The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About13-20 Delta Trucking to Rezone 1st Reading: May 22, 2013 2' Reading: June 12, 2013 Public Hearing: June 12, 2013 Adopted: June 12, 2013 Effective Date: June 13, 2013 Sponsored by: City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 13-20 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, TO CONSIDER DELTA TRUCKING, INC.'S REQUEST TO REZONE THE PORTION IDENTIFIED AS WEST 151' OF TRAC 8, OF NILE GARDENS SECTIONS I AND II, (FOLIO 08-2128-004-0070) OF THE PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 12705 NW 30TH AVENUE, FOLIO 08-2128-004-0180, FROM R-3 TO I-2 ZONING DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND REPEALER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Delta Trucking Inc. ("Delta") has requested Site Plan approval to construct a permanent office facility at 12705 NW 30th Avenue, Opa-locka, FL ("Property"); and WHEREAS,the eastside portion of the Property legally described as Folio 08-2128-004- 0070 is zoned R-3; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2013, the Planning Council recommended approval of Delta's site plan with conditions which included rezoning the R-3 portion of the Property to I-2; WHEREAS, on April 11, 2013, Delta submitted a rezoning application number 13-05- 0701, to rezone said portion of the Property from R-3 to 1-2; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 2013, the Planning council recommended approval of the rezoning request; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to approve Delta's request to rezone the property identified as Folio 08-2128-004-0070, from R-3 to I-2 zoning district; and Ordinance No. 13-20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference. Section 2. The City Commission of the City Of Opa-Locka, hereby approves the request of applicant Delta Trucking to rezone the property identified as Folio 08-2128-004-0070 from R-3 to I-2, to allow appropriate uses as listed in section 6.11A (B) of the Land Development Code. Section 3. REPEALER. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4. SEVERABILITY. If any portion, section, phrase or clause of this Ordinance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such ruling shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 5. CODIFICATION. This Ordinance shall be codified in the Code of Ordinances when the code is recodified. Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall upon adoption, become effective immediately. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 2013. • YRA T• 'LOR MAYOR Attest to: 4, .! Joanna Flores City Clerk Ordinance No. 13-20 Approved as 1 form .nd legal suf 1'is 1 . i if Iii � '' 1 Jo . .�'"eller W W — G '1 5'F EN' 'OON MARDER PA • t Atto ey Moved by: COMMISS I,NER HOLMES Seconded by: COMMISSIONER SANTIAGO Commission Vote: 5-0 Commissioner Holmes: YES Commissioner Johnson: YES Commissioner Santiago: YES Vice-Mayor Kelley: YES Mayor Taylor: YES THE MIAMI HERALD I MiamiHerald.com ND SUNDAY,JUNE 2,2013 119ND "'I PUBLIC NOTICE ,. V. City of Miami Gardens rt is 41 Department of Community Development CITY OF OPA-LOCKA,FLORIDA 1515 N.W.167 Street;Bldg.5,Suite 200 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC Miami Gardens,FL 33169 2013-2014 HUD ANNUAL ACTION PLAN(DRAFT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka, Is Now Available for Public Review and Comment Florida will hold public hearings at its Regular Commission Meeting on Wednesday, June 12,2013 at 7:00 p.m. at the Opa-locka Municipal Complex, 780 Fisherman NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Federal regulations governing Community Development Street,2"d Floor,Opa-locka,Florida to consider the following items: Block Grant(CDBG)and other U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development programs require that a participating jurisdiction provide citizens with reasonable notice SECOND READING ORDINANCES/PUBLIC HEARING: of and an opportunity to comment on the 5-Year Consolidate Plan and Annual Action Plan that will direct the City's use of Community Development Block Grant funds.These funds AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, provide programs that benefit low-to-moderate income persons in the City. FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 86-8, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 6.11, 1-2, LIBERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA LAND This notice formally advises that the 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan (DRAFT)can be DEVELOPMENT REGULATION CODE TO ALLOW INDOOR RECYCLING downloaded from the City of Miami Gardens Department of Community Development CENTERS AS A CONDITIONAL USE;PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;PROVIDING website at htto://www..Written c s-f l.gov/c to thements.html, for (30) thirty days, FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE(first reading held be dnesg y,Ju 3, 2201 Written comments to the draft Plan will t a oc tion until Wednesday,July 5,2013.To view a hardcopy of the Plan please visit a location listed on May 22,2013). below. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, City of Miami Gardens City of Miami Gardens FLORIDA, AMENDING CITY ORDINANCE 86-8, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT Department of Community City Hall CODE,ARTICLE 4,ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES,TO CREATE NEW 1515 Npment Miami i Gardens,167 FL 33169 Bldg.5,Suite 200 SECTION 4.17, TITLED"CERTIFICATE OF USE", IN ALL NON-RESIDENTIAL Mia5 i G des,FL 3 Bldg.4,Suite 190 Miami -4:30 FL F Miami Gardens,FL 33169 8:00 AM-4:30 PM M-F ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF 8:00 AM-3:30 PM M-F RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND REPEALER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE Betty T.Ferguson Recreation Complex 3000(first reading held on May 22,2013). Miami G 199 Street Mmi Gardens,FL 33056 8:00 AM-8:30 PM Monday-Thursday AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, 8:00 AM-6:30 PM Friday FLORIDA,TO CONSIDER DELTA TRUCKING INC.'S REQUEST TO REZONE THE 8:00 AM-4:30 PM Saturday PORTION IDENTIFIED AS WEST 151'OF TRAC 8,OF NILE GARDENS SECTIONS- I AND II,(FOLIO 08-2128-004-0070)OF THE PROPERTY,LOCATED AT 12705 NW NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that two public meetings for the 2013-2014 Annual Action 30T"AVENUE,FOLIO 08-2128-004-0180,FROM R-3 TO 1-2 ZONING DISTRICT, Plan will take place to inform the public and offer residents an opportunity to present PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS;PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT comments on the draft plan.The City encourages public participation by attending one of AND REPEALER;PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE(first reading held on the meetings scheduled below. May 22,2013). Thursday,June 6,2013 Tuesday,June 11,2013 RESOLUTION/PUBLIC HEARING: 5:30 pm 10:00 am City Hall-Council Chambers A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, 1515 NW 167 Street,Bldg.5,Suite 200 FLORIDA, TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF DELTA TRUCKING, INC. FOR Miami Gardens,FL 33169 FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A PERMANENT OFFICE Public comment regarding the 2013-2014 Annual Action Plan (DRAFT) can also be FACILITY AT 12705 NW 30 AVENUE, FOLIO NO.'S 08-2128-004-0180 AND submitted in the following ways: 08-2128-004-0070; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. By Mail: City of Miami Gardens Department of Community Development Additional information on the above items may be obtained in the Office of the City 1515 NW 167 Street,Bldg.5,Suite 200 Clerk, 780 Fisherman Street, 4' Floor, Opa-locka, Florida.All interested persons Miami Gardens,FL 33169 are encouraged to attend this meeting and will be heard with respect to the public Via E-Mail: hudcomment�miamigardens-fl.gov hearing. For further information,please contact Laurin Yoder,Community Development Division PURSUANT TO FS 286.0105:Anyone who desires to appeal any decision made by any board, Director,at 305-622-8041. agency,or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing will need a record of the proceedings,and for that reason,may need to ensure that a verbatim The meeting site is accessible to the disabled.In accordance with the Americans with record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon tDisabilities cpate in this 0,all persons because of that disabled and who neenglish speaking or hearing which the appeal may be based. to participate in this meeting because of that disability or non-English speaking or hearing impaired residents in need of special assistance should contact Ronetta Taylor,City Clerk JOANNA FLORES,CMC (305)622-8003,not later than 96 hours(or four days)prior to such proceeding.TDD number 1-800-955-8771 (Ad 4 13-0122) CITY CLERK 0 O °R,,,, City of Opa-Locka Agenda Cover Memo Commission Meeting May 22, 2013 Item Type: Resolution Ordinance Other Date: X (EnterXin box) Fiscal Impact: Ordinance Reading: 1st Reading 211d Reading_ (EnterXin box) Yes No (EnterXin box) X - X Public Hearing: Yes No Yes No (EnterXin box) X X Funding Source: (Enter Fund&Dept) Advertising Requirement: Yes No N/A N/A (EnterXin box) X -- Contract/P.O.Required: Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid #: (EnterXin box) X N/A Strategic Plan Related Yes No Strategic Plan Priority Area: Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy: (EnterXin box) X N/A Enhance Organizational 0 Bus.&Economic Dev • Public Safety 0 Quality of Education 0 Qual.of Life&City Image 0 Communcation 0 Sponsor Name City Manager Department: Community Development Short Title: l The City Commission of the City of Opa-locka will consider Delta Trucking, Inc's., request to rezone their property from R-3 to 1-2 for the property identified by folio 08-2128-004-0070 and located on the East portion of their site which they have also requested site plan approval to construct a permanent office facility. The site also includes the property at 12705 NW 30th Avenue, which is zoned 1-2 and is identified by folio 08-2128-004-0180. Staff Summary: On April 11. 2013 Delta Trucking, Inc., submitted Planning Council application number 13-05- 0701, as a formal request to rezone the property identified by folio 08-2128-004-0070 from R-3 to 1-2, which the applicant agreed to do at the April 2, 2013 Planning Council meeting. Staff reviewed this request and considered the criteria for rezoning as listed in Ordinance 86-8 section 4.13 B (6). Staff also reviewed the submittal of Planning Council application number 13- 04-0201, for final site plan approval to construct a permanent office facility at 12705 NW 30th Avenue, Opa-locka, FL 33054, which was presented to the Planning Council on April 2, 2013. The Planning Council was presented with this rezoning request on May 7, 2013 and the Planning Council recommended approval of this request. At the April 2nd meeting the Planning Council also recommended approval of the applicant's request for final site plan approval with the five conditions provided by staff. Proposed Action: Staff recommended approval of this rezoning request. Attachment: Planning Council Meeting Minutes, April 2„ 2013; Planning Council Meeting Minutes, May 7, 2013; Planning Council Application Staff Report and Recommendation Site Plan Check List OF 4,..,Opkq (..''' n, Memorandum TO: Myra L. Taylor, Mayor Joseph L. Kelley, Vice Mayor Timothy Holmes, Commissioner Dorothy Johnson, Commissioner Luis B. Santiago, Commissioner / FROM: Kelvin L. Baker, Sr., City Manag' r DATE: May 9, 2013 RE: An Ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka will consider Delta Trucking, Inc's., request to rezone their property from R-3 to 1-2 for the property identified by folio 08-2128-004-0070 and located on the East portion of their site which they have also requested site plan approval to construct a permanent office facility. The site also includes the property at 12705 NW 30th Avenue, is zoned 1-2 and is identified by folio 08-2128-004-0180. Request: The City Commission of the City of Opa-locka will consider Delta Trucking, Inc's., request to rezone their property from R-3 to 1-2 for the property identified by folio 08-2128-004- 0070 and located on the East portion of their site which they have also requested site plan approval to construct a permanent office facility. This site also includes the property at 12705 NW 30th Avenue, which is zoned 1-2 and is identified by folio 08-2128-004- 0180. Description: On April 11. 2013 Delta Trucking, Inc., submitted Planning Council application number 13-05-0701, as a formal request to rezone the property identified by folio 08-2128-004- 0070 from R-3 to 1-2, which the applicant agreed to do at the April 2, 2013 Planning Council meeting. Staff reviewed this request and considered the criteria for rezoning as listed in Ordinance 86-8 section 4.13 B (6). Staff also reviewed the submittal of Planning Council application number 13-04-0201, for final site plan approval to construct a permanent office facility at 12705 NW 30th Avenue, Opa-locka, FL 33054, which was presented to the Planning Council on April 2, 2013. The Planning Council was presented with this rezoning request on May 7, 2013 and the Planning Council recommended approval of this request. At the April 2nd meeting the Planning Council also recommended approval of the applicant's request for final site plan approval with the five conditions provided by staff. Implementation Time Line: Immediately Legislative History: Ordinance 86-8, section 4.4 Site Plan Review Ordinance 86-8, section 4.13 B (6) Planning Council Recommendation: The Planning Council recommended approval of the Applicant's request to rezone this property. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request. Attachment(s) Planning Council Meeting Minutes, April 2, 2013; Planning Council Meeting Minutes, May 7, 2013, Planning Council Application Staff Report and Recommendation Site Plan Check List Prepared By: Gerald Lee, City Planner Howard Brown, Director Community Development Department MITES PLANNING COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY,APRIL 2,2013 ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Chaiinian Russell. Present members were Mr.Alvin Burke, Steven Barrett, (Alvin Burke stated for the record that Ms. Lillie'Odorn`called and said she wasn't feeling well so she would not be able to attend the meeting tonight),Chairman Russell stated it would be noted for the record as an excused absence.Mr. Elio Guerrero,Chatnan Calvin Russell. Also present was Community Development D eCtor Howard W. Brown,Jr.,Planner Gerald J.Lee and Asst.City Attorney Hope Calhoun. II INVOCATION AND P i EDGBit Mr.Steven Barrett said the invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance t a followed. .5, III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 5,2013 Chairman Russell,moves ," motion to approve the minutes for March 5, 2013 Elio Guerrero motioned to appkoye'the min `sAnd \ in Burke second the motion with the necessary corrections if there were any Chairman RusseNsed iFthere were any corrections and none were noted so the minutes were approves , Upon roll call the minutes fsed 4-0. Alvin Burke - Yes Steven Barrett - Yes Elio Guerrero - Yes Calvin Russell - Yes Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 1 of 9 Chairman Russell asked for the first agenda item. Attorney Hope Calhoun read the item on the agenda. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Applicant Name: DELTA TRUCKING, INC. Address 12705 NW 30Th AVENUE OPA-LOCKA, FL 33054 Legal Description: LOT 16,NILE GARDENS SECTIONS 1 AND 11,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGE 42 , OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, SAID LANDS SITUATE,LYING AND BEING,IN DADE CQ,UNTY FLORIDA. WEST 151' OF TRAC 8,NILE GARDENS SECTIONS I AND II, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31,PAGE,OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, SAID LANDS SITUARE,LYING AND BEING IN DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. ZONED.(FOLIO 08-2128-004-0281; 08-2128-004-0071) kfi ,1 Request: Site plan review to build a permanent office facility on the property. Mr. Gerald Lee,Community Development Depa i,nent addressed the council with a slide presentation explaining why the City should allow Delia Trucla1tl 4o erect a perm anent building on the property. The city code provides for site plan re x* and intot!,code'xt,addresses,lhe needs that have to be addressed for this particular project. Based on dates and mfa, iiation proyi.c4ed;you can see the location and at that location you see two separate"p rcels and in recent'dine the largest parcel is in an industrial zoning district but the smaller parcel inesidenttalanrthfs presents a slight challenge but the building they plan to erect TT'is going to be on the propeifOnd with that being the case Delta Trucking would suggest that we allow them the approval tonight if yott,,so see it and that after that they be required to rezone the secondary property tlaf they already would have to have as a part of a unity of title so they have one parcel for the entire site so vt e would have to address that anyway so that when they do the same that they rezone the secondary parcel as industrial when they unify and that this be a requirement of site plan approval that is accomplished before building permits are issued no later than rezoning is completed before the C.O. is issued.Mr, Lee further pointed out the location and the zoning areas for clarity. Staff recommends approval for this use and for the remedies that has been suggested. Chairman Russell asked if there were any questions for staff.No questions were asked. Mr. Lee stated that the Representative for Delta Trucking was,,=present.'Mr. Raul Suarez-Delcampo,Architect for Delta Trucking stated he was the one that submitted the application. Chairman Russell opened the floor for the public to speak on behalf, for or against this project.No one came forward so the Public Hearing was closed. Chairman Russell asked Mr. Lee for clarity as to where the property was and where the zoning district lies. Mr. Lee pointed to the area on the slide presentation. Assistant City Attorney Hope Calhoun clarified for the record that the staff would add a fifth recommendation that would be the piece that is currently zoned residential must be rezoned to the compatible Industrial Zoning district prior to issuance of the C.O. on the building that's going to be erected on the piece that's industrial. Mr. Brown stated that it was an oversight on the Staff's part and we are trying to ensure that the applicant's rights are protected and if this is approved by Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 2 of 9 the planning council and city commission it can withstand a legal challenge and this is what staff is recommending and this is what we really need from you. Chairman Russell added that this is why we try to have these things done prior to so there are no discrepancies. Mr. Brown stated that this will be fast tracked and you are duly noted. Mr. Alvin Burke made the motion that we follow staffs fifth recommendation for approval with the necessary comments from the Assistant City Attorney Hope Calhoun. Elio Guerrero second the motion. Upon roll call,the minutes passed 4-0. Alvin Burke - Yes Steven Barrett - Yes Elio Guerrero - 1 cs Mr. Calvin Russell Yes 2. Applicant Name: CITY OF OP:\-L.00KA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. Address: 780 Fisherman Street, 4thi Floor, and Opa-locka,Florida 33054 Request: An Amendment to the City Ordinance 86-8,(Land Development Code) concerning Churches in the I-1 Industrial Zoning District. Assistant Attorney Calhoun announced the second item on the agenda. Mr. Lee explained that this item was before the planning council before and you all supported it. It was forwarded to the city commission. When it went to the city commission,the Way it was formatted at that time it included all industrial districts. This time it's only going to be addressing the allowance of religious facilities in I-1 zoning districts; the lowest intense industrial district in the city. The reason we are bringing this back again is that we continue to receire applications from churches that are requesting to be in industrial zoning districts. Also we know that you all supported and approved this particular use so staff is recommending approval for this with these 4 conditions. We have discussed this with the city attorney's office and they've suggested the following. Attorney Calhoun explained that what their office is recommending is that rather than making them conditions of approving the ordinance that we just amend the ordinance to fold these conditions into the ordinance. Mr. Lee stated that so it won't seem like conditional use; it will be if you want this use these things have to be adhered to. Chairman Russell stated being that apparently there are churches operating in these areas and you mentioned about parking. Mr. Lee stated that they have to have some type of agreement with the owner and the size of the ministry has to be a minimum size. Based on the size of the ministry there is an allotment based on that and it should not be a problem. Mr.Barrett asked if the owners lease to churches would the city benefit from the taxes. Mr. Lee stated yes if the owners lease to these church and remain the owner,this would not affect the taxes. Mr. Brown further stated that it's based on ownership use of the building is how the tax assessor taxes the building. It is taxed based on the ownership use per Assistant City Attorney Calhoun. Mr. Lee showed a table of other Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 3 of 9 cities Miami Dade County and Miami Gardens that allow churches in industrial zoning districts. Chairman Russell opened the floor to the Public to speak for or against the project. Mr. Tavares Robinson 14916 SW 22nd Street Miramar,Florida. He said he had spoken to Mr. Lee regarding wanting to know about the possibility of leasing 4300 NW 135 Street. The owners gave them permission but there was an issue about operating a church in the industrial area because it was not zoned for a church. He wanted to see if the City of Opa-locka would grant permission for churches to be in industrial areas. Mr. Angelo Jackson a resident of Opa-locka 1830 NW 146 Lane he agreed with the changes to allow for churches to operate in the industrial district.The Public hearing was closed by Chairman Russell. Mr. Burke stated that as long as the tax base doesn't change and the building is being leased. but what if the whole building becomes churches then what happens?Mr. Brown stated then its ownership and if it's own by a private entity then they would still receive a tax bill and we would receive our tax from it. Mr. Brown alluded back to the gentleman that spoke about 4300 NW 135 Street the churches in the industrial area that this item before us is for I-lzoning and not for the 1-3 zone and this would not help or assist his request at this time. Mr. Barrett said that what if the church goes in and down the road the o\\net-decides to sell the property to the church, what would be the guidelines then?Mir. Brown said es the church could apply for tax exemption but this provision is based on use asked if Attorney Calhoun could clarify this question. Attorney Calhoun said Mr. Brown's point was correct the church could apply for tax exemption as a church and most of them do. The ordinance speaks to the use of the property allowing a church to operate in an I-1 zoning district and what they anticipate is that a church v,ould mo■e in to an existing industrial building an operate with or without a cham_.4e in ownership and so to ■our question that if ownership changes and a church then owns that industrial buildi nu.. would that property then become tax exempt the answer is that they could apply for tax emption as a church and this ordinance is for permitted use not ownership.Mr. Brown stated that right now they are not allowed. Chairman Russell closed the public hearing and asked for the motion for or against. Mr. Alvin Burke made the motion to pass it with staff's recommendation and Mr. Elio Guerrero second the motion. Upon roll call. the vote passed 4-0. A!vin Burke - Yes Steven Barrett - Yes Elio Guerrero - Yes Mr. Calvin Russell - Yes Mr. Brown stated that the vote passes and the item would be forwarded to the city commission for further action. Attorney Calhoun asked if it would go on the next city commission meeting and Mr. Brown stated it will be sometime in April the 24th at the earliest or the May meeting. Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 4 of 9 3. Applicant Name: CITY OF OPA-LOCKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Address: 780 Fisherman Street,4th Floor Opa-locka FL 33054 Request: An Amendment to the City Ordinance 86-8 (Land Development Code)concerning certificates of use in all Non-Residential Zoning Districts. Mr. Lee stated to the committee that in the City we offer Occupational Licenses to deal with the actual license and the use that is going to be applied at that site. It has come to our attention that a better way would be to bring about having certificates of use in addition to occupational licenses then we can address zoning issues and other things that have not been specifically addressed or appropriately addressed. Certificates of Use would help us do those things listed,tnere and help us better attend to whatever happens at a property site and then on a yearly basis it wouldn't just be a renewal of an occupational license but it would be a recertifying of what actually occurs because of that license at that site Someone from the city would go out and examine what they do,determine if they are douig what they need to do or if what they are doing now is allowed in;that zorte district or not and then if not we can address it on a different level other than just havmgecode enforcement to happen t po t them to find out that they are not doing the right thing or go thiou r g b g g g�'��a process to revoke a�':l�t�ense.,W�iere as we can say the certificate of use is no longer valid and you can no longer operate the business theft. Staff recommends that to improve the city to address the need to make siire that thie right uses„occur in the right zoning districts we move the amendment forward to allow for certifieittes of use Mr.Burke said that in essence what is being said now is that not only does ari applicant have to obtain an occupational license but in addition they would have to obtain a certificate of use,:Mr. Brown answered that was correct. Mr. Burke asked if that would be in the same application or an additional application and would it cost.Mr. Brown stated yes it would be an additional cost and that the occupational license is just a payment of tax; it's not zoning approval and what we've learned through he would say the last two years in the city is that when a person comes in to obtain a license they don't necessarily have zoning approval or the ability to operate under all the laws of the city as a matter of fact,the license itself is just tax payment;most people call it business tax receipt so it's not confused so what we are doing is consistent with what most cities do. We have forms in our office that are used.routinely that say certificate of use on them and we do not charge for them other than the necessary inspections from the building and plumbing,electrical trades,they go out and make those inspections but one of the things we are finding out is that when we issue a business license to an entity, it's checked for zoning approval at the onset but every year thereafter renewals are not checked by the zoning office and so the business evolve into something else and so what the certificate of use would do is allow us to go and look at that property not just for zoning but for other issues like clean-up, if they need a permit for a sign,paint the building or get rid of junk vehicles; those are the kinds of things that come up on the certificate of use so it's not something that is requiring somebody to do something. Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 5 of 9 Mr. Brown wanted to bring the attention that there are entities that we don't want anybody to spend money in the city and operate at a location for six years and then be told that they don't have proper zoning so this is a comprehensive way of addressing the issue city wide. Mr. Burke disagreed with the idea of extra fees. Mr. Brown stated that we are trying to accomplish what other cities are doing and based on what they are doing, this is staff's recommendation to ensure field inspections are in place because currently the city only has an honor system. Mr. Barrett said this was a good idea and the guidelines and fees would be set accordingly. Mr. Brown stated that this ordinance is only to give us the authority to do these inspections and to provide for what he calls gap inspections. Right now code enforcement only deal with nuisance violations, or property violations and its all based on us getting a complaint in Community Development. Mr. Burke still disagreed with the staffs request. Mr. Elio Guerrero asked if there was a flat fee for this process. Mr. Brown stated that there was no fee established for this ordinance. This just gives us the authority to do it and the county does it and other counties. This just gives us the authority. Chairman Russell stated that the city has to survive and it's only fair that we put things in place so that the city would be able to function properly and better serve the businesses that come into the community. Chairman Russell opened the floor for or against. Mr. Bill Dissepio a business owner at 2335 NW 149 Street disagreed with the idea of an additional fee. He has been a business resident for 3 and half years and he said code enforcement was doing a good job at monitoring and he opposes the idea.Mark Maritza 2335/2337 NW 149 Street business owner stepped forward to say he was for the idea because they can afford it it benefits the city overall,and it benefits each individual business to avoid exactly what's being said that a business comes in and they start out doing one thing and the economy changes and it transforms their business into something entirely different it gives them the authority to do that and it,protects that individual business and the surrounding businesses. Mr. Willie Hernandez came forward his business is at 2350 NW 149 Street and he is against the item presented. He feels that code enforcement,does an outstanding job by coining to the business and writing people up. Perhaps a better job internally could be done rather than taxing the businesses. Chairman Russell asked for public hearing,to be closed after there were no others for or against. Chairman Russell asked for a motion on the floor.Mr. Barrett made the motion for ordinance 86-8 to be approved and Chairman Russell second the Motion. Upon roll call of the motion, the vote did not pass. 2-2 Alvin Burke - No Steven Barrett - Yes Elio Guerrero - No Mr. Calvin Russell - Yes Mr.Brown stated that the motion fails it's a tie. Attorney Calhoun said the item failed and it would go to the city commission with either no recommendation or recommendation and probably with no recommendation from this board. Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 6 of 9 4. Applicant Name: ECOLOGICAL PAPER RECYCLING, INC Property Owner ECOLOGICAL PAPER RECYCLING,LLC Address: 2350-2330 NW 149`b Street Opa-locka, Fl 33054 Legal Description: LOT 6,BLOCK 5 OF"OPA-LOCKA INDUSTRIAL PARK' ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 77,PAGE 73 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA.TOGETHER WITH: LOTS 4,5,6,&7,BLOCK 1 OF"COHEN-AGER SUBDIVISION"ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 86. PAGE 73 OF THE P PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI DADE COUNTY, F LORIDA. ZONED I-2 (FOLIOS 08-2122-027-0070: 08-2122-027-0060: 08-2122-025-0391) Request: Site Plan Review to Operate a Paper Recycling Facility Mr. Lee presented a power point presentation regarding Ecological Paper Recycling,Inc zoned in the I-2 district explaining that in the past there have been issues with compliance and since then they have made efforts to correct them and move forward with the request before this committee today. The way for this process to go through is like all the others and that's based on site plan review and this is for site plan review of a warehouse use in the industrial zoning district. Staff recommends approval of the site plan subject to compliance to the conditions listed in your report. Chairman Russell asked if the zoning was correct. Mr. Lee stated yes and based on the allowance code presently is for single stream of use and they can only operate solely for cardboard and paper recycling. Based on the code the Director can speak to that action himself but as understood based on what our code allows his interpretation allows him to say that the use that's available to them is the one that he indicated previously and unless text is added to code to add additional usage they will not be able to do everything they've envisioned and they are willing to do everything that's necessary to address those expanded uses but what's allowed in our code at present is solely for them to do paper and cardboard recycling.Mr.Brown stated that they have complied with the requests and they want to do other things like plastics,aluminum and some other things similar to what two years ago this board looked at Waste Pro who was standing behind the ordinances to do to bring in these kinds of recyclables. That goes above the scope of what they are trying to do here as far as run a paper recycling company with cardboard and anything past that our office couldn't support it and we definitely recommend an approval of their site plan with those conditions.They have hired and retained an architect to design the project and once they go through the motions and articulate parking issues and we are hoping they can resolve those issues and those are resolved through the board of appeals to which we do not have one right now. There is history with this project dating back to June or July 2012. Chairman Russell stated that basically it's only sufficient for partial of what they want to do so if this board approves it then that means we have had previous times when people just do further than what we approve to be done because they already want to do more. Mr.Brown stated that this application what Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 7 of 9 was noticed is for a paper recycling operation and that's what staff's recommendation is for and anything other than that is something that is not noticed tonight. If the applicant is saying he wants to do something other than what was noticed in the paper,we will need another legal notice and he would have to table this item or defer it until the appropriate Iegal add is put in the paper. Chairman Russell asked to hear from the applicant. Mr. Jose Flores came forward the address is 2350 NW 149 Street and that's our facility. They have been an Opa-locka business owner for 4 years and they have gone through the process of complying with all requirements.They have their occupational licenses and also went to DERM and they have their permit from them authorizing them to do single stream. They want to bring paper, cardboard,PET bottles that are no contaminates,no smell and nothing to harm the environment. They stated that they were the largest employer in Opa-locka. They have complied with all tax obligations and insurances. Mr.Willie Hernandez spoke on behalf of Ecological Paper Recycling, Inc that they have focused on hiring Opa-locka employees and they want to comply with the city and are not looking for short term. They would appreciate the favor from the city. Attorney Calhoun pointed out that the application before the board is for a paper recycling facility. The reason this is raised is because the applicant was advised board members that consistent with code paper recycling is consistent with code and only single stream paper recycling is pointed out as you deliberate. They asked for the conditions and Mr. Brown asked for Mr. Lee to read the conditions to them for the record.The conditions were read in stating the following: Only paper or paper products recycling per the city zoning code shall be allowed, unity of title shall be required to combine all three lots of record, a landscaping and parking variance shall be required, and that be in compliance with all city, county, state and federal regulations.There are concerns the city attorney gave us concerning these as'fin as we understand those variances are things that they are going to apply for after this.Mr. Browny stated that should the committee choose the staffs recommendation is to recominehd approval of the site plan with those conditions and before this is placed on the city commission s,agenda wee,,w tt]lave the zoning board of appeals hear the variance request and we can do that before the city cormniS§ioh meeting according to Mr. Geller the city attorney who I spoke with earlier about having an emergency ordinance to enact a zba so we can deal with the other part of the site plan.We have spoken with Mr. Flores and Mr.Hernandez regarding the other items they were alluding to and they are in support of an ordinance we plan on bringing later but right now this is just for paper to legitimize what they have done. They did come forward and they did try to get in compliance. They had a license but it was erroneously issued because they did not go through the process but we are trying to,get them in compliance and the only way they can is through this board. Chairman Russell called for a public bearing. Mr. Mark Maritza owner of 2335/2337 NW 149 Street and is totally against the t items approval=„before eve ng is done.The building is immense and he expects them to do what they have said they would do;, e traffic is a problem for my customers and the trucks cause an enormous problem not putting a damper on what they want to accomplish. He wants them to basically comply with the necessary items before the committee as things move forward.He presented a short presentation of the day to day activity before the committee and it will be made available upon request. Mr. Bill Dissepio owner of 2335 NW 149 Street came forward to say he has no objections to the recycling business being there and he is happy to see activity again in that area because it was dead for a while. However,the amount of dust and litter,the ground being so bad that it need repairing,the truck traffic and parking are his only complaints. If they address the issues they should become a good business in that area.Mr. Barrett suggested that Mr. Brown sets up a meeting with the business owners in that area and also discuss Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 8 of 9 the roads that need repairing and Mr. Brown consented to do that. Chairman Russell closed the public hearing and Mr. Burke recommended approval of staff's recommendations and Mr. Barrett second the motion with discussion. Attorney Calhoun stated that what supposed to happen is the zoning board of appeals is going to be reconstituted and this item will not be able to go forward to the city commission until the zoning board of appeals is reconstituted,they apply for and are granted the variances and then the site plan can go to the city commission if and when the variances are approved. Chairman Russell called for a roll call. Upon roll call of the motion,the vote did not pass. 4-0 Alvin Burke - Yes Steven Barrett - Yes Elio Guerrero - Yes Mr. Calvin Russell - Yes STAFF UPDATE No Updates. VI ADJOURNMENT . Mr. Burke gave the motion to adjourn and Mr. Elio Guerrero seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned at`3 40pm. Submitted by Mary Brown Recording Secretary ATTEST: Mr. Calvin Russell Planning Council Chairman Title Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 9 of 9 I MINUTES PLANNING COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY,May 7,2013 ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Chairman Calvin Russell. Present members were Mr. Steven Barrett,Ms. Lillie Odom,Mr. Elio Guerrero and Chairman Calvin Russell. Mr. Howard Brown stated for the record that Mr.Alvin Burke sent a letter of resignation and it was noted. Also present was Community Development Director Howard W.Brown,Jr., City Planner Gerald J. Lee and Asst. City Attorney Hope Calhoun. II INVOCATION AND PLEDGE: Chairman Russell asked Mr. Steven Barrett to give the invocation and f . . the Pledge of Allegiance followed. .,_ III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 2,;2013 Chairman Russell moved for a motion to approve the minutes for April 2, 2013. Mr. Steven Barrett motioned to approve the minutes with discussion that the guide lines for setting up the agenda need to be corrected and Mr.'Brown stated they would be corrected and Lillie Odom second the motion. Mr. Brown gave the roll call. Upon roll call the minutes passed 4-0. Steven Barrett Yes Lillie Odom - Yes Elio Guerrero - Yes Calvin Russell - Yes Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 1 of 7 Chairman Russell asked for the first agenda item and attorney Hope Calhoun read the item on the agenda. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Applicant Name: DELTA TRUCKING, INC. Property Owner: MEROD INVESTMENTS,INC Address 12705 NW 30'x'AVENUE OPA-LOCKA,FL 33054 Legal Description: WEST 151' OF TRAC 8, of NILE GARDENS SECTIONS I AND II ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31,PAGE 42, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI DADE COUNTY, SIAD LANDS SITUATE,LYING AND BEING IN DADE COUNTY FLORIDA ZONED R-3 (FOLIO 08-2128-004-0070). Request: ZONING CHANGE FROM R-3 TO 1-2. Mr. Gerald Lee,Community Development Department addressed the planning council with regards to the applicant before you today Delta Trucking from the previous meeting. He had a power point presentation of the present locations to be discussed which included the criteria for rezoning and the Iocation and zoning maps. They came for site plan review and it was approved pending rezoning of the property and this is their request to rezone the additional property at the site to make that site whole. This is a zoning change from R-3 to I-2. They submitted their application in a timely manner and staff has reviewed their site plan and found that everything was in compliance accept for this portion that they are attempting to redo now and according to our land development code the use that they have for that site is not permitted if we leave the zoning as it is. Based on the city's code(86-8),4.8 of our code allows for rezoning procedures. At the same time, 6.11 and 6.10 provide for the use that this business is going to perform in that zoning district. Mr. Lee further stated that these are the criteria that we have to go through in allowing for rezoning. The proposed change is contrary to establish land use patterns. Staffs review is not ag,unst the land use pattern. The proposed would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts;the answer is no because the property that occupies the majority of their land is for the zoning district that are trying to be zoned to The proposed change would alter the population or traffic patterns and thereby negatively tax the load on public facilities such as schools,utilities or streets;the answer is no. They are already occupying the use and this portion would make everything right in that area for what their business does at that particular site. The proposed district boundary would be more illogically drawn in relation to existing boundaries of the property proposed for change;no this is the perfect change for the use for the entire site which includes the rezoned area request and the existing area that's I-2. The proposed change would be in conflict with the adopted city comprehensive plan or portion or portions thereof or would require modification of the adopted comprehensive development plan or portion or portions thereof;the answer is no. This zoning district change is consistent with the land use for the designation. This is consistent when you look at the map it is Industrial. Zoning areas allotted Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 2 of 7 make the passage of the proposed change necessary. The answer is no.It is not the zoning areas that make the proposed change necessary but the use that they have on that property require that all of it have the same zoning and that's why we are asking for the change. The proposed change would adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; the answer is no because they are already occupying the land but it is incorrect with the zoning that's for that particular east most portion.The proposed would create or excessively increase traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety; it will not because the property is already being used as such and the traffic that's there is already there. They are not adding anything new;they are just correcting the site. The proposed change would create a drainage problem; it will not. Again for the same answer. The proposed change would seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; they are not erecting a building on the rezoned area,they are not expanding so that's a no. The proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas it will not for the same reasons stated previously. They are already in use. The proposed change would be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent properties in accordance with existing regulations; it will not negatively impact the area so the answer is no also. The proposed changes will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. It will not. There are no substantial reasons why the property can't be used in accordance with the existing zoning. Yes,the current use is permitted in the I-2 zoning district not in the R-3 so it has to be changed. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city, it is not out of scale it is a land development code requirement that the use for that business be consistent throughout all the parts that are part of that site. Finally the final two; is it possible to find other adjacent sites in the city for the proposed use in the district already permitting such use;Yes,but it is not part of this particular site and that's why they are asking for the property to be rezoned and finally the proposed development meets regulations and codes; Yes it does. For clarity Mr. Lee pointed to the area that is already I-2 and the area that is being rezoned and noted that the majority of the property is I-2. The portion that is R-3, there is an apartment complex here(pointing to the area)and this area belongs to this business and it is zoned R-3 right now and that's what Otiy are asking to be rezoned. Staff's recommendation is for the approval for the boundary change and those criteria we gave in the presentation are the points that you have to agree with staff on to be able to allow them to rezone this property. Mr.Lee asked if there were any questions and that was the finish of his presentation. Chairman Russell asked if the applicant was present and Mr. Raul Suarez came forth to speak on behalf of Delta Trucking, Inc located at 12705 NW 30TH Avenue, Opa-locka,Fl 33054. He is the architect and representative for the owner. Chairman Russell asked for his address and it is 2515 SW 101 Court,Miami Fl 33165. He stated that what they were asking for was what Mr.Lee stated to have coherent zoning for the entire site. He stated that they assumed from the beginning of their work that is was all I-2 and when they found out it was R-3 everybody agreed that it had to be done.At the last month's hearing we agreed that the project itself was approved subject to rezoning this little parcel of land and that's what we are asking to do now so that we can have coherent site that reflect what the site is being used for and has been used for years. He stated there are no changes to be done on the land at all.Mr. Elio Guerrero asked how big that part of the land was and Mr. Brown said it was just shy over an acre and Mr. Raul Suarez said the rest of the property is 4.9 acres. Mr. Steven Barrett asked to staff if there was a part in the site plans for beautification. The reason for the concern is that it was next to the apartments there zoned in R-3. That was his concern that when the residents look at the site they see some type of beautification.Mr. Raul stated that they submitted a letter stating they agreed to add Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 3 of 7 more trees and other landscaping to beautify the area beyond what the code says. Mr. Barrett asked what type of fence was on the property. Mr. Raul stated that along the east and north side of the property is block wall and on the west and south side is an iron decorative fence and that already has shrubbery and fichus trees and they are adding to those as well. Mr. Steve Barrett asked what type of landscaping was on the part that is up for recommendation of approval. Mr. Raul stated that it has a block wall and they are adding trees along that wall. Mr. Elio Guerrero asked about a building sitting in the middle of both properties and Mr. Raul Suarez stated that it was part of the project to demolish that building. Mr. Elio Guerrero ask to staff if a unification of title should it be a condition that we put or is it already understood and Mr. Brown stated that it was a condition of the site plan that was part of the approval from last month. Mr. Raul stated this is why they was asking for the rezoning so they could go ahead and get the unity of title on the whole property. Chairman Russell reiterated Mr. Barrett's question concerning the need for more landscaping and Mr. Raul Suarez agreed to add shrubs and trees along that line and around the perimeter of the whole site. Mr. Brown stated that staff would work with Delta Trucking to make sure the landscaping is incorporated in the site plans according to Mr. Barrett's question and concerns before it is brought before the City Commission. Chairman Russell asked for a public hearing for or against the project of Delta Trucking. No one came forward so public hearing was closed. Chairman Russell asked if there were any further questions. No further questions so he moved for a motion to approve. Mr. Elio Guen-ero motioned to approve and Ms. Lillie Odom second the motion. Mr.Brown gave the roll call. Upon roll call the motion passed 4-0. Steven Barrett - Yes Lillie O&M - Yes Elio Guerrero - Yes Calvin Russell - Yes Mr. Brown gave final instructions to Delta Trucking letting them know that this item has been passed affirmatively and it would go before the city commission for ratification and to keep in touch with Mr. Gerald Lee,City Planner to know what agenda they would be on. Mr. Barrett asked that::before we move to the next item on certificate of use; in the previous meeting he said that because it was a 2-2 tie vote that we could bring it back and the attorney said we could not so; if there is a correction that need to be made attorney Calhoun need to correct in stating we can bring it back for the record because they read the minutes and they will see that. Attorney Calhoun stated for the record that this item could be brought back. Chairman Russell asked for the next item. Attorney Calhoun read the next item. Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 4 of 7 2. Applicant Name: CITY OF OPA-LOCKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Address: 780 Fisherman Street, 4TH Floor Opa-locka FL 33054 Request: AN AMENDMENT TO CITY ORDINANCE 86-8(LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE),ARTICLE 4,ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES, TO CREATE A NEW SECTION 4.17 ENTITLED CERTIFICATE OF USE, CREATING A PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF USE IN ALL NON- RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT ;; I N THE C l 6 Y OF OPA- LOCKA. Gerald Lee, City Planner presented the Certificate of Use item stating that certi licatc of uSc process would ensure that we examine specific property use to a site as oppose to a license review that happens only on the first time and then it becomes a renewal and no examination of the actual use. It gives us better specificity to an actual license, actual property, and business as to what they're actually doing in the field. The certificate of use process is all over the state of Florida; all over the country but Miami Dade County in particular uses it in almost every city so it is something that is standard practice and we need to be onboard with that. This is why Opa-locka is left out with a question mark. We did a survey in other cities within Miami Dade County and as you can see that all the cities that we've examined small cities, larger cities and the county all use this. We recommend appro\al of the certificate of use. Chairman Russell asked if there were any questions or discussions. Mr. Elio Guerrero asked for the differences between the occupational license and the certificate of use because that was the part he was still not clear on. Mr. Brown explained that the occupational license was really just payment of tax it has no regulatory enforcement we can actually use to do something with. Some would say we use the occupational process as a regulatory process but we know through litigation we don't have the legal authority to close down businesses or require businesses to obtain compliance and those kinds of things like zoning, land use and these kinds of items so it is a difference where as the occupational license is just payment of tax and there is no certificate of use that allows us to view that property. Mr. Elio Guerrero asked that the occupational renewal process there is an inspection that goes along with that and Mr. Brown answered yes it is and that is in the building department and the inspection you are talking about is called the certificate of occupancy but the terms have been misused but what we are doing this helps us codify some of those functions in the building department. What this ordinance really does is allow zoning officials like myself, Mr. Lee, code enforcement officers to go out and make these inspections annually. To assure what was approved by the planning department in the beginning is what is occurring year after year and so if they are evolving good businesses will get the different industries that the use conforms or comports to the zoning ordinance. If they do, that's one thing but if they don't we would look and evaluate their use to see to either charge them for another business license or something making sure that they are safe. Mr. Brown further stated that we have had several episodes to occur nationally for example the explosion in West Texas and what we are trying to do is when our inspectors go out and they see something that is not consistent with the use that they've been allowed, they can ask what is that being stored over there and based on the response we know right then that we can put them through another process before we Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 5 of 7 just say okay. This is really the biggest part of it. The other part is all legal, but it's a process that we really need as a staff and it will allow us to be able to not only protect citizens of the city but also get us out of litigations that we are currently involved in regarding certificate of use and business licenses. Chairman Russell asked if Mr. Guerrero's question was answered and he replied yes. The floor was opened for public hearing. Mr. John Cook address 14580 NW 27 Avenue represented the public by way of being a residence and business owner in the City Of Opa-locka. He stated that he was impacted more than most because he has three licenses and He was in complete agreement with Mr. Brown's effort to take back or re-claim the commercial areas of Opa-locka that has been completely destroyed by incompetence, lack of enforcement and lack of law. He diverted to the last meet ing minutes stating that the only negative thing he saw from the last meeting that this was a cost issue that you had to pay more money and owning three business licenses, he looked at it as an investment to the City of Opa-locka. With this license I am investing to make sure that the man next door to him isn't a meth lab. In the last two years we've had two grill houses in Opa-locka burn down and lie would like to know whose next to him and also that his property value is going to remain the same because they are not out of zone and do something they are not allowed to do. The question really isn't the cost to an individual business or owner but the question is really what the cost to the city is if this isn't approved. He stated that his bottom line is that as a resident and business owner we really need to make a change because what's going on now is not working and he can't imagine anybody not feeling the same way he does because this is all about the quality of life and the city making it a better place or is it where we are going to tell people they can open a business and you don't have to be from Opa-locka and the city can't shut you down. He stated that Mr. Brown is right and everybody does this and the`;City of Opa-locka needs to implement this ordinance. Chairman Russell stated that he appreciated his efforts and the council heard him load and clearly. The public hearing was opened and there was no response and it was closed by Chairman Russell. Chairman Russell asked for a motion and Mr. Steven Barrett motioned to approve amendment to city ordinance (86-8) with discussion and Ms. Lillie Odom`second the motion. Mr. Barrett asked Mr. Brown if we will have the same power for residential properties because you have mechanic shops and so many other things that go on as well with residential properties but we didn't have the authority and this is going to cost the city. Now with this ordinance will we have the authority for residential as well. Mr. Brown answered that this particular ordinance deals with all non-residential properties so commercial property on 27 avenue, apartments we have on 22 avenue, but this does not regulate single family homes or duplexes. Mr. Barrett asked why it can't be for residential properties and Mr. Brown answered that we have the authority to react,to suspected or reported violation of our codes and we have our obligation to do that and if we receive a complaint or if we suspect something is occurring on the property our code enforcement personnel go out and they enforce the codes. Mr. Barrett asked if they are allowed to go on the property. The answer was yes we have the right of reasonable entry under the Florida Statute and where there is a life safety issue,health safety welfare,we are authorized. There was no further discussion and Chairman Russell asked for the roll call. Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 6 of 7 Upon roll call the motion passed 4-0. Steven Barrett - Yes Lillie Odom - Yes Elio Guerrero - Yes Calvin Russell - Yes There were no further discussions and Chairman Russell adjourned the meeting. STAFF UPDATE No Updates. VI ADJOURNMENT Chairman Russell gave the motion to adjourn and Mr.Elio (iuerrero seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned at 7:56pm. Submitted by Mary Brown Recording Secretar∎ ATTEST: Mr. Calvin Russell Planning Council Chairman Title Planning Council Minutes 4/2/2013 Page 7 of 7 PLANNING COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Delta Trucking, Inc„ (March 11, 20013) - Applicant �I Delta Trucking, Inc. Request Final Site Plan Approval to build a permanent office facility [ Location j 12705 N W 30th Avenue, Opa-locka, Fl. 33054 Legal Description Lot 16, Nile Gardens Sections I and II, According to the plat thereof, as recorded in plat book 31 page 42, of the public records of Dade County, sand lands situate, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. West 151' of track 8, Nile Gardens Sections I and 11, according to the play thereof, as recorded in plat book 31, page 42, of the public records of Dade County, said lands situate, lying and being in Dade County, Florida and containing approximately 6.01 acres or 262,010 square feet, more or less. Folio 08-2128-004-0180; 08-2128-004- 0070. Property Sized 262,010 square feet Zoning 1-2 (Liberal Industrial) zoning district Existing Land Use I Industrial Future Land Use Designation Industrial Comprehensive Plan According to the Future Land Use Map, the subject property is designated as an Consistency industrial land use. The current request is consistent with the Comprehensive Development Master Plan. L Other Required Approvals] Miami Dade County, State, and applicable federal regulations [ Applicable ULDR Sections City Ordinance 86-8 sections 6.11 — _ - Setbacks/Yards I Required _ 1f P'ropo,ed Front(North) 15' 15' Rear(South) 7' 680' Side (East) 7' 7' Street Side (West) 15' 268' Lot Coverage No more than 75% can be impervious Impervious surface including building surface. This includes the building footprints will not exceed more than 10% lot footprint coverage Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq ft 262,010 sq ft [ Building Height 3 Stories or 45 feet 1 Story Landscaped area at parking 50 sq. ft of landscaping for every 10 off- 100 sq. ft of landscaping for 20 off-street street parking spaces parking spaces Frontage Property Line Tree Landscaping 1 Tree/50 linear Feet 23 Trees Off-Street Parking Required: 1 space for 400 sq.feet Requirements 15 off-street parking spaces 20 off-street parking spaces Notification Requirements This request to construct an office facility was properly noticed pursuant to state law and city ordinance. l I farr�o and E i'il�; � �(iliiak Project Planner Gerald Lee, City Planner ��_ L. _ _ Howard W. Brown, Jr., Planning Director ja1i Applicant's Request: 1) To construct a permanent office facility. Surrounding Zoniriq Districts and Uses: Existing Land Uses CLUP Designstions Zoning Districts North Copart Auto Auction Industrial Commercial Liberal Business District(B-2) South Miami Dade County Industrial Limited Industrial (IU-1) Transportation Repair East Nile Gardens Apartments Moderate Density Moderate Density Multi-Family _ Residential Residential District West WASA Pump Station Public Utilities Public District Parking and Traffic: The proposed site plan meets adequate off-street parking requirements pursuant to City Ordinance No. 86-3. In terms of traffic, the site currently houses an existing trucking company. The current use and new construction of a permanent office facility will not increase traffic in the area. Adequacy and Neighborhood Compatibility: The subject property is zoned (1-2) industrial with non-residential uses to the north, south and west of the subject property. The property to the east is zoned (R-3) moderate density residential. It is important to note that there is an apartment complex to the east of the subject property. Yard Modifications: (If applicable) N/A Comprehensive Plan Consistency: This operation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Development Master Plan. Staff Determination/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this site plan subject to compliance with the following: 1. Shall maintain a masonry block wall located to the east of the subject property adjacent to the Nile Gardens residential housing complex. 2. Limit the use of truck traffic on NW 127th Street Monday through Friday from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 3. Unity of Title shall be required to combine both lots of record. 4. Compliance with all applicable, city, county, state, and federal regulations shall be required. PLANNING COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Delta Trucking, Inc. (April 18,2013) Applicant N Delta Trucking, Inc. Request District Boundary Change from R-3 to 1-2. Location 12705 N W 30th Avenue, Opa-locka, Fl. 33054 Legal Description Lot 16, Nile Gardens Sections I and II, According to the plat thereof, as recorded in plat book 31 page 42, of the public records of Dade County, sand lands situate, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. West 151' of track 8, Nile Gardens Sections I and II, according to the play thereof, as recorded in plat book 31, page 42, of the public records of Dade County, said lands situate, lying and being in Dade County, Florida and containing approximately 6.01 acres or 262,010 square feet, more or less. Folio 08-2128-004-0180; 08-2128-004- I 0070. Property Size 262,010 square feet Zoning 1-2 (Liberal Industrial District) on parcel 1 R-3 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District) on parcel 2 Existing Land Use Industrial Future Land Use Designation Industrial Comprehensive Plan !, According to the Future Land Use Map, the subject property is designated as an Consistency " industrial land use. The current request is consistent with the Comprehensive Development Master Plan. Other Required Approvals Miami Dade County, State, and applicable federal regulations Applicable ULDR Sections j City Ordinance 86-8 sections 4.13 B (6) Boundary Change Standards Rezoning of Land Setbacks/Yards Required Proposed Front(North) 15' 15' Rear(South) j 7' 680' Side (East) 7' 7' Street Side (West) 15' 268' Lot Coverage No more than 75% can be impervious Impervious surface including building surface. This includes the building footprints will not exceed more than 10% lot footprint coverage Minimum Lot Size 10,000 sq ft 262,010 sq ft Building Height 3 Stories or 45 feet 1 Story Landscaped area at parking 50 sq. ft of landscaping for every 10 off- 100 sq. ft of landscaping for 20 off-street street parking spaces parking spaces Frontage Property Line Tree Landscaping 1 Tree/50 linear Feet 23 Trees Off-Street Parking Required: 1 space for 400 sq. feet Requirements 15 off-street parking spaces 20 off-street parking spaces Notification Requirements This request to construct an office facility was properly noticed pursuant to state law and city ordinance. Name and Title Initials Project Planner Gerald Lee, City Planner MM Authorized By Approved By Howard W. Brown, Jr., Planning Director Applicant's Request: 1) A District Boundary Change from R-3 to 1-2.. Surrounding Zoning Districts and Uses: Location Existing Land Uses CLUP Designations Zoning Districts North Copart Auto Auction Industrial Commercial Liberal Business District(B-2) South Miami Dade County Industrial Limited Industrial (IU-1) Transportation Repair East Nile Gardens Apartments Moderate Density Moderate Density Multi-Family _ Residential Residential District West WASA Pump Station Public Utilities Public District Parking and Traffic: The proposed site plan meets adequate off-street parking requirements pursuant to City Ordinance No. 86-3. In terms of traffic, the site currently houses an existing trucking company. The current use and new construction of a permanent office facility will not increase traffic in the area. Adequacy and Neighborhood Compatibility: The subject property is zoned (1-2) industrial and R-3 which is why this request is being made, with non-residential uses to the north, south and west of the subject property. The property to the east is also zoned (R-3) moderate density residential. It is important to note that there is an apartment complex to the east of the subject properties. Yard Modifications: (If applicable) N/A Comprehensive Plan Consistency: This operation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Development Master Plan. Staff Determination/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this district boundary change subject to compliance with the following: 1. Shall maintain a masonry block wall located to the east of the subject property adjacent to the Nile Gardens residential housing complex. 2. Limit the use of truck traffic on NW 127th Street Monday through Friday from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 3. Unity of Title shall be required to combine both lots of record. 4. Compliance with all applicable, city, county, state, and federal regulations shall be required. ...."'. ............. . ........... .:::" . ...... .fre. . • ' '!'.. . • ..... , :••' '.... • . ........................ ......... .••• "••• PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION APPLICATION NUMBER: 3- 5-0 70134330(NUMBER: Li 1,5 cl DATE RECEIVED: Y/ 11113 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: .0.15 .e4..C) ic",1 v6-57/2,6-AtTG PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS:railattNia 577, 494-4,s2c4A, Pc 3 3 AS-4 City State/rap Code APPUC.ANrS NAME _ 1,6A74 ivve. APPUCANT'S ADDRESS: 1 r. 4 ' • NumberAireet Statefrap Code PHONE NUMBER; OFFICE lidar -a 31 g" OTHER SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4, I 2-7 ., 4. . 3 ____Idiateekteet 9442414444P TAX FOLIO NUMBER: ,g7st?Nw 127 sT . PRESair ZONRick LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel - The West 151.00' of Tract 8, of NILE Please check sped&requcat Tentative Plat GARDENS SECTION 1 ck 2, according to the plat _Final Plat a pian Ameadment thereof, recorded in Plat Book 31, Page 42 of th Public ---rpnazit Request Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida_ Ptelintinary Site Plan Review Final Site Plan Review Condidonal Use Permit—No Plans Conditional Use Permit—With Plans Special Exception—No Plans VPeciaI Buclidrin yr." . - it...dr.& X it 4. Acid any additional htformation that nary be of itupottance to this rust 00)0194/CA941r S46'■e5 4,14 PaS,./20/..94/6.4i T 09frfr/ Oh'-7/".16 7 c tyzie&A.0-e.y 42Cceb0,66r Gt/hVCR 1.5 8 P76 3, .0 40 1"-_ ** 1110'7 vsj Page 3 of 4 p IPIANINIFG COUNCIL k2P-ILEar.AMP: (aharltil&c) Ifj 1iB at be t.z2,3p,=-1]wittani roklowiag(iota. Fdrr Lap2 ir ttazu ha?e/g axe inPr-s1 La eji CeR211.;;L;61 op-AtrA0aarm jAppikation f (SO machad Ordinance 03-11)payable to the City of Ope-lorila by check or money ordar 4.1:8_) Copy of pnapeAy orixrces driver lizenseffacto palifof applicant's&War°J./Apt:oil). VAffidavit(cag 4,,E-4-7),and pewee of attorm of the iropaly owner(peoe 3)Oath nazi la-a klognr-LA V9 A coedetad N1 PH etinolt form(attached)with tha sigontun of each property ow= fron& mac, lea rigta of his paparty showing thay have no objectiens to the Int jact(name,addirets,phone oureb-, ). VAll prelioaamy and fin_11 site plans,along with property survey,amat be submitted on CD-Rom dint in Cad ft IErdieete(15)(=titled beatadatry sod topogxaphic surveys of the property(size 36 x 24 ischwt) _,,SIL.Aftecal (15) copies of Site Developtotat Plan showing all drainage, water, seinex,vamonwes, landscaping and pelting coccede=e with the City's zoning ordinance;(size 36 x 24) showing parcel to be considered and all poop:rues'legal descriptions dameci,within 375'radaut of said parcel.Wino to be V ze Mr scale. Owner's name„address,folio number and legal description on each parcel(Original and 2 copies size of document to accommodate scale) Jr...per:mime cancepz mnst be submitted with application AFFIDAVIT • i Asca. being first duly sworn,depose and say that I am the t;I: of the property,and I ortftentand that ay, be complete and accurate before a public hearing can be advertised. sigma:are I et 1"3 II 41c,,074'' VERONICA MEDINA Date A MY COMMISSION#EE879425 Soc:s", EXPIRES.Apri126,2019 `,-• Sworn to and subscraloed befoxe me: day of My commission expires q ?_1:7 Notr-Py Public AtZarb caw art-p,,,,earAf., Paige 2 of 4 E-ILE-1\TTING COUMEL APPLECLULON Powaa 017AliTonuou ric. farm Ls to be artacked to all applicatiote, and to be rammed with the application. No application will be battered. or prams luszd by the Planning Covat.:11 unless a aotarized copy of this Power of Attogney is submih4. To: City of ex-Eockst c..2,.■,,t ••■•••■.■...■•••••••••■msace .■■• •■•••••••....+Lo...=••■•■•■••■■.....,;........,,,........••..e........ .o.t■rt.••.e.....a.....n....■.. ......••• ••....+.e."..,aw'....•••••••••••• ••.■— S1.Erai aCt Power of Attorney(authorization for a pestion„other than the propm.ty owner, to s?. .1c in the ptoperty owner's behalf). I wilif2.. ....4....422/c42 .4e..._____________, being first duly swom, depose and may flat I ama tht olvit . of dm pxoperty . ,. y described as: e2c.,...,,, ,„ it-it :,,- ?$ I do give to,L.icylti, ;WA IXV2.,--i'Mrie-- C-041p ee? the power of Attorney and authority to speak in my behalf in aefrouine •. .,. desertled property. Prather-,by affudirg my notarized signet=to this document.I also authorize 42 .__ 4e., i i,„ ...,,4 ,,--. to negotiate ond commit to the City Commission arnl City Administration in my behalit I will abide by it &al •-.-••7.,••• of the City Commission and City Administration. 1 _ (VAV°* -- Si014)EOM I 4 14 ?"313 rivvvv'ARAivvvw"#4,5:, ,P4tt:1 Vh4yE cRoOlvDaNisCsAioNto: , =,679425 f___..* EXPprit- k Date) IRES Al/ /0 7 1, , Sworn to and subscribed befo‘Te n= t -IT day of I iy. i _...... • ' ---t — -..— My ocznanission esrpises:A_LL/-' C 9- \stblic ',........" Att.,41111 capy a fliaa.Vdtartia Page 3 014 ff 2515 SW 101 Court Miami, Florida 33165-2639 rsdelcampo @gmail.com 646-597-8800 April 11, 2013 Mr. Gerald J. Lee, City Planner Planning & Community Development Dept. City of Opa-Locka 780 Fisherman Street Opa-Locka, FL 33054 Subject: Delta Trucking Inc. Rezoning Application of Parcel 2 2790 Northwest 127th Street Opa-Locka, Florida 33015 Dear sir: First of all, my Client Mr. Jorge Medina and I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your invaluable help throughout the Planning Council Application process to allow the construction of Delta Trucking Inc.'s new headquarters, including your help at the Planning Council hearing earlier this month. As you know, our application was approved as submitted and as recommended by your Staff unanimously by the Council, which only added a clause to my Client to rezone Parcel 2 of Delta's property from its current R-3 to 1-2, thus making the entire property 1-2 zoning. As per the Council's wish, attached please find that application as you and I have discussed it in the intervening days. As we agreed, all the documentation needed for this application has already been submitted and accepted by the Planning Department, thus making this submittal a much easier task to review. I am enclosing the following: Planning Council Application for Rezoning along with my Client's check in the amount of $1,400.00 as per our telephone conversation. Although we dropped off several sets of the revised Water & Sewer plans to Public Works a couple of weeks ago to obtain their approval, I am also delivering two sets to you personally with this package. The processing of this W&S submittal is very critical, since Public Works must sign off on the DERM application that we gave them before we can submit that application to DERM requesting their W&S allocation letter as quickly as possible. I am also enclosing the labels for the neighbors' mail-out, which the City will handle this time around. As you know, we have repeatedly attempted to contact the neighbors within the 375' radius, and have been unsuccessful except in a very few instances, all favorable. We submitted all our returned certified letters to you during our initial review. While we do not expect a different result, we agree that we must do everything possible to contact the affected neighbors. I am delivering this package to your office personally. 1 Please review our submittal and let me know at your earliest convenience if you need additional documents, drawings, or copies so that I may have them immediately delivered to you. Since this application must go thru two Council readings instead of the one for our first application, I would request your promptest review possible, on behalf of my Client. Finally, I will be very glad to receive your assistance in the stalled construction permit process. Very truly yours, --7- Suarez-Del Campo Architect, KICARA, IIDA RSC/jmm CC: Jorge Medina, Delta Trucking Inc. 2 CITY OF ('A-LOCKA, FLORIDA , , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING DEPARTMENT CUSTOMER'S RECEIPT ( ,,,,,,,) c..t , 20 -7 r) p1 . . . 0 a 0 Code No. ' - - -I o ----,..,, ins * Received of ,--A )gl--1 4"\* 1 QU-Ct<0.1\3_(.. , -a "J, 3 (1) 1 CD m Address -NO- Ok. 3 tr r-1 1 \ M t-44 'AA; , P ( :13 15 a sr Description 7 cr te co c s\ l,E Li\. L)c.1 '- .C. AN) tss--00701Doliarss HOD . 3 * IA il ----7- = = at Make all checks payable to City of Opa-locka,Florida , Cashier WHITE — Customer Copy YELLOW—Office Copy PINK — Department Copy - . - 4156 TOTALBANK DELTA TRUCKING, INC. MAIN OFFICE BRANCH 040 REGULAR ACCOUNT MIAMI,FL 33145 P.O.BOX 527711 63-915-660 MIAMI,FLORIDA 33152 PAY One Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 Dollars DATE AMOUNT TO THE ORDER OF April 11, 2013 **"************$1,400 00 CITY OF OPA-LOCKA PO BOX 371 i OPA LOCKA, FL 33054 I i AU ORIZED SIGNATURE Memo: Permit Fee I 00 I, L S 6 90 GO 6 GOO 9 L 5 51: 00 20 ?E186060 2515 SW 101 Court Miami, Florida 33165 6464597-8800 rsdeicampo@gmail.com March 20, 2013 Mr. Gerald J.Lee, City Planner Planning&Community Development Dept. City of Opa-Locka 780 Fisherman Street Opa-Locka,FL 33054 Subject: Delta Trucking Inc. Proposed New Building Construction 12705 Northwest 20th Avenue Opa-Locka, Florida Dear sir: As per our telephone conversation today, this letter is intended to confirm our agreement that there will be two trees added along the South perimeter of the property, where the existing office building will be demolished when the new building is completed. The new tree total will therefore become 23 instead of the 21 shown on our application documents. I have confirmed the Owner's concurrence with this revision. Please attach this letter to our Site Plan Review Application. Thank you ve ' uch for your assistance. Very 1i4. C ` , Siena ez-►el Campo Archite_ .GARB,IIDA RSC/jmm Raul A. Suarez-Del Campo Architect,NCAR 3 LEED,IIDA RSC Group 2515 SW 101 Court Miami,Florida 33165 rsdelcampo @gmail.com March 7, 2013 Mr. Gerald J. Lee, City Planner Planning&Community Development Dept. City of Opa-locka 780 Fisherman Street Opa-locka,FL 33054 Subject: Delta Trucking Inc. Proposed New Building Construction 12705 Northwest 20th Avenue Opa-Locka, Florida 33015 Dear sir: This letter is intended to accompany our documentation revisions as per your meeting with Carlos Abreu on March 5th at your office. Site Plan Checklist(as marked at your meeting) 2. The Owner's and architect's addresses have been added to the title block information on the Site Plan being resubmitted. Dry seal has also been applied. 6.The location of the project relative to its vicinity and roadways is being submitted in a City of Opa- Locks Zoning Map,notating the project site and its address.Also we are submitting an aerial Vicinity Map. Both maps have a North arrow. We are also resubmitting the survey of the property,which has a vicinity key plan (highlighted) and legal descriptions as well as the survey data. 7. The property survey is attached which shows the track dimensions, acreage, north arrow,and legal description (highlighted) for each of the two parcels that comprise the properties (which are taken from the public records of Miami-Dade County). 8. We are resubmitting the 375' radius map prepared for the project, which shows the names of all neighbors. It was prepared for the hearing notices that needed to go out to these immediate neighbors.We have also submitted the certified letters replies or returns to you as agreed. 18. The property survey is attached which shows the track dimensions, acreage, north arrow, and legal description for each of the two parcels that comprise the properties. These are taken from the public records of Miami-Dade County. 30. We are attaching the Civil Engineer's Water and Sewer Plan, which shows the existing utilities and the new design for supplying water and sewer to the new building. The easements are shown on the Site Plan, which I have now highlighted for easier reading. All existing parking elevations and existing drainage structures are to remain, and are shown on our Site Plan,which I have highlighted for easier reading,and on the survey as well. 40. I have attached a 24x36 sheet which shows two views of the proposed building, in color. The design of the signage is shown on these renderings. The size of the signs is shown on the Site Plan being submitted,also highlighted. As you know I recently had lumbar surgery and am not ambulatory, but this has not delayed our response after your application review meeting with Carlos Abreu, which we are turning around in two days. Please let Mr.Abreu know the status of the dry run permit plans when he brings these documents to you. Hopefully we can now move forward to the hearing date. I would appreciate knowing the date of the next hearing,in April. Very truly yours, kcie Raul A. Suarez-Del Campo Architect,NCARB,LEED,IIDA RSC/lat Reply to: Raul A. Suarez-Del Campo RSC Group 2515 SW 101 Court Miami, Florida 33165 rs delcampo @gmail.corn With Copy to: Mr.J orge Medina Delta Trucking Company P.O.Box 527711 Miami,Florida 33152 February 12,2013 Mr. Gerald J. Lee,City Planner Planning& Community Development Dept. City of Opa-locka 780 Fisherman Street Opa-loelea, FL 33054 Subject: Delta Trucking Inc. Proposed New wilding Construction 12705 Northwest 20th Avenue )pa-Locka, Florida 33015 Dear sir: This letter is intended to outline the scope of the submittal we are making to you today. As you may recall,when we met on lecember 14,2012,you filled out-a Site Plan Checklist which showed seven items may have required further action on our part.As you can see below,of these,two items needed additional information,i.e. 25 and 34,Dumpster location and Proposed Signage size.The overall items included: 3. Drawing(Site Plan) Scale—this scale was provided in the drawing that had been submitted at the time to both the Planning Department and the 1;uilding Department when we submitted Permit Application 10406 on September 27,2012.However,I have included 15 more copies of the Site Plan that comply with this checklist item. 6.The information requested as to the location of the proposed development showing relationship to existing roadways was on the original survey.However, I have attached another copy for your use. 8. Radius Map showing adjacent neighbors'information.This information was submitted after it was completed September 20,2012. However,I have attached another copy of this map. 14.Topography of site is shown on the Site Plan and survey.All existing elevations of paving and drainage are existing and will be maintained as shown. However, I have attached another 15 copies of the Site Plan for your use. 25. Dumpster locations have been shown on revised Site Plan. 34. Building Signage sizes have been added as requested. 38.Traffic Study was previously submitted after its completion December 11,2012. However, have attached 15 more copies of it for your use. have also attached the Owner's forms showing Delta Trucking as Owner rather than Jorge Median, as per your request. As regards the notification of all neighbors, as per our latest visit,we mailed out certified letters to all owners of record on the 375'radius list.As we agreed,this would satisfy the notice requirement for our application.Attached you can see the listing with folios and addresses,the individual forms sent to each of those neighbors, and the responses,which as you can see,were mostly returned without delfvery. Please note that the required CD of the plans on CAD formai was submitted to tP. e Building Department with the Dry Run Application on September 27,2012. Also note that we have previously submitted 15 copies of the Traffic Study,Water and Sewer Plans, and Neighbor's Listing. On Page 2 of the Application, per your request, the Owner's driver's license, previously submitted, has been omitted since the application is now being made, as requested,by the corporation. The facility the Owner is proposing to build is intended only to replace his old facility with a state-of-the-art headquarters for our company.The existing facility will be demolished when the new one is completed.The existing paving and drainage,which far exceeds County requirements,will remain unchanged. The Owner is asking that the existing landscaped and sprinklered perimeter site harrier with its new decorative steel picket fence be allowed d to remain in lieu of a blank concrete block wall. There will be no effect whatsoever on the site surroundings,or on the size of the current operation,or the number of employees or their work schedules. We are ready to move forward right now on the basis of the documentation being submitted. I would like to ask for your help in retrieving our Dry Run permit plans,which we were told by the Building Department that they had been sent to Public Works,and which Public Works does not have. I believe the plans must be with the Building Department. Thank you for your attention to this request. I would ask you to reply to me at the address below, and to copy the Owner also at the address below. Very truly yours, Raul A. Suarez-Del Campo Architect,NCARB,LEED, IIDA RSC/lat Reply to: Raul A. Suarez-Del Campo RSC Group 2515 SW 101 Court Miami,Florida 33165 With Copy to: Mr.Jorge Medina Delta Trucking Company P.O. Box 527711 .Miami, Florida 33152 Delta Trucking, Inc P. Box 527711 Miami,Fl. 33152 305-685-4318 September 12,2012 Mr.Gerald J.Lee,City Planner Planning&Community Development Dept. City of Opa-locka 780 Fisherman Street Opa-locka,FL 33054 Subject: Delta Treucldnng Inc. Proposed New Building Construction 12705 Northwest 20th Avenue OPa-lock, Florida 33015 bear sir: II am writing you this letter as the Owner of the subject property,where we have successfully run our operations for many years,and on which we would like to build a new office facility to replace our existing one. We have been worldog diligently with our architect on the design of the project, and I understand that he has been in contact with you as well. The purpose of this letter is to request that the requirement of a traffic study be waived in this case, for the following reason: The facility we are proposing to build is intended only to replace our old facility with a state- of-the-art headquarters for our company.The existing facility will be demolished when the new one is completed. There will be no effect whatsoever on the site surroundings,or on the size of our operation, or the number of employees or their work schedules. Since our project will not affect our existing operation,which has been running successfully for these many years,I therefore respectfully request that we be allowed to proceed with the Site Plan Review Application process based on your other requirements,as you expressed them to our architect.We are ready to move forward right now on that basis. Thank you for your attention to this request. I would ask you to reply to me at the address ( o and to copy our architect also at the address below. Very t ly your Jorge M; Iti :� Pres dent PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION NII GIEEZ IoMO MOOD E,E: PaCeianri AD Et SS '',0 411. G, Z7 - .4eate) Pt 334314 SAL D a ON: c;---- r / od/ 4,..41 G ,, r°:6 Y�q.: va _9 - D1 .. '. _ . . �. _, _' .,: , r" ..,.• : � ♦5 i ;,.. � .. of -_-_ i q-f .o • "r X", 4--.41 of.e I /1 2 9!p / 77 f_ la F OPJtTY OWNER'S N.AIWE:1�/j zaks �✓l CIS IA Pg ONE: ADDRESS(If tylt): We,mo undcasiarted,lava ao objection to peaitiaW°s Yegtiost to: , j!.it a 4 °� e,",. '`.44.9.,- `..., Balm amagaa r_____ FRONT: Nile Gardens LLC 12800 NW 27 Avenue Copart Inc. Opa Locka, Florida 33054 12850 NW 27 Avenue Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Hugh Bryan and Patricia Rornen Enterprises LLC RIGHT: 128.40 NW 27 Avenue 2801 NW 125 Street Opa Locka,Florida 33054 Opa Locka, Florida 33054 SIDS _ Waste Services of Florida Inc. • Security Capital Industrial TRS 12890 NW 30 Avenue 3001 NW 125 Street Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Opa Locka, Florida 33054 LEFT: Florida Power&Light Co. CPRT Land Holding 2850 NW 125 Street SIDLE 12891 NW 30 Avenue Opa Locka, Florida 33054 r--------- Opa Locka, Florida 33054 !Dade County School Board 12900 lam+!30 Ave.LLC 12525 NW 28 Avenue 12900 NW 30 Avenue Opa Locka, Florida 33054 RBA Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Miami-Dade Cnty Water& Sewer 12700 NW 30 Avenue Opa Locka,Florida 33054 111111111111111111. _ p4of4 c� - k lining and Community Develop b'rt;ent I jt l t,,k il i"rr:I t 780 Fisherman Street,4th Floor I Opa-, _33054 f` 305-953-2868 ext. 1503(te,.) 305-953-3060(fax) �EJlY a ;i (irroRi in ri -i`.)eveloper, Property Owner, elk Contractoi Name of Applicant / Developer/Property Owner (Circle One) Site Address/Location - Telephone Number u/ ' ._ Email Address Date of Application Pre-Application Procedures Prior to formal application for approval of any site plan, the applicant shall request and attend a mandatory pre-application conference with the appropriate City official(s) in order to become familiar with the City's development regulations and the subdivision process. At the pre-application conference, the applicant may be represented by his or her land planner, engineer and/or surveyor. Zoning Requirements A property within the City's corporate limits that is being proposed for development must be properly zoned by the City prior to submission of an application for approval of any site plan. In addition, the proposed development layout or design shown on the proposed site plan must be in conformance with all standards and requirements prescribed in the City's Land Development Code City Ordinance No. 86-8 and Miami-Dade County Subdivision Regulations adopted by City Ordinance No. 85-5 Completeness of Application Site Plan applications which do not include all required information and materials, as outlined below and per other City policies which may change from time to time, will be considered incomplete, shall not be accepted for official submission by the City, and shall not be scheduled on a Planning Council agenda until the proper information is provided to City officials. Applicability Administrative Site plan review and approval shall be required for all nonresidential, mixed-use, townhouse, single-family attached and multi-family residential projects and structures and for any condition of special exception or conditional use as required by the Mayor and City Commission. Exceptions 1 ,..11Lu wait rvttrvtr srtctn rt�t u rMIuttta tur brrtyt�-tetiiiiy resioential oeveiopments, unless me proposed subdivision will include a pr,-, amenity, facility or a golf course ` these instances, site plan submission and approval xn, u� required for the private amenity — facility, or the golf course clubhouse/hospitality area. Site Han Checklist The proposed site plan shall show the following information (other physical and engineering data shall be included in the engineering plans or as separate documents): 0 aci Z 04 ri 1. A title block within the lower right hand corner of the site plan with the proposed X X name of the project/subdivision, total site acreage, and the location of the property I. according to the abstract and survey records of Miami-Dade County _ 2. The name and address of the owner/developer and the land planner, engineer, X X architect or surveyor responsible for the plan 3. The scale of the drawing (both written and graphic scale) X X 4. The date the drawing was prepared X 5.Zoning X � 6. A vicinity or location map showing the location of the proposed development within X the City and in relationship to existing roadways 7. The boundary survey limits of the tract and each proposed lot/tract and scale X distances with north clearly indicated t 8. The names of adjacent additions or subdivisions or the name of the owners of X X record with north clearly indicated and recording information for adjacent parcels of un-platted land, including parcels on the other sides of roads, canals, etc 9. The existing zoning and existing/proposed uses on adjacent land; X/ 10. The location, width and names of all existing or platted streets or other public X ways within or adjacent to the tract v, 11. Any existing easements, with recording information X 12. Existing buildings X 13. Railroad rights-of-way X v 14. Topography(contours at two-foot intervals) with existing drainage channels or X F creeks including the 100-year flood plain, if applicable 15. Any other important natural features, such as wetlands, wildlife habitats, and all X substantial natural vegetation 16. Proposed strategies for tree preservation including showing individual trees or X tree masses that will be preserved, and the techniques that will be used to protect them during construction V 17. The layout and width (right-of-way lines and curb lines) of existing and proposed X thoroughfares, collector streets and/or intersections, and specific configuration of proposed streets 18. Lot/tracts and blocks X 19. Proposed driveways including driveway widths and distances between driveways X / 20. Proposed median openings and left turn lanes on future divided roadways and X existing and planned driveways on the opposite side of divided roadways must also be shown for coordination and sharing of future median openings 21. Specific locations and footprints of buildings, including but not limited to proposed X nonresidential and residential densities 22. Building heights X 2 for each intended use), massing ientation 24. Loading/service areas (ir. .�. .�g proposed screening) X 25. Recycling containers, compactors & dumpster enclosures X X (including proposed screening) - 26e Pedestrian walkways X‘,; 27. Parking areas (including parking ratio calculations) X 28. Any proposed sites for parks, schools, public facilities, public or private open X space 29. Flood plains/drainage ways X V 30. All proposed and existing utilities, easements and drainage structures X 31. Traffic Impact Statement X 32. Retention/detention ponds with proposed aesthetic treatments X 33. Screening walls; fences X 34. Signage location X 35. Fire lanes and fire hydrants X 36. Lighting X X t 37. Visibility easements X 38. Other pertinent development related features X X trees to be planted, and irrigation plans, if required X 40. Color building façade (elevation) plans showing elevations with any attached X (wall-mounted) signage to be used, as determined appropriate by the City Manager, or his/her designee. Etiect }l)l:royal The approval of a site plan shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months beyond the date that the plan was approved by the City Commission. If this is not accomplished, then the approved site plan shall be deemed to have expired and shall become null and void. Revisions to d.pp•roved Sifc- Plan Minor Revisions/Amendments— It is recognized that final architectural and engineering design may necessitate minor changes in the approved site plan. In such cases, the City Manager, or his/her designee, shall have the authority to approve minor modifications to an approved site plan and which shall be submitted as an "amended site plan," which substantially conforms to the previously approved site plan, provided that such modifications do not significantly change traffic circulation, building location(s) on the site, proximity of building(s) to nearby residential areas, increase the size or height of building(s), or any other conditions specifically attached as part of the City Council's approval of the site plan. Submission materials and requirements for approval of an amended site plan shall be as determined by the City Manager or his/her designee. If the City Manager, or his/her designee, refuses to approve an amended site plan, then the applicant shall re-submit the amended site plan as a "revised site plan", whereupon the revised site plan shall be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Council and City Commission Major Revisions— In the event of revisions that are more extensive in nature and do not conform to the description for minor amendments above, a "revised site plan" must be resubmitted, reviewed by the City Manager, or his/her designee, and reconsidered by the Planning Council and City Commission. Developer's Agreement—A Developer's agreement may be required for all development except for single-family homes or duplexes pursuant to Section 4.16 of City Ordinance No. 86-8. 3 Applicant's Name , -_ ` , . f Address ;'r Signed. ..7,,�-?, ,-...r., Date My signature certifies that I have been provided with a copy of the site plan checklist and have also had a pre-conference meeting with the Planning and Community Development staff. Reviewed by Planning Staff- Gerald Lee /'".e -- 4 Date of Pre-Conference Meeting - =-` t Date of Site Plan Review - 4 ,oYpr4oc,r4,.., Site Plan Checklist �. �; Planning and Community Development Department tta • *4 � �4-Apt 780 Fisherman Street,4th Floor rs dpa-locks, FL 33054 305-953-2868 ext. 1503(tel.) 305-953-3060(fax) Contact Information—Developer, Property Owner, or Contractor Name of Applicant / ' (-7 CC( ( Q.t, C. Developer/Property Owner (Circle One) Site Address/Location M'O &e / Z 7 c T 6A1 /c 4 r/ 33o5y Telephone Number 3 0's CO 6 S ,� cf' 18 Email Address a s �L c xlm P c.?,g 14,4� Vii, Date of Application / 2114112. Pre-Application Procedures Prior to formal application for approval of any site plan, the applicant shall request and attend a mandatory pre-application conference with the appropriate City official(s) in order to become familiar with the City's development regulations and the subdivision process. At the pre-application conference, the applicant may be represented by his or her land planner, engineer and/or surveyor. Zoning Requirements A property within the City's corporate limits that is being proposed for development must be properly zoned by the City prior to submission of an application for approval of any site plan. In addition, the proposed development layout or design shown on the proposed site plan must be in conformance with all standards and requirements prescribed in the City's Land Development Code City Ordinance No. 86-8 and Miami-Dade County Subdivision Regulations adopted by City Ordinance No. 85-5 Completeness of Application Site Plan applications which do not include all required information and materials, as outlined below and per other City policies which may change from time to time, will be considered incomplete, shall not be accepted for official submission by the City, and shall not be scheduled on a Planning Council agenda until the proper information is provided to City officials. Applicability Administrative Site plan review and approval shall be required for all nonresidential, mixed-use, townhouse, single-family attached and multi-family residential projects and structures and for any condition of special exception or conditional use as required by the Mayor and City Commission. Exceptions 1 Site plan review shall not be r 1 for single-family residential deve' nts, unless the proposed subdivision will include a privice amenity, facility or a golf course. in these instances, site plan submission and approval will be required for the private amenity or facility, or the golf course clubhouse/hospitality area. Sltc Pan Ch cldist The proposed site plan shall show the following information (other physical and engineering data shall be included in the engineering plans or as separate documents): 0 4 1. A title block within the lower right hand corner of the site plan with the proposed X name of the project/subdivision, total site acreage, and the location of the property according to the abstract and survey records of Miami-Dade County 2. The name and address of the owner/developer and the land planner, engineer, X architect or surveyor responsible for the plan V 3. The scale of the drawing (both written and graphic scale) X 4. The date the drawing was prepared X �C 5. Zoning X V 6. A vicinity or location map showing the location of the proposed development within X asv the City and in relationship to existing roadways / S! 7. The boundary survey limits of the tract and each proposed lot/ block/tract and X scale distances with north clearly indicated 8. The names of adjacent additions or subdivisions or the name of the owners of X ?,48. record with north clearly indicated and recording information for adjacent parcels of unplatted land, including parcels on the other sides of roads, canals, etc 9. The existing zoning and existing/proposed uses on adjacent land; X 10. The location, width and names of all existing or platted streets or other public X ways within or adjacent to the tract 11. Any existing easements, with recording information �( 12. Existing buildings X 13. Railroad rights-of-way X 14. Topography(contours at two-foot intervals) with existing drainage channels or X A creeks including the 100-year flood plain, if applicable / �E 15. Any other important natural features, such as wetlands, wildlife habitats, and all X y substantial natural vegetation V 16. Proposed strategies for tree preservation including showing individual trees or X tree masses that will be preserved, and the techniques that will be used to protect them during construction 17. The layout and width (right-of-way lines and curb lines) of existing and proposed X thoroughfares, collector streets and/or intersections, and specific configuration of t� proposed streets 18. Lot/tracts and blocks X V 19. Proposed driveways including driveway widths and distances between driveways X r/P 20. Proposed median openings and left turn lanes on future divided roadways and X existing and planned driveways on the opposite side of divided roadways must also be shown for coordination and sharing of future median openings 21. Specific locations and footprints of buildings, including but not limited to proposed X X nonresidential and residential densities 22. Building heights X 2 23. Square footages (for multi-' or multi-purpose buildings, show si footage X for each intended use), massing, orientation P 24. Loading/service areas (including proposed screening) X ' 25. Recycling containers, compactors & dumpster enclosures X X mt (including proposed screening) 26. Pedestrian walkways X 27. Parking areas (including parking ratio calculations) X V 28. Any proposed sites for parks, schools, public facilities, public or private open X space 29. Flood plains/drainage ways X V 30. All proposed and existing utilities and easements X V 31. Drainage structures X V✓ 32. Retention/detention ponds with proposed aesthetic treatments X 33. Screening walls; fences X ,u 34. Signage location ■( t AftiteUiZ " X 35. Fire lanes and fire hydrants X v 36. Lighting X V 37. Visibility easements X 38. Other pertinent development related features f 1.AP ic. 24tAd y X . �c trees to be planted, and irrigation plans, if required X 40. Color building façade (elevation) plans showing elevations with any attached X / (wall-mounted) signage to be used, as determined appropriate by the City Manager, or his/her designee. Effect of Approval The approval of a site plan shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months beyond the date that the plan was approved by the City Commission. If this is not accomplished, then the approved site plan shall be deemed to have expired and shall become null and void. Revisions to Approved Site Plan Minor Revisions/Amendments— It is recognized that final architectural and engineering design may necessitate minor changes in the approved site plan. In such cases, the City Manager, or his/her designee, shall have the authority to approve minor modifications to an approved site plan and which shall be submitted as an "amended site plan,"which substantially conforms to the previously approved site plan, provided that such modifications do not significantly change traffic circulation, building location(s) on the site, proximity of building(s)to nearby residential areas, increase the size or height of building(s), or any other conditions specifically attached as part of the City Council's approval of the site plan. Submission materials and requirements for approval of an amended site plan shall be as determined by the City Manager or his/her designee. If the City Manager, or his/her designee, refuses to approve an amended site plan, then the applicant shall re-submit the amended site plan as a "revised site plan", whereupon the revised site plan shall be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Council and City Commission Major Revisions— In the event of revisions that are more extensive in nature and do not conform to the description for minor amendments above, a "revised site plan" must be resubmitted, reviewed by the City Manager, or his/her designee, and reconsidered by the Planning Council and City Commission. Developer's Agreement o A Developer's agreement may be required for all development except for single-family homes or duplexes pursuant to Section 4.16 of City Ordinance No. 86-8. 3 Owner/ Applicant's ?Au -11,L e .t-3 'E?t_1 �ft� Name Address Signed. Date L - `t t `mot My signature certifies that I have been provided with a copy of the site plan checklist and have also had a pre-conference meeting with the P la f ning and Community Development staff. Reviewed by Planning Staff- Gerald Lee & Howard Brown Date of Pre-Conference Meeting —\t--k5`r4 t�{ ' 2012 Date of Site Plan Review— , 2012 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURI I uE A T C i ICA , OMB No. 1660-0008 Federal Emer,ency Management Agency Expires March 31, 20 National Flood Insurance Program Important: Read the instructions on pages 1-9. SECTION A-PROPERTY INFORMATION For Insurance Company Use: Al. Building Owner's Name MEROD INVESTMENTS LLC Policy Number A2. Building Street Address(including Apt., Unit, Suite,and/or Bldg. No.)or P.O. Route and Box No. Company NAIC Number 2790 NORTHWEST 127TH STREET City OPA LOCKA State FL ZIP Code 33054 A3. Property Description (Lot and Block Numbers,Tax Parcel Number, Legal Description,etc.) PB 31-42 TRACT 16&THE W. 151'OF TRACT 8 OF:"NILE GARDENS SECTION 1 &2", PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA A4. Building Use(e.g., Residential, Non-Residential,Addition,Accessory, etc.)COMMERCIAL A5. Latitude/Longitude: Lat. 25DEG 53'24.50"N Long.-80DEG 14'42.80"W Horizontal Datum: ❑ NAD 1927 0 NAD 1983 A6. Attach at least 2 photographs of the building if the Certificate is being used to obtain flood insurance. A7. Building Diagram Number 1A A8. For a building with a crawlspace or enclosure(s): A9. For a building with an attached garage: a) Square footage of crawlspace or enclosure(s) N/A sq ft a) Square footage of attached garage N/A sq ft b) No.of permanent flood openings in the crawlspace or b) No. of permanent flood openings in the attached garage enclosure(s)within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade N/A within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade N/A c) Total net area of flood openings in A8.b N/A sq in c) Total net area of flood openings in A9.b N/A sq in d) Engineered flood openings? ❑ Yes V No d) Engineered flood openings? ❑ Yes El No SECTION B-FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM)INFORMATION ~� B1.NFIP Community Name&Community Number B2. County Name B3.State CITY OF OPA-LOCKA-120657 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA B4. Map/Panel Number B5.Suffix B6.FIRM Index 67.FIRM Panel B8. Flood B9. Base Flood Elevation(s)(Zo 12086C-0138 L Date Effective/Revised Date Zone(s) AO,use base flood depth) 09-11-2009 09-11-2009 AH" 7.00' B10. Indicate the source of the Base Flood Elevation(BFE)data or base flood depth entered in Item B9. ❑ FIS Profile ►2 FIRM ❑ Community Determined ❑ Other(Describe) B11. Indicate elevation datum used for BFE in Item B9: ® NGVD 1929 ❑ NAVD 1988 ❑ Other(Describe) B12. Is the building located in a Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS)area or Otherwise Protected Area(OPA)? ❑ Yes ® No Designation Date N/A ❑ CBRS ❑ OPA SECTION C-BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED) Cl. Building elevations are based on: ❑ Construction Drawings" ❑ Building Under Construction* ® Finished Construction *A new Elevation Certificate will be required when construction of the building is complete. C2. Elevations-Zones A1-A30,AE,AH,A(with BFE),VE,V1-V30,V(with BFE),AR,AR/A,AR/AE,AR/A1-A30,AR/AH,AR/AO. Complete Items C2.a-h below according to the building diagram specified in Item A7. Use the same datum as the BFE. Benchmark Utilized LOC 2134S/NAME N-463-NEVertical Datum NGVD 1929 Conversion/Comments ELEVATION+ 8.89' Check the measurement used. a) Top of bottom floor(including basement, crawlspace,or enclosure floor)6.56 ®feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) b) Top of the next higher floor N/A. El feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) c) Bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member(V Zones only) N/A. ❑feet ❑ meters(Puerto Rico only) d) Attached garage(top of slab) N/A. ❑feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) e) Lowest elevation of machinery or equipment servicing the building 5.95 ®feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) (Describe type of equipment and location in Comments) f) Lowest adjacent(finished)grade next to building (LAG) 5.80 ®feet ❑meters (Puerto Rico only) g) Highest adjacent(finished)grade next to building(HAG) 5.88 ®feet ❑meters(Puerto Rico only) h) Lowest adjacent grade at lowest elevation of deck or stairs, including N/A. ❑feet ❑ meters(Puerto Rico only) structural support SECTION D -SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION This certification is to be signed and sealed by a land surveyor, engineer, or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information. I certify that the information on this Certificate represents my best efforts to interpret the data available.l S .-- understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S. Code, Section 1001.►� ~ Check here if comments are provided on back of form. Were latitude and longitude in Section A provided by a / `.,c7 A" licensed land surveyor? ® Yes ❑ No �x, ='1 Certifier's Name ARMANDO F.ALVAREZ License Number 5526 Title PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS&MAPPER Company Name AFA&COMPANY, INC. Address 13050 SOUTHWEST 133`x"COURT City MIAMI State FL . SignatureA �� Date 09-14-2012 Telephone 305.234.0588 M AIM J F air FEMA Fo 81-31, Mar 09- See reverse side for continuation. Replaces all previous editio Itundling € Chotographs See Instructions for Item A6. For Insurance Company Use: Building Street Address(including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.)or P.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number 2790 NORTHWEST 127TH STREET City OPA LOCKA State FL ZIP Code 33054 Company NWC Number If using the Elevation Certificate to obtain NFIP flood insurance, affix at least two building photographs below according to the instructions for Item A6. Identify all photographs with: date taken; 'Front View" and "Rear View"; and, if required, "Right Side View" and "Left Side View." If submitting more photographs than will fit on this page, use the Continuation Page, following. FRONT VIEW BLDG.#1 /� /' LEFT SIDE VIEW BLDG.#1 °"" i . ilk Attlgt- • }.... 'I:' ''II ,a '%. . ' I .I 1 11wy phi 4'' r, k"7., I '•, i .t;., of it .' , ��• .r,t r?'. 4 ; , i REAR VIEW BLDG.#1 �/e 0 RIGHT SIDE VIEW BLDG.#1 k. ;�•to MTF � i -Ism , •hilt,;ICI ` 11 III — -, _ +aw-.. Ai n+i , ,F•4 !""1...'-'•• " ,. 1�' ` I Continuation wage For Insurance Company Use: Building Street Address(including Apt., Unit, Suite, and/or Bldg. No.)or P.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number 2790 NORTHWEST 127TH STREET City OPR LOCKA State FL ZIP Code 33054 Company NAIC Number • If submitting more photographs than will fit on the preceding page, affix the additional photographs below. Identify all photographs with: date taken; "Front View" and "Rear View"; and, if required, "Right Side View" and "Left Side View." C FRONT VIEW BLDG.#2 s.b- •-- RIGHT SIDE VIEW BLDG.#2 •fi + , l; 1 tr f ,r rr it Il • ........ .. I1 J,...-';;;-,5-- +IS .i i • I 'I I 1, ,tt;• 4 • A REAR VIEW BLDG.#2 -S/' - GENERATOR VIEW 1 ``,�,, �+{ A t) ,, 1 ,,. , +,p ' ' " ,41,r 1 hlY IA N i c .. 1 r . om D e,F9+ )i,t .. .K . + aid Y LEFT SIDE VIEW BLDG.#2 'z------?-s-r--''-------------97;7.-. All t ,, klr, U. t H�( s Il/f iYll1Ii1/t1I/i/IJIil/iiNIIIItIhJIIII1, ,;�.t,iT 7r•' ' [ TcEJ F o ti e EiR rk in ( L 1rat' T sti .. i� stei'°a t ,s, TESTING LABORATORIES ENGINEERS-INSPEC1ION SERVICES-CHEMISTS-DRILLING-ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES December 13, 2012 RSC Group 2515 SW. 101 Court Miami, Florida. 33165 Attn: Mr. Raul Suarez RE: Subsurface investigation for Delta Trucking Inc.single story office located at:12705 NW 30th Ave, Opa-Locka,Florida Dear Sir: Pursuant to your authorization, All State Engineering & Testing Consultants, Inc. (ASETC) conducted a subsurface investigation at the above referenced project. The investigation was performed on December 11,2012. The purpose of the investigation was to develop preliminary information about the site and the subsurface conditions existing in the vicinity of the proposed construction. To achieve the desired objective two (2)standard penetration test borings was performed and the log is enclosed in this report. TEST METHOD: The borings were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined for standard penetrations test and split spoon sampling of soils by ASTM Method D-1586. A two (2) foot long two (2) inches 0.0. Split Spoon Sampler was driven into the ground by successive blows with 140 lb. Hammer dropping thirty (30) inches. The soil sampler was driven two (2) feet at a time then extracted for visual examination and classification of the retained soil samples. The number of blows required for a one (1) foot penetration of the sampler is designated as"N" (known as the standard penetration resistance value). The "N" value provides an indication of the relative density of non-cohesive soils and the consistency of cohesive soils. Suitable corrections are applied to this number in order to include the effects of soil overburden pressure and other • factors. A general evaluation of soils is made from the established correlation between "N" and the relative density or consistency of soils. This dynamic method of soil testing has been widely accepted by foundation engineers and architects to conservatively evaluate the bearing capacity of soils. A continuous drilling and sampling procedures was used therefore, the samples were taken at intervals of two(2)feet or at every change in soil characteristics. The types of foundation material encountered have been visually classified and are described in detail in the boring logs. The results of the field penetration tests are presented in the boring logs in numerical forms. The average ground water level at the site was found at five (5) feet six (6) inches below the existing surface (see logs). Fluctuation in the observed ground water level should be expected due to seasonal climatic changes,rainfall variation,surface water run-off and other specific factors related to the site in question. 2380 West 78th Street/Hialeah, Florida. 330161 Phone:305-888-3373 Fax:305-888-7443 Pre 2-December 13,2012 R`�Group FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Our recommendations are based on the information provided from the client as to the type of structure planned and on our subsurface investigation performed on the proposed site. Our recommendations are as follows: 1. Excavate entire building area plus 5'-0" outside the perimeter of construction and remove all top soil and unsuitable subsurface material to the necessary depth. We anticipate an average excavation depth of approximately four(4)foot zero(0) inches,and remove marl and other deleterious material. 2. Compact excavated area to a minimum compaction of 98% of the optimum dry density as per AASHTO T-180. Verify densification procedures by taking an adequate number of field density compaction tests. The excavated area should be inspected prior to the commencement of the backfilling operation to ensure that all the unsuitable material has been removed. 3. Backfill building area, plus 5'-0" outside the perimeter of the structure to the required elevation with a clean mixture of sand and lime rock fill(or approved fill material)in compacted layers not to exceed twelve(12) inches in thickness. Compact each layer to a minimum of 98% of the optimum dry density as per AASHTO 1180. Verify densification procedures by taking an adequate number of field density tests, especially by the footing area. 4. Excavate footing trenches to the required depth from the ground elevation. 5. Compact the bottom of the footing trench to a minimum compaction of 98% of the optimum dry density as per AASHTO T-180. Verify densification procedures by taking an adequate number of field density compaction tests. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: The above foundation recommendation having been achieved and verified we anticipate that the foundation and footings may be appropriately proportioned for a safe soil bearing capacity not to exceed 2000 pounds per square foot(psf). The use of spread footings and single column pads is suggested. A monolithic slab foundation may also be adopted. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the thoroughness of our geotechnical exploration there is always a possibility that conditions on the subject property (site) may be different from those at the test locations. Therefore, should any subsoil condition different from those reported in our boring logs be encountered during construction, ALL STATE ENGINEERING AND TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC.,should be notified immediately. This report was prepared exclusively for the use of RSC GROUPS The conclusions provided by All State Engineering & Testing Consultants, Inc. are based solely on the information presented in this report. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to your company. Please feel free to contact us if there are any questions or comments pertaining to this report. Sincerely yours, ‹.----. f 7 L- /-3 ° l,.°.,..._. W ssem Quadri, P.E.#51481 All State Engineering And Testing Consultants, Inc. WQ/BM/rsc group All STATE] Ar State e 'iruT el est irg uttan !•LLNGINEERING TESTING LABORATORIES-ENGINEERS-INSPECTION SERVICES-CHEMISTS-DRILLING-ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2380 west 78th Street, Hialeah, Florida. 33016 / Phone: 305-888-3373 Fax:305-888-7443 TEST BORING REPORT CLIENT RSC Group Order No, 12=469 ADDRESS 2515 SWQ. 101 Court, Miami, Florida 33165 Report No, 1 PROJECT Delta Trucking Inc.Single story office Hole No. D-2 _ ADDRESS 12705 NW, 30th Ave,Opa-Locka,Florida Date 12-11-12 LOCATION 85' east&35'south of NW.corner of property Driller MP DEPTH DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS Sample Hammer blow "N" Hammer blows (FEET) . No. on sampler on casing 1 0'-0"to 2'-0"backfill tan medium sand with some rocks 12 15 2 0'-2' 13 12 28 3 2'-0"to 4'-0" brown medium silica sand with marl 4 3 4 2'-4' 4 3 7 5 4'-0"to 9'-6"brown medium silica sand 4 4 6 4'-6' 3 4 7 7 4 5 8 6'-8' 4 4 9 g 5 7 10 9'-6"to 15'-0"tan medium lime sand with coral rocks 8'-10' 8 10 15 11 11 10 12 10'-12' 12 15 22 13 16 12 14 12-14' 13 14 25 15 15 13 16 End of boring @ 15'=0" 14'-16' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 WATER LEVEL: 5'-6"below surface Respectfully Submitted, At Date: 12/11/12 C?d.-- (L' aseem Quadri,R.E.#51481 -_ As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients,and authorization for publication of statements,conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. Nile Gardens East Page 1 of 1 My Home IUliami-Dade County, Florida HAM*. .•- Property Information Map Summa Details: Folio No.; RiNFTIERI Pro.erty: 12705 NW 30 AVE 1.1I • Mailing MEROD INVESTMENTS LLC .C;! 'II i� • Address: Iu) ; 2890 NW 127 ST OPA c• • LOCKA FL 33054-5047 fr! ; Property Information: .w. i Primary Zone: HEAVY MFG RIAL- ( I I :I CLUC: 0068 EXTRA FEA � lip 11 : . OTHER THAN PARKING I, It ii Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: 0 tl';!'it:I ii If Living Units: 0 dj Sq Footage: 0 n Lot Size: .94 ACRES Year Built: 0 8 29 52 41 4.94 AC NILE GARDENS SEC 2 Legal PB 31-42 LOT 16 LOT Description: SIZE IRREGULAR 087 4222 12/05 COC I' /25276-4964 OR 25276- 964 1206 01 „_ ,• Assessment Information: Year: 2012 2011 Land Value: $1,076,350$1,076,350 Buildin Value: $17,248 $17,472 Aerial Photography-2012 0 ggggosemiimm 167 ft Market Value: $1,093,598$1,093,822 This map was created on 3/5/2013-11:34:47 AM for reference purposes only. Assessed Value: $1,093,598$1,093,822 Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Taxable Value Information: Year: 2012 2011 Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption! Exemption! Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $0/ $0/ $1,093,598 $1,093,822 County: $0/ $0/ $1,093,598 $1,093,822 City: $0/ $0/ $1,093,598 $1,093,822 School Board: $01 $0/ _$1,093,598 $1,093,822 Sale Information: Sale Date: 12/2006 Sale Amount: $0 Sale O/R: 25276-4964 Sales Sales which are Qualification disqualified as a result of Description: examination of the deed View Additional Sales Nile Gardens East Page 1 of 1 • My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida MIAMIOADE 11 ia 171 iciade.qov E";; } Property Information Map 1 k''' " • 1 ;� r Summa Details: 1 . r,.� Folio No_. #;-2 2:41•-#1 i' •l'� ' ',i'i1'if A.:/∎1:4 , 1 Pro*erty: 2790 NW 127 ST Ii t' 1ii'I r Otl,:t+ Mailing MEROD INVESTMENTS LLC � ddress: 2890 NW 127 ST OPA I-OCKA FL rt s, 33054-5047 15+if1'r,;lr.,�,; Property Information: .', •400 MULTI-FAMILY-3 f Primary Zone: STORY }j I; 0037 WAREHOUSE OR CLUC: STORAGE . Beds/Baths: 0/0 I f Floors: 1 I. r', I 1 Living Units: 0 I"'.t Ad)Sq Footage: 3,481 r'' Lot Size: •8,798 SQ FT Year Built: 1955 '„I I ?; NILE GARDENS SEC 2 '�i i',(111i/t64;1' ? PB 31-42 W151FT OF Legal R 8 LOT SIZE 48798 SQUARE FEET COC n Description: 4087-4222 12/05 /25276-4964 OR 25276- 964 1206 01 Assessment Information: Year: 2012 2011 1' I Land Value: $129,315 $161,033 Aerial Photography-2012 0 �� 166 ft Building Value: $87,488 $88,730 Market Value: $216,803 $249,763 This map was created on 3/5/2013 11:36:03 AM for reference purposes only. Assessed Value: $216,803 $249,763 Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Taxable Value information: Year: 2012 2011 Applied Applied el4 Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $0/$216,803$0/$249,763 ?r County: $0/$216,803$0/$249,763 # `Close; City: $0/$216,803$0/$249,763 School Board: $0/$216,803$0/$249,763 Sale Information: Sale Date: 12/2006 Sale Amount: $0 Sale O/R: ;5276-4964 Sales Sales which are Qualification disqualified as a result of Description: examination of the deed View Additional Sales (1.c..___ \.=...7 C Nile Gardens East Page 1 of 1 • My Home Miami-Dade County, Florida Property Information Map I- _ - _ ti a Summa Details: l � Folio No.: t . r-�l';,li)`!i�il�:' Pro•eity: 12891 NW 30 AVE(;) 1,MI �!'r t 1 ..1'' Mailing 12850 NW 27 AVE INC I ,ddress: CPRT LAND HOLDING I, 4665 BUSINESS CENTER DR FAIRFIELD CA I, m..-..4.._... . 04534 Pro•ert Information: ?1'd,c1111;1'.4: J Primary Zone: 7300 INDUSTRIAL � HEAVY MFG R 1 ,1 I CLUC: 0065 PARKINGNACANT LOT ENCLOSED Beds/Baths: 0/0 Floors: Living Units: j P Adj Sq Footage: D 0 1 1'1' Lot Size: :36 ACRES rJ 1,1 ,. Year Built: + '1 8 29 52 41 2.37 AC 1 I-,'.r.:.. NILE GARDENS SEC 2 }!;;';1:1(ti?.;11-li Legal PB 31-42 S1/2 OF LOT Description: 15 LOT SIZE 103237 SQUARE FEET OR I II • 16617-3817 1294 1 OR 16617-3817 1294 00 Assessment Information: 1' Year: 2012 2011 Land Value: $516,185 $516,185 I _ 1 Building Value: $7,608 $7,691 Market Value: $523,793 $523,876 Aerial Photography-2012 0 ruourro.mo 166 ft Assessed Value: $523,793 $523,876 This map was created on 3/5/2013 11:35:44 AM for reference purposes only. Taxable Value Information: Web Site©2002 Miami-Dade County.All rights reserved. Year: 2012 2011 Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/. Exemption/ Taxable Taxable Value: Value: Regional: $0/$523,793$0/$523,876 County: $0/$523,793$0/$523,876 City: $0/$523,793$0/$523,876 I 0 5 i School Board: $0/$523,793$0/$523,876. Sale Information: Sale Date: 12/1994 Sale Amount: $250,000 Sale 0/R: 16617-3817 Sales Qualification Sales which are qualified Description: View Additional Sales . •, i' 4, - . ., . , - ,i1K • ,;,'41." , „ ..r IT i .41111111E: ...■ ' . . ( 4-, •, . , lc 0. , i, ,iri ,, „,.. 1 ,. p,..,4., ci -__, I , ...4f4as:.rii ,,' . , . . • 114, , ; l't' ' .,,t ,IIP,.,' ',.'''r0, '3'{ill,, .../ ..,1 lee', l'.... , , ,1 011'4 . ,, ••,.,„.. -01,41,... i" ( hi - N,tiii .),,/,I 11 ). V,r.1 ,, . ... • -— „ I I, 1 i , ' billt,1 g. .... . , -4 r TiP ;„ , y,, ,.., • ., '. ,.,„t ',, '1 -,,,',.11 '14 .0' ,t `' '+id i, ,., , 'A. 5 , *,v,, 1, it r I '4 ■ '' ' E • .-• • , , v'', . ,., t.,10 A• . , • ') 10 i . 1:1 • 4, 1,1:1I, 1' ‘,..'r ' ' .ii,,i, , , •., 1, , 0:1,), /I , 1., .. i,.,,..,,,,I.,,,,i'.'("t1,14,.:21.1.11,11`,!..°,`.' Lir-, 4..,,(6 . , 14. .4. 1., 44. 4',. hti4. , 4,8, ,opy„,,, ,l,„ r .. r ,, ...A.., ,-,., ,.,,,,,.,..- - ..,,.,:t.,,„:....,..,,,.-4■• 1 i .44,AAlft■• J,;;,,,''',, .t''''t, . .";'1 r■, 'I . ■ II • '; .4y i ' 'I 40 .4 .. . t„ i , . u , .T.1. .r..-- '-' .1',1 . - , , - ,.•, , tti. ,•'-,.(4, ,, ,f.., '.,,i ,),'II i•' "',i q''.k - r - ‘.. ,. ..-- - - .... P.vv,t.,1 f f AVItittl. 14.t1,1 ,iyil 1,10,„ , , ,. , , •4 , .,,,,4 i , , NI, .a,-- vi(J) ,',1 ."41,1to' 7 ' J,, , .,t r •*, ,,.-1 , 5, A,..... 1., . ,, , 0,,-i ■ 1.' 1 6■ lik.',. ',■' 'LA, li..",*i ',.i ‘ i{' ia , ' , ..,' I jtk, I 1. „ ' l';',//:,Iik,..,"-• '1 ::. 14 174`". 'I'. • f. '' ,1 .,1• ,,,, ,, :,,,,I, ■ ,.,,Iyilly, 1.,L ,., , . %1. , , -1 1 ,,,, 1, •! o 1 l' Ain' ,' t•11 ••1 z ,.., 1,, 0 ' 4.414.41r,; '' litti71°:1.Iti ‘. ' 4 , — 1 1'I. :: t•-:' I '''.. 111111 - ... i . , . , -' , i',' "-t,.. , v, - ''.,, ., • r...,,t , r 104-4: /'''' '''' . ' '' 1 i ro. ' ,,,t't , • , i • -- 1 It , „ ; , t , 1 ,, `'•. - I ,. I 1" .11i1Pii. ! 1,', ; ),,,:,. , 1,I I 1 1, 1 OP .jti*.,titftwi;'' ..,ktitti t.'qq,',q:i',cr, 64,,,;('.., I. . , ,, • . • i ill li'll‘411,'(7,4'164W.. , 1, • ,,',1.',' ' tit..4 Nir,'...:;4'.1."A•le.'11'.1611..,.0.t ,.,,J , ., . ,.,,..„.,,,, ri.,„......,„,,....,„,, L .... . . „ . (...) V ' ., , • et) ,i, 1 7 I "L.°' ,4"1, ", ,■•, IC„,/ 1 t IP L 1 Int d • t' ,1 .1-.. li ' 1;1 411 ill ,1 . t g,t It . Cl) ' m0104 : .' . s,, . I.1 lii , .1-''' V ''I''■'' ' '11 , .1. , i • 4 VI4 _ P.:-.1)1'4'1,',r11} --- il I ''. - " J r, ; • 14,it-., -, , r ,',12t:- _,- ''''.-- %4-'0;1, ,.-, V,24,1A lit,. },u,,,,i.i. ,. 1 , --.. -- • ,(---) II CU (I) ' ' Ot ' -re41 Imo, I II 4. . toe.,o1' • t . . ii, . ,.....1 . ,- ,-4, ((-x;1,, -. -14,.. ,,,.' g t 1 , t,t 1,.. i 11 , ■ "II!"--- Ir. 1. 'I $.14,1 , i liti . I' 'i '`4'1 hTik. . . ......L- " i'llti,*-0;iii$(10.`" 11 . 1 '. . ' - ''''.• i',.■I q't 1,, 1 1 ._4 r 1 .11* f ' ...:,;1' 1 i11? ..."*If 4. ' 31.•' - • 4 • l' " ' , . i . (-,0 ta.) ..„ , '..'•:',1r.t.,4,i'.:',1),,;,t., ., ...., j p i■ f 1 0 . ■ itri' '. 11 7,.1 I I' ••■ _ , (....) 1 , e. .' 1 ' ti • P,1 • •, .. , - - fud z MN i Av.1.11.Ae...1.9.,,N.orammosaureesseamol 10 LIIIIIMIIIIMMIll -01: ...:...7"-,..y.,,,,, ..,•ewv,,. .,.,,*1-'.,,',,,,..>,.,,,'" ,..Ce"? . :•:..... .:,...: / .-..:,-: ::::..... .:,,, r. 1 . r,c1 •. 1; ,.. -1,!,,,,1 J 4.:'.:';',1 C‘).1:;'' ' :'. •4!'":k;:".0:1'e'"?,:::::::)::!:5:::::!::;:::•: :.;"..f:./..''5:'1:.:::f...'::.•'Me'?",:?04:,4'.5';:''.;:../.::.1 k k '.. ." ." ' ".‘ik../..''./.."!....7;:.",:":•',...f.......''''k....:::;'.....;';''.;';/...:.;":".:...;..:4';',X;'... Ns4,x g..::::k.: :::,::.:,; ::.:4::;*:'...5;;.;.;..,...: '...,.:.;,•:::.:::::......::::::;::::::.,...:::::,....:,,::::::........::,;;...2.:3,: :..,,,::...,..,,,::..: I -41111111" ,!...,,,,.;,...,.....,„.......,,„. .,/.....::....:.;;:....:,::"..:,*.;,. ,::',.,:'....f.-.:,..!....::,;•;;;;';.;-:.:,........::',..:',.;•.;,:',.;,../,'.., v/.....,./......:..::,...Y.:.Y....'/:..:',../:....:'/:::;;:.::,...:....,:...,.....,.,....,,,,,,,.......,,../.. .,.:,........,.:..::,......:,.../...:. I I 14,,, \"Vss,. , ..,:%,:::'''....,:':.:..:.:!;,;,;:.,,:.:::%..::::::;, :;:-: ',: .::::':..:::::,.;::"::::';:::2::'.•./....:.-3:::::::: ::.!:'::'::'....•''' u \ \\,. \ ,:`\,:.\:: 1,s,,, N '::::::;.:';',....:..r,. ,-,......;:,::...:.;'';',-,..,-V..:-.::::',.'::-:...:.':''.-.:1-:.':..:.:::,.:::!;:.:,::..% ::::•;,;,,...,:',.:. ,,,' ,‘ , 'N.J.. kkl, stor , lio ,,,•...•.•„,,,/,.-...,,,•••...,.,,•,.•%.,•,,,.,•,..,,••••••,,• ,, 1r— I ,••• , . , . •, ,,,,,,,.,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,....,,,..,, ., b ;tztii,4 ,,. ; . .„ .....;..........„..„... ,... .. . . k .. ,. .. ........... .. ,. . ,, . . . ::: K, !'■$ I, .,„, ,!!I ' ., ,•,.„..•,'........./..".1•'k k.••.%r r.k.k'k•k'1. • I.`,1 :''''':.2.''''...':,::.''"• '', ... ; •,, t- ' . ' '1, t. . ,...-.. ,it, i 44 irl. .15 I* ii •••%...11,* t.r 1 I •"-1' ..''. , t i 1 ! i...,:•t 1.' I*1&4 ff I jfaliifil iiii7IMIKKO", 7.,,Cpriffig:t ,^1, ::. :.: -7-.'.:?,'..,. ,..A.Mplilr'.41,1,!hi0 A . 1 k I k ( ki • . k k k I:414, lk.ID I rk AT:1%;111.?4 ill'4'•'.11- 111.4 4 It t 4 ill: 1:: 1 1 I j *tt'',.., I I i 1, 111.1 ,i'':',^i 1 . 1, j, Ile ( i hailVilria-Nirr ril I 1tii1:4 : 131(.9:1ilik -- r .- 1 di Ili 1,41 1 i 1 al rItk, 1 , ..: 13 At i.,•• ',:, : . •,' .:4" I -•"• i 1 Ctill ' ' '• ' ' - ,,ir r,'PriPr,M'1'.; ' 4 . ' ,.36-,,4 1Zr.•,hr4 ,,.. , ., ,,„_ . ,",,k 1 .• CL all) ; 1 i 1 4 0 0 I T irtil 1 14.1.1 Ii& ,*;m1 -1 1 ID ,•- ci.:1 11 ,..i_.1 i vitil N i 4 -:7-44-44-144it‘Wallia"laMaalinCI:OrATAIrgrahrlii.V,Iterottrianusuncinrainaraan:stmormaimnc4.441444ratt.bar-s4u4,1*-,;4 SirctU91:1;:it:C1.71.b.' 1 I • WON 1 ( 1 . ; 1 Nile Gardens LLC Security Capital Industrial TRS 12800 NW 27 Avenue 3001 NW 125 Street Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Folio 08-2128-004-0060 Folio 08-2128-004-0400 Folio 08-2128-004-0061 Folio 08-2128-004-0062 Florida Power& Light Co. 2850 NW 125 Street Hugh Bryan and Patricia Opa Locka, Florida 33054 12840 NW 27 Avenue Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Folio 08-2128-023-0310 Folio 08-2128-023-0320 Folio 08-2128-004-0050 Folio 08-2128-023-0330 Folio 08-2128-023-0340 Dade County School Board 12525 NW 28 Avenue Romen Enterprises LLC Opa Locka, Florida 33054 2801 NW 125 Street Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Folio 08-2128-026-0020 Folio 08-2128-026-0010 Copan Inc. Folio 08-2128-023-0290 12850 NW 27 Avenue Folio 08-2128-023-0300 Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Waste Services of Florida Inc. Folio 08-2128-004-0040 12890 NW 30 Avenue Folio 08-2128-004-0160 Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Folio 08-2128-004-0390 CPRT Land Holding 12891 NW 30 Avenue Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Folio 08-2128-004-0170 12900 NW 30 Ave. LLC 12900 NW 30 Avenue Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Folio 08-2128-002-0120 Miami-Dade County Water & Sewer 12700 NW 30 Avenue Opa Locka, Florida 33054 Folio 08-2128-004-0400 PLANNING COUNCIL APPLICATION NEI( IRHOOD PETITION RE; PROPERTY ADDRESS: 12705 NW 30 Avenue,Opa Locke, Florida 33054 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16 Nile Gardens Sections and H, PB 31, PG 42 • - • Gan:fens-Sections PB 31, PG 42 of the public records of Dade County, Florida PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Delta Trucking Inc. PHONE:305-6854318_ ADDRESS(If different): We,the undersigned,have no objection to petitioner's request to: Replace exist offices w new office building NAME ADDRESS PriT{iNE FRONT: I. 2. 3. 4. RIGHT: I. SIDE: 2. 3. 4. -- - LEFT: I. -- SIDE: 2. 3. 4. REAR: 1. _ Folio 08-2128-004-0050- Hugh Bryan and Patricia 12840 NW 27 Avenue 2. Op; Loska, Floridx33054 3. C7-\\ A ( )% vo.ture '‘ A fAX Page 4 of 4 i" • • L9 Z - w w 2 .... z O 2 A . .I 4 L L I] LLi i j j ir' :11 Lu _i 0o et■k 0 CNI it 0 a 9 616 mr. 0 •kit iro a z ,t LJ 6 O 0 ihi. ..„1 .., 4i 11.11.111111 11 111 >I. Um. Z w v > O z CL 0 < >I•1 Z 411410 • Iv- I-- 1-1-1 — f7L 11.11. iliCt Z a. D mm. ...11 2 (.1) i. 0 Cl 0 omml <IC 0 WI CL CO ,.... _ 0 Z n CD . Z N 1 O o CI) W ' F Ct Q E — O J L' LI-- W CU 0 0) C CO • • U u) a) 0) n c 0,0,10••y d •mism % i C r* a) O � , a O i ho O 1110•�N OC N W O a) O -1..0 •-•LO '- N t .S 0" O _ 03 I — , 4— lima CO C .,J ..;!•• (1) ,� . El E E .� L_ s • z v v a) *a 0 c s... o cu c CD i- cn '— O 0 CO .- --� N c � C •U .I ._ C c a) C C CO •- -� 0 0 C13 CD (/) :rz -1--; U = o C o o_ S • E M O p 0 T- a) r N O a) ,�.., N O N 1 O -C O Ct . CCS N , U N 3 1r- •MINIM MIC Q V a) a) E 'L, L. Et Q Q) —C CO Q CO J > + + O- ption Q a� CD ._ r ii „ O a.,,...,,, , 't11J� co -o ■ co C ..—(1)C`r• () L_. 6 _c co V U .� z 6 O o w(t1 -c cr co EL*a w O CO 0 — a) O •— inu 0) cu c _ co co al W '� L� 0) U •O 0 CU rl LN U a3 t3 S c -0 c ° V CD c a) Eo E c ci) a5 0 O mt O ci cu = •� O 4) s- U L- C 7 > •� > O o 03)N a .,,,,o) 0 a) 0 C co C > a) CZ ° ca s- al _J -0 J 0_ 'V ->N > .>, O 0 U U ' • a. . c0 as i. . CO M N-- o . • • V 0 0 NI. 73 bb Z z C%' •MENU O ft .e■r j -0 a O •—u) ur) a) u) c O •_ = co U 0 0 .C' ET C ) a) z z a) OP D L. Ce C a) o -0 73 CIS CO c) '0 cii■� — U C 751 i5 cu co o G c -e INIC '4'a(,) C 0) a) a) ._ >11 („„) a)E 0 „; .ir, . co ,,_, i_ •p*S a — L) o � � o a) z° � co C • C > a) m a) a) ...c , c c 0 ....., 0 a (,) „ a3 a3 4– ft U E. N N -0 0 -5 -o a) -o cz CO o D o0- oc U u)W L Q D Q U L W�II I- WJ 0 0 0 Z 4 Z N X +' --t7 O C*uI. +-' v) O - Ala Z -d U U '-d UI) C4 a) u) w 4.-, a., .. a, O 0 O - U ME Cr 4 4 1111... 0 .i:1 • f).1 '4-' U O Z b o U CD CI U 13 W c N O N to Q) '''' L. O C •....Cl) O �_ p_ 'L � chi M♦ X �`= N 5 c O a. C � � � pn o iFg- ,, r.) f6c O CU p. 0 ui. E O 4- p E Q 0 = a) .> O -Q O '- O 0--5 'Cli>1 0 La-) u O .X ca N > = 0) -0 -8' _c V >> N N • +-' C vo a) _c p N N 0 cs cu "v ° E O c NU C U C CI Co � � V I- N Co --, a) -0 0- = 4- D p- p (5 _c N 0_ O -0 >, 0 Q. -I-1 l 0 0.2 g o -� p CO 0 o CD c c o � 73 a) a_ --� ago c o Imo- o ° a = o F- CD a. =. 0 O 0 0 0 Z z z z C . 41•+ Cl) (I) CD ■■• Z 0 O O O ..0 cr' z Z Z Z Ilia w Iwo Cie a) cu U DW ,9 0 +., ,...... ,..... ,Tz, .,_. , •(1) -d O at C N V 0 gi ._ O (0) a ik P-,N a) 0 U • at >41 cl) CZ = 011) Cr2C73 '* -'1 b.0 a) U . '. )'. ). ,� O 4) CZ! CO C) al ■� '� a) iii --N' (.(3•—,-1 U , —I cC■—,5 U r--, --- O E a) c ct N o ct - U ;., U 0 U 0 —d 0� O al V O tab O O, O v� ¢, C... CI) C1-, co C a) v N H 1 O 0 O Cil• z z z CO) (I) CD ■ NC mina cr 0 1.1. w z z z 0) 13 (f) C:c) O U' • 0 4J cu 0 ct: '',;', Tzi bbl) O .- �" 0 -C" 0 O U '� O V �' U i, •al s a) 'z7 0 v ) .O rzs —, ~ C an �' S - o •- O Q) U ) , rzs a� a� a� N � v rz � � < UU cd U �. vi �, O 0 U �d 5 CU U N N 0 0 cC O U O �'' O 'br-, O :t, Ham+ • UO r:: H H H •_ (-- ..,':': U . 0 .-d +-+ 0 ;..., bA O U E Z v 0■ • "-1 N C � - 3 >., -. U) * .4._; N el U ..0 Cr 4 U O 141=0 0 , a-, v„ O ✓ ~ N 161 file I) CU (-NI a ,_N DW ,..,cy 9 ^V^'' '� W ._ 0) ^' co) aS W ;--1 rM Q (113 oa, • • v S 4, o >11 CI) V O cd O N U ✓, N = C7) ?)-° 0 �., cn• .- •C CO k -Cl ,� O . .) ■ �D U O U b N • ^' _. + ON "d 'C 4> vD O Nm -'3 ms . - o o Cl) � U rd r O O - ,, bk �,.., O aq - «S •-d N _.. / r ., w C,) a) a) ›. >_, oui +a co 0)1.5 •N mu, cn cn = Om a) lea W i Ce OD -o w •NEN 0 a.) U) %I-5J cn C C O 'b >111 (o.) 0 F O Cti U (s) INC cu ti) 0 •E bk s 01) cn ..„,, 4-) P., CA ._ C 0/ 1111 cc Cr � C) O E o 0 N -,„ .c4 4) C. : : O F- p._, _ - . -•,— .-- _____ , ._._....1 ___ • -- —.) — 0 w suep0 e slueliedv Je -.... (...) ., !..... 0 < ...... , 0 ,..- . 4-* :1 r" ,19..,," < y.... e.I • • 0 : 00 . -— (LI 3 • f- -‹ a c . 6.7 (._,) D 1 ..., ... , .... I 1 i I ,-- . (1 c...) i M = Z 7.3 0 I 1•"" • (...) 0 I I LLI M ,...j. LL1 Cr ,._.... _ — -- — _ _ _ _ ____ — — 1 a_ --I .... = Li_ co) ALIVda1001 t51II'Hon.!! i = . I u onels dill nd a pea.-I lti F3 I v.4 11 0 0 .....1 -r— %...IF ,-- ›... 5 1:12= C i= = I— --> el) 53 --I 4 I-- 2_.'.> ....._.._ , 1 p a•-• "6 .0 0 0 1:1 .g: eir 8'- ..a c . d .o) 9) 0 cr., CI Cl.. -t.--__.'••Y..- 0) r-- 000 / _ . * , . 4, I 11 • L Jr, g • - c`tt 1 - ilk- 1 rt. :0:Mils i ti":1111;:itli'it*":* .,.111:- di... : • .111,1141 . s i Ar it,,,,„...,:tvt- , _ ,,,.. • 10k ft • ,/"#* , .....‘ 1 • a ". ., *it* ZL'k.,. 44C, `- • a> -L--) lk i ..I 41kitt. '0( /1 a:- !.' . 44,2 ih, ..‘„,,,„4. • i ,... 52 ot _ •– _,-.: -i-1 r- N r , :, ... ow: , • 0 " i- 7— . JIM co ---- W' (4. .... .. . , r. L....--- . ,- :.., Ili _ _ , - 7-7 -if :71 , . - - ..1' :.= -‹ Fi = ,. ,,..., . ar.. • ' -— — — ' 111. 1:-.L j= 6 II I, i, rtA,t, , tititee,,. . , 1 era . ' CS_ C) CD — . , 0r $ ' • • it 1 .. ' ,F..,.... .• : ',...fmr ' + , . ek. , - a , . . . r • , .(v. : . „.. . .. . .., . , to ri 1,,lik elk. :. j.. mi. 4firiu . -,. iv,il, -T.- - P'..- ' 4 • + , r-< 4b. ,,• r ,\1,i , , . ., , Cm • ."..3_*• # SP.' qk ' a . .,,,,... .... .!. itt:C lo. ' •-i, IA . %14. I , `...' 1 4, I ih, ' 1 -• -- - - Ir.... i ' I - 111 441 0 V IF 44 tt .t.. • ,..,'....".%,:...-44. . - - 1or ••. I t UJ Pk rSt• c a, 1 :•` • < 't,,k i it; .e. t , ,, ,e,44•„,„ ica._, e,,,,, • 44,. i k' .,. t. i.. .i...• . . ut H • n n .....* • = tr) tik -. ut ic) _.--- 1 < ' - --.0.-... . .,,,, - • r __,- ---..--- - _ ,-_, - - ., ....... ) ...., - . = u_ 1 -1111 • 11,,.... , .64 ' ' . I:L.:1 0,14=) rl - , Ntti, 4 . ' I ■.I = 0 c _ ., ... --,' • /A' ..., LU c■I ... .00 ! ..■ ". 44C 'T. 0 OM OOP Po...O. iii .1. Evassr . .___ , ,..r.-- .. ...,.. .. No A . ., F. = --•-.7--. -= .co ., .92 .± .13 -.E• > o.> -,-. ...,c'cl •fly .r..." •–• .= ..... 0 „. .. sj....."n ., .....O I— C2I .7I. g c 1 '.... — ,.- —.J , .. I-- --) el? .1.) 4 i .. •VC:. "4 _ ,1.-1 .5 .o o 0 a. r. , tr.3 44 .a . L,.... /4: 7"—'—'7.,-. t7) .e.76 .(7) C 0 ,— ol S, ,,,,.../o" ',2 rc; .4.) t..r, .4:0 I. al. "C.•-----•a"'ov L .. .7..— E E E , cc) 7. co 0 0 . ... , .. . . ,., .. i N. ! \\. i ... _ . — . i • . 134'6 " \ . . g■-■ I 1 0 ei .1i ra, _, ‘N, N .■ '7- ... _. _ _ - II, .,6 ,. . ,_..... \-. . = , i .....-, NJ I \ - •- -—I _--, _ LL . 30Th t C) ii C) IIIIIIIII/ 1: . i r.. .... ,.,, . c...... 0 1 LL i ,(11 a ... . ch 33Prt ,-.--- "- I I-- . a a i gitl l' • . • ,1 31F i S r i 2.116-1 : Itiaii0 it ...2 - t%.ir it Ft E ! 115 56ki_? '<X i C..) 1 IA ool__Lil 4, 1 . j i I b V x. 1.,1 .4 . i 1 - .5 ileum i - - iiisi . r. 1 biat : it a r.si u . 4* '''' .., . ik ,..! f 3 - a I 2 k i f - g j 6 ; .. ....I '. IL! /;:" t ....±, li 1 i ii A b I 4 . . 4. ri... •• :4. N a ii i if• ? . iii ; 2 ■) gdil' 4 C -ri ---0-,:14- ! 1 A m A I I ; -- ,tgi .ka A21 1 C..■1 -",trzs• ›.. .,.■ r". g ' 4 .4 :-.. :: f - i - - - 111 A : I..■ U.... '...\ — LL iii I 1■7 ' 1111 I. I •••?' i- , ,��0 pr ' y 0..a c)1:t :u' C Ong V/ Ca. al C 0 Cn D CD 3 CD ED 0 CD n ...h CD 0 a O 0 Q) CD 3 73 0 = 0 0 2 0 = ci, 0 — 0 0 3 -h CD CL = 0- su (D O C rilla o Q O D c 0 -, k< o 0 cn SD D CID CD