Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2013_tcmin0409 COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 Council Chambers, 25 West Market Street, 7:30 p.m. Mayor Umstattd presiding. Council Members Present: Kelly Burk, David Butler, Thomas S. Dunn, Katie Sheldon Hammler, Marty Martinez, Kevin Wright and Mayor Umstattd. Council Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Town Manager John Wells, Town Attorney Jeanette Irby, Deputy Town Manager Kaj Dentler, Director of Utilities Amy Wyks, Director of Public Works Tom Mason, Director of Planning and Zoning Susan Berry Hill, Director of Plan Review Bill Adman, Director of Parks and Recreation Rich Williams, Director of Finance Norm Butts, Assistant Town Manager Scott Parker, Human Resources Manager Karen Dilley, Information Technology Manager Annie Carlson, Management Analyst Lisa Haley, Management Analyst Michael Bruckner, Director of Capital Projects Renee LaFollette, Airport Manager Scott Coffman, Deputy Director of Planning and Zoning Brian Boucher, Economic Development Director Marantha Edwards, Senior Planner Irish Grandfield, Chief of Police Joseph Price, Research and Communications Manager Betsy Fields and Clerk of Council Lee Ann Green AGENDA ITEMS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION: Council Member Wright 3. SALUTE TO THE FLAG: Robert McCurdy, Jr. 4. ROLL CALL: Showing all present 5. MINUTES a. Regular Session Minutes of February 26, 2013 On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the minutes of the Regular Session meeting of February 26, 2013, were approved by a vote of 7- 0. b. Work Session Minutes of March 11, 2013 On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Council Member Butler, the minutes of the Work Session meeting of March 11, 2013, were approved by a vote of 7-0). c. Regular Session Minutes of March 12, 2013 On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the minutes of the Regular Session meeting of March 12 2013, were approved by a vote of 7-0. 6. ADOPTING THE MEETING AGENDA On the motion of Vice Mayor Butler, seconded by Council Member Wright, the meeting agenda was approved as presented by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd 1 I Page COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 Nay: None Vote: 7-0 7. PRESENTATIONS a. Certificate of Recognition—Achievement of Eagle Scout Rank—Robert McCurdy, Jr. On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Dunn, a Certificate of Recognition was presented to Robert McCurdy, Jr., in recognition of his achievement of the rank of Eagle Scout. b. Certificate of Appreciation—James Wynn On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Hammler, a Certificate of Appreciation was presented to Jim Wynn for his service to the Town of Leesburg on the Information Technology Commission and the Technology and Communication Commission. c. Proclamation—Lyme Disease Awareness Month On a motion by Vice Mayor Butler, seconded by Council Member Martinez, a Proclamation proclaiming May as Lyme Disease Awareness Month was presented to Dr. David Goodfriend, Loudoun County Health Department. d. Proclamation—National Library Week On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, a Proclamation proclaiming National Library Week was presented to James Hershman, Thomas Balch Library Advisory Commission e. Proclamation—Autism Awareness Month On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Council Member Martinez, a Proclamation proclaiming Autism Awareness Month was presented to the Arc of Loudoun. f. Presentation—Environmental Advisory Commission Annual Report Neely Law gave a brief presentation on the activities of the Environmental Advisory Commission over the past year. She stated as part of their rain barrel initiative, there are rebates for the purchase of rain barrels for the first 30 Leesburg residents who participate in the work shop. Further, she noted that the Watershed Committee will be presenting recommendations for low impact development to the Council at a later meeting. g. Presentation—Promotional Video from students at Monroe Vocational and Technical School was presented. J. B. Anderson, Chair of the Technology and Communication Commission, stated this was produced in cooperation with Virginia Tech, Monroe Vo-Tech and Capitol TV Productions. He stated they are looking for Council support for more videos. 2IPage COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 8. PETITIONERS a. The Petitioner's Section was opened at 8:08 p.m. Butch Porter, stated he is representing the Leesburg Downtown Business Association (LDBA). He stated the businesses downtown agree that they have a right to be represented to the Council as a group through the LDBA and they all have a right to express themselves as individuals. He stated the downtown is strong and operating as a business district. He noted the LDBA has an active membership. Paige Buscema, stated she is the promotions chair for the LDBA. She stated they are working on Flower and Garden Festival with the Leesburg Parks and Recreation Department. She stated the next event is the car show in June which she urged everyone to attend. She stated all the downtown business owners are clients of each other and friends. Sola Palotta, stated First Friday has been a great success. She stated she is the owner of the Pink Shop and Very Virginia. She thanked Council for the Downtown Improvements Project. She stated the walkways between King Street and the garage are beautiful. She stated she is looking forward to the next phase. The Petitioner's Section was closed at 8:21 p.m. 9. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the following items were moved for approval as the Consent Agenda: a. Making an Appointment to the Technology and Communication Commission RESOLUTION 2013-046 Making an Appointment to the Technology and Communication Commission (Binkley) b. Making a Reduction of the Performance Guarantee for Public Improvements at Star Building Addition (TLPF 2011-0008) RESOLUTION2013-047 Making a Reduction of the Performance Guarantee for Public Improvements at Star Building Addition(TLPF 2011-0008) c. Loudoun Water Antenna Lease Agreement RESOLUTION 2013-048 Authorizing Loudoun Water's Request for Lease Agreement to Install an Automated Metering Infrastructure Antenna on Carr Tank I 31Pagc COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 The Consent Agenda was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 7-0 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPEALS a. Appeal of BAR Case No. TLAP 2013-0001, Old Town Grill The public hearing was opened at 8:30 p.m. Jeanette Irby noted that there is a procedural issue with this case in that the appellant did not specify a basis for the appeal. She stated that Council has the option to dismiss this appeal since the appeal, as brought by the applicant, was not complete. She stated that the zoning ordinance sets forth that a basis for appeal must be stated. Council decided to hear the appeal. Kim Del Rance, Preservation Planner, reviewed the facts of the appeal. Key points: • Location is 15 South King Street—the Old Town Grill • BAR denied a Certificate of Appropriateness for the sign because the sign material is not appropriate under the Old and Historic District Guidelines • There is no record of approval for either the original Greentree sign or any subsequent sign. • The applicant expressed an unwillingness to replace the unapproved aluminum sign with a similar sign in wood. Darius and Fabian Saiedi spoke regarding their appeal: • Stated the sign is made of the same material as the previously existing Greentree sign • Stated that his father called and left messages for town staff but never received a call back to consult over the specifics for the new sign • Feels that the BAR is anti-business Richard Koochagian, Chair of the BAR, addressed the issues raised by Mr. Saiedi. • Very few applications are declined because of working with applicants to get their applications approved • Old and Historic District Sign Guidelines are clear that metal is not an appropriate material for signs • Argument that the sign existed in metal before the text being changed is outside the BAR's purview Darius and Fabian Saiedi addressed Mr. Koochagian's statements: • Metal sign is 40 years old 41 Page COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 • Replaced original wood sign with aluminum in 1980 • No other options were given • Stated applicants to the BAR are forced to comply with the BAR because they do not know their right to appeal Richard Koochagian addressed the Saiedi's comments: • Noted that at the meeting on January 23, Mr. Saiedi explained that the original sign was wood Council Comments/Questions: • The BAR is the custodian of the Historic District and must maintain the integrity of the district • The BAR must make decisions based on the Guidelines • Question the veracity of allegation that phone messages went unanswered On a motion by Mayor Umstattd, seconded by Council Member Hammier, the following was proposed: MOTION I move to REVERSE the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in case TLHP 2012-0118, rendered on January 23, 2013 Council Comments/Questions: • What materials are other signs in town made of? Staff answer: In the historic district, most signs are wood or an appropriate composite material. Signs that have been approved through the BAR process conform with the guidelines. The BAR will approve signs made from materials that when painted, are indistinguishable from wood. • What is the purpose of stipulating the material if the sign looks historic even though it is made of aluminum? Staff answer: Guidelines repeat the idea that materials should be substantial or when worked have the look of substantial materials. Aluminum bends, flakes, corrodes and does not wear in the same way that wood wears • Are guidelines part of regulations? Staff answer: Council approved the guidelines for the BAR to use in making decisions in the historic district. Not giving weight to the guidelines sets a precedent. The motion to reverse the BAR's decision was defeated by the following vote: Aye: Mayor Umstattd Nay: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Martinez, and Wright Vote: 1-6 5 I Page COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 On the motion by Council Member Dunn, seconded by Council Member Wright, the following was proposed: MOTION 2013-016 I move to AFFIRM the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in case TLHP 2012-0118, rendered on January 23, 2013 The motion to affirm the decision of the BAR was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, and Wright Nay: Mayor Umstattd Vote: 6-1 b. Appeal of BAR Case No. TLAP 2013-0002 Kingdom Enterprise The public hearing was opened at 9:31 p.m. Kim Del Rance, Preservation Planner, gave a brief presentation on the specifics of this appeal: • Property is located at 6 West Market Street • Certificate of Appropriateness was approved for exterior changes to the building with the following condition: New decorative entry door to be submitted to staff for administrative approval as shown on the sketch that was modified during the meeting • Door and surround were installed without being submitted to staff, contrary to the condition of approval • Surround did not meet the guidelines due to size and incompatible styles • Applicant agreed to remove the pediment if directed to do so • Structure is a contributing structure to the district Michael O'Connor, appellant, spoke regarding his appeal: • Surround was hand carved in 1887 —almost the same year the building was built • Feeling that a less ornate door would be appropriate if the building were being used as something other than an upscale restaurant Richard Koochagian, Chair of the BAR, addressed Mr. O'Connor's statements: • BAR spent a lot of time working with the applicant developing something that was more acceptable for that structure at that location • Applicant agreed to conditions at the time of approval • There are no facts supporting the idea that a more ornate doorway will bring in more business • The applicant not liking the conditions of approval is not a reason to overturn a decision of the BAR 61 Page COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 Council Comments/Questions: • Is the reason for the appeal, the desire to get a ruling on what has been installed? Applicant answer: The option that the BAR approved is not the option the applicant wanted. • Can Council require an applicant to change design features of the rest of the building to match the new doorway? Staff answer: That would run counter to the reason the guidelines were written-to protect the historic nature of the district. BAR answer: Applicant did not have door at the time of approval. Once door was acquired, applicant was to get approval for installation from staff. • Side of this building and backs of the King Street buildings create another streetscape along the alley. • Problem may have been a communication problem • Historic door from the correct time period is a good addition to the building and the alley • Could they have put this type of surround on a building of this type during the time period the building was constructed? Staff answer: It would not have been used as a side entrance- there was once a building where the drive through bank is now located. Therefore, the entrance would have been in a true alley and not visible from the street. The original builders would not have used this type of materials for a doorway that is not visible from the street. Further storefront architecture from this period typically features recessed doorways. This is more of a residential style doorway. • What did the side of the building originally look like? Staff answer: Going back three years, there were windows and a utilitarian side door. The owner was trying to make this building more aesthetically pleasing by making the windows symmetrical. Original application had the windows spaced a certain way, but during construction, it was found the windows could not be spaced exactly as originally approved. On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Burk, the following was proposed: MOTION2013-017 I move to REVERSE the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in Case TLHP 2012-0127, rendered on December 17, 2012, allowing the door to remain as installed Council Comments/Questions: • Agreement with BAR and staff; however, it appears as a separate building and enhances that streetscape 7I Pag COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 Council Comments/Questions: • Is the reason for the appeal, the desire to get a ruling on what has been installed? Applicant answer: The option that the BAR approved is not the option the applicant wanted. • Can Council require an applicant to change design features of the rest of the building to match the new doorway? Staff answer: That would run counter to the reason the guidelines were written—to protect the historic nature of the district. BAR answer: Applicant did not have door at the time of approval. Once door was acquired, applicant was to get approval for installation from staff. • Side of this building and backs of the King Street buildings create another streetscape along the alley. • Problem may have been a communication problem • Historic door from the correct time period is a good addition to the building and the alley • Could they have put this type of surround on a building of this type during the time period the building was constructed? Staff answer: It would not have been used as a side entrance—there was once a building where the drive through bank is now located. Therefore, the entrance would have been in a true alley and not visible from the street. The original builders would not have used this type of materials for a doorway that is not visible from the street. Further storefront architecture from this period typically features recessed doorways. This is more of a residential style doorway. • What did the side of the building originally look like? Staff answer: Going back three years, there were windows and a utilitarian side door. The owner was trying to make this building more aesthetically pleasing by making the windows symmetrical. Original application had the windows spaced a certain way, but during construction, it was found the windows could not be spaced exactly as originally approved. On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Burk, the following was proposed: MOTION 2013-017 I move to REVERSE the decision of the Board of Architectural Review in Case TLHP 2012-0127, rendered on December 17, 2012, allowing the door to remain as installed Council Comments/Questions: • Agreement with BAR and staff; however, it appears as a separate building and enhances that streetscape 7 I ,j g c' COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 • Function is not to recreate history, but to preserve the unique history of Leesburg • Sets a precedent for property owners to do whatever they want and then ask Council to fix it The motion to reverse the decision of the BAR was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Martinez, and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Dunn, Hammler, and Wright Vote: 4-3 c. Special Exception Application TLSE 2012-0003 Home Depot The public hearing was opened at 10:36 p.m. Irish Grandfield stated that the application includes two special exceptions for outdoor and vehicle storage. He noted both uses are being performed on the property at this time and approval of these special exceptions will validate a use that is already in place. He noted that there are no areas of disagreement between staff and the applicant. Further, he stated the Planning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 7-0. The applicant agreed to all conditions. Council Member Comments/Questions: • Are there any plans to change the façade to remove the orange roof? Applicant answer: Not at this time There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this public hearing. The public hearing was closed at 10:40 p.m. On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Dunn, the following was proposed: RESOLUTION 2013-049 Approving TLSE 2012-0003 Home Depot, A Special Exception to Allow Vehicle Rental and Outdoor Storage at 280 Fort Evans Road Identified as Loudoun County Parcel Identification Number(PIN)147-15-0298 The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 7-0 8 I Pag COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 d. Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2014 The public hearing was opened at 10:41 p.m. Mr. Wells had no additional information. There were no members of the public wishing to speak at this public hearing. The public hearing was closed at 10:42 p.m. On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the following was proposed: ORDINANCE 2013-0-008 Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2014;Making Appropriations for FY 2014 for the General Fund, Utilities Fund, and Capital Projects Fund; Setting Fees for Airport Hangars and Tie-Downs;Authorizing Amendments to the Budget and Supplemental Appropriations by Council Resolution;and Authorizing and Directing the Town Manager to Take All Steps Necessary and Prudent to Effectuate the Implementation of this Ordinance Mayor Umstattd made a motion to amend the Budget to add$5,104 for the Journey through Hallowed Ground. The motion was seconded by Council Member Martinez and approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Dunn Vote: 6-1 Council Comments/Questions: • Balanced budget affords the opportunity to provide an equalized tax rate • Mindful of future needs for long time fiscal stability as well as meeting current service needs and obligations • Journey Through Hallowed Ground(JTHG) has generated over 50 mentions for Leesburg in the press locally, nationally and internationally • Addition of funds for JTHG will not affect the ability to adopt either tax rate that is being considered • Concern over continuing to ask staff to do more with less • Concern about cost of continuing VRT bus service • Need to eliminate or re-evaluate services to limited groups • With the exception of water, not every citizen uses all services provided by the town or the county. • The combination of services and amenities makes the town a better place to live • 9 1'.i , COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 The motion to approve Ordinance 2013-0-008, as amended, was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Dunn Vote: 6-1 On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the following was proposed: MOTION 2013-018 I move that Town Council acknowledge Year Two of the FY2014-2015 Biennial Budget in the total amount of$89,330,198 including$48,902,200 for the General Fund, $19,847,586 for the Utility Fund, and$20,580,412 for the Capital Projects Fund The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Dunn Vote: 6-1 On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Council Member Hammier, the following was proposed: MOTION 2013-019 I move that Town Council reaffirm its commitment to the long-term sustainability plan adopted by Resolution 2012-028 on March 13, 2012 Council Comments: • This is a look to the future • Pleased with progress the town has made • Cannot approve a two year budget The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Dunn Vote: 6-1 11. RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS a. JLMA Crosstrail and Tuscarora Crossing Referrals MOTION 2013-014 I move that Council endorse the referral comment letter dated April 10, 2013 for ZMAP 2012-0021, Crosstrail; SPEX 2012-0047 Crosstrail Hotel; SPEX 2012- 0048 Crosstrail Gas Pumps;and SPEX 2012-0049, Crosstrail Outdoor Saks,first submission, and that the letter be forwarded to county staff The motion was approved by the following vote: 10 I Pa ; c COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 6-0-1 (Dunn abstaining) MOTION2013-015 I move that Council endorse the referral comment letter dated April 10, 2013 for ZMAP 2012-0021 Tuscarora Crossing, second submission, and that the letter be forwarded to county staff. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 6-0-1 (Dunn abstaining) b. Adopting the Fiscal Year 2014-2019 Capital Improvement Program On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the following was proposed: RESOLUTION 2013-050 Adopting the Fiscal Year 2014-2019 Capital Improvements Program in the Amount of$56,513,900 Council Comments: • Would like to reduce the general fund to re-allocate funds to infrastructure improvements • Pleased that nothing was added to this year's CIP The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammler, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None Vote: 7-0 12. ORDINANCES a. Making Annual Levy and Rate of Taxes On a motion by Council Member Wright, seconded by Council Member Hammier, the following was proposed including a$0.189 equalized tax rate ORDINANCE 2013-0-009 Ordaining Chapter 20(Licenses, Taxation, and Miscellaneous Regulations), Article II(Taxation, Generally), Section 20-22(Annual Levy and Rate of Taxes), and Appendix B(Fee Schedule)Setting Tax Rates on Real Estate, Vehicles Used as Mobile Homes or Offices, Tangible Personal Property, Real Estate and Tangible Personal Property of Public Service Corporations and Bank Capital, Airport Fees for Airport Hangars and Tie Downs, and Setting Utility Water and Sewer Rates for Tax Year 2013 11 I I' d gc COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 Council Comments: • Council has adopted a budget that provides the opportunity to adopt the equalized tax rate • What was cut from the budget to achieve the equalized tax rate? Staff answer: Reduced reliance on local tax funding by adding additional revenue. • Concern that the equalized rate will continue the practice of putting expenses on the "back burner". Staff answer: Capital Asset Reserve is being used to purchase things such as vehicles, replacement systems for buildings, etc. Both tax rates will fund maintenance needs, but the equalized tax rate will reduce the effort in the automation area. • Need to keep some flexibility in the budget The motion to adopt a$0.189 tax rate failed by the following roll call vote: Aye: Wright, Hammier, Burk, and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Martinez, Butler, Dunn Vote 4-3 Council Member Hammier proposed a tax rate of$0.192 as a compromise. The motion was seconded by Council Member Burk. The motion to adopt a$0.195 tax rate was approved by the following roll call vote: Aye: Hammier, Martinez, Burk, Butler, and Mayor Umstattd Nay: Wright and Dunn Vote: 5-2 13. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. None. 14. NEW BUSINESS a. Utility Rate Advisory Committee Recommendation On a motion by Council Member Burk, seconded by Vice Mayor Butler, the following was proposed: MOTION 2013-020 I move that the Town Council accept the Utility Rate Advisory Committee presentation of April 8, 2013 and direct staff to develop a Request for Proposal (RFP) to secure the services of a utility rate setting consultant using the URAC presentation as part of the parameters for the scope of work. Staff is further directed to bring the draft RFP back to the Town Council for review before it is issued Council Comments/Questions: • Good start for the process. • Moving to a tiered rate structure simplifies things for the town. 12 I Pane COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 • Numbers shown in the presentation are for guidance purposes only • Will not support any recommendations to raise rates The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Burk, Butler, Dunn, Hammier, Martinez, Wright and Mayor Umstattd Nay: None. Vote: 7-0 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Dunn—stated he does not feel that people would rather see a higher tax rate than have a government that cannot come to a compromise. He stated he would not be participating in the Council vs. Staff trash pickup because he will do his trash pickup with the boy scouts. Council Member Butler—disclosed a telephone call from Michael O'Connor. He stated he has run for Council three times and to his knowledge, Mr. O'Connor has not contributed to any of those campaigns. He stated that Mr. O'Connor did contribute to his campaign for the House of Delegates. Council Member Burk—Disclosed in-kind contributions from Mr. O'Connor in the past. She reviewed the statistics from the town's first annual Youth Job Fair held at ProJet Aviation. She requested that Council support making this an annual event. She commended the Arc of Loudoun for their work with autism. She stated she attended the annual Valor Awards ceremony and was inspired by the first responders who were honored. She reminded everyone about the Keep Leesburg Beautiful Council vs. Staff challenge. She noted that Leesburg Girls Softball had their Opening Day and stated it was great to see all the young girls ready to play ball. She thanked everyone for helping out at the Job Fair. Council Member Martinez—noted he attended Opening Day but was recruited as a coach. Council Member Hammier—noted the dinner at Japanese Kitchen was great. She thanked the owners for the invitation. She congratulated Leesburg Today on their 25 years and the renovation of their new building. She thanked Paul Reimers for his renovation of the two houses by the W&OD trail. She commented on the completion of the improvements at the East Market Street Y. She noted that the SBDC will be holding a HUBZone training at Ida Lee. Council Member Wright—Stated Relay for Life is ramping up and encouraged everyone to participate. He expressed his appreciation for the Leesburg police unit that ensured a safe outcome for the family involved in the incident for which they were honored at the Valor Awards. He congratulated Leesburg Today on their new location and encouraged everyone to participate in Keep Leesburg Beautiful. 13 I Pagc COUNCIL MEETING April 9, 2013 16. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Umstattd stated she met with representatives of Home Depot over the past two weeks. She noted that Home Depot is always interested in helping veterans with job opportunities and repairs and materials for their homes. She congratulated Jovanna Reiser of Chimole because the Smithsonian is holding a private gathering at her shop to highlight her pottery. She stated she is looking forward to the opening of Leesburg Brewing Company. 17. MANAGER'S COMMENTS Mr. Wells thanked Council for their efforts on the budget. He also noted that a new directional sign will be placed at the East Market Street Y that will be more attractive than the current sign. 18. CLOSED SESSION None. 19. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Vice Mayor Butler, seconded by Council Member Martinez, the meeting was adjourned at 12:18 a.m., Wednesday, April 10, 2013. Kriwi 'C. stattd, Mayor Town of Leesburg A Clerk of 2013 tcmin0A 09 14 I Pagc