HomeMy Public PortalAbout04.20.2016 Park Commission PacketMEDINA►
AGENDA
MEDINA PARK COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 20, 2016 7:00 P.M.
Medina City Council Chambers
City Hall, 2052 County Road 24
1) Call to Order
2) Additions to Agenda
3) Approval of the Minutes from:
• February 17, 2016 Regular Meeting
4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda)
5) City Council Update
6) Dellcroft - PUD Concept Plan - West of Arrowhead Drive, North and South of
Hamel Road - Park Dedication Review
7) 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan Review for Parks & Trails
8) The Park at Fields of Medina Lighting Request
9) Scoreboard Graphics at Paul Fortin Memorial Field
10) Monarch Butterfly Garden Location
11) Schedule Spring Park Tour
12) Staff Report
a) Dugout Covers at Hamel Legion Park
b) Spring Clean-up Day Involvement
c) Arrowhead Drive Trail Update
d) General Items
13) Adjourn
Posted 4/15/2016 Pa • e 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Park Commission
FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: April 14, 2016
DATE OF MEETING: April 20, 2016
SUBJECT: Park Commission Meeting Report
2. Additions to Agenda
If any Park Commissioner wishes to add an item to the agenda after the agenda has
already been posted, the agenda item must be proposed at this point in the meeting. The
Park Commission must agree to add the item by motion.
5. City Council Update
This is a reoccurring agenda item to have the City Council Liaison to the Park
Commission, Lorie Cousineau, give an update at each meeting on what is happening at
the Council level.
6. Dellcroft — PUD Concept Plan — West of Arrowhead Drive, North and South of Hamel
Road — Park Dedication Review
City Planner Dusty Finke prepared the attached report outlining the applicant's request
for a review of a Concept Plan for a 161-lot residential development west of Arrowhead
Drive, north and south of Hamel Road. The applicant proposes a 22 lot Conservation
Design -Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD) on the 90 acres south of Hamel Road.
The applicant proposes 109 single family lots and 30 townhomes on the 65 acres north of
Hamel Road to be developed though a standard PUD process, not under the CD-PUD
process.
See attached staff report.
Recommended Action: Provide feedback to developer on parks and trails.
7. 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan Review for Parks & Trails
City Planner Dusty Finke has prepared the attached report and draft map outlining the
work of the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. Because the Land Use Map is
likely to be adjusted over the next few months, staff believes it may be premature to
begin discussing plans for parks and trails in specific areas of the City. However, staff
believes it is important to begin discussing the bigger picture and to start establishing
objectives and policies which will guide the Plan.
See attached report.
Recommended Action: Begin discussion on establishing park and trail objectives and
policies to guide the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan process.
1
8. The Park at Fields of Medina Lighting Request
Residents in the Park at Fields of Medina have requested that lights be added to the park
and parking lot. Public Works Director Steve Scherer has done some initial cost
estimates, which are outlined on the attached memo.
See attached memo.
Recommended Motion: Make recommendation on lighting at the Park at Fields of
Medina.
9. Scoreboard Graphics at Paul Fortin Memorial Field
The Hamel Lions Club has raised enough funds from various sponsors to purchase the
scoreboard. The resolution accepting the donations and authorizing the purchase is on the
April 19th City Council agenda for approval. The City Council packet for this item is
attached for the Park Commission's reference. The last step is for the Park Commission
to endorse the sign advertisement graphics for the scoreboard and round signs and banner
for the smaller donors.
See attached graphics and packet items.
Recommended Motion: Make recommendation on scoreboard graphics.
10. Monarch Butterfly Garden Location
Staff has received a quote from Designing Nature to install a butterfly garden in front of
the Hamel Community Building or to install a stand-alone garden in a full sun location.
The quote is on the City Council agenda for approval on April 19th with the direction to
have the Park Commission determine the exact location and plant varieties.
See attached packet items.
Recommended Motion: Make recommendation on location of butterfly garden and plant
varieties.
11. Schedule Spring Park Tour
In the past few years, we have scheduled this tour on our regular May meeting date with a
5 p.m. start time. Please look at your schedules and determine if Wednesday, May 18th at
5 p.m. works to schedule our Spring Park Tour. Also, be thinking about which parks you
would like to visit. Please be thinking about your specific assigned parks and what
projects we would like to accomplish this year. We have received a request from the
Fields of Medina residents to install a volleyball court on the west side of the park near
the proposed future water tower site. The Park Commission may want to plan to visit this
park to determine if this would be a good location.
No attachments for this item.
Recommended Action: Schedule Spring Park Tour and discuss which parks to visit.
12. Staff Report
a. Dugout Covers at Hamel Legion Park — The Park Commission has budgeted $25,000 out
of Park Dedication to install dugout covers on the quad fields in Hamel Legion Park.
Steve Scherer has been working with a contractor to put together quotes. Staff will try to
have the quotes ready prior to the April 20th meeting.
2
b. Spring Clean-up Day Involvement. Spring Clean-up Day is scheduled for Saturday, April
30th from 8 a.m. until noon. This item is to discuss if the Park Commission has an interest
in being involved at the event.
c. Arrowhead Drive Trail Update. The bid opening for the Arrowhead Drive Trail project is
on April 21, 2016 at 11 a.m. The city hopes to award a contract at the May 3, 2016 City
Council meeting.
d. General Items. This agenda item is to give a verbal update on any other general park
items.
Staff representation at the April 20th Park Commission meeting will be City Planner Dusty
Finke, Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup, and Public Works Director Steve Scherer.
3
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
February 17, 2016
Medina City Hall
Page 1 of 3
The Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on February 17, 2016 at 7:00
p.m. at Medina City Hall. Park Commission Chair Steve Lee presided.
1) Call to Order
Commissioners Present:
Commissioners Absent:
Also Present:
Steve Lee, John Jacob, Dino DesLauriers, and Michelle
Beddor
Lori Meehan, Nate Pearson, and One Vacant Seat
Assistant City Administrator Jodi Gallup, Public Works
Director Steve Scherer and City Council member Lorie
Cousineau.
2) Additions to the Agenda
Steve Lee stated that he would give an update on the Comprehensive Plan Steering
Committee under "General Items". He also requested that a Comprehensive Plan update
be added to future agendas.
The Park Commission welcomed Michelle Beddor to the Commission and introductions
were made.
3) Approval of the Minutes from January 20, 2016 Regular Meeting
A motion was made by Jacob and seconded by DesLauriers to approve the minutes from
January 20, 2016 as presented. Motion passed unanimously.
4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda): None.
5) City Council Update
Lorie Cousineau gave the Park Commission an update on recent City Council actions.
6) Scoreboard Funding Request
Ted Fust with the Hamel Hawks and Hamel Lions Club recapped that he has been before
the Park Commission for approval of the Scoreboard design late last fall with a proposed
donation from the Hamel Lions Club. He stated that the total cost of the scoreboard is too
much of a burden for the Hamel Lions Club to contribute on their own so he is back
before the Park Commission with an amended request.
Fust stated that he had met with City staff and Hamel Lions members to discuss the
scoreboard funding. He stated that the Public Works Department offered to help with the
site preparation and installation, which will bring the total cost down by $1,500. He noted
that the total cost after the donated items would be approximately $12,000. He asked the
Park Commission to contribute 25% of the project cost, which would be approximately
$3,000. He stated that he is also soliciting other donations to try to cover the remaining
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
February 17, 2016
Medina City Hall
Page 2 of 3
costs. He stated that his second request of the Park Commission would be to allow up to
three donors on the bottom of the scoreboard sign.
Lee questioned if the color scheme of the scoreboard and the donors would remain the
same if there were multiple donors. Fust confirmed the colors would remain the same and
that they wanted a uniform look with the other fields.
DesLauriers asked if they considered buying the same scoreboards that were currently on
the four-plex. He noted that the price was significantly less and it would bring a uniform
look to all the fields.
Fust stated that the Paul Fortin Memorial Field would be used by high school and adult
leagues and it was important for them to have a more sophisticated scoreboard.
Jacob confirmed that a new scoreboard would give the appearance of an updated field.
A motion was made by DesLauriers and seconded by Jacob to recommend sharing up to
$3, 000 of the cost of a new scoreboard and to allow addition sponsors as long as the
final design was reviewed by the Park Commission. Motion passed unanimously.
7) 2016 Park and Trail Goals
Lee stated that the goals document had been updated based on discussion at the January
20, 2016 meeting. He asked that each Commissioner review the 2016 goals for their
parks and set a timeline for when the item should be completed. He asked that everyone
report back to Gallup with their timelines.
Lee assigned Medina Lake Preserve and Tomann Preserve to Beddor.
8) Park Commission Ordinance
Gallup stated that staff had received a call from a new resident that was interested in
joining the Park Commission, but this resident did not meet the one year residency
requirement that is written in the Park Commission Ordinance She stated that staff was
seeking the Park Commission's feedback and recommendation to determine if the
ordinance should be amended to remove the residency requirement or if there is value in
keeping it.
Jacob noted that there is value in knowing your community before joining this
commission.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
February 17, 2016
Medina City Hall
Page 3 of 3
There was a general consensus of the Park Commission to keep the ordinance as written
with the one year residency requirement.
The Park Commission also discussed the term limit set in the Park Commission
ordinance, which states a Commissioner cannot serve more than three consecutive three
year terms. They felt that if a Park Commissioner met the term limit and there were still
vacancies on the Park Commission, the Park Commissioner should not have to leave the
Commission.
9) Staff Report
• Park Commission Vacancies — It was noted that there is still one vacant seat on
the Park Commission.
• Park Dedication Fund Balance — Gallup reported that an updated Park Dedication
Fund balance had been included in the packet and asked if anyone had any
questions. Two transactions were questioned and Gallup stated she would look
into it.
• General Items
o Arrowhead Drive Trail Update —Scherer gave a brief update on the
Arrowhead Drive Trail. He stated that staff had been working with the
engineers on a preliminary estimate and noted that some wetland
mitigation may be needed.
o Comprehensive Plan Update — Lee provided the Park Commission with a
draft map of the proposed MUSA lines by the Comprehensive Plan
Steering Committee. He noted where the high density, mixed residential,
and low density units were being proposed.
o Stonegate Trail Plan — Lee stated that Roland Aberg called him to inquire
about changing the trail plan. He stated that Aberg recommended that
Stonegate pave the trail from Medina Morningside to Homestead Trail,
but in exchange they did not want to put the base under the turf trails in
fear that the grass would not grow.
10) Adjourn
A motion was made by DesLauriers, seconded by Jacob and passed unanimously, to
adjourn the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:44 p.m.
Minutes prepared by Jodi Gallup.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner
DATE: April 14, 2016
MEETING: April 20, 2016 Park Commission
SUBJ: BFP Development LLC — "Dellcroft" — PUD Concept Plan Review —
West of Arrowhead Drive, North and South of Hamel Road —
Review Deadline
Complete Application Received: March 16, 2016
60-day Review Deadline: May 15, 2016
Summary of Request
BFP Development, LLC has requested review of a Concept Plan for a 161-lot residential
development west of Arrowhead Drive, north and south of Hamel Road. The applicant proposes
a 22 lot Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development (CD-PUD) on the 90 acres south of
Hamel Road. The applicant proposes 109 single family lots and 30 townhomes on the 65 acres
north of Hamel Road to be developed though a standard PUD process, not under the CD-PUD
process.
The subject site, both north and south of Hamel Road, is guided and zoned Rural Residential
which would generally require a minimum of 5 acres of contiguous suitable soils per lot. The
Concept Plan would require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the guided land
use of the property north of Hamel Road to Low Density Residential. The northern portion of
the development is proposed to be supported by City sewer and water through such an
amendment.
The southern portion of the Concept proposes private septic and wells through the CD-PUD
process. The applicant requests a density bonus as described in the CD-PUD zoning district in
consideration for permanent conservation of approximately 51 gross acres (27.3 buildable acres).
The applicant proposes additional conservation within the development north of Hamel Road,
but does not propose to include the northern land in the CD-PUD.
The Hennepin County Public Works facility is located north of the subject property. The land
east of Arrowhead Drive, north of Hamel Road is planned for future Business development in the
Comprehensive Plan. Property to the west, south, and east include existing Rural Residential
land uses which are planned to remain rural.
The existing use on the subject property is predominantly tilled agricultural land. There are
wetlands scattered throughout the property. The property south of Hamel Road includes a
wooded area in the northwest and along a wooded ravine north -to -south through the center of the
property. An aerial of the site and surrounding property can be found at the top of the following
page.
Dellcroft Page 1 of 6 April 20, 2016
Concept Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Comprehensive Plan
Both parcels are guided Rural Residential (RR). As noted, the applicant seeks to amend the
guiding on the northern parcel to Low Density Residential (LDR). The Comprehensive Plan
defines RR and LDR as follows:
Rural Residential (RR) identifies areas for low -intensity uses, such as rural residential, rural
commercial, farming, hobby farms, horticulture, conservation of ecologically significant natural resources
and passive recreation. This area is not planned to be served by urban services during the timeframe
covered by this Plan and requires each lot to have five contiguous acres of soils suitable for septic
systems.
Low Density Residential (LDR) identifies residential land uses developed between 2.0 units per acre and
3.49 units per acre which are served or are intended to be served by urban services. The primary use in
this area is single-family residential development. The areas designated for low density residential uses
are located near existing low density residential uses, natural resources and provide a transition between
higher density residential districts and the permanent rural areas of the community.
Dellcroft Page 2 of 6 April 20, 2016
Concept Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
The City is currently in the midst of its decennial Comprehensive Plan update. The Steering
Committee has put together drafts of a Vision, Community Goals, and a Land Use Concept. The
subject property is not proposed for urban services.
Proposed Site Layout
As noted above, the applicant proposes different types of development north and south of Hamel
Road. Although the Concept Plan is a single application, staff believes it is easier to describe the
two portions separately.
North of Hamel Road, the applicant proposes a mix of single-family lot sizes, with most of the
lots being 75 feet wide and approximately'/4 acre. Larger''/z acre lots are proposed in the
northwest portion of the site. Thirty townhome units are proposed in the northeast portion of the
site. An open space corridor is proposed north -to -south through the center of the site which
would connect to the wooded ravine south of Hamel Road.
The gross area north of Hamel Road is 66 acres with approximately 9 acres of wetland and
wetland buffers, resulting in net area of approximately 57 acres. The applicant proposes
approximately 12 buildable acres of open space within the central corridor. Much of this area
would be restored to native grassland, although a portion is proposed to be an active park area.
South of Hamel Road, the applicant proposes a CD-PUD development of 22 lots with
approximately 57 acres of conservation area (27 buildable acres). The CD-PUD district is an
option a developer is encouraged to consider as an alternative to conventional development in
order to preserve the City's ecological resources, wildlife corridors, scenic views, and rural
character. The CD-PUD allows flexibility to various zoning standards, the most significant
being a maximum density up to 200% of the base density for conventional rural development.
According to Section 827.53: "Conservation design is an option that a property owner is
encouraged to consider as an alternative to Conventional Development... The City will give
heightened consideration to such requests where the opportunities to achieve conservation
objectives are significantly higher than that available through conventional development." The
City maintains the ultimate discretion to determine whether a proposal sufficiently meets the
objectives of the CD-PUD district in order to justify the amount of flexibility sought by the
applicant. These objectives are:
1. Protect the ecological function of native hardwood forests, lakes, streams, and wetlands.
2. Protect moderate to high quality ecologically significant natural areas.
3. Protect opportunities to make ecological connections between parks and other protected
lands and ecologically significant natural areas.
4. Protect important viewsheds including scenic road segments.
5. Create public and private trails for citizens to access and enjoy Open Space resources.
6. Create public and private Open Space for citizens to access and enjoy Open Space
resources.
Dellcroft Page 3 of 6 April 20, 2016
Concept Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
In creating a CD-PUD proposal, an applicant is required to go through a site design process
which sets a priority on first identifying the areas which are to be preserved. Only after the
conservation priorities are set should house sites, streets, and trails be planned. Staff went
through a similar exercise, a summary of which is attached.
The applicant claims that there are 56 contiguous acres of suitable soil on the parcel. This
information will need to be verified following wetland delineation and survey review. If correct,
it would result in a Base Density of 11 lots with 5-acre contiguous suitable soils. The applicant
requests 22 lots, which is 200% of the base density and the maximum density allowed by the
CD-PUD district.
Tree Preservation and Buffer Yards
As noted above, there are existing wooded areas in the northwest corner of the southern parcel
and along a ravine bisecting the southern property. Staff recommends that these areas be
incorporated into Conservation Areas and to limit impact and removal of trees to the extent
possible.
The proposed development south of Hamel Road is divided into two areas by the wooded ravine.
The Developer proposes to connect these areas with a street and trail connection. While
connecting the two areas may be a goal, it may be preferable to maintain an undisturbed
greenway along the ravine and to remove the street connection.
Staff would recommend that the Developer examine opportunities to increase the buffer along
the western edge of the northern development to the extent practical. Perhaps the greenway
could be extended straight north from the wooded ravine for some distance rather than through
the center of the development.
Wetlands and Floodplain
There are wetlands located in various locations on the site. It appears that the Developer has
proposed to avoid wetland impacts. Upland buffers will be required adjacent to the wetlands on
the property.
There is a very large wetland south of the subject site which extends into the southwest corner of
the site. This wetland is classified as a good quality black ash swamp. The Developer proposes
a large buffer from this area.
FEMA floodplain maps show a floodplain over the large wetland in the southwest corner of the
southern parcel. This floodplain does not have a defined elevation and likely does not extend
onto the site as far as displayed on the state level FEMA maps. Staff does not believe there will
be any floodplain impacts, but the applicant will need to provide data to confirm.
Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces
The City's subdivision regulations requires up to 10% of the buildable property to be dedicated
for park purposes. The City may also choose to accept cash in -lieu of all or a portion of this land
dedication in an amount equal to 8% of the pre -developed market value, up to a maximum of
Dellcroft Page 4 of 6 April 20, 2016
Concept Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
$8,000 per home, or $1,288,000. Staff does not believe the fee would reach the maximum in this
case, but it will be determined more precisely during the preliminary plat review.
The applicant proposes a substantial trail network throughout the development, including 2.8
miles of trails throughout the development and 0.62 miles of trail along Arrowhead and Hamel
Road. The applicant also proposes sidewalks in the development north of Hamel Road to
connect to the trails.
The applicant proposes an active park near the center of the development north of Hamel Road.
Staff believes such an amenity would be important because the subject site is not located within
1/2 mile of a park.
The Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plan as well as the Parks and Trails Master Plan are
attached for reference. It should be noted that these plans were drafted assuming rural
development on the subject property. The requested change in land uses may justify additional
facilities.
The Parks and Trails Plans identify a potential Active Park Study Area on the subject property,
although need for a park in this located was not included in the Master Plan. As noted above, the
change in land use may affect such need. If residential development were to occur in this area,
staff would recommend an active park. The Park Commission can discuss if a public park is
necessary or if the park should be maintained by the association.
The Plans identify paved trail corridors north -south along Arrowhead Drive and east -west along
Hamel Road. The Plans also identify a turf trail east -west along the south of the property.
Staff believes there may be more trails proposed than City resources would support maintenance.
Many of the shorter trail connections would predominantly serve residents in different locations
within the development. Staff suggests that these connections may be better maintained as
private trails which would provide access to a more limited primary public trail system. The
Park Commission may wish to discuss whether it makes sense for the trails through the open
space areas to serve as alternatives to the trails shown along Arrowhead Drive and Hamel Road
in the Master Plan. Such an arrangement could serve broader connection purposes and be a more
interesting experience for users.
Purpose of Concept Plan Review/Review Criteria
According to Section 827.33 of the City Code: "As the first step in the review procedure for a
PUD, an applicant shall complete and submit... [a] Concept Plan..." "Comments and actions by
the City during review of the Concept Plan are purely advisory and in no way shall bind the City
to subsequent approval...nor imply any future approval."
The City has a great deal of discretion in the Planned Unit Development and the Conservation
Design Planned Unit Development. The City also has a great deal of discretion in the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment which the applicant would need to request in order to develop
the property with municipal sewer and water as requested. The Concept Plan process allows the
developer to receive feedback in order to determine whether they will invest in the formal
development proposal.
Dellcroft Page 5 of 6 April 20, 2016
Concept Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Attachments
1. Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plans
2. Parks and Trails Master Plan Future Facilities Map
3. Staff CD-PUD Site Design Exercise
4. Applicant's Narrative
5. Concept Plan Documents
Dellcroft Page 6 of 6 April 20, 2016
Concept Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
;aad 00Z' l 009 00E 0
(90a) 91.0Z'9 Hiciv :oleo den
suogoeuuoo lepa;od
suopeuuoo lepa;od
suo!pauuo0 Ainuapi - £ dais
sapsawoH lequa;od a;eooi - Z dais e
samsawoH lel;ua;od - Z delS
uogeniasuoo anepunqun
seaiy uogemasuoo amepun8 lepa;od
uonemosuo9 - 6 dais
s!sAieuv ails
and -cm uonilea
tiNla3w
suoisualx3
Jopwoo lepelod
A1!leno p990
dwems us'd Vera
awnosab 4len0
poop LuauJagng
wawaoueL ua
`le!lualoo
Teepee
pawls!
uopeuuoo
i0p1100 ipaualod -
��e l l c r o f t
0
. , 2 C o n c e p t
5 u A l i t t a l 3 e - b a i t s &