Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutOrdinance 849HI I JIM! CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT ORDINANCE NO. 849 AN ORDINANCE ADDING THE SAN TIMOTEO SEWER FACILITY FEE TO THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, growth in the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Area (Fee Area) as described in the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Study attached as Exhibit "A" (Fee Study) will require the development of sewer facilities in a coordinated fashion to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to facilitate implementation of the City General Plan and Master Sewer Plan; and WHEREAS, the City prepared the Fee Study to determine the probable design and construction costs of certain sewer facilities needed to support the logical and orderly development in the Fee Area in accordance with the General Plan and Master Sewer Plan; and WHEREAS, The Fee Study calculates a proposed facility fee based upon the reasonable apportionment of sewer facility costs to measurable units of development in accordance with Government code Section 6600, et. seq; and WHEREAS, the Fee Study has been presented to the City Finance Committee, the City Planning Commission and the public for consideration and comment; and WHEREAS, comments provided by City officials and the public have been incorporated into the Fee Study; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on October 7, 2003 for the purpose of hearing oral and written testimony regarding the Fee Study and the proposed facility fee. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Sectionl . Approval of Fee Study. The City Council hereby approves the Fee Study. Section 2. Adoption of Findings. The City Council hereby adopts the findings set forth in Exhibit "B." Section 3. Addition to Municipal Code. Chapter 3.23, entitled San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee, to read as set forth in Exhibit "C" is hereby added to the Beaumont Municipal Code. Section 4. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published once within fifteen (15) days after it's adoption in "The Record Gazette," a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Beaumont, and shall be posted for fifteen (15) days in the City Clerk's office within fifteen (15) days after its 1!11:1 1 111•11I adoption. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective sixty (60) days after the date of its final passage and adoption. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont on October 7, 2003. ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Beaumont on October 21, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: Mayor DeForge, Cbuncil Members Dressel, Berg, Fox, and Valdivia. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Alan C.Ka icas, City Clerk ti,) 1'179 kd, 1j _ ......_ ED ,ZJ SEWER TRUNK MAIN SEWER LIFT STATION r•1 FEE AREAS: OAK VALLEY MONT MESA 4 0 00 SO -ZZ -671V0 Z-SV3NV 333 NOIIVOLLIW :0M0 W31SAS 83M3S 0310W11. NVS ;b3010A 1811 MIR Exhibit "A" SAN TIMOTEO SEWER FEE STUDY Exhibit "B" FINDINGS SUPPORTING ADOPTION OF THE SAN TIMOTEO SEWER FACILITY FEE 1. The City Council finds that as a result of increasing regional growth in the and Empire area significant residential, commercial and industrial development is expected to o cur within the City of Beaumont. This anticipated development, including development current y approved or submitted for approval, will cumulatively generate an increased demand for sewe new residents, businesses and their employees. This increased demand will exceed t capacity of certain facilities to provide adequate levels of service needed to accomm as set forth in the City General Plan. 2. Unless certain actions are taken, the above factors will result in adverse imp is such as danger to people and property due to the lack of or untimely extension of sewer faci ities. The City Council finds that the facility fee is needed to mitigate the cumulative impact o new development under the General Plan, including development currently approved or ubmitted for approval. 3. The City Council acknowledges the demand for sewer facilities varies by di of new development. The proposed facility fee apportions the cost of the necessary facilities on a fair share basis among the different categories of new users accordin reasonably estimated demand that each type of users places upon sewer facilities. 4. In the absence of imposing the proposed facility fee, existing and future so revenue will be inadequate to fund the necessary sewer facilities identified in the F need for which has been generated by new development. 5. It is the intent of the City Council to adopt a fair and equitable method of se uring some of the necessary revenues to fund the design and construction of certain sewer faci ities needed to accommodate future growth as set forth in the Fee Study. 6. With regard to the methodology for levying the proposed facility fee, the C further finds that: facilities by e existing date growth erent types ewer to the ces of e Study, the A. B. Certain sewer facilities necessary to serve new residences, business employees have been presented in the Fee Study. The City Council sewer facilities included in the Fee Study to be necessary to meet th demands for certain sewer facilities based upon current and project - patterns. The estimated costs for the sewer facilities have been based upon c construction costs for similar facilities for which the City has recen construction bids or for which the City Public Works Director has construction cost estimates. The City Council finds that these meth estimating the costs of construction are reasonably based. Council s and their finds the future d land use ent ly received repared ds for tea. C. The Land Use Element of the Beaumont General Plan specifies the of land within the City and places limits on the intensity and density The City Council has reviewed the relationship between land uses permitted under the General Plan and the rate and amount of develo property within the City. The City Council has identified trends in development which enable the Council to project, with accuracy, the and extent of future development based upon the City's General P1. 0 1 D. The City Council has also examined the extent to which different 1. generate demands for sewer facilities, and has taken into considerati other evidence, the Fee Study. The Fee Study utilizes "equivalent d to measure the demand generated by existing and projected new resi businesses and their employees on sewer facilities. Equivalent dwell factors are then assigned to the sewer facility categories according t of needs generated by different types of land uses. The City Council equivalent dwelling unit factors are a reasonable estimation of actua sewer facilities based upon historic, current and projected demands. rmitted uses f such uses. d densities ment of owth and magnitude d uses n, among elling units" ents, ng unit an estimate Inds that the demands for E. The estimated costs for the sewer facilities have been allocated to fu ure equivalent dwelling units by service areas, and the necessary fee for he design and construction of sewer facilities has been calculated for each se ice area. The proposed facility fee has been calculated according to the estimated umber of residents per residential unit and the estimated number of equivalent dwelling units per acre generated by industrial and commercial development. F. While the City is committed and will continue to pursue all availabl funds to construct the sewer facilities, it acknowledges that sufficie not available absent the facility fee to support the demand for the fa generated by new development. G. It is a policy of the City that new development pay for the cost of i necessitated by the impacts generated by new development. The Ci finds that the apportionment of new development's fair share of the necessary sewer facilities as set forth in the Fee Study fulfills this p sources of funding is ilities rovements Council osts of the licy. 7. The facilities that will be constructed with funds generated by the proposes facility fee will significantly benefit the contributor by mitigating adverse impacts, such as ov -extended sewer facilities where health and safety may be at risk due to insufficient sewer fac lities. The inability or failure to reduce these adverse impacts caused by insufficient sewer fac lities will negatively impact future residents, businesses, and employees in the City. 8. The City Council further fmds the proposed facility fee to be charged pursu t to this Ordinance does not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of acquiring and constru ting the facilities listed in the Fee Study. The City Council additionally finds that the meths • of cost allocation adopted by this Ordinance, which is based upon equivalent dwelling uni Is for the land uses permitted under the City's General Plan, assures that the applicable fee bears . fair and reasonable relationship to each such development's burden on, and benefit from, the proposed facilities to be funded by this Ordinance. 'full I IIal P:. Sections: 3.22.010 3.22.020 3.22.030 3.22.040 3.22.050 3.22.060 3.22.070 3.22.080 3.22.090 3.22.100 3.22.110 3.22.120 3.22.130 3.22.140 Exhibit "C" Chapter 3.23 San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Purpose Terms and Definitions Applicability Adoption of the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Amount of Fee Payment of Fee Credits and Reimbursements Exemptions Use of Funds Refunds Appeals Expiration of Fee Supplementary provisions Severability 3.22.010 Purpose The City Council finds that the cumulative impact of all new development permitted under the General Plan will result in unacceptable decreases in sewer facility service levels. To prevent these undesirable consequences, sewer facilities must be provided at a rate which will accommodate the expected growth in the City. The City Council acknowledges that the demand for sewer facilities varies by types of development. The proposed Facility Fee apportions the cost of the necessary improvements among the different types of new development according to the reasonably estimated demand that each type of development places upon sewer facilities. 3.22.020 Terms and Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated in this section: A. "San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Area" is that area described within the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Study (Fee Study) dated October 7, 2003. B. "San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee" (Facility Fee) is that fee for sewer facilities to be imposed on new development within the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Area pursuant to this Chapter. C. "Sewer Facilities" means those certain sewer facilities identified in the Fee Study which are necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare as may be determined by the City Council from time to time which are not otherwise provided by, or required of development within the City pursuant to the General Plan, the Master Sewer Plan and the Beaumont Municipal Code. Sewer Facilities shall also include architectural, administrative, engineering, legal, planning, environmental, plan check, inspection, surveying, construction management and other services required in connection with the implementation of this Chapter and the construction of the foregoing improvements as part of the City of Beaumont Comprehensive Public Facilities Financing Program. B. "Developer" means an individual or entity submitting an application for a building permit or other entitlement for development. C. "Development" means: 1. New residential unit, including conversion of an existing unit to more than one residential unit. 2. New commercial, office, and industrial development. B. Additions greater than 750 gross square feet to existing commercial, office and industrial developments. D. "Service Area" means the area which benefits from the Sewer Facilities. E. "Fee Schedule" means the list of Facility Fees adopted by resolution of the City Council pursuant to Section 3.23.040 of this Chapter. 3.23.030 Adoption of the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee There is hereby adopted the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee and the various service area components thereof to be levied and collected as provided in this Chapter. 3.23.040 Applicability Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Chapter, the Facility Fee required under this Chapter is payable with respect to each development within the City for which a building permit is issued on or after the effective as adopted in the Fee Schedule. 3.23.050 Amount of Fee A. The amount of the Facility Fee shall be calculated by the Building Department prior to issuance of the building permit, based upon the then current Fee Schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council pursuant to this Chapter. B. In the event a developer does not agree with the calculation of the Facility Fee by the Building Department, he or she may within five (5) business days of the date of the II i111•11i calculation of the fee appeal the calculation of the fee to the Planning Director. C. The developer shall be notified in writing of the Planning Director's determination. Such dettuuination shall be made within thirty (30) days of the Planning Director's receipt of the appeal. The developer may provide additional information to assist the Planning Director in making the determination. The developer may appeal the determination of the Planning Director to the City Council in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.22.110 of this Chapter. D. The amount of the Facility Fee shall be subject to adjustment from time to time by the City Council. 3.23.060 Payment of Fee A. The full amount of the Facility Fee shall be paid at the time of issuance of the building permit. B. No City official may issue a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or certify a final inspection for a development until the Facility Fee with respect to such development required by this Chapter is paid in accordance with this section. C. The City shall not accept prepayments of the Facility Fee, unless prepayment is authorized in a development or other agreement or otherwise is approved by the City Council. 3.23.070 Credits and Reimbursements If the developer desires to construct a Public Facility, the developer and the City Council may enter into an agreement regarding a credit or reimbursement of Facility Fees due or paid. 3.23.080 Exemptions Unless a development or other agreement provides otherwise, the following projects shall be exempt, in whole or in part, from the Facility Fee otherwise required by this Chapter: A. Residential development consisting of the repair or replacement, on a one-to-one basis. B. Commercial or industrial development consisting of the repair or replacement of structures, provided, that such repair or replacement does not result in any conversion or change in land use, or any enlargement of gross floor area beyond that of the previous structure more than 750 square feet. In the event a commercial or industrial use expands more than 750 square feet , the Facility Fee shall be calculated based on the percentage of square feet of expanded floor area of the total multiplied by the total development acreage in accordance with the Fee Schedule. 3.23.090 Use of Funds The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall, except for temporary investments or capital expenditures, shall be placed in the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Fund and managed to avoid commingling of the fees with operating revenues or other funds of the City, and shall be used solely for the purpose of designing, acquiring and constructing the Sewer facilities identified in the Fee Study or other facility adopted as equal in the Capital Improvement Plan. Any interest income earned on the fund shall only be expended for the purposes set forth in this Chapter. 3.23.100 Refunds Refunds may be made where: A. Development has ceased, the building permit has expired and no extensions have been granted, or if granted, the extension(s) has expired; as to a development for which the Facility Fee required under this Chapter has been collected; provided that the claim for such a refund is filed no later than sixty (60) days after the expiration date of the building permit, or any extension thereof as may have been approved by the City, as the case may be; or B. A refund is specifically authorized by resolution of the City Council adopted pursuant to Government Code section 66001(d). Such amounts shall be refunded by the City to the then -current record owners of the development on a prorated basis. The City may effect such refunding by direct payment, or by providing credit towards future Facility Fees, or by any other means consistent with the intent of Government Code section 66001. 3.23.110 Appeals A developer may appeal to the City Council any determination made pursuant to this Chapter. All appeals shall be in a form prescribed by the Planning Director and shall be filed within fifteen (15) days of the date of determination. Any appeal not filed within such period shall be deemed waived. The City Council shall set the matter for hearing within forty-five (45) days of the date of receipt by the City Clerk of the notice of the appeal. 3.23.120 Expiration of Fee The San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee shall expire when the Sewer facilities are completed and all debt service related to such public improvements are paid and satisfied. 3.23.130 Supplementary Fee It is the intent of the City Council that the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee shall be supplementary to the fees, dedications and conditions imposed upon development pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, California Environmental Quality Act, and other state laws and City ordinances, policies or conditions which may authorize the imposition of fees, dedications or conditions thereon. 3.23.140 Severability 1U11111.1111=1:11. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to any person, association, corporation or to any property as to whom or which it is beyond the power of the City to impose the fee provided in this Chapter. If any sentence, clause, section or part of this Chapter, or any fee imposed upon any person or entity is found to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, such unconstitutionality, illegality or invalidity shall affect only such sentence, clause, section or part of this Chapter, and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, sentences, clauses, sections or other parts of this Chapter, or its effect on other persons or entities. It is declared to be the intention of the City Council that this Chapter would have been adopted had such unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid sentence, clause, section or part of this Chapter had not been included herein; or had such person or entity been expressly exempted from the application of this Chapter. To this end, the provisions of this Chapter are severable. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Beaumont City Council shall conduct a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 7, 2003 and at 6:00 PM on Tuesday October 21, 2003 in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223, to receive testimony and comments from all interested persons regarding the adoption of the following matter(s): ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT CALIFORNIA, ADDING THE San Timoteo Sewer FACILITY FEE TO THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE The San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee is a development fee to be levied on new residential, industrial and commercial development within a 4,500 acre area generally bounded by lands adjacent to Cherry Valley to the north, State Route 60 to the South, the City Limits to the west and Interstate 10 and Nancy Street to the east, more particularly described on the attached map. The fee will be levied on new development to fund the design and construction of certain sewer facilities. A summary of the facilities and the fee is listed below: FEE SCHEDULE Facility/Service Area San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 San Timoteo Sewer No. 2 San Timoteo Sewer No. 3 Fee per EDU $ 973.86 $ 837.61 $ 236.43 Includes roads and appurtenant facilities such as rights-of-way and drainage structures *Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors Residential Dwelling Unit Industrial or Commercial Acre Sewer EDU 1.00 10.00 A copy of the Fee Study, Staff Report and Ordinance is on file in the City Clerk's Office at City Hall, 550 East 6th Street, Beaumont, California. Interested persons may submit written comments on this matter to the City Clerk at 550 East 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223. Shelby Hanvey Deputy City Clerk Published with map: Press Enterprise: Two (2) times, one (1) on September 26, 2003 and one (1) time on October 3, 2003. 0111 ! ,Ia.!! RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING THE SAN TIMOTEO SEWER FACILITY FEE SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.23 OF THE BEAUMONT MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council the City of Beaumont hereby resolves as follows: Section 1: Incorporation of Fee Study. That certain "San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Study" dated October 7, 2003, is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 2: Adoption of the San Timoteo Sewer Facilities Fee Schedule. There is hereby adopted the San Timoteo Sewer Facilities Fee Schedule, as follows: FEE SCHEDULE Facility/Service Area Facility Fee per EDU* San Timoteo No. 1 - Lower Oak Valley San Timoteo No. 2 - Upper Oak Valley San Timoteo No. 3 - Beaumont Mesa *Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors Residential Dwelling Unit Industrial or Commercial Acre Sewer EDU 1.00 10.00 $ 973.86 $ 837.61 $ 236.43 Section 3: Periodic Review. In accordance with Section 3.23 .050, this Fee Schedule shall be periodically reviewed and revised. Section 4: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect sixty (60) days from the date of its adoption. MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor of the City of Beaumont ;1111!.1=111. Exhibit "A" SAN TIMOTEO FACILITY FEE STUDY 1111111=111 City of Beaumont San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Study Prepared for: Beaumont City Council Prepared by: Public Works Department Community and Economic Development Department October 7, 2002 I. Introduction and Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to estimate and apportion the total cost to designand construct sewer facilities which are needed to support logical and orderly development in the approximately 4,500 acre area tributary to the future San Timoteo Sewer System of the City of Beaumont. The study will be used to establish a facility fee to fund the design, construction and upgrade of sewer facilities necessary to serve future development generally located on the west side of the City. The report provides an estimate of costs for those facilities along with a calculation of facility fees to be levied on a "fair share" basis in accordance with Government Code Section 6600, et seq., and upon measurable units of expected future land uses. Currently, there are several vacant parcels within the western areas of the City which are planned for future development. As new development occurs, existing sewer facilities will be impacted by new residents and businesses, increasing their use and requiring them to be upgraded to accommodate the increased use. Additionally, new sewer facilities will need to be constructed to accommodate expected use by new development. Certain facilities or component portions thereof may be constructed pursuant to public financing districts and some may be constructed by developers to mitigate impacts of specific development projects pursuant to conditions of approval for those projects. In both instances, it is appropriate to establish the facility fee to reasonably apportion the costs of facilities on a fair share basis among future developments and to provide for fee credits and reimbursements when appropriate. The facilities to funded by the facility fee are listed below and are depicted on the San Timoteo Sewer System Mitigation Fee Areas and Facilities Map included this study. The facilities consist of all component parts and ancillary facilities depicted on the Map in this study or as may be otherwise approved by the City Council. The City Council may also use the facility fee to fund equal facilities having an equivalent benefit. Facilities to be funded by the facility fee are listed below together with their estimated cost. Sewer Facility Estimated Cost ► San Timoteo No. 1 - Lower Oak Valley $ 4,355,369 ► San Timoteo No. 2 - Upper Oak Valley $ 4,382,185 ► San Timoteo No. 3 - Beaumont Mesa $ 3,162,887 Total $11,900,441 A preliminary engineer's estimate of the cost to design and construct the facilities to be funded by the facility fee is provided in the Appendix. The estimated costs are based upon recent unit costs for similar projects which have been publicly bid in the City using prevailing wages. Where no such recent costs were available, estimates were prepared by the City Public Works Director using RS Means unit cost data adjusted for the local area. All costs for facilities should be adjusted for inflation on a regular basis by the City Council in accordance with the Engineering News Record construction cost index for the Los Angeles area. II. Facility fee Calculation The purpose of this section of the study is to provide a description of the facilities to be funded by the facility fee and an estimate of costs to design and construct those facilities. This section also provides an estimate of how much future development will benefit from each of the facilities based on "equivalent dwelling units" or EDU's. The study provides a reasonable measure of the number of new EDU's that will be developed within "service areas" which include all the vacant land that will benefit from the facilities once they are constructed. Each service area boundary and the facilities to be constructed for the benefit of undeveloped land in each service area are depicted respectively on the San Timoteo Sewer System Mitigation Fee Areas and Facilities Map included this study. Each service area includes an estimated number of EDU's that will be developed and will be responsible to pay the cost of designing and constructing the facilities. In order to establish a reasonable estimate of the number of EDU's different types of land uses will generate within the service areas of each facility, the study establishes the relative demands of residential, industrial and commercial land use on the generic types of facilities. The overall demands of residential land use placed upon the generic types of facilities as measured by a single dwelling unit with an average population of 3.2 persons per unit are used as the baseline of measurement for other land uses. In the case of sewer facilities, each dwelling unit generates an average daily flow of 280 gallons of sewage and the average acre of industrial or commercial development generates 2,800 gallons of sewage each day. Therefore, each acre of industrial or commercial development will generate an average of 10.00 EDU's of demand for sewer facilities (2,800/280). A listing of the EDU factors used in this study is provided below. Land Use Sewer EDU's Residential Dwelling Unit 1 Industrial/ Commercial Acre 10 In order to determine the number of new EDU's to be developed in the future within each service area, the study uses a listing of the number of EDU's in major projects and an estimate of residential, industrial and commercial EDU's by subarea within each service area. The list of projects and subareas and the estimated number of EDU's each project and subarea will generate in each service area is show on the table entitled Service Area EDU Estimate at the back of this study. Where a specific project could not be identified for undeveloped land, an estimate of acreage and EDU's was made by generic land uses reasonably expected to be developed in each service area based on past development patterns in the City. There are three such service areas of the facility fee which are listed below along with the estimated number of EDU's of future development within each service area. Service Area Cumulative EDU's • San Timoteo No. 1 - Lower Oak Valley 6,385 • San Timoteo No. 2 - Upper Oak Valley 9,393 • San Timoteo No. 3 - Beaumont Mesa 13,378 IVlll L.I—ILL A. Sewer Facilities Sewer facilities to be funded by the facility fee include the San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 which generally serves the area north of Interstate 10 and Brookside Avenue and the most western areas of Oak Valley, the San Timoteo Sewer No. 2 which generally serves the San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 area plus the area generally southwest of Interstate 10 and north of Oak Valley Parkway and the San Timoteo Sewer No. 3 which serves the San Timoteo Sewer Nos. 1 & 2 Service Areas and the area generally southwest of Interstate 10 and north of State Route 60. The San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 Service Area is estimated to include a total of 6,385 EDU's. The San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 includes a lift station, gravity sewer and force main sewer components and is estimated to cost $4,355,369. The San Timoteo Sewer No. 2 Service Area is estimated to include a total of 9,393 EDU's of which 3,008 are responsible for funding the gravity portion of the system and 9,393 are responsible for the pressure portion. The San Timoteo Sewer No. 2 gravity portion is estimated to cost $1,642,394 and the pressure system is estimated to cost $2,739,790. The San Timoteo Sewer No. 3 includes a lift station, gravity sewer and force main sewer components and is estimated to cost $4,382,185. The San Timoteo Sewer No. 3 Service Area is estimated to include a total of 13,378 EDU's. The San Timoteo Sewer No. 3 is estimated to cost $3,162,887. The following is a breakdown of costs and EDU's by component portion of the system. Facility/Service Area EDU's Facility Cost Fee per EDU San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 6,385 $ 4,355,369 $ 682.17 San Timoteo Sewer No. 2 gravity 3,008 $ 1,642,394 $ 291.68 San Timoteo Sewer No. 2 pressure 9,393 $ 2,739,790 $ 545.93 San Timoteo Sewer No. 3 13,378 $ 3,162,887 $ 236.43 B. Facility Fee Calculation The proposed facility fee for each facility and service area is calculated by dividing the cost of the facility by the number of EDU's in each service area which will benefit from or use the facility. The proposed facility fee for each facility and service area is summarized on the Fee Schedule below. The facility fee will be levied by the Building Department prior to the issuance of building permits for all new development or expansion of existing development. All expansions of industrial and commercial development less than or equal to 750 square feet will be exempt from the facility fee. FEE SCHEDULE Facility/Service Area San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 San Timoteo Sewer No. 2 San Timoteo Sewer No. 3 *Equivalent Dwelling Unit Factors Residential Dwelling Unit Industrial or Commercial Acre Sewer EDU 1.00 10.00 Fee per EDU $ 682.17 $ 291.68 $ 236.43 1 APPENDIX !MI Engineer's Cost Estimate !llll lI !J. City of Beaumont Community Facilities District No. 93-1 San Timoteo Sewer System Fees Sewer System EDU Cost Cum. EDU Fee/EDU San Timoteo No. 1 - Lower Oak Valley 6,385 $4,355,369.43 6,385 $682.17 San Timoteo No. 2 - Upper Oak Valley Pressure System 3,008 $2,739,790.22 9,393 $291.68 San Timoteo No. 2 - Upper Oak Valley Gravity System 3,008 $1,642,394.46 3,008 $545.93 San Timoteo No. 3 - Beaumont Mesa 3,985 $3,162,887.26 13,378 $236.43 Sewer Fees: San Timoteo No. 1 - Lower Oak Valley San Timoteo No. 2 - Upper Oak Valley San Timoteo No. 3 - Beaumont Mesa $973.86 $837.61 $236.43 11111.1E111.111 City of Beaumont San Tlmotao Sewer System EDU Summary Si$.111.11msdatiOLLLI.olatatiklidlEX Sun Cal - Oak Valley Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Callmesa County Subtotal San T1moleo Ne 2 -Neoax Oak VaINv Improvement Area No. 14 A Pulte Homes Subtotal u dLn Residential Elementary School Commercial, 4 Acres Planation on the Lake Elementary School Commercial, 15 Acres Storm Area Egg Ranch Area Infill Areas Land Uae Residential Improvement Area No. 16 - Curtis Development Residential Subtotal Improvement Area No. 17 A - Pardee Homes Phase 1 Resi0ential Elementary School Subtotal Improvement Area No. 17 B - Pardee Homes Phase 2 Residential Subtotal Improvement Area No. 17 C - Pardee Homes Phase 3 Residential Subtotal Improvement Area No. 17 D - Pardee Homes Phase 4 Residential Subtotal Desert Lawn/Oak Valley Commercial Commercial, 29.5 Acres Subtotal Improvement Area No. 18 CLCommunitles Residential Subtotal Infill Projects Subtotal Subtotal $an Tlmoleo No. 3 • Beaumont Mega Heartland Western Knolls Subtotal Subtotal Wilson Traci Portion PA - 26, Sun Cal County Area lam Ute Residential Commercial/Industrial Elementary School Residential CommemaVlndustral Elementary School City 47/Beaumont San Tlmoteo Sewer System Preliminary Engineers Cwt Estimate EMU San Timoteo Sewer No. 1 - Lower Oak Valley 3,300 Move -in 47 Clearing and Grubbing/AC 40 Excavation and Compaction/CY 3,387 Lift Station Paving 500 Electrical 47 Fencing 150 Service Road, LF 697 Dual 10' PVC Force Main 18• PVC Trunk Main 15' PVC Trunk Main Pavement Removal and Replacement/LF Signs 900 900 500 2,300 8,385 EDU 544 544 Subtotal Utilities, Fees and Permits Total San Tlmoteo Sewer No. 2 • Upper Oak Valley Move -in 241 Clearing and Grubbing/AC 241 Excavation and Compaction/CY Lift Station 488 Paving 47 Electrical 535 Fencing Service Road. LF 326 Dual 12• PVC Force Main 326 1,630 15" PVC Trunk Main 12" PVC Trunk Main 336 Pipeline Encasement 338 Jack and Bore UPRR 81-10 Pavement Removal and Replacement/LF 480 Trestle 480 Signs 205 296 194 194 110 35 650 795 Subtotal Utilities. Fees and Permits Total San Tlmoteo Sewer No. 3 - Beaumont Mesa Move4NRetlre Old Station Clearing and Grubbing/AC Excavation and Compaction/CY B Salon 3,008 Paving Electrical Egli Fencing Service Road, LF 1,100 Dual 14" PVC Force Main 120 Pipeline Encasement 47 Jack and Bore S.R. 80 1,267 Pavement Removal and Replacement/LF Signs 2.000 670 47 2,717 Subtotal 3,985 Total 13,378 Subtotal Utilities, Fees and Permits Total 1 110,000 2 11,000 10000 $5 1 $400,000 10000 $3 1 5100.000 2000 530 400 1100 14400 $80 2800 $90 18500 $75 603 $14 10 $250 1 $5,000 2 $1,000 10000 15 1 5450,000 10000 $3 1 $100,000 2000 $30 160 5100 8000 $120 9,000 575 7,600 $60 225 $88 525 1725 7500 $14 600 1350 10 $250 1 $70,000 2 51,000 10000 $5 1 5585,000 10000 53 1 $135,000 2000 $30 400 $100 8500 5140 325 5120 325 5900 3000 $14 10 5250 $10,000 $2,000 $45,000 $100,000 530,000 $100,000 $60,000 $40,000 51,152,000 1252,000 51,387,500 $7,000 12,500 $3,488,000 5867,369 $4,355,359 $5.000 $2,000 $45,000 $450,000 130,000 1100,000 160,000 115,000 $980,000 5675,000 $450,000 $19,350 5380,625 $105.000 1210,000 $2,500 53,500,475 1872,710 54,382,185 570,000 12,000 545,000 $685,000 $30,000 $135,000 $60,000 140,000 51,190,000 139,000 1292,500 $42,000 $2,500 $2,533,000 5629,887 13,162,687 211111=1U Agenda No. a STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Council Members From: Community and Economic Development Department Date: October 21, 2003 Subject: Ordinance Adding the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee to the Beaumont Municipal Code Background and Analysis: The proposed Ordinance would establish the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee which is a development fee that will be paid as building permits are issued for new residential, industrial and commercial development within a 4,500 acre area generally located west of Nancy Street, southwest of Interstate 10, north of State Route 60 and south of lands adjacent to Cherry Valley Boulevard. The facility fee will be used to fund $11,900,441 in sewer system improvements needed to support development on the west side of the City. The City currently levies development fees on a citywide basis to pay for transportation facilities, sewer treatment capacity, fire stations, railroad overpasses, traffic signals and basic services and facilities. The City also has established development fees for the Westside Area Benefit District to fund sewer system improvements within a 5,200 acre area on the west side of the City and has established the Eastside Facilities Fee to fund sewer system improvements within a 7,500 acre area on the east side of the City In 1993 the City entered into development agreements with Heartland California LLC. and Robertson Homes which required the City to use it's best efforts to establish a fee for sewer facilities within the western area of the City. The purpose of the fee is to provide a fimding mechanism that spreads the cost of constructing key facilities on a "fair share" basis. The proposed Ordinance would establish the facility fee for key sewer system facilities in accordance with the development agreements and would provide a basis for developer reimbursements and credits to the extent the facilities were required to be developed in excess of what would be a fair share basis. Attached to the staff report is the San Timoteo Sewer Facility Fee Study which describes the facilities to be funded in detail and apportions the cost of the facilities based upon equivalent dwelling units. The Study includes an exhibit showing the various facilities to be funded and the service areas where the fee for the facilities will be levied. The facility fee will not be levied for