HomeMy Public PortalAbout110-1984 - ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 73-1984 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CONTROLLER TO ASSESS THE SERVICE FEE IN THE MAX AMOUNT SET BY INDIANA CODEORDINANCE NO. 110-1984
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
73-1984 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
CONTROLLER TO ASSESS THE SERVICE FEE IN THE
MAXIMUM AMOUNT SET BY INDIANA CODE I.C.
35-43-5-5 FOR ANY CHECKS MADE PAYABLE TO
THE CITY OF RICHMOND OR ANY OF ITS
DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES THAT HAVE NOT
BEEN PAID DUE TO INSUFFICIENT FUNDS OR NO
ACCOUNT
WHEREAS, Indiana Code I.C. 35-43-5-5 authorizes the payee or holder
of a check which has been returned for insufficient funds or
no account to assess a service fee in an amount permitted by
that statute.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City
of Richmond that Ordinance No. 73-1984 be amended to
read as follows:
SECTION 1. The drawer or maker of any check or other
commercial instrument, which has been returned to the City
of Richmond or its agencies or departments as unpayable
due to insufficient funds or no accounts, shall be assessed a
service fee in the maximum amount permitted by Indiana
Code I.C. 35-43-5-5 by the City Controller.
SECTION 2. Resolution No. 20-1964 as adopted by the
Richmond Board of Sanitary Commissioners on August 20,
1984 and Resolution No. E-1984 as adopted by the Board
of Directors of Richmond Power and Light on
1984, are hereby ratified.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond,
Indiana, this 7 day of
President of t enon Council
ATTEST:223ai44: �:r -��.--
Mary Merchanthouse
City Clerk
_2_
PRESENTED by me to the May r of the City of Richmond, Indiana, this
day of , 1984.
Mary Merchanthouse
City Clerk
APPROVED by me, Frank H. Waltermann, Mayor of the City of Richmond,
Indiana, this 2m ^-/ day of �� , 1984.
Frank H. Waltermann
Mayor
ATTEST: 4.& _��
Mary Merchanthouse, City Clerk
cowwow couwczL vuT'Iwo nmnno
ELSTRO
ANC
Seconded
�movemcnd read`
[,.—....^.
'
SSAGE
IS ELSTRO
1kcSOLUT toOOKBANK MORRA
RT�
NOTICE OF HEARING
Caki
ORDINANCE NO. 110-1984
Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of the City of Richmond,
Wayne County, Indiana, will hold a public hearing on the 17th day of
September, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Richmond
Municipal Building on Ordinance No. 110-1984 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 73-1984 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CONTROLLER TO ASSESS THE
SERVICE FEE IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT SET BY-',INDIANA CODE I.C. 35-43-5-5 FOR
ANY CHECKS MADE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF RICHMOND OR ANY OF ITS DEPARTMENTS
OR AGENCIES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN PAID DUE TO INSUFFICIENT FUNDS OR NO ACCOUNT.
All parties interested in or affected by this Ordinance are invited to
attend the public hearing to speak in favor of or in opposition to said
Ordinance.
Publish Date: September 7, 1984
/s/ Mary Merchanthouse
City Clerk
Delivered by MM
Received by n
Date Received
Inv.# 090764-6
'perm Prwrlbed by state )bard of Aee6nnta
General Form No. M P (Rev. INT)
City Clerk —City of Richmond To palladium Publishing Corporation
Dr.
(Governmental Unit) 1175 North A Street
WaY.ne........ County, Indiana .4khrAoPar.144iAAA �7371.......
PUBLISHER'S CLAIM
LINE COUNT
Display Matter (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total
more than four solid lines of the type in which the body of the advertisement
is set) number of equivalent lines
3........
Head —number of lines
24
Body —number of lines
• • .... • . • . • .... .
2........
Tail —number of lines
Total number of lines in notice
... • 29........
COMPUTATION OF CHARGES
...... 29.....lines. .....nne..... columns wide equals .......29..... equivalent
lines at ........'. 16. cents per line
Additional charge for notices containing rule or tabular work
(50 ner cent of above amount)
Charge for extra proofs of publication
(50 cents for each proof in excess of two)
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM
DATA FOR COMPUTING COST
Width of single column 9 ems
Number of insertions ...1....
Size of type 6 point
Size of quad upon which type is cast ......
................
6.26
$................
Pursuant to the provisions. and penalties of Ch. 155, Acts 1953,
r hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all
just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid.
Date: Sept . a %n...., 198 .... Title.... C3shier I. .....
PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT
State of Indiana ) ss
...... Wayne .......County)
Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state,
. who,
the undersigned.......Ronald .............D ........Erk ........................................
Cashier
being duly sworn, says that ...he is. ...•.••• ••••••...••••...
of the...... Palladium -Item, .......................... a ...... Daily...............
newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the English language in the
Richmond, Indiana_ .. . . ................ in state and county
(city) of ..................................
aforesaid, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly
published in said paper for One time..., the dates of publication being as follows:
5ept...�.t..1984....... .......... _ ......
.... .. ,....
Subscribed and sworn to before s.....1 �h..dayoff.�t_ RX....... 19.. $4
C. Notary PublicCo eman
My commission expires... `fnUB .. ��a.. l9$7........
RESOLUTION NO. 20 1984
WHEREAS, Indiana Code I.C. 35-43-5-5- authorizes the payee
or holder of a check which has been returned as
unpaid due to insufficient funds or no account
to assess a service fee up to a maximum of the
greater of Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) or 5% of the
amount due (not to exceed $250.00).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Sanitary
Commissioners of the Richmond Sanitary District that
The drawer or maker of a check or other commercial
instrument, which has been returned to the Richmond
Sanitary District as unpayable due to insufficient
funds or no account, shall be assessed a service fee
in the maximum amount permitted by Indiana Code
I.C. 35-43-5-5.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Richmond Sanitary Board of Commissioners
this AT?'t` day of A.5wst- 1984,
A T T E S T: 0A'-a A 4aa-j
Carol Holliday
RESOLUTION NO. S — 1984
WHEREAS, Indiana Code I.C. 35-43-5-5 authorizes the payee
or holder of a check which has been returned as
unpaid due to insufficient funds or no account
to assess a service fee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of Richmond
Power & Light that
The drawer or maker of any check or other commercial
instrument, which has been returned to Richmond Power
& Light as unpayable due to insufficient funds or no
account, shall be assessed a service fee of the greater
of Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) or five percent (5%) (but
not more than $250.00) of the amount due.
Furthermore, this provision shall be made a part of the
terms and conditions of Richmond Power and Light,
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of Richmond Power &
Light, this 17-14 day of , 1984.
if
Preside
ATTEST:
CITY OF RICHMOND
OF RICK
y0 50 NORTH FIFTH STREET
u p o RICHMOND, INDIANA 47374
• '�I`'I�.1jl',���I� + TELEPHONE (317) 966-556I
�hDIANP
August 28, 1984
Mr. Jack Elstro, President
and Members of the Richmond
Common Council
FRANK H. WALTERMANN
MAYOR
KENNETH E. BARDEN
CITY ATTORNEY
RE: ORDINANCE NO. 110- 1984
Dear President Elstro and Mlembmers of Common Council,
Several meetings ago, the Common Council passed Ordinance
No. 73-1984 which permitted the City Controller to assess
the service fee of Ten Dollars ($10.00) for bad checks
returned to the City. Several members of the Council
expressed concern that the Ten Dollar:($10,00) service fee
was insufficient to cover the costs associated with processing
of bad checks.
The Indiana Legislature has recently amended Indiana Code
I.C. 35-43-5-5 to permit a larger service fee to be assessed.
That statute provides that the payee or holder of a check
returned as unpaid due to insufficient funds or no account
may assess a service fee which shall not exceed the greater
of Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) or 5% (but not more than $250.00)
of the amount due,
Ordinance No. 110- 1984 amends�iOrdinance No. 73-1984 to
permit the City Controller to asses's the maximum service fee
for bad checks allowed by law.
Sincerely,
I,
Kenneth E. Barden
City Attorney
KEB/bd
cc: Mayor
City Clerk
Sanitary District
City Controller
File