HomeMy Public PortalAboutOrdinance 826ORDINANCE NO. 826
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, ADDING
THE EASTSIDE FACILITY FEE TO
THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, growth in the Eastside Facility Fee Area (Fee Area) as described in the Eastside
Facility Fee Study attached as Exhibit "A" (Fee Study) will require the
development of transportation and sewer facilities in a coordinated fashion to
protect the public health, safety and welfare and to facilitate implementation of
the City General Plan and Master Sewer Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City prepared the Fee Study to determine the probable design and construction
costs of certain transportation and sewer facilities needed to support the logical
and orderly development in the Fee Area in accordance with the General Plan and
Master Sewer Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Fee Study calculates a proposed facility fee based upon the reasonable
apportionment of transportation and sewer facility costs to measurable units of
development in accordance with Government code Section 6600, et. seq; and
WHEREAS, the Fee Study has been presented to the City Finance Committee, the City
Planning Commission and the public for consideration and comment; and
WHEREAS, comments provided by City officials and the public have been incorporated into
the Fee Study; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on February 19, 2002 for the
purpose of hearing oral and written testimony regarding the Fee Study and the
proposed facility fee.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Sectionl. Approval of Fee Study. The City Council hereby approves the Fee Study.
Section 2. Adoption of Findings. The City Council hereby adopts the findings set forth in
Exhibit "B."
Section 3. Addition to Municipal Code. Chapter 3.22, entitled Eastside Facility Fee, to read as
set forth in Exhibit "C" is hereby added to the Beaumont Municipal Code.
Section 4. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published once within fifteen (15) days after it's
adoption in "The Record Gazette," a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Beaumont,
and shall be posted for fifteen (15) days in the City Clerk's office within fifteen (15) days after
its adoption.
1
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective sixty (60) days after the date of its
final passage and adoption.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont on February
19, 2002.
ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont on March 5, 2002,
by the following vote:
AYES:Mayor DeForge, council Members Dressel,Fox,Valdivia,Berg
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
an C. Kapa 'cas, ity ' erk
2
Exhibit "A"
EASTSIDE FACILITY FEE STUDY
Exhibit "B"
FINDINGS SUPPORTING ADOPTION OF THE EASTSIDE FACILITY FEE
1. The City Council finds that as a result of increasing regional growth in the Inland Empire
area significant residential, commercial and industrial development is expected to occur within
the City of Beaumont. This anticipated development, including development currently approved
or submitted for approval, will cumulatively generate an increased demand for public
transportation and sewer facilities by new residents, businesses and their employees. This
increased demand will exceed the existing capacity of certain facilities to provide adequate
levels of service needed to accommodate growth as set forth in the City General Plan.
2. Unless certain actions are taken, the above factors will result in adverse impacts such as
danger to people and property due to increased response time to public safety calls and
unacceptable constraints on industrial and commercial development due to lack of transportation
and sewer facilities. The City Council finds that the facility fee is needed to mitigate the
cumulative impact of new development under the General Plan, including development currently
approved or submitted for approval.
3. The City Council acknowledges the demand for public facilities varies by different types
of new development. The proposed facility fee apportions the cost of the necessary public
facilities on a fair share basis among the different categories of new users according to the
reasonably estimated demand that each type of users places upon transportation and sewer
facilities.
4. In the absence of imposing the proposed facility fee, existing and future sources of
revenue will be inadequate to fund the necessary transportation and sewer facilities identified in
the Fee Study, the need for which has been generated by new development.
5. It is the intent of the City Council to adopt a fair and equitable method of securing some
of the necessary revenues to fund the acquisition of property and the design and construction of
certain transportation and sewer facilities needed to accommodate future growth as set forth in
the Fee Study.
6. With regard to the methodology for levying the proposed facility fee, the City Council
further finds that:
1. Certain public facilities necessary to serve new residences, businesses and their
employees have been presented in the Fee Study. The City Council finds the
transportation and sewer facilities included in the Fee Study to be necessary to
meet the future demands for certain transportation and sewer facilities based upon
current and projected land use patterns.
A. The estimated costs for the public facilities have been based upon current
construction costs for similar facilities for which the City has recently received
construction bids or for which the City Public Works Director has prepared
construction cost estimates. The City Council finds that these methods for
estimating the costs of construction are reasonably based.
1
2. The Land Use Element of the Beaumont General Plan specifies the permitted uses
of land within the City and places limits on the intensity and density of such uses.
The City Council has reviewed the relationship between land uses and densities
permitted under the General Plan and the rate and amount of development of
property within the City. The City Council has identified trends in growth and
development which enable the Council to project, with accuracy, the magnitude
and extent of future development based upon the City's General Plan.
B. The City Council has also examined the extent to which different land uses
generate demands for transportation and sewer facilities, and has taken into
consideration, among other evidence, the Fee Study. The Fee Study utilizes
"equivalent dwelling units" to measure the demand generated by existing and
projected new residents, businesses and their employees on transportation and
sewer facilities. Equivalent dwelling unit factors are then assigned to the
transportation and sewer facility categories according to an estimate of needs
generated by different types of land uses. The City Council finds that the
equivalent dwelling unit factors are a reasonable estimation of actual demands for
transportation and sewer facilities based upon historic, current and projected
demands.
C. The estimated costs for the transportation and sewer facilities have been allocated
to future equivalent dwelling units by service areas, and the necessary fee for the
design and construction of transportation and sewer facilities has been calculated
for each service area. The proposed facility fee has been calculated according to
the estimated number of residents per residential unit and the estimated number of
equivalent dwelling units per acre generated by industrial and commercial
development.
3. While the City is committed and will continue to pursue all available sources of
funds to construct the transportation and sewer facilities, it acknowledges that
sufficient funding is not available absent the facility fee to support the demand for
the facilities generated by new development.
D. It is a policy of the City that new development pay for the cost of improvements
necessitated by the impacts generated by new development. The City Council
finds that the apportionment of new development's fair share of the costs of the
necessary transportation and sewer facilities as set forth in the Fee Study fulfills
this policy.
7. The facilities that will be constructed with funds generated by the proposed facility fee
will significantly benefit the contributor by mitigating adverse impacts, such as over-extended
public facilities where health and safety may be at risk due to slow response times to
emergencies, and insufficient transportation and sewer facilities leading to overcrowding and
decreased service to new employees and residents. The inability or failure to reduce these
adverse impacts caused by insufficient transportation and sewer facilities will negatively impact
future residents, businesses, and employees in the City.
2
8. The City Council further finds the proposed facility fee to be charged pursuant to this
Ordinance does not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of acquiring and constructing the
facilities listed in the Fee Study. The City Council additionally finds that the method of cost
allocation adopted by this Ordinance, which is based upon equivalent dwelling units for the land
uses permitted under the City's General Plan, assures that the applicable fee bears a fair and
reasonable relationship to each such development's burden on, and benefit from, the proposed
facilities to be funded by this Ordinance.
3
Sections:
3.22.010
3.22.020
3.22.030
3.22.040
3.22.050
3.22.060
3.22.070
3.22.080
3.22.090
3.22.100
3.22.110
3.22.120
3.22.130
3.22.140
Exhibit "C"
Chapter 3.22
Eastside Facility Fee
Purpose
Terms and Definitions
Applicability
Adoption of the Eastside Facility Fee
Amount of Fee
Payment of Fee
Credits and Reimbursements
Exemptions
Use of Funds
Refunds
Appeals
Expiration of Fee
Supplementary provisions
Severability
3.22.010 Purpose
The City Council finds that the cumulative impact of all new development permitted
under the General Plan will result in unacceptable decreases in transportation and sewer facility
service levels. To prevent these undesirable consequences, transportation and sewer facilities
must be provided at a rate which will accommodate the expected growth in the City. The City
Council acknowledges that the demand for transportation and sewer facilities varies by types of
development. The proposed Facility Fee apportions the cost of the necessary improvements
among the different types of new development according to the reasonably estimated demand
that each type of development places upon transportation and sewer facilities.
3.22.020 Terms and Definitions
For the purposes of this Chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated
in this section:
A. "Eastside Facility Fee Area" is that area described within the Eastside Facility
Fee Study (Fee Study) dated February 19, 2002.
B. "Eastside Facility Fee" (Facility Fee) is that fee for transportation and sewer
facilities to be imposed on new development within the Eastside Facility Fee Area pursuant to
this Chapter.
C. "Public Facilities" means those certain public facilities identified in the Fee Study
1
which are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare as may be determined by the
City Council from time to time which are not otherwise provided by, or required of development
within the City pursuant to the General Plan, the Master Sewer Plan and the Beaumont
Municipal Code. Public Facilities shall also include architectural, administrative, engineering,
legal, planning, environmental, plan check, inspection, surveying, construction management and
other services required in connection with the implementation of this Chapter and the
construction of the foregoing improvements as part of the City of Beaumont Comprehensive
Public Facilities Financing Program.
B. "Developer" means an individual or entity submitting an application for a
building permit or other entitlement for development.
C. "Development" means:
1. New residential unit, including conversion of an existing unit to more
than one residential unit.
New commercial, office, and industrial development.
1. Additions greater than 750 gross square feet to existing commercial, office
and industrial developments.
D. "Service Area" means the area which benefits from the Public Facilities.
E. "Fee Schedule" means the list of Facility Fees adopted by resolution of the City
Council pursuant to Section 3.22.040 of this Chapter.
3.22.030 Adoption of the Eastside Facility Fee
There is hereby adopted the Eastside Facility Fee and the various service area
components thereof to be levied and collected as provided in this Chapter.
3.22.040 Applicability
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Chapter, the Facility Fee required under
this Chapter is payable with respect to each development within the City for which a building
permit is issued on or after the effective as adopted in the Fee Schedule.
3.22.050 Amount of Fee
A. The amount of the Facility Fee shall be calculated by the Building Department
prior to issuance of the building permit, based upon the then current Fee Schedule adopted by
resolution of the City Council pursuant to this Chapter.
B. In the event a developer does not agree with the calculation of the Facility Fee by
the Building Department, he or she may within five (5) business days of the date of the
calculation of the fee appeal the calculation of the fee to the Planning Director.
2
C. The developer shall be notified in writing of the Planning Director's
determination. Such determination shall be made within thirty (30) days of the Planning
Director's receipt of the appeal. The developer may provide additional information to assist the
Planning Director in making the determination. The developer may appeal the determination of
the Planning Director to the City Council in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.22.110
of this Chapter.
D. The amount of the Facility Fee shall be subject to adjustment from time to time
by the City Council.
3.22.060 Payment of Fee
A. The full amount of the Facility Fee shall be paid at the time of issuance of the
building permit.
B. No City official may issue a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or certify a
final inspection for a development until the Facility Fee with respect to such development
required by this Chapter is paid in accordance with this section.
C. The City shall not accept prepayments of the Facility Fee, unless prepayment is
authorized in a development or other agreement or otherwise is approved by the City Council.
3.22.070 Credits and Reimbursements
If the developer desires to construct a Public Facility, the developer and the City Council
may enter into an agreement regarding a credit or reimbursement of Facility Fees due or paid.
3.22.080 Exemptions
Unless a development or other agreement provides otherwise, the following projects shall
be exempt, in whole or in part, from the Facility Fee otherwise required by this Chapter:
A. Residential development consisting of the repair or replacement, on a one-to-one
basis.
B. Commercial or industrial development consisting of the repair or replacement of
structures, provided, that such repair or replacement does not result in any conversion or change
in land use, or any enlargement of gross floor area beyond that of the previous structure more
than 750 square feet. In the event a commercial or industrial use expands more than 750 square
feet , the Facility Fee shall be calculated based on the percentage of square feet of expanded
floor area of the total multiplied by the total development acreage in accordance with the Fee
Schedule.
3.22.090 Use of Funds
The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall, except for temporary investments or
3
capital expenditures, shall be placed in the Eastside Facility Fee Fund and managed to avoid
commingling of the fees with operating revenues or other funds of the City, and shall be used
solely for the purpose of designing, acquiring and constructing the Public Facilities identified in
the Fee Study or other facility adopted as equal in the Capital Improvement Plan. Any interest
income earned on the fund shall only be expended for the purposes set forth in this Chapter.
3.22.100 Refunds
Refunds may be made where:
A. Development has ceased, the building permit has expired and no extensions have
been granted, or if granted, the extension(s) has expired; as to a development for which the
Facility Fee required under this Chapter has been collected; provided that the claim for such a
refund is filed no later than sixty (60) days after the expiration date of the building permit, or any
extension thereof as may have been approved by the City, as the case may be; or
B. A refund is specifically authorized by resolution of the City Council adopted
pursuant to Government Code section 66001(d). Such amounts shall be refunded by the City to
the then -current record owners of the development on a prorated basis. The City may effect such
refunding by direct payment, or by providing credit towards future Facility Fees, or by any other
means consistent with the intent of Government Code section 66001.
3.22.110 Appeals
A developer may appeal to the City Council any determination made pursuant to this
Chapter. All appeals shall be in a form prescribed by the Planning Director and shall be filed
within fifteen (15) days of the date of determination. Any appeal not filed within such period
shall be deemed waived. The City Council shall set the matter for hearing within forty-five (45)
days of the date of receipt by the City Clerk of the notice of the appeal.
3.22.120 Expiration of Fee
The Eastside Facility Fee shall expire when the Public Facilities are completed and all
debt service related to such public improvements are paid and satisfied.
3.22.130 Supplementary Fee
It is the intent of the City Council that the Eastside Facility Fee shall be supplementary to
the fees, dedications and conditions imposed upon development pursuant to the provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act, California Environmental Quality Act, and other state laws and City
ordinances, policies or conditions which may authorize the imposition of fees, dedications or
conditions thereon.
3.22.140 Severability
The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to any person, association, corporation or
to any property as to whom or which it is beyond the power of the City to impose the fee
provided in this Chapter. If any sentence, clause, section or part of this Chapter, or any fee
4
imposed upon any person or entity is found to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, such
unconstitutionality, illegality or invalidity shall affect only such sentence, clause, section or part
of this Chapter, and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, sentences,
clauses, sections or other parts of this Chapter, or its effect on other persons or entities. It is
declared to be the intention of the City Council that this Chapter would have been adopted had
such unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid sentence, clause, section or part of this Chapter had not
been included herein; or had such person or entity been expressly exempted from the application
of this Chapter. To this end, the provisions of this Chapter are severable.
5
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Beaumont City Council shall conduct a public hearing
at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 19 and at 6:00 PM on Tuesday March 5, 2002 in the City
Council Chambers at City Hall, 550 E. 6`h Street, Beaumont, California 92223, to receive
testimony and comments from all interested persons regarding the adoption of the following
matter(s):
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
CALIFORNIA, ADDING THE EASTSIDE FACILITY FEE TO
THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
The Eastside Facility Fee is a development fee to be levied on new residential, industrial and
commercial development within a 7,484 acre area generally bounded by Brookside Avenue to
the north, Westward Avenue to the South, Beaumont Avenue to the west and Highland Springs
Avenue to the east, more particularly described on the attached map. The fee will be levied on
new development to fund the design and construction of certain transportation and sewer
facilities. A summary of the facilities and the fee is listed below:
FEE SCHEDULE
Facility/Service Area EDU's Facility Cost Fee per EDU
Transportation System* 16,659 $23,289,819 $1,397.98
Upper Potrero Sewer 5,345 $ 1,314,572 $ 245.93
Lower Potrero Sewer 4,858 $ 2,139,325 $ 480.95
Southern Trunk Main 10,203 $ 898,972 $ 88.10
*Includes roads and appurtenant facilities such as rights-of-way, drainage structures, traffic signals and traffic
control devices, bike lanes and pedestrian facilities.
Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors
Residential Dwelling Unit
Industrial or Commercial Acre
Transportation EDU
1.00
17.16
Sewer EDU
1.00
10.00
A copy of the Fee Study, Staff Report and Ordinance is on file in the City Clerk's Office at City Hall, 550 East 6th
Street, Beaumont, California.
Interested persons may submit written comments on this matter to the City Clerk at 550 East 6`h Street, Beaumont,
California 92223.
Shelby Hanvey
Deputy City Clerk
Published with map: Record Gazette: Two (2) times, one (1) on February 15, 2002 and one (1) time on February
22, 2002.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING THE EASTSIDE FACILITY
FEE SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.22 OF THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL
CODE
The City Council the City of Beaumont hereby resolves as follows:
Section 1: Incorporation of Fee Study. That certain "Eastside Facility Fee Study" dated
Feb. 19, 2002, is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is incorporated herein by this reference as
though set forth in full.
Section 2: Adoption of the Eastside Facilities Fee Schedule. There is hereby adopted
the Eastside Facilities Fee Schedule, as follows:
FEE SCHEDULE
Facility/Service Area Facility Fee per EDU*
Transportation System
Upper Potrero Sewer
Lower Potrero Sewer
Southern Trunk Main
*Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors
Residential Dwelling Unit
Industrial or Commercial Acre
$ 1,397.98
$ 245.93
$ 480.95
$ 88.10
Transportation EDU
1.00
17.16
Sewer EDU
1.00
10.00
Section 3: Periodic Review. In accordance with Section 3.22 .050, this Fee Schedule
shall be periodically reviewed and revised.
Section 4: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect sixty (60) days from the
date of its adoption.
MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED this
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
day of 2002 by the following vote:
Mayor of the City of Beaumont
Exhibit "A"
EASTSIDE FACILITY FEE STUDY
City of Beaumont
Eastside Facility Fee Study
Prepared for:
Beaumont City Council
Prepared by:
Public Works Department
Community and Economic Development Department
February 19, 2002
00048
I. Introduction and Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is to estimate and apportion the total cost to design and construct
certain transportation and sewer facilities which are needed to support logical and orderly
development in the eastern area of the City of Beaumont. The study will be used to establish a
facility fee to fund the design, construction and upgrade of certain transportation and sewer
facilities necessary to serve future development. The report provides an estimate of costs for
those facilities along with a calculation of facility fees to be levied on a "fair share" basis in
accordance with Government Code Section 6600, et. seq., and upon measurable units of expected
future land uses.
Currently, there are several vacant parcels within the eastern areas of the City which are
planned for future development. As new development occurs, existing transportation and sewer
facilities will be impacted by new residents and businesses, increasing their use and requiring
them to be upgraded to accommodate the increased use. Additionally, new roads and sewer
facilities will need to be constructed to accommodate expected use by new development. Certain
facilities or component portions thereof may be constructed pursuant to public financing districts
and some may be constructed by developers to mitigate impacts of specific development projects
pursuant to conditions of approval for those projects. In both instances, it is appropriate to
establish the facility fee to reasonably apportion the costs of facilities on a fair share basis among
future developments and to provide for fee credits and reimbursements when appropriate.
The facilities to funded by the facility fee are listed below and are depicted on the Facility
Map included this study. The facilities consist of all component parts and ancillary facilities
depicted on the Facility Map in this study or as may be otherwise approved by the City Council.
The City Council may also use the facility fee to fund equal facilities having an equivalent benefit.
Facilities to be funded by the facility fee are listed below together with their estimated cost.
Facility Estimated Cast
• Transportation Facilities
• Oak Valley Parkway/Fourteenth Street $ 5,488,055
• First StreetlVelie Avenue $ 1,653,086
• Pennsylvania Avenue $ 1,753,598
• Cougar Way $ 373,920
• Interstate 10 Ramp Improvements $14.019.937
Subtotal $23,288,596
• Sewer Facilities
• Upper Potrero Sewer $ 1,314,503
• Lower Potrero Sewer $ 2,336,445
. Southern Sewer Trunk Main $ 898.925
Subtotal $ 4,549,873
Total $27,838,469
1
00049
A preliminary engineer's estimate of the cost to design and construct the facilities to be
funded by the facility fee is provided in the Appendix. The estimated costs are based upon recent
unit costs for similar projects which have been publicly bid in the City using prevailing wages.
Where no such recent costs were available, estimates were prepared by the City Public Works
Director using RS Means unit cost data adjusted for the local area. All costs for facilities should
be adjusted for inflation on a regular basis by the City Council in accordance with the Engineering
News Record construction cost index for the Los Angeles area.
II. Facility fee Calculation
The purpose of this section of the study is to provide a description of the facilities to be
funded by the facility fee and an estimate of costs to design and construct those facilities. This
section also provides an estimate of how much future development will benefit from each of the
facilities based on "equivalent dwelling units" or EDU's. The study provides a reasonable
measure of the number of new EDU's that will be developed within "service areas" which include
all the vacant land that will benefit from the facilities once they are constructed. Each service area
boundary and the facilities to be constructed for the benefit of undeveloped land in each service
area are depicted respectively on the Eastside Facility Fee Area Map and the Facility Map
included this study. Each service area includes an estimated number of EDU's that will be
developed and will be responsible to pay the cost of designing and constructing the facilities.
In order to establish a reasonable estimate of the number of EDU's different types of land
uses will generate within the service areas of each facility, the study establishes the relative
demands of residential, industrial and commercial land use on the generic types of facilities. The
overall demands of residential land use placed upon the generic types of facilities as measured by
a single dwelling unit with an average population of 2.8 persons per unit are used as the baseline
of measurement for other land uses In the case of transportation facilities it is assumed, based
upon generally accepted traffic generation data utilized by the City as part of the Comprehensive
Public Facility Financing Program, that a single dwelling unit generates 9.5 Average Daily Trips
per Day (ADT) and the average industrial and commercial use generates 163.02 ADT per acre of
development. Therefore each acre of industrial or commercial development will generate an
average of 17.16 EDU's of demand for transportation facilities (163.02/9.5). In the case of sewer
facilities, each dwelling unit generates an average daily flow of 280 gallons of sewage and the
average acre of industrial or commercial development generates 2,800 gallons of sewage each
day. Therefore, each acre of industrial or commercial development will generate an average of
10.00 EDU's of demand for sewer facilities (2,800/280). A listing of the EDU factors used in this
study is provided below.
Land Use Transport EDU's Sewer EDU's
Residential Dwelling Unit 1 1
Industrial/ Commercial Acre 17.61 10
In order to determine the number of new EDU's to be developed in the future within each
service area, the study uses a listing of the number of EDU's in major projects and an estimate of
residential, industrial and commercial EDU's by subarea within each service area. The list of
2
00050
projects and subareas and the estimated number of EDU's each project and subarea will generate
in each service area is show on the table entitled Service Area EDU Estimate at the back of this
study. Where a specific project could not be identified for undeveloped land, an estimate of
acreage and EDU's was made by generic land uses reasonably expected to be developed in each
service area based on past development patterns in the City. There are four such service areas and
four components of the facility fee which are listed below along with the estimated total acreage
and the estimated number of EDU's of future development within each service area.
Service
Facility/Service Area Area Acreage EDU's
• Transportation Facilities 7,484 16,659
• Upper Potrero Sewer 1,305 5,345
• Lower Potrero Sewer 1,190 4,858
• Southem Trunk Main 5,924 10,203
A. Transportation Facilities
Transportation facilities to be funded by the proposed facility fee include the rehabilitation
of certain road segments that provide primary access to the service area including Oak Valley
Parkway/Fourteenth Street, First Street/Velie Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue and Cougar Way.
Additionally, new road segments and ancillary facilities will be funded including the extension of
Oak Valley Parkway/Fourteenth Street and First Street/Velie Avenue, along with upgraded channel
crossings on Noble Creek and Marshall Creek at Oak Valley Parkway/Fourteenth Street and on
Marshall Creek at Beaumont Avenue. Funding is also necessary to improve access to Interstate 10
at Beaumont Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue and/or Highland Springs Avenue.
The total acreage within the Transportation Service Area is estimated to be 7,484 acres.
The total number of EDU's to be developed within the Transportation Service Area is estimated to
be 16,659 EDU's. The total cost of transportation facilities is estimated to be $23,288,596.
B. Sewer Facilities
Sewer facilities to be funded by the facility fee include the Upper Potrero Sewer which
generally serves the area north of Interstate 10 and east of Cherry Avenue, the Lower Potrero
Sewer which generally serves the area south of Interstate 10 and east of Pennsylvania Avenue and
the Southern Sewer Trunk Main which generally serves the areas north of Interstate 10 and east of
Palm Avenue, and the areas south of Interstate 10 and east of Velie Avenue. The Upper Potrero
Sewer Service Area is estimated to include a total of 1,305 acres and 5,345 EDU's. The Upper
Potrero Sewer includes a lift station, gravity sewer and force main sewer components and is
estimated to cost $1,314,503. The Lower Potrero Sewer Service Area is estimated to include a
total of 1,190 acres and 4,858 EDU's. The Lower Potrero Sewer includes a lift station, gravity
sewer and force main sewer components and is estimated to cost $2,336,445. The Southern
Sewer Trunk Main Service Area is estimated to include a total of 5,924 acres and 10,203 EDU's.
The Southem Sewer Trunk Main is estimated to cost $898,925.
3
00051
CITY OF BBAUyONT
LISTS/PT FACILITY Fir
FACILITY NAP
w
!kat- ROI
1 M1 N.'"r.1.TQaDNENV4EVIEMMEA1 RUN
1.i1.1
NM ENNUI:NM
ANE®ISI R
41:11 Wither
NAA lff ==16
$ INH ._
Y..114 p� rIV 0
UPPER POTR
ri 1111 waitao.
r IIS bill' rti' 11i1i1. �.
=1!7matt 11
1/4
LBCA'ND
XXX ARBA BOUNDARY
TRANSPORTATION INPROTLNANTS
CRATLIT TRUNK SUER
PORCI MSN sine
SLNBR CPT ST MM
BOX CULITRT
---
0
1
•
INTLRIYGNC! IMPROIBYBNTS
Ar
SCALEu'-3500
Urban Logic Consultants
Amnia. Cabbr.
At In IP -I—Ra /-s/ Ix-AAfd
00052
osteone Arty Boner
1
s
r
CITY OF B/24tW0117
LISTSIBE FACILITY FIT NM
tir'e
Itiriih, lit i i0
�l' CaiI#al1�4l1N.
INMW
.N
SCALE'1'V300'
H
1
snow
SBRilta' AREA SOCWRLPIES
rAINSPORTATION ARG
SOUTRdZE' FRUNd ACLIN ARG
- o UPPER POTRPBO ARG
-}}f}}}}}}}} i -H-1{} LO/PR POTWO ARG
NOTE: OP WKAr/ONS OP TIM LOCATION OP PROPGTrr 1077ffN
SBRnt% ARGIs SAUL Rd YARr AY PM flair PORES
R/bre7OR AUTO ON rR/6UArar SMR PLOT AMU:
•
Urban L49'ic Consultants
ft arM Ya. w:. SW, SW
l cF.fMAV 071 -WI
00053
I
C. Facility Fee Calculation
The proposed facility fee for each facility and service area is calculated by dividing the
cost of the facility by the number of EDU's in each service area which will benefit from or use the
facility. The proposed facility fee for each facility and service area is summarized on the Fee
Schedule below. The facility fee will be levied by the Building Department prior to the issuance
of building permits for all new development or expansion of existing development. All expansions
of industrial and commercial development less than or equal to 750 square feet will be exempt
from the facility fee.
Facility/Service Area
Transportation System
Upper Potrero Sewer
Lower Potrero Sewer
Southern Trunk Main
*Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors
Residential Dwelling Unit
Industrial or Commercial Acre
FEE SCHEDULE
EDU's
16,659
5,345
4,858
10,203
Facility Cost
$23,288,595
$ 1,314,503
$ 2,336,445
$ 898,925
Fee per EDU*
$1,397.98
$ 245.93
$ 480.95
$ 88.10
Transportation EDU Sewer EDU
1.00 1.00
17.16 10.00
4
00054
APPENDIX
Engineer's Cost Estimate
00055
City of Beaumont
Eastside Facility Fee Study
Preliminary Engineer's Cost Eatim ate
Facdlty/Oescrlptlon
Sewer System Faculties
Upper Portend Sewer Lia Station
Land Aquisition
Move -in
Gearing and Grubbing/AC
Excavation and Compaction/CY
LIR Station
Paving
Electrical
Fencing
Service Road, LF
Signs
Subtotal
Units Untt Cost Estimated Coat
15,000 36.00 390,000.00
1 $5,000.00 36,000
2 51,000.00 52,000
10,000 $2.00 520,000
1 5385,000.00 3385,000
10,000 53.00 530,000
1 575,000.00 575,000
2,000 $30.00 $60,000
400 550.00 320.000
10 5250.00 52,500
5889,500
Upper Potreo Sewer Trunk and Force Maine
Manhole Tie-in 1 37,500.00 $7,500
Potrero Creek Crossing 1 59,500.00 59,500
18" PVC 1,900 372.00 5136,800
12" PVC 3,300 548.00 5168,400
Remove and Replace AC 1,900 520.00 338,000
Subtotal 5350,200
Lower Potrero Sewer Lift Station
Land Aquisition 10,000 58.00 580,000.00
Move -In 1 55,000.00 55,000
Clearing and Grubbing/AC 2 $1.000.00 52,000
Excavation and Compaction/CY 10,000 52.00 320,000
Lift Station 1 5385,000.00 3385,000
Paving 10.000 53.00 330,000
Electrical 1 575,000.00 $75,000
Fencing 2,000 530.00 560,000
Service Road, LF 400 350.00 320,000
Signs 10 5250.00 32,500
5859,500
Subtotal
Lower Potreo Sewer Trunk and Force Mains
ROW Aquisitlon 1 575,000.00 575,000
Manhole Tie-in 1 $9.500.00 59,590
15" PC 5.000 560.00 5300,000
12" PVC 13,000 $48.00 3824,000
Remove and Replace AC 9,000 520.00 3180,000
51,188,500
Subtotal
Southern Trunk Main
Move -in 1 55,000.00 $5.000
Clearing and Grubbing/AC 5 53,000.00 515,000
Headworks Tie-in 1 519,000.00 519,000
Abandon 12" Sewer 1 515,000.00 515,000
30" PVC 3,800 5120.00 5456,000
15" PVC 1,000 580.00 580,000
Remove and Replace AC 4,000 520.00 580,000
Inlet Structure 1 58,500.00 58,500
Fencing 3,000 510.00 330,000
Signs 10 5250.00 52.500
Erosion ControULandscaping 1 320,000.00 520,000
5711,000
Subtotal
Upper Potrero Sewer Subtotal 51,039,700
Lower Potrero Sewer Subtotal 31.848.000
Sewer Subtotal 53,598,700
00056
Transportation System Facilities
First Stre tNalle Avenue
Move -in, Clear and GreWAC
Rough Grading/CV
4'AC/6"Cbe911 AB/SF, (40/50'(
Drainage Allowance
Rip Rap Slope Protec8OWSF
Erosion Control/SF
Sbeat Signs
SMpkg/LF
Subtotal
Cougar Way
Move -In. Clear and GrUWAC
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation
Drainage AOOwance
Erosion Control/SF
, Street Signa
Striping/LP
Subtotal
Oak Valley Parkway/Fourteenth Street
U65ty Convention
Demolition, Removal and RehablWadan
4"AC/6"Claes II AB/SF, (40750')
6" Concrete Curb and Gutter
Boa Culvert (Beaumont Ave.)
Bridge
Grouted Rip Rap
Erosion Cantml/SF
Street Signs
Striping/LF
Subtotal
Pennsylvania Avenue
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation
S" Concrete Curb and Gutter
Drainage Allowance
Erosion ControUSF
Street Sipa
SMpingtF
6 51,000.00 55,000
100,000 51.50 5150,000
600,000 51.50 5900,000
1 5100.000.00 5100,000
20,000 53.00 560,000
1 550.000.00 530.000
100 $250.00 525,000
30000 11.25 537,500
51.307,500
2 $1,000.00 $2,000
200,000 51.00 5200,000
1 550,000.00 550,000
1 520,000.00 $20,000
20 5250.00 85,000
15600 5125 518,750
5295,750
700 5350,00 5245,000
300,000 51.00 5300,000
250,000 51.50 8375,000
7,000 511.00 577,000
100 51,200.00 5120,000
15,000 5200.00 53,000,000
5,000 530.00 5150.000
1 515,000.00 515,000
100 8250.00 525,000
27,000 51.25 533,750
54,340,750
400.000 51.50 5000,000
2.000 511.00 122,000
1 5700.000.00 5700,000
1 515,000.00 515,000
100 5250.00 525,000
20,000 51.25 525,000
Subtotal 51.387,000
1.10 Ramp Widening Pro$cta
UMW ConverabrvRtlowtion 1,00 5360.00 5350,000
Demolition, Removal and RanabiRetlon 500.00 51.50 5750,000
Ramp Grading 150.00 81.60 5225,000
Strucwres and Streets 15,00 5400.00 56,000,000
Drainage Allowance 5200,000.00 5200,000
Ramp Construction and Trenadon 53,500,000.00 53,500,000
Erosion Conuot/5F 550,00.00 550,000
Street Signe 1 5500.00 55,000
Stnpbg/LF 3.000 53.00 $9,000
:Subtotal 511,089,000
Transportation System Fealties Subtotal 116,420,000
522,015,700
Subtotal Construction
Utilities, Fees and Permits
Plan Check and Inspection Fees
CaMmns/SCE Enaoaenment Permits
W atisnda 404-1603/NPDES
Subtoral
Planning, Environmental & Protect Management 1770.655
CWti & GeotecMkal Engkwedng 51,651,403
Construction Management 5990,842
126.737,534
51.100.935
5130,000
575,000
51,305,935
Project Subtotal
5% Cons0u00on Contingency $1,100,835'
Project Teal 527.833,4691
00057
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
NO. 72
NOTICE
ORDINANCE NO. 826
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Riverside SS
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; , am
over the age of eighteen years, and not a
party to or interested in the above entitled
matter. 1 am the principal clerk of the
printer of
The Daily Record Gazette
a newspaper of general circulation, printed
and published daily in the City of Ban-
ning, County of Rivcrsidc and whicb
newspaper has been adjudged a newspa-
per of general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of Riverside, State of
California, under date of
October 14, 1966. Case Number ..1737,
that the notice, of which the annexe is a
printed copy, has been published in ach
regular and entire issue of said news aper
and not in any supplement thcrof on the
following dates -to -wit.
1;15 &
all in the year 20 02
1 certify (or declare) under penal .y of per-
iury that the foreu,oinu, is truc and correct.
signature
Date 2!22 20 02
at Riverside, California.
This space for County Clerk's Filing Stamp
NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN, that the Beaumont
City Council shall conduct a
public hearing at 6:00 p.m.
on Tuesday, February 19
and at 6:00 PM on March 5,
2002 in the City Council
Chambers at City Hall. 550
E. 6th Street, Beaumont,
California 92223, to receive
testimony and comments
from all interested persons
regarding the adoption of
the following matter(s):
ORDINANCE NO. 826:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
CALIFORNIA, ADDING
THE EASTSIDE FACILITY
FEE TO THE BEAUMONT
MUNICIPAL CODE
The Eastside Facility Fee is
a development fee to be
levied on new residential,
industrial and commercial
development within 7,484
acre area generally bound-
ed by Brookside Avenue to
the north. Westward
Avenue to the South,
Beaumont Avenue to the
west and Highland Springs
Avenue to the east, more
particularly described on
the attached map. The fee
will be levied on new devel-
opment to fund the design
and construction of certain
transportation and sewer
facilities. A summary of the
facilities and the tee is listed
below:
FEE SCHEDULE
Fecili
Transportation System'
Upper Potrero Sewer
Lower Potrero Sewer
Southern Trunk Main
EDU's
16,659
5,345
4,858
10,203
Estimated Cost
$23,289,819
$1,314,572
$2,139,325
Eactors
Residential Dwelling Unit
Industrial or Commercial
Acre
Transportation EDU
1.00
17.16
Sewer EDU
1.00
10.00
A copy of the fee study, staff
report and ordinance is on
file in the City Clerks Office
at City Hall, 550 East 6th
Street, Beaumont,
California.
Interested person my sub-
mit written comments on
this matter to the City Clerk
at 550 East 6th Street,
Beaumont, California
92223.
$898,972 -s- Shelby Hanvey
Fee per EDU Shelby Hanvey
$1,397.98 Deputy City Clerk
$245.93 Publish The Record
$480.95 Gazette
$88.10 No. 72
*Includes roads and appur- 2-15, 22, 2002
tenant facilities such as
rights-of-way, drainage
structures, traffic signals
and traffic control devices,
bike lanes and peddF '
facilities. c7,bOt
,
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOg THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
NO. 72
NOTICE
ORDINANCE NO. 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Riverside
} SS
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am
over the age of eighteen ye4rs, and not a
party to or interested in the above entitled
matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of
The Daily Record Gazette
a newspaper of general circulation, printed
and published daily in the City of Ban-
ning, County of Riverside and which
newspaper has been adjudged a newspa-
per of general circulation by the Superior
Court of the County of R_verside, State of
California, under date of
October 14, 1966. Case Number 54737,
that the notice, of which the annexed is a
printed copy, has been published in each
regular and entire issue o f said newspaper
and not in any supplemer.t therof on the
following dates -to -wit.
2/15 & 2/22
all in the year 20 02
I certify (or declare) and
jury that the fo-
regoing is t�
penalty of Per-
e and correct.
Date 2/22 21 02
at Riverside, California.
This space for County Clerk's Filing Stamp
-C/27 Of BJItWONT
/ISTSIPt NOWT fld-SLA%la .(&I YIP
'i=j:I
'41E1 KNIPIP...
§111::40:�
:rug! : tr
AEI
,..n/A.II,I.. aveer.,m 1r.L..i ....0.,
Chat fllagr MO(-/.J.a /Oa+J
,t+.4.14+444.1+044+ eartf "men* MF.-I./M IOIIS
("Han Lafie Cmuullan.,
Qv nYl/VO-r.✓tipr/TA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GI
6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb
Chambers at City Hall, 550
comments from all intereste
AN ORDINANCE
CALIFORNIA, AME
LEGAL NOTICE
N, that the Beaumont City Council shall conduct a public hearing at
y 19 and at 6:00 PM on March 4, 2002 in the City Council
6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223, to receive testimony and
persons regarding the adoption of the following matter(s):
1 ORDINANCE NO 826:
F THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
IN
G THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD THE
EASTSIDE FACILITY FEE
The Eastside Facility Fee w'll
industrial and commercial d -v
Avenue to the north, Westw
Springs Avenue to the east.
construction of certain trans
is listed below:
FEE SCHEDULE
stablish a development fee to be levied on new residential,
lopment within a 7,484 acre area generally bounded by Brookside
Avenue to the South, Beaumont Avenue to the west and Highland
e fee will be levied on new development to fund the design and
ation and sewer facilities. A summary of the facilities and the fee
Facility DU s
ans ortation
System
p
Upper Potrero Sewer
Lower Potrero Sewer
Southern Trunk Main
E uivalent Dwellin - Unit Facto
Residential Dwelling Unit
Industrial or Commercial Acre
A copy of the fee study, sta
550 East 6th Street, Beaumo t, California.
s
16,659
5,345
4,858
10,203
Estimated Cost
$23,289,819
$ 1,314,572
$ 2,139,325
$ 898,972
Transportation EDU
1.00
17.16
Fee per EDU
$1,398.06
$ 245.94
$ 440.37
$ 88.11
Sewer EDU
1.00
10.00
ort and ordinance is on file in the City Clerks Office at City Hall,
Interested person may subm
Street, Beaumont, Californi. Sj2223.
itten comments on this matter to the City C
rk at 550 East 6th
Shelby Hanvey
Deputy City Cle
ii
Published with map: Recur Gazette: two (2) times. One (1) on February 15, 2002 and One
(1) time on February 22, 2
2.
CITY OF BEAuvONT
IMF FACILITY FEL' SERPICE ARRA KIP
'or
UES!
6
a
5
J
'1N4'II :11115
PMNINNI
NTS
LAVE/VD
TRANSPORTATl01Y SERVICE ARV SEAR=y 184 ACRES
SOUTHERN TRON! YAIN= 5, 92f ACRES
o UPPER POTRERO .1, 805 ACRES
I I { LONER POTRERO AREA=1,190 ACRES
FILE: Eastside Area Benefit District -1-17-01A DWG: EABD DATE: 2-11-02
0
•E
Urban Logic Consultants
m
195/7 Ridge Park Oriw. Rude 200
Amanda, California 92580
Teo /909f 676-/944 Paz /909/ 676-2054 P
1/