Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2005-10-17e 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PRAYER a. Councilman Mike Harvey 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. ROLL CALL 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Preliminmy and Final PUD Plan for 1414 West Main Street i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-84 (Brown) Passed as Ord. 13952 b. Zoning ofAnnexation for 1241 Highway 179 i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-85 (Ferguson) Passed as Ord 13953 C. Zoning of Voluntary Annexation for 2606, 2708 and 2712 Briawood Drive i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-86 (Ferguson) Passed, as Substituted, as Ord 13954 d. Zoning of Voluntary Annexation for 2607 West Edgewood Drive i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-87 (Ferguson) Passed as Ord. 13955 6 MINUTES & REPORTS RECEIVED AND FILED a. Transportation & Traffic Commission, September 8, 2005 b. CAMPO Technical Committee, September 1, 2005 C. Board ofAdjustrnent, September 13, 2005 d. September 2005 Finance Reports e. Historic Preservation Commission, September 13, 2005 f. Parks & Recreation Commission, September 12, 2005 g. Council Growth & Annexation Committee, September 27, 2004; January 31, Februmy 15, and Februay 28, 2005 h. Human Relations Commission, September 13, 2005 7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF OTHER UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS a. Citizen Input: Most Important Attributes of an Effective City Administrator b. Public Input Sessions Regarding Conference Center 9. APPOINTMENTS BY THE MAYOR City Council Agenda Recap- October 17, 2005 Page 2 10. PRESENTATIONS FROM STAFF, CONSULTANTS & INVITED GUESTS a. Jack Dillingham, Financial Advisor for Sewer Revenue Bond b. Mark Johnson & Jim Vossen - Loan Program. for Older Buildings C. Jason Vanderfeltz, MoDOT - Ciomiew /Route 50 Interchange 11. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE GALLERY - All individuals will be limited to 5 minutes without exception. Allpresentations shall be madef-onz thepodium unless other accommodation is requested and granted a. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PRESENTATIONS 13. CONSENT AGENDA u Approved a. Minutes of Council Meetings: September 29 Brown Bag, October 3 Pre -Meeting and Regular Meeting b. (RENEWAL -Year 2) Legislative ConsultantAgreement with Thomas P. Rockers Consulting, LLC C. (RENEWAL - Year 2) Sole Source Procurement - Digital 911 system Maintenance, Police Dept. d. (RENEWAL) Property and Liability Insurance 14. BILLS INTRODUCED a. 2005-95 Amending Code to Prohibit Parking on Portions ofLinn Street (Schnitzler) b. 2005-96 Enacting Jefferson City Neighborhood Reinvestment Act, Part II (Berry) C. 2005-97 Authorizing Contract to Construct Interchange at Cityview (Harvey & Ferguson) d. 2005-98 Annexation of Highway 179 Area and Placing Issue on February and April 2006 Ballots (BROWN, Layton; Beny, Martin, Ferguson, Crane, Harvey, Schnitzler, Vogel, and Pope) 15. BILLS PENDING a. 2005-83 Establishing 2005 Election Filing Period and 2006 Election Dates (Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel) Passed as Ord. 13951 b. 2005-84 Preliminary and Final PUD Plan for 1414 West Main Street (Brown) Passed as Ord. 13952 C. 2005-85 Voluntary Annexation,for 1241 Highway 179 (Ferguson) Passed as Ord. 13953 d. 2005-86 VoluntaryArznexationfor2606,2708and2712BriaiwoodDrive(Ferguson)Passed, as Substituted, as Ord. 13954 e. 2005-87 Volurnmy Annexation for 2607 West Edgewood Drive (Ferguson) Passed as Ord 13955 f. 2005-88 Authorizing Agreement with Water District No. 2 (BrolVn) Placed on bzforrnal Calendar g. 2005-89 Amending the Code Pertaining to Transit Charter Fares and Services (Ferguson) Passed as Ord. 13956 h. 2005-90 Authorizing Agreement with Stadium West Properties, LLC for Chriso, Lane A Cin, Council Agenda Recap- October 17, 2005 Page 3 Extension (Martin) Passed as Ord 13957 i. 2005-91 Vacating Portion of Sanitary Sewer Easement on Lots 3, 4, and 5 of CC rest Subdivision, Section 2 (Martin) Passed as Ord 13958 j. 2005-92 Amending Flexible Benefits Plan (Broom) Passed as Ord. 13959 Ic. 2005-93 Authorizing Agreement with Unimerica for Group Life Insurance (Brown) Passed as Ord 13960 1. 2005-94 Authorizing Sale of Sewerage System Revenue Bonds Series 2005C (Brown) Substitute Bill No. 2 in Packet - Substitute Passed, As Amended, as Ord. 13961 a. 2005-78 Renaming Man Drive to Modern Drive (Brown) Dies 11 -21 -Remains on Informal Calendar 17. RESOLUTIONS 18. SCHEDULED REPORTS a. Dec. 5 — Report on Progress of Building Appearance Committee (Melva Fast & Janice McMillan) 19. NEW BUSINESS 20. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 21. GO INTO CLOSED SESSION u -N' No Reportable Actions Taken Pursuant to Sec. 610.021 ofthe Revised Statutes of Missouri, The Council will go into Closed Session to discuss the following: a. Personnel [Sec. 610.02](3)] .. NOTICE OF MEETING AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, October 17, 2005 6:00 P.M. CRY COUNCIL CHAMBERS -JOHN G. CHRIST MUNICIPAL BUILDING -320 E. MCCARTY STRECT M1 I� i fP 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PRAYER a. Councilman Mike Harvey 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. ROLL CALL 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Preliminary and Final PUD Plan for 1414 West Main Street i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-84 (Brown) b. Zoning ofAnneeation for 1241 Highway 179 i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-85 (Ferguson) C. Zoning of Voluntary Annexation for 2606, 2708 and 2712 Briarwood Drive --- i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-86 (Ferguson) d. Zoning of Voluntary Annexation for 2607 West Edgewood Drive i. Associated Pending Bill 2005-87 (Ferguson) 6 MINUTES & REPORTS RECEIVED AND FILED a. Transportation & Trak Commission, September 8, 2005 b. CAMPO Technical Committee, September 1, 2005 C. Board ofAdjustment, September 13, 2005 d. September 2005 Finance Reports e. Historic Preservation Commission, September 13, 2005 f. Parks & Recreation Commission, September 12, 2005 g. Council Growth & Annexation Committee, September 27, 2004; January 31, Februmy 15, and Febriuvy 28, 2005 h. Hunan Relations Commission, September 13, 2005 7. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS S. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF OTHER UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS a. Citizen Input: Most Important Attributes of an Effective CiglAdministrator b. Public Input Sessions Regarding Conference Center 9. APPOINTMENTS BY THE MAYOR a. Appointments to City Boards and Commissions: City Council Meeting - October 17, 2005 Page 2 Board Person I Type I Ward Tern: Expires Term Status Trans & Traffic replace Eighmey who resigned June 2006 partial Hunan Relations Commission Stu Murphy Oct 2008 2"d fidl term TIF replace A. Reichard who moved out of town Apr 2008 partial Library Ivan Turner March 2008 2"d fidl term Library Norma Miller March 2008 Is`fudl term Econ Dev Advisory Board Lany Schepers Oct 2008 2" d term Econ Dev Advisory Board Donna Wlzite Oct 2008 2"d term Econ Dev Advisory Board Curtis Creagh Oct 2008 Ist fill term Econ Dev Advisory Board Bill Gratz Oct 2008 2"d term Econ Dev Advisory Board Chris Wrigley Oct 2008 ]". fidl teen Historic Preservation Laura Ward Dec 2008 served 1 fidl teen Historic Preservation Dottie Dallmeyer Dec 2008 served 2 fill terms Historic Preservation Tom Rynard Dec 2008 served ]fid/ teen Plumbing Board Richard Grothoff Dec 2008 served I full term Plumbing Board Rick Enke Dec 2008 served 1 fidl term Plumbing Board James Schmitz Dec 2008 served 2 fudl terms Phmrbin Board Jerry Rosslan Dec. 2008 serving partial tern,, 1"r fidl tern 10. PRESENTATIONS FROM STAFF, CONSULTANTS & INVITED GUESTS a. Jack Dillingham, Financial Advisor for Sewer Revenue Bond b. Mark Johnson & Tim Vossen - Loan Program for Older Buildings C. Jason TIandeifeltz,MoDOT-Cityview/Route 50Interchange 11. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE GALLERY - All individuals will be limited to 5 minutes without exception. All presentations shall be made firom the podium unless other accommodation is requested and granted a. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PRESENTATIONS City Council Meering - October 17, 2005 Page 3 13. CONSENT AGENDA r' a. MinittesofCouncilMeetirtgs: September29Bro%lnBag, October3Pre-Meetirhga7idRegula7-Meetiiig b. (RENEWAL - Year 2) Legislative Consultant Agreement with Thomas P. Rockers Consulting, LLC C. (RENEWAL - Year 2) Sole Source Procurement - Digital 911 system Maintenance, Police Dept. d. (RENEWAL) Property and Liability Insurance 14. BILLS INTRODUCED a. 2005-95 Amending Code to Prohibit Parking on Portions of Linn Street (Schnitzler) b. 2005-96 Enacting Jefferson City Neighborhood Reinvestment Act, Part II (Berry) C. 2005-97 Authorizing Contract to Construct Interchange at Cityview (Harvey & Ferguson) d. 2005-98 Annexation of Highway 179Area and PlacingIssue on February and Apri12006Ballots (BROWN, Layton, Berry, Martin, Ferguson, Crane, Harvey, Schnitzler, Vogel, and Pope) 15. BILLS PENDING a. 2005-83 Establishing 2005 Election Filing Period and 2006 Election Dates (Beny, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel) b. 2005-84 Preliminary and Final PUD Plan for 1414 West Main Street (Brown) C. 2005-85 Voluntary Annexation for 1241 Highway 179 (Ferguson) d. 2005-86 Voluntary Annexation for 2606, 2708 and 2712 Brianvood Drive (Ferguson) e. 2005-87 Voluntary Annexation for 2607 West Edgewood Drive (Ferguson) f 2005-88 Authorizing Agreement with Jfater District No. 2 (Brown) g. 2005-89 Amending the Code Pertaining to Transit Charter Fares and Services (Ferguson) h. 2005-90 Authorizing Agreement with Stadium West Properties, LLC for Chrisol Lane Extension (Martin) i. 2005-91 Vacating Portion of Sanitary Sewer Easement on Lots 3, 4, and 5 of CC Yijest Subdivision, Section 2 (Martin) j. 2005-92 Amending Flexible Benefits Plan (Brown) k. 2005-93 Authorizing Agreement with Unimerica for Group Life Insurance (Brown) 1. 2005-94 Authorizing Sale of Sewerage System Revenue Bonds Series 2005C (Brown) Substitute Bill No. 2 in Packet 16. INFORMAL CALENDAR a. 2005-78 Renaming Dcon Drive to Modern Drive (Brown) Dies 11-21 17. RESOLUTIONS 18. SCHEDULED REPORTS a. Dec. 5—ReportonProgress ofBuilding Appearance Committee (Melva Fast &Janice McMillan) 19. NEW BUSINESS 20. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 21. GO INTO CLOSED SESSION Pursuant to Sec. 610.021 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, The Council will go into Closed Session to discuss the following: a. Personnel [Sec. 610.02](3)] WORK SESSION of the CITY COUNCIL City of Jefferson, Missouri October 17, 2005 5:45 P.M. John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty Main Conference Room AGENDA 1. Discussion of October 17, 2005 City Council Meeting Agenda Items 2. Adjournment City of Jefferson John Landwehr Mayor NOTICE OF MEETING & TENTATIVE AGENDA CITY COUNCIL "BROWN BAG" WORK SESSION City of Jefferson, Missouri Friday, October 14, 2005 12:00 Noon John G. Christy Municipal Building - 320 E. McCarty Boone / Bancroft Room TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Discussion of October 17, 2005 City Council Meeting Agenda Items 2. Public Hearings a. Voluntary Annexation of 1241 Highway 179 b. Voluntary Annexation of 2606, 2708, 2712 Briarwood Drive C. Voluntary Annexation of 2607 W Edgewood Drive 3. Adjournment PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 1414 West Main Street Preliminary and Final PUD Plan The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public hearing on Monday. October 17, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider a Preliminary and Final PUD Plan for a 14.69 acre tract as described herein for the following property: Section 1. Property Location and Description is 1414 West Main Street: Beginning at a point on the north line of Main Street, 518.4 feet east of the west line of said quarter section, said point of beginning also being the southeast corner of a tract of land that John A. Meyer bought of Jennie Jenkins on April 12, 1923, as recorded in Book 57, Page 329, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence from said point of beginning north parallel to the west line of said quarter section to a point that stands 245.5 feet north of the north line of Main Street and 518.2 feet east of the west boundary line of said quarter section; thence easterly, parallel with Main Street; 251.4 feet; thence North 85 Degrees East, (magnetic) 63 feet; thence North 5 Degrees West, 880 feet more or less to the southerly right-of-way line of the Missouri Pacific Railway; thence westerly along and with said right-of-way line to the northeast corner of Tract II of a deed of record in Book 423, Page 977, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence southerly, along the easterly boundary of Tract II of said deed of record in Book 423, Page 977, 658 feet, more or less to the southeasterly corner thereof and said corner being the northeasterly corner of a tract described by deed of record in Book 303, Page 519, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence along the boundary of said tract described in Book 303, Page 519, the following courses: South parallel with the line of the west side of the southeast quarter of said Section 1, to a comer on the easterly boundary of said tract described in Book 303, Page 519; thence South 88 % Degrees East, 2.45 chains; thence south, parallel with the line on the west side of the southeast quarter of said Section 1, 7 chains to the north line of main street; thence leaving the boundary of said tract described in Book 303, Page 519, east along and with the north line of Main Street, 169 links to the point of beginning. Containing approximately 14.69 acres. Section 2. The Preliminary and Final PUD Plan prepared by Central Missouri Professional Services, Jefferson City, Missouri, on file as Case No . P05039 in the Office of the City's Planning Division is hereby approved for the property described in Section 1. Section 3. The following principal land uses are approved for the site: Multi -family dwellings and other uses allowed in the PUD, Planned Unit Development district. Section 4. Common Areas and Public Land. No common areas are proposed and no lands are dedicated to public use with this PUD Plan. Phyllis Powell, City Clerk City of Jefferson, Missouri P.T. - Friday, September 30, 2005 Department of Community Development/Planning Division 320 East McCarty Street, Room 120 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan (573)634-6475 Fax(573)634-6457 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Zoning Plan for 1241 Highway 179 The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public a hearing on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider a zoning plan of RU, Rural Use for the following -described land proposed for voluntary annexation by petition of the property owner, containing approximately 9.3 acres, described as follows: Part of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 28, Township 45 North, Range 12 West, Cole County, Missouri more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Section 28; thence North 2 degrees 16 minutes east along the Section line, 961 feet to the center of the Missouri Pacific Railroad tracks; thence along the center of said railroad tracks on the following courses and distances: North 69 degrees 49 minutes west, 417.38 feet; thence North 71 degrees 40 minutes west, 292.6 feet; thence North 76 degrees 20 minutes west, 76.6 feet; thence leaving the center of said railroad tracks, South 10 degrees 00 minutes east, 183 feet, more or less, to the center of Gray's Creek, thence along the center of said creek on the following courses and distances: North 36 degrees 19 minutes east, 74.5 feet; thence South 78 degrees 27 minutes east, 242.33 feet; thence South 61 degrees 57 minutes east, 303.33 feet; thence South 3 degrees 49 minutes west, 610 feet; thence South 28 degrees 12 minutes east, 380.01 feet to the south line of said Section 28; thence leaving the center of Gray's Creek, South 87 degrees 26 minutes east along the Section line, 225 feet to the beginning point of this description. Containing 9.3 acres more or less. EXCEPT that part which lies within the Missouri Pacific Railroad right of way. Phyllis Powell, City Clerk City of Jefferson, Missouri P.T. - Friday, September 30, 2005 Department of Community Development/Planning Division 320 East McCarty Street, Room 120 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan Phone (573) 634-6475 Fax (573) 634-6457 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Zoning Plan for 2708 and 2712 Briarwood Drive The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public a hearing on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider a zoning plan of RS -1 Residential Low Density Detached for the following -described properties proposed for voluntary annexation by petition of the property owner, containing approximately 0.67 acres, described as follows: Property Description for 2708 Briarwood Drive: Lot 25, Fainwood 3` Additional Subdivision, per plat of record in Plat Book 11, Page 258, Cole County Recorder's Office, located in Section 15, Township 44, Range 12, Cole County, Missouri. Containing approximately 0.34 acres. Property Description for 2712 Briarwood Drive: Lot No. 26 of Fainwood Subdivision 3 Addition, per plat of record in Plat Book 11, Page 258, Cole County Recorder's Office; said Fainwood Subdivision 3`d Addition being a subdivision of part of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, Cole County, Missouri. Except that part of Lot No. 26 of Fainwood Subdivision 3`d Addition, per plat of record in Plat Book 11, Page 258, Cole County Recorder's Office, conveyed to Arthur L. Conover and Wife, by deed of record in Book 300, Page 36, Cole County Recorder's Office. Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Containing approximately 0.33 acres Phyllis Powell, City Clerk City of Jefferson, Missouri P.T. - Friday, September 30, 2005 Department of Community Development/Planning Division 320 East McCarty Street, Room 120 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan Phone(573)634-6475 Fax(573)634-6457 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Zoning Plan for 2606 Briarwood Drive The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public a hearing on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider a zoning plan of C-2 General Commercial for the following -described land proposed for voluntary annexation by petition of the property owner, containing approximately 0.81 acres, described as follows: Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, Cole County, Missouri, described as follows: From the Southwest corner of said Section 11; thence north 85°12'30"East, along the section line, 310 feet to the beginning point of this description; thence North 5019"39" West, 174.56 feet to the north line of a tract conveyed in Book 305, Page 866, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence with same on a curve to the right and having a radius of 1719.63 feet, a distance of 130 feet; (the chord of said curve being South 82°28'East, 129.98 feet); thence south 80018'07"East, 101.322 feet; thence South 56'17'29" East, 24.08 feet; thence southerly on a curve to the left having a radius of 962.33 feet, an arc distance of 108.64 feet; (the chord of said curve being South 6°27'49"West, 108.59 feet), to a point on the South line of said Section 11; thence South 85012'30" West along the section line 221 feet to the point of beginning. Also all that part of Lot No. 1 of Fainwood Subdivision, first Addition, as per Plat of Record in Plat Book 8, Page 61, Cole County Recorder's Office, lying West of Frog Hollow Road as now located Except that part of Lot No. 1 of Fainwood Subdivision, First Addition, as per Plat of Record in Plat Book 8, Page 61, Cole County Recorder's Office, Conveyed to Stephen L. Price and Wife, by deed of record in Book 278, Page 578, Cole County Recorder's office Containing 0.83 acres Phyllis Powell, City Clerk City of Jefferson, Missouri P.T. - Friday, September 30, 2005 Department of Community Development/Planning Division 320 East McCarty Street, Room 120 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan Phone (573) 634-6475 Fax (573) 634-6457 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Zoning Plan for 2607 Edgewood Drive The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public a hearing on Monday, October 17, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, to consider a zoning plan of C-2 General Commercial for the following -described land proposed for voluntary annexation by petition of the property owner, containing approximately 0.81 acres, described as follows: Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, Cole County, Missouri, described as follows: From the Southwest corner of said Section 11; thence North 85 Degrees 12 Minutes 30 Seconds East along the Section Line, 310 feet to the beginning point of this description; thence North 5 Degrees 19 Minutes 39 Seconds West, 174.56 feet to the north fine of a tract conveyed in Book 305, Page 866, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence with same on curve to the right and having a radius of 1719.63 feet, a distance of 130 feet; (the chord of said curve being South 82 Degrees 28 Minutes East, 129.98 feet); thence South 80 Degrees 18 Minutes 07 Seconds East, 101.22 feet; thence South 56 Degrees 17 Minutes 29 Seconds East, 24.08 feet; thence Southerly on a curve to the left having a radius of 962.33 feet, an arc distance of 108.64 feet; (the chord of said curve being South 6 Degrees 27 Minutes 49 Seconds West, 108.59 feet), to a point on the South line of said Section 11; thence South 85 Degrees 12 Minutes 30 Seconds West along the Section Line, 221 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 0.81 acres. Phyllis Powell, City Clerk City of Jefferson, Missouri P.T. - Friday, September 30, 2005 Department of Community Development/Planning Division 320 East McCarty Street, Room 120 Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan Phone (573) 634-6475 Fax (573) 634-6457 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC COMMISSION MINUTES September S, 2005 Attendance July 2005 to June 2006 Jeff Ahlers 1-2✓ Don James 1-2 Ray Bledsoe 1-2✓ Frank Rycyk 2-2✓ Sam Bushman 2-2✓ Tony Wall 2-2✓ Jason Gerling 1-2✓ Bill Yarnell 2-2✓ STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Todd Logan - Street Department; Matt Morasch — Public Works; Sgt. Jeff Stiefermann - Police Department; Britt Smith - Streets and Parking; Pat Sullivan and Barb Touchette - Community Development. GUESTS Carne Carroll, David Bryan, and Kris Hilgedick with News Tribune. QUORUM ESTABLISHED Chairman Frank Rycyk called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. MINUTES Motion to accept the minutes as written was made by Sam Bushman. The motion was seconded by Tony Wall, motion carried. David Bryan made a request to permit unlimited daily use of the one-hour parking zones in Lot 10. Mr. Bryan was present and told the committee that he has 31 tenants in his building, 210 E. High, with many of these needing to load and unload their vehicles several times a day. Carrie Carroll was present and representing the Downtown Jefferson City Association. She requested that no action be taken until further studies could be conducted between her association's parking committee and the City. Mr. Bushman spoke that in the past when this lot had 2 -hour meters there was never parking for customers. Mr. Bryan was invited to join the Downtown Jefferson City Association and be a part of the discussion and solution. Bill Yarnell made a motion for the City staff to work with all concerned parties and report back at the November meeting. Tony Wall seconded the motion. After a discussion the request was to be tabled until November. Motion carries. 2. Request to place a four-way Stop at the intersection of Ella and Jordan Streets. The requestor Jessica Batiste was not present. Staff told the commission that the traffic volume and nature of area do not warrant a four-way Stop. Sgt. Stiefermann reported that there were no accidents in the area since 2002. Mr. Bledsoe mentioned that placing unwarranted Stops are just setting up place for violations. Ray Bledsoe made motion to deny the request. Jason Gerling and Sam Bushman seconded, motion carries. September 8, 2005 Minutes Page City staff requested increasing the speed limit on East McCarty Street from Grant Street to Morningside Drive. Mr. Smith reported that since the construction rebuild of this area the road was widened and a center turn lane added. After replacing the speed limit signs it was noticed that the character of the new roadway warranted changing the speed limit. Sgt. Stiefermann reported that the area is being patrolled and people are already driving 40 MPH. Ray Bledsoe made a motion to accept the request as stated, seconded by Sam Bushman. Motion carries. 4. City staff requested increasing speed limit on South Country Club Drive from Edgewood Drive/Fairgrounds Road to the southern City limits. Mr. Smith reported that the speed limit coming into the City from the county is set at 40 MPH and the road that feeds into are also set at 40 MPH. South Country Club was designed and built to meet 40 MPH standards. Jeff Ahlers made a motion to accept recommendation. Sam Bushman seconded, motion carries. OTHER BUSINESS Britt Smith informed the commission that Commissioner Don James had completed his third full term and also due to health reasons he was resigning his post. Chairman Rycyk signed a certificate of recognition to be give to Mr. James in person when his health allows him to attend a future meeting. Appreciation was also given to Mr. Ahlers for providing chocolate milk for the meeting today. Motion to adjourn was made by Sam Bushman at 8:45 a.m. Bill Yarnell seconded the motion, carried. Respectfully submitted, Barb Touchette Secretary MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION September 1, 2005 10:00 A.M. VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT RECORD Cole County. Larry Benz 3 of 4 Eric Landwehr I of I Callaway County. Paul Winkelmann 2 of 4 ,Jefferson City: Ron Craft 4 of 4 J.J. Gates (Designee) Matt Morasch 4 of 4 Janice McMillan 3 of Alan Morrison 4 of 4 Pat Sullivan 4 of 4 Richard Turner 3 of Gene Williams 4 of Missouri DOT: Jay Bestgen 2 of 4 Dion Knipp (Designee) Bill Robinett 2 of 2 Private Transportation Interest: Jim Kistler 4 of 4 VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT Jefferson City: Bill Lockwood 3 of 4 Missouri DOT: Alan Trampe 3 of EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT Jim Radmacher, Federal Highway Administration Eva Voss, Missouri Department of Transportation EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT .Joni Roeseler, Federal Transit Administration GUESTS PRESENT None. STAFF PRESENT Steve MacIntyre, Plainer I, City of Jefferson Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant, City of Jefferson 1. Call to Order and Roll Call Ms. McMillan brought the meeting to order. Ms. McMillan determined that a quorum was present with 13 of 15 members present. 4*nutes/Capital Area McU-opolitan Planning Organisation Page 2 September 1, 2005 2. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Sullivan moved and Mr. Benz seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously. 3. Approval of Minutes from the Meeting of August 4, 2005 Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Morasch seconded to approve the minutes from the August 4, 2005 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Communications from the Presiding Officer None. 5. Old Business None. 6. New Business A, Missouri Planning FrcaneHrork, Discussion as Facture Projects Mr. Bestgen stated that as a result of the Planning Framework process and Amendment 3 funds a stretch of U.S. 50 from Jefferson City to California will be expanded to four (4) lanes. He explained that the Planning Framework is a program tool with preset parameters that judges different needs and aids in determining which needs are high priority. Mr. Bestgen discussed which programs should be classified as enhancement projects, regional or statewide needs. B. Prioritization ofHighrvay Needs and Projects list from November of 2004. The Technical Committee prioritized the following projects of statewide significance: 1. Expand Highway 50 to four (4) lanes from east of Jefferson City to Union. 2. Congestion and safety improvements study for Rex Whitton Expressway. 3. Interstate "570" Loop from I-70 at Columbia on Highway 63 to Jefferson City, continuing on Highway 54 to Kingdom City at I-70. 4. Expand Highway 179 to four lanes from Cole Junction Bottoms to Highway 63. The Technical Committee prioritized the following projects of regional significance: 1. Intersection geometric modifications at Highway 179 and Missouri Boulevard. 2. Improve Route 00 to three lanes which includes a turning lane. 3. Interchange at Highway 179 for St. Mary's Health Center between West Edgewood and Route C. 4. New interchange at Highway 50/63 and City View Drive. 5. Access improvements on Highway 54 / Stadium interchange from Jefferson Street, Cluisty Drive, Southridge Drive and Madison Street. 6. Intersection geometric modifications at Ellis Boulevard and Route C. 7. Off ramps on Highway 54 at Summit Drive exit. S. New interchange at Lafayette Street and Highway 50 for Missouri State Penitentiary Redevelopment access improvements. 9. Intersection geometric modifications for Highway 179 at Rock Hill Road and West Main Street. 10. Expand Route 179 to four (4) lanes from Cole Junction Bottoms to Highway 50. 11. Extend Highway 179 at Highway 50 East from Tanner Bridge Road / Lorenzo Greene Drive area to Shamrock Road or Militia Drive. 12, Traffic control improvements at Route C and Route CC. 13. Expand Highway 50 to four (4) lanes west of California to Sedalia. Hinutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning ftanization September 1, 2005 Page i The Technical Committee determined that the following projects, although not removed from the original listing of needs, should be evaluated as Transportation Enhancement projects and prioritized separately, and at a later date: 1. Pedestrian crossing improvements and sidewalks on Missouri Boulevard from Highway 50 to South Country Club Drive. 2. Pedestrian/bicycle/facility cormection to Katy Trail on West Main Street to the Missouri River Bridge, then to Cedar City Drive to Katy Trail. 3. Paint and designate bicycle lanes on Highway 179. 4. Extend Katy Trail 850 feet to Holts Summit. 7. Other Business Mr. Benz introduced Eric Landwehr from Cole County as a new memberof the Technical Committee. 8. Set Next Meeting Date The next meeting of the Technical Committee is scheduled for October 6, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. 9. Adjournment Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Craft seconded to adjourn the meeting 11:15 a.m. The motion passed unanimously. Respectfully Submitted, OA -a �M�alol Anne Stratman Administrative Assistant MINUTES JEFFERSON CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT September 13, 2005 7:30 a.m. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Robert Dallmeyer, Jr. Bruce James Dan Klindt, Alternate Kevin Meinhardt, Chairman Chuck McPheeters, Alternate Richard Rolsing, Alternate BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Rick Prather Wilma Partee EX -OFFICIO MEMBER PRESENT Dean Martin, Alternate Council Liaison EX -OFFICIO MEMBER ABSENT Kevin Brown. Council Liaison STAFF PRESENT Charles Lansford, Assistant to the Director of Community Development Janice McMillan, Director of Planning and Transportation Services Roy Dudark, Senior Planner Michelle Coleman, Associate City Counselor Steve Maclntyre, Planner I Anne Stratman. Administrative Assistant ATTENDANCE RECORD 7of8 7of8 3of5 8of8 5of8 3of5 6of8 2of8 LME] 1. Call to Order and Introduction of Members, Ex -officio Members and Staff Chairman Meinhardt introduced Board members and staff. Board procedures were explained. Chairman Meinhardt asked if there were any Board members who would not participate in any of the hearings scheduled. A quorum was present to hear the items on the agenda as printed. All regular members and Alternates Mr. Klindt and Mr. McPheeters will vote. Mr. Klindt informed Chairman Meinhardt that he will be abstaining from voting on Case No. 805014. Chairman Meinhardt informed Mr. Klindt that a request was received to continue this case to October 11, 2005, and noted for the record that Mr. Klindt would abstain from voting in the event this case was heard. Minutes/Jefferson City Board of Adjustment Page 2 September 13, 2005 2. Procedures Explained The following documents were entered as exhibits for all items under consideration �� at this meeting: , 1. Chapter 35 of the City Code, Zoning Ordinance No. 13361 2. Advertising and Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the City Code 3. Subdivision Code, Chapter 33 4. Stormwater Code, Chapter 31 5. Flood Hazard Regulations, Article V of Chapter 8 of the City Code 6. The Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map 7. The applications filed 8. The affidavit of publication of notice of the Public Hearing 9. A list of property owners to whom notice of the hearing was sent 10. Copies of drawings and plans under consideration 11. Staff reports and minutes of proceedings 12. Photographs received 13. Correspondence from adjoining property owners 14. Memos from City staff The Chairman advised that items received regarding any agenda item become the property of the Board of Adjustment. 3. Adoption of Agenda Mr. James moved and Mr. Klindt seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Dallmeyer, James, Klindt, McPheeters, Meinhardt 4. Approval of Minutes for the Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005 Mr. Klindt moved and Mr. Dallmeyer seconded to approve the minutes as written. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Dallmeyer, James, Klindt, McPheeters, Meinhardt 5. Communications Received Communications were received for Case Numbers B05011 and B05014. 6. Old Business — Public Hearings (Continued Applications) Case No. B05011 — 136 East Circle Drive; Variance. An application filed by Suzanne K. and Garth E. Haugen, property owners, for a variance to the requirement that a structure be set back10 feet from an adjacent side property line such that an existing wooden deck could have a setback of 0 feet. The property is zoned RS -3 Single Family Residential and consists of Lot 24, Block A, Walinko Place Subdivision, Jefferson City, Missouri. (Continued from August 9, 2005) Ms. Suzanne Haugen, 932 Sardonyx Drive, spoke regarding this request. Ms. Haugen stated that the proposed deck will run parallel to the retaining wall and be setback three (3) feet from the property line. She explained that shrubs or foliage will be planted within the three (3) foot space to act as a buffer between the properties. No one spoke in opposition to this request. Minutes/Jefferson City Board of Adjustment Page 3 September 13, 2005 Correspondence was received from the following individuals: Kevin Thompson & Elizabeth Lehmann, 138 E. Circle Drive James Penfold, 1901 N. Circle Drive Mr. Dudark gave the Planning Division staff report and recommended that a condition be set subject to modifications as shown on the proposed plan and the planting of shrubs in the three (3) foot space abutting the side property line where the deck will be removed. Mr. McPheeters moved and Mr. Dallmeyer seconded to approve the seven (7) foot variance subject to modifications as shown on the proposed plan and the planting of shrubs in the three (3) foot space abutting the side property line where the deck will be removed. The Board discussed the findings and felt they have been met. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Dallmeyer, James, Klindt, McPheeters, Meinhardt 7. New Business — Public Hearings Case No. 805012 — 1922 Sun Meadow Lane; Conditional Use Permit. An application filed by Kenneth E. Moses and Coleen M. Moses, property owners, for a Conditional Use Permit to establish a Day Care Home for up to 10 children. The 0.25 r acres of property is zoned RS -2 Single Family Residential and consists of Lot 28, Sun Valley Drive Addition, Sheet 2, Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri. Ms. Coleen Moses, 1922 Sun Meadow Lane, spoke regarding this request. Ms. Moses stated that she is currently caring for three (3) grandchildren and would like to expand to 10 unrelated children. She stated that she has met with staff and is aware of the conditions and clarified that her daughter will act as a substitute in her absence. Ms. Moses stated that the children are picked up and dropped off either in the driveway or at the curb. No one spoke in opposition to this request and no correspondence was received. Mr. Dudark gave the Planning Division staff report and stated that there is adequate room indoors and outdoors for the children. He stated that the backyard is fenced and that the driveway must be paved 25 feet from the street right-of-way line to provide for an off street parking space. Mr. Dudark stated that no outside employees are allowed, although a substitute is permissible in the absence of the daycare provider. Mr. Dallmeyer moved and Mr. McPheeters seconded to approve the Conditional Use Permit to establish a Day Care Home for up to 10 unrelated children at 1922 Sun Meadow Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. The driveway shall be paved for a distance of 25 feet back from the street right of way line; 2. No outside employees or assistants shall help operate the day care home, except that a substitute shall be permitted in the occasional absence of the day care home provider; 3. The day care home shall comply with all applicable regulations prior to issuance of any licenses or permits. Minutes/Jefferson City Board of Adjustment September 13, 2005 The Board discussed the findings and felt they have been met. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Dallmeyer, James, Klindt, McPheeters, Meinhardt Page 4 Case No. B05013 — 615 Clark Avenue; Conditional Use Permit and Variance. An application filed by Alfred H. and Irma L. Schmitz, property owners, on behalf of Mike Douchant, representing Cingular Wireless, for a Conditional Use Permit to erect a 78 foot tall communications tower and for a variance of 31 feet to the requirement for a 39 foot setback such that the tower could set back 8 feet from the south property line. The 0.25 acres of property is zoned C-1 Neighborhood Commercial and RS -4 Single Family Residential and consists of Lots 116 and 117, Fairview Addition, Jefferson City, Missouri. Mr. Mike Douchant, Dolan Realty, 7718 Forsyth Boulevard, Clayton, MO 63105, spoke on behalf of Cingular Wireless, Mr. Douchant stated that the existing communications tower serving the Applicants business, will be removed and replaced with a proposed monopole telecommunications tower. He stated that the Applicant will be able to locate his existing communications antenna on the proposed tower. Mr. Douchant stated that a new fence will surround the proposed tower and new equipment shelter. He stated that the Applicant, as a part of the lease agreement, will have the opportunity to install a security system on the site. Mr. Douchant explained that the proposed tower will be able to accommodate at least two providers. Mr. Charles Lansford, representing the City of Jefferson and the Cell Tower Committee, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Lansford explained that a new tower has to meet certain qualifications such as height, the ability to accommodate more than one carrier and not be intrusive to surrounding neighborhoods. Mr. Lansford stated that the proposed tower meets those qualifications and providing a security fence around the equipment shelter and tower is an added benefit. Mr. Alfred Schmitz, 1004 Eastland Drive, spoke regarding this request. Prior to giving testimony Chairman Meinhardt swore in Mr. Schmitz. Mr. Schmitz stated that the stakes behind the existing building show where the proposed equipment shelter and tower are to be located. Mr. Douchant clarified that the stakes behind the existing building are used as reference points only and do not necessarily mark the exact location of the proposed tower and equipment shelter. No one spoke in opposition to this request and no correspondence received. Mr. Dudark gave the Planning Division staff report and explained that the setback variance is a part of this request because there is not enough space on this lot to meet the side yard setback requirements. Minutes/Jefferson City Board of Adjustment Page 5 September 13, 2005 Mr. Klindt moved and Mr. Dallmeyer seconded to approve the Conditional Use Permit allowing a 78 foot tall communications tower and a setback variance of 31 feet from the south property line at 615 Clark Avenue, subject to the following condition: 1. Compliance with all applicable regulations prior to issuance of any building or electrical permits. The Board discussed the findings and felt they have been met. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Dallmeyer, James, Klindt, McPheeters, Meinhardt Case No. 805014 — 2320 East McCarty Street; Conditional Use Permit and Variances. An application filed by Jeff Adams and Todd Balkenbush, property owners, on behalf of Don Renkemeyer, contract purchaser and developer, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of mini-warehouses/self-storage units and for variances to two zoning requirements: a) that a Type B Bufferyard be provided along each side lot line thus allowing the facility without side bufferyards; and b) that driving and parking lanes be at least 30 feet wide thus allowing driving and parking lanes to be at least 25 feet wide. The 1.8 acres of property is zoned C-2 General Commercial and RS -2 Single -Family Residential and consists of part of U.S. Private Survey No. 2701, Township 44N, Range 11W, Jefferson City, Cole County, Missouri. Correspondence was received from Central Missouri Professional Services requesting to continue this application to the October meeting to allow for consideration of an amendment which includes a variance that would eliminate the requirement for a front yard fence. Mr. Dallmeyer moved and Mr. James seconded to continue this application to October 11, 2005 to allow for consideration of an amendment which includes a variance that would eliminate the requirement for a front yard fence. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Dallmeyer, James, Klindt, McPheeters, Meinhardt 8. Miscellaneous Reports None. 9. Other Business None. 10. Adjourn Mr. McPheeters moved and Mr. Klindt seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:10 a.m. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Dallmeyer, James, Klindt, McPheeters, Meinhardt Respectfully submitted, A ne Stratman Administrative Assistant FUND REVENUES: Property Taxes Sales Tax & Sale Tax Interest Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Gasoline Tax Cigarette Tax Franchise Fees Intergovernmental Charges for Services Fees, Licenses & Permits Fines & Forfeitures Interest Income Other Operating Revenues Operating Transfers In Police Grants School Resource Officer M.U.S.T.A.N.G. Carry over Surplus* Total General Fund EXPENDITURES: icil & Mayor c¢y Clerk City Administrator City Counselor Municipal Court Human Resources Non Departmental Entitlement Grant Finance Police School Resource Officer M.U.S.T.A.N.G. 9-1-1 Police Fire Community Development -Admin Planning & Transportation -Admin Planning Metropolitan Planning Org Code Enforcement -Admin Building Regulations Environmental Services Animal Rescue Central Maintenance Public Works -Admin Engineering GIS Streets Veh/Equip Replacement Pians nsfers & Subsidies Fund Income/Loss CITY OF JEFFERSON GENERALFUND INCOME STATEMENT FOR ELEVEN MONTHS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR- YTD (OVER)/ LAST YEAR 2004-2005 MONTH TO -DATE % UNDER YEAR -TO - BUDGET ACTIVITY ACTUAL BUDGET DATE $3,322,310 $7,534 $3,294,239 99% $28,071 $3,147,626 $9,093,256 $1,099,594 $8,240,562 91% $852,694 $8,025,735 $523,570 $46,753 $453,575 87% $69,995 $456,528 $1,211,280 $99,982 $1,056,209 87% $155,071 $1,050,341 $134,000 $12,930 $131,161 98% $2,839 $124,017 $4,847,220 $429,609 $4,492,967 93% $354,253 $4,230,690 $2,451,220 $6,230 $1,396,127 57% $1,055,093 $725,552 $1,043,630 $89,763 $944,364 90% $99,266 $900,131 $616,510 $37,414 $523,052 85% $93,458 $540,981 $874,630 $86,329 $851,563 97% $23,067 $803,403 $100,000 $6,016 $126,903 127% ($26,903) $86,553 $825,475 $39,567 $632,070 101% ($6,595) $388,833 $8,400 $656 $7,915 94% $485 $7,376 $105,522 $0 $20,092 19% $85,430 $30,384 $110,660 $0 $103,020 93% $7,640 $87,929 $290,070 $29,768 $223,499 77% $66,571 $169,990 $25,557,753 $1,992,146 $22,697,319 89% $2,860,434 $20,776,071 $80,240 $6,038 $66,836 $89,080 $5,595 $84,690 $283,760 $22,110 $258,788 $280,970 $19,567 $228,941 $234,900 $25,157 $207,601 $217,120 $16,564 $190,985 $1,198,320 $16,830 $1,009,186 $639,200 $19,218 $97,398 $1,066,738 $74,985 $972,278 $6,009,166 $508,889 $5,294,398 $221,260 $16,613 $165,873 $327,340 $22,240 $268,029 $1,116,770 $64,831 $910,227 $4,750,106 $358,614 $4,115,176 $317,650 $23,522 $277,047 $139,100 $10,377 $123,244 $139,703 $7,959 $69,317 $331,740 $23,706 $177,642 $149,240 $11,101 $133,367 $329,460 $23,845 $301,252 $494,660 $41,936 $433,436 $532,335 $41,569 $453,146 $1,196,407 $189,333 $1,154,496 $136,550 $11,229 $121,354 $930,110 $68,983 $820,747 $192,490 $15,977 $169,561 $2,238,943 $152,303 $1,970,466 $2,151,964 $13,938 $2,009,713 $1,606,290 $133,524 $1,470,647 83% $13,404 $69,264 95% $4,390 $77,781 91% $24,972 $247,007 81% $52,029 $226,124 88% $27,299 $189,180 88% $26,135 $187,840 84% $189,134 $696,672 15% $541,602 $12 91% $94,460 $746,946 88% $714,768 $4,915,440 75% $55,387 $136,406 82% $59,311 $247,089 82% $206,543 $901,925 87% $634,930 $3,841,528 87% $40,603 $290,347 89% $15,856 $122,309 50% $70,386 $58,955 54% $154,098 $73,552 89% $15,673 $126,503 91% $28,208 $297,466 88% $61,224 $417,013 85% $79,189 $438,016 96% $41,911 $1,116,629 89% $15,196 $119,226 88% $109,363 $955,266 88% $22,929 $0 88% $268,475 $2,146,819 93% $142,251 $0 92% $135,643 $1,429,955 $27,401612 $1,946,553 $23,555,843 86% $3,845,769 $20,075,270 $45,593 ($858,524) $700,801 CITY OF JEFFERSON RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS AND CASH BALANCES FOR THE MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 CASH BALANCE CASH BALANCE FUND September 1, 2005 RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS September 30, 2005 GENERAL FUND $2,676,302 $2,018,203 $2,608,395 $2,086,110 SPECIAL REVENUES Grants $64,291 $187 $66 $64,413 Parks & Recreation Fund $555,164 ' $177,357 $420,869 $311,652 Police Training Fund $84,224 $1,868 $0 $86,093 Lodging Tax Fund $47,856 $32,919 $37,153 $43,621 TIF Fund $3,762 $0 $0 $3,762 City Hall Art Fund $18,088 $218 $0 $18,306 USS JC Submarine Trust $18,948 $55 $0 $19,003 Woodland Cemetery Trust $41,401 $121 $0 $41,522 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Streets Capital Projects $110,129 $321 $0 $110,450 'apitalImprovement Tax 1992-1997 $734,173 $1,941 $97,869 $638,244 apitalImprovement Tax 1997-2002 $1,634,742 $3,855 $312,722 $1,325,874 Capital Improvement Tax 2002-2007 $5,218,569 $554,068 $224,069 $5,548,568 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Fund $85,511 $915 $1,800 $84,626 Airport Fund $33,103 $17,170 $44,799 $5,474 Parking Fund $125,774 $84,481 $62,036 $148,220 Transit Fund ($337,059) $80,205 $182,487 ($439,341) Wastewater Fund $7,898,094 $580,958 $611,453 $7,867,599 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Self-Insur/Worker'sComp $1,226,856 $38,958 $21,282 $1,244,532 TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Payroll Account $188,320 $2,452,678 $2,387,864 $253,134 Firemen's Retirement Fund $1 $29,376 $29,378 $0 Total All Funds $20,428,250 $6,075,855 $7,042,242 $19,461,863 Naid Check $50.00 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION September 13, 2005 MEMBERS PRESENT: ATTENDANCE: Chris Neff, Chairman 6 of 8 Joan Kramer, Vice Chairman 7 of 8 Bill Dallmeyer 6 of 8 Dottie Dallmeyer 8 of 8 Sandy Hopkins 7 of 8 Hubie Neutzler 8 of 8 Tom Rynard 6 of 8 MEMBERS ABSENT: Laura A. Ward, Secretary 7 of 8 Ralph Bray 4 of 5 COUNCIL LIAISON: Michael Berry 2 of 8 STAFF: Ron Davenport The Historic Preservation Commission met Tuesday, September 13, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Small Conference Room of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street, Jefferson City, Missouri. The meeting was called to order by Chris Neff, Chairman. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR THE AUGUST 9 2005 REGULAR MEETING Hubie Neutzler made a motion to approve the minutes from the August 9, 2005 meeting. Tom Rynard seconded and the motion passed. DEMOLITION APPLICATIONS. 514 BROADWAY STREET Tom Rynard made a motion that the Commission release the permit for demolition at 514 Broadway Street. Hubie Neutzler seconded the motion. Discussion on the motion made followed. Chris Neff inquired to Ron Davenport if there is a way the Historic Preservation Commission could be informed when a new building is going to be constructed in a Historic area. Ron Davenport said that it would work for the City to inform the Commission when a building permit is applied for. Ron agreed to place the Commission on a distribution list of entities that receive a communication from the City that lists building permits applied for City-wide. The motion on the floor was called to vote. The motion to release the demolition permit was passed. There was one vote not to release the permit. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission. Jefferson City. Missouri September B. 2005 page 2 OTHER BUSINESS It was announced that information regarding the Historic Preservation Commission needs to be updated for the CLG status to remain with Jefferson City. Chris Neff will be informed of any information needed. Ron Davenport announced that there was not money budgeted to the Historic Preservation Commission to do any projects. This means that there is not money to finance the markers for the Lower Jefferson Conservation District. Sandy Hopkins suggested that we contact Rich Mays and put in a request for funding for the markers. Chris Neff agreed to call Mike Berry, Council liaison, about the money to fund the markers. The Commission agreed that a letter from the neighborhood needed to be drafted to make this request, finalized, and sent to Rich Mays. Chris Neff inquired to Ron Davenport how the Historic Preservation Commission can become part of the City's web site. Ron Davenport agreed to find out if this could be possible. NEXT MEETING — OCTOBER 11. 2005. 6:30 P.M. ADJOURNMENT Tom Rynard moved to adjourn the meeting. Sandy Hopkins seconded. The motion passed. Respectfully submitted, n cc.,— Joan Kramer Vice Chairman Minutes City of Jefferson Parks & Recreation Commission Regular Meeting ROLL CALL COMMISSION PRESENT: Gene Bushmann Linda McAnany Jane Smith Karl Staub Larry Vincent ABSENT. Glenda Fry Anne Lock John Pelzer CITY COUNCIL LIAISON Edith Vogel September 12, 2005 ATTENDANCE STAFF RECORD PRESENT: 2-4 Director William Lockwood 4-4 General Recreation and Support Services 4-4 Division Director: 4-4 Tina Werner 3-4 Recreation and Special Services Division Director: Phil Stiles 3-4 Park Resources Division Director: 2-4 J.J. Gates 2-4 Administrative Assistant: Amy Shaw Press: Kris Hilgedick, News Tribune Guests: Kim Hull, JCYHC 2-4 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by President Vincent at 5:35 p.m. at the Little Theatre Building, 1005 Chestnut Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101 APPROVAL OF AGENDA President Vincent requested approval of the agenda as presented. Commissioner Bushmann made a motion to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner McAnany. The motion passed with all voting in favor. PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNCIL LIAISON - EDITH VOGEL City Council Liaison Edith Vogel reported that the Finance Committee, comprised of members of the City Council, is working to finalize the 2005-2006 fiscal year budget. President Vincent asked if the travel monies have been restored to the budget. Director Lockwood reported this issue has been leftto him, Steve Schlueter and Rich Mays to iron out. Vogel also reported that the City Administrator, Rich Mays, is leaving Jefferson City for a position in Portland, Oregon. The Mayor will be tasked with finding a replacement in the upcoming days. President Vincent expressed his thanks on behalf of the Commission for Edith Vogel's support relative to the Parks and Recreation budget. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION LIAISON President Vincent stated that the Commission had not met since our last meeting and no comments were in order. APPROVAL OF MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 8. 2005 Commissioner McAnany made a motion to approve minutes of the August 8, 2005 Commission Meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bushmann. The motion passed with all voting in favor. CLOSED MEETINGS OF AUGUST 8. 2005 Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve minutes of the August 8, 2005 Closed Meetings. The motion was seconded by Commissioner McAnany. The motion passed with all voting in favor. STAFF REPORTS/PROGRESS REPORTS DIRECTORS REPORT AUGUST FINANCIAL REPORT Director Lockwood stated that the monthly financial report was included in the meeting packet. Lockwood reported that everything is on track to meet goals outlined for the year and revenues at the Ice Arena are the second highest for the five-year period due to the continued growth of the extended season and the programs that were offered this summer. Lockwood further reported that expenditures appear high in some areas, especially with the rising fuel costs, but overall he feels the budget will come out in good shape. 2005-2006 BUDGET UPDATE Director Lockwood stated there was nothing additional to report as this was discussed during the presentation from City Council Liaison Edith Vogel. GREENWAY PROJECTS UPDATE Director Lockwood reported that the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission met on Thursday, September 8, 2005 and approved three greenway projects that were previously recommended by the District 5 Review Committee. Lockwood stated that the primary project relating to the department would be the completion of the East Branch Project which runs from McCarty Street to Elm Street. Next, the Lincoln University Project that the Commission voted to support was approved with the final project being the trail from Thomas Jefferson School on Fairgrounds Road to County Park. Director Lockwood stated he has spoken to personnel at MoDOT and they have mailed us the Project Agreements which will need to be approved by the City Council Following discussion, Commissioner McAnany made a motion requesting the City Council enter into and approve the project agreements with MoDOT on behalf of the Parks and Recreation Department. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Staub. The motion passed with all voting in favor. Director Lockwood stated that he received word from MoDOT that they have approved $700,000 in enhancement funds for the Katy Trail Trailhead project. He stated this will be a unique approach as staff would be working with Charlie Brzuchalski of the Office of Administration. He reported that the Memorandum of Understanding is a draft concept of howthe Parks Commission and the Office of Administration would need to be working together to make this project happen. He reported that the Parks Department would be the lead agency but the project will actually be managed by the Office of Administration as they would take care of supervision and monitoring of the architect, approval of plans, supervision of the plans and specifications for bidding of the project and providing two- thirds of the matching funds by utilizing the property value of the land. Lockwood stated that we would be entering into a contract with the architect and the successful contract firm, although construction would be monitored by OA architects and engineers with our role being responsible for the financial end of the project. Following discussion, Commission Bushmann made a motion approving the concept outlined in the memorandum of understanding with final approval at a later date. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith. The motion passed with all voting in favor. JULY GENERAL RECREATION & SUPPORT SERVICES REPORT, RECREATION FACILITIES & SPECIAL SERVICES REPORT and JULY PARK RESOURCES REPORT Division Director Tina Werner, Phil Stiles and J.J. Gates deferred these reports as they were presented as a part of the "Virtual" Tour. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND ACTIONS A. RECREATION SERVICES COMMITTEE No work session has been held since the last Commission Meeting. The next work session is tentatively scheduled for October 25, 2005 at 7:30 a.m. B. LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE In the absence of Commissioner Pelzer, Commissioner Bushmann stated he was at the meeting and it was a very good meeting reviewing information dealing with the Long Range Stewardship of the department. Following discussion, Commissioner Bushmann made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 23, 2005 work session. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Staub. The motion passed with all voting in favor. The next work session is tentatively scheduled for November 22, 2005 at 7:30 a.m. C. PARK RESOURCES COMMITTEE No work session has been held since the last Commission Meeting. The next work session is tentatively scheduled for September 27, 2005 at 7:30 a.m. D. AdHoc OAK HILLS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No work session has been held since the last Commission Meeting. The next work session is tentatively scheduled for January 17, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. PRESIDENT'S REPORT/ANNOUNCEMENTS OTHER BUSINESS President Vincent recognized Kim Hull, President of the JCYHC and thanked him for attending. President Vincent again stated it is the Commission's desire that by next year there only be one hockey club in Jefferson City and that it not be the Capitals or the Eagles but rather a combination of the two. Hull provided a basic overview of what has transpired since the last Commission meeting between the two clubs and reported that a family skate night was held with members from both clubs attending. CLOSED SESSION Being no further business, Commissioner Vincent entertained a motion to enter into Closed Session pursuant to Sec. 610.021.(2) for the purpose of discussing real estate matters. The motion was seconded by Commissioner McAnany. On a Roll Call Vote, all voted in favor as follows: Aye: Bushmann, McAnany, Smith, Staub and Vincent Nay: None Absent: Fry, Lock and Pelzer ADJOURNMENT Being no further business, the regular meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Council Annexation Committee Meeting September 27, 2004 - 5:30 p.m. Present: Councilmen (Committee Members) Michael Berry, Brian Crane, Ken Ferguson, Roy Viessman, .Jonathon Sclmitzler Others Present: Mayor John Landwehr; Councilmen Kevin Brown, Dean Martin, Mike Harvey Staff: Rich Mays, Melva Fast, Nathan Nickolaus, Bob Rennick, .Janice McMillan, Pat Sullivan, Charlie Lansford Agenda was adopted. Minutes of August 30" were approved as written. Chairman Ferguson stated that although public comments were not on the agenda, committee has decided to allow public input. Mrs. Peggy Smart, a property owner in the area, indicated that farm prices are low, doesn't want extra taxes, not interested in fire protection. Her family owns only farmland and the vacant Renz Farm Site where they have had numerous break-ins. Committee discussed voter -approved annexation in Callaway County along Hwy 63 that includes approximately 1000 acres. It was state-owned prison property (Renz Farm). After the Flood of 1993, the property was sold to private owners who have begun to develop recreational and commercial facilities along the highway corridor. This area is not covered by any fire protection district and would benefit from planning and zoning. City Attorney Nickolaus discussed a time line for a February/April election. Councilman Berry made a motion to direct staff to draft ordinances and develop a plan of intent for the area. Seconded by Martin and passed. The Annexation Committee recommended that city staff: Continue to talk with property owners; Develop a plan of intent; — Look at February 2005 for first election; Look at moving to Cedar Creek for the western boundary line. In the future the Committee will review plans for the 179 Corridor and make contacts with property owners. Council Growth and Annexation Committee Meeting January 31, 2005 - 5:30 p.m. Present: Councilmen Michael Berry, Brian Crane, Ken Ferguson, Cindy Layton (Committee Members) Others Present: Mayor John Landwehr; Councilmen Dean Martin, Bob Weber, Kris Hilgedick Staff: Rich Mays, Melva Fast, Nathan Nickolaus, Bob Rennick, Pat Sullivan Minutes from September 27, 2004 meeting were approved. Katv Trail Annexation Report - Bob Weber. Capital City Gateway Committee Chairman Ferguson introduced Bob Weber, Chairman/Treasurer of Capital City Gateway Committee. Chairman Weber gave a report to the group about the Katy Trail Annexation effort. He made the following points: Advertising will appear in the newspaper and on the radio over the next 10 days to promote the annexation and to get out the February vote. Emphasis is being placed on sensible growth, economic development, protect the gateway to our city, public safety/protection for the recreational areas, emergency response and planning. 179 Corridor Discussion Mayor Landwehr requested that the Committee look ahead to 2006 as it is his intent to have a voter -approved annexation on the ballot each year. He suggested that the Committee begin to look at the 179 Corridor for three reasons: 1) City has a large investment in that area; in looking at the map, it is an obvious area for expansion and growth; 2) Area was recommended by Capital Area for Planned Growth as an area for annexation; 3) Voluntary annexation of St.Marys Hospital tract. Discussion followed. It was suggested that informally city councilmen talk to residents of the neighborhoods in small groups before developing a plan for annexation. Mayor Landwehr will make contacts with the rural fire protection districts and utility companies. City Attorney Nickolaus distributed a time line for a February/April election in 2006. Councilman Berry requested that another meeting of the committee be scheduled after the staff has done some preliminary work in gathering data and putting together maps of the 179 area showing land use, development, sewer lines and topography. In the future the Council will review the 179 Corridor and make contacts with property owners. The next meeting for the Planned Growth and Annexation Committee is 5 p.m. February 15" Meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Council Growth and Annexation Committee Meeting February 15, 2005 Present: Councilpersons Michael Berry, Brian Crane, Ken Ferguson, Cindy Layton (Committee Members) Others Present: Mayor John Landwehr; Councilpersons Dean Martin and Kevin Brown Staff: Rich Mays, Melva Fast, Nathan Nickolaus, Bob Renick, Pat Sullivan, Janice McMillan Minutes from January 31, 2005 meeting were approved. 179 Corridor Discussion Aerial and existing land use maps of the 179 corridor were distributed for review. Two types of areas were identified: established areas (neighborhood subdivisions) and open tracts (future development land). It was acknowledged that the two areas present different opportunities for annexation and growth. The neighborhood subdivisions are already developed and will essentially be accepted as they exist into the city. By contrast, the open tracts are not developed and would benefit from planing, zoning and guided growth. Mayor Landwehr invited the Council to participate with the citizens committee that is leading the Katy Trail Annexation effort to get out the vote for the April election. He encouraged this Committee to continue to move toward a 179 Corridor Plan of Intent which needs to be formulated by early June so that an annexation issue can be placed on the ballot next February. It was agreed that the council and mayor should make contacts with residents in the 179 Corridor. Residents in the two subdivisions, Fainwood and Colonial Hills, should be approached by council members to set up small group meeting for the purpose of discussing neighborhood needs. Mayor Landwehr will contact Tom Piper and ask him to identify interested residents in Colonial Hills; Councilperson Layton will contact Dr. Kimlinger for the same purpose in Fainwood . There was also discussion about excluding established neighborhoods from voter approved annexation. Councilpersons Brown and Layton are holding a 4°i Ward meeting this Friday evening at 5:30 p.m. at Cedar Hills Elementary School. They have invited interested residents in the Fainwood and Colonial Hills subdivisions to attend as well. The next meeting of the Growth & Annexation Committee is 5:15 p.m. February 28" Progress on neighborhood meetings will be discussed.. Staff was also requested to review the CAPPG final report. Meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Council Growth and Annexation Committee Meeting February 28, 2005 Present: Councilpersons , Brian Crane, Ken Ferguson, Kevin Brown, Dean Martin Others Present: Mayor John Landwehr; Staff: Rich Mays, Melva Fast, Nathan Nickolaus, Bob Rennick, Pat Sullivan, Kris Hilgedick Meeting came to order at 5:20. Minutes from February 15, 2005 meeting were approved. 179 Corridor Discussion -Neighborhood Meetines The concept of neighborhood meetings in Colonial Hills and Fainwood was discussed briefly at the Ward 4 Meeting on February 18". Preliminary contacts have been made with residents of Colonial Hills. Mayor Landwehr has talked with Tom Piper, and they will work together to visit individuals in small groups or a "town hall" type setting -whichever is preferred. Councilperson Layton was to contact Dr. Kimlinger. She was not present at the meeting so no report was given. CAPPG Recommendations A summary sheet of the ten recommendations that were included in the Capital Area Partnership for Planned Growth Report was distributed and reviewed. There was a general discussion about emergency sirens, land use, utility providers, storm water and city -county cooperation. Other Business - Develop contacts in 179 Corridor and set up small neighborhood meetings. Mayor will work through city staff and committee members will participate when possible. Pat Sullivan was requested to contact Chris Yarnell and drive the 179 area to identify specific needs and become more familiar with the streets, storm water and other public issues. There was concern about generating a list of needs that exceeds the resources available or allows "annexation areas" to supersede city residents in established neighborhoods. The next meeting of the Growth & Annexation Committee will either be March 15 or 16"' over the noon hour. Staff will arrange a bus tour of the 179 corridor. Meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. City of Jefferson Human Relations Commission Minutes September 13, 2005 Commission Members present: Attendance record: Alan Mudd, Chair (April 05) 20-21 Stu Murphy, Vice -Chair (April 05) 14-21 (14-17) Freda Cash Bady, Secretary 19-21 Gabriel Hulsey 18-20 Kojo Quartey 14-21 Pat Wright Tatum 17-20 Dan Nichols 6-21 (6-6) William Edwards 6-21(6-6) Lori Chowdhury 4-21 (4-6) Commission Members absent: Attendance record: none Staff and Council present: Guests present: Joseph D. McDonald Gail Strope 1. Call to Order Chair Alan Mudd called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. 2. Roll Call Secretary Freda Cash Bady called the roll, all members present. 3. Public Forum (five minute limit per person) Citizen Joseph D. McDonald presented instances of discrimination he has experienced in the community of Jefferson City as it relates to homosexuality: a. August 15, 2005, Mr. McDonald attempted to purchase gas at the Citgo service station on Dunklin and Jefferson Streets. Mr. McDonald expressed having to wait for two (2) minutes before he was acknowledged by the attendant, and then the money he had given to the attendant was thrown back to him and he was told that he could not purchase the gas along with unkind words spoken to him regarding his homosexuality. The Jefferson City police department was called and Mr. McDonald lodged his complaint regarding the discriminatory remarks and practice expressed by the attendant, who stated that he was the owner of the station. Mr. McDonald filed a complaint with the Human Rights Commission and was told that his complaintis a civil issue and not a criminal issue. He was further told by.Mr. David Baker that he was not a victim protected under the law. Mr. McDonald has contacted the following television stations regarding this incident: KCRG and KOMU 8; and KMIZ will cover it when the complaint is filed; and the New§ Tribune will not place it in the newspaper. b. Another incident occurred in the summer of 1999, at the apartment complex where Mr. McDonald was renting. His storage shed was vandalized and spray painted with discriminatory words 4. Approve Agenda Agenda was approved and accepted as presented. 5. Approval of August 2005 Minutes Acceptance of the August 2005 minutes was approved as follows: Dan Nichols moved for the acceptance; Stu Murphy second the motion. Motion carried. 6. Old Business a. Discussion of Retreat Plans Chair Mudd requested that the "retreat" planned for September 10, 2005 be tabled until the HRC has a full board. All HRC members present agreed. The following persons have been invited to join the HRC, and have received applications: Mr. Maricio Vargas, Mr. Ron Wilson, and Ms. Mary Simmons. The workshop planned for September 20, 2005 — 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. will be held in Langston Hughes Auditorium on the campus of Lincoln University - Dr. Quartey has posted flyers in various areas on the campus, and he has emailed the faculty of Lincoln University requesting their assistance by requiring students to attend. Information has also been sent to the Public Relations office. Flyers will also be sent to KJLU radio, and Channel 3. Stu Murphy has been in conversation with Donna Cavitte, who will be the speaker for this workshop. Alan Mudd will introduce Mrs. Cavitte, and he will also provide information regarding the "who" and "what" of the HRC. Refreshments will also be provided. 7. New Business a. Letter from CURE A letter from Congregations United for Racial Equity (CURE) was distributed. The letter is a response to HRC's request for CURE's attention and opinion on the discrimination issues (Gay and Lesbian rights and racial) in the Jefferson City community (letter is attached). b. Discrimination Request Follow-up Chair Mudd led the discussion stating that discrimination of any kind is a weighty and challenging issue, and that as the HRC, all attention that the Commission can give it will be beneficial for the City of Jefferson as a whole. City Staff Liaison Gail Strope informed the HRC of the City Attorney's investigation of the concept of "sexual orientation" as an ordinance. "The City of Jefferson cannot enforce the discrimination ordinance of race, etc., in that they do not have such powers of enforcement. There was a consensus of the HRC members to find out about the enforcement laws of other cities in Missouri (Columbia, St. Louis, and Kansas City) in order to have enforcement rights established in the City of Jefferson, Missouri. It was noted that the Human Rights Commission (for the State of Missouri) have enforcement powers within their particular organization, and to have impact on the discrimination issues that have come before Jefferson City's HRC, the HRC must convince the Mayor and the City Council the need for a commission with discrimination enforcement powers in place to handle these issues. Before moving forward, the current HRC Commissioners determined it would be best to wait until we have the additional members on the HRC for a full board before moving forward with the next steps in resolving the HRC's enforcement powers and policy. Further discussion around the next steps occurred with a suggestion of having conversation with those members of the City Council who will be willing to handle this issue and take the necessary steps to get the policy passed. Suggested members of the City Council were Councilmen Kermeth Ferguson and Brian Pope. Also, the HRC Commissioners would like to have a "working" meeting with the Mayor, the City Manager, City Attorney, and HRC Liaison and explore the possibility of the City Council selecting two (2) or three (3) council members to meet with HRC and discuss ways of handling this sensitive issue. Also suggested was to receive a "position" paper from Donna Cavitte for presentation to the Mayor and City Council members. 8. Next Meeting Date: October 11, 2005 at 5:30 p.m. (City Hall) 9. Announcements September 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. — PFLAG/:BGT Meeting at Shikles Auditorium Topic: Subtle Oppression of Language September 25, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. — Lisa Ann Newsom, Chair of the City of Fulton Human Rights Commission and members of the Fulton commission will present at the Summit Lake Winery 10. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 The September 30, 2005, 'Brown Bag" Work Session was convened at 11:00 A.M. by Mayor John Landwehr. The following Council Members were present when the meeting convened: Present: Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, and Vogel Absent: Berry, Pope, and Schnitzler A quorum was present. Items were not necessarily discussed in order that they appeared on the agenda. APPOINTMENTS: Mayor John Landwehr announced that he will be appointing the following persons to the City Administrator Search Committee, and he will also announce those Monday night at the Council meeting: Former Councilman Charles W. Jackson Bert Kimbel Councilman Dean Martin Councilman Edith Vogel John Pelzer Mike Shimmens Human Resources Director Gail Strope Mayor Landwehr also announced that several people have indicated they wish to serve on the Building Appearance Committee, and that he has also asked the Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission to submit some names from that Commission, and he has asked Heath Clarkston to submit a couple of names from the building community. He would also like for one or two City Council members to serve. Those persons who have already signed up to serve, and will be appointed, are former Councilman Carol Blaney and Cathy Bordner. He stated he is also requesting that Assistant to the City Administrator Melva Fast and City Planner Janice McMillan staff the committee. COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 2 BIDS OVER $25,000: Councilman Kevin Brown asked if the radios will be compatible with digital code. Jason Turner of the Fire Department will get that information for him before Monday night's meeting. BILLS PENDING: Bill 2005-78 will need to be placed on the Informal Calendar until public notice requirements can be fulfilled. BILLS INTRODUCED: A motion was made by Councilman Kevin Brown to add Bill 2005-94 pertaining to the sale of Sewerage System Revenue Bonds to the agenda under Bills Introduced, seconded by Councilman Dean Martin, and approved unanimously. Bill 2005-94 will be added to the agenda and introduced October 3, 2005. Councilman Edith Vogel left the meeting at this point (11:23 P.M.) CLOSED SESSION: Mayor John Landwehr requested that the category of Real Estate be added to the agenda under Closed Session. A motion was made by Councilman Cindy Layton to add the item to the agenda, seconded by Councilman Dean Martin, and approved unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business brought forward, the meeting adjourned at 11:30 A.M. COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 3, 2005 The Council "Pre -Meeting" Work Session of October 3, 2005, was convened at 5:45 P.M. by Mayor John Landwehr. r — TT�>+�DAN1 _ _ ..v.._.. .._ The following Council Members were present: Present: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Absent: None A quorum was present. DISUSSION��!,F,�4GENp�1'�T€MS��.�' `,,�.. i,h_�...._ _,..,r_ _..... ._� .'....,•� Items were not necessarily discussed in order that they appeared on the agenda. APPOINTMENTS: Mayor John Landwehr announced that he will be appointing the following persons to the City Administrator Search Committee, and he will also announce those later at the regular meeting: Former Councilman Charles W. Jackson Bert Kimbel Councilman Dean Martin Councilman Edith Vogel John Pelzer Mike Shimmens Human Resources Director Gail Strope Mayor Landwehr also announced that several people have indicated they wish to serve on the Building Appearance Committee, and that he has also asked the Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission to submit some names from that Commission, and he has asked Heath Clarkston to submit a couple of names from the building community. He would also like for one or two City Council members to serve. Those persons who have already signed up to serve, and will be appointed, are former Councilman Carol Blaney and Cathy Bordner. He stated he is also requesting that Assistant to the City Administrator Melva Fast and City Planner Janice McMillan staff the committee. COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 3, 2005 2 RESOLUTIONS RS2005-7: Mayor John Landwehr asked if the Council would consent to moving this resolution up on the agenda to pass after Susan Green makes her presentation and the Council has had opportunity to discuss the issue. The Council did not object to moving the Resolution forward on the agenda. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 1 The Regular Council Meeting of October 3, 2005, was convened at 6:00 P.M. by Mayor John Landwehr. Prayer was offered by Councilman Michael Berry, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. "LIZA -, , The following Council Members were present for the roll call: Present: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Absent: None A quorum was declared present. ii. a) Special Exception Use Permit for Target Expansion to Superstore at 735 W. Stadium Blvd. City Planner Janice McMillan made a presentation on behalf of staff explaining the background of the proposed special exception use permit. Following staff testimony, the following persons came forward to speak on the issue. In favor: Mr. Jason Combs of Woolpert Inc., 343 Fountains Parkway, Suite 100, Fairview Heights, IL, made a presentation on behalf of the applicant, Target. He answered questions asked by the Council about the project. No one came forward to speak in opposition to the special exception use permit. Mayor John Landwehr declared the evidentiary portion of the public hearing concluded, and announced that the Council will now take up the vote on the associated pending bill - 2005-79, as well as 2005-80 since it is related as well. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 2 Bill 2005-79, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, APPROVING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE PERMIT FOR EXPANSION OF THE RETAIL DEPARTMENT STORE INTO A SUPERSTORE/BIG BOX RETAIL DEVELOPMENT FOR 13.4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 735 WEST STADIUM BOULEVARD, DESCRIBED AS PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST, JEFFERSON CITY, COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI. Bill 2005-79 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13946: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-80, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH TARGET, INC.. Bill 2005- was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13947: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, SchniLder, and Vogel Nay: None Mayor John Landwehr announced that the following minutes and reports have been received and are on file and may be reviewed in the City Clerk's office: a. CAMPO Board of Directors, August 24, 2005 b. CAMPO Xd Quarter Report C. Finance Committee, August 29, 2005 d. Human Relations Commission, 3-9, 5-20, 9-14,11-9 in 2004; and 2-8, 3-8, 5- 10, 6-14, 7-12, and 8-9 in 2005 e. Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, August 23, 2005 f. CAMPO 2006 Unified Planning Work Program for Jefferson City Metropolitan Region REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 3 LCItJNCI,L LIAWW `12 PQR1 S ': a No liaison reports were given at this time. �4t�t�f3�iN�Elljf>�I�T,S�FtF�OTH���P�A1l�A�I11���T11���N>a E�/jfi1TS ;' . '- - _ Councilman Kevin Brown announced a Finance Committee meeting will be held Monday, October 24, at 6:00 P.M. Mayor John Landwehr announced he would entertain a motion to approve the following recommended appointments to city boards and commissions, with the exception of third - term re -appointments. He indicated that, by city regulations, all third -term reappointments have to be approved by a two-thirds majority. The appointments were as follow: Board Person Type Ward Term Expires Term Status EQC William Jackson Nov 2007 partial Trans & Traffic Ray Bledsoe June 2008 I" full term Trans & Traffic Greg Hayes June 2008 full Parks Jane Smith May 2008 1" full term Parks Gene Bushman May 2008 2"d full term Parks Karl Staub May 2008 2"' full term Parks Michael Couty May 2007 partial Planning and Zoning Mike Berendzen —third term May 2009 3rd full term Planning and Zoning Dave Hagan — third term May 2009 3"' full term Planning and Zoning Bob George — Alternate member May 2009 2'" full term Submarine Committee Denny Bannister June 2008 l" full term Human Relations Comm Mauricio Vargas Oct 2005 partial Human Relations Comm Mary Simmons Oct 2006 partial Plumbing Board Jerry Rosslan Dec 2005 partial Board of Adjustment Kevin Meinhardt Sept 2010 2"d full term Board of Adjustment Dan Klindt — Alternate Member Sept 2006 1" full term Board of Adjustment Richard Rolsing — Alternate Member Sept 2006 1" full term Board of Adjustment I Chuck McPheeters — Alternate MemberSe t 2006 3"' full term REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 4 A motion was made by Councilman Michael Berry to approve all appointments with the exception of the third -term appointees, seconded by Councilman Kevin Brown, and approved unanimously. Third -tem appointments: A motion was made by Councilman Dean Martin to approve the three third -term appointments, seconded by Councilman Michael Berry, and approved unanimously by the following roll -call vote: Present: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Absent: None Mayor John Landwehr asked Councilman Edith Vogel to make an announcement about vacancies on city boards and commissions. Councilman Vogel announced which boards and commissions had, orwill soon have, vacancies, and urged interested citizens to contact city hall to indicate their interest in serving on any of those. Mayor John Landwehr announced that he is appointing the following persons to the City Administrator Search Committee: Former Councilman Charles W. Jackson Bert Kimbel Councilman Dean Martin Councilman Edith Vogel John Pelzer Mike Shimmens Human Resources Director Gail Strope Mayor Landwehr also announced that several people have indicated they wish to serve on the Building Appearance Committee, and that he has also asked a couple of others who have not responded yet. He indicated that Councilman Cindy Layton has volunteered to be the Council representative on the committee and she will coordinate setting up a meeting. Those persons who have already signed up to serve, and will be recommended for appointment, are as follow: Former Councilman Carol Blaney Cathy Bordner Kas Mahfood Ron Brown Nicky Courtney Ron Lehman Councilman Cindy Layton He stated he is also requesting that Assistant to the City Administrator Melva Fast and City Planner Janice McMillan to be the staff liaisons. He asked the City Clerk to place on the agenda 60 days from now to receive a report on the progress of the committee. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 5 Ms. Mary Winter, Jefferson City Helps, gave the Council and citizens a status report on the progress of relief to the city of Waveland, Mississippi in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. She stated there will be another collection of donated good which can be dropped off at the Coca-Cola building on Sunday, October 9, from 11:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M., and that people can see the list of needed items at the organizations website at www.jeffcityhelps.org. Ms. Susan Green made a presentation regarding the National Incident Management System (NIMS) resolution which is on the agenda for approval tonight. She explained why that it is important for cities to be in compliance with NIMS for homeland security, disaster recovery, and federal funding for any emergency management in the future. Councilman Kevin Brown also made comments regarding the NIMS presentation explaining that future federal funding will be given to those cities with the highest percentage of NIMS training. Mayor John Landwehr stated the Council will now consider Resolution RS2005-7 since it is related to the presentation which was just made. RS2005-7 Designating National Incident Management Systems (NIMS) as Basis for all Incident Management in the City of Jefferson (Brown). A motion was made by Councilman Kevin Brown for adoption of RS2005-7 as presented, seconded by Councilman Mike Harvey, and approved unanimously. The following items were on the agenda for Council approval by Consent: a. Minutes of Council Meetings: Sept. 16 Brown Bag, September 19 Pre -Meeting and Regular Meeting b. (RENEWAL) Agreement with United Healthcare for Group Health Insurance - Human Resources Dept. C. Designation of Employer Representative to LAGERS Annual Meeting - Charles Lansford REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 6 A motion was made by Councilman Michael Berry to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, seconded by Councilman Cindy Layton, and approved unanimously. The following bid was presented to the Council for approval: a. Bid 2218 - Portable Radios, Police Dept. A motion was made by Councilman Kevin Brown to approve the bid as presented, seconded by Councilman Mike Harvey, and approved unanimously. LaN ii1L_.. TILD>CID kli}4 F 13 S h .n. _ .ur. Bill 2005-83, sponsored by Councilmen Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, ESTABLISHING THE 2005 ELECTION FILING PERIOD, AND ESTABLISHING THE 2006 PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION DATES IN THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI. Bill 2005-84, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PUD PLAN FOR A 14.69 ACRE TRACT ADDRESSED AS 1414 WEST MAIN STREET, LOCATED ON PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST, JEFFERSON CITY, COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI. Bill 2005-85, sponsored by Councilman Ferguson, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI PROVIDING FOR THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF REAL PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO, AND LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE PRESENT CITY LIMITS, INTO THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, LOCATED IN SECTION 28, IN TOWNSHIP 45 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST IN THE COUNTY OF COLE, STATE OF MISSOURI, AND AMENDING SECTION 1-17 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, DEFINING THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY BY ADDING ONE NEW SUB -SECTION PERTAINING TO THE SAME SUBJECT. Bill 2005.86, sponsored by Councilman Ferguson, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI PROVIDING FOR THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF REAL PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO, AND LYING REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 7 SOUTHERLY OF THE PRESENT CITY LIMITS, INTO THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, LOCATED IN SECTION 15, IN TOWNSHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST IN THE COUNTY OF COLE, STATE OF MISSOURI, AND AMENDING SECTION 1-17 OF THE CODE OFTHE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, DEFINING THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY BY ADDING ONE NEW SUB -SECTION PERTAINING TO THE SAME SUBJECT. Bill 2005-87, sponsored by Councilman Ferguson, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI PROVIDING FOR THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF REAL PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO, AND LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE PRESENT CITY LIMITS, INTO THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, LOCATED IN SECTION 11, IN TOWNSHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST IN THE COUNTY OF COLE, STATE OF MISSOURI, AND AMENDING SECTION 1-17 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, DEFINING THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY BY ADDING ONE NEW SUB -SECTION PERTAINING TO THE SAME SUBJECT. Bill 2005-88, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERKTO EXECUTEAN AGREEMENT WITH WATER DISTRICT#2. Bill 2005-89, sponsored by Councilman Ferguson, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING CHAPTER 34, ARTICLE III OF THE CODE PERTAINING TO TRANSIT CHARTERS AND SPECIAL ROUTES. Bill 2005-90, sponsored by Councilman Martin, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH STADIUM WEST PROPERTIES, LLC. Bill 2005-91, sponsored by Councilman Martin, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, RELINQUISHING A CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES IN LOTS 3, 4, AND 5 OF CC WEST SUBDIVISION, SECTION 2. Bill 2005-92, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING SECTION 3.5 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 OF THE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN FOR CITY EMPLOYEES AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 12181, AS MOST RECENTLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 13783. Bill 2005-93, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING UNIMERICA GROUP LIFE INSURANCE CARRIER FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON. Bili 2005-94, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZINGSEWERAGE SYSTEM REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS (STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM) SERIES 2005C. A motion was made by Councilman Cindy Layton to accept the Substitute Bill 2005-94 which was distributed to the Council previous to this meeting, seconded by Councilman Kevin Brown, and approved unanimously. Wastewater Division Director Eric Seaman stated that Mr. Jack Dillingham will be at the October 17 Council Meeting to make a presentation and answer any questions of the Council on this issue. The City Clerk was asked to place Mr. Dillingham on the October 17 agenda as in invited guest. IBiLL�l7GLJf�tz Bill 2005-72, sponsored by Councilman Berry, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, RELINQUISHING A CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES ON LOT B OF THE REPLAT OF FOX RIDGE SUBDIVISION. Bill 2005- was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13940: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-73, sponsored by Councilman Berry, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION OF SURPLUS FUNDS FOR RELOCATION OF A 6" WATER MAIN TO ACCOMMODATE THE WEHMEYER ROAD CONSTRUCTION. Bill 2005-73 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13941: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-74, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: N AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FUNDS, AMENDING THE 2004-2005 ANNUAL BUDGET WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND. Bill 2005-74 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13942: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-75, sponsored by Councilman Schnitzler, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING SECTION 19-401, (STREETS AND HIGHWAYS), SCHEDULE A (SPEED LIMITS), SUBPARAGRAPH (D), (FORTY MILES PER HOUR) OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS ON PORTIONS OF EAST MCCARTY STREET. Bill 2005-75 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13943: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-76, sponsored by Councilman Schnitzler, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING SECTION 19-401, (STREETS AND HIGHWAYS), SCHEDULE A (SPEED LIMITS), SUBPARAGRAPH (D), (FORTY MILES PER HOUR) OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, PERTAINING TO SPEED LIMITS ON A PORTION OF SOUTH COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. Bill 2005-13944 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13944: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 10 Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-77, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF COVINGTON GARDENS SUBDIVISION, SECTION FIVE, A SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI. Bill 2005-77 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13945: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-78, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, CHANGING THE NAME OF THE STREET NOW KNOWN AS IKON DRIVE TO MODERN DRIVE. Councilman Kevin Brown requested that Bill 2005-78 be placed on the Informal Calendar at this time to allow time to fulfill public notice requirements. Bills 2005-79 and 2005-80 were passed earlier in the meeting. Bill 2005-81, sponsored by Councilman Vogel, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO A PROGRAM AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION WITH THE MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES AS A PART OF THE JEFFERSON CITY GREENWAY SYSTEM. Bill 2005-81 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13948: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Bill 2005-82, sponsored by Councilman Vogel, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 11 MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO A PROGRAM AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION WITH THE MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES AS A PART OF THE JEFFERSON CITY GREENWAY SYSTEM. Bill 2005-82 was read third time by title, placed on final passage and passed by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13949: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None !N�-1C�i�N1�F�,--f,l��.—.��;.s.� f Yk. tiST inx . � r c—c_-ri� -x Nim a �i �... _. z �. j•i � `i Bill 2005-61, sponsored by Councilman Brown, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, ADOPTING A BUDGET AND PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR THE CITY FOR THE PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 1, 2005, TO OCTOBER 31, 2006, AND APPROPRIATING MONEY IN THE CITY TREASURY TO PAY THE COST OF OPERATING THE CITY GOVERNMENT DURING THAT PERIOD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUDGET. Councilman Kevin Brown requested that Bill 2005-61 be removed from the Informal Calendar and placed on final passage at this time. Bill 2005-61 was read third time by title and placed on final passage. A motion was made by Councilman Kevin Brown to accept Substitute Bill 2005-6 which was previously distributed to the Council, seconded by Councilman Jonathon Schnitzler, and approved unanimously. Bill 2005-61 was then passed, as substituted, by the following roll -call vote as Ordinance 13950: Aye: Berry, Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None Resolution RS2005-7 was adopted earlier in the meeting. Resolution RS2005-8 Accepting Voluntary Benefit Plans Through Colonial Life Insurance for Supplemental Insurance Benefits (Brown) REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 3, 2005 12 A report was given by City Counselor Nathan Nickolaus regarding staff's recommendations and findings regarding code enforcement issues, which included 17 specific observations and/or recommendations. Several questions were asked by the Council regarding some of the items contained in Mr. Nicklaus's report. NEW Councilman Dean Martin stated that the next Public Works and Planning Committee will be held Tuesday, October 18, at 5:30 P.M. UIINIShT There was no Unfinished Business brought forward at this time. �17V��C�C.ea7�����•+5�''Sr�'�r���„'�y§��'j` e�rs-� �s '�c�,��xrerC r�-� er } .. .�_ s,.. Mayor John Landwehr stated that, pursuant to Sec. 610.021 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, he would entertain a motion for the Council to go into Closed Session to discuss the following: a. Real Estate [Sec. 610.021.(2)] b. Personnel [Sec. 610.021(3)] A motion was made by Councilman Michael Berry to go into Closed Session, seconded by Councilman Jonathon Schnitzler, and approved unanimously by the following roll -call vote at 7:20 P.M.: Aye: Bert', Brown, Crane, Ferguson, Harvey, Layton, Martin, Pope, Schnitzler, and Vogel Nay: None CITY OF JEFFERSON RENEWAL OF THE LEGISLATIVE CONSULTANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Jefferson, Missouri, a municipal corporation, in Jefferson City, Missouri, hereinafter designated "City,"entered into an Agreement with Thomas P. Rackers Consulting, L.L.C., with offices in Jefferson City, Missouri, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant," on November 1,2004. WHEREAS, the Agreement was for lobbyist services; WHEREAS, both parties wish to extend the agreement for the first of four additional one-year renewal periods as stipulated in Item 8, dated November 1, 2004; and WHEREAS, both parties agree to amend Item 3 of the agreement dated November 1, 2004, to reflect compensation of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) for the first year's renewal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it agreed by the parties that the agreement is hereby renewed for the first of four renewalperiods endingAugust 30, 2006, and to increase compensation to Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00). IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of October, 2005. CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI THOMAS P. RACKERS CONSULTING LLC Mayor Lobbyist ATTEST: City Clerk APPRQN�ED AS TO FORM: City ---- HiContm l F MNa f=iond Swicmv\ kmmmdmmt D5.06 wpd .:.otractfi: M05TSTN6G71KS2 Accmmt Manager: Terry S. Tollefson SPRINT CI:.NITU1F)gtf7tHll',;' SEERV1':°tom,FF AGREEMENT This Sprint Centurion Service Agreement ("A.preoment') Letween Sprmi Miesutn I:i�. ("Sprint") and E911 Cole County ('Customer") located at 401 Niomru Sl aet , Jc; z...,,o..:.ii„ IMO 5.0. �..,.. :: �,. ,,:,; ",;,. I ::ia;n ina, tencnce sarvices ("Services") to Customer. 1. COVERED EQUIPMENT. Sprint will provide Service for the equipment identified 4'; the attached equipment list ("Coverad Equipment"). Sprint will provide Service under the Extended Fla.,. , c.".t p e ndaw^I w'lon Annual Centurion r-'ricr. tc .� sJ4.:z 2. TERMS OF SERVICE. Sprint provides Services under the Sprint Stannarc Tei:ms and Condiliim; tui Services and the Sprint Centurion Service Product Annex, each as postedat w,vr✓sp,ini.cc� .f/ratasemdcnrditionsr un the Eifeci:ve Dale and incorporated by this reference. References to URLs in this Agreement include roferen.. as Ln successor URLs identified by Sprint. 3. OPTIONAL SERVICES. Optional Services may include Expedited Delivery of reolacemen girt_, Lightnino Coverage, Maior Release coverage for manufacturer software/firmware upgrades, or On-Site Technician seriice. If available end selected by Customer, Sprint will provide Optional Services during the Term at the price specified on the Covered E:;, ipment List. Optional Sentices are not available in all locations or for all Equipment. If Customer selects On-Site Technician service: Ina on-sire technician will be based at Customer's primary location during Business Hours or as scheduled and agreed In writing by the pasties. AGREED Sprint Missouri Inc. ce} 1 C;os-aunty By: Printed: Frinted: Title: Title: Date: D& Address For Notices: Addles Fc-No!ices (if different from above): 900 Springmill Road Mailslpp: OHMANJ0101 Mansfield, OH 44906 And if related to a dispute to: Sprint— Marketing & Sales Law Dept. KSOPHT0101-Z2525 6391 Sprint Parkway Overland Park, KS 66251-2525 I Q'�Itp,ev SITE AL)utd-SS ktuDkI�Z-6: Busine,,, Name F t.nt,, :o ... . le,f.,son City Street Addres_ 401 -Ionr TN -"-'.r.h,3s!ng 401 Monroe City State zir Phone 34 -L;32 --- — — - — - Number of ports (Key=Am,!va,Pl-:- ,, 0 Number cf Number of ?V= Number of PRY VINA Pnrfc n Number of KeyVM Pnus -6 -- Numhe- of Attvrr,',�w Number of Centrex Stations i 0 e,.* C :( - x pl-ld-on klodules - Tj6nou - -- - 6 - Number spesksrF 0 - Number ot Prjoiers a Addli;onai I A - Pub. Safe!- CNIL PSAD 3 6 7 Data/Internetworking — ----- 'I lantity 1 2 3 4 7 Flat Rate Centurion Fneinq 2 3 4 6 7 9 lo 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 iq Description of optlogel ssrd,.c^, ------- ----- FINANCE DEPARTMENT PURCHASING DIVISION SUBJECT: SS 2173 - Renewal Year 2 - Digital 911 System Maintenance Police Department BIDS RECEIVED: Sprint, Westwood, Kansas $18,204.12 FISCAL NOTE: Funds for this expense were included in the 2005-2006 budget request under account 1000-3110-2150-0000. Total funds requested in the account were $74,690.00. PAST PERFORMANCE: Sprint was awarded the purchase and maintenance of the Digital 911 System under Proposal 1792 in August, 1999. Since November 7, 2002 the annual cost of maintenance for this equipment has been $18,204.12. Sprint has indicated that the cost of the maintenance agreement for the period December 5, 2005 through December 4, 2006 will remain at $18,204.12. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of staff to renew the maintenance agreement with Sprint of Westwood, Kansas in the amount of $18,204.12. ATTACHMENTS - SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Departmental Recommendation, Signature-�W9 PurchasfhgLAjent HIM.'i I sll� a JEFFERSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT To: Terry Stephenson, Purchasing Agent From: Roger A. Schroeder, Chief of Police Subject: Sprint Maintenance Bid Date: October 5, 2005 The Police Department recommends acceptance of the bid submitted by Sprint in the amount of $18,204.12 for the maintenance of the digital 911 system. Sprint is a sole source provider and has performed satisfactorily. Sprint® September 13, 2005 Mr. Jeff Strubberg % City of Jefferson Police Department 401 Monroe Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Subject: Maintenance on E9-1-1 System Dear Jeff: Attached is the Maintenance Agreement for the E911 system. Rates are the same as last year, and cover from 12/5/05 through 12/4/06, billed monthly. After signature, you may fax the signature page only to me at 913-345-6803. Please call me for any questions. Thanks for your support. Sincerely, Terry Tollefson E911 Administrator Maintenance Contractk: M05TSTN6G7KS2 Account Manager: Terry S. Tollefson SPRINT CENTURIONsm SERVICE AGREEMENT This Sprint Centurion Service Agreement ("Agreement") between Sprint Missouri Inc. ("Sprint") and E911 Cole County ("Customer") located at 401 Monroe Street , Jefferson City, MO 65102 governs Sprint's provision of certain maintenance services ("Services") to Customer. 1, COVERED EQUIPMENT. Sprint will provide Service for the equipment identified in the attached equipment list ("Covered Equipment"). Sprint will provide Service under the Extended Plan at a total price of $18,204.12 (excluding taxes) for a term of 12 months, billed monthly Standard Plan Extended Plan Annual Centurion Price $15,170.10 $18,204.12 2. TERMS OF SERVICE. Sprint provides Services under the Sprint Standard Terms and Conditions for Communications Services and the Sprint Centurion Service Product Annex, each as posted at www.spdnt.com/ratesandconditions/ on the Effective Date and incorporated by this reference. References to URLs In this Agreement include references to successor URLs identified by Sprint. 3. OPTIONAL SERVICES. Optional Services may Include Expedited Delivery of replacement parts, Lightning Coverage, Major Release coverage for manufacturer software/firmware upgrades, or On -Site Technician service. If available and selected by Customer, Sprint will provide Optional Services during the Tenn at the price specified on the Covered Equipment List. Optional Services are not available in all locations or for all Equipment. If Customer selects On -Site Technician service, the on-site technician will be based at Customer's primary location during Business Hours or as scheduled and agreed in writing by the parties. AGREED Sprint Missouri Inc. E911 Cole County By: Printed: Title: Dater Address For Notices: 900 Spdngmill Road Mallstop: OHMANJO101 Mansfield, OH 44906 And it related to a dispute to: Sprint — Marketing & Sales Law Dept. KSOPHT0101-22525 6391 Sprint Parkway Overland Park, KS 66251-2525 By: Printed: Title: Date: Address For Notices (if different from above): Centurion Service Covered Equipment List SITE ADDRESS BILLING ADDRESS Business Name E911 Cole County Business Name E911 Cole County / Jefferson City Site Contact Jeff Strubberg Billing Contact Jeff Strubberg Street Address 401 Monroe Street Street Address Finance Department - Purchasing 401 Monroe Street City - Jefferson City City Jefferson City State MO State MC, ZIP 65102 ZIP 65102 Phone (573)634-6386 Phone (573)634-6324 Description Quantity Category "V" Products 1 Number of ports (Key=Active,PBX= Equipped) 0 Number of "switch only" ports 0 Number of Tt's 0 Number of PBX VM Ports 0 Number of Key VM Ports 0 Number of Attendant Consoles 0 Number of Centrex Stations 0 Number of Centrex Add-on Modules 0 Number of Paging speakers 0 Number of Printers & Terminals 0 Additional Voice Peripherals Quantity 1 A - Pub. Safety CML PSAP Hardware 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Datallntemetworking Quantity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Plat Rate Centurion Pricing Quantity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 of IEFFt4,0 O ♦u ���II TO: Mayor John Landwehr Members of the City Council FROM: Gail Strope%� Director of Human Resources DATE: October 13, 2005 SUBJECT: Renewal of bids for Insurance On behalf of the City, our insurance broker, A.J. Gallagher & Co., accepted bids for Property, Inland Marine, General Liability, Automobile, Law Enforcement, Crime, Public Officials, Excess Liability and Boiler & Machinery insurance. An e-mail listing the recommendation is attached. All recommended firms have A+ ratings or better. City staff has reviewed our options and recommends we renew the insurance package through St. Paul. This program includes a first -dollar program for property insurance and a self-insured retention for liability insurance. The self-insured retention includes $50,000 loss per coverage with an aggregate loss fund of $250,000. This is an increase to the annual aggregate loss fund of $15,000 from our current policy. Total package cost with St. Paul is $367,524. This is an increase of approximately 2.8% from our current year. The self-insured retention also requires the use of a third -party administrator, approximate annual cost of $25,000. The City moved to the self-insured retention program for liability insurance four years ago. With the assistance of the third -party administrator, the program has worked very well. St. Paul's program also includes an extensive risk management program including the use of training personnel to offer various training programs to City employees at no additional cost. The City's broker, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., highly recommends renewing the St. Paul Insurance Company package program for property and liability, the Zurich American Insurance Company policy for boiler and machinery, XL Specialty Insurance Company for airport liability, Travelers for fiduciary liability and Corporate Claims Management for third party administrative services. Our current policies expire October 31, 2005. The new bids will be effective November 1, 2005. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. F1 Carla Trower/JeffCity 10/13/2005 10:42 AM Lance-Cadson@ajg.com 10/05/2005 04:09 PM To cc bcc Subject Fw: Property/Casualty Insurance Renewal Program To gstrope@jeffcitymo.org cc Fred_Hurley@ajg.com Subject Fw: Property/Casualty Insurance Renewal Program Gail, as a follow-up to our phone conversation ( plus my two attached e-mails ), please see the following; 1. St. Paul has confirmed that they will reduce the previously quoted Annual Aggregate ( Loss Fund ) from $275,000 to $250,000. I know that I stated this with my second e-mail to you, but I just wanted to confirm. 2. St. Paul will also reduce the Package premium by $3,700 if we reduce the UMNIM limits from $1,000,000 to $50,000 - we have agreed to do this and the Package policy premium is now $367,524 ( it was $371,224 ) 3. In summary, the renewal premiums are: a. Package - St. Paul - $367,524 ( last year was $357,428 ) b. Boiler and Machinery - Zurich - $3,667 ( last year was $3,305 ) C. Fiduciary Liability - Travelers - $4,278 ( same as last year ) d. Airport Liability - XL Specialty - $6,000 ( same as last year ) THE TOTAL RENEWAL COST, FOR THE ABOVE COVERAGES, IS NOW $381,469 LAST YEAR'S TOTAL COST WAS $371,011 THIS IS AN OVERALL PREMIUM INCREASE OF 2.8% EXCELLENT RENEWAL AS THE AVERAGE MARKETPLACE INCREASES ARE 5%-150 Thanks Lance Lance A. Carlson CPCU Senior Vice President Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. 12444 Powerscourt Drive St. Louis, Missouri 63131 314-965-4346/800-877-8218 - Phone Numbers 314-965-5425 - Fax Number BILL NO. 2005-95 SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN Schnitzler ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING SECTION 19-401, (STREETS AND HIGHWAYS), SCHEDULE (J), (PARKING PROHIBITED), SUBPARAGRAPH (A), OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, BY THE ADDITION OF PORTIONS OF LINN STREET. BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 19-401, (Streets and Highways), Schedule J, (Parkin Prohibited), Subparagraph (a), of the Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, is hereby amended by the addition of portions of Linn Street, to read as follows: Linn Street: on both sides thereof, within 10 feet of the north and south edges of Cedar Way. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: Approved: Presiding Officer ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City Counselor X61:1W '��"' TRANSPORTATION AND OCTOBER 6, 2005 �� ���� mmem o.,lly OcvcloPme TRAFFIC COMMISSION NEW BUSINESS NO. 1 'i , d: e. swr.,, r, PrE, e, Ducnor BILL NO. 2005-96 SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN Berry ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING ONE NEW ARTICLE ESTABLISHING THE FACADE IMPROVEMENT TAX REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM. BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 17 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding one new Article to read as follows: Article XV Facade Improvement Tax Reimbursement Program 17-400 Purpose. The main objective of this Article is to enhance the aesthetics of the City by improving the facades of older commercial buildings in Jefferson City so that after completion of work, citizens will recognize improvement in the appearance of the buildings A secondary objective is to promote mixed use (residential/commercial) in the older commercial areas of the city. The Tax Reimbursement Program will encourage owners to maintain and enhance the older appearance (not modernize) the exterior of their buildings and promote residential living on the upper floors. 17-401 Eligibility. To be eligible for this Program properties eligible must meet the following criteria: a. The property must be in a commercial zone and the building to be improved must be used at the time the application is made, for a purpose which would require a commercial zone (hereinafter referred to as "commercial use"); In. The structure must have been constructed before 1951: e. The property must have a fair market value of $70.000 or more at the time the application for improvements is approved; d. The property, and its owner or owners, must not be delinquent in payment of anv State, County, or Ciri taxes: e Property must remain in commercial use over the reimbursement period and must re-qualifv annually. L Exterior improvements must be significant exceeding $10.000. and be completed prior to reimbursement eligibility. g. Exterior improvement projects must meet appearance guidelines to be approved for Drafter's Note: Deleted text is shown thus. Inserted text is shown thus. Bill 2005-96 tax reimbursement. The Citv Administrator, in consolation with the Historic Preservation l Commission and the Enviromental Oualitv Commission shall publish specific guidelines, which shall provide, at a minimum, that the improvements be: (1) Consistent with the appearance of the building as originally constructed: (2) Consistent with the appearance of other buildings in the vicinity as originally constructed in Jefferson City at the same time or prior to 1951: (3) Consistent with the present appearance of other buildings on the same block which were constructed at approximately the same time. It. Any work done prior to approval of Facade Improvement Application is not eligible. L Eligible improvements include: (1) Facade removal (2) Brick or wall surface cleaning (3) Patching and painting of facade walls (4) Canopy, porch, awning installation/repair (5) Window and/or door replacement/repair (6) Mortar ioint repair (7) Railings, ironwork repair or addition (8) Cornice repair or replacement (9) Replacement/repair to exterior steps i. Plans for building/facade improvements must be approved by the Facade Improvement Committee, which is hereby created. The Committee shall consist of five (5) registered voters of the City appointed by the Mavor with the advice and consent of the Council. Committee members shall serve two vear terms.. The Committee may approve a variance to the age and market value requirements if the building at issue is abutted by one or more buildings constructed before 1951 and the building is determined by the Director of Community Development to be structurally sound. k. A property may be eligible for the Tax Reimbursement Program one time only. 1. Properties shall only be eligible to the extend that funds are available and appropriated for this purpose by the Council. m. Total annual reimbursement may not exceed the property taxes assessed or Two Thousand Seven Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($2.700.00), whichever is less. n. Eligible owners may receive reimbursement for not more than three vears starting January 1, 2006. Eligibility must be certified each year. o. If the upper floors of the buildine are also in use as residential living space after completion of the facade improvements, the owner may apply for and receive tax reimbursement for an additional 2 vears. To be eligible for the 2 additional vears of tax reimbursement, the living space must: (1) be inspected by city code inspection and certified as meeting basic livability housing standards. (2) be occupied for at least 9 months each year of the reimbursement. Drafter's Note: Deleted text is shown thus. Inserted text is shown thus. Bill 2005-96 Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval. Presiding Officer ATTEST: City Clerk Approved: Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Counselor Drafter's Note: Deleted text is shown thus. Inserted text is shown thus. Bill 2005-96 3 BILL NO. 2005-97 SPONSORED BY COUNCILMEN Ferguson and Harvey ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH COLE COUNTY AND WALMART, INC., TO CONSTRUCT AN INTERCHANGE ON CITY VIEW AT HIGHWAY 50 WEST BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized execute an agreement with Cole County and Walmart, Inc., to construct an interchange on city view at highway 50 west. Section 2. The terms of the agreement shall be substantially similar to the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: Approved: Presiding Officer ATTEST: _ MONT T 9 Mayor City Clerk City Counselor TW ma ANNEXATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE THIS ANNEXATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE is entered into this day of . 2005, by and between the CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI, a municipal corporation (the "City"), 320 E. McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101; the COUNTY OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI first class county, (the "County"), 311 E. High Street, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101, and WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. (the "Developer"), 2001 S.E. 10h Street, Bentonville, Arkansas, 72716 (collectively, the "Parties"). WHEREAS, the Developer is in the process of purchasing approximately 36.43 acres of real property generally located southeast of the existing City limits, and immediately south of U.S. 50/63, as legally described in Exhibit A (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to obtain public water and sanitary sewer services to serve its retail facility; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires for the City to extend its corporate boundaries and annex the Property; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to annex the Property pursuant to Chapter 71 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri (2000); and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to form a Transportation Development District ("TDD") in substantially the form of Exhibit B (the "TDD Petition") to contribute toward the financing of extensive road infrastructure improvements necessary for the development of the Property as described in Exhibit C hereto (the "Transportation Projects"); and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to apply to the Missouri Department of Transportation ("MODOT") Innovative Financing Program to assist in financing the Transportation Projects; and WHEREAS, the City and the County are supportive of the Project, the Innovative Financing Application and TDD financing; and WHEREAS, prior to the annexation of the Property and formation of a TDD, the Parties desire to define their duties and responsibilities to insure that in the event the City annexes the Property and all parties support the formation of a TDD, that the parties' respective actions are coordinated in order to meet the shared objectives and minimize uncertainties and delays in the development process; and WHEREAS, the Property is contiguous to the existing corporate limits of the City at the date of execution of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and County are authorized to enter into this agreement pursuant to Section 70.220 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri (2000). (17336 / 62452; 77357.2) NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Proverty and Annexation. The Developer shall cause a Petition for Voluntary Annexation (the "Petition") of the Property to be presented to the governing body within 30 days of execution of this Agreement. 2. Construction of Transportation Proiects. The Parties agree that: a. The necessary City, County and US Route 50/63 road improvements (the "Transportation Projects") to be constructed as part of the development of the Property are as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. b. New and additional rights of way and related easements will need to be acquired for the Transportation Projects. c. The Transportation Projects for the construction of the intersection of US Route 50/63 shall be designed and constructed in accordance with MODOT standards. d. All other Transportation Projects for the local transportation authorities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards. e. Following inspection by the City and MODOT and completion of the construction, Developer shall dedicate said road improvements to the appropriate governmental entity for use, operation and maintenance. 3. TDD. The Developer shall cause a TDD Petition to be filed encompassing the land area of the Property. The parties agree to support the formation of a TDD with the list of Transportation Projects as described in Exhibit C. 4. Innovative Financing. The Developer shall cause to be filed with MODOT an Innovative Financing Program Application. In the event the Developer's Innovative Financing Application is approved by MODOT, the parties agree to use their reasonable best efforts to negotiate and enter into a Cost Share Agreement with MODOT. The parties have agreed to the apportionment of estimated Transportation Projects costs as set forth in Exhibit D. attached hereto. 5. Right of Way and Related Easements Acquisition. The City and the Developer agree to work together to secure any property interests in rights-of-way and related easements ("Property Interests") necessary for the construction of the Transportation Projects. In the event the City and Developer are unsuccessful in their good faith efforts to acquire the necessary Property Interests within a reasonable time or at a reasonable cost, then the City shall use the power of eminent domain to acquire the necessary Property Interests; provided, the Developer shall advance to the City all funds necessary for the costs of initiating and continuing the eminent domain action and shall pay any condemnation award, including all fees and costs incurred by the City related to such award. If the amount of the condemnation award is unacceptable to the Developer, the Developer shall pay or reimburse the City for all costs incurred in connection with the attempted acquisition of such property interests. 117336/ 62452; 773572) 6. Zoning and Special Exception Use. Concurrent with the filing of any Voluntary Petition for Annexation, the Developer will also file a zoning plan for C-2 General Commercial zoning classification and a related Special Exception Use Permit for an indoor facility with more than 100,000 square feet, all in accordance with the City of Jefferson City Zoning Ordinance. 7. Public Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvements. The City and Developer agree that the public water and sanitary sewer system improvements necessary to be constructed as part of the development of the Property are described in Exhibits E and F, respectively, attached hereto. 8. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated in writing by any party, at its option, for any one of the following reasons: a. If the Property has not been annexed by the City within 75 days of the Developer's presentation of the Petition referred to in paragraph 1 hereof to the governing body of the City; b. If formation of the TDD and execution of all Cooperative Agreements with the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission ("MHTC") and applicable local transportation authorities required to fully implement the TDD is not successful; and c. If the Innovative Financing Application is not approved by MODOT; or i,.. d. If the rights-of-way and related easements necessary for the construction of the Transportation Projects are not timely acquire. Notice of termination shall be effective upon receipt. 9. Deannexation. If the following conditions are not satisfactorily completed, the Developer will file an application for deannexation from the City and the City will approve said application for deannexation: a. Formation of the TDD and execution of all Cooperative Agreements with the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission ("MHTC") and applicable local transportation authorities required to fully implement the TDD; and b. Approval of the Innovative Financing Application by MODOT; c. Acquisition of the rights-of-way and related easements necessary for the construction of the Transportation Projects; and d. Purchase of the Property by the Developer. 10. Prior Approval. The parties agree that execution of this Agreement in no way constitutes prior approval of rezoning, TDD formation, annexation, deannexation or development of the Property and does not in any way constitute a waiver of any requirements of applicable City ordinance requirements with which the Developer must comply in the event the Property is annexed by the City. {17336/62452;773573) 11. Complete Agreement. This Agreement shall constitute the complete agreement between the parties and any modification shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 12. Captions. Captions and headings of each part, section or subsection in this Agreement are for convenience only and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of any provisions. 13. Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto and referenced herein are expressly incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 14. Severability. Any provision of this Agreement which is not enforceable according to law will be severed herefrom, and the remaining provisions shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 15. Authority. The undersigned represent that they each have the authority and capacity from the respective parties to execute this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be valid until executed by the parties and approved by ordinance duly enacted by the City Council of the City of Jefferson City, Missouri, and order duly enacted by the Cole County Commission, Cole County, Missouri. 16. Jointly Drafted. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement has been jointly drafted and shall not be construed more strongly against either party. 17. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Missouri. 18. Notice. Written notice between the City, County and Developer, shall be deemed delivered under this Agreement by personal service, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, or by overnight courier, to the principal officers, at the addresses described above, of the City, attention City Manager; of the County, attention Presiding Commissioner and of the Developer, attention John Okwubanego, Esq., with a copy to Christine T. Bushyhead, Esq., 4510 Belleview, Suite 300, Kansas City, Missouri 64111. 19. Venue. In the event this Agreement or the Petition is litigated, venue shall be in the Circuit Court of Cole County, and the Parties expressly waive any rights to venue inconsistent therewith. 20. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding on the Developer's heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above. CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY ( 17336 162452; 773572) ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ATTEST: County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Counselor COUNTY OF COLE WAL-MART STORES EAST,L.P. 5 117336/62452;773573) EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION All that part of the Southwest Quarter (SW '/<) of the Southeast Quarter (SE '/n) of Section Twenty-two (22), Township Forty-four (44), Range Eleven (11), Cole County, Missouri, which lies southerly of U.S. Route No. 50, as shown by Report of Commissioners of record in Book 169, Page 8, Cole County Recorder's Office. (Included in the above is part of Blocks Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, and all of Tracts "A", `B", "C" and "D" in LEPAGE'S SUBDIVISION, per plat of record in Plat Book 6, Page 3, Cole County Recorder's Office.) (Being all that property conveyed by Warranty Deed of record in Book 277, page 918, Cole County Recorder's Office.) The boundary of the above described property being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest comer of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, Cole County, Missouri; thence N2°56'00"E, along the Quarter Section Line, 1177.82 feet to a point intersecting the southerly line of the U.S. Highway 50/63 Right-of- way as described in paragraph 18 of Report of Commissioners of record in Book 169, Page 8, Cole County Recorder's Office; thence Easterly, along the southerly line of said U.S. Highway 50/63 Right-of- way, the following courses: S75°46'19"E, 568.66 feet; thence S63°57'58"E, 856.46 feet; thence S71 °0029"E, 32.70 feet to a point intersecting the east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the aforesaid Section 22; thence leaving the southerly line of the aforesaid U.S. Highway 50/63, Sl°48'50"W, along the Quarter Quarter Section Line, 671.35 feet to the southeast comer of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 22; thence N89°07'58"W, along the Section Line, 1390.88 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. {17336/62452;773572] EXHIBIT B TDD PETITION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI AT JEFFERSON, MISSOURI Petitioner, ) VS. ) Case No.: THE MISSOURI HIGHWAYS & ) TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, ) and ) THE COUNTY OF COLE, MISSOURI, ) a political subdivision, ) and ) THE CITY OF JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI) r' a municipal corporation ) Respondents. ) PETITION FOR FORMATION OF A TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Petitioner pursuant to §§ 238.200, RSMo et seq., for its Petition for Formation of a Transportation Development District, states as follows. 1. Petitioner address of ("Petitioner") is a real property located within the proposed district. with an and the owner of record of all of the 2. Respondent County of Cole, Missouri (the "County"), with an address of is the affected local transportation authority within the proposed district, as indicated or contemplated under § 238.207.4(2), RSMo. 3. Respondent City of Jefferson City, Missouri (the "City"), with an address of ( 17336 / 62452; 77357.2) is an affected local transportation authority. 4. Jurisdiction is proper in this Court pursuant to § 238.207.1, RSMo. 5. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to § 238.207.1, RSMo, in that the proposed district lies entirely within Cole County, Missouri. 6. There are no persons eligible to be registered voters residing within the proposed district. 7. The name of the proposed district is the U.S. Highway 50/65 and City View Transportation Development District (the "District"). 8. A map illustrating the boundaries of the District is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by reference. The legal description setting forth the boundaries of the District is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by reference. 9. Petitioner proposes that the District will undertake the following improvements: a. City View Drive. Extend City View Drive across US Route 50/63 to Schott Road south of US Route 50/63. Included in this improvement is a bridge spanning US Route 50/63, reconstructing City View Drive just north of the intersection of Skyview Drive to US Route 50/63. Ramps will be constructed to provide access to US Route 50/63 in a partial cloverleaf configuration. Traffic control of the intersections of City View Drive with these ramps will be by roundabout design. City View Drive will be constructed with two 12 -foot lanes, 8 -foot shoulders, curbs and a 5 -foot sidewalk on the east side of the roadway. The off -ramps will be constructed with an 16 -foot wide lane, 4 -foot shoulder on left and 6 -foot shoulder on the right. The on -ramps will be constructed with a 18 -foot wide lane, 4 -foot shoulder on left and 6 -foot shoulder on the right. Additional turn lanes will be constructed as needed. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired. b. Schott Road. Schott Road will be realigned to create a "T -intersection" with the extension of City View Drive. Schott Road will be constructed with two 12 -foot lanes. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired for this project. c. U.S Route 50/63. Acceleration and deceleration auxiliary lanes will be added to US Route 50/63 as required by the new interchange. These lanes will be 12 feet wide with a 8 -foot wide shoulder. The existing at -grade 8 {17336/62452;77357 2} intersections with Eastwood Drive / LePage Road will be removed. Appropriate tum around treatments will be constructed at the end of these roadways. Existing median openings will be removed and shoulders will be reconstructed. The existing at grade intersections with Schott Road / Rolling Hills Road and Expressview Drive will have the median crossover pavement removed thereby creating right -in right -out only movements at these locations. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired for this project. d. Cellular Tower Access Road. A new access road to the cellular tower northeast of the intersection of City View Drive and US Route 50/63 will be constructed. This roadway will maintain access to the cellular tower from City View Drive. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired for this project. 10. The board of directors of the District (the `Board") shall be comprised of five members. 11. The terms of office of the members of the Board shall be staggered in approximately equal numbers to expire in one, two, or three years. 12. Petitioner proposes that the District be funded by imposing a sales tax on all retail sales made within the District which are subject to taxation pursuant to §§ 144.010 to 144.525, RSMo, except as provided by § 238.235, RSMo, but in any case in a manner consistent with § 238.207.4(9), RSMo. 13. The District does not constitute an undue burden on any owner of property within the District and is not unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, or unconstitutional. WHEREFORE, Petitioner pray for this Court's order 1) forming the District, 2) establishing the time and place of the first meeting of the owners of all of the real property located within the District, 3) certifying the Board's method of election, 4) establishing the time and place of the first meeting of the District's Board, 5) approving the District's proposed sales tax on retail sales as the method of funding the District, 6) approving the method of voter approval of the proposed sales tax, 7) for reimbursement 9 (17336/62452;773572) of their costs by the District when formed, including attorney's fees, and for such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Respectfully Submitted, WHITE GOSS BOWERS MARCH SCHULTE & WEISENFELS a Professional Corporation By: Christine T. Bushyhead Mo. 34188 Mary Jo Shaney Mo. 35919 4510 Belleview, Suite 300 Kansas City, Missouri 64111 Telephone: (816) 753-9200 Telecopier: (816) 753-9201 ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER 10 {17336 162452; 773572) EXHIBIT C TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS a. City View Drive. Extend City View Drive across US Route 50/63 to Schott Road south of US Route 50/63. Included in this improvement is a bridge spanning US Route 50/63, reconstructing City View Drive just north of the intersection of Skyview Drive to US Route 50/63. Ramps will be constructed to provide access to US Route 50/63 in a partial cloverleaf configuration. Traffic control of the intersections of City View Drive with these ramps will be by roundabout design. City View Drive will be constructed with two 12 -foot lanes, 8 -foot shoulders, curbs and a 5 -foot sidewalk on the east side of the roadway. The off -ramps will be constructed with an 16 -foot wide lane, 4 -foot shoulder on left and 6 -foot shoulder on the right. The on -ramps will be constructed with a 18 -foot wide lane, 4 -foot shoulder on left and 6 -foot shoulder on the right. Additional tum lanes will be constructed as needed. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired. b. Schott Road. Schott Road will be realigned to create a "T -intersection" with the extension of City View Drive. Schott Road will be constructed with two 12 -foot lanes. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired for this project. c. US Route 50/63. Acceleration and deceleration auxiliary lanes will be added to US Route 50/63 as required by the new interchange. These lanes will be 12 feet wide with a 8 -foot wide shoulder. The existing at -grade intersections with Eastwood Drive / LePage Road will be removed. Appropriate turn around treatments will be constructed at the end of these roadways. Existing median openings will be removed and shoulders will be reconstructed. The existing at grade intersections with Schott Road / Rolling Hills Road and Expressview Drive will have the median crossover pavement removed thereby creating right -in right - out only movements at these locations. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired for this project. d. Cellular Tower Access Road. A new access road to the cellular tower northeast of the intersection of City View Drive and US Route 50/63 will be constructed. This roadway will maintain access to the cellular tower from City View Drive. Right of Way and/or easements will need to be acquired for this project. 11 (17336 / 62452; 773572) EXHIBIT D DUAL ROUNDABOUT OPTION - September 30, 2005 REDEVELOPMENT COSTS Estimated Reimbursab Reimbursab Municipal / Wal-Mart Project Is from Is from TDD County Financing Costs MoDOT Revenues Financing Financing 7:ulnterchsr#`1oaMwa":.,&iSt als`1:"..��,I. E1�; r�?_,.".-=' Right of Wav Acquisition $1.350,0001 $375,000 .$375,000 $600,000 $0 lClearino 8 Grubbinq F $50,0001 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 Removal of Im rovements 1 $37,0001 518,500 $18,500 SO $0 Class A Excavation 1 $754,5001 $377,2501 $377,2501 Sol SO Class C Excavation I S269,7501 $134,8751 $134,675 $D $0 Embankment in Place (Borrow from Stare Site $360,000 $180,000 $180,000 $0 $D Embankment in Place (Haul in and Compact) $640,885 $320,443 $320,443 $0 $0 Compacting Embankment 1 $131,7501 $65.8751 $65,875 $0 $0 Comoactino in Cut 1 $115,9251 $7,9631 $7,9631 SD s0 Type 5 Aggregate Base (4 in. Thick $129,550 $64,775 $64,775 $0 $0 Type 5 Aggregate Base (7 in. Thick $126,000 $63,000 $63,000 $0 $0 Gravel or Crushed Stone $22,0001 $11.000 $11,000 $0 $0 9 inches, Asphaltic Concrete Pavement, SP 125 C $32,992 $16,496 $16,496 SO s0 Concrete Pavement (9 in. non- reinf. - 15 ft'cints $1,037,400 $36B,700 $368,700 5300,000 $0 Roue 50/63 Pavement Widening$672,000 $336,000 $336,000 SO $0 Draina a 1 $400,0001 $200.0001 $200,000 $0 $D Guard Rail 1 $50,0001 $25,0001 $25,0001 Sol SO Concrete Median Siri $9,100 $4,550 $4,550 $0 $0 Concrete Sidewalk, 5 ft. wide $67,200 $33,600 $33,600 s0 $0 Inte raI Curb 6 in, height) T e A $44,000 $22,000 $22,000 $D s0 Traffic Control $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 SO Mobilization $258,3001 $129,150 $129,150 $D $0 Pavement Marking $40,5001 $20,250 $20,250 $0 $0 MSE Wall (Along Cell tower Road) $518.0001 $259,000 $259,000 $01 $0 MSE Wall(Along City View Road $288,600 $64.000 $204,600 Sol s0 Seedinq/Soddinq $38,000 $19,000 $19,000 $0 $0 Erosion Control $200,000 $100,0001 $100,000 $0 $0 Lighting $100,000 $50.0001 $50,000 SO $0 Roundabout Intersections $100,000 $50,0001 $50,000 Si nals $0 $D $0 $0 $0 Sianino $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $O Conoco Phillips Pipelines Relocation 50 $245,000 $122,500 $122,500 $0 $0 Utility Relocation $100,0001 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 2 Span Plate Girder Bride sl,34u,uuul $670,000 $670,000 $0 $0 Contingency 3% $241,304 $120,652 $120,652 SO $0 Tafal tersjt�t9e'i$oadwa3t' P r 9,�F9, gal�. 7aF 59^ ,5 1; r�tJnr Sf als,.._�.� ..L.r,:.'`. w� �k :ti. .E 2. Utiitt extensionss Sanitary Sewer Extension $225,400 $0 $0 $0 $225,400 Water Main Extension $85,200 s0 s0 $0 $85,200 Conoco Gas Mains Relocation (50 1 $245,000 s0 $0 $0 $245,000 Natural Gas Main Extenson 1 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 Contin encv (12% $66,672 $0 $0 $D $66,672 ToiHliiEi1 `Extenalonc „::- nS657t'272'is ;:"t',a3B -?_i=ISD r,-D,rr" 657,27,2 S: 9fteLaaii° uisititinaCosts=�9'�D`ttIX! �- ="�0 _ =?�wQ � `�D x$3B��000 4. Buildin Costs Buildin Construction1 $8,120,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,120,000 12 117336/62452;77357.2) Continoency (12%) $974,4001 $0 $0 $0 $974,400 9 .. 9 -Totsl.'BdlIdInMCo8ts-' 4WMA00 VAGO 4.Sitework Earthwork $2,3971,000 $o $0 $0 $2,391,000 ,�torm Dralnaoe $457.538 $0 $0 $0 $457,538 Landscaping $1 41 , 000 $0 $0 $0 $141,000 Miscellaneous - Ret Wall, & Demolition $1,060,745 $0 $o $0 $1,060,745 Water Service 1 $147,246 $0 $o $0 $147,24 Sanitary Sewer $105,585 $0 $0 $0 $105,585 Onsite Utilities $53,160 $53,165 Paving 1 $1,607,345 $0 $0 $0 $1,607,345 Parking Lot- Pavement Marking, Ught bases $154,100 $0 TO $0 $154,100 Exterior Lighting $30,996 $o $0 $0 $30,996 Contingency 12%) 5737,846 $0 $0 $0 $737,846 Contractor's Overhead & Profit $998,551 1 $998,551 W"Rkm �fflaw"2 T soft costs Topographic & Boundary Surveys (Highway) $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $o $5 Topographic & Boundary Surveys Site $75,000 I $0 $0 $0 $75,005 Civil Engineering( Highway and Bridge) $635,000 $317,500 $317,500 $0 I $0 Civil Encineerinqf Site $422,000 $0 $0 $0 $422,000 Geotechnical Engineering (Highway) $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $5 Geotechnical Engineering Site $100i000 $0 $0 $o $100,355 Environmental Studies & Permitting (Highway) $17,000 $8,500 $8,500 $0 $0 Environmental Studies & Permitting Site $18,000 I $0 $0 $0 $18,000 Impact Fees/Permits $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 Construction Interest and Financing Costs $796,188 $0 $796,188 $0 $0 Civil engineering (Utility $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,00E T:e�ns, 1. IT101MI01 PAOJ Note: County Contribution $300,000 City Contribution $600,000 Earthwork cost assumes required combination contract for Highway and Site Project Costs are based on 2006 year construction 13 117336 / 62452; 77357.2) EXHIBIT E WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Approximately 1350 linear feet of 10 -inch diameter C-900 water main and 300 linear feet of 10 -inch ductile iron pipe in an 18 -inch steel casing will need to be constructed to extend the existing 10 -inch public water main from the intersection of LePage Road and Route 50/63. The public water main extension will be located along the southern limits of the proposed MoDOT right of way adjacent to ramp 3 to the southern limits of the proposed City View Drive right of way, then along the proposed City View Drive right of way to a point near the intersection of City View Drive and Route 50/63. Set forth below is a list of the materials required for the Water Main Extension: 10 -inch C-900 PVC watermain 1350 linear feet 10 -inch ductile iron pipe inl8" steel casing 3001inear feet — open cut 10- inch gate valve 2 each 8 -inch tapping sleeve I each 8 -inch tapping valve w/ box 1 each Water main fittings 1400 pounds Select granular backfill 100 cubic yards 14 117336/ 62452; 773572} EXHIBIT F SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS A public sewer extension consisting of 2050 linear feet of 4 -inch PVC force main, 300 linear feet of 4 -inch ductile iron force main with a bored and jacked steel casing, a sanitary sewer pump station, 1200 linear feet of 8 -inch PVC gravity sewer and 4 sanitary manholes will be constructed from the existing public sewer located on the east side of City View Drive approximately 1000 feet north of Route 50/63. The public sewer will extend along the east side of City View Drive to the intersection of Ramp 1 of the City View interchange, then along the MoDOT right of way to the intersection with Route 50/63. The sewer will then extend to the south across Route 50/63 via a bored and jacked steel casing to the south right of way line of Route 50/63. The public sewer will further extend to the west to a point near the intersection of City View Drive and Route 50/63. A sanitary sewer duplex pump station with control panel will be installed near this location. The public sewer will additionally be extended by a 8 -inch gravity line to serve the proposed gas station outlet located south of the intersection of City View Drive and Ramp 3 of the interchange. Set forth below is a list of the materials required for the Sanitary Sewer Improvements: Sanitary sewer duplex pump stationw/ 1 Each control panel 8 -inch PVC gravity sewer 1200 linear feet 4 -inch PVC force main 2050 linear feet 4 -inch ductile iron force main bored 300 linear feet and jacked in steel casing Sanitary manholes 4 each Select granular backfill 700 cubic yards 15 {17336/62452;7735721 BILL NO. 2005-98 SPONSORED BY COUNCILMEN BROWN, Layton, Berry, Martin, Ferguson, Crane Harvey, Schnitzler, Vogel, and Pope ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI BY ANNEXING AND INCLUDING UNINCORPORATED REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF COLE, STATE OF MISSOURI, LYING NORTH OF THE PRESENT CITY LIMITS REFERRED TO AS THE HIGHWAY 179 AREA AND AUTHORIZING AN ELECTION TO APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF THE CITY LIMITS THROUGH ANNEXATION. WHEREAS, on September 6, 2005, the City of Jefferson, Missouri declared by resolution of the City Council its intent to annex unincorporated territory described in Section 1 below into the City of Jefferson, Missouri. WHEREAS, the City of Jefferson has developed a 'Plan of Intent' to provide services to the area proposed for annexation on the same basis upon which services presently are provided to the residents of the City of Jefferson, Missouri; WHEREAS, notices of the annexation public hearing, prior to final passage, were sent by certified mail to all fee owners of record having property in the proposed annexation area during the week of October 17, 2005; and WHEREAS, a public hearing concerning the annexation was advertised on October 23, and October 30, and November 6, 2005, in the Jefferson City News Tribune; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council at 6:00 p.m., November 17, 2005, in Council Chambers, 320 East McCarty Street, Jefferson City, Missouri, at which time the "Plan of Intent' was presented; and WHEREAS, The Mayor and City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, believe elections should be held in the City to determine if a majority of the qualified voters voting thereat are in favor of extending the limits of the City to included the unincorporated areas of land hereinafter described. Bill 2005-98 WHEREAS, the effective date of the annexation of the real estate described below will be when approved by the voters or November 1, 2006, whichever is later. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Jefferson, Missouri, intends to and shall proceed to annex, as provided by law, the unincorporated area of land described as follows: Hiahwav 179 Area Part of the Northeast quarter of Section 22 and part of the Northwest quarter of section 22, and part of the Southeast quarter of Section 15, and part of the Northeast quarter of Section 15, and part of the Northwest quarter of Section 15, and part of the Southwest quarter of Section 14, and part of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, and part of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 11, and part of the Southeast quarter of Section 10, and part of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, all in the Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the County of Cole, State of Missouri and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 22, Township 44 North, Range 12 West; thence North 00 degrees 38'04" East, along the quarter quarter section line, 882.36 feet, to the intersection with the westerly line of Missouri State Highway 179, as per reference plans of Job No. J5U0441G; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Missouri State Highway 179, the following courses: North 13 degrees 49'27" West, 4.71 feet, to a point 55.451 meters (181.93 feet) right of centerline station 3+639.091; thence North 00 degrees 49'40"East, 209.62 feet, to a point 43.569 meters (142.94 feet) right of centerline station 3+579.662; thence North 30 degrees 33'45" West, 209.62 feet, to a point 70 meters (229.66 feet) right of centerline station 3+525.000; thence North 01 degrees 32'50" East, 301.14 feet, to a point 65 meters (213.25 feet) right of centerline station 3+439.872; thence North 16 degrees 45'35" East, 306.07 feet, to a point 40 meters (131.23 feet) right of centerline station 3+350.000; thence North 12 degrees 16'50" West, 421.75 feet, to a point 70 meters (229.66 feet) right of centerline station 3+225.000; thence North 12 degrees 31'31" East, 418.23 feet, to a point 45 meters (147.64 feet) right of centerline station 3+100.000; thence North 02 degrees 35'36" West, 57.90 feet to the intersection of said westerly right of way line with the north line of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 15; thence leaving the said westerly right of way line on a bearing of North 89 degrees 09'27" East, along the north line of said Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter and the north line of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 15, 1374.67 feet, to the Northeast comer of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 15; thence South 86 degrees 10'24" East, along the north line of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter 1378.23 feet, to the northeast corner of said quarter quarter section; thence North 05 degrees 57'37" East, along the east quarter quarter section line of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 14, 1367.51 feet, to a point that is the Southeast comer of the west half of the Northwest quarter of Section 14; hence North 05 degrees 21' 14" East, 2716.12 feet, to the southerly right of way of West Edgewood Drive; thence continuing along said quarter quarter section line to the north line of Section 14; thence North 06 degrees 00'26" West, along the east line of the quarter quarter section line of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 11, 1180.27 feet, thence leaving said quarter quarter section line, South 37 degrees 34'l 0" East, 133.279 feet, thence South 00 degrees 00'50" West, 9.90 feet; thence South 53 degrees Bill 2005-98 00'57" West,204.59 feet; thence South 10 degrees 09'10" East, 907.059 feet, to the northerly right of way of said West Edgewood Drive; thence in a westerly direction along the northerly right of way of said West Edgewood Drive, on a curve to the right having a radius of 1392.39 feet, a length of 170.43 feet,( having a chord North 83 degrees 24'25" West., 170.32 feet); thence North 79 degrees 54'05" West, 257.93 feet; thence North 10 degrees 05'55" West, 45 feet; thence North 79 degrees 54'05" West, 116.49 feet; thence South 10 degrees 05'55" West, 40.00 feet: thence North 79 degrees 54'05" West, 385.21 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 1477.39 feet, an are distance of 300.24 feet, (the chord of said curve being North 85 degrees 43'24" East, 299.72 feet), to a point where the northerly right of way of said West Edgewood Drive intersects the section line between Section I 1 and Section 10: thence on a curve to the left having a radius of 1477.39 feet an arc distance of 96.27 feet ( the chord of said curve being South 86 degrees 35'17" West, 96.26 feet); thence South 84 degrees 43'16" East, 22.91 feet; thence leaving said northerly right of way of West Edgewood Drive, South 04 degrees 31'29" East, 90.00 feet to the southerly right of way of said West Edgewood Drive; thence South 04 degrees 31'29" East, 248.47 feet, to the south line of Section 10; thence South 83 degrees 51'58" West, 1220.17 feet, to the southwest comer of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10; thence North 05 degrees 40'59" West, 418.47 feet, along the quarter quarter section line, to a point that is the easterly right of way of Missouri State Highway 179, as per reference plans of Job No. J5U0441D, that is left of centerline station 1+709, 130.041 meters(426.64 feet); thence along the easterly right ofway of said Highway 179 to a point that is left of centerline station 1+640, 66 meters (216.54 feet); thence to a point that is left of centerline station 1+530, 84 meters ( 275.59 feet); thence to a point that is left of centerline station 1+457.564, 52 meters (170.60 feet); thence northwesterly to a point where the easterly right of way of said Highway 179 intersects the north line of Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 10; thence along said quarter quarter section line South 82 degrees 21'12" West, 733.19 feet, to the northeast comer of the South half of the Southwest quarter of Section 10; thence South 82 degrees 23'31" West, 1000.01 feet; thence South 05 degrees 35'43" East, 370.00 feet; thence South 27 degrees 40'23" East, 1073.81 feet, thence North 82 degrees 39'49" East, 600.00 feet, to a point that is the Southeast corner of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of section 10; thence South 05 degrees 27'44" East, 1377.35 feet, along the quarter section line to the Southeast comer of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 15; thence South 04 degrees 30' East, along the quarter section line 535.17 feet, to the northerly line of county road ( know as Frog Hollow Road); thence across county road to a tract of property conveyed to Maple Leaf Properties, LLC as per Book 448 Page 241 of Cole County Recorders Office, of which is the northwest comer of a 15 foot wide tract; thence in a southerly direction along the westerly side of said 15 foot wide parcel, 830 feet more or less, to the quarter section line; thence in an easterly direction along said quarter section line, 15 feet, to the southeast comer of the Northwest quarter of Section 15; thence in a southerly direction along the quarter section line to the south quarter comer of said Section 15; thence in a westerly direction along the section line, 66 feet; thence in a southerly direction to a point that is 20 feet perpendicular to the centerline of a private road at station 1+92.8 as recorded in Book 153, Page 525 Cole County Recorders Office; thence across said road to the east side of 40 foot right of way, 20 feet southeast of station 1+92.8; thence southerly and southwesterly along the easterly right of way of said private road to a point where the easterly right of way of said private road intersects the northerly line of Lot #1 of Williams Subdivision, Plat Book 12, Page 135, recorded in Cole County Recorders Office; thence North 90 degrees 00'00" East, 195.72 feet; thence South 00 degrees 58'20" East, 233.97 feet, thence North 87 degrees 53'49" West, 185.25 feet, to a point where the property line intersects the easterly right ofway of said ValleyHi Road; thence in a southerly direction along said right of way to intersect the northerly property line of tract of property described in Book 251, Page 319, of Cole County Recorders Office; thence in a southeasterly direction to the easterly line of said parcel; thence South 04 degrees 33'52" East, 143.84 feet; thence in a northwesterly direction to the easterly right of way of said Valley Hi Road; thence southeasterly along said easterly right of way of Valley Hi Road described in Book434, Page 979, Exhibit `A' of Cole County Recorders Office, Bili 2005-9e 3 to a point of intersection with the north right of way conveyed to the State of Missouri as Route `C', (presently named as Rock Ridge Road); thence in an easterly direction along said Route `C', 145 feet; thence North parallel with the west line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 22, 1000 feet, to the north line of said quarter quarter section; thence in an easterly direction along the south line of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 22, to the point of beginning, EXCEPTING the following described lots or parcels of land all located in the State of Missouri, County of Cole: Lot 4, Fainwood 1st Addition as recorded in book 6, page 61 of the Cole County Recorder of Deeds Office; Lot 22 and 23, Fainwood 3rd Addition, as recorded in Book 11, Page 258 of the Cole County Recorder of Deeds Office; a parcel of land lying south of Edgewood and as described in book 430, page 188 of the Cole County Recorder of Deeds Office; and a parcel of land lying south of Edgewood and as described in book 337, page 979 of the Cole County Recorder of Deeds Office. Containing in all, 548 acres, more or less. Section 2. The City Council determines and does affirmatively state that the unincorporated area described in Section 1 is contiguous to the existing city limits and is compact. Section 3. The City Council determines and does affirmatively state that the length of the contiguous boundary common to the existing city limit and the proposed area to be annexed is at least fifteen percent (15%) of the length and the perimeter of the area proposed for annexation. Section 4. The City Council finds and declares that the annexation of the unincorporated area described in Section 1 is reasonable and necessary to the proper development of the city. Section 5. The City has developed a "Plan of Intent" to provide services to the area proposed for annexation after the date of annexation. (Copy attached) Said Plan of Intent is hereby adopted. Section 6. A public hearing has been held, as provided by law, on the annexation of the unincorporated area described in Section 1. Section 7. A petition for Declaratory Judgement shall be filed as soon as possible after the final election. Section 8. A proposition to extend the City Limits of the City of Jefferson, Missouri so as to embrace and include all that territory located in the County of Cole, Missouri, known as the Highway 179 Area, and as described in Section 1, shall be submitted to the voters of the City of Jefferson, Missouri and the voters of the unincorporated territory subject to the annexation proceedings, and an election shall be held and conducted for this area on Tuesday, the Ph of February, 2006. Bill 2005-9e 4 Section 9. If a majority of legal voters in the City of Jefferson vote in favor of the proposition, and a majority of legal voters of the unincorporated territory subject to the annexation proceedings shall vote in opposition to the proposition, a second election shall be held and conducted for this area to resubmit the proposition as described in Section 1, on Tuesday, the 4`h day of April, 2006. Section 10. The Proposition to be submitted on February 7, 2006, and April 4, 2006, if necessary, shall be as follows: PROPOSITION NO. A Shall the corporate limits of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, be extended to include the unincorporated areas of land contiguous to the present city corporate limits named as the Highway 179 Area in Ordinance *_ enacted by the City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, on November 19, 2005? ❑ YES ❑ NO Section 11. The annexation shall be effective immediately upon approval by the voters, or November 1, 2006, whichever is later. Section 12. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval. Passed: Approved: Presiding Officer Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk *add in Ordinance number upon approval. Bill 2005-98 5 APPROaD O FORM: r7 / i ! City Counselor PLAN OF INTENT for Annexing Unincorporated Land into the Corporate Limits of the City of Jefferson, Missouri Prepared by THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 1. Description of Area. 1 2. Area is Contiguous. 1 3. History of this Annexation Initiative. 1 4. Voluntary Annexations Will Not Achieve Goal. 2 III. REASONABLENESS AND NECESSITY OF ANNEXATION 3 1. Annexation of the area is reasonable and logical. 3 2. Annexation of the area is economically feasible. 4 IV. LISTING OF MAJOR SERVICES PRESENTLY PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF JEFFERSON 4 1. Police Protection 4 2. Fire Protection 6 3. Parks, Recreation, and Forestry 6 4. Planning and Zoning. 7 5. Jefferson City Housing Authority 7 6. Community Development 8 a. Streets 8 b. Wastewater Utilities: 8 C. Transit 9 H:\Anaexatw.\A.nexatm-2006\Revisal Plan d ffitmt 10-11-05 uWd _1_ d. Airport 9 C. Animal Rescue Division. 9 f. Building Regulations Division. 10 g. Current and Long Range Planning Divisions 11 h. Environmental Services Division 11 i. Engineering ' 12 j. Parking 1? V. PROPOSED TIME SCHEDULE WHEREBY THE CITY PLANS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE ANNEXATION AREA 13 1. Police Protection: 13 2. Fire Protection 13 3. Parks, Recreation, and Forestry 13 4. Planning and Zoning. 14 5. Jefferson City Housing Authority 14 6. Community Development 14 Stornzwater Drainage 14 Wastewater 14 Streets 15 H:\Anaexatw.\A.nexatm-2006\Revisal Plan d ffitmt 10-11-05 uWd _1_ VI. EFFECTS OF ANNEXATION 16 1. Property Tax. 16 VII. EXISTING AND PURPOSED LAND USES 16 1. Existing Land Use 16 a. Current Land Use Acreage. 16 b. Agricultural Uses 17 C. Existing and Future Commercial Land Uses. 17 d. Recreational Uses. 17 e. Single Family Residential Uses 18 f. Multiple Family Residential Uses 18 g. Roadways 18 h. Other Land Uses 19 2. How the City Proposes to Zone the Area to be Annexed 19 3. Summary Description of Proposed Zoning Districts 20 VIII. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION 21 Appendix A. Map Showing location of Proposed Annexation Area 2? Appendix B. Contiguity 2? Appendix C. Map Showing Preliminary Study Area 22 Appendix D. Showing the Entire Area Looked at (Less Portions Already Annexed 22 Appendix E. Council Growth and Annexation Committee Meetings 22 Appendix F. Citizen Input 2? Appendix G. Jefferson City Financial Statement (Budget in Brief) 22 Appendix H. Fire Response Times 22 Appendix I. Fire Department Manning Survey 22 Appendix J. Purposed Zoning 2? Appendix K. Existing Land Uses 22 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION PROPOSED JEFFERSON CITY ANNEXATION 23 H:Nnnexaciam\W ation-3006Vtev'ttd Plop otlntmt 10-11-05 awed 'n— PLAN OF INTENT FOR ANNEXING UNINCORPORATED LAND INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI PROPOSED HIGHWAY 179 ANNEXATION AREA I. INTRODUCTION The City Council of the City of Jefferson City, Missouri, has expressed intent to annex the area as generally defined above. Missouri law requires that prior to annexation, a report be prepared and presented at a public hearing setting forth the plans of the municipality for providing major municipal services. A timetable for the provision of these services and an indication as to the methods of financing also is provided. The following information has been compiled by the principal departments of the City of Jefferson City, Missouri, that would be responsible for the provision of services to newly annexed areas. A series of maps accompanies and is an integral part of this report. H. BACKGROUND Description of Area. The City of Jefferson City is proposing to annex approximately 548 acres in the unincorporated area of Cole County south of the City, referred to herein as the 179 Annexation Area. (See Appendix A) The proposed area follows Sate Highway 179 from the existing City boundary at Edgewood Road, south to Valley Hi Drive. (See Exhibit B). The area is generally surrounded on two sides by the existing City limits. 2. Area is Contiguous. Seventy-one percent (71%) of the boundary of the area is contiguous with the existing boundary of the City. (State law requires that the area be at least 15% contiguous) 3. History of this Annexation Initiative. In June of 2003, Mayor Landwehr created a standing committee of the City Council to study annexation. This became the Growth and Annexation Committee. In 2003 the Capital Area Partnership for Planned Growth (CAPPG) began a study of the annexation policies of the City of Jefferson. CAPPG was made of a mix of city and county residents, H:Annuotiow\A==mion - 2005Udevi od Plan of Immt 10-11.05 a.wpd government officials, business persons, real estate developers and others. CAPPG identified the Highwayl79 corridor and Edgewood Drive as areas which should receive priority consideration for voluntary annexation. In addition, CAPPG recommended that involuntary annexations should be limited in size and should only be used in exigent circumstances. CAPPG recommended that voluntary annexation be used to the extend possible. While recognizing that unanimous support for any annexation project is unattainable, CAPPG recommended that the City should assess public opinion and elicit public input prior to proceeding with a plan. (Capital Area Partnership for Planned Growth, Final Report, October 8, 2004.). Following the recommendation of CAPPG to examine the Edgewood/179 area, the City conducted numerous public discussions of the past 12 months to determine whether annexation of 179 corridor was desirable, to gauge public opinion, and to determine specifically the boundaries of the annexation area. Seven public meetings were held by the Council Committee on Growth and Annexation between August 2004 and May 2005 where annexation in the 179 corridor was discussed (See Appendix D, showing the entire area looked at (less portions already annexed). In addition, the full Council held a public forum on May 23, 2005 to discuss annexation in the 179 corridor and what areas should and should not be included. Eleven members of the public spoke and offered support, criticisms and suggestions regarding annexation in the 179 corridor and what the boundaries of the proposed annexation should be. The Council requested the Staff to divide the 179 corridor into specific smaller study areas so that the Council could carefully decide the specific areas where annexation should be pursued. This is referred to as the initial study area. The initial study area is shown in Appendix C. It included eleven distinct study areas. After considering the comments of stakeholders in the 179 corridor and the costs and benefits to existing citizens, the Council elected only to pursue voter approved annexation in 7 of the 11 study areas. The area selected is shown in Appendix B. This reflects due consideration to the incremental approach urged by CAPPG and the County Commission. The official resolution initiating the annexation process was adopted on September 6, 2005. Neighborhood meetings were held in the populated parts of the study area. This included small intimate meetings of a few families held at residents homes and larger meetings for the entire area held at larger venues. The larger meetings also included input from current residents. In total eleven meetings were held over a six month period. A complete listing of the meetings is shown in Appendix . Meetings were also held with other interested stakeholders, including the County Commission, Three Rivers Electric, and the Cole County Fire Protection District. 4. Voluntary Annexations Will Not Achieve Goal. The Cityhas had great success in securing many voluntary annexations within the study area. acres of the original study area have been annexed voluntarily. This does not include the approximately 130 acres voluntarily annexed for the St. Mary's hospital site in 2004. However, voluntary annexations have carried with them certain problems. First the tremendous response from land owners wanting to annex, creates a danger that other land owners, not yet ready to annex, will H:Nmcxatioms mnatiun - 20wReki Pl of Inimt 10-11-05 awed 2 become islands, completely surrounded by the City. Indeed the City has had to refrain from annexing some property simply to prevent creating such islands. Secondly, voluntary annexations tend to be erratic based on development at specific locations. This does not lend itself to orderly and planned development thus failing to achieve the primary goal of annexation. III. REASONABLENESS AND NECESSITY OF ANNEXATION 1. Annexation of the area is reasonable and logical. Annexation of the purposed area is reasonable and logical for the following reasons: a. Although the bulk of the area is presently rural, with a few residential subdivisions, the projected development within the proposed area will be largely of an urban character (retail developments, office and professional complexes, and residential subdivisions). This development is already underway in the northern part of the area. Substantial development is planned in the middle and southern portions, including the new St. Mary's hospital. Such development is more appropriate within a municipal framework. Most retail establishments would prefer to be located within the City limits and therefore the lack of annexation will be a hindrance to the economic growth of the area. b. The City is in need of sites for residential and commercial development and such sites are available in the proposed area. c. Analysis of past growth patterns shows that much of the growth that would have occurred inside the City has instead spilled over into the unincorporated area immediately surrounding the city. d. The area and the existing City will benefit from the uniform application and enforcement of building, plumbing, and electrical codes. e. Significant parts of the area are effected by flooding and will benefit from a regional approach to storm water as well as uniform enforcement of flood plain regulations. In addition significant parts of the area are part of watersheds that flow into the City. As the area develops there needs to be storm water abatement to protect the current residents of the City. £ It is expected that the area will experience exponential growth in the next 1-3 years. Since the County currently lacks planning and zoning, the area will benefit from uniform planning and zoning practices. In addition the City's current residents will benefit by being protected from unplanned and unregulated growth immediately outside our borders. g. Highway 179 and EdgewoodRoad, both major thoughfares, cross throughthe proposed area. As a result, both roads are alternatively in or out of the City limits. This causes confusion and delay in responding to fire and police calls. H:Wmumiom\Annuotion-?0o6Tmised Plan of lnt=t 10-11-05 a.xVd 3 h. Large retail developments, offices, and residences will benefit from being constructed in accordance with the City's building and fire code. 2. Annexation of the area is economically feasible. Annexation of the proposed area will increase the total size of the city by _%. Annexation of the proposed area will increase the population of the City by _°/H. These are relatively small increases which can easily be accommodated. The City is in a sound financial position and well capable of providing the services outlined in this plan. Annexation of the area is economically feasible for the following reasons: a. The City currently has authorized 88 sworn police officers. This includes three additional officers recently added.. The number of officers is currently more than adequate and this puts the City in a position to look at annexation of relatively small areas such as this one without the necessity to fund additional officers. The current force is sufficiently large to handle the additional calls that the proposed area would likely generate for the foreseeable future. b. The City Fire Department has recently added three additional officers and is sufficiently large to handle the calls generated for the foreseeable future. Because the number of firefighters is more than sufficient currently, additional firefighters would not be needed if annexation were to be successful. Likewise the current number and location of fire stations would be sufficient to handle calls in the purposed area. Estimated response times are shown in Appendix D C. The City already provides sewer to the area and the existing treatment plant is sufficient to handle the expected increase in demand. The City has already installed sewer crossings under Highway 179 in the appropriate palaces. The costs of sewer expansions would be borne by developers. d. The taxes generated from the area will be sufficient to cover the costs of maintaining existing public infrastructure. IV. LISTING OF MAJOR SERVICES PRESENTLY PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF JEFFERSON The various departments and agencies of the City of Jefferson currently provide a wide range of services to citizens residing within the present corporate limits. These services, listed by department or agency, are: 1. Police Protection: H:Wm inmrinnaation- 200641evisrA Plnn o(Intmt 10-11-05 o.wyd 4 The Jefferson City Police Department protects the lives and property of our citizens with a force of 88 sworn officers. The Police Department divides the City of Jefferson into five zones (beats). Zone 1 is located on the north side of the City, Zone 2 is located in the east side of the City, Zone 3 is located in the central part of the City, Zone 4 is located on the south side of the City, and Zone 5 is located on the west side of the City. The Police Department provides the following services to the citizens of Jefferson City: a. Comprehensive uniform patrol function for the prevention and detection of crime and apprehension of criminal offenders. b. Traffic regulation, education, and enforcement program administered by specifically defined Traffic Unit. C. Advanced traffic accident investigation services with several certified accident reconstructlonist on staff. d. State-of-the-art 911 Emergency Communications Center. e. Eight member criminal investigation unit with special training in evidence management and juvenile and domestic violence law. f. Crime detection and prevention programs such as Neighborhood Watch, Crime Stoppers, National Night Out, Sober Driver, vacation house watchlist, and numerous programs involving youth safety issues. g. Offer security inspections for residences and businesses in the City, as well as workplace violence prevention workshops. h. Covert drug enforcement and surveillance equipment and operations by Investigation Section detectives. i. Documentation and assistance for emergency and routine calls for service. Each officer is certified in Red Cross first aid and CPR. j. School Resource Officers are assigned in Simonsen 9'h Grade Center, Lewis & Clark Middle School, Thomas Jefferson Middle School, and Jefferson City Senior High School. k. Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program in public elementary and private parochial schools. 1. All members of the Traffic Unit are certified in the operation of police motorcycles which facilitates enforcement of traffic laws. In. Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Unit created for rapid deployment, to high risk incidents and for the execution of search and arrest warrants. HAA.a.tm.\A.c .fian -2006\Revved Pl..Nwrnt 10 -11 -OS awed 5 n. Community Action Team (CAT) designed to apply contemporary community policing strategies to a diverse community. These policing philosophies and strategies focus on crime prevention, community/neighborhood partnerships, and customizing police service to meet the specific needs of the businesses and residents. o. The office Professional Standards is charged with the responsibility of throughly and fairly investigating all citizen allegations ofpolice misconduct. 2. Fire Protection: The Jefferson City Fire Department is a professional fire department with an authorized strength of 72 firefighters. Twenty-four (24) hour fire services provided by five existing fire stations. Through scheduling and manning requirements, residents are assured of having a minimum of twenty fire personnel on duty every hour of every day of the year. The Fire Department protects the citizens of our city by providing the following services: a. Centralized dispatching of fire personnel by the E-911 system ensures quick response to an emergency situation providing residents with increased personal safety. b. The Fire Department provides medical first responder service within the City in conjunction with Capital Region Emergency Medical Services. Firefighters are licensed Emergency Medical Technicians or Paramedics. Capital Region provides ongoing training to the firefighters and staffs an ambulance in one of the City's stations. Staffed apparatus are equipped with external defibrillators, oxygen equipment, and other medical equipment. C. Limiting structural fire damage within the first few minutes is critical and is accomplished by responding with adequate manpower immediately upon receipt of a call to E-911 central dispatching. Dispatched to every structural fire within the City are two engine companies, a ladder company, squad company, and an assistant chief. d. Rescue services provided for disentanglement from automobiles, farm equipment, or other machinery is handled by two strategically located squad companies. e. Other fire protection services provided by the City of Jefferson are fire code inspection, public fire safety education, and service calls, such as pumping basements and responses to carbon monoxide alarm calls. 3. Parks, Recreation, and Forestry: The purpose of the Department of Parks and Recreation is to provide for the diverse leisure, conservation, recreation and aesthetic needs of the community. The City of Jefferson Department H:V nvcxnaonsWtui:xvtivv-30060 i,e Playvrlvtrnt 10-11-05 a.upd of Parks and Recreation operates a wide variety of Park and Recreation facilities. Programs and special events on a year-round basis for all age groups and abilities. The Department offers and manages: a. Programs in youth and adult sports, senior citizen, and special population activities. b. A wide variety of outdoor education/recreation self-improvement and instructional courses. C. Lifetime recreation activity skill classes in swimming, ice skating, and golf. d. 1,300 acre park system with facilities for a multitude of passive and active recreation programs and special events. The park system contains fifteen properties, ranging in size from one acre to over 600 acres, including 165 acres North of the Missouri River. e. Two swimmingpools, eleven lighted athletic fields, over 10.5 miles ofpaved multi-purpose greenway trails, an 18 -hole public golf course, and fifteen miles of mountain biking trails. f. 175 acres of fishing lakes, six large picnic pavilions, twelve playground equipment areas, one skateboard park, eleven lighted tennis courts, one recreational vehicle campground with eighteen fall hook-up sites, and an indoor ice arena. g. Enforcement of hazardous tree measures on public and private property. 4. Planning and Zoning. The City has a comprehensive plan and a zoning map. The purpose of zoning is to protect property values and encourage intelligent development by ensuring that incompatible uses are not located near to each other. The zoning regulations are administered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Adjustment, which are made up of citizens from the community. Further citizen input is achieved by requiring notice to surrounding property owners when a proposal is made to change existing uses. Planning entails not only review of purposed developments to be sure that they comply with Federal, State and local laws, but more importantly planning the procedure of evaluating how the City will evolve and grow and making preparations to assure that such growth is compatible with the existing community. 5. Jefferson City Housing Authority: The Jefferson City Housing Authority provides assistance to citizens and neighborhoods that meet certain defined guidelines established by the federal government and/or the State of Missouri. The services and assistance offered by the Housing Authority are generally provided to low and very -low H:Nm atiams meatian-1006\Rosa Plan o(ImrnI 10-11-05 aupd 7 income tenants and neighborhoods. The type of services available to qualified individuals, families, and neighborhood areas include: Family/Public housing. Elderly and disabled housing. Rental subsidy in private market units for eligible individuals and families Senior Center and senior citizen activity programs. A significant number of social services are offered by the Housing Authority and/or other agencies from facilities operated by the Authority. Examples include nutritional programs, day care, and Head Start programs. 6. Community Development: The Department of Community Development focuses on maintaining, improving, and developing the City of Jefferson. This task is divided amongst ten departments. These department serve the City in the following ways: a. Streets • Repair and maintain public streets and alleys. • Snow plowing and chemical treatment for snow removal. • Street sweeping. • Annual street resurfacing program. • Maintain and replace public storm drainage system to include bridges, culverts, pipes, inlets, and miscellaneous structures. • Maintain City owned and operated street lights. • Maintain traffic signals, traffic signing and pavement markings. • Issuance and inspection of street cut and right of way excavation permits, inspect and patch street excavations. • Minor repair and replacement of curbs and gutters. • Small street or stormwater construction projects. • Maintain rights of way. b. Wastewater Utilities: The City operates a wastewater system that treats eleven million gallons of wastewater each day, including 400 miles of gravity sewers and 30+pump stations. H:Wmmncioms =atian- 2006Tnwi PW ofInImt 10.11-05 nwpd • The Wastewater division also supervises construction to upgrade and expand the system. The Division administers a pretreatment program with certain industries. • The Wastewater Division works with developers to extend sanitary sewer lines to developing land. • The Division provides twenty-four (24) hour response to sewer backups, system overflows and odor complaints. • The Division locate lines forproperty owners, plumbers, and utilities. C. Transit d. Airport Public bus service is available Monday through Friday, from 6:45 a.m. to 5:45 p.m. A fixed route bus system is operated over set routes with regular time schedules. This fixed route public transit system is available to citizens and visitors alike. Regular fare is 50 cents. A "half -fare" program is available for eligible patrons. The City also operates Handiwheels, a city-wide paratransit service available to qualified disabled residents. The fare for this call-in service is $1.00 per one-way trip. Jefferson City operates and maintains a municipal airport for both commercial and private users located north of the Missouri River. e. Animal Rescue Division. The first and foremost job of the Animal Rescue Division is to protect the community from the spread of feline and canine diseases. The most -feared disease is rabies. Animal Rescue personnel are on call 24 hours a day for emergencies. The following services are provided: • Pick up stray animals within the City limits. Pick up animals within the City limits that are roaming without a leash. This aids in preventing animals from becoming injured or killed and helps limit the number of bite cases. • Remove and provide help in removing nuisance wildlife and wild animals, snakes and birds from homes, yards, out -buildings, etc. • Care of unwanted animals H:Wnocatinms no=aion-2006@ mcd Ploo of Immt 10-11-05 uwpd • Assist in finding animals that have bitten a person and see that proper steps are taken to insure the maximum safety of this person. • Promote and assist in educational programs for students of the local schools. • Pick up dead animals from the City streets, yards, and, upon request, houses. • Control of wasps, bees, and other insects in an outside environment where they could endanger people. • Protect persons and property by issuing summons to violators of the Animal Control Ordinance. • Help find missing animals. • Find homes for unwanted pups, kittens, dogs and cats when possible. • Protect animals from mistreatment. • Assist the police when threatened by animals in the performance of their duties. • Capture and return of escaped livestock and fowl to the owners. • Provide electronic ID chip program for all adopted animals leaving City shelter. Building Regulations Division. The Building Regulations Divisions administers and enforces all building, electrical, plumbing, and property maintenance codes. The purpose of these codes is to ensure public health and safety insofar as they are affected bybuilding construction through structural strength, adequate means of egress facilities, sanitary equipment and fire safety; and, in general, to secure safety to life and property from all hazards incident to the design, erection, repair or demolition of buildings. The Divisions inspectors make site inspections to ensure conformity with zoning regulations, for set back requirements, and appropriate use of property. H:W nadom\ m ation-2006Vd ,d Plop atlwrnt 10. 11.05 awpd 10 • The Division issues demolition permits for all structures to be removed. • The Division issues sign permits and inspect for ordinance conformity. The Division advises the public, engineers, contractors and other professionals on building code requirements and furnishes technical staff assistance to the Commission on Historic Preservation. g. Current and Long Range Planning Divisions: • Review proposed subdivision plats and development plans to ensure the development of a continuous street system, logical street naming and numbering systems, availability of adequate utilities and compliance with zoning codes, including land use, landscaping, lighting standards and bulk regulations. • Staff the Planning and Zoning Commission, maintain the zoning atlas; process applications on behalf of the Board of Adjustment for zoning appeals, zoning interpretations, zoning variances and conditional use permits. • Assist local groups with neighborhood planning matters. • Coordinate long range and transportation planning and coordinate with state and federal agencies such as Missouri Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, and U.S. Census Bureau. h. Environmental Services Division: The environmental services division protects the health and safety of Jefferson City citizens performing the following services: • Inspect various types of food services including restaurants, taverns, hospital kitchens, licensed child care facilities, schools, convenience stores, grocery stores, bakeries, delis, farmers' markets, temporary food stands, parking lot barbecues and mobile food vendors. • Provide design guidance to contractors/owners of new or remodeled food service establishments. • Investigate complaints from consumers related to food service establishments. • Investigate complaints and resolve problems concerning water supplies used for consumption. H:\M atiouWnncvotion-1006\RcvLMPlan oflnimt1011-05a d II Oversee City's trash contractor and compost site provider Investigate complaints and resolve violations of illegal dumping, trash accumulations, litter, hazardous materials, unsanitary or hazardous conditions to include rodents or vermin, dead trees, icy sidewalks, open cisterns or wells, bird roosts, and open burning of illegal materials, and other items. Provide a seasonal mosquito control program and provide public information programs and materials for preventive activity. Provide a seasonal weed control program i. Engineering: Design, prepareplans, and inspect public works construction projects for street, sanitary sewers, and stormwater improvements. Prepare and update public record maps of street rights-of-way, sanitary system, and stormwater system. Administer stormwater and flood hazard ordinances. Review plans for subdivision development and inspect construction of these public facilities. Administer consultant and construction contracts. Coordinate utility activity on right of way. Provide engineering services for other City departments. Coordinate projects with State of Missouri and other public agencies. Develop and maintain Geographic Information System (GIS) for City Departments Conduct neighborhood meetings and public hearings. Review plans prepared by developers and others which alter or extend the storm drainage system and sanitary sewer system. Conduct traffic studies. Parking Enforces parking ordinances. Operates public off-street parking facilities H:\Avnuwia�\Amecotion-2006\Rnui dPl oflntmt 10-11-05 a.ad 12 V. PROPOSED TIME SCHEDULE WHEREBY THE CITY PLANS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE ANNEXATION AREA The City of Jefferson plans to provide services listed in the preceding Section IV to the residents of the Annexation Area on the effective date of annexation, with the following modifications: 1. Police Protection: Jefferson City will provide police service to the Annexation Area immediately upon the effective date of its annexation. The Jefferson City Police Department maintains a patrol staffing requirement that provides 24 hour patrol services to its residents. Analysis of preliminary crime figures and calls for service in the Annexation Area reflects a call load that will not adversely impact work load levels for the Police Department with current personnel strength. The amount of area involved is also a factor as it related to response times within the Annexation Area. Current analysis of calls for service do not indicate a need to add additional personnel. The Jefferson City Police Department offers a variety of services that will be extended to the residents in the proposed Annexation Area. Community Policing and Problem Oriented Policing will be extended to include residents in the proposed Annexation Area. 2. Fire Protection: The City will assume fire protection services in the proposed annexation area upon the effective date of the annexation. The City will continue to cooperate with existing fire protection districts and other fire service providers. The City will work cooperatively with the water districts and land developers to attain the desired standards for fire hydrant and water system distribution capabilities. For certain remote areas, the City may place some reliance on the tanker truck capabilities of the fire district by agreement. The fire hydrant spacing standards are 300 ft. for commercial/industrial/institutional areas and 600 ft. for single family residential areas. The City will respond to calls for service from the City's closest staffed station and, depending upon the nature of the call, additional stations, apparatus and personnel will respond. 3. Parks, Recreation, and Forestry: H =aioavWn cion-2006acvac Plw ofbtmt 10-11-05 o."d 13 The general policy of the Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Commission has been to evaluate the potential park and recreation needs of annexation areas and to address provision of park and recreation programs and facilities for those areas on an equal basis with all other areas within the community. The proposed Annexation Area already contains P ark and Recreation facilities at the present time. 4. Planning and Zoning. The purposed zoning for the area is attached as Appendix _ 5. Jefferson City Housing Authority: The citizens of the Annexation Area will be eligible for consideration for programs offered by the Jefferson City Housing Authority. It must be noted, however, that (1) individuals, families, and areas must meet federally -established income and other participation criteria; (3) certain services, such as access to public housing, are operated on a "first come, first served" basis; and, (3) many of the Housing Authority services are dependent on federal funding. Any reductions in available federal funds would cause a corresponding reduction in services offered. 6. Community Development: Stormwater Drainage Jefferson City will be responsible for maintaining all public drainage facilities in the area which are currently being maintained by Cole County. Requests for local storm drainage improvements submitted by annexation area property owners will be given consideration equal to similar requests submitted by property owners currently residing in the City. The City does not participate in the construction of local storm drainage structures in new subdivisions. The City has constructed certain major storm drainage facilities in Jefferson City in recent years and will review the need to construct such facilities in the Annexation Area. Wastewater Wastewater generated within the Annexation Area is presently being collected and treated in a number of ways. Property currently served by septic tanks will continue to utilize that service until such time as growth in the area makes appropriate alternate services which may be provided by either package plants, construction of additional collector lines, lagoons or other forms of treatment based on size and timing of development. H:Woomaioms motion-2006glmv MPlm of lmmt 10.11.05 n.uVd 14 The City does not participate in the cost of constructing collection system lines in new subdivisions. The Department of Community Development reviews sewer construction plans submitted by developers, inspects construction work as it progresses, and accepts lines for maintenance when all City standards have been met. As the region develops and it becomes appropriate to make investments into infrastructure for wastewater treatment, the City will look to its wastewater fund, to economic development grants and to developers and owners who are generating the waste to fund improvements to the system. These improvements will occur in conjunction with and as the property is developed and will not be built generally in advance of user demands. Some portions of the area will be served by existing City facilities where they are in proximity to those facilities and the terrain would enable those connections to be made at reasonable cost -benefit ratios. Parking No publicly operated off-street parking facilities are planned within the proposed Annexation Area. Transit Regularly scheduled bus service is provided within the City's boundaries on fixed routes. Within 24 months the fixed route service will be reviewed to determine appropriate routes to provide service which matches the demand from various areas within the City. Areas which exhibit levels of demand warranting service will be served. Factors considered when determining fixedroutes include population density, major trip generators, customer demand for service, income levels, and vehicle ownership. Areas within the proposed annexation area will be reviewed and evaluated to determine possible routes which may be needed. Handiwheels paratransit service is a specialized service for the mobility impaired population. Federal law requires the service be provided within nine blocks of all fixed transit routes, however the City strives to make the service available beyond the nine -block area depending on availability of vehicles, drivers and funding. Extension of Handiwheels into the annexation area will occur as demand dictates. Streets Street Maintenance: Jefferson City will be responsible for maintaining all streets in the area which are currently being maintained by Cole County. Those streets in the annexation area that have not been accepted for maintenance by Cole County will not be maintained by Jefferson City. Street Signs and Marking: Street signing and marking will begin immediately upon annexation and will be completed within three years of the effective date of annexation. Street Lights: The City has an adopted policy for street lighting in improved subdivisions, subject to budget constraints, with the following criteria: NMmmmlom\Ammaion-2006\Rovis PI= of lmrn, 10 -II -05 aupd 15 • Installation of the street lights will generally be at spacings no less than 250 feet (residential) and 180 feet (commercial). • The spacing maybe less at locations of abrupt horizontal or vertical grade changes when needed for traffic safety. • The City may grant additional lighting on the basis of high concentration of pedestrian traffic such as downtown, school areas, serious traffic hazards, or high incidence of crime as determined by the Chief of Police. • Property owners requesting lighting would pay 25 percent for residential property and 50 percent for commercial property for the cost of installation and the City would install and pay formaintenance and operation when installation is complete. • Objections to the decision of the Director of Community Development with respect to the placing of street lighting can be appealed to the City Council within 30 days of the decision of the Director of Community Development. VI. EFFECTS OF ANNEXATION 1. Property Tax. Property within the City of Jefferson is assessed by the Cole County Assessor. Property within the City is assessed in the same manner as is property located outside the City. The level of assessment is based on a percent of true value. Residential property is valued at nineteen percent of true value, farmland is valued at twelve percent of true value and commercial property is valued at 32 percent of true value. New construction is assessed according to the above stated rates. The current property tax rate is $.5760 per one hundred dollars of valuation. This tax is broken down to $.48 general fund and $.0960 fireman retirement fund. VII. EXISTING AND PURPOSED LAND USES 1. Existing Land Use a. Current Land Use Acreage. Land use surveys were conducted in March 2005 and updated in August 2005. The existing land use is depicted on Existing Land Use Map (Appendix ---J. Existing land use acreage is shown in the following table. Existing Land Use in the Proposed Highway 179 Annexation Area Land Use Category Acreage Agricultural/Rural 171 H.I nmamicmV=natinn-2006VtcvivN PI..H.mt 10-11-05 a.wd 16 Commercial - Existing 28 Recreation (Future Greenway) 3 Residential - Single Family 123 Residential - Multiple Family 4 Vacant- Other 6 Vacant - Future Commercial 90 Vacant - Future Residential 42 State Highway Right -of -Way 49 County Right -of -Way 19 City Right -of -Way 7 Total Land Area 542 b. Amicultural Uses. Historical land use along Frog Hollow Road is "rural" but the character of this area is rapidly changing. Hilly and wooded terrain with farms, open fields and residential uses characterize the area along Frog Hollow Road, but the completion of the Highway 179 extension and plans for a new interchange midway between West Edgewood Drive and Missouri Route C Highway have opened up large areas to development potential. The largest undivided tracts still appear to be in agricultural use, however some of these large tracts are being planned for development by their owners. C. Existing and Future Commercial Land Uses. Commercial development is currently concentrated along Creek Trail Drive, in Creek Side Park Subdivision and includes a variety of uses including general business, offices, retail and warehouse operations. There is also a large day care operation and a dance studio on Creek Trail Drive. Two other individual commercial sites are located in the area, both located off of Frog Hollow Road. Land use along West Edgewood Drive is mixed, and includes agricultural, commercial and residential uses. A commercial development is also being planned west of the future interchange location proposed on Highway 179, and St. Mary's Health Center has announced their plans to construct a new hospital on the east leg of this future interchange location. There is one cell tower site in the area, located off of Creek Trail Drive. d. Recreational Uses. n:Wnna¢tionsWnnu¢tion- 2006\Revisal Plan a(Imrnt 10.1145 awed 17 The Jefferson City Parks and Recreation Commission owns a strip of land along the east side of Frog Hollow Road adjacent to Wears Creek, extending from West Edgewood Drive to the Cedarwood Court vicinity. This strip is for potential expansion of Greenway Trail System. Existing Greenway is located along West Edgewood Drive, which passes through both incorporated and unincorporated areas at this time. e. Single Family Residential Uses The bulk of occupied residential property is made up of single family homes. The largest single-family subdivision in the area is the Fainwood Addition, west of Frog Hollow Road. f. Multiple Familv Residential Uses A large area of attached tri-plex and duplex townhomes is being developed in Creekside Park Subdivision, accessed from the end of Creek Trail Drive, via Portobella Place Drive and Notting Hill Drive. Only a few of the lots in this subdivision have been developed with multiple family structures and occupied, but there are a number of lots ready for development. The residential portion of Creekside Park development will fie into Schepker Farm, a planned residential subdivision inside the city, via Portobella Place g. Roadways The public road pattern is dominated by the recently completed extension of Highway 179, stretching south from West Edgewood Drive to the junction with US Highway 54. Currently there is no access to Highway 179 in this area except at West Edgewood Drive and Missouri Route C Highway, however an interchange is in the planning stages for the midpoint between West Edgewood Drive and Route C. Land area in right-of-way includes State Highway 179 and local roadways. Highway 179 is a state owned and controlled highway which passes through the area. Major local roadways include West Edgewood, Frog Hollow Road and Creek Trail Drive. The Fainwood Subdivision includes the residential streets ofBriar-woodDrive, Kenwood Drive, Kenwood Circle and Tanglewood Drive. LeCar Drive is apublic right-of-way for a portion of its length beginning at its intersection with Frog Hollow Road which provides access to six single family homes on individual lots as well as a group of single family homes on a single large tract at the end of LeCar Drive. The Creekside Park Subdivision includes the streets of Creek Trail Drive, Portabello Place Drive and Notting Hill Drive. Privately maintained roadways within the Highway 179 Annexation Area include Weatherhill Road, Eagle Drive and the northern portion of LeCar Drive. Portions of West Edgewood Drive and Highway 179 are affected by an irregular corporate boundary, which results in the roadways "weaving" in and out of the corporate boundary. There are several private roads in the area, including Weatherhill Road H:WwumiortvWnnuvtion-2006Tcvlsd Plvnaflmml 10-11-05 awpd 18 and the northern portion of LeCar Drive. The private roads in the annexation area were not tabulated separately but appear within the total ofthe privately owned tracts served by these private lanes. h. Other Land Uses Other land uses not separately mapped include a flood hazard area which parallels Wears Creek and in the Frog Hollow Road area. There are no utility substations in the area, however an electric transmission line passes through the southern portion of the annexation area near the St. Mary's Health Center site. There are no identified church properties in the annexation area and no identified cemeteries. There are no mobile homes or billboards within the area. 2. How the City Proposes to Zone the Area to be Annexed The Proposed Zoning Map (Appendixes shows how the City proposes to zone the area. Existing developed or known future land uses were matched with the appropriate zoning district. Undeveloped lots in commercial areas are proposed to be zoned for commercial use, and vacant residential lots are proposed to be zoned according to the existing residential density within the subdivision or neighborhood. Proposed district boundaries follow property lines, streets or drainage features, although not in all cases. Descriptions of proposed zoning classifications are provided at the end of the Section. Agricultural Areas/Undeveloped Areas Proposed Zoning: RU Rural Use (Color Code: Light Green) The area consists of approximately acres of agricultural land proposed to be zoned RU Rural Use. Commercial Areas Proposed Zoning: C-2 General Commercial (Color Code: Red) Existing commercial uses are concentrated along Creek Trail Drive and portions of West Edgewood. A proposed commercial development area adjacent along Highway 179 west of the proposed interchange site is also proposed for commercial zoning. There are two isolated commercial uses located off Frog Hollow Road that are proposed for commercial zoning. These uses will be zoned C-2 General Commercial. Recreational Uses Proposed Zoning: RC Rural Conservation (Color Code: 1 A strip of land dedicated to the Jefferson City Parks & Recreation Foundation for the purposes of a greenway trail parallels the eastern side of Frog Hollow Road from Cedar -wood Court to West Edgewood Drive. This tract consumes approximately— acres, or percent of the land area. Single Family Residential Areas Proposed Zoning: RS -1 Single Family/Low Density Residential (Color Code: Yellow) Single family residential uses are concentrated in the northern third of the Highway 179 Annexation area. There are two single family residential subdivisions, Fainwood Subdivision, located in the north central portion of the annexation area east of Highway 179 and LeCar Subdivision, located 14_, �imwQoron-20MR�MP�onmmuo.11.05o.%Pd 19 west of Highway 179 on Frog Hollow Road. There are also individual single family uses along Frog Hollow Road and in the extreme northwest area of the annexation area, off of Weatherhill Road. Multiple Family Residential Areas Proposed Zoning: RA -1 High Density Residential (Color Code: 1 Development of a multiple family subdivision in Creekside Park Subdivision, located off of Creek Trail Drive. The development includes a mixture of duplex and multiple family structures. 3. Summary Description of Proposed Zoning Districts Jefferson City zoning districts have three distinct use categories, (1) Permitted Uses, (2) Conditional Uses and (3) Special Exception Uses. Review and approval by the Planning Commission and Council are required for Special Exception Uses. Review and approval by the Board of Adjustment is required for Conditional Uses. Hearings and prior approval are not required for permitted uses. Additional information on the proposed zoning districts can be found in the Jefferson City Zoning Code, however, a brief description of selected districts follows. RU Rural Use District The RU District is intended for the maintenance of rural areas, the continued operation of existing farms and ranches and very low density residential uses. Some higher intensity uses and recreational uses may be authorized where adequate access and services are available. RC Rural Conservation District The RC District is intended for the operation of crop farms and preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. It also permits more intensive uses associated with a riverine location and some recreational uses. This district also implements the Parks and Open Space Development Plan Land Use Category and to denote some areas of 100 -year flood plain. RS Single Family Residential Districts There are four single family residential districts in the Jefferson City Zoning Code. Land uses within the four districts are identical. The districts differ only on the density and dimensional requirements with RS -1 being the lowest density residential district, and RS -4 being a medium density detached single family residential district. The RS -1 and RS -2 Districts implement the Low Density Residential (Detached) Development Plan Land Use Category and are intended for low density residential living and public uses that traditionally serve residential neighborhoods. The RS -3 and RS -4 Medium Density Residential Districts implement the Medium Density Residential (Detached) Development Plan Land Use Category and are intended for medium density detached single-family residential dwellings and activities that traditionally serve residential neighborhoods. RA- 1 Multiple Family/High-Density Residential District The RA -1 District is intended for medium-high density residential living and includes various dwelling types, such as single family dwellings, duplexes, townhouses, row houses, and other multiple family dwelling types. H:1Amuatia�Winexwion 2006tReviud Plan dlmmt 10-11-05 a.xpd 20 C-2 General Commercial District The C-2 District implements the Commercial Development Plan Land Use Category. The C-2 District is intended to accommodate general trades and commercial services located in high traffic areas, and at busy intersections and highway interchanges. Additional information on the proposed zoning districts can be found in the Jefferson City Zoning Code. Also, see the Proposed Zoning map (Appendix ). VIII. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION The annexation shall be effective immediately upon approval by the voters or November 1, 2006, whichever is later. H:NnnuationsNwcmtion-2006V1cv dPlan oflmrnt 10-11-05 n."d 21 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Map Showing location of Proposed Annexation Area in Relation to City Appendix B. Contiguity Calculations Appendix C. Map Showing Preliminary Study Area Appendix D. Showing the Entire Area Looked at (Less Portions Already Annexed Appendix E. Council Growth and Annexation Committee Meetings Appendix F. Citizen Input Appendix G. Jefferson City Financial Statement (Budget in Brief) Appendix H. Fire Response Times Appendix I. Fire Department Manning Survey Appendix J. Purposed Zoning Appendix K. Existing Land Uses Appendix L. Legal Description H:VnncxatioreWinentiou-200M,v MPl .Co trnt 10-11.05 awed 22 Appendix � APPENDIX B BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION PROPOSED JEFFERSON CITY ANNEXATION Area = 548.77 acres Total Perimeter = 368.602 feet Contiguous Boundary = 263.378 feet Percent Contiguous = 71.5% percent IlMooxalioms Ann=ation - 2006UImv Plnn of Ino®t 10-11-05 a.wd yi. Highway 179 ParceMap Key Annexati®n Corridor F --- lCityLimits -------� = Origional Annexation Area City of Jefferson �s Y l T 4 r s EITrfLp➢�4 " 9 yi. Highway 179 ParceMap Key Annexati®n Corridor F --- lCityLimits -------� = Origional Annexation Area City of Jefferson �s APPENDIX E Council Growth and Annexation Committee Meetings August 30, 2004 Future Business Look at 179 Corridor for future voter approved annexation area September 27, 2004 179 Corridor Discussion Committee will review plans for 179 and contact property owners January 31, 2005 179 Corridor Discussion Mayor requests committee look at area for 3 reasons: 1) future growth potential 2) Recommended by CAPPG 3) St.Marys Hospital voluntary annexation February 15, 2005 179 Corridor Discussion Review of 179 Corridor aerial and existing land use maps. Mayor & Council to make contact with residents. February 28, 2005 179 Discussion -Neighborhood CAPPG Recommendations Meetings reviewed; preliminary contact with residents in Colonial Hills and Fainwood for neighborhood meetings April 7, 2005 179 Discussion Update on two informal neighborhood meetings held iin March in Fainwood Subdivision May 11, 2005 179 Discussion Review of neighborhood meetings & planning for public forum February 18, 2005 March 28, 2005 March 31, 2005 April 9, 2005 APPENDIX F Citizen Input Cedar Hills School Cafeteria - 4`h Ward Meeting Fainwood Neighborhood Meeting Fainwood Neighborhood Meeting Capital Hills Neighborhood Meeting April 15, 2005 Meeting with Committee for Planned Community Growth Annexation Discussion of 179 Corridor Informal meeting with Briarwood Dr neighbors at residence Informal meeting with Kenwood Dr neighbors at residence Informal meeting with Lexington St neighbors at residence Mayor and Staff met with committee to gather input about 179 Corridor annexation April 30, 2005 Neighborhood Meeting -Cedar Hills Mayor, Council & Staff meet with School residents and property owners for input about neighborhood needs May 4, 2005 Neighborhood Meeting -Premier Mayor, Council & Staff meet with Bank Annex residents and property owners for input about neighborhood needs May 7, 2005 Neighborhood Meeting- Cedar Hills Mayor, Council & Staff meet with School residents and property owners for input about neighborhood needs May 10, 2005 Neighborhood Meeting -Premier Mayor, Council & Staff meet with Bank Annex residents and property owners for input about neighborhood needs May 23, 2005 Public Forum- Council Chambers Mayor & Council gather input from citizens about annexation of 179 Corridor May 25, 2005 Meeting with Electric Cooperative, Mayor & Staff meet with 3 Rivers to Linn discuss annexation of 179 Corridor May 25, 2005 Meeting with property owners Staff meets with Green & Sampson to discuss annexation along 179 Corridor to include their tract May 27, 2005 Meeting with Fire Protection District Mayor & Staff meet with Cole County Volunteer Fire District to discuss annexation of 179 Corridor June 8, 2005 Meeting with property owners July 13, 2005 Meeting with CAPPG Staff meets with property owner to discuss annexation & development of property Mayor meets with city/county committee to present 179 annexation area Several other telephone conversations and one-on-one meetings with residents in area regarding annexation of 179 Corridor. r -n2 City oT Jarr�ls 2004-2005 Budget The Adopted Budget for fiscal year 2005 increases the growth in expenditures over the growth in operating revenue by SI,843,859 for the net cost of the vehicle and equipment replacement plans due to the City's healthy fund balance. Property tax rates are 73.73 cents per 5100 assessed value (9.1 cents below our authorized rate of S.8283). Tax rate remains rhe same as last fiscal year. City Organization Form: City Charier adopted in 1986 Mawr. Fiscal Year: John Landwehr (573-634-6303) Expenditures by elected for four years in 2003 2005 Council: Revenue by Source (S.000-5): Ten members from five districts. One from each district elected annually for a two year tens. Meetings on 1st and 3rd Mondays monthly (televised on Ch.3) Fees/Chgs. City Administrator 10,081 Rich Mays (573-634-6306) Franchises appointed by Mayor with Council consent Major Departments: area coda 579 Fire (non -emergency) 634-fi401 Police (non -emergency) 634-6334 L2w 634-8313 Municipal Court 634-6317 Human Resources 634-6309 Finance, taxes, licensing 634-6320 Communitv Development: 634£521 Planning 634-6424 Code Enforcement 6346430 Public Works 634-6453 Airport 634-6469 Parkma 634-6473 Transit 634-W(g Wastewater 634-6443 Parks & Recreation 634-6490 Appendix G 5UDGE T -1,1- K!EF 2004-2005 Total Budget 20(14 Fiscal Year: November l to October 31 Expenditures by 2000 2005 hanne Revenue by Source (S.000-5): 11,555 12,325 Sales tax 13,442 14,005 4.2% Fees/Chgs. 9,725 10,081 3.7% Franchises 4,604 4,847 5.3% Property tax 4,847 5,092 5.1% Intergov mmn 4,018 4,780 3,526 ental Planning & $22,863 $985 Transfers 1,692 2,005 18.5% Other 5,021 5,235 4.3% Total $43,349 $46,045 6.2% Expenditures by Type S .0011'5 : 10.7% Personnel 21,878 22,853 4.5% Capital 21,771 17,979 -17.4% Services 3,589 3,960 10.3% Debt Service 2,924 2,937 28.5% MaintlRepair 1,762 2,140 21.5% Materials 1,581 1,657 4.8% Other 4,238 4,348 26% Total 57,743 55,884 -62% 2004-2005 General Fund Budget 20(14 2005 %oftotel Expenditures by Function: change Tot full time Police/Fire 11,555 12,325 221% Wastewater 10,110 14,549 26.0% Capital Proj 14,901 3,890 7.0% Pub.Worksl 1 Total Council and Parking 4,941 4,603 8.2% Parks & Ree 3,713 3,526 6.5% Planning & $22,863 $985 Avg. Cost$ Transp 2,947 4,978 8.9% Other 9.576 11,913 21.3% Total 57,743 55,884 100.0% 2004-2005 General Fund Budget Staffing 20115 Employees 2004 21105 change Tot full time 387 394 7 Total FTE 445.6 447.6 2 Elected: 3,322 5.1% Other Mayor 1 1 Total Council 10 10 Major expenditures by Type: Court 2 2 16,196 Cost (.&O0o's) $21,878 $22,863 $985 Avg. Cost$ $49,098 $51,079 $1,981 2004-2005 General Fund Budget End balance asa%of Expenditure 19.5% 10.1% Employees by Function Number of Full Time Employees 20 .7% rn w � asu m LI Police Fire Com Dev Parks Gent Govt 2004 20115 change Revenue fall funds in S thousand.): Sales tax 9,262 9,617 3.8% Franchises 4,604 4,847 5.3% Property tax 3,160 3,322 5.1% Other 5,812 6,911 18.9% Total 22,838 24,697 8.1% Major expenditures by Type: %of tool Personnel 16,196 16,958 63.9% Services 1,881 2,262 8.5% Transfers 1,562 1,506 6.1% Maint/Repair 939 1,266 4.8% Capital 1,126 2,833 10.7% Other 1.576 1,616 6.1% Total 23,280 26,541 100.0% Majorexpend. by Function: %Qftntal Police 7,334 7,561 28.5% Fire 4,206 4,749 17.9% Streets 2,498 2,239 8.4% Gent. GovL 1,993 2,248 8.5% Transf/Other 7.249 9.744 36.7% Total 23,280 26,541 100.0% Fund Balances (S.000's): cMntie Beginning 5,486 5,044 -8A% Net Increase (Decrease) (442) (1,844) Ending $5,044 $3,200 -36.6% Less Reserves (509) (509) End Balance $4,535 $2,691 End balance asa%of Expenditure 19.5% 10.1% Employees by Function Number of Full Time Employees 20 .7% rn w � asu m LI Police Fire Com Dev Parks Gent Govt Appendix H Travel Distances and Times from Fire Stations 3, 4, and 5 to various locations Distance Time Station 3 From 179 and MO Blvd 2.3 miles 6 1/2 minutes 179 and Ed ewood 2.9 miles 7 minutes Station 4 179 and Hwy 54 2 miles 5 minutes 179 and Rt C 2.4 miles 4 1/2 minutes - by way of Hwy 54 2.9 miles 6 minutes 179 and St. Ma 's Propeq 3.2 miles 5 minutes Station 5 179 and Ed ewood 12.4 miles 4 1/2 minutes 179 and MO Blvd 13 miles 5 minutes 179 and Frog Hollow Rd 12.8 miles 5 minutes 179 and St. Ma 's Property 3.7 miles 6 minutes * All times were by driving a non -emergency car without lights with traffic * Times taken between 1145 and 1220 on Tuesday, February 1, 2005 * Appendix I FIRE DEPARTMENT SURVEY CITY POPULATION CERTIFIED RATIO Jefferson City, MO 39,636 75 528 to 1 Columbia, MO 90,066 110 818 to 1 Cape Girardeau, MO 35,833 57 628 to 1 Joplin, MO 45,000 70 642 to 1 Springfield, MO 151,010 207 729 to 1 St. Joseph, MO 73,990 131 564 to 1 University City, MO 38,000 45 844 to 1 Grandview, MO 27,000 37 729 to 1 Ames, IA 50,731 52 975 to 1 Manhattan, KS 43,794 57 768 to 1 Highway 179 Annexation Area Proposed Zoning 0 City of Jeffersono Appendix J )posed Zoning C-2 RA -1 RS -1 RU RC ROW Private Road Public Road N 40s 0 250 500 1,000 mmm7--nmmmmm= Feet Appendix K I Land Use Bicultural mmercial creational - Greenway sidential - Multi Family sidential - Single Family ;ant ;ant - Future Commercial :ant - Future Residential IW ✓ate Road )lic Road Highway 179 Annexation Area N Existing Land Use Ae City of Jefferson 0 250 500 1,000 Feet cty of , of person i� �r QDEVEMemorandum 320 East McCarty street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 . F: 573.634.6562 • www.jeffcitymo.org/cd Date: October 12, 2005 To: Nathan Nickolaus, City Counselor Phyllis Powell, City Clerk From: Eric Seaman, WWD (634-6443) Subject: Substitute Bill 2005-94/// This is the substitute bill from Gilmore & Bell. 116 - Phyllis and I questioned the $5.18M figure on page one, but it represents the principal for the refinance next Monday rather than at the time of the closing as hard as that is to believe. Per Chris Ahrens at Gilmore & Bell, everything in Section B to the back is executed in the first week of November. The bond number is 2005B, since this is the City's second issuance of the year (not C as I had indicated earlier). If you have any ordinance questions, I've been talking to Chris Ahrens (816) 218-7530 and Erin Smykay 816.218.7562. at Gilmore & Bell. "building a better community" C:\Documents and Settings\eseaman\My Documents\2005 bonds\Fall 2005 loan closing memo.doc SUBSTITUTE BILL NO. 2005-94 Sponsored by Councilman Kevin Brown XMI I► : ► • OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI PASSED OCTOBER 17, 2005 AUTHORIZING: SEWERAGE SYSTEM REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS (STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM) SERIES 2005B Gilmore & Bell, P.C. K 100323.37/Jefferson Ordinance Section 101 Section 201. Section 202. Section 203. Section 204. Section 205. Section 206. Section 207. Section 208. Section 209. Section 210. Section 211. Title................................................................... Recitals.............................................................. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Definitions of Words and Terms ........................ ARTICLE H AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS PAGE ............................................. 1 ............................................. 1 ............................................. 3 Authorizationof Bonds.................................................................................................... 6 Securityfor Bonds........................................................................................................... 7 Descriptionof Bonds....................................................................................................... 7 Designation of Paying Agent........................................................................................... 7 Method and Place of Payment of Bonds.......................................................................... 7 Registration, Transfer and Exchange of Bonds................................................................ 7 Execution, Authentication and Delivery of Bonds........................................................... 8 Mutilated, Destroyed, Lost and Stolen Bonds.................................................................. 8 Cancellation and Destruction of Bonds Upon Payment ................................................... 9 Sale and Terms of the Bonds; Authorization and Execution of Documents................................................................................................................... 9 Administrative Fee and Other Fees; Revolving Fund Loan ............................................. 9 ARTICLE IH REDEMPTION OF BONDS Section 301. Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption............................................................................. 9 Section 302. Optional Redemption..................................................................................................... 10 Section 303. Identification of Redeemed Bonds................................................................................. 10 Section 304. No Notice of Mandatory Redemption............................................................................ 10 ARTICLE IV RATIFICATION OF FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS Section 401. Ratification of Funds and Accounts............................................................................... 10 Section 402. Administration of Funds and Accounts.......................................................................... 10 (i) Section 403. Acknowledgment of Accounts.......................................................................................11 ARTICLE V APPLICATION OF BOND PROCEEDS Section 501. Disposition of Bond Proceeds........................................................................................ 11 Section 502. Assignment and Application of Moneys in the Construction Account .......................... 11 Section 503. Application of Moneys by Refunded Bonds Paying Agent ........................................... 12 Section 504. Purchase and Cancellation of Refunded Bonds............................................................. 12 ARTICLE VI APPLICATION OF REVENUES Section601. Revenue Fund................................................................................................................ 12 Section 602. Application of Moneys in Funds and Accounts............................................................. 12 Section 603. Deficiency of Payments into Funds and Accounts......................................................... 14 Section 604. Transfer of Funds to Paying Agent................................................................................ 15 Section 701 Section 801. Section 802. Section 803. Section 804. Section 805. Section 806. Section 807. ARTICLE VII DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT OF MONEYS Investment of Moneys ........................ ARTICLE VIII PARTICULAR COVENANTS OF THE CITY Efficient and Economical Operation.......... Rate Covenant ............................................ Reasonable Charges for all Services.......... AnnualBudget ........................................... AnnualAudit .............................................. Performance of Duties ............................... Tax Covenants ............................................ ARTICLE IX ADDITIONAL BONDS 15 Section901. Prior Lien Bonds............................................................................................................ 17 Section 902. Parity Lien Bonds or Obligations................................................................................... 17 Section903. Junior Lien Bonds.......................................................................................................... 18 Section904. Refunding Bonds............................................................................................................ 18 ARTICLE X DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section1001. Event of Default............................................................................................................. 18 Section1002. Remedies........................................................................................................................ 19 Section 1003. Limitation on Rights of Owners..................................................................................... 19 Section 1004. Remedies Cumulative.................................................................................................... 19 Section 1005. No Obligation to Levy Taxes......................................................................................... 19 I:\ � I 1611L DEFEASANCE Section1101. Defeasance..................................................................................................................... 19 ARTICLE XII AMENDMENTS Section1201. Amendments..................................................................................................................20 ARTICLE XIII MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section1301. Further Authority............................................................................................................20 Section1302. Severability....................................................................................................................21 Section1303. Governing Law.............................................................................................................. 21 Section1304. Effective Date................................................................................................................. 21 Passage........................................................................................................................... 21 Approval......................................................................................................................... 21 Exhibit A— Terms of Bonds Exhibit B — Form of Bond Exhibit C — Certificate of Final Terms Exhibit D — Form of Closing Certificate BILL NO. 2005- 94 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SEWERAGE SYSTEM REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS (STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM) SERIES 2005B OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING AND IMPROVING THE CITY'S SEWERAGE SYSTEM AND REFUNDING A PRIOR ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE CITY; PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS OF THE BONDS AND THE AGREEMENTS MADE BY THE CITY TO FACILITATE AND PROTECT THEIR PAYMENT, AND AUTHORIZING A NO—INTEREST LOAN FROM THE WATER AND WASTEWATER LOAN FUND AND/OR THE WTAER AND WASTEWATER LOAN REVOLVING FUND OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI AND PRESCRIBING OTHER RELATED MATTERS. WHEREAS, the City of Jefferson, Missouri (the "City") is a constitutional charter city and political subdivision of the State of Missouri, organized and existing under the constitution and laws of the State of Missouri; and WHEREAS, the City now owns and operates a revenue producing sewerage system serving the City, its inhabitants and others within its service area, including connected and related appurtenances and facilities and extensions, improvements, additions and enlargements made or acquired by the City after the date of this Ordinance (the "System"); and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 13474 adopted on November 18, 2002 (the "Refunded Bond Ordinance"), the City has issued its Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 (the "Refunded Bonds"), dated November 1, 2002, in the original principal amount of $5,555,000, of which $5,180,000 remains outstanding as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, payable out of the Revenues derived from the operation of the System; and WHEREAS, the City desires to refund the Refunded Bonds and is authorized under the provisions of Section 108.140(2) of the Revised Statutes of Missouri (the "Refunding Law"), to issue and sell refunding revenue bonds for the purpose of refunding, in whole or in part, its outstanding revenue bonds, which refunding revenue bonds may be payable from the same sources as were pledged to the payment of the Refunded Bonds; and WHEREAS, the City desires to make extensions and improvements to the System to be financed in whole or in part and to refund the Refunded Bonds in whole by the issuance, pursuant to this Ordinance, of its Sewerage System Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Fund Program) Series 2005B (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, to provide the most cost effective financing of the extensions and improvements to the System the City desires to participate in the Missouri Leveraged State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund Program (the "SRF Program") of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources ("DNR") and the State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority (the "Authority"); and WHEREAS, under the provisions of Chapter 250 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri (the "Act") the City is authorized to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of paying all or part of the cost of extending and improving the System, with the cost of operation and maintenance of the System and the principal of and interest on revenue bonds payable solely from the Net Revenues (as defined below); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, a special bond election was duly held in the City on November 7, 2000 on the following question: QUESTION Shall the City of Jefferson, Missouri, issue its sewerage system revenue bonds in the amount of $52,000,000 for the purpose of improving and extending the City's sewerage system, the cost of operation and maintenance of said sewerage system and the principal of and interest on said revenue bonds to be payable solely from the revenues derived by the City from the operation of its sewerage system, including all future improvements and extensions thereto? and it was found and determined that more than a simple majority of the qualified electors of the City voting on the question had voted in favor of the question, the vote having been 14,406 votes for the question and 2,687 votes against the question; and WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Governing Body") of the City has caused plans and specifications for extensions and improvements to the System and a cost estimate to be made by the Consulting Engineer (as defined below); and WHEREAS, the plans and specifications and the cost estimate are accepted and approved and are on file in the office of the City Clerk, the amount of the estimated cost being not less than the maximum Original Principal Amount (as defined below) set forth in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, $24,798,250 principal amount of the bonds so authorized have been issued (the Refunded Bonds and the bonds further described below) and the City finds and determines that it is necessary and advisable and in the best interest of the City and of its inhabitants to issue the Bonds in the Original Principal Amount; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 13295 adopted on October 31, 2001 (the "Series 2001B Bond Ordinance"), the City has issued its Sewerage System Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Fund Program) Series 2001E (the "Series 2001B Bonds"), dated November 1, 2001, in the original principal amount of $24,875,000, of which $22,445,000 remains outstanding as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 13878 adopted on May 4, 2005 (the "Series 2005A Bond Ordinance", the Series 2001B Bond Ordinance and the Series 2005A Bond Ordinance collectively referred to herein as the "Outstanding Panty Bond Ordinance"), the City has issued its Sewerage System Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Fund Program) Series 2005A (the "Series 2005A Bonds", the Series 2001B Bonds and the Series 2005A Bonds collectively referred to herein as the "Outstanding Party Bonds"), in the original principal amount of $4,600,000, of which $4,600,000 remains outstanding as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance; WHEREAS, the City, upon the issuance of the Bonds, will not have outstanding any other bonds or other obligations payable from the Net Revenues other than the Outstanding Panty Bonds and the Bonds; and -1)- WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance, the City may issue additional bonds payable out of the Net Revenues that are on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds, only if certain conditions are ink and` - WHEREAS, it is hereby found and determined that it is necessary and advisable and in the best interest of the City and its inhabitants that revenue bonds be issued and secured in the form and manner provided in this Ordinance and be sold to the Authority under the SRF Program, subject to the conditions of the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 101. Definitions of Words and Terms. Capitalized words and terms not otherwise defined in this Ordinance have the meanings set forth in the Purchase Agreement (as defined below). In addition to the foregoing and words and terms defined in the Recitals and elsewhere in this Ordinance, capitalized words and terms have the following meanings in this Ordinance: "Administrative Fee" means the fee payable to DNR equal to 0.714% of the outstanding principal amount of the Revolving Fund Loan on each Administrative Fee Calculation Date. "Administrative Fee Calculation Date" means the Business Day preceding each July 1, commencing on the first July 1 on which the principal of the Bonds is payable. "Authority Bonds" means the Water Pollution Control and Drinking Water Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Funds Programs) Series 2005C of the Authority. "Authority Program Bonds" means the Authority Bonds and any other bonds of the Authority issued under the SRF Program, all or a portion of the proceeds of which are loaned to the City pursuant to the SRF Program. "Authorized Representative" means the representative of the City designated by the City in accordance with the Regulations. "Bond Register" means the books for the registration, transfer and exchange of Bonds kept at the office of the Paying Agent. "Certificate of Final Terms" means Exhibit C, executed and delivered by the Mayor pursuant to Section 210 and attached to this Ordinance as of the date of issuance of the Bonds. "Closing Certificate" means the City's closing certificate executed and delivered by the Mayor on the date of issuance of the Bonds, in substantially the form attached as Exhibit D. "Consultant" means the Consulting Engineer, an independent certified public accountant or a fain of independent certified public accountants. -3- "Consulting Engineer" means each independent engineer or engineering firm with experience in designing and constructing wastewater treatment, sanitary sewerage or water pollution control facilities and retained by the City. "Current Expenses" means all reasonable and necessary expenses of ownership, operation, maintenance and repair of the System and keeping the System in good repair and working order, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, including current maintenance charges, expenses of reasonable upkeep and repairs, salaries, wages, costs of materials and supplies, Paying Agent fees and expenses, annual audits, periodic Consultant's reports, properly allocated share of charges for insurance, the cost of purchased water, gas and power, obligations (other than for borrowed money or for rents payable under capital leases) incurred in the ordinary course of business, liabilities incurred by endorsement for collection or deposit of checks or drafts received in the ordinary course of business, short—term obligations incurred and payable within a particular Fiscal Year, obligations incurred for the purpose of leasing (pursuant to a true or operating lease) equipment, fixtures, inventory or other personal property, and all other expenses incident to the ownership and operation of the System, but excluding interest paid on System Revenue Bonds, depreciation and amortization charges (including payments into the Depreciation and Replacement Account), and all general administrative expenses of the City not related to the operation of the System. "Defeasance Securities" means: (a) Federal Securities; (b) obligations of the Resolution Funding Corporation or any successor, but only if the use of the obligations to pay and discharge Bonds pursuant to Article XI will cause the discharged Bonds to be rated in the highest long—term rating category by the Rating Agency; or (c) obligations of any state of the United States of America or of any agency, instrumentality or local governmental unit of any state that: (i) are not callable at the option of the obligor prior to maturity or for which irrevocable instructions have been given by the obligor to call on the date specified in the instructions, and (ii) are fully secured as to principal, redemption premium and interest by a fund, consisting of cash or Federal Securities, that: (A) may be applied only to the payment of principal, redemption premium and interest on the obligations, and (B) is sufficient, as verified by a nationally recognized independent certified public accountant, to pay the principal, redemption premium and interest on the obligations. "Depreciation and Replacement Account" means the fund or account created or ratified and confirmed by Section 401. "Federal Securities" means any direct obligation of, or obligation the timely payment of the principal of and interest on which is unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America and backed by its full faith and credit. 0 "Interest Payment Date" means each January 1 and July 1, commencing July 1, 2006. "Net Revenues" means Revenues less Current Expenses. "Net Revenues Available for Debt Service" means, for the period of determination, Revenues less Current Expenses. "Operation and Maintenance Account" means the fund or account created or ratified and confirmed by Section 401. "Ordinance" means this Ordinance as from time to time amended in accordance with its terms. "Original Principal Amount" means the principal amount of Bonds originally issued and delivered pursuant to this Ordinance, in the amount specified in the Certificate of Final Terms, subject to Exhibit A. "Outstanding" means, as of the date of determination, all Bonds issued and delivered under this Ordinance, except: (1) Bonds cancelled by the Paying Agent or delivered to the Paying Agent for cancellation; (2) Bonds for the payment of the principal or redemption price of and interest on which money or Defeasance Securities are held under Section 1101,- (3) 101; (3) Bonds in exchange for which, or in lieu of which, other Bonds have been registered and delivered pursuant to this Ordinance; and (4) Bonds allegedly mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen and paid under Section 208. "Owner" means the Authority and its assigns. "Parity Bonds" means the Outstanding Panty Bonds and any panty bonds issued under Section 902 and Section 904 payable from the Net Revenues on a panty basis with the Bonds. "Panty Ordinances" means the Outstanding Panty Bond Ordinance and the ordinances under which any other Parity Bonds are issued. "Purchase Agreement" means the Purchase Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005, by and among the City, the Authority and DNR. "Record Date" means the 15th day (whether or not a Business Day) of the calendar month next preceding the applicable Interest Payment Date. "Refunded Bonds Paying Agent" means U.S. Bank National Association, St. Louis, Missouri, as paying agent for the Refunded Bonds. "Revenue Fund" means the fund or account created or ratified and confirmed by Section 401. "Revenues" means all income and revenues derived by the City from the System, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, including investment and rental income, net -5- proceeds from business interruption insurance, sales tax revenues which have been annually appropriated by the City or which are limited solely to the payment of improvements to or expenses of the System and any amounts deposited in escrow in connection with the acquisition, construction, remodeling, renovation and equipping of facilities to be applied during the period of determination to pay interest on System Revenue Bonds, but excluding any profits or losses on developer -financed System assets contributed to the City, the early extinguishment of debt or the sale or other disposition of investments or fixed or capital assets not in the ordinary course of business. "Revolving Fund Agreement" means the Revolving Fund Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005, by and among the City, the Authority and DNR. "Revolving Fund Loan" means the no—interest loan to the City by DNR from The Water and Wastewater Loan Fund and/or The Water and Wastewater Loan Revolving Fund under the Revolving Fund Agreement. "SRF Program Bonds" means the Bonds and any other System Revenue Bonds issued in connection with the City's participation in the SRF Program. "SRF Subsidy" means the amount of investment earnings which will accrue on the Reserve Account during each Fiscal Year (taking into account scheduled transfers from the Reserve Account which will occur upon the payment of principal on the Authority Program Bonds and assuming that the construction for the applicable project has been completed), if the Reserve Security is equal to the Reserve Percentage of the principal amount of the SRF Program Bonds outstanding, the Reserve Account is invested in an investment agreement at a fixed interest rate during the calculation period and earnings are reduced by the Administrative Fee payable to DNR. Administrative Fee, Reserve Account, Reserve Percentage and Reserve Security as used in this definition have the respective meanings set forth in the bond indentures for the applicable Authority Program Bonds. "State" means the State of Missouri. "Surplus Account" means the fund or account created or ratified and confirmed by Section 401. "System Revenue Bonds" means collectively the Bonds, the Parity Bonds and all other revenue bonds which are payable from the Net Revenues. "Term Bond" means each Bond, if any, designated as a Term Bond in the Certificate of Final "Trustee" means the trustee acting at any time as Trustee under the Indenture. "User Charge Ordinance" means Ordinance No. 13155 of the City passed on January 2, 2001, as amended, supplemented or replaced and approved by DNR. ARTICLE 11 AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS Section 201. Authorization of Bonds. The Bonds are authorized and directed to be issued in the Original Principal Amount for the purposes of this Ordinance. 1.1 Section 202. Security for Bonds. (a) The Bonds are special, limited obligations of the City payable solely from, and secured by a pledge of, the Net Revenues. The taxing power of the City is not pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds do not constitute a general obligation of the City or an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter provision, limitation or restriction. (b) The Bonds are issued on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds. Section 203. Description of Bonds. The Bonds consist of fully registered bonds without coupons, numbered from R-1 consecutively upward, in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple of $5,000. The Bonds will be issued in substantially the form of Exhibit B and will be registered, transferred and exchanged as provided in Section 206. The Bonds are dated the Dated Date as set forth on the Bonds. The Bonds will become due on the dates and in the principal amounts and will bear interest at the rates as set forth in the Certificate of Final Terms. Interest is computed on the basis of a 360—day year of twelve 30—day months from the Dated Date or from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or provided for and is payable on each Interest Payment Date. Section 204. Designation of Paying Agent. The Trustee is designated as the City's paying agent for the payment of the Bonds and bond registrar for the registration, transfer and exchange of Bonds (the "Paying Agent"). The Paying Agent will not be paid any additional fees for its services under this Ordinance. Section 205. Method and Place of Payment of Bonds. (a) Payment of the Bonds will be made with any coin or currency that is legal tender for the payment of debts due the United States of America on the payment date. (b) Each payment of principal of and redemption premium, if any, payable on each Bond will be made at maturity or upon earlier redemption to the Owner shown in the Bond Register at the maturity or optional redemption date of each Bond, upon presentation and surrender of the Bond at the principal office of the Paying Agent. The payment of interest payable on each Bond on any Interest Payment Date will be made by check or draft mailed by the Paying Agent to the address of the Owner shown in the Bond Register. The principal of and redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds is payable by electronic transfer in immediately available federal funds to a bank in the continental United States of America pursuant to instructions from any Owner received by the Paying Agent prior to the Record Date. (c) The Paying Agent will keep a record of payment of principal of, redemption premium, if any, and interest on all Bonds and, at least annually at the request of the City, will forward a copy or summary of the record of payments to the City. Section 206. Registration Transfer and Exchange of Bonds. (a) The City will cause the Paying Agent to keep the Bond Register. Each Bond when issued will be registered in the name of the Owner on the Bond Register. Bonds will be transferred and exchanged only upon the Bond Register. (b) Upon surrender of any Bond at the principal office of the Paying Agent, the Paying Agent will transfer or exchange the Bond for a new Bond or Bonds in any authorized denomination of the same maturity and in the same aggregate principal amount as the Bond which was presented for transfer or exchange. All Bonds presented for transfer or exchange must be accompanied by a written instrument of -7- transfer or authorization for exchange, in a form and with guarantee of signature satisfactory to the Paying Agent, duly executed by the Owner or by the Owner's authorized agent. All Bonds presented for transfer or exchange must be surrendered to the Paying Agent for cancellation. (c) For every exchange or transfer of Bonds the City or the Paying Agent may levy a charge sufficient to reimburse it for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid for the exchange or transfer. The charge must be paid by the person requesting the exchange or transfer. Payment of the charge is a condition precedent to the exchange or transfer. (d) The City and the Paying Agent will treat the person in whose name any Bond is registered as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether or not payment of the Bond is overdue, for the purpose of receiving payment of the principal of, redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes. All payments made to any Owner or upon the Owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the City's liability for payment of the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums paid. Neither the City nor the Paying Agent will be affected by any notice to the contrary. (e) At reasonable times and under reasonable rules established by the Paying Agent, the Owners of 25% or more in principal amount of the Outstanding Bonds, or their representative designated in a manner satisfactory to the Paying Agent, may inspect and copy the Bond Register. Section 207. Execution. Authentication and Delivery of Bonds. (a) Each Bond must be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the City Clerk, and have the official seal of the City affixed or imprinted. If any officer whose manual or facsimile signature appears on any Bond ceases to be an officer before the delivery of any Bond signed by the officer, the manual or facsimile signature on the Bond will be valid and sufficient for all purposes of this Ordinance. (b) The Mayor and the City Clerk are directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as specified in this Article, and when executed, to deliver the Bonds to the Paying Agent for authentication. Upon authentication, the Paying Agent will deliver the Bonds to the Owner, upon payment of the purchase price for the Bonds. (c) Each Bond will be authenticated by any authorized officer or employee of the Paying Agent. No Bond is entitled to any security or benefit under this Ordinance or is valid or obligatory for any purpose until authenticated by the Paying Agent. Section 208. Mutilated, Destroyed, Lost and Stolen Bonds. (a) If (i) any mutilated Bond is surrendered to the Paying Agent, or the City and the Paying Agent receive evidence to their satisfaction of the mutilation, destruction, loss or theft of any Bond, and (ii) there is delivered to the City and the Paying Agent security or indemnity as required by them, in the absence of notice to the City or the Paying Agent that the Bond has been acquired by a bona fide purchaser, the City will execute and the Paying Agent will register and deliver, in exchange for or in lieu of any mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Bond, a new Bond of the same maturity and of like tenor and principal amount. If the Bond has become or is about to become due, the City may pay the Bond instead of issuing a new Bond. (b) Upon the issuance of any new Bond under this Section, the City may require the payment by the Owner of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge imposed and any other expenses (including the fees and expenses of the Paying Agent) connected with the issuance of the Bond. (c) Every new Bond issued pursuant to this Section in lieu of any mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Bond will constitute a replacement of the prior obligation of the City, whether or not the mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Bond is enforceable by anyone at any time, and will be entitled to all the benefits of this Ordinance equally and ratably with all other Outstanding Bonds. Section 209. Cancellation and Destruction of Bonds Upon Payment. All Bonds which have been paid or redeemed or which have otherwise been surrendered to the Paying Agent, either at or before maturity, will be cancelled immediately upon the payment or redemption and the Paying Agent's receipt of the Bonds. The Paying Agent will periodically destroy cancelled Bonds. The Paying Agent will execute a certificate in duplicate describing the destroyed Bonds and file an executed counterpart of the certificate with the City. Section 210. Sale and Terms of the Bonds: Authorization and Execution of Documents. The Bonds will be sold to the Owner under the terms of the Purchase Agreement. The City is authorized to enter into the Purchase Agreement and the Revolving Fund Agreement, in substantially the forms presented to the Governing Body. The Mayor is authorized to execute the Purchase Agreement and the Revolving Fund Agreement for and on behalf of and as the act and deed of the City, with changes approved by the Mayor, which approval will be conclusively evidenced by the Mayor's execution of the Purchase Agreement and the Revolving Fund Agreement. The Mayor is further authorized and directed to approve the purchase price for the Bonds, the principal amounts by maturity, the interest rates and the other final terms of the Bonds, including applicable redemption provisions, subject to the limitations set forth in Exhibit A and in that connection, to execute and deliver the Certificate of Final Terms for and on behalf of and as the act and deed of the City, which approval will be conclusively evidenced by the Mayor's execution of the Certificate of Final Terms. Upon execution, the Certificate of Final Terms will be attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit C. The Mayor is further authorized and directed to execute the Closing Certificate and other documents, certificates and instruments that are necessary or desirable to carry out the intent of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to attest the execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Revolving Fund Agreement, the Certificate of Final Terms and any other documents, certificates and instruments that are necessary or desirable t0 carry out the intent of this Ordinance. Section 211. Administrative Fee and Other Fees: Revolving Fund Loan. (a) Subject to Section 202, the City will pay to the Trustee for deposit in the Administrative Expense Fund, within 30 days after receipt of a statement from the Trustee (i) the Administrative Fee, (ii) the City's Allocable Portion of the Master Trustee's Disclosure Fee, and (iii) the City's Allocable Portion of the Trustee's Fee. (b) The City is authorized to receive the Revolving Fund Loan under the terms of the Revolving Fund Agreement. By this Ordinance, the City assigns the proceeds of the Revolving Fund Loan, as and when received, to the Authority. ARTICLE III REDEMPTION OF BONDS Section 301. Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption. The Term Bonds set forth in the Certificate of Final Terms will be redeemed in part on the dates and in the principal amounts set forth in the Certificate of Final Terms, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount redeemed plus accrued interest to the redemption date. M Section 302. Optional Redemption. At the option of the City, certain Bonds may be called for redemption and payment prior to maturity in whole or in part on the dates and at the redemption prices set forth in the Certificate of Final Terms. Bonds will be optionally redeemed in part in integral multiples of $5,000 from the maturities selected by the City with the prior written consent of the Owner. Upon redemption, the sinking fund redemption amounts for each Term Bond will be proportionately reduced (unless otherwise directed by the City with the prior written consent of the Owner), subject to rounding to integral multiples of $5,000. The City will give written notice to the Trustee designating the amount of each maturity redeemed and the reduction in each sinking fund redemption amount, subject to verification by the Trustee. In exercising its option to redeem the Bonds, the City will deposit with the Paying Agent, prior to the redemption date, an additional premium equal to 30 -days' interest on the Bonds to be redeemed. Section 303. Identification of Redeemed Bonds. The redemption of the Bonds in part will be reflected in the records maintained by the Paying Agent. Section 304. No Notice of Mandatory Redemption. No notice of the mandatory sinking fund redemption of Bonds will be given. ARTICLE N RATIFICATION OF FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS Section 401. Ratification of Funds and Accounts. The separate funds and accounts created in, or ratified and confirmed by, the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance known respectively as the: (1) Sewerage System Revenue Fund (the "Revenue Fund"); (2) Sewerage System Operation and Maintenance Account (the "Operation and Maintenance Account"); (3) Interest Accounts, Principal Accounts and Debt Service Accounts under the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance (collectively the "Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Account"); (4) Reserve Accounts under the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance (collectively the "Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Reserve Account"); (5) Sewerage System Depreciation and Replacement Account (the "Depreciation and Replacement Account"); and (6) Sewerage System Surplus Account (the "Surplus Account"); are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 402. Administration of Funds and Accounts. The funds and accounts described in clauses (1), (2), (5) and (6) of Section 401 will be maintained and administered by, or on behalf of, the City under this Ordinance and the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance while any of the Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds are outstanding. The funds or accounts described in clauses (3) and (4) of Section 401 will be maintained and administered by the City while the Outstanding Parity Bonds are outstanding. -10- Section 403. Acknowledgment of Accounts. (a) The City acknowledges the creation of the following accounts for the City held by the Trustee under the Indenture: (1) Construction Account; (2) Reserve Account; (3) State Match Portion Debt Service Account; (4) Leveraged Portion Debt Service Account; (5) Principal Account; and (6) Interest Account. (b) The City further acknowledges that certain amounts will be transferred to the Costs of Issuance Fund and the Administrative Expense Fund under the Indenture in satisfaction of certain City obligations under this Ordinance, the Purchase Agreement and the Revolving Fund Agreement. ARTICLE V APPLICATION OF BOND PROCEEDS Section 501. Disposition of Bond Proceeds. (a) The proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, including any premium and accrued interest, will be deposited simultaneously with the delivery of the Bonds as set forth in the Closing Certificate. (b) On the issuance date of the Bonds the Trustee will disburse from the Construction Account, from the proceeds of the Bonds, to the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent the amount set forth in the Closing Certificate for application to the purchase and cancellation of the Refunded Bonds in whole. Section 502. Assignment and Application of Moneys in the Construction Account. (a) By this Ordinance, the City assigns the proceeds of the Bonds held in the Construction Account to the Owner to secure the City's obligations under this Ordinance. Moneys in the Construction Account will be disbursed to the City for the sole purpose of paying the cost of extending and improving the System in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the Consulting Engineer, previously approved by the Governing Body and DNR and on file in the office of the City Clerk, including any alterations in or amendments to the plans and specifications approved by the Governing Body and DNR with the advice of the Consulting Engineer. (b) Requisitions will be submitted for withdrawals from the Construction Account in accordance with Article III of the Purchase Agreement. -11- Section 503. Application of Moneys by Refunded Bonds Paving Agent. Moneys received by the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent will be applied solely to the payment of the principal of and redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Refunded Bonds. These moneys deposited with the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent will be held by the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent in accordance with the provisions of the Refunded Bond Ordinance. Section 504. Purchase and Cancellation of Refunded Bonds. The City has received written notice from the owner of the Refunded Bonds pursuant to Section 302(c) of the Refunded Bonds Ordinance of the mandatory tender of the Refunded Bonds in whole on the date of issuance of the Bonds. Upon payment of the purchase price of the Refunded Bonds by the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent, the Refunded Bonds will be cancelled. The Finance Director and other officers of the City and the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent are authorized and directed to take any other actions necessary to effect the purchase, payment and cancellation of the Refunded Bonds. ARTICLE VI APPLICATION OF REVENUES Section 601. Revenue Fund. The City covenants and agrees that from and after the delivery of the Bonds, all Revenues derived and collected by the City will be deposited into the Revenue Fund when received. The Revenues will be segregated from all other moneys, revenues, funds and accounts of the City. The Revenue Fund will be administered and applied solely for the purposes and in the manner provided in this Ordinance and any Panty Ordinance. Section 602. Application of Moneys in Funds and Accounts. (a) The City will apply moneys in the Revenue Fund on the dates, in the amounts and in the order as follows: (1) on the first day of each month to the Operation and Maintenance Account an amount sufficient to pay the estimated cost of operating and maintaining the System during the month; (2) on the 25th day of each month, on a panty basis (i) to the Outstanding Panty Bond Debt Service Account the amount required under the Outstanding Panty Bond Ordinance and (ii) the following amounts to the Trustee for credit to the Interest Account and the Principal Account: (A) on January 25, 2006 to and including June 25, 2006, to the Interest Account 1/6 of the amount of interest on the Bonds due on July 1, 2006 less accrued interest deposited to the Interest Account, if any; and on July 25, 2006 and thereafter 1/6 of the amount of interest due on the Bonds on the next Interest Payment Date, with these monthly payments to be reduced as follows: (1) the balance in the State Match Portion Debt Service Account and the Leveraged Portion Debt Service Account on an Interest Payment Date after the payment of the principal of and interest due on the Authority Bonds on the Interest Payment Date will be credited against the next succeeding montlily payment or payments; and -12- (11) the projected investment earnings on the Construction Account and the Reserve Account for the current Interest Period and actual investment earnings for the prior Interest Period reduced by estimated earnings for the preceding Interest Period that were previously credited, as set forth in the Trustee's semiannual notice to the City, will be credited in equal installments against the monthly payments due prior to the next Interest Payment Date; and (B) on July 25, 2006 and each monthly payment date thereafter, to the Principal Account 1/12 of the principal due on the Bonds on the next succeeding principal payment date, whether at maturity or upon mandatory sinking fund redemption. If the Initiation of Operation specified in the certificate delivered by the City under Section 3.5 of the Purchase Agreement is earlier than the expected Initiation of Operation on the City's signature page to the Purchase Agreement, (i) the first monthly installment of principal will be paid no later than the monthly payment date which is not more than 12 months after the Initiation of Operation, and (ii) on the monthly payment date which is not more than 20 years after the Initiation of Operation, all remaining unpaid principal installments will be paid; (3) on the dates required by Section 211(a), to the Trustee, for deposit to the Administrative Expense Fund, the amount required to pay the Administrative Fee, the City's Allocable Portion of the Trustee's Fee and the City's Allocable Portion of the Master Trustee's Disclosure Fee; (4) on the first day of each month, to the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Reserve Account as required by the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance and, in the event the Trustee has withdrawn moneys from the Reserve Account (other than investment earnings or the amount transferred from the Reserve Account upon the payment of principal on the Bonds), to the Reserve Account all available moneys until the Reserve Account has been replenished; (5) on the first day of each month, to the Depreciation and Replacement Account, the amount required by the User Charge Ordinance; and (6) on the first day of each month the remaining balance to the Surplus Account. (b) If the amount in the Revenue Fund is not sufficient to make the payments at the time required to be made by the City to the Interest Account, the Principal Account and the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Account, the City will apply the remaining balance in the Revenue Fund on a proportionate basis (based upon the outstanding principal amounts of the Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds) to the Principal Account, the Interest Account and the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Account. (c) If the amount in the Revenue Fund is not sufficient to make the payments at the time required to be made by the City to the Reserve Account and to the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Reserve Account, the City will divide the balance in the Revenue Fund between the Reserve Account and the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Reserve Account on a proportionate basis (based upon the outstanding principal amounts of the Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds). (d) Except as provided in Section 603, moneys in the Depreciation and Replacement Account will be used by the City for the purpose of making replacements and repairs to the System in order to keep the System in good repair and working order and to assure the continued effective and efficient -13- operation of the System. This provision will not be construed to modify any more restrictive provision of the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance for the use of moneys in the Depreciation and Replacement Account. (e) Moneys in the Surplus Account are to be expended for the following purposes as determined by the Governing Body: (1) paying the cost of the operation, maintenance and repair of the System to the extent necessary after the application of the moneys held in the Operation and Maintenance Account and in the Depreciation and Replacement Account; (2) paying the cost of extending, enlarging or improving the System; (3) preventing default in, anticipating payments into or increasing the amounts in the accounts confirmed or established in Section 401 the Principal Account, the Interest Account, the Reserve Account or the Depreciation and Replacement Account, or establishing or increasing the amount of any debt service account or debt service reserve account created by the City for the payment of any System Revenue Bonds subsequently issued; or (4) redeeming and paying prior to maturity, or, at the option of the City, purchasing in the open market at the best price obtainable not exceeding the call price (if any bonds are callable), the Bonds, the Outstanding Parity Bonds or any other System Revenue Bonds of the City hereafter issued under the conditions hereinafter specified and standing on a parity with the Bonds, including principal, redemption premium, if any, and interest. (f) All amounts paid and credited to the Operation and Maintenance Account will be expended solely for the purpose of paying the Current Expenses of the System. (g) No moneys derived by the City from the System will be diverted to the general governmental or municipal functions of the City. (h) If the deposits to the Operation and Maintenance Account (the "OM Deposits") required under this Section are greater than the OM Deposits required in the User Charge Ordinance, the OM Deposits under the User Charge Ordinance will be deemed a credit toward OM Deposits required under this Section. If the OM Deposits required under this Section are less than those required in the User Charge Ordinance, OM Deposits under this Section will be deemed a credit to OM Deposits required under the User Charge Ordinance. Section 603. Deficiency of Payments into Funds and Accounts. (a) If the Revenues are insufficient to make any payment on any date specified in this Article, the City will make good the amount of the deficiency by making additional payments out of the first available Revenues for application in the order specified in Section 602. (b) If the moneys in the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Account, the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Reserve Account, the Principal Account, the Interest Account or the Reserve Account are not sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Outstanding Parity Bonds and the Bonds as and when the same become due, the City will apply moneys in the Surplus Account and the Depreciation and Replacement Account on a proportionate basis (based upon the outstanding principal amounts of the Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds) to the Principal Account, the Interest Account -14- and the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Account to prevent any default in the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds. Section 604. Transfer of Funds to Paving Agent. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to make the payments to the Principal Account and the Interest Account as provided in Section 602, and, to the extent necessary to prevent a default in the payment of the Bonds, from the Reserve Account, the Surplus Account and the Depreciation and Replacement Account as provided in Sections 602 and 603, sums sufficient to pay the Bonds when due, and to forward amounts to the Paying Agent in a manner which ensures the Paying Agent will have sufficient available funds on or before the second Business Day immediately preceding the dates when payments on the Bonds are due. Upon the payment of all principal and interest on the Bonds, the Paying Agent will return any excess funds to the City. Except as otherwise provided in the Indenture, all moneys deposited by the City with the Paying Agent are subject to the provisions of this Ordinance. ARTICLE VII DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT OF MONEYS Section 701. Investment of Moneys. (a) Moneys in the Interest Account, the Principal Account, the Construction Account, the State Match Portion Debt Service Account, the Leveraged Portion Debt Service Account and the Reserve Account are assigned by the City to the Authority to secure the City's obligations under this Ordinance and the City acknowledges that moneys in the Interest Account, the Principal Account, the Construction Account, the State Match Portion Debt Service Account, the Leveraged Portion Debt Service Account and the Reserve Account will be invested by the Authority, subject to the Arbitrage Instructions, in Investment Securities in accordance with Section 4.9 of the hidenture. Moneys in each of the other funds and accounts created or ratified and confirmed by this Ordinance may be invested by the City in obligations as may be permitted by law, but no investment will be made for a period extending longer than the date when the moneys invested may be needed. All earnings on any investments held in any fund or account will accrue to the applicable fund or account. In determining the amount held in any fund or account under this Ordinance, obligations will be valued at the lower of cost or market value. If the amount in any fund or account held within the Treasury of the City is greater than the required amount, the City may transfer the excess to the Revenue Fund. (b) If the Outstanding Parity Bonds are outstanding, any investments made pursuant to this Section are subject to the applicable restrictions in the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance. ARTICLE VIII PARTICULAR COVENANTS OF THE CITY Section 801. Efficient and Economical Operation. The City will continuously own and will operate the System in an efficient and economical manner and will keep and maintain the System in good repair and working order. Section 802. Rate Covenant. The City will fix, establish, maintain and collect rates and charges for the use and services furnished by or through the System to produce income and revenues sufficient to (a) pay the costs of the operation and maintenance of the System; (b) pay the principal of and -15- interest on the Bonds as and when due; (c) enable the City to have in each Fiscal Year Net Revenues Available for Debt Service of not less than 110% of the amount required to be paid by the City in the Fiscal Year on account of both principal of and interest on all System Revenue Bonds at the time outstanding, provided that interest on any SRF Program Bonds will be reduced by the SRF Subsidy, if any; and (d) provide reasonable and adequate reserves for the payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon and for the protection and benefit of the System as provided in this Ordinance. The City will require the prompt payment of accounts for service rendered by or through the System and will promptly take whatever action is legally permissible to enforce and collect delinquent charges. Section 803. Reasonable Charges for all Services. None of the facilities or services provided by the System will be furnished to any user (excepting the City itself) without a reasonable charge being made therefor. If the income and revenues derived by the City from the System are insufficient to pay the reasonable expenses of operation and maintenance of the System and the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due, the City will pay into the Revenue Fund a fair and reasonable payment in accordance with effective applicable rates and charges for all services or other facilities furnished to the City or any of its departments by the System. Section 804. Annual Budget. Prior to the commencement of each Fiscal Year, the City will cause a budget setting forth the estimated receipts and expenditures of the System for the next succeeding Fiscal Year to be prepared and filed with the City Clerk. The City Clerk, within 30 days after the end of the current Fiscal Year, will mail a copy of the budget to the Owner and the Trustee. The annual budget will be prepared in accordance with the laws of the State. Section 805. Annual Audit. (a) Promptly after the end of each Fiscal Year, the City will cause an audit of the System for - the preceding Fiscal Year to be made by a certified public accountant or firm of certified public accountants employed for that purpose and paid from the Revenues. The annual audit will cover in reasonable detail the operation of the System during the Fiscal Year. (b) Within 180 days after the end of the City's Fiscal Year, a copy of the annual audit will be filed in the office of the City Clerk, and a duplicate copy of the audit will be mailed to the Owner and the Trustee. The annual audit will be open to examination and inspection during normal business hours by any taxpayer, any user of the services of the System, any Owner of the Bonds, or anyone acting for or on behalf of the taxpayer, user or Owner. (c) As soon as possible after the completion of the annual audit, the Governing Body will review the annual audit, and if the annual audit reveals any breach of this Ordinance, the City agrees to promptly cure the breach. Section 806. Performance of Duties. The City will faithfully and punctually perform all duties and obligations with respect to the operation of the System now or hereafter imposed upon the City by the Constitution and laws of the State and the provisions of this Ordinance. Section 807. Tax Covenants. (a) The City will comply with all applicable provisions of the Code, including Sections 103 and 141 through 150, necessary to maintain the exclusion of interest on the Authority Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City will not use or permit the use of any proceeds of the Bonds or any other funds of the City, nor take or permit any other action, or fail to take any action, which would adversely affect the exclusion of interest on the Authority Bonds from gross income for federal -16- income tax purposes. The City will adopt ordinances or resolutions and take other actions necessary to comply with the Code and with other applicable future law, in order to ensure that the interest on the Authority Bonds will remain excluded from federal gross income. (b) The City (1) will use the proceeds of the Bonds as soon as practicable for the purposes for which the Bonds are issued, and (2) will not invest or directly or indirectly use or permit the use of any proceeds of the Bonds or any other funds of the City in any manner, or take or omit to take any action, that would cause the Authority Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148(a) of the Code. (c) The City will not use any portion of the proceeds of the Bonds, including any investment income earned on the proceeds, directly or indirectly, (1) in a manner that would cause any Bond to be a "private activity bond" within the meaning of Section 141(a) of the Code, or (2) to make or finance a loan to any person. (d) The City will pay to the Trustee, for deposit to the Interest Account and subsequent transfer as provided in the Indenture, an amount equal to arbitrage rebate and the costs incurred in connection with determining arbitrage rebate, at the times required by the Arbitrage Instructions. The provisions of this paragraph will survive the payment in full or defeasance of the Bonds. ARTICLE IX Section 901. Prior Lien Bonds. The City will not issue any debt obligations payable out of the Net Revenues which are superior in lien, security or otherwise to the Bonds. Section 902. Parity Lien Bonds or Obligations. (a) The City will not issue any additional bonds or other long—term obligations payable out of the Net Revenues of the System which stand on a parity or equality with the Bonds unless the following conditions are met: (1) the City is not in default in the payment of principal or interest on the Bonds or any Parity Bonds or in making any deposit into the funds and accounts under this Ordinance or any Parity Ordinance; and (2) the City provides to the Owner and the Trustee a certificate showing either of the following: (A) the average annual Net Revenues as set forth in the two most recent annual audits for Fiscal Years preceding the issuance of additional bonds, are at least 110% of the average annual debt service on the System Revenue Bonds, including the additional bonds proposed to be issued, to be paid out of the Net Revenues in all succeeding Fiscal Years. Interest to be paid on any SRF Program Bonds may be reduced by the SRF Subsidy, if any. If the City has made any increase in rates for the use and services of the System and the increase has not been in effect during all of the two Fiscal Years for which annual audits are available, the City may add the additional Net Revenues which would have resulted if the rate increase had been in effect for the entire period to the audited Net Revenues, as certified by the Consultant; or -17- (B) the estimated average annual Net Revenues Available for Debt Service for the two Fiscal Years immediately following the Fiscal Year in which the improvements to the System being financed by the additional bonds are to be in commercial operation, as certified by the Consultant, is at least 110% of the average annual debt service on the System Revenue Bonds, including the additional bonds proposed to be issued, to be paid out of the Net Revenues Available for Debt Service in succeeding Fiscal Years following the commencement of commercial operation of the improvements. Interest to be paid on any SRF Program Bonds may be reduced by the SRF Subsidy, if any. In determining the amount of estimated Net Revenues Available for Debt Service for the purpose of this subsection, the Consultant may adjust the estimated net income and revenues by adding the estimated increase in Net Revenues Available for Debt Service resulting from any increase in rates for the use and services of the System approved by the City. (b) If the conditions set forth in this Section are satisfied, the City (i) may issue additional revenue bonds or other obligations of the City on a parity with the Bonds and that enjoy complete equality of the lien on the Net Revenues with the Bonds, (ii) may make equal provision for paying the additional revenue bonds or other obligations from the Revenue Fund, and (iii) may secure the additional revenue bonds or other obligations by funding reasonable System debt service accounts and debt service reserve accounts from the Net Revenues. Section 903. Junior Lien Bonds. Nothing in this Article prohibits or restricts the right of the City to issue additional revenue obligations, including revenue bonds, for the purpose of extending, improving, enlarging, repairing or altering the System, that are subordinate to the Bonds if at the time of the issuance of the additional revenue obligations the City is not in default in the performance of any covenant or agreement in this Ordinance. If the City is in default in paying either interest on or principal of the Bonds, or if the Reserve Account is not fully funded, the City shall not make any payments on the subordinate revenue obligations until the default is cured. Subject to the limitations in this Section, the City may make provision for paying the principal of and interest on the subordinate revenue bonds or obligations from moneys in the Revenue Fund. Section 904. Refunding Bonds. The City may, without complying with the provisions of Section 902, refund any of the Bonds in a manner that provides debt service savings to the City, and the refunding bonds so issued will be on a parity with any of the Bonds that are not refunded and any Outstanding Parity Bonds. If the Bonds are refunded in part and the refunding bonds bear a higher average rate of interest or become due on a date earlier than that of the Bonds that are refunded, the City must obtain the prior written consent of the Owner and DNR to the issuance of the refunding bonds. ARTICLE X DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section 1001. Event of Default. If (i) the City defaults in the payment of the principal of or interest on any of the Bonds, or (ii) the City or its Governing Body or any of its officers, agents or employees fails or refuses to comply with any provision of this Ordinance, the Constitution or statutes of the State, the Purchase Agreement or the Revolving Fund Agreement and default continues for a period of 60 days after written notice specifying the non—payment default has been given to the City by the Trustee. the Authority, DNR or the Owner of any Bond then Outstanding, at any time thereafter and while the default continues, the City shall pay to DNR the penalties assessed by DNR in accordance with the Regulations. The penalties will be assessed as a reduction in the credit provided in Section 602(a)(2)(A). 18- Section 1002. Remedies. (a) The provisions of this Ordinance constitute a contract between the City and the Owners of the Bonds. The Owner or Owners of not less than 10% in principal amount of the Bonds at the time Outstanding have the right for the equal benefit and protection of all Owners of Bonds similarly situated: (1) by any proceeding at law or in equity to enforce the rights of the Owner or Owners against the City and its officers, agents and employees, and to compel the performance by the City of its duties and obligations under this Ordinance, the Constitution and the laws of the State; (3) by any proceeding at law or in equity to require the City, its officers, agents and employees to account as if they were the trustees of an express trust; and (3) by any proceeding at law or in equity to enjoin any act or thing which is unlawful or in violation of the rights of the Owners of the Bonds. (b) Any amounts paid on the Bonds to the Owners will be applied first to interest and second to principal, to the extent due and payable. Section 1003. Limitation on Rights of Owners. No Owner has any right in any manner whatever by the Owner's action to affect, disturb or prejudice the security granted and provided for in, or enforce any right under, this Ordinance, except in the manner provided in this Ordinance. All proceedings at law or in equity will be for the equal benefit of all Owners. Section 1004. Remedies Cumulative. No remedy conferred upon the Owners is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy. Each remedy is in addition to every other remedy and may be exercised without exhausting any other remedy conferred under this Ordinance. No waiver by any Owner of any default or breach of duty or contract of the City under this Ordinance will affect any subsequent default or breach of duty or contract by the City or impair any rights or remedies thereon. No delay or omission of any Owner to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default will impair any right or power or will be construed to be a waiver of any default. Every substantive right and every remedy conferred upon the Owners of the Bonds by this Ordinance may be enforced and exercised from time to time and as often as may be expedient. If any Owner discontinues any proceeding or the decision in the proceeding is against the Owner, the City and the Owners of the Bonds will be restored to their former positions and rights under this Ordinance. Section 1005. No Obligation to Levy Taxes. Nothing in this Ordinance imposes any duty or obligation on the City to levy any taxes either to meet any obligation incurred under this Ordinance or to pay the principal of or interest on the Bonds. ARTICLE XI DEFEASANCE Section 1101. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been paid and discharged, the provisions of this Ordinance (other than Section 807) will terminate. Bonds will be treated as paid and discharged within the meaning of this Ordinance if the City has deposited with the Paying Agent, or other bank or trust company located in the State, having full trust powers and meeting the requirements of a -19- successor Trustee under the Indenture, (i) moneys and non—callable Defeasance Securities which, together with interest to be earned, as evidenced by the written report of an independent certified public accountant, will be sufficient for the payment of the principal and redemption premium, if any, of and interest to accrue on the Bonds to the date of maturity or redemption, plus an additional premium on Bonds being optionally redeemed equal to interest that would otherwise accrue on the Bonds for an additional 30—day period, and (ii) an opinion of Bond Counsel, addressed to the Authority and the Trustee, that providing for the payment of the Bonds by depositing moneys or Defeasance Securities with the Paying Agent in accordance with this Section will not cause the interest on the Authority Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. If any Bonds will be redeemed prior to maturity, the City must have given irrevocable instructions to the Paying Agent to redeem the Bonds. Any moneys and obligations which at any time are deposited with the Paying Agent or other bank by or on behalf of the City, for the purpose of paying and discharging any of the Bonds, are assigned, transferred and set over in trust for the applicable Owners, and the moneys and obligations are irrevocably appropriated to the payment and discharge of the applicable Bonds. ARTICLE XII AMENDMENTS Section 1201. Amendments. (a) Any provision of the Bonds or of this Ordinance may be amended by an ordinance with the written consent of the Authority and the Trustee. Consent must be evidenced by an instrument executed by the Authority and the Trustee, acknowledged or proved in the manner of a deed to be recorded, and filed with the City Clerk. In addition, the prior written consent of the Owner and DNR is required for any amendment that would: (1) extend the maturity of any payment of principal or interest on any Bond; (2) reduce the amount of principal or interest payable on any Bond; or (3) permit the priority of any Bond over any other Bond. (b) No amendment will be effective until (i) the City has delivered to the Owner, the Trustee and DNR an opinion of Bond Counsel stating that the amendment is permitted by this Ordinance and the Act, complies with their respective terms, is valid and binding upon the City in accordance with its terms and does not adversely affect the exclusion of interest on the Authority Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and (ii) the City Clerk has on file a copy of the amendment and all required consents. ARTICLE XIII MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 1301. Further Authority. The officers of the City, including the Mayor, the City Administrator and the City Clerk, are authorized and directed to execute all documents and take the actions as are necessary or advisable in order to carry out and perform the purposes of this Ordinance and to make ministerial changes in the documents approved by this Ordinance which they may approve. The -20- execution of any document or taking of any related action constitutes conclusive evidence of the necessity or advisability of the action or change. Section 1302. Severability. If any section or other part of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid, the invalidity will not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. Section 1303. Governing Law. This Ordinance is governed by and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State. Section 1304. Effective Date. This Ordinance is in full force and effect from and after its passage by the City Council and approval by the Mayor. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri this 17th day of October, 2005. (Seal) ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED by the Mayor this 17th day of October, 2005. (Seal) ATTEST: City Clerk -21- Mayor Mayor CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, hereby certify that attached to this Certificate is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City at a regular meeting held, after proper notice, on October 17, 2005; that the Ordinance has not been amended and is in full force and effect as of this date; and that the Ordinance is on file in my office. (Seal) WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of November, 2005 City Clerk City of Jefferson, Missouri EXHIBIT A IIaMLYAYo]a 0,163,21�7d 1. Original Principal Amount of the Bonds: Not to exceed $10,900,000. 2. Purchase Price: Not less than 99% of the Original Principal Amount. 3. Weighted Average Maturity of the Bonds: Not less than 10.5 years nor more than 14.5 years. 4. Effective Interest Cost: Not to exceed 2.40%. `Effective Interest Cost" means the discount rate that, when used in computing the present value, as of the issue date of the Bonds, of all Payments (defined below) expected to be paid on the Bonds, produces an amount equal to the deposit to the City's Construction Account. For this purpose, the term "Payments" means the sum of (a) all payments of principal and interest on the Bonds, less (b) allocable interest earnings on the City's Reserve Account (calculated assuming the Reserve Account is fully funded on the date of issuance of the Bonds), plus (c) the Administrative Fee. Effective Interest Cost is expressed as an annual percentage rate, and present value is computed on a semiannual basis using a 30/360 day -count convention. 5. Costs of Issuance: Not to exceed $190,000. A-1 FORM OF BOND [THIS BOND IS TRANSFERABLE ONLY TO ANY SUCCESSOR TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AND ENERGY RESOURCES AUTHORITY OR ITS ASSIGNS] Registered No. R -- Interest Rates See Schedule I REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MISSOURI CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI SEWERAGE SYSTEM REVENUE BOND (STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM) SERIES 2005B Maturity Dates See Schedule I Registered Dated Date November 1. 2005 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AND ENERGY RESOURCES AUTHORITY DOLLARS" THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, a constitutional charter city and political subdivision of the State of Missouri (the "City"), for value received, hereby promises to pay to the Owner shown above, or registered assigns, the Principal Amount shown above in installments in the amounts and on the Maturity Dates referenced above, and to pay interest thereon at the annual Interest Rates referenced above (computed on the basis of a 360—day year of twelve 30—day months), payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing July 1, 2006 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), from the Dated Date shown above or from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for until the Principal Amount has been paid. The principal of and redemption premium, if any, on this Bond will be paid at maturity or upon earlier redemption to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the maturity or redemption date, upon presentation and surrender of this Bond at the principal office of UMB BANK, N.A. in the City of St. Louis, Missouri (the "Paying Agent'). The interest payable on this Bond on any Interest Payment Date will be paid by check or draft mailed by the Paying Agent to the person in whose name this Bond is registered on the registration books maintained by the Paying Agent at the close of business on the Record Date. The Record Date is the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding the Interest Payment Date. The principal of and redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds is payable by electronic transfer in immediately available federal funds to a bank in the continental United States of America pursuant to instructions from the Owner received by the Paying IM Agent prior to the Record Date. The principal of, redemption premium, if any, and interest on this Bond is payable in lawful money of the United States of America. This Bond is one of a duly authorized series of bonds of the City designated "Sewerage System Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Fund Program) Series 200513" aggregating the principal amount of $ (the "Bonds"), issued by the City for the purpose of refunding certain outstanding bonds and extending and improving its sewerage system (together with all future improvements and extensions, the "System"), under the authority of and in full compliance with Chapter 250 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri and Section 108.140(2) of the Revised Statutes of Missouri and pursuant to an election duly held in the City and an ordinance adopted by the governing body of the City (the "Ordinance"). Terms not otherwise defined in this Bond have the meanings set forth in the Ordinance. Certain Bonds are subject to mandatory redemption and payment prior to maturity pursuant to the mandatory redemption requirements of the Ordinance, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest to the redemption date. At the option of the City, certain Bonds may be called for redemption and payment prior to maturity in whole or in part on any date with the consent of the Owner, as provided in the Ordinance. Bonds will be optionally redeemed in part in integral multiples of $5,000 from the maturities selected by the City with the prior written consent of the Owner. Upon redemption, the sinking fund redemption amounts for each maturity will be proportionately reduced, subject to rounding to integral multiples of $5,000. The City will give written notice to the Paying Agent, as trustee (the "Trustee"), designating the amount of each maturity redeemed and the reduction in each sinking fund installment, subject to verification by the Trustee. In exercising its option to redeem the Bonds, the City will deposit with the Paying Agent, in addition to the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, an additional premium equal to 30—days' interest on the Bonds to be redeemed for an additional 30—day period. The Paying Agent will give notice of optional redemption, unless waived, by mailing a redemption notice by registered or certified mail at least 45 days prior to the date fixed for optional redemption, to the Owner of each Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the Bond Register. If notice of redemption has been given or waived, the Bonds or portions of Bonds called for redemption will become due and payable on the redemption date at the redemption price specified in the notice. No notice of mandatory sinking fund redemption is required to be given. From and after the redemption date the Bonds called for redemption will cease to bear interest date unless the City defaults in the payment of the redemption price. The Bonds are limited obligations of the City payable solely from, and secured as to the payment of principal and interest by a pledge of, the Net Revenues. The taxing power of the City is not pledged to the payment of the Bonds either as to principal or interest. The Bonds do not constitute a general obligation of the City or an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter provision, limitation or restriction. Under the conditions set forth in the Ordinance, the City has the right to issue additional parity bonds payable from, and secured by, the Net Revenues. The Bonds are issued on a parity with respect to payment of principal and interest from the Net Revenues and in all other respects with the Outstanding Parity Bonds (as defined in the Ordinance). The City covenants with the Owner of this Bond to keep and perform all covenants and agreements contained in the Ordinance, and the City will fix, establish, maintain and collect rates, fees Lim and charges for the use and services furnished by or through the System to produce Revenues sufficient to pay the operation and maintenance costs of the System, pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds and provide reasonable and adequate reserve funds. Reference is made to the Ordinance for a description of the agreements made by the City with respect to the collection, segregation and application of the Revenues, the nature and extent of the security for the Bonds, the rights, duties and obligations of the City with respect to the Bonds, and the rights of the Owners. The Bonds are issuable in the form of fully registered Bonds without coupons in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple of $5,000. This Bond may be transferred or exchanged, as provided in the Ordinance, only upon the registration books kept for that purpose at the above—mentioned office of the Paying Agent. Upon surrender of any Bond at the principal office of the Paying Agent, the Paying Agent will transfer or exchange the Bond for a new Bond or Bonds in any authorized denomination of the same maturity and in the same aggregate principal amount as the Bond which was presented for transfer or exchange. All Bonds presented for transfer or exchange must be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer or authorization for exchange, in a form and with guarantee of signature satisfactory to the Paying Agent, duly executed by the Owner or by the Owner's authorized agent. All Bonds presented for transfer or exchange must be surrendered to the Paying Agent for cancellation. For every exchange or transfer of Bonds the City or the Paying Agent may levy a charge sufficient to reimburse it for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid for the exchange or transfer. The person requesting the exchange or transfer must pay the charge. Payment of the charge is a condition precedent to the exchange or transfer. This Bond will not be valid or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Ordinance until the Paying Agent has executed the Certificate of Authentication. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND DECLARED that all acts, conditions and things required to exist, happen and be performed precedent to the issuance of the Bonds have existed, happened and been performed in due time, form and manner as required by law, and that before the issuance of the Bonds, provision has been duly made for the collection, segregation and application of the income and revenues of the System as provided in the Ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Jefferson, Missouri, has executed this Bond by causing it to be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of its Mayor and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of its City Clerk, with its official seal affixed or imprinted. (SEAL) CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI ATTEST: City Clerk I� a Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds of the issue described in the within—mentioned Ordinance. Registration Date: UMB BANK, N.A., Paying Agent V1 Authorized Signatory RECORD OF PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS AND PREPAYMENTS Under the provisions of the Ordinance, payments of the principal installments of this Bond and partial prepayments of the principal of this Bond may be made directly to the Owner without surrender of this Bond to the Paying Agent. Accordingly, any purchaser or other transferee of this Bond should verify with the Paying Agent the principal of this Bond outstanding prior to any purchase or transfer, and the records of the Paying Agent are conclusive. Rm ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto UMB BANK N.A. Print or Type Name of Transferee the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints UMB Bank, N.A. agent to transfer the within Bond on the registration books kept by the Paying Agent, with full power of substitution in the premises. Date: STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AND ENERGY RESOURCES AUTHORITY MR Chairman City DrIetremom Missouri SCHEDULEITO CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI SEWERAGE SYSTEM REVENUE BOND (STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM) SERIES 2005 [insert Maturity Schedule from Certificate of Final Terms] B-1-1 EXHIBIT C CERTIFICATE OF FINAL TERMS C-1 FORM OF CLOSING CERTIFICATE PARTICIPANT CLOSING CERTIFICATE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI We, the undersigned, duly authorized officials of the City of Jefferson, Missouri (the "Participant'), in connection with the issuance of Sewerage System Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Fund Program) Series 2005B (the `Bonds") in the original principal amount set forth in Exhibit A to this Certificate (the "Original Principal Amount'), hereby certify as follows: 1. Organization and Authority: Definitions. The Participant is a constitutional charter city, organized and existing under the constitution and laws of the State of Missouri. The Participant has complied with all provisions of the Constitution and the laws of the State of Missouri, and has full power and authority to consummate all transactions contemplated by the Bonds, Ordinance No. adopted on October 17, 2005, authorizing the issuance of the Bonds (the "Bond Ordinance"), and any and all other agreements relating thereto. Terms not otherwise defined in this Certificate have the respective meanings set forth in the Bond Ordinance. 2. Transcript of Proceedings. The executed counterparts or copies of the proceedings of the Participant relating to the authorization and issuance of the Bonds as set forth in the supplemental transcript of proceedings (the "Transcript') prepared in connection with the issuance of the Authority Bonds are true and correct copies or executed counterparts of such proceedings, originals or executed counterparts of which are on file in the official records of the Participant; none of such proceedings have been modified, amended or repealed; and such facts as are stated therein still exist. 3. Meetings. All meetings of the City Council of the Participant as shown in the Transcript were regular meetings, or meetings held pursuant to regular adjournment at the next preceding meeting, or special meetings duly called and held as shown in the Transcript, and for all such meetings, where required, proper notice was given in the manner required by law, including Chapter 610 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, as amended. 4. Incumbency. The following named persons are the duly qualified and acting members of the City Council and officers of the Participant during the proceedings described herein: Name Title John Landwehr Mayor Kenneth Ferguson Councilmember Mike Harvey Councilmember Edith Vogel Councilmember Jonathon Schnitzler Councilmember Brian Crane Councilmember Brian Pope Councilmember Kevin Brown Councilmember Cindy Layton Councilmember Dean Martin Councilmember Michael Berry Councilmember Phyllis Powell City Clerk D-1 5. Execution of Bonds. We have duly signed and executed the Bonds, consisting of one fully registered bond in the denomination of the Original Principal Amount, numbered R-1. On the date of the Bonds, and on the date when we duly executed the Bonds, we were, and at the date hereof we are, the officials indicated by our signatures on the Bonds and by our signatures to this Certificate, respectively. 6. Signatures and Seal. The signatures of us and each of us, as such officials, respectively, on the Bonds, are our true and genuine signatures, and the seal affixed or imprinted on the Bonds at the time of their execution was and is the duly authorized seal of the Participant and was thereto affixed by the authority and direction of the Council of the Participant, and is the seal affixed to this Certificate. 7. Due Authorization and Execution of Documents. The Participant has duly authorized all necessary action to be taken by the Participant for (i) the due authorization, adoption and performance of the following documents (the "Bond Documents"): (a) Purchase Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005 (the "Purchase Agreement'), among the State Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority (the "Authority"), the Participant and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources ("DNR"), and (b) Revolving Fund Agreement dated as of November 1, 2005 (the "Revolving Fund Agreement"), among the Authority, the Participant and DNR, and acknowledged and accepted by the Trustee; (ii) the due authorization, execution and delivery of the Bond Ordinance and any and all such other agreements and documents as may be required to be executed, delivered and received by the Participant in order to carry out, give effect to and consummate the transactions contemplated by the Bond Ordinance; and (iii) the carrying out, giving effect to and consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and by the Bond Ordinance. The undersigned have duly executed the Bond Documents and this Certificate. S. Approval of Bond Terms. Attached to this Certificate is a true and correct copy of the Certificate of Final Terms executed by the undersigned and attached to the Bond Ordinance as Exhibit C, pursuant to the delegation of authority under Section 210 of the Bond Ordinance. The undersigned Mayor certifies that the requirements of the Bond Ordinance with respect to the terms of the Bonds have been satisfied. 9. Receipt of Purchase Price: Deposit of Proceeds and Other Moneys. (a) The Participant hereby acknowledges receipt from the Authority of payment in full of the purchase price for the Bonds in the amount of $ , plus accrued interest, if any. The Participant further acknowledges that the Authority has in all respects complied with and satisfied all of its obligations to the Participant as set forth in the Purchase Agreement and required to be complied with and satisfied on or prior to the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (b) The Paying Agent, in its role as Trustee under the Indenture (as defined in the Bond Ordinance), is further authorized and directed to deposit and apply such sums, into the Funds and Accounts established under the Indenture as follows: D-2 (1) into the Costs of Issuance Fund an amount equal to the Costs of Issuance in Exhibit A• (Z) into the Interest Account the accrued interest on the Bonds, if any; and (3) into the Construction Account the remaining proceeds of the Bonds. (c) Attached to this Certificate is a copy of Form SRF -01 Requisition approved by DNR in the amount of $ . The Trustee is directed to transfer $ from the Construction Account to U.S. Bank National Association, as paying agent for the Refunded Bonds (described below), in accordance with the Supplemental Closing Instructions attached to this Certificate. The Refunded Bonds Paying Agent is directed to transfer in immediately available funds the remaining balance of the Construction Loan Fund (as defined in the Refunded Bonds Ordinance defined below) ($ ) to the Trustee in accordance with the Supplemental Closing Instructions. (d) Promptly after the transfer described in paragraph (c), the Trustee shall invest the remaining amount in the Participant's Construction Account in the Investment Agreement. The Trustee is directed to transfer the amount of $ from the Costs of Issuance Fund to the Participant for reimbursement of the Participant's application fee to the Authority and the balance of the amount deposited pursuant to (ii) above for the payment of Program Costs and the Participant's costs of issuance. 10. No Litigation; Other Matters. (a) To the best knowledge of the undersigned, the Participant is not in breach of or in default under any applicable law or administrative regulation of the State of Missouri or the United States of America, or any department, agency or instrumentality thereof, or any applicable judgment or decree or any indenture, ordinance/resolution, agreement or other instrument to which the Participant is a party or is otherwise subject, which breach or default would in any way materially adversely affect the authorization, sale or issuance of the Bonds and no event has occurred as is continuing which, with the passage of time or the giving of notice or both, would constitute such breach or default under any such instrument. The execution and delivery of the Bond Documents and the Bonds, and compliance with the provisions of each thereof, will not conflict with or constitute in any material respect a breach of or default under any law, administrative regulation, judgment, decree, indenture, ordinance/resolution, agreement or other instrument to which the Participant is a party or is otherwise subject. (b) There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, public board or body, for which the Participant has been served with process or official notice or, to the best of the Participant's knowledge, threatened against the Participant affecting its corporate existence or the titles of its officers to their respective offices or seeking to prohibit, restrain or enjoin the authorization, sale or issuance of the Bonds or the collection of the revenues and other moneys pledged or to be pledged to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, or the pledge thereof by the Authority pursuant to the Indenture, or in any way contesting or affecting the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the Bond Ordinance or the Bond Documents, contesting the federal tax-exempt status of the Authority Bonds or contesting the powers of the Participant or any authority for the issuance of the Bonds, or the execution or delivery of the Bonds, the Bond Ordinance, the Bond Documents or this Certificate. (c) No further consent, approval, authorization or order of any court or governmental agency or body of the State of Missouri is required by the Participant for the authorization, sale or issuance of the D-3 Bonds or the consummation by the Participant of the other transactions effected or contemplated in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. 11. No Default. At the date of this Closing Certificate, no event has occurred and is continuing which, with the passage of time or the giving of notice, would constitute a breach of or an event of default under the Bond Ordinance or any Bond Document. 12. Request to Authenticate and Deliver Bonds. UMB Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent, is hereby requested and authorized, pursuant to Section 207 of the Bond Ordinance, to authenticate the Bonds in the Original Principal Amount and to deliver the Bonds to, or at the direction of, the Authority, upon payment to the Paying Agent for the account of the Participant of the purchase price for the Bonds specified in paragraph 10 of this Certificate. 13. Outstanding System Obligations. As of the date hereof, the Participant does not have outstanding any bonds or other obligations payable out of the net income and revenues derived from the operation of the System other than the Bonds and the Outstanding Parity Bonds. No event has occurred and is continuing which, with the passage of time or the giving of notice, would constitute a breach of or an event of default under the Bond Ordinance and the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinances. 14. Refunding. In connection with the application of the net proceeds of the Bonds to the refunding of the Participant's Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, dated November 1, 2002, in the original principal amount of $5,555,000 (the "Refunded Bonds"), issued pursuant to Ordinance No. 13474 passed on November 18, 2002 (the "Refunded Bonds Ordinance"), the Participant represents and warrants as follows: (a) The Refunded Bonds are being purchased and cancelled in whole on the date of this Certificate in accordance with the Refunded Bonds Ordinance and the Bond Ordinance. (b) Unexpended proceeds of the Refunded Bonds in the amount of $ have been deposited to the Participant's Construction Account. (c) Under Regulations § 1.148-9(h), the Bonds will be treated as two separate issues (i.e., a "Refunding Portion" and a "Project Portion") for most purposes under Code § 148. The Refunding Portion is $ principal amount and $ sale proceeds. The Project Portion is $ principal amount and $ sale proceeds. (d) The purpose of the refunding is to accomplish one or more of the following: (A) to achieve interest cost savings for the Participant through early redemption of the Refunded Bonds, (B) to reduce the debt service requirements of the Participant, and (C) to provide an orderly plan of financing for the Participant. The representations and warranties in this paragraph 15 are made with the understanding that the Authority will rely on them in connection with the Authority's execution of its Tax Certificate with respect to certain matters under Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). 16. Reliance. The undersigned acknowledge and agree that this Certificate is being relied upon by the Authority in connection with the issuance and sale of the Authority Bonds, by the underwriters of the Authority Bonds in connection with their purchase of the Authority Bonds, by the Participant's bond counsel in connection with the delivery of their approving legal opinion with respect to the Bonds, and by D-4 the Authority's Co -Bond Counsel in connection with their approving legal opinions with respect to the Authority Bonds. (Seal) WITNESS our hands and the seal of the City of Jefferson, Missouri this day of 2005. Signature Official Title D-5 Mayor City Clerk EXHIBIT A [ATTACH COPY OF CERTIFICATE OF FINAL TERMS] D -A-1 SUPPLEMENTAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI Sewerage System Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds (State Revolving Fund Program) Series 2005B The following steps will be implemented in the indicated order of priority on the indicated dates: 1. On November '2005, U.S. Bank National Association will transfer in immediately available funds the remaining balance in the Construction Loan Fund in connection with the Refunded Bonds ($ ) to LIMB Bank, N.A., in escrow pending the issuance of the referenced bonds (the "Bonds"), as follows: UMB Bank, N.A. ABA # 101000695 Acct #: Trust Operations/Ct-STL A/C# 9800006823 FBO: Series 2005B Attn: Rebecca Dengler, 314.612.8485 2. On November _, 2005, promptly upon the issuance of the referenced bonds, UMB Bank, N.A. will transfer $ from the Construction Account to U.S. Bank National Association, for application to the redemption of the Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 (the "Refunded Bonds") in whole on November , 2005, as follows: U.S. Bank National Association ABA # A/C # Attn: 3. On November 2005, upon the issuance of the Bonds, the amount deposited with UMB Bank, N.A. under Step 1 will be released from escrow and deposited to the Construction Account. RM City � of„ lef...e.rson ��s _. _ n n A. 320 . 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www.jeffcitymo.org/cd Date: October 17, 2005 To: Mayor and City Council From: Eric Seaman, P.E., WWD (634-6443) Subject: Bill 2005-94 Replacement pages Please find 3 replacement pages provided by our Bond Counsel, Gilmore & Bell this afternoon. Attached is also the excerpted changes to the Bill. They include changes to the table of contents, a typographic correction, and clarification of the refinancing language. CC: Rich Mays, City Adminstrator Phyllis Powell, City Clerk Nathan Nickolaus, City Counselor Steve Schlueter, Director of Finance Pat Sullivan, P.E., Director of Community Development "building a better community" C:\Documents and Settings\eseaman\My Documents\2005 bonds\2005 94 replacement pages.doc Excerpted changes to Jefferson Ordinance v4: TOC: Section 504. ukase and Qiqsellatioa> <Redemntion> of Refunded Bonds.................................2 Page 1: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SEWERAGE SYSTEM REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS (STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM) SERIES 2005B OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING AND IMPROVING THE CITY'S SEWERAGE SYSTEM AND REFUNDING A PRIOR ISSUE OF BONDS OF THE CITY; PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS OF THE BONDS AND THE AGREEMENTS MADE BY THE CITY TO FACILITATE AND PROTECT THEIR PAYMENT; AND AUTHORIZING A NO—INTEREST LOAN FROM THE WATER AND WASTEWATER LOAN FUND AND/OR THE �"' <WATER> AND WASTEWATER LOAN REVOLVING FUND OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI AND PRESCRIBING OTHER RELATED MATTERS. pagts� . j i —I ARTICLE V APPLICATION OF BOND PROCEEDS Section 501. Disposition of Bond Proceeds. (a) The proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, including any premium and accrued interest, will be deposited simultaneously with the delivery of the Bonds as set forth in the Closing Certificate. (b) <On the issuance date of the Bonds, the City will transfer the amount set forth in the Closing Certificate from the Project Fund under the Refunded Bonds Ordinance to the Trustee for deposit to the Construction Account. (e)> On the issuance date of the Bondsy> the Trustee will disburse from the Construction Account, from the proceeds of the Bonds, to the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent the amount set forth in the Closing Certificate for application to the <p�ehase and <redemption> of the Refunded Bonds in whole. Section 502. Assigmnent and Application of Moneys in the Construction Account. (a) By this Ordinance, the City assigns the proceeds of the Bonds held in the Construction Account to the Owner to secure the City's obligations under this Ordinance. Moneys in the Construction Account will be disbursed to the City for the sole purpose of paying the cost of extending and improving the System in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the Consulting Engineer, previously approved by the Governing Body and DNR and on file in the office of the City Clerk, including any alterations in or amendments to the plans and specifications approved by the Governing Body and DNR with the advice of the Consulting Engineer. (b) Requisitions will be submitted for withdrawals from the Construction Account in accordance with Article III of the Purchase Agreement. Section 503. Application of Moneys by Refunded Bonds Paying Agent. Moneys received by the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent will be applied solely to the payment of the principal of and redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Refunded Bonds. These moneys deposited with the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent will be held by the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent in accordance with the provisions of the Refunded Bond Ordinance. Section 504. -D..... hale and Ganeo" .t;,,.,> <Redemption> of Refunded Bonds. The -Q4, t ;., a writtene fFem the owner f the D oF. aea D a Ce, :,... n nn_i,.� 01411p, D „f.,., a �a n,.., a.. n..a:n—ee.......... -'d.- ....,,,..,a..t,.f., tender .,f tl,., n ef..., a ea Ohe date f' of the Bonds. U t of h � vvi aiv�w'nvic-orraic-ausc-vizS.."i"m"a"xccvi�i�nvna�-�PmTP°7�Tcncvi mc�arc �x$S'c-pnccT <outstanding Refunded Bonds maturing after November 1. 2005, in the aggregate the principal amount of $4.980.000, are called for redemption and payment prior to maturity on December 15, 2005. The Refunded Bonds will be redeemed at the office> of -t>,„ Refunded —RRnds b - the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent the Refii dee D 7 will be <on the redemption date. In accordance with the requirements of the Refunded Bonds Ordinance. the City Clerk is directed to cause notice of the call for redemption and payment of the Refunded Bonds to be given in the manner provided in the Refunded Bonds Ordinance. > The 4inanee Tl:reeter and other> officers of the City and the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent are authorized and directed to take any other actions necessary to effect the <redemption and> payment 4and-eaz eellatief3> of the Refunded Bonds. ARTICLE V APPLICATION OF BOND PROCEEDS Section 501. Disposition of Bond Proceeds......................................................................................... 11 Section 502. Assignment and Application of Moneys in the Construction Account ........................... 11 Section 503. Application of Moneys by Refunded Bonds Paying Agent ............................................. 12 Section 504. Redemption of Refunded Bonds..................................................................................... 12 ARTICLE VI APPLICATION OF REVENUES Section601. Revenue Fund.................................................................................................................. 12 Section 602. Application of Moneys in Funds and Accounts.............................................................. 12 Section 603. Deficiency of Payments into Funds and Accounts.......................................................... 14 Section 604. Transfer of Funds to Paying Agent.................................................................................. 15 ARTICLE VII DEPOSIT AND INVESTMENT OF MONEYS Section 701. Investment of Moneys..................................................................................................... 15 ARTICLE VIII PARTICULAR COVENANTS OF THE CITY Section 801. Efficient and Economical Operation............................................................................... 16 Section802. Rate Covenant................................................................................................................. 16 Section 803. Reasonable Charges for all Services............................................................................... 16 Section804. Annual Budget................................................................................................................. 16 Section805. Annual Audit................................................................................................................... 16 Section 806. Performance of Duties..................................................................................................... 17 Section807. Tax Covenants................................................................................................................. 17 ARTICLE IX ADDITIONAL BONDS Section901. Prior Lien Bonds............................................................................................................. 17 Section 902. Parity Lien Bonds or Obligations.................................................................................... 17 Section903. Junior Lien Bonds........................................................................................................... 18 Section904. Refunding Bonds............................................................................................................. 18 ARTICLE X DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Section1001. Event of Default.............................................................................................................. 19 Section1002. Remedies......................................................................................................................... 19 Section 1003. Limitation on Rights of Owners...................................................................................... 19 Section 403. Acknowledgment of Accounts. (a) The City acknowledges the creation of the following accounts for the City held by the Trustee under the Indenture: (1) Construction Account; (2) Reserve Account; (3) State Match Portion Debt Service Account; (4) Leveraged Portion Debt Service Account; (5) Principal Account; and (6) Interest Account. (b) The City further acknowledges that certain amounts will be transferred to the Costs of Issuance Fund and the Administrative Expense Fund under the Indenture in satisfaction of certain City obligations under this Ordinance, the Purchase Agreement and the Revolving Fund Agreement. ARTICLE V APPLICATION OF BOND PROCEEDS Section 501. Disposition of Bond Proceeds. (a) The proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, including any premium and accrued interest, will be deposited simultaneously with the delivery of the Bonds as set forth in the Closing Certificate. (b) On the issuance date of the Bonds, the City will transfer the amount set forth in the Closing Certificate from the Project Fund under the Refunded Bonds Ordinance to the Trustee for deposit to the Construction Account. (c) On the issuance date of the Bonds, the Trustee will disburse from the Construction Account, from the proceeds of the Bonds, to the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent the amount set forth in the Closing Certificate for application to the redemption of the Refunded Bonds in whole. Section 502. Assignment and Application of Moneys in the Construction Account. (a) By this Ordinance, the City assigns the proceeds of the Bonds held in the Construction Account to the Owner to secure the City's obligations under this Ordinance. Moneys in the Construction Account will be disbursed to the City for the sole purpose of paying the cost of extending and improving the System in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the Consulting Engineer, previously approved by the Governing Body and DNR and on file in the office of the City Clerk, including any alterations in or amendments to the plans and specifications approved by the Governing Body and DNR with the advice of the Consulting Engineer. -11- (b) Requisitions will be submitted for withdrawals from the Construction Account in accordance with Article III of the Purchase Agreement. Section 503. Application of Moneys by Refunded Bonds Paving Agent. Moneys received by the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent will be applied solely to the payment of the principal of and redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Refunded Bonds. These moneys deposited with the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent will be held by the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent in accordance with the provisions of the Refunded Bond Ordinance. Section 504. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The outstanding Refunded Bonds maturing after November 1, 2005, in the aggregate the principal amount of $4,980,000, are called for redemption and payment prior to maturity on December 15, 2005. The Refunded Bonds will be redeemed at the office of the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent on the redemption date. In accordance with the requirements of the Refunded Bonds Ordinance, the City Clerk is directed to cause notice of the call for redemption and payment of the Refunded Bonds to be given in the manner provided in the Refunded Bonds Ordinance. The officers of the City and the Refunded Bonds Paying Agent are authorized and directed to take any other actions necessary to effect the redemption and payment of the Refunded Bonds. ARTICLE VI APPLICATION OF REVENUES Section 601. Revenue Fund. The City covenants and agrees that from and after the delivery of the Bonds, all Revenues derived and collected by the City will be deposited into the Revenue Fund when received. The Revenues will be segregated from all other moneys, revenues, funds and accounts of the City. The Revenue Fund will be administered and applied solely for the purposes and in the manner provided in this Ordinance and any Parity Ordinance. Section 602. Application of Moneys in Funds and Accounts. (a) The City will apply moneys in the Revenue Fund on the dates, in the amounts and in the order as follows: (1) on the first day of each month to the Operation and Maintenance Account an amount sufficient to pay the estimated cost of operating and maintaining the System during the month; (2) on the 25th day of each month, on a parity basis (i) to the Outstanding Parity Bond Debt Service Account the amount required under the Outstanding Parity Bond Ordinance and (ii) the following amounts to the Trustee for credit to the Interest Account and the Principal Account: (A) on January 25, 2006 to and including June 25, 2006, to the Interest Account 1/6 of the amount of interest on the Bonds due on July 1, 2006 less accrued interest deposited to the Interest Account, if any; and on July 25, 2006 and thereafter 1/6 of the amount of interest due on the Bonds on the next Interest Payment Date, with these monthly payments to be reduced as follows: -12-