HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution 60-104 Approval of Zone Variance of Matthews at 5661 North Rosemead, Zone Case No. 60-10RESOLUTION NO. 6o -104
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMPLE CITY AND GRANTING THE ZONE VARIANCE
OF MATTHEWS AT 5661 NORTH ROSEMEAD, ZONE
CASE NO. 60 -10
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Temple
City at its regular meeting held in the City Hall, 9664 East
Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, California, on December 5, 1960,
a duly constituted public hearing in regard to a zone variance
request of B. Wallace Matthews and Ila G. Matthews, and
WHEREAS, more than ten days have elapsed since the said
meeting of the Planning Commission on December 5, 1960, and no
appeal has been filed from the decision of the Planning Commis-
sion,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temple
City does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. There are exceptional and extraordinary cir-
cumstances applicable to the property of the applicant that do
not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same
vicinity.
SECTION 2. That the granting of the variance of the ap-
plicant is not detrimental to the public health, general welfare
and convenience of the community and will not be injurious to
the property in the same vicinity.
SECTION 3. That the variance as requested is granted on
the following conditions:
(a) That the property be developed substantially with
the plot plan to be submitted by the applicants which meets the
approval of the Chairman of the Planning Commission, and which
shall show a minimum of ten (10) parking spaces and with two
percent (2 %) of the area in landscaping.
(b) That this variance shall not be effective for any
purpose until the owner of the property involved has filed with
the City Clerk of Temple City his affidavit stating he is aware
of and accepts all of the conditions of this variance.
(c) It is hereby declared that if any provision of
this variance is violated or held to be invalid, or if any law,
statute or ordinance is violated, the variance shall be void and
the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 27th day of December , 1960
ATTEST:
Clerk of'£he y o TI' mje
City, California
-Mayor 6f—t 11 e
California
124