HomeMy Public PortalAboutOrdinance 749 (2)ORDINANCE NO.
749
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AND AMENDING
CERTAIN LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BEAUMONT REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Beaumont Redevelopment Agency (the
"Agency"), has formulated, prepared and approved the Redevelopment
Plan 'for the Beaumont Redevelopment Project (the "Redevelopment
Plan"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont,
on December 27, 1993, approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan
pursuant to a duly enacted Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law has established certain limitations on the
incurring and repaying of indebtedness and the duration of
redevelopment plans as well as the use of eminent domain, which
limitations apply to every redevelopment plan adopted on or before
December 31, 1993; and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 further provides that
unless a redevelopment plan adopted prior to January 1, 1994,
already containslimitations which comply with that Section, the
legislative body shall adopt an ordinance on or before December 31,
1994, to amend the redevelopment plan either 1) to amend an
existing time limit that exceeds the applicable time limit
established by that Section, or 2) to establish time limits that do
not exceed the provisions of that Section.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section X(1000) of the Redevelopment
Plan which establishes the time limit of the Plan is hereby amended
in its entirety to read as follows: "Except for the non-
discrimination and non -segregation provisions which shall run in
perpetuity, the provisions of this Redevelopment Plan shall be
effective, and the provisions of other documents formulated
pursuant to this Redevelopment Plan may be made effective for forty
(40) years from the effective date of adoption of this
Redevelopment Plan of the Agency.
Section 2. The time limit on establishing of
loans, advances, and indebtedness set forth in the last paragraph
of Section 702 of the Redevelopment Plan, is hereby amended to
read: "Twenty (20) years from the date of adoption of the
Ordinance approving and adopting this Redevelopment Plan".
Ordinance No. 749
Section 3. A new paragraph shall be added at the end
of Section 702 which shall provide: "The Agency shall not pay
indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to Section 33670
after ten (10) years from the termination of the effective date of
the Redevelopment Plan."
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send
a certified copy of this ordinance to the Agency.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be
in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage.
Section 6. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby
ordered and directed to certify to the passage of this ordinance
and cause the same to be published more than five days prior to its
introduction and within 15 days of its adoption in the Community
Advisor, a newspaper of general circulation published and
circulated in the City of Beaumont, California.
Section 7. If any part of this ordinance is held to
be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the City
Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of
this ordinance, if such valid portion thereof had been deleted.
ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1995 by the following
vote.
Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Parrott and Council Members
Berg, Brey and Russo
Noes: None
Absent: Mayor Leja
Abstentions: None
ATTEST:
J
cet nider
uty City Clerk
APPROVED:
ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION PAGE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF BEAUMONT
)
I, JOYCE SNIDER, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of
the City Council of the City of Beaumont is five; that Ordinance
No. 749 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City on November 14, 1994 and was duly adopted by the City
Council at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 9,
1995 by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Parrott and Council Members
Berg, Brey and Russo
Noes: None
Absent: Mayor Leja
Abstentions: None
Witnessed by my hand and the seal of the City of Beaumont,
California on January 10, 1994.
CFS SNIDER,
epu City Clerk
City of Beaumont, California
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) (This Space for Clerk's Filing Stamp)
COMMUNITY ADVISER NEWSPAPER
State of California )
) ss.
County of Riverside )
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am
over the age of eighteen years and not
a party to or interested in the above -
entitled matter. I am the principal
clerk of the printer of The Community
Adviser, a newspaper printed and
published weekly in the City of
Beaumont, County of Riverside, and
which newspaper has been adjudged a
newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of
Riverside, State of California, under
date of April 2, 1990, Case Number
203688, that the notice, of which the
annexed is a printed copy (set in type
not smaller than nonpareil), has been
published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following
dates, to -wit: /
Published on: 7 / s/9 7 /
all in the year 1991+
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Signature
Date: /3 , 199
at Beaumont, California.
NOTICE TO THE CmIcNS OF
BEAUMONT, CA.
In accordance with Government
code Section 39633(c)(1), a
summary of Ordinance No. 749
introduced by the Beaumont City
Council on 12/12/94 is set forth
herein below:
A SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE N0.749
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
CITY OF BEAUMONT, CA.
ORDINANCE NO. 749, entitled "An
ordinance of the City Council of the
City of Beaumont, Calitornia,
establishing and amending certain
limitations with respect to the
Redevelopment Plan for the
Beaumont Redevelopment Project"
provides: That, except for
nondiscrimination and non -
segregation provisions which shall
nn in perpetuity, that provisions of
the Plan shall be effective, and the
provisions of other do invents
formulated pursuant to this Plan
may be made effective for forty
(40) years from the effective date
of adoption of the Plan. The time
limit on establishing loans, advances,
and Indebtedness in the last
paragraph of Section 702 o1 the
Redevelopment Pian is amended to
read: "Twenty (20) years from the
date of adoption of the Ordinance
approving and adopting this
Redevelopment Plan." A new
paragraph is added providing that
the Agency shall not pay
indebtedness or naive property
taxes pursuant M Section 33670
after ten years from the mon
of the effective date of the
Redevelopment Ptan.A copy of
Ordinance No. 749 Is 'WWI* for
public review In the office of the
Beaumont City Clerk; 550 East
Sixth Street, Beaumont, CA.
Ordinance No. 749 will be considered
for adoption at a City Council
meeting to be held January 9,1995.
Date: December 13, 1994
Joyce Snider
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont, CA
Published in The Community
Adviser 12/15/94
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P,)
COMMUNITY ADVISER NEWSPAPER
State of California )
)ss.
County of Riverside)
I am a citizen of the United
States and a resident of the
County aforesaid; I am over the
age of eighteen years and not a
party to or interested in the
above entitled matter. I am the
principal clerk of the printer of
The Community Adviser
Newspaper, a newspaper printed
and published weekly in the City
of Beaumont, County of
Riverside, and which newspaper
of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of
Riverside, State of California,
under the date of April 2, 1990,
Case Number #203688, that the
notice, of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not
smaller than nonpareil), has
been published in each regular
and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the
following dates, to wit:
Published on: /Ad �9 J
all in the year 1995
I certify (or declare) under
penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true an correct.
Date: 1- /Z , 199.r
at Beaumont, California.
(This space for Clerk's Filing Stamp)
NOTICE TO THE CITIZENS Of
BEAUMONT, CA.
In accordance with Guvemment
code Section 39633(c)(1), a
summary of Ordinance No. 749
Introduced by the Beaumont City
Council on 12/12/94 adopted on
1/9/95 by unanimous vote of the
City Council, with Mayor Leja
absent, is set forth herein below:
A SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE NO. 749
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
CITY OF BEAUMONT, CA.
ORDINANCE NO. 749, entitled "An
ordinance of the City Council of the
City of Beaumont, California,
establishing and amending certain
limitations with respect to the
Redevelopment Plan for the
Beaumont Redevelopment Project"
provides: That, except for
nondisntntlh*Mam and -non-
segaepEonprovieions witch shall
an In porpettpy, Mat provisions of
to Pan shall be etlsogae, and the
provisions et other detrntents
formulated pursued to this Plan
may be made effective for forty
(40) years from the effective date
of adoption of the Plan. The time
Emit on establishing loans, advances,
and indebtedness In the last
paragraph of Section 702 of the
Redevelopment Plan is amended to
read: "Twenty (20) years from the
date of adoption of the Ordinance
approving and adopting this
Redevelopment Plan." A new
paragraph is added providing that
the Agency shall not pay
indebtedness or receive property
taxes pursuant to Section 33670
after ten years from the termination
of the effective date of the
Redevelopment Plan.
A copy of Ordinance No. 749 is
available for public review in the
office of the Beaumont City Clerk,
550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont
CA.
Date: January 10,1995
Joyce Snider
Deputy City Clerk
City of Beaumont, CA
Published in The Community
Adviser 1/12/95
ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION PAGE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF BEAUMONT )
I, CHERRY TAYLOR, City Clerk of the City of Beaumont,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of
the City Council of the City of Beaumont is five; that Ordinance
No. 749 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City on December 12, 1994 and was duly adopted by the City
Council at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 9, 1995
by the following vote:
Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Parrott and Council Members Berg,
Brey and Russo
Noes: None
Absent: Mayor Leja
Abstentions: None
Witness by my hand and the seal of the City of Beaumont, California
on January 10, 1995.
CHERRY T LOR,
City Cl rk
City of Beaumont,
California
From the Office of:
C.?lty of _Beaumont
550 East Sixth Street
P.O. Box 158
Beaumont, CA 92223-0158
FAXGRAM
714-845-1171
FAX 845-8483
TO:
FROM:
DATE: —2-9K
NUMBER OF PAGES (I2 j
IncYuding this Page
MESSAGE:
f7,e, 7 7)//ij
IF YOUR COPY IS NOT CLEAR, OR THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE
TRANSMISSION, ADVISE BY RETURN FAX OR CALL 769— F'..6".24/4
Transmitted:
Time:
Operator:
Minutes - City Council meeting 12-12-94
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: (cont)
6. Introduction of an ordinance establishing and amending certain
limitations with respect to the Redevelopment Plan for the
Beaumont Redevelopment Project. (cont)
The Deputy City Clerk read aloud the title of Ordinance No.
749, entitled "An ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Beaumont, California, establishing and amending certain
limitations with respect to the Redevelopment Plan for the
Beaumont Redevelopment Project." Council Member Berg moved to
waive further reading of the ordinance. Second by Council
Member Russo and unanimously approved. Council Member Berg
moved to introduce Ordinance No. 749. Second by Mayor Pro Tem
Parrott and unanimously approved.
7. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF REPORTS/APPOINTMENTS:
Plannning Director Egger presented a report of a Planning
Commission meeting held December 6, 1994, indicating that a
plot plan and a negative declaration had been approved subject
to certain conditions, and a sign permit continued to the
meeting to be held January 3, 1995, for McDonald's restaurant
which will be located at Beaumont Avenue and Fifth Street. He
also reported that the Commission had approved parcel maps for
Lockheed and Loma Linda University, with certain conditions.
At 7:15 p.m., by order of Mayor Leja, the City Council recessed to
a meeting of the Beaumont Redevelopment Agency. The City Council
meeting was reconvened at 7:35 p.m. and after a brief recess, the
City Council recessed to closed session.
8. CLOSED SESSION:
A closed session was held on litigation cases Snediker vs the
City and Dulmage vs the City. The Council returned to open
session at 8:31 p.m. with all council members present. Mayor
Leja announced that the Council had taken no action in closed
session.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to be considered by the City
Council, the meeting was duly adjourned by Mayor Leja at 8:31 p.m.
6