HomeMy Public PortalAbout09 16 2019 BAR Meeting Minutes
LEESBURG BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
Monday, September 16, 2019
Town Hall, 25 West Market Street
Council Chamber
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Dale Goodson, Vice Chair Teresa Minchew, Parliamentarian
Stacy Skinner, Richard Koochagian, Tom O’Neil, Julie Pastor, Paul
Reimers, and Planning Commission Liaison Rick Lanham
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF: Preservation Planner Lauren Murphy and Executive Associate Karen
Cicalese
Call to Order and Roll Call
Chairman Goodson called the meeting to order at 7:00pm, noted attendance, and determined that a
quorum was present.
Adoption of the Meeting Agenda
On a motion by Vice Chair Minchew, seconded by Ms. Skinner, the meeting agenda was adopted by a
7-0 vote.
Approval of Meeting Minutes
a. May 20, 2019 – Business Meeting
Mr. Koochagian proposed a motion to approve the meeting minutes of May 20, 2019 as submitted.
Ms. Pastor stated she was not present for the May 20th meeting and will abstain from the vote.
The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Minchew and approved by a 6-0-1 vote (Pastor abstained).
BAR Member Disclosures
Vice Chair Minchew stated she will recuse herself from application TLHP-2019-0109, Russell Branch
Parkway SE, as the applicant is a current client of her husband’s law firm.
Ms. Skinner stated she will recuse herself from application TLHP-2019-0105, 18 South King Street, as
she and her husband regularly do business with AH&T Insurance, to whom the applicant is affiliated. She
stated their compensation never reaches $5,000 annually under the Conflict of Interest Act; however, she
would like to ensure there is no appearance of impropriety.
Mr. Reimers stated he will recuse himself from applications TLHP-2019-0103, 102 Cornwall Street NW
and TLHP-2019-0107, 215 Cornwall Street NW.
Mr. O’Neil stated he will recuse himself from applications TLHP-2019-0108, 208 Cornwall Street NW;
TLHP-2019-0095, 13 Union Street NW; and TLHP-2019-0103, 102 Cornwall Street NW.
Public Comment and Presentations
None
Consent Agenda
Chairman Goodson verified there was no public comment for the three cases proposed under the
Consent Agenda.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 2 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
a. TLHP-2019-0102, 241 Fort Evans Road NE
Small Cell Installations
b. TLHP-2019-0106, 219 North King Street
Demolition of Garage Structure
On a motion by Mr. Koochagian, seconded by Vice Chair Minchew, the consent agenda items listed
above were approved by a 7-0 vote.
c. TLHP-2019-0108, 208 Cornwall Street NW
Alteration to previous approval – window additions
On a motion by Mr. Koochagian, seconded by Ms. Skinner, this application was approved under the
consent agenda by a 6-0-1 vote (O’Neil recused).
Public Hearings on New Cases in the H-1 Overlay District
a. TLHP-2019-0098, 38 South King Street – Senor Ramon
Project: Installation of window signs
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 7:04pm.
Ms. Murphy stated the subject structure at 38 South King Street, at the prominent corner of South
King Street and Loudoun Street SE, was constructed in 1956 and is a non-contributing resource in
the Old & Historic District. She stated the applicant is seeking retroactive approval for the installation
of 7 window signs which are affixed to the glass and are 9”x10” in size. She stated one of the signs is
located on the main entry door facing South King Street and the other six are located along the
Loudoun Street SE frontage. She stated window signs are commonly found in the Old & Historic
District, serving as a decorative element to aid visitors in locating the appropriate storefront and add
to the charm, vibrancy and historic urban character of the district. Further, she stated staff finds the
proposed signs to be consistent with the Guidelines as they occupy a small percentage of the glass
and are translucent; therefore, staff recommends approval as submitted.
The applicant, Jessica Peterson, was not present.
There was discussion regarding the Board’s purview in reviewing window decal signs.
Ms. Murphy stated these signs were previously exempt from permitting requirements; however, there
was a change to the Zoning Ordinance several years ago when the exemption was inadvertently
removed. She stated the Zoning Administrator does plan to address this in a future Zoning Ordinance
batch amendment; however, a Certificate of Appropriateness and Sign Permits are currently required
until any future amendments are approved. She stated there is language in the Old & Historic District
Sign Guidelines addressing window signs which has been used in staff’s evaluation of this
application. Further, she stated this application was filed as the result of a zoning enforcement
complaint and she is not certain as to how zoning staff may address similar signs within the district.
There was further discussion regarding other similar signs in the historic district, noting some may
have been installed prior to the change in the Zoning Ordinance and therefore would not be in
violation of the Zoning Ordinance.
There were no petitioners for this application.
There was additional discussion regarding recent similar applications for window decal signs. There
was concern regarding the number of signs proposed which could be perceived as sign clutter. It was
noted that the signs in this case are approvable because of their size, placement, translucent nature,
and simple design. Further, it was noted that it is possible for a business to have too many signs and
that additional information regarding any future Zoning Ordinance amendment relative to these types
of signs should be provided to the Board.
Vice Chair Minchew proposed a motion to approve TLHP-2019-0098, 38 South King Street, based on
the information provided by Jessica Peterson received August 6, 2019, including associated photos
and specifications, as outlined in the staff report.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 3 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
The motion was seconded by Ms. Pastor and approved by a 7-0 vote.
b. TLHP-2019-0101, 106 Cornwall Street NE
Project: Replacement of windows
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 7:26pm.
Ms. Murphy stated the subject structure at 106 Cornwall Street NE was constructed circa 1940 and is
a contributing resource in the Old & Historic District. She provided an overview of the proposal to
replace the existing wood casement and double-hung windows with new wood windows. She stated
the new windows will match the existing windows in style, design, and material. She stated the
existing windows were installed under a 2001 Certificate of Appropriateness approval. Further, she
stated the proposed in-kind window replacement is in keeping with the Design Guidelines and
recommended approval as submitted.
The applicant, Louis Hartig, expressed his agreement with the staff report.
There was discussion regarding details of the existing windows and the need for additional
clarification regarding the material and details of the proposed windows.
Mr. Reimers proposed a motion to continue TLHP-2019-0101, 106 Cornwall Street NE, to a future
work session agenda.
The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Minchew and approved by a 7-0 vote.
c. TLHP-2019-0105, 18 South King Street
Project: In-kind Replacement of door and windows
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 7:44pm.
Ms. Murphy stated the subject structure at 18 South King Street was constructed circa 1823 and is a
contributing resource in the Old & Historic District; however, the façade has been heavily altered over
time. She stated the applicant proposes the in-kind replacement of the 30-lite storefront window, the
9-lite over crossbuck panel main entry door and the 6-lite transom window. She stated the existing
wood storefront window is not believed to be original to the structure and was likely added during the
late 1950’s or early 1960’s when many of the structures along King Street were modified with heavy
cornices and other colonial style features. She stated the applicant has provided photographs
showing the deterioration of the window, noting it is bowed from the fourth rail down and is proposing
to replace the window in-kind. She stated photographic evidence has shown that the door was likely
installed in the early 1970’s, noting it is not sized properly for the space and does not provide a
weathertight enclosure. She stated the applicant is proposing the in-kind replacement of the door;
however, staff finds that a 9-lite over simple single panel configuration would also be appropriate as
shown in the 1971 photo of the structure. She stated the transom over the door is integrated into the
storefront window and door system; therefore, the applicant is proposing the in-kind replacement of
this element as well. Further, she stated staff finds the proposal to be in keeping with the Guidelines
and therefore recommends approval as submitted.
There was discussion regarding the proposed replacement storefront window and it was confirmed
that the new window will match the existing window in size, muntin configuration and material.
Vice Chair Minchew proposed a motion to approve TLHP-2019-0105, 18 South King Street, as
submitted, based on the information provided by Howard Armfield received August 19, 2019,
including associated specifications, photos, and product cutsheets, as outlined in the staff report and
with the following clarifications:
1. Any replaced trim will match the existing in profile and other details.
2. The existing trim and muntin details are to be measured, recorded and provided to staff prior to
removal.
3. The existing hardware will be reused.
4. The existing paint colors will be duplicated.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 4 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
5. Final specification sheets and drawings will be approved by staff prior to installation.
Mr. Koochagian proposed a friendly amendment to clarify that the door panel can have either the
crossbuck design existing or a simple panel matching the 1971 photo provided, with the BAR
preference being the latter. Further, the glazing for the door, transom and he multi-light window will
be single-pane and the correct number of lights will be identified for these items.
The friendly amendment was accepted.
The amended motion was seconded by Mr. Koochagian and approved by a 6-0-1 vote (Skinner
recused).
d. TLHP-2019-0107, 215 Cornwall Street NW
Alteration to previous approval and window replacement
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 8:03pm.
Ms. Murphy outlined the application to install one additional window to match other windows
approved in the 2017 rear porch enclosure. She stated the applicant also requests to replace 7
existing windows with new windows. She stated the windows proposed for replacement were installed
in the 1960s or later and are located in a non-contributing addition to the house. Further, she stated
both requests are consistent with the Guidelines and recommended approval, as submitted.
The applicant Rob Bassett, was present. He stated the existing windows are not of a high quality and
he would like to replace them with more efficient windows. Further, he stated the additional window is
requested to allow more light into that portion of the house.
There was discussion regarding the previous approval from 2017 and the appropriateness of the
proposed windows for installation on the front of this non-contributing 1960’s addition, noting they
were previously approved for installation on the rear of this addition.
There were no petitioners for this application.
There was additional discussion regarding the details of the previously proposed windows, now
proposed for the front of the 1960’s addition. It was verified that the windows will have full length
screens. Further, it was noted that a copy of cutsheets for the windows should be included in the file
for this application.
Ms. Pastor proposed a motion to approve TLHP-2019-0107, 215 Cornwall Street NW, as submitted,
based on the information provided by Rob & Adrienne Bassett, received August 19, 2019, including
associated specifications, photos, and the product cutsheets provided this evening.
The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Minchew.
Chairman Goodson proposed a friendly amendment to clarify that the replacement windows in the
1960’s addition will be the same size and color as the existing windows.
The friendly amendment was accepted and the amended motion was approved by a 6-0-1 vote
(Reimers recused).
e. TLHP-2019-0095, 13 Union Street NW
Amendment to previous COA – Porch
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 8:17pm.
Ms. Murphy noted the structure at 13 Union Street NW was constructed circa 1920 and is a
contributing resource in the Old & Historic District. She stated the applicants seek to amend a
previous approval granted under TLHP-2016-0105 for alterations to the front porch. She stated the
previous approval included pouring a second concrete slab over the existing; however, the applicant
now proposes to cover the existing concrete floor with wood and wrap the porch with a composite
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 5 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
skirt board. She noted the use of wood on the porch is consistent with the age and character of the
structure and suggested that the Board could find that the proposed use of an alternative material for
the skirt board is approvable given that it would be attached to the new wood decking and would not
cause harm to any historic materials. Further, she recommended approval of the application with the
following conditions:
1. The proposed skirt board will be constructed of wood.
2. All previously approved drawings and conditions associated with TLHP-2016-0105 will remain in
place.
The applicants, Victoria and Catherine Kimball were present. Ms. Catherine Kimball clarified that the
existing porch is not sinking; however, it was not installed properly and is not level.
There was discussion regarding the proposed stain color for the wood porch floor. There was also
discussion regarding the possibility of installing a flagstone porch floor in lieu of the wood. Further,
there was concern regarding the proposed use of pressure treated wood for the porch floor and the
possibility of using other types of wood.
Ms. Victoria Kimball noted that the ends of the decking will be framed to provide a more finished
appearance.
There were no petitioners for this application.
There was additional discussion regarding possible wood products such as fir, mahogany or ipe and
options for the porch and composite materials for the front of the porch such as HardiePlank, PVC or
Boral. It was the consensus of the Board to continue the application to allow the applicants to
consider material options.
Mr. Koochagian proposed a motion to continue TLHP-2019-0095, 13 Union Street NW, to the
October 7, 2019 work session.
The motion was seconded by Ms. Pastor and approved by a 6-0-1 vote (O’Neil recused).
f. TLHP-2019-0103, 102 Cornwall Street NW
Construction of an addition and installation of a pool.
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 8:42pm.
Ms. Murphy noted the contributing resource at 102 Cornwall Street NW was constructed circa 1762
and may be individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places given its previous use as
the Methodist Parsonage. She outlined the proposal to construct a new 1 ½ car garage, a pool with
surrounding fence and patio, and various alterations to the existing side porch. She stated the subject
pool is to be surrounded by brick with a stone and grass pool deck and will be completely obstructed
from view by the proposed fence. Further, she stated in general the pool and patio surround are
consistent with the Guidelines; however simplification of the stone patterns on the patio may be more
consistent with the historic character of the property.
Ms. Murphy provided her analysis of the proposed fence noting that the existing iron fence will
remain; however, this additional fence is needed to meet building code regulations for the pool. She
stated the fence is constructed of horizontal wood boards with brick piers lending a non-traditional,
contemporary design which could be mitigated by adding additional brick courses. She stated an
additional gate is also recommended in the fence to connect to the surrounding yard. She provided
her analysis of the proposed garage addition noting that the garage will be connected to the primary
structure with a small covered walkway to meet zoning requirements because of the unique
easement and setback constraints associated with this property. She stated the garage is generally in
conformance with the Guidelines; however, staff recommends additional discussion regarding the
proposed doors. She briefly addressed the proposed building alterations expressing concern with the
proposed change from undivided windows to 6/6 double hung windows in the previously enclosed
porch. Further, she recommended that the Board schedule a site visit and recommended that the
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 6 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
applicant consider pursuit of a National Register of Historic Places preliminary information form for
this property to determine eligibility of the structure for listing individually.
The applicant Kit Lisle and his architect Tom O’Neil were present. Mr. O’Neil stated a 4-foot high,
solid fence is required by code for enclosing the pool. He stated there are examples in the Design
Guidelines of vertical board fences with brick piers and the applicant is willing change the orientation
of the horizontal boards on the proposed fence to be vertical. He stated solid pavers were shown in
the plan directly behind the garage to create a uniform surface for grilling and similar activities;
however, the applicant is open to having a consistent material of pavers with the grass surround for
all patio surfaces as there are stormwater requirements to be met on site so the impervious area
cannot be increased. He addressed staff’s concern regarding the garage doors, noting the applicant
prefers the contemporary look but would be willing to propose an alternate door design. He discussed
the zoning requirements that necessitated the covered walkway connecting the garage to the house,
stating it is proposed to be as simple and light and possible and can be easily removed in the future.
He stated the fencing for the pool was kept as far as possible from the cemetery on the adjoining
property to allow for an adequate landscape buffer and confirmed that the existing iron fencing will be
retained. Further, he stated efforts were made to keep the pool as flush with the ground to the extent
possible and asked for feedback from the Board regarding the pool fence and gate design.
There was discussion regarding the entry door and roof material for the garage.
Mr. O’Neil addressed the porch window alterations stating that the existing windows were likely
installed in the 1960’s. He stated the existing kitchen was previously a porch that was enclosed and
the applicant is proposing a 6/6 window in the existing porch to match the other windows in the
kitchen. He stated the windows were also brought in a bit to leave room in the corners for new kitchen
cabinetry as well. Further, he stated the door currently leading into the mudroom will also be moved
to the new entry.
It was noted that the existing windows appear to be storm windows, or something similar, that were
installed when the kitchen was enclosed. There was additional discussion regarding the evolution of
this structure over time, noting that the porch on the rear of the ell was likely enclosed in the 1890’s
and the first story of the side porch facing Wirt Street was likely enclosed in the 1930’s. Further, there
was discussion regarding the height of the pool fence.
There was no public comment.
There was concern expressed with the style of the pool fence, the garage door styles, the overall
massing of the garage and the relationship of the garage to the house. There was additional
discussion regarding the concerns raised with the height and massing of the garage structure, the
possibility of a connection at the second story level, and the proposed window alterations in the
porch. Further, there was additional discussion regarding the site constraints and Zoning Ordinance
requirements necessitating the need for the connection between the house and the structure.
It was the consensus of the Board to continue this application to a future work session.
Ms. Minchew proposed a motion to continue TLHP-2019-0103, 102 Cornwall Street NW, to a future
mutually agreed upon meeting date, no earlier than October 7, 2019.
The motion was seconded by Ms. Skinner.
Mr. Koochagian offered a friendly amendment to schedule a site visit prior to the work session
discussion.
The friendly amendment was accepted and the amended motion was approved by a 5-0-2 vote
(O’Neil and Reimers recused).
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 7 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
g. TLHP-2019-0104, 212 Edwards Ferry Road NE
Exterior Alterations
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 9:50pm.
Ms. Murphy noted the structure at 212 Edwards Ferry Road NE was constructed circa 1890 and is a
contributing resource in the Old & Historic District. She stated the historic survey refers to the unusual
flush siding technique on the front elevation which is identified as a character defining feature. She
outlined the proposal to replace existing vinyl and wood windows with new wood windows to match
existing configurations, replace existing shutters with new wood louvered shutters, replace the
existing siding with new wood siding to be tongue and groove on the front elevation and lapped on
other elevations, install a new 12” stone base around the perimeter of the structure to address water
infiltration issues, and replace the existing gutters with new half-round copper gutters. She noted the
guidelines support repair or replacement in-kind where possible and the applicant is proposing
replacement in-kind in all instances. She recommended that the application be continued and a site
visit scheduled to evaluate the proposed areas of siding replacement and window replacement.
The applicant, Helen Aikman, and her contractor, Yong Hwang, were present. Ms. Aikman stated
she has no concern with keeping the existing window configurations as noted by staff. She stated the
stone around the perimeter of the building is Laurel Mountain stone which is sourced in Loudoun
County and will match the existing stone wall in the back yard. She stated she is willing to repair the
existing siding where possible, especially on the front elevation. She stated in general, the existing
windows do not open and they are single-pane, requiring the use of storm windows which are not
visually appealing. She noted her preference to replace the windows with new wood windows in the
same profile and lite configuration as existing. Further, she stated she would be open to a site visit if
that is the preference of the Board.
There was discussion regarding the steep pitch of the porch roofs and it was verified that staff does
not have record of any modification or replacement of these roofs in the past. There was further
discussion regarding the need for additional information regarding the installation and detailing of the
proposed stone water table and the possibility of an alternate treatment.
There was no public comment.
It was the consensus of the Board to continue this application to allow for a site visit to be scheduled.
Mr. Koochagian proposed a motion to continue TLHP-2019-0104, 212 Edwards Ferry Road NE, to
the next work session with a site visit to be scheduled prior to that meeting.
The motion was seconded by Mr. O’Neil and approved by a 7-0 vote.
Public Hearings on New Cases in the H-2 Corridor Overlay District
a. TLHP-2019-0100, 241 Fort Evans Road NE – Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets
Amendment to Comprehensive Sign Plan – Monument Signs
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 10:12pm.
Ms. Murphy provided an overview of the proposal to replace the two existing monument signs, reface
the existing sign bases and change the lighting from external to internal at Leesburg Corner Premium
Outlets. She stated this proposal was referred to the Board by the administrative comprehensive sign
plan panel due to the change in lighting. She stated the current method of external illumination for the
monument signs is the first preference of the Design Guidelines; however, the Guidelines do allow for
internal illumination as well. Further, she stated staff is seeking direction from the Board with regards
to the lighting; however, staff finds the other proposed alterations to be approvable.
The applicant, Jim Gonzalez, General Manager of Leesburg Premium Outlets, and his architect were
in attendance.
There was discussion regarding the proposed alterations to the signs and it was confirmed that the
sign facing the Route 7/15 Bypass will be curved to fit on the existing sign base and will have some
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 8 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
external illumination to highlight the brick features of the base and the crown. There was discussion
regarding the proposed lighting levels or brightness of the signs. There was further discussion
regarding the other signs on the buildings, including some which are currently internally illuminated;
however, the two monument signs were brought forward separate from the comprehensive sign
package because they are currently externally illuminated.
There was no public comment.
It was noted that the proposed signs consist of a metal panel with white acrylic letters in a thin font
that the light is subtly pushed through versus a typical internally lit sign cabinet. Further, it was the
consensus of the majority that the redesign of the signs is successful and that the proposal meets the
design guidelines for the H-2 Historic Corridor.
Mr. Koochagian proposed a motion to approve TLHP-2019-0100, 241 Fort Evans Road NE, based on
the information provided by Jim Gonzales dated August 13, 2019 including associated plans,
specifications, and product information, as submitted.
The motion was seconded by Ms. Skinner and approved by a 7-0 vote.
b. TLHP-2019-0109, Russell Branch Parkway SE – Brown’s Nissan
New construction of a commercial structure
Chairman Goodson opened the public hearing at 10:26pm.
Ms. Murphy provided an overview of the proposal to construct a new automobile dealership in
accordance with Concept Plan and Proffer Amendment TLZM-2015-0007, Special Exception TLSE-
2016-0054 and the Board’s previous General Concept Plan (GCP) discussion under TLHP-2016-
0054. She stated the building location and scale have been set by the approved rezoning concept
plan and the proposed architecture is generally in conformance with the previously reviewed GCP
and the Design Guidelines. She suggested that the Board discuss rooftop equipment screening with
the applicant and recommended approval as submitted.
The applicant, Lori Hall, Penney Design Group, was present. She provided a quick overview of the
design evolution for this structure, noting that there have not been any changes since the Board’s
previous review.
There was discussion regarding the proposed mechanical screening and its location on the rooftop of
the structure towards the center. It was verified that the height of the screening will match the height
of the mechanical units. Further, it was noted that portions of the design were previously endorsed by
the Board under the General Concept Plan review process.
There was no public comment.
There was discussion regarding the size of the proposed signage and it was confirmed that the
signage will return to the Board for review under a separate application. Further, it was the
consensus of the Board that the proposal is generally consistent with the design guidelines for the
H-2 Historic Corridor.
Ms. Pastor proposed a motion to approve TLHP-2019-0109, Russell Branch Parkway SE, based on
the information provided by Penney Design Group received August 19, 2019 including associated
drawings, specifications, and product information, as submitted.
The motion was seconded by Mr. O’Neil and approved by a 6-0-1 vote (Minchew recused).
Old Business
a. BAR Outreach Subcommittee
Chairman Goodson asked that members forward any suggestions they have regarding outreach to
Ms. Pastor and Mr. O’Neil for consideration.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
September 16, 2019 Page 9 of 9
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING · 25 WEST MARKET STREET · LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176
Telephone 703.771.2765 · Fax 703.771.2724 · www.leesburgva.gov/planning
New Business
a. Informational Item: Zoning Ordinance Batch Amendments
Ms. Murphy stated the Planning Commission held their public hearing on the proposed Zoning
Ordinance amendments earlier this month and asked that the hearing be continued to allow for input
from the Board on amendments relative to the Board’s workload. She stated another issue was
brought to staff’s attention regarding Section 2.3.4 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding required
qualifications for Board members. She stated this section is currently not proposed for amendment;
however, staff was notified that one member of the Board is not a “bona fide resident” of the Town
and a potential remedy for this issue would be to alter the language so that a resident or owner of
property in the historic district could qualify as a member of the Board. She stated the Town Code
allows for Board and Commission members to be a resident or property owner; however, this
language in the Zoning Ordinance is more restrictive.
There was discussion regarding the proposed change to qualifications for BAR members and the
Town’s current approval process for Board and Commission members. There was also discussion
regarding the need to research Certified Local Government requirements for members through the
Virginia Department of Historic Resources as well. Further, it was the consensus of the Board to
request that Section 2.3.4 regarding Board Membership be removed from the Zoning Ordinance
Batch to allow for additional discussion and that the other proposed amendments move forward as
written.
Staff Announcements
Adjournment
On a motion by Ms. Pastor, seconded by Mr. O’Neil, the meeting was adjourned at 11:03 pm.
Dale Goodson, Chairman
Deborah Parry, Planning & Zoning Analyst