HomeMy Public PortalAboutAAC Minutes 1996 08/21AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN WORK SESSION
AUGUST 21, 1996
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Tom Tucker at 1800
hours in the Council Chambers.
Members present: Tom Tucker, Rick Fereday, Gordon Colburn
Members absent: Mike Anderson, Merrill Saleen
Guest Attendance: Chuck Sundby, T-0, Wayne Pickerill, State
Aeronautics, Dave Rickerson, Transportation Solutions, Gary
Shimun, McCall City Manager.
Chairman Tucker opened the meeting with a call for nominations to
serve as chairman for the coming year of the Airport Advisory
Committee.
Rick Fereday nominated Gordon Colburn
Gordon Coburn nominated Rick Fereday
The vote indicated Mr. Fereday won (or lost) the election
depending on your point of view.
The airport Manager informed the committee of two pending leases
that were in process, Lot 17 to Mr. Tim Gadler and parcel#1 lot D
Block 8 to Mr. Steven McCarter.
Chuck Sundby, T-0, brought the committee up to date on the
product addressed in Engineering Brief 44, a rejuvenating sealer
for overlay use. He stated Mr. Jerry Trujillo with the FAA said
if the City of McCall could demonstrate a continuing history of
crack sealing and runway repair the product could be used. If we
could not, then we must use a slurry product. It was indicated
that a straight aggregate slurry seal had a working life of 5 to
7 years. Where as, a Polimer modified aggregate slurry would
last at least 7 years. The price difference of the products were
discussed at length and a difference of approximately $.75 more
per sq. yard for the polymerized aggregate slurry appeared to be
the product that would be recommended.
The discussion lead into the new Taxiway addressed in Amendment
41 of AIP 4 and it appears the approval to include it in AIP 4 is
marginal at best. Mr. Pickerill indicated with the City portion
and the State participation it could still be accomplished. The
committee agreed it was important that it be done at the same
time as the rest of the project.
Mr. Tucker then turned the meeting over to Mr. Dave Rickerson
with Transportation Solutions for the work session of the Airport
Master Plan. The outline attached concerning options, issues and
features of the airport expansion or construction were discussed
at length. It was the consensus of the committee that our goal
for the airport was to recoup the lost runway length, work toward
a precision instrument approach and address the Deinhard issues.
The acquisition of the property surrounding the airport to the
South with the implementation of Phase 1 & 2 as presented would
be our near term 5 to 10 year goal and to proceed as soon as
possible with a relocation survey for the long term 10 to 20
years goal
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at
2100 hours.
Tom lrucker
Chairman
1 2
<E=I S❑UTH ❑PERATI❑NAL FL❑W
TURA - 6,150'
LEA - 6,000'
ASDA - 6,150'
TODA - 6,450'
ROFA
RSA
TORA - 6,09W
LDA - 6,09W
ASDA - 6,090'
•TODA - 6,306'
3 4
4
3
3 5 6
V N❑RTH ❑PERATI❑NAL FL❑W
1 6 6 - END OF RUNWAY SAFETY AREA
2 B. 4 - END OF FULL STRENGTH RUNWAY PAVEMENT
3 - DISPLACED RUNWAY 16 THRESHOLD
5 - START OF RUNWAY SAFETY AREA NORTH END OF RUNWAY 16-34
"L.':4i5.G554...4.7i+lL::i:SSS'iY.::'f.'b:•r�N/+rJ/ri ...,+. gy, rrr yr rHi..............:'.L.:Y»SSGL2:::G'vL:i:'.S'.ib%3'i.S'SSSNG:::r.. _ ....... •r x+u++rurr a r1d976i i63SiSQL%Y.dfG
_Attributes ,
1. Meets Identified Runway Length Requirements
2. Does Not Impact Any Existing Residential Uses
3. Does Not Impact Any Existing Right of Way
4. Extends Runway Away From City of McCall
rile Requires acquisition of 22 acres of land for Runway / Taxiways
Object Free Areas and Runway Protection Zones
Ex> Requires filling of lake on southeast end of Runway
DP Requires filling of 14.2 acres of wetlands and their
replacement / mitigation
Ex> 20:1 approach surface is only reasonably viable approach
slope - runway extension with displacement precluded by
FAA policy
ost> Requires movement of 490,000 cubic yards of earth
Impacts potential development of property south of Airport
Estimated Cost of Option 9
d Earthwork
d Site Prep
d Pavement / Sub base
d Land Acquisition
d Ancillary Construction
d Wetland Mitigation
TOTAL PRELIMINARY COSTS
$ 980,000
$ 300,000
$ 1,008,472
$ 550,000
$ 200,000
$ 284,000
$ 31322,472
.46,:wiktkM4OX6OX.44,(A.�li�uL�W.2ttiY�>iiXtu<cuYurvr+ficW,Uifl�i'i�;;r.:.:n�.;isG:'u>l+:
Airport A/erler PI
a
n
,s
�n p. _`z•O.•:_ 7A.J2
vU t=` •. •x
.{.._
w:`'' ,
:1 v<.:.u•..4a • 1,
, 6.:4'
:set.
01,5,.
�Oa�000K0 �O1l��it�' �
1. Addresses runway length requirements
2. Provides for a 34:1 approach slope from south away from city
3. Mitigates existing RSA/ROFA/RPZ issues associated with Deinhard Lane
4. Maintains viability of Deinhard Lane alignment
5. 34:1 slope required for precision approaches
DP Requires acquisition of 24.5 acres of land for Runway/Taxiway, Object Free
Areas and Runway Protection Zones (RPZ)
ps> Precludes proposed bikeway in abandoned rail alignment
liao Requires extensive tree trimming / removal in and adjacent to RPZ on
north runway end in transitional surfaces
g;» Would require tunneling of Deinhard Lane beneath extended Runway /
Taxiways - Requires reconfiguration of Thula / Deinhard and Mission / Deinhard
Lane intersections
c» Requires grading in residential areas north of the airport and purchase of between
3-5 residences northeast of runway end
DP Requires 80,400 cubic yards of cut on north runway end and 600,000 cubic
yards of cut on south runway end to provide 34:1 approach slope
s Requires removal of Dam and draining of lake southeast of runway - Penetrates
approach slope in RPZ
Estimated impacts to wetlands equals 15.8 acres
Estimated Cost of Option 2
ffif Earthwork $ 1,360,800
d Site Prep Work $ 300,000
d Pavement / Sub base $ 1,008,472
of Intersection and Deinhard Lane Tunnel $ 4,000,000
uif Land Acquisition $ 1,362,500
at' Ancillary Construction $ 200,000
133f Wetland Mitigation $ 316,000
TOTAL PRELIMINARY COSTS $ 8,547,772
r,.:::,,,:tu.'S�„n(iirt:%Zt ri,,,,,,C:%%>il{•:22i!gf'+."%:%Si•C%{,,,,,,,,,,U,,,,,:x,,,,,,,%,,,,,, :.ii»,,,...,.:,..rrr:..••-•-, ,,,:..::........ r:./::.: r rirr45Xf+lrJ,
;4,..,4 �Aom ot, s,is» :r, y s:sSs.:sssss:�
,
i'ft si %'ts r.•,> v%!%'i,,,,,, s ys s/1?0100 i i/ ;/:ssi? is iyi�» l/•,• ;s sss ;si
Airport Atom, P1a
41[0.3.„�rib q
1. Meets the requirements of the fleet of Small Aircraft Under 12,500 Pounds
2. Does not impact any existing Right of Way
3. Orients future runway development away from the City of McCall
4. Does not impact any existing residential development
5. Has the least impact of any of the runway extension alternatives
Lake Not Impacted
Limited Cut Required
DO Requires the acquisition of a minimum of 16.5 acres of land for
Runway/Taxiway Object Free Areas and Runway Protection Zones
E» Requires the filing of 5.6 acres of wetlands and their replacement
and/or mitigation
Ept> 20 to 1 approach surface is only reasonably viable approach slope to
the extended Runway - Runway extension with displacement precluded
by FAA policy
D. Requires the movement of 65,000 cubic yards of earth for the approach slope
Et. Impacts potential development of property south of the Airport
Estimated Cost of Option 3
tf Earthwork
d Site Prep
ril Pavement / Sub base
uf Land Acquisition
ti Ancillary Construction
ffif Wetland Mitigation
$ 130,000
$ 170,000
$ 545,000
$ 412,500
$ 100,000
$ 112,000
TOTAL PRELIMINARY COSTS $ 1,469,500
«< ..u.:..rc�:>�:�: :: �::;<::r>:::.::.::.::::...............................................<,.:.,�-.:r.r<r..<r<•.urrr<ria<..<;<..r:. r««...:::....................,.......,.......:...:::::::
A l r p or / Master Plan
-sf
cx> Airport is out of available land for facility development.
Additional property must be purchased.
0. Steep topography seriously impacts runway development
both to the north and south.
Do Extensive wetlands limit runway and other Airport facility
development south of current facilities.
CEP
04>
04>
Deep ravine south of U.S.F.S. removes developable acreage
on west side of Airport.
Precision approach from north precluded by mountains on
northwest side of Payette Lake.
Precision approach from south requires a minimum of 34 to 1
clearance over ridge south of Airport - Highly Unlikely.
Airport does not currently comply with design criteria
relative to Object Free Areas, Runway Safety Areas, Runway
Protection Zones, transitional surfaces and runway to parallel
taxiway separation.
Existing runway length must be reduced to meet Runway
Safe Area and Object Free Area criteria on the north end of
Runway 16-34.
i r p n„ .V a f t e r Plan
GP
Current alignment of Deinhard Lane limits approach slope
from north to a 20 to 1. Ultimately Deinhard Lane must be
relocated.
Trees located north of the Airport, lateral to the extended
runway centerline, penetrate the Runway Protection Zone
and transitional surfaces.
Existing residential uses located northeast of the Airport
penetrate existing transitional surfaces.
Land Use Compatibility conflicts north of the Airport
beneath the approach to Runway 16.
Non -compatible development is encroaching on the
approaches to Runway 34 and extensive residential is
planned in the immediate Airport Vicinity.
Extension of the Forest Service Taxiway will require land
acquisition and wetland mitigation.
Airport development will necessitate utility upgrades and
extensions.
DP Existing constraints require the under -design of Airport
facilities, i.e. use of B-II criteria rather than the more
appropriate C-II criteria.
40604004500»: :4435 06i6YAWA%A C,» iWiY:
RAY/AYIOW/!A}IAYA'AAV eVA A VAYAYAYa SYAWAiNat Xe.4)WASHHYNAO