HomeMy Public PortalAboutOrdinance 837ORDINANCE NO. 837
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
• ESTABLISHING THE BEAUMONT ROAD AND BRIDGE BENEFIT
MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM
AND AMENDING CHAPTER 3.22 OF THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of Beaumont does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Title
This Ordinance shall be known as the "Beaumont Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee
Program Ordinance."
Section 2: Findings
A. The Beaumont City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds, that
future development within the vicinity of Beaumont will result in traffic volumes
exceeding the capacity of the local roadway network as it presently exists. A map
depicting the system is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.
B. The Beaumont City Council has been further informed and advised, and hereby finds,
that if the capacity of the local roadway is not enlarged, the result will be substantial
traffic congestion, with unacceptable levels of service throughout the City of
Beaumont by 2025.
C. The Beaumont City Council has been further informed and advised, and hereby finds,
that funds will be inadequate to construct the roadway system needed to avoid the
unacceptable levels of traffic congestion and related adverse impacts. Absent a the
Beaumont Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation (BRB) fee, existing and known future
funding sources will be inadequate to provide the necessary improvements to the
system, resulting in a unacceptably high level of traffic congestion within and around
Beaumont.
D. The City Council has caused to be prepared, and has reviewed, the Facility Fee Study,
attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and hereby finds that future development within the
City will result in inordinate levels of congestion, and that unless such development
contributes to the cost of improving the roadway system, the system will operate at
unacceptable levels of service.
E. The City Council hereby finds and determines that failure to mitigate growing traffic
impacts on the transportation system within the City will substantially impair the
ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond. The failure to mitigate
impacts on the roadway system will adversely affect the public health, safety and
welfare.
F. The City Council further finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational
relationship between the use of the BRB fee and the type of development projects on.
which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the
transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of
the residential and non-residential users of the development projects on which the
BRB fee will be levied.
G. The City Council further finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational
relationship between the need for the improvements to the roadway system and the
type of development projects on which the BRB fee is imposed because it will be
necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access
to the transportation system. Such development will benefit from the transportation
system improvements and the burden of such development will be mitigated in part
by the payment of the BRB fee.
H. The City Council further finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the
Facilities Fee Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the roadway system
improvements, and that the amount of the BRB fee expected to be generated by new
development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development.
The fees collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall be used to help pay for the
construction and acquisition of the roadway system improvements identified in the
Facilities Fee Study. The need for improvements is related to new development
because such development results in additional traffic thus creating the demand for the
improvements.
J. By notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a
public hearing on the Facility Fee Study and the fee proposed thereunder, and at least
ten days prior to the hearing, the City made the Facility Fee Study available to the
public.
At the time and place set for the hearing, the City Council duly considered that data
and information provided by the public relative to the cost of the services for which
the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted
prior to the conclusion of the hearing.
L. The City Council finds that the Facility Fee Study proposes a fair and equitable
method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements to the
transportation system.
M. The City Council hereby adopts the Facility Fee Study and findings incorporated
therein, which Study is attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and incorporates it herein as
though set forth in full.
Section 3: Establishment of the Beaumont Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee
A. Adoption. There is hereby adopted a schedule of fees as set forth in the Facility Fee
Study.
B. Fee Calculation
i. For non-residential projects, the fee rate utilized shall be based upon the
predominate use of the building or structure identified in the building permit.
ii. For non-residential projects, the fee shall be calculated on the total square
footage of the building or structure identified in the building permit.
C. Fee Adjustment
The fee schedule may be periodically reviewed and the amounts adjusted by the
Beaumont City Council. By amendment to this Ordinance, the fees may be increased
or decreased to reflect changes in actual and estimated costs of the roadway system
including, but not limited to, debt service, lease payments and construction costs. The
adjustment of the fees may also reflect changes in the facilities required to be
constructed, in estimated revenues received pursuant to this Ordinance as well as the
availability or lack thereof of other funds with which to construct the roadway system.
D. Purpose
The purpose of the BRB fee is to fund those certain improvements to the roadway
system depicted on Exhibit "A" and identified in the Facility Fee Study, Exhibit "B".
E. Applicability
The BRB fee shall apply to all new development within the City, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, unless otherwise exempt hereunder.
F. Exemptions. The following new development shall be exempt from the BRB:
i. Low income residential housing. •
ii. The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any legal, residential structure
and/or the replacement of a previously existing dwelling unit.
iii. The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any non-residential structure where
there is no net increase in square footage. Any increase in square footage
shall pay the current applicable rate.
iv. Residential projects that have been issued a building permit prior to the
effective date of this Ordinance.
v. Non -Residential projects that have been issued a building permit prior to the
effective date of this Ordinance.
Section 4: Amendment of the Municipal Code:
A. Chapter 3.22, entitled Beaumont Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee, to read as
set forth in Exhibit "C" is hereby added to the Beaumont Municipal Code. This new
Chapter 3.22 shall replace existing Chapter 3.22 of the Municipal Code.
B. Publication
This Ordinance shall be published once within fifteen (15) days after it's adoption in
"The Record -Gazette," a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Beaumont,
and shall be posted for fifteen (15) days in the City Clerk's office within fifteen (15)
days after its adoption.
Section 5: Effective Date
A. This ordinance shall be effective sixty (60) days after the date of its final passage and
adoption.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont on 2/4 2003.
ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont on 2/18 ,2003, by the
following vote:
AYES: Mayor DeForge, Council Member Dressel, Berg, Fox, and Valdivia.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
City of Beaumont
Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee
Facility Fee Study
Prepared for:
Beaumont City Council
Brian DeForge, Mayor
Larry Dressel, Mayor Pro Tem
Roger Berg, Council Member
Jeff Fox, Council Member
Placido Valdivia, Council Member
Prepared by:
Public Works Department
Community and Economic Development Department
February 4, 2003
Table of Contents
Section/Description Page No.
I. Introduction and Purpose of the Study 1
II. Transportation Facility Fee Calculation 2
A. Transportation Facilities 3
B. Transportation Facility Fee Calculation 4
Appendix
Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate
EDU Summary
Facility Fee Summary
0
n
1. Introduction and Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is to estimate and apportion the total cost to design and
construct certain transportation facilities which are needed to support the logical and orderly
development of the City of Beaumont and surrounding region. The study will be used to
establish the Beaumont Road and Bridge Benefit Facility Fee (BRB) to fund the design,
construction and upgrade of certain transportation facilities necessary to serve future
development in the City. The report provides an estimate of costs for those facilities along with a
calculation of transportation facility fees to be levied on a "fair share" basis in accordance with
Government Code Section 6600, et. seq., and upon measurable units of expected future land
uses.
Currently, there are several thousand vacant acres of land within the City and its Sphere
of Influence which are planned for future development. As new development occurs in the City
and surrounding region, existing transportation facilities will be impacted by new residents and
businesses, increasing their use and requiring them to be upgraded to accommodate theincreased
use. Additionally, new roads and related transportation facilities will needed to accommodate
expected use by new development. Certain complete facilities or component portions thereof
may be constructed pursuant to public financing districts and some may be constructed by
developers to mitigate impacts of specific development projects pursuant to conditions of
approval for those projects. It is appropriate therefore to establish the transportation facility fee
to reasonably apportion the cost of those facilities included in this study on a fair share basis
among future developments and to provide for fee credits and reimbursements when those
facilities are otherwise constructed or funded.
The facilities to funded by the transportation facility fee are listed below and are depicted
on the BRB Facility Master Plan included this study. The facilities depicted on the BRB Facility
Master Plan are identified and described in detail in the Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate,
or as may be otherwise approved by the City Council. The City Council may use the
transportation facility fee to fund equal facilities having an equivalent benefit. Facilities to be
funded by the transportation facility fee are listed below together with their estimated cost.
Transportation Facility Estimated Cost
• Potrero Boulevard $ 38,178,931
• SR 79/Beaumont Avenue $ 13,949,002
▪ Oak Valley Parkway $ 20,138,880
• First StreetNeile Avenue $ 1,644,722
• Highland Springs Avenue $ 9,362,650
• Pennsylvania Avenue $ 5.237.323
Total $ 88,511,506
Li
11
11
\\V
C0 -r0-2 311.0 E0-1' 334 NOUValn 7410.0101 NOUVIMOdSNYtil VAC
11115AS NOUVISWVEVIII V3/0 -IWO:UN 't130104
a
o
4'
A preliminary estimate of the cost to design and construct the facilities to be funded by
the transportation facility fee is provided in the Appendix of this study. Tlie estimated costs are
based upon recent unit costs for similar projects which have been publicly bid in the City using
prevailing wages. Where no such recent costs were available, estimates were prepared by the
City Public Works Director using RS Means unit cost data adjusted for the local area. All costs
for facilities should be adjusted for inflation on a regular basis by the City Council in accordance
with the Engineering News Record construction cost index for the Los Angeles area.
The facilities included in the BRB Facility Master Plan are components of key regional
transportation arteries which will move traffic in and around a confluence of three major
highways which converge in the City of Beaumont; Interstate 10, State Route 60 and State Route
79. Needed improvements to these and other regional transportation facilities in western
Riverside County will be funded through a recently approved voter initiative known as Measure
A and the Westem Riverside County Uniform Transportation Mitigation Fee (TUMF). It is
appropriate for the transportation facilities to be funded and developed by the proposed City fee
to function in conjunction with and complement those to be funded and constructed by Measure
A and TUMF. Measure A and TUMF funded facilities combined with those funded by the BRB
Fee, will address not only impacts created in the City of Beaumont, but will also address the
impacts of development in westem Riverside County generally. The transportation facilities to
be funded by the proposed BRB fee are consistent with the Circulation Element of the General
Plan and include some of the same and components of facilities to be funded by TUMF. In the
event TUMF is not adopted or implemented in Beaumont, the extension and widening of the
BRB facilities will be funded directly by developers to address regional impacts.
II. Transportation Facility Fee Calculation
The purpose of this section of the study is to provide a description of the facilities to be
funded by the transportation facility fee and an estimate of costs to design and construct those
facilities. This section also provides an estimate of how much future development will benefit
from each of the facilities based on "equivalent dwelling units" or EDU's. The study provides a
reasonable measure of the number of new EDU's that will be developed on the vacant land and
will benefit from the facilities once they are constructed. Each facility to be funded and
constructed for the benefit of undeveloped land is depicted respectively on the BRB Facility
Master Plan map included this study. The study and fee is based upon the total estimated cost of
the facilities divided by number of EDU's that will benefit from and will be responsible to pay
the cost of designing and constructing the planned transportation facilities.
In order to establish a reasonable estimate of the number of EDU's different types of land
uses will generate, the study establishes the relative demands of residential, commercial and
industrial land uses on the generic types of facilities. The average demand placed on the
transportation facilities of a single dwelling unit with an average population of 3.2 persons per
unit is used as the baseline of measurement for other land uses. In the case of transportation
facilities it is assumed, based upon generally accepted traffic generation data utilized by the City
as part of the Comprehensive Public Facility Financing Program, that a single dwelling unit
generates 9.5 Average Daily Trips per Day (ADT) and the average industrial and commercial use
generates 163.02 ADT per acre of development. Therefore each acre of industrial or commercial
development will generate an average of 17.16 EDU's of demand for transportation facilities
(163.02/9.5). The study makes an adjustment in the EDU factor for industrial and commercial
uses and for age -restricted dwelling units. The study assumes that 50% of the trips generated by
commercial and industrial development will be generated from residential development in the
City of Beaumont and 50% will be generated by shoppers and employees originating outside the
City. The study assumes 50% of the trips associated with commercial and industrial land uses
are included in the 9.5 ADT of a residential EDU. This is a reasonable assumption considering
the central location of the City of Beaumont and the regional nature of a significant portion of
commercial and industrial land uses designated for future development in the General Plan. A
listing of the EDU factors used in this study is provided below.
Land Use Transport. EDU's
Residential Dwelling Unit 1.00
Industrial/ Commercial Acre (50% City) 17.61
In order to estimate the number of new EDU's to be developed in the future, the study
uses a listing of the number of EDU's in major projects and an estimate of residential, industrial
and commercial EDU's which may develop on remaining undeveloped parcels within the City
and the City's Sphere of Influence in thirty (30) years. The list of projects and undeveloped areas
along with the estimated number of EDU's each project and area will generate is shown on the
table entitled EDU Summary in the Appendix of this study. Where a specific project could not
be identified for undeveloped land, an estimate of acreage and EDU's was made by generic land
uses reasonably expected to be developed in each area based on past development patterns in the
City and the current General Plan land use designation.
A. Transportation Facilities
Transportation facilities to be funded by the proposed transportation facility fee includes
construction of a new freeway interchange, the widening of three interchanges and the
realignment, extension and/or rehabilitation of certain road segments that provide primary access
to Interstate 10, State Route 60 and State Route 79 including segments of Oak Valley Parkway,
Highland Springs Avenue, First Street/Velie Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue. Additionally,
the proposed fee will fund construction of Potrero Boulevard, along with upgraded arterial
highway crossings of the Union Pacific Railroad main line tracks, San Timoteo Creek, Noble
Creek and Marshall Creek. Facilities to be funded by others through TUMF or Measure A
include Interstate 10 and State Route 60 facilities and the widening and extension of BRB
facilities as needed to mitigate regional impacts.
For the purposes of this study, the total number of EDU's to be developed is estimated to
be 35,839 EDU's. The total cost of BRB transportation facilities is estimated to be $88,511,506.
B. Transportation Facility Fee Calculation
The proposed transportation facility fee is calculated by dividing the cost of the planned
facilities by the number of EDU's which will benefit from or use the facility. For purposes of
calculating the proposed facility fee, the total number of EDU's remaining to be built in the City
was adjusted by subtracting the number of EDU's for which building permits have been issued
and those related to commercial and industrial trips generated by residential development in the
City. EDU reductions are calculated for commercial and industrial uses to compute the fair
share cost of the facilities for each generic land use. The fair share cost is calculated by dividing
the reduced or "adjusted" number of transportation EDU's each generic land use will generate
into the total number of future EDU's for which building permits will be issued in the City. The
proposed transportation facility fee for each generic land use is calculated by dividing the fair
share cost of facilities by the number of estimated EDU's for which building permits are
estimated to be issued in each land use category. The reduction in EDU impacts associated with
residential, commercial and industrial land uses is reflected in the reduced fee per EDU.
The total number of EDU's estimated to be issued building permits, the Fair Share Cost
of facilities and the proposed facility fee for each generic land use are summarized on the Fee
Schedule below. The transportation facility fee will be levied by the Building Department prior
to the issuance of building permits for all newdevelopment or expansion of existing
development. All expansions of industrial and commercial development less than or equal to
750 square feet will be exempt from the transportation facility fee.
Land Use
Residential
Commercial and Industrial
*E• uivaient Dwettin ' Unit
Residential Dwelling Unit
Industrial or Commercial Acre
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Open Space and Agriculture
4<i
ors
FEE SCHEDULE
EDU's
17,600
9,488
Transportation
1.00
17.16
86.70
159.50
429.60
0.00
Fair Share Cost
$74,319,990
$14,191,516
EDU
Fee per EDU*
$ 4,222.73
$ 1,495.73
r
"
a
fl
Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate
rrl
11
City of Beaumont
Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee Study
Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate Summary
Total Cost Residual
Facility/Description
Potrero Boulevard
SR 79/Beaumont Avenue
Oak Valley Parkway
First StreetNeile Avenue
Highland Springs Avenue
Pennsylvania Avenue
Project Total
$74,677,000.00
$14,500,000.00
$27,787,000.00
$34,331,000.00
$16,376,000.00
$14,500,000.00
$182,171,000
$36,498,069.43
$550,997.95
$7,648,120.43
$32,686,278.19
$7,013,350.33
$9,262,677.43
$93,659,494
-
BRB Fee
$38,178,931
$13,949,002
$20,138,880
$1,644,722
$9,362,650
$5,237,323
$88,511,506
City of Beaumont
Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee Study
Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate
Facility/Description Units Unit Cost Estimated Cost
SR 60/Potrero Boulevard Interchange
Utility Conversion/Relocation 1,000 $500.00 $500,000
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 500,000 $2.00 $1,000,000
Ramp Grading 150,000 $3.00 $450,000
Structures and Streets 53,600 $250.00 $13,400,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $200,000.00 $200,000
Ramp Construction and Transition 1 $4,500,000.00 $4,500,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 $200,000.00 $200,000
Street Signs 10 $5,000.00 $50,000
Striping/LF 9,000 $3.00 $27,000
Subtotal $20,327,000
I-10/SR 79 Interchange
Utility Conversion/Relocation 1,000 $350.00 $350,000
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 500,000 $1.50 $750,000
Ramp Grading 150,000 $1.50 $225,000
Structures and Streets 15,000 $400.00 $6,000,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $200,000.00 $200,000
Ramp Construction and Transition 1 $3,500,000.00 $3,500,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 $50,000.00 $50,000
Street Signs 10 $500.00 $5,000
Striping/LF 3,000 $3.00 $9,000
Subtotal
I-10/0ak Valley Parkway Interchange
Utility Conversion/Relocation
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation
Ramp Grading
Structures and Streets
Drainage Allowance
Ramp Construction and Transition
Erosion Control/SF
Street Signs
Striping/LF
Subtotal
$11,089,000
1,000 $350.00 $350,000
500,000 $1.50 $750,000
80,000 $2.50 $200,000
15,000 $400.00 $6,000,000
1 $200,000.00 $200,000
1 $3,500,000.00 $3,500,000
1 $50,000.00 $50,000
10 $500.00 $5,000
3,000 $3.00 $9,000
$11,064,000
11
.LJ
I-10/Highland Springs Avenue Interchange
Utility Conversion/Relocation 1,000 $150.00 $150,000
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 500,000 $1.50 $750,000
Ramp Grading 150,000 $2.00 5300,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $200,000.00 $200,000
Ramp Construction and Transition 1 $3,500,000.00 $3,500,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 $50,000.00 550,000
Street Signs 10 5500.00 $5,000
Striping/LF 3,000 $3.00 $9,000
Subtotal 54,964,000
Pennsylvania Avenue
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 400,000 51.50 $600,000
6" Concrete Curb and Gutter 2,000 $11.00 $22,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $700,000.00 $700,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 $15,000.00 $15,000
Street Signs 100 $250.00 $25,000
Striping/LF 20,000 $1.25 $25,000
Subtotal $1,387,000
I-10/Pennsylvania Avenue Interchange
Utility Conversion/Relocation 1,000 $150.00 $150,000
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 500,000 $1.50 $750,000
Ramp Grading 75,000 $1.50 $112,500
Drainage Allowance 1 $200,000.00 $200,000
Ramp Construction and Transition 1 51,500,000.00 $1,500,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 550,000.00 $50,000
Street Signs 10 $500.00 $5,000
Striping/LF 3,000 $3.00 $9,000
Subtotal $2,776,500
Oak Valley Parkway
Rip Rap Slope Protection/SF 30,000 $3.00 $90,000
Rough Grading/CY 50,000 $1.50 $75,000
Flood Control Structures/SF 400,000 $2.00 $800,000
Noble Creek Drainage Fac. 4,500 $300.00 $586,322
Road Rehabilitation 600,000 $1.50 $900,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $200,000.00 $200,000
Utility Conversion 900 $500.00 $450,000
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 300,000 $1.00 $300,000
4"AC/6"Class 11 AB/SF, (40'/50') 250,000 $1.50 $375,000
6" Concrete Curb and Gutter 7,000 $11.00 $77,000
Box Culvert (Beaumont Ave.) 100 $5,000.00 $500,000
Noble Creek Bridge 15,000 $200.00 $3,000,000
Grouted Rip Rap 5,000 530.00 $150,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 $35,000.00 $35,000
Street Signs 100 $250.00 $25,000
Striping/LF 27,000 $1.25 $33,750
Subtotal $4,945,750
is
kl
Potrero Boulevard
Utility Conversion/Relocation 2,000 $350.00 5700,000
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 500,000 $1.50 $750,000
Rough Grading 300,000 $2.00 $600,000
Structures and Streets 30,000 $200.00 56,000,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $200,000.00 $200,000
4"AC/6"Class II AB/SF, (40'/50') 1,140,000 $1.50 51,710,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 $50,000.00 $50,000
Street Signs 10 $500.00 $5,000
Striping/LF 3,000 $3.00 59,000
Subtotal $10,024,000
Highland Springs Avenue
Utility Conversion/Relocation 1,000 $350.00 $350,000
Demolition, Removal and Rehabilitation 50,000 $1.50 $75,000
Rough Grading 150,000 $2.00 $300,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000
4"AC/6"Class II AB/SF, (40'/50') 460,000 $1.50 $690,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 $50,000.00 $50,000
Street Signs 10 $500.00 $5,000
Striping/LF 3,000 $3.00 $9,000
Subtotal $2,479,000
First StreetNelie Avenue
Move -in, Clear and Grub/AC 5 $1,000.00 $5,000
Rough Grading/CY 100,000 $1.50 $150,000
4"AC/6"Class II AB/SF, (40'150') 600,000 51.50 $900,000
Drainage Allowance 1 $100,000.00 $100,000
Rip Rap Slope Protection/SF 20,000 $3.00 $60,000
Erosion Control/SF 1 530,000.00 $30,000
Street Signs 100 $250.00 $25,000
Striping/LF 30,000 $1.25 $37,500
Subtotal $1,307,500
Subtotal Construction $70,363,750
Utilities, Fees and Permits
Plan Check and Inspection Fees $3,518,188
Caltrans/SCE Encroachment Permits $130,000
Wetlands 404-1603/N PDES $75,000
Subtotal $3,723,188
Planning, Environmental & Project Management $2,462,731
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering 55,277,281
Construction Management $3,166,369
Project Subtotal $14,629,569
5% Construction Contingency $3,518,188
Project Total 588,511,506
EDU Summary
h1
LI
P,
u
u
City of Beaumont
Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee Study
EDU Summary
CFD No. 93-1 Project Name IA No.
Res. EDU Com/Ind EDU
Beaumont Holdings 1 400 0
Olinger Commercial 2 0 84
Coscan Stewart, Three Rings Ranch 3 548 0
Rolling Hills Ranch 4 546 0
Heartland California Beaumont LP 5 994 490
Loma Linda 6a & 6b 1,078 1,645
Hovchild 7 2,217 88
Pardee 8 4,700 300
Cougar Ranch 9 67 0
Cougar Crossing 10 164 0
Omega Homes, Mountain Meadows 11 130 0
Victoria Homes 12 109 0
Pacific Communities 13 107 0
Oak Valley Greens 14 2,200 150
Precision 1&2 LLC 15 71 0
Oak Valley Champions 16 4,650 150
Subtotal
17,981 2,907
Residential Project Name IA No. Res. EDU Com/Ind EDU
Beaumont Heights 1,200 150
Beaumont Mesa, Nejedly 650 300
Brookfield Homes/Olinger 260 0
Infill Projects 1,500 300
Nobel Creek Vistas, LLC 300 0
Lockheed Aircraft, Beaumont Gateway 500 150
Lonie, Donald D., Noble Creek 200 0
Oak Valley Parkway West 300 250
Olinger Residential 260 0
Shea Homes, Jack Rabbit 700 0
Willow Springs Area 2,500 250
Subtotal
8,370 1,400
Non-residential Proect Name IA No. Res. EDU Com/Ind EDU
Allied Group/Marshall Creek Area 0 150
Beaumont Electric 0 14
Beaumont Industrial/Fourth Street Area 0 500
Beaumont Town Center 0 150
Beaumont Unified School District 0 925
Dowling 0 500
Dura Plastic Products Expansion 0 51
Lowe's Reload Facility 0 300
Noble Creek Villages 0 150
Rancho Ready Mix 0 28
Risco, Inc. 0 28
Weaver Motuary 0 35
Rootenberg, Leon &Barbara 0 1,500
Sixth Street Commercial Corridor 0 500
San Timoteo 48/BUSD/Hamilton 0 350
Subtotal
Total
0 5,181
26,351 9,488
bt
0
11
Facility Fee Summary
City of Beaumont
Road and Bridge Benefit Mitigation Fee Study
Facility Fee Summary
Fee Component
Residential
Commercial
Total
Total EDU's
Total Permits Issued
Commercial Factor
Total Adjusted EDU's
Residential % EDU
Commercial % EDU
Total Facilities Cost
Eauivalent Dwellina Unit Factors
Single-family Dwelling Unit
Commercial/Industrial Acre EDU/AC
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Open Space/Agriculture/AC
JJ
EDU's Fair Share Cost
17,600 $74,319,990
9,488 $14,191,516
29,588 $88,511,506.25
50%
Trans EDU
1.00
17.16
86.70
159.50
429.60
0.00
35,839
1,507
4 744
29,588
84.0%
16.0%
$88,511,506
Fee per EDU
$4,222.73
$1,495.73
6'149of 1SEaumoni
550 East Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
(909) 769-8520
FAX (909) 769-8526
FAX (909) 769-8525
LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council will conduct a public h; aring to
consider the matter described below. The public hearing on this matter will b; held at
6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 21, 2003 in the Civic Center, 550 E 6th Street, B - aumont
California. The matter to be considered is further described below:
ORDINANCE NO. 837
IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEA
ESTABLISHING THE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATIO
PROGRAM AND AMENDING CHAPTER 3.22 OF THE BEAUMONT
CODE.
ONT
FEE
CIPAL
On public hearing items the public may present testimony to the City Council eit er in
person or by mail. Written comments will be accepted until the night of the heari g.
Ernest Egger, AI
Director of Planning
Dated: January 8, 2003
Publish one time only in the Press Enterprise. No later than January 14, 2003.
FRI 08:41 FAX 98497078
BANNING PE
5/ie/b�2
Ad Number:114/114559402 Operator:afuntani
CustomerClTY OF BEAUMONT
Purge:02-0B-03 SatesPerson:ALEXANDER
SIze:A 2,00 x 4.00 RunDate:01/14/03
LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
E ooi
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council
will conduct a public hearing to consider the matter
described below. The public hearing on this matter will
be held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 21, 2003 in
the Civic Center, 550 E 6th Street, Beaumont,
California. The matter to be considered is further
described below.
ORDINANCE NO. 837
IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT ESTABLISHING THE
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
PROGRAM AND AMENDING CHAPTER 3.22 OF
THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE.
On public hearing items the public may present testi-
mony to the City Council either in person or by mail.
Written comments will be accepted until the night of
the hearing.
OK as iJ Ac OK 1 ico; C.lcr;t I_