HomeMy Public PortalAbout04-26-2018 HPC Agenda PacketHistoric Preservation Commission
Thursday, April 26, 2018
7:00 PM
Village Boardroom
24401 W. Lockport Street
Plainfield, IL 60544
Agenda
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Minutes of the Historical Preservation Commission dated December 14, 2017.
2017-12-14 HPC Minutes.pdf
CHAIR'S COMMENTS
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per topic)
OLD BUSINESS
Rehabilitation Grant Program
Rehabilitation Grant Program Description DRAFT 2018.pdf
Rehabilitation Grant Agreement DRAFT 2018.pdf
Rehabilitation Grants in Other Communities.pdf
NEW BUSINESS
Case No.: 1784-040618.HPC
Request: Landmark (Public Hearing)
Location: 24038 W. Main St.
Applicant: Ralph & Shirley Rouse
24038 W. Main Street Landmark Staff Report.pdf
1
Historic Preservation Commission Page - 2
Nomination for Individual Landmark for 24038 W. Main Street.pdf
DISCUSSION
ADJOURN
REMINDERS
Important Upcoming Dates
May 3rd at 5:00 p.m. - Joint LDDC & Public Outreach Subcommittees Meeting
May 14th at 7:00 p.m. - Joint Committee of the Whole and Historic Preservation
Commission Meeting
May 17th at 6:00 p.m. - BTD & Preservation Meeting
TBD - Tour of Plainfield House
May 7, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. - Next Village Board Meeting
May 10, 2018 at 7:00p.m. - Next Historical Preservation Commission Meeting
2
Agenda Item No:
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date: April 26, 2018
Submitted by: Tracey Erickson
Submitting Department: Planning Department
Item Type: Minutes
Agenda Section: APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Subject:
Minutes of the Historical Preservation Commission dated December 14, 2017.
Suggested Action:
Attachments:
2017-12-14 HPC Minutes.pdf
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Agenda Item No:
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date: April 26, 2018
Submitted by: Tracey Erickson
Submitting Department: Planning Department
Item Type: Old Business Item
Agenda Section: OLD BUSINESS
Subject:
Rehabilitation Grant Program
Suggested Action:
Attachments:
Rehabilitation Grant Program Description DRAFT 2018.pdf
Rehabilitation Grant Agreement DRAFT 2018.pdf
Rehabilitation Grants in Other Communities.pdf
10
Approved X/XX/XXXX
REHABILITATION GRANT
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
PROGRAM PURPOSE
The Village of Plainfield Rehabilitation Grant Program is designed to encourage owner
investment in the exterior rehabilitation and restoration of historically designated residential
structures in the Village. The program is intended to provide financial assistance and incentives
to owners of local landmarks or contributing properties in a historic district in recognition of the positive impact that individual building improvements can have on the overall appearance, quality, and vitality of the neighborhood and community as a whole. The rehabilitation and
maintenance of historic resources will protect the character of the community for years to come.
GRANT ELIGIBILITY
To be eligible for a Rehabilitation Grant reimbursement, projects must preserve, restore, or
rehabilitate the historic character of the structure’s exterior. Rehabilitation for the purpose of
this grant means that an effort is being made not only to maintain a historic property in
reasonable repair, but to improve, reclaim, and restore historic architectural characteristics that
are threatened or have been lost through wear, alteration, or neglect.
Additionally, the property must be a designated landmark or located within a designated historic
district. Properties with a pending application for landmark or district designation at the time of
application are also eligible. (An official designation is required to receive grant funding. See
the “Grant Reimbursement” section of this document for more information.) All projects must conform to the Design Manual for the Lockport Street Business Corridor and/or the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The Standards for Rehabilitation can be found online
at http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/TPS/tax/rhb/ or copies of both documents are available in the
Planning Division Office.
Property owners or tenants who will make at least $500 in qualifying improvements are eligible
to receive a matching grant. Eligible improvements include, but are not limited to paint and
repair, substitute siding removal and rehabilitation of architectural elements. For a full list of
qualifying improvements, please see the “Eligible Improvements” section of this document.
FUNDING GUIDELINES
Grants are available to make certain improvements to a historically designated building. The
grant reimburses up to 50% of the total project cost – the reimbursable amount is not to exceed
$2,500 per project. Rebates and other forms of economic incentives may be utilized as part of the grant reimbursement at the Village’s discretion. Funding amount can be influenced by the scope of the project, facade orientation, and other factors.
11
Rehabilitation Grant Program Description Page #2 of 4
Approved X/XX/XXXX
Grants would be awarded to applicants for residential properties once each fiscal year. If
awarded, the sum of the grant amounts may not exceed the maximum grant allowance.
Applicants may apply for the Rehabilitation Grant Program once per fiscal year for each parcel.
While architectural services by a licensed architect are encouraged, they are not required to participate in the program. If the Village approves the project, the architect may provide
bidding, construction plans and documents, as well as construction supervision. Only
architectural services directly related to the approved improvements will be reimbursed.
APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS Interested parties should schedule a pre-application meeting with staff at (815) 439-2824 prior to
preparing any materials for submittal. Following said meeting, the applicant may complete and
submit a grant application form, available on the Village’s website or in the Planning office.
Submittal requirements are set forth on the application form. In addition, staff may request material samples to gain a better understanding of the proposed colors. Information provided by the applicant will be used as the basis for preparation of the staff report to the Historic
Preservation Commission.
The Village retains the right to approve an entire request, to approve portions of a request, suggest and/or ask for changes/additions to a request before approving, or to deny any request or portion thereof. Staff will prepare a report offering a brief introduction to the project, a review
of the various aspects of the proposal, and a suggested recommendation based on an evaluation
of the proposed work against the Village’s Downtown Design Guidelines. The report will then
be presented to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for review and then forwarded to the Village Board for approval.
Designated properties may require a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) in addition to any
applicable building permits, filed in conjunction with this application. See Planning Staff for
requirements for COAs. Every project will be evaluated for the historic or architectural significance of the structure,
extent/scope of work proposed, impact to the streetscape, and occupant. The staff report will be
presented and consider various aspects in the following method:
1. Introduction to the project and proposal
2. Analysis of proposal
a. Historic or Architectural Significance
i. Service of the building
ii. Historic significance
(Historic significance will be based on the landmark/district nomination or designation, as well as the historic resources surveys available in the Planning Department.) b. Extent/scope of work proposed
i. Discuss each aspect of the project
(Utilize photographs and descriptions submitted by the applicant to explain and evaluate the project.
Projects that intend to reconstruct missing historic elements are required to submit evidence of such element.)
12
Rehabilitation Grant Program Description Page #3 of 4
Approved X/XX/XXXX
c. Contribution to improving the streetscape
i. Building location/visibility
ii. Impact on block/neighborhood
d. Occupancy (owner-occupied vs. rental unit)
3. Summary a. Highlight desirable or unique aspects
b. Funding proposal
4. Recommendation
PROCESSING TIMELINES Upon receipt of a complete application, with all required attachments, a petition will be
scheduled for the next available HPC meeting, typically within thirty (30) days of receipt of
completed submittals. The HPC meets the second and fourth Thursday of each month. The HPC
will make its recommendations with any appropriate revisions and will prepare a Letter of Agreement that will become part of the Rehabilitation Grant Agreement that will be signed by the Chairperson of the HPC, Planning Staff and forwarded to the Village Board. The Village
Board meets in regular session the first and third Monday of each month.
Upon Village approval, the applicant and Village will enter into a formal agreement, called a Rehabilitation Grant Agreement, establishing the scope of work and approved reimbursement amount. The Agreement is signed by the Village and the applicant, after the Village Board has
approved the project. Grant project work may commence after the Agreement is signed and
necessary building permits are obtained.
All work completed under the Rehabilitation Grant Program is to be skillfully performed using appropriate materials approved by the Village. The work is to be conducted, installed and
completed to secure the results intended by the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The Village has
the authority to reject work not completed using the acceptable materials or standards of
workmanship. Upon notification by the owner that the work is entirely complete, the Village will inspect and notify the owner of any incomplete or defective work. The property owner will be required to take immediate steps to remedy such deficiencies.
GRANT REIMBURSEMENT
If costs exceed the original estimates, the property owner or tenant will be responsible for the full amount of the excess. The Village cannot reimburse more than the total amount specified in the Agreement. Any work commenced prior to Village Board approval and signing of the
Rehabilitation Grant Agreement will not be eligible for reimbursement funding. The applicant
has one year to complete the work from the date of approval. Owners or lessees may request a
six-month extension provided there is a demonstrated hardship. Grant reimbursement will occur upon official landmark or district designation, completion of the
improvements and after proof of payment has been received. If the applicant is doing his/her
own labor, funding will be reimbursed only for material costs.
13
Rehabilitation Grant Program Description Page #4 of 4
Approved X/XX/XXXX
Reimbursement grants are subject to Federal and State taxes, and are reported to the Internal
Revenue Service on Form 1099. Property owners and tenants should consult their tax advisor for
tax liability information. ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS
• Reconstruction of Missing Features
Reconstruction of missing original features such as front/side porches, towers, turrets,
cornices, carriage houses, etc. Reconstruction must be based on evidence such as historic
images.
• Removal of Non-Original Features/Restoring Original Details
Removal of any material that is not original and restoring back to the historic material(s),
primarily substitute siding. Substitute siding is siding that has been installed over the historic exterior cladding material. When substitute siding is removed, the original
material uncovered and any trim and ornamental details are to be repaired or restored.
• Repairing/Stabilizing Deteriorated Existing Elements
Repair or reinforcement of existing details that are deteriorating: for example, repairing a
porch using new structural lumber and decking, but conserving existing column/posts, spindles/balusters and brackets through epoxy consolidations or other methods; or
repairing windows using epoxy consolidations or other methods.
• Continuing Maintenance Cleaning, tuckpointing, scraping and painting; porch handrail repair, glazing and glass
replacement while retaining original sashes. Paint colors are subject to HPC review.
• Replacement Replacing deteriorated materials with appropriate materials different than the original.
Original materials may be replaced if more than fifty (50) percent is damaged. Replacement might consist of new wood siding, new wood windows, new door, or new architectural composition asphalt shingles, where the new materials shall consist of
traditional building materials.
The following items are not eligible for reimbursement grants under the Village of Plainfield
Rehabilitation Grant Program:
• Acquisition of land or buildings;
• Title reports and legal fees;
• Building permit fees and related costs;
• New additions;
• Decks and fences;
• Landscaping;
• Repair or installation of sidewalks;
• Site improvements that are not associated with the designation;
• Extermination of insects, rodents, vermin, and other pests;
• Heating, ventilation and air conditioning;
• Electrical work;
• Plumbing;
• Interior floor or ceiling replacement and repair; and,
• Any work commenced prior to execution of a Rehabilitation Grant Agreement.
Contact Planning Staff at (815) 439-2824 with inquiries or to schedule a pre-application meeting.
14
Page 1 of 6
VILLAGE OF PLAINFIELD REHABILITATION GRANT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this _____ day of __________, 20____,
between the Village of Plainfield, Illinois (hereinafter referred to as “VILLAGE”) and the
following designated OWNER/LESSEE, to witness:
Owner Name: _____________________________________________________
Lessee’s Name: ____________________________________________________
Name of Business: __________________________________________________
Tax ID#/Social Security #: ___________________________________________
Address of Property to be Improved: ____________________________________
PIN Number: ______________________________________________________
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Village of Plainfield has established a Rehabilitation Grant
Program to for the purposes of encouraging the preservation, restoration and/or
rehabilitation of designated structures within the Village; and
WHEREAS, said Rehabilitation Grant Program is administered and funded by
the VILLAGE; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rehabilitation Grant Program the VILLAGE has
agreed to participate, subject to its sole discretion, in reimbursing Owners/Lessees for the
cost of eligible exterior improvements to designated properties up to one-half (1/2) of the
approved construction, reimbursement amount is not to exceed $2,500, including
applicable professional services, of such improvements as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the OWNER/LESSEE’s property is designated a landmark or
a contributing property in a designated district, and the OWNER/LESSEE desires to
participate in the Rehabilitation Grant Program pursuant to the terms and provisions of
this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
obtained herein, the VILLAGE and the OWNER/LESSEE do hereby agree as follows:
15
REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT Created 9/18/06
Page 2 of 6
SECTION 1
With respect to eligible exterior and related improvements, the VILLAGE shall
reimburse OWNER/LESSEE for the cost of improvements to the OWNER/LESSEE’s
property at the rate of fifty percent (50%) of such cost, reimbursable amount is not to
exceed $2,500, including the cost of applicable fees for professional services pertaining
to such improvements as defined herein.
The actual total reimbursement amount per this Agreement shall not exceed
$_______ for eligible improvements. The improvement costs, which are eligible for
VILLAGE reimbursement, include all labor, materials, equipment, and other contract
items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the work as shown on the
plans, design drawings, specifications and estimates approved by the VILLAGE. Such
plans, design drawings, specifications and estimates are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Professional fees may include architectural, landscape, or other appropriate design
services as determined by the VILLAGE.
SECTION 2
No improvement work shall be undertaken until its design has been submitted to
and approved by the VILLAGE. Following approval, the OWNER/LESSEE shall
contract for the work and shall commence and complete all such work within one year
from the date of such approval. The OWNER/LESSEE may request a six-month
extension provided there is a demonstrated hardship.
This Agreement shall in no way replace the requirement for a building or other
applicable permit(s). Any improvement work requiring a permit shall not commence
until this Agreement is executed and the applicable permit is issued.
Initials:
______ ______
16
REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT Created 9/18/06
Page 3 of 6
SECTION 3
The Community Development Director or his designee shall periodically review
the progress of the contractor’s work on the improvement(s) pursuant to this Agreement.
Such inspections shall not replace any required permit inspections by the Building
Inspectors. All work which is not in conformance with the approved plans, design
drawings and specifications shall be immediately remedied by the OWNER/LESSEE and
deficient or improper work shall be replaced and made to comply with the approved
plans, design drawings and specifications and the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION 4
Upon completion of the improvements and upon their final inspection and
approval by the Community Development Director or his designee, the
OWNER/LESSEE shall submit to the VILLAGE a properly executed and notarized
contractor sworn statement showing the full cost of the work, as well as each separate
component amount due to the contractor and each and every subcontractor involved in
furnishing labor, materials or equipment in the work. In addition, the OWNER/LESSEE
shall submit to the VILLAGE proof of payment of the contract cost pursuant to the
contractor’s statement and final lien waivers from all contractors and subcontractors. The
OWNER/LESSEE shall also submit to the VILLAGE a copy of all the invoices for
professional service fees for preparation of plans and specifications. The VILLAGE
shall, within thirty (30) days of receipt of the contractor’s statement, proof of payment
and lien waivers, and the professional services statement, issue a check to the
OWNER/LESSEE as reimbursement for one-half (1/2) of the approved cost estimate or
one-half (1/2) of the actual cost, whichever is less, but not to exceed $2,500 subject to the
limitations set forth in Section 1 hereof.
In the alternative, at its sole discretion, the VILLAGE may reimburse
OWNER/LESSEE in two payments. The first reimbursement may be made only 1) upon
completion of work representing 40% or more of the maximum reimbursement specified
in Section 1 hereof, and 2) upon receipt by VILLAGE of the professional services other
invoices, contractor’s statements, invoices, proof of payment and notarized final lien
waivers for the completed work, and 3) upon a determination by the Community
17
REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT Created 9/18/06
Page 4 of 6
Development Director or his designee that the remainder of the work is expected to be
delayed for thirty days or more following completion of the initial work due to weather,
availability of materials, or other circumstances beyond the control of the
OWNER/LESSEE. The second, final reimbursement payment shall be made by
VILLAGE only upon submittal of all necessary documents as described herein.
SECTION 5
If the OWNER/LESSEE or his contractor fails to complete the improvement work
provided for herein in conformity with the approved plans, design drawings and
specifications and the terms of this Agreement, then upon written notice being given by
the Community Development Director or his designee to the OWNER/LESSEE, by
certified mail to the address listed above, this Agreement shall terminate and the financial
obligation on the part of the VILLAGE shall cease and become null and void.
SECTION 6
Upon completion of the improvement work pursuant to this Agreement and for a
period of three (3) years thereafter, the OWNER/LESSEE shall be responsible for
properly maintaining such improvements in finished form and without change or
alteration thereto, as provided in this Agreement, and for the said period of three (3) years
following completion of the construction thereof, the OWNER/LESSEE shall not enter
into any Agreement or contract or take any other steps to alter, change or remove such
improvements, or the approved design thereof, nor shall OWNER/LESSEE undertake
any other changes, by contract or otherwise, to the improvements provided for in this
Agreement unless such changes are first submitted to the Community Development
Director or his designee, and any additional review body designated by the Director, for
approval. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld if the proposed changes do
not substantially alter the original design concept of the improvements as specified in the
plans, design drawings and specifications approved pursuant to this Agreement.
OWNER/LESSEE shall execute and record a restrictive covenant at the VILLAGE’s
request.
18
REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT Created 9/18/06
Page 5 of 6
SECTION 7
This agreement shall be binding upon the VILLAGE and upon the
OWNER/LESSEE and its successors, to said property for a period of three (3) years from
and after the date of completion and approval of the improvement provided for herein. It
shall be the responsibility of the OWNER/LESSEE to inform subsequent
OWNER/LESSEE(s) of the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 8
The OWNER/LESSEE releases the VILLAGE from, and covenants and agrees
that the VILLAGE shall not be liable for, and covenants and agrees to indemnify and
hold harmless the VILLAGE and its officials, officers, employees and agents from and
against, any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or expenses, of every conceivable
kind, character and nature whatsoever arising out of, resulting from or in any way
connected with directly or indirectly with the improvement(s), including but not limited
to actions arising from the Prevailing Wage Act (8320 ILCS 30/0.01 et seq.) The
OWNER/LESSEE further covenants and agrees to pay for or reimburse the VILLAGE
and its officials, officers, employees and agents for any and all costs, reasonable
attorneys’ fees, liabilities or expenses incurred in connection with investigating,
defending against or otherwise in connection with any such losses, claims, damages,
liabilities, or causes of action. The VILLAGE shall have the right to select legal counsel
and to approve any settlement in connection with such losses, claims, damages, liabilities,
or causes of action. The provisions of this section shall survive the completion of said
improvement(s).
SECTION 9
Nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict or prohibit the OWNER/LESSEE from
undertaking any other work in or about the subject premises, which is unrelated to the
improvement provided for in this Agreement.
19
REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT Created 9/18/06
Page 6 of 6
SECTION 10
This agreement shall be enforceable by any action at law or in equity, including
actions for specific performance and injunctive relief. The laws of the State of Illinois
shall control the construction and enforcement of this agreement. The parties agree that
all actions instituted on this agreement shall be commenced and heard in the Circuit
Court of Will County, Illinois, and hereby waive venue in any other court of competent
jurisdiction. Before any failure of any party to perform any obligation arising from this
agreement shall be deemed to constitute a breach, the party claiming the breach shall
notify the defaulting party and demand performance. No breach of this agreement shall
have been found to have occurred if performance is commenced to the satisfaction of the
complaining party within thirty (30) days of the receipt of such notice.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the
date first appearing above.
OWNER VILLAGE OF PLAINFIELD
Village Administrator
LESSEE (if applicable)
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
20
21
Agenda Item No:
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date: April 26, 2018
Submitted by: Tracey Erickson
Submitting Department: Planning Department
Item Type: New Business Item
Agenda Section: NEW BUSINESS
Subject:
Case No.: 1784-040618.HPC
Request: Landmark (Public Hearing)
Location: 24038 W. Main St.
Applicant: Ralph & Shirley Rouse
Suggested Action:
Attachments:
24038 W. Main Street Landmark Staff Report.pdf
Nomination for Individual Landmark for 24038 W. Main Street.pdf
22
23
24
25
1
Nomination for listing in the Plainfield, Illinois Register of Historic Places
Individual Landmark
Plainfield House – c. 1838; 1859; 1879; 1907
Halfway House – 1834;
24038 W. Main Street – (f/k/a 503 W. Main Street) Plainfield, Illinois
PIN: 06-03-09-402-021-0000
Petitioners: Ralph & Shirley Rouse A request to the Village of Plainfield to consider designating the structure at 24038
W. Main Street, a local landmark.
Site:
The house at 24038 West Main Street is one of five residences in Plainfield that have survived from the
Village’s earliest days – there were five families that were instrumental in the creation of the 4 sections of Plainfield and their houses are not only still standing but are still being used as residences. A one and
one-half story frame building was built in 1834 by Levi Arnold to serve as a tavern and home for his
wife and their infant daughter Harriet (born in July 1834) on the quarter section of land - the SE ¼ of Section 9 - 160 acres purchased from the U.S. Land Office in 1834.
The Federal government realized that with the opening of the lands west of the Appalachians for
settlement, stagecoaches could provide suitable transportation for businessmen, women and elected
officials. Arnold’s lot fronted the Chicago – Ottawa Road and would serve as the overnight stop and
hostelry for the Dr. John Temple Stage Line operating between Ottawa and Chicago – thus becoming
known as “Halfway House.” Arnold also secured the first appointment as Postmaster and his location saw the establishment of the first government franchised post office in Will County, when Will County
was still part of Cook County at the rear of his tavern.
By 1835 Levi Arnold and Lewis Brinsmaid Judson had succeeded in creating a new settlement on the Fox River called Hudson and in 1836 Levi Arnold moved his family from Plainfield to Hudson soon after the birth of their second child, Lydia in March 1836. Arnold leased the property to Dr. Erastus G.
Wight of Naperville who also leased some adjoining property. Historical records indicate that Levi
Arnold used locally milled lumber from the James Walker sawmill on the DuPage River near the
original settlement of Walkers’ Grove, to build Halfway House in 1834. The Walker sawmill was destroyed by a flood in 1838 and the 1840 Census shows Dr. Wight and his family living in Naperville where he served as the Coroner of Naperville from 1840 – 1841. Dr. Wight did not purchase the house
and surroundings lands until 1844, so the exact details may never be known when Plainfield House was
constructed, however we do know that Dr. Wight was responsible for the addition which became the
house as it currently stands. Eventually the stagecoach line shifted south and after Dr. Wight took over the property, the residence came to be known as Plainfield House, serving as an inn until 1886. The 26
2
house served as a town meeting hall, social gatherings with many dances and entertainments taking
place in the second-floor ballroom, a militia headquarters and artillery park for the Plainfield Light
Artillery organized by Dr. Wight’s son, Roderick and Edward McAllister as well as a private residence
for Dr. Erastus G. Wight, the first practicing circuit physician in Will County and northeastern Illinois and members of his family after his death in 1864. In 1956, the house was sold by the estate of Dr.
Wight’s son Roderick Wight and his descendants to Levi and Ruth Brockway who began a restoration
and refurbishment of the then 122-year-old house.
Architecture
The Greek Revival style is the largest architectural representation in the Village of Plainfield with over
forty such structures. The quality of design and quantity of examples of this style in Plainfield is quite extraordinary. The occurrence of the Greek Revival style is uniquely significant in Plainfield, when one looks at the general lack of this style across the rest of communities in Illinois. The Greek Revival style
was common in the United States from about 1820 to just after the end of the Civil War (1865),
however examples in Illinois for the most part happened later here than in the eastern portion of the
country. The Greek Revival style promoted the use of classical ideals and elements and was inspired by
archaeological excavations and drawings of ancient Greek temples. Carpenters in the eastern sections
of the United States did much to popularize the style, so that it was quite popular in the 1830s and
1840s and pioneers migrating west introduced the style when building their new homes in the new states of the Northwest Territories. The majority of the buildings in Plainfield exhibit the “Greek Revival influence” rather than being full high style examples, however the Halfway or Plainfield
House is among the earliest examples of the style in the Village.
Architectural Description
The original section of the Halfway House was built by Levi Arnold in 1834 as a one and one-half
story frame structure used as tavern and the first government franchised post office in what would
eventually become Will County in January 1836. History says it was the first frame house built in Plainfield and one of the oldest in northern Illinois at a time when the most prevalent structure were log
cabins. A portion of the original building existed within the structure of the current house as it now
stands with a two-story ell-shaped frame house likely built sometime after Dr. Erastus G. Wight
purchased the property from Lewis B. Judson in May 1844 and an additional parcel from Levi Arnold’s
estate in September 1845. A one-story addition was made to the back of the house in 1859, utilizing the same type of siding, window framing, and a gable roof copying the original. A porch was added to
the main entrance in 1879; a mortgage was secured in February 1879 likely for that construction and a
second one story addition was made on the west side in 1907.
The foundation sill is of hand hewn oak beams, partially covered by cement for preservation and stability. The building’s framing is of oak and black walnut utilizing mortise and tenon joints fastened
with wood pegs. The house is sided with black walnut boards painted white, with thin corner boards.
The south façade contains the main entrance facing the old Chicago to Ottawa trail that originally
brought passengers who paid their five dollars to the John Temple Stagecoach Line. Sidelights frame
27
3
the original oak door with its crisscross panels and original iron lock. Rectangular double sash windows
with 12 over 8 lights glazed with lead are symmetrically placed on the south, west and east facades.
Smaller double sash windows, varying 6 over 6 to single pane, are located in the rear portion and west
addition to the house.
The east-west portion of the ell-shaped building has a simple pedimented gable roof. The north-south
portion of the ell and the 1859 addition also have a simple gable roof. The original roofing material of
walnut shingles have since been replaced by asphalt roofing. Exterior chimneys are located on the west
and north facades. Two attic window vents are located in each of the east and west gables. The back
portion of the house was the location of Arnold’s original post office built in 1834 and later would be
the location of the Brockway’s kitchen.
28
4
South Facade
Main structure built c. 1838 Entry porch added built c. 1879 Addition to West built c. 1907 (left)
Records and observation indicate that much of the structure is constructed with black walnut and oak
lumber fastened with wooden pegs. The walnut sill plate supporting this facade consists of a series of
hewn walnut beams that have had a coating of mortar on the exterior to offer protection from the elements. Black walnut siding with an exposure of 5 inches has been applied just above grade level
without a water table course. The siding application and associated joinery throughout is of simple
straight forward example. At the eve line between the top of the second story windows and the soffit is
a plain frieze board.
The roof is of a moderate pitch (rise of seven to a run of twelve) covered with modern three-tab asphalt
shingles. The gutters and downspouts as installed represent what may well have been utilized in the
original construction.
The penetrations in this facade consist of seven windows and the entry door. The double hung windows are all the same size and configured in twelve light over eight light fashion. Exterior window
trim is again simple four-inch material with an informal drip ledge at the top and an equally simple sill 29
5
on the bottom. Corner boards are straight forward vertical elements utilizing a small meeting block
drip when meeting the frieze. Designed to receive the butt joint of the siding boards, the corner as well
as the siding material exhibit a rough sawn texture.
The porch consists of a fairly low-pitched hip roof covered with modern three-tab asphalt shingles and
a pair of Tuscan columns support. As noted in the photograph description above, this element was built
more than forty years after the main structure.
The entry door and associated side lights are very likely to be original to the c. 1838 construction date. The door consists of eight raised panels without any glass. The panels are arranged in horizontal pairs
and are all of different heights. A mortise lock set with porcelain knob above make up the original
security hardware. Above the original lock is a more modern cylinder lock which most likely operates
a surface type latch system on the interior. The porcelain knob to the right of the door is the original
bell pull which served to announce the arrival of guests. The storm door is a wooden twelve light design with exchangeable glass and screen inserts. Five light vertical sashes flank the entry door with a
single flat panel below. The entry door and associated side lights are separated and bracketed by four
vernacular, carpenter built faux columns. It is these columns that make the first strong statement as to
the Greek Revival theme which is exhibited elsewhere in the structure.
To the West (left) side of this view is the 1907 addition. Even though it was added much later than the
original construction, it exhibits very similar design elements. The window is the same size and
configuration as are the siding and corner board detail. Considering that this addition was constructed
more than seventy years after the main structure the attention to the original design is worthy of
comment. The single differentiation of consequences is the lower pitch used on the roof of the addition.
30
6
South and East Facade
Main structure built c. 1838
1. This view is offered primarily to exhibit the East Facade; however, it presents an excellent
representation of the main section of the original structure as seen from an angle. The windows,
trim and siding detail match perfectly those presented on the South Facade. The main element
in this view and further indication of Greek Revival influence in the structure as a whole, is the continuation of roof line from eave to eave enclosing the gable in a triangle. Although simple, this single element places this structure squarely as a representation of the Vernacular Greek
Revival style. The pair of louvered attic vents in the gable do not fall strictly within the stated
theme, they however do not in any way make doubt of the Vernacular Greek Revival style.
31
7
East Elevation Detail
Main structure built c. 1838
This view offers a reference for many of the details appearing on the original structure.
Of particular note are siding, corner boards, drip block corner meeting block, frieze, small crown soffit
board, applied trim to soffit board and fascia detail.
Considering the age of the structure and the condition of many of the materials covered in this presentation, it is likely that at least some of those materials have been replaced over the years. The
point to be made here is the fact that the materials shown in this view and elsewhere reflect the
concern, care and the good luck that has kept the integrity of this structure.
As photographs and descriptions progress through this presentation please note that there are few and basically minor condition problems that will be observed.
32
8
East Facade B
Main structure built c. 1838 (left) Addition to north built c. 1859 (right)
It is not clear in this view or the next that the porch and small protrusion under that porch were
constructed with the original structure or any subsequent additions. What is clear is that the windows, siding and trim detail exhibited on the second floor of this section follow those on the other portions of the 1838 structure. The two-double hung sashes visible on the second floor are trimmed as and show
the exact features as others on the original structure. The fact that these sashes are shorter and consist
of a six light one over one double hung design may indicate that this porch was in-fact original to the
1838 construction. In 1859 the addition on the North (right) was built. Again, the attention to the original design and
detail was observed. Six light one over one double hung sash on the second floor and a larger four over
four configuration on the lower floor.
33
9
North Facade A
Main structure built c. 1838
This facade contains one single element that does not conform to the design criteria set forth in the
previous descriptions. What appears to be a more modern horizontal sliding window unit at the top
right of this view was likely a modification of the original configuration. A small six light hexagonal
fixed sash window shown in this view could very well be an original. The six over six double hung
window shown consistent with the other windows in the 1838 structure. This north facing section showing few penetrations indicates the possible location of a set of stairs between first and second
floor.
34
10
North Facade B
Addition to North built c. 1859 (center) Addition to West built c. 1907 (right)
The sliding double door and a second-floor balcony which is supposed by turned colonial columns are
clearly not part of the original 1850 construction. The entry which is centered in the lower portion of
the facade is secured with a modern prime door and aluminum storm door again, later date alterations. Those observations being noted, the remaining features comprising this elevation follow quite
sensitively the details of the preceding phases of construction. Siding, corner boards, frieze, soffit and
fascia are clearly and strongly tied to the original.
No attempt has been made to achieve a clear statement of adherence to a Greek Revival theme. However, the consistency in material usage and the simplicity shown in the basic structure and finishes
in no way does harm to the primary architectural theme.
The 1907 addition shown on the west (right) shows only a departure from previous iterations of the
original. The roof pitch is lowered to fit under the second-floor windows in the original construction.
35
11
West Facade A
Addition to North built c. 1850 (far left) Main structure built c. 1838 (upper right) Addition to West built c. 1907 (lower right)
Note that in this view and the one following we see that all of the windows in the street accessible
views of the 1838 structure are identical twelve over eight light double hung. The majority of the
sashes in the remainder of the 1838 structure are of identical six over six double hung design. As a nod to the owners who made and dictated the changes to this building all were sensitive to the style,
materials used and personality of the original. Seventy years of building and modifications have been
blended into an almost seamless presentation. The 1907 addition to the west with its six over six
double hung windows, simple corner boards, consistent window trim, door trim, frieze, soffit and fascia
fit well enough to the rest of the building as to easily be mistaken for a portion of the original. The only departure that might be cited is the continuous window sill that spans the entire west and south
sides of the 1907 structure.
36
12
West Facade B
Addition to North built c. 1859 (far left)
Main structure built c. 1838 (upper) Addition to West built c. 1907 (lower)
In this view of the 1907 addition we see five double hung twelve over eight light sash that appear
identical in size and construction to their counterparts from seventy years earlier. Those sashes along
with the lone six over six sashes not described in the page, form the single story west addition. Note
that a small meeting block drip is employed when the trim between the windows meets the frieze, of the original building. This is a minor detail, it shows however, the sincerity of owners and their
builders.
This elevation displays the “upright side” of the “L” we speak of when describing the foot print of the
1838 structure. This elevation and those on the East are all but perfectly identical, with the exception of the chimney, it is that symmetry and balance that are hallmarks of Greek Revival Architecture.
37
13
Main Street Entry
Main entry built c. 1838
The entry door and associated side lights are very likely to be original to the 1838 construction date.
The storm door is a wooden twelve light design with exchangeable glass and screen inserts. Five light
vertical sashes flank the entry door with a single flat panel below. The entry door and associated side lights are separated and bracketed by four vernacular, carpenter built faux columns. It is these columns
that make the first strong statement as to the Greek Revival theme which is exhibited elsewhere in the
structure.
38
14
Entry Door Detail
Main entry built c. 1838
The door consists of eight raised panels without any glass. The panels are arranged in horizontal pairs
and are all of different heights. A mortise lock set with porcelain knob above make up the original
security hardware. Above the original lock is a more modern cylinder lock which most likely operates a surface type latch system on the interior. The porcelain knob to the right of the door is the original bell pull which served to announce the arrival of guests.
39
15
Latch, Locks and Bell Pull Detail
Main entry built c. 1838
40
16
Siding, Gutter and Corner Detail
South East corner of main structure built c. 1838
41
17
Interior
Although the interior of Halfway or Plainfield House is not under consideration, it should be noted that when Levi and Ruth Brockway acquired the house from the estate of Roderick Wight, the only son of
Dr. Wight in 1956, they proceeded to update and renovate the plumbing, wiring and the heating of the
historic house. During the ongoing renovation by Levi and Ruth Brockway, several flint arrowheads
were found embedded in the oaken timbers. Apparently, they were shot into the tree by the resident Pottawattamie Indians while they still stood in the forest near Walker’s Grove. They were enchanted with the prospect of maintaining the house in its original state including many of the old antique pieces
that had been part of the house for its first 100+ years. Additionally, the Brockways found many home
furnishings in the attic and correctly added period pieces throughout the house. In October 1980, the
house was placed on the National Register of Historic Places through the efforts of Ruth Brockway, Ed DeMarco, Director of the Plainfield Park District and Ione Mueller of the Plainfield Historical Society.
Levi Arnold used lumber milled at the saw mill operated by James Walker from the black walnut and
oak forests located south of the village and on either side of the DuPage River, when the tavern was
built in 1834. An addition by Dr. Erastus G. Wight likely was completed after his purchase of the
property from Lewis B. Judson in May 1844 and additional lands in Plainfield and Oswego from the
estate of Levi Arnold in 1845. All the siding on the house is made of walnut and to better understand how houses were constructed between 1838-1844, one only needs to climb the narrow stairs to the attic
and see the whole branches with tree bark still on them used as rafters to support the roof.
Huge oak timbers support each of the rooms and jut out from the corners and those beams rest on
sections of walnut tree trunks in the basement. Some of the old wheat plaster was removed due to its
cracked and broken conditions and was repaired with plaster. The east living room is part of the original tavern built by Levi Arnold in 1834. In the dining room one of the supporting timbers has been left exposed – the sanded and varnished beam adds an artistic touch to the room, displaying the 19th
Century construction as well as the original 20-inch wide oak floorboards. The dining room is part of
the original tavern built by Levi Arnold that also had a large second floor space where weary travelers
could sleep. Many of the original French windows in the house remain that were glazed with lead instead of putty.
This process was often used extensively to set windows in churches. Many of the windows have
imperfections or bubbles in them, which was not uncommon in the 1830s. Interior trim is of black
walnut painted white. Most of the flooring in the Wight addition is oak, covered in most places by carpeting or tile. As noted, one solid oak beam joist is exposed in the dining room, while all the other original framing members remain and are covered by wallpaper.
A walnut buffet used when the home was a stagecoach inn still remains in the dining room of the
house. The black crisscross paneled front door is still affixed to the house along with the original iron lock. The doorbell is a complicated mechanism and is as old as the house. There is a knob attached to a spindle, which is pulled to operate and fastened to the spindle is a chain, which runs up inside over a
small pulley. The bell is located above the door and is activated by pulling on the chain.
The first floor originally served as the tavern, 25 x 10-foot dining room and a 17 x 15-foot kitchen with the original tavern floor beneath the existing floor tile. Adjoining the kitchen is a sun parlor, half bath and storage room. There is a 27 x 11-foot living room with an adjoining 16 x 15-foot music room. An
entrance hall contains an oak staircase to the second floor where the original ballroom/meeting room 42
18
serves as the master bedroom and 3 additional bedrooms (sleeping rooms for the Inn) and a full bath
complete the second-floor plan. The attic was originally used for cheaper accommodations, serves now
as storage space. The original framing is exposed and there is evidence of fireplaces at either end. Statement of Significance
The Land Ordinance of 1785 was adopted on May 20, 1785 by the Continental Congress and set the
stage for an organized and community-based westward expansion in the United States in the years after
the American Revolution. The Land Ordinance of 1785 was the effort of a five-person committee led by Thomas Jefferson and established a systematic and ubiquitous process for surveying, planning, and
selling townships on the western frontier.
Each western township contained six square miles of land which was further divided into thirty-six lots
or sections, each containing one square mile or 640 acres. The sections were numbered starting at 1 in the northeast and running east to west in each tier to 36 in the southeast. This mathematical precision of
planning was through the concerted efforts of surveyors which allowed these sections to be easily
subdivided for re-sale by settlers and land speculators. Each township contained dedicated space for
public education and other government uses, as the centermost of the 36 sections were reserved for
government or public purposes - Sections 15, 16, 21 & 22, with Section 16 dedicated specifically to public education. Additionally, roadways were often constructed along the north-south or east-west Township
or Section division lines that comprised the Township and Range delineations. As was the case in most
of the newly established towns and villages of the Northwest Territories, once the pioneer families had
built their houses and established businesses, places of worship and schools for their children were
soon to follow.
Long before there were railroads, most Chicagoans’ link to civilization was primarily by schooner to
and from New York City via the Great Lakes, the Erie Canal and the Hudson River. In the early 1830s,
Chicago was closer to a Wild West town than a metropolis. The two principal cities of the Midwest
were the river towns of Cincinnati and St. Louis, both which had good steamboat service. The closest a river steamer could get to Chicago was Ottawa, more than 90 miles from Chicago on the Illinois River.
The Postal Act of 1792 established the role of the Postmaster General and made the United States’
Government responsible for creating post offices and establishing the delivery of the mail by private
contractors. The first Post Office in northern Illinois opened in Galena in 1826, five years before Chicago saw one established at their settlement. With the establishment of a post office in Galena in
1826, John D. Winters began running stagecoaches between St. Louis and Galena, carrying passengers
and the U.S. Mail.
The stagecoach became the pre-dominant mode of overland public transport for passengers and mail. Stagecoach lines were chosen not just for the convenience of passengers but to accommodate the
timely collection and distribution of the mail. Without mail contracts most stage lines would not have
survived. Chicago’s first stagecoach line arrived from Detroit in 1833 after the end of the Blackhawk
War of 1832 that ended an Indian revolt over ownership of Illinois farmland which now made overland
travel safe west of Chicago. In July 1833, John Taylor Temple (1804-1877) of Virginia, who had received a homeopathic medical degree in 1824 from the University of Maryland arrived in Chicago
with his wife and 4 children with a contract from the U.S. Postmaster General to carry the mail from
Chicago to Fort Howard at Green Bay. He soon built a two-story frame house at the corner of Wells &
Lake Street and a medical office at the southwest corner of Franklin and South Water Street. 43
19
In 1831, the High Prairie Trail from Chicago to Ottawa had been laid out by State officials as both
northern Illinois’ newest official road that also used established Indian trails. Soon after the Chicago to
Fort Howard at Green Bay route began, it was discontinued and on January 1, 1834, Temple had political connections that allowed him to secure the mail contract from Chicago to Peoria and had
money to purchase a coach and set up the necessary way stations. Thus, Temple was given a contract
for operating a stagecoach line and conveying the U.S. Mail from Chicago southwest to Peoria to meet
the steamboats navigating the Illinois River from St. Louis and later a route to Ottawa via Walkers’
Grove. The route to Ottawa started at the shore of Lake Michigan near the banks of the Chicago River and extended almost due west following the old Pottawattamie Indian trail along the DesPlaines River
which is now part of U.S. 6 to the ford across the DesPlaines River at Riverside, thence the road headed
west to Captain Joseph Naper’s settlement at the DuPage River ford before turning southwest towards
Walker’s Grove averaging about 10 miles each hour. Initially stage passengers stayed with settlers in
Walker’s Grove, which consisted of three or four crude log huts that offered limited comforts. Later the route was moved north to the newly platted settlement at Plainfield (1834). Leaving Plainfield, the trail
passed into what would become Kendall County in 1841, crossing the prairie to the tiny cluster of
cabins at the southernmost point of a grove of towering black walnut trees before continuing on to
Ottawa which was located at the head of navigation on the Illinois River.
Arnold realized the business opportunities that soon presented itself at Walkers’ Grove and established
a friendship with Dr. John Temple. Thus Arnold’s 1834 land acquisition adjacent to the DuPage River
and along the Chicago-Ottawa Road gave him a strategic advantage along this new stagecoach line – he
could establish a small inn or tavern, provide a stable for the teams of horses needed to pull the coaches
and hopefully procure an appointment as a Postmaster to handle the mail carried by the Temple stagecoach line. A “tavern” in the 1830s was a place where weary travelers could rest for the evening
after suffering a hot, dusty summer ride, a bone-jarring winter ride over frozen ruts or helping to push
coaches out of the mud plus helping with repairs in the Spring and Autumn.
Passengers and lodgers in the areas west of Chicago often paid 12 ½ cents a night or 25 cents for a combined supper and breakfast. Sleeping accommodations were generally in one large room, usually
with more than one traveler per bed. Arnold’s Halfway House became the mid-point stop on the ninety-
mile Ottawa – Chicago stagecoach line and with his appointment as Postmaster, the post office
franchise would be a windfall for the newly created Plainfield settlement which would increase its
importance and allow land values to rise. Juliet’s (Joliet’s) postmaster, Albert W. Bowen regularly picked up his settlement’s mail that arrived by stagecoach at Plainfield’s post office until a stage
operation was inaugurated between Chicago and Joliet in mid-1837.
In 1836, John Temple opened a stagecoach line carrying passengers and mail between Chicago and
Galena. John Frink, a Connecticut-born entrepreneur and stagecoach operator from New England, arrived in Chicago with his wife and 3 children in 1836. He had previously visited the “West” in 1830 to gauge business opportunities and when the fledgling railroads in 1831 began to make inroads into
the exclusive contracts initially given to stagecoaches in the East, he eventually decided to relocate to
Chicago. Later that year Frink joined John Trowbridge who had already established a stagecoach line
that was competing against Temple. By 1837, the population of Chicago had grown to 4,179 and Frink purchased Temple’s stagecoach line that year and secured the lucrative mail contract that came with it, combining it with other routes that he and Trowbridge had previously established. In 1839, John Frink
and Martin Walker began a business relationship and in 1840 created Frink & Walker - they became the
stagecoach powerhouse for the next 16 years in Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Indiana and 44
20
Missouri.
Temple ordered a new stagecoach from the Abbot-Downing Company in Concord, New Hampshire for
his new ninety-mile route that would run twice a week for the day and one-half journey charging each passenger five dollars, however the lucrative portion for his stagecoach line was the coveted
procurement of the U.S. Mail contract. Beginning in January 1834, Temple’s first driver on his Ottawa
to Chicago line was John Dean Caton (1812 – 1895). Caton had arrived in Chicago from New York in
early 1833 when the settlement numbered just 200 residents and in July become the first lawyer in
Chicago. Caton rented a room at John Temple’s house on Lake Street for his office and in December was elected the Village Attorney for Chicago. By 1842 he was living in Ottawa and was appointed to
the Illinois Supreme Court, serving for 22 years – both as a Justice and twice as the Chief Justice –
1855 and 1857-1864.
In 1838 the completion of the Archer Road from Chicago to Lockport and commencement of work on the I&M Canal finally established Joliet as the main artery of stagecoach travel to Ottawa & later
Springfield & St. Louis – but from 1834 – 1837 the Plainfield route was the most direct and preferred
by western travelers and freighters. Early History of Plainfield
The area from which Plainfield developed was first inhabited by the Potawatomie Indians. The
Potawatomie hunted the dense forests along the banks of the DuPage River and had some semi-permanent settlements. When Illinois achieved statehood in 1818 most of the territory was wilderness. Occasional explorers, soldiers on the marches to distant outposts, as well as American Indian traders
and trappers, had given glowing descriptions of the beauties of the region. The Illinois and Michigan
Canal project had been conceived during the War of 1812 which prompted the initial purchases of
Native Americans lands commencing in 1816. The first Europeans arriving in the area were French fur traders in the 1820s, who traded peacefully with the Potawatomie but did not establish any permanent settlements. By about 1826, American missionaries began to arrive to Christianize the Native
Americans and establish permanent settlements.
Revolutionary War land bounty land warrants were first awarded through an Act of Congress on September 16, 1776. These were grants of free land from Congress or states like Virginia who claimed lands west of the Appalachian Mountains in areas that would later become the states of Ohio and
Kentucky as a reward for serving in the Continental Army during the American Revolution and the War
of 1812. The grants were not automatic as veterans had to apply for them and if granted, use the
warrant to apply for a land patent which granted them ownership of the land that could be transferred or sold to other individuals. Land warrants issued by Congress were usually for the newly established
lands created by the Land Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 in Michigan, Ohio,
Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota.
Along with the occasional pioneers who ventured into the lands covered by the Northwest Ordinance came several early Methodist missionaries. One of these early Methodist missionaries was The
Reverend Jessie Walker who came to the area before statehood. Walker had been born in Virginia and
first visited the Indiana territory in 1806 and later was appointed to the circuit in Illinois and likely
introduced his son-in-law, James Walker, to the region. In 1828, James Walker led a party that
established a small settlement and sawmill along the DuPage River at Walkers’ Grove just south of present-day Plainfield. 45
21
This new settlement was known as Walker's Grove and the saw mill thrived in the midst of the thick
forests in the area. The DuPage River also provided essential transportation between the settlements at
Fort Dearborn at Lake Michigan (now Chicago) and Ottawa along the Illinois River. Walker's Grove was an important link along the water and trail route. Walker's sawmill and the area's timber also
supplied the fast growing settlement of Chicago with lumber to build their first wood-framed houses. It
has been documented that the lumber used to build the first balloon-framed structures in Chicago were
hauled by wagons built in Plainfield by John Bill and driven by Reuben Flagg and Timothy Clark from
Walker's Mill – the George Washington Dole Forwarding House and the Philip Ferdinand Wheeler Peck House – a two-story frame building in which he kept a store at southeast corner of South Water
and LaSalle Streets that was built in the Autumn of 1832. Walker’s Grove was also reportedly the first
permanent settlement in Will County.
In 1828, Chester Ingersoll traveled from his home in Vermont to northeast Illinois and settled at the Walkers’ Grove settlement and four years later, joined with others to defend Fort Beggs and later
opened one of the first hotels in Chicago. In October 1833, Chester purchased 160 acres of land in the
NE ¼ of Section 16 and in December 1833, married a young actress, Phebe Wever in Chicago and
together they ran the Traveler Hotel until 1834. Ingersoll platted a town in August 1834, northeast of
Walkers’ Grove, naming it Planefield. Ingersoll platted his town with thirteen nearly square blocks consisting of rectangular lots on a modified grid plan that would be familiar to many of those newly
arriving pioneer families from New England. Ingersoll’s east-west streets were named for the three
main towns in Northeastern Illinois at the time - Ottawa, Chicago and Lockport - while his north-south
streets were named for the region’s rivers - DuPage, Kankakee, Fox River, DesPlaines, and Illinois. He
envisioned a public square to become his central business district that would be centered about the northern half of Block 3 with DesPlaines Street to the east and Fox River Street to the west along a
proposed east-west thoroughfare to be built on the section line where Sections 16 and 9 met (Exhibit A
- Ingersoll’s 1834 Plat of Planefield).
In 1834 Chester Ingersoll built a house for his family on an open tract of land that was south of Lot 26 in Block 13 of his newly platted town; this house was recently restored and designated a Village
Landmark in September 2013. In October 1837, Ingersoll’s oldest daughter, Melissa married Thomas
Jefferson York and soon thereafter, Ingersoll built a small cottage west of his house for them. The
location of this house was south of Lot 25 in Block 13 and was designated a Village landmark known
as “Pioneer House” in 2008. In May 1837, Ingersoll recorded an addition to his original town plat comprising of twelve additional blocks – 6 blocks on either side of a new east-west street, named Juliet.
Thus Ingersoll’s 1834 house was located on Lot 2 and the house built for his daughter was built on Lot
3 in Block 1 of Ingersoll’s Addition to Plainfield (Exhibit B – Ingersoll’s Addition to Plainfield).
Levi Arnold, a bachelor, likely traveled to the settlement around Walker’s Grove in late 1831 or 1832 in
the company of the family of James and Sarah Mathers, who he had met in the area of St. Joseph,
Indiana. He staked claims in the area near the DuPage River and in present-day Kendall County before
returning to St. Joseph, Indiana to marry Maria Skinner on August 6, 1833. Sometime in early 1834,
Levi Arnold and his wife Maria arrived from Indiana and purchased the quarter section of land north of Ingersoll’s newly platted town – the SE ¼ of Section 9 on December 11. Arnold was particularly
interested in land adjacent to the DuPage River and parcels that straddled the Chicago-Ottawa Road.
Unlike Ingersoll who preferred orderly development as shown in his 1834 Plat of Planefield, Arnold
soon laid out four streets in his addition and allowed pioneer families to build homes and businesses on
46
22
his land but often chose not to sell the land to them which allowed the creation of many irregular and
disorganized lots in shape and size. He did not embrace Ingersoll’s concept of a New England town
square since a portion of Block 4 in his corresponding addition would be needed to join Ingersoll’s
planned segment. In 1844 Levi Arnold took sick and died in September at the age of 37. His wife Maria, who was 32 with four young daughters had her late husband’s holdings in Plainfield surveyed
which was completed by the following September (1845) and began collecting money through the sale
of the lots in her husband’s portion of Plainfield.
Likely, this difference in development styles frustrated Ingersoll’s sense of order and has led local historians to record that Ingersoll and Arnold were “at loggerheads” regarding the development of the
burgeoning community. Arnold cultivated a new friendship with Lewis B. Judson and together in 1835,
they started a new town on the east bank of the Fox River called Hudson. Arnold only lived in
Plainfield a short time, choosing to devote most of his energies toward the development of his new
town, Hudson. Initially the new town which was located 10 miles northwest of Plainfield, attracted few settlers and in the Spring of 1836, Levi Arnold moved his family to Hudson renting his Plainfield home
on Main Street to Dr. Erastus G. Wight, a circuit riding physician.
Chester Ingersoll abandoned his public square concept in 1836, opting instead for a public park located
in Block 10, now called the Village Green, which was immediately south of his failed public square concept that was eventually surrounded by residential housing. In 1840, as the family of Chester and
Phebe Ingersoll grew, they moved from the village north to a farm in Wheatland Township and within
three years were living on a farm near Lockport. In 1847 Ingersoll along with members of his family
and numerous families from the area left Illinois and traveled to the West to settle in California where
Ingersoll died unexpectedly in September 1849.
Within a short time, businesses spread randomly throughout Ingersoll’s Plainfield with a concentration
of restaurants, blacksmiths, liveries and hotels along DesPlaines Street where it intersected with the
east-west roadway known as DuPage Street and by 1844, the first commercial buildings were erected
on this thoroughfare that would later become known as “the Lockport Road” as it was known outside of the village. This thoroughfare separated the two communities begun by Arnold and Ingersoll
branching eastward 6 miles to the canal port at Lockport which in 1848 saw the opening of the Illinois
and Michigan Canal. Once this road was completed, it carried travelers going between the canal docks
at Lockport and the accelerating farm settlements west of the DuPage River with the village of
Plainfield growing significantly after 1850.
Various buildings were moved from other sites in Plainfield to the north side of DuPage Street and set
on every other lot so that infill buildings only required front and rear walls, a floor, and a roof. By
1849 the only centralized commercial and industrial center in Plainfield that had formed was located
about the intersection of present-day Joliet Road, Division Street, and Commercial Street. Kankakee Street was renamed James Street, in honor of James Fairbanks, who created Fairbanks’ Addition along
the street bearing his name in 1853 and DuPage Street along the DuPage River had been abandoned.
Unfortunately, no formal adoption of street names existed between the Ingersoll and Arnold sides of the
village. In fact, names of streets changed—typically—at DuPage Street (now Lockport Street) which
divided the two sides of the village. A residential neighborhood grew around the Village Green in Ingersoll’s original part of Plainfield.
Simultaneous to efforts of Ingersoll and Arnold, a third distinct community began to develop. In
November 1834, James Mathers and James M. Turner purchased a quarter section of land in the SW ¼ 47
23
of Section 10 that was east of Arnold’s SE ¼ of Section 9. In June 1836, James Mathers purchased
Turner’s half share and in July 1836, platted East Plainfield which was comprised of 96 lots along Main
Street and Water Street (which is now Plainfield-Naperville Road), which paralleled the DuPage River on
which Mathers built a sawmill and gristmill. Mathers also built himself a house in 1835 at the northeast corner of Mill and Water Streets (which is now Plainfield-Naperville Road) near his sawmill and gristmill
and his partner James Turner had built a small cottage for his family at the southeast corner of Section
10 (currently the house at the northeast corner of Lockport Street and Eastern Avenue).
The southeastern part of the Village or the NW ¼ of Section 15 was the last portion of the Village to be developed. In December 1834 Robert Chapman had purchased 280 acres in NE ¼ & N ½ of the NW ¼
of Sec. 15 & S ½ of the NW ¼ of Sec. 15 and in July 1838 sold all of his holdings “excepting& reserving
from the SW corner of the S ½ of the S ½ of said NW ¼ of Sec. 15,” a 2 ½ Acre parcel from the SW corner
or 20 square rods to be used as a cemetery that Chapman had donated to the residents in the Spring of
1837. In 1840, Dr. Oliver J. Corbin bought a 12-acre parcel south of Joliet Road and in 1845 sold a small 3 lot triangular parcel of land to John Dillman to build a foundry, creating Plainfield’s first
industrial park in what would become O.J. Corbin’s Subdivision in 1856. In 1852, a 40-acre parcel was
purchased by Elihu Corbin who would have the land subdivided into an addition to Plainfield as well as
several subdivisions.
Thus, Plainfield’s commercial and residential development became concentrated in portions of the four
quarter sections of prairie lands along or near to the DuPage River that made up the Village. Thus, a
North-South roadway (West St. or Division) and an East-West Roadway (Lockport Road) were created
along the division lines of Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16.
1. Chester Ingersoll’s - NE ¼ of Sec. 16 (1833),
2. Levi Arnold’s - SE ¼ of Sec. 9 (1834),
3. James Mathers’ - SW ¼ of Sec. 10 (1835),
4. Elihu Corbin’s - NW ¼ of Sec. 15 (1852).
The Levi Arnold Connection
Levi Arnold was born in Pennsylvania in May 1804 and moved to White Pigeon in the Michigan
Territory in 1825 where he met James and Sarah Mathers. In 1828 the Mathers’ moved to Indiana and
Levi Arnold traveled with them and this he met Mariah Skinner in Elkhart, Indiana. By 1829 he was back living in St. Joseph County, Michigan where he was enumerated in the 1829 Michigan Census. Once again, he traveled from Indiana with the Mathers to the settlement at Walker’s Grove and
eventually returned to St. Joseph, Indiana, marrying Mariah Skinner on August 6, 1833. They moved
west to Illinois sometime in early 1834 arriving before the birth of their first child, Harriet, who was
born in Plainfield on July 12, 1834. On December 11, Arnold purchased 160 acres of land in the Southeast Quarter of Section 9 along the
DuPage River which was immediately north and adjacent of Chester Ingersoll’s newly platted village
of Plainfield. Before the end of the year Levi opened a tavern that later became known as Halfway
House – located halfway between Chicago and Ottawa on the Chicago-Ottawa Road. West and near to his tavern, he built several barns with the capacity of 100 horses to accommodate the changing of stagecoach teams that would stop in Plainfield along the Chicago to Ottawa Road. Arnold was
appointed Plainfield’s first postmaster in 1834 which he relinquished in January 1837 after relocating to 48
24
Hudson (now Oswego).
In 1835 Arnold and Lewis Judson laid out the new settlement of Hudson at the shallow ford on the east
bank of the Fox River just above the mouth of Waubonsie Creek. In the Spring of 1836 shortly after the birth of their second child, Lydia on March 19, Levi Arnold moved his family ten miles northwest of
Plainfield to Hudson and leased his tavern in Plainfield to Dr. Erastus G. Wight. The settlement of
Hudson changed its name to Lodi and on January 24, 1837, Arnold was appointed its Postmaster. On
July 31, 1838 after the residents of Lodi decided to rename their community, Oswego, Arnold was re-
appointed Postmaster.
In September 1844 Levi Arnold died at the age of 37 after a brief illness. Having to raise four young
children, his wife had her husband’s holdings in Plainfield surveyed and in September 1845 began
selling all of their parcels in the section of Plainfield that would become known as Arnold’s Addition to Plainfield. The subsequent Plat of Survey revealed many irregular lot configurations with lengthy legal descriptions since many structures had been built on un-surveyed lots (Appendix C – Map of Arnold’s
Addition to Plainfield).
The Dr. Erastus G. Wight Connection
Erastus was the second oldest of four children born to Reuben Wight and his wife Sarah (Sally) Fanning of Richmond, Massachusetts with three sons surviving to adulthood – James Fanning (1793),
Erastus (1795) and William (1799); ten-month-old Sally Maria died in March,1798. The early 19th
Century Census records can be confusing and the earliest verifiable records of the Wight’s are from the
1820 Census for Richmond, Massachusetts – Reuben, his wife and their son William are listed living in Richmond and his son Erastus is a neighbor, living with his wife Frances and their children. Additionally, their oldest son James Fanning is listed as living in Oswego, New York with his wife and
family.
The Census of 1830 (reference Ancestry.com) for Stuyvesant, New York lists a Eraskes W. Wight on page 19, however when one looks at the actual photograph of the Census page, it appears that the census taker neglected to cross the “t” in Erastus’ first name. There is a tally of 15 people in the list for
Erastus Wight which likely included the parents of James and Erastus and their families, though the
wife of James Wight had died in 1828 leaving him to raise his son Algernon and he remained a
widower for the next 21 years until he re-married in 1849 in Plainfield. On page 17 there is a William W. Wight, their youngest brother living with his family and in close proximity to Erastus Wight. On January 1, 1834, Erastus’ wife Frances died from complications during childbirth of their infant
daughter Mary Betts on December 28, 1833 in Stuyvesant, New York. Thus, the Census of 1830
information corroborates to this being the Wight family and Frances was buried at Center Cemetery in
Richmond, Massachusetts, twenty-seven miles east of Stuyvesant. Upon the death of his wife, Erastus was left to raise five small children - his oldest daughter Jeanette
was ten followed by seven-year-old Adela, six-year-old Roderick and two-year-old Elvira and his
infant daughter Mary. In 1831 after the birth of their son James, William Wight, his wife Ann and their
2 small children moved forty miles southeast of Stuyvesant to Dutchess County, New York. In Spring of 1833 William moved his family from Dutchess County, New York to Naperville, Illinois and historical records indicate that Erastus along with his brother James whose wife had died in 1828 along
49
25
with his small children and their parents decided to move to Illinois to the settlement where their
brother William had moved.
During the Spring of 1834 James F. Wight and Erastus G. Wight moved their families to Chicago by booking passage on an Erie Canal packet boat that left Albany on the Hudson River to Buffalo on Lake
Erie. That 363-mile trip was completed on packet boats that were designed expressly for carrying about
40 passengers and their belongings in relative comfort on boats 78 feet long and 14 ½ feet wide pulled
by a single horse or mule. At Buffalo, they transferred to a lake steamer to complete their nearly 1,700-
mile relocation to Chicago. Records indicate that James and Erastus stayed at Green Tree House in Chicago before moving their families to Naperville sometime in late 1834 or early 1835. An obituary in
a Naperville paper from April 1860 stated that William Wight, a longtime Village resident, “first
settled in this Village in 1833” having emigrated from Dutchess County, New York.
Historical references on James Fanning Wight suggests he and his brother Dr. Erastus G. Wight assisted in the establishment of the settlement of Naperville with John Naper. The Census of 1840 shows that Dr. Wight was living in DuPage County, likely Naperville where he had settled with his brother James
Fanning Wight in 1834 or 1835. Census information lists James Wight’s occupation as a lawyer and on
May 4, 1840 was elected Clerk Pro Tem of the DuPage County Society for Mutual Protection. Later in
September of 1840, James Wight’s son, Algernon died. Plainfield historical references mention that in 1836, Dr. Wight leased Halfway House from Levi
Arnold after Arnold moved his family to the small settlement that he and Lewis B. Judson had created
the previous year on the east bank of the Fox River approximately 10 miles northwest of Plainfield. A
copy of that lease has not been found in the archival records at the Will County Recorder of Deeds between Dr. Wight and Arnold. After Arnold purchased the “Southeast Quarter of Section 9” from the
Government Land Office in 1834, he sold fewer than six lots that were scattered throughout his
Plainfield holdings and by 1840 had sold all the lots that fronted along DuPage or Lockport Road. He
allowed people to build on his Plainfield holdings though they did not hold title to the land.
When Arnold passed away in September 1844 and his wife and attorney had his holdings in Plainfield
surveyed and the following year (1845) began collecting money from those who had built on his lands
in Plainfield. Contracts found at the Will County Recorder of Deeds for Dr. Wight prior to 1845
indicate that he was a resident of DuPage County and the Census of 1840 also indicated that he was
living in DuPage County and served as the Coroner for Naperville in 1840 – 1841. Local Plainfield histories have maintained that Dr. Wight bought Halfway House that he had leased from Arnold in
1836 in 1837. In Deed I-255-256 signed on May 5, 1844 with Lewis B. Judson and his wife Dianah,
Dr. Wight and his wife Ann purchased a five-acre parcel that contained Levi Arnold’s Halfway House
and surrounding lands for $1,000; the Deed mentions the inclusion of a house on the property and Dr.
Wight’s brother, James F. Wight is listed as a witness as well as a Justice of the Peace for DuPage County. On that same day, Dr. Wight and his wife agreed to a mortgage (H-383-84) with Lewis B.
Judson for $350 using his new purchase as collateral. In Contract K-42-43, dated September 5, 1845,
Dr. Wight purchased from the Arnold estate, twenty-five lots in Oswego and Outlot 10, which
contained an 8.67-acre parcel that included the area west of the Halfway House parcel purchased the
year before from Lewis B. Judson and additional land north to the DuPage River as well as Lots 3 and 4 in Block 2, which were located across Main Street from Halfway House. Wight’s purchase of these properties were in the portion of Plainfield that would become known as Arnold’s Addition to Plainfield.
50
26
Research has ascertained that Dr. Wight was a shrewd land speculator. Records have not been
examined in DuPage County where Dr. Wight initially lived nor in Kendall County where he purchased
twenty-five lots in Oswego from the Arnold estate in 1845; however, in Will County he concluded
about 24 land contracts in Plainfield before his death in 1864 with most dealing with the parcels located between the Chicago and Ottawa Road and the DuPage River. Thus, construction of the addition to the
house that he leased from Arnold in 1836 may not have been started until the early 1840s since Dr.
Wight was living in Naperville in DuPage County. The leased Halfway House was still used as an
overnight stop on the Temple Line and later the Frink and Walker stagecoach line and as a post office
for Plainfield with Ralph Smith having replaced Arnold as Postmaster in January 1837. It is possible that Dr. Wight might have maintained duo residences – Halfway House in Plainfield and his residence
in Naperville, since he served as the Coroner of Naperville from 1840-1841 and still was a circuit
traveling physician.
In June 1841, Dr. Wight’s oldest daughter, Jeanette married druggist Aylmer Keith in DuPage County and were living in Naperville when their first child was born in January 1842. After the end of his term
as Coroner of Naperville and perhaps sometime after his marriage in May 1842 to the widow Ann
Nimmons Rickey, Dr. Wight moved his family – daughters Elvira, Mary and son Roderick to the house
on Main Street known as Halfway House. His daughter Adela taught school for three years in
Naperville prior to her marriage to Harlow B. Godard in December 1846 at her father’s house in Plainfield. Sometime prior to this relocation to Plainfield, the addition must have been completed. The
addition to Arnold’s original Halfway House more than doubled the size of the house and local records
indicate that the house was still accommodating overnight guests from the stagecoach line and renting
rooms until 1886.
On September 15, 1847 in Contract N-532-33, the Circuit Court of Will County submitted new
language for some of the descriptions contained in Contract K-42-43. On November 11, 1847 in
Contract N-532, Dr. Wight purchased Lot 2 in Block 2 directly across from Halfway House on Main
Street from William and Fanny Morgan where local histories have related that Dr. Wight built a two-
story frame drug store in c.1838. According to the 1847 contract, there was an existing building on the property when the parcel was purchased and in June 1852, Dr. Wight sold the South half of Lot 2 in
Block 2 while retaining ownership of the North half of Lot 2 in Block 2 until it was sold in November
1891 by his middle daughter Adela Wight Tyler for $500. Additionally, local histories have maintained
that Dr. Wight’s son Roderick worked and ran the drug store; in 1838 Roderick would have been only
13 and in 1847 he would have been 22.
In November 1847 and July 1848, Dr. Wight’s father Reuben and mother Sarah respectively, passed
away in Naperville and were buried. On July 10, 1849, James Fanning Wight married Mrs. Mary Child,
a widow at his brother Erastus’ home in Plainfield on the old Ottawa - Chicago Road (now known as
Main Street), that came to be known as Plainfield House (See Research Note - A). In April 1850, Dr. Wight’s daughter, Elvira married William White and his son Roderick had joined his cousin James
Wight, the youngest son of Dr. Wight’s youngest brother, William Wight, a grocer in Naperville to try
their luck in the gold fields of California.
The first medical college opened in 1765 at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia and the Massachusetts Medical Society (publishers of today’s New England Journal of Medicine) was
incorporated in 1781, seeking to license physicians. When Erastus turned five years old in 1800 only
four medical schools existed in the United States – University of Pennsylvania (1765), Kings’ College
(1767), Harvard (1782) and Dartmouth (1797). When Erastus died in March 1864 during a smallpox 51
27
outbreak in the Plainfield area, forty-six new medical schools had been created in the United States,
including Rush Medical College in Chicago in 1843.
The quality of instruction at proprietary schools were haphazard at best and entrance requirements were non-existent other than the ability to pay their fees and the standard course of instruction consisted of 2
– 4 month terms of lectures during the winter, with the second term, identical to the first. The
curriculum generally consisted of 6 courses – 1) anatomy, physiology, pathology, 2) therapeutics &
pharmacy, 3) chemistry, 4) theory & practice of medicine, 5) principles & practice of surgery, and 6)
obstetrics & diseases of women and children – with 7 or 8 hours of lectures a day, supplemented by textbook reading and little laboratory work. Often the only requirement for graduation was the ability
to pay the fees. Many students desiring a more rigorous education supplemented it by going to Europe
or training/apprenticeship with an existing doctor. Medical schools were often opened by physicians
who wanted to improve American medicine and raise the medical profession to the high status it
enjoyed in Europe and England. With scientific training, doctors became more authoritative and practiced medicine as small entrepreneurs, charging a fee for their services.
Prior to the Civil War most doctors traveled by foot, horseback or by carriage to patient’s homes. In
this practice, a physician was limited in the number of tools and drugs he could use to those items that
could fit into a hand-held case or saddlebags. It is understandable that the quality of care might be poor due to the combination of limited tools and the expectation of the doctor to treat a variety of ailments.
Examinations and treatments were usually done in a patient’s home. Examinations could include
general observation of the patient’s body, the use of a stethoscope to the chest, lungs, and digestive
tract or the analysis of blood. Bloodletting was often a common practice during this time to cure many
ills.
Surgery could also be carried out in a patient’s home though anesthesia was not widely used until the
end of the 19th Century, so most surgeries were restricted to surface areas of the body and a patient’s
tolerance of pain. Early anesthesia consisted of ether or chloroform and carried some risk of
asphyxiation plus the risk in this type of surgical setting was infection. Anti-septic was not common until the close of the 19th Century, so the risk of infection from surgery was high.
Nineteenth century doctors usually charged their patients per procedure performed, however a major
difference from current doctors was that nineteenth century physicians were not often paid with cash,
but rather “in-kind” with whatever produce, services or goods were available to their patient which was especially true for “frontier” physicians. Having a circuit-traveling physician visiting patients at the
new settlements in northeastern Illinois in the 1830s and 1840s must have been a welcome sight for
many families who had traveled from the farms near cities, towns, and villages of New England and the
Middle Atlantic states where doctors could be found.
Early historical accounts relate that Dr. Wight was the first practicing physician in northeastern Illinois
and in those early years his monthly circuit took him from Plainfield to Bourbonnais Grove and
Chicago Heights in southern Will County, back through Western Springs and Wheaton, Ottawa and
occasionally as far west as Rock Island and north to Libertyville. The first verifiable historical record
indicating that he was a physician was his appointment in 1840 – 1841 as the Coroner of Naperville. But one needs to wait until the Census of 1850 and 1860 that lists his occupation as a physician.
Several anecdotal historical records were written after Dr. Wight’s death in March 1864 stating he
received his medical degree/training from Dickinson College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania which is near
Harrisburg, the state capital. Dickinson College was chartered in September 1783 giving it the 52
28
recognition of being the first college founded after the formation of the United States, however the
college’s archivist have indicated that they did not have a medical school.
While practicing medicine in the Plainfield-Naperville area and his monthly circuit-traveling duties, local histories have reported that Dr. Wight began losing his eyesight and his son Roderick (1825 –
1912) assisted his father during his travels as a circuit riding physician. A related historical anecdote
stated that Dr. Wight had his eyesight restored through an operation at Chicago’s Reese Medical
School, which at that time was a Rush Clinic staffed by Dr. Wight’s Philadelphia associates. While it is
possible that Dr. Wight’s eyesight was likely restored by doctors in Chicago, it could not have been done until sometime after 1843, since the first medical college in Chicago, Rush Medical College was
not chartered until 1837 and opened with 22 students on December 4, 1843. Dr. Daniel Brainard
founded the school and named it after Dr. Benjamin Rush, the only signer of the Declaration of
Independence who was a doctor. Another historical anecdote notes that Dr. Wight regained partial sight
through the services of a noted oculist at Rochester, New York.
Dr. Brainard had received his medical degree from Thomas Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia
in 1834 and the Reese Medical School/Hospital was not created until 1881, some 27 years after Dr.
Wight’s death. An additional historical record mentioned that Dr. Wight had Philadelphia associates.
Initially the city of Philadelphia was where medical training and the teaching of medicine began in the Colonies and the United States. Investigations have revealed that there were only two medical schools
in the Philadelphia area that Dr. Wight could have attended – the University of Pennsylvania, which
was the first medical college in the Colonies, opened in 1765 and Thomas Jefferson Medical College,
whose first class was graduated in 1826 and this was the school where Dr. Daniel Brainard received his
medical degree in 1834 before coming to Chicago. Both schools have responded that Dr. Wight did not graduate from their school. This researcher contacted Kings’ College which opened in 1767 in New
York City, since during the mid-1820s, Erastus Wight lived close to its location. Their archivist
searched the records at Kings’ College and did not find any student graduating with the last name of
Wight or Wright with a medical degree – there are no records showing him a student or graduate. It
seems probable that Dr. Wight may have worked or apprenticed with a practicing physician which was a common practice in the training of physicians during the years from 1815 – 1860 for an aspiring
physician.
After the Wight’s moved to Plainfield in the late 1840s, Dr. Wight had the name “Plainfield House”
painted on the East side of the house - local residents often referred to the house as “Wight Tavern” or “Halfway House.” In 1856 Roderick Wight and Edward McAllister, who had settled in Plainfield in
1852 organized the Plainfield Light Artillery. Prior to the Civil War, Plainfield House served as the
militia headquarters and artillery park for the Plainfield Light Artillery and Union Greys. On April 19,
1861, the day after the Confederates fired on Fort Sumter at Charleston, South Carolina, Edward
McAllister volunteered for military service and was elected Captain of the Plainfield Light Artillery battery of three cannons. They were sent to defend Cairo and then to Fort Holt and participated in the
battles of Forts Pillow & Donelson. At the first day’s battle at Shiloh, McAllister’s battery silenced
Stanford’s Mississippi Battery in an artillery duel and the next day stopped a Confederate advance on
the Corinth Road by placing their cannons in the road and using canister fire to stop the advance. On
the last day at Shiloh, the McAllister battery silenced Byrne’s Battery and routed the Washington Light Artillery of New Orleans. McAllister was badly wounded & was forced to return home.
The Census of 1850 and 1860 indicate that Dr. Wight and his wife were living at Plainfield House on
Main Street and had boarders living there at the time when the Census was taken. According to local 53
29
histories, Plainfield House was used as a town meeting hall with many Cook-Will County land grants
administered there, as well as the ideal place for social gatherings with many dances and entertainments
taking place in the second-floor ballroom. In 1861, the Evangelical Association opened Plainfield
College and in 1864 the school changed its name to North Western College and was chartered in 1865. The first graduating class under the 1865 collegiate charter occurred in 1866 and many students
attending classes at the College also rented rooms at Plainfield House. In 1870 the College moved to
Naperville because of poor transportation access in Plainfield.
On March 22, 1864, sixty-eight-year-old Dr. Erastus G. Wight died during a large smallpox epidemic that had spread in and around the Plainfield area. It is not known if Dr. Wight had contracted the
disease however one could be sure that he and the other physicians living in the area were kept very
busy. He was buried on March 24 in the Plainfield Township Cemetery. Anna Nimmons Wight, Dr.
Wight’s second wife lived in the house at the time of the 1870 Census along with Mary Betts Wight
and two boarders. Sometime after the birth of their last child Nettie in Enterprise, Illinois and before the death of his stepmother, Anna Wight on September 21, 1871, Erastus’ son Roderick moved his wife
and children into Plainfield House from Enterprise, Illinois to help care for her. Two months later in
November 23, 1871, Dr. Wight’s last daughter Mary Betts Wight married Sampson M. Robinson at
Plainfield House and then moved to Sullivan, New York. In February 1879, Roderick and his wife
Elizabeth borrowed $800 from Horace Smith using Plainfield House and the surrounding land as collateral to make repairs and additions (main entrance porch) to the house.
In February 1883, Roderick’s wife Elizabeth died and soon thereafter, the family decided to stop the
practice of offering rooms for rent at the Plainfield House. The Census of 1900 and 1910 indicate that
Roderick continued to share Plainfield House with his daughter Adela and his deceased wife’s youngest sister, Jeanette Bradley until his death in 1912. He was the only child of Dr. Wight to be
buried at Plainfield Township Cemetery. Jeanette Wight Keith Christie, Dr. Wight’s oldest daughter
died in Chicago in April 1903 at the age of 82. Her sister Adela Wight Godard Tyler died in Oakland,
California in 1909 at the age of 85 and Elvira Wight White died in 1901 at the age of 72 at the Southern
Hospital for the Insane in Anna, Illinois. The youngest daughter of Dr. Wight, Mary Betts Wight Robinson died in May 1909 at the age of 76 in Chittenango, New York.
In October 1955, Nettie Wight Sweetwood passed away as she was the last surviving child of Roderick
Wight. Arnold built what was known as Halfway House in 1834 and Dr. Wight leased the property on
1836. In June 1956, the estates of Roderick Wight and Nettie Wight Sweetwood sold the property to Levi C. Brockway and Inez Ruth Rouse. Further research at the Will County Circuit Cook and
Recorder of Deeds reveals that there were no wills or probate for filed for Dr. Wight or his son
Roderick after their deaths as well as Lewis B. Judson. Those possibly were filed in either Kendall or
DuPage County.
The Brockways moved into their “new” historic home and proceeded to update and refurbish the house
and preserve the history of Plainfield House. The Brockways found that many of the furnishings in the
house could be classified as antiques since they had been purchased over the years by the various
members of the Wight family. Additionally, many furnishings were located in the attic and were re-
introduced into the rooms and correctly furnished rooms in antiques where possible. One of the dreams of the owners was to get Plainfield House listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Through
the efforts of the Brockways, the Plainfield Township Park District and the Plainfield Historical
Society that dream was realized on September 29, 1980.
54
30
55
31
Research Notes:
A. In July 1849, James Fanning Wight living in the Will County portion of Naperville applied for a
marriage license # 1127 – Wight wrote the following that was recorded on Marriage License
1127 -
I want a marriage license; Having been a widower more than twenty-one years and therefore
of age and my intended wife being a widow over forty years of age, I think you will acquire no oath in in relation to our ages. I want some minister of the gospel or other person authorized to celebrate the rights and solemnization of notarizing license to marry James F. Wight to Mrs. Mary Child. The marriage will take
place in your county, thence my application to you for license. Roderick B. Wight, the son of Dr. Erastus G. Wight, the brother of James Wight and Rev. Elwood
witnessed the marriage on July 7, 1849.
B. In the 1878 History of Will County there is a biography of R. B. Wight which was most likely
written by Roderick himself, since he did not pass away until 1912 or 34 years after this entry
appeared in the volume. I mention this only because I have seen several portions of this
biography cited in many previous writings about the Wight family. The biography infers that
Roderick “was one of 9 who composed the first class in Rush Medical College and soon after graduating, commenced the practice of medicine during which time he also opened a drug store (in
1838, the first in Plainfield).
1. Rush Medical College was chartered in 1837 and opened with 22 students on December 4, 1843. Roderick would have been 18 in 1843, however the archivist at Rush University
Medical Archives has no record of a Roderick Wight or Wright ever being a graduate or a
student at Rush, examining records from 1843 – 1900; also, his name does not appear in any
Illinois medical directories. 2. As stated previously the site of the drug store opened by Dr. Erastus G. Wight on Lot 2 in
Block 2 of Arnold’s Addition to Plainfield did not happen in 1838 as local histories have
maintained, since Dr. Wight did not purchase the property until 1847 from William &
Fanny Maria Morgan. That contract mentions that there was an existing building when the property was sold, so it is likely that Dr. Wight enlarged the existing building. That property remained in the hands of the Wight family until it was sold in 1891 for $500.
3. In another biography from the Illinois State Historical Library, it lists Roderick as a
physician, having graduated from Rush Medical College and practicing medicine in Flora, Illinois before returning to Plainfield to tend to his father during his last illness – Historical records show Roderick was named Postmaster of Elwood, IL (Will County) in 1857 and
then at Enterprise in Wayne County, IL in 1865. The 1860 Census lists Roderick as
physician in Mt. Erie in Wayne County and is a neighbor to his wife’s father, George
Bradley, a hotelkeeper. Nevertheless, in the 1880 Census he is now living at Plainfield House with his wife and family and lists his occupation as a painter and in the 1900 Census living in Plainfield, he lists his occupation as a Farmer. I suspect he might have decided to
practice as a doctor after having worked with his father during the time his father’s eyesight
was failing.
56
32
Summary Statement of Significance
The Plainfield “Halfway” House is one of the most historic buildings in Plainfield. Plainfield was first
settled in the late 1820s by a group seeking to convert the local Native American tribe, the
Pottawatomie to Christianity. Levi F. Arnold, the first postmaster of Plainfield, purchased the tract of land on which the building stands. In 1834, he built a small building to serve as a post office and a stop
for stagecoaches halfway between Chicago and Ottawa on the Temple Stagecoach Line. The property
was leased to Dr. Erastus G. Wight of Naperville in 1836 after Levi Arnold moved his family to his
new settlement, Hudson on the Fox River, some 10 miles northwest of Plainfield that he and Lewis B.
Judson had laid out. Dr. Wight purchased the property in 1844 from Lewis B. Judson and his wife and in 1845 Dr. Wight purchase additional land west of Halfway House the Arnold estate.
Dr. Wight added a two-story ell-shaped frame house in the Federal style to serve as a combination
tavern, inn and stagecoach stop and incorporated Arnold’s original 1834 construction. A one-story
addition was made to the back of the house in 1859 utilizing the same siding, window framing, and gable roof as the original. A. porch was added to the main entrance on Main Street in 1879-1880 and a
second one story addition was made on the west side in 1907.
The Plainfield “Halfway” House, with exception of new roofing materials and the 1907 west addition, looks much the same as it did when it served as a tavern, inn, and stagecoach stop between 1836 and 1886. The period of significance for The Plainfield Halfway House begins with its creation in 1834 to
1956 when the property was sold by the last descendants of Dr. Erastus G. Wight. Dr. Wight and his
son Roderick essentially built the house as it now stands.
The Plainfield Halfway House is nominated for designation as a local landmark in the Village of Plainfield under the following criteria:
Criterion a: has character, interest, or value which is part of the development, heritage, or cultural
character of the community, county, state, or nation; Criterion b: is the site of a significant local, county, state or national event;
Criterion c: is identified with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development
Of the community, county, state or nation Criterion d: embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for
the study of a period, type, method of construction, or use of indigenous materials;
Criterion f: embodies elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that are of architectural significance;
Criterion i: is a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure with a high level of
integrity or architectural significance; Criterion j: is suitable for preservation or restoration;
Criterion k: is included in the Illinois or National Register of Historic Places; 57
33
EXHIBITS
A. Ingersoll’s Original Plat of Planefield – 1834
B. Ingersoll’s Addition to Plainfield – 1837 C. Plat of Arnold’s Addition to Plainfield – September 4, 1845 – this shows the quarter section
that came to be known as Arnold’s Addition - was surveyed almost a year after Levi Arnold’s
death.
D. Chain of title for Plainfield Halfway House
E. History of the Dr. Erastus G. Wight family
58
34
EXHIBIT A
59
35
EXHIBIT B
60
36
EXHIBIT C
61
37
EXHIBIT D
24038 (503) W. Main
06-03-09-402-021-0000
Plainfield Halfway House
Lot 4 & the NE 5’ of Lot 3 in Oscar L. Gaylord’s Subdivision of part of Lot 10 GRANTOR GRANTEE
10/09/2014 Rouse, Ralph/Shirley [Trust Deed – R2014095936] Shirley Rouse Living Trust 10/09/2014 Circuit Court of Will County [Estate Release – R2014095935] Rouse, Ralph/Shirley
3/08/2004 Brockway, Ruth I. [Executor’s Deed] Rouse, Ralph/Shirley (Nephew of Ruth Brockway) 6/08/1956 Wight, Roderick B. [WD – 1601-167] Brockway, Levi C./Ruth (Sweetwood’s)
Lot 4 & the NE 5’ of Lot 3 in Oscar L. Gaylord’s Subdivision of part of Lot 10 of Arnold’s subdivision of part of SE ¼ of Sec. 9 in Twp. 36 N Range 9 E. convey the property known as Halfway House & owned by Nettie Wight Sweetwood, now deceased & Roderick B. Wight as
joint tenants. 2/21/1879 Wight, Roderick/Elizabeth T.[MTG-185-564] $800 Smith, Horace
A part of the SE ¼ of Sec. 9 in 36N Range 9E – Commence at a post marked WM on the north side of the Ottawa & Chicago Road, thence N 53 degrees W 27 rods to the DuPage River, thence N 37 degrees 14 rods, thence N 10 degrees East 10 rods, thence South 53 degrees East
40 rods to the Chicago Road, thence South 53 degrees West 23.875 rods along said Chicago Road to the place of beginning, containing about 4 acres of land known as E. G. Wight’s Tavern Stand; Also 7.56 acres being the SE ¼ corner of the E ½ of NW ¼ of SE ¼ of Sec. 9 in
Twp. 36N Range 9E – See release 215-506 9/05/1845 Sanger, L./Arnold, M. [Deed – K-42-3] Wight, Erastus G.
Outlot No. 10 is laid down in Arnold’s Addition to the Village of Plainfield, excepting that portion of the same formerly deeded by Levi F. Arnold & wife to William Mudgett bearing the
date of July 8, 1838 in Book D-292-3 for the sum $56.56; also Lots 3 & 4 in Block 2 in said Arnold’s Addition for the sum of $23, having been purchased by E. G. Wight at said sale for the sum of $29.56, that being the highest & best bid, therefore the said parties of the 1st part in consideration of the sum of $79.50 to them paid by E.G. Wight, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged & by virtue of the directed order aforesaid, have granted, bargained, sold, alined &confirmed by these premises unto said Erastus G. Wight.
62
38
5/04/1844 Wight, Erastus G./Ann [MTG – H-383-4] $350 Judson, Lewis B./Dianah
(DuPage County) (Kendall County)
Part of the SE ¼ of Sec. 9 – at a post marked WM at the NW side of the Ottawa & Chicago Road, thence North 53 degrees West 27 rods to the DuPage River, thence North 37 degrees East 14 rods, thence North 10 degrees East 10 rods, thence South 53 degrees East 40 rods
to the Chicago Road, thence 53 degrees West 23.875 rods along said road to place of beginning, containing about 5 acres.
5/04/1844 Judson, Lewis B./Dianah [Deed – I-255-6] $1,000 Wight, Erastus G.
(Kendall County) (DuPage County) Part of the SE ¼ of Sec. 9 – at a post marked WM at the NW side of the Ottawa & Chicago Road, thence North 53 degrees West 27 rods to the DuPage River, thence North 37 degrees East 14 rods, thence North 10 degrees East 10 rods, thence South 53 degrees East 40 rods to
the Chicago Road, thence 53 degrees West 23.875 rods along said road to place of beginning, containing about 5 acres
7/08/1838 Arnold, Levi [Deed – D-292-3] $2,500 Mudgett, Willso
Commencing at a post marked W.M. on the NW side of Ottawa & Chicago Road, thence North 53 degrees West 27 rods to DuPage River, thence North 37 degrees East 14 rods, thence North
10 degrees East 10 rods, thence South 53 degrees East 40 rods to the Chicago Road, thence South 53 degrees North on said Road to place of beginning, containing about 5 A. to the following described tract or parcel of land, it being a part of the same quarter section,
commencing on the SE side of said Ottawa & Chicago Road at a post marked W. M., thence South 53 ¾ degrees East 10 rods, thence North 53 ¾ degrees East 9 rods, thence North 53 ¾ degrees North 10 rods to said Chicago Road, thence South 53 ¾ degrees West 9 rods along
said road to place of beginning containing approximately one-half Acre plus 2 rods ? always that if a Village should be laid off and the plat of said Village recorded then and in that case a reservation is made of one rod in (not legible) in the center of said tract or parcel commencing on said Chicago Road, thence South 53 ¾ degrees East 10 rods to the back line. 12/11/1834 U. S. Land Office [Land Patent – 401-356 (1584)] $200 Arnold, Levi
The SE ¼ of Sec. 9 in Twp. 36 N Range 9E, containing 160 A
63
39
EXHIBIT E
Dr. Erastus G. Wight
A. Father – Reuben Wight – b. 1767 – 1847 (Naperville)
B. Mother – Sally Fanning – b. 1771 – 1848 (Maperville) C. Reuben Wight & Sally Fanning m. on 11/18/1792 in Richmond, MA. - Their Children:
a. James Fanning – b. - 10/02/1793 – 1/19/1861- Naperville in 1835.; Lawyer b. Erastus G. – b. - 7/20/1795 –3/22/1864 - in DuPage Co. – 1840 Census
c. Sally Maria – b.- 5/19/1797 - 3/15/1798 in Richmond, MA. d. William W. – b. - 2/09/1799 – 3/25/1860 - in Naperville in 1833; 1850 listed as a Grocer D. Erastus G. Wight m. Frances Maria Betts [b. 1796 - 1/04/1834] on 10/13/1819 in Richmond, MA 5 Children:
a. Jeanette Maria - b. 9/17/1820 – 4/01/1903 – m. Aylner Keith (1841); John Christie (1866) b. Adela Eliza – b. 1/19/1824 – 5/20/1909 – m. Harlow Godard (1846); Simeon B. Tyler (1874) c. Roderick Burt – b. 3/27/1825 – 3/02/1912 – m. Elizabeth T. Bradley (1853)
d. Elvira – b. 1/05/1829 – 3/24/1901 – m. William P. White (1850) e. Mary Betts – b. 12/28/1833 – 2/26/1909 – m. Sampson M. Robinson
E. Erastus moved family to Chicago (1834), Naperville (1834/5), Plainfield (1845) F. Served as Coroner of Naperville – 1840-1841
G. Dr. Erastus G. Wight m. Anna Nimmons Rickey on 5/04/1842 in Will Co. (#456) H. Erastus G. Wight died March 22, 1864
1850 Census – Plainfield – Sept. 9 1850 Census – Naperville – Aug. 31
55 Erastus G. Wight (1795-MA) – Dr. 57 James F. Wight (1793 MA). – Lawyer 52 Ann Rickey Wight (1797-NY) – m. 5/4/1842 42 Mary Child (1808-NY) – m. 7/10/49
28 Catherine Peck (1822 – NY) 82 Agnes Nimmons (1868- NJ) 23 R. Suddath (M – 1827-VA) 17 Sarah Heulburt (1833-NY)
10 Lawrence Ufford (1840-OH) – m. Anna M. Naper – 7/02/1863 1860 Census – Plainfield–July 12 No Census listing for James F. Wight in Naperville in 1860
65 E. G. Wight – Dr./Druggist 62 Ann
24 Charles Stranahan – Druggist (1836 – NY) 20 Agnes A. Nimmons – School Teacher (1840 – NY) – m. Charles Stranahan on 2/11/1864 in Will Co. 17 Ebenezer (Eben) Nimmons (1843 – NY) – m. Celeste Lawrence on 12/30/1874 in Will Co.
In 1850 Agnes & Eben are living in Fayette, NY (Seneca Co.) with their father James Nimmons, a carpenter & their brothers William (13), Robert (12), John (5) & sisters Elizabeth (8) & Mary (3). Could Agnes Nimmons who is 82 living in Naperville with Dr. Wight’s brother James be the
mother of James Nimmons and grandmother to his children?
64
40
In 1860 James Nimmons is still living in Fayette, NY with Elizabeth Crubaugh and his children
John, Elizabeth and Mary and in 1870 he is living alone in the same town.
1870 Census – Plainfield – Aug. 16 July 3, 1865 Census 73 Ann Wight (Widow of Erastus) 57 Mary Child Wight (widow of James Wight)
34 Mary Betts Wight - b. NY 22 Electa Lunette Nimmons (b. 1843 –NY) – School Teacher 28 Arthur Shutts – b. PA 22 Andrew Culver – b. NY 1870 Census -Naperville – July 6
62 Mary Child Wight (widow of James Wight) 27 Electa Lunette Nimmons (b. 1843 –NY) – School Teacher
1880 Census – Plainfield- June 25 1900 Census – Plainfield- June 26 1910 Plainfield – May 6 54 Roderick B. Wight 74 Roderick B. Wight 85 Roderick 46 Elizabeth 42 Adela 53 Adela 23 Adaline H. (b. 1856 in IL) 65 Jeanette Bradley
16 Algernon B. (b. 1864 in IL) 13 Willie (b. 1867 in IL) 8 Nettie (b. 1872 in IL)
65
41
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A Field Guide to American Architecture, Carole Rifkind, Plume Book, 1980, ISBN 0-452-25334-5 A History of Plainfield: Then and Now (2nd Edition), Plainfield Bicentennial Commission (Plainfield
Enterprise: Plainfield, Illinois, 1976
Ancestry.com
Appointments of US Postmasters – 1832 - 1971 Historic Urbanized Core Survey, Plainfield Historic Preservation Commission. ArchiSearch Historic Preservation Consultant Alice Novak, Sept. 12, 2005
Archivists at Dickinson College, Kings College, Thomas Jefferson University, University of
Pennsylvania The History of Will County, Illinois - 1878 Illinois State Historical Library Joliet Herald News
Naperville Cemetery Records
Plainfield Enterprise
Plainfield Historical Society Archives – Plainfield, Illinois Plainfield Township Cemetery Records Restoring Old Houses, Nigel Hutchins, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 1997, ISBN 1-55209-144-9
Rush University Medical Center Archives (Rush Medical College)
U.S. Federal Census Records – 1820, 1830, 1840, 1850, 1860, 1870, 1880, 1900, 1910, 1920, 1930, 1940 Will County Clerk’s Office Will County Recorder’s Office Archives: Joliet, Illinois
Researchers
Michael Bortel Leif Hendricksen
Photographs
Leif Hendricksen Using a SONY a100 SLR - with f3.5/5.6 18-70 lens Please note that the photograph files that are embedded in this document are quite large
and will provide enough data to permit more detail than presented.
66
Agenda Item No:
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date: April 26, 2018
Submitted by: Tracey Erickson
Submitting Department: Planning Department
Item Type: New Business Item
Agenda Section: REMINDERS
Subject:
Important Upcoming Dates
May 3rd at 5:00 p.m. - Joint LDDC & Public Outreach Subcommittees Meeting
May 14th at 7:00 p.m. - Joint Committee of the Whole and Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
May 17th at 6:00 p.m. - BTD & Preservation Meeting
TBD - Tour of Plainfield House
Suggested Action:
Attachments:
67
Agenda Item No:
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Report
Meeting Date: April 26, 2018
Submitted by: Tracey Erickson
Submitting Department: Planning Department
Item Type: New Business Item
Agenda Section: REMINDERS
Subject:
May 7, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. - Next Village Board Meeting
May 10, 2018 at 7:00p.m. - Next Historical Preservation Commission Meeting
Suggested Action:
Attachments:
68