Action:
City staff is looking for City Council direction to launch a second round of the
Beaumont Small Business Assistance Grant Program (BAP).
Attachments:
A. Beaumont Small Business Assistance Grant Program Application
B. Beaumont Small Business Assistance Grant Program Agreement
339
Item 9.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
Business Assistance Program
Small Business Assistance Grant Agreement
This Business Assistance Program Small Business Assistance Grant Agreement (“Agreement”) is
between the City of Beaumont, a political subdivision of the State of California (“City”), and
__________________________________________, a business licensed to operate within the City of
Beaumont (“Business”).
1. Overview:
a. Purpose – The City of Beaumont Business Assistance Program (“Grant Program”)
provides financial assistance to City-based small businesses impacted by the
COVID-19 pandemic.
b. Program Funding – The Beaumont City Council has agreed to appropriate from
the City’s General Fund an amount not to exceed $142,009 which is to be utilized
to provide financial assistance to certain, qualified small businesses within the
City.
c. Grant Amount – Pursuant to this Agreement, the City will disburse $3,000 to the
Business (“Grant”).
d. Grant Use – Grant awards must be applied toward direct expenses of the Business
related to payroll and payroll related expenses, equipment purchases/repairs,
supply purchases, rent/mortgage payments, or loan payments.
e. Grant Disbursement – The City will disburse the Grant to the Business within ten
(10) business days after all the following have been completed:
i. Grant application has received final approval,
ii. All parties have signed this Agreement, and
iii. All required information has been provided to the City.
f. Grant Term – This Agreement will take effect on the execution date and terminate
on February 1, 2021 (“Grant Term”).
g. Final Report –
i. By January 31, 2021 (“Reporting Deadline”), the Business must provide the
City with a Final Report on the operational status of the Business, the
number of current employees as of the date of the report, and an
accounting of the use of the Grant as of December 31, 2020. The Business
must submit a hard copy of the report on a form provided by the City
with wet signatures.
ii. As an attachment to the Final Report, the Business must provide
documentation of its reported Grant use, such as expense receipts and
340
Item 9.
Page 2 of 5
payroll filings for the period cover the Effective Date through December
31, 2020.
h. Repayment of Grant Funds –
i. Should Business fail to use the Grant as required by Section 1d., then
Business must repay $3,000 to the City by the end of the business day of
February 28, 2021.
ii. Should the Business cease operations prior to the end of the Grant Term,
Business must notify the City immediately and must complete the Final
Report and repay any unused portion of the Grant to the City within thirty
(30) calendar days of the business closure.
iii. Should ownership of Business be sold or transferred prior to the end of
the Grant Term, Business must notify City immediately and must complete
the Final Report and repay any unused portion of the Grant to the City
within ten (10) calendar days of the business transfer of ownership.
i. Retention of Financial Records – All financial records related to the receipt and
the use of Grant funds must be retained by the Business for a period of not less
than five (5) years from the termination of the Grant Term and must make said
records available to the City of Beaumont immediately upon written request of
the City Manager or his/her designee.
2. General Provisions:
a. Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties – Formal notices,
demands, and communications between the parties shall be given by (i) personal
service; (ii) reputable document delivery service, such as Federal Express, with a
receipt showing date and time of delivery; or (iii) certified or first-class United
States mail, postage prepaid, with a receipt showing date and time of delivery to:
To the City: City Manager
City of Beaumont
550 East Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
To the Business: ___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Attn.: _____________________________________________________
Email: _____________________________________________________
Written notices, demands, and communications shall be sent in the same manner
to other addresses that any party designates in writing.
341
Item 9.
Page 3 of 5
b. Entire Agreement; Amendments – This Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement among the parties as to the Grant and may not be amended or
modified, except in writing signed by each of the parties. Business may not assign
or transfer its rights and interests in this Agreement to any other person,
business, or entity.
c. No Third-Party Beneficiaries – This Agreement is not intended to create any rights
or benefits for a person or entity who is not a party, whether as a third-party
beneficiary or otherwise.
d. Governing Laws; Venue – This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
State of California. Any legal action related to the performance or interpretation
of this Agreement shall be filed only in the Superior Court of the State of
California located in Riverside, California, and the parties waive any provision of
law providing for a change of venue to another location. In the event any
provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless
continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
e. Severability – If any term of this Agreement is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the other provisions will remain
in force to the extent practicable and taking into consideration the purposes of
this Agreement.
f. Interpretation – The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with the meaning of the language used and not for or against any party by
reason of authorship or any other rule of construction that might otherwise
apply. The Section headings are for purposes of convenience only and shall not
be construed to limit or extend the meaning of this Agreement.
g. Determinations; Disbursements –
i. Any determination by the City Manager, or his/her designee, of fulfillment
or non-fulfillment of the terms of this Agreement by Business shall be
binding on City. City may request such determinations by the City
Manager as necessary.
ii. City shall have no responsibility to disburse any funds beyond the amount
that the City Council has itself allocated for the purpose of the Grant
Program.
h. Non-Liability of Officials, Employees, and Agents – No member, official,
employee, or agent of the City or of the Business shall be personally liable to the
Business in the event of any default or breach by the City Council or by the City
or for any amount that may become due to the Business or its successors or
assigns under the terms of this Agreement.
342
Item 9.
Page 4 of 5
i. Attorney’s Fees – Each party shall pay its own attorney’s fees.
j. Business Day Convention – If the date of any required action falls upon a
weekend day or a holiday when the City is not open for business, the required
action may be deferred to the next business day.
k. Force Majeure – No party will be held responsible for failing to perform its
responsibilities under this Agreement if the failure results from any act of nature
or other cause that is beyond the reasonable control of the party and that makes
performance impossible or illegal.
l. Confidentiality – Unless otherwise required by acceptable law or regulation, the
City will use best efforts to keep all reports and other information submitted by
the Business as confidential and will not make such information available publicly,
except that the City (i) will include a list of all businesses that received Grants and
the individual grant amounts, (ii) may report to the City Council the Business’s
reported information concerning the operational status of the Business and
aggregate job data on jobs, tax and revenue data of all businesses that received
Grants. Business shall identify any such records by clearly labeling each document
with the asserted privilege, such as confidential or trade secret, to notify City
when an such privileges are to be asserted by the Business.
m. Counterparts – This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall be one and the
same instrument. A facsimile, pdf copy or other electronic signature (i.e.
Docusign) of this Agreement, when signed in compliance with this Section, is an
enforceable, original Agreement for all purposes.
n. Dispute Resolution – In the event that an issue regarding or arising under this
Agreement cannot be resolved by the parties, the issue will be brought to the
City Council for final decision.
o. Non-Discrimination – The Business will not discriminate against any individual
with regard to employment or participation or in any other manner for reasons of
race, color, religion, gender or gender identification, sexual identity, pregnancy,
childbirth or related medical conditions, national origin, marital status, disability,
or any other characteristic that is protected by local, state, or federal law.
p. Administration – The City Council, by a vote of the majority of its duly elected
membership, is the only authorized City representatives who may at any time, by
written order, alter this Agreement. The City manager, or his/her designee, shall
administer this Agreement on behalf of the City.
343
Item 9.
Page 5 of 5
DISCLAIMER: THIS DOES NOT CREATE A BINDING CONTRACT UNTIL THE BUSINESS HAS BEEN
APPROVED AND SELECTED FOR THE GRANT FUNDING. THIS IS ONLY A CONDITIONAL
ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT APPLICATION. GRANT AWARD IS CONTINGENT UPON
VERIFICATION OF ALL INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT,
APPROVAL AND SELECTION OF THE APPLICATION BY THE CITY, AND CONFIRMATION TO THE
APPLICANT THAT THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN SELECTED FOR GRANT FUNDING.
Business:
By:_____________________________________________________ Date:__________________________
City of Beaumont, California:
By:_____________________________________________________ Date:__________________________
Rey Santos, Mayor
344
Item 9.
BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Small Business Assistance Grant
Date Submitted: ___________________________________
Business Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________
Type of Business: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Physical Business Address: __________________________________________________________________________
Business Phone: ____________________________ Email: ________________________________________________
BUSINESS OWNERSHIP
Name of Owner: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Address of Owner: __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
Owner Phone: _______________________________ Email: ________________________________________________
QUESTIONS
Please reply to each question below. By providing an affirmative response to any of these
questions you signify that you can verify the corresponding information for the City of Beaumont
Business Assistance Program.
What is the current status of your business?
Open – no restrictions
Open with restrictions
Closed
Please explain: __________________________________________________________________________________
What date was the business established? ___________________________________________________________
What date did the business establish a physical location within Beaumont? _______________________
Does the business have a valid Beaumont Business License? Yes No
Is the business in good standing with the City of Beaumont?
(No outstanding code violations, compliance orders, etc.) Yes No
Did the business have fewer than 15 employees as of March 1, 2020? Yes No
How many full-time employees does the business have as of the date of the application? __________
345
Item 9.
Page 2 of 2
Since March 2020, has the business received assistance from any other County, State, or Federal
program? Yes No
If yes, please explain: ________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Can verification be provided that demonstrates the business was negatively impacted by the
coronavirus pandemic? Yes No
If yes, please explain: ________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Is the business home-based? Yes No
Is the business engaged in any illegal activities, the adult entertainment, gambling, or cannabis
industries? Yes No
What are the sources of revenue for the business? __________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Is the business willing to participate in the City of Beaumont Safe Business Pledge Program?
(Information on the program is available at BeaumontCa.gov/Pledge) Yes No
Is the business willing to complete a Grant Agreement with the City of Beaumont obligating the
use of the grant funds for the intended purpose? (An executed copy of the agreement is required with this
application.) Yes No
APPLICATION CERTIFICATION
I declare that I am the owner of the business applying for this grant. I have read the foregoing
City of Beaumont Business Assistance Program Small Business Assistance Grant Application and
understand the questions and requirements. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. I acknowledge that the completion
of this application does not in any way indicate eligibility or approval. I acknowledge that, due to
the limited funds available for the program, some qualifying applications including this one may
not be funded.
Name: ________________________________________________ Title: _______________________________________
Signature: ________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________
346
Item 9.
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Todd Parton, City Manager
DATE January 19, 2021
SUBJECT: COVID-19 Update by City Staff
Background and Analysis:
City staff will provide a status report to the City Council regarding the current status of
the COVID-19 pandemic. This report will be comprehensive in nature and will cover the
following topics:
1. Existing Riverside County data to include the number of COVID -19 cases,
COVID-19 deaths, COVID-19 general hospitalizations, COVID-19 ICU patients,
and ICU availability;
2. Status of Riverside County COVID-19 vaccination program; and
3. Status of legal challenges to the State’s COVID-19 restrictions and requirements.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been extremely fluid with data and trends, regulatory
requirements, and vaccine programming changing daily. The information provided in
this report represents the information available at the time of this report. Sources of
information are from the Riverside County Public Health Department, Riverside County
Emergency Management Department, and the State of California. Much of the data is
reported on a County-wide basis, however, Riverside County does break out some
limited data on a supervisory district basis. It should also be noted that there are some
minor discrepancies in the various sources of data due to the timing by which such data
is reported. For example, California data is typically reported one to two days earlier
than Riverside County data so there are some slight variations.
Riverside County Public Health reports that, as of January 12, 2021, the City of
Beaumont had confirmed cases of COVID-19 infections of 4,809 with 41 COVID-19
related deaths. The data also shows that 2,971 individuals have recovered. In other
words, 61.8% of those infected have fully recovered while 0.9% of those infected have
passed away.
347
Item 10.
Data shown for Supervisory District 5 is dated January 10, 2021. This data shows that
COVID-19 hospitalizations and ICU patients have remained very constant from January
4 – 10, 2021. Confirmed hospitalizations on January 4 were 373 and were 394 on
January 10 while ICU occupancy was 84 and 80 respectively. This report also shows
that the overall positivity rate of infection (since the inception of the pandemic) is 15.7%
and the weekly positivity rate is 27.2%. Attachment A contains District 5 data.
The table below contains County-wide information.
Riverside County
COVID-19 Data
Date Cases
Increase
from
Last
Report
Deaths Recoveries
COVID
Patients
Not ICU
ICU
Patients
ICU
Capacity
Available
10/1/2020 59,488 556 1,226 54,404 NA NA NA
10/8/2020 61,416 1,928 1,248 55,809 NA NA NA
10/15/2020 63,125 1,709 1,269 57,173 NA NA NA
10/22/2020 65,386 2,261 1,279 58,602 NA NA NA
10/29/2020 67,552 2,166 1,306 60,490 NA NA NA
11/5/2020 70,309 2,757 1,331 62,260 NA NA NA
11/12/2020 73,541 3,232 1,355 64,200 NA NA NA
11/19/2020 78,009 4,468 1,396 65,427 NA NA NA
11/24/2020 80,971 2,962 1,417 66,283 NA NA NA
12/3/2020 86,797 5,826 1,457 67,974 NA NA NA
12/7/2020 92,272 5,475 1,488 68,939 700 146 21.5%
12/10/2020 111,053 18,781 1,551 69,676 775 171 7.9%
12/14/2020 119,691 8,638 1,586 70,814 901 169 4.2%
12/17/2020 132,818 12,153 1,708 71,539 NA NA NA
12/21/2020 150,422 17,604 1,753 73,498 1,239 229 0.0%
12/23/2020 156,834 6,412 1,805 74,448 1,322 247 0.0%
12/28/2020 174,477 17,463 1,870 110,736 1,367 282 0.0%
12/30/2020 180,537 6,060 1,951 114,480 1,484 297 0.0%
1/4/2021 198,236 17,699 2,096 131,588 1,543 330 0.0%
1/6/2021 203,957 5,721 2,151 132,570 1,611 343 0.0%
1/8/2020 207,841 3,884 2,218 134,691 1,648 370 0.0%
1/11/2021 216,275 8,434 2,250 145,380 NA NA NA
1/13/2020 230,600 14,235 2,307 149,686 1,636 363 0.0%
SOURCE: Riverside County, Emergency Management Department.
348
Item 10.
Governor Newsom has established protocols to be used in determining the level to
which business and related activities are to be curtailed. Protocols are evaluated on a
County-wide basis and restrictions implemented on a County-by-County basis. One of
the most critical data points is ICU capacity. When ICU capacity drops to 15%
restrictions are tightened. Conversely, when ICU capacity grows greater than 15%
restrictions are lessened. Restrictions are adjusted in real time, often within several
days of ICU capacity shifts. The State provides a dashboard showing hospitalization
and ICU capacity. The table below is the State’s ICU capacity data for Riverside
County, dated January 12, 2021.
State of California
Riverside County ICU Capacity – January 12, 2021
The State’s ICU data shows that capacity has steadily declined over the past 6 months.
Area hospitals have been reporting that they are at capacity since mid to late December
2020.
Riverside County has recently launched a COVID-19 vaccination program. County
officials are implementing a plan to vaccinate 2.1 million residents as exp editiously as
possible. Five vaccination clinics have been established throughout the County to serve
certain individuals who are deemed to be critical (i.e. medical workers, first responders,
food and agriculture workers) and those who are 65 and older. Qualified individuals may
349
Item 10.
make an appointment for a vaccine on-line and no walk-in patients will be served. At
this time, it is not known when vaccines will be made available to the general public.
Information regarding the Riverside County vaccination program is available at
www.ruhealth.org/covid-19-vaccine.
As stated, City staff will provide a full report to the City Council with the most recent
information available on January 19, 2021.
Fiscal Impact:
City estimates that preparation of this report cost approximately $2,150.
Recommended Action:
City staff recommends that the City Council receive the report and provide
direction.
Attachments:
A. Riverside County District 5 – Weekly COVID-19 Report
B. Riverside County COVID-19 Vaccination Infographic
350
Item 10.
J a n 4, 2021 - Jan 10, 2021 ▼
D ISTRICT FIVE - WE E KLY CO VID-19 REPORT
COVID-19 Cases by Week
COVID-19 Da ily ICU/Hospitalizations
Con rmed ICU Con rmed Hospit alizations
Jan 4
Jan 5
Jan 6
Jan 7
J an 8
Ja n 9
Ja n 10
0
100
200
300
400
84 84 88 85 89 87 80
373 389 394 383 390 395 394
COVID-19 Testing
0 5K 1 0K 1 5 K 20K 25K
Mo reno Valley
Perris
Menifee
Beaumo nt
Banning
Nuevo
Calimesa
Inc arc erated
Cherry Valley
Cabazon
Lakeview
Ro moland
24,3 5 1
10,0 1 6
6,545
4,3 9 7
2 ,299
7 5 1
7 0 5
435
345
220
182
179
0 5 0 100 1 5 0 200
Mo reno Valley
Perris
Menifee
Banning
Beaumo nt
Calimesa
Cherry Valley
Nuevo
Romoland
Cabazon
Incarcerated
Lakeview
178
104
74
42
38
7
7
5
2
1
1
1
Total Incarcerated Cases Total Cases
4/20 - 4/265/1 1 - 5/1 76 /1 - 6/76/22 - 6/28
7/1 3 - 7/1 98/3 - 8/98/24 - 8/30
9/14 - 9/2010/5 - 10/1 110/26 - 1 1/111 /16 - 1 1/2212/7 - 12/1 31 2/28 - 1/30
2K
4K
6K
9 4 10 2 8 21 1 2 0 4 3 2 7 17 15 5 20 1 3 2 3 6 2 4 2 1 5 0 5 0 27 10 27 13 70 4 1 3221168178177202190241355
694
1,0319891,2731,1011,015823608565450354303295313342464454443541648921
1,275
2,171
2,588
4,325
5,476
6,261
4,958
5,727
2,676
5,727
NEW WEEKLY CAS ES
474
TOTAL DEATHS
19
NEW WEEKLY DEATHS
30.3
DOUBL ING TIME
51,784
Total Deaths by City/Community
TOTAL CASES
( 7-day average)
770.3 27.2%15.7%26,050378,923
Total
Tests
Positivity Rate
(Overall)
Positivity Rate
(Weekly)
New Tests
(Weekly)
Total Tests
per Capita
*Totals do not include cases with missing geograph ic locations
*C ities/Commun ities with p opu lation s less than 2 ,0 00 are n ot inclu ded
*Weekly C ase/Death cou n ts re ect previou s w eek's data as current w eek's case/d eath counts
are prelimin ary an d subject to ch ange.
*Does not include incarcerated populations. Testing totals and calculations include repeat testers.
*New Week ly Tests/Weekly Positivity Rates are based on previous week as tests may tak e 3-5 days to result
Incarcerated = 436 Incarcerated = 1 Incarcerated = 1 Incarcerated = 0 *Does not include incarcerated
Total Cases by City/Community
*Most recent week's data is preliminary and subject to change*
*Includes 7-day lag *Includes 7-day lag
(tes ts /1,000 people)
351
Item 10.
352
Item 10.
Beaumont City Council
COVID-19 City Staff Report
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING | 1/19/2021
1
353
Item 10.
`Presentation INFORMATION
•Riverside County Trends
o October 1, 2020 thru January 18, 2021
o COVID-19 Cases vs. Recoveries
o COVID-19 Deaths
o Hospital Capacity
•Riverside County –District 5 Status
o Snapshot –January 10, 2021
•Operation RivCo Shield
o Riverside County Vaccination Program
•Legal Review –Legal Challenge to State COVID-19 Restrictions
o San Bernardino County Lawsuit Against Governor Newsom
2
354
Item 10.
`Riverside County Trends
3
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
10/1/202010/8/202010/15/202010/22/202010/29/202011/5/202011/12/202011/19/202011/26/202012/3/202012/10/202012/17/202012/24/202012/31/20201/7/20211/14/2021Riverside County
COVID-19 Cases vs. Recoveries -10/1/2020 to 1/18/2021
Cases Recoveries
355
Item 10.
`Riverside County TRENDS
4
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
10/1/202010/8/202010/15/202010/22/202010/29/202011/5/202011/12/202011/19/202011/26/202012/3/202012/10/202012/17/202012/24/202012/31/20201/7/20211/14/2021Riverside County
COVID-19 Deaths -10/1/2020 to 1/18/2021
Deaths
356
Item 10.
`Riverside County TRENDS
5
SOURCE:State of California, January 15, 2021
357
Item 10.
`Riverside County TRENDS
6
358
Item 10.
`District 5 STATUS
7
359
Item 10.
`Riverside County VACCINATIONS
•Operation RivCO Shield
o County-wide vaccination effort (Phased)
o Vaccinate 2.1 million people
o Vaccination Centers throughout
Riverside County
•Who Gets Vaccinated?
o Phases 1A and 1B
o General population 65+ years of age
o Appointments Required
o www.RUHealth.org/covid-19-vaccine
•Current Vaccination Levels
o 210,575 Doses Allocated
o 157,775 Doses Received
8
360
Item 10.
`Legal Challenges STATUS
9
Update on Recent Litigation Challenging
COVID-19 Restrictions
361
Item 10.
`Sources of INFORMATION
10
GENERAL COVID-19 INFORMATION:
www.rivcoph.org/coronavirus
COVID-19 VACCINATION INFORMATION
& SCHEDULING APPOINTMENT:
www.ruhealth.org/covid-19-vaccine
362
Item 10.
City Council discussion and direction
to City Manager and City Attorney.
11
363
Item 10.
364
Item 11.
365
Item 11.
366
Item 11.
367
Item 11.
368
Item 11.
369
Item 11.
370
Item 11.
371
Item 11.
372
Item 11.
373
Item 11.
374
Item 11.
375
Item 11.
376
Item 11.
377
Item 11.
378
Item 11.
379
Item 11.