HomeMy Public PortalAboutTBP 2014-08-06
BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
FRASER TOWN HALL
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 6, 2014 6:00 p.m.
Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. - Fraser Town Hall
1. Workshop
6:00 Town BoardRetreat Follow-up
2. Roll Call
7:00
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Consent Agenda
a) Minutes July 16, 2014
5. Open Forum
a) Business not on the agenda
6. Public Hearing
7. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding
a) Forest Management
b) Xcel Construction Work Hours Exception Request.
c) Resolution 2014-08-01 A Resolution Authorizing The Town Manager To
Enter Into A Contract With GEI Consultants For A Study Related To
Copper Limits Within The Discharge Permit For Wastewater Treatment
Plant.
d) Resolution 2014-08-02 Authorizing Expenditures for Vehicles Purchases
e) Resolution 2014-08-03 Retiring the Peterson Trust Fund
8. Staff Reports
9. Other Business
Upcoming Meetings:
Wed. August 20, 2014 Board of Trustees
Wed. August 27, 2014 Planning Commission
Posted August 1, 2014
Lu Berger
Lu Berger, Town Clerk
FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES
MINUTES
DATE: Wednesday, January 21, 2009
MEETING: Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room
PRESENT
Board: Mayor Fran Cook; Mayor Pro -Tem Steve Sumrall; Trustees: Adam
Cwiklin, Eric Hoyhtya and David Pratt - absent Scotty Brent,
Joyce Burford - absent
Staff: Town Manager Jeff Durbin, Town Clerk Lu Berger, Finance
Manager Nat Havens, Public Works Director Allen Nordin, Town
Planner, Catherine Trotter, TA McGowan, Police Chief Trainor
Others: See attached list
Mayor Cook called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
1. Roll Call
2. Approval of Aizenda:
Trustee Cwiklin moved, and Trustee Hoyhtya seconded the motion to approve
the Agenda. Motion carried: 4-0.
3. Executive Session: For the purpose of determining positions relative to
matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for
negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6-
402(4)(e) and for a conference with the Town Attorney for the
purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions under C. R. S.
Section 24-6-402(4)(b);
Scotty Brent arrived 6:23 p.m.
Trustee Sumrall moved, and Trustee Cwiklin seconded the motion to enter into
executive session for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters
that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations,
and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e) and for a
conference with the Town Attorney for the purpose of receiving legal advice on
specific legal questions under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b); and to include TM
Durbin, TA McGowan and Special Legal Counsel Bridston. Motion carried:
4-0.
Trustee Cwiklin moved, and Trustee Hoyhtya seconded the motion to exit
executive session for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters
that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations,
and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e) and for a
conference with the Town Attorney for the purpose of receiving legal advice on
specific legal questions under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b); and to include TM
Durbin, TA McGowan and Special Legal Counsel Bridston. Motion carried:
4-0.
TA McGowan was excused and left the meeting.
Attorney's Opinion Required by C.R.S. 24-6-402(2)(d.5)(II)(B).
As the attorney representing the Town of Fraser, I am of the opinion that the
entire Executive Session, which was not recorded, constituted a privileged
attorney-client c mmunication.
Rod McGowan, Legal Counsel
4. ConsentAgenda:
a) Minutes - January 7, 2009
b) Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Cozens Pointe SIA
Trustee Cwiklin moved, and Trustee Brent seconded the motion to approve the
consent agenda. Motion carried: 5-0.
5. Open Forum:
a) None
6. Updates:
a) CAST Plastic Bag Challenge: Chiara Subhas addressed the Board and
requested the Board pass a Resolution supporting the CAST plastic bag
challenge. Local stores will be approached and asked to participate in the
challenge. When customers bring in reusable bags, the stores would enter a plu
code tallying the customer's use of the bags. The CAST community which tallies
the most uses of reusable bags on a per capita basis would win the challenge. A
Resolution will be brought to the next meeting.
7. Public Hearings:
a) None
8. Action Items:
a) Resolution Approving 4th Amendment to Pre -Inclusion Agreement:
The amendment would allow the FSD to release funds being held in accordance
with the agreement guaranteeing payment of the FSD bond.
Trustee Brent moved, and Trustee seconded the motion to approve the
Resolution Approving 4th Amendment to Pre -Inclusion Agreement. Motion
carried: 5-0.
b) Resolution Approving Ellie & Daisy's Adventure Park Sign Permit:
TP Trotter outlined the request from Colorado Adventure Park (CAP). CAP
requested permission to construct a sign 31 sq. ft. in size. The Town currently
has directional signage for various businesses. Trustees voiced their concern
with setting a precedent allowing signs promoting businesses outside of the
Town limits posted within the Town. Concern on the number of sign requests
that would follow was also voiced. The County has granted approval for two
signs on the property and the adjacent property, Mary Kay Wray addressed the
Board on CAP's request. She asked the Board to add signage to the current
directional signs within the Town, Trustees agreed to this request.
Trustee Sumrall moved, and Trustee Brent seconded the motion to deny the
Resolution Approving Ellie &, Daisy's Adventure Park Sign Permit. Motion
carried: 5-0.
9. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding:
a) Grand Mountain Bank Waterline MOU Amendment: PW Director Nordin
explained the cost over runs on the project. With the cost over runs the
project exceeded the original MOU's $57,000.00 amount. An amendment is
needed to address these costs. Trustees directed PW Director Nordin write
an amendment to the current MOU. MOU will be on the February 2, consent
agenda.
b) Cozens Ranch Drainage Easements: TP Trotter outlined the request for the
drainage easements allowing drainage onto the Town's Linear Park into a
detention pond. Historical drainage pattern was outlined for the Board.
Trustees advised TP Trotter to move forward with the developers on the
drainage easements.
c) Forest Management: TM Durbin summarized an Ordinance requiring the
residents of Fraser maintain the trees on their property. A discussion on the
thirty (30) day time frame for tree removal was held. A forest management
plan outlining the property owner's intent to maintain their trees can be
submitted to the Town extending the thirty day time frame. TM Durbin
directed to speak to Winter Park and Grand Park about tying into their
current forestry program and the use of their air curtain burners.
10. Committee Reports:
a) None
11. Staff Reports:
Town Clerk-
* None
Finance Manager-
* Feels confident we'll hit the 2008 year end estimate for sales tax revenue.
Town Planner-
• A large number of surveys have been returned. Planning Commission
schedule was outlined for the Board.
Public Works Director -
Met with Grand County 1 Water & San on emergency connections. They
would like to begin this year. Work on an IGA will begin.
Town Manger-
s Clarified meeting times.
Chief Trainor -
Has met with the Driver's Education contact. Chief Trainor believes
Driver's Ed will be available this spring at an estimated cost of $250.00
per student.
12. Other Business:
Trustee Cwiklin moved, and Trustee Hoyhtya seconded the motion to adjourn.
Motion carried: 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 8: 0 p.m.
Lu Berger, Town lerk
BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING
SIGN IN SHEET
NAME / HOME ADDRESS / REPRESENTING OR AREA OF INTEREST
i
J(/A
THANK YOU!
FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES
MINUTES
DATE: Wednesday, July 16, 2014
MEETING: Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room
PRESENT
Board: Mayor Peggy Smith; Mayor Pro -Tem Philip Naill; Trustees; Eileen
Waldow, Katie Soles, Cody Clayton Taylor, Andy Miller and Jane Mather
Staff: Town Manager Jeff Durbin; Town Clerk, Lu Berger; Finance Manager Nat
Havens; Public Works Director Allen Nordin; Town Planner, Catherine
Trotter; Police Officer, Sean Curran
Others: See attached list
Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 7:17 p.m.
1. Workshop: 2013 Audit Workshop
2. Regular Meeting: Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda:
Trustee Miller asked that 4b be moved to a discussion item.
Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Naill seconded the motion to approve the Agenda.
Motion carried: 7-0.
4. Consent Agenda:
a) Minutes — July 2, 2014
Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to approve the
consent agenda. Motion carried: 7-0.
5. Open Forum:
a) Grand County Library District Update
Jeanette McQuade introduced the new Executive Director, Stephanie Ralph. They
updated the Board on the new hours and enhancements the library has implemented.
b) Clark Lipscomb asked if there had been any follow up from his previous concerns
regarding the Sumrall property, tree ordinance and the junk ordinance. TM
Durbin updated the Board on the research he had been doing regarding Mr.
Lipscomb's concerns.
Page 2 of 2
6. Public Hearings:
7. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding:
a) 2013 Audit Presentation
Paul Backes outlined the 2013 Audit for the Board.
Trustee Mather moved, and Trustee Taylor seconded the motion to approve the 2013
Audit Presentation. Motion carried: 7-0.
C) Eisenhower Avenue Traffic Control Discussion
TM Durbin briefed the Board on the history of discussions regarding the Eisenhower
intersection. The Board directed staff to initiate an RFP regarding a traffic signal and
whistle less crossing on Eisenhower.
C) Resolution 2014-07-03 Reauthorizing Rotary Adopt a River Agreement
A discussion on why no one under the age of 18 can participate in the cleanup was held.
Trustee Nail abstained from the vote as he is the acting president of the Rotary.
Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Taylor seconded the motion to approve Resolution
2014-07-03 Reauthorizing Rotary Adopt a River Agreement with the condition that the
Town Manager works with the Rotary to look at changing the age limitation. Motion
carried: 6-0-1.
8. Executive Session: For the purpose of determining positions relative to matters
that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or
instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e) regarding
County Road 72 and to include TM Durbin and PW Director Nordin.
Trustee Taylor moved, and Trustee Mather seconded the motion to enter executive
session. Motion carried: 7-0.
Enter: 9:00 p.m.
Exit: 9:27 p.m.
Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to exit executive
session. Motion carried: 7-0.
Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion
carried: 7-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Lu Berger, Town Clerk
•
f
a�
4-
�0
mE- o=a
-a-
0CL
°am
m
U) Y
r+ R E
=,_
d '0, m0
'�, N
R
N 'p
J
O L
ui
= K L
m '�n •3 °'
c
to
ON
m
,0
0O'a=N°m
V
0 0 =
C7 E�_. 0
�R
= 0
R
R
3E0=—=
=
-c
E
O• -s• 0
X N to
d—
L •>
R
_
_ E= 2-0
N 'L
Q.
L
.�
1 r to
O N
�
O
A
w= R
a'► O to .= O
0
'75 Y
cm
>1
m
0 0 to CL'-
CL
�' N
ui
d
.a to
0 +'
'a
_
'E
4) O 'a C
*,
= 'a
R = d'
O ,° '++ R
& fy R
C t 'a
G
(n
a) O -i
oma
O N = L
'3Rd
O
�Eo'
L O R
0=.
0
0
0
CD
L
V
0
� 3
N
tp
V 0 0. +R+
= 0. U)
Q0'O
3
0
R
0 d r R .-.
= O R
R
W
3—,0o
mea'
r
e $
L
>' O 4
ty Q.
ry tC L
to0 ° R ro
0
U.L m E
R L 0
U)r
L
O O
Q = L
0 °
0
L
r 00 O O
R R M
00
0 0
L
Q
i V 4) d
R
0 0
_ =
to -
MM
Q*'
M
O,R
E6
d y ++ N N
R i
O
r L;
NQ.
>+
r L i
R
tmJ9
4J
2' R 0 �'
R to
,ra
0 (-
=rm*'Q
R
L
E
E
RoE
d
-0
L a:
_U
O Y L
�
r Gi
L
0
Q. to =
aNE
C ;d
rn>
to
mE
o'3
O r
= N r
0tm
E
'i ' =
_
3 =
to —
U) 3
ANO
E
CTII
• d d tU
0 R_
= ai
MWE
mo
°. E° c -C .0
0 0
C O
0
s s 0 0-
F- rmm =�
• •
_
Q�
a�
m
V
N 'p
J
ON
m
O
to CD
3�w
a) J
z
>1
-02
C: a
OQCO
Q
(n
a) O -i
oma
0
c6
ca
W
Lu
�
0
Q
�
Q
P
Q > W
4J
°-
_U
CTII
W
G
Z4�L
vU
TOWN OF FRASER
ORDINANCE NO.
Series 2008
(THIS DRAFT WAS CONSIDERED BY BOARD IN 2008 BUT NOT ADOPTED)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN OF FRASER MUNICIPAL CODES BY
ADDING MUNICIPAL CODE XX FIRE MITIGATION REGULATIONS
WHEREAS, The Town of Fraser Board of Trustees desires to reduce hazards from threat of
wildland fires; and,
WHEREAS, The Town of Fraser Board of Trustees desires to establish fire mitigation standards
for the protection of life and property and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and,
WHEREAS, The risk of wildland fires is significantly increased by the existence of dead or
beetle infested trees; and,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN
OF FRASER, COLORADO, THAT:
1.The Code of the Town of Fraser, Colorado, is hereby amended by adding Fire
Mitigation Regulations, to be numbered XXX which shall read as follows;
X-X-XX Fire Mitigation Regulations
A.Public Nuisance: The spread of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae)
has posed an immediate threat to the pine trees located within the Town. Trees
infested with the mountain pine beetle, as well as trees that have died or are in the
process of dying as the result of such infestation, and trees that have died of other
causes increase the risk of uncontrolled fires within the Town. In order to contain the
spread of the mountain pine beetle, to reduce the risk of uncontrolled fires, and to
protect the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the Town, the Board of
Trustees does hereby declare pine trees infected with the mountain pine beetle, as
well as pine trees that have died or are in the process of dying as a result of such
infestation, and other dead trees a public nuisance to be abated by the owner of the
land on which such trees are found, or if not so abated, to be destroyed by the Town.
B.Abatement of Nuisance by Owner, It shall be unlawful for any owner of any lot or
parcel of land in the Town to permit or maintain on such lot or parcel any dead or live
the owner of such property to promptly remove or otherwise abate or eradicate such
nuisance as may be appropriate, under the supervision or at the direction of the Town
Manager or his designee.
1.The Town Manager or his designee shall perform the duties set forth in this
Section and shall enforce the provision of this Section.
2.The Town Manager or his designee is authorized and empowered to enter
upon any lot or parcel of land in the Town at any reasonable hour and after a
reasonable attempt to notify the owner of the property for the purpose of
inspecting any tree situated thereon to determine whether such tree is
infested, dead, or substantially dead. It shall be unlawful for any person to
take any action to prevent the Manager of his designee from performing his
duties or the exercise of any authority as provided in this Section.
3.A written notice of violation and order for removal of dead or infested trees
must be sent by registered mail to the last known address of the property
owner or posted on the property in a conspicuous place, declaring such
property to be harboring such nuisance, notifying the owner of the property
of their obligation to abate the nuisance caused by such dead or infested trees
and to comply with the provisions of this Section within thirty (30) days of
the mailing or posting of such notice. Unless, within thirty (30) days of the
sending or posting of such notice the owner of the property provides the
Town with substantial evidence demonstrating the tree is neither infested nor
dead, the tree shall be conclusively presumed to be infested or dead.
4.In the event the owner is unable, despite reasonable efforts, to personally
remove or secure services for said tree removal within the thirty (30) day
period, the owner may request an extension of time by presenting a written
proposal to the Town Manager during such thirty (30) day period, which
outlines the proposed time frame of removal of said trees and the person or
company responsible for that removal. The Town Manager shall grant or
deny any extension of time, in the exercise of reasonable discretion.
5.Tree removal shall be accomplished in an ecologically feasible and
environmentally safe manner in accordance with all applicable laws,
ordinances, rules and regulations.
6.In the event the owner fails to comply in any manner with the Notice of
Violation or any extension thereof, then the Town may have said trees
removed, and the cost of the inspection, removal, and other incidental costs
associated therewith shall be assessed against the owner, as well as the lot,
lots, or tracts of land from which said trees are removed. The costs assessed
by the Town for such work shall be in addition to the penalties imposed
herein for violation of noncompliance with any provisions of this Section.
Such assessment shall be a lien in the amount assessed against each lot or
tract of land until paid. Any such assessment that is not paid within thirty
(30) days of billing, shall be certified by the Town Clerk or Treasurer to the
Grand County Treasurer, said certification to be the same in substance and in
the same form as required for certification of property taxes, and the County
Treasurer, upon receipt of such certified list, is hereby authorized to place the
same upon the tax list for the current year and to collect the special
assessment in the same manner as other taxes are collected with ten percent
(10%) penalty thereon; and all the laws of the State for the assessment and
collection of the general taxes, including the laws for the sale of property for
taxes and the redemption thereof, shall apply to and have full force and effect
for the collection of all such assessments.
C. Any person violating any of the provisions of this Section by failing, neglecting or
refusing to comply with the provisions of any notice herein provided within the time
specified, or who shall resist or obstruct the carrying out of the provisions of this
Section shall, upon conviction of such violation shall be fined in and amount not to
exceed $1,000.00 in addition to any other remedies provided herein or allowed by
ordinance, law, rule or regulation. Each day of violation shall constitute a separate
offense.
PART 2: REPEAL. Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of
Fraser covering the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all
ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby
repealed; provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or
punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby
repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance.
PART 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect
the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town of Fraser
hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause
or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
PART 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage,
adoption and publication thereof as provided by law. This Ordinance shall be published \[by title
only\].
READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS day of, 2008.
Votes in favor: ___ BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
Votes opposed: ___ TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO
Votes abstained: ___
BY:________________________________
Fran Cook, Mayor
ATTEST:
( S E A L )
___________________________________
Lu Berger, Town Clerk
Published in the Middle Park Times on, 2008.
MEMO TO: Mayor Smith and the Board of Trustees
FROM: Allen Nordin, Public Works Director, CWP
DATE: August 8, 2014
SUBJECT: Xcel Energy Gas Line Replacement Work Hours Extension Request
MATTER BEFORE BOARD:
Xcel Energy will be installing a replacement high pressure intrastate gas transmission line along
CR 8 in the Town of Fraser at a date to be determined in August/September following the Labor
Day weekend holiday.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Xcel Energy is requesting the Board of Trustees to approve an exception to the Municipal Code
for construction work hours (Monday- Friday sunrise to sunset) as stated in Section 18-3-150 of
the Town of Fraser Municipal Code, for one or two days of the total construction duration, dates
in September/October are yet to be determined.
BACKGROUND:
Xcel Energy is replacing a 45 year old 8-inch natural gas pipeline, within its existing easement
on the south side of County Road 8 between US Hwy 40 and Wapiti Drive, to ensure service
reliability and ongoing public safety. The new line will be installed using horizontal directional
boring which is less invasive than open trenching, and will allow the pipeline to run 20+ feet
under the Fraser River. The project is scheduled to begin August 11, 2014 and take
approximately 6-8 weeks.
Xcel has an existing Franchise Agreement (agreement) in place with the Town and will be
working under the provisions of the agreement with the exception of the Access and Bulk
Construction Permits, which have applied for with the Town for this project. Fees and surety are
waived per the agreement.
The attached memo from Xcels Contract Agent outlines the project parameters in addition to
the benefits of going from a 3-bore pit project to a 2-bore pit project. At the conclusion of this
project, Xcel will be making all necessary repairs to any damaged hard and unimproved
surfacing within the Towns ROW as well as replacing failed asphalt in CR 8 that was repaired
two years ago during another Xcel project but failed due to improper and late season installation
practices.
I have attached a site map of the location and areas that may be affected during this period of
construction:
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
Site Map
Red Line
= Approx. 1,100 Feet of Horizontal Directional Bore
Blue Line
= Approx. location of Wapiti Dr. street closure
Orange Circles
=Approx. location of Bore Pits
ALTERNATIVES:
1. No alternatives suggested given that this project is in the best interest of the community
to ensure service reliability and ongoing public safety.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approving the extension of work hours for the purposes statedin the Xcel
memo for the continuous pulling of the pipe string for approximately 3 days.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
Right of Way & Permits
1123 West 3 rd Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80223
Telephone: 303.975.2866
Facsimile: 303.935.9002
July 31, 2014
Town of Fraser
Board of Trustees
PO Box 370
Fraser, CO 80442-0370
Re: Xcel Energy Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement
Dear Trustees:
Xcel Energy is replacing a 45 year old 8-inch natural gas pipeline, within its existing easement on the
south side of County Road 8 between US Hwy 40 and Wapiti Drive, to ensure service reliability and
ongoing public safety. The new line will be installed using directional boring which is less invasive than
open trenching, and will allow the pipeline to run 20+ feet under the Fraser River. The project is
scheduled to begin August 11, 2014 and take approximately 6-8 weeks.
Xcel Energy is requesting the Board of Trustees grant an exception to the Municipal Code construction
work hours (Monday- Friday sunrise to sunset) as stated in 18-3-150, for one or two days of the total
construction duration.
If the Board of Trustees agrees to extend the work hours, Xcel can modify the construction technique to
The benefit to using one long bore:
Only two bore pits are required versus three, which keeps CR8 open to 2-way traffic
Eliminates gas pipe stringing on the shoulder of CR8, creating safer unrestricted travel
Eliminates one road closure and detour at Sterling Way
Total construction duration shortened by at least one week
Closure of Wapiti Drive, detour and restoration time including repaving is shortened
The extended work hours are needed during the pipe pull phase through the bore, which must be done in
one continuous operation to ensure the integrity of the bore hole. The pipe is pulled west to east as
is estimated to take 16-24 continuous hours.
Four pieces of receiving equipment will be set up in Wapiti Drive (which will be closed with detours in
place) during the pipe pull. There will be safety lights, some equipment noise and possible vibration.
Before the extended work hours are implemented, Xcel Energy will deliver door hanger notices to
and the scheduled day of
the work.
Your consideration of this request for extended construction work hours is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Nancy Hibbert
Nancy Hibbert
Contract Agent, ROW and Permits
Public Service Company of Colorado, an
Xcel Energy Company
WAPITI DR CLOSED LATE AUGUST
VARIABLE MESSAGE BOARD -
CR8 DELAYS 8-11 TO 9-30
WAPITI DR
WORKZONE
NOTE:
W21-7
UTILITY
AHEAD
WORK
QUAIL DR
MERGING
L/3 in FT
MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH FOR WIDTH OF OFFSET = 12 FT
200220240260
107180
2742
6082
MERGING
L/2 in FT
270300330360390
123160
406390
TABLE L
MERGING
L in FT
245320540600660720780
125180
80
SPEED MPH
COUNTY ROAD 8
APROACH
20253035404550556065
8-11 - 9-30
CR8
TYPE 7 BARRIERS
WAPITI DR CLOSED LATE AUGUST
VARIABLE MESSAGE BOARD -
CR8 DELAYS 8-11 TO 9-30
NOTE:
CR8
8-11 - 9-30
0
4
Y
A
W
H
G
I
H
WAPITI DR CLOSED LATE AUGUST
VARIABLE MESSAGE BOARD -
CR8 DELAYS 8-11 TO 9-30
NOTE:
TYPE 7 BARRIERS
WAPITI DR CLOSED LATE AUGUST
VARIABLE MESSAGE BOARD -
CR8 DELAYS 8-11 TO 9-30
TO CR 804
CRANMER
CLOSED
ROAD
R11-2
WAPITI DR
NOTE:
W21-7
UTILITY
AHEAD
WORK
QUAIL DR
COUNTY ROAD 8
MERGING
L/3 in FT
MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH FOR WIDTH OF OFFSET = 12 FT
200220240260
107180
2742
6082
MERGING
L/2 in FT
270300330360390
123160
406390
TABLE L
MERGING
L in FT
245320540600660720780
125180
80
SPEED MPH
APROACH
20253035404550556065
WAPITI DR CLOSED LATE AUGUST
VARIABLE MESSAGE BOARD -
CR8 DELAYS 8-11 TO 9-30
NOTE:
0
4
Y
A
W
H
G
I
H
WAPITI DR CLOSED LATE AUGUST
VARIABLE MESSAGE BOARD -
CR8 DELAYS 8-11 TO 9-30
NOTE:
4
0
8
D
A
O
R
Y
T
N
U
O
C
R
D
I
T
I
P
A
W
R11-2
COUNTY ROAD 8
0
4
Y
A
W
H
G
I
H
AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE
COLORADO DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, (25-8-101 et seq., CRS, 1973 as amended),
for both discharges to surface and ground waters, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.; the "Act"), for discharges to surface waters only, the
Town of Fraser
is authorized to discharge from the Fraser Valley wastewater treatment plant located in the SE 1/4, NE 1/4, See.18, T1S,
R75W; 75487US Hwy 40, Fraser CO; at 39.96230 latitude North and 105.81581 longitude West
to Fraser River
in accordance with effluent 'limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in Parts I and Il hereof.
All discharges authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit.
The applicant may demand an adjudicatory hearing within thirty (30) calender days of the date of issuance of the final
permit determination, per the Colorado State Discharge Permit System Regulation 61.7(1). Should the applicant choose to
contest any of the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements or other conditions contained herein, the applicant must
comply with Section 24-4-104 CRS 1973 and the Colorado State Discharge Permit System Regulations. Failure to
contest any such effluent limitation, monitoring requirement, or other condition, constitutes consent to the condition by
the applicant.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight, May 31, 2017
Issued and Signed this 31 st day of May, 2012
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
Janet Kieler, Permits Section Manager
Water Quality Control Division
Permit Actions Summary:
Modification #1— Issued May 31, 2012, Effective June 1, 2012 (Part I.A.2)
Originally Issued and Signed April 27, 2012 and Effective June 1, 2012
Permit, Part I
Page 2 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PARTI..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................3
A.
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.........................................................................................................3
1.
Permitted Features(s)................................................................................................................................................................................3
2.
Limitations, Monitoring Frequencies and Sample Types for Effluent Parameters....................................................................................3
3.
Monitoring Frequency and Sample Type Influent Parameters..................................................................................................................6
4.
Salinity Parameters....................................................................................................................................................................................6
B.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS..........................................................................................................................................................................6
1.
Service Area..............................................................................................................................................................................................6
2.
Design Capacity ........................................................................................................................................................................................6
3.
Expansion Requirements...........................................................................................................................................................................7
4.
Facilities Operation and Maintenance.......................................................................................................................................................7
5.
Chronic WET Testing - Outfall 001 A......................................................................................................................................................7
6.
Compliance Schedule(s)..........................................................................................................................................................................10
7.
Industrial Waste Management.................................................................................................................................................................11
C.
DEFINITION OF TERMS..............................................................................................................................................................................13
D.
GENERAL MONITORING, SAMPLING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.....................................................................................17
1.
Routine Reporting of Data......................................................................................................................................................................17
2.
Annual Biosolids Report .........................................................................................................................................................................17
3.
Representative Sampling.........................................................................................................................................................................18
4.
Influent and Effluent Sampling Points....................................................................................................................................................18
5.
Analytical and Sampling Methods for Monitoring and Reporting..........................................................................................................18
6.
Records...................................................................................................................................................................................................20
7.
Flow Measuring Devices.........................................................................................................................................................................20
8.
Signatory Requirements..........................................................................................................................................................................20
PARTI1
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................22
A.
NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS..............................................................................................................................................................22
1.
Notification to Parties.............................................................................................................................................................................22
2.
Change in Discharge...............................................................................................................................................................................22
3.
Special Notifications - Definitions..........................................................................................................................................................22
4.
Noncompliance Notification...................................................................................................................................................................23
5.
Other Notification Requirements............................................................................................................................................................23
6.
Bypass Notification.................................................................................................................................................................................24
7.
Upsets......................................................................................................................................................................................................24
8.
Discharge Point.......................................................................................................................................................................................24
9.
Proper Operation and Maintenance.........................................................................................................................................................25
10.
Minimization of Adverse Impact............................................................................................................................................................25
11.
Removed Substances...............................................................................................................................................................................25
12.
Submission of Incorrect or Incomplete Information................................................................................................................................25
13.
Bypass.....................................................................................................................................................................................................25
14.
Reduction, Loss, or Failure of Treatment Facility...................................................................................................................................25
B.
RESPONSIBILITIES......................................................................................................................................................................................26
1.
Inspections and Right to Entry ................................................................................................................................................................26
2.
Duty to Provide Information...................................................................................................................................................................26
3.
Transfer of Ownership or Control...........................................................................................................................................................26
4.
Availability of Reports............................................................................................................................................................................27
5.
Modification, Suspension, Revocation, or Termination of Permits By the Division...............................................................................27
6.
Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability ...................................................................................................................................................29
7.
State Laws...............................................................................................................................................................................................29
8.
Permit Violations....................................................................................................................................................................................29
9.
Property Rights.......................................................................................................................................................................................29
10.
Severability .............................................................................................................................................................................................30
11.
Renewal Application...............................................................................................................................................................................30
12.
Confidentiality....................----.................................................................... ..........................................................................................
30
13.
Fees.........................................................................................................................................................................................................30
14.
Duration of Permit..................................................................................................................................................................................30
15.
Section 307 Toxics..................................................................................................................................................................................30
16.
Effect of Permit Issuance........................................................................................................................................................................30
PARTIII.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................32
Permit, Part I
Page 3 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
PART I
A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
1. Permitted Features
Beginning no later than the effective date of this permit and lasting through the expiration date, the permittee is authorized to
discharge from, and self monitoring samples taken in accordance with the monitoring requirements shall be obtained from
permitted feature:
001A following disinfection and prior to mixing with the receiving stream. 39° 57.727' N, 105" 48.935' W
The location provided above will serve as the point of compliance for this permit and it is appropriate as it is located after all
treatment and prior to discharge to the receiving water.
In accordance with the Water Quality Control Commission Regulations for Effluent Limitations, Section 62.4, and the
Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations, Section 61.8(2), 5 C.C.R. 1002-61, the permitted discharge shall not contain
effluent parameter concentrations which exceed the following limitations specified below or exceed the specified flow
limitation.
2. Limitations, Monitoring Frequencies and Sample Types for Effluent Parameters
In order to obtain an indication of the probable compliance or noncompliance with the effluent limitations specified in Part
I.A, the permittee shall monitor all effluent parameters at the frequencies and sample types specified below. Such monitoring
will begin immediately and last for the life of the permit unless otherwise noted. The results of such monitoring shall be
reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report form (See Part LD.).
Self-monitoring sampling by the permittee for compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be
performed at the location(s) noted in Part I.A.1 above.
If the permittee, using an approved analytical method, monitors any parameter more frequently than required by this permit,
then the results of such monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the values required in the Discharge
Monitoring Report Form (DMRs) or other forms as required by the Division. Such increased frequency shall also be
indicated.
Percentage Removal Requirements (BODS and TSS Limitations) - As noted in the limits table(s), the arithmetic meant of the
BODS and TSS concentrations for effluent samples collected during the DMR reporting period shall demonstrate a minimum
of eighty-five percent (85%) removal of both BODS and TSS, as measured by dividing the respective difference between the
mean influent and effluent concentrations for the DMR monitoring period by the respective mean influent concentration for
the DMR monitoring period, and multiplying the quotient by 100.
Oil and Grease Monitoring: For every outfall with oil and grease monitoring, in the event an oil sheen or floating oil is
observed, a grab sample shall be collected and analyzed for oil and grease, and reported on the appropriate DMR under
parameter 03582. In addition, corrective action shall be taken immediately to mitigate the discharge of oil and grease. A
description of the corrective action taken should be included with the DMR.
Total Residual Chlorine: Monitoring for TRC is required only when chlorine is in use. DMR shall indicate "NCT" (No
Chlorine Treatment) when chlorine is not in use."
Flow Recording Device: For this facility, two flow recording devices are provided and are located at the point of inflow to
and discharge from the treatment plant. In case of malfunction, a single flow measurement device will be used for recording
and reporting of both influent and effluent flows since effluent flows will not be significantly different from influent flows.
Reported flows will be used to monitor compliance with the effluent flow limitation.
Metals: Metals concentrations measured in compliance with the effluent monitoring requirements listed in Part I.A of this
permit may be used to satisfy any pretreatment or industrial waste management metals monitoring requirements listed in Part
Permit, Part I
Page 4 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
I.B.7, if the metals are in the same form (i.e. total). The special sampling procedures (e.g. 24-hour composite samples)
specified in Part I.B.7 must be followed.
Permitted Feature 001 A
Effluent Limitations Maximum
Monitoring Requirements
[CIS
Concentrations
Code
Effluent Parameter
30 -Day
7 -Day
Daily
2 -Year
Frequency
Sample Type
Average
Average
Maximum
Average
50050
Effluent Flow (MGD)
2.499
Report
Continuous
Recorder
00010
Temp DM & MWAT (°C)
Report
Report
Continuous
Recorder
00400
pH (su)
6.5-9
Daily
Grab
51040
E. coli (#/100 ml)
111
222
2 Days/Week
Grab
50060
TRC (mg/1)
0.016
0.055
5 Days/Week
Grab
00640
Total Inorganic Nitrogen (mg/1)
Report
Report
2 Days/Week
Composite
00610
Total Ammonia as N (mg/1)
2 Days/Week
Composite
January
5.6
11
NA
2 Days/Week
Composite
February
4
13
NA
2 Days/Week
Composite
March
2.5
20
NA
2 Days/Week
Composite
April
13
22
2.0
2 Days/Week
Composite
May
13
23
1.9
2 Days/Week
Composite
June
17
30
2.6
2 Days/Week
Composite
July
20
54
2.1
2 Days/Week
Composite
August
17
53
2
2 Days/Week
Composite
September
15
43
1.8
2 Days/Week
Composite
October
12
24
1.8
2 Days/Week
Composite
November
8
14
1.1
2 Days/Week
Composite
December
1.6
12
NA
2 Days/Week
Composite
00310
BODS, effluent (mg/1)
30
45
Monthly
Composite
81010
BODS (% removal)
85 (min)
Monthly
Calculated
00530
TSS, effluent (mg/1)
30
45
Monthly
Composite
81011
TSS (% removal)
85 (min)
Monthly
Calculated
84066
Oil and Grease (visual)
Report
Daily
Visual
03582
Oil and Grease (mg/1)
10
Contingent
Grab
TDS (mg/1)
70295
3
PWS intake (mg/1)
Report
Monthly
Composite
70295
WWTF effluent (mg/1)
Report
Monthly
Composite
00978
As, TR (µg/1) Until 04/30/2015
Report
Monthly
Composite
00978
As, TR (gg/1) Beginning
0.04
Monthly
Composite
05/01/2015
01313
Cd, PD (µg/1)
0.3
1.1
Quarterly
Composite
01118
Cr, TR (µg/1)
Report
Report
Monthly
Composite
ICIS Effluent Parameter
Code
01220
Cr+6, Dis (µg/1) Until 04/30/2015
Report
Cr+6, Dis (µg/1) Beginning
01220
05/01/2015
01306
Cu, PD (µg/1) Until 10/31/2016
35
Cu, PD (µg/1) Beginning
01306
11/01/2016
00718
CN, WAD (µg/1) Until 10/31/2016
1.8
CN, WAD (µg/1) Beginning
00718
11/01/2016
01046
Fe, Dis (µg/1)
00980
Fe, TR (µg/1)
01318
Pb, PD (µg/1)
01056
Mn, Dis (µg/1)
71900
Hg, Tot (µg/1) Until 10/31/2016
71900
Hg, Tot (µg/1) Beginning
11/01/2016
01323
Se, PD (µg/1)
01304
Ag, PD (4g/1)
01303
Zn, PD (µg/1)
51568
Nonylphenol (µg/1)
WET, chronic Until 6/30/2015
TKP6C
Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic
Pimephales promelas
TKP3B
Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic
Cerioda hnia dubia
WET, chronic Beginning 7/1/2015
TKP6C Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic
Pimephales promelas
TKP3B Static Renewal 7 Day Chronic
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Effluent Limitations Maximum
Concentrations
30 -Day 7-Dav Daily 2 -Year
Average Average Maximum Average
Report Report
21.5 24
Report Report
7.3 8.1
Report
Report
NOEC and
IC25
Report
NOEC and
IC25
NOEC or
IC25 >
IWC
NOEC or
IC25 >
IWC
Report
Permit, Part I
Page 5 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
Monitoring Requirements
Frequency I Sample Type
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Quarterly 3 Composites
/ Test
3 Composites
Quarterly / Test
Quarterly 3 Composites
/ Test
Quarterly 3 Composites
/ Test
7.8
Report
Report
1500
1.56
32
35
Report
Report
0.019
1.8
29
Report
Report
63
96
Report
Report
Report
NOEC and
IC25
Report
NOEC and
IC25
NOEC or
IC25 >
IWC
NOEC or
IC25 >
IWC
Report
Permit, Part I
Page 5 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
Monitoring Requirements
Frequency I Sample Type
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Quarterly 3 Composites
/ Test
3 Composites
Quarterly / Test
Quarterly 3 Composites
/ Test
Quarterly 3 Composites
/ Test
Permit, Part I
Page 6 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
3. Monitoring Frequency and Sample Type Influent Parameters
Regardless of whether or not an effluent discharge occurs and in order to obtain an indication of the current influent loading
as compared to the approved capacity specified in Part I.A.3 and Part I.B.2; the permittee shall monitor influent parameters at
the following required frequencies, the results to be reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report (See Part I.D):
If the permittee monitors any parameter more frequently than required by the permit, using an approved test procedure or as
specified in the permit, the result of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of data to the Division.
Self-monitoring samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified below shall be taken at the
following location: Outfall 300I, at a representative point prior to biological treatment.
Permitted Feature 300I
ICIS
Code
Influent Parameter
Frequency
Sample Type
50050 G
Flow, MGD
Continuous
Recorder
00180 G
Plant Capacity (% of Capacity - Hydraulic) *
Monthly
Calculated
00310 G
BOD5i mg/1
Monthly
Composite
00310 G
BOD,, lbs/day
Monthly
Calculated
00180 G
Plant Capacity (% of Capacity - Organic) *
Monthly
Calculated
00530 G
Total Suspended Solids, TSS, mg/1
Monthly
Composite
*The % capacity is to be reported against the listed capacities of 2.499 MGD for the hydraulic capacity and 5,600 lbs/day for
the organic capacities as noted in Site Approval 4589. The percentage should be calculated using the 30 -day average values
divided by the corresponding capacity, times 100.
4. Salinity Parameters
In order to obtain an indication of the increase in salinity due to the treatment and use of water within this service area, the
permittee shall monitor the raw water source and the wastewater effluent at the following required frequencies, the results to
be reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report (See Part I, Section D.2.):
Self-monitoring samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken prior to
treatment of the raw drinking water source (with a composite sample proportioned to flow prepared from individual grab
samples if more than one source is being utilized), and at the established wastewater treatment facility effluent sampling
point identified above in Part I, Section A.
B. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Service Area
All wastewater flows contributed in the service area may be accepted by the Town of Fraser for treatment at the permittee's
wastewater treatment plant provided that such acceptance does not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the throughput or
design capacity of the treatment works or the effluent limitations in Part LA, or constitute a substantial impact to the
functioning of the treatment works, degrade the quality of the receiving waters, or harm human health, or the environment.
In addition, the permittee shall enter into and maintain service agreements with any municipalities that discharge into the
wastewater treatment facility. The service agreements shall contain all provisions necessary to protect the financial, physical,
and operational integrity of the wastewater treatment works.
2. Design Capacity
Based on Site Approval 4589, the design capacity of this domestic wastewater treatment works is 2.499 million gallons per
day (MGD) for hydraulic flow (30 -day average) and 5,600 lbs. BODS per day for organic loading (30 -day average).
Permit, Part I
Page 7 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
3. Expansion Requirements
Pursuant to Colorado Law, C.R.S. 25-8-501 (5 d & e), the permittee is required to initiate engineering and financial planning
for expansion of the domestic wastewater treatment works whenever throughput reaches eighty (80) percent of the treatment
capacity. Such planning may be deemed unnecessary upon a showing that the area served by the domestic wastewater
treatment works has a stable or declining population; but this provision shall not be construed as preventing periodic review
by the Division should it be felt that growth is occurring or will occur in the area.
The permittee shall commence construction of such domestic wastewater treatment works expansion whenever throughput
reaches ninety-five (95) percent of the treatment capacity or, in the case of a municipality, either commence construction or
cease issuance of building permits within such municipality until such construction is commenced; except that building
permits may continue to be issued for any construction which would not have the effect of increasing the input of wastewater
to the sewage treatment works of the municipality involved.
Where unusual circumstances result in throughput exceeding 80% of treatment capacity, the permittee may, in lieu of
initiating planning for expansion, submit a report to the Division that demonstrates that it is unlikely that the event will
reoccur, or even if it were to reoccur, that 95% of the treatment capacity would not be exceeded.
Where unusual circumstances result in throughput exceeding 95% of the treatment capacity, the permittee may, in lieu of
initiating construction of the expansion, submit a report to the Division that demonstrates that the domestic wastewater
treatment works was in compliance at all times during the events and that it is extremely unlikely that the event will reoccur.
Where the permittee submits a report pursuant to unusual circumstances, and the Division, upon review of such report,
determines in writing to the permittee that the report does not support the required findings, the permittee shall initiate
planning and/or construction of the domestic wastewater treatment works as appropriate.
4. Facilities Operation and Maintenance
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control including all
portions of the collection system and lift stations owned by the permittee (and related appurtenances) which are installed or
used by the permittee as necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and
maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision
requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems when installed by the permittee only when
necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. However, the permittee shall operate, at a minimum, one
complete set of each main line unit treatment process whether or not this process is needed to achieve permit effluent
compliance. Any sludge produced at the wastewater treatment facility shall be disposed of in accordance with State and
Federal guidelines and regulations.
5. Chronic WET Testing — Outfall 001A
a. General Chronic WET Testing and Reporting Requirements
The permittee shall conduct the chronic WET test using Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas, as a static
renewal 7 -day test using three separate composite samples. The permittee shall conduct each chronic WET test in
accordance with the 40 CFR Part 136 methods described in Short-term Methods for Estimatine the Chronic Toxicity of
Effluents and Receiving Water to Freshwater Organisms, Fourth Edition, October 2002 (EPA -821-R-02-013) or the most
current edition.
The following minimum dilution series should be used: 0% effluent (control), 7%, 13%, 26%, 63%, and 100% effluent.
If the permittee uses more dilutions than prescribed, and accelerated testing is to be performed, the same dilution series
shall be used in the accelerated testing (if applicable) as was initially used in the failed test.
Tests shall be done at the frequency listed in Part LA.1. Test results shall be reported along with the Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) submitted for the end of the reporting period when the sample was taken. (i.e., WET testing
results for the calendar quarter ending March 31 shall be reported with the DMR due April 28, etc.) The permittee shall
submit all laboratory statistical summary sheets, summaries of the determination of a valid, invalid or inconclusive test,
and copies of the chain of custody forms, along with the DMR for the reporting period.
Permit, Part I
Page 8 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
If a test is considered invalid, the permittee is required to perform additional testing during the monitoring period to
obtain a valid test result. Failure to obtain a valid test result during the monitoring period shall result in a violation of the
permit for failure to monitor.
b. Violations of the Permit Limit, Failure of One Test Statistical Endpoint and Division Notification
A chronic WET test is considered a violation of a permit limitation when both the NOEC and the IC25 are at any effluent
concentration less than the IWC. The IWC for this permit has been determined to be 26% effluent.
A chronic WET test is considered to have failed one of the two statistical endpoints when either the NOEC or the IC25
are at any effluent concentration less than the IWC. The IWC for this permit has been determined to be 26% effluent.
In the event of a permit violation, or when two consecutive reporting periods have resulted in failure of one of the two
statistical endpoints (regardless of which statistical endpoints are failed), the permittee must provide written notification
to the Division. Such notification should explain whether it was a violation or two consecutive failures of a single
endpoint, and must indicate whether accelerated testing or a Toxicity Identification Evaluation or Toxicity Reduction
Evaluation (TIE or TRE) is being performed, unless otherwise exempted, in writing, by the Division. Notification must
be received by the Division within 14 calendar days of the permittee receiving notice of the WET testing results.
c. Automatic Compliance Response
The permittee is responsible for implementing the automatic compliance response provisions of this permit when one of
the following occurs:
• there is a violation of the permit limit (both the NOEC and the IC25 endpoints are less than the applicable IWC)
• two consecutive monitoring periods have resulted in failure of one of the two statistical endpoints (either the
IC25 or the NOEC)
• the permittee is otherwise informed by the Division that a compliance response is necessary
When one of the above listed events occurs, the following automatic compliance response shall apply. The permittee
shall either:
• conduct accelerated testing using the single species found to be more sensitive
• conduct a Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) or a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) investigation as
described in this section.
i. Accelerated Testing
If accelerated testing is being performed, testing will be at least once every two weeks for up to five tests with only
one test being run at a time, using only the IC25 statistical endpoint to determine if the test passed or failed at the
appropriate IWC. Accelerated testing shall continue until; 1) two consecutive tests fail or three of five tests fail, in
which case a pattern of toxicity has been demonstrated or 2) two consecutive tests pass or three of five tests pass, in
which case no pattern of toxicity has been found. Note that the same dilution series should be used in the accelerated
testing as was used in the initial test(s) that result in the accelerated testing requirement.
If accelerated testing is required due to failure of one statistical endpoint in two consecutive monitoring periods, and in
both of those failures it was the NOEC endpoint that was failed, then the NOEC shall be the only statistical endpoint
used to determined whether the accelerated testing passed or failed at the appropriate IWC. Note that the same
dilution series should be used in the accelerated testing as was used in the initial test(s) that result in the accelerated
testing requirement.
If no pattern of toxicity is found the toxicity episode is considered to be ended and routine testing is to resume. If a
pattern of toxicity is found, a TIE/TRE investigation is to be performed. If a pattern of toxicity is not demonstrated but
a significant level of erratic toxicity is found, the Division may require an increased frequency of routine monitoring or
some other modified approach. The permittee shall provide written notification of the results within 14 calendar days
of completion of the Pattern of Toxicity/No Toxicity demonstration.
Permit, Part I
Page 9 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
ii. Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) or Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE)
If a TIE or a TRE is being performed, the results of the investigation are to be received by the Division within 180
calendar days of the demonstration chronic WET in the routine test, as defined above, or if accelerated testing was
performed, the date the pattern of toxicity is demonstrated. A status report is to be provided to the Division at the 60
and 120 calendar day points of the TIE or TRE investigation. The Division may extend the time frame for
investigation where reasonable justification exists. A request for an extension must be made in writing and received
prior to the 180 calendar day deadline. Such request must include a justification and supporting data for such an
extension.
Under a TIE, the permittee may use the time for investigation to conduct a preliminary TIE (PTIE) or move directly
into the TIE. A PTIE consists of a brief search for possible sources of WET, where a specific parameter(s) is
reasonably suspected to have caused such toxicity, and could be identified more simply and cost effectively than a
formal TIE. If the PTIE allows resolution of the WET incident, the TIE need not necessarily be conducted in its
entirety. If, however, WET is not identified or resolved during the PTIE, the TIE must be conducted within the
allowed 180 calendar day time frame.
The Division recommends that the EPA guidance documents regarding TIES be followed. If another method is to be
used, this procedure should be submitted to the Division prior to initiating the TIE.
If the pollutant(s) causing toxicity is/are identified, and is/are controlled by a permit effluent limitation(s), this permit
may be modified upon request to adjust permit requirements regarding the automatic compliance response.
If the pollutant(s) causing toxicity is/are identified, and is/are not controlled by a permit effluent limitation(s), the
Division may develop limitations the parameter(s), and the permit may be reopened to include these limitations.
4
If the pollutant causing toxicity is not able to be identified, or is unable to be specifically identified, or is not able to be
controlled by an effluent limit, the permittee will be required to perform either item 1 or item 2 below.
1) Conduct an investigation which demonstrates actual instream aquatic life conditions upstream and
downstream of the discharge, or identify, for Division approval, and conduct an alternative investigation
which demonstrates the actual instream impact. This should include WET testing and chemical analyses of
the ambient water. Depending on the results of the study, the permittee may also be required to identify the
control program necessary to eliminate the toxicity and its cost. Data collected may be presented to the
WQCC for consideration.at the next appropriate triennial review of the stream standards;
2) Move to a TRE by identifying the necessary control program or activity and proceed with elimination of
the toxicity so as to meet the WET effluent limit.
If toxicity spontaneously disappears in the midst of a TIE, the permittee shall notify the Division within 10 calendar
days of such disappearance. The Division may require the permittee to conduct accelerated testing to demonstrate that
no pattern of toxicity exists, or may amend the permit to require an increased frequency of WET testing for some
period of time. If no pattern of toxicity is demonstrated through the accelerated testing or the increased monitoring
frequency, the toxicity incident response will be closed and normal WET testing shall resume.
The control program developed during a TRE consists of the measures determined to be the most feasible to eliminate
WET. This may happen through the identification of the toxicant(s) and then a control program aimed specifically at
that toxicant(s) or through the identification of more general toxicant treatability processes. A control program is to be
developed and submitted to the Division within 180 calendar days of beginning a TRE. Status reports on the TRE are
to be provided to the Division at the 60 and 120 calendar day points of the TRE investigation.
If toxicity spontaneously disappears in the midst of a TRE, the permittee shall notify the Division within 10 calendar
days of such disappearance. The Division may require the permittee to conduct accelerated testing to demonstrate that
no pattern of toxicity exists, or may amend the permit to require an increased frequency for some period of time. If no
pattern of toxicity is demonstrated through the accelerated testing or the increased monitoring frequency, the toxicity
incident response will be closed and normal WET testing shall resume.
Permit, Part I
Page 10 of 34
Pen -nit No. C00040142
d. Toxicity Reopener
This permit may be reopened and modified to include additional or modified numerical permit limitations, new or
modified compliance response requirements, changes in the WET testing protocol, the addition of both acute and chronic
WET requirements, or any other conditions related to the control of toxicants.
6. Compliance Schedule(s)
All information and written reports required by the following compliance schedules should be directed to the Permits Section
for final review unless otherwise stated.
a. Mixing Zone Analyses —Conduct remaining threshold tests for exclusion from further analysis under Mixing Zone
Regulations. The second threshold test is the Application of the Mixing Zone Exclusion Tables (p. 20, Colorado Mixing
Zone Implementation Guidance, February 2002). Under this compliance action, the permittee will collect the necessary site-
specific data, perform the required analysis, and provide a report to the Division. The report will indicate the findings of this
threshold test and, if not excluded, provide the workplan for the next threshold test (i.e., determining of the size of the
physical and regulatory mixing zones).
Code
Event
Description
Due Date
50008
Submit Study
Collect site-specific data, perform threshold tests based on
04/30/2013
Results
Mixing Zone Exclusion Tables, and submit study results.
50008
Submit Study
If a low flow condition is not reached on the receiving water
04/30/2014
Results
during the first year, the permittee shall collect the site-specific
data, perform threshold tests based on Mixing Zone Exclusion
Tables, and submit study results.
b. Activities to Meet Dissolved Copper, Free Cyanide, and Total Mercury Final Limits —In order to meet dissolved copper,
free cyanide,
and total mercury
limitations, the following schedule will be included in the permit.
Code
Event
Description
Due Date
43699
Facility
Submit a plan identifying strategies to detect sources of dissolved
04/30/2013
Evaluation Plan
copper, free cyanide, and total mercury in the wastewater
treatment facility.
43699
Facility
Submit a report that identifies sources of dissolved copper, free
04/30/2014
Evaluation Plan
cyanide, and total mercury to the wastewater treatment facility.
00899
Implementation
Submit a report identifying strategies to control sources such that
04/30/2015
Schedule
compliance with the final copper, cyanide, and mercury
limitations may be attained.
00899
Implementation
Submit a progress report summarizing the progress in
04/30/2016
Schedule
implementing the strategies to control sources such that
compliance with the final copper, cyanide, and mercury
limitations may be attained.
CS017
Achieve Final
Submit study results that show compliance has been attained with
10/31/2016
Compliance
the final copper, cyanide, and mercury limitations.
with Emissions
or Discharge
Limits
Permit, Part I
Page 11 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
c. Activities to Meet Total Recoverable Arsenic and Dissolved Hexavalent Chromium Final Limits — In order to meet total
recoverable arsenic and dissolved hexavalent chromium limits, the following compliance schedule has been included in the
permit.
Code Event Description Due Date
22099 Monitoring Plan Design and implementation a monitoring plan to develop a more 04/30/2013
robust characterization of the mean and data distribution for total
recoverable arsenic and dissolved hexavalent chromium.
CS01 I Plan, Report, or Submit a report describing the actions that will be taken to attain 04/30/2014
Scope of Work compliance with the total recoverable arsenic and dissolved
hexavalent chromium limitations.
CS016 Complete Complete all appropriate actions, which will allow the permittee 04/30/2015
Required Work to meet the total recoverable arsenic and dissolved hexavalent
chromium limitations.
No later than 14 calendar days following each date identified in the above schedules of compliance, the permittee shall
submit either a report of progress or, in the case of specific actions being required by identified dates, a written notice of
compliance or noncompliance, any remedial actions taken, and the probability of meeting the next scheduled requirement.
7. Industrial Waste Management
a. The Permittee has the responsibility to protect the Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works (DWTW), as defined at
section 25.8.103(5) of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, or the Publicly -Owned Treatment Works (POTW), as
defined at 40 CFR section 403.3(q) of the federal pretreatment regulations, from pollutants which would cause pass
through or interference, as defined at 40 CFR 403.3(p) and (k), or otherwise be incompatible with operation of the
treatment works including interference with the use or disposal of municipal sludge.
b. Pretreatment Standards (40 CFR Section 403.5) developed pursuant to Section 307 of the Federal Clean Water Act (the
Act) require that the Permittee shall not allow, under any circumstances, the introduction of the following pollutants to
the DWTW from any source of non-domestic discharge:
i. Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the DWTW, including, but not limited to, wastestreams with a
closed cup flashpoint of less than sixty (60) degrees Centigrade (140 degrees Fahrenheit) using the test methods
specified in 40 CFR Section 261.21;
ii. Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural damage to the DWTW, but in no case discharges with a pH of lower
than 5.0 s.u., unless the treatment facilities are specifically designed to accommodate such discharges;
iii. Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow in the DWTW, or otherwise interfere
with the operation of the DWTW;
iv. Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (e.g., BOD), released in a discharge at a flow rate and/or
pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with any treatment process at the DWTW;
v. Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the DWTW resulting in Interference, but in no case heat in
such quantities that the temperature at the DWTW treatment plant exceeds forty (40) degrees Centigrade (104
degrees Fahrenheit) unless the Approval Authority, upon request of the DWTW, approves alternate temperature
limits;
vi. Petroleum oil, non -biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause
Interference or Pass Through;
Permit, Part I
Page 12 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
vii. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the DWTW in a quantity that may
cause acute worker health and safety problems;
viii. Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the DWTW; and
ix. Any specific pollutant that exceeds a local limitation established by the Permittee in accordance with the
requirements of 40 CFR Section 403.5(c) and (d).
x. Any other pollutant which may cause Pass Through or Interference.
c. EPA shall be the Approval Authority and the mailing address for all reporting and notifications to the Approval
Authority shall be: USEPA 1595 Wynkoop St. 8ENF-W-NP, Denver, CO 80202-1129. Should the State be delegated
authority to implement and enforce the Pretreatment Program in the future, the Permittee shall be notified of the
delegation and the state permitting authority shall become the Approval Authority.
d. In addition to the general limitations expressed above, more specific Pretreatment Standards have been and will be
promulgated for specific industrial categories under Section 307 of the Act (40 CFR Part 405 et. seq.).
e. The Permittee must notify the state permitting authority and the Approval Authority, of any new introductions by new or
existing industrial users or any substantial change in pollutants from any industrial user within sixty (60) calendar days
following the introduction or change. Such notice must identify:
L Any new introduction of pollutants into the DWTW from an industrial user which would be subject to Sections 301,
306, or 307 of the Act if it were directly discharging those pollutants; or
ii. Any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants being introduced into the DWTW by any industrial
user;
iii. For the purposes of this section, adequate notice shall include information on:
(A) The identity of the industrial user;
(B) The nature and concentration of pollutants in the discharge and the average and maximum flow of the
discharge to be introduced into the DWTW; and
(C) Any anticipated impact of the change on the quantity or quality of effluent to be discharged from or
biosolids or sludge produced at such DWTW.
iv. For the purposes of this section, an industrial user shall include:
(A) Any discharger subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under Section 307 of the Act and 40
CFR chapter I and subchapter N;
(B) Any discharger which has a process wastewater flow of 25,000 gallons or more per day;
(C) Any discharger contributing five percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the DWTW treatment plant;
(D) Any discharger who is designated by the Approval Authority as having a reasonable potential for
adversely affecting the DWTWs operation or for violating any Pretreatment Standard or requirements;
i At such time as a specific Pretreatment Standard or requirement becomes applicable to an industrial user of the
Permittee, the state permitting authority and/or Approval Authority may, as appropriate:
L Amend the Permittee's CDPS discharge permit to specify the additional pollutant(s) and corresponding effluent
limitation(s) consistent with the applicable national Pretreatment Standards;
Permit, Part I
Page 13 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
ii. Require the Permittee to specify, by ordinance, order, or other enforceable means, the type of pollutant(s) and the
maximum amount which may be discharged to the Permittee's DWTW for treatment. Such requirement shall be
imposed in a manner consistent with the program development requirements of the General Pretreatment
Regulations at 40 CFR Part 403; and/or,
iii. Require the Permittee to monitor its discharge for any pollutant which may likely be discharged from the Permittee's
DWTW, should the industrial user fail to properly pretreat its waste.
The state permitting authority and the Approval Authority retains, at all times, the right to take legal action against any source
of nondomestic discharge, whether directly or indirectly controlled by the Permittee, for violations of a permit, order or
similar enforceable mechanism issued by the Permittee, violations of any Pretreatment Standard or requirement, or for failure
to discharge at an acceptable level under national standards issued by EPA under 40 CFR, chapter I, subchapter N. In those
cases where a CDPS permit violation has occurred because of the failure of the Permittee to properly develop and enforce
Pretreatment Standards and requirements as necessary to protect the DWTW, the state permitting authority and/or Approval
Authority shall hold the Permittee and/or industrial user responsible and may take legal action against the Permittee as well
as the Industrial user(s) contributing to the permit violation.
C. DEFINITION OF TERMS
1. "Antidegradation limits" — See "Two (2) - Year Rolling Average".
2. "Chronic toxicity", which includes lethality and growth or reproduction, occurs when the NOEC and IC25 are at an effluent
concentration less than the IWC indicated in this permit.
3. "Composite" sample is a minimum of four (4) grab samples, collected at equally spaced two (2) hour intervals and
proportioned according to flow. For a SBR type treatment system, a composite sample is defined as sampling equal aliquots
during the beginning, middle and end of a decant period, for two consecutive periods during a day (if possible).
4. "Continuous" measurement, is a measurement obtained from an automatic recording device which continually measures the
effluent for the parameter in question, or that provides measurements at specified intervals.
5. "Daily Maximum limitation" for all parameters except temperature, means the limitation for this parameter shall be applied
as an instantaneous maximum (or, for pH or DO, instantaneous minimum) value. The instantaneous value is defined as the
analytical result of any individual sample. DMRs shall include the maximum (and/or minimum) of all instantaneous values
within the calendar month. Any instantaneous value beyond the noted daily maximum limitation for the indicated parameter
shall be considered a violation of this permit.
6. "Daily Maximum Temperature (DM)" is defined in the Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water 1002-31, as
the highest two-hour average water temperature recorded during a given 24-hour period. This will be determined using a
rolling 2 -hour maximum temperature. If data is collected every 15 minutes, a 2 hour maximum can be determined on every
data point after the initial 2 hours of collection. Note that the time periods that overlap days (Wednesday night to Thursday
morning) do not matter as the reported value on the DMR is the greatest of all the 2 -hour averages.
For example data points collected at:
08:15, 08:30, 08:45, 09:00, 09:15, 09:30, 09:45, 10:00, would be averaged for a single 2 hour average data point
08:30, 08:45, 09:00, 09:15, 09:30, 09:45, 10:00, 10:15, would be averaged for a single 2 hour average data point
08:45, 09:00, 09:15, 09:30, 09:45, 10:00, 10:15, 10:30, would be averaged for a single 2 hour average data point
This would continue throughout the course of a calendar day. The highest of these 2 hour averages over a month would be
reported on the DMR as the daily maximum temperature. At the end/beginning of a month, the collected data should be used
for the month that contains the greatest number of minutes in the 2 -hour maximum.
Data from 11 pm to 12:59 am, would fall in the previous day. Data collected from 11:01 pm to 1:00 am would fall in the new
month.
7. "Dissolved (D) metals fraction" is defined in the Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water 1002-31, as that
portion of a water and suspended sediment sample which passed through a 0.40 or 0.45 UM (micron) membrane filter.
Permit, Part I
Page 14 of 34
Permit No. 000040142
Determinations of "dissolved" constituents are made using the filtrate. This may include some very small (colloidal)
suspended particles which passed through the membrane filter as well as the amount of substance present in true chemical
solution.
8. "Geometric mean" for E. coli bacteria concentrations, the thirty (30) day and seven (7) day averages shall be determined as
the geometric mean of all samples collected in a thirty (30) day period and the geometric mean of all samples taken in a seven
(7) consecutive day period respectively. The geometric mean may be calculated using two different methods. For the
methods shown, a, b, c, d, etc. are individual sample results, and n is the total number of samples.
Method 1:
(1/n)
Geometric Mean = (a*b*c*d*...) "*" - means multiply
Method 2:
Geometric Mean = antilog ( [log(a)+log(b)+log(c)+log(d)+...]/n )
Graphical methods, even though they may also employ the use of logarithms, may introduce significant error and may not be
used.
In calculating the geometric mean, for those individual sample results that are reported by the analytical laboratory to be "less
than" a numeric value, a value of 1 should be used in the calculations. If all individual analytical results for the month are
reported to be less than numeric values, then report "less than" the largest of those numeric values on the monthly DMR.
Otherwise, report the calculated value.
For any individual analytical result of "too numerous to count" (TNTC), that analysis shall be considered to be invalid and
another sample shall be promptly collected for analysis. If another sample cannot be collected within the same sampling
period for which the invalid sample was collected (during the same month if monthly sampling is required, during the same
week if weekly sampling is required, etc.), then the following procedures apply:
L A minimum of two samples shall be collected for coliform analysis within the next sampling period.
ii. If the sampling frequency is monthly or less frequent: For the period with the invalid sample results, leave the
spaces on the corresponding DMR for reporting coliform results empty and attach to the DMR a letter noting that a
result of TNTC was obtained for that period, and explain why another sample for that period had not been collected.
If the sampling frequency is more frequent than monthly: Eliminate the result of TNTC from any further calculations, and
use all the other results obtained within that month for reporting purposes. Attach a letter noting that a result of TNTC was
obtained, and list all individual analytical results and corresponding sampling dates for that month.
9. "Grab" sample, is a single "dip and take" sample so as to be representative of the parameter being monitored.
10. "In-situ" measurement is defined as a single reading, observation or measurement taken in the field at the point of discharge.
11. "Instantaneous" measurement is a single reading, observation, or measurement performed on site using existing monitoring
facilities.
12. "Maximum Weekly Average Temperature (MWAT)" is defined in the Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water
1002-31, as an implementation statistic that is calculated from field monitoring data. The MWAT is calculated as the largest
mathematical mean of multiple, equally spaced, daily temperatures over a seven-day consecutive period, with a minimum of
three data points spaced equally through the day. For lakes and reservoirs, the MWAT is assumed to be equivalent to the
maximum WAT from at least three profiles distributed throughout the growing season (generally July -September).
The MWAT is calculated by averaging all temperature data points collected during a calendar day, and then averaging the
daily average temperatures for 7 consecutive days. This 7 day averaging period is a rolling average, i.e. on the 8t' day, the
MWAT will be the averages of the daily averages of days 2-8. The value to be reported on the DMR is the highest of all the
rolling 7 -day averages throughout the month. For those days that are at the end/beginning of the month, the data shall be
reported for the month that contains 4 of the 7 days.
Permit, Part I
Page 15 of 34
Permit No. 000040142
Day 1: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
Day 2: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
Day 3: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
Day 4: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
Day 5: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
Day 6: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
Day 7: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
1St MWAT Calculation as average of previous 7 days
Day 8: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
tad MWAT Calculation as average of previous 7 days
Day 9: Average of all temperature data collected during the calendar day.
3rd MWAT Calculation as average of previous 7 days
13. "Potentially dissolved (PD) metals fraction" is defined in the Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water 1002-31,
as that portion of a constituent measured from the filtrate of a water and suspended sediment sample that was first treated
with nitric acid to a pH of 2 or less and let stand for 8 to 96 hours prior to sample filtration using a 0.40 or 0.45 -UM (micron)
membrane filter. Note the "potentially dissolved" method cannot be used where nitric acid will interfere with the analytical
procedure used for the constituent measured.
14. "Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL)" means the minimum concentration of an analyte (substance) that can be measured with
a high degree of confidence that the analyte is present at or above that concentration. The use of PQL in this document may
refer to those PQLs shown in Part LD of this permit or the PQLs of an individual laboratory.
15. "Quarterly measurement frequency" means samples may be collected at any time during the calendar quarter if a continual
discharge occurs. If the discharge is intermittent, then samples shall be collected during the period that discharge occurs.
16. "Recorder" requires the continuous operation of a chart and/or totalizer (or drinking water rotor meters or pump hour meters
where previously approved.)
17. "Seven (7) day average" means, with the exception of fecal coliform or E. coli bacteria (see geometric mean), the arithmetic
mean of all samples collected in a seven (7) consecutive day period. Such seven (7) day averages shall be calculated for all
calendar weeks, which are defined as beginning on Sunday and ending on Saturday. If the calendar week overlaps two
months (i.e. the Sunday is in one month and the Saturday in the following month), the seven (7) day average calculated for
that calendar week shall be associated with the month that contains the Saturday. Samples may not be used for more than
one (1) reporting period. (See the "Analytical and Sampling Methods for Monitoring and Reporting Section in Part
I.D.S for guidance on calculating averages and reporting analytical results that are less than the PQL).
18. "Thirty (30) day average" means, except for fecal coliform or E. coli bacteria (see geometric mean), the arithmetic mean of
all samples collected during a thirty (30) consecutive -day period, which represents a calendar month. The permittee shall
report the appropriate mean of all self-monitoring sample data collected during the calendar month on the Discharge
Monitoring Reports. Samples shall not be used for more than one (1) reporting period. (See the "Analytical and Sampling
Methods for Monitoring and Reporting Section in Part I.D.S for guidance on calculating averages and reporting
analytical results that are less than the PQL).
19. Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) is a set of site-specific procedures used to identify the specific chemical(s) causing
effluent toxicity.
20. "Total Inorganic Nitrogen (T.I.N.)" is an aggregate parameter determined based on ammonia, nitrate and nitrite
concentrations. To determine T.I.N. concentrations, the facility must monitor for total ammonia and total nitrate plus nitrite
(or nitrate and nitrite individually) on the same days. The calculated T.I.N. concentrations in mg/L shall then be determined
as the sum of the analytical results of same-day sampling for total ammonia (as N) in mg/L, and total nitrate plus nitrite (as
N) in mg/L (or nitrate as N and nitrite as N individually). From these calculated T.I.N. concentrations, the daily maximum
and thirty (30) day average concentrations for T.I.N. shall be determined in the same manner as set out in the definitions for
the daily maximum and thirty (30) day average. (See the "Analytical and Sampling Methods for Monitoring and
Reporting Section in Part I.D.S for guidance on calculating averages and reporting analytical results that are less than
the PQL).
Permit, Part I
Page 16 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
21. "Total Metals" means the concentration of metals determined on an unfiltered sample following vigorous digestion (Section
4.1.3), or the sum of the concentrations of metals in both the dissolved and suspended fractions, as described in Manual of
Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 1979, or its equivalent.
22. "Total Recoverable Metals" means that portion of a water and suspended sediment sample measured by the total recoverable
analytical procedure described in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, March 1979 or its equivalent.
23. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) is a site-specific study conducted in a step -wise process to identify the causative agents
of effluent toxicity, isolate the source of toxicity, evaluate the effectiveness of toxicity control options, and then confirm the
reduction in effluent toxicity after the control measures are put in place.
24. "Twenty four (24) hour composite" sample is a combination of at least eight (8) sample aliquots of at least 100 milliliters,
collected at equally spaced intervals during the operating hours of a facility over a twenty-four (24) hour period. For volatile
pollutants, aliquots must be combined in the laboratory immediately before analysis. The composite must be flow
proportional; either the time interval between each aliquot or the volume of each aliquot must be proportional to either the
wastewater or effluent flow at the time of sampling or the total wastewater or effluent flow since the collection of the
previous aliquot. Aliquots may be collected manually or automatically.
25. "Twice Monthly" monitoring frequency means that two samples shall be collected each calendar month on separate weeks
with at least one full week between the two sample dates. Also, there shall be at least one full week between the second
sample of a month and the first sample of the following month.
26. "Two (2) -Year Rolling Average" - Antidegradation limits apply as the average of all data collected in a two (2) year (24 -
month) period. These limits become effective upon the effective date of the permit, but are not reportable on a DMR until
two years (typically 24 months) of data have been collected. After data has been collected for 24 months, the 30 -day
averages for each month are then averaged together to determine the two-year rolling average (using data from month 1 to
month 24, then month 2 to month 25, month 3 to month 26, etc).
For ammonia, two-year rolling averages may be set up for individual months, or may be grouped together for several months.
For individual months (every month has a different two-year rolling average limit) the two-year average is reportable after
two months of data are collected.
Example: Permit is effective Jan 2010 and there is a two-year rolling average limit specific to the month of January.
Jan 2010 DMR — Nothing to Report
Jan 2011 DMR — 2 -Year Average of Jan 2010 and Jan 2011
Jan 2012 DMR — 2 -Year Average of Jan 2011 and Jan 2012, etc.
Where several months have the same two-year average limit, it is reportable on the DMR after two months of data have been
collected for every month in the group.
Example: Permit is effective Jan 2010 and there is a two-year rolling average limit specific to the months of Jan, Feb,
June.
1st Reportable DMR — June 2011 - 2 -Year Average Jan 2010 Feb 2010 June 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 June 2011
2nd Reportable DMR — Jan 2012 - 2 -Year Average Feb 2010 June 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 June 2011 Jan 2012
3rd Reportable DMR — Feb 2012 - 2 -Year Average June 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 June 2011 Jan 2012 Feb 2012, etc.
(See the "Analytical and Sampling Methods for Monitoring and Reporting Section in Part I.D.S for guidance on
calculating averages and reporting analytical results that are less than the PQL).
27. "Visual" observation is observing the discharge to check for the presence of a visible sheen or floating oil.
28. "Water Quality Control Division" or "Division" means the state Water Quality Control Division as established in 25-8-101 et
al.)
Permit, Part I
Page 17 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
Additional relevant definitions are found in the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, CRS §§ 25-8-101 et sec.., the Colorado
Discharge Permit System Regulations, Regulation 61 (5 CCR 1002-61) and other applicable regulations.
D. GENERAL MONITORING, SAMPLING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Routine Reportine of Data
Reporting of the data gathered in compliance with Part LA or Part I.B shall be on a monthly basis. Reporting of all data
gathered shall comply with the requirements of Part I.D. (General Requirements). Monitoring results shall be summarized
for each calendar month and reported on Division approved discharge monitoring report (DMR) forms (EPA form 3320-1).
The permittee must submit these forms either by mail, or by using the Division's Net -DMR service (when available). If
mailed, one form shall be mailed to the Division, as indicated below, so that the DMR is received no later than the 28th day
of the following month (for example, the DMR for the first calendar quarter must be received by the Division by April 28th).
If no discharge occurs during the reporting period, "No Discharge" shall be reported.
The original signed copy of each discharge monitoring report (DMR) shall be submitted to the Division at the following
address:
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Water Quality Control Division
WQCD-P-B2
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, Colorado 80246-1530
The Discharge Monitoring Report forms shall be filled out accurately and completely in accordance with requirements of this
permit and the instructions on the forms. They shall be signed by an authorized person as identified in Part LD.8.
2. Annual Biosolids Report
The permittee shall provide the results of all biosolids monitoring and information on management practices, land application
sites, site restrictions and certifications. Such information shall be provided no later than February 19th of each year.
Reports shall be submitted addressing all such activities that occurred in the previous calendar year. If no biosolids were
applied to the land during the reporting period, "no biosolids applied" shall be reported. Until further notice, biosolids
monitoring results shall be reported on forms, or copies of forms, provided by the Division. Annual Biosolids Reports
required herein, shall be signed and certified in accordance with the Signatory Requirements, Part I.D., and submitted as
follows:
The original copy of each form shall be submitted to the following address:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT,
WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION
WQCD-PERMITS-B2
4300 CHERRY CREEK DRIVE SOUTH
DENVER, COLORADO 80246-1530
A copy of each form shall be submitted to the following address:
WATER PROGRAM REGIONAL BIOSOLIDS PROGRAM
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VIII,
1595 WYNKOOP STREET
DENVER, CO 80202-2466
ATTENTION: BIOSOLIDS PROGRAM MANAGER
Permit, Part I
Page 18 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
3. Representative Sampling
Samples and measurements taken for the respective identified monitoring points as required herein shall be representative of
the volume and nature of: 1) all influent wastes received at the facility, including septage, biosolids, etc.; 2) the monitored
effluent discharged from the facility; and 3) biosolids produced at the facility. All samples shall be taken at the monitoring
points specified in this permit and, unless otherwise specified, before the influent, effluent, or biosolids wastestream joins or
is diluted by any other wastestream, body of water, or substance. Monitoring points shall not be changed without notification
to and prior approval by the Division.
4. Influent and Effluent Sampling Points
Influent and effluent sampling points shall be so designed or modified so that: 1) a sample of the influent can be obtained
after preliminary treatment and prior to primary or biological treatment and 2) a sample of the effluent can be obtained at a
point after the final treatment process and prior to discharge to state waters. The permittee shall provide access to the
Division to sample at these points.
5. Analytical and Sampling :Methods for Monitoring and Reporting
The permittee shall install, calibrate, use and maintain monitoring methods and equipment, including biological and indicated
pollutant monitoring methods. All sampling shall be performed by the permittee according to specified methods in 40 C.F.R.
Part 136; methods approved by EPA pursuant to 40 C.F.R. Part 136; or methods approved by the Division, in the absence of
a method specified in or approved pursuant to 40 C.F.R. Part 136 (see text below for specifics on nonylphenol monitoring).
If the permit contains a numeric effluent limit for a parameter, the analytical method and PQL selected for all
monitoring conducted in accordance with this permit for that parameter shall be the one that can measure at or below
the numeric effluent limit. If all specified analytical methods and corresponding PQLs are greater than the numeric
effluent limit, then the analytical method with the lowest PQL shall be used.
If the permit contains a report only requirement for a parameter, the analytical method and PQL chosen shall be one
that can measure at or below the potential numeric effluent limit(s) (maximum allowable pollutant concentration as
shown in the WQA or fact sheet). If all analytical methods and corresponding PQLs are greater than the potential
numeric effluent limit (s), then the analytical method with the lowest PQL shall be used.
If the permit contains an interim effluent limitation (a limit is report until such time as a numeric effluent limit
becomes effective) for a parameter, the analytical method and PQL chosen for all monitoring conducted in
accordance with this permit for the parameter shall be one that can measure to the final numeric effluent limit. If all
analytical methods and corresponding PQLs are greater than the final numeric effluent limit (s), then the analytical
method with the lowest PQL shall be used.
For parameters such as TIN, the analytical methods chosen shall be those that can measure to the potential or final
numeric effluent limit, based on the sum of the PQLs for nitrate, nitrite and ammonia.
When the analytical method which complies with the above requirements has a PQL greater than the permit limit,
and the permittee's analytical result is less than the PQL, the permittee shall report "BDL" on the DMR. Such
reports will not be considered as violations of the permit limit, as long as the lowest available PQL is used for the
analysis. When the analytical method which complies with the above requirements has a PQL that is equal to or less
than the permit limitation, and the permittee's analytical result is less than the PQL, "< X" (where X = the actual
PQL achieved by the laboratory) shall be reported on the DMR For parameters that have a report only limitation,
and the permittee's analytical result is less than the PQL, "< X" (where X = the actual PQL achieved by the
laboratory) shall be reported on the DMR.
In the calculation of average concentrations (i.e. 7- day average, 30 -day average, 2 -year rolling average) any individual
analytical result that is less than the PQL shall be considered to be zero for the calculation purposes. When reporting:
If all individual analvtical results are less than the PQL, the permittee shall report either "BDL" or "<X" (where X = the
actual PQL achieved by the laboratory), following the guidance above.
Permit, Part I
Page 19 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
If one or more individual results is greater than the PQL, an average shall be calculated and reported. Note that it does
not matter if the final calculated average is greater or less than the PQL, it must be reported as a value.
Note that when calculating T.I.N. for a single sampling event, any value less than the PQL (for total ammonia, total
nitrite, or total nitrate) shall be treated as zero. The T.I.N. concentration for a single sampling event shall then be
determined as the sum of the analytical results (zeros if applicable) of same day sampling for total ammonia and total
nitrite and total nitrate. From these calculated T.I.N. concentrations, the daily maximum and thirty day average
concentrations shall be calculated and must be reported as a value.
The present lowest PQLs for specific parameters, as determined by the State Laboratory (November 2008) are provided
below. If the analytical method cannot achieve a PQL that is 'less than or equal to the permit limit, then the method, or a
more precise method, must achieve a PQL that is less than or equal to the PQL in the table below. A listing of the PQLs for
organic parameters that must meet the above requirement can be found in the Division's Practical Quantitation Limitation
Guidance Document, July 2008.
For nonylphenol, until such time as there is an EPA 40 CFR Part 136 method, the State is approving use of ASTM
Methods D7065 and D7485. Until a statewide PQL has been developed, the permittee shall use either the default
PQLs listed in the table below, or develop their own site-specific PQL in accordance with the Practical Quantitation
Limitation Guidance Document (July 2008) for Organic Parameters. This document is available on the Division's
website at www.coloradowaternermits.com . The delayed effective date for the monitoring requirement allows time
for the permittee to develop a site-specific PQL.
These limits apply to the total recoverable or the potentially dissolved fraction of metals.
For hexavalent chromium, samples must be unacidified so dissolved concentrations will be measured rather than potentially
dissolved concentrations.
Parameter
Practical
Quantitation
Limits,
Parameter
Practical
Quantitation
Limits, /1
Aluminum
50 µg/l
Mercury
0.1 µ /1
Ammonia
I mg/1
Mercury (low-level)
0.003 pg/1
Arsenic
1 µg/1
Nickel
50 µg/1
Barium
5 µg/I
N -Ammonia
50 µ /l
Beryllium
1 µg/1
N Nitrate/Nitrite
0.5 mg/1
BOD / CBOD
1 m l
N -Nitrate
50 /l.
Boron
50 1
N -Nitrite
10 µ l
Cadmium
1 µ I
Total Nitrogen
0.5 mg/1
Calcium
20 µg/l
Phenols
100 µ /l
Chloride
2 mg/I
Phosphorus
10 µg/1
Chlorine
0.1 mg/1
Radium 226
1 pCi/l
Total Residual Chlorine
Radium 228
1 pCi/l
DPD colorimetric
0.10 m g /I
Selenium
1 µg/1
Amperometric titration
0.05 mg/1
Silver
0.5 g/1
Chromium
20 µ /l
Sodium
0.2 mg/1
Chromium, Hexavalent
20 µg/1
Sulfate
5 mg/1
Copper
5 µg/1
Sulfide
0.2 mg/1
Cyanide (Direct / Distilled)
10 µg/1
Total Dissolved Solids
10 m I
Cyanide, WAD+A47
5 µg/1
Total. Suspended Solids
10 mg/1
Fluoride
0.1 mg/1
Thallium
I µ /1
Iron
10 µg/1
Uranium
1 µ /l
Lead
I µg/1
Zinc
10 µ /l
Magnesium
20 4g/1
Nonylphenol D7065
10 1
Manganese
2 µg/1
I Nonylphenol D7485
0.33 µ 1
Permit, Part 1
Page 20 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
6. Records
a. The permittee shall establish and maintain records. Those records shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
L The date, type, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
ii. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;
iii. The date(s) the analyses were performed;
iv. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;
v. The analytical techniques or methods used; and
vi. The results of such analyses.
b. The permittee shall retain for a minimum of three (3) years records of all monitoring information, including all original
strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, all calibration and maintenance records, copies of all
reports required by this permit and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit. This period of
retention shall be extended during the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the discharge of pollutants by the
permittee or when requested by the Division or Regional Administrator.
7. Flow Measuring Devices
Unless exempted in Part I.A.2 of this permit, flow metering at the headworks shall be provided to give representative values
of throughput and treatment of the wastewater system. The metering device shall be equipped with a local flow indication
instrument and a flow indication-recording-totalization device suitable for providing permanent flow records, which should
be in the plant control building.
For mechanical facilities, where influent flow metering is not practical and the same results may be obtained from metering at
the effluent end of the treatment facility, this type of flow metering arrangement will be considered, and if approved, noted in
Part LA2 of this permit. For lagoons, an instantaneous or continuous effluent flow measuring device shall be required in
addition to the above described influent flow measuring device.
At the request of the Division, the permittee must be able to show proof of the accuracy of any flow -measuring device used
in obtaining data submitted in the monitoring report. The flow -measuring device must indicate values within ten (10) percent
of the actual flow entering the facility.
8. Sienatory Requirements
a. All reports and other information required by the Division, shall be signed and certified for accuracy by the permittee in
accord with the following criteria:
i) In the case of corporations, by a responsible corporate officer. For purposes of this section, the responsible
corporate officer is responsible for the overall operation of the facility from which the discharge described in the
form originates;
ii) In the case of a partnership, by a general partner;
iii) In the case of a sole proprietorship, by the proprietor;
iv) In the case of a municipal, state, or other public facility, by either a principal executive officer, or ranking elected
official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer has responsibility for the overall operation of the
facility from which the discharge originates;
v) By a duly authorized representative of a person described above, only if-
1)
E
l) The authorization is made in writing by a person described in i, ii, iii, or iv above;
2) The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of
the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field,
superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility
Permit, Part I
Page 21 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named
individual or any individual occupying a named position); and,
3) The written authorization is submitted to the Division.
b. If an authorization as described in this section is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has
responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of this section must
be submitted to the Division prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an
authorized representative.
The permittee, or the duly authorized representative shall make and sign the following certification on all such
documents:
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible
for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of
fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permit, Part II
Page 22 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
PART II
A. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
1. Notification to Parties
All notification requirements under this section shall be directed as follows:
a. Oral Notifications, during normal business hours shall be to:
Water Quality Protection Section - Domestic Compliance Program
Water Quality Control Division
Telephone: (303) 692-3500
b. Written notification shall be to:
Water Quality Protection Section - Domestic Compliance Program
Water Quality Control Division
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
WQCD-WQP-B2
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80246-1530
2. Chante in Discharge
The permittee shall notify the Division, in writing, of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility.
Notice is required only when:
a. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged, or;
b. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the permittee's sludge use or disposal practices, and such
alteration, addition, or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or absent in the
existing permit, including notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported pursuant to an approved land
application plan.
The permittee shall give advance notice to the Division of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which
may result in noncompliance with permit requirements.
Whenever notification of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility is required pursuant to this
section, the permittee shall furnish the Division such plans and specifications which the Division deems reasonably necessary
to evaluate the effect on the discharge, the stream, or ground water. If the Division finds that such new or altered discharge
might be inconsistent with the conditions of the permit, the Division shall require a new or revised permit application and
shall follow the procedures specified in Sections 61.5 through 61.6, and 61.15 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System
Regulations.
3. Special Notifications - Definitions
a. Bypass: The intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility.
b. Severe Property Damage: Substantial physical damage to property at the treatment facilities which causes them to
become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in
the absence of a bypass. It does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production.
c. Upset: An exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with permit effluent
limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance
to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of
preventative maintenance, or careless or improper operation.
Permit, Part II
Page 23 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
4. Noncompliance Notification
a. If, for any reason, the permittee does not comply with or will be unable to comply with any discharge limitations or
standards specified in this permit, the permittee shall, at a minimum, provide the Division and EPA with the following
information:
i) A description of the discharge and cause of noncompliance;
ii) The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times and/or the anticipated time when the discharge will
return to compliance; and
iii) Steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncomplying discharge.
b. The permittee shall report the following circumstances orally within twenty-four (24) hours from the time the
permittee becomes aware of the circumstances, and shall mail to the Division a written report containing the information
requested in Part II.A.4 (a) within five (5) working days after becoming aware of the following circumstances:
i) Circumstances leading to any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment regardless of the cause
of the incident;
ii) Circumstances leading to any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitations in the permit;
iii) Circumstances leading to any upset which causes an exceedance of any effluent limitation in the permit;
iv) Daily maximum violations for any of the pollutants limited by Part LA of this permit and specified as requiring 24-
hour notification. This includes any toxic pollutant or hazardous substance or any pollutant specifically identified as
the method to control any toxic pollutant or hazardous substance.
c. Unless otherwise indicated in this permit, the permittee shall report instances of non-compliance which are not required
to be reported within 24 -hours at the time Discharge Monitoring Reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the
information listed in sub -paragraph (a) of this section.
5. Other Notification Requirements
Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any
compliance schedule in the permit shall be submitted no later than fourteen (14) calendar days following each scheduled date,
unless otherwise provided by the Division.
The permittee shall notify the Division, in writing, thirty (30) calendar days in advance of a proposed transfer of permit as
provided in Part II.B.3.
The permittee's notification of all anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.
All existing manufacturing, commercial, mining, and silvicultural dischargers must notify the Division as soon as they know
or have reason to believe:
a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any
toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification
levels":
i) One hundred micrograms per liter (100 µg/1);
ii) Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 µg/1) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500
µg/1) for 2.4-dinitrophenol and 2-methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1.0 mg/1) for antimony;
iii) Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application in accordance
with Section 61.4(2)(g).
Permit, Part II
Page 24 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
iv) The level established by the Division in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 122.44(f).
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non -routine or infrequent basis, of
a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification
levels":
i) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 µg/1);
ii) One milligram per liter (I mg/1) for antimony; and
iii) Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
iv) The level established by the Division in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 122.44(f).
6. Bypass Notification
If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, a notice shall be submitted, at least ten (10) calendar days before
the date of the bypass, to the Division. The bypass shall be subject to Division approval and limitations imposed by the
Division. Violations of requirements imposed by the Division will constitute a violation of this permit.
7. Upsets
a. Effect of an Upset
An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with permit effluent limitations if the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this section are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims
that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject
to judicial review.
b. Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Upset
A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly signed
contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:
i) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the specific cause(s) of the upset; and
ii) The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated and maintained; and
iii) The permittee submitted proper notice of the upset as required in Part II.A.4. of this permit (24-hour notice); and
iv) The permittee complied with any remedial measure necessary to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or
disposal in violation of this permit which has a reason able likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the
environment.
In addition to the demonstration required above, a permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset for
a violation of effluent limitations based upon water quality standards shall also demonstrate through monitoring,
modeling or other methods that the relevant standards were achieved in the receiving water.
c. Burden of Proof
In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof.
8. Discharee Point
Any discharge to the waters of the State from a point source other than specifically authorized by this permit is prohibited.
Permit, Part II
Page 25 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
9. Proper Operation and Maintenance
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control including all
portions of the collection system and lift stations owned by the permittee (and related appurtenances) which are installed or
used by the permittee as necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and
maintenance includes effective performance and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality
assurance procedures (40 CFR 122.41(e). This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar
systems which are installed by the permittee only when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit.
10. Minimization of Adverse Impact
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge of sludge use or disposal in violation of
this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. As necessary,
accelerated or additional monitoring to determine the nature and impact of the noncomplying discharge is required.
11. Removed Substances
Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters shall be disposed in
accordance with applicable state and federal regulations.
For all domestic wastewater treatment works, at industrial facilities, the permittee shall dispose of sludge in accordance with
all State and Federal regulations.
12. Submission of Incorrect or Incomplete Information
Where the permittee failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit
application or report to the Division, the permittee shall promptly submit the relevant information which was not submitted or
any additional information needed to correct any erroneous information previously submitted.
13. B ass
a. Bypasses are prohibited and the Division may take enforcement action against the permittee for bypass, unless:
i) The bypass is unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage;
ii) There were no feasible alternatives to bypass such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated
wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate
back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a
bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
iii) Proper notices were submitted in compliance with Part II.A.4.
b. "Severe property damage" as used in this Subsection means substantial physical damage to the treatment facilities which
causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be
expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in
production.
c. The permittee may allow a bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is
for essential maintenance or to assure optimal operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of paragraph
(a) above.
d. The Division may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering adverse effects, if the Division determines that the
bypass will meet the conditions specified in paragraph (a) above.
14. Reduction, Loss, or Failure of Treatment Facility
The permittee has the duty to halt or reduce any activity if necessary to maintain compliance with the effluent limitations of
Permit, Part II
Page 26 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
the permit. Upon reduction, loss, or failure of the treatment facility, the permittee shall, to the extent necessary to maintain
compliance with its permit, control production, control sources of wastewater, or all discharges, until the facility is restored
or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This provision also applies to power failures, unless an alternative power
source sufficient to operate the wastewater control facilities is provided.
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would be necessary to halt or reduce the permitted
activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.
B. RESPONSIBILITIES
1. Inspections and Right to Entry
The permittee shall allow the Division and/or the authorized representative, upon the presentation of credentials:
a. To enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or in which any records are
required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit;
b. At reasonable times to have access to and copy any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this
permit and to inspect any monitoring equipment or monitoring method required in the permit; and
c. To enter upon the permittee's premises in a reasonable manner and at a reasonable time to inspect and/or investigate, any
actual, suspected, or potential source of water pollution, or to ascertain compliance or non compliance with the Colorado
Water Quality Control Act or any other applicable state or federal statute or regulation or any order promulgated by the
Division. The investigation may include, but is not limited to, the following: sampling of any discharge and/or process
waters, the taking of photographs, interviewing of any person having knowledge related to the discharge permit or
alleged violation, access to any and all facilities or areas within the permittee's premises that may have any effect on the
discharge, permit, or alleged violation. Such entry is also authorized for the purpose of inspecting and copying records
required to be kept concerning any effluent source.
d. The permittee shall provide access to the Division to sample the discharge at a point after the final treatment process but
prior to the discharge mixing with state waters upon presentation of proper credentials.
In the making of such inspections, investigations, and determinations, the Division, insofar as practicable, may designate as
its authorized representatives any qualified personnel of the Department of Agriculture. The Division may also request
assistance from any other state or local agency or institution.
2. Duty to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Division, within a reasonable time, any information which the Division may request to
determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance
with this permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Division, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this
permit.
3. Transfer of Ownership or Control
a. Except as provided in paragraph b. of this section, a permit maybe transferred by a permittee only if the permit has been
modified or revoked and reissued as provided in Section 61.8(8) of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations,
to identify the new permittee and to incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Federal Act.
b. A permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if
i) The current permittee notifies the Division in writing 30 calendar days in advance of the proposed transfer date; and
ii) The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittee(s) containing a specific date for
transfer of permit responsibility, coverage and liability between them; and
Permit, Part I1
Page 27 of 34
Permit No. 000040142
iii) The Division does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of its intent to modify, or revoke
and reissue the permit.
iv) Fee requirements of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations, Section 61.15, have been met.
4. Availability of Reports
Except for data determined to be confidential under Section 308 of the Federal Clean Water Act and the Colorado Discharge
Permit System Regulations 5 CCR 1002-61, Section 61.5(4), all reports prepared in accordance with the terms of this permit
shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Division and the Environmental Protection Agency.
The name and address of the permit applicant(s) and permittee(s), permit applications, permits and effluent data shall not be
considered confidential. Knowingly making false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal
penalties as provided for in Section 309 of the Federal Clean Water Act, and Section 25-8-610 C.R.S.
5. Modification, Suspension, Revocation, or Termination of Permits By the Division
The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, termination or a notification of
planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit condition.
a. A permit may be modified, suspended, or terminated in whole or in part during its term for reasons determined by the
Division including, but not limited to, the following:
i) Violation of any terms or conditions of the permit;
ii) Obtaining a permit by misrepresentation or failing to disclose any fact which is material to the granting or denial of
a permit or to the establishment of terms or conditions of the permit; or
iii) Materially false or inaccurate statements or information in the permit application or the permit.
iv) A determination that the permitted activity endangers human health or the classified or existing uses of state waters
and can only be regulated to acceptable levels by permit modifications or termination.
b. A permit may be modified in whole or in part for the following causes, provided that such modification complies with
the provisions of Section 6 1. 10 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations:
i) There are material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility or activity which occurred after
permit issuance which justify the application of permit conditions that are different or absent in the existing permit.
ii) The Division has received new information which was not available at the time of permit issuance (other than
revised regulatidns, guidance, or test methods) and which would have justified the application of different permit
conditions at the time of issuance. For permits issued to new sources or new dischargers, this cause includes
information derived from effluent testing required under Section 61.4(7)(e) of the Colorado Discharge Permit
System Regulations. This provision allows a modification of the permit to include conditions that are less stringent
than the existing permit only to the extent allowed under Section 61.10 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System
Regulations.
iii) The standards or regulations on which the permit was based have been changed by promulgation of amended
standards or regulations or by judicial decision after the permit was issued. Permits maybe modified during their
terms for this cause only as follows:
(A) The permit condition requested to be modified was based on a promulgated effluent limitation guideline, EPA
approved water quality standard, or an effluent limitation set forth in 5 CCR 1002-62, § 62 et seq.; and
(B) EPA has revised, withdrawn, or modified that portion of the regulation or effluent limitation guideline on which
the permit condition was based, or has approved a Commission action with respect to the water quality standard
or effluent limitation on which the permit condition was based; and
Permit, Part II
Page 28 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
(C) The permittee requests modification after the notice of final action by which the EPA effluent limitation
guideline, water quality standard, or effluent limitation is revised, withdrawn, or modified; or
(D) For judicial decisions, a court of competent jurisdiction has remanded and stayed EPA promulgated regulations
or effluent limitation guidelines, if the remand and stay concern that portion of the regulations or guidelines on
which the permit condition was based and a request is filed by the permittee in accordance with this Regulation,
within ninety (90) calendar days of judicial remand.
iv) The Division determines that good cause exists to modify a permit condition because of events over which the
permittee has no control and for which there is no reasonable available remedy.
v) The permittee has received a variance.
vi) When required to incorporate applicable toxic effluent limitation or standards adopted pursuant to § 307(a) of the
Federal act.
vii) When required by the reopener conditions in the permit.
viii) As necessary under 40 C.F.R. 403.8(e), to include a compliance schedule for the development of a pretreatment
program.
ix) When the level of discharge of any pollutant which is not limited in the permit exceeds the level which can be
achieved by the technology-based treatment requirements appropriate to the permittee under Section 61.8(2) of the
Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations.
x) To establish a pollutant notification level required in Section 61.8(5) of the Colorado Discharge Permit System
Regulations.
xi) To correct technical mistakes, such as errors in calculation, or mistaken interpretations of law made in determining
permit conditions, to the extent allowed in Section 6 1. 10 of the Colorado State Discharge Permit System
Regulations.
xii) When required by a permit condition to incorporate a land application plan for beneficial reuse of sewage sludge, to
revise an existing land application plan, or to add a land application plan.
xiii) For any other cause provided in Section 6 1. 10 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations.
c. At the request of a permittee, the Division may modify or terminate a permit and issue a new permit if the following
conditions are met:
i) The Regional Administrator has been notified of the proposed modification or termination and does not object in
writing within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of notification,
ii) The Division finds that the permittee has shown reasonable grounds consistent with the Federal and State statutes
and regulations for such modifications or termination;
iii) Requirements of Section 61.15 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations have been met, and
iv) Requirements of public notice have been met.
d. Permit modification (except for minor modifications), termination or revocation and reissuance actions shall be subject
to the requirements of Sections 61.5(2), 61.5(3), 61.6, 61.7 and 61.15 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System
Regulations. The Division shall act on a permit modification request, other than minor modification requests, within 180
calendar days of receipt thereof. Except for minor modifications, the terms of the existing permit govern and are
enforceable until the newly issued permit is formally modified or revoked and reissued following public notice.
Permit, Part II
Page 29 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
e. Upon consent by the permittee, the Division may make minor permit modifications without following the requirements
of Sections 61.5(2), 61.5(3), 61.7, and 61.15 of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations. Minor
modifications to permits are limited to:
i) Correcting typographical errors; or
ii) Increasing the frequency of monitoring or reporting by the permittee; or
iii) Changing an interim date in a schedule of compliance, provided the new date of compliance is not more than 120
calendar days after the date specific in the existing permit and does not interfere with attainment of the final
compliance date requirement; or
iv) Allowing for a transfer in ownership or operational control of a facility where the Division determines that no other
change in the permit is necessary, provided that a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit
responsibility, coverage and liability between the current and new permittees has been submitted to the Division; or
v) Changing the construction schedule for a discharger which is a new source, but no such change shall affect a
discharger's obligation to have all pollution control equipment installed and in operation prior to discharge; or
vi) Deleting a point source outfall when the discharge from that outfall is terminated and does not result in discharge of
pollutants from other outfalls except in accordance with permit limits.
f. When a permit is modified, only the conditions subject to modification are reopened. If a permit is revoked and reissued,
the entire permit is reopened and subject to revision and the permit is reissued for a new term.
g. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance or termination does not stay
any permit condition.
h. All permit modifications and reissuances are subject to the antibacksliding provisions set forth in 61.10(e) through (g).
6. Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any
responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject to under Section 311 (Oil and Hazardous
Substance Liability) of the Clean Water Act.
7. State Laws
Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any
responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any applicable State law or regulation under authority granted
by Section 510 of the Clean Water Act. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to prevent or limit application of any
emergency power of the division.
8. Permit Violations
Failure to comply with any terms and/or conditions of this permit shall be a violation of this permit. The discharge of any
pollutant identified in this permit more frequently than or at a level in excess of that authorized shall constitute a violation of
the permit. Except as provided in Part LD and Part ILA or B, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee
from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance (40 CFR 122.41(a)(1)).
9. Property Rights
The issuance of this permit does not convey any property or water rights in either real or personal property, or stream flows,
or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any
infringement of Federal, State or local laws or regulations.
Permit, Part II
Page 30 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
10. Severability
The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provisions of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit
to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances and the application of the
remainder of this permit shall not be affected.
11. Renewal Application
If the permittee desires to continue to discharge, a permit renewal application shall be submitted at least one hundred eighty
(180) calendar days before this permit expires. If the permittee anticipates there will be no discharge after the expiration date
of this permit, the Division should be promptly notified so that it can terminate the permit in accordance with Part II.B.5.
12. Confidentiality
Any information relating to any secret process, method of manufacture or production, or sales or marketing data which has
been declared confidential by the permittee, and which may be acquired, ascertained, or discovered, whether in any sampling
investigation, emergency investigation, or otherwise, shall not be publicly disclosed by any member, officer, or employee of
the Commission or the Division, but shall be kept confidential. Any person seeking to invoke the protection of this
Subsection (12) shall bear the burden of proving its applicability. This section shall never be interpreted as preventing full
disclosure of effluent data.
13. Fees
The permittee is required to submit payment of an annual fee as set forth in the 2005 amendments to the Water Quality
Control Act. Section 25-8-502 (1) (b), and the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations 5 CCR 1002-61, Section 61.15
as amended. Failure to submit the required fee when due and payable is a violation of the permit and will result in
enforcement action pursuant to Section 25-8-601 et. seq., C.R.S. 1973 as amended.
14. Duration of Permit
The duration of a permit shall be for a fixed term and shall not exceed five (5) years. Filing of a timely and complete
application shall cause the expired permit to continue in force to the effective date of the new permit. The permit's duration
may be extended only through administrative extensions and not through interim modifications.
15. Section 307 Toxics
If a toxic effluent standard or prohibition, including any applicable schedule of compliance specified, is established by
regulation pursuant to Section 307 of the Federal Act for a toxic pollutant which is present in the permittee's discharge and
such standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation upon such pollutant in the discharge permit, the Division
shall institute proceedings to modify or revoke and reissue the permit to conform to the toxic effluent standard or prohibition.
16. Effect of Permit Issuance
a. The issuance of a permit does not convey any property rights or any exclusive privilege.
b. The issuance of a permit does not authorize any injury to person or property or any invasion of personal rights, nor does
it authorize the infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations.
c. Except for any toxic effluent standard or prohibition imposed under Section 307 of the Federal act or any standard for
sewage sludge use or disposal under Section 405(d) of the Federal act, compliance with a permit during its term
constitutes compliance, for purposes of enforcement, with Sections 301, 302, 306, 318, 403, and 405(a) and (b) of the
Federal act. However, a permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated during its term for cause as set
forth in Section 61.8(8) of the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations.
Permit, Part II
Page 31 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
d. Compliance with a permit condition which implements a particular standard for sewage sludge use or disposal shall be
an affirmative defense in any enforcement action brought for a violation of that standard for sewage sludge use or
disposal.
PART III
CATEGORICAL INDUSTRIES
Aluminum Forming
Asbestos Manufacturing
Battery Manufacturing
Builders' Paper and Board Mills
Canned & Preserved Fruits and Vegetables Processing
Canned & Preserved Seafood Processing
Carbon Black Manufacturing
Cement Manufacturing
Coal Mining
Coil Coating
Copper Forming
Dairy Products Processing
Electrical and Electronic Components
Electroplating
Explosives Manufacturing
Feedlots
Ferroalloy Manufacturing
Fertilizer Manufacturing
Glass Manufacturing
Grain Mills
Gum and Wood Chemicals Manufacturing
Hospital
Ink Formulation
Inorganic Chemicals Manufacturing
Iron and Steel Manufacturing
Leather Tanning and Finishing
Permit, Part III
Page 32 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
Meat Products
Metal Finishing
Metal Molding and Casting (Foundries)
Mineral Mining and Processing
Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing
Nonferrous Metals Forming and Metal Powders
Oil and Gas Extraction
Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers
Ore Mining and Dressing
Paint Formulation
Paving and Roofing Materials (Tars and Asphalt)
Pesticide Chemicals
Petroleum Refining
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Phosphate Manufacturing
Photographic
Plastics Molding and Forming
Porcelain Enameling
Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Manufacturing
Rubber Manufacturing
Soap and Detergent Manufacturing
Steam Electric Power Generating
Sugar Processing
Textile Mills
Timber Products Processing
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
ORGANIC TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN EACH OF FOUR FRACTIONS
IN ANALYSIS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROSCOPY (GC/MS)
Volatiles
Base/Neutral
Acid Comaounds
Pesticides
acrolein
acenaphthene
2 -chlorophenol
aldrin
acrylonitrile
acenaphthylene
2,4-dichlorophenol
alpha -BHC
benzene
anthracene
2,4, -dimethylphenol
beta -BHC
bromoform
benzidine
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
gamma -BHC
carbon tetrachloride
benzo(a)anthracene
2,4-dinitrophenol
delta -BHC
chlorobenzene
benzo(a)pyrene
2-nitrophenol
chlordane
chlorodibromomethane
3,4-benzofluoranthene
4-nitrophenol
4,4' -DDT
chloroethane
benzo(ghi)perylene
p -chloro -m -cresol
4,4' -DDE
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
benzo(k)fluoranthene
pentachlorophenol
4,4' -DDD
chloroform
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
phenol
dieldrin
dichlorobromomethane
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2,4,6 -trichlorophenol
alpha-endosulfan
1,1-dichlorethane
bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
beta-endosulfan
1,2-dichlorethane
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
endosulfan sulfate
1, 1 -dichlorethylene
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
endrin
1,2-dichlorpropane
butylbenzyl phthalate
endrin aldehyde
1,3-dichlorpropylene
2-chloronaphthalene
heptachlor
ethylbenzene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
heptachlor epoxide
methyl bromide
chrysene
PCB -1242
methyl chloride
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
PCB -1254
methylene chloride
1,2 -dichlorobenzene
PCB -1221
Permit, Part III
Page 33 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
OTHER TOXIC POLLUTANTS
(METALS AND CYANIDE) AND TOTAL PHENOLS
Antimony, Total
Arsenic. Total
Beryllium, Total
Cadmium, Total
Chromium, Total
Copper, Total
Lead, Total
Mercury, Total
Nickel, Total
Selenium, Total
Silver, Total
Thallium, Total
Zinc, Total
Cyanide, Total
Phenols, Total
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
ORGANIC TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN EACH OF FOUR FRACTIONS
IN ANALYSIS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROSCOPY (GC/MS)
Volatiles
Base/Neutral Acid Compounds
Pesticides
1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane
1,3 -dichlorobenzene
PCB -1232
tetrachloroethylene
1,4 -dichlorobenzene
PCB -1248
toluene
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
PCB -1260
1,2-trans-dichloroethylene
diethyl phthalate
PCB -1016
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
dimethyl phthalate
toxaphene
1,1,2 -trichloroethane
di -n -butyl phthalate
trichloroethylene
2,4-dinitrotoluene
vinyl chloride
2,6-dinitrotoluene
di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-diphenylhydrazine (as azobenzene)
fluorene
fluoranthene
hexachlorobenzene
hexachlorobutadiene
hexachlorcyclopentadiene
hexachloroethane
indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
isophorone
naphthalene
nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
phenanthrene
pyrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
OTHER TOXIC POLLUTANTS
(METALS AND CYANIDE) AND TOTAL PHENOLS
Antimony, Total
Arsenic. Total
Beryllium, Total
Cadmium, Total
Chromium, Total
Copper, Total
Lead, Total
Mercury, Total
Nickel, Total
Selenium, Total
Silver, Total
Thallium, Total
Zinc, Total
Cyanide, Total
Phenols, Total
TOXIC POLLUTANTS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
REQUIRED TO BE IDENTIFIED BY EXISTING DISCHARGERS
IF EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT
Toxic Pollutants
Asbestos
Hazardous Substances
Permit, Part III
Page 34 of 34
Permit No. C00040142
Acetaldehyde
Isoprene
Allyl alcohol
Isopropanolamine
Allyl chloride
Keithane
Amyl acetate
Kepone
Aniline
Malathion
Benzonitrile
Mercaptodimethur
Benzyl chloride
Methoxychlor
Butyl acetate
Methyl mercaptan
Butylamine
Methyl methacrylate
Captan
Methyl parathion
Carbaryl
Mexacarbate
Carbofuran
Monoethyl amine
Carbon disulfide
Monomethyl amine
Chlorpyrifos
Naled
Coumaphos
Napthenic acid
Cresol
Nitrotoluene
Crotonaldehyde
Parathion
Cyclohexane
Phenolsulfanate
2,4-D(2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
Phosgene
Diazinon
Propargite
Dicamba
Propylene oxide
Dichlobenil
Pyrethrins
Dichlone
Quinoline
2,2-Dichloropropionic acid
Resorcinol
Dichlorvos
Strontium
Diethyl amine
Strychnine
Dimethyl amine
Styrene
Dinitrobenzene
TDE (Tetrachlorodiphenylethane)
Diquat
2,4,5-T (2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy acetic acid)
Disulfoton
2,4,5 -TP [2-(2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy) propanoic acid]
Diuron
Trichlorofan
Epichlorohydrin
Triethylamine
Ethanolamine
Trimethylamine
Ethion
Uranium
Ethylene diamine
Vandium
Ethylene dibromide
Vinyl Acetate
Formaldehyde
Xylene
Furfural
Xylenol
Guthion
Zirconium
Geotechnical
Environmental
Water Resources
Ecological
Memo
To: Gene Riordan, Vranesh & Raisch
From: Steve Canton, Carrie Claytor, and Amanda Kovach
Date: July 11, 2014
Re: Recommended scope of work for issues related to the copper permit limit for the Town of
Fraser, Colorado
GEI Consultants, Inc. (GEI) has prepared this proposed scope of work to assist the Town of
Fraser, Colorado (Fraser), who discharges through the Fraser Valley Wastewater Treatment
Plant (FVTP), with issues related to their copper permit limit and the potential development
of site-specific standards for the Upper Colorado River Basin Segment 10c. This segment is
currently defined as:Mainstem of the Fraser River from a point immediately below the
Hammond Ditch to the confluence with the Colorado River.
Copper Compliance and Water Quality Standards
It is our understanding that Fraser has been issued an amended NPDES permit
(CO0040142) with a compliance schedule for copper (plus, the compliance schedule also
includes cyanide and mercury) extending until October 2016. The compliance schedule
describes recommended activities intended to assist Fraser in meeting final copper limits.
The compliance schedule consists of the following steps and deadlines:
Table 1: Fraser compliance schedule with related GEI tasks
(GEI tasks pertain only to copper.)
Proposed
Event Description Due Date
GEI Task
Submit a plan identifying strategies to detect
Facility
sources of dissolved copper, free cyanide, and total 4/30/2013 -
Evaluation Plan
mercury in the wastewater treatment facility.
Submit a report that identifies sources of dissolved
Facility
copper, free cyanide, and total mercury in the 4/30/2014 -
Evaluation Plan
wastewater treatment facility.
Submit a report identifying strategies to control
Implementation
sources such that compliance with the final copper, 4/30/2015 Tasks 1-5
Schedule
cyanide, and mercury limitations may be attained.
Submit a progress report summarizing the progress
Implementation in implementing the strategies to control sources
4/30/2016 Tasks 1-5
Schedule such that compliance with the final copper, cyanide,
and mercury limitations may be attained.
Achieve Final
Submit study results that show compliance has
Compliance
been attained with the final copper, cyanide, and 10/31/2016 Tasks 6-7
Discharge
mercury limitations.
Limits
GEI Consultants, Inc.
4601 DTC Boulevard, Suite 900, Denver, CO 80237
303.662.0100 fax: 303.662.8757
Memo Page 1
www.geiconsultants.com
Memo Page 2 July 11, 2014
Gene Riordan, Vranesh & Raisch
In order to assist Fraser in satisfying the requirements of the copper compliance schedule
we have developed a series of tasks focused around collecting the data necessary to
determine if the existing in-stream copper standards, which are the basis for the associated
permit limit, are appropriate or if site-specific copper standards for Segment 10c should be
considered.
If site-specific standards appear to be a viable solution, there are two options for proposing
such standards. Since the Upper and Lower Colorado Basin hearing was just completed,
the first and most desirable option (as a result of its smaller size) would be to request a
special hearing to be held in conjunction with the December 2015 Temporary Modifications
Hearing. In order to meet the schedule for this hearing, data collection will need to begin as
soon as possible. Alternatively, if additional time is needed for data collection and analysis,
a special hearing to be held spring 2016 or perhaps in conjunction with the June 2016 Basic
Standards Hearing could be targeted.
As described in detail below, our general approach would be to review all relevant existing
data and also work with Fraser, FVTP, and/or Grand County Water Information Network
(GCWIN) to collect data necessary to use the biotic ligand model (BLM), and more
specifically, implement this model to develop standards using the “fixed monitoring
benchmark” (FMB) guidance (EPA 2012). The BLM and FMB combine to provide the most
scientifically defensible approach available for deriving site-specific copper standards that
reflect the moderating effects of water quality characteristics on the toxicity of copper. Use of
these methods often results in considerable permit relief, while still being fully protective of
aquatic life. GEI used this approach successfully at last the June 2013 Arkansas Basin
Hearing in which the Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) and US Environmental
Protection Agency Region 8 (EPA), approved an FMB-based copper standard for upper
Monument Creek. The same methodology is also being used by GEI to propose site-specific
copper standards for multiple clients in the December 2014 Temporary Modifications
Hearing and the 2015 South Platte Basin Hearing.
Task 1: Review of existing data
The first task will be to conduct an analysis of existing data. The GCWIN database was
briefly evaluated for publically available data that could be used in implementing the
BLM/FMB approach. It was determined that the specific BLM/FMB data needs would not be
met using this dataset. We have noted the presence of FVTP effluent data, as well as data
for upstream and downstream locations in Fraser’s Source Identification Memo to the
Colorado department of Public Health and Environment (June 27, 2014). This task would
include the review of these and any other data that Fraser is able to provide.
Task 2: Study design
Taking any existing data into consideration, the second task is to design a sampling plan to
collect all the data necessary for use in developing site-specific standards for copper using
the BLM/FMB method. We recommend the placement of four sampling sites along Segment
10c; one site upstream of the FVTP and three sites downstream of the FVTP. Sampling at
these sites would need to include measurements of all BLM parameters, as well as
dissolved copper concentrations.
Any dataset used to derive BLM/FMB-based standards will need to meet all of the below
criteria:
Memo Page 3 July 11, 2014
Gene Riordan, Vranesh & Raisch
At least 20 samples representing water quality over multiple seasons and flow
conditions (i.e., capturing a full year of temporal variability);
Contain data for: temperature, pH, DOC, Ca, Mg, Na, K, SO, Cl, and alkalinity;
4
Contain data for dissolved copper.
Dissolved copper must be analyzed with an appropriately low detection limit
o
(e.g., 1 µg/L) so that no more than 80 percent of measured copper
concentrations are below detection limits.
GEI may also coordinate a meeting between Fraser and the Colorado WQCD after some
preliminary data are available, to determine if the study design satisfies their requirements
for site-specific standards on this segment.
Task 3: Sampling coordination
The third task would involve collecting the samples described above. We recommend that
GEI not be responsible for the actual sampling activities due to the distance of Segment 10c
from GEI’s office locations and associated costs. Instead, we would work with Fraser, FVTP,
and possibly GCWIN to determine which party or combinations of parties would collect the
samples and transfer them to the analytical laboratory. We recommend that ACZ
Laboratories, Inc. be responsible for analysis of the BLM parameters as well as dissolved
copper, and so all samples would be delivered to their facility in Steamboat Springs,
Colorado. Bi-monthly sampling should commence as soon as possible in order to collect
sufficient data for exploring the BLM/FMB approach as a means to address the existing
copper compliance schedule in the timeframe allowed.
Task 4: Analytical coordination
The fourth task would involve work to coordinate efforts between the field and laboratory
staff. This would include correspondence with both parties to ensure that adequate sampling
containers and equipment are available to the field staff, and that samples are received by
the lab staff within the analytical holding times. This task would also involve communications
with the lab staff before, during, and after analysis to obtain analytical cost estimates,
answer any questions regarding field conditions (if necessary), help validate the analytical
results, and maintain the project database.
Task 5: Analysis, reporting, and compliance
The fifth task would involve data analysis and reporting. This would include running
BLM/FMB calculations using the data collected during tasks 3 and 4, and preparing periodic
study update memos to summarize the outcome of these analyses and provide our
recommendations for how to proceed with BLM/FMB-based copper standards for Segment
10c. This effort may include running the BLM/FMB either using individual monitoring
locations or by combining data from multiple sites to generate a single FMB.
As part of this task, GEI also would assist Fraser in meeting the upcoming, copper-related
requirements of the compliance schedule (i.e., Implementation Schedules). GEI would help
craft language and provide analyses to convey to the Permits section of the Colorado
Department of Public Health and the Environment (CDPHE) Fraser’s intent to explore
compliance by evaluating the appropriateness of the permit limit’s underlying in-stream
copper standard. GEI would also be available to review documents drafted by Fraser prior
to submission to CDPHE.
Memo Page 4 July 11, 2014
Gene Riordan, Vranesh & Raisch
Task 6: Regulatory support
The sixth task would be geared toward regulatory support in preparation for the Special
Hearing to be held in conjunction with either the December 2015 Temporary Modifications
Hearing, spring 2016, or the June 2016 Basic Standards Hearing. Again, the specific
Hearing that Fraser may participate in will depend primarily on the date at which sampling is
begun and the associated availability of adequate data. Specifically, this task would include
the development of materials for the Hearing notice, the prehearing statement and
corresponding technical report/testimony, rebuttals, and participating in the Hearing itself.
This task would likely also include a meeting between Fraser, GEI and the Water Quality
Control Division (WQCD) to summarize the findings and potential site-specific copper
standard proposal prior to the Hearing.
Task 7: Permitting assistance
In this final task, GEI would be available to provide support during the permit renewal
process, should Fraser require assistance.
Schedule and Estimated Costs
Upon authorization, GEI would develop a formal Sampling and Analysis Plan/Quality
Assurance Project Plan (SAP/QAPP) for review by Fraser so water quality sampling can
begin in as soon as possible. If sampling is begun during summer 2014, it is likely that
Fraser could target the 2015 Temporary Modifications Hearing.
As samples are analyzed, we will do a brief review and compile data in an on-going basis.
Assuming sampling begins in summer 2014, we would begin running data through the
BLM/FMB calculations in late fall 2014 in order to begin evaluating the most appropriate way
to calculate an FMB for this segment.
Total estimated costs for the proposed tasks are provided below.
Table 2: Estimated costs for copper compliance and water quality standards tasks
Tasks Total ($)
1: Review of existing data 4,000
2: Study design 7,000
3: Sampling coordination *3,000
4: Lab Costs and Analytical coordination **15,900
5: Analysis and reporting 14,500
6: Regulatory support 16,200
7: Permitting assistance TBD
Total 60,600
*Represents GEI’s effort to coordinate sampling only-does not represent the cost incurred by the field staff, who have yet to be
determined.
**Represents analytical and shipping costs as well as GEI’s effort to coordinate analytical work. Assumes four sampling
locations and that sample filtering will be conducted by the analytical lab (ACZ).
Thank you for the opportunity to present you with this proposed scope of work and please
call if you have any questions.
TOWN OF FRASER
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-08-01
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH
GEI CONSULTANTS INC. FOR A STUDY RELATED TO COPPER LIMITS WITHIN THE
DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
WHEREAS, the Town of Fraser is the Manager of the Joint Facilities on behalf of the member
entities; and
WHEREAS, the Fraser Valley Wastewater Treatment
outlines copper limits within the discharge permit compliance schedule; and
WHEREAS, the proposed study will provide analyses to covey to the Permits section of the
-stream copper standard.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
FRASER, COLORADO THAT:
1. The Town Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract with GEI Consultants Inc.
not to exceed $60,600.
READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
th
THIS 6 DAY OF AUGUST, 2014.
Votes in favor: ___ BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
Votes opposed: ___ TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO
Absent: ___
Abstained: ___ BY:
Mayor
ATTEST:
( S E A L )
Town Clerk
MEMO TO: Mayor Smith and the Board of Trustees
FROM: Joe Fuqua, Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent
DATE: 29 July 2014
SUBJECT: Discharge Permit Compliance for Metals
MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Staff is seeking authorization to enter into contract for a study that
is necessary because pursuant to our permit we are required to identify sources of metals that
are being discharged from the treatment plant and identify how we will meet permit limits for
those metals.
ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize staff to enter into a contract with GEI Consultants to perform
the attached scope of work.
BACKGROUND: In accordance with the compliance schedule attached to the discharge permit,
the treatment plant is required to perform some studies and testing in order to locate the
sources of metals that are being discharged to the treatment plant. Those metals requiring
further research were: free cyanide, total mercury, dissolved copper, dissolved hexavalent
chromium, and total recoverable arsenic. In our testing and research, we have solutions or can
meet permit requirements for all of the above listed metals except copper. The copper is
believed to coming from the water service lines and the indoor plumbing. I would note that our
public water supply systems are allowed 1300 µg/L of copper by those permits (which all three
entities comply with) but the wastewater plant can only discharge 7.3 µg/L. The plant, like most
public systems, was not designed to remove metals during the treatment process.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Do nothing and pay fines and penalties imposed by the health department.
2) Enter into contract with GEI with the goal of amending our permit limits or
higher discharge limits for the Fraser River.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
3) Build a new facility at the plant to remove metals from the wastewater. This
would cost between 5 to 7 million dollars and increase operation costs for this
like sludge disposal because of the metals.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
This study was not anticipated in 2014 Budget. This direction has been identified during 2014
during our permit compliance discussions and we believe to be far more cost effective, both
short term and long term, than any other alternatives we have identified.
Given progress on other budgeted projects, we will remain well under budget at year end. No
amendments to the 2014 Budget are anticipated.
All three entities have been included in these discussions and support this work.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend approval of Resolution 2014-08-01 authorizing
the Town Manager to enter in contract with GEI consultants.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
Permit, Part I
Page 10 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
d. Toxicity Reopener
This permit may be reopened and modified to include additional or modified numerical permit limitations, new or
modified compliance response requirements, changes in the WET testing protocol, the addition of both acute and chronic
WET requirements, or any other conditions related to the control of toxicants.
6. Compliance Schedule(s)
All information and written reports required by the following compliance schedules should be directed to the Permits Section
for final review unless otherwise stated.
a. Mixing Zone Analyses — Conduct remaining threshold tests for exclusion from further analysis under Mixing Zone
Regulations. The second threshold test is the Application of the Mixing Zone Exclusion Tables (p. 20, Colorado Mixing
Zone Implementation Guidance, February 2002). Under this compliance action, the permittee will collect the necessary site-
specific data, perform the required analysis, and provide a report to the Division. The report will indicate the findings of this
threshold test and, if not excluded, provide the workplan for the next threshold test (i.e., determining of the size of the
physical and regulatory mixing zones).
Code Event Description Due Date
50008 Submit Study Collect site-specific data, perform threshold tests based on 04/30/2013
Results Mixing Zone Exclusion Tables, and submit study results.
50008 Submit Study If a low flow condition is not reached on the receiving water 04/30/2014
Results during the first year, the permittee shall collect the site-specific
data, perform threshold tests based on Mixing Zone Exclusion
Tables, and submit study results.
b. Activities to Meet Dissolved Copper, Free Cyanide, and Total Mercmy Final Limits — In order to meet dissolved copper,
free cyanide, and total mercury limitations, the following schedule will be included in the permit.
Code Event Description
Due Date
43699 Facility Submit a plan identifying strategies to detect sources of dissolved 04/30/2013
Evaluation Plan copper, free cyanide, and total mercury in the wastewater
treatment facility.
43699 Facility Submit a report that identifies sources of dissolved copper, free 04/30/2014
Evaluation Plan cvanide, and total mercuiv to the wastewater treatment facilitti-.
00899 Implementation Submit a report identifying strategies to control sources such that 04/30/2015
Schedule compliance with the final copper, cyanide, and mercury
limitations mai- be attained.
00899 Implementation Submit a progress report summarizing the progress in 04/30/2016
Schedule implementing the strategies to control sources such that
compliance with the final copper, cyanide, and mercury
limitations mai- be attained.
CS017 Achieve Final Submit study results that show compliance has been attained with 10/31/2016
Compliance the final copper, cyanide, and mercury limitations.
with Emissions
or Discharge
Limits
Permit, Part I
Page 11 of 34
Permit No. CO0040142
c. Activities to Meet Total Recoverable Arsenic and Dissolved Hexavalent Chromium Final Limits — In order to meet total
recoverable arsenic and dissolved hexavalent chromium limits, the following compliance schedule has been included in the
permit.
Code Event Description Due Date
22099 Monitoring Plan Design and implementation a monitoring plan to develop a more 04/30/2013
robust characterization of the mean and data distribution for total
recoverable arsenic and dissolved hexavalent chromium.
CSOI I Plan, Report, or Submit a report describing the actions that will be taken to attain 04/30/2014
Scope of Work compliance with the total recoverable arsenic and dissolved
hexavalent chromium limitations.
CS016 Complete Complete all appropriate actions, which will allow the permittee 04/30/2015
Required Work to meet the total recoverable arsenic and dissolved hexavalent
chromium limitations.
No later than 14 calendar days following each date identified in the above schedules of compliance, the permittee shall
submit either a report of progress or, in the case of specific actions being required by identified dates, a written notice of
compliance or noncompliance, any remedial actions taken, and the probability of meeting the next scheduled requirement.
7. Industrial Waste Mana6ement
a. The Permittee has the responsibility to protect the Domestic Wastewater Treatment Works (DWTW), as defined at
section 25.8.103(5) of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, or the Publicly -Owned Treatment Works (POTW), as
defined at 40 CFR section 403.3(q) of the federal pretreatment regulations, from pollutants which would cause pass
through or interference, as defined at 40 CFR 403.3(p) and (k), or otherwise be incompatible with operation of the
treatment works including interference with the use or disposal of municipal sludge.
b. Pretreatment Standards (40 CFR Section 403.5) developed pursuant to Section 307 of the Federal Clean Water Act (the
Act) require that the Permittee shall not allow, under any circumstances, the introduction of the following pollutants to
the DWTW from any source of non-domestic discharge:
i. Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the DWTW, including, but not limited to, wastestreams with a
closed cup flashpoint of less than sixty (60) degrees Centigrade (140 degrees Fahrenheit) using the test methods
specified in 40 CFR Section 261.21:
ii. Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural damage to the DWTW, but in no case discharges with a pH of lower
than 5.0 s.u., unless the treatment facilities are specifically designed to accommodate such discharges:
iii. Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow in the DWTW, or otherwise interfere
with the operation of the DWTW:
iv. Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (e.g., BOD), released in a discharge at a flow rate and/or
pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with any treatment process at the DWTW:
v. Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the DWTW resulting in Interference, but in no case heat in
such quantities that the temperature at the DWTW treatment plant exceeds forty (40) degrees Centigrade (104
degrees Fahrenheit) unless the Approval Authority, upon request of the DWTW, approves alternate temperature
limits:
vi. Petroleum oil, non -biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause
Interference or Pass Through:
MEMO TO: Mayor Smith and the Board of Trustees
FROM: Allen Nordin, Public Works Director, CWP
DATE: August 6, 2014
SUBJECT: Staff Report PW: Work Vehicle Purchase- REVISED
MATTER BEFORE BOARD:
The Public Works (PW) department is seeking board approval for additional funds in addition to the
previously approved $20,000 for the purchase of two used work vehicles.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve Resolution No. 2014-08-02 hereby authorizing the Town manager to expend up to
$40,000 for the purchase of two (2) work trucks for Public Works. This resolution would repeal and
replace the previous Resolution 2014-06-01.
BACKGROUND:
After receiving approval for the purchase of two used work trucks in June, staff began researching two
work truck purchases that would suit our needs. We quickly discovered that the used truck purchased
in 2007 at auction, was at a price level that is no longer a reality. In 2007, the construction industry had
tanked leaving a surplus of work trucks from large construction companies that were much newer
models with low mileage and at fire-sale pricing. There were also many more auction companies in
business selling off this inventory. Today, I have discovered that with the recovering economy these
deals no longer exist and explains why we are experiencing much higher pricing for older model year
trucks with higher mileage and dealers with limited inventories.
Fast forward to today, we are now in a position where our 1988 work truck is in need of a new
transmission and I simply cannot justify spending $2,000 on this aged vehicle to keep it on the road.
Our initial approach was to purchase a seasonal 2-wheel drive truck that would provide the gardening
staff a tool that would be purely seasonal; however, it would sit idle for several months during the winter
and be of no other use during that time. The other truck was to be a 4-wheel drive utility type of vehicle
that would have a year-round use.
Regrouping, staff feels that the purchase and application of work vehicles should be for year-round use
and not just seasonal use. Pricing levels we are seeing today with front range dealers (or auction if
available) for the purchase for truck model years ranging from 2002 to 2010 with cost between
$16,000 - $30,000.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
Also during the June meeting I informed the board that I would be bringing another CERF equipment
purchase to them this month, that being a new V-Box sander that was slated for replacement this year
at a cost of $20,000. Given my underestimation of the funding requirements for replacement work
trucks, staff reevaluated the need to replace the V-Box sander to see if it has the ability to last another
2 winters It was confirmed that it should be able to last through the 2017 winter season barring any
major, unforeseen issues that might arise.
I would like to entertain a discussion that we use the $20,000 currently in the CERF for replacement
vehicles in addition to the $20,000 available for the V-Box replacement combining those amounts
towards the purchase of two work trucks for a total expenditure not-to-exceed $40,000.
FINANCIAL:
I have attached an updated version of the 2014 Capital Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF) budget
for vehicle expenditures for your review and which includes $50,000 for new purchases and $45,418 in
lease purchase payments related to the street sweeper (CERF expenditure lines 30-40-745 30-40-
910). The 2014 budget anticipates a fund balance of nearly $440,000 at year end.
PW maintains a projected 10-year fleet rotation schedule which is updated annually for the Capital
Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF) as a planning tool to assist with identifying what our long term
equipment and vehicle replacement needs will be as well as adding new inventory to the fleet as the
Town grows (including additional snow and ice trucks, loaders, specialized equipment that is location
specific, etc.). The estimated purchase prices and anticipated years of purchases used in the
worksheet are merely estimates based on current fleet status in addition to the last type of
equipment/vehicle purchased while applying a 5-7 percent annual cost increase.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. No additional funds approved. Amend the resolution to allow for the purchase of either one or
two trucks with the previously approved amount of $20,000.
2. Approve an expenditure in between the $20,000 to $40,000 amount.
3. Lease a truck for the remainder of the year for the gardening staff to perform their gardening
duties.
4. Eliminate the number of remote planters and planter beds that are currently being maintained
thus minimizing the need for one of the two additional work trucks.
PW continues to maintained a lean (and aging) fleet of work vehicles and we been very diligent with our
requests for work truck (and CERF) purchases for many years now. There are no apparent
alternatives or solutions to solving the matter of replacement vehicles. We need to replace at a
minimum of one truck this year in order to provide staff with the proper tools for the job to be able to
efficiently and effectively cover the vast areas of our maintenance programs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval for expenditures from the 2014 Capital Equipment Replacement Fund
(CERF) in the amount Not-To-Exceed of $40,000 for the purchase of two (2) work trucks for public
works.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
MEMO TO: Mayor Smith and the Board of Trustees
FROM: Allen Nordin, Public Works Director, CWP
DATE: June 11, 2014
SUBJECT: Staff Report PW: Work Vehicle Purchase
MATTER BEFORE BOARD:
The Public Works (PW) department is seeking board approval forthe expenditure of budgeted
funds for the acquisition of two additional used work vehicles given the aged and aging
condition of our current fleet.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve Resolution No. 2014-06-01 hereby authorizing the Town manager to expend
up to $20,000 for the purchase of two (2) work trucks for Public Works.
BACKGROUND:
The public works department is responsible for the operation and maintenance of many town
owned assets including our water production, distribution and sewer collections systems as well
as the many parks and open spaces, trails, planters and planter beds covering a vast area in
and around town. With our current fleet of aging work trucks we are not able to efficiently and
effectively cover these areas without wasting valuable time and fuel shuttling folks around town
to their various work places. During the summer months the gardeners occupy two of the work
trucks on any given day which can be converted to a noxious weed sprayer truck and another
as a water tank truck for watering beds and planters.
Currently there are two work trucks out of service for either repairs or they have been deemed
terminal. For several weeks now, one of our older work trucks, which is utilized by the
water/collections operators, has been experiencing transmission problems and has spent these
weeks in Denver attempting to be repaired. This unit was purchased new in 2001 and is
th
entering its 14 year of service. It was anticipated to be replaced in 2001
last into 2014. On the subject of fleet rotation, I wanted to give you a bit of background as to
During the years of 2001-2004 the boards were
introduced to the reality that we have been operating an aged fleet of PW vehicles.
Recognizing the need to have safe and reliable work vehicles in order to serve the residents of
the town for providing public health and safety, these boards were supportive of not only
upgrading the fleet with newer, reliable and safe units but also increasing the size of our fleet as
they saw the expanse of our town limits growing.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
In 2001, the fleet consisted of one 1985 medium-duty snow and ice truck; ); three work trucks
1976-1999 vintage, one w/a snow plow; two 1985 & 1996 vintage wheel loaders; a 1996 skid
steer loader; one 19motor grader; one 1992 street sweeper (already used when purchased); a
1985 back hoe and a 1982 tandem axel dump truck. Fast forward to our fleet today
consists of three 2001-08 vintage medium-duty snow and ice trucks; 5 work trucks 1992-2007 (3
w/snow plows); 3 wheel loaders (1996-2008); a 2001 motor grader; a 2012 mini excavator; a
2004 skid steer loader; a 2013 street sweeper and a 1982 tandem axel dump truck.
With a drop in revenues to the General fund in 2008, PW has been anticipating the need to
luctantly the responses were reserved and we
held back from bringing these expenses to the board for these larger expenses whenever
practicable and have been carrying forward these funds from year to year knowing that we will
eventually need to make these purchases.
As an example, w
winter storage this spring, it was discovered that the water pump and clutch need to be
replaced. Past repairs include clutch replacement, exhaust work, brake work, thermostats,
replacement leaf springs, and several electrical issues that have been developing over the past
years. With electrical work there comes a large price tag when it comes to tracing down and
repairing these systems. The time has come that we must now replace this unit as it no longer
makes financial sense to put additional money into a vehicle that has reached the end of its
useful career.
Historically, when purchasing small equipment and vehicles, we have been successful at buying
these through auctions which has allowed us to get more for our dollar. When buying used
vehicles, they are typically retired units from other municipal fleets and generally come with
service maintenance records and overall they are mechanically suitable for our needs. Another
bonus to auctions that we have found is that we can get 2-for-1 purchases since at auction, if
there are several vehicles in a group that is being auctioned, the winning bid is offered the
option to purchase as many of those units at the winning bid amount that they want.
When it comes to purchasing new vehicles through the state bid process/dealers with
government discountwe have realized significant savings. It has been our practice to
research both new and used equipment for cost comparisons and we will continue with that
practice for all equipment and vehicle expenditures. Past experience has shown that when we
purchase through a state bidding process we can generally save upwards of 20 percent on new
equipment/vehicles. This generally off-sets the 15-20 percent instant depreciation one takes if a
new vehicle is purchased through a dealer that does not have the state bid award or
government pricing.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
FINANCIAL:
The 2014 budget for vehicle expenditures includes $50,000 for new purchases and $45,418 in
lease purchase payments related to the street sweeper (CERF expenditure lines 30-40-745
30-40-910). The 2014 budget anticipates a fund balance of nearly $440,000 at year end. Of the
$50,000, $20,000 has been earmarked for the purchase of work vehicles. If we were to trade in
some of our excess administrative vehicle inventory, we would likely receive a better trade-in
value from a dealer than if we put them out for public bid. Another $20,000 has been set aside
for a replacement V-Box sander to replace an 11 year old V-box that has reached the end of its
useful life. The remaining $5,000 was left there for some small equipment purchases.
PW maintains a 10-year fleet rotation schedule which is updated annually for the Capital
Equipment Replacement Fund (CERF) as a planning tool to assist with identifying what our long
term equipment and vehicle replacement needs will be. The estimated purchase prices and
anticipated year of purchases are merely estimates based on current fleet status as well as the
last type of equipment/vehicle purchased and applying a 5-7 percent annual cost increase.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Continue to shuttle staff around town using other work trucks and staff resources which
will affect the amount and quality of work that gets accomplished. This approach will
provide a challenge for getting water and tools to the various work sites, for both
gardeners and utility maintenance personnel.
2. Employ some of our aging administrative fleet. Some of these vehicles are not reliable
and it would again be very time consuming and inefficient for supply and delivery of
water (delivery of water would be by gravity thus extending the time at each site).
3. Purchase and equip three-gardening staff could peddle around
town to the numerous planters and planter beds. This would be very time consuming
and inefficient as water supplies and delivery would be extremely reduced. (max. 5-
gallons/trike and would be by gravity thus extending the time at each site.
4. Purchase one work truck now that could be shared between the gardeners and utility
maintenance staff. If a second truck is determined to be needed staff could again look
for another unit for sale.
5. Eliminate the number of remote planters and planter beds that are currently being
maintained thus minimizing the need for one of the two additional work trucks.
PW has maintained a lean (and aging) fleet of work vehicles and has been very diligent with our
requests for work truck purchases for several years now. There are no apparent
alternatives or solutions to solving the matter of replacement vehicles. By purchasing two
additional work vehicles this will provide staff with the proper tools for the job to be able to
efficiently and effectively cover the vast areas of our maintenance programs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval for expenditures from the 2014 Capital Equipment Replacement
Fund (CERF) in the amount Not-To-Exceed of $20,000 for the purchase of two (2) work trucks
for public works.
ƚǞƓ ƚŅ CƩğƭĻƩ
th .ƚǣ ЌАЉͲ CƩğƭĻƩͲ /h БЉЍЍЋ ƚŅŅźĭĻ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЍВЊ Ņğǣ ВАЉΏАЋЏΏЎЎЊБ
ǞǞǞ͵ŅƩğƭĻƩĭƚƌƚƩğķƚ͵ĭƚƒ
(O
N
O
N
LL�
N
O
N
V
O
N
m
N
O
N
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
NO
N
O
O
N
0
O
O
O
LL�
O)
fA
0
O
O
O
LL�
N
fA
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
fA
0
O
O
O
O
N
fA
O
O
O
LL�
N
O
O
O
O
LL�
0
0
0
O
LL1
fA
O
O
O
O
(O
fA
O
O
O
LL�
M
fA
O
O
O
O
N
fA
o
U
0
0
0
N
fA
0
0
0
N
O
fA
fA
O
O
O
LL�
V
fA
fA
fA
O
O
O
LL�
O)
fA
O
O
O
LL�
N
fA
O
O
O
LL�
O
o
O
N
of
N
O
N
LL�
O
U
O
V
r
0
o
0
in
o
in
U
o
o
o
N
N
r
m
o
U
m
fA
fA
fA
N
�
fA
0
0
0
o
U
o
o
N
of
N
V
V
O
U
O
m
fA
fA
fA
fA
N
�
fA
O
0
O
0
O
o
(0
U
O
o
o
N
LL�
N
O
U
O
fA
fA
fA
N
�
fA
v
O
in
N
O
o
o
O
o
ur
U
(0
U
O
�
O
N
n
N
o
U
O
U
r
m
O
N
O
O
O
o
fA
fA
O
O
LL�
in
N
fA
fA
fA
N
�
N
�
fA
O
O
LL�
in
N
fA
N
O
N
^
�
�
�
O
O
O
O
N
fA
O
O
O
O
N
fA
R
O
H
a
Ool
w
w
a
p
a
U
w
3
3D
U-
O
O
a
O
Q
Q
m
w
af
w
w
K
m
Y
E�
O
z
z
0
o
U
m
cn
J
J
Y
w
-o
N
ii
a
w
w
o
o
W
w
X
N
o
in
N
N
QQ
M
p
Z
o
S
N
Q
S
D
F
W
F
S
F
S
Y
U_
U
d
W
10
}
x
L
o
�
a`J
W
Y
W
Y
O
FO
CD
U
X
X
V
U
>
>
>Q
>
g
N
X
S
d'
d
O
3
O
o
S
>
v
v
C7
z
�S
S
U
S
U
S
U
p
Y
r
r
m
N
o
f
�
F
U
O
N
O
m
o
a
J
F
F
J
F
x
x==
W
W
x
m
F
m
F
W
z
z
Q
Q
Q=
o
`m
U}
U
U
m
0
0
0
0
Q
W
W
U
U
W}}
m
LL,���3
W�
oz=
ooU���
��
�ww0
W
u'S
o
w
N
w
Q
p
p
O
O
O
OW
OW
w
w
LL
M
O
LL
LL�
O
(n
W
O
-a
B
Q
Y
O
O
Y
O
Y
W
O
Z
V
O
�
O
D
O
ii
V
Q
-a
w
Y
N
W
N
O
O
LL�
O
U
N
O
N
O
W
W
m
O
B
Q
ii
O
O
V
O
N
O
(O
O
O
O
m
O
U
I�
O
U
r
O
d
TOWN OF FRASER
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-08-02
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO (2) WORK
TRUCKS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
WHEREAS, the 2014 General Fund, line item Capital Equipment Replacement Fund Budget
provides for the purchase of replacement work vehicles.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
FRASER, COLORADO THAT:
1. The Town Manager is hereby authorized to expend up to $40,000 for the purchase of
two (2) work trucks for the Public Works department as outlined in the Public Works staff
briefing dated June 11, 2014.
2. If approved, Resolution 2014-06-01 will be repealed and replaced by Resolution 2014-
08-02.
READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
th
THIS 6 DAY OF AUGUST, 2014.
Votes in favor: ___ BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
Votes opposed: ___ TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO
Absent: ___
Abstained: ___ BY:
Mayor
ATTEST:
( S E A L )
Town Clerk
MEMO TO: Mayor Smith and the Board of Trustees
FROM: Nathaniel Havens, Finance Manager
DATE: July 30, 2014
SUBJECT: Retirement of the Petersen Trust Fund
MATTER BEFORE BOARD:
The Peterson Trust Fund was established to provide transparency and accountability related to
the expenditure of a bequest from the estate of Larry Peterson. It was established as a Fully
Expendable Fund and can be retired after being fully expended. I see no reason to keep this
Fund on our books and believe it appropriate for the Town Board to retire the Fund via resolution.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve the retirement of the Petersen Trust Fund (PTF), a fully expendable trust fund
via Resolution 2014-08-03
BACKGROUND:
On November 30, 2003 the Town receipted a bequest from the estate of the late Larry Petersen a
.
Larry cared so much for the community he called home and which he raised his family in, that he
chose to give back to its citizens by donating a very large sum of money to the Town. That sum
children, Andrew and Nicki, and the then Town Clerk Vicky Winters) to decide on the projects to
fund for the community with his bequest.
The committee chose the following projects: 1) To fund the refurbishment of a historic fire truck
Larry had held the position of Fire Chief for East Grand Fire 2) To install a lighted flagpole at the
softball fields owned by the FVMRD 3) To provide dugouts at the Aksel Nielson Ball Field at the
Fraser Valley Elementary school 4) Connect the FVMRD ball fields to Town via a trail so the
community could safely access the opportunities at the fields by bike or foot. 5) To invest in
F the Church of
Town of Fraser
PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518
www.frasercolorado.com
The fund along with matching grants and donations and an enormous amount -
community to live in perpetuity. The fund was fully expended in 2012 nine years after the
origination of the Fund. We are particularly proud to note that the $50,000 bequest resulted in
well over $150,000 of community improvements.
This year our Town Auditor, Paul Backes of McMahon and Associates, recommended removing
the Fund from our books via resolution.
Alternatives The only other alternative is -
unnecessary work for our audit staff. The PTF was originally set up as a fully expendable trust
fund. So when the fund is expended it is done.
Financial Implications There are really no financial impacts associated with retiring the fund
other than reducing some billable time auditing and recording comments on the fund during our
yearly audit process.
Recommendation Staff is recommending a motion to retire the Petersen Trust Fund by
Resolution 2014-08-03.
Town of Fraser
PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518
www.frasercolorado.com
TOWN OF FRASER
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-08-03
A RESOLUTION RETIRING THE PETERSON TRUST FUND
WHEREAS, IN 2003 the Town of Fraser received a bequest in the amount of $50,000 from the
Estate of Larry Peterson for community projects, and
WHEREAS, in 2012 the projects that were appropriated funds from this bequest were all
completed resulting in well over $150,000 of community improvements, and
WHEREAS, the Peterson Trust Fund was established as a Fully Expendable Trust Fund that is
to be retired upon fully expending those funds.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
FRASER, COLORADO THAT:
1. The Peterson Trust Fund is hereby retired.
2. On behalf of the community, we express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to both
the estate and family of Larry Peterson.
READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES THIS
th
6 DAY OF AUGUST, 2014.
Votes in favor: ___ BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
Votes opposed: ___ TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO
Absent: ___
Abstained: ___ BY:
Mayor
ATTEST:
( S E A L )
Town Clerk
a
=
O�
00
m
101—
�
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
0
LO
O
LO.
O.
I—
C)
V
(O
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
00
C7
i
Clerk Update: 08/06/2014
Prepared: 07/30/2014
I have spoken with Dan Volpe of Serene Wellness Medical Marijuana Center. He is meeting
with the State on July 31, 2014 to submit his application for a Retail Marijuana License. When
that is completed, , and we will
proceed with the application process. I
We receive inquiries on a weekly basis concerning acceptable retail marijuana locations. We
have yet to see any follow-up from those inquiries, but there is definitely interest in locating in
Fraser.
As always please contact me with any questions or concerns you might have: 726-5491 X201 or
at lberger@town.fraser.co.us.
Lu
Finance Update: 08/06/2014
Prepared: 07/30/2014
Transmitted with your packet this week are the June Financial Statements for both the Town and
the Joint Facility along with the May Sales Tax Report.
With some previousyear take backs by the State in May (taxes paid to Fraser which were
mistakenly paid to the wrong jurisdiction), our forward momentum in sales tax collections dropped
traffic and people we have been seeing in our community the last two months will bode well for
our June and July collections.
Busy doing the behind the scene budget prep as we prepare to begin budget discussions in the
near future.
As always please contact me with any questions or concerns you might have: 726-5491 X206 or
at nhavens@town.fraser.co.us.
Town of Fraser
PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518
www.frasercolorado.com
TOWN OF FRASER - JOINT FACILITIES
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
JOINT FACILITIES FUND
ASSETS
40-10100 CASH ALLOCATED TO OTHER FUNDS 11,623.50
40-10210 JFOC CHECKING -GMB 0318047507 107,878.23
40-10215 GMB MONEY MARKET -O&M RESERVE 31,000.32
40-11550 A/R - WPR 13,039.16
40-11560 A/R - GC#1 20,853.56
40-11570 A/R - TOF 11,539.88
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
40-20920 JFOC O&M RESERVE
TOTAL LIABILITIES
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
3,955.65
191,979.00
3,955.65
195,934.65
191,979.00
3,955.65
195,934.65
TOWN OF FRASER - JOINT FACILITIES
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
JOINT FACILITIES FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
REVENUE
40-30-100
INTEREST- O&M ACCOUNTS
31.86
166.61
400.00
233.39
41.7
40-30-200
O&M REIMBURSEMENT - WPR
13,039.16
80,947.73
235,827.00
154,879.27
34.3
40-30-210
O&M REIMBURSEMENT -GC#1
20,853.56
129,459.94
376,180.00
246,720.06
34.4
40-30-220
O&M REIMBURSEMENT -TOF
11,539.88
71,640.16
204,002.00
132,361.84
35.1
40-30-900
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
.00
3,789.02
2,000.00 (
1,789.02)
189.5
40-30-999
CARRYOVER BALANCE
.00
.00
192,116.00
192,116.00
.0
TOTAL REVENUE
45,464.46
286,003.46
1,010,525.00
724,521.54
28.3
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
45,464.46
286,003.46
1,010,525.00
724,521.54
28.3
TOWN OF FRASER - JOINT FACILITIES
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
JOINT FACILITIES FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
PLANT EXPENDITURES
40-85-110
SALARIES
13,138.71
89,448.24
192,326.00
102,877.76
46.5
40-85-210
HEALTH INSURANCE
2,903.98
17,413.71
50,400.00
32,986.29
34.6
40-85-220
FICA TAX
938.68
6,403.40
14,713.00
8,309.60
43.5
40-85-230
RETIREMENT
525.55
3,387.90
7,693.00
4,305.10
44.0
40-85-250
UNEMPLOYMENT TAX
39.43
268.38
577.00
308.62
46.5
40-85-280
TRAINING PROGRAMS
315.00
775.00
3,000.00
2,225.00
25.8
40-85-290
TRAVEL - MEALS AND LODGING
.00
671.22
2,500.00
1,828.78
26.9
40-85-295
MEALS - LOCAL BUSINESS
.00
.00
200.00
200.00
.0
40-85-310
LEGAL FEES
.00
.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
.0
40-85-320
AUDIT FEE
.00
.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
.0
40-85-330
ENGINEERING FEES
594.00
1,519.17
15,000.00
13,480.83
10.1
40-85-350
SLUDGE REMOVAL
6,265.45
18,248.92
65,000.00
46,751.08
28.1
40-85-370
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
243.60
1,461.60
20,000.00
18,538.40
7.3
40-85-375
REIMBURSABLE PROF SERVICES
.00
.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
.0
40-85-410
BANK CHARGES
.00
.00
100.00
100.00
.0
40-85-430
INSURANCE - PLANT
.00
.00
35,000.00
35,000.00
.0
40-85-440
ADVERTISING
.00
22.11
500.00
477.89
4.4
40-85-460
PLANT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
2.59
22,441.09
40,000.00
17,558.91
56.1
40-85-475
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
.00
.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
.0
40-85-480
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
.00
.00
500.00
500.00
.0
40-85-490
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
.00
90.00
500.00
410.00
18.0
40-85-500
OPERATING SUPPLIES
1,739.96
2,842.32
20,000.00
17,157.68
14.2
40-85-506
OPERATING SUPPLIES - CHEMICALS
3,051.36
17,047.94
85,000.00
67,952.06
20.1
40-85-510
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR
.00
8,576.43
20,000.00
11,423.57
42.9
40-85-520
TESTING
2,424.32
17,004.45
55,000.00
37,995.55
30.9
40-85-525
PERMITS
.00
160.30
10,000.00
9,839.70
1.6
40-85-560
UTILITIES -TELEPHONE
232.22
1,316.62
5,500.00
4,183.38
23.9
40-85-562
UTILITIES - ELECTRICITY
12,092.30
66,214.61
140,000.00
73,785.39
47.3
40-85-565
UTILITIES - NATURAL GAS
326.80
2,498.85
6,000.00
3,501.15
41.7
40-85-567
UTILITIES - PLANT GENERATOR
.00
.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
.0
40-85-569
UTILITIES -TRASH REMOVAL
161.90
971.40
3,500.00
2,528.60
27.8
40-85-650
VEHICLE EXPENSES
436.75
3,264.15
6,500.00
3,235.85
50.2
40-85-690
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
.00
.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
.0
TOTAL PLANT EXPENDITURES
45,432.60
282,047.81
816,009.00
533,961.19
34.6
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES
45,432.60
282,047.81
816,009.00
533,961.19
34.6
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 31.86 3,955.65 194,516.00 190,560.35 2.0
ASSETS
47-10100 CASH - COMBINED FUND
47-10220 COLOTRUST 8006 - CRR
47-10310 CB MONEY MARKET - CRR
47-10410 GMB MONEY MARKET - CRR
47-10521 CDARS - 1014540756 - CRR
47-10522 CDARS - 1014540802 - CRR
47-10523 CDARS - 1014540837 - CRR
47-10525 CDARS - 1015300856 - CRR
47-10526 CDARS - 1015300872 - CRR
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
47-20910 JFOC - CRR FUNDS
TOTAL LIABILITIES
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
TOWN OF FRASER - JOINT FACILITIES
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
JFF - CRR/CIP FUND
11,623.50)
31,883.95
246,129.86
235,398.20
383,048.73
383,048.76
382,997.40
366,233.24
383,360.50
2,400,477.14
2,393,842.46
2,393,842.46
6,634.68
6,634.68
6,634.68
2,400,477.14
TOWN OF FRASER - JOINT FACILITIES
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
JFF - CRR/CIP FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
CRR AND CIP FUND REVENUES
47-30-100 INTEREST INCOME - CRR ACCOUNTS
1,104.39
6,634.68
15,000.00
8,365.32
44.2
47-30-990 CRR CARRYOVER BALANCE
.00
.00
2,396,684.00
2,396,684.00
.0
TOTAL CRR AND CIP FUND REVENUES
1,104.39
6,634.68
2,411,684.00
2,405,049.32
.3
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
1,104.39
6,634.68
2,411,684.00
2,405,049.32
.3
TOWN OF FRASER - JOINT FACILITIES
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
JFF - CRR/CIP FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
CAPITAL RPLMNTRESERVE PROJECTS
47-60-730 CRR PROJECTS
TOTAL CAPITAL RPLMNTRESERVE PROJEC
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
47-65-730 CIP PROJECTS
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CAPITAL PURCHASES
47-69-740 CAPITAL PURCHASES
TOTAL CAPITAL PURCHASES
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
.00 .00 248,000.00 248,000.00 .0
.00 .00 248,000.00 248,000.00 .0
.00 .00 134,000.00 134,000.00 .0
.00 .00 134,000.00 134,000.00 .0
.00
.00
150,000.00
150,000.00 .0
.00
.00
150,000.00
150,000.00 .0
.00
.00
532,000.00
532,000.00 .0
1,104.39
6,634.68
1,879,684.00
1,873,049.32 .4
Fraser Building Activity 2014
Total Number of Building Permits
Total for201036
Total for201145
Total for201249
Total for201363
2012 through July23
2013 through July39
2014 through July21
Difference2014/2013(18)
Difference2014/2012(2)
Dollar Valuation
(no hourly fee has valuation $ in 2011 - 14)
Total for2010$135,233
Total for2011$3,743,778
Total for2012$2,190,195
Total for2013$5,508,091
2012 through July$938,640
2013 through July$2,882,634
2014 through July$4,117,544
Difference2014/2013$1,234,910
Difference2014/2012$3,178,904
Building Fees
Total for 2010$3,644
Total for 2011$40,277
Total for 2012$27,412
Total for 2013$66,364
2012 through July$11,305
2013 through July$32,837
2014 through July$38,730
Difference2014/2013$5,892
Difference2014/2012$27,425
New Residential Area
2014 through July19,679sq. ft.
New Commercial Area
2014 through July0sq. ft.
New Garage Area
2014 through July5,344sq. ft.
New Deck/Patio Area
2014throughJuly1,893sq. ft.
A new building permit application has been submitted for a single family dwelling in the Rendezvous subdivision and two building
permits have been issued for single family dwellings in the Cozens Meadow subdivision of Grand Park. A permit for a detached
garage across from Fraser Town Hall has been issued as well. Despite the somewhat quiet month for building permit activity in
Fraser, construction activity continues to be strong throughout Winter Park, Fraser, and Granby.
Staff Contact: Brian Szczepanski - Building Official\[bszczepanski@wpgov.com\] 970-726-8081
Treatment Plant update: August 6, 2014
Pre-Treatment Facilities Minor maintenance on equipment such as replacing
hoses and broken water lines and repairs to various equipment.
Secondary Treatment Facilities Staff shut down one train at the plant since the
infiltration flows have dropped.
Disinfection Facilities Equipment is working well.
Solids Handling We will need to empty one or both digesters this summer for
inspection of the mixers. Both of these tanks are 500,000 gallons. We will wait for
the ground water table to drop usually by the fall.
Site & Landscape Drainage piping has been installed across road to help with
irrigation water from hay meadows. When the hay meadows are being irrigated,
the water sometimes floods the access road to the plant.
Chemical Building The feeder is still causing issues. The latest is the auger had
to be replaced because of wear; this was done under warranty and is now back
in operation.
Permit Requirements The compliance schedule in the permit has requirements
to locate the sources of the following metals; dissolved copper and total
recoverable arsenic, with these two metals we cannot meet pending permit
requirements. Higher permit numbers for arsenic have been issued across the
state with the Fraser River being left off the list by oversight, in December they
assured us that the higher values would be used on the Fraser River. The permit
limits for copper cannot be meet with the current facility and that is why we have
the attached letters and requests. I have included a copy of the Discharge
Permit.
Please call if you have any questions 970 531-1230
Thank you, Joe Fuqua
Town of Fraser
PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518
www.frasercolorado.com
TOWN OF FRASER
COMBINED CASH INVESTMENT
JUNE 30, 2014
COMBINED CASH ACCOUNTS
01-10200 GENERAL CHECKING #878-000884 16,794.47
01-10220 GENERAL CO -01-0160-8001 8,231,526.84
TOTAL COMBINED CASH 8,248,321.31
01-10100 CASH ALLOCATED TO OTHER FUNDS ( 8,248,321.31)
TOTAL UNALLOCATED CASH .00
CASH ALLOCATION RECONCILIATION
10 ALLOCATION TO GENERAL FUND
2,702,698.59
20 ALLOCATION TO CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
3,807.28
30 ALLOCATION TO CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND
508,898.94
32 ALLOCATION TO CAPITAL ASSET FUND
836,677.22
40 ALLOCATION TO DEBT SERVICE FUND
499,291.09
50 ALLOCATION TO WATER FUND
1,004,702.06
55 ALLOCATION TO WASTEWATER FUND
2,692,246.13
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS TO OTHER FUNDS 8,248,321.31
ALLOCATION FROM COMBINED CASH FUND - 01-10100 ( 8,248,321.31)
ZERO PROOF IF ALLOCATIONS BALANCE .00
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 1
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
GENERALFUND
TOTAL LIABILITIES
10-27000 RESFUND BAL - SAVINGS
10-27100 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
2,957,831.38
228,757.47
750,000.00
221,805.00
1,757,268.91
1,757,268.91
2,729,073.91
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 2
ASSETS
10-10100
CASH - COMBINED FUND
2,702,698.59
10-10290
CASH WITH TREASURER
( 1,413.28)
10-11100
PROPERTY TAXES RECEIVABLE
195,916.00
10-11550
ACCTS REC - BILLINGS
83,149.04
10-12000
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCTS.
( 20,409.55)
10-12500
FORFETURES DUE TOF FROM CCOERA
( 2,109.42)
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
10-21730
STATE WITHHOLDING PAYABLE
2,605.00
10-21740
UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES PAYABLE
( 80.52)
10-21760
HEALTH INSURANCE PAYABLE
.38
10-21773
DEPENDENT CARE PAYABLE
( 1,148.09)
10-21775
FLEX HEALTH PLAN PAYABLE
4,935.35
10-22210
DEFERRED TAXES
195,916.35
10-22920
SUBDIVISION IMP SECURITY DEP
7,779.00
10-22930
DRIVEWAY PERMIT SURETY
17,500.00
10-22950
RENTAL PROPERTY DEPOSITS HELD
750.00
10-22960
COMMUNITY DONATIONS -PROJECTS
500.00
TOTAL LIABILITIES
10-27000 RESFUND BAL - SAVINGS
10-27100 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
2,957,831.38
228,757.47
750,000.00
221,805.00
1,757,268.91
1,757,268.91
2,729,073.91
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 2
TOWN OF FRASER
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
GENERALFUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
TAXES
10-31-100
GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAX
18,639.73
153,103.97
195,000.00
41,896.03
78.5
10-31-200
SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAX
1,046.57
4,230.04
8,500.00
4,269.96
49.8
10-31-300
MOTOR VEHICLE TAX
388.50
1,683.50
4,200.00
2,516.50
40.1
10-31-400
TOWN SALES TAX
114,310.59
604,235.94
1,650,000.00
1,045,764.06
36.6
10-31-410
USE TAX - BUILDING MATERIALS
112.00
66,353.13
55,000.00
( 11,353.13)
120.6
10-31-420
USE TAX - MOTOR VEHICLE SALES
9,591.82
24,917.71
45,000.00
20,082.29
55.4
10-31-430
STATE CIGARETTE TAX
349.22
1,359.63
5,000.00
3,640.37
27.2
10-31-800
FRANCHISE FEES
2,333.37
19,613.38
49,000.00
29,386.62
40.0
TOTAL TAXES
146,771.80
875,497.30
2,011,700.00
1,136,202.70
43.5
LICENSES & PERMITS
10-32-100
BUSINESS LICENSE FEES
40.00
13,520.00
12,000.00
( 1,520.00)
112.7
10-32-110
REGULATED INDUSTRY FEES/TAXES
634.53
10,153.95
22,500.00
12,346.05
45.1
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
674.53
23,673.95
34,500.00
10,826.05
68.6
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
10-34-100
ANNEXATION FEES
.00
.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
.0
10-34-110
ZONING FEES
.00
2,500.00
1,500.00
( 1,000.00)
166.7
10-34-120
SUBDIVISION FEES
5,100.00
13,400.00
1,500.00
( 11,900.00)
893.3
10-34-130
MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING FEES
130.00
600.00
1,000.00
400.00
60.0
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES
5,230.00
16,500.00
5,000.00
( 11,500.00)
330.0
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
10-36-100
INTEREST EARNINGS
262.61
1,540.63
3,500.00
1,959.37
44.0
10-36-300
RENTAL INCOME
775.00
4,800.00
8,000.00
3,200.00
60.0
10-36-610
REIMBURSABLE - PROF SERVICES
26,264.68
36,116.54
50,000.00
13,883.46
72.2
10-36-900
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
( 75.00)
17,704.32
35,000.00
17,295.68
50.6
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
27,227.29
60,161.49
96,500.00
36,338.51
62.3
OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS
10-39-999
CARRYOVER BALANCE
.00
2,009,109.67
1,937,333.00
( 71,776.67)
103.7
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS
.00
2,009,109.67
1,937,333.00
( 71,776.67)
103.7
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
179,903.62
2,984,942.41
4,085,033.00
1,100,090.59
73.1
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED
07/19/2014 11:33AM
PAGE: 3
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
GENERALFUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
Tn\A/KI RnAPr)
10-41-110
SALARIES
3,800.00
7,920.00
26,000.00
18,080.00
30.5
10-41-220
FICA TAX
290.70
605.88
1,989.00
1,383.12
30.5
10-41-280
TRAINING PROGRAMS
280.25
2,236.14
2,000.00 (
236.14)
111.8
10-41-290
TRAVEL, MEALS AND LODGING
225.00
2,045.99
5,000.00
2,954.01
40.9
10-41-295
MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT
23.01
2,484.31
8,000.00
5,515.69
31.1
10-41-690
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
550.00
825.00
3,000.00
2,175.00
27.5
10-41-860
GRANTS AND AID TO AGENCIES
.00
500.00
.00 (
500.00)
.0
10-41-861
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS
.00
.00
19,000.00
19,000.00
.0
10-41-862
FRASER/WINTER PARK POLICE DEPT
33,849.00
203,094.00
412,080.00
208,986.00
49.3
10-41-863
STREET LIGHTING AND SIGNALS
1,180.94
7,053.71
14,500.00
7,446.29
48.7
10-41-864
SPECIAL EVENTS
10,000.00
10,000.00
20,000.00
10,000.00
50.0
10-41-867
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - IGA
.00
16,314.51
54,945.00
38,630.49
29.7
10-41-868
WINTER SHUTTLE - IGA
.00
52,000.00
52,000.00
.00
100.0
10-41-870
BUSINESS DIST STREETSCAPE
3,126.40
3,126.40
5,000.00
1,873.60
62.5
10-41-871
BUSINESS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS
3,200.00
3,200.00
90,000.00
86,800.00
3.6
TOTAL TOWN BOARD 56,525.30 311,405.94 713,514.00 402,108.06 43.6
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 4
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
GENERALFUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
ADMINISTRATION
10-45-110
SALARIES
14,823.74
101,679.25
209,116.00
107,436.75
48.6
10-45-210
HEALTH INSURANCE
2,799.25
16,795.50
36,378.00
19,582.50
46.2
10-45-220
FICA TAX
1,058.17
7,285.51
15,997.00
8,711.49
45.5
10-45-230
RETIREMENT
582.18
3,784.17
8,365.00
4,580.83
45.2
10-45-250
UNEMPLOYMENT TAX
44.46
304.97
627.00
322.03
48.6
10-45-280
TRAINING PROGRAMS
.00
1,371.30
2,500.00
1,128.70
54.9
10-45-290
TRAVEL, MEALS AND LODGING
1,355.77
5,874.10
3,000.00 (
2,874.10)
195.8
10-45-295
MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT
175.39
340.32
3,500.00
3,159.68
9.7
10-45-310
LEGAL FEES
8,108.98
23,341.93
50,000.00
26,658.07
46.7
10-45-320
AUDIT FEES
6,869.00
15,669.00
12,184.00 (
3,485.00)
128.6
10-45-330
ENGINEERING FEES
48.00
297.84
5,000.00
4,702.16
6.0
10-45-360
COMPUTERS -NETWORKS AND SUPPORT
1,796.39
14,230.56
45,000.00
30,769.44
31.6
10-45-370
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,600.00
43,078.50
105,000.00
61,921.50
41.0
10-45-375
REIMBURSABLE PROF SERVICES
24,883.32
28,338.42
50,000.00
21,661.58
56.7
10-45-380
JANITORIAL SERVICES
620.00
3,505.77
15,000.00
11,494.23
23.4
10-45-385
TREASURER'S FEES
372.78
3,062.05
5,850.00
2,787.95
52.3
10-45-395
RECORDING FEES
.00
.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
.0
10-45-410
BANK CHARGES
37.40
421.62
800.00
378.38
52.7
10-45-420
ELECTIONS
.00
569.12
5,000.00
4,430.88
11.4
10-45-430
INSURANCE - ALL DEPARTMENTS
( 44,628.76) (
2,806.26)
50,000.00
52,806.26
( 5.6)
10-45-440
ADVERTISING
.00
203.34
2,500.00
2,296.66
8.1
10-45-490
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
1,733.00
5,678.12
7,000.00
1,321.88
81.1
10-45-500
OPERATING SUPPLIES
682.23
5,462.30
12,000.00
6,537.70
45.5
10-45-510
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR
.00
6,740.75
15,000.00
8,259.25
44.9
10-45-550
POSTAGE
.00
174.60
1,500.00
1,325.40
11.6
10-45-560
UTILITIES -TELEPHONE
404.97
2,833.89
6,060.00
3,226.11
46.8
10-45-561
UTILITIES - NATURAL GAS
.00
2,228.43
5,700.00
3,471.57
39.1
10-45-562
UTILITIES - ELECTRICITY
352.55
2,391.39
6,700.00
4,308.61
35.7
10-45-569
UTILITIES - TRASH REMOVAL
100.00
613.69
1,500.00
886.31
40.9
10-45-670
PROP MGMT - 117 EISENHOWER DR
503.44
5,500.31
12,000.00
6,499.69
45.8
10-45-671
PROP MGMT - 105 FRASER AVE
.00
76.75
500.00
423.25
15.4
10-45-673
PROP MGMT - 153 FRASER AVE
1,756.76
2,575.14
23,000.00
20,424.86
11.2
10-45-674
PROP MGMT - 200 EISENHOWER DR
.00
52.00
500.00
448.00
10.4
10-45-676
PROP MGMT - 400 DOC SUSIE AVE
33.39
330.34
2,500.00
2,169.66
13.2
10-45-690
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
.00
1,000.00
7,500.00
6,500.00
13.3
10-45-810
LEASE/PURCHASE - PRINCIPAL
.00
9,509.50
19,252.00
9,742.50
49.4
10-45-820
LEASE/PURCHASE - INTEREST
.00
9,677.38
19,122.00
9,444.62
50.6
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 28,112.41 322,191.60 766,651.00 444,459.40 42.0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 5
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
GENERALFUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
PUBLIC WORKS
10-60-110
SALARIES
28,917.84
178,599.95
372,252.00
193,652.05
48.0
10-60-210
HEALTH INSURANCE
5,736.89
34,139.08
80,054.00
45,914.92
42.7
10-60-220
FICA TAX
2,056.20
12,666.32
28,477.00
15,810.68
44.5
10-60-230
RETIREMENT
1,002.18
6,355.25
14,890.00
8,534.75
42.7
10-60-250
UNEMPLOYMENTTAX
86.74
535.73
1,117.00
581.27
48.0
10-60-280
TRAINING PROGRAMS
200.00
990.00
1,000.00
10.00
99.0
10-60-290
TRAVEL, MEALS AND LODGING
.00
93.86
1,000.00
906.14
9.4
10-60-295
MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT
88.53
347.72
500.00
152.28
69.5
10-60-330
ENGINEERING FEES
1,128.00
2,928.00
60,000.00
57,072.00
4.9
10-60-360
COMPUTER NETWORK SUPPORT
.00
.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
.0
10-60-370
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
.00
1,662.31
2,500.00
837.69
66.5
10-60-475
CONTRACT SNOW REMOVAL
.00
440.00
.00 (
440.00)
.0
10-60-480
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
.00
.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
.0
10-60-490
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
.00
500.00
250.00 (
250.00)
200.0
10-60-500
OPERATING SUPPLIES
4,140.91
35,105.32
70,000.00
34,894.68
50.2
10-60-506
PLANTS/PLANTER SUPPLIES
3,844.99
4,999.61
10,000.00
5,000.39
50.0
10-60-510
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR
5,482.73
12,075.95
30,000.00
17,924.05
40.3
10-60-560
UTILITIES - TELEPHONE
130.71
596.87
2,700.00
2,103.13
22.1
10-60-561
UTILITIES - NATURAL GAS
.00
3,144.05
6,000.00
2,855.95
52.4
10-60-562
UTILITIES - ELECTRICITY
137.12
868.18
2,500.00
1,631.82
34.7
10-60-569
UTILITIES - TRASH REMOVAL
113.96
671.42
2,100.00
1,428.58
32.0
10-60-670
PROP MGMT - 125 FRASER AVE
553.75
1,810.10
2,500.00
689.90
72.4
10-60-673
PROP MGMT - FRASER RIVER TRAIL
.00
.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
.0
10-60-674
PROP MGMT - HWY 40 PEDESTRIAN
.00
130.83
5,000.00
4,869.17
2.6
10-60-676
PROP MGMT - OLD SCHLHOUSE PK
700.00
700.00
500.00 (
200.00)
140.0
10-60-679
PROP MGMT - SCHOOL BUS GARAGE
54.40
2,386.76
6,500.00
4,113.24
36.7
10-60-681
PROP MGMT - COZENS RANCH PARK
130.00
3,400.29
105,000.00
101,599.71
3.2
10-60-682
PROP MGMT - AMTRAK STATION
.00
8.99
.00 (
8.99)
.0
10-60-684
PROP MGMT - FRODO
.00
.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
.0
10-60-685
MOUNTAIN MAN PARK
.00
.00
500.00
500.00
.0
10-60-686
GORANSON STATION
512.62
2,220.16
15,000.00
12,779.84
14.8
10-60-690
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
.00
.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
.0
10-60-725
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
7,157.66
26,986.80
75,000.00
48,013.20
36.0
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
62,175.23
334,363.55
915,540.00
581,176.45
36.5
120 ZEREX AVENUE
10-65-370
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
.00
.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
.0
10-65-380
JANITORIAL SERVICES
450.00
2,150.00
5,500.00
3,350.00
39.1
10-65-560
UTILITIES - TELEPHONE
50.80
304.84
500.00
195.16
61.0
10-65-561
UTILITIES - NATURAL GAS
.00
646.02
1,500.00
853.98
43.1
10-65-562
UTILITIES - ELECTRICITY
76.74
401.04
1,000.00
598.96
40.1
10-65-670
PROP MGMT - 120 ZEREX
1,400.00
1,566.61
8,000.00
6,433.39
19.6
TOTAL 120 ZEREX AVENUE 1,977.54 5,068.51 26,500.00 21,431.49 19.1
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 6
TRANSFERS
10-90-940 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE FUND
TOTALTRANSFERS
10-95-110
SALARIES
10-95-220
FICA TAX
10-95-230
RETIREMENT
10-95-250
UNEMPLOYMENT TAX
111011/_10;16107_1 W-1wA011
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
GENERALFUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
.00 247,373.00 247,373.00 .00 100.0
.00 247,373.00 247,373.00 .00 100.0
6,524.05
6,524.05
.00 (
6,524.05)
.0
466.31
466.31
.00 (
466.31)
.0
260.96
260.96
.00 (
260.96)
.0
19.58
19.58
.00 (
19.58)
.0
7,270.90
7,270.90
.00 (
7,270.90)
.0
156,061.38
1,227,673.50
2,669,578.00
1,441,904.50
46.0
23,842.24
1,757,268.91
1,415,455.00 (
341,813.91)
124.2
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 7
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
ASSETS
20-10100 CASH -COMBINED FUND
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD 3,807.28
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
3,807.28
3,807.28
3,807.28
3,807.28
3,807.28
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 8
TOWN OF FRASER
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
CONSERVATION TRUST FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
20-30-100 CONS TRUST (LOTTERY) PROCEEDS
1,365.85
2,911.25
6,100.00
3,188.75
47.7
20-30-800 INTEREST EARNINGS
.73
2.85
10.00
7.15
28.5
20-30-999 CARRYOVER BALANCE
.00
893.18
402.00 (
491.18)
222.2
TOTAL REVENUE
1,366.58
3,807.28
6,512.00
2,704.72
58.5
TOTAL FUND REVENUE 1,366.58 3,807.28 6,512.00 2,704.72 58.5
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 1,366.58 3,807.28 6,512.00 2,704.72 58.5
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 9
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND
ASSETS
30-10100 CASH -COMBINED FUND
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD 508,898.94
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
508,898.94
508,898.94
508,898.94
508,898.94
508,898.94
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 10
TOWN OF FRASER
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
REVENUE
30-30-100
HWY USE TAX PROCEEDS
3,576.41
18,034.91
44,594.00
26,559.09
40.4
30-30-800
INTEREST EARNINGS
48.55
278.34
300.00
21.66
92.8
30-30-920
TRANSFER FROM UTILITY FUNDS
.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
.00
100.0
30-30-999
CARRYOVER BALANCE
.00
470,585.69
470,019.00 (
566.69)
100.1
TOTAL REVENUE
3,624.96
508,898.94
534,913.00
26,014.06
95.1
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
3,624.96
508,898.94
534,913.00
26,014.06
95.1
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 11
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
EXPENDITURES
30-40-755 HEAVY EQUIPMENT PURCHASE
.00
.00
50,000.00
50,000.00
.0
30-40-810 LEASE/PURCHASE - PRINCIPAL
.00
.00
40,938.00
40,938.00
.0
30-40-820 LEASE/PURCHASE - INTEREST
.00
.00
4,480.00
4,480.00
.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
.00
.00
95,418.00
95,418.00
.0
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES
.00
.00
95,418.00
95,418.00
.0
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
3,624.96
508,898.94
439,495.00 (
69,403.94)
115.8
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 12
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
CAPITAL ASSET FUND
ASSETS
32-10100 CASH -COMBINED FUND
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD 836,677.22
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
836,677.22
836,677.22
836,677.22
836,677.22
836,677.22
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 13
CAPITAL ASSET REVENUE
32-30-100 RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE
32-30-800 INTEREST EARNINGS
32-30-999 CARRYOVER FUND BALANCE
TOTAL CAPITAL ASSET REVENUE
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
TOWN OF FRASER
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
CAPITAL ASSET FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
728,120.00
728,120.00
2,250,000.00
1,521,880.00 32.4
10.14
65.11
5.00 (
60.11) 1302.2
.00
103,883.65
.00 (
103,883.65) .0
728,130.14
832,068.76
2,250,005.00
1,417,936.24 37.0
728,130.14 832,068.76 2,250,005.00 1,417,936.24 37.0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 14
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
CAPITAL ASSET FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
CAPITAL ASSET EXPENDITURES
32-40-810 CAPITAL PROJ- STREETS EXISTING
.00 (
4,608.46)
.00
4,608.46 .0
32-40-815 CAPITAL PROJ - STREETS NEW
.00
.00
2,250,000.00
2,250,000.00 .0
TOTAL CAPITAL ASSET EXPENDITURES
.00 (
4,608.46)
2,250,000.00
2,254,608.46 ( .2)
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES
.00 (
4,608.46)
2,250,000.00
2,254,608.46 ( .2)
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 728,130.14 836,677.22 5.00 ( 836,672.22) 16733
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 15
ASSETS
40-10100 CASH -COMBINED FUND
40-10290 CASH WITH TREASURER
40-11100 PROPERTY TAXES RECEIVABLE
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
40-22210 DEFERRED PROPERTY TAXES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
FUND EQUITY
40-27000 RESFUND BAL-1 YEARS PAYMENT
40-27100 RESTRICTED FUND BALANCE
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
DEBT SERVICE FUND
499,291.09
( 577.26)
80,000.00
80,000.00
300,000.00
116,732.14
81,981.69
81,981.69
498, 713.83
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 16
TOWN OF FRASER
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
DEBT SERVICE FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
REVENUE
40-30-100
PROPERTY TAX
7,612.98
62,532.20
80,000.00
17,467.80
78.2
40-30-200
SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAX
427.45
1,691.95
3,000.00
1,308.05
56.4
40-30-800
INTEREST EARNINGS
47.10
297.71
250.00 (
47.71)
119.1
40-30-910
TRANSFER IN FROM GENERAL FUND
.00
247,373.00
247,373.00
.00
100.0
TOTAL REVENUE
8,087.53
311,894.86
330,623.00
18,728.14
94.3
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
8,087.53
311,894.86
330,623.00
18,728.14
94.3
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 17
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
DEBT SERVICE FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
40-40-385
TREASURER'S FEES GO BOND
152.28
1,250.67
2,000.00
749.33
62.5
40-40-810
BOND PRINCIPAL - 02 S&U ISSUE
.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
.00
100.0
40-40-811
BOND PRINCIPAL - 98 GO ISSUE
.00
.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
.0
40-40-812
BOND PRINCIPAL - 98 S&U ISSUE
.00
170,000.00
170,000.00
.00
100.0
40-40-820
BOND INTEREST - 02 S&U ISSUE
.00
3,850.00
7,013.00
3,163.00
54.9
40-40-821
BOND INTEREST - 98 GO ISSUE
.00
4,837.50
9,676.00
4,838.50
50.0
40-40-822
BOND INTEREST - 98 S&U ISSUE
.00
24,975.00
45,360.00
20,385.00
55.1
40-40-850
BOND AGENT FEES
.00
.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
.0
40-40-910
TRANSFER TO DSF RESERVES
.00
.00
29,074.00
29,074.00
.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
152.28
229,913.17
330,623.00
100,709.83
69.5
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES
152.28
229,913.17
330,623.00
100,709.83
69.5
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
7,935.25
81,981.69
.00 (
81,981.69)
.0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 18
ASSETS
50-10100 CASH - COMBINED FUND
50-10290 CASH W/TREASURER - COLLECTIONS
50-11500 A/R CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES
50-16100 LAND
50-16200 BUILDINGS
50-16203 WELLS SYSTEM
50-16212 WATER DISTRIBUTION/STORAGE
50-16213 WELLS
50-16400 EQUIPMENT
50-16500 WATER RIGHTS
50-17900 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
50-17901 ACCUMULATED DEPR - BLDGS& IMPR
50-17902 ACCUMULATED DEPR - SYSTEM&IMPR
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
50-20775
DUE TO RENDEZVOUS - TAPS
50-20776
DUE TO GRAND PARK - TAPS
50-21100
ACCRUED PTO AND BENEFITS
50-22910
ROAD CUT SURITY FEES
TOTAL LIABILITIES
FUND EQUITY
50-27000 RESFUND BAL - O & M
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
50-29800 RETAINED EARNINGS
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
WATER FUND
1,004,702.06
722.83
175,659.94
100,000.00
2,928,912.49
768,371.74
9,845,211.82
1,076,740.43
353,994.02
19,775.86
( 3,542,825.67)
( 72,684.00)
1 inn ❑nn nm
30,800.00
23,100.00
4,114.74
17,360.00
75,374.74
460,000.00
11,176,957.39
645,709.39
11,822,666.78
12,282,666.78
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 19
FEES & TAXES
50-31-200 FRASER FIRMING REVENUE
TOTAL FEES & TAXES
LICENSES & PERMITS
50-32-100 EXCAVATION PERMIT FEES
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
50-34-100
CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES
50-34-150
PENALTIES & INTEREST
50-34-200
PLANT INVESTMENT FEES
50-34-300
WATER METER SALES
938.08)
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES
.00
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
50-36-100
INTEREST EARNINGS
50-36-900
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
5,950.00
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
5,450.00)
OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS
177,478.51
50-39-999 CARRYOVER BALANCE
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
TOWN OF FRASER
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
12,601.38 25,202.76 50,000.00 24,797.24 50.4
12,601.38 25,202.76 50,000.00 24,797.24 50.4
.00 275.00 200.00 ( 75.00) 137.5
.00 275.00 200.00 ( 75.00) 137.5
177,172.51
357,235.52
722,080.00
364,844.48
49.5
306.00
1,938.08
1,000.00 (
938.08)
193.8
.00
.00
8,000.00
8,000.00
.0
.00
5,950.00
500.00 (
5,450.00)
1190.0
177,478.51
365,123.60
731,580.00
366,456.40
49.9
98.54
100.00
522.56
3,806.00
1,000.00
2,500.00 (
477.44
1,306.00)
52.3
152.2
198.54
4,328.56
3,500.00 (
828.56)
123.7
.00
573,820.00
438,348.00 (
135,472.00)
130.9
.00
573,820.00
438,348.00 (
135,472.00)
130.9
190,278.43
968,749.92
1,223,628.00
254,878.08
79.2
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 20
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
EXPENDITURES
50-40-110
SALARIES
12,624.16
67,323.12
173,250.00
105,926.88
38.9
50-40-210
HEALTH INSURANCE
1,863.39
9,969.73
33,600.00
23,630.27
29.7
50-40-220
FICA TAX
927.86
4,893.02
13,254.00
8,360.98
36.9
50-40-230
RETIREMENT
314.50
2,074.15
6,930.00
4,855.85
29.9
50-40-250
UNEMPLOYMENT TAX
36.68
198.97
520.00
321.03
38.3
50-40-280
TRAINING PROGRAMS
.00
110.00
3,000.00
2,890.00
3.7
50-40-290
TRAVEL, MEALS AND LODGING
.00
.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
.0
50-40-295
MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT
11.92
87.17
2,000.00
1,912.83
4.4
50-40-310
LEGAL FEES
1,855.00
24,669.40
85,000.00
60,330.60
29.0
50-40-330
ENGINEERING FEES
2,529.00
9,982.25
60,000.00
50,017.75
16.6
50-40-360
COMPUTERS -NETWORKS AND SUPPORT
250.00
1,342.33
10,000.00
8,657.67
13.4
50-40-370
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
34.43
21,980.06
5,000.00 (
16,980.06)
439.6
50-40-430
INSURANCE
14,584.16
14,584.16
25,000.00
10,415.84
58.3
50-40-440
ADVERTISING
.00
.00
500.00
500.00
.0
50-40-460
SYSTEM REPAIR AND MAINT- PROD
1,147.50
5,887.70
70,000.00
64,112.30
8.4
50-40-465
SYSTEM REPAIR AND MAINT - DIST
598.50
2,420.41
45,000.00
42,579.59
5.4
50-40-490
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
.00
1,815.00
8,000.00
6,185.00
22.7
50-40-500
OPERATING SUPPLIES -PRODUCTION
300.16
6,107.92
25,000.00
18,892.08
24.4
50-40-505
OPERATING SUPPLIES-DISTRIB
206.48
4,087.70
25,000.00
20,912.30
16.4
50-40-510
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR
.00
1,398.22
12,000.00
10,601.78
11.7
50-40-520
TESTING
60.00
550.20
5,000.00
4,449.80
11.0
50-40-550
POSTAGE & BILLING SUPPLIES
.00
586.75
3,500.00
2,913.25
16.8
50-40-560
UTILITIES - TELEPHONE
232.75
1,396.72
3,500.00
2,103.28
39.9
50-40-562
UTILITIES - ELECTRICITY
2,237.05
14,313.55
50,000.00
35,686.45
28.6
50-40-670
PROP MGMT - FRASER WTP
.00
.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
.0
50-40-680
PROP MGMT - MARYVALE WTP
.00
.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
.0
50-40-690
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
.00
.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
.0
50-40-715
WATER RIGHTS - DIVERSION & DEV
.00
.00
35,000.00
35,000.00
.0
50-40-730
CAPITAL PROJECTS
.00
17,262.00
160,000.00
142,738.00
10.8
50-40-760
FRASER FIRMING - CAPPROJ
.00
.00
50,000.00
50,000.00
.0
50-40-930
TRANSFER TO CERF
.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
.00
100.0
50-40-970
TRANSFER TO O&M RESERVES
.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
.00
100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
39,813.54
323,040.53
1,035,054.00
712,013.47
31.2
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES
39,813.54
323,040.53
1,035,054.00
712,013.47
31.2
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 150,464.89 645,709.39 188,574.00 ( 457,135.39) 342.4
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 21
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
WASTEWATER FUND
TOTAL ASSETS 14,149,246.35
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
I IARII ITIFC
55-21100 ACCRUED PTO AND BENEFITS 6,743.29
TOTAL LIABILITIES 6.743.29
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
ASSETS
55-29800 RETAINED EARNINGS
55-10100
CASH - COMBINED FUND
2,692,246.13
55-10290
CASH W/TREASURER - COLLECTIONS
621.33
55-11500
A/R CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES
176,086.50
55-11550
A/R- BILLINGS
7,250.00
55-15950
CAP REPL RES HELD W/JFOC
815,582.23
55-15955
O&M RESERVE HELD W/JFOC
45,739.00
55-16100
LAND
144,320.40
55-16200
SEWER TREATMENT PLANT
3,305,761.56
55-16210
METER BUILDING & IMPROVEMENTS
8,056.39
55-16220
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
10,816,277.19
55-16250
CONSOLIDATED COLLECTION SYSTEM
279,069.00
55-16400
EQUIPMENT
37,385.17
55-17900
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
( 801,376.42)
55-17905
ACCUM DEPR - PLANT/JFOC
( 45,347.52)
55-17910
ACCUM DEPR - SEWER COLLECT-FSD
( 3,296,176.72)
55-17915
ACCUM DEPR-EQUIPMENT
( 36,247.89)
TOTAL ASSETS 14,149,246.35
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
I IARII ITIFC
55-21100 ACCRUED PTO AND BENEFITS 6,743.29
TOTAL LIABILITIES 6.743.29
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
55-29800 RETAINED EARNINGS
10,411,720.88
55-29820 RETAINED EARNINGS -RESTRICTED
861,321.23
REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES -YTD
2,869,460.95
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE 14.142.503.06
TOTAL FUND EQUITY 14,142,503.06
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 14,149,246.35
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 22
LICENSES & PERMITS
55-32-100 EXCAVATION PERMIT FEES
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
55-34-100
CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES
55-34-150
PENALTIES & INTEREST
55-34-200
PLANT INVESTMENT FEES
1,197.46
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES
197.46)
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
55-36-100
INTEREST EARNINGS
55-36-500
JFF MANAGEMENT FEE
700.0
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
392,111.56
OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS
295,444.44
55-39-999 CARRYOVER BALANCE
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES & TRANSFERS
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
TOWN OF FRASER
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
WASTEWATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
275.00 275.00 .00 ( 275.00) .0
275.00 275.00 .00 ( 275.00) .0
169,207.05
338,414.10
679,056.00
340,641.90
49.8
58.00
1,197.46
1,000.00 (
197.46)
119.8
.00
52,500.00
7,500.00 (
45,000.00)
700.0
169,265.05
392,111.56
687,556.00
295,444.44
57.0
261.57
7,250.00
1,508.58
14,500.00
2,500.00
29,000.00
991.42
14,500.00
60.3
50.0
7,511.57
16,008.58
31,500.00
15,491.42
50.8
.00
2,699,802.00
2,624,986.00 (
74,816.00)
102.9
.00
2,699,802.00
2,624,986.00 (
74,816.00)
102.9
177,051.62
3,108,197.14
3,344,042.00
235,844.86
93.0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 23
TOWN OF FRASER
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2014
WASTEWATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
55-40-110
SALARIES
15,572.79
87,549.26
178,500.00
90,950.74
49.1
55-40-210
HEALTH INSURANCE
2,271.19
12,337.94
28,560.00
16,222.06
43.2
55-40-220
FICA TAX
1,151.31
6,438.32
13,655.00
7,216.68
47.2
55-40-230
RETIREMENT
441.72
2,867.57
7,140.00
4,272.43
40.2
55-40-250
UNEMPLOYMENT TAX
45.44
259.00
536.00
277.00
48.3
55-40-280
TRAINING PROGRAMS
.00
.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
.0
55-40-290
TRAVEL, MEALS AND LODGING
.00
.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
.0
55-40-295
MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT
11.93
81.67
1,000.00
918.33
8.2
55-40-310
LEGAL FEES
.00
22,814.40
5,000.00 (
17,814.40)
456.3
55-40-330
ENGINEERING FEES
.00
2,702.75
10,000.00
7,297.25
27.0
55-40-360
COMPUTERS -NETWORKS AND SUPPORT
250.00
1,342.33
6,000.00
4,657.67
22.4
55-40-370
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
34.42
20,869.86
10,000.00 (
10,869.86)
208.7
55-40-410
BANK CHARGES
.00
.00
100.00
100.00
.0
55-40-430
INSURANCE
5,860.12
5,860.12
6,000.00
139.88
97.7
55-40-440
ADVERTISING
.00
.00
500.00
500.00
.0
55-40-460
SYSTEM REPAIR AND MAINT-COLLEC
604.19
3,079.79
160,000.00
156,920.21
1.9
55-40-490
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
.00
1,185.00
6,000.00
4,815.00
19.8
55-40-500
OPERATING SUPPLIES -COLLECTIONS
61.63
61.63
5,000.00
4,938.37
1.2
55-40-510
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR
.00
502.00
2,500.00
1,998.00
20.1
55-40-520
TESTING
.00
.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
.0
55-40-550
POSTAGE & BILLING SUPPLIES
.00
557.00
2,500.00
1,943.00
22.3
55-40-560
UTILITIES - TELEPHONE
21.22
127.29
500.00
372.71
25.5
55-40-650
WW TREATMENT CHARGES/JFOC
17,180.64
60,100.26
204,002.00
143,901.74
29.5
55-40-690
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
.00
.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
.0
55-40-730
CAPITAL PROJECTS
.00
.00
60,000.00
60,000.00
.0
55-40-930
TRANSFER TO CERF
.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
.00
100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
43,506.60
238,736.19
725,493.00
486,756.81
32.9
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 43,506.60 238,736.19 725,493.00 486,756.81 32.9
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 133,545.02 2,869,460.95 2,618,549.00 ( 250,911.95) 109.6
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 24
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
ASSETS
91-16100
LAND
730,630.35
91-16200
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
208,379.39
91-16203
MAINTENANCE BUILDING
57,722.51
91-16208
HOUSE - 400 DOC SUSIE AVE
54,839.27
91-16209
VISITOR CENTER
183,895.00
91-16211
BUSBARN & 105 FRASER AVE HOUSE
100,000.00
91-16250
CHURCH
267,000.00
91-16306
PARKS
367,800.08
91-16311
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
3,439,840.00
91-16312
HIGHWAY 40 PATH
8,872.00
91-16490
EQUIPMENT - OTHER
872,015.00
91-16500
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
57,261.75
91-17900
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
( 2,260,048.61)
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
FUND EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE:
91-29800 INVESTMENT IN FIXED ASSETS 4,088,206.74
BALANCE - CURRENT DATE
TOTAL FUND EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
4,088,206.74
4,088,206.74
4,088,206.74
4,088,206.74
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 25
ASSETS
95-18100 AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
TOWN OF FRASER
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 2014
GENERAL LONG-TERM DEBT
3,131,161.31
95-25050 2002 SERIAL BONDS 360,000.00
95-25060 1998 REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS 2,035,000.00
95-25070 1998 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 475,000.00
95-25200 ACCRUED COMPENSATED ABSENCES 15,677.17
95-25500 CAPITAL LEASES KOMATSU LOADER 245,484.14
TOTAL LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
3,131,161.31
3,131,161.31
3,131,161.31
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 50 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 07/19/2014 11:33AM PAGE: 26
(a9 W) Atha 113d M013
M
O
m
am
.. N
i
00
N
N
N
.. N
.. N
.. N
N
N
N
O
00
v
%
Ln m
� o
O
� o
G
O
� o
0
00
Ln
i
.. M
.. N
....,
...,.
.....
....,
.................................,
....,...
,.
O
U-) O U-) O
U-) O
U-) O U-) O
N O Il U�
N O
n U� N O
N
N N r -I r -I
r -I r -I
O O O O
(a9 W) Atha 113d M013
(a!) VY) Atha 113d MOl3
O
M
Ql
y�
o
N
00
N
�UJ
II
..
N
..
N
..
N
M
..
N
1.
N
/
N
�
O
N
r�
00
A�
3
� v
1
M
O
�
N
O
�
o
0 o
0
i
II,
M
O
U') O U') O U') O
U')
O U') O
U�
N O n U� N O
n
U� N O
N
N N r -I r -I r -I r -I
O
O O O
(a!) VY) Atha 113d MOl3
INFLUENT FLOWS
UPPER FRASER VALLEY TREATMENT PLANT
Date
Day
Influent
MGD
GCWS#1
Influent Flow
WPR
Influent Flow
TOF
Influent Flow
1 -May -14
Thu
1.398
0.653
0.225
0.52
2 -May -14
Fri
1.477
0.735
0.243
0.499
3 -May -14
Sat
1.622
0.83
0.266
0.526
4 -May -14
Sun
1.735
0.943
0.296
0.496
5 -May -14
Mon
1.671
0.901
0.263
0.507
6 -May -14
Tue
1.655
0.929
0.263
0.463
7 -May -14
Wed
1.553
0.833
0.236
0.484
8 -May -14
Thu
1.494
0.844
0.241
0.409
9 -May -14
Fri
1.49
0.806
0.234
0.45
10 -May -14
Sat
1.636
0.879
0.285
0.472
11 -May -14
Sun
1.524
0.813
0.264
0.447
12 -May -14
Mon
1.391
0.738
0.23
0.423
13 -May -14
Tue
1.312
0.697
0.211
0.404
14 -May -14
Wed
1.266
0.676
0.19
0.4
15 -May -14
Thu
1.289
0.696
0.209
0.384
16 -May -14
Fri
1.286
0.68
0.206
0.4
17 -May -14
Sat
1.294
0.686
0.219
0.389
18 -May -14
Sun
1.258
0.689
0.217
0.352
19 -May -14
Mon
1.214
0.657
0.196
0.361
20 -May -14
Tue
1.178
0.661
0.187
0.33
21 -May -14
Wed
1.143
0.628
0.173
0.342
22 -May -14
Thu
1.092
0.583
0.148
0.361
23 -May -14
Fri
1.165
0.674
0.172
0.319
24 -May -14
Sat
1.438
0.819
0.274
0.345
25 -May -14
Sun
1.461
0.75
0.27
0.441
26 -May -14
Mon
1.31
0.684
0.228
0.398
27 -May -14
Tue
1.204
0.664
0.184
0.356
28 -May -14
Wed
1.162
0.626
0.158
0.378
29 -May -14
Thu
1.146
0.635
0.165
0.346
30 -May -14
Fri
1.3331
0.7171
0.2261
0.39
31 -May -14
Sat
1.3571
0.7211
0.2121
0.424
AVG. 1.373 0.737 0.222 0.413
MAX 1.735 0.943 0.296 0.526
MIN 1.092 0.583 0.148 0.319
INFLUENT FLOWS
UPPER FRASER VALLEY TREATMENT PLANT
Date
Day
Influent
MGD
GCWS#1
Influent Flow
WPR
Influent Flow
TOF
Influent Flow
1 -Jun -14
Sun
1.278
0.653
0.186
0.439
2 -Jun -14
Mon
1.21
0.633
0.165
0.412
3 -Jun -14
Tue
1.183
0.619
0.171
0.393
4 -Jun -14
Wed
1.122
0.586
0.146
0.39
5 -Jun -14
Thu
1.096
0.545
0.127
0.424
6 -Jun -14
Fri
1.066
0.547
0.137
0.382
7 -Jun -14
Sat
1.059
0.537
0.133
0.389
8 -Jun -14
Sun
1.105
0.59
0.154
0.361
9 -Jun -14
Mon
0.987
0.514
0.129
0.344
10 -Jun -14
Tue
0.941
0.483
0.132
0.326
11 -Jun -14
Wed
0.924
0.479
0.132
0.313
12 -Jun -14
Thu
0.905
0.466
0.134
0.305
13 -Jun -14
Fri
0.916
0.491
0.134
0.291
14 -Jun -14
Sat
0.947
0.48
0.144
0.323
15 -Jun -14
Sun
0.909
0.498
0.144
0.267
16 -Jun -14
Mon
0.824
0.443
0.143
0.238
17 -Jun -14
Tue
0.802
0.43
0.164
0.208
18 -Jun -14
Wed
0.807
0.415
0.123
0.269
19 -Jun -14
Thu
0.807
0.41
0.162
0.235
20 -Jun -14
Fri
0.813
0.42
0.12
0.273
21 -Jun -14
Sat
0.834
0.424
0.13
0.28
22 -Jun -14
Sun
0.794
0.422
0.179
0.193
23 -Jun -14
Mon
0.72
0.37
0.191
0.159
24 -Jun -14
Tue
0.713
0.374
0.145
0.194
25 -Jun -14
Wed
0.702
0.373
0.15
0.179
26 -Jun -14
Thu
0.714
0.385
0.157
0.172
27 -Jun -14
Fri
0.767
0.385
0.149
0.233
28 -Jun -14
Sat
0.817
0.418
0.159
0.24
29 -Jun -14
Sun
0.784
0.406
0.157
0.221
30 -Jun -14
Mon
0.711
0.346
0.133
0.232
AVG. 0.909 0.471 0.148 0.290
MAX 1.278 0.653 0.191 0.439
MIN 0.702 0.346 0.12 0.159
TN
m 0
-m
0 0
E
00
00
00
r�
�6
r�
OAO
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0
o
-It
'R
rNI
L'i
Ln
L'i
r1
L'i
r4
rIj
Lq
4t
lD
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D.
Ln
a
to
0
>
t0 C
M
<
0
Nr`
a,
q
ri
A E
r,
N
lo
m
rq
rq
rq
0 o
< J
on
in
Ln
O
Ln
Ln
Lj E
0
rj
Nrq
m
m
E
0
Ln
N
m
m
rq
N
rq
4
OM
ao
>,Ln
Ln
E
r,
Nm
m
rl
rl
rq
rq
m
9�
t
OM
bA
0
Q
Zo
r,
Ql
4D
E
0
E
Ln4i
0i
0i
h
ui
r
m
T
a)
o)
o)
o)
o)
cz
.2
m
m
oo
o
CM
Lm ao
<
m
00
Ln
In
I
N
Ln
Zo
Cin
w
It
10
w
M
m
Ln
Co
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
L-ul
wr,
ao
<
m
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
q
Ln
oq
m
OM
4t
w2
x
rdi
o
m
2 'nm
'D
M
Ln
Ln
00
Q�)
M
't
00
rl�
M
ll�
llkD
0q:
lf�
M
rl`
r�
N
of
N
D
r1i
0
0
�
0
r1l.
ooMr, oo
I;
OM
�D
Ln
Ln
ro
0)
0)
M
�
r,
M
m
mt
Ln
Ln
lD
L,n
'M
OM
r,
O
m
r,
Ln
N
N
L
n
mE
73
E
(5
m
a
E
m
(u
cL
u
>
0
w
0
a
z
w
a
L6
p
0)
to
0)
Ln
Ln
00
Ln
0)
00
rn
�o
rn
r,
rJ
0
0
0
m
Q1
a)
rn
t
r,
rn
a)
O
m
u
cou
CU
m
E
cu
m
E
rq
I
E
r-
.8
<
m
a
a
u
CU
>
cu
u
LZ
LL
<
CL
4,
z
cu
TN
m 0
-m
0 0
-It
'R
rNI
L'i
Ln
L'i
r1
L'i
r4
rIj
Lq
lD
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D.
t0 C
M
.0
0
0 o
Lj E
0
rj
Nrq
m
m
m
0
Ln
rIj
4
rq
rq
m
OM
E
Ln4i
0i
0i
h
ui
r
(u
T
a)
o)
o)
o)
o)
.2
o
Lm ao
<
Cin
w
It
-
E
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
L-ul
wr,
ao
<
m
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
q
Ln
oq
m
OM
w2
rdi
,2
of
ooMr, oo
I;
�D
Ln
Ln
ro
N
r,
O
m
r,
Ln
N
N
L
n
mE
73
E
(5
m
a
E
m
(u
cL
u
>
u
w
0
a
z
w
a
Ln
m
O
m
in
M
m
rT
N m do
Q
W
h
d;
cF
'D
a
Q
O
rf
iri
N
O
iri
ri
F X
L
C
N U
� ? e
O_
C
M
N
N
N
W D
oo
C >
O
N
W
Ln
O
Z O a
N
Q1
N
O
G
tD
(Y1
F C
'
O
N
W M
t44
too
bA
Q J
r.+
O
VI
00
M
ID
I,
VI
ID
m
M
O
00
t
bA
Q
N
lD
I,
n
n
N
LD
Ql
VI
Cl
VI
lD
00
N
-I
M
n
VI
N
00
N
00
n
V1
N £
}
N
N
ti
N
N
.-f
Q1
Z o>n
~ Q J
t
VI
N
I-
?
on
O
I,
M
M
M
lD
d'
tD
0£
w O
W M
X
f0
cO
C
T
E
O
00
M
M
r,
lD
73
N
Q1
Q1
n
cM-I
D
p
o
z
ar
o
J
a
m
O
m
ID
m
l4
Ln
M
d'
l4
m
N'.
4>A
N
N J
Q
Q
Q
O
Ql
tD
c -I
O
00
00
ti
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Z
T N
oto
O
u -
O q
>
O
E
Q C
G
M
dt
a
M
a
N
a
-i
111
O
U1
a
r
a
d
r
a
a
a
w �
, J
N
M
O
N
M
O
M
M
N
0 C
C.
>
N
N
N
N
Nm
VI
Ln
N
N
N
J
bA
rl
a
I^�
m
rr7
m
N
m
O
m
O
a>n E
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
m
1^
v
M
M
n
O
N
n
V1
N
i
C
�+
L
m
3
1,
O
m
in
M
m
rT
N m do
Q
W
h
d;
cF
'D
a
7 I`C
O
rf
iri
N
O
iri
ri
L
w o
z CIO
oo
C >
O
N
W
Ln
O
7 D £
E
N
00
Ql
I�
tD
�
wO
W M
t
o
0
0
0
0
0
a
Q
N
Ln
O
oo
171
R O
ti
N
N
.-f
.-f
a
It u
It
d i o\°
Q
O
Oj
cF
d'
tD
C
T
E
m
73
p
o
z
ar
o
a
H