HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes_CCMeeting_06162015CITY COUNCIL MEETING
IONA COMMUNITY CENTER
JUNE 16, 2015 - 7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Mayor Brad Andersen, Attorney Dale W. Storer, Council President Robyn Walker,
Council Member Rob Geray, Council Member Dan Gubler, Public Works Director Zech Prouse,
Building Inspector Allen Eldridge, Chief of Police Matt Lurker, and City Clerk Julie Hammond.
ABSENT: Council Member Kathy McNamara, Treasurer Amy Sullivan and Animal Control
Officer Kayla Key.
VISITORS: Jolyn Louk, Robalyn Gubler, Thomas Moore, Jeanne Moore, Jerry Hansen, and
Ben Moon.
Mayor Andersen welcomed everyone and Council Member Geray led with the Pledge of
Allegiance. A roll call was taken to open the meeting.
Consent Agenda: Council Minutes and Work Meeting Minutes of May 19, 2015 had been
reviewed. Council reviewed the finance reports for the period ending May 31, 2015 (67% of the
fiscal year (FY) elapsed). The City had $1,062,733 in the bank and routine bills had been paid.
Mayor Andersen entertained a motion. Council President Walker moved to approve the Consent
Agenda. Council Member Geray seconded the motion. All were in favor, motion carried.
Visitor Concerns: Mayor Andersen reminded visitors that if they wanted to be on the agenda
they needed to contact the City Office at least 48 hours prior to Council.
Robalyn Gubler wanted to know why the water was left on at the splash pad and suggested
people pay to use it. Mayor Andersen stated the splash pad was on a sensor and would shut off
after so many minutes of non-use and they had discussed having people pay for it before but
thought for this year they would see how it goes.
Mrs. Gubler also wanted to know about state funding for the water tank and, if the City was
going to meters, would their water bill remain the same. Mayor Andersen indicated that bills for
services will have to increase because they have not had an increase in eight years. He stated
that anyone is welcome to attend the Water Committee Meetings and the minutes would be
posted on the City's website.
The City had contacted Thomas and Jeanne Moore regarding their mailbox because they did not
have a breakaway post and it sits on a corner which, during snow plow season, can easily be hit.
The Moore's did not want to cause public safety issues but had consulted with the Post Office
prior to placing their mailbox. They said they could drill holes in the base to make it a
breakaway post.
Attorney Storer recommended the City spend some time with the Post Office to come to a
consensus on placement of mailboxes.
1
froos
Hansen Property Recommendations: Mr. Hansen was given two suggested options (four lot
option or two lot option) from the City Engineer to develop his property at the corner of 49th
North and 55th East. Mr. Hansen felt the City Engineer's recommendations were to implement
rules for things that could happen fifty years from now. He stated that he expected the
City/Citizens to bear the cost of his water mainline, not him. He believes the person who wants
to develop the property should be responsible to build/pay for the mainline that runs across the
frontage of his property.
Mr. Hansen indicated he wanted to de -annex his property and go through Bonneville County.
Mayor Andersen thanked Mr. Hansen and asked if he wished to be added to next month's agenda
for that request. Mr. Hansen responded affirmatively.
City Attorney Storer suggested a work session for lessons learned regarding annexations
undertaken without platting.
Approval for Support of Targhee Regional Public transportation Authority (TRPTA):
Amanda Eli of TRPTA came to the Work Meeting to ask for the annual support for TRPTA and
explain their plan for the year.
Council Member Gubler felt that the program was not functioning. Mayor Andersen considered
giving TRPTA one more year to prove themselves. Council President Walker was indifferent
but overall thought it was a good program and widely used in Idaho Falls. Council Member
Geray indicated that ultimately we are making an investment in Ms. Eli and her intended plans
since history indicates the program is not cost-effective for Iona. No funding was approved.
Council would look at funding when they see TRPTA executing their plan.
Itinerant Merchant Application — Kaelyne Schwieder: Chief Lurker approved Mrs.
Schwieder's Itinerant Merchant Application for the sale of snow cones at 4949 E Iona Rd
pending payment of her background check. Council agreed.
Iona Day Celebration Update: Sasha Belliston would be working with a committee to provide
activities for the Iona Day Celebration. Registrations for the Fun Run would be mailed to
previous participants next week. Mayor Andersen suggested contacting Rocky Mountain Power
and the Idaho Department of Transportation for support of the event.
Personnel Policy: Any proposed changes would need to go to Treasurer Sullivan so the policy
could be approved at next month's Council Meeting. Attorney Storer expressed a number of
reservations concerning the policy, but acknowledged the validity of the Mayor's concerns
regarding the legal expense to modify and address those issues. The Council decided to go
ahead with the Idaho Counties Risk Management Program's template and review the cost of
modifications thereto at a future date.
Westmark CD: Council Member Gubler suggested Treasurer Sullivan check with Auditor
Dana Izatt of Searle Hart & Associates to check on other options through the Government Slush
Fund and if there were any penalties for early withdrawal.
2
e�1
Reports
Public Works Department: Director Prouse reported that the chip sealing was scheduled for
July 27, 2015. He was waiting for another bid on the Iona Square Pathway. Council asked about
the tennis courts. Director Prouse suggested upgrading to proper use or to get rid of them
because of the constant maintenance.
Bids for the Water Storage Tank Bladder would need to be Request for Proposal (RFP)
Engineered. Water usage for May was down due to the amount of rainfall. The splash pad has
been a big hit. Water used from June 3, 2015 to present for the splash pad was 2,000 gallons.
Director Prouse would add another float to help with water flow. The chlorine had been checked
every day with good results. He suggested switching out the blue post sprayer because it loses
water when the wind blows.
Director Prouse thought the Water Committee needed to come to a decision or direction. Mayor
Andersen stated there would be no more members added to the committee.
Director Prouse asked if anyone had contacted the owners of the Steele property located on the
corner of Dayton and Rockwood. The property has not been maintained and the City could
certainly use it for another T-Ball field or shelter. Council would try and contact the owners.
Dumpsters are scheduled to be set for Spring Clean-up this weekend. Safety chips will be
delivered so they can be added to the play areas.
Building Department: Inspector Eldridge reported five new houses in May with four more
already for the month of June. Sprinkler permits are steady. There was some vandalism reported
in Country Haven that Chief Lurker is checking into.
Electrical Inspector Brent Purcell is a licensed contractor and is operating under Jane Shaw's
Inspector License at this time.
Police Department: Chief Lurker has the same cases as last month. He is following up on code
enforcement. His computer should be done this week. He will have to rebuild his incident
reports due to the computer crashing. He will be picking up a 2 gigabyte drive for $100 so he
can back up his system.
Bonneville County is getting ready to replace their Animal Control Slide -out Unit if the City is
interested in purchasing it. Animal Control Officer Key has to take out her kennel every time
she picks up a large animal. Council Member Geray has observed a large number of stray dogs
in the area.
City Offices: Clerk Hammond reported that her husband had accepted a position in South
Carolina. The position required the family to move and she would have to leave her position as
City Clerk. The position would be posted in the Post Register, Association of Idaho Cities
Website, and on the City's Homepage and would run from June 18-28, 2015. Mayor Andersen,
3
Council President Walker, Council Member McNamara, Clerk Hammond, and Treasurer
Sullivan would help with the interviews.
Budget: Mayor Andersen asked that everyone have their budget information to him by the end
of the month. The Preliminary Budget would be on next month's agenda.
Meeting Adjourned 9:00 p.m.
COUNCIL APPROVED: July 21, 2015
ATTEST:
Julie - ammond, City Clerk
Brad Andersen, Mayor
4
City of Iona Finance Worksheet - Banks Page: 1
Period: 05/15 Jun 10, 2015 03:01PM
Report Criteria:
Print Source Titles
Total by Source
Print Department Titles
Total by Department
All Segments Tested for Total Breaks
[ReportlAccount Number ="011050","101175","101221","101231","101241" "511200","511210""511222","511232","511252","101242","511211"
Prior month 2 Pdor month 2014-15
Current year
Account Number Account Title Actual
01-1050 CHECKING - COMMERCE BANK 76,825.73 153,989.06 90,898.21
10-1175 INVESTMENTS -COMMERCE -GENERA 166,545.18 166,556.13 166,567.45
10-1221 ZIONS- GENERAL CD 58,143.99 58,161.82 58,178.99
10-1231 KEY BANK GENERAL - CD 157,910.52 157,913.12 157,915.80
10-1241 WELLS FARGO--GENERAL .00 .00 .00
10-1242 WESTMARK CD --GENERAL 50,568.88 50,723.30 50,723.30
51-1200 INVESTMENTS -COMMERCE WATER 197,596.25 197,609.24 237,624.42
51-1210 WELLS FARGO-WATER SVGS .00 .00 .00
51-1211 WESTMARK CD -WATER 52,508.97 52,669.71 52,669.71
51-1222 ZIONS - WATER SVGS-CD 43,863.01 43,876.47 43,889.43
51-1232 KEY BANK WATER -CD 52,636.84 52,637.70 52,638.60
51-1252 ZIONS BANK --WATER SAVINGS 151,535.97 151,582.45 151,627.22
Net Grand Totals: 1,008,135.34 1,085,699.00 1,062,733.13
.14
City of Iona
Check Register - Iona
Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 5/12015 - 5YJ7/2015 Jun 09, 2015 04:30PM
report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
Gl Pedod Check Issue Date Check Number
Payee
Descdpbon
GL Account Amount
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
FOR005/15
05/16
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/15
05/04/2015 13006
05/042015 13007
05/04/2015 13008
05/04/2015 13009
05/042016 13010
05/042015 13011
05/04/2015 13012
05/04/2015 13013
05/042015 13014
05/042015 13015
05/04/2015 13016
05/04/2015 13017
05/04/2015 13018
05/04/2015 13019
05/04/2015 13020
05/04/2015 13021
05/042015 13022
05/04/2015 13023
05/06/2015 13024
05/112015 13025
05/112015 13028
05/122015 13039
05/12/2015 13040
05/12/2015 13041
05/122015 13042
05/12/2015
05/12/2015
05/122015
05/12/2015
05/12/2015
05/12/2015
05/12/2015
05/122015
05/12/2015
05/12/2015
05/122015
05/19/2015
05/19/2015
05/19/2015
05/19/2015
05/19/2015
05/20/2015
05/20/2015
05282015
Grand Totals:
USPS
C-A-L-RANCH STORES
DIGIS
FALLS PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC.
FIRST RESPONDERS
FREMONT COMMUNICATIONS
IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPT.
LANDON EXCACATING, INC.
PACIFIC STEEL - IDAHO FALLS
PORTER'S OFFICE PRODUCTS
PRO RENTALS & SALES, INC
SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK
STATE INSURANCE FUND
TETON MICROBIOLOGY LAB
UNITED MAILING DIRECT Bd,540-10
WE)( BANK ?aids /9 tar
H-K CONTRACTORS, INC.
HOLDEN KIDWELL HAHN & CRAPO P.L.L.C.
BRENT PURCELL
GREG MCBRIDE
JENA MOORE
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD.
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS CO.
IONA FOOD MART
13043 NATIONAL PEN CO. LLC
13044 NETBACK, LLC
13045 PC PLUS
13046 POST REGISTER
13047 PSI ENVIRONMENTAL
13048 RYAN PRECISION CABINET, INC.
13049 SCHIESS & ASSOCIATES
13050 SUNNYSIDE GARDENS
13051 VALLEY READY MIX
13052 VERIZON WIRELESS
13053 YELLOWSTONE LUMBER LLC
13054 IONA HISTORICAL MUSEUM
13055 CABLE ONE
13058 CASELLE, INC.
13057 PEAK ALARM
13058 ROCKY MTN. POWER
13059 GREG MCBRIDE
13060 JENA MOORE
13075 WADE WHITE
Summary by General Ledger Account Number
MAILING WATER STATEMENTS
MISC. MAINT.
Domain Service
Misc. maint. parts
Animal Control Officer uniform
TELEPHONE
EXEMPT PLATES
Screened Topsoil delivered and s
15" Culvert
Office supplies
Sod Cutter rental -Pioneer Park
Membership fees
Installment Premium
Water tests
Preparing Water statements
Public Works -Fuel Sift. of
Asphalt overlay Longhurst & Wild
City Attomey Retainer fees
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
Mechanical Inspections
Cleaning
Streets -Right of Way Weed Killer
Head gates
Natural gas
Ice
Customized pens
Office PC's backup
Set up email for Bldg. Dept. & Offi
PH-LUV E
Garbage pick up
Library Bookcases
Proposed tank site continued vror
2 Trees -Arbor Day
Steele & Dayton Ditch repairs
Cell phones
Park -Pioneer Park -Shelter
Museum Utilites approved by Cou
Internet
CONTRACT SUPPORT
Qtrly Security alarm monitoring
Street Lights - 411 Ander
Mechanical Inspections
Cleaning
itinerant Merchant Fee reimburse
514150 365.54
104710 83.44
104150 4.02
104710 40.36
104890 68.99
514150 281.17
104690 23.00
104710 154.12
104710 229.00
104150 116.35
104710 88.70
104150 55.98
104170 5.805.00
514710 75.00
514150 862.70
104710 448.79
104820 26,318.54
104180 540.00
104720 190.00
104720 995.18
104710 252.00
104710 380.00
104820 625.00
514710 303.87
104790 19.31
514150 83.50
514150 75.00
104720 93.75
104155 92.63
104710 102.14
104810 1,600.00
514180 367.50
104820 162.98
104710 578.00
514710 207.83
104820 49.41
104780 61.54
514150 119.00
104150 248.00
104150 106.23
104175 4,815.37
104720 60.00
514710 280.00
104790 50.00
47,250.92
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
DEBIT CARD PURCHASES
Dates:
5/01 thru 5/31/2015
Julie Hammond:
Zech Prouse
Council misc.
Council B-day
Potting Soil & flowers
4TH of July Parade Fee
Park bathroom supplies
Account Total
10-41-50
10-41-50
10-47-10
10-47-90
16.43
3.75
171.06
50.00
10-47-10 222.84
Total 464.08
City of Iona
Check Register - Iona Page: 2
Check Issue Dates: 5/12015 - 5/31/2015 Jun 09, 2015 04:30PM
GL Account
Debit Credit Proof
Grand Totals:
Dated:
Mayor:
City Council:
10-2010 .00 41,233.35- 41,233.35-
1041-50 689.16 .00 689.16
1041-55 92.63 .00 92.63
1041-80 540.00 .00 540.00
1041-70 5,805.00 .00 5,805.00
1041-75 904.83 .00 904.83
1048-90 485.01 .00 485.01
1047-10 2,131.80 .00 2,131.80
1047-20 1,292.04 .00 1,292.04
1047-80 81.54 .00 81.54
1047-90 69.31 .00 69.31
1048-10 1,600.00 .00 1,600.00
1048-20 27,153.93 .00 27,153.93
104950 388.10 .00 388.10
51-2010 .00 6,017.57- 6,017.57-
5141-50 1,220.23 .00 1,220.23
5141-75 3,710.54 .00 3,710.54
5141-80 367.50 .00 367.50
5147-10 719.30 .00 719.30
47,250.92 47,260.92- .00
(erne/ s
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
TAX REVENUE
10-31-10 PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
LICENSES & PERMITS
10-32.20 BEER & DOG LICENSES
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CITY OF IONA
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2015
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
3,493.53 158,764.82 235,480.00 76,715.38 67.4
3,493.53 158,764.62 235,480.00 76,715.38 67.4
.00 457.00 1,200.00 743.00 38.1
.00 457.00 1,200.00 743.00 38.1
10-33-10 STATE LIQUOR TAX .00 43,224.00 63,000.00 19,776.00 68.8
10-33-20 STATE REVENUE SHARING 5,448.78 54,483.41 88,355.00 33,871.59 61.7
10-33-30 STATE HIGHWAY USERS .00 48,760.72 63,000.00 14,239.28 77.4
10-3340 POLICE REVENUE 250.65 3,346.89 7,200.00 3,853.11 46.6
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,899.43 149,815.02 221,555.00 71,739.98 67.6
CHARGES FOR SERVICE
10-34-10 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES 6,524.40 36,181.40 72,000.00 35,818.60 50.3
10-34-20 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 1,831.00 3,888.38 8,300.00 4,411.62 46.9
10-3430 NATURAL GAS FRANCHISE .00 8,356.68 13,000.00 4,643.32 64.3
10-3440 POWER FRANCHISE .00 17,425.05 27,000.00 9,574.95 84.5
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE 8,155.40 65,851.51 120,300.00 54,448.49 54.7
OTHER REVENUE
10.38-10 INTEREST 31.17 909.57 1,000.00 90.43 91.0
10-36-50 BUILDING RENT 1,245.00 9,085.00 12,600.00 3,515.00 72.1
10-36-60 MYAC REVENUE .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0
10-38-70 IONA DAY REVENUE .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0
10-38-80 MUSEUM .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0
10-36-90 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 125.00 5,332.34 8,000.00 2,667.66 66.7
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 1,401.17 15,326.91 25,600.00 10,273.09 59.9
RECREATION REVENUE
10-37-50 RECREATION FEES 5,745.50 72,063.43 85,000.00 ( 7,083.43) 110.9
10-37-80 SHELTER RENTAL 245.00 420.00 1,250.00 830.00 33.6
TOTAL RECREATION REVENUE 5,990.50 72,483.43 68,250.00 ( 8,233.43) 109.4
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/10/2015 10:30AM PAGE: 1
CITY OF IONA
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2015
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1038-20 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
RESERVES
10-39-50 RESERVES .00 .00 102,395.00 102,395.00 .0
TOTAL RESERVES .00 .00 102,395.00 102,395.00 .0
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
24,740.03 462,698.49 817,780.00 355,081.51 56.6
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 08/10/2015 10:30AM PAGE: 2
CITY OF IONA
EXPENDITURES WRH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2015
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
ADMINISTRATION
10-41-10 PAYROLL 8,914.29 63,583.34 116,000.00 52,416.66 54.8
1041-20 PAYROLL TAXES 1,031.48 7,088.62 15,000.00 7,931.38 47.1
10-41-30 RETIREMENT 1,024.57 7,788.20 12,000.00 4,211.80 64.9
10-41-40 HEALTH INSURANCE 2,187.72 16,666.52 30,000.00 13,333.48 55.6
1041-50 OFFICE EXPENSE 709.34 10,486.45 11,000.00 513.55 95.3
10-41-55 PUBLISHING 92.63 562.92 1,500.00 937.08 37.5
1041-60 LEGAL &AUDIT FEES 540.00 19,069.00 40,000.00 20,931.00 47.7
1041-63 ENGINEERING .00 742.50 15,000.00 14,257.50 5.0
1041-65 TRAINING/TRAVEL .00 1,002.30 5,000.00 3,997.70 20.1
1041-70 INSURANCE LIABILITY 5,805.00 9,345.00 18,500.00 9,155.00 50.5
1041-75 ELECTRICITY -NATURAL GAS 904.83 9,405.52 18,000.00 5,594.48 52.3
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
POLICE DEPARTMENT
21,209.84 145,720.37 282,000.00 136,278.63 51.7
1046-10 POLICE -PAYROLL 5,237.50 34,240.94 85,000.00 50,759.06 40.3
1046-20 PAYROLL TAXES 537.60 3,387.40 9,000.00 5,612.60 37.6
1046-30 POLICE -RETIREMENT 538.26 3,135.29 8,800.00 5.664.71 35.6
104640 POLICE -HEALTH INSURANCE 1,433.50 8,480.49 30,000.00 21,519.51 28.3
1046-70 POLICE -TRAINING .00 923.24 7,500.00 8,576.76 12.3
1046-80 POLICE-COUNTY/DISPATCH .00 12,321.67 39,000.00 26,678.33 31.6
1046-90 POLICE -GENERAL 485.01 11.529.79 15,000.00 3,470.21 76.9
TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 8,231.87 74,018.82 184,300.00 120,281.18 38.1
MISCELLANEOUS DEPT
1047.10 MAINTENANCE 2,525.70 34,908.07 94,000.00 58,091.93 37.1
10-47-20 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 2,023.06 13,598.47 26,000.00 12,401.53 52.3
1047-30 EQUIPMENT EXPENSE 80.08 966.91 5,000.00 4,033.09 18.3
1047-50 CVIL DEFENSE .00 895.00 1,000.00 105.00 89.5
1047-60 MYAC EXPENSE .00 38.60 1,000.00 961.40 3.9
1047-70 IONA DAY EXPENSE .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0
10-47-80 MUSEUM EXPENSE 81.54 202.23 1.000.00 797.77 20.2
1047-90 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 119.31 4,788.97 10,000.00 5,211.03 47.9
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS DEPT 4,829.69 55,398.25 140,000.00 84,601.75 39.6
CAPITAL OUTLAY
10-48.10 LIBRARY 1,600.00 1,812.50 3,000.00 1,187.50 60.4
1048-20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 27,153.93 68,210.64 83,480.00 15,289.38 81.7
1048-50 LAND ACQUISITION .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 28,753.93 70,023.14 98,480.00 26,456.86 72.6
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 67 % THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/10/2015 10:30AM PAGE: 3
CITY OF IONA
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2015
GENERAL FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
RECREATION EXPENDITURES
10-49-10 RECREATION LABOR 760.45 21,120.19 27,000.00 5,879.81 78.2
1049-20 PAYROLL TAXES 88.52 1,921.08 4,500.00 2,578.92 42.7
10-4950 RECREATION SUPPLIES 419.10 11,712.96 21,000.00 9,287.04 55.8
1049-80 RECREATION EQUIPMENT .00 526.28 4,500.00 3,973.72 11.7
1049-70 RECREATION MAINTENANCE .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0
TOTAL RECREATION EXPENDITURES 1,268.07 35,280.51 60,000.00 24,719.49 58.8
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
10-50-10 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 84,293.40 380,441.09 817,780.00 437,338.91 46.5
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES ( 39,553.37) 82,257.40 .00 ( 82,257.40) .0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/10/2015 10:30AM PAGE: 4
OPERATING REVENUE
51-31-10 COLLECTIONS
51-31-30 HOOK UP FEES
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CITY OF IONA
REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2015
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
18,176.82 143,867.64 198,000.00 54,132.36 72.7
12,000.00 54,000,00 81,000.00 27,000.00 66.7
30,176.82 197,867.64 279,000.00 81,132.36 70.9
51-33-80 GRANTS .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0
WATER
51-35-10 WATER SYSTEM .00 .00 66,150.00 68,150.00 .0
TOTAL WATER .00 .00 86,150.00 66,150.00 .0
MISCELANEOUS REVENUE
51-36-10 INTEREST
73.81 1,278.28 1,200.00 ( 78.28) 106.5
51-36-20 MISC REVENUE .00 .00 200.00 200.00 .0
TOTAL MISCELANEOUS REVENUE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
73.81 1,278.28 1,400.00 121.72 91.3
51-38-60 EQUIPMENT RESERVES .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
RESERVES
51.39-50 RESERVES .00 .00 70,500.00 70,500.00 .0
TOTAL RESERVES .00 .00 70,500.00 70,500.00 .0
TOTAL FUND REVENUE
30,250.63 199,145.92 465,060.00 265,904.08 42.8
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 67 % THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 06/10/2015 10:30AM PAGE: 5
ADMINISTRATION
51-41-10 PAYROLL
5141-20 PAYROLL TAXES
5141-30 RETIREMENT
514140 HEALTH INSURANCE
5141-50 OFFICE EXPENSE & LEGAL
5141-75 ELECTRICITY & NATURAL GAS
51-41.80 ENGINEERING
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
MISCELLANEOUS
CITY OF IONA
EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET
FOR THE 8 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2015
WATER FUND
PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT
4,608.34
531.33
603.76
1,432.08
1,220.23
3,710.54
387.50
48.232.09
5,601.84
8,140.85
12,291.88
15,993.26
23,149.17
5,147.50
69,500.00 21,267.91 69.4
8,000.00 2,398.16 70.0
8,200.00 2,059.15 74.9
18,500.00 6,208.12 66.4
15,250.00 ( 743.26) 104.9
41,400.00 18,250.83 55.9
15,000.00 9,852.50 34.3
12,473.78 116,558.59
175,850.00 59,293.41 66.3
5147-10 MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 719.30 16,320.84 50,000.00 33,879.36 32.6
5147-20 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE .00 .00 200.00 200.00 .0
5147-30 EQUIPMENT EXPENSE .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0
5147-35 EQUIPMENT RENT .00 .00 4,000.00 4,000.00 .0
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 719.30 18,320.64 57,200.00 40,879.36 28.5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
5148-20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS .00 15,280.00 70,000.00 54,740.00 21.8
5148-30 LAND ACQUISITION .00 .00 15,000.00 15,000.00 .0
5148-50 SYSTEM UPGRADE .00 .00 102,000.00 102,000.00 .0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS .00 15,280.00 187,000.00 171,740.00 8.2
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
51-50-10 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
TOTAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0
TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 13,193.08 148,137.23 485,050.00 316,912.77 31.9
NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 17,057.55 51,008.69 .00 ( 51,008.89) .0
FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY
67 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 08/10/2015 10:30AM PAGE: 8
CITY OF IONA
3548 N Main
P.O. Box 487
Iona, Idaho 83427
June 16, 2015
Jerry Hansen
5609 E. Iona Road
Idaho Falls, ID 83401
Phone: (208) 523-5600
Fax: (208) 535.0087
Re: Building Permit/Water Connection Permit — Property Located at Intersection of
49`h N. and 45`h East
Dear Mr. Hansen:
Following your last appearance before the Iona City Council, I asked Mr. Paul Scoresby of
Schiess & Associates to comment upon the Record of Survey which you delivered to the City
Council last month. As you are aware, Mr. Scoresby is a Consulting Engineer for the City of
Iona and he had previously reviewed and commented upon some of your earlier plans and
surveys. I am enclosing Mr. Scoresby's recommendations and comments with respect to your
most recent Record of Survey, which, in its current configuration proposes the development of
four lots upon the property with the remainder of the property left undeveloped and no access to
a public road.
As noted in Mr. Scoresby's letter, your current proposed configuration would create safety issues
with respect to the access being too close to a major intersection and further result in having
public water lines located in an easement rather than a dedicated right-of-way. The current
configuration would also require the installation of water main lines in 49`h N and 55`h East at
substantial cost to you. These connections would be required because the need for the water
lines is driven by the frontage of these lots on those roads.
As noted in Mr. Scoresby's letter, you may wish to consider a two lot configuration which would
mitigate the safety problems associated with street access and would eliminate the need for the
construction of a water line in 55`h East. If you elect to proceed with such revised configuration,
you will need to have your engineer prepare a new Record of Survey and file the site plan and
IBSD Certifications with the City before applying for a building permit and water connection
permit. Obviously the choice is yours; however, given Mr. Scoresby's recommendations, I
believe it is unlikely the Building Official would approve an application for those permits in its
current configuration. On the other hand, if you were to reduce the number of lots to two lots
and include the deliverables referenced in Mr. Scoresby's letter, I believe the Building Official
would be much more likely to authorize the issuance of a water connection permit and building
permit.
Jerry Hansen
June 16, 2015
Page 2 of 2
As noted in Mr. Scoresoy's letter, the City needs to know whether or not you wish to consider
such revised configuration or whether you desire to proceed with the existing four lot
configuration. If you will provide t1-at information to me, I will respond appropriately.
Sincerely yoy}rs,
irz�rn,
lie Hammond
City Clerk
Enclosure
94
NEW O
CITY OF IONA
3548 N MAIN
P.O. BOX 487
IONA, ID. 83427
208-523-5600(Phone)
208-535-0087(Fax)
ITINERANT MERCHANT APPLICATION
RENEWAL ® CHANGE OF INFORMATION
License Fee (New & Renewal)
Idaho Business 0
$50.00
Out of State Business 0
$50.00
Investigation Fee Total $25.00/Individual $
Total Paid for License and Investigation Fee $.
SWean- Shack_
Business Full Name
�oSsl— 333s
Business Phone Number
Ot e l u .,bttA)}fcti✓
Business Cdntact (Owner/Manager)
State Sales Tax #
LtiLtei 6. lona [°fi t
Business Physical Address
Business Mailing Address
4n--6 5 :3--i q 31
Association 0 Partnership 0 Corporation 0 Other gi
Please list all of the individuals who will be selling goods/services within the City of Iona for the business
listed above. A separate 525.00 investigation fee will be applied for each individual. Each individual
must provide a copy of a valid state issued identification card.
First, Middle, Last Name
Date of Birth I.D. Number or Social Security Number
Please list all vehicle registration numbers and state of issuance that will be used in conjunction with this
license.
Briefly describe the nature/type of business, goods and services sold and location where goods will be
sold within the City.
5911 'no cane')
Please describe whether any business -related permit or license held by the applicant or any of the
applicant's agents or employees has been revoked within the past five (5) years by any jurisdiction, and
if so, where, when and why the revocation occurred.
Please list any felony convictions or crimes of immorality for any of the applicants listed above within
five (5) years prior to the date of this application.
N l'jor
Licenses will be approved/denled within 30 days of the application. If the application is denied during
the 30 day review period, the applicant's license fee will be reimbursed. If the application is denied
after the initial 30 day review period for ANY reason, no refund will be given on ANY fees charged.
Please understand the Itinerant Merchant license Is valid till December 31g of the current calendar
Year. Any violation of Iona City Code or Idaho State Law may revoke this license. If this license is
revoked for am reason. you will be given the opportunity to request a reinstatement of this license
from the lona City Council at the next coundl meeting within 30 days of revocation.
Chief of Police
Approved O Denied
Mayor of Iona Approved 0 Denied
City Clerk
Date of License: to
Explanation will be attached if application is denied.
"
S S c h i e s s & A s s o c i a t e s
I M P R O V I N G C O M M U N I T Y I N F R A S T R U C T U R E
7 1 0 3 S O U T H 4 5 T H W E S T , I D A H O F A L L S . I D 8 3 4 0 2
O F F I C E : ( 2 0 8 ) 5 2 2 - 1 2 4 4 F A X : ( 2 0 8 ) 5 2 2 - 9 2 3 2
J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 5
J u l i e H a m m o n d , C i t y C l e r k
C i t y o f I o n a
P O B o x 4 8 7
I o n a , I D 8 3 4 2 7
R e : R e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d o f s u r v e y o f t h e J e r r y a n d J o A n n H a n s e n p r o p e r t y l o c a t e d o n t h e
n o r t h e a s t c o r n e r o f 4 9 t h N o r t h a n d 5 5 t h E a s t i n t h e C i t y o f I o n a
D e a r J u l i e :
P e r y o u r r e q u e s t , w e h a v e r e v i e w e d t h e p r o p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t p l a n / r e c o r d o f s u r v e y o f M r . J e r r y
H a n s e n . W e u n d e r s t a n d t h a t t h e C i t y o f I o n a a n n e x e d t h i s u n p l a t t e d , u n d e v e l o p e d p r o p e r t y i n
2 0 1 4 . T h e a n n e x a t i o n i n c l u d e d t h a t p o r t i o n o f 4 9 t h N . ( T e l f o r d R o a d ) a l o n g t h e f r o n t a g e o f M r .
H a n s e n ' s p r o p e r t y . A p p a r e n t l y , a t t h e t i m e o f a n n e x a t i o n M r . H a n s e n c o n t e m p l a t e d d e v e l o p i n g
t h e p r o p e r t y i n t o s i x l o t s , b u t b e c a u s e o f u r g e n c y e x p r e s s e d b y M r . H a n s e n , n o s u b d i v i s i o n p l a t
o r d e v e l o p m e n t a g r e e m e n t w a s e x e c u t e d i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e a n n e x a t i o n . T h e p o r t i o n o f t h e
o r i g i n a l p r o p e r t y t h a t i n c l u d e d t h e o l d F r a n d s e n h o m e w a s a l r e a d y s p l i t a w a y f r o m t h e s u b j e c t
p a r c e l a n d w a s n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h e a n n e x a t i o n . A t s o m e p o i n t i n t i m e , M r . H a n s e n ' s e n g i n e e r
p r e p a r e d a r e c o r d o f s u r v e y c o n s i s t i n g o f s i x l o t s . I t i s n o t c l e a r w h e t h e r t h i s r e c o r d o f s u r v e y
w a s e v e r r e c o r d e d . S u b s e q u e n t l y , M r . H a n s e n c h a n g e d e n g i n e e r s a n d M r . H a n s e n t h e n r e d u c e d
t h e n u m b e r o f b u i l d i n g l o t s t o f o u r b y e l i m i n a t i n g t w o o f t h e s u r v e y e d l o t s , b u t o t h e r w i s e
k e e p i n g t h e r e m a i n i n g l o t s t h e s a m e a s h a d b e e n o r i g i n a l l y s h o w n i n t h e r e c o r d o f s u r v e y . T h e
d e v e l o p m e n t p l a n c u r r e n t l y p r o p o s e d b y M r . H a n s e n c o n s i s t s o f t h o s e s a m e f o u r b u i l d i n g l o t s
a n d a l a n d l o c k e d p o r t i o n n o t t o b e p a r c e l e d o u t a t t h i s t i m e . T h i s p r o p o s a l w a s p r e p a r e d b y
B e n c h m a r k L a n d S u r v e y i n g d a t e d M a y 1 2 , 2 0 1 5 a n d i s a t t a c h e d t o t h i s l e t t e r i n a r e d u c e d s i z e .
T o c o n d u c t t h i s r e v i e w w e c o n s u l t e d t h e f o l l o w i n g d o c u m e n t s :
1 . I o n a S u b d i v i s o n O r d i n a n c e
2 . I o n a W a t e r S e r v i c e O r d i n a n c e
3 . B o n n e v i l l e M e t r o p o l i t a n P l a n n i n g O r g a n i z a t i o n ( B M P O ) A c c e s s M a n a g e m e n t P l a n
4 . B M P O L o n g R a n g e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n a n d s u b s e q u e n t r o a d w a y p l a n u p d a t e s o b t a i n e d
f r o m B M P O s t a f f
5 . T h e I d a h o D r i n k i n g W a t e r R u l e s ( I D A P A 5 8 - 0 1 - 0 8 )
6 . T h e I d a h o W a s t e w a t e r R u l e s ( I D A P A 5 8 - 0 1 - 1 6 )
7 . I o n a W a t e r M a s t e r P l a n d a t e d A u g u s t 2 0 0 7
8 . I o n a W a t e r F a c i l i t i e s P l a n n i n g S t u d y d a t e d O c t o b e r 2 0 0 9
9 . I o n a S u p p l e m e n t t o t h e I d a h o F a l l s S t a n d a r d S p e c i f i c a t i o n s a n d D r a w i n g s
1 0 . M e a d o w b r o o k A c r e s p l a t a n d A n n e x a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 3 2
1 1 . H a n s e n A n n e x a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 1 8 4 - 0 6 - 1 4
Julie Hammond
June 12, 2015
Page 2
We also consulted with the following organizations and people to properly interpret the rules and
guidelines that are applicable to dividing this parcel of ground:
1. City staff including the city clerk, public works director and city attorney
2. Bonneville County surveyor
3. BMPO director
These resources and organizations were consulted in an effort to perform a thorough review and
to protect the health and safety of the general public, the current owners, the City of Iona and the
eventual owners of the lots in question. We are also mindful of the long term planning interests
and goals of Iona, Bonneville County and regional BMPO member organizations.
Our understanding of the City subdivision ordinance is that the four lot development proposed by
Mr. and Mrs. Hansen falls beneath the five lot definition of a subdivision. Therefore a plat is not
required for the development of the proposed four lots. If Mr. Hansen later sells or develops any
additional lots within this parcel, then this development will be considered as a five lot
development, the definition of a subdivision would then be met and full compliance with the
subdivision ordinance will be required.
Given Mr. Hansen's desire to use the entire north two-thirds of the parcel for his own personal
residence and shop, he may wish to consider dividing the property into just two lots as shown on
the attached marked up photocopy of the proposed plan labeled "Engineer Suggested Plan." This
would greatly simplify Mr. Hansen's effort to divide up the parcel, would eliminate the would-be
land -locked portion and be more in line with his desire to use the majority of the overall parcel
for his own use. It also would support more distance between the access and the intersection of
55th E. (Iona North Road) and 49` N. It would also eliminate the need to immediately construct
a waterline and a sewer line in 49th N.
Assuming Mr. Hansen chooses to proceed with his current plan, there are several requirements to
which he should adhere in order to protect public health and safety. These are enumerated in
detail as follows:
1. Both 55`h East and 49`h North have been classified by BMPO as minor arterials as shown
on the attached map labeled 2040 BMPA Master Roadway Plan. According to the BMPO
Access Management Plan, future right of way desired to promote long-term safe and
effective movement of traffic along major corridors requires that 100 feet of roadway be
preserved for a future five -lane road. If this were required, Mr. Hansen would then be
responsible for half of the 100 feet or 50 feet from the section line. Although requiring
this much right of way from Mr. Hansen may not be justifiable due to the size of the
Hansen development, we suggest that the City request dedication of 35 feet from road
centerline so that the water mainline constructed at the location shown on Mr. Hansen's
record of survey is located in the road right-of-way and not in a utility easement. See
section 8-2-12 of the Iona City Code. Proof of such dedication should be provided to the
City prior to the City sending to DEQ a "Will Serve" letter agreeing to the construction of
the waterline extension along 55`h E. To accomplish this, Mr. Hansen will have to revise
the record -of -survey and shift the lot lines to the west in order to make room for the
Julie Hammond
June 12, 2015
Page 3
waterline in the street right-of-way. This will require a new record of survey to establish
the actual locations of the lot corners that take into account the location of the waterline
in the 55th E. street right-of-way. This should occur before a building permit is granted.
Along the south side of 49th N., the developer of Meadowbrook Acres dedicated to the
City 25 feet of street right-of-way from the section line which is located at the centerline
of 49th N. Again, due to the size of the Hansen development, it is difficult to justify
requiring Mr. Hansen to dedicate 50 feet of street right-of-way from the section line north
into the Hansen property. As per Section 8-2-12 of the Iona City Code, , the City should
require Mr. Hansen to dedicate 35 feet of street right-of-way along 49th N. in order to
allow installation of the waterline in the street right-of-way, rather than within a utility
easement, as proposed in Mr. Hansen's record of survey. Due to the existing location of
dry utilities, 25 feet allows for little room for the future water main line as reflected on
Mr. Hansen's record of survey. This will put the future water main line in the street right-
of-way where it belongs. Please also note that with the Engineer -proposed two lot plan,
Mr. Hansen will not need to construct a water mainline in 49th N. This would only be
needed if Mr. Hansen or someone else developed property beyond the subject
development which warranted the extension of City water service.
2. The BMPO Access Management Plan is a regional guide that restricts the number of
accesses and locations of those accesses relative to the nearest minor arterial
intersections. Table 6 in Section 4.3 of this document suggests safe spacing of accesses
(or minor intersections such as driveways) to minor arterial intersections. Considering
spacing along 55th E., the 35 mph information in the table applies. This table
recommends the distance from any access to the intersection of 49th N. and 55th E. to be
340 feet. With the developer -planned four lot subdivision, the separation distance cannot
be met for Lots 2 and 3, which would compromise safety. The City should not accept
these accesses on grounds of safety. Conversely, if there is only one access along 55th E.
for the large Lot 2, as reflected on the attached Engineer Suggested Plan, then proper
access spacing of 340 feet can be achieved. This approach would also require relocation
of the speed limit sign located just south of the intersection of 49th N. to the north of 49th
North prior to approaching the access of Lot 2 on the Engineer Suggested Plan.
For access to Lot 1 on the Engineer Suggested Plan along 49th S, the desired spacing
according to Table 6 at 50 mph is 425 feet. Obviously, under the circumstances this much
distance is not achievable. Therefore, we recommend the City allow the access at the far
west edge of the lot in order to achieve as much distance as possible. This approach
would result in spacing of about 260 feet from the intersection of 49th S and 55th E.,
which is the best possible outcome under these circumstances.
3. We understand that the zoning is R-I. Although the Hansen four lot proposal could
comply with the lot sizing requirements of R-1, a two lot plan would also comply with
the lot sizing requirements of the R-1 zone.
sio
Julie Hammond
June 12,2015
Page 4
4. Under section 8-2-12 of the Iona City Code, the City has authority to require construction
of water mains across the frontage of any property for which a water service connection
is requested. If the City decides to upsize water mains for future planning, then the City
would pay the material cost differential for the larger line. Improvement plans for needed
water main extensions should conform to the Idaho Drinking Water Rules (IDAPA 58-
01-08) as administered by DEQ and the City is subject to those Rules. Therefore Mr.
Hansen should submit improvement plans and specifications to the City and DEQ prior to
connection to the City water lines and issuance of a building permit. DEQ will not
approve the water lines unless the City provides a "Will Serve" letter to DEQ. These
improvement plans would include plan and profile that illustrates the location of the
waterline relative to other utilities, including any sewer collection lines and water and
sewer service lines to each lot and the size of and type of proposed water lines. The City
and DEQ will then be able to verify compliance with the Idaho Drinking Water Rules.
There are many considerations when determining whether a water main line should be
upsized in front of the Hansen development. With the City's plan of constructing a
storage tank above the east end of 49th N. on the Heuer -Smith property on the hill, the
City will have to construct a large waterline (probably 12 inch or larger) from the storage
tank on the hill west along 49th N. to 55th East, then south along 55th E. to Steele Ave.
The two previous water studies referenced above recommended an eight inch diameter
pipe to replace the existing six inch pipe from Steele Ave. to 49th N. along 55th E. This
recommendation was made without consideration of a new storage tank on the hill above
the end of 49th N. This new tank and large water main line connected to the pipe network
in the original town site may spur growth near the large waterline.
Despite the foregoing considerations, in my opinion an eight inch waterline along 55th E.
in front of the Hansen lots appears to be adequate now and in the future. With the canal
situated as it is crossing the road from west to east north of the Hansen property, the
street is a little problematic when considering installation of a water trunk line. There are
many homes built on both sides of the road north of the intersection of 49th N. and 55th
E. If properties north of 49th N. are developed, it appears that it would be more useful to
connect a northbound trunk line to the 49th N. trunk line built in connection with the new
storage tank. This northbound trunk line would likely be placed within a large
subdivision by a developer. A main line on 55th E. could serve as a loop and wouldn't
have to be 12 inches in diameter. Considering the geographic elements already in place, I
believe an 8 inch diameter water main line along the frontage of the Hansen lots along
55th E. is adequate. A fire hydrant should be installed near the end of the main line to
make fire flow effective for the new homes and for flushing of the dead end line.
If Mr. Hansen were to implement a two lot plan, a water main along the frontage of the
Hansen property on 49th N. would not be needed. However, if Mr. Hansen insists upon a
four lot configuration, then we suggest the City require a 12 inch diameter line in the
Telford Road right of way, with the City paying the material cost differential. Keep in
mind that Telford Road is bounded by Meadowbrook Acres to the south and the Hansen
development to the north and therefore 49th N. remains the only corridor available for a
water main line that could potentially serve hundreds of homes located to the west.
Julie Hammond
June 12, 2015
Page 5
As noted above, the City has the ability to require that water mains be extended along the
entire frontage of the customer's property as per Section 8-2-12 of the Iona City Code. If
the City elects to require installation of the oversize water main in 49`h N., then
preparation of a Development Agreement will be required in order to enable Mr. Hansen
to recover the oversize materials costs from the City. Additionally, if Mr. Hansen agrees
to implement the two lot plan, installs the eight inch waterline along 55`h E. and wants the
opportunity to be reimbursed for any service line hookups granted by the city in the
future across the street, then a Development Agreement would be required. Each Hansen
lot should still be subject to the payment of connection fees per Section 8-2-14(B). The
need to prepare a Development Agreement is therefore necessarily driven by Mr.
Hansen's decision regarding a two -lot versus a four -lot configuration and the desire for
future reimbursement. Mr. Hansen needs to make that decision sooner rather than later.
Iona has adopted the Idaho Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications as a basis for
plans and specifications and Mr. Hansen should file plans and specifications with the City
and DEQ demonstrating compliance with such standards. The nature and extent of such
plans and specifications is necessarily driven by Mr. Hansen's determination to go with a
two lot or four lot configuration. He should make that determination and proceed
accordingly. Mr. Hansen's engineer should also refer to lona's Supplement to the Idaho
Falls Standard Drawings and Specifications document for more specific guidance on the
installation of water mains and water meter boxes that are not included in the Idaho Falls
Standard Drawings and Specifications.
5. Improvement plans for needed sewer main extensions will be required by IBSD with the
proposed four lot development plan. IBSD has jurisdiction of sewer line extensions in
Iona. IBSD will dictate the collection pipe size. Mr. Hansen will have to conform to
IBSD's review and approval process of design plans and specifications, pay the costs of
engineering review and inspections and submit record drawings upon project completion.
He should check with IBSD for all the requirements. DEQ review and approval of the
design of these sewer main lines is required by the Idaho Wastewater Rules IDAPA 58-
01-16. Therefore improvements plans will need to be prepared and submitted to IBSD
and DEQ for approval. IBSD, in connection with Mr. Hansen's engineer, should seek the
advice of the City as to the locations of the sewer mains in the public streets. These
improvement plans and specifications should be prepared in connection with the water
main extension plans and specifications discussed in Item 4 above. IBSD also will charge
its customary connection fee for each new home. Prior written approval of ISBD should
be required as a condition for lona's issuance of a water mainline connection permit, the
"Will Serve" letter for the waterline extension along 55th E. and building permits.
If Mr. Hansen elects to proceed with a two lot development as shown on the Engineer's
Suggested Plan enclosed herewith, then no sewer collection line extensions would be
required because both lots could connect to the existing IBSD sewer mainline in 55`h E.
Permitting of the service would still be required through IBSD, but no sewer
improvement plans would have to be prepared and submitted to IBSD, Iona and DEQ for
approval.
Julie Hammond
June 12, 2015
Page 6
In summary, we cannot recommend that the City accept the four lot development in its current
configuration as proposed by Mr. Hansen. Mr. Hansen has not filed water main line
improvement plans including profiles and specifications, nor any document designating proposed
accesses to 49th North and 55th East, nor has he demonstrated compliance with the IBSD
standards and permit requirements. In the absence of these documents, we are unable to
determine if the proposed lot development complies with City and IBSD standards, as well as the
BMPO Access Management Plan. On the other hand, the City could readily accept the two lot
plan if required documents were assembled and provided to the City as described herein.
Please feel free to call me if you or the elected officials have any questions.
Sincerely,
Paul H. Scoresby, PE
Attachments: Four lot development plan proposed by the Mr. Hansen
Engineer Suggested Plan showing division of parcel into two lots instead of four
2040 BMPA Master Roadway Plan showing classification of streets
Pages 7, 22, 24 and 26 of BMPO Access Management Plan
wanly 47 meters- sw mom
10211N00 h00Z S17V3 ONVOI 30 ADO = ONI8V3EI 30 SISV9
IZZf9Z 3Yl Z0.UN
^ 3�69,1,0.0N
-7
5
o
rc
Gw � Q
W
13 OS 010'9t
3 'ON 73afiVd
6
L_ J
,4S'£Zl
,ZO'£SZ
w AYY 6Z
U
z 303 N31VM
� ,9 50dONd
13 'OS fGG'91
E 'ON 733Edd
t_ J
M.61.40.0S
,BY6Zl
,Of = ,.l :37VOSC
uua NVnr .4/ t tIhl
'9f '03S WOO '35
Mw S
6 n o
w
S 3.Zt.S£.44N=BO ,]
.4ovz. I
O'1f83
rc 00'0Z=a
94,00.6B=V
3 —7 ,
'13 'OS 6092I
Z 'ON 730211'd
,69Z£t
M.64,10.0S
3aNN35 8341
MOVOdddV
13 'OS 99Z'9I
i ON 73OUVel 1
3041213S 2131VM
w
§¢
0
I W�
I Way,
maw
L J en`a
1N3M3SV3
un¢n .or►
.t9'49t
lG'6£t
l.0
**xi isvArks.a,is JadPeictig
4;9 aye, c94.- 15apda-p rV79p1-41 ptiP S fr1,1-S 15kyr%
102LLNOO t.00Z Slld3 OHd01 JO ADO = ONINV28 30 SISb8
LZ'L£9Z
.55a2›y z _peg
C
Se�A w n' k��. C 4fi. h f
0� = „ I :37VOSC
J-c) +4; �
UCla NiJH
3„Z L,S£.44N=90
,40.9Z=0
L £=1
Z=a
s9=v
ssa.723/ I al
&g
2040 BMPA Master
Roadway Plan
Freeway
Principal Arterial
Proposed Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Proposed Minor Arterial
Urban Collector
Proposed Urban Collector
Residential Collector
Local Street
oiC
1 r •
g ,urns
SumyatdeRd
49th..outh(Tow is fp Rd).
Rural Major Collector (p)
Proposed Rural Major Collector (p)
Rural Major Collector (m)
Proposed Rural Major Collector (m)
Rural Minor Collector
BMPO Access Management Plan July 2012
The typical right-of-way widths shown in Table 3 also provide a benchmark for long-range
planning purposes. If planning studies suggest more vehicle lanes and/or significant right-of-
way are needed beyond these assumptions, then that indicates revisiting the overall street
network and land use plans and policies (i.e. symptom of a mismatch). For example, if a
collector street needs to be widened to five lanes, then that could indicate (A) the collector
street should be an arterial, (B) too much development was allowed in the vicinity, and/or (C)
poor overall vehicle connectivity in the transportation network.
If planning studies suggest less lanes are needed, then cost-effective interim urban
improvements should be used rather than building and maintaining unneeded pavement. This
preserves right-of-way for future needs while creating a livable and financially sustainable
situation in the present environment.
See Section 5.1 for discussion on street cross-section characteristics. Specific cross -
sectional element designs would differ based on travel context classifications.
Table 3. Typical Right -of -Way Widths
Classification'
Number of Vehicle Lanes
Roadway Segments Accommodated
Freeways
200 feet' 2 or 3 lanes per direction
Expressways
100 feet" 2 or 3 lanes per direction
Strategic Arterials
120 feet 2 or 3 lanes per direction
Principal Arterials
100 feet 5 lanes
wr...� Minor Arterials
100 feet 5lanes
Major Collectors
80 feet 3 lanes
Residential Collectors
70 feet' 2 to 3 lanes
Local Streets
Varies 2 lanes
Intersections with Arterials' Add 20 feet to width above'
1 additional left-tum lane and
1 additional right-tum lane
1. Right-of-way based on vehicular functional classifications. Specific cross -sectional element designs would differ based on travel
Context classifications.
2. Additional right-of-way needed at intersections with strategic arterials, principal arterials, and minor arterials for Wm lanes etc.
3. Could accommodate up to three lanes in each direction. Based on RG Guidelines and review of facilities in region.
4. Use 80 feet width if center tum bay is anticipated on residential collectors.
5. Consult the lead agency as intersection right-of-way needs vary by location. The linear length of the additional right-of-way would
be based on the functional area of the intersection (See Section 4.3.1). Right-of-way needs around interchanges depend on the
type of interchange planned for the area.
rranspoGRouP
7
.14
BMPO Access Management Plan
Jury 2012
for centerline -to -centerline measurements. The downstream spacing is based on stopping
sight distance after clearing half the intersection.
The spacing of all intersections near a major intersection should be greater than the minimum
spacing provided in Table 6.
(Source: Access Management Manual, TRB, 2003)
Figure 5. Functional Area of Major Intersections
Table 6. Intersection Spacing Based on the Functional Area of Major Intersections
Maneuver Queued Veh. Distance to Minimum Minimum
Posted Speed P.R. Distance Distance Length Centerline Upstream Downstream
(mph) (ft)' (ft)' (it)s (tt)` Spacing (ft)' Spacing 005
A B C 0 A+B+C+D
25 55 70 50 50 225 155
SS i- 30 65 115 50 50 280 200
35 80 160 50 50 340 250
40 90 220 50 60 420 305
y� N 45 100 275 50 60 485 360
111111111111Mi; 50 110 425 50 70 655 425 )
55 125 515 50 70 760
49(
Source: Access Management Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2003)
1. Distance Traveled During Drivers Perception -Reaction. See Access Management Manual Table 8-3.
2. Desirable Maneuver Distances; includes deceleration and lane change. See Access Management Manual Table 10-2.
3. Minimum length for two queued vehicles or one truck Under congested conditions, queues may be longer but likely offset with
lower operating speeds (i.e. shorter required maneuver distance).
4. Distance from cross -street centerline to front of queue.
5. Minimum upstream driveway spacing, centeriine to centerline. See Access Management Manual Chapter 9.
6. Minimum downstream driveway spadng, centeriine to centeriine. Based on stopping sight distance after Bearing hag the
intersection.
%transpooRouP
22
BMPO Access Management Plan July 2012
pedestrians than other arterials. For two-lane Rural Context minor arterials, major
intersections should be spaced 1,320 feet or greater.
Major Collectors
The spacing between major intersections on most major collectors should be 300 feet or
greater. Major collector should provide abundant crossing opportunities for vehicle and
pedestrians. For two-lane Rural Context major collectors, major intersections should be
spaced 660 feet or greater.
Residential Collectors
The spacing between major intersections on residential collectors should be 300 feet or
greater. Residential collectors should provide abundant crossing opportunities for vehicle and
pedestrians. Vehicles should operate at lower speeds to benefit pedestrian and bicycles but
lower speeds also allows for reduced intersection spacing needs.
4.4 Minor Intersection Spacing
As defined in Section 1.3.5, a minor intersection is any intersection that is not considered a
major intersection. Minor intersections include driveway connections to public streets.
Strategic Arterials
Any form of minor intersection is highly discouraged on strategic arterials. If a minor
intersection is allowed, use the spacing guidelines for major intersections along strategic
arterials. See Section 4.3 for major intersection spacing guidelines.
Principal Arterials
Like strategic arterials, any form of minor intersection is highly discouraged on principal
arterials. If a minor intersection is allowed, use the spacing guidelines for major intersections
along principal arterials. See Section 4.3 for major intersection spacing guidelines.
Minor Arterials
Minor intersections are discouraged on minor arterials. If a minor intersection is allowed, use
the spacing guidelines for major intersections along minor arterials. See Section 4.3 for major
intersection spacing guidelines.
Major Collectors
For major collectors, driveways are allowed for all land uses except individual residential lots.
The spacing between two minor intersections (including driveways) on a major collector is
based on the number of daily trips expected from the development:
• Minimum Use — Less than 50 vehicle trips per day: use 105-foot spacing
• Minor Generator — 51 to 5,000 vehicle trips per day: use 175-foot spacing
• Major Generator — Over 5,000 or more vehicle trips per day: use 210-foot spacing
Access should be limited to one driveway for each tract of property separately owned.
Properties contiguous to each other and owned by the same person are considered to be one
tract.
f transpoGROUP
24
"
B M P O A c c e s s M a n a g e m e n t P l a n J u l y 2 0 1 2
4 . 7 S u m m a r y o f A c c e s s C o n t r o l a t D r i v e w a y s
T h i s s e c t i o n s u m m a r i z e s c r i t e r i a f o r a c c e s s c o n t r o l a s t h e y a p p l y t o i n d i v i d u a l d e v e l o p m e n t s ,
t y p i c a l l y i n t h e f o r m o f d r i v e w a y s ( m i n o r i n t e r s e c t i o n s ) . T y p i c a l a c c e s s c o n t r o l r e q u i r e m e n t s
f o r s t r a t e g i c a r t e r i a l s p r i n c i p a l a r t e r i a l s m i n o r a r t e r i a l s a n d m a j o r c o l l e c t o r s a r e p r o v i d e d a s
f o l l o w s :
V ' o ! 4 4 0 4 . . . + 1 0 1 ) N o d r i v e w a y a c c e s s s h o u l d b e a l l o w e d f o r a n y r e s i d e n t i a l l o t .
p e r 2 ) D r i v e w a y s s h o u l d b e o u t s i d e t h e f u n c t i o n a l a r e a o f m a j o r i n t e r s e c t i o n s ( s e e
S e c t i o n 4 . 3 . 1 ) .
G a b l e l i i l t 3 ) U n l e s s o t h e r w i s e a p p r o v e d b y g o v e r n m e n t a l a g e n c y ' s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , a c c e s s s h o u l d
b e l i m i t e d t o o n e d r i v e w a y f o r e a c h t r a c t o f p r o p e r t y s e p a r a t e l y o w n e d . P r o p e r t i e s
c o n t i g u o u s t o e a c h o t h e r a n d o w n e d b y t h e s a m e p e r s o n a r e c o n s i d e r e d t o b e o n e
t r a c t .
4 ) D r i v e w a y s g i v i n g d i r e c t a c c e s s m a y b e d e n i e d i f a l t e r n a t e a c c e s s i s a v a i l a b l e .
5 ) W h e n n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e s a f e a n d e f f i c i e n t m o v e m e n t o f t r a f f i c , a c c e s s p o i n t s m a y b e
r e q u i r e d t o b e d e s i g n e d f o r r i g h t t u m s i n a n d o u t o n l y .
6 ) W h e n a p p r o v e d , o r d i r e c t e d b y g o v e r n m e n t a l a g e n c y ' s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , a d r i v e w a y
a c c e s s d e s i g n m a y b e a " s t r e e t t y p e i n t e r s e c t i o n " w i t h c u r b r e t u r n s .
t r a n s p o o R O U P
2 6
PLEDGE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
This is to certify that I, , an employee of City of Iona,
understand that any information (written, verbal or other form) obtained durin he performance
of my duties must remain confidential. This includes all information th ay become privy to
as part of my employment with City of Iona which is not part of general public's knowledge,
including but not limited to information about personal id ing information about co-workers
or members of the public, ongoing investigations, a ny information relating to medical records
as well as any other information otherwise ma or known to be confidential. Public Records
retained by the City of Iona should only eleased by. those City officials who are designated to
do so.
I understand that any unauthorized release or carelessness in the handling of this confidential
information is considered a breach of the duty to maintain confidentiality.
I further understand that any breach of the duty to maintain confidentiality could be grounds for
immediate disciplinary action up to and including dismissal from employment.
Signature of Employee
Date
Signature of Witness