HomeMy Public PortalAboutOrdinance 893ORDINANCE NO. 893
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT AND THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BEAUMONT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the
City of Beaumont and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees'
Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached
hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein
set out in full.
Section 2: The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized, empowered, and
directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency.
Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its
adoption, and prior to the expiration of fifteen days from the passage thereof shall be
published at least one time in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation,
published and circulated in the City of Beaumont and thenceforth and thereafter the same
shall be in full force and effect.
MOVED AND PASSED upon first reading this 21st day of February, 2006, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Fox, Council Members DeForge „Dressel, Berg, and Killough.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 2006, upon
second reading by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Fox, Council Members DeForge and Killough.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT:
Council Members Dressel and Berg.
Deputy City C
k
ORDINANCE NO. 894
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT
AMENDING AND SUPERSEDING ORDINANCE NO. 839 & 875 AND ORDINANCE NO.
875 AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM
The City Council of the City of Beaumont ("City") ordain as follows:
Section 1: Title
This Ordinance shall be known as the "Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2006" ("Ordinance").
Section 2: Findings
A. The City is a Member Agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments
("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency consisting of the City, the County of Riverside, and the
thirteen Cities situated in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, the Member Agencies of
WRCOG developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the
Regional System of Highways and Arterials in Western Riverside County (the "Regional
System") could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee on future
residential, commercial and industrial development. A map depicting the boundaries of Western
Riverside County and the system is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. As a
Member Agency of WRCOG, the City participated in the preparation of a certain "Western
Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study", dated October 18, 2002
("2002 Nexus Study") prepared pursuant to California Government Code, Section 66000 et seq.,
the Mitigation Fee Act. Based on this nexus study, the City adopted and implemented an
ordinance authorizing its participation in a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program.
B. WRCOG with the assistance of its member agencies have now prepared an
updated "Western Riverside County Transportation Fee Nexus Study" ("Nexus Study") pursuant
to California Government Code Section 66000 et seq., the Mitigation Fee Act, for the purpose of
updating the fees imposed by Ordinance No. 839 AND Ordinance 875 (collectively, "the
Ordinances").
C. Consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of the Ordinances, the
City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds, that future development within
Western Riverside County and the Cities therein will result in traffic volumes exceeding the
capacity of the Regional System as it presently exists.
D. Consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of the Ordinances, the
City Council has been further informed and advised, and hereby finds, that if the capacity of the
1
Regional System is not enlarged, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of
Western Riverside County and the City, with unacceptable Levels of Service throughout Western
Riverside County by 2030.
E. The City Council has been further advised, and so finds that funding, in addition
to those fees adopted pursuant to the 2002 Nexus Study, will be inadequate to fund construction
of the Regional System. Absent an update of the "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee"
("TUMF") based on the Nexus Study, existing and known future funding sources will be
inadequate to provide necessary improvements to the Regional System, resulting in an
unacceptably high level of traffic congestion within and around Western Riverside County and
the City.
F. The City Council has reviewed the Nexus Study, and hereby finds that future
development within the County and City will substantially adversely affect the Regional System,
and that unless such development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the
Regional System will operate at unacceptable Levels of Service.
G. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the failure to mitigate growing
traffic impacts on the Regional System within Western Riverside County and the City will
substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond. The failure
to mitigate impacts on the Regional System will adversely affect the public health, safety and
welfare.
H. The City Council further finds and determines that there is a reasonable and
rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on
which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation
improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-
residential users of the development projects on which the TUMF will be levied.
I. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational
relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of
development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the
residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional System.
Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such
development will be mitigated in part by the payment of the TUMF.
J. The City Council further finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in
the Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System
improvements, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development
will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development.
K. The City Council further finds that the cost estimates set forth in the Nexus Study
are reasonable cost estimates for the facilities that comprise the Regional System; and that
TUMF program revenues to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair
share of these costs.
2
L. The fees collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall be used to help pay for the
construction and acquisition of the Regional System improvements identified in the Nexus
Study. The need for the improvements is related to new development because such development
results in additional traffic thus creating the demand for the improvements.
M. By notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a
public hearing on the Nexus Study and the fee proposed thereunder, and at least ten days prior to
the hearing, the City made the Nexus Study available to the public.
N. At the time and place set for the hearing, the City Council duly considered that
data and information provided by the public relative to the cost of the services for which the fees
are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion
of the hearing.
O. The City Council finds that the Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method
for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements to the Regional System.
P. The City Council hereby adopts the Nexus Study, which Study is attached hereto
as Exhibit "B", and incorporates it herein as though set forth in full.
Q. The City Council hereby adopts this Ordinance to amend and supersede the
provisions of the Ordinances.
Section 3: Definitions
For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the
following meanings:
A. "Class 'A' Office" means an office building that is typically characterized by
high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology
for voice and data, on site support services/maintenance, and often includes full
service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to a bank, restaurant/office coffee
shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum
requirements of an office building classified as Class 'A" Office shall be as
follows: (i) minimum of three stories (exception will be made for March JPA,
where height requirements exist); (ii) minimum of 15,000 square feet per floor;
(iii) steel frame construction; (iv) central, interior lobby; and (v) access to suites
shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central
business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be
accessed from the street to provide entrances/ exits for commercial uses within the
building.
B. "Class `B' Office" means an office building that is typically characterized by
high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology
for voice and data, on site support services/maintenance, and often includes full
service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to a bank, restaurant/office coffee
shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum
3
requirements of an office building classified as Class `B" Office shall be as
follows: (i) minimum of two stories; (ii) minimum of 20,000 square feet per
floor; (iii) steel frame, concrete or masonry shell construction; (iv) central,
interior lobby; and (v) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the
building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which
case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/exits for
commercial uses within the building.
C. "Development Project" or "Project" means any project undertaken for the
purpose of development including the issuance of a permit for construction.
D. "Gross Acreage" means the total property area as shown on a land division map
of record, or described through a recorded legal description of the property. This
area shall be bounded by road rights of way and property lines.
E. "Habitable Structure" means any structure or part thereof where persons reside,
congregate or work and which is legally occupied in whole or part in accordance
with applicable building codes, and state and local laws.
F. "Industrial Project" means any development project that proposes any industrial
or manufacturing use allowed in the following zoning classifications: M -L, M -C,
M -IP, 0, M, SP or SPA with one of the aforementioned zones used as the base
zone.
G. "Low Income Residential Housing" means residential units in publicly
subsidized projects constructed as housing for low-income households as such
households are defined pursuant to section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety
Code. "Publicly subsidized projects," as the term is used herein, shall not include
any project or project applicant receiving a tax credit provided by the State of
California Franchise Tax Board.
H. "Multi Family Residential Unit" means a development project that has a density
of greater than eight (8) residential dwelling units per gross acre.
I. "Non -Residential Unit" means retail commercial, service commercial and
industrial development which is designed primarily for non -dwelling use, but
shall include hotels and motels.
J. "Recognized Financing District" means a Financing District as defined in the
TUMF Administrative Plan as may be amended from time to time.
K. "Residential Dwelling Unit" means a building or portion thereof used by one (1)
family and containing but one (1) kitchen, which is designed primarily for
residential occupancy including single-family and multi -family dwellings.
"Residential Dwelling Unit" shall not include hotels or motels.
4
L. "Retail Commercial Project" means any development project that proposes any
commercial use not defined as a service commercial project allowed in the
following classifications: C -HS, C -N, C -G, M -C, C -C, 0, SPA or SP with one of
the aforementioned zones used as the base zone..
M. "Service Commercial Project" means any development project that is
predominately dedicated to business activities associated with professional or
administrative services, and typically consist of corporate offices, financial
institutions, legal and medical offices.
N. "Single Family Residential Unit" means each residential dwelling unit in a
development that has a density of 8 units to the gross acre or less.
Section 4: Establishment of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
A. Adoption.
The schedule of fees shall be adopted by resolution ("Resolution").
B. Fee Calculation. The fees shall be calculated according to the calculation
methodology set forth in the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from
time to time. The following shall be observed for purposes of calculating the fee:
For non-residential projects, the fee rate utilized shall be based upon the
predominate use of the building or structure identified in the building
permit or structure identified in the building permit and as further
specified in the TUMF Administrative Plan.
ii. For non-residential projects, the fee shall be calculated on the total square
footage of the building or structure identified in the building permit and as
further specified in the TUMF Administrative Plan.
C. Fee Adjustment. The fee schedule may be periodically reviewed and the amounts
adjusted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. By amendment to the Resolution, the fees may be
increased or decreased to reflect changes in actual and estimated costs of the Regional System
including, but not limited to, debt service, lease payments and construction costs. The adjustment of
the fees may also reflect changes in the facilities required to be constructed, in estimated revenues
received pursuant to this Ordinance, as well as the availability or lack thereof of other funds with
which to construct the Regional System. WRCOG shall review the TUMF program no less than
every four (4) years after the effective date of this Ordinance.
D. Purpose. The purpose of the TUMF is to fund those certain improvements to the
Regional System depicted on Exhibit "A" and identified in the Nexus Study, Exhibit "B".
E. Applicability. The TUMF shall apply to all new development within the City
unless otherwise exempt hereunder.
5
F. Exemptions. The following new development shall be exempt from the TUMF:
i. Low income residential housing.
ii.
Government/public buildings, public schools and public facilities.
iii. The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any habitable structure in use
on or after January 1, 2000 provided that the same or fewer traffic trips are
generated as a result thereof.
iv. Development Projects which are the subject of a Public Facilities
Development Agreement entered into pursuant to Government Code,
Section 65864 et seq. prior to the effective date of this, wherein the
imposition of new fees are expressly prohibited provided that if the term
of such a Development Agreement is extended by amendment or by any
other manner after the effective date of this Ordinance; the TUMF shall be
imposed.
v. Guest Dwellings.
vi. Additional single family residential units located on the same parcel
pursuant to the provisions of any agricultural zoning classifications set
forth in the Municipal Code.
vii. Kennels and Catteries established in connection with an existing single
family residential.
viii. Detached Second Units.
ix. The sanctuary building of a church or other house of worship, eligible for
a property tax exemption.
x. Any nonprofit corporation or nonprofit organization offering and
conducting full-time day school at the elementary or high school level for
students between the ages of five and eighteen years.
G. Credit. Regional System improvements may be credited toward the TUMF in
accordance with the TUMF Administrative Plan and the following:
6
Regional Tier
i Arterial Credits: If a developer constructs arterial improvements identified
on the Regional System, the developer shall receive credit for all costs
associated with the arterial component based on approved unit cost
assumptions for the Regional System. WRCOG staff must pre -approve any
credit agreements that deviate from the standard WRCOG approved format.
ii Other Credits: In special circumstances, when a developer constructs off-
site improvements such as an interchange, bridge, or railroad grade separation,
credits shall be determined by WRCOG and the City in consultation with the
developer. All such credits must have prior written approval from WRCOG.
iii The amount of the development fee credit shall not exceed the maximum
amount determined by the most current unit cost assumptions for the Regional
System or actual costs, whichever is less.
Local Tier
i The local jurisdictions shall compare facilities in local fee programs against
the Regional System and eliminate any overlap in its local fee program except
where there is a Recognized Financing District has been established.
ii If there is a Recognized Financing District established, the local agency may
credit that portion of the facility identified in both programs against the
TUMF in accordance with the TUMF Administrative Plan.
Section 5: Reimbursements
Should the developer construct Regional System improvements in excess of the TUMF
fee obligation, the developer may be reimbursed based on actual costs or the approved unit cost
assumptions, whichever is less. Reimbursements shall be enacted through a three party
agreement including the developer, WRCOG, and the City, contingent on funds being available.
In all cases, however, reimbursements under such special agreements must coincide with
construction of the transportation improvements as scheduled in the five-year Capital
Improvements Program adopted annually by WRCOG.
Section 6: Procedures for the Levy, Collection and Disposition of Fees
A. Authority of the Building Department. The Director of Building & Safety, or
his/her designee, is hereby authorized to levy and collect the TUMF and make all determinations
required by this Ordinance.
B. Payment. Payment of the fees shall be as follows:
i. The fees shall be paid at the time a certificate of occupancy is issued for the
Development Project or upon final inspection, whichever come first (the
"Payment Date"). However this section should not be construed to prevent
7
payment of the Fees prior to issuance of an occupancy permit or final
inspection. Fees may be paid at the time application is made for a building
permit, and the fee payment shall be calculated based on the fee in effect at
that time, provided the developer tenders the full amount of his/her TUMF
obligation. If the developer makes only a partial payment prior to the
Payment Date, the amount of the fee due shall be based on the TUMF fee
schedule in place on the Payment Date. The fees shall be calculated
according to fee schedule set forth in the Resolution and the calculation
methodology set forth in the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14,
2003, as amended from time to time.
ii. The fees required to be paid shall be the fee amounts in effect at the time of
payment is due under this Ordinance, not the date the Ordinance is initially
adopted. The City shall not enter into a development agreement which
freezes future adjustments of the TUMF.
iii. If all or part of any development project is sold prior to payment of the fee,
the property shall continue to be subject to the requirement for payment of
the fee, accordingly, the fees shall run with the land.
iv. Fees shall not be waived.
C. Disposition of Fees. All fees collected hereunder shall be transmitted to the
Executive Director of WRCOG within thirty days for deposit, investment, accounting and
expenditure in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and the Mitigation Fee Act.
D. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed with WRCOG in accordance with the provisions
of the TUMF Administrative Plan. Appealable issues shall be the application of the fee,
application of credits, application of reimbursement, application of the legal action stay and
application of exemption.
E. Reports to WRCOG. The Director of Building and Safety, or his/her designee,
shall prepare and deliver to the Executive Director of WRCOG, periodic reports as will be
established under Section 7 of this Ordinance.
Section 7: Appointment of the TUMF Administrator
WRCOG is hereby appointed as the Administrator of the Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee Program. WRCOG is hereby authorized to receive all fees generated from the
TUMF within the City, and to invest, account for and expend such fees in accordance with the
provisions of this Ordinance and the Mitigation Fee Act. The detailed administrative procedures
concerning the implementation of this Ordnance shall be contained in the TUMF Administrative
Plan adopted May 5, 2003 and as may be amended from time to time. Furthermore, the TUMF
Administrator shall use the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from
time to time, for the purpose of calculating a developer's TUMF obligation. In addition to
detailing the methodology for calculating all TUMF obligations of different categories of new
8
development, the purpose of the Fee Calculation Handbook is to clarify for the TUMF
Administrator, where necessary, the definition and calculation methodology for uses not clearly
defined in the respective TUMF ordinances.
WRCOG shall expend only that amount of the funds generated from the TUMF for staff
support, audit, administrative expenses, and contract services that are necessary and reasonable
to carry out its responsibilities and in no case shall the funds expended for salaries and benefits
exceed one percent (1%) of the annual net amount of revenue raised by the TUMF. The TUMF
Administrative Plan further outlines the fiscal responsibilities and limitations of the
Administrator.
Section 8: Severability
If any one or more of the terms, provisions or sections of this Ordinance shall to any
extent be judged invalid, unenforceable and/or voidable for any reason whatsoever by a court of
competent jurisdiction, then each and all of the remaining terms, provisions and sections of this
Ordinance shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable.
Section 9: Judicial Review
In accordance with State law, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set
aside, void or annul this Ordinance shall be commenced within 90 days of the date of adoption of
this Ordinance.
Section 10: Ordinance No. 839 and Ordinance No. 875
This Ordinance supersedes the provisions of Ordinance No. 839 and Ordinance No. 875,
provided this Ordinance is not declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction. If, for whatever reason, this Ordinance is declared invalid or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction, Ordinance No. 839 and Ordinance No. 875, and all other related
ordinances, resolution, and polices shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 11: Effective Date
This Ordinance shall become effective July 3, 2006.
MOVED AND PASSED upon first reading this 18th day of April , 2006 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Fox, Council Members Berg, Dressel, and Killough.
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: Council Member DeForge
9
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of May , 2006 by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Fox, Council Members DeForge, Dressel, Berg, and Killough
NOES: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Cler
46r of he City . Bea ont
CERTIFICATION
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Ordinance No. 894 duly introduced
at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 18 , 2006, and was duly
adopted upon a second reading on May 2 , 2006 , y the roll call ► tes indicated
therein.
Deputy City Cle , City of Bea 'ont
10