HomeMy Public PortalAboutTown of Gulf Stream Comprehensive Plan (2009)The Comprehensive Plan
For
Gulf Stream, FL
July, 1989
AS AMENDED BY:
Amendment 91 -1 (Ord. 91/14) Adopted March 8, 1991
(Potable Water Sub - Element)
Amendment 95 -1 (Ord. 95/2) Adopted June 9, 1995
(Future Land Use Element & Future Land Use Map)
Amendment 99 -1 (Ord. 99/6) Adopted February 11, 2000
(Intergovernmental Coordination Element)
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord. 08/10) Adopted July 10, 2009
(Ear -Based Amendments to Adopted Comprehensive Plan)
Prepared for:
The Town of Gulf Stream
Gulf Stream, Florida
Prepared by:
Resource Engineering and Planning, Inc.
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
Amendments prepared by Town Staff
and
Urban Design Kilday Studios
The Comprehensive Plan
for
Gulf Stream, Florida
July, 1989
Prepared for:
The Town of Gulf Stream
Gwif Stream, Florida
Prepared by:
Resource Engineering and Planning, Inc.
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELEMENT SECTION
FUTURE LAND USE
I
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
II
HOUSING
III
INFRASTRUCTURE
IV
Sanitary Sewer
4A -1
Solid Waste
4B -1
Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
4C -1
Potable Water
4D -1
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
V
CONSERVATION
VI
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
VII
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
VIII
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
IX
1026.00.01- GSTOC- 7/1/89
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Prepared for:
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida
Prepared by:
Resource Engineering and Planning, Inc.
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
(Amendment 08 -1 prepared by Urban Design Kilday Studios)
Original Adoption July 1989
Amendment 08 -1 adopted July 10, 2009 (Ord. 08 /10)
1014.03- GSTRAFTC- 7/7/89
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section page
List of Figures
I. INTRODUCTION 2 -1
II. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 2 -1
Existing Conditions 2 -1
Traffic Circulation Analysis 2 -2
Data and Analysis Update 2 -4
III. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 2 -5
1014.03- GSTRAFTC- 7/7/89
LIST OF FIGURES
Number
Page
2 -1 Existing Traffic Circulation Network 2 -3
2 -2 Future Traffic Circulation Network 2 -8
O1014.03- GSTRAFTC- 7/7/89
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
The following Traffic Circulation Element for the Town of Gulf
Stream has been prepared in accordance with Section 9J -5.007
Florida Administrative Code. It briefly explains the existing
traffic circulation network and projected improvements. The last
section of the plan provides goals, objectives, and policies.
II. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Existing Conditions
Figure 2 -1 portrays the existing traffic circulation network for
Gulf Stream. As can be seen, the only two arterials serving the
town are U. S. Highway 1 (Federal Highway) and State Road A -1 -A
(ocean Boulevard). Both of these arterials run in a north -south
direction. U.S. 1 does not occur within town limits but is
located along the western -most portion of the town. The primary
arterial providing access to the town is State Road A -1 -A. It is
the only roadway which provides access in and out of the town
limits east of the Intercostal Waterway. Accident frequency
within the town is very low. Between July 1988 and July 1989
only 11 traffic accidents were reported. Causeways over the
Intercostal Waterway are located to the north and south of the
town's limits. The remainder of the roads within Gulf Stream are
local roads and are maintained by the Town of Gulf Stream.
Figure 2 -1 portrays the existing circulation network using the
gstraf- 1014.03- 7/7/89 2 -1
Florida Department of Transportation Functional Classifications.
There are no limited access facilities, collector roads, ports,
airports, airlines or high -speed rail lines existing or proposed
within the town's limits.
Traffic Circulation Analysis
Any future additional traffic generated by new residents within
the Town of Gulf Stream will be minimal. As explained in the
Future Land Use Element, only approximately 559 permanent
residents are anticipated within the town by the year 2000. The
minimal number of trips anticipated by these residents can be
accommodated by the existing traffic circulation network.
The Town of Gulf Stream does not anticipate any major land use
changes in the near future. Therefore, land uses affecting State
Road A -1 -A are not anticipated to change to a degree necessary
for future roadway improvements. U.S. 1 is scheduled to be 6-
laned in the future, however, no additional collector roads nor
limited access facilities are anticipated. It is expected that
all future land uses and associated trips can be accommodated by
the existing traffic circulation network. The Florida Department
of Transportation Five -Year Transportation Plan anticipates no
further improvements to State Road A -1 -A nor to U.S. 1, except as
cited above.
Figure 2 -2 portrays the future traffic circulation for the Town
of Gulf Stream. As can be seen, no major improvements are
anticipated by the town or by county and state departments of
transportation.
gstraf- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 2 -2
iLS
Los D
2 LANE
'846AD-r
E
CONSTRAINED ROADWAY
- SHARED FACILITY
LEGEND
111111 STATE URBAN COLLECTOR
■ ■ ■ ■ STATE URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL
LOS LEVEL OF SERVICE
ADT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC, 2008
Town of Gulf Stream
Existing Traffic Circulation Network
2009
PALM TRAIL BUS ROUTE #1
r I
P.M..
AT&ANTIC
rA
OCEAN
L:z
. STATE URBAN
MINOR ARTERIAL
FIGURE 2-1
GULF
STREAM
PARK
1111011111h.
SOURCE: PBCO, 2009 urban
1000 500 0 1000 desi
*+ N
Q0 kild
feet 'I' %
scale STU S
APRIL 2009
2-3
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Data and Analysis Update
There is only one main arterial roadway through the Town; State Road A -1 -A
(Ocean Boulevard), which bisects the eastern portion of Town in a north -south
direction. As identified on Metropolitan Planning Organization and Palm Beach
County maps, Ocean Boulevard is a constrained roadway, limited by existing
conditions to a maximum of two lanes. This constrained roadway and also
identified as a shared facility, and marked with appropriate signage, for vehicular
and bicycle use.
The only other arterial roadway within the municipal limits is U.S. Highway One
(Federal Highway), which is adjacent to the Place Au Soleil neighborhood, which
is the only portion of the Town located west of the Intracoastal Waterway. U.S.
Highway One is a state - maintained roadway. These State roadways which run
through Town are generally operating below the adopted level of service
standard of "D," as indicated in the Table below.
Traffic Counts (Daily Trips) on Arterial Roadways within Town of Gulf
Stream
Source: Palm Beach County Engineering Department, Traffic Division
The remainder of the roads within Gulf Stream are local roads and are
maintained by the Town. These local roadways are in good condition and
operate well below the level of service. As shown in the Future Land Use
Element, the Town is essentially built -out with only a handful of vacant single
family lots available for new development. The Town's population is only
expected to rise 34 residents within the next 10 years.
As limited development or redevelopment is projected for the near future of the
Town, it is projected that all future land uses and associated trips can be
accommodated by the existing traffic circulation network. The roadways within
the Town's jurisdiction are satisfactory with only typical maintenance planned.
There are no capital improvement projects that would incur the expenditure of
Town funds projected for either the 5 or 10 year planning periods.
Transportation Element
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08 /10)
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida 2 -4 Adopted July 10, 2009
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Level of
Service
"D" ADT
State AlA
11,774
10,175
10,718
10,847
8,665
7,846
12,300
(Ocean
Boulevard)
u.s.
33,368
32,128
31,509
32,572
26,817
27,430
32,700
Highway
One
(Federal
Highway)
Source: Palm Beach County Engineering Department, Traffic Division
The remainder of the roads within Gulf Stream are local roads and are
maintained by the Town. These local roadways are in good condition and
operate well below the level of service. As shown in the Future Land Use
Element, the Town is essentially built -out with only a handful of vacant single
family lots available for new development. The Town's population is only
expected to rise 34 residents within the next 10 years.
As limited development or redevelopment is projected for the near future of the
Town, it is projected that all future land uses and associated trips can be
accommodated by the existing traffic circulation network. The roadways within
the Town's jurisdiction are satisfactory with only typical maintenance planned.
There are no capital improvement projects that would incur the expenditure of
Town funds projected for either the 5 or 10 year planning periods.
Transportation Element
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08 /10)
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida 2 -4 Adopted July 10, 2009
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
III. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 2.1: A SAFE, CONVENIENT AND EFFICIENT MOTORIZED AND
NON — MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SHALL BE AVAILABLE
FOR ALL RESIDENTS AND VISITORS TO THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM.
Objective 2.1.1.: Roadway deficiencies shall be identified and corrected
in a timely, efficient, and cost — effective manner.
Policy 2.1.1.1.: The Town hereby adopts the following peak hour LOS
standards for each listed facility type:
a) Collector roadways — LOS standard G D
b) Arterial roadways — LOS standard G D
State Road A1A (Ocean Boulevard) is a constrained roadway and is limited to a
maximum of two through lanes.
Policy 2.1.1.2.: Proposed roadway projects shall be evaluated and ranked in
order of priority according to the follow guidelines:
a) Whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the
Town's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or
achieve full use of existing facilities;
b) Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents
or reduces future improvement cost, provides service to developed areas
lacking full service, or promotes in —fill development; and
c) Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services
within a designated urban service area.
Policy 2.1.1.3.: The Town shall give priority to any new roadway projects those
needed to address existing deficiencies, particularly when high accident
frequency is evident.
Obiective 2.1.2.: Right —of —way needs shall be formally identified and a
priority schedule of acquisition or reservation shall be established.
Policy 2.1.2.1.: Minimum right —of —way requirements for new roadways shall be:
a) Local roads — 60' right —of —way (swale drainage);
Policy 2.1.2.2.: The Town shall require mandatory dedications or fees in lieu of
as a condition of plat approval for acquiring necessary rights —of —way.
Transportation Element
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08/10)
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida
2 -5 Adopted July 10, 2009
Policy 2.1.2.3.: The Town shall review all proposed development for
consistency with this Comprehensive Plan and impacts upon the adopted LOS
standards.
Policy 2.1.2.4.: The Town shall ensure that adequate roadway capacity is
available consistent with Policv 2.1.1.1. of this Comprehensive Plan, or is
planned for, when needed in order to serve new development during the Town's
development review process other than individual single family homes. New
development and redevelopment shall comply with the Palm Beach County
Concurrency standards for the roadway network. Any required transportation
facilities associated with new development or redevelopment shall be in place or
under construction within three years of the issuance of the first structural
building permit for the new construction.
Policy 2.1.2.5.: The Town shall consult Palm Beach County,_Metropolitan
Planning Organization and Florida Department of Transportation right —of —way
plan when determining right —of —way needs.
Obiective 2.1.3.: The provision of motorized and non — motorized vehicle
parking, and the provision of bicycle and pedestrian ways will be regulated.
Policv 2.1.3.1.: The Town shall prohibit on— street parking on all arterial and
major collector roads.
Policv 2.1.3.2.: The Town shall review all proposed development for its
accommodation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs.
Obiective 2.1.4.: The Town's transportation system will emphasize safety
and aesthetics.
Policv 2.1.4.1.: The Town shall eliminate or minimize roadway designs which
lead to hazardous conditions by:
a) Requiring the provision of adequate storage and weaving areas;
b) Prohibiting direct access from driveways and local roads onto high —speed
traffic lanes;
c) Preventing conflicts between roadway and pedestrian; and
d) Providing adequate capacity for emergency evacuation.
Obiective 2.1.5.: Traffic circulation planning will be coordinated with the
future land uses shown on the future land use map of this plan, the Florida
Department Of Transportation 5 —Year Transportation Plan, plans of
neighboring jurisdictions, and county Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Transportation Element
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08/10)
2 -6 Adopted July 10, 2009
Policv 2.1.5.1.: The Town shall review subsequent versions of the FDOT 5—
Year Transportation Plan and county MPO documents in order to update or
modify this element, if necessary.
Policy 2.1.5.2.: The Town shall review for compatibility with this element, the
traffic circulation plans and programs of the unincorporated county and
neighboring municipalities as they are amended in the future.
Policy 2.1.5.3.: All proposed amendments to this Traffic Circulation Element
shall include a statement of findings supporting such proposals.
Transportation Element
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08/10)
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida
2 -7 Adopted July 10, 2009
CONSTRAINED ROADWAY - SHARI
FACILITY FOR VEHICULAR AND
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
LEGEND
MINION STATE URBAN COLLECTOR
■ ■ ■ ■ URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL
LOS LEVEL OF SERVICE
SOURCE: PBCO, 2009
2 -O
Town of Gulf Stream FIGURE 2 -2
Future Traffic Circulation Network
2029
OCEAN
HURRICANE EVA'
ROUTE
1000 500 0 1000
scale feet
vo�TO�
1n " GULF
STREAM
PARK
nk �yp
cftnj
STLI DIOSJ
APRIL 2009
TOWN OF
GULF STREAM
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE,
DRAINAGE AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER
AQUIFER RECHARGE, AND POTABLE WATER ELEMENT
(INFRASTSRUCTURE ELEMENT)
Prepared for:
The Town of Gulf Stream, Florida
Prepared by:
Resource Engineering and Planning, Inc.
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
(Amendment 08 -1 prepared by Urban Design Kilday Studios)
Original Adoption July 1989
Amendment 08 -1 adopted July 10, 2009 (Ord. 08 /10)
GSHINTOC- 1014.03.03- 7/7/89
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page
PREFACE
Sub - Elements
A - Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element A -1
B - Solid Waste Sub - Element B -1
C - Drainage and natural Groundwater C -1
Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element
D - Potable Water Sub - Element
GSINTOC- 1014.03 - 7/7/69
D -1
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SANITARY SEWER SUB- ELEMENT
Prepared for:
The Town of Gulf Stream, Florida
Prepared by:
Resource Engineering and Planning, Inc.
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
(Amendment 08 -1 prepared by Urban Design Kilday Studios
Original Adoption July 1989
Amendment 08 -1 adopted July 10, 2009 (Ord. 08/10)
GSSEWTC- 1019.03- 7/7/89
SANITARY SEWER SUB- ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
List of Tables
List of Figures
I. INTRODUCTION 4A -1
II. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 4A -1
Existing Conditions 4A -1
Projected Demand 4A -4
Performance Assessment 4A -5
III. PACKAGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS 4A -5
Existing Conditions 4A -6
Little Club Plant 4A -6
Gulfstream Shores Plant 4A -10
Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant 4A -11
Projected Demand 4A -12
Little Club Plant 4A -12
OGulfstream Shores
Plant
4A -12
Somerset of Gulf
Stream Plant
4A -13
Performance Assessment
4A -13
Little Club Plant
4A -13
Gulfstream Shores
Plant
4A -14
Somerset of Gulf
Stream Plant
4A -15
III. SEPTIC TANKS 4A -15
Existing Conditions 4A -15
Projected Demand 4A -16
Performance Assessment 4A -16
Infrastructure Element
SANITARY SEWER SUB- ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(CONTINUED)
Section Page
IV. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 4A -20
Data and Analysis Update 4A -22
V. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 4A -23
APPENDIX 4A -I 4A -25
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
O
OInfrastructure Element
6 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table Page
4A -1 Summary of the South Central Regional 4A -3
Wastewater Treatment Facility
4A -2 Summary of Package Waste Water 4A -7
Treatment Facilities
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page
4A -1 Wastewater Service Areas within the 4A -9
Town of Gulf Stream
4A -2 General Soils Association 4A -17
CJ
01 Infrastructure Element
TOWN OF GULF STREAM
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SANITARY SEWER SUB- ELEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
The Town of Gulf Stream's sanitary sewer needs are adequately met
by private septic tanks, several approved package treatment
facilities and service provided to a limited area by the City of
Delray Beach. The Town of Gulf Stream does not provide any
centralized sanitary sewer service to its residents. Although
the operation of these existing systems is not regulated by the
town, this element will analyze the current demand, capacities,
and levels of service for each and establish future levels of
service. The data, analysis, goals, objectives, and policies in
this sub - element are provided in accordance with Rule 9J- 5.011,
Florida Administrative Code (FAC).
Several wastewater systems are currently in use within the Town
Of Gulf Stream. These include: the City of Delray Beach sanitary
sewer system; three (3) "package" wastewater treatment plants;
and numerous septic tanks. As discussed previously, the town
itself does not provide its own nor does it participate in a
regional wastewater collection and treatment system.
II. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
Existing Conditions
The City of Delray Beach currently provides sanitary sewer
service to one multi - family development and one private club
located within the Town of Gulf Stream. The Cities of Delray
Beach and Boynton Beach jointly own and operate the South Central
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -1
Wastewater Treatment Plant. The plant has an existing capacity
of 24 million gallons per day (MGD) which is allocated evenly
between the two cities' service areas. Appendix 4A -I contains
portions of the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Delray Beach,
May 23, 1989, which summarize existing and projected conditions
of the treatment facility. The various findings are then
capsulized in Table 4A -1 of this element.
The El Cortijo Condominium Association and the Gulf Stream Bath
and Tennis Club are the only developments within the Town of Gulf
Steam receiving wastewater service from the City of Delray Beach.
The Gulf Stream Bath and Tennis Club has approximately 420
members and is located adjacent to the City of Delray Beach on
the south. Wastewater generating facilities at the club include
locker room facilities and two residential units provided for
club managers. The E1 Cortijo is adjacent to the Bath and Tennis
Club on the north. This development contains 24 multi - family
units. These two developments constitute the only portion of the
Delray Beach wastewater service area within the Town of Gulf
Stream (see Figure 4A -1).
Since the City of Delray Beach does not meter wastewater flows
from either of these developments, their current demand or levels
of service cannot be determined. For the purposes of this
Comprehensive Plan then, it is assumed that the population of the
two developments has a current level of service of 95 gallons per
capita per day (GCD) . The current level of service for the
entire Delray Beach service area is actually 117 GCD. However,
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -2
TABLE 4A-1
SUMMARY OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL
REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
* Service area has reached buitdout. No change anticipated.
*• The Comprehensive Plan for the City of DeLray Beach does not incLude peak fLoW data.
Source: City of Delray Beach; REP /Inc., 1989.
4A -3
ENTIRE DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH SERVICE
PRIMARY ATTRIBUTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I SERVICE AREA
AREA WITH GULF STREAM
Responsible Entity
lCity of Delray Beach
IDetray Beach
City of Boyton Beach
Geographic Service Area
lCity of Delray Beach*
jGULf Stream Bath and Tennis
(see Figure in Appendix 4A-1)
JEL Cortizo
(see Figure 4A -I)
Year Built /Remaining Life
1979/40 years
IN /A
Design Capacity
124 MGD
IN /A
Capacity Set- asides
112 MGD to Detray Beach
lNone
Service Area
Current /1995/2000
17.63/0.56/90.5 MGD
10.027 MGD-
Average Demand
Current /1995/2000
X115/117/105 GCD
195 GCD-
Average LOS
Current /1995/2000
14.37/3.44/2.95 MGD
IN /A
Average Surptus
Current /1995/2000
I **
**
Peak Demand
Expansion Opportunities/
lNone
lNone
Problems
Impact on Natural
INone
lNone
Resources
Average LDS to be Adopted
1117 GCD
195 GCD
Peak LOS to be Adopted
I **
**
* Service area has reached buitdout. No change anticipated.
*• The Comprehensive Plan for the City of DeLray Beach does not incLude peak fLoW data.
Source: City of Delray Beach; REP /Inc., 1989.
4A -3
this figure is inflated by storm water infiltration and inflow
caused by cracked pipes. As this is not thought to be a problem
for those pipes within the Town of Gulf Stream, this
Comprehensive Plan uses the year 2000 level of service desired by
the City of Delray Beach.
The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Delray Beach does not
establish a peak level of service. Therefore, there is
insufficient data for the establishment of a peak level of
service for that portion of the Delray Beach service area that is
within the Town of Gulf Stream.
Both the E1 Cortijo and the Bath and Tennis Club have wide
seasonal fluctuations in use. Both are near capacity during the
period of October to March while their use is greatly diminished
during the period of April to September. Therefore, over the
course of a 12 month period, each can be estimated to have an
average monthly occupancy of 60 %. This amounts to a population
of approximately 30 for E1 Cortijo and 252 for the Bath and
Tennis Club for a total of 282. Therefore, at a level of service
of 95 GCD, the average monthly demand for wastewater facilities
from these two developments is 26,792 gallons per day. At 100%
(peak) occupancy, the two developments have a demand for
wastewater treatment of 44,650 gallons per day (see Table 4A -1).
Projected Demand
As is shown on Table 4A -1, the Delray Beach service area is
projected to have surplus capacity at the wastewater treatment
facility for both the next five years and the next ten years. As
the E1 Cortijo and Bath and Tennis developments have already
reached buildout, their projected daily demand, average level of
service, and peak level of service are not expected to change in
either then next five years or ten years. The projections for
the two development are shown on Table 4A -1.
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -4
0
Performance Assessment
As described in Appendix 4A -I, the South Central Wastewater
Treatment Facility was built in 1979 and has a programmed life
expectancy of 50 years. In addition, the Delray Beach service
area is projected to have treatment plant capacities through
buildout (year 2000). Therefore, expansion or relocation of the
plant is not necessary either during the next five or ten years.
Although surplus capacities are projected for the Delray Beach
service area, qualitative improvements and maintenance of the
plant are necessary. A master plan for the plant has recently
been completed which describes suggested improvements to the
plant which are summarized in Appendix 4A -I. It is important to
note; however, that the wastewater system is self- supporting and
thus, all revenues necessary for the improvement of the plant are
to be generated from existing users of the system only.
Therefore, as the El Cortijo and Bath and Tennis Club
developments contract with the City of Delray Beach independent
of the Town of Gulf Stream, the Town of Gulf Stream has no
financial responsibilities for the system.
III. PACKAGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
Within the Town of Gulf Stream there are currently three (3)
private package wastewater treatment plants. Package wastewater
treatment plants are small, on -site sewage treatment and disposal
systems that usually serve one or more residential developments.
The systems within the town are known as the Little Club Plant,
Gulfstream Shores Plant, and the Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant.
Each of these systems is fully permitted by the Palm Beach County
Health Department, Division of Sciences and Engineering.
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 LA-5
Existing Conditions
The existing and projected demand and capacity of each of the
three package wastewater plants within the Town of Gulf Stream
are shown on Table 4A -2.
Little Club Plant
The Little Club Plant is owned by Little Club, Inc., a private
golf club with 435 members. Operation and maintenance of the
facility has been contracted to Utility Caretakers, Inc. The
plant has a design capacity of 0.025 MGD but is only permitted
for 0.015 MGD. The reason for the difference between the design
and permitted capacity is unknown. However, as is shown on Table
4A -2, the plant has an existing surplus capacity which is not
expected to change.
In addition to servicing the Little Club clubhouse, the plant is
also used by the Los Casitas and Hillside House Apartments
developments. Thus, the club and the two residential
developments comprise the entire service area of the development
(see Figure 4A -1). Las Casitas is a multi - family development
consisting of ten (10) small units. The Hillside Apartments has
eleven (11) units.
Between May, 1988, and April, 1989, both residential developments
were estimated to have had a total average daily population of 26
people. Therefore, the average annual daily flow for this
period (4,580 gallons) indicates a level of service of 176.15
GCD. Using the average peak day flow per month (7,670 gallons)
and the average daily population, the plant had a peak level of
service of 295 GCD (see Table 4A -2).
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -6
9
v
TABLE 4A -2
SUMMARY OF PACKAGE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
I LITTLE CLUB
PRIMARY ATTRIBUTES I TREATMENT PLANT
------------------------- ------------------- - - - - --
Responsible Entity
Geographic Serive Area
Year Built /Remaining Life
Design Capacity
Capacity Set- asides
Current /1995/2000
Average Demand
Current /1995/2000
Average LOS
Current /1995/2000
Average Surplus
Current /1995/2000
Peak Demand
Current /1995/2000
Peak Surplus
Expansion opportunities/
Problems
ILittle Club, Inc.
I
(Little Club, Los Casitus,
land Hillside House
((see Figure 4A -I)
I
.11971/20 yrs.
i
10.025 MGD
I
]None
1
10.00450 MGD*
]
i
1176 GCB*
]
I
10.001042 MGD*
I
I
10.020 MGD*
I
I
(None
I
I
I*
1
GULFSTREAM SHORES
SOMERSET
TREATMENT PLANT
------------- I -------------------------------
TREATMENT PLANT
IGuLfstream Shores
-------------
ISOmerset of Gulf
Owners Association
I
I Stream, Inc.
]Guifstream Shores
I
Isomerset of Gulf Stream
((see Figure 4A-I)
I
1
1
I
11970/20 yrs.
I
I
11968/20 yrs.
10.008 MGD
I
I
10.01 MGD*
Wane
1
I
(None
10.0038 MGD*
I
1
10.0024 MGD*
I
1
163.3 GCD*
I
1
1130 GCD*
I
1
10.0042 MGD*
I
1
10.0073 MGD*
I
I
10.008 MGD*
I
I
10.0074 MGD*
I
I
(None
I
I
I
I
I
10.0022 MGD*
I
I
I
I
a
1
TABLE 4A -2 (CONT -D)
* service area has reached buildout. No change anticipated.
Source: REP /Inc., 1989.
LITTLE CLUB
I GULFSTREAM SHORES
SOMERSET
PRIMARY ATTRIBUTES
---------------------------------------------"..-_-------.-----------__---------------------------------------
I TREATMENT PLANT
TREATMENT PLANT
TREATMENT PLANT
Impact on Natural
lNone
lNone
lNone
Resources
Average LOS to be Adopted
1176 GCO
164 GCD
1130 GCD
Peak LOS to be Adopted
1295 GCD
1
187.5 GCD
1
1252 GCD
1
* service area has reached buildout. No change anticipated.
Source: REP /Inc., 1989.
Town of Gulf Stream
Wastewater Service Areas
WA
Bath -and
Tennis
`' `• Ef Corbio
LEGEND
CITY OF DELAY BEACH��
SERVICE AREA
w CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH SERVICE AREA
GULFSTREAM SHORES SERVICE AREA
® SOMMERSET OF GULF STREAM SERVICE AREA
F] AREAS SERVICED BY SEPTIC TANKS
� SERVED BY SEWER LINES
SOURCE: City of Delray Beach
4A -9
ATLANTIC
SOmmerset of Gulf
OCEAN
._J
Gulfstream
1000 500 d 1000
scale feet
FIGURE 4A -1 II
Las C s
Little Club
Hillside
House
urban
ST Id�
sruoios
MARCH. 2009
During the month of December, daily flows of 20,000 gallons were
recorded, although, the month of March had the highest average
daily flow with 8,000 gallons per day. Both of these months
coincide with peak occupancy periods of the residential
developments and peak use times for the club. However, the
levels of service presented in Table 4A -2 are higher than would
be expected as they include population the golf club. Since the
population of the service area at any one time in unknown, the
average peak day flow per month and the average daily population
of the residential developments are used to establish the peak
level of service.
Gulfstream Shores Plant
The Gulfstream Shores Plant is owned by the Gulfstream Shores
Owners Association, a 54 unit, multi - family residential
development. Operation and maintenance of the facility has been
contracted to Utility Caretakers, Inc. The plant has a design
capacity of 0.008 MGD and is permitted for the same. This plant
services the Gulfstream Shores development exclusively. Thus,
the development comprises the entire service area of the facility
(see Figure 4A -1).
Between May, 1988, and April, 1989, Gulfstream Shores had an
estimated average daily population of 60 persons. The average
daily flow at the wastewater treatment facility during this same
period was 3,800 gallons for an average level of service of 63.3
GCD. The average peak day per month for this period was 5,250
gallons for a peak level of service of 87.5 GCD (see Table 4A -2).
During the months of March and April, 1989, the plant experienced
peak flows of 8,000 gallons per day and averaged 6,000 and 7,000
gallons per day respectively. These months correspond to the
high population months of the development. However, since the
population of the development at any one time is unknown, the
average peak day per month and the average daily population are
used to establish the peak level of service.
GSSEWER- 1014.03- 7/7/89 4A -10
Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant
The Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant is owned by the Somerset of
Gulf Stream, Inc., a 24 unit, multi - family cooperative.
Operation and maintenance of the facility has been contracted to
Larry Stone and Associates, Inc. The plant has a design capacity
of 10,000 gallons per day but is permitted for only 9,600 gallons
per day. The plant serves the Somerset development exclusively.
Thus, the development comprises the entire service area of the
facility (see Figure 4A -1).
Between May, 1988, and April, 1989, the Somerset of Gulf Stream
had an estimated average daily population of 18.5 persons. The
average daily flow at the wastewater treatment facility during
this same period was 2,400 gallons for an average level of
service of 130 GCD. The average peak day flow per month for
this same period. was 4,667 gallons for a monthly peak level of
service of 252 GCD (see Table 4A -2).
During the the twelve month period described previously, the
months of December, 1988, and January, 1989, had the highest
average daily flow with 3,200 and 3,300 gallons respectively.
However, the highest peak daily flow was recorded in August,
1988, at 7,400 gallons. While the December and January flows
coincide with the peak population period of the development, the
high flow in August is the result of storm water infiltration.
The Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant is located under the parking
lot of the development. Thus, storm water runs into the plant
and can significantly increase the flow. However, the peak flow
is far from the permitted capacity of 9,600 gallons per day.
Since the population of the development at any one time is
unknown, the average peak daily flow per month and the average
daily population are used to establish the peak level of service.
GSSEWER - 1014.03- 7 /7/89 4A -11
Projected Demand
The projected demand and level of service for each of the three
package wastewater treatment plants within the Town of Gulf
Stream are shown on Table 4A -2.
Little Club Plant
Between May, 1988, and April, 1989, the Little Club Plant had an
average daily flow of 4,580 gallons, an average level of service
of 176.15 GCD, a peak day flow of 20,000 gallons, and an average
peak day per month level of service of 295 GCD. The average
demand level yielded a surplus capacity of 10,420 gallons per
day. The plant capacity also exceeded or met the peak flows.
According to discussions with the Little Club management, no
expansions of either the service area or the plant are
anticipated in either then next five years or ten years.
Therefore, the demand and levels of service are not expected to
change from those found in the past (see Table 4A -2).
Gulfstream Shores Plant
Between May, 1988, and April, 1989, the Gulfstream Shores Plant
had an average daily flow of 3,800 gallons, an average level of
service of 63.3 GCD, a peak day flow of 8,000 gallons, and an
average peak day per month level of service of 87.5 GCD. The
average demand level yielded a surplus plant capacity of 4,200
gallons. The plant capacity also exceeded or met the peak flows.
According to discussions with the Gulfstream Shores management,
no expansions of either the service area or plant are anticipated
in either the next five years or ten years. Therefore, the
demand and levels of service are not expected to change from
those found in the past (see Table 4A -2).
GSSEWER- 1014.03- 7 /7/89 4A -12
Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant
Between May, 1988, and April, 1989, the Somerset of Gulf Stream
Plant had an average daily flow of 2,400 gallons, an average
level of service of 130 GCD, a peak day flow of 7,400 gallons,
and an average peak day per month level of service of 252 GCD.
The average demand level yielded a surplus capacity of 7,200
gallons. The plant capacity also exceeded the peak day flow by
2,200 gallons.
According to discussions with the Somerset of Gulf Stream
management, no expansions of either the service area or plant are
anticipated in either the next five years or ten years.
Therefore, the demand and levels of service are not expected to
change from those found in the past (see Table 4A -2).
Performance Assessment
The life expectancy, current condition, opportunities /problems
for expansion, and impact on natural resources for each of the
three package wastewater treatment plants are summarized on Table
4A -2.
Little Club Plant
The Little Club Plant was built in 1971 and is expected to last
another 20 years. The system has concrete tanks and uses
percolation ponds for effluent disposal. The plant operator
reports the plant to be in excellent shape. The plant is fully
permitted by all appropriate regulatory agencies and currently
meets all regulatory standards for effluent discharge. No adverse
impacts on the natural resources of the area have been reported
and none are anticipated. If desired, the Little Club does have
sufficient room in which to expand the plant. However, as
discussed previously, expansions of the service area or plant are
not anticipated.
GSSEWER- 1014.03- 7 /7/89 4A -13
Although the Little Club Plant is projected to last another 20
years and have surplus capacities throughout this period, the
management of the club has expressed a desire to use the City of
Boynton Beach's sanitary sewer system. If it would be cost
effective, the extension of service to this area would be
reasonable, in as much as the abutting property to north of
Little Club is in the City of Boyton Beach and currently has
sewer service to it. Studies concerning the possibility of the
Town of Gulf Stream using the Boynton Beach system are discussed
in the Septic Tank section of this element.
Gulfstream Shores Plant
The Gulfstream Shores Plant is estimated to have been built in
1970 and is projected to last another 20 years. The system has
concrete tanks and uses a drainfield for effluent disposal. The
plant operator reports the plant to be in excellent shape. The
plant is fully permitted by all appropriate regulatory agencies
and currently meets all regulatory standards for effluent
discharge. However, on rare occasions during the peak season when
morning instantaneous use is high, some solids have flowed into
the drainfield. When this has occurred, the drainfield has been
chemically treated to reduce any environmental or public health
impacts. No adverse impacts on the natural resources of the area
have been reported and none are anticipated if the plant is
managed properly. No room exists on the current site to expand
the plant. However, as discussed previously, expansions of the
service area or plant are not anticipated.
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -14
Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant
The Somerset of Gulf Stream Plant was built in 1968. The plant
is currently under -going major renovations which should keep it
operational for another 20 years. The system has metal tanks and
uses a drainfield for effluent disposal. The plant is fully
permitted by all appropriate regulatory agencies and currently
meets all regulatory standards for effluent discharge.
Because the plant is located below grade on the western end of
the development, storm water can run into the system and
significantly increase the flow. However, as the plant has such
a large surplus capacity and the high population season tends to
coincide with the dry season, the inflow of storm water has not
created any problems. No adverse impacts. on the natural
resources of the area have been reported and none are anticipated
if the plant is managed properly. No room exists on the current
site to expand the plant. However, as discussed previously,
expansions of the service area or plant are not anticipated.
III. SEPTIC TANKS
Existing Conditions
In 1988, there were an estimated 506 housing units and no
commercial or industrial structures within the Town of Gulf
Stream. Of these units, 123 have wastewater service provided by
either the City of Delray Beach or by package treatment plants.
The remainder of these units (380) are serviced by septic tanks,
Some of these units are in multi - family developments which have
one or more septic tanks. Therefore, there are an estimated 325
septic tanks within the town.
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -15
In Palm Beach County, septic
the Palm Beach County Health
Engineering. Regular septic
encouraged but not required.
Town of Gulf Stream meet the
septic tank usage.
Projected Demand
tanks are permitted and regulated by
Department, Division of Sciences and
tank maintenance and inspections are
Almost all of the lots within the
current regulatory size standard for
There are currently approximately 25 vacant, single family
residential lots within the town. Should neither the cities of
Delray Beach or Boynton Beach or the package treatment plants
expand their service areas, all new residential development will
include septic tanks. All of these lots meet the minimum square
footage requirement. All developed areas that are not part of
the service areas of the City of Delray Beach or package
wastewater treatment plants, as shown on Figure 4A -1, use or will
use septic tanks.
Performance Assessment
In general, septic tanks have worked well in the Town of Gulf
Stream. However, the high water table and very permeable soils
of the area place severe limitations on the use of septic
systems. Figure 4A -2 shows the soils of the town by type and
location according to the Soil Survey of Palm Beach County Area,
Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service, December, 1978.
The inclusion of "Urban land complex" in most of the soils
associations indicates the high degree of development that has
taken place within the Town of Gulf Stream. Although most of
this development consists of low density, single family
residential units, or golf courses, all of the land has been
regarded. While the previously referenced soil survey did not
GSSEWER- 1014.03- 7 /7/89 4A -16
V
=SOILS
5 R ^ t
_ SuB
AX
cuB AX
c Is
•e �
- AX
SOIL LEGEND _ PbB
AX na.m.u,e.. l.m ..n.l.......a. C{lB
Bn �a
CUB ..............
PbB v .e. .I... ATLANFX
P...n -a,e. .e Ur
PhB
SUB aa..w.l..,. om..,..x. .
ur
e.o.xee.xmxen..xo.x..uxx�xo. me
` " "'°"° ^ °•• ^ ° "•• —••• THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM .61LV 1969
PALM SEAp C0UWY•FLO69A 1000 500 0
000
scale le �
assess the septic tank absorption field suitability of the Urban
land complex associations, the natural soil types were all listed
as having "severe limitations" for septic drainfields. Severe
limitations indicate that, "soil properties or site features are
so unfavorable or so difficult to overcome that major soil
reclamation, special designs, or intensive maintenance is
required." Because of this, some of the septic systems have
"perched" drainfields where fill has been brought -in to raise the
drainfield area. This increases the soil depth between the
septic effluent outfall and the water table in order to slow
absorption.
Recently, five (5) single family residences located on the east
and west sides of Polo Drive at the intersection of School Road
have experienced septic problems. These parcels do not have
perched drainfields and are located in one of the lowest areas of
the town. While actual failures have been rare, these residences
must be conscious of their septic demands. Thus, before large
social gatherings, these homes must have their septic
tanks emptied in order to accommodate the large short -term flows.
The problem with these systems then, has been that of an
inconvenience rather than a health problem.
As a result of these marginal systems, the Town Commission
recently undertook several actions. First, the town commissioned
a study to determine the costs of using alternative systems for
these five residences and an additional 25 residences in the same
area. The report, completed by James A. Butkus and Associates on
February 8, 1988, examined two alternatives: using the City of
Boynton Beach's wastewater system via an unincorporated area and
using the Little Club package wastewater treatment plant. The
report determined that the use of the Little Club Plant by all 30
residences would be the most cost effective alternative of those
examined.
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -18
In addition, the report revised the 1978 South Central Palm
Beach County 201 Facilities Plan estimated cost of providing
centralized sewer service to the entire Town of Gulf Stream. The
plan proposed that sewer service be provided via the City of
Boynton Beach's wastewater system which, as discussed previously,
shares the South Central Wastewater Treatment Facility with the
City of Delray Beach. The cost, in 1988 dollars, is estimated to
be $9,450 per single family unit and $6,576 per multi - family
unit. In addition, those using septic tanks would have to bear
additional costs (approximately $2,500 per unit) of hooking into
the central system and removing or filling their septic systems.
Likewise, the multi - family developments and some single family
homes would also have to have on -site improvements including, for
some, the addition of a lift station (average cost: $35,000).
Once the report was completed, the town conducted a survey,of all
property holders of record to determine if the town residents
were in favor of a centralized system for the entire town. Of
the 520 surveys mailed, 229 were returned. Of those registered
to vote in the Town of Gulf Stream, 62 voted for a centralized
system while 105 voted against. Of those not registered to vote
in the Town of Gulf Stream, 35 voted for a centralized system and
27 voted against. Thus, a total of 97 property owners voted for
a centralized system while 132 voted against a centralized
system, and 291 property owners did not respond. It should be
noted that of the 37 property owners in the area of the septic
failures, 19 voted for a centralized system while only 13 voted
against.
The third action taken by the Town Commission was the provision
of a "free" septic system inspection and consultation by the
town's consulting engineer for any residence experiencing septic
problems. Of all those using septic tanks, approximately, 16
asked for the consultation. The engineer reported that none of
the systems inspected posed a health threat. He reported that
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -19
perched drainfields would improve the situation for those five;
however, the systems most likely could never accommodate the
large peak flows without continued cleaning prior to peak events.
According to the engineer, the on -site improvements of a perched
drainfield could cost upward of $10,000 per system. Thus, the
residents would rather pay more to hook into a central system
than to improve and continue to manage their own systems.
To date, the town is working with the five residents to resolve
this issue. The primary reason for the lack of resolution is
that funding from the federal government or the state is not
currently available. Given that the most of town is on a barrier
island such funding sources are not likely to be available in the
near future (Please consult the Coastal Management Element of
this Comprehensive Plan for a further discussion of barrier
island limitations.) However, the town will continue to study
the issue. In the meantime, the residents in the low -lying areas
are continuing their own investigation of using the Boynton Beach
system.
IV. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
In general, developments within the Town of Gulf Stream have
adequately provided for their own wastewater treatment systems.
The City of Delray Beach's system appears to be adequate to
continue providing service to the two developments in the Town of
Gulf Stream that are a part of City's service area. Likewise,
the three private package wastewater treatment systems also are
projected to meet the projected needs of their service areas for
the next several years. In addition, most of those using septic
tanks have experienced few problems, and with regular inspections
and maintenance, should continue to use these systems without
problems in the future.
GSSEWER- 101 4.03 - 7/7/89 4A -20
Presently, the only wastewater problems identified in the town
concern five single family residences which have experienced some
problems with their septic tanks. While these problems do not
pose a health threat, they do create an inconvenience for these
residents as their septic flows must be constantly monitored.
The town has received a study on some alternatives for these
residences. While the town will continue to study the matter, the
major problem remains the attainment of outside funding in order
to pay for these alternatives.
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -21
Infrastructure Element
Sanitary Sewer Sub — Element
Data and Analysis Update
A large percentage of the Town currently uses private septic systems to handle
their wastewater service. However, there are several private systems within the
community. There is a private low pressure sanitary system operated by
homeowners in the Gulf Stream Core area. In 1991, the Gulf Stream Home
Improvement Association was created to service the Gulf Stream Core area. This
Association services 71 single family homes and the Gulf Stream School. The
Somerset of Gulfstream residential project has its own system, as does
Gulfstream Shores. The Little Club Plant, which previously serviced the Little
Club area, Las Casistas and Hillside House is no longer functional and those
areas connected to the City of Boynton Beach.
Gulf Stream has recognized the need for a municipality -wide wastewater system
to replace the septic system currently in use throughout most of the Town. The
Town continues to assess and evaluate the financial feasibility this potential
capital improvements.
The current arrangement of septic systems and small private sewer systems in
place are able to handle the Town's wastewater adequately at this time. Since
the remaining developable land is minimal and primarily single family lots, septic
systems would handle any new development as well. Developers are responsible
for the cost of wastewater improvements necessary for their development and
redevelopment projects
Below is an analysis of the sanitary sewer service within the Town during the 20-
year planning time frame..
Level of Service Analvsis
LOS \Year
2009
2014
2019
2024
2029
Population
754
772
788
801
810
Sanitary Sewer, 160 gpcpd*
120,640
gal /day
123,520
gal /day
126,080
gal /day
128,160
gal /day
129,600
gal /day
* Sanitary Sewer service in the Town is provided through private septic systems,
package plants and septic tanks. The LOS analysis applies to all systems.
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida 4A -22
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08/10)
Adopted July 10, 2009
Infrastructure Element
Infrastructure Element
Sanitary Sewer Sub — Element
V. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 4.A.1.: TO ENSURE SANITARY SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE
PROVIDED WHICH COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND
WHICH MEET THE NEEDS OF THE CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS
OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM.
Objective 4.A.1.1.: The level of service standards established in this sub —
element shall be maintained.
Policy 4.A.1.1.1.: The Town shall adopt an average annual daily sanitary sewage
flow level of service standard of 160 gallons per capita per day for all treatment
facilities, public and private.
Policy 4.A.1.1.5. 2: Development orders for new development or redevelopment
shall not be issued which would cause the wastewater facilities addressed in
Policy 4.A.1.1.1. of this sub — element to operate below the level of service
standards adopted in this subelement.
Obiective 4.A.1.2.: Development orders for new development or
redevelopment proposing to use septic systems shall not be approved for
parcels that do not meet Palm Beach County Health Department minimum
requirements.
Policy 4.A.1.2.1.: Prior to approval, all proposed development using septic
systems shall provide evidence of compliance with all applicable septic system
requirements.
Objective 4.A.1.3.: The Town shall participate, if requested, in
discussions /negotiations between Town residents and potential
wastewater disposal providers, and continue to investigate sources of
revenue for the construction /extension of centralized wastewater facilities
within the Town.
Policy 4.A.1.3.1.: The Town shall participate, if requested, in
discussion /negotiations between Town residence and public wastewater system
providers, such as the Cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach, concerning
the extension of regional wastewater services to all portions of the Town.
Policy 4.A.1.3.2.: The Town shall participate, if requested, in
discussions /negotiations between Town residents and private wastewater system
providers, such as existing package treatment plants within the Town, concerning
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08/10)
Adopted July 10, 2009
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida 4A -23 Infrastructure Element
the extension of wastewater services to all or portions of the Town. Such
extensions shall not be permitted where the level of service standards adopted
by this sub — element for a private wastewater facility would not be met.
Policy 4.A.1.3.3.: Prior to 2011, the Town shall conduct a study to investigate
possible funding sources for a centralized municipal wastewater system.
Town of Gulf Stream, Florida
Amendment 08 -1 (Ord 08/10)
Adopted July 10, 2009
4A -24 Infrastructure Element
APPENDIX 4A -1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
MAY 23, 1989
GSSEWER- 1014.03 - 7/7/89 4A -25
P U B L I C F A C I L I T I E S
OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
1. Background
E L E M E N T
2. Inventory & Analysis, Sewer
3. Inventory & Analysis, Water
4. Inventory & Analysis, Solid waste
S. Inventory & Analysis, Drainage
6. Inventory & Analysis, Streets
7. Inventory & Analysis, Buildings and
Facilities
8. Needs & Recommendations
9. Goals, Objectives, and Policies
1. BACKGROUND:
The basic work involved in the inventory and analysis phase of
preparing this element was accomplished under contract with the
firm of Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. (PBS &J) a large
engineering, planning, and architectural firm . located in Miami
with a regional office in West Palm Beach. This firm is also
engaged in work for the City with respect to various aspects of
water and sewer planning and engineering and updating the City's
Water Master Plan.
In addition to the work by PBS &J, a citizens task team was
created. The task team worked with PBS &J to develop an
understanding of the Comprehensive Planning Act, the requirements
of Administrative Rule 9J -5, and of the workings of the City's
water, sewer, drainage, and solid waste disposal systems and
Programs. The task team met on the following dates with the
consultant and with.selected members of the City administration:
* August 2nd, "kick -off" meeting
* August 11th
* August 18th
* September 1st
* September 8th
* September 22nd.
The task team theh held a special workshop on September 29th at
which time the initial listing of Goals, Objectives, and Policies
were established for this element. Those policies were reviewed
with the Planning and Zoning Board on December 29th.
This write -up of the Element is a summary of the complete
inventory, analysis, and recommendations which are contained in
the PBS &J report, a Wastewater Master Plan proposed for the South
III -B -1
Central Regional
write -up of the
the task team any
City Commission.
Kovacs, Director
Beach.
Plant by Camp Dresser re McKee, and a complete
Goals, Objectives, and Policies as prepared by
i modified by the Planning and Zoning Board and
This write -up has been prepared by David J.
of Planning and Zoning for the City of Delray
The complete PBS &J report and other documents which are cited
herein are available for public review at the Planning Department
Offices located at 100 N.W. lst Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida.
INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS:
The following summaries have been prepared to facilitate review
with the requirements of Administrative Rule 9J -5. As a summary,
only s`:•ificant items are highlighted. The full PBS &J report
should . referred to for more infnrmai -inn
A separate inventory and analysis is provided for sewer, water,
drainage, and solid waste disposal facilities. Inventory and
analysis dealing with groundwater aquifer recharge is addressed
under the water subsection.
C2. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS - -- SEWER FACILITIES:
The South Central Wastewater Treatment Facility Board is the
entity having operation responsibility for treatment of sewage.
The Board is comprised of the City Commissions of the Citys of
Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. An Executive Director who
reports directly to the Board oversees the daily operations of
the facility. The City of Delray Beach (Utility Department) is
responsible for the collection.system within it's service area.
The _qe. lghic service area for that part of the wastewater
treatment facility which-'is under the responsibility of the City
of Delray Beach is shown in Figure P -1. It corresponds to the
City's Planning Area plus service (through contract) to Highland
Beach. The Town of'Gulfstream *is included in the service area;
however, except for one multiple family .development, other
development in Gulfstream is served by septic systems. There are
no plans to have central sewer extended further into Gulfstream.
This area encompasses approximately 18 square miles. The area is
urbanized with a complete range of land uses from rural
residential to heavy industrial. The area is more than 87%
developed.
The design capacity of the wastewater treatment plant is
established by it's secondary treatment capacity which is 24 MGD.
CThis capacity is shared equally between Boynton Beach and Delray
Beach.. The current demand at the plant is 14 MGD. Of this
amount, 7.63 MGD is attributed to Delray Beach. The level of
service ascribed to Delray Beach is 115 gpdc (gallons per _ day -per
capita).
III -B -2
Figure P -1 Delray Beach Planning and Service Areas
OCEAN RIDGE
)
The City of Delray Beach
CI'T'Y AND PLANNING AREA
FIGURE P -1
�\ j 0 _25 .50 .75 1
!� �� MILES
BOYNTON BEACH
1"
x
L -30 Canal
! .............
<'
I
a
A
i K F
1
a
UNE IDA
I
RD
W
N � ° I GULFS
ETH ST
1
. • —
.. g
!
___
w w
> � o
NE 4TH ST
S
O I- x
q
N W W c
Z 2'3
!
E A TIC AVE
'
...iw ATLANTIC AVE
e DELRAY BEACH
i
H
'^
O W
O
�......
LOWSON BLVD
SW 10TH
ST
�=` �
SE10 T R
F
II
i'a Q
I
.
LINTON BLVD
!
>
<
W
W AIA "-
W 9g
N
W
Q
6
:33
Z
O
L L -33 Culal
l
.�..............�.�.�.�.
. ........ all
;
@ Mater
* Sever
service includes Taw
Of Gulf Stream
service includes Tow
of Highland Beach
HIGHLAND BEACH
BOCA
-
HIGHLAND BEACH
)
The City of Delray Beach
CI'T'Y AND PLANNING AREA
FIGURE P -1
�\ j 0 _25 .50 .75 1
!� �� MILES
The City's wastewater collection system consists of approximately
90 miles of gravity sewer and force mains which are
interconnected to three master lift stations.
Facility capacity analysis:
* Under existing conditions the facility is operating
significantly under capacity (14 MGD demand with 7.63
MGD attributed to Delray Beach, 24 MGD capacity)
* At the end of the first planning period (FY 94/95) the
plant will still be operating significantly under
capacity (8.56 MGD demand, 12.0 MGD capacity).
* Major capital outtage for R &R approximates $2,046,000
(CDM Report) . These expenses are paid for out of a
sinkina fund which exists.
* At build -out (year 2000), the plant will still be
operating under capacity (9.05 MGD demand, 12.0 MGD
capacity).
* Long -term capital for expansion range from $13,600,000
to $29,500,000 depending upon processing alternatives
which are selected (CDM Report).
* The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton .Beach
projects demand at 20 MGD in the year 2000. This is
over their 12.0 MGD allocation. Thus, during the
planning period while the wastewater plant will be
operating below capacity it will be necessary to adjust
allocations.
Performance Analysis:
* Environmental performance standards as required by the
EPA, the State of Florida, and Palm Beach County Health
Department have consistently been met.
* The facility has a projected life significantly beyond
the planning period. The facility was constructed in
1979 and has a programmed life of 50 years.
* There has been an odor problem which adversely affects
the air quality of the immediate area (including
residential subdivisions).
* Ultimate disposal is by ocean discharge of secondary
effluent and land spreading of sludge. Although
neither process has an adverse impact upon these
natural resources, alternatives to each need to be
explored in light of the continued urbanization of the
County and potential restrictions on any amount of
ocean discharge.
III -B -3
* The City has more than 110 lift stations which are
involved in the pumping of sewage to the treatment
plant. Upgrading and maintenance of the lift stations
requires continuing capital investment. Frequently,
lift station upgrading is necessary to accommodate
individual (new) development projects. An assessment
of the impact of each new development upon the
downstream lift stations is made a part of the site
plan and subdivision review process.
* A 1987 report, "Infiltration Investigation for the City
of Delray Beach" determined that some portions of the
collection system have excessive infiltration.
Reduction of infiltration /inflow (I /I) is a cost -
effective method of reducing future facility costs and
capital expansion costs.
* There is no need to expand or relocate the treatment
plant. Thus, there are no problems or opportunities in
regard to this matter.
* There are more than 1,000 septic tanks within the
planning area. Many are found in former county
enclaves which were annexed in 1988. An equal amount
are located in County areas which are not yet annexed.
The only area in which problems with septic tanks is
known is by Lake Ida where a high water table exists.
Other areas served by septic systems have existed for
upwards of twenty years without observable problems to
the systems or to water quality. The City will provide
funds to provide sewer service to former enclave areas
which are inhabited so that service will be available
to all by the end of the second planning period (Year
2000). Sewer service will be provided to existing
County areas upon formation of assessment districts or
upon annexation at which time sewer main extensions and
connections will be required of the property owner.
3. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS - -- POTABLE WATER AND GROUNDWATER
The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach is the entity
having operational responsibility for all phases of the water
system. Day -to -day operations are under the auspices of the
Director of Public Utilities who reports to an Assistant City
Manager.
The geographic service area for the water utility is shown, in
Figure P -1. It corresponds to the City's Planning Area plus
service (through contract) to the Town of Gulf Stream. This area
encompasses approximately 18 square miles which is more than 87%
developed. The area is urbanized with a complete range of land
uses from rural residential to heavy industrial.
III -B -4
Facility capacity analysis - water treatment plant:
The design capacity of the water treatment plant is established
by it's clarifier capacity which is 20.4 MGD. The current
demand at the plant is approximately 13.2 MGD. The level of
service is established at 195 gpdc (gallons per day per capita)
daily average demand and at 263 gpdc peak demand.
* Under existing conditions the facility is operating
under capacity (13.2 MGD demand, 17.5 MGD @ peak
demand; 20.4 MGD capacity) .
* At the end of the first planning period (FY 94/95) the
plant will still be operating under capacity (14.0 'MGD
demand, 20.1 peak demand; 27.2 MGD capacity, clarifier
added in 1989).
* At build -out (.year 2000), the plant will still be
operating under capacity (14.5 MGD demand, 21.9 peak
demand; 27.2 MGD capacity)
Performance Analysis - Water Treatment Plant:
* Environmental performance standards as required by the
EPA, the State of Florida, and Palm Beach County Health
C Department have consistently been met except during
1988 when the system was contaminated by a major spill.
Corrective measures which cost more.than $1,000,000 and
include the continuing use of- air - strippers have
reestablished water quality. The City operated under
emergency water conservation measures for nine months.
* The facility has a projected life significantly beyond
the planning period. The facility was constructed in
1972 and has a programmed life of 50 years.
To accommodate the potential need for plant expansion,
would involve use of property immediately to the south
of the treatment plant. Purchase of property under the
City's relocation policy (see Housing Element) began in
1988. There are no other problems or opportunities in
regard to this matter.
The water system is comprised of mains which vary in
size from two to twenty -four inches in diameter. The
two inch mains, which are found in the older portions
of the community, are not sufficient for the siting of
fire hydrants. The City annually provides funds for
the upgrading of these mains to six inches and for the
installation of hydrants.
C The quality of the water, while meeting health
standards, is relatively hard. Citizens frequently
complain about water quality. A commitment is made,
III -B -5
through the Comprehensive Plan, to change to a lime
coagulation system and, thus enhance water quality.
The estimated cost for the change if $5,865,000 (PBS &J
WTP Master Plan Up -date, 1989).
* Upon completion of an expansion in 1989, the treatment
facilities are such that an additional expansion should
not be necessary.
Pumping Systems: The high service pumps and transfer
pumps at the water treatment plan have adequate
capacity to meet design conditions.
In order to meet fire demand requirements with one pump
out of service, suction .piping at the south reservoir
should be corrected.
No improvements are currently necessary for standby
pumping.
To meet future needs
be added at the water
C, with a total capacit y
the north reservoir;
capacity at the south
a 3,500 gpm transfer pump should
treatment plant; additional pumps
of 5,400 gpm should be added at
and 4,000 gpm additional pumping
reservoir.
* Storage Facilities: Existing storage facilities at 6.88
mg is adequate to meet current demand.
Future needs are based upon a LOS of 15% of maximum
flow or 3.3 mg; fire reserve at 1.5 mg; and emergency
reserve at 25% of storage. This equates to 6.0 mg.
This amount of storage is currently provided; however,
it is recommended that better distribution of storage
be provided through the addition of a .5 mg tank in the
southeast (Miller Field), 1.0 mg tank in the southwest,
and .5 mg tank in the north.
The combined costs for long -term pumping and storage
facilities is approximately $3,000,000.
Piping Systems: A computer system used by Post,
Buckley, Schuh, & Jernigan, Inc identified more than 45
individual segments or projects to be undertaken in
order to properly accommodate demand conditions,
localized fire demands, and ultimate peak hour demands.
The improvements extend beyond the planning periods
used in the Comprehensive Plan.
The cost for the above facilities and for extending
mains to unserved areas approximates $13,000,000.
III -B -6
* Water system interconnections between the City system
and the systems for Boca Raton and Boynton Beach should
be provided in order to accommodate emergency
situations among these communities. Such situations
would occur when the water supply to a community must
be reduced due to a shutdown of individual wells or a
wellfield.
Facility capacity analysis - Raw Water Supply:
The City's water supply is provided from 29 wells in three well
fields. The eastern wellfield (16) along Dixie Highway, the
Series 20 wellfield (6) just east of 2 -95, and the golf course
wellfield (7). The wells draw water from the Floridan aquifer.
The design capacity of the well fields is 30 MGD. The amount of
withdrawal is established by the South Florida Water Management
District ( SFWMD). SFWMD has limited production from ten of the
eastern wells because of their impact upon salt water intrusion.
In December, 1987, SFWMD issued a permit for the use of 15.7 MGD
(23.06 MGD peak). Upon completion of the golf course wellfields
in 1989, restrictions were lifted. The current demand is 13.2
MGD, with peak demand at' 17.5 MGD. The level of service is
established at 195 gpdc (gallons per day per capita) daily
average demand and at 260 gpdc peak demand.
* Under existing conditions the well fields are operating
under capacity (13.2 MGD demand, 17.5 MGD @ peak
demand; 26.2 MGD capacity)
* At the end of the first planning period (FY 94/95) the
field will still be operating under capacity (14.0 MGD
demand, 20.1 peak demand; 26.2 MGD capacity).
* At build -out (year 2000), the capacity of the existing
well fields will be (14.5 MGD demand, 21.9 peak demand;
26.2 MGD capacity). While this accommodates demand,
there is sufficient reserve capacity to accomodate pump
failures or repair of wells.
Performance Analysis - Raw Water Suppl
* The projected life of existing wells extends
significantly beyond the planning period. However
maintenance is costly and recurring. The Floridan
acquifer is the water source for all communities in
Palm Beach County.
* A future wellfield expansion may be necessary. Such a
necessity will occur only if it becomes necessary to
abandon eastern wellfields because of salt water
intrusion. Such an event is unlikely in the
III -B -7
foreseeable future, thus there are no problems or
opportunities to be addressed with respect to expansion
or relocation.
The eastern wellfield and the series 20 wellfield are
located in areas where industrial activities occur.
Wellfield protection zones one. twn. Ann +t oe ;�., -,.,
Wnicn is zoned Industrial is located within the
wellfield protection zones of the series 20 wells.
* There are more than 1,000 domestic wells within the
planning area. Many are found in former County
enclaves which were annexed in 1988. An equal amount
are located in County areas which are not yet annexed.
Although many wells have high concentrations of iron
and leave unappealing residues, there are no instances
of unacceptable water quality, from a health
regulations perspective, in the planning area. The City
is programming funds to provide water service to former
enclave areas which are inhabited so that service will
be available to all by the end of the second planning
period (Year 2000). Water service will be provided to
existing County areas upon formation of assessment
districts or upon annexation at which time water main
C extensions and connections will be required of the
property owner.
* There are no major recharge areas within the Planning
Area.
* The City's raw water pumps can increase capacity
through rehabilitation of existing facilities. Such a
program is estimated to cost $350,000 (PBS &S, WTP
Master Plan Up -date, 1989).
4. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS -- SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT:
The Solid Waste Authority is the entity.having responsibility for
maintaining facilities for the ultimate disposal of solid waste.
The City of Delray Beach contracts for the collection of solid
waste with Waste Management (a private firm).
The geographic service area for which the City contracts is that
contained within the municipal limits. The City collects payment
for service through monthly billings administered by it's
Utilities Billing Division.
The design capacity of the Dyer Sanitary Landfill (destination
for virtually all of Palm Beach County) is near capacity. The
Solid Waste Authority and the Palm Beach County Commission were
engaged in selecting a new landfill site at the time of the
C' writing of this Element.
III -B -8
A facility capacity analysis of the landfill is not provided
since it is clear that the current facility will not accommodate
needs within a two or three year period. The City has no
influence in the determination of the landfill location or the
development of the facility. The City does account for
approximately 83,900 tons of refuse on 'an annual basis or about
7.4% of the demand at the landfill.
A transfer station is
has a rated capacity
volumes estimated at
operating at capacity.
Performance Analysis:
located in the City of Delray Beach. It
of 1,000 tons per day with truck traffic
200 trucks per day. The facility is
There are no known problems with respect to the actual
provision of service within the City, The City
Commission periodically reviews its contracts for
enhanced services.
* At times, truck traffic crueues from the Transfer
Station along S.W. 4th Avenue and into Linton
Boulevard. These infrequent occurrences happen when
there are malfunctions at the station. They do portend
however, that expansion of the facility or the addition
of more services (e.g. regional recycling) which bring
more truck traffic must be carefully evaluated prior to
implementation.
The Solid waste Authority is working with the City in
establishing a pilot recycling program at the time of
the writing of this Element.
INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS -- DRAINAGE:
The South Florida Water Management Distinct (SFWMD).is one of the
entities having operational responsibility for management of
drainage. others include the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD)
and the city itself.
The geographic service area for SFWMD extends far beyond the
City's Planning Area. All of the Planning Area (except the
coastal zone) is included within the District's C -15 basin which
comprises 74.6 square miles. The LWDD also extends beyond the
Planning Area but it does not include all of the City. LWDD has
jurisdiction west of I -95 with only a small portion of its
service area east of I -95. The City addresses local drainage
needs within its municipal boundaries. The area for which the
City is directly accountable is urban with uses ranging from
rural estates to industrial. The area is 87% built -out
(population basis).
III -B -9
The design capacity of all the SFWMD facilities (C -15 Canal &
S -40 spillway) maintains a headwater stage of 8.2 feet NGVD. The
water level is lowered to a minimum of 7.7 feet NGVD during heavy
rain periods. The C -15 is designed to discharge a 30 year storm.
The LWDD system is designed to accommodate a 25 year storm. The
peak demand discharge at S -40 was 4,050 cfs in April, 1979. The
discharge design is 4,800 cfs.
The level of service for drainage devices is established by the
SFWMD. See the PBS &J report for a description of this design
criteria and its application.
Facility Capacity and Performance Analysis:
The SFWMD and LWDD facilities are all designed to accommodate an
area greater than the City's Planning Area. The Planning Area is
87% built -out and remaining development will not have a
significant impact upon. those agency's existing facilities.
Furthermore, all new development must be permitted through SFWMD
and LWDD, as applicable.
With respect to local drainage facilities for which the City of
Delray Beach is responsible, there are many capacity
deficiencies. These deficiencies arise from the simple fact that
storm water management was not a part of development
infrastructure when most of the land east of I -95 was developed.
The correction of poor drainage conditions is a remedial activity
which should be undertaken by the City,
The City's Engineering Department has undertaken or contracted
for drainage assessments in several areas of the City. These
include:
* N. Swinton /Seacrest Area (Wantman)
$
100,000
* Northwest Area (BOA) (Without Fail)
$
1,300,000
* Southwest Area I (R &A)
$
undetermined
* Southwest Area II (Paramount)
$
undetermined
* East Central Area, includes CDB (BOA)
$
2,060,000
* Tropic Palms (City)
$
250,000
* Bass Creek (City)
$
150,000
* N.E. 8th Street (City)
$
25,000
* S.W. 1st Avenue & 2nd Street (City)
$
40,000
* N.W. 7th Court (City)
$
25,000
* Homewood (City)
$
30,000
* Lowson, Homewood to E -4 Canal
$
200,000
* S.E. 1st Street from U.S. 1 to ICWW
$
200,000
$
4,380,000
III -B -10
The City's Engineering Department has also prepared preliminary
estimates for improving street and drainage in those former
County enclaves which were annexed to the City in 1988. These
include:
* Lake Heights
$
150,000
* Gulfstream Estates
$
300,000
* Lake Ida Area
$
1,250,000
* N.E. Federal Highway
$
600,000
* Germantown Area
$
1,100,000
* Silver Terrace area
$
400,000
* LaMat /Federal Highway area
$
700,000
* Brandon Drive (Windward Palms Sub)
$
110,000
* Lone Pine Road (unplatted sub)
$
400,000
* Greenbrier (Woodvue Sub)
$
30,000
* Delray Shores area
$
1,190,000
$ 6,230,000
6. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS -- STREET SYSTEMS
The City of Delray Beach is entity having Jurisdictional
responsibility for repair and maintenance for most streets.
Exceptions include those which are specifically under the County
Maintenance Program, private streets, and dedicated streets which
C, have not been accepted into a maintenance program. The City
accepts repair and maintenance responsibilities through formal
action. in 1989, the City _maintained approximately 163 miles of
roadways.
New development must provide a street section which provides for
two twelve foot travel lanes and must otherwise meet adopted
standards. A large portion of the City has roadways which were
built prior to the evolution of street standards. Accordingly, a
level of service standard of eighteen feet as a minimum pavement
width for existing situations has been established.
Facility Capacity and Performance Analvsis:
The City is involved in an on -going program of street resurfacing
at the rate of $250,000 per year. In 1985, an extensive study of
street conditions was undertaken. It identified 41 local street
.projects which involved reconstruction as opposed to resurfacing.
Those projects are estimated to cost $2,772,000. The 1988/89
annexation for former County pockets created an additional demand
of approximately $6,200,000 for street reconstruction. (These
cost estimates also include drainage improvements associated with
street reconstruction and installation of sidewalks, . as
appropriate.) Heretofore there has not been a program for street
reconstruction due to a lack of dedicated revenue.
III -B -11
The consideration of street resurfacing and reconstruction is
directed to streets which are the sole responsibility of the
' City. Streets which are under the responsibility of the County
are collectors and arterials and are well maintained.
Improvements to City streets which are required in order to
maintain the LOS established for traffic flow are addressed in
the Traffic Element.
INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS - -- BUILDINGS AND OTHER FACILITIES
The buildings which are under the auspices of the City include:
* City Hall on NW 1st Avenue
* Utilities Building on NW 1st Avenue
* Water Building on Lake Ida Road
* Central Fire Station on NW 1st Avenue
* Three Fire substations #2, #3, and #4
* Public Works Administration on SW 4th Street
* Water Treatment Plant Administration Bldg on SW 2nd Ave
Public Safety Building (Police) on Atlantic Avenue
The City Library is operated by the Friends of the Library. The
Cemetery is a City owned facility whose operations are leased but
whose maintenance lies with the City. The Golf Course is a City
owned facility operated by a full service lessee.
There are no level of service standards which apply to City owned
and operated buildings other than they being convenient and
accessible to the public. This includes handicapped access.
City Hall is undergoing an expansion program in 1990 which will
place all development oriented services within a single wing and
thus facilitate the provision of governmental services. Although
no future expansions are proposed, it will be necessary to
provide additional office space for normal growth in the
administration and to accommodate programs proposed in the
Comprehensive Plan.
The Central Fire Station no longer provides the space and
facilities which are required for modern operations. In recent
years, trailers have been placed next to the Central Station in
order to accommodate space needs. In addition, the Station is
located on prime commercial property which is targeted for
redevelopment as a part of the Atlantic Avenue corridor. A new
fire station will replace substation 42 in 1990. Rehabilitation
and renovation is required for substations #3 and #4 in order
to provide adequate facilities for fire fighters. A new
substation ( #5) is required in the southwest portion of the
community.
The Utilities Building on NW 1st Avenue is functional but
isolated from other functions. Likewise, a water division
facility on Lake Ida Road is isolated.
III -B -12
The Public Works Facility is adjacent the Water Treatment Plan
and Water Administration Facility. There is vacant land nearby
upon which additional facilities can be built. This provides an
opportunity to relocate the Utility Department and its outlying
water division building to a more central site. The Water
Administration Facility has been expanded in 1989 and should not
require further expansion.
The Public Safety (Police) Building was constructed in 1988 with
built -in reserve space which should accommodate all future needs.
The golf course is addressed in the Open Space and Recreation
Element. The municipal cemetery needs to expand onto property to
its south. A master plan for such expansion is maintained by the
Department of Parks, Recreation, and Leisure Services.
Program for additional facilities: Except for renovation of fire
substations and relocation of the Central Fire Station, there
are no plans or programs for changes to City buildings and
facilities except as provided for in individual elements of the
Plan e.g. water treatment plant expansion (Water sub- element of
Facilities Element).
The following opportunities exist:
relocation of Utilities and the water building to the
Public Works Complex on SW 4th Street;
such relocation would allow expansion of City Hall
needs northerly of the existing site, or in an
alternative would allow relocation of a central fire
station to that location;
The following needs exist:
relocation .of Fire Station #1 (Central) and Fire
Headquarters in order to provide more appropriate
facilities and clear the way for redevelopment of the
existing site;
additional office space for City Hall employees who are
necessary to accommodate normal growth and the demands
for new programs as reflected throughout this Plan.
This demand can be met by new facilities or through the
leasing (or other arrangements) of office space in the
proposed office development area (Atlantic Avenue
Redevelopment) immediately south of the existing City
Hall Complex.
Cemetery expansion to the reserved area south of the
existing facility.
III -B -13
C. 8. NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
C�
Summarizing the from the previous facility and performance
analysis, the following needs and recommendations are put forth
for the City's Public Facilities Element.
The existing sewer collection and water distribution
master plans need to be updated and thus take into
consideration the new population and growth projections
as contained in this Comprehensive Plan.
following the 1990 Census reexamination of future
wastewater flows should be conducted in order to verify
many of the assumptions which have gone into the
population estimates and projects upon which current
projections have been made.
Establishment of a set aside account in the water and
sewer (enterprise) capital fund to provide for remedial
activities to correct and maintain:
- lift stations
- manhole repair and replacement (infiltration)
- replacement of two inch water mains
- installation of fire hydrants on upgraded mains
* Undertake a program for reduction of I/I in the sewer
collection system in order to diminish needs for City
participation in sewer plant expansion costs.
* Establish a program, with funding, for extending water
and sewer mains to unserved, inhabited areas in the
City.
in light of the future shift in use of the wastewater
treatment plant from 50/50 to 35/65 (Delray Beach /
Boynton Beach), the current practice of a 50/50 of
required expansion costs should be reevaluated by the
City and a proposal for change made to the SCWWTP
Board.
Undertake a city -wide drainage assessment study which
will update and use common assumptions and criteria of
the drainage projects identified in the inventory and
analysis. Establish priorities based upon adopted
criteria. Provide funding through a revenue bond back
by a new funding source i.e. a drainage facilities fee.
Change over the water treatment process to lime
coagulation (softening) in order to enhance' water
quality.
III -B -14
* Reassess water and sewer rates in light of long -term
capital needs and make provisions for a water and sewer
revenue fund bond to cover such obligations.
* Provide a firm funding source for the reconstruction of
City streets.
* Make provisions for the relocation of the Central Fire
Station.
* Undertake a space needs study in order to estimate
office requirements for the staff of the City
Administration and determine the best methods for
housing such staff.
* Develop a program, including funding and improvements,
for expansion of the municipal cemetery.
III -B -15
0
9. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES:
The Public Utilities Task Team (citizen's of the community)
initially prepared the goals, objectives, and policies based upon
the inventory and analysis work; the recommendations cited in the
previous section; and their own feelings and research. Thus, the
initial goals, objectives, and policies reach beyond just meeting
the minimum requirement of the Administrative Rule 9J -5. The
work of the Task Team was reviewed and modified by the Planning
and Zoning Board and City Commission prior to inclusion in this
document.
THE FOLLOWING OUTLINE IS INTENDED AS AN AIDE IN REVIEWING THE
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT.
PLEASE REFER TO THE COMPLETE TEXT IN ORDER TO GAIN A PROPER
UNDERSTANDING OF THE MATTER.
GOAL AREA "A" ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Objective A -1 Point Sources of Pollution
Policy A -1.1 Odor at the WWTP
Policy A -1.2 Ocean Discharge
Policy A -1.3 Septic Systems,
C. Policy A -1.4 Rehabilitation of Sewer System
Objective A -2 Non -point Sources of Pollution
Policy A -2.1 Component of Storm Water Master Plan
Objective A -3 Waste Disposal
Policy A -3.1 Alternative Sewage Sludge Disposal
Method
Policy A -3.2 Local Drop -off for Hazardous Waste
Policy A -3.3 Solid Waste Sites
Policy A -3.4 Solid Waste Recycling
GOAL AREA "B" POTABLE WATER
Objective B -1 Level of Service
Policy B -1.1 Water Master Plan Up -date
Policy B -1.2 New Development Concurrency
Policy B -1.3 Exemptions for In -fill
III -B -16
Objective B -2 Water Supply
Policy B -2.1 WWTP Effluent Recycling
Policy B -2.2 Storm Drainage and Canals
Policy B -2.3 Retrofitting of existing wells
Objective B -3 Meeting Future Demands
Policy B -3.1 Decrease in Per Capita Use by 10%
Policy B -3.2 Financing Final Phase of WTP Expansion
Policy 3-3.3 Consideration of Conservation in
Determining Needs
Objective B -4 Groundwater Protection
Policy B -4.1 Pretreatment and Monitoring Wells
Policy B -4.2 Expansion of Wellfield Protection Ord.
Policy B -4.3 Rezonings in Well Zone 3
Policy B -4.4 Less Reliance on Eastern Wellfield
Policy B -4.5 Focus Recharge in Central Section
Objective B -5 Enhancement of Water Quality (Potable)
Policy
B -5.1
Conversion
to Sodium Aluminate
Policy
B -5.2
Funding for
Water Testing and Analysis
Policy
B -5.3
Reports to
the City Commission
Policy
B -5.4
Water Main
Inspection
GOAL AREA "C" SEWER SYSTEM
Objective C -1 Master Sewer Plan Up -date
Policy C -1.1 Minimal Expenditures, Pending Up -date
Policy C -1.2 Revisions to Capital Improvement Element
Objective C -2 Capital Improvements
Policy C -2.1 Manholes Replacement
Policy C -2.2 Lift Station Repair
Policy C -2.3 Design Capacity of the WWTP
Objective C -3 Unsewer Areas to Receive Service by 2000
Policy
C -3.1
Limited Interim
Funding
Policy
C -3.2
Funding Through
Bond Issue
Policy
C -3.3
Obligations of New Development
Objective C -4 Full Water Service by the Year 2000
Policy C -4.1 Limited Interim Funding
Policy C -4.2 Funding Through Bond Issue
Policy C -4.3 Obligations of New Development
III -B -17
I
Objective C -5 Priorities of Funding
Policy
C -5.1
General Fund Relationship
Policy
C -5.2
Annual Allocations for Upgrading of
System Components
Policy
C -5.3
Bonding for Serving Inhabited Areas
Policy
C -5.4
Upgrading to Have Priority
Policy
C -5.5
Coordination with Street and Drainage
Projects
Objective C -6 Wastewater Treatment Plant
Policy
C -6.1
Revaluation of Participator Formula
Policy
C -6.2
LOS
Policy
C -6.3
Infiltration Program
GOAL AREA "D"
BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
Objective D -1 Fire
Facilities and Equipment
Policy
D -2.1
Capital Replacement Fund
Policy
D -2.2
Central Fire Station Replacement
Policy
D -2.3
New Fire Station in the Southwest
1
Objective D -2 Cemetary Expansion
Policy D -2.1 Funding Program
Policy D -2.1 Improvements on S.W. 10th Street
Objective D -3 Administration Needs
Policy D -3.1 Space Study
GOAL AREA "E" STREETS AND DRAINAGE
Objective E -1 Capital Improvement Plan for Drainage
Facilities
Policy E -1.1
Policy E -1.2
Policy E -1.3
Policy E -1.4
Policy E -1.5
Policy E -1.6
Establishment of Needs and Priorities
Priority for Property Protection
Focus on Correcting Local Problems
Design Standards Adopted
Regulations to be Created
Priority to 3 Acres in Coastal
Management Element
Objective E -2 Funding Mechanisms
Policy E -2.1 Drainage Assessment Fee
Policy E -2.2 Bonding
III -B -18
Objective E -3 Street Resurfacing and Reconstruction
Policy E -3.1 Retain Current Program
Policy E -3.2 Reconstruction in First Period
Policy E -3.3 Reconstruction in Second Period
GOAL AREA "F" PUBLIC INFORMATION
Objective F -1 Overcoming of Perceived Lack of Knowledge
Policy F -1.1 Map Display
Policy F -1.2 Display of Capital Improvement Program
Policy F -1.3 Pamphlets Describing Various Facilities
Objective F -2 Public Participation
Policy F -2.1 Public Hearings Required Prior to
Setting Priorities
Policy F -2.2 Local'Planning Agency Responsibilities
Policy F -2.3 Changes not Permitted
III -B -19
N
GOAL AREA "A" THE PURPOSES, PROGRAMMING, AND PROVISION OF
PUBLIC FACILITIES SHALL BE DIRECTED
BY THE IDEAL OF PROVIDING A SAFE AND DECENT
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT.
Objective A -1
Specific programs to mitigate the adverse impacts of point
sources of pollution, as identified in the following
policies, shall be prepared and placed in written form prior
to June, 1990. These programs shall be prepared by the
Community Service Group.
Policy A -1.1 The odor level at the Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant shall be reduced by January 1, 1991, if not
sooner. Approaches to to be considered in achieving this
end shall include:
pre - chlorination of wastes before they enter the
regional treatment plant (see Intergovernmental
Coordination Element for related policy);
secure enclosure of the grit removal building;
review of potential solutions to the odor problem and
the making of a decision by the regional body shall be
achieved by the Regional Board by June 1, 1990.
C` Policy A -1.2 Even_ though current standards for ocean
discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean
discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method
of disposal of effluent. A program for the reuse of
effluent from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant shall
be presented to the Regional Board by June 1, 1991. (see
Policy B -1.2 for related policy; and see Intergovernmental
Coordination Element for related policy).
Policy A -1.3 All existing septic tanks which are located in
sewered or sewerable areas shall be removed from use,
throughout the City, by January 1, 1995, except in those
specific situations where it is physically demonstrated that
there is no degradation of groundwater. As a part of the
Master Sewer Plan Update (Objective C -1), the following
shall be addressed:
* an identification of critical areas shall be
completed;
* a program for the inspection of existing septic
tanks shall be instituted; and
* existing owners (operators) of septic tanks shall
be informed of amortization requirements.
III -B -20
��1 N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h i s p o l i c y , a n y s e p t i c
s y s t e m d e e m e d t o h a v e a n a d v e r s e i m p a c t o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t
s h a l l b e a b a n d o n e d a n d c o n n e c t i o n m a d e t o t h e c e n t r a l s e w e r
s y s t e m ( s e e P o l i c y C - 5 . 3 f o r r e l a t e d p o l i c y ) . .
( B 1 ) ( B 2 ) ( B 5 ) ( C 4 )
P o l i c y A - 1 . 4 P r o g r a m m i n g o f i m p r o v e m e n t s t o t h e s e w e r
s y s t e m s h a l l p l a c e a h i g h p r i o r i t y u p o n t h e r e h a b i l i t a t i o n
o f p o r t i o n s o f t h e o r i g i n a l s y s t e m w h i c h a r e n o w
e x p e r i e n c i n g i n f i l t r a t i o n a n d l e a k a g e . T h e p r o g r a m s h a l l
i n c l u d e d e t e c t i o n a n d e l i m i n a t i o n o f c o m b i n e d s e w a g e a n d
s t o r m s e w e r s . ( S e e P o l i c y C - 5 . 4 f o r r e l a t e d '