Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20180820-PC PACKET.pdfPLANNING COMMISSION Demery Bishop Ron Bossick Marianne Bramble Tina Gann Charles Matlock David McNaughton Alan Robertson A. Call to order: CITY MANAGER Shawn Gillen COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR George Shaw Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA August 20, 2018 — 7:00 p.m. For City Council Meeting September 13, 2018 — 7: 00 p.m. B. Consideration of Minutes: 1. Minutes of July 16, 2018 2. Minutes of July 26, 2018 C. Disclosures/Recusals: D. Old Business: E. New Business: CITY ATTORNEY Edward M. Hughes Zoning Variance: Consideration of setback encroachments for new single-family dwelling — 4 Wilson Avenue — 4-0002-03-024 — Herman Lee Allred. 2. Zoning Variance: Consideration of setback encroachments for new single-family dwelling — 9 Naylor Avenue — 4-0002-03-012 — Carmela Aliffi & Jane Fishman. 3. Site Plan Approval: Modify site for an office and parking spaces — 3 Old Hwy 80 — 4-0024- 02-001 — Shannon Hollar (Cruises to Nowhere LLC.) F. Standing Agenda Item: MPIC Update Adjournment: Lisa L. Schaaf Individuals with disabilities who require certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting, or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the facilities are required to contact Jan LeViner at 912.472.5080 promptly to allow the City to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. PLANNING COMMISSION Demery Bishop Ron Bossick Marianne Bramble Tina Gann Charles Matlock David McNaughton Alan Robertson CITY MANAGER Shawn Gillen COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR George Shaw Planning Commission Meeting MINUTES July 16, 2018 CITY ATTORNEY Edward M. Hughes Chair Bishop called the July 16, 2018 Tybee Island Planning Commission meeting to order. Commissioners present were Charles Matlock, Marianne Bramble, Alan Robertson, Tina Gann and David McNaughton. Vice Chair Bossick was not present. Consideration of Minutes: Chair Bishop asked for consideration of the June 18, 2018 meeting minutes. Alan Robertson made a motion to approve. Tina Gann seconded. The vote to approve was unanimous. Disclosures/Recusals: Chair Bishop asked if there were any disclosures or recusals. There were none. Old Business: Chair Bishop asked if there was any old business. There was none. New Business: Zoning Variance: Sec.3-090.1(D)(2), Sec.3-190(B) and Sec.3-190(E). For the placement of a swimming pool and decks alone south side of residence partially within the marsh buffer. -21 Teresa Ln. -4-0022-01-372 — Barry Weiner. Mr. Shaw approached the Planning Commission and stated that the petitioner is requesting the addition of a pool and pool decking to encroach the marsh buffer. The pool itself would be on an existing impervious driveway and the decking would encroach further into the marsh within a few feet, which is supported by a bulkhead. The decking is to be pervious; it most likely would kill any vegetation underneath and take away the filtration benefit of the buffer, which is why it is there. There is also the fact that the pool's chlorination might affect the marsh and there is another issue with our ordinance stating no pools in the front yard. Staff recommends denial of this addition. Chair Bishop asked if the deck would extend further than the existing bulkhead. Mr. Shaw stated it would stop just shy of the bulkhead but further than the existing driveway. John Deering approached the Planning Commission and stated he is with Greenline Architecture and is representing the petitioner. He stated that this house was built in two parts; the eastern part was around 1989 or 1990. The addition was built around 1994 or 1995. He also stated the original house does encroach within the marsh buffer and the concrete driveway has been disturbed by hurricanes and construction. The proposal is to put the pool within the already paved driveway area and then create the wood deck further into the marsh buffer. The other option would be to eliminate the deck and just add the pool in the already encroached area. David McNaughton asked which side is the front of the house. Mr. Deering stated the Wieners were told the riverside is the front but he is not sure and this area is about the only place to put a pool. Dottie HIutz approached the Planning Commission and stated she lives on Officers Row. She stated that Tybee needs to pay more attention to the amount of marsh buffer approvals to keep the island safer. Tina Gann made a motion to deny. Marianne Bramble seconded. Vote to deny was unanimous. 5-0 Site Plan Approval with Variance: Tear down existing structure on property and rebuild new structure. Three foot front variance -19 Silver Ave. — 4-0008-06-015 — Walter Freeman. Mr. Shaw approached the Planning Commission and stated the property is a stand-alone parcel with a couple of small outbuildings. At some point, this parcel was part of the Atlantis Inn across the street and at some time, it was separated. The petitioner would like to use this location as a private pool for guests of his vacation rental business. This would not be a public pool. The variance is to have buildings within the setback. Staff recommends denial. Tina Gann asked if there are parking requirements for this property. Mr. Shaw stated that since the use is not changing there would not be any additional parking. Alan Robertson stated he only has a hand drawing not an actual site survey, so he is not sure what the petitioner is asking for. Mr. Shaw stated the applicant could not get a survey done in time for this meeting. Mr. Freeman approached the Planning Commission and stated he lives at 129 Lewis Avenue, and he is the owner of 19 Silver Ave. He stated that the pool would be redone to be up to code and dress it up as much as possible to fix the drainage. He would also like to build a structure that is the size of what is there now for restrooms and an office. He also stated he could not get a surveyor to have something ready for about three to six weeks. Tina Gann asked if they would have to get an additional business license to operate this site and how will it be regulated for people. Mr. Shaw stated the number part would be up to the Fire Marshall and the business entity would have to have a business license. David McNaughton made a motion to continue until required documents for site plan are included. Alan Robertson seconded. Vote was unanimous to continue, 5-0. Text Amendment to Land Development code: Sec. 4-050 Zoning Districts (0) South End Business Overlay District. Mr. Shaw approached the Planning Commission and stated approximately four or five months ago, City Council passed a resolution to put a moratorium on demolition of historic structures within the South End Overlay District. During that, time staff with an ad hoc comity, with the assistance of a consultant, was tasked to come up with some design guidelines to help preserve structures and improve future additions to existing. Staff approves. Rebecca Fenwick approached the Commission and stated she is a historic preservationist with Lominack, Kolman, Smith Architects in Savannah. Ms. Fenwick stated they gathered information from the community as well as the public and came up with the draft presented. She explained how this would promote the welfare and vitality of the city original main commercial area. Alan Robertson stated this proposed ordinance needs more work to conform with the Land Development Code. Ms. Fenwick stated that the two advisory groups are comfortable with this as well as Mr. Shaw. Charles Matlock stated he thinks this ordinance is very restrictive and does not need to be. David McNaughton stated there are sections that are not clear and need to be fixed before it goes to City Council. Mr. Shaw stated that there is an issue with the variance guideline and the setbacks that needs to be explained better and continuing this would be a good idea. That way we can get feedback from planning commissioners and make the necessary changes. Dottie Klutz approached the Planning Commission and stated that this is a wonderful ordinance and she hopes that the Planning Commission does not deny. Jan Will approached the Planning Commission and stated she is a resident of Tybee and she owns two historic homes. She stated that Tybee is unique and she would like to help keep it that way through this ordinance. Jay Altman approached the Planning Commission and stated he lives at 167 Lewis Avenue. He stated that he has been restoring historic homes for a long time and is very impressed with Tybee's look and would like to keep that look through this guideline. Alan Robertson made a motion to continue action on the proposed text amendment to the Tybee Island code of ordinances until represented by zoning and planning indicative that the same is conforming to the Land Development Code with respect to all applicable previsions. Charles Matlock seconded. Voting in favor were Alan Robertson, Charles Matlock and David McNaughton. Voting against were Tina Gann and Marianne Bramble. Motion to continue carried, 3-2. Standing Agenda Item: Chair Bishop asked if there were any standing agenda items. Commissioner Robertson stated there was none for this meeting. Commissioner Gann made a motion to Adjourn. Commissioner Matlock seconded. The vote was unanimous. Meeting adjourned 9:00pm. Lisa L. Schaaf PLANNING COMMISSION Demery Bishop Ron Bossick Marianne Bramble Tina Gann Charles Matlock David McNaughton Alan Robertson CITY MANAGER Shawn Gillen COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR George Shaw Planning Commission Special Meeting MINUTES July 26, 2018 CITY ATTORNEY Edward M. Hughes Chair Bishop called the July 26, 2018 Tybee Island Planning Commission meeting to order. Commissioners present were Charles Matlock, Marianne Bramble and David McNaughton. Old Business: Text Amendment to Land Development code: Sec. 4-050 Zoning Districts (0) South End Business Overlay District. Chair Bishop started the planning commission meeting and stated this petition was on the July 16 Planning Commission agenda and was voted to be continued for answers to questions raised at that meeting. Since then questions have been answered and they are in front of the Commission tonight to look over. David McNaughton asked why City Council wants to get to this by August 9. Is there a deadline involved? Chair Bishop stated there is a moratorium that terminates in September and the consulting firm that is involved has a period on which they are under contract and will expire soon. Chair Bishop read Commissioner Ron Bossick's comments aloud. Sarah Ward approached the Planning Commission and stated she is the principle for Ward Architecture and Preservation. Sarah Ward stated they are excited to help Tybee Island with this text amendment. Rebecca Fenwick approached the Planning Commission and stated changes were made to the text amendment based on the comments from the July 16 meeting, and this is what is before them. She also stated they decided to add the definitions into the text as opposed to going into the general definitions list as part of the code. She stated if there are conflicts with variances and setbacks the stricter standard will govern. She also stated there would be a phase after this that will be an illustrated guide with sketches and examples. Sarah Ward stated there could also be some workshops with the public to help make this more user friendly. Vickie Hammons approached the Planning Commission and stated she is the vice Chair of the Tybee Island Main street and Development authority. She stated that this is very crucial to this area and hopes it will be approved. David McNaughton made a motion to approve. Marianne Bramble seconded. Voting in favor were David McNaughton and Marianne Bramble. Voting against was Charles Matlock. Motion to approve carried, 2-1. Marianne Bramble made a motion to Adjourn. Charles Matlock seconded. The vote was unanimous. Meeting adjourned 5:30pm. Lisa L. Schaaf STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: August 20, 2018 g CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 13, 2018 LOCATION: 4 Wilson Ave. PIN: 4-0002-03-012 APPLICANT: Herman Lee Allred OWNER: Same EXISTING USE: Vacant lot PROPOSED USE: Single-family dwelling ZONING: R -1B USE PERMITTED BY RIGHT: Yes COMMUNITY CHARACTER MAP: Ft. Screven Historic District APPLICATION: Zoning Variance (5-090) from Section 3-090 (Schedule of Development Regulations). PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting setback variances for construction on a vacant, substandard R-113 lot of record in an effort to save existing large trees. ANALYSIS: The general character of the area surrounding this lot is residential. The size of this sub -standard lot is approximately 2500 square feet. The minimum lot size in the R -IB district is 6600 square feet. The requested variance does meet the "hardship" test outlined in Land Development Code Section 5-090 (A): (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions beyond that of surrounding properties, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of the lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions, or considerations related to the environment or the safety, or to historical significance, that is peculiar to the particular property; and, (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of this Land Development Code, without undue hardship to the property. The required building setbacks for lots zoned R-113 are 20 -feet front, and 10 -feet rear and sides. The applicant is requesting approval of setback variances for construction of a single family residence that would have the following approximate setbacks: a 5 -foot front yard, 8 -foot side yards, and 5 -foot rear yard. This requires variances for the front, rear and both side yard setbacks. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Ft. Screven Historic District in which it lies as follows: The Fort Screven Historic District includes Officers Row and all of Ft. Screven, which represents significant historic, cultural and natural resources. Varied uses include new, larger scale development, traditional cottages, townhomes/condominiums, public uses/parks, historic sites, narrow streets, street trees, public parking. Zoning includes R-1, R-2, R -T, R-1/NEC, P -C, and PUD. Comprehensive Plan — Community Character Area The Ft. Screven Historic District Recommended Development Strategies Meets Strategy STAFF FINDING Staff recognizes the required setbacks for a 6600 square foot lot in an R -1B district are challenging for development of this 2500 square foot lot of record. The proposed single-family dwelling is not considered detrimental to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Staff can support a variance similar to the variance requested for 9 Naylor but not a greater variance. ATTACHMENTS A. YIN or N/A 1. Establish standards and guidelines for signage N/A 2. Provide signage for landmarks and historic businesses N/A 3. Preserve and restore historic structures whenever possible N/A 4. Provide appropriate incentives for historic restoration projects N/A 5. Ensure continued preservation of old growth trees, parks, and greenspace Y 6. Support an improved bicycle and pedestrian environment with connected facilities N/A 7. Consider adoption of architectural standards for historic structures N/A 8. STAFF FINDING Staff recognizes the required setbacks for a 6600 square foot lot in an R -1B district are challenging for development of this 2500 square foot lot of record. The proposed single-family dwelling is not considered detrimental to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Staff can support a variance similar to the variance requested for 9 Naylor but not a greater variance. ATTACHMENTS A. Variance application B. Narrative C. Site Plan D. SAGIS map 0 This Staff Report was prepared by George Shaw. ��-1 Applicant's Name CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND :LONING VARIANCE APPLICATION Lee, A ZLra Fee CommercW $soo Residential $too /,S on A ve- I Address and location of subject property Lof f Sub /ot5 . Fo -f Wawa " Wl IkK l �� AL1-- , PIN 4 - c) 06 x-03 Applicant's Telephone Number T 7 9-7o3 -3 q 9 7 Applicant's Mailing Address X26 Wi I l; akm Soh Dvi ve. Alac oh &A 31 P- 10 Brief description of the land development activity and use of the land thereafter to take place on the property: TS w�� (CL co-Ff Property Owner's Name Her mon R LL r e d Telephone Number y V-703-3* 47 Property Owner's Address I E i��oyn+soh��. ��aCr r ... --. Is Applicant the Property Owne ? Yes No If Applicant is the Property Owner, Proof of Ownership is attached: Yes If Applicant is other than the Property Owner, a signed affidavit from the Property Owner granting the Applicant permission to conduc such land development is attached hereto. Yes Current Zoning of Property R - 1-B Current Use yaca h -+ La h Names and addresses of all adjacent property owners are attached: _ Yes If within two (2) years immedi hely preceding the filing of the Applicant's application for a zoning action, the Applicant has made campaign .:ontributions aggregating to more than $250 to the Mayor and any member of Council or any member of the EIianning Commission, the Applicant and the Attorney representing the Applicant must disclose the following: a. The name of the local g 3vernment official to whom the campaign contribution or gift was made; b. The dollar amount of Tach campaign contribution made by the applicant to the local government official during the two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the application for this zoning action, and the date of (lach contribution; c. An enumeration and description of each gift having a value of $250 or more made by the Applicant to the local government official during the two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the application for this zonii)g action. Disclosure of Campaign Contributions form attachment hereto; Yes lire oy,. La- a" �� �� S /i S Signature of Applicant Date Fee Amount City olfcial NOTE: Other specific data is required for each type of Variance. $ goo, - C heck um r rl `r r% Date NOTE: This application must to accompanied by additional documentation, including drawings that include or illustrate the information outlirn�d below. REFERENCE DESCRIPTIO14 5-040 (D) (1) Site plan and;or architectural rendering of the proposed development depicting the location of lot restrictions. 5-040 (D) (2) Narrative describing the hards� ip and the reason for the variance request. Explain the hardship: _Need GL L I -Ale IaY'��r F00+ PYih+ 0-�' hOtiASe -�Oy S Moat C'sw" e . 5-040 (D) (3) A survey of the property signed and stamped by a State of Georgia certified land surveyor. 5-094 (A) (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions beyond that of surrounding properties, ircluding: _>T ir-egularity; n arrowness; or, 7 -shallowness of the lot shape; or, exceptional topographical or other physical circumstances, conditions, or considerations related to the environment, or the safety, or to historical significance, that is peculiar to tha particular property; and; 5-090 (A) (2) because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot be developed ir- strict conformity with the provisions of the Land Development Code, without undue hardship to the property. NOTE: Provide attachments illustrating conditions on surrounding properties and on the sub ect property, indicating uniqueness, etc. 5-090 (B) If this varian -e application is for a Height Variance, in addition to other requirements, the petitioner shell be required to: Abd two feet to each side yard setback For each one foot above 35 feet in height, and, 1 -ave safeguards consisting of sprinkler systems, smoke detectors and other fire p ,otection equipment deemed necessary at the time by the Mayor and Council, a id, _ V'here a rear yard abuts a side yard of the adjacent lot, the petitioner shall be required to add two feet to the rear setback for each foot above 35 feet height, The Applicant certifies that hclshe has read the requirements for Variances and has provided the required information to the best of his/her ability in a truthful and honest manner, 1-4 rm'r� k-1, A -P -0. - Signature of Applicant 6/rg/i 8 Date 5-090(C) Variance longevity. After a variance has been granted by the mayor and council it shall be valid for a period of 12 months from date cf approvai. Such approval is based on information provided in the application. Building permits may only be gra nted for plans consistent with the approved application. Any deviation from the information submitted will requir separate approval by the mayor and council. CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN ZONING ACTIONS DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS Have you within the pas. two (2) years made campaign contributions or gave gifts having an aggregate value of $250.00 or more to a member of the City ofTybee Island Planning Commission, or Mayor rind Council or any local government official who will be considering the rezoning application? YES NO IF YES, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING SECTION: NAME OF CONTRIBUTIONS GIFTS DATE OF GOVERNMENT OF $250.00 OF $250.00 CONTRIBUTION OFFICIAL OR MORE OR MORE IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK CONCERNING THE ATTACHED REZONING APPLICATION, THIS FORM MUST BE FILED WITH THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FIVE (5) DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNINC COMMISSION MEETING IF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS OR GIFTS IN EXCESS OF $250.00 HAVE BEEN MADE TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR MAYOR AND COUNCIL. Signature Printed Name Date r ' ��y Searba����Cs ���a V �� R eam $ " each, S4e- F r ow, F) L& A to p rn vr+�� 1-.k v e . EXt5��%r5 e aS evnev��t s a2Q' Fr��on��r io' s; aes ' VC���%r�� w'��c���- 157 s on -Uewr Moser Design Group, Inc. 17 Market, No.2 Beaufort, SC 29906 843.379.5630 www.moserdesigngroup.com _ mag copyright 2011 A BEDR,ti' Eu ;>ity PORCH Q' 8" X 10'-4" 7' X ?C ENTRY ELEVATION BATH ; m LOFT ° UVING AREA �� 1 i' X 1" 6" 0 1.8"x15' -1 - K1ICHEN 0 7'4" X 10'-1C" �r aim Immo n 1 r o o a f ENTRE PORCf- '11-1 7w f 8X20 OZ a p y Q ^ LLIQ Y n Z uj C Q J� 3 Ll- o E i — 7uQ z o Zo a FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN ADDITIONAL IMAGES Q m CL TN H -GC -02A aka. KC69 7 TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES - GUEST COTTAGE COLLECTION S!gnincam mod!ffcalfons may be sequined 9 buNdhg in 50 mi!e radius of Beaufort. SC. The final set of construcnion document, may vary or hove been updated f.om this conceptual design. Please ccntacl MOG! . if you have ony questions. Chatham County Board of Assessors: 2018 property Record Card 4-... http://boa.chathamcounty.org/DesktopModules/C 1aathainCounty/Boar... 2018 Chatham County Board of Assessors 4-0002-03-024 Property Record Card WILSON AVE TYBEE ISLAND ;APPRAISER MWTHOMASi LOT F BEING APT OF LOT 5 FORT WARD TYBEE PRB 3P 131 PRBC -195 ALLRED HERMAN LEE; CAMA ASMT LAST INSP 01/05/2016 I 220 WILLIAMSON DR 150,200 50 200 LAND 1 APPR ZONE 000008 MACON GA 312101 BLDG 0', OBXF 0 50,200 50,200 Cost - MS SALES BOOK 1 INS VI QU RSN PRICE'( CODES PAGE Picture Unavailable !PROPERTY 0006 RESIDENTIAL 10 Nov 1217 632 WD V Q 73,000 USE i2017 iUTA 0004 Tybee Island GRANTOR:BROWNRODGES GRANTEE:ALLRFD HERMAN LEE �NBHD 020270.00 7270 TYBEE 106 Nov 253Q 0361 NA l U U8 a -,11► SCREVEN 2003 EXEMPTIONS GRANTOR_HOSTI ERNEST G 11 GRANTEE:HOSTI SHARON FLOYD (HISTORY LAND IMPR TOTAL 10 Apr 249W 0145 WD V Q fi0,000l 2017 50,200 50,200 Cama l 2003 2016 50,200 50,200 Cama' GRANTOR:HOSTI ERNEST C 11 & SHARO 2015 47,500 47,500 Cama GRANTEE:BROWN RODGER 12014 47,500 47,500 Cama - -- - - 2013 47,500 47,500 Cama' COMMENTS: 02 Feb 2004 2004 NEW PlN, SPLIT [Click for larger picture] 2012 53,600 53,600 Cama; OUT OF 4-2-3-11 212104 PL 2011 70,400 70,400 Cama 12010 99,800 99,800 Cama `E)AG I S 12009 100,000 100,000 Over `�:/ /��rri. . 2008 100,000 100,000 Cama 2007 100,000 100,000 Cama 12Co6 98,000 98,000 Cama 1 '2005 64,500 64,500 Carnal 2004 52,500 52,500 Cama ILAND - - 'iD# USE DESC FRONT DEPTH UNITS/TYPE PRICE ZONING LCTN TOPO OTHER ADJ1 ADJ2 ADJ3 ADJ4 MKT VALUE 108294 RESIDENTIAL V L 50 50 1.00 -LT 125400.00 R1 SZ -60 50200 1 �a'�3 t S� 10 of 1 WavA-s c' - S(de--s 07/05/2018, 11:04 AM swap v iewer - 3avannan .urea wN https://www.sagis.org/Home/Map4 <soki Ave. vi r �, -yVA./ `i8 ` ._ 12 z '�X, Parcel Search 3 �; .,- 34 AG �OJ 5 l t Select by: ��. 13} r Name �,� 20 First Name: �p\�q 3 ` 25 � 4 \ e� , "� 18 19 ops Last Name: 9 F J Search 59L� V GS Q�2Y t d 22 U 10 .. 5 21 'a �c' G� 5 2 o' 3 pip g. ` X12 13 16A 19 •, 11 7 2A 20 ;.:r 152_ a p� 16 1 3 ate\\ try, 1 C 2 4 2D /° \ yp 5q'- 17 2 3 = 18 �� 15 'A 49 \7A 2L 4 22 G - �18 nn fig r. Z 5 n0 �, lA v �( or li Na far J 3 W air-, J 1r N�for rl Na+��ov' Shy°i(\ bask; Ken `'Shi r I,--Ove—:Yc)r�aw, 1 a-'7 E SO S�• �O X 0(0 , t Nwytar Yhv�. '?(I -B 313a -g so�,O 3LLt 0 so molt -80-847, 32.019 1 of 1 07/31/2018, 3:58 PM Aw —w f. . + �� da . s dbloam 44 !-„'A !14 04 �P. 4b GOL ''r' lb A F 8 oa _ r r - �• "• T '+ • r Ll Poll lap 49 !S O d STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: August 20, 2018 g CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 13, 2018 LOCATION: 9 Naylor (Corner of Naylor and Wilson PIN: 4-0002-03-012 APPLICANT: Jane Fishman & Carmela Aliffi OWNER: Same EXISTING USE: Vacant lot PROPOSED USE: Single-family dwelling ZONING: R -1B USE PERMITTED BY RIGHT: Yes COMMUNITY CHARACTER MAP: Ft. Screven Historic District APPLICATION: Zoning Variance (5-090) from Section 3-090 (Schedule of Development Regulations). PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting setback variances for construction on a vacant, substandard R-113 lot of record in an effort to save existing large trees. ANALYSIS: The general character of the area surrounding this lot is residential. The size of this sub -standard lot is approximately 2600 square feet. The minimum lot size in the R -IB district is 6600 square feet. The requested variance does meet the "hardship" test outlined in Land Development Code Section 5-090 (A): (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions beyond that of surrounding properties, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of the lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions, or considerations related to the environment or the safety, or to historical significance, that is peculiar to the particular property; and, (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of this Land Development Code, without undue hardship to the property. The required building setbacks for lots zoned R-113 are 20 -feet front, and 10 -feet rear and sides. The applicant is requesting approval of setback variances for construction of a single family residence that would have the following approximate setbacks: 11 feet on the front (Naylor) and five on the side (Wilson). No variances are being requested for the other two sides. Currently the property has been granted a variance for a 16 -foot front yard, 6 -foot western side yard. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Ft. Screven Historic District in which it lies as follows: The Fort Screven Historic District includes Officers Row and all of Ft. Screven, which represents significant historic, cultural and natural resources. Varied uses include new, larger scale development, traditional cottages, townhomes/condominiums, public uses/parks, historic sites, narrow streets, street trees, public parking. Zoning includes R-1, R-2, R -T, R-1/NEC, P -C, and PUD. Comprehensive Plan — Community Character Area The Ft. Screven Historic District STAFF FINDING Staff recognizes the required setbacks for a 6600 square foot lot in an R -1B district are challenging for development of this 2600 square foot lot of record. The proposed single-family dwelling is not considered detrimental to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The preservation of the large trees is a goal of the comprehensive plan. This request is slightly greater than the one granted last year and will save an additional large tree. Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS Recommended Development Strategies Meets Strategy YIN or N/A 1. Establish standards and guidelines for signage N/A 2. Provide signage for landmarks and historic businesses N/A 3. Preserve and restore historic structures whenever possible N/A 4. Provide appropriate incentives for historic restoration projects N/A 5. Ensure continued preservation of old growth trees, parks, and greenspace Y 6. Support an improved bicycle and pedestrian environment with connected facilities N/A 7. Consider adoption of architectural standards for historic structures N/A 8. STAFF FINDING Staff recognizes the required setbacks for a 6600 square foot lot in an R -1B district are challenging for development of this 2600 square foot lot of record. The proposed single-family dwelling is not considered detrimental to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The preservation of the large trees is a goal of the comprehensive plan. This request is slightly greater than the one granted last year and will save an additional large tree. Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS A. Variance application B. Narrative C. Site Plan D. SAGIS map 0 This Staff Report was prepared by George Shaw. CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION V�Y l�•lnb� ` Applicam.'s Name L } zz- ve. Address and location of subject property Tcfs' COmmet-cial $500 Residential $200 IV PIN -'Y-ee, 0 2, -4 3 - e r�?-, Applicant's Telephone Number 5?/.2 - V ffV-� Applicant's Mailing Address /`, C.i �� ?`f' i'T:��ET A , r, A 4/6 Brief description of the land development activity and use of the land thereafter to take place on the property; "I. Property Owner's Name 1✓GTelephone Number-4<8oy- f=..5f/ v7q .,j Property Owner's Address 1.2 Is Applicant the Property Owner? V-11Yes No If Applicant is the Property Owner, Proof of Ownership is attached: &4 iUW Yes ©Al 55 4 6�7-7 S 5,7% If Applicant is other than the Property Owner, a signed affidavit from the Property Owner granting the Applicant permission to conduct such land development is attached hereto. Yes Current Zo iing of Property Current Use 4-71J r a r - STc)le/c. ffierl7 Names and addresses of all adjacent property owners are attached: i. --Yes If within two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the Applicant's application for a zoning action, the Applicant has made campaign contributions aggregating to more than $250 to the Mayor and any member of Council or any member of the Planning Commission, the Applicant and the Attorney representing the Applicant must disclose the following: a. The name of the local government official to whom the campaign contribution or gift was made; b. The dollar amount of each campaign contribution made by the applicant to the local government official during the two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the application for this zoning action, and the date of each contribution; c. An enumeration and description of each gift having a value of $250 or more made by the Applicant to the local government official during the two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the application for this zoning action. DisclosuNe of Campai Sign utions form attaclbment hereto: Y NOTE: Other specific data is required forleach type of Variance. ..... ...... ... ...a ...................................................................................................................................................... Fee Amount .$ i ��E Check umper� Dat71 City Oficial NOTE: This application must be accompanied by additional documentation, including drawings that include or illustrate the information outlined below. REFERENCE DESCRIPTION 5-040 (D) (1) Site plan and/or architectural rendering of the proposed development depicting the location of lot restrictions. 5-040 (D) (2) Narrative describing the hardship and the reason for the variance request. Explain the hardship: r6 `e; 5-040 (D) (3) A survey of the property signed and stamped by a State of Georgia certified land surveyor. 5-090 (A) (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions beyond that of surrounding properties, including: ,,--'irregularity; narrowness; or, _;�' shallowness of the lot shape; or, L' ? exceptional topographical or other physical circumstances, conditions, or considerations related to the environment, or the safety, or to historical significance, that is peculiar to the particular property; and; 5-090 (A) (2) because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the Land Development Code, without undue hardship to the property. NOTE: Provide attachments illustrating conditions on surrounding ro erties and on the subject propeLbj, indicating uniqueness, etc. 5-090 (B) If this variance application is for a Height Variance, in addition to other requirements, the petitioner shall be required to: Add two feet to each side yard setback for each one foot above 35 feet in height, and, Have safeguards consisting of sprinkler systems, smoke detectors and other fire protection equipment deemed necessary at the time by the Mayor and Council, and, Where a rear yard abuts a side yard of the adjacent lot, the petitioner shall be required to add two feet to the rear setback for each foot above 35 feet height. The Applicant certifies that he/she has read the requirements for Variances and has provided the required information to the best of his/her ability in a truthful and honest manner. J %'"N of Appi Date 5-090(C) Variance longevity. After a variance has been granted by the mayor and council it shall be valid for a period of 12 months from date of approval. Such approval is based on information provided in the application. Building permits may only be granted for plans consistent with the approved application. Any deviation from the information submitted will require separate approval by the mayor and council. CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN ZONING ACTIONS DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS Have you within the past two (2) years made campaign contributions or gave gifts having an aggregate value of $250.00 or more to a member of the City of Tybee Island Planning Commission, or Mayor and Council or any local government official who will be considering the rezoning application? YES IF YES, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING SECTION: NAME OF CONTRIBUTIONS GOVERNMENT OF $250.00 OFFICIAL OR MORE GIFTS DATE OF OF $250.00 CONTRIBUTION OR MORE IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK CONCERNING THE ATTACHED REZONING APPLICATION, THIS FORM MUST BE FILED WITH THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FIVE (5) DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS OR GIFTS IN EXCESS OF $250.00 HAVE BEEN MADE TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR MAYOR AND COUNCIL. Signatur /��'- Printed Name Date -72t (-- Y 301 2010 (:14gme 1 f4 r$ L /,-,- / Sec. 5-090. - Variances. (A) Standards. After an application has been submitted to the designated city official, reviewed by the planning commission, and a public hearing has been held by the mayor and council, the mayor and council may grant a variance from the strict application of the provisions in this Land Development Code only if a physical circumstance, condition, or consideration exists as described in subsection (1). (1) There are unique physical circumstances or conditions or considerations beyond that of surrounding properties, including a substandard lot of record that existed prior to March 24, 1971 (see section 3-040); irregularity; narrowness; or shallowness of the lot shape; or exceptional topographical or other physical circumstances, conditions, or considerations related to the environment, or to safety, or to historical significance, that is peculiar to the particular property; and; (2) Because of such physical circumstances or conditions or considerations, the property cannot be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of this Land Development Code, without undue hardship to the property. (3) A nonconforming use or structure does not constitute a unique physical circumstance, condition, or consideration. (B) Height. No part of any structure shall project beyond 35 -feet above the average adjacent grade of a property except: (1) Chimneys, flues, stacks, heating units, ventilation ducts, air conditioning units, gas holders, elevators, solar panels and similar appurtenances needed to operate, and maintain the building on which they are located. (2) The following items that were existing on the date of the adoption of this ordinance: flag poles, television aerials, water towers and tanks, steeples and bell towers, broadcasting and relay towers, transmission line towers, and electric substation structures. (C) Variance longevity. After a variance has been granted by the mayor and council it shall be valid for a period of 12 months from date of approval. Such approval is based on information provided in the application. Building permits may only be granted for plans consistent with the approved application. Any deviation from the information submitted will require separate approval by the mayor and council. (D) Reviewing variance applications. The designated city official, planning commission, and governing body, shall consider the factors stated herein in reviewing variance applications in taking action on a particular variance. In exercising the powers to grant variances, the mayor and council may attach any conditions to its approval which it finds necessary to accomplish the reasonable application of the requirements of these regulations. (E) Application approval. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code of Ordinances, the designated city official may approve applications for variances without the need of public hearings and without the need of review by the planning commission or the mayor and council as follows: (1) When either of the following circumstances exists: a. The proposed improvement or alteration will not result in an expansion of the existing footprint of the existing structure; or b. No additional encroachment into any setback shall be created by the proposed improvement, construction or addition. (2) When each of the following circumstances also exists: a. No encroachment or construction of habitable space or other prohibited improvements will exist below one foot above the base flood elevation; and b. The requested improvements or construction will not violate existing zoning provisions. This subsection shall have specific application to existing nonconforming structures as referred to in section 3-020. - (F) Compliance with ordinances. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code of Ordinances, no application for a variance may be accepted nor may any variance be granted with respect to any property that is then not in compliance with the requirements of ordinances for the condition on which the variance is sought, unless the applicant files with the application a detailed written explanation of how, when, and by whom the need for a variance was created. In such a case, the planning commission shall make a recommendation to the mayor and council as to whether the variance should be approved or rejected or modified and the mayor and council, following a public hearing, may approve, reject or modify the variance request. In the event property is constructed in violation of the ordinances, the violation status remains until such time as the condition is rectified and placed in conformity with the ordinances. Violations of the ordinances may be subject to the enforcement provisions of this Code and all penalties permissible by law. A variance that is granted under this section does not excuse prior violations including those that have resulted or may result in enforcement action by the city. (Ord. No. 1999-27, 8-12-1999; Ord. No. 2002-08, 5-9-2002; Ord. No. 2002-08 Variances, amended 8-29-2002; Ord. of 8-11-2005; Ord. No. 14-2010, 8-26-2010; Ord. No. 57-A-2014, § 1, 12-112014 ) July 30, 2018 Dear Mr. George Shaw and City Council members We are very much looking forward to building a home on the sub -standard (50'x50') but beautiful tree filled lot at Naylor and Wilson. Our current plans call for building a single-family residence while keeping -the existing 40" oak tree and the existing 37" pine. At the previous City Council Meeting it was decided not to save the pine and consequently Council reduced the size of the requested variance. That approval is shown on the plans.(Note: they had previously approved the bigger scheme for Rodney Hickox.) Since we are now going to save the pine, we are returning to request approval of the previously of the following setbacks: • Front yard on Naylor: 11 -foot setback ■ Northwestern side yard: 5 -foot setback • Rear yard and southeast side yard: no change With these setbacks the footprint of the house is 36" from the trunk of the trees. We ask that the City might favorably consider this variance. This would be a significant help in trying to preserve the trees. Sincerely, Carmela Aliffi Jane Fishman Owners of 15 Wilson Iot,Tybee Island, Georgia i -r A&1 y /e-� c_-� we. % zl P15K" �br I' sidf' u►tls , S' Fwn-� Na*r' E. Snyder SITE- REVISED SETBACKS Architect, P.C. oDaniel 218 t Oao1on !MN project number projed Utle Swmnmh, OwrgM 31401 TSI: 012_236.Cr�O 17006.4 Casa Luna Fe:: er+z.z3a.aa2a scale dab one sheet 3/32"=1'-0" 07.31.18 I p {� 0 OISTANCE 0 08 - LO T 8" LOT 'tt' N/F GILYARD 1 V 1 I LRT 'E' i 1e1/F l 6" MOD FENCE RODGES BROWN, EXISTING LWE OAK CANOPY It , a� A6ANCQ� WATER TA.ltx o w ton _1 o o z �orq 40'LIYF OAX U 37 P-,14,. un d STEP til r y , LOT E ACREAGE: 1.5" PIPE 4- VAYLOR AVE DISTANCE 1.25" -{ PORTION OF LOT 4 N/F ERNESTSNE CAMPBELL 0 _ v:CS of � Z q O i o• A LU zU Y. irn Lb LU nip►~ J LE EXI5TENG PAVEMENT STREET SIGN flerl�oai L 1-� ARi{ auurin ❑e,e o N 0 5: SPIRE IN VVIT POLE: nNanal, INCLa S1)YJ C`V MIO OL Y, l!YrOOV fO�e rJ, rMNla /IaA M aGTUMIa 1. rru� MAKHOLE IIOa! j,11A3VS[,al.,l u1Pi C�tYI•vrt - ' �.• RVL19 Mr,r, W► • p['FEr ENCEi- ! Y NII 1.1I`el al AVAEWI GWT �t�: ro•cll rr Ywnrlll roan • Ilnl lm roam It, 16, elrivxeor r•lar[�Ilrrgl•,rlyr,Dl Wf•IlR /In M-1 •r[R. - 11MRNp,r.► aco rlla .1 6+IRsr M NTh. A 9G►LFI 1•iA' uo,MlfnA wD w,Mr - G. R>'4 L1 R0.1y.i o O IR4�rm.r• avmnr IAnICCT, Dnar/a llwaftud r1�L14MC •M rT+m W.Nl r wr IDD /N A." I • LP11.&LM= lrle-311 rye rl[71[ rulRVa 4rnNlrlart• r4+e•Dk aur.c •:w[� rvr' 31R•LT, 1 Of 4 Ia► Chatham County Board of Assessors: 2018 Property Record Card 4-... http://boa.chathameounty.org/DesktopModules/ChathamCounty/Boar... 2018 Chatham County Board of Assessors Property Record Card APPRAISER MWTHOMAS LOT E SUB OF 5 DUCK POND FORT WD TYBEE PRB 38P LAST INSP 01/05/2016 6 APPR ZONE 000008 SALES BOOK 1 INS VI QU RSN PRICE PAGE 13 0Ct 11981 WD V Q 80,000 2017 GRANTOR: EQUITY TRUST COMPANY' & THOMAS LEROY GRANTEE:ALIFFI & FISHMAN CARMELLA & JANE 07 Jan 384A 443 QC I U UQ 2013 GRANTOR:HABERSHAM BANK & THOMAS LEROY GRANTEE -EQUITY TRUST COMPANY' & THOMASLEROY 02 Feb 367Z 306 WD I U UR 2011 GRANTOR:COMMUNITY BANK & TRUST & THOMASLEROY GRANTEE: HABERSHAM BANK & THOMAS LEROY 21 Aug 330Q 0135 WD I U UN 110,000 2007 GRANTOR:GILYARD THOMAS GRANTEE -COMMUNITY BANK & TRUST & 01 Feb 158Q 0666 QC 1 U UN 1993 GRANTOR:THOMAS LEROY & VIRGINIA GRANTEE. THOMAS & GILYARD LEROY & COMMENTS: IMPR TOTAL 24 May 2013 TY14 384A1443: REF USE 158Q/667 - NO DOC RE UTA INT OF LEROY THOMAS 22 May 2013 TY14 384A1443: *FBO ROD Cama HICKOX IRA 07 Jun 2011 TY12 3671306: NO DOC TO Cama TAKE OFF INT OF LEROY 49,700 THOMAS 09 Oct 1998 A1C 98 REMOVE CODE 22 49,700 SEE EX ON 4-2-3-5 14 May 1998 ADD CHG PER OWNER 56,000 5-14-981AP q fiayi 6rP vell it e- 4-0002-03-012 ItS ST TYBEE_ ISLAND ALIFFI &FISHMAN CARMELLA & CAMA ASMI JANE 50,200 50,200 LAND 1 1227 E 50TH ST SAVANNAH GA 31404 BLDG 0 700 700 OBXF 1 50,900 50,900 Cost - MS GAG I S CODES IMPR TOTAL PROPERTY 0006 RESIDENTIAL USE 1,900 52,100 UTA 0004 TYbee Island NBHD 020270.00 T27o TYBEE Cama SCREVEN EXEMPTIONS 2,000 51,700 HISTORY LAND IMPR TOTAL 2017 50,200 1,900 52,100 Cama 2016 50,200 2,000 52,200 Cama 2015 49,700 2,000 51,700 Cama 2014 49,700 2,100 51,80() Cama 2013 49,700 2,200 51,900 Cama 2012 56,000 2,300 58,300 Cama 2011 73,600 2,300 75,900 Cama 2010 104,300 2,300 106,600 Cama 2009 104,500 2,500 107,000 Over 2008 104,500 2,500 107,000 Cama 2007 104,500 2,500 107,000 Cama 2006 102,500 2,500 105,000 Cama 2005 67,500 2,500 70,000 Cama 2004 55,000 2,500 57,500 Cama 2003 39,000 2,500 41,500 Cama 2002 26,500 2,500 29,000 Cama 2001 33,000 4,500 37,500 Cama 2000 26,000 4,500 30,500 Cama 1999 6,700 4,000 10,700 Over 1998 10,700 A1C 1997 10,700 A1C 1996 7,000 1,200 8,200 Over 1995 7,000 1,200 8,200 Over 1994 7,000 1,200 8,200 Over 1993 7,000 11200 8,200 Over 1992 7,000 1,200 8,200 Over EXTRA FEATURES ID# BLDG # SYSTEM DESC DIM 1 DIM 2 UNITS OL UNIT °RICE RCN AYS EYB DT ECON FUNC SP SP°/a RCNLD MKT VALUE 191441 MISC BUILD. AV 24 10 240.00 A 15.05 3,612 1980 1980 21R 722 700 LAND - 1D# USE DESC FRONT DEPTH UNITS/TYPE PRICE ZONING LCTN TOPO OTHER ADJ1 ADJ2 ADJ3 ADJ4 MKT VALUE 108275 SINGLE FAMILY RES 0 0 1.00 -LT 125400,00 R1 SZ -60 50200 of 1 OR/fllYJnlst o-'�s ana Map Viewer - Savannah Area GIS https://www.sagis.org/Horne/Ma] NY 16 r i 12 "f' _- O •dry A Pasrel search i -' ,- � J '' 34 AC O� _ 5 5efect by: - 1 3' k t L7 r Name first Name: y 20 `Q cg G' "�' 25 Pv F' Last Name: O 18 19 Search 5 22� 4 � f U 10 21� lk `I'O --14J c `92 `� O ; 19 15 G _ f 13 16A 11 7 i` 1 2A <^ 20 �° 2 13." o '52 2 'aj � ^ 16 1 C `��` e q 2D yoA ? i 1� 15 49A A. � � 2C`\ ' G 22 - - � 3 18 6) 2 n4 j; 1A ! alb Roe 7 R�ca1r �d tr .� 11 Nay Herm &ti% l-ee" Wl red Tkc ynwS 9- Ke*,. 9- Sh ►r I e �+ e ��r S aa6 UJ,I[iav►�soir, fir. - o.3 -Ctgq� 11 Nay (ar A-ve. rV Gc-- '3 3N(p, 3 1 cA E a- -80-846,32.019 MAYOR Jason Buelterman CITY COUNCIL Barry Brown, Mayor Pro Tem Wanda Doyle Bill Garbett Julie Livingston John Major Monty Parks CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND i 1�5 MANAGER Shawn Gillen Petitioner: Jane Fishman and Carmela Aliffi agent for Rodney R. Hickox CITY CLERK Janet LeViner CITY ATTORNEY Edwa rd M Hughes Description: Requesting setback variances for construction on a vacant, substandard R -1B lot of record in an effort to save existing large trees. Property Address: Corner of Naylor and Wilson Zoning Action Requested: Variance/Setback Following any required Public Hearing, the Mayor and Council of the City decided on the 12th day of October, 2017, to approve the application for a variance/setback, to -wit: Variance will be for 4' on Naylor which will make it a 16' front setback and 4' Variance on Wilson which will make it a 6' side setback. Cl of Council � k/h I- _Z4 Date /0 z,, 7 Date `o1 urk , Date /0/.7- e. 1 Date P.O. Box 2749 — 403 Butler Avenue, Tybee Island, Georgia 31328-2749 (912) 786-4573 — FAX (912) 786-5737 www.cityoftybee.org Planning Commission Meeting MINUTES September 18, 2017 Chair Bishop called the September 18, 2017 Tybee Island Planning Commission meeting to order. Commissioners present were .john King, Charles Matlock, Davia McNaughton, Tina Gann and Ron Bossick. Disclosures/Recusals: Chair Bishop asked if there were any disclosures or recusals, there were none. New Business: Variance: Reduce front and side yard setbacks — ]ane Fishman & Carmela Aliffi — Zone R -1B - PIN 4-0002-03-012. George Shaw approached the Commission and stated the petitioners are interested in purchasing a lot at the corner- of ornerof Wilson and Naylor which is an undersized lot, 50 x 50. The setbacks are 20' front, 10' side and 20' in the rear. There are also two large trees the petitioner would like to save while building a residence but need a variance for the front and side setbacks. Staff feels the trees are of value and recommends approve of the request. Commissioner Bossick made reference to the Arborist comments. Mr. Shaw explained the current owner applied for a variance in 2008 and was approved and due to unknown circumstances, never built on the property. Commissioner Matlock asked Mr. Shaw if the adjoining property owners were notified of the request and was there feedback. Mr. Shaw stated the proper notification was done and no feedback has been received. He also explained he needs to get clarification of the exact number of feet the petitioner is requesting. Chair Bishop stated the lot has been vacant for some time and this is a great opportunity to move forward even with a variance request. Thomas Lee, 7 Naylor Avenue, approached the Commission and asked for clarification of setbacks. Mr. Shaw responded a variance would not be needed on that side, Naylor, as there is a large tree in the way. Chair Bishop confirmed the setback of 10' would be maintained on the side of Mr. Lee's property that adjoins the petitioner's. Carmela Aliffi approached the Commission and stated it is their desire not to take down any trees of the property and would ask the Commission approve their request. Commissioner McNaughton asked for an explanation of the flags that were on the property as that would indicate a much smaller house than what is shown in the packet, 20171012CityCouncilPacket Page 130 of 181 20171006/jrl City Council Synopsis October 12, 2017 Consideration of Items for Consent Agenda Mayor Buelterman called the consent agenda to order at 6:30PM on October 12, 2017. Those present were Julie Livingston, Monty Parks, John Major, Wanda Doyle, Barry Brown, and Bili Garbett. Also attending were Dr. Shawn Gillen, City Manager; Bubba Hughes, City Attorr)ey; George Shaw, Director, Community Development; Angela Hudson, Director, Finance Department; and Janet LeViner, Clerk of Council. Mayor pro tem Brown listed the following items on the consent agenda: • City Council Meeting, September 28, 2017 • Commercial Film Production Application Consideration: The Beach House, October 30 — November 21, 2017 • AXON Master Services and Purchasing Agreement • Request City Council amend the fiscal year 2017-2018 General fund Operating and Capital by increasing the budget from $10,300,584 to $12,221,119 an increase of $1,920,535 • Resolution — FY 2018 Revenue and Expenditure Operating and Capital Budget • 2017-02, Emergency Ordinance • Bubba Hughes: Lewis Avenue and Storm Issues. Discussion: Mayor and Council authorized Mr. Hughes to spend up to $1,500 to do titles searches for properties Lewis Avenue Mayor Buelterman called the regular meeting to order at 7:OOPM. All those present for the consent agenda were present. Opening Ceremonies Call to Order Invocation — Jan LeViner • Pledge Allegiance Citizens to be Heard: Please limit comments to 3 minutes. Maximum allowable times if 5 minutes. Wanda Doyle made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Monty Parks seconded. Vote was unanimous, 6-0. Public Hearings Variance: Reduce front and side yard setbacks— Jane Fishman and Carmela Aliffi. Zone R -1B PIN: 4-0002-03-012. Bill Garbett recused. Monty Parks made a motion to approve. John Major seconded. Vote was unanimous to approve, 5-0. Map Amendment: Rezone parcel from R-1 to R -T: 15 Meddin, 76 Meddin, LLC. Zone R-1 PIN: 4-0002-12-020. John Major recused. Monty Parks recommended approval R -T for the Lots 5 and 6 leaving Lots 3 and 4 R-1 with the following conditions placed on only the R -T lots: The zoning is contingent on the continued existence and restoration of the historic Barracks building which currently sits on the property, All renovations must be historically accurate as judged by the Georgia State DNR Program and the Federal 6-1 STAFF REPORTPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: September 18, 2017 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 12, 2017 LOCATION: Corner of Naylor and Wilson APPLICANT: Jane Fishman & Carmela Aliffi EXISTING USE: Vacant lot PIN: 4-0002-03-012 OWNER: Rodney Hickox PROPOSED USE: Single-family dwellirag ZONING: R -1B USE PERMITTED BY RIGHT: Yes COMMUNITY CHARACTER MAP: Ft. Screven Historic District APPLICATION. Zoning Variance (5-090) from Section 3-090 (Schedule of Development Regulations). PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting setback variances for construction on a vacant, substandard R-1 B lot of record in an effort to save existing large trees. ANALYSIS: The general character of the area surrounding this lot is residential. The size of this sub -standard lot is approximately 2600 square feet. The minimum lot size in the R -IB district is 6600 square feet. The requested variance does meet the "hardship" test outlined in Land Development Code Section 5-090 (A): (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions beyond that of surrounding properties, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of the lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions, or considerations related to the environment or the safety, or to historical significance, that is peculiar to the particular property; and, (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of this Land Development Code, without undue hardship to the property. The required building setbacks for lots zoned R-113 are 20 -feet front, and 10 -feet rear and sides. The applicant is requesting approval of setback variances for construction of a single family residence that would have the following approximate setbacks: a 16 -foot front yard, 5 -foot western side yard, and 5 -foot rear yard. This requires variances for the front, rear and wes side yard setbacks. imi ar nce w�rantcd fo is prope i e pa but was never acted upon. %U The Comprehensive Pla describes t Ft. creven Historic Distric,Li6 which it lies as fo The Fort Screven Historic District includes Officers Row and all of Ft. Screven, which represents significant historic, cultural and natural resources. Varied uses include new, larger scale development, traditional cottages, townhomes/condominiums, public uses/parks, historic sites, narrow streets, street trees, public parking. Zoning includes R-1, R-2, R -T, R-1/NEC, P -C, and PUD. Comprehensive Plan Community Character Area The Ft. Screven Historic District STAFF FINDING Staff recognizes the required setbacks for a 6600 square foot lot in an R-113 district are challenging for development of this 2600 square foot Iot of record. The proposed single-family dwelling is not considered detrimental to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The preservation of the large trees is a goal of the comprehensive plan. Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS A. Variance application B. Narrative C. Site Plan D. SAGIS map 2 This Staff Report was prepared by Geot--ge Shaw. Recommended Development Strategies ets ?Zt7 ategy or N/A 1. Establish standards and guidelines for signage N/A 2. Provide signage for landmarks and historic businesses N/A 3. Preserve and restore historic structures whenever possible N/A 4. Provide appropriate incentives for historic restoration projects N/A 5. Ensure continued preservation of old growth trees, parks, and greens ace y 6. Support an improved bicycle and pedestrian environment with connected facilities N/A 7. Consider adoption of architectural standards for historic structures N/A S. STAFF FINDING Staff recognizes the required setbacks for a 6600 square foot lot in an R-113 district are challenging for development of this 2600 square foot Iot of record. The proposed single-family dwelling is not considered detrimental to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The preservation of the large trees is a goal of the comprehensive plan. Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS A. Variance application B. Narrative C. Site Plan D. SAGIS map 2 This Staff Report was prepared by Geot--ge Shaw. !S O d STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: August 20, 2018 g CITY COUNCIL MEETING: September 13, 2018 LOCATION: 3 Old Hwy. 80 PIN: 4-0024-02-001 APPLICANT: Cruises to Nowhere, LLC OWNER: Pat Mathews EXISTING USE: Docks, parking, storage PROPOSED USE: recreational cruise boat ZONING: M -D Maritime District USE PERMITTED BY RIGHT: yes COMMUNITY CHARACTER MAP: North Beach Maritime District APPLICATION: Site plan approval for a recreational cruise ship able to carry up to 150 passengers and up to 20 employees. PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting site plan approval for an office and required parking for a casino cruise ship. ANALYSIS: This parcel is over 7 acres with approximately 3.5 acres of upland. 35 parking spaces are required and the site plan shows 80. There is room for even more than that. Currently there are some small buildings on the site and some storage containers. The project engineer states that there will be no adverse effects of stormwater on neighboring properties. The Comprehensive Plan describes the North Beach Maritime District as follows: The North Beach/Maritime District merges three previous areas: North Beach, Lazaretto Creek and Historic Battery. This multifaceted area housed R-1, R-2, R -IB, R-1/NEC, R -T, E -C, PUD, and M -D zoning. Uses include commercial, recreational, campground, public/government uses and buildings, and a mix of residential styles and homes set on narrow streets. In addition to these developed portions, the area also includes extensive undeveloped environmentally sensitive areas with multi -use trails and public water access Comprehensive Plan — Community Character Area North Beach/Maritime District Recommended Development Strategies Meets Strategy YIN or N/A 1. Establish standards and design guidelines for signage in keeping with island character N/A 2. Allow for the development of retail, restaurants, and services for seasonal and year round o ulations. Y 3. Im rove the pedestrian and bicycle environment N/A 4. Discourage downzoning from commercial to residential in the Lazaretto Creek area and maintain commercial dock usage. Y 5. Im rove street conditions through grading improvements N/A 6. Provide signage for landmarks and commercial establishments N/A 1 7. Preserve/restore historic structures whenever possible N/A 8. Facilitate water access where appropriate and on public property N/A STAFF FINDING This large site will only be adding a small building. While 80 parking spaces are identified, the owner currently has no plans to mark or add surface treatment. This use will bring customers to our commercial waterfront. Staff recommends approval ATTACHMENTS A. Site plan application (5 pages) B. Survey (1 page) C. Site Plan (1 page) D. SAGIS map (1 page) W This Staff Report was prepared by George Shaw. E r "4 CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION Commerc/ai .$500 F Residential $250 Applicant's Name \11 D \4-0 1ll)Y*Pt LL --C csywaba hWaR r t Address and locationofsubject property 3 LI�, "I -A 21? PIN C ✓ ��7 ��- l Applicant's Telephone Number Applicant's Mailing Address ` C) ]( Ll -S LA -�n'MC CA V) Brief description of the land development activity and use of the land thereafter to take place on the property: Property Owner's Name ?1'�21 C1C A -MP -1,J 5 Telephone Number _ 2&- 4�� r Property Owner's Address S C:>1 Ck 11Wq 16c) &G-7 a 5 3q Is Applicant the Property Owner? Yes �l�o If Applicant is the Property Owner, Proof of Ownership is attached: Yes If Applicant is other than the Property Owner, a signed affidavit from the Property Owner granting the Applicant permission to conduct such land development is attached hereto. ,,- Yes Current Zoning of Property 11'IE!¢mm t- Current Use Names and addresses of all adjacent property owners are attached: Yes If within two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the Applicant's application for a zoning action, the Applicant has made campaign contributions aggregating to more than $250 to the Mayor and any member of Council or any member of the PIanning Commission, the Applicant and the Attorney representing the Applicant must disclose the following: a. The name of the local government official to whom the campaign contribution or gift was made; b. The dollar amount of each campaign contribution made by the applicant to the local government official during the two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the application for this zoning action, and the date of each contribution; c. An enumeration and description of each gift having a value of $250 or more made by the Applicant to the local government official during the two (2) years immediately preceding the filing of the application for this zoning action. NOTE: Fee Amount $�0 City Official Date Other specific data is required for each type of Site Plan Approval. ........... ............ .......................... ....................... .......................... ...........................................J............................................................................................ ........, Check Nurn er % 7 r Date 7S 1! NOTE: This application must be accompanied by following information: 1 copy, no smaller than 11 x 17, of the proposed site plan and architectural renderings. 1 copy, no smaller than 24 x 36, of the engineered drainage and infrastructure plan. 1 copy, no smaller than 11 x 17, of the existing tree survey and the tree removal and landscaping plan. Disclosure of Campaign Contributions The PIanning Commission may require elevations or other engineering or architectural drawings covering the proposed development. The Mayor and Council will not act upon a zoning decision that requires a site plan until the site plan has met the approval of the City's engineering consultant. (Note: Section 5-080 (A) requires, "Once the engineer has submitted comments to the zoning administrator, a public hearing shall be scheduled.") The Applicant certifies that he/she has read the requirements for Site Plan Approval and has provided the required information to the best of his/her ability in a truthful and honest manner. Signature of Applicant Date CITY OF TYBEE ISLAND CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN ZONING ACTIONS DISCLOSURE OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS Have you within the past two (2) years made campaign contributions or gave gifts having an aggregate value of $250.00 or more to a member of the City of Tybee Island Planning Commission, or Mayor and Council or any local government official who will be considering the rezoning application? YES NO IF YES, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING SECTION: NAME OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF $250.00 OR MORE GIFTS OF $250.00 OR MORE DATE OF CONTRIBUTION IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK CONCERNING THE ATTACHED REZONING APPLICATION, THIS FORM MUST BE FILED WITH THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FIVE (5) DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS OR GIFTS IN EXCESS OF $250.00 HAVE BEEN MADE TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR MAYOR AND COUNCIL. Signature ''"� 141 XA— Printed Name 511417,11 #0 11 A, Date See. 5-080. - Site plan approval. The site plan approval process is intended to provide the general public, planning commission, and mayor and council with information pertinent to how a new development will affect the surrounding area and the city as a whole and to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations and considerations as hereinafter stated. Where a variance, special review, or any other land development activity is involved in connection with a site plan, the standards applicable to the variance, special review, and/or land development activity applied for shall apply. (A) Process. Upon submittal of the site plan, the designated city official will review the site plan or 110ticeable discrepancies and determine if there is a need to apply for other zoning actions. The site plan is then forwarded to the city's consulting engineer. Once the engineer has submitted comments to the designated city official, a public hearing before the planning commission shall be scheduled. The public hearing shall be held regardless of whether the site plan meets the requirements of this Land Development Code. Until the applicant addresses all of the engineer's comments and the site plan is satisfactory, the mayor and council will not consider the plan. In addition to all other requirements, any applicant for a site plan must identify all prior site plan applications made by the applicant, any affiliates/relatives, corporate or business entities in which the applicant has had an interest for the property which is the subject matter of the current application. The applicant must identify any parking meters proposed to be eliminated from city rights-of- way by the proposed site plan implementation. The applicant must demonstrate compliance with all other applicable ordinances including but not limited to stormwater, flood damage prevention, and buffering. In considering a site plan, the mayor and council may consider whether the proposed development will be unreasonably detrimental to adjacent or nearby uses and whether the proposed development will adversely impact existing conditions in the overall neighborhood, including but not limited to: (1) The impact or lack thereof on available resources and utilities. (2) Whether the proposed development is of a scale and mass so as to be compatible with the character of the neighborhood. (3) Whether the proposed development is consistent with the character area under the master plan. (4) Density considerations for the neighborhood including demands on infrastructure, traffic, and other relevant factors. In considering a site plan, the mayor and council may approve or deny the application as submitted, or add or delete conditions appropriate to protecting the interest of the applicant as well as those of nearby properties. Buffering requirements beyond those expressly identified may also be imposed. If conditions are added or deleted the applicant must subsequently submit a revised plan of the proposed development to the designated city official and all such conditions that had been added or deleted must be accepted by the city's consulting engineer. If all of the foregoing requirements have been satisfied and further if the mayor and council find that the benefits of and need for the proposed use and project are greater than any possible depreciating effects and damages to the neighboring properties, the application may be granted. (B) Other zoning actions. Because special review, variances and map amendments require site plans, site plan review may be the first step in the permitting process, however, the site plan should identify any other zoning actions necessary in order for the intended development to be constructed so that a public hearing can be held on all such zoning actions simultaneously with the public hearing on the site plan. Site plan approval should encompass approval of all other zoning actions necessary to accomplish the development, however, if the intended development is to be altered from an approved site plan, additional public hearing and review is necessary if an additional special review, variance or map amendment is necessitated by the proposed alteration. (C) Site plan longevity. After a site plan has been approved by the mayor and council it shall be valid for a period of 18 months from the date of approval. If a building permit has not been obtained and work has not begun, the site plan approval shall be void and a new application must be submitted for site plan approval. (Ord. No. 1999-26, 8-12-1999; Ord. No. 2002-15, 7-11-2002; Ord. No. 2002-15, amended 1-9-2003; Ord. No. 1999-26, amended 8-12-1999; Ord. No. 1999-19, amended 6-15-1999; Ord. No. No. 2005-14, § 1, 5-26-2005; Ord. No. 2005-14, § 1, 5-26-2005; Ord. No. 01-2015, § 1, 1-15-2015) BOSWELL DESIGN SERVICE'S, INC. 103 NASSAUDRIVE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31410 912-8-97— E932 L4 HBOsPBELLSO UTH. NET August 6, 2018 George Shaw Planning and Zoning Tybee Island, Georgia Re: Pat Mathews Gambling Boat Project Highway 80 / Lazeretto Creek Tybee Island, Georgia George / Lisa, Based on the concept submitted on this day, it is our opinion that the proposed parking and portable office shown on the concept will not generate post -developed storm water run-off that will impact any adjacent properties. Thank you for your assistance and please do not hesitate to contact us if you should require more information. We may be reached at 897-6932, fax to 897-2287 or e-mail to IahbosUbellsouth. net. Sincerely, -m.'Q Mark Boswell City 4� T-�bee15s�"d 4k AMWVF 1 f r f r<< _f y Chatham County Board of Assessors: 2018 Property Record Card 4-... http://boa.chathamcounty.org/DesktopModules/CbathamCc)unty/Boar... 2018 Chatham County Board of Assessors Property Record Card APPRAISER ALCUMMIN TCT BTWN OLD & NEW HWY 80 RIW E LAZRETTO CREEK LAST INSP 04/28/2016 APPR ZONE 000008 SALES BOOK/ INS VI QU RSN PRICE PAGE 17 Oct 2008 345U 0575 NA I U UR GRA NTOR:MATHEWS FRANK C JR GRANTEEWATHEWS PATRICK T PERMITS TYPE DATE AMOUNT 120228 EL 01 Jan 2013 Camp 1,500 COMMENTS: LAND 22 May 2003 2003, LANA REVIEW. 06 Nov 1998 ADD CHG 11-6-98 DH PER TC UTA OFF 21 Dec 1994 INSP BY HCC & CL FOR 1995. 2016 CAMA TURNED ON. ORIGINAL EXEMPTIONS DOCK AREAS BUILT OUT OF COMMCATEG GROVED BARGE TIMBERS. 315,400 STILL IN EXCEL. CONDITION. 4-0024-01-002 3 OLD US HIGHWAY 80 TYBEI` ISLAND MATHEWS PATRICK T CAMA ASMT 102 CEDAR VIEW LN 315,800 315,800 LAND i SAVANNAH GA 31410 13,100 13,100 BLDG 3 58,900 58,900 OBXF 6 387,800 387,800 Cost, MS SAGIS CODES LAND PROPERTY OOD2 COMMERCIAL USE 2017 UTA 0004 Tybee Island NBHD 020500.00 T500 TYBEE TO 2016 BULL_ R EXEMPTIONS 386,600 COMMCATEG 311 Clubhouse HISTORY LAND IMPR TOTAL 2017 315,600 71,500 387,300 Cama 2016 315,400 71,200 386,600 Cama 2015 315,400 71,200 386,600 Cama 2014 315,400 71,800 387,200 Cama 2013 315,400 72,500 387,900 Cama 2012 315,400 76,400 391,800 Cama 2011 315,400 76,400 391,800 Cama 2010 315,400 76,400 391,800 Cama 2009 430,000 113,500 543,500 Over 2008 430,000 113,500 543,500 Cama 2007 430,000 113,500 543,500 Cama 2006 430,000 102,000 532,000 Cama 2005 286,500 102,000 388,500 Cama 2004 286,500 129,000 415,500 Cama 2003 286,500 129,000 415,500 Cama 2002 285,000 129,000 414,000 Cama 2001 285,000 126,500 411,500 Cama 2000 285,000 126,500 411,500 Cama 1999 203,500 126,500 330,000 Cama 1998 203,500 137,500 341,000 Cama 1997 203,500 136,500 340,000 Cama 1996 162,840 146,960 309,800 Cama 1995 310,420 211,010 521,430 Cama 1994 241,960 33,040 275,000 Over 1993 241,960 33,040 275,000 Over 1992 241,960 33,040 275,000 Camp EXTRA FEATURES ID# BLDG # SYSTEM DESC DIM 1 DIM 2 UNITS OL UNIT PRICE RCN AYB EYB DT ECON FUNC SP SPIO RCNLD MKT VALUE 142873 87438 CAN STY 14 FR LOW 20 15 300.00 3 15.75 4,725 1971 1971 OC 25.00 1,181 1,100 FRAME CANOPY DRAWING #2 142874 Dock4"avg piling 0 0 5307.00 3 41,75 221,567 1987 1987 20 44,313 39,900 BD3 STATIONARY DOCK AREA 142875 Dock4"avg piling 0 0 1666.00 3 41.75 69,556 1993 1993 20 13,911 12,500 BD4 NEW STATIOARY DOCKS 142876 Dock 3'light piling 0 0 755.00 3 35.88 27,089 1993 1993 20 5,418 4,900 STATIONARY DOCKS 142877 87437 Comm porch low 16 5 80.00 3 11.19 895 1971 1971 35 179 200 LAND SIDE PORCH BLDG #1 142878 87437 Comm porch avg 10 10 100.00 2 13.33 1,466 1971 1971 35 293 300 RIVER SIDE PORCH BLDG #1 LAND 10# USE DESC FRONT DEPTH UNITS I TYPE PRICE ZONING LCTN TOPO OTHER ADJ1 ADJ2 ADJ3 ADJ4 MKT VALUE 112445 General Commercial 1 0 0 5.80 -AC 60500.00 C -M CN -10 315800 of 07/11!')015z 11•cc AA ;hatham County Board of Assessors: 2018 Property Record Card 4- 2018 Chatham County Board of Assessors Property Record Card http://boa.ch ath ameounty. org/D esktopModules/Chathaln County/Boar... 4-002401-002 3 OLD US HIGHWAY 80 TYBEE ISLAND BUILD[NG SECTION CONSTRUCTION TYPE RCN AYB EYB DEP TYPE PHYS ECON FUNC OBSV I % TOTAL DEP % RCNLD U.FACTOFR MKT VAL 87437-1-2018 Commercial 44,675 1940 1975 MS 80.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 80.00 8,935 8,935 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --.--------------- 30' 10, AREA 1340 STORIES 1.0 1 1 POR PERIMETER/SHAPE 152 1pp OCCUPANCIES AREA % CLASS �HEIGHT�QUAL494 Industrials, Light Mitg. #340 100.00 D COMPONENTS Units °� QUAL 3 490 C1 887 Stud -hardboard Siding 100.00 hd.,wi k, r ignurrtg. y 1340 I2' 16' 12' ■ 9 5' so [Click for larger picture] SEAFOOD PROCESSING PLANT. n.r d 07/11/2018. fl _ -55 :55 AM Chatham County Board of Assessors: 2018 Property Record Card 4-.,, 2018 Chatham County Board of Assessors Property Record Card http://boa. chathamcounty. org/DesktopModules/CbathamCounty/Boar... 4-0024-01-002 3 OLD US HIGHWAY 80 TYBEE ISLAND BUILDING SECTION I CONSTRUCTION TYPE RCN AYB EYB DEP TYPE PHYS ECON FUNC OBSV / % TOTAL DEP % RCNLD U.FACT'QR MKT VAL 87438-1-2018 Commercial 21,217 9960 1975 MS 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 4,243 4,243 ------------------------ - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - --------------------- - -------------- - ----- - -------- - -- - -- 20 18' r t 0 432 1 r Restrocaquading 0 CAN t44 Canopy 300 20' J ......................... .................... . .. ................ ............. [Click for larger picture] CONCRETE BLOCK RESTROOM BUILDING AND FRAME CANOPY. AREA 144 STORIES 1-0 PERIMETER I SHAPE 52 OCCUPANCIES AREA % CLASS HEIGHT QUAL 432 Restroom Building 144 100.00 C 6.00 1.00 COMPONENTS Units % QUAL Ci 812 Concrete Block 100.00 of 07/11/?01R 11.55 AAA :hatham County Board of Assessors: 2018 Property Record Card 4-... http://boa.chathamcounty.org/DesktopModules/ChetthamCounty/Boar... 2018 Chatham County Board of Assessors 4-0024-01-002 Property Record Card 3 OLD US HIGHWAY 80 TYBEE ISLAND BUILDING SECTION CONSTRUCTION TYPE RCN AYB EYB DEP TYPE PHYS ECON FUNC OBSV 1 % TOTAL DEP % RCNLD U.FACTOFR MKT VAL 87439.1-2018 Drawing Only NaN MS 0.00 0.00 0.00 NaN NaN r----------------------------------------------------------------------- CQMPONENTS Units % QUAL -- ----------------------------------------------------------- [Click for larger picture] BD3 IS ORIGINAL DOCK AREA BUILT OUT OFBARGE TIMBERS BY C.O.E. +1-40 YEARS AGO (NAILS/SPIKES AREN'T EVEN RUSTY). BD4 IS NEW SECTIONS OF DOCK REDONE (BUILT) IN 1993. -1PA 07/lt19n1R 17.55 A114 B R I D G E 13 188' R/W U S H I G HI W A Y 8 Q 240' R/W D.N.R. F=LAG (TYPICAL) \tlr, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES JURISDICTIONAL. DINE AS DELII,vrEATED BY JOHN WYNNE ON OCTOBER 31, 2013 ter, ,tjr/- ,tl'` lll,- tlr, tlt, tlr, .Ir, tlr, tir, BOTTOM BROKEN R/W G.M.F. S 85'24'00" E _ 410'± 124'f ter, tFt,i►t,------�; 140.00 _ tit, i4600 % S 04436100"W tit, ter, o \t�f, tlr, 30.00 ", cr- SALT WATER L VEGETATION <� a % S 8J 24 OO E ! _ _ - .tit, � _ 843,11 — . . ,� � Vn % / 3: 1 1 IlHo- _.. f,.- vol,, `--7 - :�- _ ,�, • --Loo\o, 0 G D E D A rte' F= A v/ /` �✓ \til/ „ \t,l, tn 1 -1 -12d--d 4C XT'G PROPOSED T PORTABLE ESTRUCTURES -9EFI CE -,.. ' . eco �, — \1I1. \{f, 11. oCo _... ''� .f�^tlr, t(r, �tk(, ,Ir, tItG.P. i tlt, tkr, GEORGIA DEPARTNAll..!�" <; `� t — RESOURCES JURI`SDI�;_ 60.0 0 S A Et!'' AS DELINEATED BY �o P C o - 0N N 0 VEM B E R 18, 20"2 •GJ� VERIFIED ON OCTCcI= I1. NOTE: SALT WATER V GETATION AN \ /' T E EPr ONEtWALES E D IMPROVEMENTS \ ` A r AR Tei BE �� QED-\\ ' IN THIS AREA, SUCH AS DOCKS, BUILDINGS, TANKS, \ � r____---�-- C Q tlr, '\ tib o tir, CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, ETC. WERE NOT LOCATED. _ Q ! o ,,Ir, Ilt. 1 \ o� = 0 o 0 ---,89.74s' _- oo — C.P. o N 74 $' ,: C.P. ` `� tir, tlt, G `�-•. 6 - C3 R.R.I.F. - L=307.22' z N/F IRIS H. & MICHAEL B. SCARBROUGH tr D.B. 154P--630 N O oOlt go -' -- -- _ Z5� tlt, tlt, i!t, o �r o 'o - oil/ 01! 156• -III \51 _IIIIIf�dS��11111111L Vn % / 3: 1 1 IlHo- _.. f,.- vol,, `--7 - :�- _ ,�, • --Loo\o, 0 G D E D A rte' F= A v/ /` �✓ \til/ „ \t,l, tn 1 -1 -12d--d 4C XT'G PROPOSED T PORTABLE ESTRUCTURES -9EFI CE -,.. ' . eco �, — \1I1. \{f, 11. oCo _... ''� .f�^tlr, t(r, �tk(, ,Ir, tItG.P. i tlt, tkr, GEORGIA DEPARTNAll..!�" <; `� t — RESOURCES JURI`SDI�;_ 60.0 0 S A Et!'' AS DELINEATED BY �o P C o - 0N N 0 VEM B E R 18, 20"2 •GJ� VERIFIED ON OCTCcI= I1. NOTE: SALT WATER V GETATION AN \ /' T E EPr ONEtWALES E D IMPROVEMENTS \ ` A r AR Tei BE �� QED-\\ ' IN THIS AREA, SUCH AS DOCKS, BUILDINGS, TANKS, \ � r____---�-- C Q tlr, '\ tib o tir, CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, ETC. WERE NOT LOCATED. _ Q ! o ,,Ir, Ilt. 1 \ o� = 0 o 0 ---,89.74s' _- oo — C.P. o N 74 $' ,: C.P. ` `� tir, tlt, G `�-•. 6 - C3 R.R.I.F. - L=307.22' z N/F IRIS H. & MICHAEL B. SCARBROUGH tr D.B. 154P--630 N O oOlt go -' -- -- _ Z5� tlt, tlt, i!t, o �r o 'o - oil/ 01! 156• -III \51