Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2015_tcwsmin0309 Council Work Session March 9, 2015 Council Chambers, 25 West Market Street, 7:30 p.m. Mayor Kristen C. Umstattd presiding. Council Members Present: Kelly Burk, David Butler, Suzanne D. Fox, Katie Sheldon Hammler, Marty Martinez and Mayor Umstattd. Council Members Absent: Thomas Dunn, II. Staff Present: Town Manager Kaj Dentler, Town Attorney Barbara Notar, Deputy Town Manager Keith Markel, Director of Parks and Recreation Richard Williams, Interim Information Technology Manager John Callahan, Library Manager Alexandra Gressitt, Director of Economic Development Marantha Edwards, Airport Manager Scott Coffman, Research and Communications Manager Betsy Fields, Captain Carl Maupin, Captain Vanessa Grigsby, Chief Joseph Price, Interim Human Resources Manager Annie Carlson, Director of Public Works Tom Mason, Assistant Town Manager Scott Parker, Human Resources Analyst Mark Hauer, Director of Planning and Zoning Susan Berry Hill, Director of Plan Review Bill Adman, Deputy Director of Capital Projects Tom Brandon, Director of Capital Projects Renee Lafollette, Senior Management Analyst Jason Cournoyer, Senior Management Analyst Lisa Haley, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Clark Case, and Executive Associate I Tara Belote. AGENDA ITEMS 1. Work Session Items for Discussion a. Budget Work Session Renee Lafollette presented the draft Capital Improvements Program for 2016-2021. Key Points: • Projects were reviewed and ranked by a committee of department directors. • Ranked projects were reviewed by the Town Manager's office and the Department of Finance. • Projects were limited to those with realistic scopes of work, identified funding sources, and realistic schedules. • In 2000, there were 130 projects in the Capital Improvements Program —currently 32 projects are proposed. • Schedule changes include: o Battlefield Parkway, Rt. 15 to the Greenway was delayed from a spring start to fall 2015 because of utility relocations. o Lowenbach, Phase V completion was delayed because of gas line and overhead utility relocations. o South King Street Widening, Ph. II, start delayed from spring 2015 to summer 2015 because of sound wall analysis. o Sycolin, Phase IV, schedule was adjusted to better reflect the actual timeline for design and land acquisition and funding. 1 Page Council Work Session March 9, 2015 o Evergreen Mill Road Widening schedule was adjusted to address funding source changes as VDOT moved it out of their Six-Year Plan. Looking at revenue sharing and NVTA funding. o Chesapeake Bay TMDL Project, start was delayed from spring 2015 to summer 2015 to address time of year concerns—into the drier part of the year. o Tuscarora Creek, start was delayed from summer 2015 to summer 2016 to address the FEMA approval schedule and continued coordination with the Virginia Knolls Community Association. o Lower Sycolin Sewer, Ph. II Project, schedule was accelerated to start at the end of FY 2015 to time it with the developer, Peterson's, schedule. • New projects include: o Water play area for the Aquatics Center o Hope Parkway, which was added as a mid-year adjustment o Traffic management system for town-wide traffic signals o Airport Master Plan update o Airport Stormwater Management Plan and Drainage Study o Customs General Aviation Clearance Facility o Taxiway and Runway Lighting Rehabilitation o Security System for the Water Pollution Control Facility and Utility Maintenance Building o Water Booster Pump Station o Hospital Storage Storage Tank recoating and rehab o 33" Sewer Trunk Line Assessment o Water Treatment Plant Filters #1 and #2 • Airport projects are on the funding list with the Federal Aviation Administration. • Approximately$11.9 million in projects that have been or will be completed by the end of the fiscal year. • Downtown Street Light project was reduced by $1.3 million because an error was found in the calculations. • Skate Park Renovation budget was increased by $144,800 due to project management costs being added in. • Tuscarora Creek Flood Mitigation budget increased by $1.6 million partially due to project management costs. • Lower Sycolin Sewer, Ph. II budget was increased by approximately $685,000 partially due to project management costs being shown in the CIP this year. • Studies included in the operating budget: o Downtown Sidewalk study to look at Market/Ayr Street intersection. o Edwards Ferry between Prince Street and 226 Edwards Ferry Road. o Other missing link areas of sidewalk where requests have been received from residents. o North Street Drainage Study 2IPage Council Work Session March 9, 2015 o Royal Street Drainage Study o Monroe Street Drainage Study o Chancellor Street Drainage Study o Dry Mill Road Sidewalk and Drainage Study • Will seek reimbursement for project management costs on NVTA projects. Council Comments/Questions: • It is important to reiterate that at one point there were 130 projects on the list and due to Council requests, the Town has cut them down to a more likely 32 projects. • How many projects were completed last year? Staff answer: 11 projects. • Will 11 new projects be added? Staff answer: Not necessarily. It depends on the requests received and whether there is enough information to put a realistic budget together and are they in alignment with the Town Plan • The town will be reimbursed for Airport projects? Staff answer: The FAA, DOAV or a combination of the two will reimburse between 80-90% of those projects. • How is this shown in the budget? Staff answer: If you look at the breakout of the funding on airport projects, 80-90% of each project is shown as FAA and a percentage is also shown as DOAV (state) and the remainder is the town. Project management costs are town-borne because the audit procedures necessary to recoup the project management costs from the FAA and DOAV cost more to perform than what would be returned. • Would be interested to know what the total amount of the budget adjustments are. • What does the increase in funding for the Skate Park Renovation represent? Staff answer: The project increased$144,800 - $44,800 is the project management costs which includes staff time to administer design and construction. The additional$100,000 is for the skate park itself. • What are the statistics on the use of the skate park? Staff answer: We do not have statistics on the number of users; however, the usage of the park has diminished as a direct correlation to the condition of the park as well as the features in the park being outdated. • Is there a fee for use for the skate park? Staff answer: It is currently free. • Is there any way to look at what other municipalities have done in terms of comparing where they maybe had an outdated skate park and added renovations or have we done any sort of survey to determine from those that like to use skate boards the kind of features they are looking for? 3IPage Council Work Session March 9, 2015 Staff answer: Features have changed to concrete style skate parks, not necessarily constructed wooden ramps anymore. Part of the development costs proposed in the project involve a skate park design and construction company coming forward and engaging the public to find out exactly what the users want. They have a litany of different features that can be presented and they will perform public outreach to be able to incorporate the public desires into the design. • Are you sure that the decline in usage of the skate park is in direct correlation with the condition of the park? Staff answer: Cannot say that for sure, but am pretty confident that is the case. It is the condition of the park as well as the outdated features of the park. • On a recent site visit, every one of the users said that was the reason they do not come as often as they used to come. • It is somewhat unusual in the spreadsheet in that under capital projects we itemize when there is a plan that is going to be designed and plans separate from, in this case,just the line item that is presumably just for construction. What is the timeline? I think this needs to be addressed. This is like the one big project relative to Veteran's Park, any other park. Staff answer: That is a component of the project as a whole. • What is the timeline in terms of coming back to Council with the results of the study before construction? Staff answer: I would envision, if we were given the go-ahead for this project, we would begin community outreach in the early part of the summer to try to line up a firm as quickly as possible. We could start July 1. I think we could fulfill the community outreach in the September/October time frame and then have something in early fall back to Council. We would hopefully move forward with construction through the winter season and have it open late spring/early summer. • The broader question is—is there a way to make it an even higher, better use to leverage the additional land we may have access to. To have an opportunity for a teen center or something that would bring more activity to teens in the town. I don't know if that is something that could be incorporated into the study. Obviously, you don't want it to get so big that you don't get your skate park moved along and it might become a several year process, but to me that is what the opportunity looks like. It seems like there is such a small segment that uses skate boards, there may be a way to get a higher, better use out of that. • With respect to budget enhancements, our packet mentioned$148,000 for plans, if you will. I am assuming those are all allocated within the CIP. It was not completely clear. Staff answer: The $148,500 for the studies is in the operating side of the capital budget. It does not show up here because they are not projects yet. 4IPage Council Work Session March 9, 2015 • The airport master plan is in the airport section? Staff answer: It is in the airport section. A master plan is a lot more detailed and a lot more expansive than just the studies. In about 2006- 2007 time frame, we made the decision to take studies out of the actual CIP because of the expectation level it gave to the community that it will keep moving forward. Studies were put in to the architectural/engineering budget so that studies could be worked on and determined whether they rose to the level of moving forward to become a project. • Concerned about using general obligation bond money that interest is being paid on to fund a study. We need to decide the best financial way to handle this. • Would appreciate discussing being reimbursed for Hope Parkway— opportunities to reallocate those funds when they come back. What projects do we currently have funded and which projects would we have to go back to market to bond that are not currently funded? • Leesburg is putting$1.1 million into the Route 7/Battlefield interchange. Similar to Battlefield Parkway, if there are opportunities to get this fully funded by other levels of government, it is in the best interest of the citizens. Staff answer: It is our anticipation that will be needed. • On page 169, same issue as relates to road widening. Obviously, we know that gas tax is going to go away and we have anticipated that. • I think it is great to know that we will have the customs clearance area. The Airport Commission has worked very hard getting clearance from the Federal government. It will be a huge enhancement to have an international airport. • Clarification that the shed will be a very large shed for$500,000. • In discussion about the hanger, I would request a pro-forma that is revenue neutral from a taxpayer/general fund perspective. If we are investing in the airport there should be some profit and/or benefit to doing so relative to increasing the operations at the airport. • Highlight concern that one of the biggest cost overruns in the CIP is the $1.6 million for the Tuscarora Creek. Agree that there is a significant concern as relates to erosion control. Would specifically request that staff look at the erosion control issue and be able to come back with a plan for how to take care of that as a priority relative to what would be the best timeline for completion of the project. • Assuming that the aquatic feature at Symington is something that will be able to be funded based on revenues coming into the pool. How does the pro-forma work relative to the enhancements at Symington? Staff answer: There is not a specific pro-forma for that specific element. It is an enhancement to the facility to keep the facility attractive to users. There is not a specific pro-forma established for that specific feature. 5IPage Council Work Session March 9, 2015 • At what point will we take a serious look at Izaak Walton Park? We keep funding the property owner's improvements, such as the bridge. • Would be open to looking at additional investments to bring more people downtown. • Veteran's Park is a very unique asset—having access to the Potomac. • The skate park is an active amenity. It would make sense to look at what other localities are doing as far as charging admission fees for skate parks. • Would advocate the Council sit down and throw out ideas of what they would like to see the town be in 10 years, but not during a budget session. Should just stick to what is being funded for the next few years through capital projects. Wants should be done in a separate session. • A lot of people, even in their mid-20s still like to skate board. • Following up on Battlefield/Rt. 7 interchange - $1.1 million is allocated for 2017 —exactly what is that for? Can you explain that? Staff answer: That would be the Interchange Justification Report. It is the initial survey work, concept designs and initial budget. • No money is allocated after that for this interchange. Staff answer: This project the town is working with Loudoun County through the 70%NVTA funding. Both localities are working together to request NVTA money for this project. They have requested an additional million and then $13 million is being requested from the NVTA 2016 money. The county will be taking an item to request an additional $37 million in FY 2017 to begin funding this interchange to move it forward. Everyone recognizes that this is a high accident interchange that needs to be moved forward to construction as quickly as possible. Belmont Ridge Road at Rt. 7 will go to construction this fall—the Battlefield at Rt. 7 interchange is the last one that needs a funding stream to create the limited access facility from the town to the Rt. 28 corridor. • Whenever we discuss the Rt. 15 bypass/Edwards Ferry Road interchange, we have always made sure that it includes the Fort Evans Road Interchange. The CIP does not mention Fort Evans Road. There is no point on spending $1.8 million dollars if both lights are not eliminated. Staff answer: The estimates included here include Fort Evans. • Agree that the Tuscarora Creek Flood Mitigation is necessary, but when a project goes from$1.28 million to $2.8 million, it makes me nervous. It is a million more than the Dry Mill/Wage/Anne project, which was pretty extensive. Are there any alternatives that are less expensive? Is there a specific reason for the current schedule? • This is the only time between now and the adoption of the budget to discuss new projects that might be desired. • Would like to include a crosswalk at Battlefield Parkway and the Bypass. Wage Council Work Session March 9, 2015 • Would like to include approximately$350,000 for a water feature in Mervin Jackson Park. • Question whether the Tuscarora Creek Flood Mitigation impact Tuscarora Creek Trail (formerly King Street Trail extension). Is it possible to add the trail in for much less money than to do the trail separately. • What has the town been paying for at Izaak Walton Park? Staff answer: Currently, the lease on the property is $111,000 per year. The town also pays half the taxes on the property. • Besides the Dog Park, what else does the town use at Izaak Walton? Staff answer: The town runs recreation programs out of the building. Gymnastics and Tae Kwon Do programs are run out of that building. Dog obedience classes are also located at the park. It is also a passive park. • How long has the town been leasing this property? Staff answer: Since 2000. • Concerned that the town has been paying rent on a piece of property for 14 years, improved the property and the owners are not interested in selling. • Was frustrated with the Major Issues session because Council could have listed and prioritized as a group from the department and capital perspective. Staff answer: There isn't much meat in the budget. Although there are many needs of the organization, what can be afforded to focus on at this time, is included in the budget proposal. There is not a lot of new things included. Kaj Dentler gave a brief presentation of enhancements to the FY 2016- 2017 proposed budget. Key Points: • Enhancements are above the base budget. • $20,000 for East Market Street Corridor Transportation Analysis • $42,000 for police overtime ($32,000 is detective overtime that is already occurring based on cases that are being handled and$10,000 for targeted enforcement). • $150,000 in capital projects studies. • $89,000 in automation improvements. Council Comments/Questions: • There is a lot of money allocated to Capital Projects justification studies. Why is so much money being spent on studies? Staff answer: They are needed to see if there is reason to go forward. One that has been requested is the sidewalk improvements on West Market from Ayr to Morven Park Road. There are a lot of questions 7IPage Council Work Session March 9, 2015 involved that need to be answered prior to bringing it to Council to determine if the project is one that Council would like to go ahead with. Drainage studies are more expensive because they include topographical surveys to determine elevations and what is draining through a particular area. • In follow-up to the drainage studies, why is it applicable to the utility fund, not the general fund as relates to sewer issues? Staff answer: Drainage studies are storm drainage studies. If they had something to do with water and sewer, it would be in the utility department. • We are under a lot of pressure given things like TMDL and necessities in terms of what we will be funding from the town's perspective. People only see the tip of the iceberg in terms of what can be significant cost and liability to the town. We are going to have to start looking with fresh eyes about where the expectation was that the town was going to take complete liability for some of these projects particularly given the fact that Lowenbach started at about$5 million and it is now over$10 million. A couple of things you will hear me bring up is the process for two things —cost overruns — obviously you are doing a great job working with the communities as you are designing what are important projects for them; however, we also need to look at the overall cost from the town perspective. In a number of situations, Virginia Knolls owns quite a bit of that land, so it might make sense for homeowners to also contribute. Just a policy for adding a drainage project so that we determine needs. I don't have full understanding of what it was because I don't recall any petitioners even coming necessarily about it. I would like that additional fact for anyone who is looking back at decisions that Council is making. Staff answer: Royal Street is one that we have had petitioners before you. Most of these have had people who have been in here petitioning you to evaluate their situation. • In terms of the other couple of things that are on the enhancements. Could you describe what the functionality is in terms of the new, specific technology enhancements? Staff answer: Almost half of the funding is for the implementation town-wide of an automated time keeping system. Right now, we have already applied it to part time and temporary help in the recreation department. The new time keeping system uses a number of different approaches. It can key in time on the computer, swipe a badge, use a thumbprint— depending on the location and what is appropriate. The original scope of the project was to get automation in place because it helps us meet the very short critical processing window that we have to meet the ACH deadline. Hand-keying the time sheets into the system is extremely stressful on the payroll department because if you miss the deadline, you miss the payroll. It has been very successful with the part time employees. We have looked at using built in time attendants and 8IPage Council Work Session March 9, 2015 meters, but it was not satisfactory. We propose to use the time and attendance system that has been successful with the recreation department for the entire town. The next piece is an upgrade from the 9.4 to the 10.4 version of MUNIS. This upgrades us to the latest version of MUNIS on July 1. After implementation, there will additional functionality that will be available and will enhance record keeping and customer service. • The one specific area with the police department we have talked about in terms of leveraging with Loudoun County in terms of getting additional support was in the Sheriff's area. What is the timeline for looking at our justification for additional over time versus where there might be ways that we can leverage the Sheriff? Staff answer: Justification for the enhancements are two-fold. Number one, the criminal investigation department has been a historic shortfall in our last two budget cycles by roughly $30,000-35,000. Criminal investigations are detectives that are involved in major cases such as homicide. Drug investigations also take a significant amount of time over and above their normal work. The second one for$10,000 is a figure that covers what we believe to be Council initiatives including additional police presence at crosswalks, First Friday, and even during Council meetings. • We are anticipating an average of 3% performance increases. What is the actual range? What is the highest? Staff answer: Our current system allows for an employee to either earn a 3% or not. If you are the top performers, you are eligible for a bonus. That has not been well received by employees, which is very interesting. Our thought process is to evaluate going to a range of between 2-4% with 3%being the average. It allows the top performers to get what they feel they deserve. Bonuses create different reactions from employees. The other category is that some in the middle category get the same amount regardless of where they fall in the middle category. • Three percent is not significant—it is only the cost of living. I would think that you would want to give all employees at least three percent because of their experience, time and effort. The two to four percent should be above and beyond the three percent. • Can you clarify what you mean by a bonus structure? Staff answer: We have less full time employees today than we did ten years ago, but we have a significant number of new customers and visitors than we did 10 years ago. The system that we have used to manage the additional work load is that every employee has to do their job because we are understaffed. If you do your job, you receive three percent. If you do better—a top performer(ten to twenty percent of the work force), then you received a bonus. What is being looked at today, is basically a three point scale. Three percent is in the middle category of doing your job. If you are not quite there, but you are still hitting the 91Page Council Work Session March 9, 2015 minimum goals, it is 2 percent. If you are the top, it is four percent, instead of a bonus. We did focus group sessions with 60+ full time employees and we were quite surprised with the reaction to the bonus system. It is only about fifty percent popular with the employees, including the top performers. A lot of the top performers are not wild about the bonus. They are uncomfortable with it—they feel like they are working extremely hard, but not able to advance their salaries. The amount included in the budget is three percent, but we are not sure how the system will be tailored based on Council's funding. The employees have given significant input and the directors have unanimously endorsed to this approach. At the proposed tax rate, this is what we can afford. • It is the town manager's job to look at averages and find out where there are significant deviations and the reason for those. • When is the revenue expected for the Panda new employees? Staff answer: The idea is to begin advertising at the beginning of the new fiscal year. As the construction is being completed, the employees need to understand the operations of the entire plant before we can add the reclaimed water portion of their duties. We need them to be onboard and trained before we start operations with Panda. The money will not start until late in 2017 because it is when the plant begins operation. • Would like to see what the revenue stream looks like with respect to these new employees. • If I wanted to add to the enhancements, based on what you have said it looks like we have two choices— one option would be to readvertise a higher tax rate, which I suspect would not find a lot of support amongst Council members. The other option would be to find savings in the current budget. • If Lowenbach went from$5 million to $10 million, perhaps if we had spent more money on an initial study, we might have known what the final price tag would have been earlier. • Did we get it in writing—we were anticipating that we would get the easements for free. Was that not in writing, because eventually we ended up having to pay for those easements. Staff answer: That was what the understanding was. • We should consider putting agreements for easements in writing, if landowners initially agreed to donate them. • Do we anticipate the Airport Commission coming forth by Saturday with requests for additional enhancements? I know there has been talk in the Commission about the FBO situation and maintenance situation at the airport. Staff answer: The FBO agreement is coming to the end of its first term in January 2016. The Airport Commission is trying to evaluate all options to ensure services, particularly aircraft maintenance, stay at the airport. Aircraft maintenance is difficult because it requires facilities 101 Page Council Work Session March 9, 2015 that the town does not own. The Airport Commission is leaning towards asking for a pro-forma to look at the costs and determine if it is revenue neutral or positive to acquire additional hangers. It has not been included in the budget because it has not yet been determined if it is revenue neutral or positive. • On changing the waste water treatment plant to a 24 hour/7 day weekly schedule, we are planning to have the three new employees in place about a year ahead of when we estimate Panda will begin operations? Staff answer: Panda has a start up period where they will require reclaimed water. The agreement was written that during that the annual payment would not start at that time. The employees will come in as trainees that do not yet have operator's licenses. They will have to work towards a minimum class IV operator's license. The sooner we can get them into the licensing class, the better. • Why doesn't Panda pay for that? Why do we have to wait a year if the employees are working on Panda operations? Staff answer: They are not just working on that part—they will have to learn all operations. • I was wondering why it is so expensive to have three new employees. Staff answer: The assumption in the budget is that the employees would come in as a trainee, which is Operator I. That number also includes fringe benefits and insurance. • Reading between the lines, I am inferring we will not be making as much in additional revenue from Panda as we will be spending for the three new employees? After we begin receiving revenue, do the current estimates indicate the additional revenue will pay for the additional employees? Staff answer: We will be paying more prior to receiving any revenue from Panda Power. There were additional costs that will have to be taken on in the beginning, but it is a net positive to the town. • We are trying to maintain a AAA bond rating with Standard and Poors, and trying not to increase the tax rate. Do you still feel that you can maintain the tax rate while maintaining the services that the town provides and maintaining the AAA bond rating? Staff answer: Yes. It was noted that the Council's budget work session will be held on Saturday, March 14 beginning at 9 a.m. in the Council Chambers. 2. Additions to Future Council Meetings Vice Mayor Burk stated she was at the Exeter HOA meeting and they started talking about their stormwater pond. Who takes over the filters for the stormwater pond? The HOA seems to think the town will take over the cost of maintaining the filters. 111 Page Council Work Session March 9, 2015 Tom Mason noted that it is totally the responsibility of the Exeter Homeowner's Association. He stated all the easements state this. He stated under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL program, if the town can get the necessary easements to construct or reconstruct the existing pond areas so that they now do water quality treatment as well as quantity treatment, part of the negotiations will be who ends up maintaining the water quality part of the pond. We are anticipating that the HOAs are not going to want to do that. We anticipate that the HOAs will not want to do that and it will become something that the town will have to take over and will become part of General Fund expenses. The town may have to look at initiating a stormwater utility or some way of generating revenues to retain the water quality treatment areas. The town can phase the project in over 15 years with the current state permits. It was decided that an information memo covering the future ramifications of the TMDL program would be produced. Mayor Umstattd noted that property tax bills should include an itemization of what state and federal unfunded mandates such as TMDL is costing the individual taxpayer. Council Member Fox stated she would like to find out if there is a way to work with the county to pay for some of the CIP projects, especially those in the JLMA and the Lower Sycolin area. Renee Lafollette noted that no transportation projects that have been proposed are outside the town's corporate limits. She stated the town is leveraging NVTA 70/30 money and VDOT revenue sharing(which is 1:1). The majority of the transportation projects will use little to no bond funding. She clarified that the town is working closely with the county's transportation department to get the NVTA funding. The Lower Sycolin Sewer Conveyance project is partially funded by pro- rata fees. It was requested that a chart be produced that would show what projects use what percentage of taxpayer bonds so that Council can determine the best plan of action for getting additional funds from alternate sources. Council Member Hammier requested an agenda item allowing her to accept the Mayor's Maker Challenge. She stated this is the issue that Pat Scannell brought up about municipalities embracing the manufacturing movement. She stated there is an opportunity to participate in the White House national conference call of Mayors. She stated there is no financial obligation, but there are suggested Maker "moves", which include a roundtable that could be done with the Economic Development Commission, Maker Fair, Maker Liaison, Maker Spaces, etc. She stated the town will have the only Maker's organization in the county and one of only four in Northern Virginia. 121Page Council Work Session March 9, 2015 There was Council consensus to put this on the agenda for March 24 to give everyone time to review Council Member Hammler's information about the Challenge. Council Member Hammier stated she would like to send a letter to the town's congresswoman about the EPA investigation that took three years and ultimately yielded no determination of cause and took a lot of taxpayer money. There was Council consensus to put this on the agenda for the March 24 meeting. Council Member Butler stated he wanted to make sure that whatever the county is spending on their TMDL mitigation, that Leesburg is not paying for it. He stated there cannot be another opportunity for double taxation for town residents. There was Council consensus to have an information memo on this subject. Council Member Butler stated that financial incentives in the Arts and Cultural District are so weak that there are current businesses that do not feel it is worth filling out the paperwork to be part of the Arts and Cultural District. He stated that the state has given localities more authority to increase incentives, so he would like to add a discussion about potentially increasing the financial incentives including allowing restaurants to apply. There was consensus to put this on a future work session. 3. Adjournment On a motion by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Butler, the meeti' was ad'. rned at 9:06 p.m. I' , d'TA t Clerk of . 146 2015_tcwsmin0311 131 Page