HomeMy Public PortalAbout2013_tcmin0409 COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
Council Chambers, 25 West Market Street, 7:30 p.m. Mayor Umstattd presiding.
Council Members Present: Kelly Burk, David Butler, Thomas S. Dunn, Katie Sheldon
Hammler, Marty Martinez, Kevin Wright and Mayor Umstattd.
Council Members Absent: None.
Staff Present: Town Manager John Wells, Town Attorney Jeanette Irby, Deputy Town
Manager Kaj Dentler, Director of Utilities Amy Wyks, Director of Public Works Tom
Mason, Director of Planning and Zoning Susan Berry Hill, Director of Plan Review Bill
Adman, Director of Parks and Recreation Rich Williams, Director of Finance Norm
Butts, Assistant Town Manager Scott Parker, Human Resources Manager Karen Dilley,
Information Technology Manager Annie Carlson, Management Analyst Lisa Haley,
Management Analyst Michael Bruckner, Director of Capital Projects Renee LaFollette,
Airport Manager Scott Coffman, Deputy Director of Planning and Zoning Brian
Boucher, Economic Development Director Marantha Edwards, Senior Planner Irish
Grandfield, Chief of Police Joseph Price, Research and Communications Manager Betsy
Fields and Clerk of Council Lee Ann Green
AGENDA ITEMS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION: Council Member Wright
3. SALUTE TO THE FLAG: Robert McCurdy, Jr.
4. ROLL CALL: Showing all present
5. MINUTES
a. Regular Session Minutes of February 26, 2013
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the
minutes of the Regular Session meeting of February 26, 2013, were approved by a vote of 7-
0.
b. Work Session Minutes of March 11, 2013
On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Council Member Butler, the
minutes of the Work Session meeting of March 11, 2013, were approved by a vote of 7-0).
c. Regular Session Minutes of March 12, 2013
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the
minutes of the Regular Session meeting of March 12 2013, were approved by a vote of 7-0.
6. ADOPTING THE MEETING AGENDA
On the motion of Vice Mayor Butler, seconded by Council Member Wright, the meeting
agenda was approved as presented by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
1 I Page
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
Nay: None
Vote: 7-0
7. PRESENTATIONS
a. Certificate of Recognition—Achievement of Eagle Scout Rank—Robert
McCurdy, Jr.
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Dunn, a
Certificate of Recognition was presented to Robert McCurdy, Jr., in recognition of his
achievement of the rank of Eagle Scout.
b. Certificate of Appreciation—James Wynn
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Hammler,
a Certificate of Appreciation was presented to Jim Wynn for his service to the Town of
Leesburg on the Information Technology Commission and the Technology and
Communication Commission.
c. Proclamation—Lyme Disease Awareness Month
On a motion by Vice Mayor Butler, seconded by Council Member Martinez, a
Proclamation proclaiming May as Lyme Disease Awareness Month was presented to Dr.
David Goodfriend, Loudoun County Health Department.
d. Proclamation—National Library Week
On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, a
Proclamation proclaiming National Library Week was presented to James Hershman,
Thomas Balch Library Advisory Commission
e. Proclamation—Autism Awareness Month
On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Council Member Martinez, a
Proclamation proclaiming Autism Awareness Month was presented to the Arc of Loudoun.
f. Presentation—Environmental Advisory Commission Annual Report
Neely Law gave a brief presentation on the activities of the Environmental
Advisory Commission over the past year. She stated as part of their rain barrel
initiative, there are rebates for the purchase of rain barrels for the first 30
Leesburg residents who participate in the work shop. Further, she noted that the
Watershed Committee will be presenting recommendations for low impact
development to the Council at a later meeting.
g. Presentation—Promotional Video from students at Monroe Vocational
and Technical School was presented. J. B. Anderson, Chair of the Technology
and Communication Commission, stated this was produced in cooperation with
Virginia Tech, Monroe Vo-Tech and Capitol TV Productions. He stated they are
looking for Council support for more videos.
2IPage
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
8. PETITIONERS
a. The Petitioner's Section was opened at 8:08 p.m.
Butch Porter, stated he is representing the Leesburg Downtown Business
Association (LDBA). He stated the businesses downtown agree that they have a
right to be represented to the Council as a group through the LDBA and they all
have a right to express themselves as individuals. He stated the downtown is
strong and operating as a business district. He noted the LDBA has an active
membership.
Paige Buscema, stated she is the promotions chair for the LDBA. She
stated they are working on Flower and Garden Festival with the Leesburg Parks
and Recreation Department. She stated the next event is the car show in June
which she urged everyone to attend. She stated all the downtown business
owners are clients of each other and friends.
Sola Palotta, stated First Friday has been a great success. She stated she is
the owner of the Pink Shop and Very Virginia. She thanked Council for the
Downtown Improvements Project. She stated the walkways between King Street
and the garage are beautiful. She stated she is looking forward to the next phase.
The Petitioner's Section was closed at 8:21 p.m.
9. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the following
items were moved for approval as the Consent Agenda:
a. Making an Appointment to the Technology and Communication Commission
RESOLUTION 2013-046
Making an Appointment to the Technology and Communication Commission
(Binkley)
b. Making a Reduction of the Performance Guarantee for Public Improvements at
Star Building Addition (TLPF 2011-0008)
RESOLUTION2013-047
Making a Reduction of the Performance Guarantee for Public
Improvements at Star Building Addition(TLPF 2011-0008)
c. Loudoun Water Antenna Lease Agreement
RESOLUTION 2013-048
Authorizing Loudoun Water's Request for Lease Agreement to Install an
Automated Metering Infrastructure Antenna on Carr Tank I
31Pagc
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
The Consent Agenda was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: None
Vote: 7-0
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPEALS
a. Appeal of BAR Case No. TLAP 2013-0001, Old Town Grill
The public hearing was opened at 8:30 p.m.
Jeanette Irby noted that there is a procedural issue with this case in that
the appellant did not specify a basis for the appeal. She stated that Council has
the option to dismiss this appeal since the appeal, as brought by the applicant,
was not complete. She stated that the zoning ordinance sets forth that a basis for
appeal must be stated.
Council decided to hear the appeal.
Kim Del Rance, Preservation Planner, reviewed the facts of the appeal.
Key points:
• Location is 15 South King Street—the Old Town Grill
• BAR denied a Certificate of Appropriateness for the sign because the sign
material is not appropriate under the Old and Historic District Guidelines
• There is no record of approval for either the original Greentree sign or any
subsequent sign.
• The applicant expressed an unwillingness to replace the unapproved
aluminum sign with a similar sign in wood.
Darius and Fabian Saiedi spoke regarding their appeal:
• Stated the sign is made of the same material as the previously existing
Greentree sign
• Stated that his father called and left messages for town staff but never
received a call back to consult over the specifics for the new sign
• Feels that the BAR is anti-business
Richard Koochagian, Chair of the BAR, addressed the issues raised by
Mr. Saiedi.
• Very few applications are declined because of working with applicants to
get their applications approved
• Old and Historic District Sign Guidelines are clear that metal is not an
appropriate material for signs
• Argument that the sign existed in metal before the text being changed is
outside the BAR's purview
Darius and Fabian Saiedi addressed Mr. Koochagian's statements:
• Metal sign is 40 years old
41 Page
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
• Replaced original wood sign with aluminum in 1980
• No other options were given
• Stated applicants to the BAR are forced to comply with the BAR because
they do not know their right to appeal
Richard Koochagian addressed the Saiedi's comments:
• Noted that at the meeting on January 23, Mr. Saiedi explained that the
original sign was wood
Council Comments/Questions:
• The BAR is the custodian of the Historic District and must maintain the
integrity of the district
• The BAR must make decisions based on the Guidelines
• Question the veracity of allegation that phone messages went unanswered
On a motion by Mayor Umstattd, seconded by Council Member Hammier, the
following was proposed:
MOTION
I move to REVERSE the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in case
TLHP 2012-0118, rendered on January 23, 2013
Council Comments/Questions:
• What materials are other signs in town made of?
Staff answer: In the historic district, most signs are wood or an
appropriate composite material. Signs that have been approved through
the BAR process conform with the guidelines. The BAR will approve
signs made from materials that when painted, are indistinguishable from
wood.
• What is the purpose of stipulating the material if the sign looks historic
even though it is made of aluminum?
Staff answer: Guidelines repeat the idea that materials should be
substantial or when worked have the look of substantial materials.
Aluminum bends, flakes, corrodes and does not wear in the same way that
wood wears
• Are guidelines part of regulations?
Staff answer: Council approved the guidelines for the BAR to use in
making decisions in the historic district. Not giving weight to the
guidelines sets a precedent.
The motion to reverse the BAR's decision was defeated by the following vote:
Aye: Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Martinez, and Wright
Vote: 1-6
5 I Page
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
On the motion by Council Member Dunn, seconded by Council Member Wright,
the following was proposed:
MOTION 2013-016
I move to AFFIRM the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in case
TLHP 2012-0118, rendered on January 23, 2013
The motion to affirm the decision of the BAR was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, and Wright
Nay: Mayor Umstattd
Vote: 6-1
b. Appeal of BAR Case No. TLAP 2013-0002 Kingdom Enterprise
The public hearing was opened at 9:31 p.m.
Kim Del Rance, Preservation Planner, gave a brief presentation on the
specifics of this appeal:
• Property is located at 6 West Market Street
• Certificate of Appropriateness was approved for exterior changes to the
building with the following condition: New decorative entry door to be
submitted to staff for administrative approval as shown on the sketch that
was modified during the meeting
• Door and surround were installed without being submitted to staff,
contrary to the condition of approval
• Surround did not meet the guidelines due to size and incompatible styles
• Applicant agreed to remove the pediment if directed to do so
• Structure is a contributing structure to the district
Michael O'Connor, appellant, spoke regarding his appeal:
• Surround was hand carved in 1887 —almost the same year the building
was built
• Feeling that a less ornate door would be appropriate if the building were
being used as something other than an upscale restaurant
Richard Koochagian, Chair of the BAR, addressed Mr. O'Connor's
statements:
• BAR spent a lot of time working with the applicant developing something
that was more acceptable for that structure at that location
• Applicant agreed to conditions at the time of approval
• There are no facts supporting the idea that a more ornate doorway will
bring in more business
• The applicant not liking the conditions of approval is not a reason to
overturn a decision of the BAR
61 Page
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
Council Comments/Questions:
• Is the reason for the appeal, the desire to get a ruling on what has been
installed?
Applicant answer: The option that the BAR approved is not the option
the applicant wanted.
• Can Council require an applicant to change design features of the rest of
the building to match the new doorway?
Staff answer: That would run counter to the reason the guidelines were
written-to protect the historic nature of the district.
BAR answer: Applicant did not have door at the time of approval. Once
door was acquired, applicant was to get approval for installation from
staff.
• Side of this building and backs of the King Street buildings create another
streetscape along the alley.
• Problem may have been a communication problem
• Historic door from the correct time period is a good addition to the
building and the alley
• Could they have put this type of surround on a building of this type during
the time period the building was constructed?
Staff answer: It would not have been used as a side entrance- there was
once a building where the drive through bank is now located. Therefore,
the entrance would have been in a true alley and not visible from the
street. The original builders would not have used this type of materials for
a doorway that is not visible from the street. Further storefront
architecture from this period typically features recessed doorways. This is
more of a residential style doorway.
• What did the side of the building originally look like?
Staff answer: Going back three years, there were windows and a
utilitarian side door. The owner was trying to make this building more
aesthetically pleasing by making the windows symmetrical. Original
application had the windows spaced a certain way, but during
construction, it was found the windows could not be spaced exactly as
originally approved.
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Burk,
the following was proposed:
MOTION2013-017
I move to REVERSE the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in Case
TLHP 2012-0127, rendered on December 17, 2012, allowing the door to remain as
installed
Council Comments/Questions:
• Agreement with BAR and staff; however, it appears as a separate building
and enhances that streetscape
7I Pag
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
Council Comments/Questions:
• Is the reason for the appeal, the desire to get a ruling on what has been
installed?
Applicant answer: The option that the BAR approved is not the option
the applicant wanted.
• Can Council require an applicant to change design features of the rest of
the building to match the new doorway?
Staff answer: That would run counter to the reason the guidelines were
written—to protect the historic nature of the district.
BAR answer: Applicant did not have door at the time of approval. Once
door was acquired, applicant was to get approval for installation from
staff.
• Side of this building and backs of the King Street buildings create another
streetscape along the alley.
• Problem may have been a communication problem
• Historic door from the correct time period is a good addition to the
building and the alley
• Could they have put this type of surround on a building of this type during
the time period the building was constructed?
Staff answer: It would not have been used as a side entrance—there was
once a building where the drive through bank is now located. Therefore,
the entrance would have been in a true alley and not visible from the
street. The original builders would not have used this type of materials for
a doorway that is not visible from the street. Further storefront
architecture from this period typically features recessed doorways. This is
more of a residential style doorway.
• What did the side of the building originally look like?
Staff answer: Going back three years, there were windows and a
utilitarian side door. The owner was trying to make this building more
aesthetically pleasing by making the windows symmetrical. Original
application had the windows spaced a certain way, but during
construction, it was found the windows could not be spaced exactly as
originally approved.
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Burk,
the following was proposed:
MOTION 2013-017
I move to REVERSE the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in Case
TLHP 2012-0127, rendered on December 17, 2012, allowing the door to remain as
installed
Council Comments/Questions:
• Agreement with BAR and staff; however, it appears as a separate building
and enhances that streetscape
7 I ,j g c'
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
• Function is not to recreate history, but to preserve the unique history of
Leesburg
• Sets a precedent for property owners to do whatever they want and then
ask Council to fix it
The motion to reverse the decision of the BAR was approved by the
following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Martinez, and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Dunn, Hammler, and Wright
Vote: 4-3
c. Special Exception Application TLSE 2012-0003 Home Depot
The public hearing was opened at 10:36 p.m.
Irish Grandfield stated that the application includes two special exceptions
for outdoor and vehicle storage. He noted both uses are being performed on the
property at this time and approval of these special exceptions will validate a use
that is already in place. He noted that there are no areas of disagreement
between staff and the applicant. Further, he stated the Planning Commission
recommended approval by a vote of 7-0.
The applicant agreed to all conditions.
Council Member Comments/Questions:
• Are there any plans to change the façade to remove the orange roof?
Applicant answer: Not at this time
There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this public
hearing.
The public hearing was closed at 10:40 p.m.
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Dunn,
the following was proposed:
RESOLUTION 2013-049
Approving TLSE 2012-0003 Home Depot, A Special Exception to Allow Vehicle
Rental and Outdoor Storage at 280 Fort Evans Road Identified as Loudoun
County Parcel Identification Number(PIN)147-15-0298
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: None
Vote: 7-0
8 I Pag
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
d. Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2014
The public hearing was opened at 10:41 p.m.
Mr. Wells had no additional information.
There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this public
hearing.
The public hearing was closed at 10:42 p.m.
On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the
following was proposed:
ORDINANCE 2013-0-008
Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2014;Making Appropriations for FY 2014 for
the General Fund, Utilities Fund, and Capital Projects Fund; Setting Fees for
Airport Hangars and Tie-Downs;Authorizing Amendments to the Budget and
Supplemental Appropriations by Council Resolution;and Authorizing and
Directing the Town Manager to Take All Steps Necessary and Prudent to
Effectuate the Implementation of this Ordinance
Mayor Umstattd made a motion to amend the Budget to add$5,104 for the
Journey through Hallowed Ground. The motion was seconded by Council Member
Martinez and approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Dunn
Vote: 6-1
Council Comments/Questions:
• Balanced budget affords the opportunity to provide an equalized tax rate
• Mindful of future needs for long time fiscal stability as well as meeting
current service needs and obligations
• Journey Through Hallowed Ground(JTHG) has generated over 50
mentions for Leesburg in the press locally, nationally and internationally
• Addition of funds for JTHG will not affect the ability to adopt either tax
rate that is being considered
• Concern over continuing to ask staff to do more with less
• Concern about cost of continuing VRT bus service
• Need to eliminate or re-evaluate services to limited groups
• With the exception of water, not every citizen uses all services provided by
the town or the county.
• The combination of services and amenities makes the town a better place
to live
•
9 1'.i ,
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
The motion to approve Ordinance 2013-0-008, as amended, was approved by the
following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Dunn
Vote: 6-1
On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the
following was proposed:
MOTION 2013-018
I move that Town Council acknowledge Year Two of the FY2014-2015 Biennial
Budget in the total amount of$89,330,198 including$48,902,200 for the General
Fund, $19,847,586 for the Utility Fund, and$20,580,412 for the Capital Projects
Fund
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Dunn
Vote: 6-1
On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Council Member Hammier,
the following was proposed:
MOTION 2013-019
I move that Town Council reaffirm its commitment to the long-term sustainability
plan adopted by Resolution 2012-028 on March 13, 2012
Council Comments:
• This is a look to the future
• Pleased with progress the town has made
• Cannot approve a two year budget
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Dunn
Vote: 6-1
11. RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS
a. JLMA Crosstrail and Tuscarora Crossing Referrals
MOTION 2013-014
I move that Council endorse the referral comment letter dated April 10, 2013 for
ZMAP 2012-0021, Crosstrail; SPEX 2012-0047 Crosstrail Hotel; SPEX 2012-
0048 Crosstrail Gas Pumps;and SPEX 2012-0049, Crosstrail Outdoor Saks,first
submission, and that the letter be forwarded to county staff
The motion was approved by the following vote:
10 I Pa ; c
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: None
Vote: 6-0-1 (Dunn abstaining)
MOTION2013-015
I move that Council endorse the referral comment letter dated April 10, 2013 for
ZMAP 2012-0021 Tuscarora Crossing, second submission, and that the letter be
forwarded to county staff.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: None
Vote: 6-0-1 (Dunn abstaining)
b. Adopting the Fiscal Year 2014-2019 Capital Improvement Program
On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the
following was proposed:
RESOLUTION 2013-050
Adopting the Fiscal Year 2014-2019 Capital Improvements Program in the
Amount of$56,513,900
Council Comments:
• Would like to reduce the general fund to re-allocate funds to infrastructure
improvements
• Pleased that nothing was added to this year's CIP
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: None
Vote: 7-0
12. ORDINANCES
a. Making Annual Levy and Rate of Taxes
On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Council Member Hammier,
the following was proposed including a$0.189 equalized tax rate
ORDINANCE 2013-0-009
Ordaining Chapter 20(Licenses, Taxation, and Miscellaneous Regulations),
Article II(Taxation, Generally), Section 20-22(Annual Levy and Rate of Taxes),
and Appendix B(Fee Schedule)Setting Tax Rates on Real Estate, Vehicles Used
as Mobile Homes or Offices, Tangible Personal Property, Real Estate and Tangible
Personal Property of Public Service Corporations and Bank Capital, Airport Fees
for Airport Hangars and Tie Downs, and Setting Utility Water and Sewer Rates
for Tax Year 2013
11 I I' d gc
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
Council Comments:
• Council has adopted a budget that provides the opportunity to adopt the
equalized tax rate
• What was cut from the budget to achieve the equalized tax rate?
Staff answer: Reduced reliance on local tax funding by adding additional
revenue.
• Concern that the equalized rate will continue the practice of putting
expenses on the "back burner".
Staff answer: Capital Asset Reserve is being used to purchase things such
as vehicles, replacement systems for buildings, etc. Both tax rates will
fund maintenance needs, but the equalized tax rate will reduce the effort
in the automation area.
• Need to keep some flexibility in the budget
The motion to adopt a$0.189 tax rate failed by the following roll call vote:
Aye: Wright, Hammier, Burk, and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Martinez, Butler, Dunn
Vote 4-3
Council Member Hammier proposed a tax rate of$0.192 as a compromise. The
motion was seconded by Council Member Burk.
The motion to adopt a$0.195 tax rate was approved by the following roll call vote:
Aye: Hammier, Martinez, Burk, Butler, and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: Wright and Dunn
Vote: 5-2
13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. None.
14. NEW BUSINESS
a. Utility Rate Advisory Committee Recommendation
On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the
following was proposed:
MOTION 2013-020
I move that the Town Council accept the Utility Rate Advisory
Committee presentation of April 8, 2013 and direct staff to develop a
Request for Proposal (RFP) to secure the services of a utility rate setting
consultant using the URAC presentation as part of the parameters for the
scope of work. Staff is further directed to bring the draft RFP back to the
Town Council for review before it is issued
Council Comments/Questions:
• Good start for the process.
• Moving to a tiered rate structure simplifies things for the town.
12 I Pane
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
• Numbers shown in the presentation are for guidance purposes only
• Will not support any recommendations to raise rates
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd
Nay: None.
Vote: 7-0
15. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council Member Dunn—stated he does not feel that people would rather see a
higher tax rate than have a government that cannot come to a compromise. He stated
he would not be participating in the Council vs. Staff trash pickup because he will do his
trash pickup with the boy scouts.
Council Member Butler—disclosed a telephone call from Michael O'Connor. He
stated he has run for Council three times and to his knowledge, Mr. O'Connor has not
contributed to any of those campaigns. He stated that Mr. O'Connor did contribute to
his campaign for the House of Delegates.
Council Member Burk—Disclosed in-kind contributions from Mr. O'Connor in
the past. She reviewed the statistics from the town's first annual Youth Job Fair held at
ProJet Aviation. She requested that Council support making this an annual event. She
commended the Arc of Loudoun for their work with autism. She stated she attended the
annual Valor Awards ceremony and was inspired by the first responders who were
honored. She reminded everyone about the Keep Leesburg Beautiful Council vs. Staff
challenge. She noted that Leesburg Girls Softball had their Opening Day and stated it
was great to see all the young girls ready to play ball. She thanked everyone for helping
out at the Job Fair.
Council Member Martinez—noted he attended Opening Day but was recruited
as a coach.
Council Member Hammier—noted the dinner at Japanese Kitchen was great.
She thanked the owners for the invitation. She congratulated Leesburg Today on their
25 years and the renovation of their new building. She thanked Paul Reimers for his
renovation of the two houses by the W&OD trail. She commented on the completion of
the improvements at the East Market Street Y. She noted that the SBDC will be holding
a HUBZone training at Ida Lee.
Council Member Wright—Stated Relay for Life is ramping up and encouraged
everyone to participate. He expressed his appreciation for the Leesburg police unit that
ensured a safe outcome for the family involved in the incident for which they were
honored at the Valor Awards. He congratulated Leesburg Today on their new location
and encouraged everyone to participate in Keep Leesburg Beautiful.
13 I Pagc
COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013
16. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Umstattd stated she met with representatives of Home Depot over the
past two weeks. She noted that Home Depot is always interested in helping veterans
with job opportunities and repairs and materials for their homes. She congratulated
Jovanna Reiser of Chimole because the Smithsonian is holding a private gathering at her
shop to highlight her pottery. She stated she is looking forward to the opening of
Leesburg Brewing Company.
17. MANAGER'S COMMENTS
Mr. Wells thanked Council for their efforts on the budget. He also noted that a
new directional sign will be placed at the East Market Street Y that will be more
attractive than the current sign.
18. CLOSED SESSION
None.
19. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Vice Mayor Butler, seconded by Council Member Martinez, the meeting
was adjourned at 12:18 a.m., Wednesday, April 10, 2013.
Kriwi 'C. stattd, Mayor
Town of Leesburg
A
Clerk of
2013 tcmin0A 09
14 I Pagc