Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2012_tcmin0214COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Council Chambers, 25 West Market Street, 7:30 p.m. Mayor Umstattd presiding. Council Members Present: David Butler, Thomas Dunn, II, Katie Sheldon Hammler, C. Terry Titus, Kevin Wright and Mayor Umstattd. Council Members Absent: Council Member Dunn arrived at 7:34 p.m. Council Member Martinez was absent. Staff Present: Town Manager John Wells, Deputy Town Attorney Barbara A. Notar, Deputy Director of Utilities Aref Etemadi, Director of Planning and Zoning Susan Berry Hill, Deputy Director of Planning and Zoning Brian Boucher, Senior Planner Michael Watkins, Zoning Administrator Chris Murphy, Senior Project Manager Lee Phillips, Director of Finance Norm Butts, Library Director Alexandra Gressitt and Clerk of Council Lee Ann Green AGENDA ITEMS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION: Council Member Hammler 3. SALUTE TO THE FLAG: Vice Mayor Wright 4. ROLL CALL: Showing Council Member Dunn arriving at 7:34 p.m., and Council Member Martinez absent. 5. MINUTES a. Regular Session Minutes of January 10, 2012 On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Butler, the minutes of the January 10, 2012 regular session meeting were approved by a vote of 5 -0 -2 (Dunn and Martinez absent). b. Work Session Minutes of January 23, 2012 On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Butler, the minutes of the January 23, 2012 work session meeting were approved by a vote of 5 -0 -2 (Dunn and Martinez absent). C. Regular Session Minutes of January 24, 2012 On a motion by Council Member Titus, seconded by Vice Mayor Wright, the minutes of the January 24, 2012 regular session meeting were approved by a vote of 5 -0 -2 (Dunn and Martinez absent). 6. ADOPTING THE MEETING AGENDA On the motion of Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Butler, the meeting agenda was approved as presented. The motion was approved by the following vote: 1 I Pa" COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Aye: Butler, Hammler, Titus, Wright and Mayor Umstaud Nay: None Vote: 5 -0 -2 (Dunn and Martinez absent) 7. PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation — African American History Month On a motion by Council Member Hammler, seconded by Council Member Butler, the following proclamation was approved unanimously. PROCMMAT /ON AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH February 2012 WHEREAS, in February of 1926, sixty -one years after the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution, Dr. Carter Woodson, a noted historian, desired to recognize the achievements and contributions of African Americans in this country; and WHEREAS, the month of February was appropriately chosen to recognize the achievements of African Americans as it contained the birth anniversaries of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass; and WHEREAS, the traditional one -week observance was expanded in 1976 to include the entire month of February; and WHEREAS, African American History Month allows us to honor the achievements of and celebrate the heritage of African Americans while recalling the courage of their struggle to achieve equality; and WHEREAS, historically African Americans, such as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Medgar Evers, Jessie Jackson, Dred Scott, W.E.B. DuBois, and Mary McLeod Bethune have worked to lay the very foundation for the free and diverse society that we as Americans enjoy today; and WHEREAS, this year's theme is Black Women in American Culture and History and honors African American women and the roles they played in shaping our Nation. THEREFORE, the Mayor and Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia hereby proclaim the month of February of the Year 2012 as African American History Month in the Town of Leesburg and urge the citizens. of Leesburg to join in recognizing the contributions made by the 2 1 pan COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Loudoun Chapter of the NAACP and other community organizations to preserve and remember the accomplishments of African Americans throughout the history of our nation. PROCLARYIED this 14th day of February 2012. 8. PETITIONERS The petitioner's section was opened at 7:38 p.m. Ann Robinson stated she has been a Leesburg resident for 22 years and thanked Council for the transparency in allowing her to attend all of the budget hearings. She stated Council is working in a non - partisan fashion to solve the problems and concerns of the people of the town. She stated 2012 will be a challenging year with at least 10,000 additional voters casting their votes in the November election, making it more difficult to create a non - partisan environment. She stated Leesburg is an example of how America does business. Butch Porter, stated he is in support of the new dance studio in downtown Leesburg. He stated the default should go to the business when the town's regulations have not kept up with other programs that the Council has approved, such as the Arts and Cultural District. He stated it is obvious that the zoning restriction needs to be lifted because this sends a mixed message and makes the Economic Development department's job harder. The petitioner's section was closed at 7:47 p.m. 9. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Butler, the following items were moved for approval as part of the Consent Agenda: a. PMW Farms Waterline Reimbursement RESOLUTION 2012 -014 Authorizing Reimbursement for Waterline Upsizing and Installation of a Casing Pipe at PMW Farms Development b. Supplemental Appropriation to the Parks and Recreation Budget for Donations for Shade Canopies at Freedom Park RESOLUTION 2012 -015 Approving a Supplemental Appropriation to the Parks and Recreation Budget of Donations Totaling $6,640.00 from Leesburg Girls Softball League and Central Loudoun Little League 31r>�� COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 C. Awarding a Construction Contract — South King Street Widening RESOLUTION 2012 -016 Awarding the Construction Contract for the Route 15 (South King Street) Widening Phase I (Governors Drive to Greenway Drive) Project to General Excavation, Inc., in the Amount of $4,498,188.60) d. Recommendation for Town Representative for the County Affordable Dwelling Unit Advisory Board (ADUAB) RESOLUTION 2012 -017 Recommending the Board of Supervisors of Loudoun County that Dwight Stonerook be Considered the Town Representative on the Loudoun County Affordable Dwelling Unit Advisory Board (ADUAB) The Consent Agenda was approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Titus, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 6-0-1 (Martinez absent) 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Approving Rezoninia Concept Plan and Proffer Amendment TLZM 2008- 0005 Allman - Stanfield and Special Exceptions TLSE 2008 -0012 and TLSE 2010 -0004 The public hearing was called to order at 7:51 p.m. Michael Watkins gave a brief presentation on the request for a Concept Plan and Proffer Amendment (TLZM 2008 - 0005), also known as Allman - Stanfield and the two special exceptions (TLSE 2008 -0012 for a bank drive - through, and TLSE 2010 -0004 for a childcare center). Summary of Key Points for TLZM 2008 -0005: • Amendment to approved (ZM -101) Concept plan with an increase in square footage from 59,000 square feet to 75,850 square feet. o Property has been subdivided into two parcels: DMAA and Stanfield parcels • Change in layout of the buildings. • Some existing structures have been proposed for reuse • Demolition permit for structures not to be reused has been approved • New building on Stanfield property will be mixed office /retail uses • New buildings on DMAA property will be restaurant /retail /office /bank uses • Changes in the allowable uses. • Amendments to the Proffers including • Changes in the use limitations • Contribution towards a traffic signal • Landscaped median on Greenway Drive • Optional Meade Drive connection if levels of service show need • Trail reimbursement for the trail along South King Street 4 1 P <, c COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 • Reduced evening lighting • Phased development of the property • Elimination of an off -site transportation contribution Summary of Key Points for Special Exception Applications (TLSE 2008 -0005 and TLSE 2010 - 0004): • 4000 square foot building for bank with three drive - through lanes o Alternative use to bank is a by -right pharmacy with single lane drive through • 208 -child childcare center with 10 employees • Provision for a summer program at the childcare center • Modifications for screening requirements due to existing vegetation • Modifications of buffer yard widths • Reduction in the number of loading spaces from 6 to 4 • Reduction of the dumpster setback for a residential zoning district after upgraded masonary screening and landscaping with year -round evergreens • Approval of a shared parking agreement for a minimum of 4 spaces on the Allman parcel • BAR conditionally approved demolition of the Manager's Cottage Staff recommends conditional approval for the three applications. Bob Sevila, representative for the one of the applicants, Stanfield Properties, gave a brief presentation on the ownership divisions and the details of the applicants' request. Council questions: • Who builds the $50,000 median? Applicant Answer: Developer will build the median as part of phased development. • Is the breakdown of square footage the same for both parcels? Staff Answer: In the existing plan it is broken down as 29/30 square feet. • Do the proffered amounts reflect Town Plan requirements? Staff Answer: Currently, the Town Plan recommends $1.2 million for off -site road improvements on the full square footage of the property without discounts. Difference after credit is given for proffered off -site improvements is still around $800,000. • Is staff comfortable with current proffer language? Staff Answer: Staff objects to the language regarding the connection to Meade Drive and has suggested alternate wording that would require connection to be made if a traffic study warrants the connection. • What is the economic impact of this application? Staff Answer: There are no dissimilar uses so the property will still generate BPOL and real estate taxes. There is no additional information to be gained from an updated impact study. 5 1 Pagc COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Applicant Answer: The economic impact analysis was not included in the packet, but was emailed to Council previously. • Have any considerations been made for impact on the viewshed of parking along Rt. 15? Staff Answer: Staff made several recommendations regarding arrangement of the buildings and visibility of parking; however, the applicant has chosen to move forward with the current design. • What is the estimated timeline for construction, if approved? Applicant Answer: The Stanfield property is owner occupied and they intend to begin using the Manor House as soon as approved. The Barn building will be stabilized, renovated and converted to a church use. The Allman family is currently vigorously and aggressively pursuing tenants. • Why do we need another bank? Applicant Answer: The community is prosperous and a lot of banks are anxious to locate here. A bank will not locate here unless they feel it can be successful. • How many jobs will be created by this development? Applicant Answer: between 140 -220 depending on whether there is a bank or a pharmacy and /or a specialty store. • What are the traffic impacts? Staff Answer: In the a.m. peak hour on the Allman property, there will be an additional 178 trips. In the p.m. peak hour, total, there will be an additional 282 trips and the average daily trips will equate to 1,987. On the Stanfield property, the trips increase by 272 in the a.m., 335 in the p.m. and roughly 2,479 trips for the average daily. In terms of a percent change, the a.m. is increased 62 %, the p.m. is increased 123% and there is a 40% increase in average daily trips as a comparison between previously approved condition to proposed condition. Citizen Comments: Greg Wigfield stated he is one of the applicants and is in favor of the application. He stated William Penn and William Meade came from England to escape religious persecution. He stated Captain Greenway built the Greenway Manor with the bricks that were the ballast to the ship they arrived on. He stated William Meade was a Quaker minister and began his ministry in this country on that property. David Allman thanked staff for helping them with the application. He stated they want everyone to walk away a winner because they are not trying to put anything over on anybody. He stated they are open to comments. Andrew Allman stated approval of this project will guarantee jobs in south Leesburg. Bill Wolf, 314 Belmont Place, SW, stated his support for this application and the use of the property for Destiny Church. 6 P a 4 COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Kevin Murray, stated he also attends Destiny Church. He stated his opinion that this will be a community enhancement and will provide a nice mix of uses. Dave Hobson, 703 Foxtail Circle, NE, stated he has been involved with Destiny Church for about seven years. He stated he supports the application. Rosemary Ray, 114 Meadowbrook Court, stated Mr. Wigfield is an excellent neighbor who takes meticulous care of the manor house. She stated she feels the plans are aesthetically pleasing. Robert Ray, stated he is in full support of this project. Tyronna, statedhe is a resident at 194 Connery Terrace. He stated Mr. Wigfield and the Stanfield Company and Destiny Church have been good neighbors and stewards of the property. He stated they still have concerns including the location of the dumpster, the number of occupants, and the location of the play area, and noise and parking concerns. Edwin Medina, stated he has a home on Connery Terrace and a home on Country Club. He stated he is a member of Destiny Church and does not consider the sounds of children playing as noise. Robin Frank, stated she is half owner of Brown - Carrera Real Estate and is a member of Destiny Church. She stated the Loudoun County community needs more stable churches. She stated she owns two condos in Country Club and a house across the street in Evergreen Meadows. She stated they manage 60 properties in and around Leesburg and has all 60 votes in favor of this application. She stated this property has historical significance in that it was always intended to be used for the use they are thinking of. The public hearing was closed at 9:19 p.m. Further Council issues: • Stormwater Management. Staff Answer: When the application was submitted, it pre -dates the current computations and requirements for graphic representation. Staff has worked with the applicant to make them aware of potential pitfalls with respect to the development process. He stated the applicant is likely to apply a note that says they acknowledge the requirement to comply with today's standards. • Compliance with the 2005 Town Plan. Staff Answer: In terms of the analysis regarding land use, language was added to the 2005 Town Plan regarding this piece of property. Further, there are now policies to satisfy encroachments into the stream valley buffer. 7 a c COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 • Can the existing pond be part of the stormwater management plan for the property? Staff Answer: The existing pond is not engineered to be a stormwater management facility. • Will any traffic concerns be taken care of by the South King Street Widening project? Staff Answer: Phase 1 of the South King Street project would start at the intersection with Greenway Drive and move towards the bypass. Phase 2 is a later phase that would do the frontage improvements in front of the Allman /Stanfield properties. Previously, with ZM 101, there were proffers for frontage improvements that have been completed by others. It was noted that Phase 2 has a component of state funding. They will reimburse the town for the cost of the signal light at Greenway Drive and some additional curb and gutter. • What are the implications of not approving this application? Staff Answer: The applicant would be required to construct the connection to Meade Drive. They would have to revise the building footprints that would decrease their building potential by approximately 14,000 square feet. Further, they would still owe the town $39,000 based on the current Town Plan. • Is a Church a by -right use in the B -1? Staff Answer: Yes, but it is not one of the proffered uses on the site. • Too much development, including loss of open space and trees for one of the entrances to town. • Inadequate buffering/ distance between dumpsters and residences. Staff Answer: There is a proffer to restrict the hours when the dumpsters will be used — between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. to mitigate noise impact. The town's noise ordinance is 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Applicant Answer: The encroachment into the buffer yard is minor and there is additional landscaping and an improved masonry enclosure. The distance is approximately 200 feet from the closest residence. • Proposed uses are too intense for the site. • Parking is inadequate. 81 COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 • Square footage calculations do not take into consideration existing square footage. Recalculated, the new square footage the guidelines would be about what the applicant is proffering. Council Member Titus made a motion to postpone this item until the next work session. The motion was seconded by Council Member Hammler. The motion failed by the following vote: Aye: Titus and Hammler Nay: Butler, Dunn, Wright, Martinez and Mayor Umstattd Vote: 2 -5 Council Member Dunn made a motion to table this item until after completion of Item 10e. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Wright and approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Martinez, Wright, and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Titus Vote: 6 -1 Time: 10:20 p.m. Discussion on this item resumed at 11:53 p.m. On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Dunn, the following was proposed: ORDINANCE 2012 -0 -003 Approving Concept Plan and Proffer Amendment TLZM2008 -0005, Allman - Stanfield, Amending ZM -101 to Allow an Increase in Density and to Revise the Proffers and the Layout of the Concept Plan for the Properties Located at the Southwest Quadrant of the Intersection of South King Street and Greenway Drive Vice Mayor Wright made the following comments: • There is existing zoning on this property that would be less desirable than the proposed rezoning. • Amended language that the owners have agreed to, the main risk item with the proffer language is addressed. • Transportation provisions that the applicant has provided adequately offset the additional impact from the zoning and comply with the intent of the Town Plan. • Off -site transportation proffers include funding for a traffic signal and construction of an enhanced median with a total value of approximately $350,000. Council Member Dunn made the following comments: • This application has gone through the process before the Planning Commission. • Project meets all the qualifications to move forward. 9 1 Page COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Council Member Titus made the following comments: Cannot support the motion. Objection is not to the church use, but to the overall project. Council Member Hammler made the following comments: • Possibility of moving the dumpster locations. Applicant Answer: • The closest dumpster to the residences is 235 feet away. • Screened with landscaping and hard masonry structures that will match architecture of the buildings. • Additional required buffers on three sides that will be landscaped. • Waivers to buffer are not on the rear of the dumpster locations. • Proffered restriction is changed from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. Council Member Butler made the following comments: • Did not feel this needed to go to another work session. Mayor Umstattd made the following comments: • There is no strong, widespread public opposition to this application. • Pleased that the applicant is willing to delay dumpster activity until 9 a.m. • Appreciate Council Member Titus' comments. • Proposed elevations are beautiful. Staff noted that the ordinance will be amended with an updated proffer date. The amendment was accepted by Vice Mayor Wright and Council Member Dunn. The motion to approve the rezoning ordinance was approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Titus Vote: 5-1-1 (Martinez absent) On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Butler, the following was proposed: RESOLUTION2012 -018 Approving Special Exception TLSE 2008 -0012, Greenway Bank, a Bank with Drive -In Facility, on the Property Located Near the Intersection of South King Street and Greenway Drive Vice Mayor Wright had the following comment: • Applicant has allowed flexibility to allow the possibility of a bank with a drive through if a by -right use is not possible. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Titus 10 1 P 'l COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Vote: 5-1-1 (Martinez absent) On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Dunn, the following was proposed.• RESOLUTION2012 -019 Approving TLSE 2010 -0012, Stanfield Child Care Center, a Child Care Facility Located on the Property having PIN Number of 273 -39 -1389, and Located Near the Intersection of South King Street and Greenway Drive The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Titus, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 6-0-1 (Martinez absent) b. Amending Chapter 34, Articles II and III of the Town Code to Add /Amend Certain Fees The public hearing was opened at 10:21 p.m. Aref Etemadi gave a brief presentation on the proposed changes to the Town Code regarding certain utilities fees. Summary of Important Points: • Section 34 -39. Fee for resumption of water service charge — not to exceed $30.00 • Section 34 -59. Fee for water service charge not to exceed $15 and clarification of the charge to include transfer of an account • Section 34 -62. Water drawn at a hydrant shall be charged up to $75.00 per quarter and up to $1511000 gallons. Water drawn at the WTP shall be charged at $50 /quarter plus the current high water usage rate in town water rate/ 1000 gallons • Section 34 -69. Clarification of requiring an active deposit when service is discontinued • Section 34 -71. New section to establish a field service fee not to exceed $30 during normal work hours and not to exceed $50 after hours • Section 34 -72. New section to establish a penalty fee for tampering with water meter, not to exceed $250.00 • Section 34 -73. New section to establish a meter testing fee not to exceed $50.00 • Section 34 -74. New section to establish a leak check fee not to exceed $90.00 • Section 34 -163. For a sewer charge not to exceed $15 and clarification of the charge to include transfer of an account Citizen comments: 11►Pag COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 Tom Rust owner and operator of Loudoun Milk, stated he had concerns regarding the fees for water drawn at a hydrant as he hauls potable water for bulk users such as swimming pools and festivals. He stated these changes raise the price of water about 20 %. Further, he congratulated the town for setting up the loading station at the water plant. He stated Leesburg water is his preferred site for potable water because of the quality of the water and the loading station allows him to load up without using a fire hose. He stated his preferred spot for non - potable water is the hydrant near the Bloom on South King Street. He stated going to the water plant adds about 10 miles to the trip. He expressed concern that only having one loading station will cause major delays. The public hearing was closed at 11:13 p.m. Council did not feel this item was ready for adoption. The proposed ordinance was not moved. The item will be scheduled for a work session for discussion. C. Appeal of the BAR Decision TLAP 2012 -0001 Leesburg Toyota This item was cancelled at the request of the applicant. d. Amending the Leesburg Zoning Ordinance TLZO 2011 -0007 The public hearing was opened at 11:15 p.m. Council Member Comments: • Concern over the use of the word "agent" as someone requesting an interpretation. Staff Answer: Text was taken directly from state code enabling language. • Section 3.19.4 gives the public 30 days to appeal, but the zoning administrator 60 days to answer. Staff Answer: Text was taken directly from state code enabling language. • Concern over the omission of a staff report. Staff Answer: Public hearing is an opportunity for the public to comment. As long as the public is given the opportunity to comment, the requirements are fulfilled. There were no members of the public wishing to speak to this subject at this public hearing. The public hearing was closed at 11:21 p.m. On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Titus, the following was proposed.• 12 1 P COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 ORDINANCE 2012 -0 -004 Amending Article 2 Review and Decision Making Bodies, Article 3 Review and Approval Procedures, Article 6 Nonresidential Districts, Article 7 Overlay and Special Purpose Districts, Article 9 Use Regulations, Article 10 Densityllntensity & Dimensional Standards, Article I1 Parking, Loading and Pedestrian Access, Article 12 Tree Preservation, Landscaping, Screening, Open Space and Outdoor Lighting, Article 13 Flood Protection, and Article 18 Definitions Further Council Comments: • Can a resident have a dance studio in their home? Staff Answer: Dance studios would be limited to B -1, B -2 and I -1. Dance lessons could be held in a residence as a home occupation. Conditions limiting number of students, sessions per day and days of the week are proposed to minimize potential impact on neighbors. One non - resident employee is allowed, similar to other home occupations. It was decided to divide the question, removing the dance lessons as a permitted home occupation from the main ordinance. • Why is a dance studio opening in the Old and Historic District when it is not a permitted use? Staff Answer: The dance studio is currently not open, but this item was added to the batch so that the business can open. The Arts and Cultural District was instituted, but changes to the Zoning Ordinance to allow some of those uses were not instituted. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Titus, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 6-0-1 (Martinez absent) Mayor Umstattd made a motion to allow in home dance lessons as a permitted home occupation. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Wright. After discussion, the motion was withdrawn. e. Amending_ Chapter 20 (Licenses, Taxation and Miscellaneous Regulations), Article II (Taxation Generally), Section 20 -24 of the Code of the Town of Leesburg The public hearing was opened at 11:43 p.m. Norm Butts gave a brief presentation on the proposed amendment to the Town Code to change the due date for the payment of supplemental personal -- property taxes from January 6 to March 5 and to establish a methodology for 13 1 P �.� COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 computing the personal property tax on qualifying vehicles following the Code of Virginia. Summary of Key points: • Currently PP tax is calculated based on the tax rate for all personal property and the state credit is then deducted. This function is repeated for every account. • The Code of Virginia allows a simplified method of taking a percentage of the state tax reimbursement and applying that to the rate. • Proposed resolution extends the due date for this year's PP taxes for this year. Council Comments: • PP Tax will still be calculated on the actual value of the vehicle. • Tax will be the same regardless of which method is used. There were no members of the public wishing to speak to this subject at this public hearing. The public hearing was closed at 11:51 p.m. On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Butler, the following was proposed: RESOLUTION 2012 -020 Providing an Extension for the Payment of Tax Year 2011 Personal Property Taxes The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Titus, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 6-0-1 (Martinez absent) On a motion by Vice Mayor Wright, seconded by Council Member Butler, the following was proposed.• ORDINANCE 2012 -0 -005 To Amend and Add to the Town Code Part II Chapter 20 (Licenses, Taxation and Miscellaneous Regulations) The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Titus, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 6-0-1 (Martinez absent) 11. RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS a. None. 14 ► Pa- COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 12. ORDINANCES a. None. 13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. None. 14. NEW BUSINESS a. None. 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Butler disclosed meetings with Allman- Stanfield and Peter Kalaris. Council Member Hammler disclosed a meeting with Chris Gleckner on the Toyota issue before it was postponed and a conversation with Hobie Mitchell. Vice Mayor Wright disclosed a teleconferenced meeting with the Allmans. Council Member Titus disclosed a meeting with Chris Gleckner about the Toyota appeal and Mr. Mahan about Courthouse Square. He expressed concern that the Town is doing away with the PO Box address right in the middle of the discussions to retain the post office. Council Member Dunn disclosed a conversation with the Allmans. 16. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Umstattd disclosed a meeting with the Allmans and the Destiny Church group as well as a telephone conversation with Chris Gleckner, representing Leesburg Toyota. Mayor Umstattd presented the illustrated ideas from the Pre - Kindergarten class at Loudoun County Day School's for what they would do, if they were the Mayor. 17. MANAGER'S COMMENTS Mr. Wells noted the Town Clerk, Lee Ann Green, has received her Certified Municipal Clerk designation. 18. CLOSED SESSION None. 15 1 Ilagc COUNCIL MEETING February 14, 2012 19. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Council Member Dunn, seconded by Council Member Butler, the meeting was adjourned at 12 :15 a.m., Wednesday, February 15, 2012. f 4 -- _ n C. Umstattd, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: Clerk of Cot5il 2012 tcmin0214 16 1 p a