Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout1974_06_24SPEC 1 1 WAIVER OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING JUNE 24, 1974 We , the undersigned, being members of the Town Council of the Town of Leesburg , in Virginia , do seve- rally waive all statutory and Charter requirements as to notice of time , place and purpose of a Special Meet- ing of the Town Council , to be held in the Council Cham- bers , 10 West Loudoun Street, Leesburg, Virginia, at 7 :30 P.M. , Monday , June 24, 1974 , for the purpose of discussing water and sewer rates , and any other matter that may come before the Council . • G. Dew- ill , Mayor afar Walter F . Mi r y Herbert L. Ridder 40, Robert A. Orr �C. � Ter, Titus/( / OW i/� iil ' "'�' `r. O ' I o W. Puma rey John A. Wallace , J /Y{ a 3t . MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL, JUNE 24, 1974. , A special meeting of the Leesburg Town Council was held in . the Council Chambers , 10 West Loudoun Street, Leesburg, Virginia on June 24, 1974 at 7 :30 P.M. , pursuant to Waiver of Notice attached hereto. Present were the following : Mayor Hill, Councilmen Murray, Pumphrey, Ridder, Titus and Wallace ; also Town Manager James W. Ritter, Jr. , Deputy Town Manager E. Wesley Devero and Town Attorney George M. Martin. Absent from the meeting was Councilman Robert A. Orr. Also present were some thirteen (13) builders and/or developers , along with Council Members-Elect Bange, Newman and Rock. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hill, who recognized Mr. Harry Burt, representing Daniel A. Robinson & Associates , who performed a study for the Town on water and sewer rates . He turned the meeting over to Mr. Burt at this time. Mr. Burt explained that this study was performed for the purpose of laying out an estimate of costs for the water and sewer systems of Leesburg sufficient to permit the setting of rates , fees and charges , and to aid in calculating the utility system budget each year for the O next five fiscal years . The configuration assumed is the regional CD utility system recommended by the NVPDC and preferred by the Town. He explained in detail the basis for the availability fees set by the Town after the issuance of the sewer moratorium - this being a "front end" payment by the developers as they used capacity in the proposed Ca new plant. He found this system to be equitable . He pointed out that this study looks to the year 1990, although the planning horizon for the Budget is for five years only. The Water Pollution Control Act provides that the system must be cost-effective and Federal Grants are based on this provision. • Mr. Burt then went on to explain various exhibits and tables in the Report, with his first recommendation being to change the water and sewer rate charges to the consumer from a block rate structure to a flat rate for water consumption at 80 cents per thousand gallons , along with a minimum charge of $2 .00 per utility bill - this to cover administrative costs of the system. Sewer charges at 100 per cent of the water gallonage charge are recommended to be continued, this then being in conformance with the Water Pollution Control Act. He explained in detail Table 6 of the Report, which has to do with the calculation of availability charges , with his recommendation being that the total of both water and sewer connection fees be $1,500 per unit. He further recommended that, since the bond reso- lutions speak to operating the two systems together, the charge should be $750- each• for water and sewer in those cases where connections are made individually. • There was discussion at this time on this portion of the report. In answer to Mr. Shor 's question concerning the inflationary factor, Mr. Burt said this portion of the report is in 1974 dollars - infla- tion will be dealt with• later in the Report. Councilman Titus asked how you would handl#t2r500 available sewer connections when there are only 7600 available connections. Mr. Burt replied that, when the Town has used up the 3 million gallon permit from the State of Maryland, it would either have to seek a larger permit and expand the Plant or start using the wells again, or get some other source of supply. Mr. Jennings asked if the difference in flows had been taken into con- sideration for multi-family dwellings , commercial and industrial users. Mr. Burt replied that these figures have been factored in on an averaged out basis in terms of dwelling units or their equivalents , which basi- cally means the same gallonage . The apartments , etc . are using about in the same range as a single-family house . Mr. Silverman said he had figures from Loudoun County showing the average number of persons to a dwelling at 2 .35 in multi-family dwellings . He questioned the consis- tency of using a constant factor for this . Mr. Burt said the purpose of this study is to show that, when you buy out capacity, it permits you to handle these "shocks" from the Water Control Board. With fur- ther refinement, such a scale could be developed, however, he has not been able to carry the investigation into great detail, but he has checked 3 or 4 apartments in Leesburg and their consumption figures per unit are about the same as a single-family dwelling, so he has made no distinction . Q� 4 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, JUNE 24, 1974. Mr. Bua then continued with explanation of his Report, citing the projectid op@ raating ipcome for the next five years and a five- . year operating plfHi. / RR5Ehditures and debt service both increase more rapidly than operating income , therefore; making the assump- tion that operating expenditures have to at least be covered by operating income, he would recommend another rate increase in 1980, even without inflation . Furthermore, the debt service, which is :expected to be carried by the"front end"money coming in as ' the sys- tem grows , will be increasing more rapidly than that income by 1978. There are several different ways of handling this , but his recommenda- tion is to' re-evaluate costs as to timing of the water system expan- sion, especially Stages 2 and 3. There is no question that the new water plant is needed, but Stages 2 and 3 may need to be strung out longer in time. He explained the potential effects of inflation and recommended that construction of AWT facilities and Stage I of the water system be moved forward as quickly as possible . Mr. Burt then explained the formula used by Council in arriving at the current availability fees of $1,300 each for water and sewer, these fees being based only on filling up the capacity of the present Sewer Plant. He then explained Table 8 - Availability Summary. This breaks down availability at the old rate and availability at the ' new rate, and calculates what may be expected from those on various Priority Lists , etc. , but excludes any new money coming in on the Priority List. This summary then shows the adjustment in the event a policy might be adopted for the return of a portion of this money. The amount liable for refund still faces the uncertainty regarding the configuration of a regional system, and the delay will relate to inflation. He recommended that this study be revised when the system settles down and some of the costs are better known, and, further, that some interim means of handling availability payments , funds on hand, contingent liabilities with regard to taps, etc. should be given very careful consideration by this Council, and that this consideration use principles of equity for the developer and control of risk for the Town. Councilman Titus asked the reason for the uniform rate. Mr. Burt explained that the Water Pollution Control Act requires that sewage charges be based on an economic basis and, since the sewer charge is tied into the water rate, you must have a flat rate for water, in order to be eligible for a Federal Grant. Mr. Logan Jennings asked about the possibility of availability fees being adjusted annually in relation to inflation. Mr. Burt be- lieved that, theoretically, it could be done , but did not recommend it. One of the principles of "equity" is the stability of the rates . and adjusting theseevery year or six months might lead to as many problems. Also, one of the problems of stability is that at some point• in time the Grants are fixed, as well as the leverage, and inflation is absorbed on the entire amount. Mayor Hill asked Mr. Jennings if he were going to build 200 houses , would he not pay the fees for all 200 to avoid any. inflation. Mr. Jennings believed that he probably would, however, he still was in favor of establishing a new fee each year - this way, the builder would catch it as he goes along . Mr. William Herndon could see no benefit in buying in advance because costs keep going up. Mr. Sorensen asked if the Town is prepared to go along with the recommendations in this Report. He said the members of the Builder's Advisory Committee are definitely pleased and would like to see the Town go along with the recommendations of Mr. Burt. Mayor Hill re- plied that, apparently, the Council was not too far off in allocating 1 million gallons ' capacity in the Plant a little over a year ago. However, this report takes it to the full capacity of the Plant. Coun- „ oilman Titus said it has not been determined what percentage of the 1.3 million gallons is proposed as infiltration due to the fact that you can 't segregate sewage from water when it gets to the Plant. Mayor Hill added that this meeting tonight is in conformance with the Agree- ment with Mr. Shor and he feels that this study is in line and com- mended Mr.. Burt for an excellent job. Included in the debt service for this five-year operating plan are two new Bond Issues , one in 1975 for $5 .6 million dollars and one in 1977 for $2.6 million. 315- MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, JUNE 24, 1974 . Councilman Wallace also commended Mr. Burt for an excellent Re- port, but felt it should be stamped "UNCERTAIN:" Until something is resolved by the Water Control Board, the Council certainly cannot adopt a policy to refund any portion of availability fees at this time . We can build a water plant, but it does no good if you can '_t sell the water. Mr. Shor felt that this makes it a. little more tenable for the builders and something that they can all work with. Lenders are go- ing to look at whether the Town is going to grow and he believed that, if the Town adopts this Report; then we can get some money and some growth. other Councilman Titus said there are two/items to be considered' also : (1) The availability of Federal monies , and (2) The position of the taxpayers with regard to another bond issue . You are talking about approximately $14,000,000, less Federal Grants , and this is a lot of money to ask the people for. O Councilman Murray agreed completely with this - he would have very strong reservations about a bond issue of this magnitude , based on growth as opposed to non-growth votes . 0 C Mr. Herndonaskedwhy this availability money has to be "front end" money before you can get a Zoning Permit. He cited the develop- ment of 13 town houses to be built by Mr. diZerega and him - the availability fee being $36,400 before they caneven start this project , which would be only four to five months work for them. He asked how many members of Council could post $36,000. for four to five months work. Water and sewer are not needed for these houses until they are ready for occupancy, therefore , he could not see the need for payment of these fees in the beginning . He pointed out that it is eventually the buyer who is paying it. He asked that someone explain why the Council made this requirement: Mayor Hill explained that this is a part of the selling price of the house and you must have water and sewer to sell it. The Town was collecting this mbney• at various times and it became necessary for the Council to delineate a certain stage for the Town Manager . to collect these fees . Mr. Herndon still felt that this is too much money for the Town. to take at the beginning and em einterest on it when the builders are paying more iah@xeM for the/money. Councilman Titus asked Mr. Herndon, as a builder,%/would prefer to pay it and how. Mr. Herndon suggested when the builder is ready to do his finished grading - the meter is not set until the sidewalk is poured, etc. Mr. Titus commented that, once it leaves Mr. Forbes ' desk as a Zoning Cer- tificate , there is no way of recovering this money . Mr. Fredric Spain suggested using the Occupancy Permit issued by the County as a time to pay these availability fees. Councilman Titus asked how effective an occupancy permit is . Mr. Shor said it is very effective if it is carried out properly, however, he commented at length on the discrepancy existing in Fairfax County concerning such a permit. Mr. Spain went on to say that, under such requirements, he would have to pay $300,000 for 103 taps and he could not imagine anyone thinking he could put up that kind of money before a foundation is even cut. The builder has to borrow the money and he certainly could not see that it is logical at all for the Town to take this money and put it in the Bank and draw interest on it . He suggested that these fees be paid when the taps are made and would hope that the Town would realign this requirement. Mr. Spain also felt that capacity has been released to the developers on the Priority List in the present 1 . 3 million gallon plant, which was built under an old system of economics - therefore, he did not feel that any increase in the availability fee was proper for the use of capacity in this Plant. However, he would be happy to sign anything that would pursue the development ariiexpansion of this Plant. • Mr. Sorensen pointed out that he paid $66,500 for 21 houses in Exeter Hills . He called for the second water meter the other day in order to keep the bricklayers going and it took three (3) days to check out the fact that he had paid the tap fees. The developer re- " 316 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, NNE 24, 1974. . quests' the water meter to be set, so why not, before h& calls for the meter, pay the availability and tap fee and then submit this to the Director of Public Works , who controls the setting of the meters . He pointed out that, two or three meetingsafter he paid these availa- bility fees, he sat at a Council meeting and watched the Town. open bids for the investment of these monies at 9 to 10 per cent. The . builders are not going to put all this money into building without paying for water and sewer. He said this "front money" is. impossible to get and he certainly hopes that-the Town will. consider his sugges- tion. as a time for payment of these fees. He believed he was speak- ing for all those members of the Builders ' Advisory Committee. - Mr. Shor said he would prefer to have the water cut on ahead of " this time so that the dry wall could be tested in his buildings , how- ever, ow ever, he was not against the procedure suggested by Mr. Sorensen. He still felt the best control would be by the issuance of occupancy per- mits. Mr. Silverman asked where the capacity was found for the recent taps released. Councilman Titus explained that the Town has been work- ing with a Certificate, of 1.0 million gallons and they have never been able to determine where the 1.0: million- gallons is and where the 300,000 gallons of infiltration is , so they discussedthis with the Water Con- trol Board and they agreed that you can!'t tell the difference between a gallon of sewage and a gallon of water. Therefore, they have al- lowed the capacity to reach the 95 per cent limit. There was considerable discussion concerning the -possibility of a future bond issue, with Councilman Murray feeling thatthe present taxpayers would certainly not go along with " this since it ,would bring more growth to the Town, and some members of the Advisory Committee feeling that it would be necessary to keep taxes down . Mayor. Hill agreed that there should be no additional burden on the Town , but that future,growth will have to pay for anycapital improvements . Councilman Wallace felt that Council should certainly give some thought to developing a policy whereby the availability fees would not be paid as "front money." He agreed with Mr. Herndon on this point Mr. Spain pointed out that lending institutions pay off in "draws" as work proceeds on building and they do not generally lend the amount required as availability fees by Leesburg before the initial start. He elaborated on these "draws"; then introduced Mr. Nick Nichols of the F . W. Behrens Company. Mr. Nichols then gave a brief resume as to how lending institutions operate and said that, under the present circum- stances , Leesburg would require special handling. Mr. Herndon agreed with Mr. Nichols and said that water and sewer connections must be made before a builder can get his final_draw, :so;the.ie . is no way the Town could lose on this. Mr. Burt said this Report does not speak tothe time of payment of these fees - only that they must be paid before the house is occupied. " Councilman Ridder felt that both Mr. Sorensen 's request to pay these fees at the timeathe water and sewer are connected and Mr . Shorts request to pay the fees earlier in order to test dry wall could both be accommodated by the Town. _ Mr. Sorensen then asked Mr. Burt his feeling as to the time frame " for accepting this report. Mr. Burt replied that perhaps the Town would like to adopt this to the extent that it would be policy ' to pro- ceed this way as the way becomes clear. The adoption of this would be contingent upon knowing the configuration of the regional system and the costs thereof and knowing where the Town. is now, insofar as old tap fees , ,new tap fees , tap fees yet to be paid from those on Priority lists and all of this needs to be given very careful thought. He recommended that Council consider this as a matter of policy only and that the Town move slowly to solve these problems as the informa- tion is developed and the regional system becomes clear. He did feel that Council couldadopt new water and service rates at this . time, which would have nothing to do with availability charges or tap fees . . 317 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, JUNE 24 , 1974.- • • Mr. Sorensen asked if Council feels that the Town will continue to charge $1 ,300 for availability and, if the needed information be- comes available at a later date , would there be a possiblity of a re- - . fund. Mayor Hill said he felt there would be no question .about this. - However, there is the possibility that the Water Control Board could " make a decision on this regional plant that would involve legal en- tanglements that could, delay a decision for two to three years . Mean- time., the- Town is locked tight and cannot make• a. move, and also being blamed for everything. The question then arose as to who would get the refund - the builder or the buyer. That question was not resolved. Mayor Hill believed the time of paying availability and tap fees brought up by Mr. Herndon is a very valid one. Mr. Spain asked if - Council expects to consider this matter and Mayor Hill said he would like to defer any decision until the new Council takes office on - July 1st. Mr. Spain then requested that the Public Works Committee consider this matter and make some recommendation at the meeting to be held on July 10th in order that he might be able to get started on construction by mid-July. Councilman Wallace felt that- this is too - much 'of a burden to put on a new ,Council in less than a month after taking office. Mr. Spain continued with his request for immediate action to relieve the• builders who have been held up for over a year CC now. . Mayor Hill then asked the Town Manager and his staff to review this situation prior to the next Public Works Committee meeting and, if they can come up with a plan they feel is workable , present it to the Committee for its consideration and recommendation to_ the Council at the next meeting . He assured the group assembled that Council will do whatever they can- to implement this problem.- • There being no further discussion, on motion. of Councilman, Wallace, seconded by Councilman Ridder, the meeting was adjourned at 9:32 P.M. May. • Clerk of if e Council -