Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutSeptember 29, 2008 - Prepared the attached Objections, Recommendations and Comments ReportSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" CHARLIE GRIST THOMAS G. PELHAM Govemor Secretary September 29, 2008 Honorable Robert L. Vernon Mayor, Village of Key Biscayne 88 West McIntyre Street Key Biscayne, Florida 33149 Dear Mayor Vernon: The Department of Community Affairs has completed its review of the Village of Key Biscayne proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (DCA No. 08-PEFE 1), which was received on July 30, 2008. Copies of the proposed amendment have been distributed to appropriate state, regional, and local agencies for their review and their comments are enclosed. The Department reviewed the comprehensive plan amendment for consistency with Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and prepared the attached Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report which outlines our findings concerning the comprehensive plan amendment. The Department identified three objections and two comments, as identified in the attached report. My staff and I are available to assist the Village in addressing the issues identified in our report. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Pable, AICP, at (850) 922-1781. )7)/ MM/bp ad.. --t 1. -4. - Mike McDaniel, Chief Office of Comprehensive Planning Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report Review Agency Comments f cc: Mr. Genaro Iglesias, Village Manager Mr. Chad S. Friedman, Weiss, Serota, Heitman, Pastoriza, Cole, & Boniske, P.L. Ms. Carolyn A. Dekle Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100 850-488-8466 (p) • 850-921-0781 (f) • Website: www dca state fl us ♦ COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488-2356 (p) 850-488-3309 (f) • • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 850-488-7956 (p) 850-922-5623 (0 • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT FOR VILLAGE OF KEY BISCAYNE AMENDMENT 08-PEFE1 September 29, 2008 Division of Community Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-11.010, F.A.C. INTRODUCTION The following Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report is based upon the Department's review of the Village of Key Biscayne 08-PEFE1 proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to §163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Any objections discussed relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J- 5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Each objection includes a recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the extemal agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. Each objection must be addressed by the Village and corrected prior to the amendment being resubmitted for the Department's compliance review. Objections that are not addressed may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items, which the local government may consider not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying the local government's non -applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non -applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments that follow the objections and recommendations section are advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by the Department's reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations, and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. 2 TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this letter, the Village of Key Biscayne has 60 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine that the Village will not adopt the proposed amendment. The process for adoption of local government comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, F. S., and Rule 9J-11.011, F.A.C. The Village must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163.3189(2)(a), F.S. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the Village must submit the following to the Department: 1. Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments; 2. A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; 3. A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and 4. A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendments, and pursuant to Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c), F.S., requires the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local governments plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information to the Department. Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event there are no citizens requesting this information, please inform us of this as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. 3 Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report for Village of Key Biscayne Amendment 08-REFEi. September 29, 2008 I. Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. The Department has completed its review of the proposed Village of Key Biscayne Amendment 08-PEFE1 and has the following objections and comments. Objection: The amendment does not meet all of the requirements in Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., for an educational facilities element. The proposed educational facilities element does not contain all of the objectives and policies required to be in an educational facilities element, pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The shortcomings are detailed below, with the particular statutory and administrative rule citations. 1. The proposed educational facilities element does not meet the requirement that it contain a policy which requires the adoption of annual plan amendments adding a new fifth year, updating the financially feasible public schools capital facilities program, coordinating the program with the 5 -year district facilities work plan, the plans for other local governments, and, as necessary, updates to the concurrency service area map. The annual plan amendments shall ensure that the capital improvements program continues to be financially feasible and that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained. Citation: Rule 9J-5.025 (3)(c)(2), F.A.C., and Section 163.3177(12)(g)(1), F.S. Recommendation: The Village's Policy 2F provides an outdated version of this policy. The Village should delete the existing Policy 2F and replace it with the following version of the policy to be consistent with other Miami -Dade County municipality school elements: "Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Miami -Dade County Public schools 5 -Year District Facilities Work Program, developed by Miami -Dade Public Schools and adopted by the Miami -Dade County School Board on September 5, 2007, is incorporated by reference into the City's Capital Improvement Plan, as applicable. The Village of Key Biscayne shall coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public Schools to annually update its Facilities Work Program and/or concurrency service area maps to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5 -year and long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard will continue to be achieved and maintained. The Village of Key Biscayne, through its annual updates of the 5 -year Capital Improvements Element and Program, will incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities 4 Work Program for educational facilities. The Village of Key Biscayne, Miami -Dade County Public Schools, and other local governments will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment process, and during updates to the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. The Miami - Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period." 2. Level of service standards are not fully included and adopted into the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the local comprehensive plan and applied district -wide to all schools of the same type. Citation: Section 163.3180(13)(b)(2), F.S. Recommendation: The amendments to CIE Policies 1.1.6 and 1.2.1 contain almost all of the text in the version adopted in other communities. However, the following text should be appended to the end of CIE Policy 1.2.1: "No credit against the impact of development shall be given for either magnet or charter schools if their enrollment is at, or above, 100% FISH capacity." 3. The CIE does not fully set forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities program, established in conjunction with the school board that demonstrates that the adopted level of service standards will be achieved and maintained. Citation: Section 163.3180(13)(d)(1), F.S. Recommendation: CIE Policy 1.5.6 directly incorporates the School Board's five year schedule by reference. However, CIE Policy 1.5.4 states the following: "The capital improvements associated with the construction of educational facilities are not addressed in the Village's Capital Improvements Plan, but rather are the responsibility of the Miami -Dade County Public Schools. To address financial feasibility associated with public school concurrency, the Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program for educational facilities will be incorporated by reference into the Capital Improvements Element." The underlined portion of this policy is not accurate. The City should either delete the policy, or rewrite it as follows: "The capital improvements associated with the construction of educational facilities are the responsibility of the Miami -Dade County Public Schools. To address financial feasibility associated with public school concurrency, the Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program for educational facilities will be incorporated by reference into the Capital Improvements Element." Comments: 1. The cover letter for the amendment notes that "In support of the proposed comprehensive plan amendments, the Village is opting to rely upon the data and analysis provided by 5 Miami -Dade County in their document entitled Supporting Data and Analysis for the Special Application Requesting Amendments to Miami -Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan Addressing Public Schools, Dated July 3, 2007." The citation to this document is almost correct. The City should delete "...Schools, Dated July 3, 2007' from the end of the reference, and replace it with the following: "School Facilities, dated July 3, 2007, as prepared by the Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, and as supplemented in October 2007 to include the Miami -Dade School Board's adopted 2007-08 through 2011-12 District Facilities Work Plan." 2. The Village is reminded that the adopted Interlocal Agreement should be resubmitted with the adopted Public Education Facilities Element. II. Consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan The above cited amendments do not further and are not consistent with the following goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.): • Urban and Downtown Revitalization Goal (16), Policy 8 • Public Facilities Goal (17), Policies 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 • Plan Implementation (25), Policy 7 Revise the amendment to be consistent with and further the referenced goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. This may be accomplished by revising the amendment as recommended for the specific objections above. 6 South Florida Regional Planning Council MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6a DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: STAFF SUBJECT: PROPOSED PUBLIC EDUCATION FACILITIES ELEMENT/ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT UPDATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Introduction Council staff has received proposed plan amendments from the municipalities Key Biscayne d West Park to amend their Comprehensive Plans to include a new Public Education Faci ities ement and associated text amendments for review of consistency with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida (SRPP). Staff review is undertaken pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rules 9J-5 and 9J- 11, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). No proposed Capital Improvements Element Update Comprehensive Plan Amendments were received for review this month. Background The proposed Public Education Facilities Element and related text amendments have been transmitted pursuant to the 2005 Growth Management legislation. The legislation requires that local governments and school boards adopt a school concurrency program, to update existing public schools interlocal agreements, establish level of service standards to define school capacity, and adopt a Public School Facilities Element into their comprehensive plan to implement a school concurrency program. The school concurrency program must ensure that adequate school capacity to support new development either exists or will be in place or under actual construction within three years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval, or the functional equivalent. The interlocal agreement establishes procedures that will be followed in coordinating land use and public school planning. Since the legislation was passed, working groups have been formed in both Miami -Dade and Broward Counties to develop the proposed amendments. Each working group included representatives from the applicable County Public Schools, all affected local governments and the development community. Because of the efforts of the Working Groups, within each county the amendments have been coordinated and each local government is adopting similar amendments. 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021 Broward (954) 985-4416, Area Codes 305, 407 and 561 (800) 985-4416 FAX (954) 985-4417, e-mail sfadmin©sfrpc.com Summary of Staff Analysis for Miami -Dade County Amendments Miami -Dade County and the 27 non-exempt municipalities in the County must adopt the Public Education Facilities Element, related comprehensive plan text amendments and the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning in Miami -Dade Counhj (ILA) by January 1, 2008, in order to meet statutory requirements. Proposed Public Educational Facilities Element amendments would add new goals, objectives, and supporting policies to coordinate new residential development with future availability of public school facilities consistent with the adopted level of service (LOS) standards for public school concurrency. The initially proposed LOS standard for public school facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity beginning January 1, 2008. This standard would allow for the use of relocatable classrooms and provides that when public school facilities achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (no relocatable classrooms) they should no longer rely on relocatable classrooms except in temporary "operational" situations such as remodeling, renovation or expansion of a facility. The proposed amendments would include an additional policy, which establishes a goal of achieving 100% Permanent FISH capacity in all public school facilities in the County by January 1, 2018. Proposed amendments to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element would provide a formal process for intergovernmental coordination through an Interlocal Agreement which establishes specific coordination activities to occur on a regular basis. Proposed Capital Improvement Element amendments would allow the applicable local government to prepare and adopt a five year capital improvements program that includes school facilities. This month the Village of Key Biscayne is the only local government in Miami -Dade County proposing a Public Education Facilities Element and related text amendments. A table with information regarding the municipality's vote on the amendment follows. Local Government . Plan Amendment Number Local Government Meeting Governing Body Transmittal Vote Key Biscayne #08-PEFE1 7/8/08 Unanimous Staff analysis confirms that the proposed text amendments are compatible with and supportive of the goals and policies of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida. Summary of Staff Analysis for Broward County Amendments Broward County and the municipalities in the County must adopt the Public Education Facilities Element, related comprehensive plan text amendments and Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning in Broward Counhj (ILA) by February 1, 2008. Proposed Public Educational Facilities Element amendments would add new goals, objectives and supporting policies to provide coordinating new residential development with future availability of public school facilities consistent with the adopted level of service (LOS) standards for public school concurrency. The LOS standard shall be 110% of the Florida Inventory of School Housing (FISH) capacity for each public elementary, middle and high school. The amendment would also adopt twelve Future Conditions Maps for public school facilities for the short-term (five-year) and long-term planning periods. Proposed amendments to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element would add policies which would coordinate County and municipal land use planning and permitting processes with the School Board's site selection and planning process to ensure future school facilities are consistent and compatible with land use categories and enable a close integration between existing and planned school facilities and the surrounding land uses. Proposed Capital Improvement Element amendments would add policies that would ensure that public school facilities are available for current and future students consistent with available financial resources and the adopted LOS_ This month West Park is the only local government in Broward County proposing a Public Education Facilities Element and related text amendments. A table with information regarding the municipality's vote on the amendment follows. Local Government Plan Amendment , Number - Local Government " Meeting r Governing Body Transmittal Vote West Park #08-PEFE1 8/6/08 Unanimous Staff analysis confirms that the proposed text amendments are compatible with and supportive of the goals and policies of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida. Recommendation Find proposed plan amendments from the municipalities of Key Biscayne and West Park related to the new Public Education Facilities Element and associated text amendments generally consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida. Approve this staff report for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. 3 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT September 4, 2008 Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: 1 739 CEP 1 .1 2008 r Subject: Village of Key Biscayne, DCA #08-PEFE1 SFWMD Comments on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments The South Florida Water Management District has completed its review of the Village of Key Biscayne's (Village) proposed amendments and there appear to be no significant water resource related impacts. Therefore, we forward no recommended comments for inclusion in your review comments to the City. We look forward to collaborating with the Village, their water supplier, and the Department of Community Affairs on developing sound, sustainable solutions to meet the Village's future water needs. For assistance or additional information, please ct John Mulliken at (561) 682-6649 or jmullsAsfwmd.gov. S' Chip , = rriam Dep Executive Director Water Resources c: Marjorie Craig, SFWMD Bob Dennis, DCA Chad Friedman, Esquire Rachel Kalin, SFRPC John Mulliken, SFWMD (;un ( i�,i� 1:, .�.1 Wk. -4 1'a1m i��'.i.h, 1 l,,ri,la • (;hl) t,!sb• Si11) • 1 1.'\,11 L., 1-`•tNl-•4 'I)-45 1'0. Rat ,_h,tii), ‘1'< 1`,11m 13,.ich, FI. ;1411,-4t ,ti) • t, ., w,Itt m,1 ;gut M IrrA M I -DAD Carlos Alvarez, Mayor Mr. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: August 29, 2008 Planning and Zoning 111 NW 1st Street • Suite 1210 Miami, Florida 33128-1902 T 305-375-2800 miamidade.gov el) y '�A.. atir• .ham .,EP _ zoo '''"&I. .. w 8 lr1 1 , 4. 4 1'x : ' . Proposed Amendments to the Village of Key Biscayne Comprehensive Plan rega o .2 Public School Facilities -411412,64 Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Department of Planning and Zoning (Department) has reviewed the Village of Key Biscayne's (Village) proposed amendments to their comprehensive plan as transmitted to us on August 11, 2008. Our review is conducted to identify points of consistency or inconsistency with provisions of Miami -Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). The Department finds that the Village's proposed amendments are generally consistent with the County's amendments to the CDMP for Public School Facilities adopted on July 1, 2008. If you have any questions, please contact Mark Woemer, Chief, Metropolitan Planning at 305- 375-2835. Sincerely, arc C. LaFerrier, AICP Director, Department of Planning & Zoning MCLF:SB:PHC:AH September 4, 2008 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and DRI Processing Team Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: Key Biscayne 08-PEFE I Dear Mr. Eubanks: _1,EdoN /( /j/) fwoi On behalf of the Department of Environmental Protection, the Office of Intergovernmental Programs has reviewed the comprehensive plan amendments in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. As required by law, the scope of our comments and recommendations is limited to the environmental suitability of the proposed changes in light of the Department's regulatory and proprietary responsibilities. Based on our review of the report, the Department has found no provision that requires comment, recommendation or objection under the laws that form the basis of the Department's jurisdiction and authority. If the report pertains to changes in the future land use map or supporting text, please be advised that at such time as specific lands are proposed for development, the Department will review the proposal to ensure compliance with environmental rules and regulations in effect at the time such action is proposed. In addition, any development of the subject lands will have to comply with local ordinances, other comprehensive plan requirements and restrictions, and applicable rules and regulations of other state and regional agencies. Thank you for the opportunity to continent on this proposal. If I may be of further assistance. please call me at (850) 245-2169. Sincerely. addi Christopher J. Stahl En% ironmental Specialist Office of Intergovernmental Programs CJS/ Florida Department of Transportation ( 11 SRI IE ('RISr (:{N I R\()R DISTRICT SIX Office of the Director of Transportation Development 1 000 NW 1 11 ' Avenue Miami, Florida 33172-5800 (305) 470-5464 August 14, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 S FFPIIA\IF: C. KOPF:I_Ut SOS SF:('RE'r %Rt' Subj: Village of Key Biscayne Comprehensive Plan Amendment 08-PEFE1 Dear Mr. Eubanks: In accordance with your request, and the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, this office has completed a review of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Village of Key Biscayne. No additional impacts to the Florida Intrastate Highway System facilities are anticipated to result from these amendments. Therefore, the District has no specific objections or recommendations at this time. Please contact Phil Steinmiller at 305-470-5825, if you have any questions concerning our response. Cc: Aileen Boucle, AICP Phil Steinmiller Sincerely, A(ze. Alice N. Bravo, P.E. District Director of Transportation Development w\ +N .dut..tate. t1. us Carlos Alvarez, Mayor August 29, 2008 At. Ray Eubanks. Administrator Plan Review and Processing Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallalhasses, Florida 32399-2100 Planning and Zoning 111 NW 1st Street• Suite 1210 Miami, Florida 33128-1902 T 305-375-2800 RE: Proposed Amendments to the Village of Key Biscayne Comprehensive Plan regarding Public School Facilities pC) i=tr 1 Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Department of Planning and Zoning (Department) has reviewed the Village of Key Biscayns's (Village) primed amendments to their comprehensive plan as transmitted to us an August 11, 2005. Our review is conducted to idend y points of consistency or inconsistency with provisions of Miami -rude County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). The Department finds that the Village's proposed amendments are generally consistent with the County's amendments to the COMP for Pubic School Fadlltles adopted on July 1, 2008. If you have any questions, please contact Mark Woemsr, Chief, Metropolitan Plenning at 306- 375.2835. MCLF:SB:PHC:AH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S. Browning Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES August 21, 2008 Mr. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Key Biscayne (08PEFE1) Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Miami -Dade County) Dear Mr. Eubanks: According to this agency's responsibilities under Sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document to determine if data regarding historic resources have been given sufficient consideration in the request to amend the Key Biscayne Comprehensive Plan. We reviewed the proposed Public School Facilities Element and associated text changes to other plan elements to consider the potential effects of these actions on historic resources. Our cursory review indicates that historic resource concerns are not addressed. Nevertheless, should there be any school buildings fifty years of age or older, they should be considered for rehabilitation and adaptive reuse. Thus, while the proposed changes may have no adverse effects on historic resources, it is the village's responsibility to ensure that the proposed revisions will not have an adverse effect on significant archaeological or historic resources in Key Biscayne. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp of the Division's Compliance Review staff at (850) 245-6333. Sincerely, Frederick P. Gaske, Director sec: Mr. Bob Dennis 500 S. Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • http://www.flheritage.com !7 Directors Office t7 Archaeological Research kti50) 243-6300 • FAX: 245-6436 Historic Preservation (850) 245.6444 • FAX: 245-6452 (S50) 245-63:3 • FAX: 24x6437