HomeMy Public PortalAbout1994_05_31349
I:2}
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 31, 1994
A special meeting of the Leesburg Town Council was held on May 31, 1994, at 6:00 p.m., in the second floor
Councilmember's meeting room, 25 West Market Street, Leesburg, Virginia. Notice having been delivered to all
members prior thereto. The purposes of the meeting were to consider the following:.
Proffer/concept plan for #ZM-138 Stratford in Leesburg.
Approving the architectural plans for Leesburg Gateway.
Rezoning Application #ZM-137 by Pence-Friedel Developers, Inc., and amending the Zoning
District Map.
To conduct interviews for the Airport Commission and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Clem.
Councilmembers present
Mayor James E. Clem
George F. Atwell
Georgia W. Bange
R. W. Blake (absent)
Joseph R. Trocino
Ki'isten C. Umstattd
William F. Webb
Staff members present
Town Manager Steven C. Brown
Zoning Administrator Scott Johnson
Traffic Engineer Calvin Grow
Chief of Plan Review Paul Gauthier
Deputy Town Attorney Deborah Welsh
AGENDA ITEMS
1. ZM-138 Stratford in Leesburg - Mr. Brown stated that proffer amendments were submitted by the Stowers
Family in an attempt to make the property more marketable. The Stowers have provided the community a
tremendous amount of benefit through their dedication of the right-of-way for the toll road and the airport clear
zone as well.
Mr. Brown commented on the proposed proffer amendments by stating that the process of administering the
proffers could be burdensome for the Town to take on. Included in the proffer amendment is the institution of
the cap for offsite improvements. This is unprecedented. The Town has not had caps on any rezonings before.
The Council needs to know that in the event that this proffer amendment is approved, staff cannot guarantee that
the public improvements can be installed with the money being allocated. It then becomes the town's responsibility
to finish the improvements on Sycolin Road.
Mr. Brown stated that Scott Johnson has worked extremely hard to get this amendment into the position it is in
right now. Mr. Johnson has recommended that the cap be indexed for inflation - adjusted according to the
consumer price index.
Ms. Umstattd expressed concern with if the town goes forward and makes any improvements to Sycolin Road in
advance does the town face the loss of proffers that have been made by other developers for improvements to that
road - whereby the town could not get reimbursement from those other developers unless they agreed up front to
reimburse the town.
Mr. Grow stated, for example, if the town improves the property along the Reynolds Metal frontage there is a
proffer that states Reynolds Metal would build two lanes of their frontage - it does not state in their proffers about
town reimbursement. Highpoint is another developer that has proffered to build two lane of frontage property and
if the town built these lanes the town would not be reimbursed.
Ms. Umstattd asked, if the town agrees to the Stower's proffer amendment would the town lose substantial proffer
sums from other developers?
Mr. Grow stated yes if the town builds the road all the way out to the airport.
Mr. Bowers representing the Stowers family further addressed Ms. Umstattd's concern by stating that the proffers
associated with the Stowers rezoning are to improve Sycolin Road south in a four-lane undivided section from the
bypass to Battlefield Parkway.
350
-2-
MOTION
On motion of Mr. Trocino, seconded by Mr. Webb, the following ordinance was proposed and adopted.
94-0-17 - ORDINANCE - APPROVING REZONING APPLICATION #ZM-138 TO AMEND THE EXISTING
PROFFER/CONCEPT PLAN ESTABLISHED FOR #ZM-116 - STRATFORD IN LEESBURG
WHEREAS, on December 14, 1993 the Town Council received and referred Resolution #93-249 to the
Planning Commission for a proffer/concept plan amendment to the Stratford Planned Development; and
WHEREAS, on March 3, 1994 the Planning Commission recommended to Council that the Stratfor,
proffer/concept plan amendment be favorably considered if the engineering comments dated February 28, 1994, are
addressed in Council discussions with the applicant; and
WHEREAS, on April 12, 1994 CounCil considered this proffer/concept plan amendment at public hearing
and received no comments from the public; and
WHEREAS, the proposed proffer/concept plan amendment seeks to establish a phasing plan for the public
roadway improvements that will not unfairly burden the initial phase of development; and
WHEREAS, this rezoning request is in the interest of public necessity, convenience and general welfare:
THEREFORE, ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows:
SECTION I. Proffer No. 6 is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following shall be inserted in its place:
Project Phasing Plan for Off-Site Roadway Improvements. The off-site roadway improvements for
the Project shall be developed in accordance with the plan entitled "Project Phasing Plan for Off-
site Roadway Improvements" prepared by Bowers & Associates, P.C. dated October 29, 1993,
revised through May 27, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit I ("Phasing Plan").
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Proffers, the Applicant shall have no
obligations to complete any "off-site roadway" improvements should the cost of such improvementc
exceed the aggregate sum described in Proffer No. 3 and Proffer No. 4 hereofi
Said Phasing Plan provides for development of off-site roadway improvements in accordance with
the following schedule:
A. Residential Development.
The improvements to Sycolin Road (Route 643) from Route 7/15 Bypass to
approximately 300 feet south of Hope Parkway shall be a four-lane undivided
roadway and the road design shall be completed prior to the recordation of the first
final record plat. This will be considered an "off-site roadway" improvement.
(a)
Concurrent with the recordation of the first final record plat, acceleration,
deceleration and left turn lanes shall be dedicated and bonded at the
intersection of Hope Parkway (formerly known as Stratford Center
Parkway) and Sycolin Road. Such improvements shall be considered an
"on-site roadway" improvements, unless the turn lanes can be incorporated
in the design described in Proffer 6.A.1 above, in which event they shall be
considered "off-site roadway", improvements.
(b)
Additionally, the Applicant, or its successors-in-interest, shall dedicate free
and clear of all liens rights-of-way to VDOT or the Town of Leesburg for
the planned future flyover of Sycolin Road (Route 643) over the Route 15
Bypass consisting of approximately 100 feet of right-of-way from th
centerline of Sycolin Road extending for a distance of approximately 4~
feet from the centerline of the Route 15 Bypass into the Property. Th
dedication will not occur until the Dulles Toll Road Extension (a/k/a the
Dulles Greenway) and its above-grade interchange with Battlefield Parkway
(realigned Route 654) has been constructed and is in operation and when
such dedication is requested by VDOT or the Town of Leesburg.
Only in the event that the Town has acquired all necessary right-of-way dedications
from off-site owners, a separate Northbound right turn lane on Sycolin Road with
a storage length of 200 feet and a traffic signal installed at the intersection of
Sycolin Road and Hope Parkway shall be bonded prior to the recordation of the
351
-3-
final plat containing the 304th residential unit.
These improvements shall be considered "off-site
roadway" improvements.
Prior to the recordation of the final record plat containing the 540th residential
unit, the westerly half-section of a four lane undivided Sycolin Road (Route 643)
possessing approximately 52 feet in width and 1,500 feet in length, from Hope
Parkway to the Route 643/Route 7/15 Bypass intersection shall be dedicated and
bonded. The Applicant agrees to dedicate the right-of-way when requested by the
Town if it occurs prior to the 540th residential unit. This dedication may be
necessary to accommodate the commercial development as provided in Proffer 6.B.
hereof. All of these improvements shall be considered as "off-site roadway"
improvements.
The remaining easterly half section of 52 foot four lane undivided roadway
described in Proffer 6.A.4 shall be dedicated and bonded on or before the
recordation of the final record plat containing the 948th residential unit. These
improvements shall be considered as "off-site roadway" improvements.
o
Finally, on or before the recordation of the final record plat containing the last
residential unit, the residential traffic signal at the intersection of Stowers Lane and
Evergreen Mills Road, S.E. shall be designed and bonded and the developer shall
make the required five percent (5%) contribution to the residential traffic signal at
the intersection of Evergreen Mills Road, S.E. and King Street. All of these
improvements shall be considered as "off-site roadway" improvements.
Subject to Proffer 6.A.8 below, should any or all of the above-referenced Proffer
6.A. 1 through 6.A.6 be completed by a party not owning property within the
Stratford project, then the $1,000 per unit contribution required pursuant to Proffer
No. 3 of the Proffers adopted September 26, 1990 as part of #ZM-116 shall be
paid to the Town immediately prior to issuance of each zoning permit.
Should any or all of Proffer 6.A.1 through 6.A.6 be completed by the owner or
developer of the commercial section, the $1,000.00 per unit contribution to be paid
by the residential developer as required by Proffer No. 3 of the Proffers adopted
September 26, 1990 as part of #ZM-116 shall be paid in the following manner.
The developer of the commercial section responsible for completing any of the
proffered improvements described in Proffer 6.A.1 through 6.A.6 shall file invoices
for such work with the Town. The Town will approve the invoices or a portion
thereof and establish a record for payment of said approved invoices by the
owners/developers of the residential section. Upon application for a residential
building permit, the residential owner/developer shall be informed of the amount
to be repaid and such repayment shall be a condition of the issuance of the building
permit; provided, however, that the residential developer/owner shall never be
required to make a contribution in excess of $1,000.00 per residential unit, which
contribution shall include any credits described in Proffer No. 5. The $1,000.00
contribution shall be allocated in such a manner that all credits, as described in
Proffer No. 4 will be deducted first, then the commercial owner with an invoice on
file shall be paid. The Town will be provided with a receipt executed by the
commercial developer/constructing party or a copy of a cancelled check as evidence
that they payment has been made. Any portion of the required contribution
remaining shall be paid directly to the Town. All of these payments when taken
together shall satisfy the requirements of said Proffer No. 3 and the proffers
provided for herein.
Commercial Development.
The Applicant shall dedicate free and clear of any liens a 120-foot typical right-of-way
section for proposed Battlefield Parkway (realigned Route 654), as shown on the plan
entitled "Project Phasing Plan for Off-site Roadway Improvements", and a 70-foot typical
right-of-way section for Hope Parkway, as shown on the plan. The deed of conveyance
shall contain provisions reserving in the grantor and its successors-in-interest, rights for
utility and/or drainage easements to accommodate the Applicant's proposed development.
These dedications shall generally take place pursuant to the following schedule listed in
Proffers 6.B.1 through 6.B.7. However, this schedule may be modified according to the
findings and conclusions of a traffic study which shall be submitted by the Applicant
352
-4-
with the first commercial subdivision or development plan which
will evaluate the roadway improvements necessary to accommodate
the commercial use.
The Applicant, or its successors-in-interest, shall construct proposed Battlefield Parkway
(realigned Route 654) as a four-lane divided typical road section, possessing approximately
2500 feet in length, with the necessary acceleration, deceleration, turn lanes and
signalization in accordance with the Town of Leesburg and VDOT standards through th~
Property. The remaining two lanes of the ultimate six-lane divided road section planne¢
for Battlefield Parkway (realigned Route 654) shall be constructed by others. Thc
Applicant, or its successors-in-interest, shall construct Hope Parkway as a four-lane
undivided typical road section, possessing approximately 600 feet in length, from proposed
Battlefield Parkway as a four-lane undivided typical road section, possessing approximately
600 feet in length, from proposed Battlefield Parkway (realigned Route 654) to Tolbert
Lane (Route 654). The construction of Battlefield Parkway (realigned Route 654) and
Hope Parkway between proposed Battlefield Parkway (realigned Route 654) and Tolbert
Lane (Route 654) will generally occur as provided in Proffer 6.B.7 below or in conformance
with the traffic study submitted to evaluate the timing of the improvements necessary to
accommodate the commercial development of the site.
Any traffic signal warranted at the intersection(s) of Hope Parkway or other internal roads
with Battlefield Parkway (realigned Route 654) shall not be considered "off-site roadway~
improvements. Additionally, construction of Hope Parkway between proposed Battlefield
Parkway (realigned Route 654) and Sycolin Road (Route 643) shall not be considered an
"off-site roadway" improvement.
The Applicant acknowledges that the Land Development Official shall review the traffic
study presented and, upon recommendation of Town Staff and the Applicant, make a
determination regarding the scheduling, necessity, nature and magnitude of the
improvements required pursuant to the traffic study. It is agreed that the Land
Development Official has the authority pursuant to this proffer to amend the phasing
schedule described below in Proffer 6.B, to change (either by increasing or decreasing) th{
improvements which will be necessary to serve the commercial development, and t~
complete all other duties of the Land Development Official described herein.
Prior to the approval of the first subdivision plat or development plan for uses other than
residential uses on the property, a traffic study shall be submitted by the Applicant for the
Town's evaluation which demonstrates that the improvements listed in Proffers 6.B. 1
through 6.B.7 will accommodate an acceptable level of service as provided in the Town of
Leesburg's Design and Construction Standards Manual.
Notwithstanding the schedule set forth in Proffer 6. B. 1 through 6. B.7 below, concurrent
with the approval of the first subdivision plat or development plan for the construction of
commercial development two lanes of Sycolin Road from Battlefield Parkway to Route 7/15
Bypass, with appropriate intersection improvements, must have been dedicated and bonded
by the Applicant.
At the time of the approval of the site plan for the first 200,000 square feet of
commercial space, approximately 1,000 linear feet of a two lane section of
Battlefield Parkway, from the intersection of Sycolin Road into the commercial
section shall be dedicated and bonded by the Applicant. All of these improvements
shall be considered "off-site roadway" improvements.
At the time of approval of the site plan establishing a total square footage of
450,000 square feet of commercial space or more, an approximately 1,500 linear
foot section of the four lane undivided portion of Sycolin Road from Hope Parkwa
to Battlefield Parkway shall be dedicated and bonded or constructed by th,
Applicant. All of these improvements shall be considered "off-site roadway
improvements.
At the time of the approval of the next 200,000 square feet (650,000 square feet
total of commercial space) site plan an additional approximately 1,000 linear foot
section of the two lane portion of the four lane divided Battlefield Parkway shall
be dedicated and bonded. All of these improvements shall be considered "off-site
roadway" improvements.
353
-5-
o
The second portion of the approximately 1,000 linear feet of Battlefield Parkway
from Sycolin Road into the commercial section shall be dedicated and bonded at
the time of the approval of the site plan containing the next 200,000 square feet
(850,000 square feet total of commercial space). All of these improvements shall
be considered "off-site roadway' improvements.
o
The remaining two lane section of Battlefield Parkway shall be dedicated, and
bonded as part of the approval of the site plan containing the next 200,000 square
feet (1,050,000 square feet total of commercial space). Such improvements shall
be considered "off-site" roadway improvements.
o
On or before the approval of the site plan containing the next 250,000 square feet
(1,300,000 square feet total of commercial space), approximately 1,500 linear feet
of a two lane section of the re-designed four lane divided Sycolin Road from
Battlefield Parkway to Tolbert Lane S.E. (formerly designated as Long Lane) shall
be dedicated and bonded. Such improvements shall be considered "off-site"
roadway improvements.
A section of the four lane undivided Hope Parkway (Extended) from Battlefield
Parkway to Tolbert Lane shall be dedicated and bonded in association with the site
plans containing the next 121,950 square feet (1,421,950 square feet total of
commercial space). Such improvements shall be considered "off-site" roadway
improvements.
As part of the public improvement plan for the final 200,000 square feet of
commercial space or when and if warranted by the traffic study the following
proffers shall be performed: (a) the proffered contributions to the commercial
traffic signals on Sycolin Road (i) in between Hope Parkway and Battlefield
Parkway and (ii) at the intersection of Battlefield Parkway shall be made; (la) the
proffered contribution to the traffic signal at the intersection of Sycolin Road and
Tolbert Lane shall be made; (c) the proffered contribution to the traffic signal at
the intersection of Hope Parkway and Tolbert Lane shall be made; (d) the
proffered contribution to the commercial traffic signal at the intersection of Tolbert
Lane and Battlefield Parkway shall be made; (e) the internal commercial traffic
signal on Battlefield Parkway near the mixed-use center at the intersection with
Hope Parkway shall be designed and installed; and (f) the proffered contribution
to the commercial traffic signal at the intersection of Evergreen Mills Road, S.E.
and Battlefield Parkway (Extended) shall be made. Such improvements shall be
considered to be ~off-site" roadway improvements.
Traffic Signal Contributions.
The Applicant's contributions to the traffic signals identified as being required to support
the residential and commercial development shall be made in the percentages provided
below. Where the percentage is identified as 100% the Applicant shall have the obligation
for the design and construction of the signal. Where the percentage identified is a
percentage less than 100% the contribution will be made in accordance with the schedule
mandated by the traffic study and will be funded directly to the Town of Leesburg.
1. Route 15 and Evergreen Mills Road. 5% (Residential)
2. Evergreen Mills Road, S.E. and West Site Access 1 100% (Residential)
3. Battlefield Parkway and Tolbert Lane 24%
4. Battlefield Parkway and Hope Parkway 100%
5. Battlefield Parkway and East Site Access 1 100% (Residential)
6. Battlefield Parkway and Sycolin Road 40%
7. Tolbert Lane and Hope Parkway 15%
8. Tolbert Lane and Sycolin Road 20%
9. Sycolin Road and East Site Access 2 33%
10. Sycolin Road and Hope Parkway 100% (Residential)
354
Contributions for traffic signalization devices listed as 2, 4, 5, and
10, above, shall be paid by the Applicant with the express
understanding that the Applicant shall be reimbursed by other
landowners using the four referenced traffic signalization devices
in accordance with those landowners' respective pro-rata
percentage of assigned uses as determined by the Town at time of
development of those landowners' parcels. The pro-rata
reimbursement shall be based on traffic use projections at the
respective intersections identified above and shall be inflated by the
Consumer Price Index from the date of installation. The intent of
this proffer is to provide the mechanism whereby the cost of the
signal in its ultimate use will be proportionally borne by the users
according to their actual use. To the extent that a participant is to
be reimbursed for a previous expenditure then reimbursement will
occur on a proportional use basis plus interest.
Should warrants not be deemed by VDOT and/or the Town to exist mandating the
installation of said signalization immediately prior to site plan approval for the last phase
of the Stratford development, then the Applicant, or its successors-in-interest,
shall post, if requested by the Town, a cash escrow representing its proportional share cost
with the Town prior to such site plan approval. These traffic signals shall be considered to
be "off-site roadway" improvements.
Proffer No. 7 of ZM-116 (as amended) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Throughout the Proffers where the term "Project Phasing Plan of Plan A" is used it shall mean "Phasing Plan" as
defined in amended Proffer No. 6.
Proffer No. 8, sub-part B, "Recreational Facility East of Dulles Toll Road Extended", shall be deleted in its entirety
and the following inserted in its place:
Recreational Facility East of Dulles Toll Road Extended (.a/k/a Dulles Greenwa¥) - Construct/o,'
shall begin prior to issuance of a residential occupancy permit representing a seventy percent (70~A
completion of the residential area east of the Dulles Greenway and construction shall be complete
prior to the issuance of a residential occupancy permit representing a ninety percent (90%)
completion of the aforesaid residential area or within eight (8) months after commencement of
construction of the recreational facility, whichever event occurs first.
Proffer No. 9 shall be deleted in its entirety and the following inserted in its place:
The Applicant, or their successors-in-interest, shall provide roadway improvements, in accordance
with the Phasing Plan. The Applicant, or their successors-in-interest, may commence and/or
complete construction of any section or component of the project independent of any other Section,
provided that the appropriate roadway improvements for the number of residential zoning permits
issued or commercial square footage approved are dedicated and bonded or constructed in
accordance with the Phasing Plan. The proffered' contributions provided for in Proffer Nos. 3 and
4 are maximum contributions that will be required for each component of the Project. As such, if
the required maximum contributions have been made for the residential section, no
additional contribution can be required of a property owner in the residential
section for improvements required to support commercial development as required
by the Phasing Plan nor may any zoning permits be withheld because improvements
which have been designated as improvements necessitated by the commercial area
have not been made. Under the same theory, if the required maximum
contributions have been made for the commercial section, no additional
contribution can be required of a property owner in the commercial section for
improvements required to support residential development .as required by the
Phasing Plan nor may any zoning permits be withheld because improvements which
have been designated as improvements necessitated by the residential area have not
been made.
Section II. This Ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage.
Discussion continued with regard to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in Section II of the proposed ordinance.
Mayor Clem and Ms. Bange stated they did not see a need for the CPI in Section II. Ms. Bange asked that Section
II be deleted.
355
-7-
CZ)
Ms. Umstattd stated that the CPI is a good idea. She appreciates Mr. Bower's honesty, this reflects well on the
applicants, however, this may not be fully developed for 15 years and the cost to the town taxpayers may be
substantial. She stated she would vote against the motion on that basis and on the basis that the proffer relating
to the fire station site has not been cleared or checked out with the fire company. We may have a repeat of the
problems in the northeast quadrant. She expressed concern with not having a good traffic study at this time and
that she has just received the ordinance tonight and has not had a chance to read it, as well as the May 31, memo.
Mayor Clem asked Mr. Bowers if anything has changed with regard to the proffer for the fire station site?
Mr. Bowers stated that the fire station proffer remains unchanged.
VOTE
Aye:
Nay:
Absent:
Councilmembers Atwell, Bange, Trocino, Webb and Mayor Clem
Councilmember Umstattd
Blake
PAY AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN STUDY - Mr. Brown asked that the Council review this information
and forward any comments or suggestions to the staff.
REVIEW OF DECISION - PROFFER INTERPRETATION - Mr. Johnson provided a staff
report.
Mr. Bowers representing the applicant addressed the Council providing a summary of the request.
Mr. Trocino asked if there is a condominium association and if so is the association aware of this request?
Mr. Leo Chang the applicant was present and addressed the Council stating that he is the president of the
condominium association and that all of the partners in the association are aware of this. He stated that he believes
the building will be of high quality and acceptable to the general public.
Mr. Webb stated that he would like to know more about the costs involved before taking a vote.
MOTION
On motion of Mr. Trocino, seconded by Mr. Webb, this matter was deferred for two weeks.
VOTE
Aye: Councilmembers AtwelI, Bange, Trocino, Umstattd, Webb and Mayor Clem
Nay: None
Absent: Blake
DISCUSSION
Ms. Umstattd stated, in support of Mr. Chang's request, she was prepared to vote in favor of the proposal. She
stated that a lot more consideration is being given to this request then was given to the Stower's request and the
Stower's development is a far more important development. She stated as long as the brick is retained and there
is some notation that isn't legally enforceable that there will be brick for the lower floor and on both sides of the
entrance - this is not unattractive and would be highly marketable. Given the Council's pledge to affordable housing
in town this would help in that situation. Unless there is a major cry from the homeowners association she will vote
in favor of the request.
Mr. Chang expressed urgency of the request to close on the property by the end of the year. He pointed out that
all of the units are rented, not owned.
MOTION
On motion of Mr. Webb, seconded by Ms. Umstattd, the following resolution was proposed and adopted.
94-113 - RESOLUTION - APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LEESBURG GATEWAY
SUBMITTED BY DF CRIGLER ASSOCIATES ON APRIL 19, 1994 AS CONSISTENT WITH
THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT
356
-8-
WHEREAS, on May 24, 1994 Mr. David Bowers submitted a request for a proffer interpretation for ZM-
122 to determine if the architectural renderings submitted by DF Crigler Associates are consistent with the proffers
associated with ZM-122 Leesburg Gateway; and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 1994 the zoning administrator issued a determination that Proffers #3 intended
that architectural brick be utilized on the front and sides of the structure; and
WHEREAS, Title 15.1-491.5 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended provides that any person aggriev
by the decision of the zoning administrator made pursuant to the interpretation of proffers may appeal to t
Council for a review of the decision; and
WHEREAS, it is within the purview of the Council to clarify and determine whether the proposed
architectural design meets the intent of the proffers.
THEREFORE, RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia, as follows:
The architectural renderings submitted by DF Crigier Associates, dated April 19, 1994 meet the intent of
the proffers by being equal to the residential character of the Gateway area.
VOTE
Aye: Councilmembers Atwell, Bange, Trocino, Umstattd, Webb and Mayor Clem
Nay: None
Absent: Blake
MOTION
On motion of, and duly seconded, the following motion was made:
Pursuant to Section 2.1-344 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, I move that the Leesburg Town
Council convene in Executive Session. The authority for this Executive Session is found in Section 2.1-344 (vx
Subsection (1) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The purpose of this Executive Session is to condt
interviews for the Airport Commission and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
VOTE
Aye: Councilmembers Atwell, Bange, Trocino, Umstattd, Webb and Mayor Clem
Nay: None
Absent: Blake
MOTION
On motion of, and duly seconded, the following resolution was proposed and adopted.
94-114 - RESOLUTION - CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE SESSION OF MAY 31, 1994
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia, has this day convened in Executive
Session in accordance with an affirmative recorded vote of the Leesburg Town Council and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Leesburg Town Council does hereby certify that to the
best of each member's knowledge, 1) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to which this
certification applies; and 2) only such public business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the said
Executive Session was convened were heard, discussed or considered by the Leesburg Town Council.
VOT.E
Aye: Councilmembers Atwell, Bange, Trocino, Umstattd, Webb and Mayor Clem
Nay: None
Absent: Blake
357
-9-
MOTION
On motion of, and duly seconded, the meeting was adjourned.
Clerk of Council
· Clem, Mayor