Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20090108minutesMINUTES JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 8, 2009 5:15 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT Mike Berendzen, Chair Randy Bickel Bob George David Hagan J. Rick Mihalevich Ralph Robinett, Vice Chairman Jack Deeken, Alternate Chris Jordan, Alternate COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT John Lake David Nunn Chris Yarnell Scott Stacey, Alternate EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT Mike Harvey, Alternate City Council Liaison ATTENDANCE RECORD 6of7 4 of 7 5of7 4of7 4 of 7 6 of 7 5of7 5 of 7 4of7 5of7 5 of 7 Oof1 STAFF PRESENT Janice McMillan, Deputy Director of Planning & Transportation Services Drew Hilpert, Associate City Counselor Eric Barron, Senior Planner Shane Wade, Civil Engineer II Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant 1. Call to Order and Introduction of Members, Ex -officio Members and Staff The Chairman, five regular members and two alternates were present. A quorum was present. 2. Procedural Matters and Procedures Explained Mr. Barron explained the procedures for the meeting. The following documents were entered as exhibits. Mr. Barron advised that copies of the exhibits are available through the City Clerk or the Department of Community Development: Chapter 35 of the City Code, Zoning Chapter 33 of the City Code, Subdivision Regulations Chapter 31 of the City Code, Stormwater Management Chapter 8 of the City Code, Building Regulations Chapter 7 of the City Code, Boards and Commissions Chapter 3 of the City Code, Advertising and Sign Code Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map Copies of applications under consideration A list of property owners to whom notices were sent Affidavit of publication of the public notice in the newspaper Rules of Procedure, City of Jefferson, Missouri Mr. Barron submitted the following items for the record: Staff reports Minutes of proceedings Copies of drawings, plans, and/or renderings under consideration Letters or memoranda from staff Materials submitted by the public or applicants pertaining to the cases under consideration Designation of Voting Alternates All regular members and alternates Mr. Deeken and Mr. Jordan were designated to vote. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2009 Page 2 3. Adoption of Agenda Mr. George moved and Mr. Hagan seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett 4. Approval of Minutes for the Regular Meeting of November 13, 2003 Mr. Hagan moved and Mr. Jordan seconded to approve the minutes for the regular meeting of November 13, 2008. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Communications Received Correspondence was received for Case Nos. P09002, P09003 and P09004 6. New Business — Public Hearing Case No. P09001 — 1616 Oil Well Road; Rezoning from RU to M-1 and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Application filed by Daniel and Kimberly Baumgartner, property owners, to rezone 3.84 acres from RU Rural to M-1 Light Industrial and an associated amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The property is located on Oil Well Road approximately 2000 feet northwest of the intersection of Katy Road. The described property is part of the larger tract of land containing the Turkey Creek Golf Center. The property is described as part of US Private Survey No. 2622 of Sections 9 and 10, Township 44 North, Range 11West, in the City of Jefferson, Callaway County, Missouri. The complete property description is on file at the Department of Community Development. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant) Mr. Barron described the proposal and explained that in 1998 the applicant requested to rezone the entire property from RU to M-1 in order to allow for the development of the Turkey Creek Golf Center. He stated that this request was denied by Council and the zoning code was subsequently amended in order to allow outdoor recreational facilities as a conditional use of the RU zoning district. Mr. Barron explained that the applicant then applied for and was granted a conditional use permit by the Board of Adjustment on October 13, 1998. Mr. Danny Baumgartner, 2406 Lexington Drive, spoke regarding this request and explained that the proposed storage units will be able to accommodate boats for the use of the Department of Conservation boat ramp. He explained that smaller units will be built on the end to accommodate bicycles for use on the Katy Trail. Mr. Mike Bates, Central Missouri Professional Services, 2500 E. McCarty Street, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Bates distributed a visual depicting the area to be rezoned. He explained that the subject property is located in the floodplain and the proposed storage units will be built in accordance with floodplain regulations. No one spoke in opposition to this request and no correspondence was received. Mr. Barron gave the Planning Division staff report and explained that several industrial uses exist in the vicinity and that the property is well suited for industrial use. He emphasized that this property is in the floodplain and any development would need to be in accordance with floodplain regulations. Mr. Bickel moved and Mr. Hagan seconded to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to show the property as industrial, to the City Council. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Mr. Bickel moved and Mr. Hagan seconded to recommend approval of rezoning 1616 Oil Well Road from RU to M-1, to the City, Council. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2009 Page 3 Case No. P09002 — 3025 Robinson Road; Rezoning from RS -2 to C-2. Application filed by DHR Properties LLC, property owner, Don Renkemeyer, authorized representative, to rezone 4.38 acres from RS -2 Low Density Residential to C-2 General Commercial. The property is located on the northeast corner of Robinson Road and East McCarty Street and is described as part of the East Half of the Northeast Fractional Quarter of Section 22, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. The complete property description is on file at the Department of Community Development. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant) Mr. Barron explained that the rezoning request is for a portion of a larger tract of land consisting of 14.4 acres of which approximately 1.1 acres are zoned C-2. He stated that the proposed rezoning request would expand the existing C-2 zoning district by 4.38 acres, with the remainder of the property remaining zoned RS -2 and C-1. Mr. Barron stated that the property owner has also submitted a request to vacate a portion of the right-of-way at the intersection of E. McCarty Street and Robinson Road. He explained that this request has been forwarded to the Public Works and Planning Committee. Mr. Duane Schreimann, Schreimann, Rackers, Francka & Blunt, LLC, 2316 St. Mary's Boulevard, Suite 130, spoke on behalf of DHR Properties, LLC. Mr. Schreimann explained that the L-shaped portion on the northwest side of the subject property is currently zoned C-2 and the property to the southeast is currently zoned C-1. He stated that the residential buffer to the northeast will remain zoned RS -2. Mr. Schreimann explained that currently there are no specific plans for this property. He stated that rezoning this tract to C-2 makes the property more compatible with the surrounding businesses. Mr. Mike Bates, Central Missouri Professional Services, 2500 E. McCarty Street, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Bates distributed (1) a composite visual that gives an overall view of the rezoning requests for Robinson Road and City View Drive and; (2) a site visual for Robinson Road and E. McCarty Street. Mr. Bates explained that the 1996 Comprehensive Plan Update identified the new 50/63 interchange as a much needed transportation improvement. He stated that the City and County have identified improvements to E. McCarty Street as well. Mr. Bates explained that it is unlikely that a significant portion of the C-1 and C-2 zoned portion of the subject property will be developed because of issues with the terrain. He stated that this is an ideal location for future development and commercial zoning would complement the surrounding uses. No one spoke in opposition to this request. Correspondence was received from Mr. and Mrs. Ronald G. Hurley, 2924 Algoa Road. Mr. Barron gave the Planning Division staff report and explained that this request would be an expansion of an existing C-2 General Commercial zoning district and is in conformance with the development plan map of the comprehensive plan. He explained that in an effort to unify the zoning of the property in the event the requested right-of-way vacation is approved, staff recommends that the zoning boundary between the C-2 zoning proposed for the property and the M-1 zoning on the opposite side of Robinson Road and E. McCarty Street be established as the centerline of the two streets. Mr. Bickel moved and Mr. Jordan seconded to recommend approval of rezoning 3025 Robinson Road from RS -2 to C-2 with the C-2 / M-1 zoning boundary adjacent to the property established as the centerline of E. McCarty Street and Robinson Road, to the City Council. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2009 Page 4 Case No. P09003 — 225 City View Drive; Rezoning from RS -2 and RU to C-1. Application filed by Don and Velma Renkemeyer, property owners, to rezone 2.34 acres from RS -2 Low Density Residential to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial and 3.16 acres from RU Rural to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial. The property is located on the eastern side of City View Drive immediately north of the intersection of City View Drive and US Highway 50/63. The property is described as part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. The complete property description is on file at the Department of Community Development. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant) Mr. Barron explained that a small portion of the property, approximately 0.25 acres, is currently zoned C-1. He stated that this rezoning request would expand the existing C-1 zoning district by rezoning 3.16 acres from RU to C-1 and rezoning approximately 2.1 acres from RS -2 to C-1. Mr. Barron explained that the stated purpose of the rezoning request is to allow for the development of a neighborhood commercial project. Mr. Duane Schreimann, Schreimann, Rackers, Francka & Blunt, LLC, 2316 St. Mary's Boulevard, Suite 130, spoke on behalf of Don and Velma Renkemeyer. Mr. Schreimann explained that this property is located across the street from a C-1 zoning area on City View Drive. He stated that this rezoning request gives an opportunity for continued development on the east side. Mr. Schreimann stated that they are aware of the neighbors concerns with what potentially could go in there. He stated that he is at liberty to tell the Planning and Zoning Commission that this property is currently under an oral contract with a local bank. Mr. Schreimann explained that the property owners on the east side of City View Drive and north of the Renkemeyer property are in support of this project. Mr. Mike Bates, Central Missouri Professional Services, 2500 E. McCarty Street, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Bates distributed (1) a composite visual that gives an overall view of the rezoning request for Robinson Road and City View Drive and; (2) a site visual for City View Drive and Highway 50. Mr. Bates stated that a cell tower is located on the southeast corner of the site and is accessed by a gravel drive that parallels the right-of-way line for the 50/63 interchange. He explained that there is a conceptual site plan for the financial facility, which will complement the neighborhood. Mr. Bates stated that this portion of E. McCarty Street and City View Drive will be going through a redevelopment. He explained that two of the five properties that Mr. Schreimann referenced are owned by Mr. Renkemeyer. Mr. Bates stated that the remaining property owners are aware of the redevelopment and understand that it is logical that their homes could be bought. He stated that there is not a lot of potential for use of the remainder of the property due to issues with the terrain. No one spoke in opposition to this request. Correspondence in opposition to this request was received from the following individuals: Nikki and Doug Loethen, 2930 Hillview Drive Chris Pritchard, 2934 Hillview Drive Mr. Barron gave the Planning Division staff report and explained that this rezoning request would be an expansion of an existing C-1 Neighborhood Commercial zoning district and is in conformance with the development plan map of the comprehensive plan. He stated that the property is located adjacent to City View Drive, a minor arterial roadway, and a major highway interchange. In response to Mr. Robinett's question whether this is an example of spot zoning, Mr. Barron explained that immediately across the street are a number of duplexes that were developed under a conditional use permit back when the zoning code allowed for duplexes as a conditional use in the C-1 zoning district. He explained that this property is located across Highway 50/63 from the Wal-Mart development, which is zoned C-2. Mr. Barron stated that this rezoning request would be a logical expansion of commercial zoning in the area. Mr. Robinett stated that he disagrees and that two major US highways and an interchange is not a continuation of commercial zoning but constitutes a buffer. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2009 Page 5 Mr. Jordan agreed that this is a continuation of C-1 zoning, as Mr. Barron stated in the staff report a small portion of this property is currently zoned C-1. Mr. Jordan moved and Mr. Bickel seconded to recommend approval of rezoning 225 City View Drive from RS -2 and RU to C-1, to the City Council. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Case No. P09004 — 2310 Green Meadow Drive; Rezoning from RS -1 to PUD, Preliminary PUD Plan, and Preliminary Subdivision Plat. Application filed by Tom and Sharon Investments LLC, property owner, Tom and Sharon Naught, authorized representatives, for the following: 1. Rezoning of 23.34 acres from RS -1 Low Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development 2. A Preliminary PUD Plan for a private residential subdivision consisting of 4 to 5 residential lots and establishment of a gated community as outlined in Section 33- 11.A.1 of the Jefferson City Subdivision Code. 3. A Preliminary Subdivision Plat of Whitney Waye Subdivision. The property is located on the western side of Green Meadow Drive approximately 2300 feet south of the intersection of Whitney Woods Drive. The property is described as part of Section 30, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, County of Cole, Missouri. The complete property description is on file at the Department of Community Development. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant) Mr. Barron explained that the applicant proposes to develop the property as a private gated community with a private street. He stated that the proposed development would consist of 4 or 5 residential lots with access to Green Meadow Drive via a private cul-de-sac. Mr. Barron explained that the subject property is located west of Green Meadow Drive adjacent to Rivers Edge Estates and is accessed by a 60 foot wide access easement that is shown on the plat of Rivers Edge Estates. Mr. Mike Bates, Central Missouri Professional Services, 2500 E. McCarty Street, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Bates distributed a small scale Preliminary PUD Plan and Preliminary Subdivision Plat of Whitney Waye Subdivision. Mr. Bates explained that this property is the last phase of the overall development of this property, formerly known as the Lincoln University Greenberry Farm. He reiterated that the applicant proposes to develop a private gated community estate consisting of four lots. Mr. Bates explained that a planned unit development would allow for the use of the access easement and can be done without using this as public right of way as far as the proposed private street is concerned. He stated that the proposed private street will be built to city standards and will be maintained by a neighborhood association. Mr. Bates explained that originally there was a conceptual subdivision plat that showed a cul-de-sac off of Route B that was approximately 3,000 feet long. He stated that City staff was concerned that this dead end street was too long and suggested that the development access Green Meadow Drive to make the connectivity. Mr. Ken Otke, 6524 Route B, spoke regarding this request and stated that this is a reasonable request for the remaining 20 acres and there will be minimal disruption to the neighboring subdivision. Ms. Beverly Price, 2316 Green Meadow Drive, requested clarification whether there would be some type of temporary emergency access granted in the event of flooding. In response, Mr. Otke explained that the Kampeter's have indicated that they may in the future want to tie into this development with a hard surface driveway as long as it remains a private road. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2009 Mr. Roger Verslues, 816 Nelson Drive, spoke in opposition to this request and explained that the letter from Mr. Rick Muenks, legal representative for Roger and Irma Verslues, will stand as his comments. In response to Mr. Muenks letter, Mr. Hilpert explained that the proposed plan shows access to the city street. He stated that staff conditioned the recommendation for approval on the fact that it become a roadway built to city street standards. Mr. Hilpert explained that what is on the plat is referred to as a public access easement and it is not up to City staff whether the Naught's can build their street on top of that. He emphasized that if the street is never built up to city standards, than the developer will not receive a building permit. Mr. Hilpert stated that the Commission can approve the PUD Plan because it conforms with the City's requirement that the plan show access to the city street. He stated that whether or not the street actually gets built is going to be up to the developer and property owners. Mr. Hilpert clarified that the Commission's approval tonight does not approve Mr. Naught's building of the street. Mr. Bates explained that it is the developer's intent to establish a plan that complements the neighborhood, yet there continues to be a disagreement between the two adjoining property owners regarding the access easement. He stated that his firm was requested in the red -line review process to show an extension of that easement and there is a reference to a private drive basically built to city street standards. Mr. Bates stated that he is aware of the neighbors concerns regarding flooding. He stated that if the situation warrants it the developer may have to pursue legal action as a remedy for the access easement. Mr. Barron explained that the staff red -line comments asked whether or not an access easement could extend from the bulb of the cul-de-sac to the western side of the property. He stated that Green Meadow Drive is a very long cul-de-sac where residents are stranded when the Moreau River floods. Mr. Barron clarified that there is a 60 foot wide access easement that is shown on the plat of Rivers Edge Estates. He stated that the question was raised whether it would be feasible to continue such an easement that could potentially be dedicated as future right-of-way in the event that the entire cul-de-sac could be dedicated as right-of-way, and thereby improve local roadway connectivity. Ms. Price stated that she has no further comments. Mr. Verslues stated that this access easement was put there for the benefit of the Rivers Edge Estates residents and no one else. He reiterated that the letter submitted by Mr. Muenks will stand as his comments. Correspondence in favor of this request was received from Christy and Brad Hake, 2307 Green Meadow Drive. Correspondence in opposition to this request was received from Rick Muenks, Legal Representative for Roger and Irma Verslues, 3401 S. Kimbrough Avenue, Suite 106, Springfield Missouri, 65807. Mr. Barron gave the Planning Division staff report and explained that gated subdivisions with private roads are only permitted in association with a planned unit development. He stated that the requested rezoning would establish the PUD zoning for the property and the associated Preliminary PUD Plan outlines an underlying zoning district of RS -1. Mr. Wade gave the Engineering Division staff report and explained that sidewalks are proposed along Whitney Waye Court. He stated that fire hydrants and street lights exist along Green Meadow Drive and facilities are proposed in accordance with city standards for this subdivision. Mr. Wade explained that the proposal does show sanitary sewer to be extended across the bulb of the cul-de-sac to serve the proposed subdivision. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2009 Page 7 Mr. Jordan inquired whether it would be beneficial to put in another easement for the remainder of this tract in case of future development or would it deter from the final development of this tract. In response, Mr. Bates explained that he believes the developer is receptive to this but believed that it needed to be a public discussion. He stated that the developer is receptive to showing the extension of that easement if that is the recommendation of the Commission. Mr. Bates explained that any changes to a PUD Plan would require an amendment and he believes that if it is the desire of the commission to extend the easement, it makes sense for future planning to show that easement now. He stated that it is his understanding that the original intent of the Kampeter's was to build a two to three estate type facility. Mr. Hagan moved and Mr. Bickel seconded to recommend approval to rezone 2310 Green Meadow Drive from RS -1 to PUD to the City Council. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Mr. Jordan moved and Mr. Hagan seconded to recommend approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan, with the stipulation that the easement be investigated as part of the final platting process, to the City Council subject to the following conditions: a. The underlying zoning district shall be established as RS -1 Low Density Residential for the purpose of establishing allowed uses. b. Approval is subject to obtaining access to Green Meadow Drive via a roadway built to city street standards. As a discussion point, Mr. Jordan inquired whether Commission members would want to amend the PUD Plan to allow an easement to continue through the property to the Kampeter tract. He inquired of staff whether the easement needs to be similar in width and verbage as to what is on the existing plat. Mr. Berendzen inquired whether the Commission could approve the Preliminary PUD Plan as submitted and add the easement to the Final PUD Plan after further discussion with adjoining property owners. Ms. McMillan explained that the Preliminary PUD Plan and rezoning application will proceed to Council as submitted. If the Commission wishes that an access easement be provided to the adjoining property, staff can work toward that end during the final platting process. Mr. Berendzen suggested approving the Preliminary PUD Plan and the preliminary subdivision plat as submitted with the contingency that the easement be investigated as part of the final platting process. After further discussion, the motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Mr. Bickel moved and Mr. George seconded to approve the Preliminary Subdivision Plat of Whitney Waye Subdivision, with the stipulation that the easement be investigated as part of the final platting process, subject to the following conditions: a. Adherence to the requirements of Section 33-11.A.1.a-n regarding private streets. b. Approval is subject to obtaining access to Green Meadow Drive via a roadway built to city street standards. c. Compliance with the recommendations and technical corrections of the Engineering Division. The motion passed 7-0 with the following votes: Aye: Bickel, Deeken, George, Hagan, Jordan, Mihalevich, Robinett Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission Page 8 January 8, 2009 7. Other New Business None. 8. Miscellaneous Report None. Mr. George left at 6:30 p.m. 9. Other Business A. Discussion of zoning code revisions pertaining to the keeping of horses Ms. McMillan explained that one of the issues included in the current draft pertains to the types of fences and architectural standards. She stated that Mr. Nunn commented that the storage of hay should be inside a suitable building. Mr. Deeken stated that the problem with storing hay indoors is that a lot of people use the large round bales which could be difficult to store inside unless you have a larger structure. He suggested making a distinction between small bales and large round bales. In response, Ms. McMillan clarified that Mr. Nunn was probably concerned about the visual impact in a residential neighborhood. Ms. McMillan stated that Mr. Nunn also agreed that there should be structural, material and appearance standards, which poses the question whether to allow metal, wood or cinderblock buildings. Ms. McMillan explained that he also suggested notifying property owners if a request was made to keep horses. In response to Mr. Deeken's comment regarding inspections, Ms. McMillan explained that the current ordinance requires an annual permit to keep horses. She stated that there would be an annual inspection at the time the permit is renewed, unless a complaint is received. Ms. McMillan explained that depending on the nature of the complaint staff from the planning division, code enforcement or building regulations would address those issues. She stated that animal control would address complaints about an animal. In response to Mr. Mihalevich's comment regarding acreage, Ms. McMillan explained that the current ordinance requires a minimum area of five (5) acres of land and a maximum number of five (5) animals. Ms. McMillan explained that information pertaining to horse stalls and barns was attached to the handout so that Commission members could determine how large the building needs need to be. She stated that the current draft stipulates that the minimum size for a horse stall should be 10' x 10'. Ms. McMillan explained that there also should be an area for the storage of tack. She stated that most of the building plans I have seen are modular, so that you can add on based on the types of activities you anticipate. Mr. Deeken inquired whether this ordinance would interfere with any subdivision covenants. In response, Ms. McMillan explained that this ordinance will allow the keeping of horses however subdivision restrictions and covenants would place additional requirements on the property. She stated that we want to allow something that would be permitted if the subdivision covenants allow it. Mr. Bickel stated that the types of metal or cinderblock buildings almost have to be compatible with the neighborhood you don't want to be too restrictive or too lenient. Mr. Jordan inquired of the process if someone were to file an appeal. Ms. McMillan explained that if someone objects to how a provision in the code is interpreted they would appeal to the Board of Adjustment, unless we set up a separate administrative procedure where it would be adjudicated otherwise. Minutes/Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission January 8, 2009 Page 9 Mr. Jordan stated that we do not want to recreate the wheel and recommended following the appeal procedures as established in the zoning code. Mr. Deeken inquired of the review process for building guidelines. Ms. McMillan explained that staff would draft the proposed standards and then the planning and building regulations staff would have to apply those standards. Mr. Deeken stated that as long as the building meets the architectural standards of the neighborhood it would be easy to approve or disapprove. Mr. Berendzen stated that if the majority of the neighborhood is brick it would be nice if the stable would tie into the majority of the houses. Ms. McMillan stated that there needs to be some minimum standards for the material whether it is metal, wood or cinderblock and keep it a neutral color. Mr. Jordan stated that he agrees that the outbuildings should be in keeping with the characteristics of the neighborhood and recommended to require neutral colors. Mr. Berendzen stated that it was discussed at the last meeting whether to require liability insurance and if riding horses on city streets is allowed. In response, Mr. Hilpert stated that he is still researching whether requiring liability insurance is necessary. He clarified that it is permitted to ride horses on city streets. Mr. Berendzen stated that the buffering or screening of horse trailers was also discussed. In response, Ms. McMillan explained that the current draft requires that the horse trailer be parked next to the shelter. She stated that a stipulation could be added that requires horse trailers to be stored out of view of neighbors. Mr. Deeken inquired whether there will be a separate ordinance for the boarding of horses. In response, Ms. McMillan explained that someone could board a horse but they would only be allowed a maximum of five (5) animals and they would have to have a minimum of five (5) acres. Ms. McMillan stated that these comments will be incorporated in the draft ordinance and sent out for further review and comment. B. Selection of a Representative to the Environmental Quality Commission Mr. Bickel moved and Mr. Jordan seconded to elect David Hagan as the Representative to the Environmental Quality Commission. The motion was approved by acclamation. 10. Adjourn. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:48 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Eric Barron, Assistant Secretary