Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06-19-2018 Plan Commission Minutes Plan Commission Record of Minutes Date: June 19, 2018 Location: Village Hall CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE, ROLL CALL Chairman Kiefer called the Plan Commission meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. immediately following the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Minnis, Renzi, Seggebruch, Womack, and Chairman Kiefer were present. Commissioners Green and Heinen were absent. Plainfield Fire Protection District, Plainfield Township Park District, Plainfield Public Library District and Plainfield Community Consolidated School District 202 were absent. OTHERS PRESENT: Jonathan Proulx, Director of Planning; Jake Melrose, Community Development Manager; Kendra Kuehlem, Associate Planner; and Tracey Erickson, Recording Secretary. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Plan Commission minutes dated June 5, 2018, were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENTS No Comment. DEVELOPMENT REPORT The development report was given during the preceding Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. OLD BUSINESS Case No. 1791-042718.CP NEC of 127th St. & Heggs Rd. (Ballard Farm) Camus Development NEW BUSINESS Case No. 1801-060718.FP 26204 W. Stewart Ridge Dr. & 12154 W. Sinclair Dr. DJK Meadow Mr. Proulx stated the applicant is seeking to consolidate Lots 88 and 89 into one lot in the Stewart Ridge residential subdivision. Currently, Lot 89 is occupied by a two-story single-family home, and Lot 88 is vacant. Lot 89 is 12,788.66 square feet and Lot 88 is 15,603.95 square feet. The subject site is currently zoned R-1 (Low-Density Single-Family Residential). Mr. Proulx stated There is no detailed design or plan for the vacant Lot 88; the applicant is not requesting any changes to the occupied Lot 89 at this time. Mr. Proulx reviewed the findings of fact from the staff report dated June 15, 2018. Mr. Proulx stated overall, the applicant’s Final Plat request meets the requirements of the Village’s Zoning Ordinance as well as the Stewart Ridge annexation agreement. Chairman Kiefer stated the applicant is not present. Chairman Kiefer asked for public comment. There was no response. Commissioner Renzi asked why the applicant needs the additional lot. Mr. Proulx stated in the past that these requests have been made for a pool. Commissioner Renzi asked what the fence setback will be for the consolidated lot. Mr. Proulx stated the consolidated lot would be considered a corner lot and the corner lot setbacks would apply. Commissioner Renzi asked if the applicant is aware of the setbacks. Mr. Proulx stated he does not believe so but the applicants house is currently on a corner lot. Chairman Kiefer stated he is concerned with what the lot could become, for example the applicant paving the lot. Mr. Proulx explained that the lot will not be independent and described what would be allowed. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 2 of 10 Commissioner Seggebruch asked if the applicant would be allowed to have a second driveway on the additional lot. Mr. Proulx stated the Subdivision Code does not restrict the number of driveway access points. Commissioner Seggebruch asked if the applicant would have to appear before the commission again for a pool or fence. Mr. Proulx explained the development standards that would apply, and if the applicant stays inside the standards, the applicant would not have to come before the Plan Commission. Commissioner Seggebruch stated his concerns for the future use of the property. Commissioner Minnis asked if Lot 89 is still owned by the builder. Mr. Proulx stated he is not sure and would have to check into it. Commissioner Minnis stated it would be helpful to know what the applicant’s intent of the lot it. Chairman Kiefer stated he is concern about the intent of the lot and how it will affect the neighbors. Commissioner Renzi made a motion to recommend approval of the Final Plat of Consolidation for Lots 89 and 88 (Parcel Identification Numbers 07-01-30-101-013 and 07-01-30-101-012, respectively) in the Stewart Ridge residential subdivision development subject to the following stipulations: 1. Compliance with requirements of the Village Engineer 2. Compliance with the requirements of the Plainfield Fire Protection District. Second by Commissioner Seggebruch. Vote by roll call: Minnis, No; Womack, yes; Seggebruch, Yes; Renzi, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 4-1 Case No. 1795-052418.SU 22419, 22531, & 22537 W. Renwick Road Alexander Domanskis, Attorney of GP Transportation Mr. Melrose stated the applicant, GP Transportation Co., is proposing to purchase the property located at 22419 W. Renwick Rd. westerly adjacent to Interstate 55, and establish their truck freight terminal operation. The subject property was annexed to the Village in 2012 and was re-zoned to I-1 Office, Research & Light Industrial District upon annexation. A truck freight terminal use is a permitted use through a special use permit in this district. The applicant is seeking special use permit approval of the proposed terminal operation. This application is concurrent with applications for annexation and rezoning of properties 22531 and 22537 W. Renwick Road, and if approved these properties will be included in the special use permit request. Mr. Melrose reviewed the findings of fact from the staff report dated June 15, 2018. Mr. Melrose stated staff believes the proposed truck freight operation will provide a needed redevelopment to a blighted industrial property while creating new job growth in the village of Plainfield. Based on the foregoing analysis, prior to any public comment and discussion by the Plan Commission, staff recommends approval. Chairman Kiefer swore in Al Domanski, Attorney of GP Transportation. Mr. Domanski introduced the individuals in attendance with him this evening. Mr. Domanski stated that the existing entrance is not appropriate for the development and explained how the property along the ComEd easement will be used for an addition entrance. Mr. Domanski explained how the property is currently being used. Mr. Domanski provided information about GP Transportation and explained how the property will be developed. Mr. Domanski stated GP Transportation is part of the Smart Way Program and what that is. Chairman Kiefer asked for public comment. Mr. Sniegowski asked what the total number of trucks per day will be. Mr. Melrose reviewed the information in the traffic study. Mr. Domanski explained how the truck traffic will be heaviest on Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 3 of 10 Sunday, Monday and Friday. Mr. Domanski explained how the numbers were determined for the traffic study. Mr. Sniegowski explained his concerns regarding traffic, safety, noise pollution, air pollution, property values, accidents, and quality of life. Chairman Kiefer explained the process of a Special Use hearing and that the Plan Commission is a recommending board. Chairman Kiefer swore in Susan Moritz, resident. Ms. Mortiz voiced her concern regarding traffic, safety, quality of life, and the reflection the terminal will have on Plainfield. Chairman Kiefer asked staff who has jurisdiction of Renwick Road where the truck terminal will be located. Mr. Proulx indicated the road is under Will County jurisdiction and staff understands the safety concerns with Renwick Road. Mr. Proulx explained how the new access point and road improvements would enhance the safety of the road. Chairman Kiefer reviewed the improvements that would be made to Renwick Road. Mr. Proulx stated the road improvements will need to be approved by Will County. Chairman Kiefer asked if Will County was planning on making these improvements. Mr. Proulx stated these road improvements will be made because of this project. Chairman Kiefer swore in Laura Sniegowski, resident. Ms. Sniegowski voiced her concern regarding safety, accidents, traffic, noise pollution, and air pollution. Chairman Kiefer stated the current zoning of the parcel is I-1, Industrial. Mr. Proulx provided a history of the parcel and explained the annexation process. Chairman Kiefer stated he was on the Plan Commission when the property was annexed and to his recollection there was talks about moving that access drive then as well. Chairman Kiefer swore in Juan Esquivel, Resident. Mr. Esquivel voiced his concern regarding property values. Chairman Kiefer asked the applicant if they would like to address the concerns of the residents. Mr. Domanski stated the purchase of the properties is contingent on the approval of the special use. Mr. Domanski addressed the concerns of the access point, Renwick Road improvements that will improve the safety of the road, and that the applicant has purchased electric trucks. Chairman Kiefer swore in Ellen Rasmussen, resident. Ms. Rasmussen asked, if the special use is approved can Will County not approve improvements to Renwick Road and for staff to explain how the Village will work with Will County to get the improvements made to Renwick Road. Mr. Proulx explained how the Village works with other jurisdictions for road improvements and indicated certain access points are not in the Village’s control. Chairman Kiefer asked for clarification that even with a special use approval the road improvements will need to be approved by Will County. Mr. Proulx stated correct and the Village is advocating for the western access point. Chairman Kiefer swore in Nancy Serdar, resident. Ms. Serdar asked what property Will County would use to expand Renwick Road. Mr. Proulx stated that will be addressed as part of the final engineering and included in the site plan review. Mr. Proulx stated that staff did receive several calls regarding the case. Mr. Proulx stated he spoke with Shirley Avery, and Ms. Avery voiced concern regarding the new access drive. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 4 of 10 Chairman Kiefer indicated when the subject property was annexed, it was annexed in its existing state. Chairman Kiefer stated if the special use is approved the applicant will need the property up to code, which in his opinion would be an improvement. Commissioner Seggebruch reviewed his recollection of the annexation case for this property. Commissioner Seggebruch stated he appreciates the public comments, and agrees that traffic is a problem throughout Plainfield. Commissioner Renzi asked staff to provide examples of the appropriate measures that can be incorporated into the site plan to mitigate against potential noise and impact as stated in staff report. Mr. Melrose stated that a berm or fencing could be used to separate the access drive. Chairman Kiefer asked the applicant if they are committed to mitigate the potential noise and impact. Mr. Domanski stated yes and explained how that could be accomplished with a 10-foot berm. Mr. Domanski explained the site plan and that the maintenance of the trucks will be done indoors. Commissioner Renzi stated berms have been used in other retail projects in Plainfield, like the Wal-Mart and Jewel. Commissioner Renzi asked the applicant how the trucks will cross Mink Creek. Chairman Kiefer Swore in Dave Zientek, of Ruettiger Tonelli & Associate, Engineer for applicant. Mr. Zientek indicated that there is an existing road crossing over the creek and there would be improvements but they have not been finalized yet. Commissioner Renzi asked if Mink Creek would be enhanced or improved by potential improvements to the bridge. Mr. Zientek stated the intent is not to impact the wetlands or flood plain, if there was impacts the applicant would receive proper permitting. Chairman Kiefer asked staff if the applicant will need to have a Site Plan review by the Village. Mr. Proulx stated correct and explained that the project was not required to submit full plans since the case is for a special use. Mr. Zientek explained how the berm will be determined based on how much land would be available. Commissioner Renzi asked staff if the Wetland Report is available online. Mr. Melrose stated he believes the entire packet is available online. Commissioner Renzi asked if the draft site plan in the packet will be the similar to the final Site Plan that could be presented in the future. Mr. Zientek responded yes but the drainage and detention calculations have not been considered yet. Commissioner Renzi asked if the ability to see the road will be minimized so it does not affect the neighbors. Mr. Zientek stated that was correct. Commissioner Minnis asked staff if the proposed turn lanes and deacceleration lanes will be larger since it will be used for truck traffic. Mr. Proulx indicated yes and explained why. Commissioner Minnis asked the applicant to clarify the distance from the road to the houses. Mr. Zientek explained the measurements. Commissioner Seggebruch asked if the applicant will be using the ComEd easement for the access drive. Mr. Zientek stated there is a 19-foot easement alongside the ComEd easement for the current driveway. Commissioner Seggebruch asked if the current driveway has ever been used for truck traffic under the current ownership. Mr. Zientek stated no, the concept plan in the packet does not accurately reflect the drive road and described the access road. Chairman Kiefer swore in Mike Martin, Attorney for Collins Family Partnership. Mr. Martin explained that the Collins Family will be keeping the house at 22531 W. Renwick Road, but they will be selling the west 36-feet of the lot, so the applicant can have an access road. Mr. Martin provided a history of the property, annexation, and the first time the access road was proposed. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 5 of 10 Commissioner Womack asked the applicant if the egress/ingress truck route from Route 30 to I-55 is a mandated route. Mr. Domansk indicated that Renwick Road to Route 30 is because of the access to I-55. Commissioner Womack asked if the eastern access road will be primarily used for shift worker with cars and little trucks. Mr. Domanski stated yes and he does not see it being used for any truck traffic. Commissioner Womack asked the applicant if they looked at different configurations for the site plan to move the road further away for the residents. Mr. Domanski indicated the applicant has looked at different configurations but they have the take into consideration the wetland and flood plains. Commissioner Womack asked what type of trailers will be stored at the proposed site. Chairman Kiefer swore in Dominic Zastarskis, CEO of GP Transportation Co. Mr. Zastarskis stated 53- foot drive ends with no intention for hazard materials, tankers or refrigerated trailers. Mr. Zastarskis stated his company is also a software company so curb appeal is very important to them and they have the greatest intention to make the site safe and well managed. Commissioner Womack indicated from a high-level view it does not seem like the best use and explained why. Commissioner Womack indicated that it is hard to grant the special use without the site plan, which would include stormwater manage, lighting, etc. Commissioner Womack stated he is personally not comfortable with what is before him and the intensity. Commissioner Seggebruch asked what the plan is with the land locked parcel to the south. Mr. Domanski stated the purchase of the property is contingent on the approval of the special use. Mr. Domanski indicated that the owner would be able to stay in the house between 2 to 3 years, then the house will be demolished. Commissioner Seggebruch explained in his opinion how holding off demolishing the home could affect the outcome of the site plan and explained how it may affect the placement of the road and berm. Mr. Domanski explained how the applicant will be using part of the property before the home is demolished and stated the commissioner’s comments will be taken into consideration. Commissioner Renzi made a motion to adopt the findings of fact of staff as the findings of fact of the Plan Commission and, furthermore, recommend approval of the special use permit for GP Transportation Co. to operate a truck freight terminal in the I-1 zoning district for the property commonly known as 22419, 22531, and 22537 W. Renwick Road, subject to the following three (3) stipulations: 1. Compliance with the requirements of the Village Engineer; 2. Compliance with the requirements of the Plainfield Fire Protection District; and 3. Compliance with the requirements of Will County with respect to Renwick Road ingress/egress/access. Second by Commissioner Minnis. Vote by roll call: Seggebruch, No; Womack, No; Minnis, yes; Renzi, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 3-2 Case No. 1793-052418.AA.REZ 22537 W. Renwick Rd. GP Transportation Co. Mr. Melrose stated the applicant is seeking to annex a parcel that is currently landlocked by the industrially zoned property at 22419 W. Renwick Road. The applicant has applied for a special use permit for 22419 Renwick, the subject property, and part of 22531 Renwick to allow for a truck freight terminal operation. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 6 of 10 Mr. Melrose stated the subject property would be incorporated into the development eventually; however, residents are currently leasing the property and the applicants would like the ability to let the residents stay in the home for a maximum of three (3) years to allow them appropriate time to relocate. Mr. Melrose stated upon annexation, the applicant has also requested the Village rezone the subject property from R-1 Low-Density Single Family Residential to I-1 Office, Research, and Light Industrial District to be consistent with the surrounding property. Mr. Melrose reviewed the findings of fact from the staff report dated June 15, 2018. Mr. Melrose stated staff believes the proposed annexation is a logical extension of the Village’s boundaries, and furthermore, staff believes the proposed rezoning from R-1 to I-1 upon annexation is consistent with the existing zoning surrounding the property. Prior to any public comment and discussion by the Plan Commission, staff recommends approval. Chairman Kiefer swore in Al Domanski, Attorney of GP Transportation and Dominic Zastarskis, CEO of GP Transportation Co. Chairman Kiefer asked for public comment. There was no response. Commissioner Minnis asked for an explanation on why the home owner is being allowed to stay in the home for 3 years. Mr. Domanski indicated the current owner made the request 2 years. Commissioner Womack asked if the applicant has purchased the property. Mr. Domanski stated the purchase of the property is contingent upon approval of the special use. Mr. Domanski stated that the north end of the Broadus property will be used for the access road. Commissioner Seggebruch reiterated that he does not want the prolonged demolition of the house to be a detriment to the residents. Mr. Zastarskis stated besides the access road, they do not have any plans to develop the northern part of the site for another 10 years. Chairman Kiefer reopened Public Comment. Chairman Kiefer swore in Joseph Broadus, home owner. Mr. Broadus clarified that the he did not request to stay in the home for 2 years, it was offered as part of the sale of the property. Commissioner Womack asked for clarification if the special use from the prior case will pertain to this property. Mr. Proulx stated yes. Commissioner Renzi asked for clarification on how the zoning will be affected since the property will remain a residence for a couple years. Mr. Proulx stated the property will have an annexation agreement and the 2 or 3-years agreement between the buyer and seller would be part of the annexation agreement. Commissioner Renzi clarified property would be a nonconforming use in the annexation agreement while it is being used as a residence. Mr. Melrose stated correct. Commissioner Seggebruch stated he does not see a problem with the annexation of this property since it is a land locked parcel. Commissioner Seggebruch stated that the commission should not base the decision on how long someone will be living in the home on the property. Chairman Kiefer stated he agrees especial if this project comes back for site plan review. Commissioner Womack asked for clarification from the applicant, if they were not developing the northern area of the site around the homes, but would be putting in the access road. Mr. Domanski stated yes. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 7 of 10 Commissioner Minnis made a motion to recommend approval of the annexation of the property commonly known as 22537 W. Renwick Road (Parcel Identification Number 06-03-23-200-028-0000), as a logical extension of the Village of Plainfield. Second by Commissioner Renzi. Vote by roll call: Womack, yes; Seggebruch, yes; Renzi, yes; Minnis, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 5-0 Commissioner Renzi made a motion to adopt the findings of fact of staff as the findings of fact of the Plan Commission and, furthermore, recommend approval of the rezoning of the property commonly known as 22537 W. Renwick Road (Parcel Identification Number 06-03-23-200-028-0000) from R-1 Low-Density Single-Family Residential District to I-1 Office, Research, and Light Industrial District. Second by Commissioner Seggebruch. Vote by roll call: Minnis, yes; Womack, no; Renzi, yes; Seggebruch, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 4-1 Case No. 1794-052418.AA.REZ 22531 W. Renwick Rd. Collins Enterprises Partners, L.P. Mr. Melrose stated the applicant, GP Transportation Co., is the contract purchaser of the property at 22531 W. Renwick and is seeking to annex the property into the Village of Plainfield with the authorization of the current land owner, Collins Enterprises Partners, L.P. The applicant has applied for a special use permit for 22419 Renwick, the subject property, and the property at 22537 Renwick to allow for a truck freight terminal operation. Mr. Melrose stated upon annexation, the applicant is requesting to rezone Parcel 1 on the plat of survey to I-1 Industrial District. Parcel 1 is 0.281 acres to be purchased by the applicant from the existing landowner to allow for the primary access into the truck freight terminal operation which is currently zoned I-1 Industrial District. Parcel 2 on the plat of survey provided will remain R-1 Single Family Residential upon annexation and with the proposed configurations would be in conformance with the Village Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Melrose reviewed the findings of fact from the staff report dated June 15, 2018. Mr. Melrose stated staff believes the proposed annexation is a logical extension of the Village’s boundaries, and furthermore, staff believes the proposed rezoning from R-1 to I-1 upon annexation of Parcel 1 on the plat of survey is consistent with the existing zoning surrounding the property. Prior to any public comment and discussion by the Plan Commission, staff recommends approval. Chairman Kiefer swore in Mike Martin, Attorney for the Collins Enterprises Partner, L.P. Mr. Martin clarified only the 36 feet of the west side of the property will be zoned I-1. Chairman Kiefer asked for public comment. Chairman Kiefer swore in Jeff Sniegowski, resident. Mr. Sniegowski asked if the side setback of 60 feet for an industrial area adjacent to residential will pertain to this property. Mr. Proulx indicated that the building setback would be 60 feet. Commissioner Minnis asked if the intent will be to have the house remain residential. Mr. Martin stated yes and the house is currently rented. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 8 of 10 Commissioner Renzi asked staff about Village Code for berms and fences when industrial is adjacent to residential. Mr. Melrose stated there are requirements during the site planning process for transitional buffers such as a berm or a fence. Mr. Melrose stated in the site plan process it may be beneficial to have a fence. Commissioner Renzi stated he does not want site lines compromised by a fence or a landscape berm. Mr. Martin indicated that the applicant will be installing landscaping along the access road. Commissioner Renzi asked the applicant if the property for the access drive is enough to include a landscaped easement. Mr. Martin stated the site plans are not finalized yet and all that will be taken into consideration. Commissioner Renzi asked if there will be a landscaped buffer for the access drive no matter what, whether it be on the property being purchased, or the property that will remain residential. Mr. Martin stated yes. Commissioner Seggebruch asked the applicant if they were selling the entire parcel. Mr. Martin stated the applicant is only selling the west 36-feet. Commissioner Seggebruch asked the applicant if they are willing to make improvements on the residential property to create an additional buffer. Mr. Martin stated yes, but those plans have not been finalized yet. Chairman Kiefer asked staff how it will be ensured those improvements are made. Mr. Proulx stated that will be demonstrated through the site plan review. Commissioner Renzi provided a detailed description on the survey received from the applicant, including what will be zoned I-1 and R-1. Commissioner Renzi stated the R-1 lot on this parcel will be the end lot not the Sniegowski Residents. Mr. Martin stated correct. Commissioner Womack stated he feels the annexation is a logical extension of the Village but he cannot support the rezoning since it is tied to the special use. Commissioner Minnis made a motion to recommend approval of the annexation of the property commonly known as 22531 W. Renwick Road (Parcel Identification Number 06-03-23-200-029-0000), as a logical extension of the Village of Plainfield. Second by Commissioner Renzi. Vote by roll call: Womack, yes; Seggebruch, yes; Renzi, yes; Minnis, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 5-0 Commissioner Renzi made a motion to adopt the findings of fact of staff as the findings of fact of the Plan Commission and, furthermore, recommend approval of the rezoning identified as Parcel 1 of 22531 W. Renwick Road on the attached plat of survey from R-1 Low-Density Single-Family Residential District to I-1 Office, Research, and Light Industrial District. Second by Commissioner Seggebruch. Vote by roll call: Minnis, yes; Womack, no; Seggebruch, yes; Renzi, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 4-1 Chairman Kiefer asked staff what other uses are permitted in I-1 zoning which would not require a special use. Mr. Proulx stated farming, commercial green house, moving/self-storage facility, outdoor storage of contained materials, light industrial, brewery, auto body and repair, service station for automotive, taxidermist, and Car wash. Chairman Kiefer explained why this case was heard before the Plan Commission this evening. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 9 of 10 Case No. 1796-53118.AA.REZ.SU P3 Rezoning & Planned Unit Development Village of Plainfield Mr. Melrose stated that on May 21, 2018, the Village Board of Trustees approved a public-private partnership (P3) agreement between the Village of Plainfield and Northern Builders, Inc. with the intent to attract development interest to the 51.231 remaining acreage while also constructing a needed Plainfield Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) facility on the site. Mr. Melrose stated as part of this agreement, the Village is required to rezone the subject property from R-1 Low-Density Single Family Residential to I-1 Office, Research, and Light Industrial District and provide a planned development by special use to establish a hybrid zoning district that includes certain uses from the B-3 Highway Business District and prohibits certain uses from the I-1 zoning district. Mr. Melrose reviewed the findings of fact from the staff report dated June 15, 2018. Mr. Melrose stated staff supports the proposed rezoning to I-1 for Lot 2, 3, & 4 of the subject area and supports the planned unit development adding specific B3 uses while prohibiting some I-1 uses. Based on the foregoing analysis, prior to any public comment and discussion by the Plan Commission, staff recommends approval. Chairman Kiefer asked for public comment. There was no response. Commissioner Renzi asked if the Village can restrict the use for religious assembly and institution. Mr. Proulx stated there are certain zoning districts it can be prohibited, it cannot be prohibited in all zoning districts. Chairman Kiefer stated that all religious uses would have to be denied not just some. Commissioner Seggebruch asked if a special use for religious assembly/institution have been approved in other I-1 zoned properties. Mr. Proulx stated yeas and explained why the religious assembly/institution can be challenging in I-1. Chairman Kiefer stated that someone could request a special use with this planned unit development for religious assemble & institution. Commissioner Renzi asked for clarification on prohibiting a use. Mr. Proulx explained the difference between special use and prohibited use in the zoning code. Mr. Proulx stated the planned development can be modified to permit the use. Commissioner Seggebruch indicated that it was suggested that the Village had too much industrial property, he asked if now the Village looking to develop these type of uses again. Mr. Melrose stated there is gap of type of industrial available and explained the gap. Mr. Melrose stated the category of uses chart is separate from the zoning ordinance since this is an agreement between two parties and explained why. Commissioner Seggebruch asked who owns the subject property. Mr. Melrose stated the Village owns the property and the process in which the property will be transferred to Northern Builders. Mr. Melrose also explained the process how the PEMA facility will be built. Commissioner Seggebruch asked if the concept site plan will change. Mr. Melrose stated the PEMA building will be constructed on the lot as shown but the rest of the concept plan could change depending on who is attracted or recruited to the site. Mr. Proulx explained the final plat of subdivision and how when a deal comes through there will be a resubdivision at that time. Commissioner Seggebruch asked if the street will run directly south. Mr. Proulx state there will be provisions in the development agreement and explained what the provisions maybe. Commissioner Minnis asked if the uses list is a hypothetical list of what can be developed on the property. Mr. Melrose stated yes. Plan Commission Minutes June 5, 2018 Page 10 of 10 Commissioner Minnis made a motion to adopt the findings of fact of staff as the findings of fact of the Plan Commission and, furthermore, recommend approval of the requested map amendment (re-zoning), from R-1 to I-1, for the Lot 2, 3, & 4 of the Pace-Village Subdivision. Second by Commissioner Seggebruch. Vote by roll call: Renzi, yes; Womack, yes; Seggebruch, yes; Minnis, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 5-0 Commissioner Seggebruch made a motion to adopt the findings of fact of staff as the findings of fact of the Plan Commission and, furthermore, recommend approval of the proposed planned development for Lots 2 & 4 of the Pace-Village Subdivision, subject to the following two (2) stipulations: 1. Compliance with the requirements of the Village Engineer; and 2. Compliance with the requirements of the Plainfield Fire Protection District; Second by Commissioner Minnis. Vote by roll call: Womack, yes; Renzi, yes; Minnis, yes; Seggebruch, yes; Kiefer, yes. Motion carried 5-0 DISCUSSION No Discussion. Chairman Kiefer read the reminders. Meeting adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Tracey Erickson Tracey Erickson Recording Secretary