Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20160613_GDOT-Hwy80-Response.pdf GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION One Georgia Center, 600 West Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Telephone: (404) 631-1000 Russell R. McMurry, P.E., Commissioner June 13, 2016 Georgia Department of Transportation One Georgia Center 600 West Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Mayor Jason Beulterman City of Tybee Island PO Box 2749 403 Butler Avenue Tybee Island, GA 31328 Re: Responses to Open House Comments for PI# 0010560, Chatham County, S.R. 26/U.S. 80 @ Lazaretto Creek and Bull River, Project Number: 0010560 Dear Mayor Beulterman, Thank you for your comments concerning the proposed project referenced above. We appreciate your participation and all of the input that was received as a result of the November 17, 2015 Public Information Open House. Every written comment received and verbal comment given to the court reporter has been made part of the project’s official record. Although we have been considering the valuable input for the past several months, we apologize for the delay in sharing these comments and responses. Several topics required further progress in our studies and design so that we could address them more completely. Part of our answers are based on decisions or findings over the past two months. Continuing community outreach will be a part of our ongoing efforts on the project over the next year and beyond. A total of 180 people attended the open house on November 17. Of the 106 respondents who formally commented, 54 were in support of the project, 12 were opposed, 18 were uncommitted, and 22 expressed conditional support. The attendees of the open house and those persons sending in comments within the comment period raised the following questions and concerns. The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) has prepared this one response letter that addresses all comments received so that everyone can be aware of the concerns raised and the responses given. Please find the comments summarized below (in italics) followed by our response.  The proposed sidewalk and bicycle lanes are an important and needed part of this project. – 36 comments Improved connectivity and safety for pedestrians and cyclists are important goals of the project. The proposed design includes paved shoulders and a 10-foot multi-use path, separated from travel lanes by barriers on the bridges and a grass buffer along the roadway section where the trail is proposed between Bull River and the McQueen’s Island Trail access area.  S.R. 26/U.S. 80 should be widened to a four-lane road. – 37 comments The S.R. 26/U.S. 80 project has been discussed through numerous studies over a 20-year period, including the most recent Coastal Regional Metropolitan Planning Organization (CORE MPO) planning study in December 2012. The CORE MPO is comprised of local and regional officials , including representatives from the City of Tybee Island. Due to factors including key environmental resources, average daily traffic, and overall expense, a four-lane highway was rejected as a practicable option within the current project scope.  S.R. 26/U.S. 80 should not be widened to four lanes. – 11 comments At this time, the project proposes a two-lane highway with improved paved shoulders for the entirety of the corridor. The proposed project is recommended by a planning study approved by the CORE MPO in December 2012. Engineering, environmental and hydraulic studies will be performed during the next phase of the project, which could result in changes to the proposed concept. However, current data supports a two-lane highway option.  Emergency vehicle access is a concern. S.R. 26/U.S. 80 would benefit from the inclusion of a lane for emergency vehicles in the event of a traffic incident. – 17 comments The proposed project includes 10-foot paved full-depth shoulders on both sides, which would allow emergency vehicles access and/or provide a lane to detour traffic during an incident response.  Opposing traffic lanes need to be separated by a barrier. The bike/pedestrian lane also needs a barrier to be separated from car traffic. – 12 comments The project team will investigate the addition of a median barrier. Safety is a central focus of all future improvements made to S.R. 26/U.S. 80; a barrier could impede access during emergency situations. However, the proposed multi-use bike/pedestrian path would be separated from travel lanes by a barrier on the bridges and a grass buffer along the roadway section.  The existing passing lanes need to be removed. – 5 comments The proposed concept would remove the existing passing lanes on S.R. 26/U.S. 80 between Bull River and Lazaretto Creek.  If rumble strips are included on the shoulders, it is requested that they be installed in a skip pattern and on or as close as possible to the fog line. – 2 comments Options for rumble strips within the shoulders, including those suggested by local cyclists, will be considered during the design phase following selection of a preferred alternative. The bike/pedestrian lane/trail should be widened to 12 feet. – 1 comment The proposed project includes a 10-foot, multi-use trail, which would be a significant amenity for residents and visitors alike. The bicycle/pedestrian width will be investigated. However, any increase in the width would have additional impact on the adjacent environmental resources.  The entrance to Fort Pulaski National Monument and the Rails to Trails entrances should be improved by including dedicated turn lanes. – 3 comments The proposed concept includes dedicated left- and right-turn lanes at the entrance of Fort Pulaski, McQueen’s Island Trail access, and the Lazaretto Creek Boat Ramp.  The project should be shifted to avoid encroachment on marina and condominium properties. – 2 comments At this time, alternatives have been proposed which could potentially shift the p roject to the north or south. The alternatives will be studied for engineering and environmental issues to determine the best overall layout that would meet federal regulations and minimize impacts. Landmarks and resident concerns will be considered during the alternatives process. �� The bridges need to be raised in order to accommodate shrimping boats, and the width between pillars must be at least 150 feet to accommodate outriggers.  1 comment The geometry of the bridges will be fully determined after further engineering, environmental and hydraulic studies are completed. The proposed height and clear span width will be coordinated with the U.S. Coast Guard. �� Drainage improvements along the highway with culverts to improve tidal flow are necessary. Flooding is a significant concern; the height of the road needs to be taken into consideration.  17 comments To ensure appropriate road height and any profile change along the corridor, hydraulic studies will be performed during the next phase of the project in summer/fall 2016. Concerns over recent flooding incidents are being taken into consideration. Recently, GDOT determined that approximately 2.8 miles of U.S. 80 would need to be raised at least to the approximate elevation on the island (7.5 feet above mean sea level), which would be an increase of 12 to 18 inches in the lowest spots along the existing pavement. �� Intersection treatments need to be considered for whenever cars, cyclists and pedestrians interact .  1 comment Local GDOT staff is consulting with Chatham County staff to investigate interim safety improvements at existing intersections separately from this project. The proposed project will incorporate the most current bike/pedestrian intersection treatments. The contact for the interim improvements is Cynthia Y. Phillips, GDOT District Traffic Engineer (912-530-4410, located at 204 North Highway 301, Jesup, Georgia 31545). �� The project should support the extension of the McQueen s Island Trail to the Lazaretto Creek bridge.  2 comments The extension of McQueen s Island Trail is not within the current project scope; therefore, it will need to be evaluated independently. As part of this project, GDOT will coordinate with the local officials on connecting the proposed bike/pedestrian facilities to the existing trail network. �� The project should include a twin-bridge design at each bridge location. New bridges should be constructed adjacent to the existing bridges.  2 comments The existing bridges must be replaced based on their aging conditions. To maintain traffic during construction, replacement bridges need to be built at least partially adjacent to the existing ones. The existing structures then would be removed after the new ones are open to traffic. The project proposes wider two-lane replacement bridges with paved shoulders in both directions and a barrier-separated, multi-use trail along the north side. �� The speed limit needs to be lowered on S.R. 26/U.S. 80.  12 comments The project team recognizes that the speed limit is an item of concern for residents and visitors to Tybee Island. Travel speeds along the corridor and safety standards will be examined to determine the appropriate speed limit on the improved highway. �� Signage should be improved at Bull River and Lazaretto Creek and throughout the project corridor.  5 comments The signing and pavement marking will be designed to meet current standards. Specialty signs will be investigated for unique project circumstances. �� Lighting should be improved along S.R. 26/U.S. 80.  1 comment Lighting improvements will be investigated along the corridor to improve overall safety and aesthetics of the road. However, lighting could have a negative impact on ecological resources within the adjacent marshland. �� Enforcement of traffic laws along S.R. 26/U.S. 80 needs to be improved through an increased police presence.  3 comments Traffic enforcement on S.R. 26/U.S. 80 is a collaborative responsibility of the Savannah-Chatham Police Department and the Tybee Island Police Department. This comment has been forwarded to local law enforcement officials for their consideration. �� The impact of the project on various environmental resources (wetlands, terrapins, etc.) is a concern.  6 comments Extensive environmental studies are being conducted along the project corridor to identify the best overall layout to meet federal regulations. One of the goals of the project team is to minimize the impact to the surrounding environmental resources. �� The timeline of the project is a concern. Solutions to traffic concerns and all other issues should be expedited.  10 comments Realizing the importance of the proposed operational and safety improvements, GDOT is committed to completing the project as quickly as possible for residents, visitors, and local businesses. The surrounding natural, historical, and archaeological resources present a unique challenge. Based on the status of S.R. 26/U.S. 80 as a Federal Highway and State Route located within National Park Service land, the project is subject to additional regulation. Completing all environmental and design requirements on the shortest achievable schedule is a high priority for GDOT. �� Safety is a concern. The top design priority of the project needs to be the protection of the drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians who use the road.  22 comments Safety is a top priority of the project team. Every effort will be made during design to provide the safest and most cost-effective solution that addresses vehicular traffic as well as cyclists and pedestrians. �� Specific routine maintenance along existing S.R. 26/U.S. 80 is necessary, as is removal of invasive species along the road.  2 comments This comment has been passed on to the local GDOT area office responsible for maintenance. Again, thank you for your comments. We look forward to engaging more with local stakeholders, the general public, and resources agencies as we complete studies in the coming months. Should you have further questions, comments or concerns, please call the project manager, David Moyer, at 404-291-5880 or the environmental analyst, Andrew Cobb, at 404-631-1255. Sincerely, Eric Duff State Environmental Administrator ED/TB cc: David Moyer, GDOT Project Manager (via email) PDF for Project File; Hardcopy to General Files