Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout022-1979 - AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND;HERITAGE REGENCY INC PROJECTCITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA ORDINANCE NO. 22-1979 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $1,650,000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND, SERIES A (HERITAGE REGENCY, INC. PROJECT) OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA, FOR THE PUR- POSE OF FUNDING A LOAN TO HERITAGE REGENCY, INC. .IN ORDER TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY FOR USE By HERITAGE REGENCY, INC.: AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE LOAN AGREEMENT, MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE DELIVERY OF THE FIRST MORTGAGE NOTE, THE COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS, THE CROSS - LIEN AND CROSS -DEFAULT AGREEMENT, AND THE GUARANTY AS SECURITY FOR SAID BOND AND THE MORTGAGOR'S AFFIDAVIT; AUTHORIZING AN INDEN- TURE OF TRUST APPROPRIATE FOR THE PROTECTION AND DISPOSITION OF THE REVENUES FROM THE FIRST MORTGAGE NOTE; AND AUTHORIZING THE TERMS AND SALE OF SAID BOND WHEREAS, the City of Richmond, Indiana (hereinafter called the "City"), is a municipal corporation and political subdivi- sion of the State of Indiana and by virtue of IC 18-6-4.5-1 through 18-6-4.5-29, inclusive, as amended (hereinafter called the "Act") is authorized and empowered to make direct loans to a developer for the acquisition and construction of economic development facilities to overcome insufficient employment opportunities and insufficient diversification of industry in and near the City and to promote the general economic welfare of the area in and near the City and to issue its economic development revenue bonds to pay all costs of acquisition or construction of such economic development facilities, includ- ing engineering, legal fees, and all other expenses related thereto during construction, including the costs of issuing the bona and to secure said bond pursuant to a trust indenture by the pledge of the note of the developer; and WHEREAS, Heritage Regency, Inc. (the "Developer") is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana, with its principal office in Wayne County, and duly qualified to conduct business in the State of Indiana; and WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed to acquire and construct economic development facilities within the limits of the City and thereby create new employment opportunities and provide diversification of economic development in and near the area of the city, and make payments on the note evidencing its loan obligations in an amount or amounts sufficient to pay the prin- cipal of, premium, if any, and interest on the economic develop- ment revenue bond hereinafter authorized; and WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City (the "Common Council") has heretofore, by Ordinance Na 21231 f'and pursuant to IC 1971, 18-6-4-1 through 18-6-4-28, inclusive, created the Richmond Economic Development Commission (the "Commission") and the members of the Commission have been duly appointed and qualified pursuant to law and the Commission has organized and undertaken the duties imposed upon it by the Act and has found by written resolution that because of existing insufficient employment opportunities and insufficient diversification of �s industry, the economic welfare of the City would be benefited ! by financing the acquisition of economic development facilities for and on behalf of the Developer; and WHEREAS, the Commission has, by such resolution, approved a report estimating the public services which Would be made necessary or desirable, and the expense thereof, the number of jobs, the estimated payroll on account of the acquisition of the economic development facilities and the cost of the economic development facilities and has submitted such report to the Richmond Plan Commission; and WHEREAS, after giving notice in accordance with the Act, the Commission held a public hearing on the proposed financing -2- Trustee, First Federal Savings and Loan Association of India- napolis ("First Federal"), and Heritage House of Richmond, Inc. ("Heritage House"), and a Collateral Assignment of Rents, dated as of , 1979 (the "Assignment of Rents") of Developer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public Benefits. The Common Council of the City hereby finds and determines that the real estate, interests in real estate, other improvements thereon and other machinery and equipment, as described in Exhibits A and B to the Agreement (the "Project") to be acquired and constructed with the proceeds of the bond herein authorised as "economic development facilities" as that phrase is used in the Act and that acquisition and construction of the Project will increase employment opportunities and increase diversification of economic development in and near the City, will improve and promote the economic stability, development and welfare of the area in and near the City and will encourage and promote the expansion of industry, trade and commerce in the area in and near the City and the location of other new economic development facilities in suc area. Section 2. Findings. The Common Council hereby finds that this Ordinance (the "Bond Ordinance") is of public benefit to the economic welfare of the City, by tending to overcome the deficiencies previously found to exist, to -wit: insufficient employment opportunities and insufficient diversification of economic development, and that such benefit is greater than the cost of public facilities (as that phrase is defined in the Act) which will be required by the Project and further that the proposed financing will be of benefit to the welfare of the City and complies with the purposes and provisions of the Act. -4- Section 3. Authorization of $1,650,000 Economic Develop- ment Revenue Bond. In order to pay the cost of acquiring and constructing the Project, there is hereby authorized to be issued, sold and delivered the Bond in aggregate principal amount of $1,650,000. It is hereby recognized that pursuant to the terms of the ,Agreement, any Balance of the cost of the Project will be paid for by the Developer unless paid for out of the proceeds of additional parity bonds (the "Additional Bonds") as identified in the Indenture. Section 4. Definitions. In addition to the words and terms defined in this Bond Ordinance, the words and terms used in this Bond Ordinance shall have the meanings set forth in the Bond, Indenture and Agreement unless the context or use indi- cates another or different meaning or intent in the form of the Bond and the forms of the Agreement and Indenture, which forms are before the meeting, are hereby incorporated by reference in this Bond Ordinance and the Clerk is hereby directed to insert then into the minutes of the Common Council and to keep them on file. Section 5. Terms for the Bond. The total principal amount of the Bond is hereby expressly limited to $1,650,000; provided, however, that Additional Bonds may be issued as here- inafter provided. The terms of the Bond will be such as are set forth in the Indenture and particularly as set forth in Articles II and III of the Indenture, and such terms are adopted herein by reference and by approval of the Indenture. The Bond is a limited obligation of the City, payable solely from payments of principal, premium, if any, and inter- est made by the Developer on the Nate, except to the extent that the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond may be paid out of money attributable to Bond proceeds or -5- from temporary investments, or from other moneys, if any, accru- ing to the Trustee for the benefit of the Bondholder. The Note shall secure the outstanding Bonds, Payments by the Developer on the Note shall be used by the Trustee to make a like payment of principal or, or premium, or interest on, the Bond. By the Indenture, the City will assign to the Trustee the City's rights under the Agreement, including the right of the City to receive the Note and to receive payments thereunder, all as security for the payment of the Bond. The Bond will be secured as provided in the Agreement, Indenture, Cross -Lien and Corss-Default Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Guaranty and the terms of said instruments are adopted herein by reference and by approval of the instruments. The Note and the foregoing documents, as assigned, will constitute the sole security for the Bond. The Bond and the interest thereon shall be a valid claim of the holder only against the Bond Fund created under the Indenture and other moneys held by the Trustee. The City will have no ownership interest in the Project, and the Bond will not be secured by any other mortgage or other security interest in the Project or in any other property of the Developer. The Bond does not and shall never constitute an indebted- ness of, or a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the City. Section 6. Additional Bonds. The City may authorize the issuance of Additional Bonds upon the terms and conditions pro- vided in the Indenture and the Agreement. All Additional Bonds shall be of the same rank as the Bond, but shall bear such date or dates, bear such interest rate or rates, have such maturity dates, redemption dates and redemption premiums, and be issued at such prices as shall be approved as provided in the Inden- ture. Concurrently with the sale and delivery of any Additional -6- Bonds, the Developer will execute and deliver to the City one or more notes in substantially the form of the Note, secured in the same manner as the Note, and with necessary and appropriate variations to correspond with the interest rates, principal amounts, maturities, sinking fund payments and redemption pro- visions of the Bond. The note of the Developer issued in con- nection with the Additional Bonds shall equally and ratably secure such Additional Bonds and shall be assigned as security for such Additional Bonds. Prior to the issuance, sale or delivery of any such series of Additional Bonds, the Common Council shall adopt and approve an appropriate resolution or resolutions and ordinance or ordinances authorizing execution and delivery of a supplement to the Agreement and a Supplemental Indenture and the issuance of such series of Additional Bonds. Section 7. Sale of the Bonds. The Mayor and the Clerk of the City are hereby authorized and directed to sell the Bond to First Federal, at a price of par, plus accrued interest from , 1979, to the date of delivery and payment therefor. Section 8. Indenture. In order to secure the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bond, the Mayor and Clerk shall execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name and on be- half of the City, an Indenture of Trust, herein identified as and called the "Indenture", in the final form submitted to the Common Council, which is hereby approved in all respects; and the Clerk is hereby directed to insert a copy thereof in the form submitted to this meeting and approved hereby, in the minutes of this Common Council and to certify thereon that the same is the form of Indenture so submitted to this Common Coun- cil and approved by this Bond Ordinance and identified herein as the Indenture and to keep such Indenture on file. Said -7- Indenture contains provisions authorized and permitted by the Act, and this Bond Ordinance shall constitute a part thereof as therein provided and for all purposes of said Indenture, includ- ing the provisions thereof relating to amendments and the sev- erability of provisions of the Indenture. Section 9. Loan Agreement, Mort a e and Security A ree- ment. In order to provide for the loaning of the proceeds of the Bond to acquire and construct the Project and the payment by the Developer of an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bond, the Mayor and Clerk shall execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name and on behalf of the City a Loan Agreement, Mortgage and Security Agreement, herein identified as and called the "Agreement," in the final form submitted to this Common Council, which is hereby approved in all respects; and the Clerk is hereby directed to insert a copy thereof, in the form submitted to this meeting and approved hereby, in the minutes of this Common Council and to certify thereon that the same is in the form of Agreement submitted to this Common Council and approved by this Bond Ordinance and identified herein as the "Agreement" and to keep such Agreement on file. Said Agreement contains provisions authorized and permitted by the Act. Section 10. Guaranty. in order to further secure the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond, the City shall require that Richard M. Benson, James E. Carter, James E. F. Carter, Rod DeRoy, G. A. Ramsdel, Robert W. Reed and Frank H. Stine, individually guarantee payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond pursuant to a Guaranty, herein identified as and called the "Guaranty" in the final form submitted to the Common Council, which is hereby approved in all respects; and the Clerk is -8- hereby directed to insert a copy thereof in the form submitted to this meeting and approved hereby, in the minutes of this Common Council and to certify thereon that the same is the form of Guaranty so submitted to this Common Council and approved by this Bond Ordinance and identified herein as the Guaranty and to keep such Guaranty on file. Said Guaranty contains provi- sions authorized and permitted by the Act. Section 11. Collateral Assignment of Rents: In order to further secure the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bond, the City shall require that Developer execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name and on behalf of the City a Collateral Assignment of Rents, herein identified as and called the "Assignment of Rents" in the final form submitted to the Common Council, which is hereby approved in all respects; and the Clerk is hereby directed to insert a copy thereof in the form submitted to this meeting and approved hereby, in the minutes of this Common Council and to certify thereon that L-he same is the form of Assignment of Rents so submitted to this Common Council and approved by this Bond Ordinance and identified herein as the Lease and to and to keep such Assignment of Rents on file. Said Assignment of Rents contains provisions authorized and permitted by the Act. Section 12. Cross -Lien and Cross -Default Agreement: in order to further secure the payment of the principal of, premi- um, if any, and interest on the Bond, the City shall require that Developer, Trustee, and Heritage House of Richmond, Inc. execute, together with the Mayor and Clerk in behalf of City, a Cross -Lien and Cross -Default Agreement, herein identified as and called the "Cross -Lien and Cross -Default Agreement" in the final form submitted to the Common Council, which is hereby approved in all respects; and the clerk is hereby directed to -9- insert a copy thereof in the form submitted to this meeting and approved hereby, in the minutes of this Common Council and to certify thereon that the same is the form of Cross -Lien and Cross -Default Agreement so submitted to this Common Council and approved by this Bond Ordinance and identified herein as the Cross -Lien and Cross -Default and to keep such on file. Said Cross -Lien and Cross -Default Agreement contains provisions authorized and permitted by the Act. Section 13. Mortgagor's Affidavit: In order to further secure the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond, the City shall require that Developer execute a Mortgagor's Affidavit herein identified as and called the "Mortgagor's Affidavit" in the final form submitted to the Common Council, which is hereby approved in all respects; and the Clerk is hereby directed to insert a copy thereof in the form submitted to this meeting and approved hereby, in the minutes of this Common Council and to certify thereon that the same is the form of Mortgagor's Affidavit so submitted to this Common Council and approved by this Bond Ordinance and identi- fied herein as the Mortgagor's Affidavit and to keep such on file. Said Mortgagor's Affidavit contains provisions authorized and permitted by the Act. Section 14. Acceptance of Note: In connection with the Bond, the City accepts as security for such Bonds the Note of the Developer. The Note shall he in substantially the form attached as Exhibit C to the Agreement. Section 15. General: The Mayor and Clerk be, and they each hereby are, authorized and directed, in the name of and on behalf of the City to execute any and all instruments, perform any and all acts, approve any and all matters, and do any and all things deemed by them, or any of them, to be necessary or -10- desirable in order to carry out the purposes of this Bond Ordi- nance (including the preambles hereto), the acquisition and construction of the Project by the Developer, the issuance and sale of the Bond, and the securing of the Bond under the Inden- ture. Section 17. Effective Date: This Bond Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana, on this day of , 1979, at o'cLock .M. Presiding Officer ATTEST! City -Clerk PRESENTED by me to the Mayor this day of , 1979, at o'clock M. APPROVED by me this at o'clock M. This Ordinance sponsored by City-Cler day of Mayor , 1979, YfYmath Paiict P.,,......;,..,.,,, + Z.,.. - now ORDINANCE NO. 22 - 1979 AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF 1,650,000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND SERIES A (HERITAGE REGENCY, INC. PROJECT) By Section 5 - Terms for the nond, it is specifi- cally provided as follows: The Bond does not and shall never constitute an indebtedness of, or a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the City. This is in accordance with the statutes creating the Economic Development Commission and the statutes of authority for the City t❑ adopt the ordinance following action by the Economic Development Commission. BIIRTON A SIMKIN .ATT03LNMYS AT "W ¢ FORTH 62 " N-M ®TBEET RODERT G. 13UA7ON MCUMOWD, IWDIA-IA 47314 AREA CODE 317 OONALO L.SIN ✓•IN TELEPHONE UGG-ES19 TO- Common Council City of Richmond, Indiana FROM: Robert G. Burton, Attorney in opposition RE: Ordinance No. 22-1979 for issuance of economic development bonds for Heritage Regency, Inc. DATE: March 19, 1979 Gentlemen. Enclosed are several documents supporting some of the points of opposition to this ordinance: (1) Letter of David Moberg, Project Review Analyst, Central Indiana Health Systems Agency, dated March 16, 1979, regarding excess bed capacity through 1982. (2) Letter of Arthur E. Hasse, Director, Facilities Planning, State of Indiana State Board of Health, dated March 13, 1979, regarding adverse impact on existing nursing homes, increased shortage of manpower, and lack of financial feasi- bility. (3) Regulation. (state and federal) prohibiting charging less to private pay patients than medicaid patients. (4) State of Indiana, State Hoard of Health, statistics showing excess beds through 1982. (5) Series of articles of Palladium -Item (7/19/78, 9/7/78, 10/24/78, 11/26/78, 11/28/78 and 12/19/78) regarding critical shortage ❑f nurses at Reid Memorial Hospital. (6) Article of Cincinnati Post (3/25/79) re adverse effect on transferring patients from facility to facility (from private pay to medical, etc.). Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, �BURTON & SIMKIN Robert G. Burton RGB: tic Encls. ( ' i1tlul In(ima 3901 1C. 86th Mice'. in(li,inapodis, IN 46'6`i t4arch 16, 1979 Mr. Sam Knobler Golden Rule Nursing Home 2001 U.S. 27 South Richmond, Indiana 47374 RE: Proposed 132 bed long term care facility in Wayne County Dear Mr. Knobler: i 'Ici lrnrrt::317/2'97-3990 In response to your request regarding long term care bed requirements in Wayne County, the current inventory of comprehensive (skilled and intermediate care) beds within Wayne County totals 672 beds. At present, there are 532 comprehensive long term care beds in operation. Two long term care facilities have received planning approval for additional com- prehensive beds. Vista Pines was granted approval for a new 100 bed facility in December, 1975. Pinehurst Nursing Home received approval for 40 additional beds in February, 1977, As a result, the total bed inventory of the county (operating and approved -not operating) totals 672 comprehensive beds. Current Central Indiana Health Systems Agency bed need projections indicate a need for 647 comprehensive beds through 1982. Given the total bed capacity of Wayne County, the county is in excess of the CIHSA bed need projection by 25 beds. Construction of a proposed 132 bed long term care facility would create an excess of 157 comprehensive beds through 19$2, assuming no change in existing licensed capacity or in existing approvals for additional beds. Although the beds will serve private pav patients only, and are thus not subject to review through the planning process, the beds must be included in the inventory of the county in that they are designed to serve the general population age 65 and over. Sincerely, David A. Moberg Project Review Analyst DAM/rip _1. 1"nalrk.I'icsidcni ' Rk.hui-1 F� ,lLh:0bSCr;, 4xccutiv,� 1hrectur —� Owl us En 111111 iti111v i i=� - - 77, March 1.3, 19?9 i i i. Iin .t,E llrl Mr. Sam Knobler Assistant Administrator Golden Rule Nursing Center, Inc. 2001 U.S. 27 South Richmond, IN 47374 Dear Mr. Knobler: This is in response to your correspondence dated March 7, 1979, which requests information relative to the impact of the proposed 132-bed home by Heritage Regency, Inc., in Richmond, Indiana. At this particular time, 1 assume the facility will be licensed as a comprehensive care nursing home and will hold out its services primarily to private pay patients as it would not be eligible for reim- bursement of its capital expenditure through reimbursement for care of medicare/medicaid patients since the project has not been processed with Section 1122 review. However, if the project were processed through Section 1122 review and were approved, the capital expenditure could be partially reimbursed through the medicare/medicaid programs. This would mean that it would have passed the four criterin in evaluating projects. These criteria are: 1. Is the project needed in the community to provide the proposed service without providing unnecessary duplicity of this service? 2. Is there adequate manpower availnhle to the staff of this project'? J. Is the project fivanci:rl.ly feasible so that it won't hold an unreasouAble charge structure on the patients? 4. Will it foster cost containment or improve the quality of care throuRb efficiency and productivity? As of today, if this project received official Section 1122 review, the poss.ihility exists that it would receive a negative recommen- dation because Wayne County is recorded in our books with an excess of 66 nursing home beds. This means that currently 602 beds are determined as needed while no inventory of 670 beds exists. If unapproved beds are constructed, the inventory will climb to 772 buds and theoretically -2- Mr. Sam Knobler March 13, 1979 there could be 200 excess beds in the county. ']'his situation may impact adversely against the existing homes in terms of increasing the shortage of manpower and consequently the Quality of care offered. The project would not be financially feasible as its rate structure would be required to support a new organizational structure in pay for a facility determined it' planning as not being needed. However, due to circumstances beyond the planners control, inventories tend to change due to closure of nursing homes, failure of approved projects to proceed as previously planned, and other situations. Also, the planning mechanism updates not only the inventory on an ongoing basis, but also updates the number of programmed beds determined as needed. 5o that which is true today may not be true in several days hence. Independent action of the members of the nursing home industry to construct without planning approval also has adverse impact on the sponsors of projects who wish to adhere to the planning mechanism in Indiana. The adversity is observed in those communities which have had unapproved beds constructed and thus handicaps the sponsors who wish to follow the planning protocal. Perhaps a Certificate of Need law in Indiana would correct the situation, but it appears currently that such I,jw will not be enacted by this session of the Legislature. This, if allowed to continue, will no douht result in beds and hones beyond determined need, and this is considered still legal in Indiana. Thank you for your inquiry and interest. if I may assist you again, please feel tree s❑ contact me. Sincerely; c- Arthur E. Hasse Facilities Planning AC 317/633-8522 cc: .John Hayes K INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE RATE SETTING CRJERIA FOR NURSING HOMES MEDICAID PROGRki SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES AND INTERhIEDIATE CARE FACILITIES III. Annual Fate nccreas', LiT1tat'on fhe=nisum allowable increase in 3 average Medicaid rate w' li prpv� der s :nine percent (9�) of r_o oe greater than rate per any twelve their previously approved July 1, 1976 , and adjusted ()puMont, period begi:nnin ; directives of t, �pursuant to the tie'P ne Sate Department of Public are. :he maximum allowable increase will be calculated on, one increase, or the aggregate Of the two increases per year as provided herein, - --- IV. Private FaY Rate Li:ni`ati i In no instance shad a M vi Medicaid rate be hi ho„ der13 approved thaty the provider 4 �,e than he rate ea.'.d to services, gene:+al public for 01milar i V. provider lqe-uest wi^a_tatiQn__ toot e the ffour ous Possible ,Pates commuted subject h0her Chan the re;mbutseest oelli-t9s all be I i _mburse-rent rate requested by the p_t .dar, he approved rate Will 1 be the requested it should be emphasized that all Of the above -described ceillnas operate in conjunctfan w another, that the--^¢imbursement rate with one her, and given provider will have 'beenfevaivatedrinellgbt o any and every possible idmit{ � b ing ceiling. �0 s. Surma*=• o_" .yllosrahle^7osts - rl?14Wable Fur cses c tlis section .a, costs for the be ed in the srate ssetting Vcditaria,:yuc the costa cart adjustment for the e.tpenses lisueh Is, but tfnot limited to sections:in A. 700 - Depreciaticn B. 800 Interest C• 10CC - Faciiity Staffing �• ICAO _100 wnePs or :':3r.aS4Tent Compe s do r elated sy n .. 'ACC - Allocat-' ,g_ "3-'cr.s 3rd Tease-, G. "400 - Costs „cns '�et:Jeen Distinct Parts :'on-allcwablea'ed sc Patient Care and other -8- (Reimbursement System effective January 1, 1978.) TT�- InrA1�TA AT„ i fi! O Tn. id' srAre eo•aui� uiiti,aL111 , rAle AN It)VAI IIIMR IN It NI I IMill 11k 19 TO: Interested Parties SUBJECT: Guide to Indiana Fong -Term Care Resources IN DIANAPOLIS AJdres. Hrp14- In- I •,,1..�rlx SI.IIr IS11urd ��( 1Ii`:r I111 111111te•al tl icllit;:en Sher�S I nil cinipnGs. IN 1A.10r, Accompanying this letter is a copy of the Guide to Indiana Long -Term Care Resources: Inventory and Utilization of Existing Resources and Projected Seed for Future Facilities and Beds. 'This Guide is one of two published by the State Board of Health to supplement the Indiana Hospital and Health Facilities Interim Plan 1975-1976, which was adopted by the Executive Board in September 1976. The Interim Plan is based on 1974 utilization data. This Guide and its companion document, the Guide to Indiana Acute Care, Outpatient and Rehabilitation Centers: Inventory and Utilization of Existing Resources and Projected Need for Future Facilities Beds, and Services, are based on Calendar Year 1977 utilization data. Both guides were approved by the Executive Board of the State Board of Health on May 10, 1978. They are to be used as guidelines for determining need under the review process established by the provisions of Section 1122 of the Social Security Act. WILLIAM T. YNTER, M.D., SECRETARY 1NDIANA S TE BOARD OF HEALTH Thi m � � roN@ x m i n a M6. r n w w n 1*1 ID P• Y• N '3 r� boi w rt f4 Y• a. r m � b H fo rt A Fi H M m � N m a a. C3 O fla rf O'CS S7 V7 7 C m � w o r. •+ w F+•'O O MM •• N• y va a n oa IQCP T1 A C6*IZ V •byy P V C C 4• W Y N •y M Q, w O In O 9 O Ot m m th w M CD �0 w 14 M (i N �• N �W 1+• Y• 10 7 in It 7 a m m n n f{4 CA o-+ P% N M w W r n �t c v a w +A el W� mx o Oo ti OP N Is b +J V C r• w14 N to 0 00 w x y m mle_.� 2 V--603 ■ | NOIc . , - - _ 2| , 'vzs © ■ ■ �. _a . di B� E2 azmzN _ ■§ __�_© ; . __- - . , _ ° k § k / §§ | CI 0 Z �k � § § � y § S(1311 W.E011 2 2 _. _ �-N__. _n. o\ (� § § _y, -- � § \ % t Rlylol - 2 � \ ) �§ | � § § / ■ ( R �q 142 � �o .H t � � n F M ti 1 N c7ourLsacw w � '"� id UM[ritlOJNOa u N °• k a o � `'C .V7 hun}Wp} ti nraxrza t to t atrar xs t a-, U L• < f ey � x < a n C m m < � o p Yg7Y b d c �[ou,uLoo a 0 a L m 6 F � q ry Q0 wiry 7N O�ONsn :N Q W M Q .'i � r•v n � w N o 0 0 0 s O 4 s 0 0 0 O N W Mad . i 4 N Q C Q t r N „} , 4 1 , , I 1 f I,, I 1 O O p 0 O O C 7 0 0 O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O b p O n 0 0 0 0 O P O O C. O C O O p N aOO[TGOiOOCO Lv