Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2017-06-20 Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda PacketZoning Board of Appeals Tuesday, June 20, 2017 7:00 PM Village Boardroom 24401 W. Lockport Street Plainfield, IL 60544 Agenda ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals dated December 20, 2016. 2016-12-20 Zoning Board of Appeals minutes.pdf PUBLIC COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT REPORT OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS Case No: 1763-060117.VAR 25105 W Round Barn Road Request: Variance for a Fence Location: 25105 W. Round Barn Road Applicant: Bill Slabich 25105 W Round Barn Road 1763-060117.VAR Staff Report, Site Plan and Photos.pdf DISCUSSION ADJOURN REMINDERS - July 3, 2017 - Next Village Board Meeting at 7:00 p.m. July 18, 2017 - Next Plan Commission Meeting at 7:00 p.m. 1 Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 2016-421- Submitted by: Tracey Erickson Submitting Department: Planning Department Meeting Date: June 20, 2017 SUBJECT Minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals dated December 20, 2016. Recommendation: ATTACHMENTS 2016-12-20 Zoning Board of Appeals minutes.pdf 2 Zoning Board of Appeals December 20, 2016 Chairman Kiefer called the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. immediately following the Plan Commission meeting. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Seggebruch, Minnis, Heinen, Womack, and Chairman Kiefer were present. The Library District was present. Commissioners Renzi and Green were absent. The Fire, Park and School Districts were absent. The minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals dated December 6, 2016 were accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There was no response. DEVELOPMENT REPORT: The development report was given during the preceding Plan Commission meeting. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: Case No. 1744-113016.V 12549 S Wingstem Street This is a public hearing, the notice and mailings were posted and published in accordance with state statute and local ordinance. Mr. Bogda stated this is a request for a variance to allow a 5- foot aluminum fence to be installed in the corner side yard one foot from the edge of the sidewalk along Corydalis Street. Mr. Bogda indicated the adjacent land uses, zonings and street classifications to be single-family detached residential. Mr. Bogda further described the type of fence requested as noted in the staff report dated December 12, 2016; and also stated the reasons for this request as noted in the staff report. Mr. Bogda reviewed the findings of fact as noted in the staff report dated December 15, 2016. Prior to direction from the Zoning Board of Appeals, staff is suggesting a recommendation of approval. Chairman Kiefer swore in Loc Ha, owner of the property. Chairman Kiefer asked for public comments. Chairman Kiefer swore in Scott Portillos, neighbor on Corydalis. Mr. Portillos asked if this project has received approval from the Homeowners Association (HOA.) Mr. Proulx stated the applicant must show approval from a HOA at the time of the submittal of the request for permit. Mr. Ha stated he spoke with the HOA and was told they would approve the fence if the Village approved it. Commissioner Seggebruch mentioned to the applicant that if this request is approved by the Village he will still need approval from the HOA, and they will need a building permit. Commissioner Seggebruch stated the rear yard gets smaller due to the curvature of the street. Commissioner Seggebruch asked how the owner intended to maintain the fence and the property just 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes December 20, 2016 Page 2 of 2 outside of the fence. Mr. Ha stated he would be willing to move the fence back from the sidewalk so he could plant a tree outside of the fence. Commissioner Seggebruch asked if he meant some low bushes. Mr. Ha said yes. Commissioner Heinen liked the fence material; fells this is a large lot; expressed concern with the location being only 1 foot from the sidewalk; indicated he would prefer the fence be located 10 feet back from the sidewalk. Chairman Kiefer mentioned we want to avoid having fences all along the street. Commissioner Womack asked how the owner was going to deal with the existing trees in the corner of the lot. Mr. Ha indicated the existing trees in the back corner are old and will be replaced with new trees. Commissioner Womack suggested a good compromise would be to retain the south corner landscaping and grant an encroachment of the fence due to the hardship of the street. Commissioner Heinen did not feel Corydalis Street caused a hardship due to the size of the side yard of this lot; felt some separation from the sidewalk to the location of the fence is worthwhile. Commissioner Seggebruch explained that this corner side yard faces the front yard of the neighbor across the street; mentioned the open design of the proposed fence is favorable to a solid fence. Mr. Bogda mentioned the Commission could amend the motion to include the type of fence. Commissioner Minnis supported the material of the fence; felt 1 foot spacing to the sidewalk was too tight; would like some kind of a landscaping buffer that could be incorporated between the sidewalk and the fence. Commissioner Seggebruch like the idea of backing up the fence 10-feet to preserve the easement. Mr. Ha agreed to back up the 10 feet from the sidewalk. The Commissioners felt this was a good compromise. Commissioner Heinen made a motion to adopt the findings of fact of staff as the findings of fact of the Zoning Board of Appeals and recommend approval of a variance to permit a fence up to 30 feet into the corner side yard but no less than 10 feet from the edge of the sidewalk along Corydalis Street for the property located at 12549 S Wingstem Street. Seconded by Commissioner Minnis. Vote by roll call: Womack, yes; Seggebruch, yes; Minnis, yes; Heinen, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 5-0. DISCUSSION Meeting Adjourned at 7:34 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Merrilee Trotz Recording Secretary 4 Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 2016-418- Submitted by: Tracey Erickson Submitting Department: Planning Department Meeting Date: June 20, 2017 SUBJECT Case No: 1763-060117.VAR 25105 W Round Barn Road Request: Variance for a Fence Location: 25105 W. Round Barn Road Applicant: Bill Slabich Recommendation: ATTACHMENTS 25105 W Round Barn Road 1763-060117.VAR Staff Report, Site Plan and Photos.pdf 5 6 7 8 9 Attention: Jonathan Proulx and Andrew Dogda, RE: Variance case #1763-060117.V Thank you with your assistance with trying to pass this variance to install a fence at Residence of 25105 Round Barn Rd. Plainfield IL. My house happens to be the West entrance house of Walkers Grove subdivision. The house is located on the North east corner of 135th Street & Meadow. As you know both Streets are very busy, and have been getting even busier lately. Being 135th Street is a main street to get to I-55. Recently my wife and I had our 3 year old Cairn terrier get run over by a car on 135th street, and killed behind our house. He ran under our other dogs legs out the door, and chased something into the street. He ran between the large 6ft tall bushes on the South of our property into the street. My Wife Is also pregnant now with our first child, and we recently just adopted another dog. With these changes in life we want to install a 4ft aluminum style fence in the shown areas of the attached plat of survey, and the Google earth plan view picture. The reason we need a variance is to relocate this fence a bit more to the west is to go around the existing tall bush, tree, landscaping, and pergola that is off of the south west corner of our house. I have supplied pictures of the outside, and inside of my property for reference. As you can see by the property there is a lot of landscaping going on, and a lot around the perimeter of the back yard. Our plan is to install the fence to the inside of the bushes on the south side. Install the fence inside the 14ft + tall evergreen trees to the West. Also run the fence on the east side along the neighbors existing 5ft tall wood fence. Basically making it where you will only see about 10% of the fence from the outside of my property line. Being this is a corner lot we have picked the most open style fence that our Walkers Grove subdivision will allow, and we are keeping it below the max height allowed. That way if there is a worry about site of view, it hopefully will not be an issue. Especially being that the fence is smaller than any landscaping surround the corner of 135th, and Meadow. We are hoping that after reviewing the pictures, survey, plan view picture, obstructions, and latest circumstances the Zoning Board, and Village board will allow this variance for my family. Thank you for your assistance and patience during this process. Respectfully, William Slabich 708-307-2634 10 11 12 13 14 15 16