HomeMy Public PortalAbout12-31 Rezone 2145 Lincoln Avenue 1st Reading: 11/14/2012
2°d Reading: 12/12/2012
Public Hearing: 12/12/2012
Adopted: 12/12/2012
Effective Date: 12/19/2012
Sponsored by: City Manager
ORDINANCE NO. 12-31
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF OPA-LOCKA, TO REZONE THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED
AS 2145 LINCOLN AVENUE, FOLIO 08-2122-030-0130 AND
FOLIO 08-2122-030-0170 FROM B-1 (COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD) ZONING DISTRICT TO MAGNOLIA
NORTH REDEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (MNRO) ZONING
DISTRICT, APPROXIMATELY 0.423 ACRES, WITH SPECIAL
EXCEPTION; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF
RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND REPEALER;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CODIFICATION;
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2012, applicant Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC,
submitted a rezoning request for the property described as Folio Nos. 08-2122-030-0130 and 08-
2122-030-0170, also know as 2145 Lincoln Avenue; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2012, the Planning Council reviewed the applicant's
completed request and the staff report recommendation (with special exceptions), to rezone
Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC's, property from the B-1 Zone to the MNRO Zone; and
WHEREAS, there is no cost to the City in rezoning the property to MNRO Overlay, and
the project will generate approximately $55,780 for fiscal year 2013, including enhanced tax
revenues, franchise fees, impact fees, and building fees; and
Ordinance No. 12-31
WHEREAS,the Planning Council recommended approval of rezoning the property from
B-1 (Commerical Neighborhood) Zone to the Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay Zone,
with special exceptions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The property described as Folio Nos. Folio Nos. 08-2122-030-0130 and
08-2122-030-0170, also known as 2145 Lincoln Avenue, is hereby rezoned from B-1
(Commercial Neighborhood) Zoning to Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay (MNRO)
Zoning District, with the following special exceptions:
1. Reduce the number of required parking spaces from 21 to 19
2. Increase density from 15 units/acre to 28.4 units/acre
3. Reduce the minimum size of the 1 bedroom units to 870 square feet
4. Reduce the minimum size of the 2 bedroom units to 875 square fee
5. Unity of Title will be required.
Section 3. REPEALER. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed.
Section 4. SEVERABILITY. If any portion, section, phrase or clause of this
Ordinance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such ruling shall not affect the
validity of the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5. CODIFICATION. This Ordinance shall be codified in the Code of
Ordinances when the code is recodified.
Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall upon adoption, become effective
immediately.
Ordinance No. 12-31
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of December, 2012.
MY AYLOR
MAYOR
Attest to:
Jjanna Flores
�V ty Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Jos:� S. eller
Cit Atto ey
Moved by: VICE MAYOR KEL EY
Seconded by: COMMISSIONER J e HNSON
Commission Vote: 3-2
Commissioner Holmes: NO
Commissioner Johnson: NO
Commissioner Santiago: YES
Vice-Mayor Kelley: YES
Mayor Taylor: YES
THE MIAMI HERALD I MiamiHerald.com ND THURSDAY,NOVEMBER 29,2012 17ND
THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
_ << Honor & Remember... CORDIALLY INVITES YOU TO THE
- /) A Memorial Tree will be placed in the lobby of MO' D o-----_,-
our cemetery through December 24,2012. C_=�
Personalize a beautiful dove ornament and place it on our a DilE SERE M
Memorial Tree to honor the memory of your loved one.
The ornament will be compliments of the facility(at no cost).
Our cemetery will be open Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. 1 1 SATURDAY, DECEMBER 1st
until 5 p.m.,Saturdays from 9 a.m.until 4 p.m.,and -- -
Sundays from 10 a.m.until 3 p.m. J 5:30 P.M. - 6:30 P.M.
For more information contact us at(305)445-5425.
HISTORIC CITY HALL
` '" 777 SHARAZAD BLVD
Cd�dl� rt ' 'oei o
oodatoiz OPA-LOCKA, FL
Funeral Homey Cernetenes&Crematoy Y T '
3260 South West 8th Street•Miami,FL 33135 * t.
CaballeroRiveroWoodlawn.com
02012 STET <" 1, v-
0
°s':` "°' LIGHT REFRESHMENTS
z
t-� I„l AND
•CITY OFOPA-LOCKA,FLORIDA HOLIDAY CHEERS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC "
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka,Florida will hold public lh
hearings at its Regular Commission Meeting on Wednesday, December 12, 2012 at 7:00 p.m.at the ,:
Opa-locka Municipal Complex, 780 Fisherman Street, 2i° Floor, Opa-locka, Florida to consider
the following items:
SECOND READING ORDINANCE/PUBLIC HEARING: - - "^
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA•LOCKA, FLORIDA,TO REZONE
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS 2145 LINCOLN AVENUE, FOLIO 08-2122.030.0130 AND FOLIO - :-
08-2122-030-0170 FROM B-1 (COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD) ZONING DISTRICT TO MAGNOLIA
NORTH REDEVELOPMENT OVERLAY(MNRO)ZONING DISTRICT,APPROXIMATELY 0.423 ACRES,WITH
SPECIAL EXCEPTION;PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS;PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND i j
REPEALER;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CODIFICATION;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE "'�1j/`",
(first reading held on November 14,2012).Sponsored by C.M. e3
RESOLUTIONS/PUBLIC HEARING: -Presented by:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA,FLORIDA,TO GRANT THE
REQUEST OF MAGNOLIA NORTH 2148 APARTMENTS,LLC,FOR FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL OF THEIR The Li Mayor, City Commission,
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2145 LINCOLN AVENUE;FOLIO NOS.08-2122-003-0130 AND 08-2122-003.0170;
PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. N
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA,FLORIDA,TO GRANT THE and City Employees
REQUEST OF UDG III OASIS, LLC TO APPROVE THE MODIFICATION OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR > I
THEIR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13900 NW 17.AVENUE, FOLIO NO.:08-2122-000-0191;PROVIDING FOR w
INCORPORATION OF RECITALS;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. t t ,,,
Additional information on the above items may be obtained in the Office of the City Clerk,780 Fisherman r I(
Street,4"Floor,Opa-locka,Florida.Al interested persons are encouraged to attend this meeting and will be heard with For More f o r rn a t i o n:
respect to the public hearing.
PURSUANT TO FS 288.0105: Anyone who desires to appeal any decision made by any board, agency, please Contact the Office of the City Clerk at
or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing will need a record of the
proceedings,and for that reason,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record I Y 8 •
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal may be based. i� 305.1688P4611°
JOANNA FLORES,CMC
a
CITY CLERK 'w'
tio
APO RAs
City of Opa-Locka
Agenda Cover Memo
Commission Meeting November 14, Item Type: Resolution Ordinance Other
Date: 2012 (EnterXin box) X
Yes No Ordinance Reading: 1st Reading 2"d Reading
Fiscal Impact: (Enter X in box) X X
(EnterXin box) X Public Hearing: Yes No Yes No
(Enter X in box) X X
Funding Source: (Enter Fund &Dept) Advertising Requirement: Yes No
N/A N/A (Enter X in box) X
Contract/P.O. Required: Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid #: N/A
(Enter X in box) X
Yes No Strategic Plan Priority Area: Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy:
Enhance Organizational I= N/A
Strategic Plan Related Bus. & Economic Dev •
(EnterXin box) X Public Safety (]
Quality of Education I]
Qual. of Life &City Imager
Communcation 0
Sponsor Name City Manager Department: Community Development
Short Title:
An Ordinance of the City Commission to grant the request of Magnolia North 2145 Apartments,
LLC, to rezone their property at 2145 Lincoln Avenue from the B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood)
zoning district to the MNRO (Magnolia North Redevelopment Ordinance) Overlay District with
special exceptions. The subject properties are specifically described in folio nos. 08-2122-030-
0130; 08-2122-030-0170; and contains approximately 0.423 acres.
Staff Summary:
On August 14, 2012, Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC submitted a rezoning application
No. 12-09-0403 to rezone the subject properties from the B-1 zoning district to the MNRO with
special exceptions. On August 31, 2012, the applicant was notified that additional documents
were required. On September 12, 2012, the applicant's rezoning request was deemed complete
by staff.
On October 2, 2012, the Planning Council held a regular meeting and reviewed this request to
rezone the properties from the B-1 zoning district to the MNRO district with special exceptions.
At that meeting, the Planning Council reviewed the staff's report and recommendation and
recommended approval of the property owner's request to rezone property from the B-1 zoning
district to the MNRO with special exceptions. There was no noted public opposition for this
project at the Planning Council meeting.
Proposed Action:
Planning Council recommends approval of this rezoning request from the B-1 to the MNRO
zoning district with the following special exceptions:
• Reduce the number of required parking spaces from 21 to 19
• Increase density from 15 units/acre to 28.4 units/acre
• Reduce the minimum size of the 1 bedroom units to 870 square feet
• Reduce the minimum size of the 2 bedroom units to 875 square feet
• Unity of Title will be required.
Evaluation:
Without rezoning the subject properties to the MNRO overlay district the proposed project could
not be constructed. This rezoning request is consistent with the future land use of the property.
Attachments:
Planning Council Application
Staff Report and Recommendations
Site Plan Checklist
Magnolia North Redevelopment Ordinance
Power Point Presentation-Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC
0 9 p,.40Cx4..
a �
Memorandum
TO: Myra L. Taylor, Mayor
Dorothy Johnson, Vice Mayor
Timothy Holmes, Commission:
Rose Tydus, Commissioner
Gail Miller, Commissioner
FROM: Kelvin L. Baker, Sr., City Man;11,
DATE: November 5, 2012
RE: An Ordinance of the City Commission to grant the request of Magnolia
North 2145 Apartments, LLC, to rezone their property at 2145 Lincoln
Avenue from the B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning district to the
MNRO (Magnolia North Redevelopment Ordinance) Overlay District with
special exceptions. The subject properties are specifically described in
folio nos. 08-2122-030-0130; 08-2122-030-0170; and contains
approximately 0.423 acres.
Request:
An Ordinance of the City Commission to grant the request of Magnolia North 2145
Apartment, LLC, to rezone their property at 2145 Lincoln Avenue from B-1 zoning
district to the MNRO Overlay District with special exceptions. The subject properties
are specifically described in folio nos. 08-2122-030-0130; 08-2122-030-0170; and
contains approximately 0.423 acres.
Description:
On August 14, 2012, Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC submitted a rezoning
application No. 12-09-0403 to rezone the subject properties from the B-1 zoning district
to the MNRO with special exceptions. On August 31, 2012, the applicant was notified
that additional documents were required. On September 12, 2012, the applicant's
rezoning request was deemed complete by staff. On October 2, 2012, the Planning
Council held a regular meeting and reviewed this request to rezone the properties from
the B-1 zoning district to the MNRO district with special exceptions. At that meeting, the
Planning Council reviewed the staff's report and recommendation and recommended
approval of the property owner's request to rezone property from the B-1 zoning district
to the MNRO with special exceptions. There was no noted public opposition for this
project at the Planning Council meeting.
1
Magnolia North Apartments,LLC
Analysis:
Without rezoning the subject properties to the MNRO overlay district the proposed
project could not be constructed. This rezoning request is consistent with the future
land use of the property.
Financial Impact:
There are no perceived costs to the city for the approval of this use. However, indirectly
once site and building improvements are completed, the City will realize franchise fees,
impact fees and 30% of all building permit fees.
Implementation Time Line:
Immediately
Legislative History:
Ordinance No. 86-8
Ordinance 11-17
Resolution 11-8196
Planning Council Recommendation:
Planning Council recommends approval of this rezoning request from the B-1 to the
MNRO zoning district with the following special exceptions:
• Reduce the number of required parking spaces from 21 to 19
• Increase density from 15 units/acre to 28.4 units/acre
• Reduce the minimum size of the 1 bedroom units to 870 square feet
• Reduce the minimum size of the 2 bedroom units to 875 square feet
• Unity of Title will be required.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff Recommends Approval of this rezoning request to the MNRO with special
exceptions as listed above.
Attachment(s)
Planning Council Application and Meeting Minutes
Powerpoint Presentation
Staff Report and Recommendation
Site Plan Checklist
Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay Ordinance
Prepared By: Howard W. Brown, Jr., Community Development Directo
Gerald Lee, City Planner
2
Magnolia North Apartments,LLC
E
N w L
o
7 ° o
•
$ t o J _
''.."4. •. •? }1 _ )
j c
1 N^,
N W
N 7_
c6._Co
o �N-
_ i __ -__ c�crn CI)
( ) - II
z n 5
� =3 cn
W
E
A
_ - , a
N
_
m 2
I
W
Q
Z .
O1 1 y: - 3
Lo c _ l 2 O
Z N N J Cn fn
■_I I r, N
u J --- --I v
Z
W
0
Z
W
l°$ 0�// N
`_
d
z
2 ,N
7 C
I ® _s 2
fil
w
J
r - w
Ill
U
1,
'^ ._
VJ O
z
THE GREAT t1TV "
f04 p-t-bCk4. C3 P41 C:it t IX a
6)0i Of
grkirlikt
M
PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION
APPLICATION NUMBER:I Z°O t'f-O HECK NUMBER:4039 DATE RECEIVED: O B° P4°1 Z
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME:MAGNOLIA NORTH 2145 APARTMENTS L.L.0(OPA LOCKA CDC)
PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 490 OPA LOCKA BOULEVARD SUITE 20 OPA LOCKA FL 33054
Number/Street City State/Zip Code
APPLICANT'S NAME: MAGNOLIA NORTH 2145 APARTMENTS L.L.0(OPA LOCKA CDC)
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:490 OPA LOCKA BOULEVARD SUITE 20 OPA LOCKA FL 33054
Number/Street City State/Zip Code
PHONE NUMBER: OFFICE (305)687-8451 HOME OTHER
SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2145 LINCOLN AVENUE OPA LOCKA FL 33054
Number/Street
TAX FOLIO NUMBER:08-2122-003-0130 PRESENT ZONING: B1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 22 52 41 MAGNOLIA SUB PB 40-80 LOTS 10-11-12 & 13 BLK 3 LOT SIZE
IRREGULAR 75R-229937 OR 21210-23050403 1
Please check specific request:
Tentative Plat
Final Plat
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
_Drainage Plan
_Fill Permit Request
Preliminary Site Plan Review
_Final Site Plan Review
Conditional Use Permit—No Plans
Conditional Use Permit—With Plans
Special Exception—No Plans
_Special Exception—With Plans
_X_Other—Please specify: REZONE TO THE MAGNOLIA NORTH OVERLAY DISTRICT(MNRO)
Add any additional information that may be of importance to this request:
PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION
(Check list)
Applications will not be accepted without the following data. For a public hearing, all items below are necessary
and mus be submitted.
Completed application form
—7 Application fee of$1250.00 payable to the City of Opa-locka by check or money order
\I Copy of property owner's and/or applicant's driver license/photo 1.D.
\..Affidavit(see below),and power of attorney of the property owner(page 3)(Both must be Notarized)
/ A completed Neighborhood. Petition form (attached) with the signature of each property owner in front, rear,
left and right of his property showing they have no objections to the project(name,address,phone number).
\/ All preliminary and final site plans, along with property survey, must be submitted on CD-Rom disc in Cad
format
IFifteen(15)certified boundary and topographic surveys of the property(size 36 x 24 inches)
Nilf Fifteen (15) copies of Site Development Plan showing all drainage, water, sewer, structures, landscaping and
parking in accordance with the City's zoning ordinance;(size 36 x 24)
/ Map showing parcel to be considered and all properties' legal descriptions thereof, within 375' radius of said
parcel. Map to be 1" = 100" scale. Owner's name, address, folio number and legal description on each parcel
(Original and 2 copies size of document to accommodate scale)
V7 Narrative concept to be submitted with application
AFFIDAVIT
1,Se/7Aanie I'Y•Z4'a - gala/oil;, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the OWNER of the property ,and I
u derstand that this application must be complete and accurate before a public hearing can be advertised.
/ ilifi, IL- ita-_ _
Signature
.F7ig/ari02- . - -AL-- - AM. - -- - .
Date ,aot' `a c; LATOYA A.JAMES-
I - rr i Notary Public-State of Florida ■
1 1,:, y i ,, My Comm.Expires Mar 16,2015
Sworn to and subscribed before me: 1 '.9rEOF`�.° Commission#EE 74720
This . day of I • _,!
/411 AJfat -i- My commission expires D4,,Ve/? 16) 21 I
Attach ,i py of identification
Page 2 of 4
PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION
POWER OF ATTORNEY
This form is to be attached to all applications, and to be returned with the application. No application will be honored or
persons heard by the Planning Council unless a notarized copy of this Power of Attorney is submitted.
To: City of Opa-locka
From:
Subject: Power of Attorney (authorization for a person, other than the property owner, to speak in the property
('� owner's behalf)).
I ✓TCPianiL Milia.mS- gaaW`h ,being first duly sworn,depose and say that I am the owner
of the property legally described as:
I do give to "Per".S' 7 �� ? the power of Attorney and authority to speak in my
behalf in refs nce to the" c,above scribed property. Further, by affixing my notarized signature to this document, I also
authorize ci G , - rozyt.i, to negotiate and commit to the City Commission and City
Administration in my behalf. I will abide by all final determinations of the City Commission and City Administration.
Sign ark3/410/.2--
g
Date
Sworn to and subscribed before me:
This 14 day of fiat(1g-ii-
�i,�ri� My commission expires: Mfr t(0 701
•tary 'u is
Attach copy of identification elog°"'�.
py t.ATOYA A.JAMES
bNotary Public-State of Florida
y Comm.Ex
pirea Mar 18.2015
,,time` Commission*EE 74720
Page 3 of 4
PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION
RE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2145 LINCOLN AVENUE OPA LOCKA FL 33054
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 22 52 41 MAGNOLIA SUB PB 40-80 LOTS 10-11-12& 13 BLK 3 LOT
SIZE IRREGULAR 75R-229937 OR 21210-23050403 1
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAGNOLIA NORTH 2145 APTS L.L.C. PHONE(305)687-8451
ADDRESS(If different): 490 OPA LOCKA BOULEVARD SUITE 20 OPA LOCKA FL 33054
We, the undersigned,have no objection to petitioner's request to: REZONE TO THE MAGNOLIA NORTH
OVERLAY DISTRICT(MNRO)
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
FRONT: 1.
2- r niMir 4 t C 01 J,f 61 .1 r 1_ji :t ` �� ci' ,t j
_
4.
RIGHT: 1.01 p
LUX.. C 2O( `C L t6f'r *kJ C `30 S) G31- SL(St
SIDE: 2. \
3.
4.
LEFT: 1.
SIDE: 2.Mee A Val 1'14;-t��
L111.11/31411111101111411111411rilea
4.
REAR: 1.
2.
3.
4.
Page 4 of 4
,4 1...),...l ..J
Check Date: 6/7/2012 Payee: ','OF OPA-LOCKA" PLANNING &COMM. D Check 1 is !nt: $1,250.00
Date Memo Invoice# Amount
6/7/2012 2145 LINCOLN AVE.: PLANNING COUNCIL AP 06072012-519M-8 1,250.00
i2.41li otguivr,,,, -,„--...-.- 0111(Iran! i,“,......,..44 I.,..14 ;,I. 4,,r.47.4.4,.1.7Li.Ill 4,...,,,I,,,,_,r,,,,,,,,,,,,!,!,;_■,,,:4!',41 1.(2;:,,t,1) ANIIIIIIIIII, ,. _
i
i
_....,:::_-- OPA LOCKA,I t 33054
1 IT i nil.11Pj11.-72,71:tA ', 41?. n 1:g;1'"}T -',1:,
MAGNOLIA NORTH 2145 APfk.'lz l'
11Fr:- GENERAL ACCOUNT
490 OPA LOCKA BLVD,SUITE 20 WArnoviA 004039
OPA LOCKA,FL 33054 63 643/670
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
If 6/7/2012 $1,250.00
PAY One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty exactly*'"*""*"""*"*****"*****"*""""********"*"*""""'''''****"""""""—"A
ToonDIFIRE
E CITY OF OPA-LOCKA" PLANNING &COMM. DEVELOP, DEPT NOT VALID AFTER 90 DAYS
OF: 780 FISHERMAN STREET j*--4-x-,..:c//(te(—Ag-461.--„,„,_
OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054
- ;;;; ;,,-;4;i-; -;;•:,1,•., ,,;;;ii,i•,;,,,a,.,„;!..;.J.:.•„;.:,ii,:;,,,„4LiuL \i\‘t i;
mt.i dilet 1,01.,yi II wi, iniq:,.:
i ill
ire N:.,i ,(...„ ,,, 1,.. -,, ..i A ti : 51 • I IV:
iTI,'.1 -,I'14 10 ti.4;4'.1 iLtiFt,l,
.I Lt' -1'7° L1' 1 !EL.„ ..,,,i,,,,„, ,,Iitiiiiii. ...,.
4,--0,mr,RuirrouNgg -.Lmirtsii,tWrzi-7-,,i-i-?->z,,,,r4
11100 40 39111 1:0 6 700E34 3 21: 2000060 ?4G739101
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
<
CUSTOMER'S RECEIPT au.i..vt,SV 14 20. 1 2- w
Code No. 7 0 N4 a
9, `z
Received of rr\ Cril■PO L IA QC)ENH -2■LkS APT '1,-(-C,
t- 3 co
co =
Address Li et 0 OpCL-kt-Vsct 2-b Odoct-A"-La 0 gi
c 1 , r, -33itsti 22:
Descriptson
■
- 6
0 V kStloki 11 STibt-T - &F 01(2-k6- ‘-' \01#464■A.I. C...0 U.A.L.C.t,\ o- ID-
cp
0 3
• C---\L-3-14 t1 b/et r -"C"'- l 'i)e 1 1-4`)el':ts q-' )I Dollars$ k •St) 1,1.)
Olf 3
ct,
' .
Make all checks payable to Fif .A...411
...
City of Opa-locka.Florida Gas hier
Si4°_° tea•
■1111040Viritalir 44,1*,;
41011111/ allft•
1 �.a.1 a Nor-It 1-s_
City of Opa-locka
780 Fisherman Street
Opa-locka, FL 33054
Attn: Mayor and Commission
August 15, 2012
RE: Narrative Concept—Rezoning Application
2145 Lincoln Avenue
Opa-locka, FL 33054
Dear Sir/Madam:
This letter is a request to rezone the subject property from B-2 (two-family residence) zoning
district to the MNRO (MAGNOLIA NORTH REDEVELOPMENT OVERLAY) zoning district.
We are the owners of 2145 Lincoln Avenue Opa Locka FL 33054 and the rezoning of the subject
property is necessary in order for the property to be used legally. As you know, the property is
located in the Magnolia Subdivision and a there are many vacant, abandoned, and underutilized
properties within this area. This area has been slated for redevelopment and is also located
within the proposed Community Redevelopment Agency(CRA) area boundaries. This means
that all redevelopment and construction improvements made within this area directly benefit the
city of Opa-locka as a result of enhanced property tax.
The MNRO will encourage the revitalization of the area and will encourage the revitalization of
the area's residential and commercial uses. The area will also encourage the formation of
pedestrian friendly designs and the development of mixed use/live work housing.
We look forward to your continued support as we work together to resolve this situation. Thank
you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
//41,aied4-41i
Stephanie Williams-Baldwin
Senior-Vice President
15050 Duval Street•2060,2070 Lincoln Avenues Opa-locka,FL 33054•
Phone(786)333-9586•Mat/!noliallorth ATheApartmentCorner.com
9• M6
,,t‘:,,,,,
O
z
\
p
< LU
wz
N
,,,s, (a),� w
2
O w
Y J ,;` 0 0
N
t4 N 4 - z Et w w� 0
,‘,:!!. CL Z W t
CL
It CO
�
e1/4,,,,,,, \ >cri °; OQ w w CC
f 0 ?� w
iiiiiM
;1' 0
'
„ V .4./.10 z O
, _
z
U
AA,,,
ttg
Z
wil
Q
J
kl6 0
li
ki
i- - ,
(i)
J u,
J cn
CI)
�
CI.
)z O
� W o -1-•
.0,
.„,..
.„,,, o
,m,
.,,,
.... 0, IX,, , ill— _c O
<oik _C—C) °-0
'CD g,, < W
Vt It) 'U
w.
N
0. I o C _
40 imi- U
A, Ce
AI
0 -i-i 05 a
Z o2
Qw's1 4— a) -§
U
0
0
Z o0
W (1•9 ,.._.......
r� -1fG N + Z
5 O Ll
N N
�'`
_ -0 ■•.... •-)
1
0 0
) -1■•••
Cl)
�N c CO N to
O
CD O o
f+ co r N 73 > N
s''''''.::,,4,4,;,:,'':,'1': CO
0
00 N N 7
4) U
p i- ...
= co ca .- ai 73 Et C o
C3) C13
,,:: ar ,-.. .-
U , -0 Z
::::,„,: a) ,--\
a r U) o o -
L
O CO c,a - .en Z O 0
o o '� U
o co
o 'er Ecc62
D c�
L U
CO O 0
M
A aD � � � ono
■�
Q. � � O Ca
kk
O � s-
L =CD 73 O'
�k O O
il 0 x— CD w a)
"k O
i.,; (..) o 0 0
o U i--
4
O i a U �� _
41 E 0 � � �&' L ri)
i4 U C O
t, - O N co O >
2 ci2 � z0 �
•
_ 1
O' o -C
.� >.
III 11■10
4) U
Q >
oC o
Cr z � -o
„,,, O) 0 c_ ..
"` �E � _. to =
O tp- O-1-•
,� 0) N .4-•
O
L U U
._ O
k C -0 U N N
0
,e-: N
o
Ce -CD E L._ -0
(n 0
\ U
.- a) ..c3..c3�,y as
J
k4 r w o_ V) _ o_
ti Ail 13 N
N � . to to
4., Cl) O
w m CO O c Q
0 00 Nom
.*E V jo. N N
x L
N O O
. 0 f w
m
6> N
U_
u k.� c L V) -
a
o �1 Ll /)¢ .
4
r n �(1!'
"°--,,.:,.'6--- c'''��� • `� � V/ • V
,,.
--,
11111111b, # ---'
.„-----.-----r. ..
1,-
. i..,
ri
s LI,
in I-I
: 1,1u"Li-1 :
l ,
— rh
V. Li 1
__11:VICk
>
Ct.:1 Si'° 41 ; :4!
. 0 01 ...
14 4) n
codi*
r. ?1,1P #
(01) 11111.111‘
-.4 0')
CO
C*. cut,'
in
id ill 66\ 00.
Z ... 0.-
1 .
.,
0-
0-
C, I,
Z I ........
CIO I
I
, '\-- >
./1 LIJ
XI MIME
L _
UJ z 6'
V) uj 0
- ,....■■•.6% iettlb D > m
2 t 3 LL
C9 (j U
0.4
ZZ k..)
—Ii
(In <
VINIMORINIIMIRRIP■,...0111•11 .... 5 0,.
A
I 1
**7 g i
i
. t -b
iz 1 L14
...
1 C iri
IQ inn
od
...,,.
,
..O.
4 CI
4 i
le
.
ED I i
..
L-
I' eu g
E —
1.7, 44 „ w *
L.
mi. p
i ..-
„, rh
c 1
_ -
4 ......se .,
4 'E
loot 411114e..,„
. ,
Ni#4.
.,
_ ■
41
\
,s,
•
''.
Itlore
a -
, ...
........-' . . ,,,i..,;v.,
et')
■.I
lt
t C11
Ce
1.1.11 -,,, 41*,
•
r -
a' 41
la
A ' '
,...
, .
.... 7,xi 141 <
.... .401 0.-
..., 7
it
I
, 4
;? 1
al.
12 ?air:
IL II ,
/...* 0..0
I 0
nk -
..<1.,..,—'7',•
3 ›
.._.,
.""\0:S,..:rNs"::\
\ NN.‘ .N. ."."'..'*tN,W•7\ti,s,
..,,,,*.
'-'z.:-.4; :k.,.\\,,,,..,,,-,,,,,..
, ,,. ., ,,..
.....;:\„-N%...,.....
1M
,,,,-,..F.f.
,,,,,.k
,
,..".r,,,,,, ,x
•:!..Zz, %;',1.1 c ...
..„..
:-:'''''''\,\"- : . ';‘,\,:% .NS,','3,;.',N.,.\„-N7S.,',' \\,...::: •!'...):.,,'..c.
. ,
. ,
c c
S‘).,...„\'‘ ,,,, Z.c. v.- ••.‘ „\\,
II
: c
' N."...N....5,
■.,‘'''. ;N:".:4'n:S.:::::t.„\Z \ . '"*.:\ '&,,,,,No. Att,
.., i ,,1 I
.
s ..., ,..,
\ N,
. i0 I,
. .....„,,, .
!
z
i
\
16 1
4 0
ri
Nc•Is.:*: "\e,%. ,'s,1/4"1/4, . \:c,'. \ *Nc. ''''',,N'
\
\
,
.--;
„......
. .
a 1
'''''' ,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,\::: aa, ''X'S'S'''.:1,;„
\N'Sha.,‘:'SV*Nk,NtaN-
NaZi,a IN \s';',,skcficzsvZz,
• ri
'•.'.:'..`i.'..'..''°•....:”.' 1.1 '''.'''.''1%11:'
. . .• ...
S1/4\k‘*\,''':• \''''kk\•
\N,•I '''''''''':."Np,V\N'-'
, • .. . . •. ,,. ..
. -...„. % .. .. . . , . •-.
N,,
• ,,• ..••,...• •. , ...• •-
\*' "•:*!•••
Ns\%*.Z1.4,\;N•\!'
1 Iii 1 1ii 11
,... . •° -,, -. ' . .s
. •.. - - , ..., •,.,
'...%::":.\•-,..':::•:,.-Z,::::::•..:\,
,..:F.;•::::::::::-..N.,•::"Z":::,,,
:::::Z.::: ::::::::•:;:.:•:'...3,::
,:',...",:;::::,,"•:"•::::-.••••%:"‘•
1
1 g I I i ill
8 0
i Ili , isi
I l * flit
C
1 i 1
ilii ii ! ! j „ 2 2 2 1 I I 1
1/4c.
4 4
oI
rizz,-,
0 5
(..)
I IN Ill IN
u 0
- _.
tit 1■1
(-- ..
J ?�j •r-1
O •Z
ii 4-0 ( ) V z z z z
CD p
s g+.4
V w ft
cn
u (/) (/)
C 00 ° z z z
.it
z
it O CO
CO it —c3
6
C -Q .
q�a c
CO O tlo r�
aJ
us
114 7:3
O X Cll
i ; 0 a,
���
O °
al —C3
C U +'
4 '� 0
rd
Tii
c�
ca 0 c 13 Li
0 44
gi
i1 a)
'it CC N as
p
›
iis
,u U o a` o'Ill 0 O
a;'� O U U .� tz.-• p �, O
O +� 6 .i. 0 , Sr
0 U
c
as
a,
.� 'o O t3
0
› CD F+ O °
"y " v 0 at
L 0 _
0 O O v "
3 3 a)
r C6 O- s�
ono 0o CD ;• r4),
o
Q_
as• o U
as
•ct
.�v ° o>
cJ .� '0
0 v m O a� ca. O m I- 0 0,. i u
CD
.. ��CD
O p�+ 4-.H H „ ��,'H
rD rD rD rD rD rD O 0 d
• `O rD 0 O O O O O 0
CT 0 o h-t
rrt rD CCD n■ rrDD rD D O
Q- o1. SI m cl, Q v' rt ¢,
saa Da hfD D o Da CD x
S:1)
g
ro
0rq Up 0rq G� Up rD O Up
#-1. C .0
rD 0 Pa r�r N co D D
m 0 rD rD ,.,t 'i O rD
rD O D .-1- O
`C ..-, 0
CD
�t 'rte
¢" P co MI O O" 0
n CD g'
Da sla
s' rD O Q, O Da
5, w A n O O p
ro rD O .• 0 O
Pa fi 0 0 rD 0 1).-4* n ft
Pa rD rD
rD co rD N
Pa O 0Q D
C O o �.
(�,� 0 rD
0 O.
C
0 0 O 0 O 0 rD
rle
F■IN
Fh
0 O 0 O 0 O rD
cn
n �
n i.
■
•
,-,<. 0 i-t ..,
a ,-t m c/ co rt (c)
O
(
`� `� � '� .e .O T
• O co �.d � Q a) co' S 4.
0 N CD D '71 `CS
rQ Q O • O 0 0 o
. O rD fD
1-0 rD 0 rD
CA rD
.•
CD CD Cl) co cD
fo 0.
CD m PI- 0' n K
OP r O P.) ro
• n �j. .-
cD co
,� 0
c] +.
Q. i fi
co D
o 0
rD pa
0.+ - 0
can 5,- m 0 '� E
CD CD 2,- -.
CD
0 0
`CS � 0 Cfq
rt ∎t co Q. 0 A, CD
O rD
C Uq n 0 0
0 ¢, �
� 0 n 0 rt
.' Q. CD a) O�
cn 0 5 O
1 5 C n
A) CD 1-t CD
Pi-
a.
z O
fO � z z CD m
O Nm 0 W 0 m 0 0
,y
. C °' O A) O ''
O pq
►- CP
a) t C C
Y �• fD z
iceL1. cn . f'h
_ •
n
�-'
0 cn• A)
z ‹
0 O `CA o o n
n -•
Imil•
O lJ n - ,.A r.:,..1 C CD CD
a a- 5 a- 5 p ,,,
. 5 N = '
P CD w rD AA
-• PI -. 'A w Cn 5 CD z CD $
CD CCD CD ',
cAr+ En En
O.
CD
cJ, o0 00 o CD
o o Z �. kW',,
rD
sii) „,
�• ,,,,,,,,
..• ,C
off,
Gro '4
m _
r+
C
CD
e,
C
�i
k
0
N 00 0o r--+ ►t
00 -P J A
L,, ° ,.� (/fi .
c
CD C,
• a 1„
c
cn
....„. ,.,,,,\:',,,,:‘,,,
P
rD
CD
r IV _. • :,:,
--- ,
,,,‘„
D C Ell „,
„„,
,,,,,,‘,
v,
.,,,
• - p 415k(111):::,,\:::';',,,,,
C
0� - -. *
t
R.
=- CD -% 0 �a
� 0 :��
C
CD — '� a�
o CD
Ct- - co
CD O
CD *111 1■1• A,,
o CO =
0) ( CD � ,,�
...
�w,„
D
,,,,,,
„„
(c) o
.,,,,,,,,
o c
_,
O aD D
CD
2
N r'h '� a,,
a
r+ O
0.1.11LIIMMI II CO9 1:11)....i i:
U) '
E. 2 ,y
ao ,.
C) W ,.
....4.. I
. . c
Qr-ii-
r-�.
— o
a
cco
..... _.....)
.4.
L .• r
m
ti I j� L.
MINUTES
PLANNING COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY,OCTOBER 2,2012
ROLL CALL:
The meeting was called to order at 7:07 pm by Howard W. Brown, Jr. Present were Members Joseph
Kelly,Elio Guerrero, and Chairman Calvin Russell. Also in attendance were Attorney Joseph Geller,
Community Development Director Howard W. Brown, Jr. and City Planner Gerald J. Lee. Absent
members were Member Steven Barrett, and Member Lillie Odom.
II INVOCATION AND PLEDGE: Member Kelly said the invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance
followed.
III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 4,2012
Elio Guerrero made a motion to pass the minutes,Joseph Kelly seconded the motion
Upon roll call,the minutes passed 3-0.
Joseph Kelly - Yes
Elio Guerrero - Yes
Calvin Russell - Yes
Roll passes 3-0
Planning Council Minutes
10/2/2012
Page 1 of 6
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Applicant Name: Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC./Opa-locka CDC
Address 2145 Lincoln Avenue, Opa-locka, Florida 33054
Legal Description: Magnolia Sub PB 40-80 Lots 10, 11, 12 & 13 Block 3 and
Magnolia Sub PB 40-80 Lots 14-16 including Block 3. Containing 18, 420 square feet, More or
Less. Property(s)Zoned B-1 (Folio (s) 08-2122-003-0130; 08-2122-003-0170
REQUEST#3: Approval to rezone this property site from B-1 to Magnolia North Redevelopment
Overlay District
2. Applicant Name: Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC./Opa-locka CDC
Address 2145 Lincoln Avenue, Opa-locka,Florida 33054
Legal Description: Magnolia Sub PB 40-80 Lots 10, 11, 12 & 13 Block 3 and
Magnolia Sub PB 40-80 Lots 14-16 including Block 3. Containing 18, 420 square feet, More or
Less.Property(s)Zoned B-1 (Folio(s) 08-2122-003-0130; 08-2122-003-0170
REQUEST#1: Site Plan Approval for a 12 unit apartment complex with a community room and
two offices
3. Applicant Name: Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC./Opa-locka CDC
Address 2145 Lincoln Avenue, Opa-locka,Florida 33054
Legal Description: Magnolia Sub PB 40-80 Lots 10, 11, 12 & 13 Block 3 and
Magnolia Sub PB 40-80 Lots 14-16 including Block 3. Containing 18, 420 square feet, More or
Less. Property(s)Zoned B-1 (Folio (s) 08-2122-003-0130; 08-2122-003-0170
REQUEST#2: Approval of the Developer's Agreement
Russell noted that there were three different items listed on the agenda for the same applicant.Attorney
Geller noted that one public hearing could be held for all three items, as long as separate votes were
taken. He announced the items on the as follows;
1. Request for final site plan approval for a 12 unit apartment complex with a community room and
2 offices.
2. Request for approval of a Development Agreement.
3. Request for an approval to rezone the property site from B1 to the Magnolia North
Redevelopment Overlay District(MNRO).
Planning Council Minutes
10/2/2012
Page 2 of 6
•
Chairman Russell asked if staff had a PowerPoint presentation they wanted to review. Howard Brown
stated that they wanted to show the steps which helped them get to this point. Russell noted that in the
past,the city had attempted to revitalize Magnolia North. Russell stated that it was imperative that this
time around,tasks needed to be accomplished in order for the plan to launch. Kelly said that he was for
revitalization,but wanted to ask questions in order to clarify concerns he had. Kelly said he'd wait until
the public hearing because the public had the right to speak. Geller stated that all three items required a
public hearing but one public hearing could be conducted to address each individual item. Mr. Lee made
a PowerPoint presentation,the presentation was inaudible,unable to transcribe. After Lee concluded his
presentation, Chairman Russell opened up the public hearing. Zamar Brown introduced himself as
principal architect of Design2Form and noted he was the architect of record for the proposed project at
2145 Lincoln Avenue. He stated that his designs were keeping within the scale of the neighborhood, and
noted that the parking was purposely tucked away to promote a pedestrian friendly structure. He said that
the OLCDC wanted to incorporate community elements for the complex such as community room and a
management office. The management office would be used for 2145 Lincoln Avenue, 2060&2070
Lincoln Avenue, and 15050 Duval Street. He noted that he is a attempting to obtain a green certification
for the project. Chairman Russell asked Zamar if he had any pictures to show the panel. Zamar showed
pictures of the property and continued his presentation. Zamar stated that currently,there are 14 units on
the property. The density would be reduced from 14 to 12 units. The existing 14 units are 600 sq ft., so
the plan is to bump up the square footage to make it a more comfortable home environment. Kelly told
Zamar that currently,they are 14 units and the project proposes 28.He asked Zamar which numbers
accurately reflected the density. Guerrero responded that the density would end up being almost double,
and that in fact,you're actually decreasing density. Zamar explained that in addition to the 14
apartments,there was a big market on the first floor and the existing building had a commercial space.
Currently,the building is located on only one lot. Once you expand to a 2°d lot, it reduces the density.
Kelly said that the unit requirements are 1000 sq. ft for a one bedroom apartment, and you are proposing
870 square feet. Zamar replied that there are 5 apartments that are less than 1000 square feet. The rest of
the 2-3 units are above 1000 square feet. Kelly noted that the requirement state that the units should be
1000 square feet. He told Zamar that what he's saying and what's on the paper are two different things.
Kelly informed him that he was present for the original resolution, and had has worked with the OLCDC
to develop the project. Kelly explained that he had no problem with development,but he does have
challenges with the numbers. He reiterated that what Zamar said explained that what the paperwork said
and what staff presented were two different things. Kelly concerns were regarding minimum square
footage for a one and two bedroom unit.Kelly noted that the proposal said 845 square feet while Zamar
stated 1000 square feet. Kelly demanded further clarification on the square footage. Zamar clarified his
previous statement, and said with regard to the one bedroom apartments,there were(3) one bedroom
apartments which end up being 870 square feet. With regard to the two bedroom apartments,there were a
total of(8)two bedroom apartments. Out of those,two units will be 845 square feet and the remaining
will be above 1000 square feet. Zamar said what is being presented are the units with minimum square
footage, and not the average square footage of all the units in the project. Kelly replied that he sees the
required and the proposed square footage and replied that the information he is stating isn't accurately
articulated in the documents he's reviewed. Kelly said density is still small even though you're adding a
lot more amenities to make the space more amenable. Zama said the architects are attempting to give a
Planning Council Minutes
10/2/2012
Page 3 of 6
breakdown on minimum requirements on units. For example,we have four units will come up to the 870
square feet. There are a total of(2)three bedroom units which are completely above the 1000 square feet,
they are within the 1400 sq ft range. There are(6)two bedroom units that are 840,and there are(2)that
are below 1000 square feet. Out of those(6)there are(4)that re 1000 square feet and(2)that are below.
When we gave a breakdown,we gave the minimum for comparison; however a majority of the units are
above 1000 square feet. Member Guerrero said that for units that fall below 1000 square feet, a special
exception would be needed. Zamar replied yes. Kelly replied that he followed what Zamar was saying,
but wanted to know what was going to change the dynamic of folks staying there if you are going to still
have a number of small units. He wanted to know who was going to stay there for a long period of time,
considering the units were so small. Kelly was worried that the units would end up being rented out for
short period of time and people would transition out of the housing, thereby making it and unstable
environment. Zamar understood but also said that hopefully,the amenities in the building would attract
prospective tenants. He said that the amenities would be utilized by residents at the other apartment
buildings as well. Zamar went on to describe the amenities; the community spaces on the first floor, and
the terrace on the 2nd floor. He said they plan on landscaping the terrace, in order to give a feeling of an
outside space for recreational use. Zamar said within the Triangle,there are no other apartments which
are two story apartments.They will be the opportunity for a 2 story effect so they can feel safer. Kelly
asked how come the architects didn't chose to make the buildings two story apartments. Kelly asked how
come you didn't make them all amenable, and create two bedrooms units as opposed to a smaller area.
Zamar asked if Kelly's questions were more directed toward the one bedroom apartments that happen to
be less than 1000 square feet. Zamar said the architects will attempt fit as much on the property as
possible and noted there were multiple factors. OLCDC needed to make a certain amount of units to
make the project viable.They needed to create an additional 12 apartments to make the project a viable
venture. Member Kelly replied that in the end, it was a financial decision. Zamar replied yes.Kelly
asked in terms of parking, 21 spaces are required,but you're proposing 19. Kelly wanted to know how
many spaces will be handicapped. Zamar replied, one parking space will be designated for a physically
handicapped occupant, and the other for a vision impaired/hearing impaired individual. Zamar said if the
person occupying the residence is blind&deaf;the occupant wouldn't necessarily need a space allocated.
Zamar also included that they were going to provide an elevator to the property. He noted that the 3
buildings had no elevator,thereby making the units inaccessible. Kelly said that he heard Zamar mention
that 2145 Lincoln Avenue would be where the meetings and gathering would be held, and that space on
the first floor would be designated to do so. There would also be an office for management for all of the
buildings. Zamar replied that there would be a community room as well. Kelly said it would be used
for a meeting gathering place,but noted that during some events, you will not be able to hold more than
50 people in the space. Guerrero wanted to know how many units will there be in total for the project.
Zamar said there will be 42 units, and you'll roughly have 2 people per apartment. Those who have two
bedrooms will allow for up to 4 individuals occupying the property. Zamar said Gerald wanted him to
clarify to the panel that that the existing building would be completely demolished and a new structure
would be built. Zamar concluded his presentation and Chairman Russell asked if anyone else wanted to
speak on the behalf of the public hearing. After no response, Chairman Russell closed the hearing. Kelly
stated that resolutions have been passed to ensure that development occurs,however he still has a
problem with these units. Kelly said he is not sure how the occupants would reside in the units and
Planning Council Minutes
10/2/2012
Page 4 of 6
addressed his concerns with regards to stability. He said he liked the idea of a community room and
believes that the commission is going to work with the OLCDC to get this project off the ground.
Chairman Russell said when you're talking about having an area like Magnolia North,trying to make it
habitable for a limited amount of occupants; you will end up seeing more occupants fill the units up to
maximum capacity. Kelly agreed with Russell and replied that the project would actually add more
people to the area. Chairman Russell said that he knows what we're facing, and said that revitalizing the
area gives it a better look. He notes that the spaces may be a bit small,but units that are too big would be
terrible ideas for that area. Russell was agreeable with the size of the units proposed. Joe Geller gave the
roll calls for each item. Upon roll call, approval to rezone this property site from B-1 to Magnolia North
Redevelopment Overlay District passed 3-0
Joseph Kelly - yes
Elio Guerrero - yes
Calvin Russell - yes
Roll passes, 3-0
Upon roll call, site plan approval for a 12 unit apartment complex with a community room and two
offices passed 3-0.
Joseph Kelly - yes
Elio Guerrero - yes
Calvin Russell - yes
Roll passes, 3-0
Upon roll call, approval for the developer's agreement passed, 3-0.
Joseph Kelly - yes
Elio Guerrero - yes
Calvin Russell - yes
Roll passes, 3-0
Chairman Russell said for the record,the area itself is not a large space so if improvements can be made.
He said he hoped that the money would be utilized appropriately to make these changes. Russell thanked
the panel, staff, and the applicant for attend the meeting.
STAFF UPDATE
Mr. Brown indicated there were no items for staff update.
Planning Council Minutes
10/2/2012
Page 5 of 6
VI ADJOURNMENT
Member Kelley motioned to adjourn and Member Guerrero seconded the motion.
Meeting adjourned at 7:45pm.
Submitted by
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Mr. Calvin Russell
Planning Council Chairman
Planning Council Minutes
10/2/2012
Page 6 of 6
City of Opa-Locka Planning Council
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Magnolia North 2145 Apartments L.L.C. (September 12, 2012)
Property Owner Magnolia North 2145 Apartments,LLC
Applicant Magnolia North 2145 Apartments, LLC
Request Rezoning from the B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood) zoning district to the
MNRO(Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay)district
Location 2145 Lincoln Avenue, Opa-locka,Fl 33054
Legal Description Tract No. 1: Lots 10, 11, 12, & 13,Block 3,"Magnolia Subdivision"according
to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 40,Page 80, of the Public Records
of Miami-Dade County,Florida.
Tract No.2: Lots 14 to 16 in Block 3,"Magnolia Subdivision", as recorded in
Plat Book 40,on Page 80,Miami-Dade County,Florida.
Property Size Aggregate total: 18,420 Square Feet (0.423 Acres)per Miami-Dade Property
As raiser De.artment data.
Zoning Tract 1: B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood)zoning district
Tract 2: B-1 (Commercial Neighborhood)zoning district
Existing Land Use Tract 1: Vacant Mixed-used retail/residential building
Tract 2: Vacant
Future Land Use Tract 1: Moderate Density Residential
Designation Tract 2: Low Density Residential
Comprehensive Both tracts fall within the low and moderate density residential land use
Plan Consistency categories. This use is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Other Requirements The Mayor and City Commission must approve this rezoning request.
/ Approvals
Applicable LDC City Ordinance No 86-8
Sections City Ordinance No. 11-17
Resolution No. 11-8196
Setbacks/Yards Required MNRO Proposed
Front(East) 10 ft 10'feet 3" inches
Rear (North) 15 ft 15'Feet 6" inches
Front (South) 10 ft 10'feet 6" inches
Side (West) 5' feet or as determined by 5' feet 10"inches
Building Code
Lot Density 15 units per acre 28.4 units per acre.
Lot Size N/A 18,420 Square Feet
Lot Width N/A N/A
Building Height 35' feet 37' feet
Structure Length N/A N/A
Floor Area N/A 25,548
Landscaping City Ordinance no. 86-8 article Applicant has provided 13 trees of varying
Required VII regulates landscaping. The types, 1089 plants of varying types, and.
applicant has provided a landscaped the area with sod and mulch
landscape plan. according to the site plan.
Tree Preservation Compliance with Tree The applicant must comply with Article 7
Preservation Ordinance required of City Ordinance NO. 86-8.
Ordinance pursuant to city ordinance no. 10-
03
Open Space Minimum amount of not N/A
covered pervious site area is
40%.
Parking Residential: 19 spaces 19 spaces
Office: 2 spaces
Notification This request will be properly noticed pursuant to state law and city charter by
Requirements the city clerk's office.
Action Required Rezoning of this property to the MNRO District.
Project Planner Gerald Lee, City Planner c
Authorized By
Howard W. Brown, Jr. Planning Director
Approved By
Applicant's Request: 1) 1) Zoning Change from B-1 to the Magnolia North
Redevelopment Overlay Ordinance.
Surrounding Uses: 2) Residential;
3) Residential
Location 4 Existing Land Uses FLUM Zoning Districts
Designations
North Duplex Residential Low Medium Residential Duplex
Density Residential (R-2)
&Moderate Density
Residential
South Vacant Lots Commercial & Low Commercial
Density Residential Neighborhood (B-1)
East Vacant Lot Low Medium Residential Duplex
Density Residential (R-2)
& Moderate Density
Residential
West Commercial & Vacant Commercial & Semi Commercial
Public Neighborhood (B-2)
Parking and Traffic:
The applicant is providing 19 spaces for the residential component of the property and two spaces for the
office use. A traffic impact statement has been provided per site plan requirements.
Adequacy and Neighborhood Compatibility:
The subject property is compatible with other residential developments in the area.
Yard Modifications: (If applicable)
N/A
Comprehensive Plan Consistency:
The proposed use of the subject property is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Staff Determination
Staff recommends approval of this request subject to the following special exceptions which are
as follows:
• Reduce the minimum number of off-street parking spaces from 21 to 19
• Increase density from 15 dwelling units per acre to 28.4 dwelling units per acre
• Reduce the minimum size of the 1-bedroom dwelling units from 1000 sq. feet to 870 sq.
feet
• Reduce the minimum size of the 2-bedroom dwelling units from 1000 sq. feet to 845
square feet
• Increase the maximum height of building from 35 feet to 37 feet
F ming and Corfu HUM ty 0E cip'nen apartment
780 Fisherman Street,4th Floor Opa-locka, FL 03054
305-953-2868 ext. 1503(tel.)
305-953-3060(fax)
ormation—Developer, Property Owner, or Contractor
Name of Applicant / A e-,110lm l A t`10 z:t-`! 2.10 S /� PA a Z'v�trn,�`t LLC
Developer/Property Owner
(Circle One) (O PP‘ Ctc C-� C
Site Address/Location E
Telephone Number
365 C.1 "1m r-LfSl
Email Address
Date of Application
X11(4\ 12.
Pre-Application Procedures
Prior to formal application for approval of any site plan, the applicant shall request and attend a
mandatory pre-application conference with the appropriate City official(s) in order to become familiar
with the City's development regulations and the subdivision process. At the pre-application conference,
the applicant may be represented by his or her land planner, engineer and/or surveyor.
Zoning Requirements
A property within the City's corporate limits that is being proposed for development must be properly
zoned by the City prior to submission of an application for approval of any':site plan. In addition, the
proposed development layout or design shown on the proposed site plan must be in conformance with
all standards and requirements prescribed in the City's Land Development Code City Ordinance No.
86-8 and Miami-Dade County Subdivision Regulations adopted by City Ordinance No. 85-5
Completeness of Application
Site Plan applications which do not include all required information and materials, as outlined below
and per other City policies which may change from time to time, will be considered incomplete, shall not
be accepted for official submission by the City, and shall not be scheduled on a Planning Council
agenda until the proper information is provided to City officials.
Applicability
Administrative Site plan review and approval shall be required for all nonresidential, mixed-use,
townhouse, single-family attached and multi-family residential projects and structures and for any
condition of special exception or conditional use as required by the Mayor and City Commission.
Exceptions
1
61t s'a no be requfred for sinote-em[! resides d'ar develo mants, unless ne proposed
subdivision will include a private nenity, facility or a golf course. In .3se instances, site plan
submission and approval will be required for the private amenity or facility, or the golf course
clubhouse/hospitality area.
Site i m Checklfs
The proposed site plan shall show the following information (other physical and engineering data shall
be included in the engineering plans or as separate documents):
5
Q 6
a V
1. A title block within the lower right hand corner of the site plan with the proposed X
name of the project/subdivision, total site acreage, and the location of the property
according to the abstract and survey records of Miami-Dade County
2. The name and address of the owner/developer and the land planner, engineer, X
architect or surveyor responsible for the plan
3. The scale of the drawing (both written and graphic scale) X V V
4. The date the drawing was prepared X
5. Zoning X '
6. A vicinity or location map showing the location of the proposed development within X
the City and in relationship to existing roadways
7. The boundary survey limits of the tract and each proposed lot/ block/tract and X
AR
scale distances with north clearly indicated
8. The names of adjacent additions.or subdivisions or the name of the owners of X
record with north clearly indicated and recording information for adjacent parcels of
unplatted land, including parcels on the other sides of roads, canals, etc ,r
9. The existing zoning and existing/proposed uses on adjacent land; X /
10. The location, width and names of all existing or platted streets or other public X
ways within or adjacent to the tract
11. Any existing easements, with recording information X t MAR
12. Existing buildings X Ato
13. Railroad rights-of-way X
14. Topography (contours at two-foot intervals) with existing drainage channels or X
creeks including the 100-year flood plain, if applicable
15. Any other important natural features, such as wetlands, wildlife habitats, and all X x.
substantial natural vegetation
16. Proposed strategies for tree preservation including showing individual trees or X
tree masses that will be preserved, and the techniques that will be used to protect
them during construction
17. The layout and width (right-of-way lines and curb lines) of existing and proposed X
thoroughfares, collector streets and/or intersections, and specific configuration of
proposed streets
18. Lot/tracts and blocks X
19. Proposed driveways including driveway widths and distances between driveways X ✓6 r/
20. Proposed median openings and left turn lanes on future divided roadways and X
existing and planned driveways on the opposite side of divided roadways must also
be shown for coordination and sharing of future median openings
21. Specific locations and footprints of buildings, including but not limited to proposed X X
nonresidential and residential densities
22. Building heights X r/
2
23. Square fool .g ,s (for multi-tenant or rriuiti-purpose buildings, show souare footage A t�P
poi each intended use), massing, c station
24. Loading/service areas (including proposed screening) X
25. Recycling containers, compactors & dumpster enclosures X X
(including proposed screening)
26. Pedestrian walkways X V' V
27. Parking areas (including parking ratio calculations) X V V C4
28. Any proposed sites for parks, schools, public facilities, public or private open X
space
29. Flood plains/drainage ways X
30. All proposed and existing utilities and easements X V /
31. Drainage structures X / V
32. Retention/detention ponds with proposed aesthetic treatments X
33. Screening walls; fences X / V
34. Signage location X / /
35. Fire lanes and fire hydrants X / V
36. Lighting X 1,
37. Visibility easements X / V
38. Other pertinent development related features X
trees to be planted, and irrigation plans, if required X
40. Color building façade (elevation) plans showing elevations with any attached X
(wall-mounted) signage to be used, as determined appropriate by the City Manager,
or his/her designee.
Effect of Approval
The approval of a site plan shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months beyond the date that the
plan was approved by the City Commission. If this is not accomplished, then the approved site plan
shall be deemed to have expired and shall become null and void.
Revisions to Approved Site Plan
Minor Revisions/Amendments— It is recognized that final architectural and engineering design may
necessitate minor changes in the approved site plan. In such cases, the City Manager, or his/her
designee, shall have the authority to approve minor modifications to an approved site plan and which
shall be submitted as an "amended site plan,"which substantially conforms to the previously approved
site plan, provided that such modifications do not significantly change traffic circulation, building
location(s)on the site, proximity of building(s)to nearby residential areas, increase the size or height of
building(s), or any other conditions specifically attached as part of the City Council's approval of the site
plan. Submission materials and requirements for approval of an amended site plan shall be as
determined by the City Manager or his/her designee. If the City Manager, or his/her designee, refuses
to approve an amended site plan, then the applicant shall re-submit the amended site plan as a
"revised site plan", whereupon the revised site plan shall be scheduled for consideration by the
Planning Council and City Commission
Major Revisions— In the event of revisions that are more extensive in nature and do not conform to the
description for minor amendments above, a "revised site plan" must be resubmitted, reviewed by the
City Manager, or his/her designee, and reconsidered by the Planning Council and City Commission.
Developer's Agreement—A Developer's agreement may be required for all development except for
single-family homes or duplexes pursuant to Section 4.16 of City Ordinance No. 86-8.
3
Owner/
Applicant's
Name /kita - .?
„ (
Z.-- et 6.°S-1
c-,
Address I L
Signed.
Date ( Cf
My signature certifies that I have been provided with a copy of the site plan checklist and have also had
a pre-conference meeting with the Planning and Community Development staff.
Reviewed by Planning Staff- Gerald Lee
Date of Pre-Conference Meeting —August 14, 2012
Date of Site Plan Review— September 4, 2012
4
I Reading: September 14, 2011
2"6 Reading October 12, 20?
Public Hearing: October 12, 2011
Adopted October 12, 2011
Effective Date: October 13, 2011
Sponsored by: City Manager
ORDINANCE NO, 11-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF' THE
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA, TO AMEND
ORDINANCE 86-8, THEE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
BY CREATING THE MAGNOLIA NORTH
REDEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ORDINANCE, TO
ENCOURAGE THE REVITALIZATION OF UNDERUSED
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS UNTO
DEVELOPMENTS THAT PROVIDE A
COMPLEMENTARY MIX OF USES; PROVIDING FOR
INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICT AND REPEALER; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABHATY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, empowers and requires the City to establish
land-use codes and provide for their administration, enforcement, and amendment, and;
WHEREAS, the City Commission proposes to amend the Land Development Code,
Ordinance 86-8, by creating the Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay (MNRO) Ordinance;
and
WHEREAS, the MNRO will encourage the revitalization of underused commercial and
residential areas into developments that provide a complementary mix of uses; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 1178184, the City Manager's Office and the
Community Development Department have worked with the Opa-locka Community
Development Corp. and determined that an overlay Ordinance would be necessary to allow the
mixed property uses which are deemed necessary for redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2011, the Planning Council recommended approval of the
proposed Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay ordinance.
Ordinance No. I LT i:?
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT DULY ORDAINED f38:' THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA:
Section J fle. recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The Land Development Code of the City of Opa-locka, Ordinance 86-8, is
hereby amended to create the Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay (MNRO) Ordinance, as
follows
Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay Ordinance
A. Purpose and Intent
1. To encourage the revitalization of underused commercial and residential areas into
pedestrian oriented developments that provide a complementary mix of uses, including a
variety of residential options, within convenient walking distance.
2. To encourage efficient land use and redevelopment plans forming a live-work-play
environment that offers residents the opportunity to fulfill their daily activities with
minimal use of single-occupant automobiles.
3. To encourage contiguous development and maximize land use allowing for increased use
of alternative transportation modes such as bus transit, rail transit, ridesharing, bicycling,
and walking.
4. To encourage formation of a well-designed, pedestrian-friendly activity center with
commercial and residential development that increases choices for safe living
environments for the citizens of the great City of Opa-locka.
5. To allow flexibility in development standards in order to encourage the design of
innovative development projects that set high standards for landscaping, green space,
urban design, and public amenities.
6. To promote a distinct, unified theme that will reinforce the branding process and improve
the market attractiveness of the area for investments by the private and public sectors.
7. To provide the appropriate incentives to encourage reinvestment and renewal necessary
to realize the potential of the 22nd Avenue, and Magnolia North Subdivision, consistent
with the City of Opa-lock.a Comprehensive Plan.
Ordinance No 1. 1-11
8 To encourage a design plan that improves public safety and security throughout Magnolia
North
H. Applicability
Me provisions of this map apply to all parcels designated within the Magnolia Subdivision and
portions of 22nd Avenue corridor, south of N W 151st Street, and North of State Road 9
(EXHIBIT ATIACHE,D). The boundary of the district shall be shown on the Official Zoning
map of the City of Opa-locka and all parcels contained within (he .nrie, which met the
eligibility section below, arc able to utilize ihe provisions :et forth in Ifirs ordinance.
All land uses and development, including but not limited to buildings, driveways, parking areas,
streets, buffers, landscaping, and pedestrian / bicycle ways, shall he located and/or provided in
accordance with the provisions of the City of Opa-locka Land Development Code and Miami-
Dade County Subdivision, except as modified by this chapter.
C. Eligibility
Properties may use the MNRO ordinance if they meet the following criteria
1 Can be served by public water and sewer
2. Identified in the applicability section
3 Have an R-I, R-2, B-0, 13- I, 13-2, or 1-i zoning designation
D. Relationship to Existing Zoning Districts
The Developer of property that falls within the area covered by this ordinance may choose to
develop his/her property using either standards of the underlying zoning district or the standards
as set forth under this ordinance.
ftI the Developer chooses to use the standards set forth in this ordinance, then the standards of
ibis section shall lake precedence over those of the underlying zoning district and other sections
of the land development code,
E. Exclusions
The following activities shall he excluded from the use of the MNRO requirements and
development review, although they may be reviewed under separate administrative procedures
Ordinance No J:17
where noted in this section or in other sections of the city of Opa lock.a Land Development or
City Code of Ordinances.
Non Residential Properties - All lc /parcels that are zoned industrial, except I-I (limited
Industrial). are excluded from this ordinance, but shall comply with the provisions set
forth in other sections 01 the City of Opa-locka Land Development Code. Compliance
with these provisions shall be verified through the building permit process.
Historic Properties - Properties that are contained or listed by the city now or in the future
v,phin a locally designated historic district are exempt from his ordinance, but shall
comply with the land development code that pertains to the property
c Restrictive Use Areas — This area excludes the construction of single-family and duplex
dwellings.
F. Permitted Uses
1 Mixed-use developments, provided that the subject property uses a mix of
commercial and residential uses simultaneously
2 Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to any of the above permitted
uses
3 Community Gardens and other public amenities
4. More than one principal use may be permitted on a lot of record, provided the use is a
residential and commercial mixed-use and is utiliLed with administrative site plan
approval.
G. Principal Uses Permitted - Subject to Special Exceptions:
The following uses may be permitted by the Planning Council subject to the conditions
hereinafter imposed for each use, including the review and approval of the site plan by the
Mayor and City Conunission through its Planning Council in accordance with state public
notification and hearing re.quirements.
1 All uses allowed under Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay Ordinance
a Uses permitted under section F shall also comply with the following
i. The Planning Council shall impose conditions on the operation of the
proposed use including hours of operation, outdoor operations and
Ordinance No ll�i7
delivery and shipping of material Mai is necessary to ensure the uses
compatibility with /u(TO uodmgareas
In proposed areas of the Magnolia North Redevelopment Overlay district.
where residential and commercial proJon'ma|r, any structural proposals
for consuucu9n, neicve|qpmcot, rehahU}moon, mmjiOzmion, or
expansion, the exterior appoara`c, shaJ| remain consistent with the general
character of the ocon, including scale and mass of the huUding,
nnnn8rmrm of windows, pitch of roof, and wpr of siding mu/erin[
hi
ho Planning Counci shall reduce the mini mutt number of parking spaces
rcqmmx| [n/ the properly involving tv"o or more uses if (hcir parking
demand is anticipated to overlap.
H|. Restrictive Uses — The area identified as a restrictive use on the attached exhibit is
prohibited from constructing a single-family home, or duplex.
1. Area and Bulk Requirements:
I. Uses shall comply with Article V, VI, VD, and Vitt of the city's Land Development
Code regarding heigh|, minimum size of l*t. We maximum density permitted, and
providing minimum yard setback requirements for the underlying zoning district,
2. In addition, the Planning Council should recommend m dho City Commission
maximum front and street side lot line setbacks and minimum height requirements for
any uxpaosmn, rehabUituhvn, redevdopoeni, or new development if they determine
it us necessary to maintain the urban character of ih c neighborhood.
3. Where more than one principal use is allowed on a lot of record, setbacks between dhc
buildings shall be based on the yuzd setbacks of the underlying zoning dixtric|, but
may be modified by the City Commission if they are determine that adequate
conditions have been included to address public health and adequate emergency
access wiUzin the site,
J. Standards
( Any non-residential or residential zoned property within he Magnolia Subdivision
recorded by subdivision plat or dacd, using de proper municipal or county processes
at that time, prior to July 27' 2011' is deemed a buildable lot for mixed-use
—
Ordinance No I t-i
development, even though the lot may have ies;; than the minimum area for any
residential or non residential zones. Uits developed in this Cashion shall use standards
as set forth in this section.
2. Lot size and density - Lot size should not apply. Density shall not exceed fifteen ((5)
dwelling units per acre.
3 Lot width - Minimum lot width shall riot apply to parcels using this ordinance.
4. Building Height - Maximum building height should be 35'
5 Floor area - Minimum floor area shall hr 1000 square feet per residential unit
6. Building Coverage - Maximum lot coverage shall not apply to parcels using this
ordinance.
7. Minimum front setback - No less than ten (10) feet.
8. Minimum side (majoi and minor) setbacks - No less than five (5) feet or as
determined by Florida Building Code,
9. Minimum Rear Setback - No less than fifteen (15) feet.
K. Architectural Standards:
While the city encourages that all new developments adhere to the Moorish architectural
guidelines, ail new development created under the MNRO may be exempt and shall have the
option to include a number of minor design and site planning elements to ensure quality and
compatibility with general housing trends within the city.
L. Application Procedures
All applicants submitting for development approval through the MNRO ordinance shall follow
the following procedures
1, An original and seventeen (17) copies of site plan, supplementary data, and
architectural renderings, shall be submitted to the Community Development
Department for review by all relevant city staff, Once staff has reviewed the
information and deemed this information to be complete and in compliance with the
standards set forth in this ordinance, the proposal and staff comments will he
transmitted to the Mayor and City Commission for review
2 The Mayor and City Commission shall review and approve, deny, or modify its
approval through ordinance.
- -
Ordinance No ||- 7
3 An application may be withdrawn "///bout pm%udicepnnr md/epuh|/cheu000,
Section 3. All ordinances or Code provisions in conflict herewith are hereby
Section 4. If any section, subsection,wn. y:n/enre. Juuse, phrase or portion n/ v5s
Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
|urisdic6on, such portion shall be deemed a sopaxte, disnou, and independent provision and
such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions: of this Ordinance
Section S. The ordinance shall become effective in the manner provided hy law
PASSED AND ADOPTED this [2th day of October, ]O1 /
_--_��— `^
� MY ATAYL0R
MAYOR
Attest to:� nppnn`edaxtoform and legal sufficiency
/ '
/ �
L
�
,� Irby —_— —_ � �'/ 1 _
Dcbo
' ^—1 —
City(�
A(ioMhoy
Moved hy: COMMISSIONER
Seconded by: COMMISSIONER MILLER
Commission Vote. 5-0
Commissioner Holmes: YES
Commissioner Miller: YES
Commissioner Tydus: YES
Vice-Mayor Johnson: YES
Mayor Taylor! YES
FY 2013-2014 REVENUE SNAPSHOT
MAGNOLIA NORTH 2145 DEVELOPMENT
2145 LINCOLN AVENUE
OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA 33054
Sit. ft /
FY l 1 1 Y 1/1 FY 15 FY 16
Category Tdx/Fee Milldge Rdte
Impact Fees
Parks 0.722 18,420 13,299.24 0 0
Public Safety 0.116' 18,420` 2,136.72 0 0
i
Road/ Drainage Impact Fee 0.454 18,420 8,362.68 0 0
Total Impact Fees 23,798.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Franchise Fees
Florida Power& Light* 96.44 12 x 12 x .059q 819.35 819.35 $89
Telecommunications* $1,200.00 6 x 0.572} 4,118.40 4,118.40 $4,118.40
Waste Management ,
Stormwater Utility Fees $1.90 12.00 { $273.60 ! $273.60 $273.60
Water&Sewer 1
Total Franchise Fees $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,211.35 $5,211.35 $5,211.35
-
Building, Permitting and
Licensing Fees j
I_ -
Builiding Permit Fees* 18,4201 24,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Landlord Permit Fees** 75.00 12 900.00 $540.00 i $540.00 $540.00
Site (paving and drainage) 8,000.00 $0.00 i $0.00 $0.00
Total Pemit Fees j i I 32,900.00 . $540.00 $540.00 $540.00
Ad Valorem Taxes
08-2122-003-0170; 1
08-2122-003-0130 2,500,000' 9.1526/1000} 22,881.50 22,881.501 22,881.50 $22,881.50
Total Taxes I 22,881.50 . 22,881.50 22,881.50 $22,881.50
Grand rotdi X5,781.50 28,632.85 28,01 85 $28,632.85
Date:October 5,2012
Prepared By:Community Development Department
Source:City Ordinance,Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser,2012 DA
*City retains only 30%of Building Permit Fees and fees stated do not include plumbing,electrical,and mechanical permit
fees.
**Landlord permit fees after year 1 is$45 per dwelling unit